The Dehumanization Conspriacy

Dehumanizing migrants by casting them as economic, security, and cultural menaces has become a linchpin in hard-line immigration politics. This framework reduces complex human movements to simplistic “threat narratives” that justify punitive policies and stoke public fear.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/conspiracy-theories-exploring-the-unseen--5194379/support.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
The humanization of migrants as threats to wages, public safety,
and national identity. Thanks for joining the Fortune Factor podcast.
Where conversations Do matter.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
Dehumanizing migrants by casting them as economic security and cultural
menaces has become a lynchpen and hardline immigration politics. This
framework reduces complex human movements to simplistic threat narratives that
justify punitive policies and stoke public fear.

Speaker 1 (00:36):
One framing migrants as economic threats to wages.

Speaker 2 (00:42):
Scapegoating in economic downturns. Politicians in media often blame newcomers
for wage stagnation or job losses during recessions, despite broad
data showing that immigrants typically fill jobs that complement rather
than replace, native labor.

Speaker 1 (01:00):
Job stealer rhetoric terms like illegals taking American jobs evoke
the image of a zero sum labor market, when in reality,
migrants often create new demand through consumption, entrepreneurship, and by
filling essential roles in agriculture, healthcare, and services.

Speaker 2 (01:23):
Historical parallels in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, waves
of European immigrants were depicted as undercutting wages for US workers.
Similar tropes fueled the Chinese Exclusion Act. Of eighteen eighty
two and the nineteen twenties national origins quotas.

Speaker 1 (01:42):
Two, Casting migrants as public safety.

Speaker 2 (01:45):
Risks criminalization through language, migrants get labeled invasion, criminal, hoards,
or animals, implying they possess an inherent proclivity for violence
or law breaking. Such labels individuals of nuance and paint
entire communities as dangerous.

Speaker 1 (02:05):
Linking migration and crime rates. Despite extensive research showing immigrants,
both documented and undocumented, tend to have lower crime rates
than native born populations, political rhetoric continues to associate border
crossings with drug cartels, human traffickers, and gang members.

Speaker 2 (02:29):
Policy outcomes. Fear of violent migrants has underpinned family separations,
mandatory detention, and stop and frisk style workplace rates, measures
that erode civil liberties and inflict trauma on vulnerable populations.

Speaker 1 (02:46):
Three. Portraying migrants as threats to national identity cultural.

Speaker 2 (02:53):
Invasion narrative, Migrants are cast as eroding a shared language, religion,
or set of values. This framing elevates a mythical, pure
national identity that must be defended against.

Speaker 1 (03:06):
Dilution us versus them symbolism. Political campaigns deploy imagery of
close borders, barbed wire, and uniformed others to visually reinforce
the idea that migrants are a foreign hoard, not contributing
members of society.

Speaker 2 (03:28):
Link to dehumanizing tropes by denying migrants full humanity, calling
them vermin, congenital criminals, or testosterone bombs. Extremist parties across
Europe and the US legitimize policies that strip rights and
isolate these groups from civic life.