Top Pollster Sounds Alarm: MAGA Fracturing, Youth Turning Radical, Conflict Ahead

Top Pollster Sounds Alarm: MAGA Fracturing, Youth Turning Radical, Conflict Ahead

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
You know me now is the lead pollster at Rasmussen,
Mark Mitchell.

Speaker 2 (00:05):
He joins us by phone.

Speaker 1 (00:06):
We could have waited till tomorrow and had him on camera,
but there's just too much breaking news. I got to
get an update from Mark Mitchell.

Speaker 2 (00:13):
Hello Mark, Yeah, great to be back.

Speaker 1 (00:15):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (00:15):
I guess tomorrow we're going to see that Trump speech.
That sounds like it's going to be a really big deal.

Speaker 2 (00:20):
What Trump speech are you talking about?

Speaker 3 (00:23):
He just came out in the last hour or two
and announced that there's going to be a major address
tomorrow night, and I'm interested for one to hear what
he's going to talk about.

Speaker 2 (00:32):
Is he going to do it from the Oval Office
or what?

Speaker 3 (00:35):
Not? Really sure, I think that's the case. I think
this is a major push to try and prove to
America that they're recapturing kind of the narrative, because it
does seem like train's gotten off the track a little
bit in the last month or so.

Speaker 2 (00:48):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (00:48):
Think, by the way, I'm barely hearing him in my earpiece.

Speaker 2 (00:51):
I don't know why.

Speaker 1 (00:52):
Yeah, it's definitely gotten off track. That's what I want
to ask about some polling. But here's a guy I
quote sometime on X. I don't know, I guess say
his name sir Cernovic.

Speaker 3 (01:02):
Oh yeah, Mike Cernovic.

Speaker 1 (01:04):
Yep, he's got like one point four million followers. I
think he was one of the dudes that was handed
one of the Epstein binders, wasn't he.

Speaker 3 (01:11):
I'm not sure if he was down there or not,
but I follow him. He's really great.

Speaker 2 (01:17):
Well, he's like mega guy, right.

Speaker 3 (01:21):
Yeah, I would say, like in an open minded hard
right and without any sort of like affiliation ra ra cheerleading.

Speaker 1 (01:31):
Okay, what what what what does he mean here his
ex account logan, he's saying completely degenerate?

Speaker 2 (01:39):
What is that? What is is he criticizing Trump? He's
criticizing you?

Speaker 1 (01:44):
Is this I know Trump's I want to get to
that Trump's marijuana move would go far beyond Biden.

Speaker 2 (01:52):
And it's a Wall Street journal piece.

Speaker 1 (01:53):
Trump's maman marijuana move would go far beyond Biden. Plus
job numbers for November October. President Trump criticized the Rob
Ryan or Nancy Mason's unusual bid the South Carolina next governor.
I don't know, you know, that's kind of shocking to
me to see that, I mean, completely degenerate from this
guy who's got what one point four million followers. You know,
I think he's been a big MAGA guy if I

(02:14):
remember correctly.

Speaker 3 (02:16):
Yeah, but he is not immune to calling out Trump
neither am I. You know, I'm in this for America.
I'm in this for my kids, I'm in this for
the voters, and I want to see this movement succeed
because I think it was kind of founded on the
right principles. But then it's like, when we look back,
there's definitely been some wins over the last year out

(02:36):
of the Trump administration, but fundamentally kind of seems like
there's a mismatch in expectation setting, Like people in MAGA
thought that they were going to get in many ways
something different than what they have in the last year
gotten out of the Trump administration. And when they're looking
and what they're seeing is stuff like this and stuff
like the Rob Ryiner true social post, it raises questions.

(03:01):
And so I think Trump has gotten away with a
lot over the last ten years, and people have stuck
with him even through some of the things that were
sort of questionable. But when it comes at a pivotal
moment when people are looking forward and wondering, well, this
was a referendum on the federal government. Only thirty percent

(03:22):
trust the federal government. Over three quarters of voters think
the federal agencies still need major reforms. We don't have
an American middle class anymore, people think the American dream
was stolen from them. That's all different than it was
ten years ago. And so this isn't the kind of
country that's just going to sit back and forever tolerate
these kind of ROSI O'donald's sort of posts on true

(03:44):
social I think that there's going to be anger and
blowback if there isn't like a real reckoning about what
America really needs right now, and that is an actual
reformation of the economy and of the federal government. And
that's as I covered with you on your show, the
advice I gave him almost a month ago. Now in
the White House, and everything needs to be passed through

(04:05):
that filter. We need a wartime president, not somebody who's
sort of stoking this increasing temperature of political rhetoric.

Speaker 1 (04:13):
Well, I came out really hard. Yes, I shouldn't say
it came out really hard. I was very gracious and
kind about it, but I was very adamant that I
thought his truth social posts about Rob Reiner was just
completely wrong.

Speaker 2 (04:25):
It was unpresidential.

Speaker 1 (04:26):
It damages the presidency, it damages the party, It sets
us up for more loss in the mid term, it
demoralizes the base. And then it was just not It
was not a good example for the young people in
our country. He could disagree with Rob Reiner politically, I
said yesterday, he's been surrounded by people that have criticized him.
I don't think Rob Reiner ever said anything about Trump.

(04:47):
There wasn't said by some of the people he ended
up hiring. His own VP had some pretty harsh things
to say about him. I'm not sure Rob Reiner ever
said anything any worse than what jad Vance said. Yet
he was apparently able to put that behind to have been
choose him as VP. So could you not put that
behind you at the man's death and simply say condolence
is to the family.

Speaker 2 (05:07):
This is horrific. Many many families.

Speaker 1 (05:10):
Are touched by, you know, children with substance abuse and
mental issues. Whatever went on here, I don't know, but
you know this touches a lot of families and extended families.
Pray for his family, And I said, do you realize
how far that would have gone for his credibility. He
gets handed these great opportunities all the time, and he
blows it almost all the time, true or false.

Speaker 3 (05:33):
Well, I would say he has a innate knack to
control the narrative. And if they wanted America focused on
all of the successes out of the Trump administration, they
know how to do that. I mean, just think back
to January, February, and March. People weren't talking about ridiculous
stuff that Trump was putting on true social people were

(05:53):
talking about all the new executors there were coming out,
all the new discoveries inside the federal government, all the
things that were going to get done legislatively. And now
it's like there's a vacuum, and so it's like what
happens is then America is going to laser focus on
what Trump's putting out and what is Trump putting out
counterproductive tweets that I'm sorry, this is going to have

(06:14):
an impact. I don't know what it's going to be,
but I guarantee you we're probably going to get a
little bit of a drop at least in Trump approval
among women. For sure, my wife and all the people,
she knows, we're freaking out about this, and again they've
seen bad stuff out of Trump. But it's like the
timing and the main character ness of it all. This

(06:35):
is supposed to be about the American people, and the
American people don't want to see somebody making fun of
a family where somebody just had a throat slit. Like
it's not good optics at all. We're beyond that. This is,
like I said, this is a wartime presidency. It needs
to be single mindedly focused on economic war and deep
state war.

Speaker 2 (06:55):
What do you make of this article? Here's Vanity Fair.

Speaker 1 (06:57):
I'm showing it on the screen at a picture of
all the cabinets, you know, a bunch of the not cabinet,
a bunch of the top dogs around the table there
with with Wiles, Susie Wiles, JD. Vance and the junkyard dogs,
the White House chief of Staff on Trump's second Term,
Part one of two. And it's said that throughout the
first year of Donald Trump's second administration, Vanity Fair writer

(07:19):
Chris Whipple has interviewed Wiles amid each moment of crisis.
The Insider's account joins a portfolio of portraits for an unflinching,
up close look.

Speaker 2 (07:31):
At power and Harold.

Speaker 1 (07:33):
Now, I think according to this this was done with
eleven interviews. I think I just read this was eleven
interviews that we're done. Are these things normally are these
things normally recorded?

Speaker 2 (07:45):
And do you.

Speaker 1 (07:46):
Because I guess the White House and some folks are
trying to push back against some of this today, do
you think this was all recorded in document? Because they
seem to have quotes around some of these quotes, and
some of them aren't very flattering of the of the
administration or the president.

Speaker 3 (08:02):
Well, this is interesting. I can give some personal insight
here is that all of these organizations have either systematically
ignored grass mustering reports or targeted US over the years.
New York Times funded five point thirty eight for a while,
and those came after us brutally as an information gatekeeping
operation within political polling. Washington Post is sick their fake

(08:25):
fact checkers on us all the time, and believe it
or not, after my trip to the Washington d C,
a Washington Post reporter reached out to me and said, Hey,
you know, that's kind of interesting that an outsider like
that came down to advise the White House. Love to
hear about your experience, and they wrote a story about me,
and I think it came out yesterday, and there were

(08:45):
other people in the story, but it was framed as like, hey,
some people are giving Trump advice. The White House is listening.
And I gave my honest feedback, and I know that
they checked in with a White House. They checked in
with me prior to publishing it. There was some disagreement about,
you know, sort of how I said, because it was
a long talk and I said, well, you know, I
don't like the way this is framed. It doesn't really

(09:06):
represent how I feel. Then they changed it, and the
reason they did is because they want to maintain access,
you know what I mean, Like they might have had
ulterior motives. I don't know, but the article, in my opinion,
was kind of fair for the Washington Post. Now you
look at the New York Times and obviously they hate
the Trump administration. He called them very fake, you know,
back in twenty sixteen, and they probably have an AX

(09:28):
to grind here. But there are also reporters here. I
guess Steve Baker's the guy who want to I'm sure
they were checking with them and hey, this is what
we're going to post. What do you think about it,
and there's maybe horse trading or not. But if you
are a scummy journalist and just out and out lie,
you're not going to be a very good effective journalist

(09:48):
for long. And so I suspect that there's a significant
amount of truth to what is in those articles and
in the forthcoming article as well. Now I don't know
if they disingenuously framed it, but some of that stuff
is sort of head scratching, like for instance, And again,
Susie's one of the people that helped bring me to
the White House, so I think she wants Trump to

(10:10):
get better advice. I think she's concerned about the American
people and making sure the administration succeeds. But one of
the things I saw was, well, there's she said, well,
there's a ninety day time limit on our retribution, like
let's take this out and then we have to move on. Well,
that ninety day window was when Trump was pulling really well,
especially with people under sixty under forty sorry, there are

(10:34):
sixty percent job approval rating, and I guess they closed
that window and Trump got back to presidency. Is normal,
and I don't think we need a presidency.

Speaker 2 (10:46):
It's normal.

Speaker 3 (10:47):
I think that people were sort of on board with retribution.
Maybe you could call it brutal reform, and that's what
I asked. I said that we should focus on because
these agencies haven't been fixed, and they want why nobody
trusts the FBI. Well, I just pulled a week and
a half GOO And normally what happens is when the
party in power gets in, people in that party say no, no, no,

(11:10):
the federal government's fine, it doesn't need to be fixed.
And now with the Trump administration, Republicans, over eighty percent,
eighty three percent of Trump voters say yes, agencies like
the FBI and CIA still need major reform. And so
I could point to a ton of things like that
to show just from the polling metrics, the deep root

(11:30):
cause problems of America haven't been fixed. Like we don't
see increasing trust in the federal government. We still see
results like only seventeen percent say the federal government has
done enough to stop political violence in America. We remember
the Epstein stuff, only sixteen percent agreed that the case
was closed. You have over eighty percent saying these agencies

(11:51):
need major reform. And this is even before we're starting
to talk about the economic picture. And so That's the
problem is that if you look at the polling back
in twenty sixteen, we just weren't there. You know, people
still thought that there was going to be a middle
class for their kids. People still said by a majority
that they were better off than they were four years ago.
That all went out the window. Now and Trump wanted

(12:13):
to be president, and you know, we're just not in
a scenario where he can do what he did in
twenty sixteen, which is they have Steve Bannon go back
and look at all of his stump speeches and write
a list everything he promised and then start checking them off.
That's not good enough, Like we're beyond that transactional stuff.
I mean, we asked a question, has Trump done too

(12:33):
much of what he promised? Or not enough of what
he promised? And by almost two to one, Americans say
he hasn't done enough of what he promised. The eighteen
to forty nine or sorry, eighteen to twenty nine voters,
it was forty nine percent to nineteen percent. The zoomers,
they're like, definitely not this guy has not given us
what we wanted. Half of them say not enough. Only

(12:55):
nineteen percent say too much, And like that's a problem.
He it's going to look like failure. And I don't
know what for under forty voters particularly. I think these
people are just going to vote for the communists to
burn this system down and get themselves in the political
upheaval so that they can get themselves in charge faster.
The way the youth are starting to talk about Trump

(13:17):
on the internet is wild on Twitter and YouTube now,
the influencers kind of starting to talk about Trump like
he was a big bait and switch. And it's like
then when you come out and he have these Rob
Ryiner posts where maybe it would have flown ten years ago,
but when people are super concerned about violent left is
shooting them, you know what I mean? Like I increased

(13:40):
my life insurance Brandon, just in the last month. I
don't want political violence stoked. It's not coming to joke,
are you?

Speaker 2 (13:49):
Are you being serious?

Speaker 3 (13:51):
Yeah, of course.

Speaker 1 (13:52):
Well that's very interesting because you don't know this, but
we've already done interviews on this tonight, and we did
it for an hour on radio and TV at one
o'clock Central, and we were talking about the fact, like
this headliner here disturbing details emerged was Brown University, another Charlie.

Speaker 2 (14:09):
Kirk style assassin.

Speaker 1 (14:11):
Here's another one life site news Brown University shooting victim,
Ella Cook remembered as a conservative Christian.

Speaker 2 (14:19):
Then we have.

Speaker 1 (14:19):
Another headline from the New York Post if I can
find it, that has to Oh yeah, church going woman
suffered burns and random toxic chemical attack while walking at
a park. We predicted with some of our guests early
twenty twenty five that we were going to start seeing
an increased attack on self described Christians. We said, you're
going to continue to see the attacks on Jews, but

(14:42):
watch as the attacks on Christians start to ramp up.
And of course then we saw with the murder of
Charlie Kirk and now other people, and now a church
going woman suffers attack of acid looks like thrown on
her or something. Now we have this gal that is
killed who is apparently a conservative Christian at Brown.

Speaker 2 (15:01):
So here you are.

Speaker 1 (15:03):
Yeah, I don't think you know what we've funked about tonight,
but here we are. And you lot out with you've
upped your life insurance because you're concerned about political violence.

Speaker 3 (15:15):
I'm just a polster. I just asked people questions and
report on the results and try and interpret them online
and I had Mark Levin get in Twitter fight with
me really hostile, like really disingenuous and disgusting, thinks ed
And all I'm saying is, yo, bro, you guys aren't helping.
It's turning the numbers on Israel. Like we talked a

(15:37):
lot about this, Brandon. He was insane and I don't
know what kind of people listen to him and what
they're willing to do. And then India, I worked in
corporate America in a technology company. I've seen the abuse
of the H one B scam firsthand, and this is
something that affects tens of millions of Americans. And you

(15:57):
know what, on Twitter, there's probably only about ten, fifteen,
twenty of us who talk about this topic. And it's
because everybody's really scared about what it's going to do
in their careers. They're never going to work again because
these these fortune five hundred companies are being taken over
in engineering departments by H one B labor and epotistic
hiring and the pushing of body shops. And it's a

(16:19):
scam that runs all the way to the highest levels
of the Indian government. And I've already been written up
in multiple Indian papers, including the India Times, because of
the things that I've said about H one B is
that I'm doing only in the name of the American voter.
And then we just had pulling back today for the
first time, a plurality of trunk voters actually support withdrawing

(16:41):
from NATO. Meanwhile, you have the NATO head literally slabbering
over an impending World War three with Russia. These people
want to rebuild some grand European army and throw young
men into the meat grinder, and they want Americans there
with them. We are seeing the death of the post
World War two like uh, you know, liberal world order

(17:03):
and all these institutions are going to come crashing down
and there's going to be a big scrambling I guess,
the reordering of these things. And you have young men
who are just waiting for it to happen. They can't wait,
they can't wait for the old order die. You're seeing
it every day. You're seeing it with Pierce more Morgan
just getting completely torn about, torn up by Nick Fuentes.

(17:25):
You're seeing people rebel against the Trump administration online because
he wasn't radical enough. These people are begging and all
of them know, but like this is the where, this
is where the right is going.

Speaker 1 (17:37):
Well, let me just let me just stop you for
a minute, because you're saying this is where the right
is going. You're saying there are people who voted for
him that don't think President Trump is going far enough.
He's not cutting the size of government, restoring the economy,
dealing with inflation, dealing with housing. Uh, you know, our jobs,
our jobs are being as you say, taken, and I
agree with you, by h oneb visa people. He's saying,

(17:59):
we need these people in here. The American people are
smart enough for these jobs. I'm kind of paraphrasing, but
we found out later those are entry level jobs. We
need six hundred thousand chi coms in here to prop
up the Marxist woke deieah cultural Marxist schools all talk
what's that like?

Speaker 3 (18:14):
Brown? Brown has, according to GROC, ten to fifteen percent
in international students, of which over sixty percent apparently are
Chinese foreign nationals. So these Chinese students are propping up
these Marxist institutions like Brown University, where you have a
young conservative leaders getting gunned down and targeted. It's really

(18:35):
wild and then and.

Speaker 1 (18:37):
Then they just add in real quick here for you
to continue your You're afraid you know, your your conversation
with me, but you said something about the basically you
described to me how there are people on the right
getting really really frustrated that Trump's not going far enough.

Speaker 2 (18:51):
But then you have the people on the left.

Speaker 1 (18:52):
And I just released an article today called the Turtle
Island Liberation Front, subtitled a frontline assault in the Worldview
wore against America, and I talked about this group that
apparently was planning all kinds of attacks on New Year's
Eve according to the government, and this Turtle Island they

(19:13):
are not so much just a pro Palestinian group. When
I go to their website and I can even cite
the New York Post here we see their literature death
to America, Long Live Turtle Island and Palestine, Death to Ice.
You know, this seems to me more like a cultural
Marxist Marxist group that has just tuned into the Palestinian

(19:34):
movement because they see Israel as occupiers, as being involved
a genocide colonization, just like they do America, that we've
stolen the land from the indigenous people.

Speaker 2 (19:43):
This is no different than The.

Speaker 1 (19:44):
Weather Underground, and I've been holding up all night the
Weather Underground's manifesto from nineteen seventy four, Prairie Fire, Will
Bill Ayers and others. We're praising the Palestinian Liberation or organization,
talking about MAO saytm and burning down the capitalist system
if you will. This is not new, what this Liberation

(20:06):
Eternal Island Liberation Front, This group is not new. This
is the same worldview, it's just a different time. And
then we had this movie by Leonardo DiCaprio called What
One Battle After There was about going after ice people
and these kind of domestic terrorists.

Speaker 2 (20:20):
We've played the trailer. I don't know.

Speaker 1 (20:22):
That's kind of predictive programming. You've got a movie out
and you got this group planning these things.

Speaker 2 (20:26):
I don't know what's going on.

Speaker 1 (20:27):
But the point I'm trying to make here is it
seems as though you have an extreme element on the
left merging with Islamist, and then you've got this group
on the right that's super frustrated. It seems as though
every the stage is set to bring about conflict. So
how does this fit into your concerns and your warnings

(20:50):
the last few months to us about a potential civil war.

Speaker 3 (20:55):
Well, we haven't pulled on civil war yet, but I
feel like conflict is probably coming sooner rather than later.
I don't even know what question ask. I mean, we
would probably see an increase in the number of people
who said the civil wars likely. There's a ridiculous number
of people. I think it was seventy four percent of
under forty voters off the top of my head, I

(21:15):
think who thought that there was going to be increasing
political violence over the next couple of months. Don't quote
me on that one, but it was high, and especially
the under forty voters. They think that more of this
is coming. But if you look at just like ideologically,
you don't see the left really waxing philosophical about all
of the policies and what is the right way to

(21:36):
order society. And what's been kind of interesting is that
there's just been a steady drift among Democrats of increasing
socialists ideal identification as opposed to moderates. So you go
back to like the Bill Clinton years, you'd see a
lot of moderate Democrats and increasingly they're just becoming more

(21:56):
openly socialist. Now they're going to run on that because
it helps them get into power, and then they're gonna
just do whatever the heck they want. And they're not
embracing I mean, they're definitely embracing their French. And they've
been openly violent against conservatives for years now with antifa
right and letting people off disproportionately that attack conservatives, and

(22:17):
the way that they've been targeting young white men in
the corporate America, and the way that all of the
sort of liberal messaging definitely subverts like traditional patriarchal stuff
like this is this is where they're going. And we've
seen it now. If you look at the right, the
Republicans have always had a very high conservative ID. So

(22:40):
it's like almost eighty percent of people who call themselves
Republicans also call themselves conservative. And you know, there's a
whole world in the independence and we don't have to
get into that. The problem is is that like what
does conservative even mean. It's changing, it doesn't mean the
same things. And what it kind of is sort of
meant is like economic libertarianism with a smattering of like

(23:05):
classical liberalism with all this egalitarian stuff. And that has
kind of been conservatism for a very long time. It's
established it's what everybody in Washington, DC would call conservatism.
And this is kind of what there's a backlash against,
which is really interesting to see. And I watch a

(23:28):
lot of young people on Twitter talk about YouTube talk
about politics. I think it's fascinating because they think very
differently and they think that that's all like loser talk.
They call it the conservatives beautiful losers because they've conserved
nothing and they've helped exacerbate a system that is a
moral And so a lot of older people, a lot

(23:51):
of people who are traditional conservatives, look at this younger
generation with trepidation and say, these people have no values.
We're going to dark place, like conflict is going to
be bad. And yet when you hear a lot of
these people talk, it's almost like they feel like they
have the moral imperative to burn the system down because

(24:12):
they think the system is a moral. They don't like
the idea of fake egalitarianism being used in order to
you know, all these social justice things, the way that
their society is crumbling because of white replacement and the
job job offshoring, and the way the corporate capture with

(24:32):
the government works, like all of these things that we've
seen the complete capture of the judicial system and the
way it's created a two tier system or justice. And
this is the problem I think we're staring at. And
the thing with public opinion is you never know how
it's going to break, but when it does, you can
look back and say, oh, well, it's because of X,

(24:52):
Y and Z. And I'm looking at X, Y and
Z right now and trying to figure out, like, in
a year from now, what will America think about what
he's been put through for the last twelve a month
or so. And what I'm afraid of is that in
the next year people are going to realize that we
can't really vote ourselves out of this mess because the

(25:13):
economic situation. I think the Trump administration is looking at
that and saying, well, there's possibly some good news. Maybe
the economy will be really good next year and will
be rewarded for it in the ballot box, and maybe not.
Though I see a lot of corporate layoffs, I see
increasing subplant prime delinquencies. I see talk of maybe a
housing market collapse, and that actually might be okay, the

(25:35):
housing market collapse, but just looking at the way every
asset's overbid and the way the market's working right now,
I don't know if I would take the over under there, Like,
who the heck knows what the economy is going to
look like. And if you can't run on the economy,
you have to run on other accomplishments. You know, you
can tell people it's going to be a golden age. Finally,

(25:56):
when people break around on all these factories in three years,
that's not necessarily enough to get you to win. And
so while the other thing is this whole reform of
this government system that's failed us. And look, they basically
tried to arrest one person, James Comey, and how's it going?
Like not that great? You have these judges throwing out

(26:17):
the evidence, you have the mistrials or whatever, the case
is not going to get filed, and you have Trump
lawyers getting kicked out of their spots. And it's just
a complete mess. And so our justice system is a
moral it doesn't work, it's failed. We're a banana republic.
And what is more ethical to bring attention to that

(26:40):
so that the system can be burned down and fixed faster,
or to extend and pretend. And the Conservatives would say, well,
we need to kick the can, we need to maintain
business stability. We need to just keep this all together
as long as we can. And that is not the
increasing younger right mentality. And it's just going to get bigger,
bigger and bigger, and you know, they're starting to influence

(27:03):
older generations. I get a lot of gen X people
in my reply who are like, yeah, this is this
is screwed, Like we should like this is it all
has to come crashing down and you know, maybe you'll
finally get people on the right thinking like accelerationists, like
people on the left. They've been undermining these This has
been part of their plan. This is a color revolution,

(27:24):
we all know it. And the rights just hasn't been
on the battlefield. Well right now, the movers and shakers
on the right, these young people, these influencers, they are
on the battlefield now. They're saying, well, you're you're derelict,
you're mia, you're a wall, you're not fighting this battle.
I can't wait for you to go away so we
can fight it for you. And you're gonna see this

(27:46):
gonna it's gonna be wib Congress is only fourteen percent
gen Z and millennial right now, and it's sixty percent boomer.
I think and there's even a bunch of silence. I
think there's more silent generation and generation people in the
Senate at least than there are millennials, or it's pretty close. Well,

(28:07):
what's that going to look like in five or ten years.
The writing's on the wall. You're going to get your
zoomers and your millennials in. And it's already starting to
make crazy stuff. I've been watching this James Fishback guy
that's running against Byron Donalds in Florida, and I don't
know if he's got a shot or not, but he
is getting a lot of traction online and it's just
obvious stuff, which is like, oh, the systems doesn't work.

(28:28):
I'm going to fix it, and this is how we're
going to fix it. We're going to get rid of
all these people who are stealing your jobs. And that
resonates with people and is that right wing I don't know,
but it's what people on the right, especially young people want,
which is Okay, finally we're reordering a system that has
been weaponized against us, and it's the moral thing to do.
They're going to have the moral high ground and they're

(28:48):
not going to want to hear. I've watched all these videos.
They're not going to want to hear about his tears
about the constitution and constitutional crisis. Is they already think
we're here when you see the president get arrested for
fake times?

Speaker 2 (29:02):
Right, Well, what are you going to do when you elect?
What do you do when they elect these people?

Speaker 1 (29:06):
To go and shake up the system and put us
back under our constitutional public, get rid of all the illegals,
to the h one B visa people, all the student visas,
you know, six hundred thousand chi coms and and everything else.
And those guys get to DC and they roof either
drink and put them in a compromising position and take
their pictures game over, or they maybe enough to do that.

(29:27):
They just make sure whatever is their appetite is, which
I'm sure by then the time they get to Washington,
they know what their appetite is and whatever is on
their preferred menu is what they end up being given.

Speaker 2 (29:38):
While on video.

Speaker 1 (29:40):
To me, you can elect all the good people all
day long, but a lot of people have Achilles heels
and they know right where they are to cut them,
and then those people are captured.

Speaker 3 (29:53):
Yeah, no, I agree with you. I think a lot
of that happens, for sure. I think that the corporate
capture by lobbyists is the bigger problem, by far, by lobbyists,
by foreign influences, but basically just any influence, right, And
just because I've kind of seen how decision making works
down there, and it's like the think tanks, in my opinion,

(30:16):
there are some good ones, but having seen MAGA and
sort of like how it works, it's like, you got Trump,
he's just running the presidency, and it's it's not really
a party apparatus, and it's they're not really plugging in
a whole lot of pre prepared policy because most of
this policy doesn't benefit Americans. It's like, how can we

(30:36):
benefit companies while screwing Americans the least so that we
can get it through and still stay in power. And
that's how most of the decision making gets done.

Speaker 2 (30:46):
I think that's amazing. That's pretty amazing what you just said.

Speaker 1 (30:49):
I hope people, I hope people understood what you just
said that there is really the corporations that are running
the bankers and the corporations are running the country.

Speaker 3 (30:58):
Yeah, and foreign influence operations as well. I mean that's like,
not forget that there are MAGA people that are, you know,
registered foreign agents for India and Israel.

Speaker 2 (31:08):
And guitar and guitar people and guitar.

Speaker 3 (31:10):
Are probably Yeah, I've heard about people taking guitar checks.
I'd assume everybody you know in Washington, DC's somebody's you know,
they're sugar daddy, one hundred percent, every single one. That's
why it was kind of weird for me to go
to the White House. I really do feel like the
only lobbyist for the American people. And I again, I
know there are the got.

Speaker 1 (31:29):
A new headline for him is the honest pollster and
the leading lobbyist for the American people.

Speaker 3 (31:38):
Yeah, I just wanted an America that works for my
kids and right now, and so.

Speaker 2 (31:42):
Is all this going to lead to AI?

Speaker 1 (31:44):
I mean, these these politicians are captured, they're bribed, they're intimidated, they're.

Speaker 2 (31:48):
Bought off, whatever.

Speaker 1 (31:49):
Maybe it's time to just turn it over to AI.

Speaker 2 (31:51):
Now.

Speaker 1 (31:51):
I don't believe that, because AI can just be programmed.
But is that going to become more and more acceptable
to young people, because that would be their goal if
you read Yarvin and these other guys, right.

Speaker 3 (32:03):
Yeah, I don't think so. And here's why First off,
I think this marriage of tech bros and the MAGA
movement it's not gonna last long. It'll probably blow up
over each one. Be's I don't know. We'll see what
happens with Vivik in Ohio and what happens long term
with Elon. But it's like, one of the troubling findings
is that under forty voters actually were kind of okay

(32:26):
with AI taking over government and the judicial system and
the military. The numbers were in the thirties to low forties,
depending on the question. But what was weird is that
there was a really strong conservative young voter interest in
AI taking over. It was fifty five percent of young
self ideed conservatives said yeah, sure, let's give an advanced

(32:48):
AI control over governance and legislative power. I think it
was forty nine percent of them said that they wanted
the military to take over. That's like Skynet and the
liberals were really against it, which is which is kind
of wild and uh, but like, I don't think that's
going to happen. First off, well, I don't know. I
think everything's really going to fall apart before then, to

(33:08):
be honest with you, but it is weird. Though, because
Trump's big danger. And one of the things I said
is it like, sir, you know, you're an economic populist president,
but they then get in and you have all these
optics that make it look like you're a plutocrat. I
said in the White House, you got to smash the oligarchy,
not be the oligarchy. And it's like, okay, multi trillion

(33:29):
deals with massive AI companies when everybody hates technology companies, like,
that's not a long term path to success. So these
tech companies are highly distrusted. And yet I think this
this sort of like vote, this young conservative vote for
AI is more of like a protest vote, you know
what I mean, Like we're just set up.

Speaker 2 (33:50):
We want order something.

Speaker 1 (33:53):
You said something very interesting. You said you think it's
all gonna all going to fall apart before we could
get to AI even being an option for taking over.
Are you saying that you think the country is headed
for a breakup? I mean you have Trump signing an
executive order having states when it comes to the tenth
Amendment of the US Constitution and state rights, go pound
sand We're going to dictate to you with data centers

(34:15):
and social credit scores and central banking, digital currency, whatever
else we want to do. So you know, go pound
sand Well, that's not sitting well with the governor of Arkansas,
that's not studying well with the governor of Florida and
some red blue state governors as well. But do you
do you see us breaking apart into multiple regions as
a country, because isn't that what some Russian professor predicted

(34:37):
like five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten years ago?

Speaker 3 (34:41):
Oh, I don't know if to look that up for
this eve. It's hard to look at utter chaos and say, well,
this is how it's going to reorder itself in a
few years. But I'm just looking at the writing on
the wall and saying, well, we have a pretty free YouTube.
It's pretty good. People can complain about Google. I'm on

(35:02):
YouTube it's pretty good.

Speaker 1 (35:03):
But that's only in the last year or so because
we couldn't post Harley's squad there.

Speaker 2 (35:09):
But now we can.

Speaker 3 (35:10):
Now we can, yep, and we have Twitter. Twitter is
a marketplace of ideas. It is being won by the right,
and we can argue about what the right means, but
they're winning right now on Twitter, right, And I think
that what these conversations are going to be about increasingly
is just a microscope of delegitimization for the system. That's

(35:35):
what we're just going to see over and over again.
Everybody's going to be increasingly convinced that this whole thing
is illegitimate, and they'd be right because it is. I mean,
we live in, as we've said, a global homo kleptocrat,
you know, corporatist plutocracy, whatever you want to call it, right,
string together a bunch of words, that's what we have.
A cabal unelected deep state that's you know, made common

(36:01):
cause with a bunch of corporate welfare queens, like whatever
you want to say, that's what we have. And I'm
also not very bullish long term on the economy. I
think stocks will go up because we're printing a bunch
of money and you know, maybe Trump's tariffs, maybe you know,
the definit's going to come down a little bit. But
ultimately what's happening is that we're kind of tapped out
from credit perspective. There's a declining birth rate. We've brought

(36:25):
in a ton of people who are a burden on
our system. We don't really have like any impending economic
booms coming up from innovation I think, you know, I
think the big one is AI and it might actually
choke out a lot of productivity in our autonomy. And
so plus we're being strangled by home prices and the

(36:48):
whole monetary burdens. Like there, I just and maybe I'm
not an autonomous Maybe there's somebody that can look and say, no,
this is gonna be great. We're gonna have this golden age.
I don't think so. And I think that can economic
golden age would be very helpful for the country to
sort of get everybody's focus off of how bad the
system is. And I think that the uniparty system would

(37:11):
want nothing better than that, right, But then they're subject
to certain constraints and limitations, and those constraints and limitations
are well, they're not allowed to do anything that impacts
business stability or effects corporate profits. Right, And so we
have this thing where the velocity of money, everything's stagnated,

(37:32):
there's no creative destruction. It's all entrenched. This whole this
whole system is entrenched. So I look at a microscope
of increasing a delegitimization in the social networks and an
entrench system that can't change in a way that Americans
need it to and that's just you know, an immovable

(37:52):
object and an unstoppable force they're going to meet. I
don't know how it could be some kind of Fort
Sump three type thing. And you he presented one scenario,
there's probably a million We could send in Seal Team
six to get Tina Peters or Colorado could kill her,
the cartels or whoever is doing that to her. You know,
Governor Pritzker, could you know, do some stuff to ice
people where we could send in the National Guard in

(38:15):
Minneapolis to try and roll up all these people who
are defrauding the federal government, Like why haven't we done that?
Like why aren't somalion fraud gangs who are laundering American
taxpayer money back to Musslem terrorist organizations in Somalia. Why
isn't that a clear impression danger to the United States?
Like why don't we take aggressive action to stop that?

(38:35):
And I think that those are valid questions that younger
people on the right are asking, like what are we
even doing here? And it's like Trump had strong language
on the campaign, He promised a lot of stuff, but
he kind of seems comfortable right now, kind of like
we're not asking these tough questions or taking these tough actions,
and again looking back, when the Democrats get in charge

(38:57):
and people look and say, well, we gave the Republicans
it's the best chance they're ever going to get in
reforming the system. We're going to get to a point
where people are like, Nope, we can't vote ourselves out
of it. And there's a lot of young people who
can't form families, that don't have a future of their jobs.
They've been given away. There comes a time when they
just won't put up with it anymore. And you know what,

(39:17):
when when it happens, they will have the moral high grounds.

Speaker 1 (39:21):
Let me ask you in closing, go back to the
interview with Vanity Fair. This, according to the New York Times,
with Missus Wiles. Miss Wiles took place over eleven interviews.

Speaker 2 (39:35):
Yeah, they have. They have a lot of quotes.

Speaker 1 (39:39):
As you roll through the interview at Vanity Fair, there's
a lot of quotes, you know, sentences.

Speaker 2 (39:45):
Do you think this.

Speaker 1 (39:46):
These interviews were recorded because there seems to be some
pushback today from the White House and some folks. But
I would think I would think Vanity Fair would want
to protect their credibility and say, well, I'm we have
all the we have all the recordings.

Speaker 2 (39:59):
Do you think were recorded?

Speaker 3 (40:03):
Uh? Maybe I really don't know. I think we'll I
guess we'll wait and see what comes out of the
next one. I saw Susie Wiles address it. I'm not
really sure what she said there. There wasn't a whole
bunch of like they're lying, right.

Speaker 2 (40:16):
No, I don't think I read that. I read her statement.

Speaker 1 (40:17):
It seemed more like she felt like they didn't put
her in context, right, Logan, that's kind of what we
were reading when we read it.

Speaker 2 (40:24):
Logan read it to me.

Speaker 3 (40:26):
But yeah, I don't know what that means. But I
will tell.

Speaker 1 (40:29):
You if she said some of those things. By the way,
why would she speak so freely? Is she frustrated? Did
you sense her frustration when you were at the White House?

Speaker 3 (40:41):
Did I sense frustration? I sensed great hospitality, a really
nice woman interested in what I had to say, trying
to help me get across my message to Trump. And
the subtext was they're trying to get him in front
of more voices, and my personal opinion and feeling having
talked to him that he is still very much leading

(41:02):
this whole thing. But you what the output that you
see is based on the inputs that go into him,
and the inputs that go into him are not what
you would They're not where we need to be if
you wanted a true, viable alternative to democratic socialism and

(41:23):
a you know, brutal addressing of government reform. It's it's
basically people who donated to him and people who he
likes on Fox News and people who he golfs with.
That's just And I guess he talks to some policy
people too, And I guess there's policy people in the
White House, you know, but where are they?

Speaker 1 (41:45):
Like We're so she was bringing you in to try
to get him give him a view of what, you know,
what people are thinking. Then obviously then she's not happy
with where things are going on.

Speaker 2 (41:55):
I don't. I mean, that's what I.

Speaker 3 (41:58):
Like. I don't have any inside knowledge here, but I
know that chief of staff don't last that long, and
I know that they probably also make a very salient
target to take your angst out on. I also think
looking around in the White House, there's not a lot
of other stuff that they can really do. And I
do think they need I do think they need a

(42:18):
pivot and I'm not saying that it needs to be her,
but there needs to be some intent here, Like there
needs to be a plan. I told them they needed
the fight Fight Fight plan for America. There should be
daily war rooms. There should be like, you know, multiple
cz ours to go after this. There should be an
online presence. There should be a push like, hey, this
is how we're going to fix America. Like how can

(42:41):
they expect people to vote for Republicans. I understand that
there's limitations in Congress, and I wouldn't I would love
better people than Mike Johnson and John Soon, but at
the end of the day, they are limited. And part
of this is like you can only fight them so long,
you know what I mean. It's like Trump's not going
to be on the ballot again, so if he's just
going to keep crashing Mike Johnson and John Soon until

(43:03):
that they're completely unelectable and then he can't even bail
him out, you know, Like what, like how does this look?

Speaker 2 (43:09):
Yeah, well it looks to me like that.

Speaker 1 (43:12):
It looks to me like it's all based on how
it's all based on personal feelings. It's all subjective to him, unfortunately,
is how I think he sees everything through his own lens.
That's what I'm picking up on. But I want to
go back to the Vanity Fair article real quick. Supposedly
she's quoted as saying alcoholism does bad things to relationships,

(43:33):
and so it was with my dad and me in
quote quote. Some clinical psychologists that knows one million times
more than I do will dispute what I'm going to say.
But high functioning alcoholics or alcoholics in general, their personalities
are exaggerated when they drink. So I'm a little bit
of an expert in personalities in quote.

Speaker 2 (43:55):
While said Trump.

Speaker 1 (43:56):
Has quote an alcoholics personality in quote, he quote operates
with a view that there's nothing he can't do, nothing, zero, nothing,
end quote. Okay, Now, if you go through this article
and against at Vanity Fair, if you go to the article,
there are all of these quotes. So one has to
wonder over eleven what was reported to be eleven interviews.

(44:19):
Is this person doing this shorthand and keeping up with it?

Speaker 2 (44:22):
Is it out of context? Is it is it on
recording and be backed up. I don't know.

Speaker 1 (44:27):
I guess we'll find out for at least some of
it is recorded. Okay, Well, but what do you think
of that, though? What do you make of that comment
though about you know Trump doesn't drink, but what if
it's true that this was said an alcoholics personality who
operates with a view that there's nothing he can't do, nothing, zero, nothing,
What do you make of that?

Speaker 3 (44:48):
I think it's an unfortunate framing. I actually look at
a lot of Trump's leadership style and know that I'm
not one hundred percent like Trump, but we share some things.
I've led people. I've been a leader for twenty years
in corporate America in the military, and he's an intuitive leader.
And like, first off, you need leaders who can boldly
execute a vision, right. And there's different kinds. There's your managers,

(45:11):
there's your task masters, and your being counters. But at
the end of the day, if you have an organization
that has big things to do, you need somebody who
can look at something and without saying no, we're making excuses, right,
And then those kind of people like to pivot and constantly,
you know, get new information. This is a very military
thing too, a military officer thing, which is like, why,

(45:34):
yes there's rules, and yes, I'm going to understand the rules.
I'm going to understand why they're there and when they
need to be followed and when they don't. But then
I'm also going to constantly assess new information because we
need to be dynamic because and I need to pivot right,
and then the mission is more important than anyone ego.
So I'm going to listen to everybody and make my judgment.

(45:55):
And you know, we're all a team here, mission oriented, right,
And I did this in Walmart. This is my other organizations.
And sometimes it's chaotic to be under it really is,
because all of a sudden, the leader might talk to
somebody and you're like, why is he talking to that person,
And it's like, well, he's got a thirty thousand foot
view and he just made a snap decision that just
saved everybody's lives. That actually like plays out in the

(46:16):
real world. And you know, I think that that is
kind of like a lot of what he does, especially
because of how he came up in real estate development
with a lot of subcontractors and a very dynamic real
estate marketplace and the business world. Constantly assessing new information.
They're reading the paper every day and making new judgments,

(46:37):
and so I think that's very unfair because I think
that's like he is.

Speaker 2 (46:39):
Now.

Speaker 3 (46:40):
What I will say, though, is that a military leader
that's like that. It's like, okay, well, you've just been
giving control of Eastern Command and you're going to like literally,
you know, create an invasion to push back against Hitler,
right or whatever. Right, You're now leading a tank brigade
or whatever. It's like, well, okay, now I have single
minded folks this on one mission, and I need to

(47:02):
be disciplined and completely focused on this one thing. And
maybe that means that my mental picture needs to change.
Maybe it means I need to listen to different people
or the rules have changed. And I don't know if
everybody's capable of doing that, But what does a leader
do in that situation. They acknowledge their shortcomings and delegate. Right.
And so if Trump can't really fundamentally understand the major

(47:28):
conflicts facing especially the young people who are going to
decide the next couple the next elections, then there has
to be a point where it's like, well, you know,
I'm going to scale back my discussion. We're going to
get the right people in here that understand. And I like,
just talking to him, I didn't get the feeling that
he understands the crushing despair that people have when they

(47:50):
go to shopwrite and get a cart for groceries, or
the feeling that they're never going to be able to
afford a house, and so how can I think about
having a family? And Trump is talking about gifts like
this is the fundamental disconnect. He's he's never had to
struggle for these things, and I think that he loves
now more than I think he did, sort of taking

(48:11):
victory laps off of unearned wins. You know, this is
like the same bionomics stuff. It's like, yeah, we're in
a golden age. They literally are putting out from the
Trump forty seven rapid response Twitter things like they were
putting out means that said we're in the golden age
now because gas prices went down, And that's that's tone death,
that's not that's like people are looking at that and saying, well,

(48:31):
the general in charge of our army is tilting at
windmills here, like what are we even doing. We're going
I'm going to get sent off to my death. And
that's it. Where at war. This is economic and governmental war,
and the left is fighting it. The right is derelict.
It's a Wall, it's not fighting this. Trump is the

(48:53):
avatar for the new right that desperately wants this system corrected.
And the way there's need to talk about him, I mean,
especially the especially this one test folks, the young right,
like they are very brutal about this. They think that
Trump is owned by people. They post memes about Selfer
and Agan and how many times is that football going

(49:15):
to be held out there only to be yanked back?

Speaker 1 (49:18):
So two last questions, Mark, do you believe that this
in these interviews by Susie do you believe is it
your opinion that they were given and this is kind
of a way of her to protect her reputation that Hey,
don't blame me. I mean because obviously you say she
helped bring you in to try to convince Trump about

(49:38):
certain things, and now she's poortedly given these inter these
eleven interviews where she's saying reportedly saying these things. I
guess I'd like to know if they really are accurate.
But if she is, is this not a way of
kind of protecting her brand on her way out the
door where she can continue running a consulting firm or
something and not be blamed. Hey, I tried but I'm

(50:00):
it's not easy to micromanage Donald Trump. Is this is
in part what she's doing protecting her kind of you know,
wave a flag, don't blame me, and protect her reputation
or what.

Speaker 3 (50:12):
I really don't know if the optics are not great.
I know that her calling her life's work is representing
large corporations. That's you know what she's that's her job.
She runs a big lobbyist firm that has major industry
people like pharmaceutical companies. I don't know. I really don't
know what to tell you. But I again, there was,

(50:34):
in my opinion, less troublesome things in the Washington Post
article that was focused on me, and it felt like
there was heartburn about it. And this is I just
don't know what this is going to do. So I
guess we'll see. Maybe I'll get a feeling from Amfest.

Speaker 1 (50:48):
Okay, And then and then let's ask you this. We
go into January, within the first what thirty days of
January in the new year twenty twenty six, how many
days does he have in the new year to get
together his contract with America, his fight fight fight plan
as you call it. How many days in the new
year does you have in order to set up his

(51:10):
plan is contract with America to keep from being absolutely
destroyed in the midterm elections.

Speaker 3 (51:17):
Yeah, I would have hoped that they had done it already.
We're down to like what three hundred and twenty days
or something like that. You fast forward a month from now,
we're in the I mean, it's way worse. We're in
the two hundreds, the two nineties. Right. And also they're
just announced today that they're going to try and codify
one hundred and fifty executive orders into the next reconciliation bill. Right,

(51:40):
that's good, that's really good news. That's Republicans. They could
have talked about this a long time ago. Everybody's like,
what are you doing? Why aren't you passing anything? And
it's like, okay, well, instead of Trump railing against the
Republican Party that is limited in Congress, he could be
out there saying like, no, we got this, we got
two more bites of the reconciliation apple, and we're going
to get all in. And that was not the messaging, right,

(52:02):
And it's like, okay, well, if Mike Johnson comes out
today and says, Yep, this is the plan We're going
to have reconciliation by the end of January. We're going
to codify one hundred and fifty Trump executive orders. First off,
John fu should be out there shoulder to shoulder on
this one, and maybe he was. I don't know, I
didn't see it. But it's like, if that's the plan,
well you got thirty days to tell America how great

(52:23):
all that stuff is and exactly what that's going to
do to do for them, right, you know? Or are
we just going to sit and let this happen and
then afterwards try and tell America how great this is
going to be when nobody even knows what was in right, right,
and it's like, okay, well, at the end of the day,
you're going to look back at the one hundred and
nineteenth Congress and be like, well, it past eight things, Well,
like what was in those things? And Trump has been

(52:45):
doing I guess a better job with one big beautiful
bill telling people about the impending populist tax cuts and
no tax on tips like this kind of stuff. But
the one big beautiful bill itself like didn't really move
the polling numbers. People were confused about it, that people
were upset it didn't cut the deficit. So even the
way they're communicating about this stuff, and I was dead serious,

(53:07):
don't tell America that we're in a golden age. Show
us the golden path to the Golden age, and give
us like real achievable things that the Republicans are going
to set out to do, you know, little empty radio boxes.
Check them off on the website as they get done.
People shouldn't be confused about what the Trump administration is
going to accomplish. That's the problem, is this situation where

(53:28):
it's like, well, why eleven months into this thing, are
we trying to set expectations?

Speaker 2 (53:35):
Yeah, one hundred percent.

Speaker 1 (53:38):
Here you go follow him on and you don't have
any By the way, before I show your AX account,
you have no idea what the presidential Dressdomore Night's about? U?

Speaker 3 (53:46):
No, but I would assume it's not a Washington Post.
In the New York Times article, here we.

Speaker 1 (53:52):
Go at on his polster, at on his polster, Mark
Mitchell Tonight.

Speaker 2 (53:58):
Wow, fascinating interview.

Speaker 1 (54:00):
You a lot of great analysis, and of course a
lot of people are frustrated, a lot of us and
Mark understands it, and of course he sees that it
is polling and when's your next set of polling numbers
coming out that will help us further understand how it
is impacting him.

Speaker 3 (54:17):
Yeah, we have new stuff coming out, definitely. The NATO
one was a really big one. A lot of fresh
numbers out again about people just don't think Trump is
doing enough, and we're going to be going after that
theme pretty hard. Next stop numbers back next week on
well what does Maggie even mean? Do people care about that?
Or hardly going back into the arms of traditional Republicans.

(54:39):
I don't know if you saw that, but NBC tried
to come out and put a pole out that says, look,
because of Trump, people are souring on MAGA and everybody
in DC is going to misinterpret that and say, oh,
look the time of the establishment or Republican has returned. No, guys,
it's going to a place where you people are not
prepared at all.

Speaker 1 (55:00):
Well, I'm glad you're keeping track of it and helping
us understand it. Follow him here, folks, There he is
at Honest Polster, Raspmosenreports dot com, Raspmosenreports dot Com And
as always, Mark, thank you for joining us tonight. My pleasure,
Mark Mitchell checking in head Honest Polster at Honest Polster.
He's the honest Polster. And he's also the prime lobbyist

(55:22):
for the American people. That's what he is heard of tonight.
Another great slogan. I'm not paid, I'm not anybody's pocket.
I'm just here for the American people, for my kids,
that's what he said.

Speaker 2 (55:33):
I like that.

Speaker 1 (55:33):
Well, I'm here for my kids and I'm here for
my grandkids, and we got real problems. He's right, and
we see that the war drums are beating and the
Europeans seem to want to be heavily involved in conscription
and getting ready for drafts.

Speaker 2 (55:48):
And going to war.

Speaker 1 (55:50):
It's not looking good, but it is what it is,
and we're trying to understand it and help people see
it and know how to respond.

Speaker 2 (55:58):
That's what we do here, all right.

Speaker 1 (56:01):
Guys, if you appreciate our broadcast, I need you to
support us Worldviewfoundation dot com, Worldview Foundation dot com. Please
don't forget about us. And you're into the year giving.
It's so vital we hear from you so we can
set our budgets for twenty twenty six and keep pushing
out free programming, cutting edge programming folks that helps you

(56:22):
understand the times and know how to respond. And of
course we have a database now of what next year
will be thirty six years of radio shows, TV shows, ebooks, audiobooks.
So many of my books, well all of my books,
all of my books are in the vault.

Speaker 2 (56:36):
You don't need to buy them.

Speaker 1 (56:37):
They're in the vault at worldviewtube dot com slash vault.
And by the way, we just put in there my
book on Hamas a few weeks ago, my book on
my documentary Siege, my book on my documentary Sabotage, and
I just finished up on Sunday Night, part four on
why I'm a Christian Zionist from the Bible, and I
will be releasing that as a book, and you do.

Speaker 2 (56:59):
Not need to buy it.

Speaker 1 (57:00):
It'll automatically be in the vault for you at worldviewtube
dot com slash Vault. And then in the new year,
we should have out my new book, my next book
on my year and a half study of the Book
of Revelation, verse by verse. It's a commentary and a
study guide that will also be available for Vault members automatically.

(57:20):
You don't need to buy it worldviewtube dot Com slash
Vault and then I have a new book coming out.

Speaker 2 (57:27):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (57:28):
I'm taking a lot of my TV shows, a lot
of my series, and I'm transcribing them and I'm working
on them and I'm cleaning them up and I'm turning
them into books. And one of the next ones is
Transhumanism is Eugenics, The Power Elite, the history of the
Power Elite, and Transhumanism is Eugenics. That will be out

(57:52):
in the first quarter of the new year. That too,
is not a book you need to buy, it'll automatically
be in And there's a PDF for Vault members worldvietube
dot com slash vault.

Speaker 2 (58:04):
So there are two ways to support us.

Speaker 1 (58:05):
One worldvietube dot com slash Vault and by the way,
get it as a Christmas gift for somebody. Go to
worldviewtube dot com forward slash vault. You can get it
as a Christmas gift. When you get there, just click
that you want to get either the year or monthly
or whatever. Click it and then when you get there,
be sure to check this is a gift, and it'll
make a great gift. And we're just gonna keep cranking

(58:28):
out and putting so much content in there for you.

Speaker 2 (58:32):
Okay, so makes a great gift.

Speaker 1 (58:34):
Worldvietube dot com, slash vault the other Way, Worldview Foundation
dot com, roll the music, let's call it a night,
Worldview Foundation dot com. Okay, alrighty guys, we're gonna be
here through the twenty third of December. The twenty third
of December will be what is supposed to be our
last day of broadcasting for twenty twenty five, and we'll

(58:58):
be back that first Monday in the new year unless
there's breaking news, and if there is, we will come
right back to the desk. I don't care if it's
Christmas Eve, Christmas Day. You depend on us, We're not
gonna let you down.

Speaker 2 (59:09):
We'll be here.

Speaker 1 (59:10):
Thank you for your support. May God save America. Take
care