Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
Welcome Constution Radio K E T fourteen ninety am. Glad
you're here. Thank you taking time out of your busy day.
If you're listening live. If you're listening live to this show,
h then you know you are free to call. In
a matter of fact, I might even recommend if you
really have a question or a comment. Yes, I know
(00:30):
we do a lot on this show, and sometimes it
feels like it wouldn't be able to squeeze anybody in.
But I would love for you to call if you
wanted to nine five one nine two two three five
three two get back to two hours. I may even
set up a set aside a time for folks to
call and say, hey, this is a call in a
half hour or something.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Now, hey, Doug, I got to write that number down.
Could you say it a little slower.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
I'll get back to it. I'll get back to it.
I'm adding other commentary. See see what I have to
go through through? Audience, Hang on, let me get out
my whips. I could crack it nine one nine two
two three five three two. Need it again one more time? There,
young man.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
A little slower, but yes, a.
Speaker 3 (01:14):
Little because you know, a little slower for someone who's
a little slow nine five one two two three five
three two.
Speaker 4 (01:27):
You gotta you gotta wake me up again now.
Speaker 1 (01:30):
Ninety five one nine two two three five three two. Well,
I tell, I tell you.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
What you know.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
I just.
Speaker 4 (01:38):
It was so slow I was falling asleep.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
That's okay.
Speaker 1 (01:41):
Well, well, sometimes I'm not sure if I'm a lion
tamer or a slough tamer.
Speaker 3 (01:45):
But okay, uh So anyway, everybody see what I gotta
put up with people.
Speaker 1 (01:51):
So you know, this morning, I was talking to my
wife about different things, and the question came up. What
got me interested in? Paul went Because my wife and
I go all the way back to high school, and
she could remember back during her senior year, my junior year,
how I would get into debates with her friend Amanda.
(02:14):
Once I met Virginia and I met and then she
shot me down and I asked her to date me regularly,
go out with me. I wasn't going to give up easy,
so I so, rather than go play basketball with my
friends at lunchtime like I did every day for like
the last eight years, at that point, I decided to
(02:38):
hang out with Virginia and her friends. So it was
Virginia and Catherine and Amanda, and Amanda was lib tard
and then some I mean, looking back, I'm realizing she's
a straight out Marxist communist. But then again, I guess
that's pretty much what a Democrat is anymore. And even
back then, it's just they were better at hiding it.
And so I was already kind of into politics. I'll
(03:01):
tell my wife that my parents, Stepdad, my mom, while
they talked about that kind of stuff a little bit
here and there, they really weren't very political. They really
didn't tak politics per se back then. And in fact,
they were Democrats until Reagan in eighty they switched parties.
(03:25):
So I really didn't get it from there. And I wonder,
and we're talking about different stuff, and it finally dawned
on me. It was my real dad, my father, he
was very political.
Speaker 3 (03:36):
Matter of fact.
Speaker 1 (03:36):
After he died and I started going through his book collection,
I was finding all kinds of interesting books and like
none dare call it a conspiracy for example, which some
of you are probably very familiar with. And uh, and
I remember as a kid, while I only saw him
once or twice a year, Uh, he didn't do the
weekend thing. It'd be a week or two at his place.
(03:58):
You know, it's Christmas vacation or or summer vacation, and
and sometimes both. And you know, I'd be I'd spend
a week with him, sometimes two weeks. And uh, he
and his friends were very political talk politics.
Speaker 3 (04:11):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
My father was very liberal in his lifestyle, but very
conservative in his thinking. My grandmother, his mom, was a
member of the John Birch Society, and a very active,
outspoken member of the John Birch Society. From what I hear,
and so, this conservative line of thinking has always been
(04:33):
kind of.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
I grew up around it. I heard it. Uh.
Speaker 1 (04:38):
And then of course, being a Christian, uh, it seemed
to match just right. And and uh so and so
I've always kind of been that conservative minded kind of guy.
And uh and and so as I watched the minds
of the progressive leftist commis in America, and now they
(05:00):
shut out any truth, reason, or original attent to the
United States Constitution, and I've gotten to realize is it
I don't know if it's because they haven't been exposed
to the other side, but I do know they have
a warped view of government and of politics and reality.
The perception they can only see it through one lens.
It's sort of like Black lives matter, you know. And
(05:21):
they've convinced themselves that everything is racist, that institutionalized racism
runs through the veins of American history, and every white
person alive is racist, they see. And they got to
the point where they saw racism and everywhere, at every moment,
in everything, because they expected to see it even though
it wasn't there. And I think the communist, socialist progressive
(05:44):
minds kind of work the same way. They have convinced
themselves that communism works. And so every time they see something,
oh see communism in action.
Speaker 3 (05:53):
That's good.
Speaker 1 (05:54):
That's not communism, or that isn't good, it isn't succeeding,
it's failing.
Speaker 3 (05:59):
But they can't see. All they see.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
Is socialist philosophies working wonderfully in their mind and then
their eyes, and what they think. There's like I was
watching the news, uh yesterday and and I can't remember
what show was, but the woman commentator host had a
conservative and a Democrat on the air.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
The Democrat says, well, what are you talking about?
Speaker 1 (06:27):
You know, with inflation high, prices are high, and no
one can afford eggs even yet today in this President said,
when are you getting your information? Do you not believe
your own eyes? Well, the cost of beef is high,
so the cost of beef is high, so everything else
is high. But because that's all they see, that's it's
(06:47):
like the racism thing with Black lives matter. They go
looking for it and if it doesn't exist, they'll see
it anyway.
Speaker 3 (06:55):
And and they and they believe that the fault, the
problem with.
Speaker 1 (07:00):
What they see is nothing but problems, even when the
person don't exist, is the American system, American liberty, the
free market system, and so therefore you must have the
alternative communism and communism successful communism never has existed, but
(07:25):
they are convinced and then they see communism, depending on
if they want it good or bad, they see it.
Speaker 3 (07:33):
It amazes me.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
They love communism except for the bad parts about it.
And if you and if there are bad parts about it,
then they'll say that's the Republicans. I remember, and this
was like twenty fourteen, I think it was, and there
was this and there's this leftist congressman Joe Garcia. He
tried to compare that border security even right before Trump
(07:56):
emerged on the scene. We're talking border security, and he
tried to compare it to the horrors of communism. Oh,
so you want to put up fences and walls and stuff,
you know, like the communists, did you put a border
between the United States, and so like putting up a
Berlin wall.
Speaker 3 (08:12):
He compared the ideas of fences and walls in the
border of the Berlin Wall.
Speaker 1 (08:18):
But yeah, and the warped view. I remember I had
this one guy, Tom, and he was just like this
regular visitor. And one time, in reaction to a article
I had written about past Soviet regimes, and and I
found the quote because I had this on my mind,
early had to find it the comment, and I had
(08:40):
to go way back. This was like two thousand and twelve,
I think it was. The Soviet Union wasn't lefty. It
was a hard line right wing authoritarian regime, not unlike
North Korea. That's not the type of government any Western
liberal advocates. When you make that sort of claim, it's
just propaganda because I indicated that, you know, I was
(09:00):
talking about the political spectrum far right, far left, one
hundred percent left, so Soviet Union's left or then there
was this other guy who comment the one hundred percent
government is supposed to be on the right. It's the
right wingers that want to use government to force a
woman to not be able to have an abortion if
she wants, or use government to control marriage. The right,
(09:20):
the religious right, wants a church to control us our
thoughts are decisions, and to force us to not act
the way we want. Democrats want government out of our lives.
On stuff like that, which makes it obvious that the
one hundred percent government lunatics are.
Speaker 3 (09:32):
On the right like you. That's kind of a warp
view looking things.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
And then you have another saying, oh, you already have
communism in your life. You're complaining, but yet you appreciate
communisms already in your life. Police services and other emergency
services being government eight you know, government agencies, that's communism.
So if you're true to your right wing ideology, you'd
want all of them run by for profit companies. This
is the way the left kind of things, and it's warped.
(10:03):
It's it's a warped viewpoint of yes, we do have government.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
Governments a necessary evil.
Speaker 1 (10:10):
The attitude is if you're believe in a limited government
and you hate communism, and that means you hate government
period and there should be no government doing anything. Never
said that government's there for a reason so you can
have an orderly society. Fire services, police services goes so
hand in hand with having a government that's not communism communism,
(10:32):
And what fascinates me the most is that the real,
key part of what communism truly is gets left out
of the conversation. Communism is a control of the means
of production, eliminating the private ownership of things. And everybody
knows that communism is not what is American. And so
(10:55):
the communists in the past, in the Democratic Party have
always had to do it with creeping incrementalism, the frog
and the pop theory, a little bit here, a little
bit more, a little bit more, never notice kill it's
too late. But they have not been able to hold
onto power. So they realized they had to push a
(11:20):
little harder. And then came along Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
They finally had their plan, their sixteen year plan in place.
Obama would be the setup man, Hillary would be the closer.
They were finally gonna make America in their own leftist image.
(11:41):
And then along came Donald J. Trump, and Donald J.
Trump not only emerged, but then he won the election
in twenty sixteen. Well, that's not possible. They had been
setting it up for so long, preparing for so long.
Obama was the messiah. Practically Hillary was the obvious heir apparent.
(12:08):
Everybody knew she was gonna win. The Poles said so,
even though they were manipulting the Poles, they got to
the point where they believe their own bs. They they
believed that. And then Donald Trump in twenty sixteen, does
see impossible? How was it that he could defeat them?
(12:32):
With all their planning, all their cheating, all of their polls,
all their It was absolutely impossible that he could have won,
especially fairly, or at least he had or at least
they had to convince the American public of that. So
it must have been the Russians. Now understand. My wife
(12:52):
asked me why the Russians. Why did they choose Russia?
Why not China? Because see, Russia had committed the ultimate
sin in the eyes of the Democrats. They had gotten
rid of communism, so they were now the enemy and
is still their allies are still communists. Remember, deep down
(13:13):
the Democratic Party is communists. And so then they decided
that Russia collusion must have taken place. So Barack Obama
and Hillary Clinton and all their allies got together to
create this Russian influence excuse for Trump winning. The problem
(13:37):
is the intelligence agency had said, well, actually.
Speaker 3 (13:43):
They don't.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
They're not capable of it much less do they want
to Putin doesn't want Trump to be present. He wants
he'll already to be present. She's closer to his ideology,
she's going, she's on. Democrats tend to be weaker leaders
are easier to push around. Well, we got to figure
(14:04):
it out. So Obama went to Brennan and call me
a CIA FBI changed the intelligence community's findings to say
that Russia wanted Trump to win and the Russia colluded,
and that they could change it all. And they did.
And then the media stepped in to make sure everyone
just knew that the Russians were the problem and that
(14:26):
Trump's win was just a big lie.
Speaker 3 (14:29):
And then they started launches and I wrote the article
I found.
Speaker 1 (14:33):
I was looking for it on my Policasio couldn't find it,
but I found it on my Canada Free Press Free
pess Canada Free Press page Hamilton sixty eight, which was
launched to basically it was a scheme that was launched
approved everyone with hard evidence that the Russians were scouring
the Internet with their bots and technology to put out
(14:55):
that false narrative true, you know that Trump was uh,
you know, and then and the Russian as we're colluding
with each other. And then you have the infamosy Steel dossier,
collection of unverified claims funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign and
the Democratic National Committee, which was dismissed internally as Internet rumor,
but still influenced the whole scheme. Now we knew that
(15:17):
the Democrats are lying all along. They cooked up the
whole scheme, but nobody was there to be able to
do anything about it because they had control of everything.
And then they did what they do, and they got
their guide back in they got and they brought Biden in,
and then a bunch of things began to happen. They
didn't expect. Some of it they thought was to their advantage,
(15:37):
some not so much. Their opposition caught on to their schemes,
to their lies, to their election medaling and said so
and it was out there, well that's misinformation, that's misinformation.
They did everything they can to stop it. Then Biden,
who you know, it's a sweet old man in the
(15:58):
eyes of the public. From their point of view, everybody
will like bi and he's like everybody's grandpa. Yeah, and
like some of our grandpa's got to the point where
he didn't know what room we was in.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
Did expect that? But that's okay. What was cover up?
Cover everything else up?
Speaker 1 (16:12):
Anyway, Then they got the what, and then they planned
what the January sixth, A bunch of Trump lting the
Republicans went to Washington, DC to air their grievances. New
plan was cooked up. Now we have a chance to
make those Trump supporting MAGA people. You know, it looked
like insurrectionists, and that's what they did. They arrested over
(16:34):
fifteen hundred people in connection with the alleged January sixth insurrection,
despite evidence that the whole thing was not an insurrection.
There was agitation it perpetrated by the Democrats' allies and
the Capitol Police FBI assets were on the ground manipulating
the scene. Antifa had been brought in by the bus loads,
(16:56):
dressed up in MAGA gear but wearing their hats backwards
so they could identify each other. And then the January
sixth Committee, which was a sham put out damaging findings
that Trump and his MAGA supporters or you know, a
bunch of insurrectionists. They figured, ok out, now we've got them.
(17:16):
So they hit and they hit everything about Biden. But
then Biden wound up messing up his debate, and so ah,
we'll bring a kamala. It's still ours.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
We'll cheat.
Speaker 1 (17:27):
Well, we'll the people won't fall. We'll just hate Trump.
No one will fall for his stuff. The law fair
we've made him was a criminal. He's got sixty four
counts against him that you know, Uh, he's a fellon.
Blah blah blah, blah blah. We're safe. And then something happened.
Trump won twenty twenty four and while slam, the Republicans
(17:52):
held onto the majority in the House and in the
Senate if you count the Vice president's tyebreaking vote. And
that has been a disaster for them. They went from
battling with Trump the first time to on the ropes.
Speaker 3 (18:07):
This time.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Their sixteen year plan had been interrupted. Now the stick
in the spokes was so severe the whole bike flipped
over and their pelmets were cracked.
Speaker 3 (18:19):
They had no clue. They don't know what to do.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
Their policies are losers, and Trump has set them up
on everything. So they did what they've done many times
in the past. When I say they don't mean the Democrats,
I mean leftists. They retreated to the courts where it'd
be more difficult to dislodge them and fight against them.
Speaker 3 (18:43):
And then they use their lawfair.
Speaker 1 (18:44):
But they now see earlier the lawfair had been focused
on Trump the civilian. Now it's Trump the president, and
they're doing the lawfair, but through the federal inferior courts,
where activist judges are being used to unconstitutionally strike down
everything Trump does that get them, and that's not working either.
In fact, everything they've thrown at Trump has backfired. Trump
(19:09):
has garnered more support now than ever before, and ninety
according to QPAC poll, ninety percent of Republicans, Uh, not
just favor, but but what's the right word, extremely favor.
I don't remember the word that they use in the
poll now endorse, no, no favor. That's the polls, the approval,
(19:33):
that's it. His approval rating it with among Republicans at
they've been so high. The Democrats their favorability and even
their own polls as the lowest. It's ever been Their
dirty games have not been working. And now not only
is Trump looking under their skirt and behind the curtain,
(19:55):
so was cash betailing Dan bong Gino and Pam Bondi
and the list goes on and on and on. But understand,
they've had control of all the document stuff we're trying
to look out over the last eight years or more,
and so they've been destroying documents, doctoring documents. But it
hasn't been enough. I talked about Epstein. That's what they
(20:17):
did with Epstein. You know, Pambondi had the Epstein fase
I got the files. I've got everything we need. She
hadn't looked at him yet though. Then they opened it
up and whoa, where's the stuff that's supposed to be there?
And what's this garbage that got inserted? That's why we
haven't seen this stuff yet. You don't show a bunch
of doctor documents to the public. They've got to find
(20:39):
the truth. That's why the trying to get those grand
jury you know records, which a court recently.
Speaker 3 (20:45):
Said, oh, you can't have them. Really. So now a
former Democrat, Toulsey Gabbert, the.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
United States stretcher of National Intelligence, has been digging, digging
and found something.
Speaker 3 (21:03):
And she's put out there.
Speaker 1 (21:07):
That a report that shows that Russian Vladimir Putin, that
that that the report about him favoring Trump and and
and and getting involved in the election, that it's not true.
C i A Director John Brennan, under the direction of
(21:28):
President Barack Obama, had all of the intelligence reports changed.
Speaker 3 (21:37):
Everything was flipped, The report.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
Was changed from the intelligenmut was changed to fit their narrative,
and all of it was a manufactured narrative.
Speaker 3 (21:54):
The whole thing reveals corruption at the highest level. The
whole thing was.
Speaker 1 (21:58):
Not designed to protect national secure already as advertised. He
was to dismantle the legitimacy of an election that shook
the leftist, corrupt establishment to the corps.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
Both elections. Their goal, according to.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
Gabbert, was to subvert the will of the American people
and enact what was essentially a year long, years long
coup with the objective of trying to usurp the president
from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.
The coup involved a misuse of intelligence, weaponization of law
enforcement agencies, and sustained campaign to delegitimize a city President
(22:36):
and now I just saw this on Yahoo News this morning. Well,
Colci Gabert is lying. It's already been We've already got
all the information we need. It was false information, President Obama.
This is, according to Gabert, the Director of the CIA,
John Brennan, and others fabricated the Russia hoax, suppressed intelligence.
(23:00):
Putin was preparing for a Clinton victory, manufacturing findings from
shoddy sources, disobeyed IC standards, and knowingly lied to the
American people. This means that President Barack Obama and the
US leaders directing intelligence agencies at the time lied about
the whole Russian collusion thing. President Richard Nixon resigned and
(23:21):
was under a threat of impeachment for lying to the
American people. President Bill Clinton was impeached for lying to
the American people about services rendered in the Oval Office
by well Monica Lewinsky. He wasn't impeached over the act.
He was impeached for because he lied about it. Lying
to the American public is a big deal. This is
(23:42):
not the kind of thing that should go quietly into
the dark. As the Golden Age finally gets his chance
to unveil itself and Obama didn't just lie. They took
that lie, and they then created a giant conspiracy his administration,
using American US intelligence back false claims about Trump and
(24:02):
Russia doing what they could to try and sabotage a
peaceful transition of power.
Speaker 3 (24:09):
Didn't.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
The Democrats claim that trying to overturn an election and
messing with an election is insurrection. While they were deceptively
barking about January sixth, twenty twenty one, the Democrats lied
to Americans about Russian interference and smeared Trump as a
treason as colluterer with Russia.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
Obama lied to Americans.
Speaker 1 (24:30):
In speeches about Russian election and interference, well knowing that
US intelligence, before he ordered them to change their assessment,
had assessed his statements to be false. They erected a
totalitarian censorship edifice under the pretext of misinformation and disinformation.
To cap the deception, they blatantly leaked false intelligence to
(24:53):
the Washington Posts. They falsely claimed that Russia used cyber
means to influence the outcome of the election. The narrative
spread throughout the willing corporate media web like a virus,
infecting the news cycles with false information and filling the
heads of Americans with doctored information and false claims in
the hopes of hamstringing the first Trump presidency. An echo
(25:15):
chamber was created, and the mainstream media is selling that
Trump was a creasonous colluder with Russia, the collusion smear
against Trump. In the process of it, Obama intelligence officials
(25:35):
lie to Congress. Obama himself was involved in ensnaring Trump's
first national security advisor and yet another fabricated scandal using
spine leaking, a manipulation of US intelligence.
Speaker 3 (25:49):
And as this is going on, the knuckleheads.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
And the lift say, oh, it's all big lie Le's
that's say said originally they are liars. Of course they're
gonna say, oh, yeah, she's lying. I hope she is
being honest, that she has tangible, hardcore evidence. I believe
she does, and she is given to the Department of Justice.
(26:13):
This information, I mean, this goes away beyond This goes
way beyond crossfire, Hurricane. This goes all the way back
to even before Trump was elected the first time.
Speaker 3 (26:23):
And here's the key.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
And I was watching this investigative journalist, John Solomon, not
just watching him on another show yesterday, but he was
on Steve Bannon's real American voice, and he said that
Pam Bondy doesn't have to seek a grand jury or
an indictment in Washington, DC either, where the jury pool
is coming from a ninety percent Democrat environment because of
(26:45):
the Mara Lago raid makes it a part of the conspiracy.
The case can be brought in Florida or several over
acts of the conspiracy occurred. Solomon also explained that the
conspiracy spanned multiple events, including the Trump Trump Russia hoax,
Ukraine impeach, even the FBI's refusal to act on intelligence
(27:05):
regarding Chinese interference in the twenty twenty election. It's all
a part of a giant conspiracy, which means they can
all pull it into one. They didn't want to help
Donald Trump, so they ignored a potential counterintelligence threat when
it came to China. It allows for a very large
series of events to be wrapped into a single conspiracy.
(27:28):
This is what we so. This could be huge. They
could go back beyond ten years, Still get Brennan, Still
get all of these guys with more serious charge of
the conspiracy out of a coup. Now Barack Obama is
not the clean, untouchable messiah. After all, the former president
(27:52):
is now at the center of the entire Russia hoax
with evidence to back it up. HU to Obama's framing
of Trump as some would be Russian asset lead to
something bigger that may even allow the former president to
be prosecuted for his part in Dare I say it insurrection? Yes,
I understand that we've got the immunity case for presidents,
(28:16):
but that's regarding presidents in the process of carrying out
their presidential duties. Treason is not a presidential duty. If
false intelligence early was manufactured at the president's request, then
Barack Obama is a really big trouble. He engaged in treason,
his conspiracy, and I could totally see Barack Obama being arrested,
(28:43):
Barack Obama going before jury, Barack Obama being convicted, and
Barack Obama in jail. In fact, Trump put a video
on his Trump Social page of Obama being arrested.
Speaker 3 (28:57):
It's kind of funny to watch.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
Senate Republicans are also meanwhile reopening the Clinton email probe.
Several thumb drives were never analyzed the DOJ's prior investigation
to the Hillary Clinton's email server also served as a piece
of the overall conspiracy against Trump. The information related to
Hillary Clinton's emails constitute material evidence in Obama's broader criminal
(29:22):
conspiracy and contained information relevant to the conspiracy investigation. In
the batch of information is also some of Obama's emails
and purported communications with the Democratic National Convention people like
chairman then chairman Wi Wassaman Schultz, and two different individuals
who worked for the soro's Open Society foundations. The intelligence
(29:45):
reports allege that the Obama administration took efforts to scuttle
the investigation into Clinton to protect her candidacy and to
protect him. Weeks after Comy exonerated Clinton in a public statement,
Comy's FI formally open the bogus Crossfire Hurricane investigation and
a Trump president truck's just proven collusion with Russia?
Speaker 3 (30:08):
Could it be?
Speaker 1 (30:10):
Could it be that finally the orange jumpsuits are gonna
be handed out. I'm hopeful, but unfortunately I can't hold
my breath on this one. I might not make it.
We'll be back. Don't go anywhere.
Speaker 5 (30:37):
You got a dent in your door, scratch in your fender,
or a cratch in your door and a dent in
your fender. If you need auto detailing, if you need
buyer shooting decals on the side of your car, if
you need a rally stripe right down the middle of
your hardtop, I don't care what it is. The Patriots
at All Star Collision are the place you want to go.
They're the only place to go by twenty two Railroad
Street in Corona. Web address all Star ci dot com.
(31:00):
See all that they do and what they're all about
well number nine five one two seven, nine nine one
sixty one All Star Collision d Kings of Reck and
Roll help.
Speaker 6 (31:09):
Me fight the good fight. This radio program is funded
by advertising dollars. So if you are a business, add
Constitution Radio with Douglas V. Gibbs to your business portfolio.
If you are a listener, become a patron of the
businesses advertising on this program. Without advertising, your weekend dose
of truth ends with more advertising.
Speaker 3 (31:29):
Constitution Radio with Douglas V.
Speaker 6 (31:31):
Gibbs grows and we will be on the way to
win the battle to restore the Republic. To learn more,
email us at Constitution Speaker at yahoo dot com, or
visit Douglas V. Gibbs dot com.
Speaker 7 (31:44):
If you've been waiting to go solar, don't wait any longer.
Propose legislation ending a thirty percent federal tax credit could
pass this summer and go into effect by December thirty first.
With utility rates rising year after year and summer hikes
with no end in sight, now is the time to
walk in and fixed energy costs for years to come.
As Guard Energy is a local, family owned company that
(32:05):
serves southern California since two thousand and eight, with over
four thousand flawless installs and personalized service you can trust
call eight five five seven six zero energy. That's eight
five five seven six zero three six three seven before
waiting costs you thirty percent more. As Guard Energy local, trusted, proven, we.
Speaker 1 (32:36):
Are the socialists will decided your individual Entergy's personal freedom, Sandman,
individuality will be added to our own.
Speaker 3 (32:46):
Resistance is futile. Welcome back Constitution Radio Douglas V.
Speaker 1 (33:04):
Gibbs kmy T fourteen nine named so, I just spent
a lot of time talking about I talked about the
socialist foundation of the Democratic Party, the lies, the games,
all of that.
Speaker 3 (33:17):
Going all the way back to you know, years before.
Speaker 1 (33:20):
And then I got into the secret Russia meeting with
Obama and Clapper and Brennan and Komy and so on
and so forth. And I really went into quite a
bit of detail, not as much detail.
Speaker 3 (33:33):
As my article. You want to read the article, go
to Douglas v.
Speaker 1 (33:36):
Gibbs dot com, hit the blog link and find Russia's
hoaxes records point at Obama. But you know, and I
went through all of this, and and I'm thinking of
myself as I'm saying this, and I'm going through all
this information.
Speaker 3 (33:55):
We knew all along.
Speaker 1 (33:57):
This is not something we didn't know, but now the
public will get to know. And I don't care how
much law fair they tried to play. I don't care
how many games they played, how many lines they put
out there, and how much the media was complicit in
all of this. In the end, the court that matters
the most is the court of public opinion. And I
(34:19):
think the court of public opinion is finally conveniing.
Speaker 3 (34:24):
Get us. What's your thoughts?
Speaker 4 (34:28):
Well, kind of like I said during the break, and
what you've said is just kind of prompted to me.
You don't want to say this again, but you and
I talked jumped suits years ago. Durham. Durham should have
been able to do this, Bill Barr, you know, this
(34:49):
is the stuff you and I wave your career.
Speaker 3 (34:51):
The problem. They were part of the problems.
Speaker 4 (34:53):
Well, and and I'm going to use this the catapult
and the other thing that you and I were talking
about during the break, the fact fact that Durham and
bar either had access to this or did not have
access to it. If they didn't have access, then how
do you audit If you don't have access, You know,
(35:13):
they're part of the victim as well because they didn't know.
If they knew and they didn't do it, then they're
part of the cover up. So do you add Durham
and Bar to the names of call me and Brennan
and Clapper. I don't know. But the fact that we
did not get the information. Then the fact that I
(35:35):
can be an American right now and I don't listen
to ABC and NBC, MSNBC and all these because it's
BSc and n I mean, I know you do it
for opposition research, okay, But the fact that ABC and
NBC put your report and you confirmed it during the break,
and I've read this elsewhere that they have never covered
(35:57):
this story at all. This is a huge story. They
aren't covering at all is proof to me that they're
part of the conspiracy. What is their justification? I think
that the FEC should look at what they're not doing.
(36:18):
You know, if my freedom of speech is being restricted,
if I can't speak on Yahoo, on Google, on Facebook,
if I can't speak, and if I bring it up,
you know, I'm the the DOJ hits me as a
domestic terrorist and wants to come after me. You know.
(36:40):
So if I'm not able to speak, I'm being violated.
If I'm not able to hear, I'm also being violated.
And I think Trump ought to look at this and
raise hell over the fact that NBC and ABC are
not coming out with credible public awareness coverage. And because
(37:03):
they aren't doing that, unless they start doing that, they're
going to be investigated as part of the hopes. I
put the gun right against their head, you know. And
I was thinking also that if we can't hit the
target with this, I mean, you're sitting there, Doug, with
a twelve gage shotgun three feet from the target, and
(37:23):
you can't hit the target.
Speaker 3 (37:29):
I hear you.
Speaker 4 (37:33):
So that's kind of my side. Take everything else you
talked about, Yeah, we've all known it. A lot of
us have known it, felt it. And like I say,
I've got a picture of the notes that Peter Struck
took during one of his meetings back in January of
twenty seventeen with those same people in the room, and
(37:56):
his notes were saying that there's no case. But then
he brags about the fact that he was so glad
him and Lisa about being part of this great movement
to stop Trump when he knows it was fake. They
all knew it was fake, so that at all get
(38:17):
the same punishment. And I agree, there's no immunity, and
there's an f word that in business you can't get
away from, and that's fraud. Okay, I don't believe there's
a statute of limitations for fraud and for them to
(38:41):
perpetrate what they've perpetrated. I don't know how you hand
behind immunity. Immunity is to protect you, so you have
the freedom to exercise your judgment based upon what you
know in good faith as you carry out your responsibilities
in a public you know, whether it be policemen, rather
it be the president or whatever. This this treason, his act,
(39:04):
as she calls it, is not anything they can be
protected because it's not anything he should be able to do,
let alone give him immunity for it, and I yield.
Speaker 1 (39:15):
You know, I uh, Normally I would say, well, you know,
these social media and these news agencies and stuff. You know,
it's a privately owned business and they don't want to
give that information. That's their business. However, they are receiving
federal funding. They are in collusion with segments of the government.
Speaker 4 (39:35):
Well, they have a license from the government, right.
Speaker 1 (39:42):
But you know, I'm a I'm a believer in freedom
and liberty, but I do not. It's it's like I
talk about corporations, and I know a lot of people
get it all into it about big corporations and the
robber barons, blah blah, blah blah. I don't care if
the rich get rich and successful get successful, and they
even try to wield a little in ones in the
consumer world. But the moment they start colluding with government,
(40:05):
shoot them down. Now that said Alan, Yeah, oh, the
Obama Russia hog all of that. It's a big deal,
the left saying, Cholsey Gabbert's lying. She says, Hey, I've
got the evidence and I've given it the Pam BONDI
(40:26):
what's your thoughts.
Speaker 2 (40:28):
Well, I'll think I'll open a little differently than you two.
Speaker 3 (40:32):
I'm shocked. I know.
Speaker 2 (40:34):
That's why I'm glad you're sitting down. As you all
have covered it, there's certain words that are phrases that
have been mentioned that I would like to talk about
because it adds context to the whole conversation. Early on
it was mentioned that somebody considered our government's border security
(40:58):
and this is decades ago and liking it to the
Berlin Wall. Well, I've been to the Berlin Wall, saw
it in Berlin, went through it at checkpoint Charlie went
into East Berlin and the guys on top of the
wall they had firearms, rifles, and they were pointed in
(41:19):
to East Berlin. They weren't pointed into West Berlin to
keep people out. They were there to keep people in.
And that wall was so serious throughout where I saw
it in East Germany. Even driving along the roadways not
quite a freeway, they had fence, you know, right, and
(41:42):
on top of the fence was razor wire. The whole
thing was about keeping people in. No one was trying
to get in to East Germany. So liking it to
have your protected borders like you have protected borders that.
Speaker 1 (42:03):
You're well, and that was and that was actually and
that's exactly true. And that's why I brought that up
is it shows the warp view that the left has.
Progressive left ask you know what the truth is what
they see are two different things, right, but they see
it because there the god do whatever they can to
support their narrative.
Speaker 2 (42:26):
Continuing on the this idea of and you've talked about
this before, which is there's a let's say there's a
political spectrum mhmm from one side to the other, and
just go with the narrative. You got left and right
(42:47):
full left communism. You might even put a monarchy or
dictatorship in there. It's total control, means of protection, property, everything, media,
everything that is communist, with the understanding is that you'll
(43:09):
lead a happier, better life because everything is controlled for
your benefit.
Speaker 3 (43:15):
And equal.
Speaker 2 (43:17):
Well it's equal. I mean it's interesting, yes, the okay,
when I think of equality, I kind of have an
idea of what that means, which some than others, you know,
which which begs the question, how is it you have
billionaires in China, the most communist country in.
Speaker 1 (43:37):
The Worldism, they play games, they play they play the
game with the government so they get favorability.
Speaker 2 (43:45):
So you have that, and then going along that spectrum,
the next place is fascist.
Speaker 3 (43:50):
Government collusion and all I was talking about me go ahead.
Speaker 2 (43:53):
Got fascists. Yeah, and Nazis. They're not far right, they're
almost full left because they're about not ownership of property,
which communism is means of production and property. They're about controlling,
not owning, the means of production, and that's type control.
(44:16):
Then you get to the middle and I don't mean
necessarily physically, but it's the constitution. And then you go
far right, which you've talked about before, which is anarchy.
Understanding what the political spectrum is I think is very
helpful and not just throwing terms out because it fits
(44:39):
a narrative or fits an agenda. How's communism doing today
in this world? Well, let's go to China for one.
China is a massive country. And when I talk about China,
I'm not really talking about the country or the people
or the culture. I'm talking about the CCP, who owns
(45:04):
China the CCP. In twenty twenty, the World Health Organization
did a investigation of the most polluted cities in the world.
Probably can still find it this is twenty twenty, that
five hundred of the most polluted cities in the world
(45:26):
approximately of my memory, two hundred and sixty over half
the most polluted cities in the world were in China alone.
Over four hundred of the five hundred were in China
and five other countries. And how many of the five
hundred most polluted cities in the world are in the
US or were in the US got a guest dog.
(45:50):
Zero zero and we have to go green. It's horrendous
what is being done to that country environmentally and to
the people because they're living in it. If this is
what communism brings, you don't want it, then you can
(46:13):
get you can get to even in some ways even
worse North Korea. I mean, I met somebody the other
day who is from South Korea and we talked about it.
He is a younger guy, and that okay, that that
border splitting, split families. Yeah, if you had in your
(46:39):
family line people in North Korea, you don't know about
them because you can't call them, you can't write them, everything,
everything is controlled. That this is not a good way to.
Speaker 1 (46:53):
Live, and that they are convinced they've been told through
propaganda that they have a good there in North Korea.
Speaker 3 (47:01):
The rest of the word's worse. That's why.
Speaker 2 (47:05):
That's why you can't call them, That's why they don't
have internet access. Goes on and on.
Speaker 3 (47:11):
It would ruin the deception. Right.
Speaker 2 (47:14):
Another word that's our words in the conversation that I
think needs to be fully understood insurrection. An insurrection isn't
a party gone back. An insurrection is a violent uprising
against an authority or government. Emphasis on violent uprising caring
(47:38):
science is not violent. Being in a protest is not violent.
I guess I should have looked up the definition violent.
Speaker 3 (47:47):
Sorry.
Speaker 2 (47:48):
Another word out there which was used in the beginning
but has gone away as coup. A coup nice French
word is a sudden, violent exercise of force and unlawssful,
unlawful seizure of power from a government. Was any power seized?
Speaker 3 (48:08):
No, well, they're sure as a hell of an attempt.
Speaker 1 (48:11):
And it doesn't have to be by violent means to
be a coup in my opinion.
Speaker 2 (48:16):
No, I'm I'm talking about J six mm. There was
no seizure of power.
Speaker 3 (48:24):
Right.
Speaker 2 (48:26):
In other words that you used that's out there now.
I have when people disagree with me, which is often
I have four questions that I want to be answered
because often I'm a student and I want to learn.
I'm not about being right. I'm about learning, getting knowledge
and sharing it. I'm not vested in you know, some
(48:50):
agenda and my four questions. You know my four questions, Doug,
I think I've heard them before, But go ahead, four questions.
If someone disagrees with me and I say this politely,
of course, what did I say that's wrong? Why is
it wrong? What's correct? And why is it correct? Help
(49:10):
me learn what I find is. You know, usually what
precedes that is the statement, well, that's misinformation or disinformation. Okay,
if it's misinformation, tell me why labeling something doesn't make
(49:33):
that actually accurate. It's a way of not having the conversation.
And we need to have the conversation because and then
because in the process, when you have a healthy conversation
as opposed to an argument, debate, name calling, fingerpointing, when
(49:53):
you have a conversation, you're able to get out there
and see how much comm and ground you stand on
them with someone else. And what happens when you find
out you actually have or potentially have a lot of
common ground that you stand on. Now you have a connection.
(50:14):
But when it's just back and forth yelling, screaming, arguing,
name calling, labeling, no one's getting anywhere because apparently they're
not vested in learning, they're vested in being right.
Speaker 3 (50:31):
How's that? How that's fine?
Speaker 2 (50:33):
Okay?
Speaker 1 (50:35):
Now I want to point out that not everybody calls
nine five one nine two two three five three.
Speaker 3 (50:40):
Two to call on the show.
Speaker 1 (50:41):
There's a few people who know me well enough that
they'll text me during the program. One of our listeners texted.
Speaker 2 (50:47):
Me, right, well, that's almost it's a call.
Speaker 3 (50:50):
Yeah, monkey might and uh high monkey and text this.
Speaker 1 (50:57):
Comparing the Berlin and US border walls, cost Ortes raised
eyebrows overcommon in March of twenty nineteen, comparing President Trump's
border wall plans with a Berlin Wall, a Cold War
symbol of communist oppression that divided Germany for nearly three decades.
The New York Democrat made her remarks during a live
stream video for her supporters, during which she discussed the
(51:19):
scrutiny she received since she won last the pre prior
year's election. No matter how I feel about the wall,
I think it's a moral abomination. I think it's like
the Berlin Wall. I think it's like any other wall
designed to separate human beings and block out people who
are running away from humanitarian disasters. The Berlin Wall wasn't
(51:39):
there to block people out away from running away from
the humanitarian disasters. It was, I mean it was, but no,
it was the other way, yeah, the reverse. But she's
basically saying, well that the wall between Mexico is like
is like putting up a wall to keep people from
going to Eastmany. West Romany is basically Mexico being like
(52:02):
East Germany. And I says being like West Germany. That's
what That's what she was making a comparison.
Speaker 2 (52:08):
The other thing is just one more thing on the wall.
When I was there and we went in, we went
into East Berlin from West Berlin at Checkpoint Charlie. When
you go in, there's this big empty area before you
get to the actual guardhouse that lets you into East Berlin.
It's kind of a grassy area with a lot of obstacles.
(52:33):
I called that the kill zone because there's no place
to hide when you're trying to approach the wall from
in essence, East Berlin, you're completely out in the open.
That's the and the and the guys on the wall.
Speaker 4 (52:51):
M M.
Speaker 2 (52:52):
They're looking.
Speaker 1 (52:56):
All right, and with just a couple of minutes left,
what what are we talking about here? We're talking about
I mentioned communism earlier, the Democrats, and that's what they're about.
And all my life it was creeping incrementalism. Get back
to the frog in the pot, little here, little there.
They thought they saw their goal, They thought they were
almost there with the Obama and Hillary Trump stopped it,
(53:21):
but they still believe they're really close. The veil is gone,
the hiding, the creeping incrementalism is gone. I remember back
when Hillary ran and Bernie Sanders, because he's so radical,
was pushed out of the way so that Hillary could
get the primary. Now Bernie's mainstream Democrat, AOC is mainstream.
Speaker 3 (53:50):
Democrat.
Speaker 1 (53:52):
And now the radical Camir apparent apparently is Mom Donnie,
who is now surfaced on the streets of Gotham embracing
this radical mystique and and uh and and he is
he and and he is Communists. The whole party has
lurched leftward even more than it was. Mamdani is the
(54:15):
logical move leftward for them. Hopefully the GOP will continue
to capitalize on his rise to warn Americans that radical
figures like Mam Donnie now represent the future of the
Democratic Party and the current state of the Democratic Party.
We need to recognize the Democrats are not what they
(54:38):
claim to be or what they have claimed to be
in the past. They are not they're they're the communists
in their party are not fringe candidates.
Speaker 3 (54:47):
They are the norm.
Speaker 1 (54:49):
And this is the result of a generation taught to
despise its own founding, despite its own country can and
be convinced that the Constitution is an outdated relic seduced
by the utopians of equality, and by force New York
embraces a communist future, but it affects all of us.
Speaker 3 (55:09):
We may not get another chance.
Speaker 1 (55:11):
We need to stop it even there, all right, plug yourself, sir.
Speaker 2 (55:17):
Five to seven pm, Sunday's West Coast time on Patriot Soapbox.
Check us out on for the Republic.
Speaker 1 (55:25):
Thank you, Allen, Thank you Dennis Jackson for being on
this episode with me United, We stand combined with you.
But God bless America, my friends, God bless you.
Speaker 3 (55:34):
Visit me. Douglas Vgibbs dot com. Douglas v Gibbs dot com.
Speaker 1 (55:38):
Douglas v gibbs dot com and hit the join link
in the link bar and become a nine dollars a
month patron. Help fund the movement, be a part of
the movement. Let's move forward. We'll see you next time.
Thanks for being here, Bye bye now
Welcome Constution Radio K E T fourteen ninety am. Glad
you're here. Thank you taking time out of your busy day.
If you're listening live. If you're listening live to this show,
h then you know you are free to call. In
a matter of fact, I might even recommend if you
really have a question or a comment. Yes, I know
(00:30):
we do a lot on this show, and sometimes it
feels like it wouldn't be able to squeeze anybody in.
But I would love for you to call if you
wanted to nine five one nine two two three five
three two get back to two hours. I may even
set up a set aside a time for folks to
call and say, hey, this is a call in a
half hour or something.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Now, hey, Doug, I got to write that number down.
Could you say it a little slower.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
I'll get back to it. I'll get back to it.
I'm adding other commentary. See see what I have to
go through through? Audience, Hang on, let me get out
my whips. I could crack it nine one nine two
two three five three two. Need it again one more time? There,
young man.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
A little slower, but yes, a.
Speaker 3 (01:14):
Little because you know, a little slower for someone who's
a little slow nine five one two two three five
three two.
Speaker 4 (01:27):
You gotta you gotta wake me up again now.
Speaker 1 (01:30):
Ninety five one nine two two three five three two. Well,
I tell, I tell you.
Speaker 3 (01:35):
What you know.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
I just.
Speaker 4 (01:38):
It was so slow I was falling asleep.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
That's okay.
Speaker 1 (01:41):
Well, well, sometimes I'm not sure if I'm a lion
tamer or a slough tamer.
Speaker 3 (01:45):
But okay, uh So anyway, everybody see what I gotta
put up with people.
Speaker 1 (01:51):
So you know, this morning, I was talking to my
wife about different things, and the question came up. What
got me interested in? Paul went Because my wife and
I go all the way back to high school, and
she could remember back during her senior year, my junior year,
how I would get into debates with her friend Amanda.
(02:14):
Once I met Virginia and I met and then she
shot me down and I asked her to date me regularly,
go out with me. I wasn't going to give up easy,
so I so, rather than go play basketball with my
friends at lunchtime like I did every day for like
the last eight years, at that point, I decided to
(02:38):
hang out with Virginia and her friends. So it was
Virginia and Catherine and Amanda, and Amanda was lib tard
and then some I mean, looking back, I'm realizing she's
a straight out Marxist communist. But then again, I guess
that's pretty much what a Democrat is anymore. And even
back then, it's just they were better at hiding it.
And so I was already kind of into politics. I'll
(03:01):
tell my wife that my parents, Stepdad, my mom, while
they talked about that kind of stuff a little bit
here and there, they really weren't very political. They really
didn't tak politics per se back then. And in fact,
they were Democrats until Reagan in eighty they switched parties.
(03:25):
So I really didn't get it from there. And I wonder,
and we're talking about different stuff, and it finally dawned
on me. It was my real dad, my father, he
was very political.
Speaker 3 (03:36):
Matter of fact.
Speaker 1 (03:36):
After he died and I started going through his book collection,
I was finding all kinds of interesting books and like
none dare call it a conspiracy for example, which some
of you are probably very familiar with. And uh, and
I remember as a kid, while I only saw him
once or twice a year, Uh, he didn't do the
weekend thing. It'd be a week or two at his place.
(03:58):
You know, it's Christmas vacation or or summer vacation, and
and sometimes both. And you know, I'd be I'd spend
a week with him, sometimes two weeks. And uh, he
and his friends were very political talk politics.
Speaker 3 (04:11):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
My father was very liberal in his lifestyle, but very
conservative in his thinking. My grandmother, his mom, was a
member of the John Birch Society, and a very active,
outspoken member of the John Birch Society. From what I hear,
and so, this conservative line of thinking has always been
(04:33):
kind of.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
I grew up around it. I heard it. Uh.
Speaker 1 (04:38):
And then of course, being a Christian, uh, it seemed
to match just right. And and uh so and so
I've always kind of been that conservative minded kind of guy.
And uh and and so as I watched the minds
of the progressive leftist commis in America, and now they
(05:00):
shut out any truth, reason, or original attent to the
United States Constitution, and I've gotten to realize is it
I don't know if it's because they haven't been exposed
to the other side, but I do know they have
a warped view of government and of politics and reality.
The perception they can only see it through one lens.
It's sort of like Black lives matter, you know. And
(05:21):
they've convinced themselves that everything is racist, that institutionalized racism
runs through the veins of American history, and every white
person alive is racist, they see. And they got to
the point where they saw racism and everywhere, at every moment,
in everything, because they expected to see it even though
it wasn't there. And I think the communist, socialist progressive
(05:44):
minds kind of work the same way. They have convinced
themselves that communism works. And so every time they see something,
oh see communism in action.
Speaker 3 (05:53):
That's good.
Speaker 1 (05:54):
That's not communism, or that isn't good, it isn't succeeding,
it's failing.
Speaker 3 (05:59):
But they can't see. All they see.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
Is socialist philosophies working wonderfully in their mind and then
their eyes, and what they think. There's like I was
watching the news, uh yesterday and and I can't remember
what show was, but the woman commentator host had a
conservative and a Democrat on the air.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
The Democrat says, well, what are you talking about?
Speaker 1 (06:27):
You know, with inflation high, prices are high, and no
one can afford eggs even yet today in this President said,
when are you getting your information? Do you not believe
your own eyes? Well, the cost of beef is high,
so the cost of beef is high, so everything else
is high. But because that's all they see, that's it's
(06:47):
like the racism thing with Black lives matter. They go
looking for it and if it doesn't exist, they'll see
it anyway.
Speaker 3 (06:55):
And and they and they believe that the fault, the
problem with.
Speaker 1 (07:00):
What they see is nothing but problems, even when the
person don't exist, is the American system, American liberty, the
free market system, and so therefore you must have the
alternative communism and communism successful communism never has existed, but
(07:25):
they are convinced and then they see communism, depending on
if they want it good or bad, they see it.
Speaker 3 (07:33):
It amazes me.
Speaker 1 (07:34):
They love communism except for the bad parts about it.
And if you and if there are bad parts about it,
then they'll say that's the Republicans. I remember, and this
was like twenty fourteen, I think it was, and there
was this and there's this leftist congressman Joe Garcia. He
tried to compare that border security even right before Trump
(07:56):
emerged on the scene. We're talking border security, and he
tried to compare it to the horrors of communism. Oh,
so you want to put up fences and walls and stuff,
you know, like the communists, did you put a border
between the United States, and so like putting up a
Berlin wall.
Speaker 3 (08:12):
He compared the ideas of fences and walls in the
border of the Berlin Wall.
Speaker 1 (08:18):
But yeah, and the warped view. I remember I had
this one guy, Tom, and he was just like this
regular visitor. And one time, in reaction to a article
I had written about past Soviet regimes, and and I
found the quote because I had this on my mind,
early had to find it the comment, and I had
(08:40):
to go way back. This was like two thousand and twelve,
I think it was. The Soviet Union wasn't lefty. It
was a hard line right wing authoritarian regime, not unlike
North Korea. That's not the type of government any Western
liberal advocates. When you make that sort of claim, it's
just propaganda because I indicated that, you know, I was
(09:00):
talking about the political spectrum far right, far left, one
hundred percent left, so Soviet Union's left or then there
was this other guy who comment the one hundred percent
government is supposed to be on the right. It's the
right wingers that want to use government to force a
woman to not be able to have an abortion if
she wants, or use government to control marriage. The right,
(09:20):
the religious right, wants a church to control us our
thoughts are decisions, and to force us to not act
the way we want. Democrats want government out of our lives.
On stuff like that, which makes it obvious that the
one hundred percent government lunatics are.
Speaker 3 (09:32):
On the right like you. That's kind of a warp
view looking things.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
And then you have another saying, oh, you already have
communism in your life. You're complaining, but yet you appreciate
communisms already in your life. Police services and other emergency
services being government eight you know, government agencies, that's communism.
So if you're true to your right wing ideology, you'd
want all of them run by for profit companies. This
is the way the left kind of things, and it's warped.
(10:03):
It's it's a warped viewpoint of yes, we do have government.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
Governments a necessary evil.
Speaker 1 (10:10):
The attitude is if you're believe in a limited government
and you hate communism, and that means you hate government
period and there should be no government doing anything. Never
said that government's there for a reason so you can
have an orderly society. Fire services, police services goes so
hand in hand with having a government that's not communism communism,
(10:32):
And what fascinates me the most is that the real,
key part of what communism truly is gets left out
of the conversation. Communism is a control of the means
of production, eliminating the private ownership of things. And everybody
knows that communism is not what is American. And so
(10:55):
the communists in the past, in the Democratic Party have
always had to do it with creeping incrementalism, the frog
and the pop theory, a little bit here, a little
bit more, a little bit more, never notice kill it's
too late. But they have not been able to hold
onto power. So they realized they had to push a
(11:20):
little harder. And then came along Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
They finally had their plan, their sixteen year plan in place.
Obama would be the setup man, Hillary would be the closer.
They were finally gonna make America in their own leftist image.
(11:41):
And then along came Donald J. Trump, and Donald J.
Trump not only emerged, but then he won the election
in twenty sixteen. Well, that's not possible. They had been
setting it up for so long, preparing for so long.
Obama was the messiah. Practically Hillary was the obvious heir apparent.
(12:08):
Everybody knew she was gonna win. The Poles said so,
even though they were manipulting the Poles, they got to
the point where they believe their own bs. They they
believed that. And then Donald Trump in twenty sixteen, does
see impossible? How was it that he could defeat them?
(12:32):
With all their planning, all their cheating, all of their polls,
all their It was absolutely impossible that he could have won,
especially fairly, or at least he had or at least
they had to convince the American public of that. So
it must have been the Russians. Now understand. My wife
(12:52):
asked me why the Russians. Why did they choose Russia?
Why not China? Because see, Russia had committed the ultimate
sin in the eyes of the Democrats. They had gotten
rid of communism, so they were now the enemy and
is still their allies are still communists. Remember, deep down
(13:13):
the Democratic Party is communists. And so then they decided
that Russia collusion must have taken place. So Barack Obama
and Hillary Clinton and all their allies got together to
create this Russian influence excuse for Trump winning. The problem
(13:37):
is the intelligence agency had said, well, actually.
Speaker 3 (13:43):
They don't.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
They're not capable of it much less do they want
to Putin doesn't want Trump to be present. He wants
he'll already to be present. She's closer to his ideology,
she's going, she's on. Democrats tend to be weaker leaders
are easier to push around. Well, we got to figure
(14:04):
it out. So Obama went to Brennan and call me
a CIA FBI changed the intelligence community's findings to say
that Russia wanted Trump to win and the Russia colluded,
and that they could change it all. And they did.
And then the media stepped in to make sure everyone
just knew that the Russians were the problem and that
(14:26):
Trump's win was just a big lie.
Speaker 3 (14:29):
And then they started launches and I wrote the article
I found.
Speaker 1 (14:33):
I was looking for it on my Policasio couldn't find it,
but I found it on my Canada Free Press Free
pess Canada Free Press page Hamilton sixty eight, which was
launched to basically it was a scheme that was launched
approved everyone with hard evidence that the Russians were scouring
the Internet with their bots and technology to put out
(14:55):
that false narrative true, you know that Trump was uh,
you know, and then and the Russian as we're colluding
with each other. And then you have the infamosy Steel dossier,
collection of unverified claims funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign and
the Democratic National Committee, which was dismissed internally as Internet rumor,
but still influenced the whole scheme. Now we knew that
(15:17):
the Democrats are lying all along. They cooked up the
whole scheme, but nobody was there to be able to
do anything about it because they had control of everything.
And then they did what they do, and they got
their guide back in they got and they brought Biden in,
and then a bunch of things began to happen. They
didn't expect. Some of it they thought was to their advantage,
(15:37):
some not so much. Their opposition caught on to their schemes,
to their lies, to their election medaling and said so
and it was out there, well that's misinformation, that's misinformation.
They did everything they can to stop it. Then Biden,
who you know, it's a sweet old man in the
(15:58):
eyes of the public. From their point of view, everybody
will like bi and he's like everybody's grandpa. Yeah, and
like some of our grandpa's got to the point where
he didn't know what room we was in.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
Did expect that? But that's okay. What was cover up?
Cover everything else up?
Speaker 1 (16:12):
Anyway, Then they got the what, and then they planned
what the January sixth, A bunch of Trump lting the
Republicans went to Washington, DC to air their grievances. New
plan was cooked up. Now we have a chance to
make those Trump supporting MAGA people. You know, it looked
like insurrectionists, and that's what they did. They arrested over
(16:34):
fifteen hundred people in connection with the alleged January sixth insurrection,
despite evidence that the whole thing was not an insurrection.
There was agitation it perpetrated by the Democrats' allies and
the Capitol Police FBI assets were on the ground manipulating
the scene. Antifa had been brought in by the bus loads,
(16:56):
dressed up in MAGA gear but wearing their hats backwards
so they could identify each other. And then the January
sixth Committee, which was a sham put out damaging findings
that Trump and his MAGA supporters or you know, a
bunch of insurrectionists. They figured, ok out, now we've got them.
(17:16):
So they hit and they hit everything about Biden. But
then Biden wound up messing up his debate, and so ah,
we'll bring a kamala. It's still ours.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
We'll cheat.
Speaker 1 (17:27):
Well, we'll the people won't fall. We'll just hate Trump.
No one will fall for his stuff. The law fair
we've made him was a criminal. He's got sixty four
counts against him that you know, Uh, he's a fellon.
Blah blah blah, blah blah. We're safe. And then something happened.
Trump won twenty twenty four and while slam, the Republicans
(17:52):
held onto the majority in the House and in the
Senate if you count the Vice president's tyebreaking vote. And
that has been a disaster for them. They went from
battling with Trump the first time to on the ropes.
Speaker 3 (18:07):
This time.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Their sixteen year plan had been interrupted. Now the stick
in the spokes was so severe the whole bike flipped
over and their pelmets were cracked.
Speaker 3 (18:19):
They had no clue. They don't know what to do.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
Their policies are losers, and Trump has set them up
on everything. So they did what they've done many times
in the past. When I say they don't mean the Democrats,
I mean leftists. They retreated to the courts where it'd
be more difficult to dislodge them and fight against them.
Speaker 3 (18:43):
And then they use their lawfair.
Speaker 1 (18:44):
But they now see earlier the lawfair had been focused
on Trump the civilian. Now it's Trump the president, and
they're doing the lawfair, but through the federal inferior courts,
where activist judges are being used to unconstitutionally strike down
everything Trump does that get them, and that's not working either.
In fact, everything they've thrown at Trump has backfired. Trump
(19:09):
has garnered more support now than ever before, and ninety
according to QPAC poll, ninety percent of Republicans, Uh, not
just favor, but but what's the right word, extremely favor.
I don't remember the word that they use in the
poll now endorse, no, no favor. That's the polls, the approval,
(19:33):
that's it. His approval rating it with among Republicans at
they've been so high. The Democrats their favorability and even
their own polls as the lowest. It's ever been Their
dirty games have not been working. And now not only
is Trump looking under their skirt and behind the curtain,
(19:55):
so was cash betailing Dan bong Gino and Pam Bondi
and the list goes on and on and on. But understand,
they've had control of all the document stuff we're trying
to look out over the last eight years or more,
and so they've been destroying documents, doctoring documents. But it
hasn't been enough. I talked about Epstein. That's what they
(20:17):
did with Epstein. You know, Pambondi had the Epstein fase
I got the files. I've got everything we need. She
hadn't looked at him yet though. Then they opened it
up and whoa, where's the stuff that's supposed to be there?
And what's this garbage that got inserted? That's why we
haven't seen this stuff yet. You don't show a bunch
of doctor documents to the public. They've got to find
(20:39):
the truth. That's why the trying to get those grand
jury you know records, which a court recently.
Speaker 3 (20:45):
Said, oh, you can't have them. Really. So now a
former Democrat, Toulsey Gabbert, the.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
United States stretcher of National Intelligence, has been digging, digging
and found something.
Speaker 3 (21:03):
And she's put out there.
Speaker 1 (21:07):
That a report that shows that Russian Vladimir Putin, that
that that the report about him favoring Trump and and
and and getting involved in the election, that it's not true.
C i A Director John Brennan, under the direction of
(21:28):
President Barack Obama, had all of the intelligence reports changed.
Speaker 3 (21:37):
Everything was flipped, The report.
Speaker 1 (21:42):
Was changed from the intelligenmut was changed to fit their narrative,
and all of it was a manufactured narrative.
Speaker 3 (21:54):
The whole thing reveals corruption at the highest level. The
whole thing was.
Speaker 1 (21:58):
Not designed to protect national secure already as advertised. He
was to dismantle the legitimacy of an election that shook
the leftist, corrupt establishment to the corps.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
Both elections. Their goal, according to.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
Gabbert, was to subvert the will of the American people
and enact what was essentially a year long, years long
coup with the objective of trying to usurp the president
from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.
The coup involved a misuse of intelligence, weaponization of law
enforcement agencies, and sustained campaign to delegitimize a city President
(22:36):
and now I just saw this on Yahoo News this morning. Well,
Colci Gabert is lying. It's already been We've already got
all the information we need. It was false information, President Obama.
This is, according to Gabert, the Director of the CIA,
John Brennan, and others fabricated the Russia hoax, suppressed intelligence.
(23:00):
Putin was preparing for a Clinton victory, manufacturing findings from
shoddy sources, disobeyed IC standards, and knowingly lied to the
American people. This means that President Barack Obama and the
US leaders directing intelligence agencies at the time lied about
the whole Russian collusion thing. President Richard Nixon resigned and
(23:21):
was under a threat of impeachment for lying to the
American people. President Bill Clinton was impeached for lying to
the American people about services rendered in the Oval Office
by well Monica Lewinsky. He wasn't impeached over the act.
He was impeached for because he lied about it. Lying
to the American public is a big deal. This is
(23:42):
not the kind of thing that should go quietly into
the dark. As the Golden Age finally gets his chance
to unveil itself and Obama didn't just lie. They took
that lie, and they then created a giant conspiracy his administration,
using American US intelligence back false claims about Trump and
(24:02):
Russia doing what they could to try and sabotage a
peaceful transition of power.
Speaker 3 (24:09):
Didn't.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
The Democrats claim that trying to overturn an election and
messing with an election is insurrection. While they were deceptively
barking about January sixth, twenty twenty one, the Democrats lied
to Americans about Russian interference and smeared Trump as a
treason as colluterer with Russia.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
Obama lied to Americans.
Speaker 1 (24:30):
In speeches about Russian election and interference, well knowing that
US intelligence, before he ordered them to change their assessment,
had assessed his statements to be false. They erected a
totalitarian censorship edifice under the pretext of misinformation and disinformation.
To cap the deception, they blatantly leaked false intelligence to
(24:53):
the Washington Posts. They falsely claimed that Russia used cyber
means to influence the outcome of the election. The narrative
spread throughout the willing corporate media web like a virus,
infecting the news cycles with false information and filling the
heads of Americans with doctored information and false claims in
the hopes of hamstringing the first Trump presidency. An echo
(25:15):
chamber was created, and the mainstream media is selling that
Trump was a creasonous colluder with Russia, the collusion smear
against Trump. In the process of it, Obama intelligence officials
(25:35):
lie to Congress. Obama himself was involved in ensnaring Trump's
first national security advisor and yet another fabricated scandal using
spine leaking, a manipulation of US intelligence.
Speaker 3 (25:49):
And as this is going on, the knuckleheads.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
And the lift say, oh, it's all big lie Le's
that's say said originally they are liars. Of course they're
gonna say, oh, yeah, she's lying. I hope she is
being honest, that she has tangible, hardcore evidence. I believe
she does, and she is given to the Department of Justice.
(26:13):
This information, I mean, this goes away beyond This goes
way beyond crossfire, Hurricane. This goes all the way back
to even before Trump was elected the first time.
Speaker 3 (26:23):
And here's the key.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
And I was watching this investigative journalist, John Solomon, not
just watching him on another show yesterday, but he was
on Steve Bannon's real American voice, and he said that
Pam Bondy doesn't have to seek a grand jury or
an indictment in Washington, DC either, where the jury pool
is coming from a ninety percent Democrat environment because of
(26:45):
the Mara Lago raid makes it a part of the conspiracy.
The case can be brought in Florida or several over
acts of the conspiracy occurred. Solomon also explained that the
conspiracy spanned multiple events, including the Trump Trump Russia hoax,
Ukraine impeach, even the FBI's refusal to act on intelligence
(27:05):
regarding Chinese interference in the twenty twenty election. It's all
a part of a giant conspiracy, which means they can
all pull it into one. They didn't want to help
Donald Trump, so they ignored a potential counterintelligence threat when
it came to China. It allows for a very large
series of events to be wrapped into a single conspiracy.
(27:28):
This is what we so. This could be huge. They
could go back beyond ten years, Still get Brennan, Still
get all of these guys with more serious charge of
the conspiracy out of a coup. Now Barack Obama is
not the clean, untouchable messiah. After all, the former president
(27:52):
is now at the center of the entire Russia hoax
with evidence to back it up. HU to Obama's framing
of Trump as some would be Russian asset lead to
something bigger that may even allow the former president to
be prosecuted for his part in Dare I say it insurrection? Yes,
I understand that we've got the immunity case for presidents,
(28:16):
but that's regarding presidents in the process of carrying out
their presidential duties. Treason is not a presidential duty. If
false intelligence early was manufactured at the president's request, then
Barack Obama is a really big trouble. He engaged in treason,
his conspiracy, and I could totally see Barack Obama being arrested,
(28:43):
Barack Obama going before jury, Barack Obama being convicted, and
Barack Obama in jail. In fact, Trump put a video
on his Trump Social page of Obama being arrested.
Speaker 3 (28:57):
It's kind of funny to watch.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
Senate Republicans are also meanwhile reopening the Clinton email probe.
Several thumb drives were never analyzed the DOJ's prior investigation
to the Hillary Clinton's email server also served as a piece
of the overall conspiracy against Trump. The information related to
Hillary Clinton's emails constitute material evidence in Obama's broader criminal
(29:22):
conspiracy and contained information relevant to the conspiracy investigation. In
the batch of information is also some of Obama's emails
and purported communications with the Democratic National Convention people like
chairman then chairman Wi Wassaman Schultz, and two different individuals
who worked for the soro's Open Society foundations. The intelligence
(29:45):
reports allege that the Obama administration took efforts to scuttle
the investigation into Clinton to protect her candidacy and to
protect him. Weeks after Comy exonerated Clinton in a public statement,
Comy's FI formally open the bogus Crossfire Hurricane investigation and
a Trump president truck's just proven collusion with Russia?
Speaker 3 (30:08):
Could it be?
Speaker 1 (30:10):
Could it be that finally the orange jumpsuits are gonna
be handed out. I'm hopeful, but unfortunately I can't hold
my breath on this one. I might not make it.
We'll be back. Don't go anywhere.
Speaker 5 (30:37):
You got a dent in your door, scratch in your fender,
or a cratch in your door and a dent in
your fender. If you need auto detailing, if you need
buyer shooting decals on the side of your car, if
you need a rally stripe right down the middle of
your hardtop, I don't care what it is. The Patriots
at All Star Collision are the place you want to go.
They're the only place to go by twenty two Railroad
Street in Corona. Web address all Star ci dot com.
(31:00):
See all that they do and what they're all about
well number nine five one two seven, nine nine one
sixty one All Star Collision d Kings of Reck and
Roll help.
Speaker 6 (31:09):
Me fight the good fight. This radio program is funded
by advertising dollars. So if you are a business, add
Constitution Radio with Douglas V. Gibbs to your business portfolio.
If you are a listener, become a patron of the
businesses advertising on this program. Without advertising, your weekend dose
of truth ends with more advertising.
Speaker 3 (31:29):
Constitution Radio with Douglas V.
Speaker 6 (31:31):
Gibbs grows and we will be on the way to
win the battle to restore the Republic. To learn more,
email us at Constitution Speaker at yahoo dot com, or
visit Douglas V. Gibbs dot com.
Speaker 7 (31:44):
If you've been waiting to go solar, don't wait any longer.
Propose legislation ending a thirty percent federal tax credit could
pass this summer and go into effect by December thirty first.
With utility rates rising year after year and summer hikes
with no end in sight, now is the time to
walk in and fixed energy costs for years to come.
As Guard Energy is a local, family owned company that
(32:05):
serves southern California since two thousand and eight, with over
four thousand flawless installs and personalized service you can trust
call eight five five seven six zero energy. That's eight
five five seven six zero three six three seven before
waiting costs you thirty percent more. As Guard Energy local, trusted, proven, we.
Speaker 1 (32:36):
Are the socialists will decided your individual Entergy's personal freedom, Sandman,
individuality will be added to our own.
Speaker 3 (32:46):
Resistance is futile. Welcome back Constitution Radio Douglas V.
Speaker 1 (33:04):
Gibbs kmy T fourteen nine named so, I just spent
a lot of time talking about I talked about the
socialist foundation of the Democratic Party, the lies, the games,
all of that.
Speaker 3 (33:17):
Going all the way back to you know, years before.
Speaker 1 (33:20):
And then I got into the secret Russia meeting with
Obama and Clapper and Brennan and Komy and so on
and so forth. And I really went into quite a
bit of detail, not as much detail.
Speaker 3 (33:33):
As my article. You want to read the article, go
to Douglas v.
Speaker 1 (33:36):
Gibbs dot com, hit the blog link and find Russia's
hoaxes records point at Obama. But you know, and I
went through all of this, and and I'm thinking of
myself as I'm saying this, and I'm going through all
this information.
Speaker 3 (33:55):
We knew all along.
Speaker 1 (33:57):
This is not something we didn't know, but now the
public will get to know. And I don't care how
much law fair they tried to play. I don't care
how many games they played, how many lines they put
out there, and how much the media was complicit in
all of this. In the end, the court that matters
the most is the court of public opinion. And I
(34:19):
think the court of public opinion is finally conveniing.
Speaker 3 (34:24):
Get us. What's your thoughts?
Speaker 4 (34:28):
Well, kind of like I said during the break, and
what you've said is just kind of prompted to me.
You don't want to say this again, but you and
I talked jumped suits years ago. Durham. Durham should have
been able to do this, Bill Barr, you know, this
(34:49):
is the stuff you and I wave your career.
Speaker 3 (34:51):
The problem. They were part of the problems.
Speaker 4 (34:53):
Well, and and I'm going to use this the catapult
and the other thing that you and I were talking
about during the break, the fact fact that Durham and
bar either had access to this or did not have
access to it. If they didn't have access, then how
do you audit If you don't have access, You know,
(35:13):
they're part of the victim as well because they didn't know.
If they knew and they didn't do it, then they're
part of the cover up. So do you add Durham
and Bar to the names of call me and Brennan
and Clapper. I don't know. But the fact that we
did not get the information. Then the fact that I
(35:35):
can be an American right now and I don't listen
to ABC and NBC, MSNBC and all these because it's
BSc and n I mean, I know you do it
for opposition research, okay, But the fact that ABC and
NBC put your report and you confirmed it during the break,
and I've read this elsewhere that they have never covered
(35:57):
this story at all. This is a huge story. They
aren't covering at all is proof to me that they're
part of the conspiracy. What is their justification? I think
that the FEC should look at what they're not doing.
(36:18):
You know, if my freedom of speech is being restricted,
if I can't speak on Yahoo, on Google, on Facebook,
if I can't speak, and if I bring it up,
you know, I'm the the DOJ hits me as a
domestic terrorist and wants to come after me. You know.
(36:40):
So if I'm not able to speak, I'm being violated.
If I'm not able to hear, I'm also being violated.
And I think Trump ought to look at this and
raise hell over the fact that NBC and ABC are
not coming out with credible public awareness coverage. And because
(37:03):
they aren't doing that, unless they start doing that, they're
going to be investigated as part of the hopes. I
put the gun right against their head, you know. And
I was thinking also that if we can't hit the
target with this, I mean, you're sitting there, Doug, with
a twelve gage shotgun three feet from the target, and
(37:23):
you can't hit the target.
Speaker 3 (37:29):
I hear you.
Speaker 4 (37:33):
So that's kind of my side. Take everything else you
talked about, Yeah, we've all known it. A lot of
us have known it, felt it. And like I say,
I've got a picture of the notes that Peter Struck
took during one of his meetings back in January of
twenty seventeen with those same people in the room, and
(37:56):
his notes were saying that there's no case. But then
he brags about the fact that he was so glad
him and Lisa about being part of this great movement
to stop Trump when he knows it was fake. They
all knew it was fake, so that at all get
(38:17):
the same punishment. And I agree, there's no immunity, and
there's an f word that in business you can't get
away from, and that's fraud. Okay, I don't believe there's
a statute of limitations for fraud and for them to
(38:41):
perpetrate what they've perpetrated. I don't know how you hand
behind immunity. Immunity is to protect you, so you have
the freedom to exercise your judgment based upon what you
know in good faith as you carry out your responsibilities
in a public you know, whether it be policemen, rather
it be the president or whatever. This this treason, his act,
(39:04):
as she calls it, is not anything they can be
protected because it's not anything he should be able to do,
let alone give him immunity for it, and I yield.
Speaker 1 (39:15):
You know, I uh, Normally I would say, well, you know,
these social media and these news agencies and stuff. You know,
it's a privately owned business and they don't want to
give that information. That's their business. However, they are receiving
federal funding. They are in collusion with segments of the government.
Speaker 4 (39:35):
Well, they have a license from the government, right.
Speaker 1 (39:42):
But you know, I'm a I'm a believer in freedom
and liberty, but I do not. It's it's like I
talk about corporations, and I know a lot of people
get it all into it about big corporations and the
robber barons, blah blah, blah blah. I don't care if
the rich get rich and successful get successful, and they
even try to wield a little in ones in the
consumer world. But the moment they start colluding with government,
(40:05):
shoot them down. Now that said Alan, Yeah, oh, the
Obama Russia hog all of that. It's a big deal,
the left saying, Cholsey Gabbert's lying. She says, Hey, I've
got the evidence and I've given it the Pam BONDI
(40:26):
what's your thoughts.
Speaker 2 (40:28):
Well, I'll think I'll open a little differently than you two.
Speaker 3 (40:32):
I'm shocked. I know.
Speaker 2 (40:34):
That's why I'm glad you're sitting down. As you all
have covered it, there's certain words that are phrases that
have been mentioned that I would like to talk about
because it adds context to the whole conversation. Early on
it was mentioned that somebody considered our government's border security
(40:58):
and this is decades ago and liking it to the
Berlin Wall. Well, I've been to the Berlin Wall, saw
it in Berlin, went through it at checkpoint Charlie went
into East Berlin and the guys on top of the
wall they had firearms, rifles, and they were pointed in
(41:19):
to East Berlin. They weren't pointed into West Berlin to
keep people out. They were there to keep people in.
And that wall was so serious throughout where I saw
it in East Germany. Even driving along the roadways not
quite a freeway, they had fence, you know, right, and
(41:42):
on top of the fence was razor wire. The whole
thing was about keeping people in. No one was trying
to get in to East Germany. So liking it to
have your protected borders like you have protected borders that.
Speaker 1 (42:03):
You're well, and that was and that was actually and
that's exactly true. And that's why I brought that up
is it shows the warp view that the left has.
Progressive left ask you know what the truth is what
they see are two different things, right, but they see
it because there the god do whatever they can to
support their narrative.
Speaker 2 (42:26):
Continuing on the this idea of and you've talked about
this before, which is there's a let's say there's a
political spectrum mhmm from one side to the other, and
just go with the narrative. You got left and right
(42:47):
full left communism. You might even put a monarchy or
dictatorship in there. It's total control, means of protection, property, everything, media,
everything that is communist, with the understanding is that you'll
(43:09):
lead a happier, better life because everything is controlled for
your benefit.
Speaker 3 (43:15):
And equal.
Speaker 2 (43:17):
Well it's equal. I mean it's interesting, yes, the okay,
when I think of equality, I kind of have an
idea of what that means, which some than others, you know,
which which begs the question, how is it you have
billionaires in China, the most communist country in.
Speaker 1 (43:37):
The Worldism, they play games, they play they play the
game with the government so they get favorability.
Speaker 2 (43:45):
So you have that, and then going along that spectrum,
the next place is fascist.
Speaker 3 (43:50):
Government collusion and all I was talking about me go ahead.
Speaker 2 (43:53):
Got fascists. Yeah, and Nazis. They're not far right, they're
almost full left because they're about not ownership of property,
which communism is means of production and property. They're about controlling,
not owning, the means of production, and that's type control.
(44:16):
Then you get to the middle and I don't mean
necessarily physically, but it's the constitution. And then you go
far right, which you've talked about before, which is anarchy.
Understanding what the political spectrum is I think is very
helpful and not just throwing terms out because it fits
(44:39):
a narrative or fits an agenda. How's communism doing today
in this world? Well, let's go to China for one.
China is a massive country. And when I talk about China,
I'm not really talking about the country or the people
or the culture. I'm talking about the CCP, who owns
(45:04):
China the CCP. In twenty twenty, the World Health Organization
did a investigation of the most polluted cities in the world.
Probably can still find it this is twenty twenty, that
five hundred of the most polluted cities in the world
(45:26):
approximately of my memory, two hundred and sixty over half
the most polluted cities in the world were in China alone.
Over four hundred of the five hundred were in China
and five other countries. And how many of the five
hundred most polluted cities in the world are in the
US or were in the US got a guest dog.
(45:50):
Zero zero and we have to go green. It's horrendous
what is being done to that country environmentally and to
the people because they're living in it. If this is
what communism brings, you don't want it, then you can
(46:13):
get you can get to even in some ways even
worse North Korea. I mean, I met somebody the other
day who is from South Korea and we talked about it.
He is a younger guy, and that okay, that that
border splitting, split families. Yeah, if you had in your
(46:39):
family line people in North Korea, you don't know about
them because you can't call them, you can't write them, everything,
everything is controlled. That this is not a good way to.
Speaker 1 (46:53):
Live, and that they are convinced they've been told through
propaganda that they have a good there in North Korea.
Speaker 3 (47:01):
The rest of the word's worse. That's why.
Speaker 2 (47:05):
That's why you can't call them, That's why they don't
have internet access. Goes on and on.
Speaker 3 (47:11):
It would ruin the deception. Right.
Speaker 2 (47:14):
Another word that's our words in the conversation that I
think needs to be fully understood insurrection. An insurrection isn't
a party gone back. An insurrection is a violent uprising
against an authority or government. Emphasis on violent uprising caring
(47:38):
science is not violent. Being in a protest is not violent.
I guess I should have looked up the definition violent.
Speaker 3 (47:47):
Sorry.
Speaker 2 (47:48):
Another word out there which was used in the beginning
but has gone away as coup. A coup nice French
word is a sudden, violent exercise of force and unlawssful,
unlawful seizure of power from a government. Was any power seized?
Speaker 3 (48:08):
No, well, they're sure as a hell of an attempt.
Speaker 1 (48:11):
And it doesn't have to be by violent means to
be a coup in my opinion.
Speaker 2 (48:16):
No, I'm I'm talking about J six mm. There was
no seizure of power.
Speaker 3 (48:24):
Right.
Speaker 2 (48:26):
In other words that you used that's out there now.
I have when people disagree with me, which is often
I have four questions that I want to be answered
because often I'm a student and I want to learn.
I'm not about being right. I'm about learning, getting knowledge
and sharing it. I'm not vested in you know, some
(48:50):
agenda and my four questions. You know my four questions, Doug,
I think I've heard them before, But go ahead, four questions.
If someone disagrees with me and I say this politely,
of course, what did I say that's wrong? Why is
it wrong? What's correct? And why is it correct? Help
(49:10):
me learn what I find is. You know, usually what
precedes that is the statement, well, that's misinformation or disinformation. Okay,
if it's misinformation, tell me why labeling something doesn't make
(49:33):
that actually accurate. It's a way of not having the conversation.
And we need to have the conversation because and then
because in the process, when you have a healthy conversation
as opposed to an argument, debate, name calling, fingerpointing, when
(49:53):
you have a conversation, you're able to get out there
and see how much comm and ground you stand on
them with someone else. And what happens when you find
out you actually have or potentially have a lot of
common ground that you stand on. Now you have a connection.
(50:14):
But when it's just back and forth yelling, screaming, arguing,
name calling, labeling, no one's getting anywhere because apparently they're
not vested in learning, they're vested in being right.
Speaker 3 (50:31):
How's that? How that's fine?
Speaker 2 (50:33):
Okay?
Speaker 1 (50:35):
Now I want to point out that not everybody calls
nine five one nine two two three five three.
Speaker 3 (50:40):
Two to call on the show.
Speaker 1 (50:41):
There's a few people who know me well enough that
they'll text me during the program. One of our listeners texted.
Speaker 2 (50:47):
Me, right, well, that's almost it's a call.
Speaker 3 (50:50):
Yeah, monkey might and uh high monkey and text this.
Speaker 1 (50:57):
Comparing the Berlin and US border walls, cost Ortes raised
eyebrows overcommon in March of twenty nineteen, comparing President Trump's
border wall plans with a Berlin Wall, a Cold War
symbol of communist oppression that divided Germany for nearly three decades.
The New York Democrat made her remarks during a live
stream video for her supporters, during which she discussed the
(51:19):
scrutiny she received since she won last the pre prior
year's election. No matter how I feel about the wall,
I think it's a moral abomination. I think it's like
the Berlin Wall. I think it's like any other wall
designed to separate human beings and block out people who
are running away from humanitarian disasters. The Berlin Wall wasn't
(51:39):
there to block people out away from running away from
the humanitarian disasters. It was, I mean it was, but no,
it was the other way, yeah, the reverse. But she's
basically saying, well that the wall between Mexico is like
is like putting up a wall to keep people from
going to Eastmany. West Romany is basically Mexico being like
(52:02):
East Germany. And I says being like West Germany. That's
what That's what she was making a comparison.
Speaker 2 (52:08):
The other thing is just one more thing on the wall.
When I was there and we went in, we went
into East Berlin from West Berlin at Checkpoint Charlie. When
you go in, there's this big empty area before you
get to the actual guardhouse that lets you into East Berlin.
It's kind of a grassy area with a lot of obstacles.
(52:33):
I called that the kill zone because there's no place
to hide when you're trying to approach the wall from
in essence, East Berlin, you're completely out in the open.
That's the and the and the guys on the wall.
Speaker 4 (52:51):
M M.
Speaker 2 (52:52):
They're looking.
Speaker 1 (52:56):
All right, and with just a couple of minutes left,
what what are we talking about here? We're talking about
I mentioned communism earlier, the Democrats, and that's what they're about.
And all my life it was creeping incrementalism. Get back
to the frog in the pot, little here, little there.
They thought they saw their goal, They thought they were
almost there with the Obama and Hillary Trump stopped it,
(53:21):
but they still believe they're really close. The veil is gone,
the hiding, the creeping incrementalism is gone. I remember back
when Hillary ran and Bernie Sanders, because he's so radical,
was pushed out of the way so that Hillary could
get the primary. Now Bernie's mainstream Democrat, AOC is mainstream.
Speaker 3 (53:50):
Democrat.
Speaker 1 (53:52):
And now the radical Camir apparent apparently is Mom Donnie,
who is now surfaced on the streets of Gotham embracing
this radical mystique and and uh and and he is
he and and he is Communists. The whole party has
lurched leftward even more than it was. Mamdani is the
(54:15):
logical move leftward for them. Hopefully the GOP will continue
to capitalize on his rise to warn Americans that radical
figures like Mam Donnie now represent the future of the
Democratic Party and the current state of the Democratic Party.
We need to recognize the Democrats are not what they
(54:38):
claim to be or what they have claimed to be
in the past. They are not they're they're the communists
in their party are not fringe candidates.
Speaker 3 (54:47):
They are the norm.
Speaker 1 (54:49):
And this is the result of a generation taught to
despise its own founding, despite its own country can and
be convinced that the Constitution is an outdated relic seduced
by the utopians of equality, and by force New York
embraces a communist future, but it affects all of us.
Speaker 3 (55:09):
We may not get another chance.
Speaker 1 (55:11):
We need to stop it even there, all right, plug yourself, sir.
Speaker 2 (55:17):
Five to seven pm, Sunday's West Coast time on Patriot Soapbox.
Check us out on for the Republic.
Speaker 1 (55:25):
Thank you, Allen, Thank you Dennis Jackson for being on
this episode with me United, We stand combined with you.
But God bless America, my friends, God bless you.
Speaker 3 (55:34):
Visit me. Douglas Vgibbs dot com. Douglas v Gibbs dot com.
Speaker 1 (55:38):
Douglas v gibbs dot com and hit the join link
in the link bar and become a nine dollars a
month patron. Help fund the movement, be a part of
the movement. Let's move forward. We'll see you next time.
Thanks for being here, Bye bye now
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.