Digital Currency, Open Borders & Federal Overreach: Rep. Glenn Grothman Sounds the Alarm

Digital Currency, Open Borders & Federal Overreach: Rep. Glenn Grothman Sounds the Alarm

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Joining me now is our favorite US Congressman from the
sixth District in Wisconsin, which a lot of our VCY
America listeners. He represents them and so we're glad to
have him back from the nation's capital, Congressman Glenn Growthman. Congressman,
welcome back, Merry Christmas.

Speaker 2 (00:19):
Glad to be on the show, and Merry Christmas to
you as well.

Speaker 1 (00:23):
Thank you, good sir.

Speaker 2 (00:24):
Isn't it a great to have administration that can say
Mary Christmas?

Speaker 1 (00:27):
It is? And you know what I want to start
out saying. I also played the speech by President Trump
when he lit the White House Christmas tree there near
the eclipse he gave he read the Gospel. He talked
about the meaning and purpose of Christmas, where we celebrate
the birth of Jesus Christ, and what salvation really means.
And so I you know, I just call balls and strikes,

(00:50):
and I tell the audience all the time when this
mystery he does something, I like, I'm going to praise them.
When they don't, I'm going to point it out. And
I have to point out. I love the fact that
he was unapology about talking about the context of why
we celebrate Christmas. So yeah, absolutely everything going good there
in the nation's capital.

Speaker 2 (01:10):
Things are okay right now. We wish we were spending
a little less money, right We wish they were focusing
more on building up families. But we'll talk about that
a little. Good things we've done and what good things
we haven't done?

Speaker 1 (01:21):
All right, Well, since you brought it up, here we go.
Look at this, thanks to Congress helping struggling American families
during Christmas, is gifting Ukraine? What is that eight hundred
that eight hundred million dollars? No, it can't be eight
hundred billion. Is it really eight hundred billion? Honressman? What's

(01:41):
going on?

Speaker 2 (01:42):
But we're just are allowing President Trump to do to
spend if he wants to do, some of the money
in the defense spilled if he needs it for what's
going on in Ukraine. It's a very scary thing, Crane.
I felt all along. It was the toughest channel President
Trump was going to face. The Russian troops are brutal.

(02:06):
We know from the way they acted at the end
of World War Two. The way they treat women isn't good.
They've captured tens of thousands of little Ukrainian children to
be adopted by Russian couples, so we would really like
to wrap it up. I think one of the differences
between the Trump administration and Biden administration is you talk

(02:27):
to these Biden people and how we're going to wrap
this up, and they would have no clue. It's like
it never occurred to them. We're just over here to fight,
and if the fight was on another ten years, what
do we care. President Trump is trying to end this war,
but he doesn't want to complete collapse in which you
have atrocities committed in Ukraine, and we have a lot

(02:48):
more people dying in the Ukraine. So that's kind of
what's going on here. And I think people, you know,
are you going to let forty thousand Ukrainian children be
adopted by Russian couples? Are we going to allow Russia
to run ramshot across Ukraine, raping the women? Just I

(03:10):
hope not so. President Trump is trying to wrap this up,
save as manionized as possible, and and quite frankly, get
out of there as quickly as possible with the least
financial quest.

Speaker 1 (03:22):
Yeah, that would be good to get out of there,
wouldn't it. Just for the record, logan, I think it
is eight hundred million. I think that number was eight
hundred million. So there you go. Now, let's go to
another one of your colleagues, one of your colleagues, Representative
Keith Self. I'm sure you know mister self, right, Congressman Self,

(03:42):
He says, cbdc's central bank digital currencies are already being
built in secret, right under our noses, and they're the
final nail in the coffin for financial freedom. He said
that Project Hamilton is a cooperative effort between the fellow
Reserve Bank of Bass and MIT. They created an open

(04:03):
source code that processes one point eight million transactions a second,
fast enough to track every dollar you spend in real time.
The concluded project never stopped. MIT and other FED banks
are still actively pushing it via the Bureau of Industry
and Security or BIS. And this probable money surveillance expiration date,
social credit, total control, it's not coming, It's here. Demand

(04:25):
Congress ban cbdc's permanently. What do you make of this?
And by the way, I'm sure you know who this
congressman is. Where's he from here? Let me look, he
is from Florida, From Florida, Florida. Okay, what do you
make of this.

Speaker 2 (04:40):
It's a concert. It's the end of our freedom. Ive
it's adopted. I think the Democrats have made it clear
that they would like to adopt it. The reason they
claim they'd like to adopt it is they feel that
there's all sorts of transactions we aren't monitoring. We're losing
a lot of tax revenue, and of course they always
want to spend more money. But just as great as
danger as once you go to a digital currency, the

(05:03):
federal government could do what the Canadian government did to
the Canadian truckers during COVID, and that is turn off
your currency. So you can think, you know, I've got
fifty thousand dollars in the bank, I'm in good shape.
You know, I can take care of myself, and all
of a sudden, your fifty thousand dollars can't buy anything.
And of course we know in the Bible references to

(05:28):
being unable to transact business without the market, the beast,
what have you. So this is predicted a long time ago.
It's not going to happen as long as the Republicans
are in charge. But the Democrats ever get the presidency
in both houses, I could see them in the name
of trying to balance the budget getting more tax dollars

(05:48):
in I could see the Democrats being in favor of
this sort of thing. Now we could pass the law,
and I'm certainly in favor of such a law in
which you banned digital currency, but only as good as
you have the Republicans in charge right now, and if
the Democrats get in charge, you to will the other way.
It's why we have to remain vigilant and why we

(06:09):
have to make sure we get commitments out of all
of our congressmen, Democrats as well as Republican that they
will never vote for a digital currency.

Speaker 1 (06:19):
Yeah, I agree with that. Of course, your neighboring state
of Minnesota has a real crisis with the Somalians. I
guess the fraud is up to a billion dollars there
under the governorship of Kim Walls. But I hear today
it's also in Ohio. It's being reported I think by
Fox News that's also in Ohio. Here is doctor Peter

(06:41):
sat o'neigue. However you say his name. I watched his
clips from time to time. He says Somali's in Minnesota
apparently stolen billions. But it's the tip of the Iceberg
Government Accounting Office estimates five hundred billion a year in
welfare fraud. Five hundred billion could eliminate income tax for
ninety percent of Americans. You know, I argued in a

(07:04):
radio and TV broadcast in early twenty twenty after the
United Nations had their ID twenty twenty conference, I said,
you know, you can see where the people on the
left and the people on the right are all going
to argue for this kind of technology for various reasons.
And one of it on the right will be to
stop all the people that are getting welfare and other
programs from the government that don't deserve it. And you

(07:25):
can see where biometrics and registering everybody, which is consistent
with sixteen point nine, the Code of Agenda twenty one
and Genda twenty thirty, you can see where the left
will make their arguments. The right will make their arguments.
This would be one of them. We can get rid
of the American income tax for ninety percent of Americans.
We just get welfare fraud under control. So I don't know,
I have to watch all these things.

Speaker 2 (07:46):
To talk about the Somali thing. You know, John Adams
said America is built for moral and religious people and
totally unfished for any other kind. There are many countries
around them. Well, there's a little bit of graft in America.
We'd like to make fun of America, but it's rare.
In too many other countries, it's common for the government

(08:09):
to quite frankly be for sale. And we've got to
make sure we don't get too many of those type
of people here. Like I said, John Adams said, America
is fit for a moral religious people, totally unfit for
any other kind. And obviously we've made a mistake in
letting this surmalies in here, and we have to kick

(08:30):
out as many as we can and be more vigilant
in the future who he lives here, which comes to
a huge problem. The Democrat Party, I think, forout most
of our lifetime at least, was in favor of endorsing,
how enforcing immigration laws. As a matter of fact, there
was a time in the nineteen nineties when I was
first involvement politics, the Democrat Party was leading the charge

(08:51):
to make sure that we didn't have the wrong type
of people coming here. And we we're going to let
illegals in right now. Too much of the Demo, our
Credit Party would let anybody in under any circumstances. And
let me remind your listeners. Right now, over eight hundred
thousand new people are sworn in as new citizens legally
in this country every year. So we're having a huge

(09:14):
shift in the population right now, a lot of people
coming here. Nobody should ever feel apologetic or say we're
not letting enough people in this country. By historical standards,
we're letting a lot of people in this country. But
obviously we have let in some people who come from
backgrounds in countries in which graft and stealing is just

(09:37):
too common, And we have exposed a problem now in Somalia.
If you have a country back home, it's about as
bad a country as you could find, kind of a
no man's land there on a horn of Africa. And
hopefully President Trump can kick out as many illegal surmaries

(09:58):
as possible.

Speaker 1 (09:59):
Does Wisconsin have the Somali problem that Ohio and Minnesota
has not?

Speaker 2 (10:04):
In my district? I mean there's a substantial Somali population
in northwestern Wisconsin.

Speaker 1 (10:11):
Okay, let's go to this clip here. This is making
a lot of people on social media, a lot of
I've seen a lot of comments today by very well
known conservative social economic conservatives. Maga people, America first people,
they're not happy about this executive order last night in
Noval office. We'll play it and get your response. Congressman,
here we go.

Speaker 2 (10:30):
Good picture pullet surprise. This is going to be a
pullit serprise.

Speaker 1 (10:33):
So let's give him the Pollitt serprise.

Speaker 2 (10:35):
He said that, do you like this guy? Everybody likes
Aalbert Gray. Yeah. No, what I'll been necessary. That's a
whole big deal.

Speaker 1 (10:54):
Is what's that all about? Okay, dude, And that happens
to be the executive order related to one rule book
for AI. Now, I'm a state rights guy, the tenth Amendment,

(11:14):
so I'm a little concerned about the idea of states
not being able to object to certain things. We have
a big data center here with of course, we're right
outside of Memphis, so we have groc here. I mean,
Grok is just a few miles away. Elon built his
whole thing here. We have I guess Google's going right
over the river in Arkansas. That's going to be massive.

(11:35):
So states, I would think, ought to have the right
to say, wait a minute, we don't want social credit scores,
we don't want cbdc's we don't want uh Ai being
used to teach our children. We don't want all this
integrated into our school system with our kids. We're standing
up for our sovereignty as independent republics. What do you
make of basically, I think stripping the states of their

(11:57):
right to object when it comes to all these data
centers what they're doing. Do you have a problem with this?

Speaker 2 (12:04):
I think it is something we have to be very
vigilant about. Technology is a mixed bague. I think I,
like a lot of people, I wish in many ways,
we'd go back to thirty years ago. And you know,
one of the reasons is it's just too easy to
monitor too much about people.

Speaker 1 (12:22):
It is too it is too easy to monitor. All right,
let's go to the issue of family. What do we
do in any legislation to continue strengthening the family, giving
financial relief to families, encouraging people to have children, encouraging
people to get married, because we obviously are seeing Americans
pro create going down either from desire not to get married,

(12:45):
not to have children, infertility. We got a population crisis
among our own people, do we not? So how can
the government make to scentivize it.

Speaker 2 (12:54):
Part of it is a government problem, and part of
it is quite frankly, I think a problem with the
clergy of this country. As far as it's a government problem,
I think right now we are making the single family
too much of the norm, and we're doing it through
a bunch of welfare programs which are conditioned upon people

(13:15):
not getting married, or at least not getting married to
a guy with an income. So and we know back
in the sixties, even before that, we know Karl Marx
was against the American family, and the sixties the radical
feminist Kate Molett and that crew founders of Women's Studies.
They were anti family, they were anti man. And since

(13:37):
then we've just added more and more benefits conditioned upon
not getting married. And sadly, one of the big problems
in the Big Beautiful Bill, where I think the Republicans
Republican leadership kind of went off the rails and shows
how much you have to trust them. They put provisions
in there saying a larger and larger percent of the

(13:59):
housing stock is going to be conditioned upon not having
a certain degree of income, which means either the federal
government is discouraging you from working or discouraging you from
getting married. We believe their variety of nonprofit organizations that
are going to come out in the near future and

(14:19):
demand action from Congress and demand action from President Trump
in which we stop encouraging the end of the new
Killer family. So people are working on it. I have,
of course been very outspoken. It's the reason I ran
for this job, and hopefully a Republican leadership can get
on board a little bit more.

Speaker 1 (14:39):
Here, tell me what you know about the whole UFO thing.
I mean, I think you sit on a committee to
oversee some of that. That was all making news a
couple of weeks ago. It just keeps going. Now there's
this new documentary out that's going crazy. As a Christian,
as I know you are as a conservative, and based
on whatever you've seen maybe some of and it's classified,

(15:00):
you can't talk about. What is this all about?

Speaker 2 (15:04):
Well, they're hinting stuff at my belief, which is not
necessarily mean this is what's going on. It's just my
suspicion is that Jeromees and that sort of thing. The
United States has superior technology compared to what we know
the government has, and in so far as people see

(15:25):
the dermes or other sort of things. They think it's UFOs.
I think it was UFOs. We would know that by
now right. I mean, these rumors have been out there
for literally over seventy years, and you know, we have
no heart and fast evidence of anything. I have sat
on subcommittees in which we looked at this, and it

(15:47):
does come across like the federal government is trying to
hide something. But like I said, I think they're trying
to hide something of a military nature more than they're
trying to hide from us that people are coming here
from other planets.

Speaker 1 (16:00):
We had Tommy Robinson on yesterday with an exclusive interview
for an hour and five minutes. I don't know if
you know who this gentleman is out of the UK,
but he's been jailed ten times, he said yesterday. Law
enforcements come to him twelve times, telling him that some
Islamic groups, terrorist groups want to eliminate him. There's nothing
we can do to protect you, but we're giving you

(16:21):
a warning. Like so many people in the UK, I
we're reading and getting reports. We see some of it
online where they actually film people being arrested for putting
very benign things that well, things that you and I
say when we talk with each other here on this broadcast,
they're saying on social media things are concerned about, I
don't care for the Palestinian flag waving in my neighborhood,
tons of them right after October seventh. There are other

(16:41):
concerns they have about Islam and rape, you know, gang
raping going on, and Tommy's kept being thrown in jail
over this, other people, thirty people a day. And then
we have guys like this. This is a video, we
won't bother to play it. But when Mulclims become the
majority in the West the next forty years, non Muslims
will have to convert, hey, the jizia, or be killed
because Sharia will rule. And we get all kinds of

(17:05):
emoms saying these kind of things and we play them
on the air. Memory as a well known group that
tracks all this stuff. How do you feel about whether
it's Governor DeSantis, Governor of Texas abbot declaring Muslim brotherhood
in these groups domestic terrorists investigating them, particularly after the
federal government's holding on Foundation trial under George W. Bush,

(17:28):
which I think was the largest federal investigation of terrorist
funding in America. Where do you come down on this
as they're growing, coming in here, buying churches, converting them
to mosque, and then they don't want to assimilate. They
probably say, yeah, we want Sharia.

Speaker 2 (17:43):
Well, it's one of the reasons why we have to
restrict not only in legal immigration, but some of the
legal immigration. You know, we have a certain I guess
you'd say cold that we all live by. We're not
all Christians, but I think the way we live is
to a large extent governed by Christian norms. And you

(18:05):
look around the world. How many Muslim countries would you
want to live in, right, you know, pretty much none. Nevertheless,
perhaps not surprising, people keep immigrating here from Muslim countries
around the world, and I don't think it's necessarily a positive.
We saw recently things connected to some of Afghanis who

(18:26):
came here, and I'm sure some ath Dhanis they did
help us in the Middle Eastern Wars. But there is
a lot of hostility to Christianity and hostility to America
in some of these Islamic sects, and I think it
would be better if some of these people wanted to

(18:47):
move to another country, they moved to another Islamic country.
And of course they don't want to do that because
the Christian countries or even the less Christian but traditionally
Christian countries like Europe, like Canada, like the United States,
are much more enjoyable to live in than say Iraq
or Afghanistan or Pakistan or these countries. And we have

(19:11):
to be very mindful of that, and we let more
people in this country. I think President Trump is mindful
of that. I think the rest of the world is
kind of built in on this diversity. Diversity, diversity is
all that wonderful. Well, if I think it's all that wonderful,
I think they should spend some time finding out what
it's like it's living in Pakistan or Syria or some

(19:34):
of these other places, and I think they find out
that maybe diversity isn't all that good.

Speaker 1 (19:40):
Here you are talking on a panel as the chairman
actually concerning healthcare costs, which I'll play just a little
bit of the clip of you doing your job there
in the second. But I saw another report today where
Americans were walking across the border into Mexico or dental care.
I don't think that's something I would do, but I
guess people are going over the border to get dental

(20:03):
care because the cost is so high in America. But
you're trying to address it. I want you to tell
our audience, but I want to show folks here he
is the chairman of a committee trying to address this
affordability issue in healthcare. Here we go.

Speaker 2 (20:14):
Welcome to this joint hearing of the Subcommittee on Economic Growth,
Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs and the Subcommittee on Healthcare
and Financial Services. There's an exciting opportunity for us to
address one of the most pressing issues for Americans, the
continued rising cost of healthcare.

Speaker 1 (20:30):
All right, So that's what you're addressing, and I'm thankful
for that, because it does seem like everything's going up.
Our insurance, health insurance, health insurance, it's all going up.
So how do we fix this?

Speaker 2 (20:41):
Their variety things we have to do. We need to
go more of a market pit based approach to healthcare
in this country, right and over time we're kind of
going the opposite way. Most healthcare plans are set up
so the more you do, the more you make. And
I think as the result, we not only are overtested,

(21:02):
but frequently we have even surgeries that maybe aren't that
good and I think the more it's publicized, the more
we get outraged in the American public, they will insist
on us doing listen, not President Trump's doing a good
job with prescription drugs. You'll listener know I don't take
money from the pharmaceutical industry. The cost of drugs has
spiral lot of hand and like I said, I think

(21:22):
President Trump is going to do what he can to
bring the cost of these drugs back to where they
are in European countries, in Canada and that sort of thing,
which will be a big step in the right direction.
And in so far as we have more involved in hssays,
I think people will themselves have an option to say no,
I think this test is not necessary, or we can

(21:45):
do things so they're more educated on the fact that
costs of certain procedures vary dramatically from provider to provider.
I know in Wisconsin, we have places, you know, within
twenty miles of each other in which might be billed
eighteen thousand dollars for a new knee and new hip,
And you've got other places in which you might be

(22:07):
built twenty dollars of eighty dollars, you know, maybe four
times as much for a new joint. And that's despite
the fact they're doing a better job in a cheaper place.
So as we get things out of here, hopefully how
we can reduce the costs. I've got a friend by
the name of John Trenez who's got a company about
ady employees. He does a good job for his employees.

(22:29):
A'm monitoring different costs from one procedure to the next,
and as the result, he directs people at a place
where you can save money. And hopefully as we get
more and more transparency on the cost of things, that
will become more common. Right now in this country, we're
spending about fourteen thousand dollars per person on healthcare. Can
you imagine that?

Speaker 1 (22:50):
No? All right, a couple more questions, Congressmen will let
you go. We always appreciate your visiting with us. Tell
me what are you and the Republicans and the administration
doing to hell the American farmers? I know that's near
and dear to your heart.

Speaker 3 (23:02):
Being from Wisconsin, we know to a degree these tariffs
are in the farmer and President Trump recently released I
think it was forty billion dollars, might have been twenty
billion dollars from a fund at the University of I'm
sorry that.

Speaker 2 (23:20):
From a fund that the Department of Agriculture has to
help out distress farmers. So this is a short term carryover,
and hopefully when we're done with all the negotiating on
trade with these other countries, we can get back up
the amount of soybeansay or other products that we are sending,
particularly to our Asian countries where so much of their

(23:44):
nutrition is imported from other countries.

Speaker 1 (23:48):
I like playing clips of Congressman growth Men in action.
Here he is. Here's another great clip. Watch this will
have him respond. This is on birthright citizenship in the
fourteenth Amendment.

Speaker 2 (23:57):
I want to point out that in the fourteenth Amendment,
it does not say all persons born in the United
States become citizens of the United States. It's all persons
born or naturalized in the United States and subject to
the jurisdiction thereof. That amendment was passed coming out of
the Civil War. There's a reason it was passed coming

(24:18):
out of the Civil War. Congress was afraid that the
Democrats would try to undermine the results of that war
by forbidding former slaves from voting, and clearly that's what
the amendment was supposed to deal with. It did not

(24:38):
include anybody who just happened to show up here and
have a baby and moved on Any congressman at that
time is going to be seen from the debate on
the floor. At that time, no congressman felt that resulted
in what we are now referring to his birthright citizenship.
It was supposed to be limited to slay. You were

(25:01):
only sub to the jurisdically up if you're a former slave.
A person who came here from France and was just
passing through their child would not become a citizen.

Speaker 1 (25:10):
Wow, that is something that's so important to be said
over and over again, because American people just don't get this,
do they serve? Well?

Speaker 2 (25:16):
The Democrats are doing all they can to change America,
and one of the ways to do that is distort
that amendment and say that if you come here and
have a baby or that baby is an American citizen.
That was never the intent of the amendment. If you
look at what the Senators and congressmen said at that time,
it was clear that they never dreamed that the US

(25:38):
would adapt such a nutty idea that you would just
come here and their child would automatically become a citizen.
I assume the Supreme Court will eventually settle that matter,
but I think in the interim, we have to do
all we can to educate our American citizens so that
they do not get the goofy idea that somebody can

(26:02):
through somebody from China here can land take a flight
to California, have a baby and that baby's a citizen.
Like I said, we're already swearing an eight hundred and
fifty thousand new citizens as is. That's enough. We don't
to apologize for that number. But it shouldn't be an

(26:23):
unlimited network like the Democrats want, because the Democrats want
to permanently change America. And we know the more people
you get here from China, the more people you get
here from Afghanistan, what have you. You're going to change America.
America is going to look more like Afghanistan, look more
like Pakistan, and we don't have to have it changed

(26:45):
that way. Where the social wars are those of other countries.

Speaker 1 (26:51):
You're doing it again, another great idea on the House floor.
I'll just show your own tweet. The House just passed
my Spare and Fair and Accountable IRS Review Act with
bipartisan support. Taxpayers deserve a penalty process. It's fair and transparent.
This bill restores the supervisor review Congress intended from day one.

(27:13):
You know, I'm so glad to see this because, as
you know, I shared with you months ago on air
about we paid our payroll tax. We tried to pay
it online. There's the IRS system was down. Tried the
second day to pay it online. IRS system was down.
Count it said overnight the check, overnight of the check,
and they came back and find us and for paying

(27:35):
on with a check versus online. We appealed it and
we got a letter saying, don't worry about it. We're
abating that, so no worry. About two years later they
come back and they say we want the penalty plus interest,
where we're like, wait a minute, you're going to count
penalty and interest from the last two years that when
you abated this two years ago, you're going to come
back reverse yourself and add on penalty. And the lady,

(27:57):
actually an IRS agent turned out to get it out
of Millwak. He was like, mister House, this is crazy.
I see where your check came in. You overnighted it.
This is crazy. I've never seen us reverse our own abatements,
and she tried. She went to a supervisor who supervisor
said no, he's got to pay it, and we did.
We had to hand over fifty thousand dollars because we
paid our tax with a check versus online when the

(28:19):
IRA system was down. I am so thankful to see
you doing this. Tell me about it, well.

Speaker 2 (28:24):
I used to do taxes and my prior life as
an attorney, and you're right, the IRIS was getting a
little bit out of control. It was too easy for
some of these agents to get power hungry boss people
around put penalties on there when they're supervisors perhaps would
not sign off on it. So as we're giving more
authority back to the supervisor's hopefully it'll rain in some

(28:48):
of these out of control penalties that were being imposed
in the past, and I'm sorry if they were imposed
on you. I will also point out, don't be afraid
to call your congressman. You know, we sometimes get complaints
with the IRS and we help out, you know, the
taxpayer who's been mistreated or if there's a problem even

(29:09):
just getting a refund. So we certainly help people in
the sixth Congressional district. And I assume other congressmen to
do this.

Speaker 1 (29:15):
Well, yeah, two more Venezuela. What do you know that
you can say is going on with these narco terrorists
being you know, eliminated in the open sea. I'm not
so sure. I have a problem with it. A Narco
terrorists are not you know, they're not on my list
of people I am in favor of. But there seems

(29:35):
to be a lot of controversy even among the conservative world.
Is the Secretary of War in clear legal you know
ground here to be Yes.

Speaker 2 (29:46):
Yes, yes, I think he is. And let's look at
the size of the problem. Okay, we all made a
big out of nine to eleven. What was that, like,
thirty five hundred people died in this country. It's decreased
a little bit lately, but we still have about eighty
thousand people dying every year because of drug obrosis. I
think a lot of that is because the family breakdown,

(30:06):
the social breaker and breakdown. But in addition to that,
some of that is caused by all these drugs coming
across the border. Now, in the past, you administrations, like
the Biden administration, they just wait people on through and
we don't care. President Trump cares and for the people
who think we should have been getting you have to
go to court before we could do something to prevent

(30:29):
this huge volume of fentanyl coming in this country. What
exactly is your alternative. I mean, we had fifty seven
thousand people dying in the Vietnam War. I remembered, I
remember all the protests. I remember all the young people,
particularly liberal people, wanted us out of that war. Now
that was fifty seven thousand people over thirteen years. Now

(30:49):
we have eighty to one hundred thousand people dying every year,
and people are looking to nitpick and say, oh, it's
a horrible thing. We go up one of these boats. No,
it was a horrible thing trying to sneak ventanyl and
other fatal drugs into this country. And I am all
for President Trump stepping up to the plate and saying,

(31:10):
I see ventanyl coming in this country. We're blowing up
the boat. We'll see what the judges have to say
about it later.

Speaker 1 (31:16):
Yeah. And I don't know what's going on with what
I do know, according to numerous reports, we've been falling
for years. Russia, China, Iran, Hezbola are all in Venezuela
right in our backyard. So you know that to me
is very concerning.

Speaker 2 (31:32):
It's very concerning, and I think President Trump is trying
to act aggressively to prevent any more of these countries
to becoming the new Venezuela or the new Cuba. You know,
Latin America does not have the traditional American law abiding culture,
and so many of these countries are crooked from top

(31:54):
to bottom. They're always going to be a problem unless
President Trump steps in there. And if you see President
Trump taking steps to make sure we have more favorable
governments to the United States, he is doing it to
save American lives. Again, One Cuba, one Venezuela is enough.

(32:17):
We don't need any more of that stuff in this hetmosphere.

Speaker 1 (32:20):
I agree. Okay, closing comment our question, what have I
not asked you that you're passionate about or that you're
working on that you want the sixth District to know
about as well as everybody else listening in.

Speaker 2 (32:32):
Well, I have a bill, and there's another bill that
Margie Green, who's leading Congress, has to put an end
to these sex change surgeries coming out of the transgender movement.
In something that wasn't as publicized anywhere near enough, it
recently was determined that the percentage of people young people

(32:56):
in college claiming to be transgender dropped from six point
eight percent to three point six percent. In other words,
like a lot of us said all along, this is
not a genetic thing. It's a fad. But unfortunately some psychologists,
psychiatrist doctors have been making big money on the fad
and telling young people that you should get you know

(33:17):
your body changed when you're sixteen or seventeen years old.
I am trying to demand from Republican leadership that we
get these bills to the fore. They talk about men
and women's sports, that's wrong, but that may be one
or two examples, three or four examples of state. I
think every state has thousands of these transgenders. It's time

(33:38):
to stop telling the young people this is okay. Stand
up to the psychiatrists and psychologists industry, which is encouraging
more of this. So I would love to see that
bill on the floor, and we'll see whether Mike Johnson
can do that. By the way, the bill putting an
end to these sex change operations, my bill is under

(33:58):
age twenty one.

Speaker 1 (33:59):
I wish we could excellent. That's our favorite congressman right there, folks,
he comes on the broadcast. We don't rehearse the questions.
He doesn't know what questions are coming. He sits there,
he takes someone after the other and answers us and
he comes on several times a year. I mean, wow,
we appreciate you. Look, folks follow him on x here's
his account right here at Rep. Growthman. At Rep. Growthman,

(34:23):
you can follow him and all the different oversight committees
that he's on, and education and budget. It's all there.
And hopefully he was with us in April at the
Walkestra Expo Center. We had a thousand people standing room only,
and we've invited him back to also greet the crowd
the attendees for our twenty second annual Worldview Weekend that

(34:43):
we're moving for the first time our national conference. We
held it in the Ozarks for twenty years, twenty one years,
twenty one years. We moved it to the mid South
for the twenty second annual, and next year for the
twenty third annual, we're moving it to Milwaukee Wisconsin Expo
Center in Walkeshaw and we're hoping the Congressman can join
us October twenty third or twenty fourth and greet the

(35:05):
crowd again, Congressman.

Speaker 2 (35:08):
Well, I can't wait. It's just another ten months away,
and it's gonna be a lot of fun.

Speaker 1 (35:13):
It'll be here before you know it. That's the reality
of it. But we've got you got you got an
election coming up next year too, right.

Speaker 2 (35:20):
It's something we have to go through every two years.
So yep, yep, yep. Hopefully the people in the sixth
district still still like me.

Speaker 1 (35:29):
I think they do from what we hear. From what
we hear, Congressman is always thanks for being with us.
Thank you very much for having Merry Christmas, Mary Christmas.
Congress been, Glynn growth been folks. All right, guys, that's
our broadcast for tonight. Before we go, let's say good
night to Dolly. Everybody, say good night to your favorite

(35:50):
studio dog, Dolly House. Dolly Delta House. She's named after
her half sister who passed away. Of course, there she
is what we move out of the way. There she is,
look old tired. There, Dolly, you ready for bed? Watch
when I do this. She knows, she knows what I'm saying. Hey, guys,
I should just just rehearsal. Thanks for watching. May God
save America. Take care. Oh see, she knows all that.

(36:14):
You know all that, don't you. I'm telling you, Delta
got where. She knew that too. She knows that phrase.
I'm just testing to see if you're awake paying attention.
That's barely all right? You ready to go? Ready to go?
Go out, Psycho potty and call it a day. It's
been a long day up here in the studio, hasn't it. Huh?

Speaker 2 (36:31):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (36:31):
It is all right? Yep, yep, yep. All right. Guys, Hey,
if you appreciate the program, thanks again for your support.
Roll the music. Let's call it a night. Worldviewfoundation dot com,
Worldview Foundation dot com, Worldview Foundation dot com. You' also
find our mailing address there if you prefer to support
us through the mail. Okay, Sunday Night, Part four. Why

(36:54):
I'm a Christian Zionist. We're gonna look at the Haysar theory.
You've heard of that the Jews and Israel not the
real Joes, and that's called the Kasar theory. I'll blow
that myth out of the water, and then we're gonna
turn into a book and you don't even have to
buy it. It'll be in the vault, but it comes out.
May God save America.

Speaker 2 (37:10):
Take care you are watching Worldview two build under thirty
five years of Worldview books, documentary research, high profile interviews,
and the radio and television broadcasts of Brandon Howe