AI, Technocracy, and the Final Betrayal: How Power, Surveillance, and False Theology Are Converging

AI, Technocracy, and the Final Betrayal: How Power, Surveillance, & False Theology Are Converging

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Of me now is Patrick Wood of Technocracy dot News.
I'm going to try my very best to keep Patrick
from getting his blood pressure too high. But I have
a lot of video clips and a lot of news
stories tonight that I think are gonna have him to
have to really pray hard.

Speaker 2 (00:18):
Keep palm.

Speaker 1 (00:19):
Welcome back, mister Technocracy dot news.

Speaker 3 (00:24):
You got all right?

Speaker 1 (00:25):
Well, here we go, buckle in. Here's a clip from
President Trump yesterday.

Speaker 2 (00:30):
Here we go.

Speaker 4 (00:33):
Well, thank you very much. We have a big signing
right now, and we have a tremendous industry where we're
leading by a lot.

Speaker 3 (00:41):
It's the AI Artificial intelligence.

Speaker 4 (00:44):
I always thought it should be a SI Supreme intelligence,
but I guess somewhere along the line they decided to
do the word artificial.

Speaker 1 (00:51):
And supreme intelligence. H that sounds almost sounds blasphemous, does
it not? And he signed an executive word. Are basically
saying that states can't do anything about it. Data centers,
everything's going on. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, governor of Arkansas, is
not standing for it. The Santo's down in Ronda Santis,

(01:13):
Santo's governor Ronda Santis, done Florida, is not standing for it.
I mean I just have to ask myself, what is
this guy doing? Midterms are coming up. He demoralizing the base.
What does he not care about the Constitution? The tenth
Amendment of the US Constitution, the powers of the federal
government has are listed specific and the unlisted powers belong

(01:35):
to the states and respected people thereof. He's going to
lose this at the Supreme Court.

Speaker 3 (01:40):
No kidding. You know this is the well it's flipped
on you. But this is the essence of my book,
The Final Betrayal. You know this, This is a betrayal
of the American public, all of them, not just conservatives
or MAGA or the populace whatever. All Americans are at

(02:00):
this point are being betrayed by this whole thing.

Speaker 1 (02:03):
And I don't want to sit here and report this.
I do not want to sit here report this. I
wanted to sit here report one victory after another, where
we got tired of reporting on victories.

Speaker 3 (02:12):
Remember I mean, yep, exactly. I hate this too, absolutely
hate it.

Speaker 1 (02:18):
And you know Daniel Horowitz, we've tried to get Daniel
on the show. Maybe all you guys should go over
to his website here it is look at this, because
we've text him he re responded once. But we've been
trying to get him on the show. I don't know
why he's not wanting to come on the show. But
I like Daniel. I'm always quoting his stuff. Here he
is talking about Trump pimping for pot. But he has

(02:40):
another one here here, it is here, it is here,
it is so. Daniel Horowitz tweeted this, This is edge computing.

Speaker 2 (02:44):
There is no cloud involved. The cloud and Ai.

Speaker 1 (02:47):
Trump is just a boomer who's been conned by tech bros.
Like a senior citizen scammed by telemarketers. The only difference
is to scale. Instead of his life savings, they've conned
him into handing over the treasury and all our future earnings.
They play upon his simultaneous intellectual laziness. That's a good word,

(03:08):
because I have thought that for a while, intellectual laziness.
When what was the last book President Trump read? Intellectual
laziness and Declining mental Acuity. I don't know about the
last the next that one there, the mental acuity, I
don't know about that. The intellectual laziness, I think that's
probably very true, as well as his massive ego. Okay,
I'll go with that one. But you know, we all

(03:29):
have to struggle. We all struggle with our vices. So
I'm not going to throw stones, right. You know, he
was without sin let him cast the first stone. So
we all have our weaknesses. But I do think he
is intellectually lazy. But I'm just reading a major conservative here,
Daniel Horowitz, whose title is over at The Blaze, Senior
editor at the Blaze.

Speaker 2 (03:51):
Okay, so this is not.

Speaker 1 (03:53):
Some leftist guy, and this is the kind of thing
going on all over social media today.

Speaker 2 (03:58):
People are ticked.

Speaker 1 (04:01):
Can you imagine if Biden or Kamala Harris were doing this?

Speaker 3 (04:07):
Yeah, there you go. You know we Why am I.

Speaker 2 (04:10):
More exercise than you? Patrick? Did you take something before
you came on the air?

Speaker 3 (04:14):
No? No, So no soma for me. But I'll tell
you what. We need to stop making excuses for Trump.
Trump is who he is and we should understand from
the get go, even going back to to the first administration,

(04:34):
he's been on the side of AI and tech bros.
All the way. So this is not surprising at this
point that he's caving to these people. And you know this.
Since January twenty third, when the inauguration took place, he's
executed over maybe two hundred and twenty one executive orders,

(04:58):
more than any president in street. Incredible, two hundred and
twenty one executive orders without Congress. So you know this,
this whole thing is over the top of this at
this point, and many of these eos have been related
to the unleashing of AI and our government and society

(05:19):
in particular. Now he's trumping the States as well. He
knows better, you know, he said, Well, maybe he doesn't
understand the constitution really how that doesn't take a brain,
you know, surgeon to figure out what's going on here.
These these tech bros, Yes, they're in charge for sure,

(05:42):
but these tech bros especially we see standing behind the
president there was a Secretary of Commerce. This EO hamstringing
the States is being done under the Department of Commerce
and particular who I think they can enforce the Commerce

(06:04):
Clause of eighteen seventy six. I think it was something
like that. And so you see the word commerce and
this EO all over the place, like seven times I checked.
So the Secretary of Commerce is going to be mounting
a task force to make sure the States tow the line.

(06:26):
Good luck with that.

Speaker 2 (06:28):
Yeah, good luck with that?

Speaker 3 (06:30):
All right?

Speaker 1 (06:30):
Well, then we have to add in Ted Cruise, I
have never been a fan of Ted Cruz since he
was pushing the transpecific partnership. It's in my twenty fifteen book,
I mean religious right. Then we can get into Heidi
in her what she supposed he was doing with the
George W. Bush administration and the whole Mexico, Canada and

(06:52):
America thing.

Speaker 2 (06:52):
Right, But anyway, here's Ted, here's Ted.

Speaker 5 (06:57):
It's a race, and if China wins the race, whoever wins,
the values of that country will affect all of AI.
We don't want China's values of surveillance and centralized control
by the communist government governing AI. We want American values
of free speech, of individual liberty, of respecting the individual.

(07:18):
So this executive order, I believe is a tremendously important
thank you for your leader.

Speaker 2 (07:23):
What the executive order related to not allowing state?

Speaker 1 (07:27):
Is that the executive order he's talking about related to
the states not regulating AI?

Speaker 2 (07:31):
Well, how is that?

Speaker 1 (07:32):
That's the absolute opposite of everything? Stupid Ted, I think
just said.

Speaker 3 (07:37):
You're right, You're absolutely right. This is this is so
much double speak. It just makes your head spin around
the whole thing with AI. Since at least when Trump
got in office, it's been a complete gaslight operation, saying,

(07:58):
you know, saying stuff that just isn't true, and then
telling people it is true. Huh, you can't make this
stuff up. It's absolutely incredible. So you know, you turn
it around now, I say, well, in order to serve
the common good, we're going to just take away States rights,

(08:18):
even temporarily maybe, but well you get it back, you know, eventually.
They say this is a gaslight it's totally false.

Speaker 1 (08:28):
Well, if Ted is so worried about China winning the
AI right race and we can't have social credit scores
everything they have, well then don't empower the tech bros
who can't be accountable to the States and the people
thereof that's how that happens, mister Ted Cruz.

Speaker 2 (08:42):
And if you're so worried.

Speaker 1 (08:43):
About China out doing us on the AI race, then
look at this headline today from the Associated Press.

Speaker 2 (08:49):
Trump approves sale.

Speaker 1 (08:51):
Of more advanced Navidia computer chips used.

Speaker 2 (08:54):
In AI to China.

Speaker 1 (08:55):
I mean, again, the doubles speak. Where is Ted Cruz
saying we don't want them to win? Mister president, don't
ship Navidio chips to China. There was his chance to
say it right there on camera. But I think he's
playing he's counting on the American people being uh, you know,
bottom feeding, low information voters.

Speaker 3 (09:19):
Yeah, I think so wow, this is this is just incredible.
And then we have the story about Pete Pete Haigesith
at this point, who's uh embedding a I now into
the military. This is so so disturbing for Christians especially. Uh,
I think I'm bringing it up.

Speaker 2 (09:39):
Yeah, I'm bringing it up as quick as I can.

Speaker 3 (09:41):
Yeah. There it is well in this in this press release,
he says, he makes up that makes the comment that
manifest destiny. That's why we're doing this. It's our our
God given manifests manifest test destiny to bring a I
in to the Department of War in order to conquer

(10:04):
our enemies who on earth? But twist the scripture so
much to think that God gave us the AI in
the first place in order to conquer our enemies for Christ.

Speaker 1 (10:20):
Break shut down real quick while he's talking, because I
want to search something real quick.

Speaker 2 (10:25):
I want to search something.

Speaker 1 (10:26):
Hold on one second, guys, manifest destinies. Manifest destiny.

Speaker 2 (10:32):
Is that a phrase?

Speaker 1 (10:34):
Oh yes, it is used by the New Apostolic Reformation.

Speaker 3 (10:39):
Sort of. It has a long history. You might remember,
the West was conquered based on manifest destiny doctrine, right
first the West, right the West. So when when the
settlers came west under manifest destiny, the leaders in Washington,
d c. Told them that it was their God given

(11:00):
right to force all of the natives away from the savages,
if you will, out of the land, conquer it. In
other words, for Christ. This was twisted. It was evil
in that point. At that point, it is still evil.
You know, God is not interested in having us conquered
any anyone at this point other than people shooting us,

(11:21):
shooting at us. But these people weren't obviously, So you
know this, this is the This is the the doctrine
if you will, that that Pete is enforcing and everybody
he's wildly while widely described as a Christian nationalist, he

(11:42):
he he adheres to the doctrine that we have to
conquer the world for Christ before Christ can come again.

Speaker 1 (11:50):
Yeap, that is uh, that's where I wanted to bring
in the New Opostlic Reformation. Yeah, because I have let
me do this, let me put it in my books.
Manifested Sons of God. All right, here we go. We're
gonna get plenty here all right. This is in my
book Religious Trojan Hord No, yes, Religious Trojan Horse from

(12:13):
two thousand and eleven Manifested Sons of God.

Speaker 2 (12:20):
Here we go.

Speaker 1 (12:21):
The New Apistetic Reformation teaches that certain individuals are becoming
new spiritual beings. George Wood, he was the superintendent of
the Assemblies of God. He warned against this, the revived
anticipated by the revival or the revised revived excuse me,
the revived Church anticipated by the Kingdom Now proponents.

Speaker 2 (12:40):
That's what you just described.

Speaker 1 (12:43):
You're saying that he's a Christian nationalist like Doug Wilson
and these guys that think we have to usher in
the Kingdom of God and then the Lord can return.
That fits with New Apistolic Reformation false prophets and apostles
and people like us, I think Cindy Jacobs and Paula
White and others. The revived Church anticipated by the Kingdom
Now proponents would demand a new breed of Christians, supermen

(13:03):
and superwomen. Believers would be taught that they are more
than humans. Some Kingdom Now adherents go beyond little gods,
teaching where little gods ringing rend on the earth, to
holding to the possibility that we are the manifested sons
of God, the race of Christians, whose bodies will be
transformed not by the coming of the Lord, but by
his inner secret coming within themselves.

Speaker 2 (13:22):
Quote.

Speaker 1 (13:23):
And then of course they go on to teach that
those kind of people will be able to raise the
dead and do all kinds of stuff. Let's see what
this is. A Jewles husband was an Assemblies of God pastor.
She sent me a bunch of research when I was
writing this book and became concerned with this heresy. In
ninety one Jewelry at least a report Joel's Armies often
called in which she correctly identifies four aspects of the

(13:44):
manifested Sons of God heresy. I to claim perfection through
progressive revelations beyond scripture. The written Word of God is
held in low esteem and experimental knowledge very high. The
Word of God is perceived as a symbolic book. The
claims that the God Man dwells at every member and
is waiting to be discovered and manifested by believers.

Speaker 2 (14:03):
And it goes on from there. Yeah, paul Kin tells
it like it is.

Speaker 1 (14:10):
This is one guy writing about him Mike Bickle International
House of Prayer. Cain had been a promoter of Joel's
Army Heresy, also known as Manifested Sons of God. Paul
Kane tells it like it is. He says, I don't
know what the second coming means to you. There's so
many different returns of the Lord are coming to the Lord.

Speaker 2 (14:27):
I don't know. We have a cardinal doctrine like that.
But he goes on.

Speaker 1 (14:34):
Let me tell you he's coming to you. He's coming
to his church. He's coming to abiding you to take
up his aboding you. I want you to know he's
coming to the church. Before he comes for the church,
He's going to perfect the church so the church can
be the image and be Him and his representation. In
quote nim Bob Jones says, and the church that is
raising up the government will be the head and the
covering for them. There's a ministry after the fivefold called

(14:57):
the ministry of perfection, the machaelsa dec priasthood. Your children
will be moving into the ministries of perfection, coming into
the divine nature of Jesus Christ. They themselves will be
that generation that's raised up to put death itself under
their feet, because the Lord Jesus is worthy to be
lifted up by a church that has reached the full maturity.

Speaker 2 (15:15):
Of the god Man.

Speaker 1 (15:17):
And then Bill Hammond writes, Jesus will come back to
earth and be given the kingdom that has been won
for him by this men manchild company. The manifested Sons
of God doctrine teaches that these sons will be equal
to Jesus Christ in mortal, sinless, perfected sons who have
partaken of the divine nature. They will have every right
to be called gods and will be called gods. Now

(15:38):
I bring all that up because I don't know if
you care if you call it manifested destiny, manifested sons
of God, this Christian nationalism, taking dominion reconstructionism, it all
I think fits and flows together into something I find
very dangerous.

Speaker 2 (15:53):
Agree or disagree that I'm tying this all together.

Speaker 3 (15:56):
Totally totally what? No, I agree with you, And I'll
say that even though Hesith is not a member of
the n NAR movement, uh, there's so many overlaps with
Christian reconstruction and dominion theology, and he is he is

(16:17):
a member of the UH.

Speaker 1 (16:20):
It's a church tied back to UH. There's a church
I think tied back to to the Doug Wilson at Idaho.

Speaker 3 (16:25):
Doug Doug Wilson exactly. He goes to a church in Washington,
d C. That's connected one of the churches that Doug
Wilson UH support.

Speaker 1 (16:35):
At trying to bring in Old Testament law like the
Mosaic law for the church today, which of course is
part of the replacement theology.

Speaker 3 (16:41):
Right. It really is on balance, if they could achieve
a theocracy, they would do it. Now it's not going
to happen just like this, they think. But that's that's
the underlying UH direction that they're going. So when they
talk about the manifest destiny, what they're saying is we

(17:03):
have a mandate for God from God using Ai. Basically,
the concept is they're they're blaming Ai on God and saying,
maybe he invented in the first place, gave all these
people the inspiration. Now we have this as a tool
to conquer our enemies. This is so twisted. This is

(17:26):
not Christian theology.

Speaker 1 (17:28):
And I bet you, I bet you Patrick that you
and I are one of the few people that are
making these connections.

Speaker 3 (17:35):
I think you're right. I'm really sick of it. I'm
really sick.

Speaker 1 (17:39):
I mean, where are these Where are all the Bible
teachers and everybody and the parent church ministry leaders that
were warning about the new Apostolic Reformation like we've done
for years.

Speaker 2 (17:49):
Where are they now?

Speaker 1 (17:50):
Why are they not connecting the dots and warning the
church that, you know what, many of you thought this
was going to come in from these profits and apostles.
But what if, what if Satan is setting up the
right to bring it in, Which is why I wrote
the book in twenty fifteen, The Coming Religious Reich, because
I saw it happening right then in that year, and

(18:12):
now it's furthered under the Trump administration. When you have
I think people like PAULA White hanging around, and then
others like Pete Hegseth that apparently are being influenced by
reconstructionism by churches tied. We're told and read back to
Doug Wilson.

Speaker 3 (18:26):
Exactly exactly. This is very disturbing when national leaders take
this position to enforce their theology, if you will, on
the rest of Christianity. Many Christians are obviously asleep. They
should be hopping up and down, Like if Trump wants

(18:47):
to stop states' rights, you would think that constitutionalists would
be hopping up and down right in the same way
Christians should be hopping up and down right now for
what Heggs has just said that we're going to basically,
we're going to conquer our enemies with AI because AI
is our manifest destiny. And so you know, nobody gets

(19:08):
it at this point. I can't believe it. But you know,
all of these pastors who have defected in the past,
even starting with the death of Charlie Kirk, what happened
after church Kirk's death has been stunning to me. All
of these churches now who followed him in the first place,

(19:29):
they've all swung into this Christian reconstruction camp. They've they've
changed their eschatology at this point, they've gone into all
other errors of uh relating to the returning of return
of Christ. They're not looking imminently from for his return

(19:51):
at this point. And where does that leave Where does
that leave you? Leaves you with a bunch of Christians
who have a hollowed out, a hollowed out hope for
the return of Christ. This is so stunning. It's just
vacating the church at this point, yep.

Speaker 2 (20:13):
And I'm sorry.

Speaker 1 (20:14):
I'm not compromising my Christian convictions and my biblical worldview
to any politician, not even to the Trump administration.

Speaker 2 (20:22):
That's not where my allegiance lies.

Speaker 1 (20:24):
And I told this audience from day one, we're gonna
call balls and strikes. We're not perfect, we're not sinless,
we have beat of clay like everybody else.

Speaker 2 (20:32):
We're not gonna be, you know, like condescending. We're not.

Speaker 1 (20:36):
We're gonna celebrate the victories, but we're gonna point out
and be the watchman on the wall. We're not gonna
try to do it in a self righteous way. We
have no I have no right to be like that.
But I am going to be convicted and I'm gonna
be passionate because I think this is one of the
greatest deceptions because if this was done under Biden or Harris,
people would be coming unglued. This is all you'd be

(20:57):
hearing about on talk radio. But this is where say
gets people into power, or God allows these people to
come into power because Satan is trying to set up
his beast system and God's stepping back and letting man
do what man wants to do, because man is a
free will, and you're seeing it happen through the Trump administration.
And I'm telling you now, Donald Trump's administration, whether he

(21:19):
intends to or not, is going to end up doing
more to set up the antichrist beast system than any
president and American history, thus are true or false?

Speaker 3 (21:27):
Exactly right, exactly right. And when when Ted Cruz somehow
equates what's going in China that we don't want that
to come here, I'm you know, excuse me, it's already here,
with companies like Palenteer operating in our government to spy
on everybody. That's just tell me how that's a different different, Ted,

(21:53):
What are you talking about? You know, we're we're setting
up the same system in America that they have in
China already. And I might add this system of China
was set up by the same technocrats to doing it here.
So what's the difference. It's the same system. It's a

(22:14):
global system. It's a global system where there's no race.
There's no race between us at all. The race is
Satan getting ready to set set up is global kingdom
including everybody. That's all the nations of the world are
going to be in it, not China. It's not going
to be multi polar right, It's going to be one system.

Speaker 1 (22:37):
And if the Lord doesn't return, you know, are is
not returning to the second Coming. But if the Lord
doesn't call the church op yes, in a few years,
we're going to look back and say, oh, you see
all this stuff right here that you guys are bemoaning.
That was Pete hag Seth, that was Donald Trump, that
was love Nick, that was all those guys, right. No,

(22:59):
wonder the left, by the way, you know, you watch
some of these groups like right wing Watch, right wing
Watch that was started by people for the American Way.
What was the name of the guy that he was
the producer of All in the Family and all those shows.

Speaker 3 (23:13):
Remember him, Norman Lear?

Speaker 1 (23:16):
Norman Lear, Yeah, Norman Lear. Right wing Watch. You know,
I look at some of their videos sometime and they're
like freaked out about the right. I'm like, yeah, me too.
The right freaks me out. They're a part of the
there's parts of the left.

Speaker 2 (23:31):
That freaked me out. There's part of the right that
freaks me out. Right, I know, wonder the people that loved.

Speaker 1 (23:37):
Are freaking out because they're thinking, I don't want to
live under the theocracy of the new Alpstelic Reformation.

Speaker 2 (23:42):
People neither do I.

Speaker 1 (23:44):
I think they're like the Christian Taliban in my opinion,
theologically speak exactly.

Speaker 3 (23:48):
Yeah, we don't. We don't want that type of a
government in place anywhere in the world. We saw it
with Islam Scheria law. Give me a break, it would
be just as bad as Shari. So we need to
band this ban and this whole idea of enforcing Biblical
laws somehow on the whole people, on the whole society.

(24:10):
It'd be so ugly, so unfair, so so anti God.
It would be unbelievable.

Speaker 2 (24:17):
Speaking of anti God.

Speaker 1 (24:18):
Remember Jeffrey Sachs, Oh yeah, didn't Tucker interview Jeffrey, Yes
he did. It wasn't a challenging debate. I think it
was just a saltball interview. And I think Jeffrey Sachs
is big into the whole United Nations Agenda twenty one,
Genda twenty thirty thing two. Listen to what he said

(24:38):
recently about robots and all this going to happen.

Speaker 2 (24:41):
The best comes at the back end of the clip.
So hang with me, folks.

Speaker 6 (24:44):
What we should be saying is we need to go
towards decarbonizing the energy system because that's crucial. We need
to be preserving biodiversity and making a common global strategy
for that that's really important. Need to be working together
to fight communicable diseases like ebola so that we don't

(25:06):
have a Zeka Abola mirrors sours Dange global epidemic, because
we're really close to that. Also, for one of these,
we had it with AIDS where it started in a
forest in West Africa and it became a global epidemic.
So there are things we really need to do together.

(25:28):
And then we need to reflect that we're living in
the coolest time of all of science and technology, so
we could actually do a lot of fun things together
as well. And the most fun thing we could do
together is let the robots take all our jobs so
that we could go sit in the coffee shops. And
that's my idea of basically the twenty first century Garden

(25:51):
of Eden.

Speaker 3 (25:51):
It's something like Starbucks and Wi Fi, presumably unfree bottomos
school exactly with Wi Fi and.

Speaker 6 (26:01):
No baristas anymore, because that will also be robots, but
they will know from your Irish scan that you want
a hold.

Speaker 1 (26:12):
It'll be like a garden of Eden heaven on earth.
We'll be served by robots. Oh, I I'm really thankful.
I'm fifty six years of age.

Speaker 3 (26:28):
Right, I think I say this all the time.

Speaker 2 (26:31):
I mean, I don't know you are if you want
to announce it. But I'm glad I am the age
I am.

Speaker 1 (26:35):
I would not want to be I would not want
to be twenty two years old in this world, would you.

Speaker 3 (26:40):
It would be really tough at this point. And you know,
at some point there's going to be a civil war
probably in America as well. And you know, every every
totalitarian regime that's coming uh that's come into power in
the last one hundred and twenty years has resulted for
that society has resulted in at least fifty million deaths each.

(27:04):
So if if if we turn into a totalian teller
from state we're going, we we will risk the death
of many millions of people in our country. We don't
want to see this, obviously, but this is the nature
of totalitarian regimes. They all end up killing their citizens.

Speaker 1 (27:30):
Okay, now look at this if you want to, and
I've reported on this in the world.

Speaker 2 (27:35):
You report tonight. But now you're gonna have to upload
if you want to come visit.

Speaker 1 (27:38):
And I guess be here. Part of the soccer thing
coming up. What is it called the Barney Fife Is
it what the barney Fife soccer tournament? Oh FIFA. I
think it's the barney Fife Barney FIFA Soccer Tournament coming up.
Then there's got a lot of visitors coming.

Speaker 2 (27:59):
Okay, I vet them. Do whatever you gotta do. I
appreciate that, but.

Speaker 1 (28:02):
I think what this is really about is using that
oh safety and it's always safety and convenience, right, and
now they're gonna use that to get everybody used to
loading up their data on this global system. As you
already said, this is not a race between China and America.
The World Economic Forums keynote speaker at their Great Reset
conference a few years ago was Gigip. He was the

(28:24):
opening speaker. Okay, there's no race. They are all in agreement.
They're all going together. They're doing the Global Government Summit
in you know, Abbi Dabby and the United Arab Immorants.
They're all on the same side. There's no war between
the communists, the fascist, the socialist, the globalist, the Islamists,

(28:45):
they're all together where they hold their conferences at each
other's places. They're all together on this. So stop buying
the line that, well, we got to beat China because
we don't want to become like China. Really, no, they
are all cooperating together. Okay, So here the US is
gonna make you if you want to come here and visit.

(29:06):
But in all your social media council the last five years,
your biometrics, your face, your fingerprints, your your DNA. Wait
a minute, really your DNA. Okay, we go to the
Executive Order. There it is DNA. Now people say, oh,
that's for security. Look, they're gonna find every reason they

(29:27):
can for you to get on an airplane to proly
from you know, Arizona down to Miami. You're gonna have
to do this too, eventually, I mean everything under the sun.
They want to harvest all this data. I don't care
what event they have coming on in the country. They're
just trying to get everybody used to this, whether you're
coming or going or in the country.

Speaker 2 (29:48):
This is gonna be.

Speaker 1 (29:49):
For everybody, right, anyone rich or port, small or great.
That's what the Bible says, the Revelation thirteen.

Speaker 2 (29:58):
That's what's coming exactly exactly.

Speaker 3 (30:01):
Probably probably the most disturbing thing, the most disturbing phrase
in relating to commerce in the Bible and the Book
of Revelation is the concept of the buying and selling
of souls That always, you know, triggered me. What what

(30:22):
is it talking about the buying and selling of souls?
This is you know, we we don't. We don't see
this necessarily today, but you can see where it's going.
When you're when your whole persona is put into an
AI program to create a digital twin of you that

(30:45):
could be analyzed and tweaked and whatever, it's like your
soul is being sucked out of your body and that
becomes a tradable commodity.

Speaker 1 (30:55):
Logan, do we have the video you made the other
night of me? How long will that take?

Speaker 2 (31:04):
Okay? So Logan walks into my office the other.

Speaker 1 (31:07):
Day he says, I want to show you something, and
he starts playing a video of me at the news desk.
I thought it was me. I thought it was me.
If someone had said, is that you, I would say
I think it might be. I mean, of course, to

(31:27):
this day of AI, I don't know, but I think that's.

Speaker 2 (31:30):
Probably me it sure sounds like me, it looks like me.

Speaker 1 (31:34):
Now, Logan said, look, there are a few small details
you can see that would cause you to say, I
think that's AI.

Speaker 2 (31:42):
And he's right.

Speaker 1 (31:43):
But my initial reaction was when he showed it to
me was what am I watching? I mean, it's one
of my it's my worldview report. What He's like, No,
that's AI. And then as I examined it more closely,
I was like, Okay, I can see aspects of where
that would come out, But the point is we're in
the early stages. If I am looking at something going

(32:05):
is that me? Or is that AI? It sounds like me,
it looks like me. Okay, well there's a few things there.
It caused me to think that's probably AI. Now I've
done about one almost not yet, but almost one thousand
worldview reports, almost one thousand thirty minute worldview reports. So

(32:26):
do you think I can remember every worldview report I've delivered. No?
But if it's that good, now where I even have
to do a double take to say is that really me?
Is that really my voice? Is that really me my image?

Speaker 2 (32:38):
Or is that AI?

Speaker 1 (32:39):
Then imagine what the average person out there is going, Well,
that's Brandon House. But wait a minute, way to the
technology and another six months to a year is so
good that I can't tell logan can't tell. Watch this.
This is all AI, folks, the voice and everything.

Speaker 2 (32:55):
Watch this.

Speaker 1 (32:57):
What if I told you that America's entire future hin
is on one issue.

Speaker 2 (33:00):
Immigration.

Speaker 1 (33:02):
According to the Atlantic, the country's ability to solve its
biggest challenges depends on getting immigration right. First, the U
s faces a shrinking workforce and only immigrants are keeping
it growing. Second, political gridlock has stalled any real reform
for decades, leaving millions in limbo. Third, the article warns

(33:24):
that without a clear path forward, America risks falling behind globally.
The takeaway immigration isn't just a border issue. It's the
foundation for everything else. Want to know what's at stake next?

Speaker 2 (33:35):
Keep watching as we break down the real impact of
America's immigration debate. Now you can tell with the mouth
that wait a minute, that may not be real.

Speaker 1 (33:44):
But I did do a double take. I did do
a double take to say, wait a minute, that's not me, right,
He's like, no, that's Ai. I said my voice. I
said that sounds like my voice. Okay, so wait till
it's another six months from now, I won't be able
to tell. Nobody would tell things. We be being put
out there, not me. That's what you're talking about. You're
talking about trading your soul, right, No, I know exactly.

Speaker 2 (34:06):
I mean, what do you think of that you just saw?

Speaker 3 (34:11):
I could spot it almost immediately, But that's only because
I've listened or views so many fake videos and I
look for stuff intuitively now. But you're absolutely right. It
just it makes you shake your head. Maybe maybe it
is me with some modification, but yeah, he can.

Speaker 1 (34:32):
And that was a beta version. Logas telling me that
was a beta version of the software, meaning that's just
the testing phase.

Speaker 3 (34:40):
Yeah, exactly.

Speaker 1 (34:44):
I mean I've got to talk to and what I
need to do, literally, what I need to do is
go and talk to my I have a litigation attorney,
a corporate attorney, a tax attorney, and I have an
intellectual rights attorney in a trademarket. So I need to
go talk to my intellectual property and trademark attorney about

(35:06):
trademarking my voice in my image. I'm not kidding, because
if you're and you should do the same. If you're
a public figure of any kind, you should probably be
looking at trademarking your voice and your image.

Speaker 2 (35:21):
Yeah don't you agree.

Speaker 3 (35:23):
I do. Yeah, it would cost money, but yeah, I see.

Speaker 1 (35:26):
It, because then you would at least have a legal
ground to have stuff taken down. You're violating copyright, Yeah,
you're infringing on trademark.

Speaker 3 (35:35):
Here's the scenario. An interesting scenario considering that Pete Hegseth
wants the AI in all government, the Department of War.
He says, everybody in the whole department, top to bottom,
needs to use AI. Imagine a soldier in the field
gets getting the hands on a video creation software and

(35:59):
fake some orders from higher ups to do certain illegal
things for instance or whatever. Just imagine if that was
pawned off as being the commander himself, your company leader
or whatever, your you know. And imagine the chaos that

(36:19):
that could create in the military.

Speaker 7 (36:23):
Mm hm.

Speaker 1 (36:25):
And imagine if a fake AI comes out of Gigi
being or putin declaring war.

Speaker 3 (36:33):
Yes, exactly, all.

Speaker 1 (36:34):
Right, Let's go to this little video. As we wrap
Joe Rogan, people are saying, you got to see this.
Look at this Joe Rogan talking to Elon Musk.

Speaker 8 (36:42):
Look at this as to the jobs that are going
to be lost because of AI and robotics, the jobs
due to automation, the jobs due to no longer do
we need human beings to do these jobs because AI
is doing them. Do you think it's going to be
some sort of a universal basic income thing? Do you
think there's going to be some other kind of solution
that has to be implemented.

Speaker 3 (37:06):
Because a lot of people are going to be out
of work, right?

Speaker 7 (37:10):
I think there will be actually a high demand for jobs,
but not necessarily the same jobs. So I mean this
is actually this process has been happening throughout modern history.
I mean there used to be like like doing calculations

(37:32):
manually with whether with like a pencil and paper.

Speaker 3 (37:33):
It used to be a job.

Speaker 7 (37:35):
So they used to have like buildings full of people
cold computers. Whether the banks would like all you do
all days is is you do calculations because they didn't
have computers then, didn't they didn't have digital they didn't
have digital computers that that people do. Yeah, Well, there's
just people just like add some track stuff on piece
of paper and and that that would be how banks

(37:57):
would do, you know, financial processing.

Speaker 8 (37:59):
And you'd have to literally go over their equations to
make sure the books are balanced.

Speaker 7 (38:02):
Yeah, and most times it's just simple math, like you know,
the like in a world before computers, how did you
calculate how did you do transactions? You had to do
it by hand. So then when computers were introduced, the
job of doing you know, bank calculations no longer existed,

(38:23):
so people had to go do something else. And that's
what's going to happen. That what's that's what is happening
at an accelerated rate, do AI and and then robotics.

Speaker 8 (38:34):
That's the issue though, right, the accelerated rate, because it's
going to be it's.

Speaker 7 (38:37):
The accelerator, it's it's it's just happening. Like I said,
like AI is the supersonic synomy. So that's why I
call it supersonic synomy.

Speaker 8 (38:49):
So it's like what other jobs will be available that
aren't available now because of AI?

Speaker 3 (38:58):
Well, AI well is really still digital.

Speaker 7 (39:01):
Ultimately, AI can improve the productivity of humans who who
build things with their hands or do things with their
hands like plump, you know, literally welding, electrical work, plumbing,
anything that's that's physically moving atoms like.

Speaker 3 (39:20):
Cooking food or.

Speaker 7 (39:23):
You know, farming or like like anything that's that's physical
Those jobs will exist for a much longer time. But
anything that is digital, which is like just someone at
a computer doing something, AI is going to take over
those jobs, like lightning.

Speaker 3 (39:40):
Coating anything.

Speaker 7 (39:42):
Yeah, it's going to take over those jobs like lightning,
just like it, Just like digital computers took over the
job of people doing manual calculations.

Speaker 1 (39:53):
So if you want your child or grandchild to succeed,
you better get them as plumbers, electricians, ARP and things
that require physical a lot of physical stuff. I mean,
I guess the robots will be doing some physical stuff,
but I kind of don't think that the robots will
be sent out to the house to take a fifty
foot snake down the toilet to unclog the can or

(40:15):
you know, I don't see. I don't see robots roofing
the house when your house needs new shingles.

Speaker 2 (40:22):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (40:22):
You you kind of think that's coming. I can tell
by your facial expression.

Speaker 3 (40:25):
I do, absolutely, I do.

Speaker 1 (40:27):
Yeah, Well, okay, somebody let the robot in so we
can get the snake down the can and unclogged the toilet.

Speaker 3 (40:35):
I know robots are coming, you know. Elon Musk says
he's going to build a one million industrial grade robots
next year at twenty twenty six, Right, where are they
going to go? I don't know.

Speaker 1 (40:49):
I guess they're going to be folding clothes and vacuuming.
But are they going to be painting your house and
reshingling the roof and doing the electrical work on the how?

Speaker 2 (41:00):
I don't know.

Speaker 3 (41:01):
I know, Well, this is this is the attention. You
look at the robots in China, for instance, they're so
far advanced from from us at this point with robots especially,
They're they're doing incredible things in China with robots already.

Speaker 2 (41:18):
And I don't I don't.

Speaker 1 (41:19):
I don't want to sound like some old fuddy duddies
stuck in the mud who's afraid of technology. You know,
people said nobody will watch the television. Nobody, you know,
the radio will be supreme. Nobody's gonna sit there and
watch a television. Well apparently people said that. Whether it's
true or not, I hear the story told. I'm not
opposed to the technology, right, I love the technology, we
use it all the time. I'm not even opposed to robots,

(41:40):
you know, because again, how do you describe robots?

Speaker 2 (41:44):
I think some of you in.

Speaker 1 (41:46):
This audience probably have those vacuum cleaners that go around
the floor and vacuum the floor.

Speaker 2 (41:49):
And the dust bunnies up. That's a robot. Oh yeah,
that's a robot.

Speaker 1 (41:53):
Might be a low level robot, but it's a robot.

Speaker 2 (41:58):
You know.

Speaker 1 (41:58):
I saw, I gotta grab this for you real quick.
But I guess what I'm trying to say is, I'm
not opposed to the technology, but at some level in
a society, don't you have to put in safeguards in
order to protect your free market system because your free
market system is based on work right, the whole free market.

(42:19):
This is something most conservatives don't know. Most conservatives don't
know that the whole free market system is based and
biblically based on work. Even in the garden before the fall,
God required work right, So work is a function ordained
by God even before the fall, and after the fall.
It says, what you still gain your wealth or the

(42:42):
course of time through the sweat of your brow work right.
And the Bible says to people, don't take advantage of
the poor, don't cheat them of their wages, don't be
involved in unjust weights and measures, And a lot of
this relates to work. Right, your work or your skill

(43:03):
is your property, and you trade that skill and property
for a wage work. So when we run our free
market system, it's all based on work. That's what makes
something of value. That you had to put in time,
you had to put in capital, and.

Speaker 2 (43:22):
You had to produce something. Right, it's work.

Speaker 1 (43:25):
Everything we do is tied back to someone doing work.
But all of a sudden, you're bringing in robots that
do everything. Doesn't that automatically go against your free market
system that is based on work.

Speaker 2 (43:38):
And that's where governments.

Speaker 1 (43:39):
Can step up and say, look, we're not talking about
too much government, and we're not talking about too little government.
Too little government's bad, too much government's bad. But at
the end of the day, the purpose of government is
to reward the righteous and punish the wicked. And the
righteous are to do what the Bible says they are
to work. And he who does not provide for his

(44:01):
family work is worse than a pagan an unbeliever. He
who will not work, you shall not eat. We see
that in the Bible work is commended. The righteous man
is to supposed to try to live a solemn and
quiet life in his own work. So thereby government comes
along and says, we don't want too little government, we

(44:23):
don't want too much government, but we're going to be
right in the middle, kind of like right where it
should be. And we're going to we are going to
regulate robots because we do not want to destroy the
work ethic of which our entire free market and Judeo
Christian worldview system is based. Therefore, we will not allow

(44:44):
and states and local governments and could do the same thing.
We will not allow robots to take over certain jobs.

Speaker 2 (44:53):
Now I'm gonna ask you, do.

Speaker 1 (44:54):
You think that is a violation of people's liberty or
freedoms to put in those kind of restraints are not.

Speaker 3 (45:01):
Not at all, not at all. The government should be
in the in the the the business of protecting the citizens, period.
That's that was a purpose of government from the get go.
And it doesn't matter what kind of a government, it
is to protect the rights of the people to just
get along, to live their life and not let you know,

(45:22):
foreign hoardes, you know, come in and steal everything, that
sort of thing. And you know, it's like this is
not a difficult concept. But at this point, all of this,
all of this has been inverted against God. Think about
all the things that have been inverted that God told

(45:42):
us to do in the first place, and work as
one of them. For sure, work, as instance, essential to society.
So is your immune system. So what are they what
are they trying to do with all the m R
n A shots, et cetera to destroy your immune system
that was your your defense against diseases and stuff. You know,

(46:04):
think about the other things like the air we breathed.
Global warming is a threat because of CO two. Oh
I thought, God said, the whole thing in motion CO
do is our blessing, is not our curse, and is
part of the life cycle. Right. All of the stuff
that these people have done is inverting some aspect of creation.

(46:29):
Work is such an important aspect of that. If you don't,
if you take people's work away from them, what are
they going to do other than just basically they're going
to wither and die. What happens when people retire from
their jobs? They have for forty forty years forty five years,

(46:49):
people talk about, well, what happened, Oh, you know uncle
Joe whatever, Well he retired and then two years later
he died, Right, what happened? Well, you know what he
just gave up because there was no work for him anymore.
This is gonna happen on a mass cale.

Speaker 2 (47:07):
Now, apparently this is the first automated McDonald's. Have you
seen this?

Speaker 3 (47:11):
Oh yeah, the show really here it is. This is
huge news.

Speaker 9 (47:16):
The first fully automated McDonald's is now open in Fort Worth, Texas. Now,
this is what's gonna happen with AI technology. It's gonna
first take over low level jobs that require repetitive task,
simple decision making. This includes jobs like this McDonald's here.
As AI systems become more sophisticated, that will take over
more complex jobs. Financial analysis, legal, even medical diagnosis will

(47:40):
eventually be taken over by AI.

Speaker 1 (47:43):
This wou and then we have more videos. I guess
how it's done. Let me say you can find another one.
I think we got another one.

Speaker 2 (47:48):
Here we go, let's watch this one here, going to
see that the machine will sense that the machine that
there's a camera there. Give me the BARCOO tells you
exactly what it is that you order.

Speaker 3 (48:08):
Now, this machine will cut onions, lettuce, tomatoes, and pickles.

Speaker 2 (48:13):
Fresh so and place it on the river. So the
wr stuff is going to be blew us.

Speaker 3 (48:27):
And then the onions it's going to pick up the pickles.

Speaker 2 (48:33):
And then after that so we will pick up the
the tomatoes.

Speaker 3 (48:38):
And then place it onto the border. The great thing
about this is that as it's places it onto the burger,
the machine tells you at the end of the day,
how many onions, say spas the pickles was using a day?

Speaker 2 (48:49):
How many bogus rounder your system, which is great for operating.

Speaker 6 (48:51):
This machine has people really had four different sauces in
this case, there's two, there's a garlic people and then
go to do sauce. Now this can be less more
or extras the amount of sauce that you put onto
the burger as well.

Speaker 3 (49:06):
Every every purpose can be tailored.

Speaker 2 (49:09):
To your The customers demand the last part bomb we
call them bomb burgers can be better.

Speaker 3 (49:16):
We'll close the clamshum the fries with a lot of.

Speaker 1 (49:19):
That will come up.

Speaker 3 (49:24):
A train.

Speaker 2 (49:33):
Point.

Speaker 6 (49:33):
We're done.

Speaker 2 (49:35):
That's your burger. Okay, I don't think that's McDonald's, but
that's that. That is pretty cool.

Speaker 1 (49:41):
But you know the only thing I could say I
like about it is I don't like people breathing on
my food. I'm a real germophobe. I don't like people
breathing on my food. If you ever come into my
house to eat, you'll notice that if my wife has
a lot of people out and around and we do
a buffet, she already has picked up a plate and
set it aside because she If people go through the
buffet line and she has not gotten my plate, I

(50:03):
will not eat that. I will have her making a
peanut butter and jelly sandwich. I will not eat food
that people have breathed all over just me.

Speaker 2 (50:09):
Sorry.

Speaker 1 (50:11):
So the only good thing I can say say about
that is I don't have to worry about hey one
breathing on my hamburger. And you know what, I've seen
some videos where people are spitting in hamburgers and stuff.
Have you seen that some people doing this? Yeah, I
won't have to worry about that. Other words, you know,
my wife's like she'd send something back. She's always worried.

(50:32):
You know, the people in the back kitchen are kicked
at her now.

Speaker 2 (50:34):
Because she's like, hey, you know, it is what it is.

Speaker 1 (50:37):
But if the robot was making it, we wouldn't have
to really worry about the robot spitting in anything, would we?

Speaker 3 (50:41):
Well, what if what if the robot was just oiled
and it drops oil and food casoline.

Speaker 1 (50:47):
Right, Oh yeah, okay, thank you for giving me something
else to worry about. But on a serious note, this
is this is not good.

Speaker 2 (50:56):
I mean again, I don't I really am.

Speaker 1 (50:58):
We got to try to figure out how we process this.
Because I'm for innovation, I'm for cutting costs. I'm for
businesses being as profitable as possible, right, I am for
the freedom that people have to make decisions on how
to raise their run their business and make their business
more profitable, particularly in a day and age where inflation, taxation,

(51:19):
red tape make it so hard on business owners. Right,
So when it's so hard on business owners and they're thinking,
I'd rather have people.

Speaker 2 (51:28):
Work for me.

Speaker 1 (51:29):
But between workers comp, health insurance, paid leave that they
now say I have to pay for. Like up in Minnesota,
you get so many days off for your you know,
bonding with your baby.

Speaker 2 (51:39):
I think even the dads get this stuff now.

Speaker 1 (51:42):
Then we have people who file frivolous you know, worker
comp things onto employers.

Speaker 2 (51:49):
Right, it doesn't take very long.

Speaker 1 (51:50):
If you've run a business, you're like, I'm not really
wanting to mess with the employees because I've had too
many of them lie to me, cheat me, file false,
you know, and frivolous worker comp claims cost me a fortune.

Speaker 2 (52:04):
So yeah, I would like to go automated.

Speaker 1 (52:06):
So I guess what I'm trying to say is that
I'm not saying every employer is you know, every employee
is ever like that, Not saying that, but I'm saying,
with all of the obstacles our government has put into
the up for the entrepreneur and the business owner, sometimes
you can see where they would go, Well, if this
will cut my cost and help me increase my bottom
line to make a living for myself and my family, Okay,
because the government's made it so hard to run a

(52:28):
business with all the taxes and regulation and red tape.
As I said, so in one sense they have they
have laid the perfect scenario to cause business owners to
need to do this, not just maybe want to do it,
but need to do it.

Speaker 2 (52:43):
Does that make sense?

Speaker 3 (52:45):
Probably? So it does. You know. I've always said, if
technology serves me, I'm okay. If technology demands that I
serve it, I'm not okay. That's my litmus test. If
you will, and even as a businessman, you have to
count the costs down the road when you get rid

(53:09):
of your people, and then for whatever reason, something shumes
up and you can't use that technology like you thought.
Then you're up the creek with a bunch of robots
sitting around and they can't do anything at all, and
you've lost your employees and all your capitals tied up
and you're instantly bankrupt.

Speaker 2 (53:29):
Mm hmm.

Speaker 1 (53:30):
That's a very good point. But of course someone's going
to have to build these restaurants. Someone's gonna have to
install these restaurants, someone's gonna have to monitor, and someone
is going to have to.

Speaker 2 (53:40):
Repair all of those robots, right, yes, of course.

Speaker 1 (53:45):
So I mean, if you're talking about millions and millions
of robots, you're talking about millions of jobs to service
the robots, unless I guess at some point they get
the robots to service the robots.

Speaker 3 (53:54):
Well wait just a minute. You're exactly right. The robots
are already being trained to a pair of the robots
and themselves if they can. Yeah, this has been a thing, you.

Speaker 1 (54:11):
Know, I grew up watching Buck Rogers and all that stuff.
This is far beyond I mean, this is so hard
to wrap your mind around, isn't it for us? I mean,
it probably isn't for the guys in the control room,
the twenty somethings, they've all been born into an environment
with computers and iPads and phones. But for you and I,
this is getting I mean, it's really like hard to

(54:32):
believe that this is happening in this this fast.

Speaker 2 (54:36):
You and I have seen such massive change.

Speaker 1 (54:38):
Look, you're older than I am, but at fifty six
years of age, born in nineteen sixty nine, the amount
of change that I have seen in my lifetime. You know,
I don't know how you're probably what fifteen years older
than I am. So can you imagine the change that
anyone that's in their eighties my parents have seen? Now,

(54:59):
I just think the change I have seen. Remember, I
was playing the old Pong game where we thought the
fun video game was just a little bleep.

Speaker 2 (55:07):
Going across the screen and you move your little.

Speaker 1 (55:11):
Dial so that the little rectangle hits the ball back
to the opponent and you're playing pong back and forth.
In the early seventies or mid seventies. Hey, that's a
pretty cool game. Hey, we are so far beyond that now.

Speaker 3 (55:25):
It really is. Yeah, we need to remember the most
important thing in life are human connections. Number one and
to find ourselves doing the things that God set us
here to do in the first place, like work and

(55:46):
serve people and those sorts of things. This is the
essence of Christianity, I believe.

Speaker 1 (55:52):
But you especially, you have an article on your website
MIT study AI initiatives failed ninety five percent of the time. Okay,
so so is this really going to work in the
next year or two? Are are we being sold a
lot of a lot of smoking mirrors right now?

Speaker 3 (56:10):
A lot of smoking mirrors for sure, because at this
point developed software people are telling me that there's a
false narrative when when first you create a program out
of using AI, you prompt the AI said I wanted
to do this or that whatever, and it does it.

(56:30):
It might work on day one, but if the developers
are skilled developers, three months later or three weeks later,
three months later they discovered, oh there's a bug or
we need to change a feature now. Well, for out
of a reason that this is the nature of software
in their first place, you got to change it. So
what they've discovered now they can't debug their own their

(56:54):
programs that are generated from AI in the first place,
because they're too complex, and AI does stuff that human
developers doesn't do, don't do, so all of a sudden
their programs are unsustainable. They can't be uh extended, et cetera,
and just take this on. And what they're complaining about,

(57:16):
by the way, what they can't understand is how did
how did the software the creation software, what decisions were
made along the way to arrive at that solution? In particular, right,
there's no audit trail on the decisions. So when human

(57:36):
when the human decisions can't be questioned, you can't question anything.
At that point, there's the program like it or lump it. Think,
think what the government is inducting in a in a
self at this point on this on this basis, government
is always dependent on human decisions along the way. Right,

(57:57):
So if if that audit trail of the human decisions
are is lost because of AI. When AI comes up
with the solution or something, it or says you're out
of the system or you're in the system, whatever, there's
no way to go back and say, well, how did
AI arrive at this decision? For me, there's no way

(58:20):
to tell that. And at this point, the military, for instance,
they're completely embedding it. Our government Washington, DC, isn't betting
AI everywhere? How do you think this is going to
go when the human decisions that when the chain is
broken of the human decisions that went into all of

(58:41):
the decisions that are made, nobody's going to have a
clue what happened. They won't. There's no way they can
figure it out, figure it out what happened here? And
it's going to be train wreck for a government.

Speaker 1 (58:51):
And what are they going to do when a foreign
government cyber hatchet and shuts everything down and you have
no food, no distribution, no trucking, no nothing, because all
the robots you know I've been turned off or there
have been malware put in and everything's been messed up
on purpose. So now your whole economy collapses because there's
no human to go physically.

Speaker 2 (59:11):
Load the truck, drive the truck, deliver the goods.

Speaker 1 (59:14):
Harvest the goods because they've put a you know, infectious
uh malware across the whole system.

Speaker 3 (59:23):
That could happen, certainly could. But even even if it doesn't,
the whole of society dependent dependent on AI in general
is going to degrade by itself short of any other
type of you know event like an EMP or something

(59:43):
and society itself will degrade because the human decisions are
are absent from the system. Nobody can figure out how
AI arrived at a particular decision now, and this is
so dangerous, and so people are going to be their
Their brains would be so atrophied at that point they

(01:00:05):
can't make a decision, right, right.

Speaker 1 (01:00:07):
Right right, you don't you don't lose use it, you
lose it. You don't use it, you lose it.

Speaker 6 (01:00:12):
Right.

Speaker 1 (01:00:12):
Okay, as we wrap all of this is going to
require more than five G. We're gonna have to get
to six G and higher.

Speaker 3 (01:00:20):
What is this?

Speaker 1 (01:00:21):
Well, look look at what President Trump. I'm going to
see this for the first time. I read the description,
but I'm hearing it for the first time.

Speaker 3 (01:00:26):
Here we go.

Speaker 4 (01:00:27):
So we're into sixteen.

Speaker 2 (01:00:29):
Now you catch he said, we're on to six G. Now,
just in case you didn't catch that.

Speaker 5 (01:00:34):
So we're into six G now.

Speaker 6 (01:00:37):
I just I was.

Speaker 4 (01:00:38):
I was a leader on five G getting that, and
now they're up to six Let's do it again.

Speaker 6 (01:00:44):
What does that do?

Speaker 4 (01:00:45):
Give you a little bit deeper view into somebody's skin? Yeah,
my goodness, I like the cameras the old days. So
he's just had a nice feature. Now they cover every
little Let's see, Michael, you're a good shape.

Speaker 3 (01:00:59):
You're not gonna but I tell you it's so you're
the six is coming six G. Okay, now what he's
talking about here? What he talk what he's talking about
here about seeing under your skin. This is the concept
of digital twinning, where digital twins can be modeled like people, cars, buildings,

(01:01:26):
whole cities, whatever, it's going to be dependent on six G.
That technology will be enabled by six G the twinning,
for instance, of the bodies the people have, and they
don't have to experiment on you, give you a shot
or whatever. They can experiment on your digital twin, figure

(01:01:49):
out what's going to happen, and then they can retrofit
the whatever they want to give you and you get
it in your own flesh at that point. This is
exactly what he's talking about here and now.

Speaker 1 (01:01:59):
Of course, this is popular mechanics back in twenty twenty three.
Scientists can now use Wi Fi to see through people's walls,
and of course the more higher six G you have,
the more they can use this technology to get I think,
clear and clearer images and views using all the Wi Fi,
the wireless technology, right.

Speaker 3 (01:02:20):
Good, good, big yeah, who knows the whole.

Speaker 1 (01:02:22):
Thing is a is A is just quite shocking. But
as far as the five G six G, the question is,
and we have a lot of studies from doctor Bashima
Williams and other doctors about what this does to us,
what it does to your DNA, breaking down your DNA,
making people sick, unhealthy, contaminating yourselves at the DNA level.

(01:02:44):
I mean, this has serious ramifications. I mean, isn't it
RFK Junior that has done court cases on the impact
of five G onto families and children and people who
have massive health problems after being around this. They move
them out in the middle where this is going on,
their health improves, bring them back to where it's at,
their problems show up again.

Speaker 2 (01:03:05):
We'll just go to six G, then seven G.

Speaker 1 (01:03:07):
At what point have we just destroyed our own DNA
and now we have a whole problem with fertility, reproduction
and sustaining life. But don't worry about it because they want,
apparently the globalists, to depopulate and they got robots. They
don't really need people.

Speaker 3 (01:03:26):
You're right, and when you consider we didn't talk about
Curtis Yarvin and his whole concept of benevolent genocide. Oh my,
you know, we won't talk about it now for sure,
but people need to read the book and just say,
see what we said about his writings explaining how benevolent

(01:03:51):
genocide wild get rid of all the undesirable elements of
society like you and me and oh boys, this is
a crazy, crazy sci fi scenario. But you know, this
is the way these people are thinking at that point.
They don't care about your health at all. They really don't.
That's why there's never been any significant pushback against five G. Fact,

(01:04:16):
it was President Trump that brought it up and brought
it out in his first term. He was all in
on a five G from the get go. He just
said it probably the he said in that meaning we
just saw yeah exactly, So you know he is all in.
Then he'll be all in when six six G comes.
But at this point AI is taking the stage, center stage,

(01:04:40):
and AI is going to be what's showcased this just
to the destruction of society going forward from here.

Speaker 1 (01:04:48):
Technocracy News Technocracy News in the book The Final Betrayal,
available on Amazon and at Technocracy dot News is always
great program with you Patrick, Thank you, my friend, my pleasure.

Speaker 2 (01:05:00):
Thank you, see you and my friend. All right, we'll
be back right after this short break.

Speaker 1 (01:05:03):
Remember, hey, you appreciate all we just did right there,
all we talked about and through the lens of a
Christian worldview. You brought up scripture along the way, did
we not. Within Please continue to support us with your
end of the year giving.

Speaker 2 (01:05:14):
Thank you to all of you that have.

Speaker 1 (01:05:15):
If you cannot support us financially, don't worry about it.
That's why we push it out. We don't want people
limited over the dollar figure. But if you can support
us and you're not, please don't forget about this and
you're into the year giving. We'll send you a tax
receipt with our EI in number by the end of
January of twenty twenty six. You can make a contribution
now at Worldviewfoundation dot com. You can use that phone
number right there. You just leave a voicemail from Melissa

(01:05:36):
or a Texter so get back to you or again.
You'll find our mailiing address at Worldviewfoundation dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:05:41):
We'll be right back