Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
But what is it that ANTIFA is looking for?
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Like why are they doing like why is this enemy
doing this? What is it that they want?
Speaker 3 (00:15):
Answer?
Speaker 4 (00:15):
That is it?
Speaker 5 (00:16):
I mean it's simply the violent overthrow of the government.
Speaker 6 (00:19):
I mean what is it?
Speaker 3 (00:20):
Yes, for the for the ultimate the ultimate goal is
to destroy the United States. Antifa as a movement, it
is anarchist communism. Like people sometimes have just simply branded
them as communists, that's not the full picture.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
The reality is that extreme.
Speaker 3 (00:38):
There are communists and Antifa, but they're more so. The
majority of them are anarchists and anarchist communists, and so
they the violence is done essentially out of nihilism, and
that's why there's such brutality in it, setting buildings on
fire when people are inside, or in the case of
in June, the ice facility locked, trying to lock and
(01:00):
barricade the doors on that as facility inside it on
fire when there are people inside. These type of brutal, cruel,
sub human type of acts of violence, and their motto
is become ungovernable. So they want to destroy not just
the US as a nation, but they don't necessarily replace
it with like a communist regime. They want to destroy
(01:22):
everything all these institutions, the concept of nation states. So
when they do things like aid in giving out drug paraphernalia,
there's a reason for that. In the homelessness they believe
it's in an mass homelessness they view as an attack
on capitalism, is destabilizing two communities.
Speaker 4 (01:43):
They like that.
Speaker 3 (01:44):
They know that the money from the drugs that are
flowing in that are killing people, helps foreign and international
cartel networks that keeps migrants coming in. All that's meant
to destabilize the US. They know they don't have the tanks,
so the type of weapons that can compete with the
US military. So their goals are attacking infrastructure and playing
(02:09):
a very long game, and they've had a lot of success.
Speaker 4 (02:11):
I mean twins.
Speaker 5 (02:14):
And there you go.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
Welcome to Constitution Radio. Douglas Speak Gibbs k E T
fourteen ninety am. What that is as an interview, I'm
trying to remember the gentleman's name that was talking escapes
me at the moment. But this is an interview that
lays out what antifa is all about. Now, if you
listen to the mainstream media, Antifa doesn't exist.
Speaker 5 (02:36):
Why it's just.
Speaker 2 (02:37):
Some you know, just a bunch of kids being you know,
silly and getting together and putting on black There's no organization,
there's no there's no direction, there's no funding behind it.
It's just you know that these you know, these these protesters,
and besides, it's mostly peaceful protesting anyway. No, Antifa is
an organization. It is an organized organization receiving monies. And
(03:00):
in fact, there's a headline that just I was just
looking at the other day. I'm looking for it right
now on my computer, and by the time I get
to it'll probably be too late. So I will just
go from what I can remember is that there is
a whistleblower that has exposed that a lot of antifa's
(03:26):
funding are coming from organizations tied to George Soros and China.
So we have this organization, and so now here's the
reason why I bring this up.
Speaker 5 (03:38):
Donald J.
Speaker 2 (03:38):
Trump has the National Guard coming into cities to a
help assist ice in executing the laws of the United States.
Article one, section eight Constitution says that the militia may
be called up to execute the laws of the Union.
But after that Article one, section eight, it says suppress insurrections.
(04:01):
This is not Article four, Section four, where it says
that in the case of domestic violence that let me
read it word for word, the United States will guaranteed
every state in this Union a republican form of government,
and shall protect each of them against invasion and on
application of the legislature or of the executive when the
(04:23):
legislature cannot be convened against domestic violence, domestic violence, basic
domestic violence just for the just because there's violence going on,
the federal government can't just suddenly bring in federal personnel
and interstate and inter accounting without the sheriff's okay, and
just start taking control. That clause they are an artic four.
(04:48):
Section four is a result of the founding father's fear
of a standing army being used against the people. But
Founding Folence also realize there's going to be times when
there needs to be a force, a show of force
in certain situations when it comes to executing federal.
Speaker 5 (05:09):
Law, it may be necessary.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
Their example before they wrote this document was Shay's Rebellion,
where the veterans of the Revolutionary War were ticked because
the money was that they were given for fighting the
war was worthless, and so they rebelled. They were blocking
the front steps of courthouses, and they were doing it
(05:33):
with their guns. And part of the problem was the
government then had no way of dealing with it. And
the states are like, well, we use our militias. No,
it's the militia that's reacting. We need a central federal
authority that can take care of this kind of business.
In George Washington's presidency, that opportunity came up quickly the
(05:55):
Whiskey Rebellion, where there was an armed rejection of federal law,
a tax on whiskey. Whether or not it was a
right law, wrong law, good law, bad law, is not
the point. It was federal law. And the tax agent
would enter these towns who collect the tax, and they
were attacked by the by the barrel of a rifle.
(06:22):
Things were being done to them, They were being detained
by the rebels, and so on and so forth. So
President George Washington, with the militia came into the area
with a show of force to take care of business this.
These people who participated in the Whiskey rebellion, many of
(06:44):
them then were brought up on charges of insurrection, treason, rebellion. Now,
now let me read article on section eight again to
provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws
of Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions. If it's insurrection activity,
the for government doesn't have to ask the state's permission
(07:05):
to be there. What is insurrection? Is Antifa insurrection? We
played the audio. Yes, their goal, their plan. It is
an organization. It is an organized effort to overthrow our system,
as it is to overthrow our constitution, to overthrow any
(07:28):
constitutional government, and to create chaos to be ungovernable. So yes,
President Trump has the authority to have a show of force,
to bring in the militia, the National Guard into these
cities to get this under control. But you have to
understand who are up against. The Democrats hate well, any
(07:54):
show of force. I guess they hate what President Trump's
trying to do, and they hate anything military. You want
an example, let's let's let's bring up And I didn't
even know about this till right before the show. Uh,
my co host Alan Myers brought this up. And that's why
(08:15):
I'm gonna let him talk first. I know he's excited.
The five Freeway is going to be closed for for
four hours today because of a marine Corps anniversary event
at Camp Penland. They're gonna have live fire, and the
(08:39):
Marine Corps is like, hey, there's been previous instances where we've.
Speaker 5 (08:44):
Had live fire.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
Public highways remain open because you know, this is now
me because military is not so stupid to like let
bombs and bullets hit cars on the freeway. But Newsome,
being the idiot that he is, shutting down.
Speaker 5 (09:02):
From Harbor Drive.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
In in Oceanside to Barcelonia Road, basically at the north
end of Camp penal In there right right before you
get to San Clemente. And this is a major this
is a major artery in California. Eleven am three pm.
(09:27):
That thing is shut down. It's a major artery. I
don't care. I used to drive a big writ through
there a lot. I don't care what time of date is.
There's a lot of traffic. But this idiot that who
is governor of California, Oh, it's gonna be a lit fire.
We got to protect everybody, shut down the freeway. He
wants to send a message that the military is not
(09:49):
capable of controlling itself, and it ties into what Trump
is doing.
Speaker 5 (09:53):
In the cities. If they can't control themselves, right, there
on their own basis.
Speaker 2 (09:57):
How can they control themselves in the cities going after
Antifa or assisting Ice. They're out of control. You can't
trust the military. Shut down, the freeway shut down, Trump
shut down. Everything has to do with the military. That's
the message he's sending. Now, gentlemen, I have a bunch
of stories today. We never get through one or two.
(10:20):
I want to try to get to at least four
of them. So I'm gonna ask you to give me
a concise, precise opinion five minutes max, and then move
let's move on to the next story. So Alan, Yeah,
so you heard the video, the audio of that video,
that interview, heard what I've had to say. You're the
one that came up, you know, showed me this story
(10:42):
and it all ties into the same stuff in my opinion.
Speaker 5 (10:45):
What's your thoughts?
Speaker 1 (10:48):
Well, in addition to this, commemorating the two hundred and
fiftieth first day of the Marine Corps, vice President will
be there, m And Okay, I believe the Marine Corps,
(11:09):
among the all all the military branches, they deal with
live fire.
Speaker 7 (11:15):
It's kind of a normal thing for it's it's kind
of yeah, we have you know, we don't practice with
rubber bands and squirt guns.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
The and for those who would not know, Penalton Campellan
is an enormous space, huge lot of property. Instead of
working something out or confirming with the military at Camp Pendleton,
(11:45):
Hey guys, I'm the governor of California. I want to
make sure that people on I five are safe. Uh,
can you can confirm and you know, show to me
that you're not going to send any ammunition, any live
fire over the freeway.
Speaker 2 (12:02):
Well, let me let me give you a line from
that article I just read at CBS. Despite the US
Marine Corps previous insistence that public highways would remain open,
in other words, it's no big deal, right.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
And the thing is this got announced apparently this morning,
which means for people who are who are planning.
Speaker 5 (12:26):
To yeah, they got no heads up.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
Got you no heads up? And and you know the
announcement came through the California Highway Patrol. Where's the you know,
if you haven't shown that there's a danger, why are
you doing this now?
Speaker 5 (12:48):
Notify because in his opinion, there is a danger.
Speaker 1 (12:51):
Well, notify everybody in the state. By the way, if
you're traveling this roadway between this time they're maybe while
you're traveling this fifteen mile stretch there may be live
fire activity going on to Campenal. Then if that worries you,
don't drive between eleven and three. Let people make the decision.
(13:13):
They're capable of doing it. With Antifa, you know, and
we've talked about this before in the program. People get
confused between far left and far right, and antifa is
about being quote unquote anti fascist, which is just inside
(13:38):
the far left of communism. It's government control, but some
public some private ownership, but it's still government control and regulation.
If they're Antifa and they don't want to be full
left commies, then what they're about is full right, and
full right is anarchy. And how safe are you going
(14:02):
to be in your life in the States state of anarchy.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
Well, the thing is too though, is historically anarchy is
not designed to remain. Typically what happens is when anarchy
historically is when anarchy takes place, then the chaos hits,
and then the very people created the anarchy says, oh,
we'll be your governance. So it's a far right action
for a far left result.
Speaker 1 (14:31):
Yeah, this is about oh you need us, so now
you'll want communism because you know you all can't represent
yourself or be involved.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
It's flowerd pivot, it's cloward pivot. You tear down the
whole system so you can build it up the way
you want it.
Speaker 1 (14:48):
So it's uh. But either way, if one of your
techniques of getting your way is to use violence, burn things,
steal things, whatever, her, Uh, that's not a good way.
That's just wrong.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
I'll leave it all right, Very good, Dennis. Your thoughts
about what we've discussed so far.
Speaker 6 (15:14):
Well, I think your comments on Holi Antifa, obviously that's
been something that Trevor, you know, has got into and
the yeah and the sorows many arms or solo says, let.
Speaker 2 (15:36):
Me pause because the audience, not not every the audience
may be familiar. Trevor Louden had had a book and
a movie which you were executive producer of Enemies Within,
and in it he explains how what was it a
hundred of or eighty or one hundred of the members.
Speaker 6 (15:54):
Of he said, he said, what would you think of
one hundred members of the US Congress could not pass
an FBI background chet.
Speaker 2 (16:03):
Because of their connections of communism or Islam or something right? Right,
because so anyway, so that's that's that's what he said, Trevor, folks,
that's what he's referred to.
Speaker 5 (16:11):
All right, go ahead, you.
Speaker 6 (16:12):
Know, and you know that was in you know, twenty fourteen,
twenty fifteen, you know, a year or two before the election.
And Antifa and other similar names of organizations. Again, they're
all the chaos companies. They're the people, as you alluded
to earlier, you know, are out to destroy and they're
(16:34):
they're doing the pivot move, trying to overload the government
in debt and in payments to the illegals to where
it basically breaks the system and the financial system will fail.
And what rises out of it. They supposedly don't really have,
(16:55):
you know, that great of a concern, but they do.
You know, nobody is a pure communist, nobody is a
true anarchist.
Speaker 5 (17:05):
You know.
Speaker 6 (17:05):
They want to replace it with something more to their liking.
There will be a rise of some other form of
tyranny and power and government, and it would be to
the devastation.
Speaker 8 (17:19):
Of the citizens of the United States, and.
Speaker 6 (17:22):
Wholly to destroy the Constitution because they know that it
is the foundation that our government is based on, and
it's enemy number one.
Speaker 8 (17:35):
Family is enemy number two.
Speaker 5 (17:37):
You know.
Speaker 6 (17:38):
One of the great lives of the devil was he
doesn't exist, and now they're copy and pasting that in.
You know, with this recent last couple of weeks that
Antipa doesn't exist.
Speaker 8 (17:50):
You know, it surely does.
Speaker 6 (17:52):
Keith Ellison, who was the Attorney General under Obama, they
have pictures of him holding the handbook for Matifa, you know,
we had pictures of that, you know, going back to
the days of Obama. So and his son is now
(18:12):
a politician and is of the ilk of his father
and doing everything he can, which is why they do
not want law enforcement to be funded, which is why
they do not want people to be held in jail.
They want to keep them on the street where they
can continue to attack law and order and the fighters
(18:39):
on and Trump hopefully, you know, I mean they are
to arrest.
Speaker 8 (18:47):
Ellison and just start rounding these people up. They are
the Democratic.
Speaker 6 (18:52):
Leaders and the faithful. They are traders in the United
States of America. George Soros how to be arrested. His
money should taken just like they do with the cartel money.
They got to go in and just take the money
out of the bank accounts. To me, they got to
go after Zuckerberg, to go after all these more soft targets,
(19:17):
because they're enabling, you know, the hard action of Antifa
and these others that are very well organized, and the
election stealing is all part of the undermining of the
law and order, you know, of the country. So twenty
(19:39):
twenty election theft. All of these people are of the
same ilk, even though they wear different uniforms. If they
have uniforms, Anti Fish uniform is black and masks and anonymous.
Speaker 8 (19:59):
And when you fight fire.
Speaker 6 (20:00):
With fire, life with ice doing that, they talk about
how one constitutional it is, but they support it on
the other side with the terrorists, anarchists, Antifa, right.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
Very good And as all this is going on, and
the idea is to throw around the idea that Trump
is some kind of authoritarian, he's some out of control
authoritarian that will use the military against everybody.
Speaker 5 (20:34):
And that he wants war and all this other stuff.
Speaker 2 (20:37):
Meanwhile, this is the guy who's in the Middle East
making a deal for peace between Hamas and Israel. And
this is something no one else could ever do. This
is something that no politician could accomplish. Take now, you know,
granted we have a businessman here and I guarantee you.
Speaker 5 (20:57):
I wasn't in on these conversations. I guarantee you.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
They went something like, hey, you know I can blow
you to smithereens I've done. You know, I dropped bunker
Buster in Pakistan, I took out i RAN's nuclear capabilities.
You know I could find smither rings. You you got
a choice, smith Rings? Or have I got a deal
for you. Let's make this new Middle East? You know, uh,
(21:22):
give it, you know, make make it an investment.
Speaker 5 (21:25):
You could be rich. So it's your choice.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
I kill you, or you'll work with me and you
and you get to take part in some great big
hotels or something. That's what I'm thinking. And understand that
that when he did this, in this deal came through,
We've got even some Democrats going, whoa.
Speaker 5 (21:47):
You've got to give them kudos. You know, we did
not see this coming.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
We did not expect this, We did not think it
was possible, and it hasn't been possible for the last
however many hundreds of years.
Speaker 6 (22:01):
Well, well, one of the one of the great lies
is this whole no king's deal. You know, he doesn't
want to be a king, and they're trying to use
the courts what they're doing now saying you can use
the National Guard, but you can't use the national Guard.
You know, they're trying to stop him from using his
executive authority. And if I were him, I would just
(22:22):
tell him to go to hell and do it anyway,
you know, kind of in the spirit of.
Speaker 5 (22:25):
And Andrew Jackson did exactly.
Speaker 6 (22:29):
It's exactly what I'm saying, is he just ought to
say no, I had the constitutional authority. I'm moving, you know,
rather because of UHU, the government and uh people that
are uh trying to I got a mental block on
the word what. What's the word I want? Uh? Not recession,
(22:53):
not secession?
Speaker 5 (22:54):
What I'm not sure where you were going there.
Speaker 8 (23:02):
Well, you know the people that are fighting against the government.
Speaker 5 (23:07):
Right now, right the insurrectionists, insurrection.
Speaker 6 (23:10):
That's the word I'm looking for, you know, is that
he's going after them. And you and I have talked
about orange suits for nearly a decade. You know, they
need to start rounding these guys up. You know, they
they've got called me. You know, they've got Bolton. You know,
they had to get a few more. They had to
get McCabe, you know, they had to get.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
And Jennifer let me interrupt you here for a second.
You're exactly right across the board. But see, this is
why this piece in the Middle East thing ties into
this in white. It's so big because see, it doesn't
matter what the left wants. It matters what the what
the court of public opinion thinks. And the court of
public opinion has been fooled for a very long time.
(23:55):
But this piece in the Middle East thing, what it
has done, it is is because because the people are
watching and the media can't spin it.
Speaker 5 (24:05):
They can't spin it against him. How do you spin
against Trump?
Speaker 2 (24:09):
Oh my gosh, he got Israel and Hamasta shake hands
and they're both saying thanks Trump boy.
Speaker 5 (24:14):
How horrible is that? I mean, how do you is that?
Speaker 2 (24:17):
I mean they can't right and put and and see
and So what it's doing, though, is it's it's it's
making the public Uh that does not haven't figured things
out yet? Look and say, wait a second, He's done
a great job here. He's not acting like an authoritarian.
(24:37):
What are they lying to us about because they've been
spinning everything this finally they can't spin it. I see
what Trump's doing and what it's And I'm a firm believer.
Speaker 5 (24:48):
That the big key here is the fact that the
court of public opinion.
Speaker 6 (24:53):
It's well, I hope, so I hope that the court
of the public opinion it gets smart enough and big
enough to where they reject you know, the no kings.
Speaker 8 (25:02):
He is not an authoritarian. He is a president who.
Speaker 6 (25:06):
Is exercising executive authority and his constitutional right down the line.
He's using the military correctly because there are insurrectionists people,
there are pockets of the Democrat Chicago, Portland, wherever, you know.
And now you've got Congress, you know, trying to pass
the law saying that he can't do anything in Venezuela,
(25:27):
you know, unless they declare war.
Speaker 8 (25:29):
No.
Speaker 6 (25:30):
Now, that's not the way it works. He's the commander
in chief, for God's love the world. They didn't send
the committee. If he feels its power, then Congress can
try to check him after the fact, but they're trying
to get out.
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Of national security is his primary function, that's it.
Speaker 5 (25:49):
And he can wage war.
Speaker 2 (25:50):
And we talked about this even when other presidents were there.
Speaker 8 (25:53):
That's trying.
Speaker 2 (25:54):
The president can wage war without decoration if he feels
its necessary for national security.
Speaker 6 (26:01):
And he's being effective enough to where they're trying to
bollox him up now with Congress, just like they're trying
trying to bollox them up with the courts, and he
just needs to continue on his merry way.
Speaker 2 (26:13):
Absolutely, Alan, you've listened to us talking about this. I've
thrown in the piece of Middle East. How that throws
a boomerang into the left hatred of him.
Speaker 5 (26:21):
What's your thoughts about that part of the discussion.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
One thing I'd like to see everybody in my office
say is before they talk about what they want to do,
plan to do, hope to do, I like them to
lead in with this is why what I'm planning or
hoping to want is constitutional. I know I'm dreaming.
Speaker 2 (26:46):
And when the Democrats use Constitution General Welfare yeah, or
their version of the Congress clause yes.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
I would really like this to be come expected listening audience,
mm hmm, because if we don't ask for it, we're
not going to get it.
Speaker 2 (27:05):
Well, here's the thing, Alan, is this what's going on
is not just in this country though, we are up
against a global enemy. And I was reading and don't
get me wrong, I technology can be a wonderful thing.
Technology is a wonderful tool. I'm glad that AI is
(27:26):
a great tool. And as we navigate through this world
of technology, and we've had to do it more and
more and more as time passes, we have to do
everything we can digitally that's available digitally to secure our information,
to protect our our things online. I mean, we change
(27:47):
our We're supposed to change our passwords often. And you
know now they've got these multi factor authentication. You know,
you put in your passwords in a sense a text
to your phone or an email to your email address
or whatever. And you know, and we can with this
because we don't see a reason not to. We want
to keep our information safe. So we use the pin
numbers and the fingerprint scanning and the facial recognition and
(28:08):
all the other biometric methods. And it's a no brainer
in this age of technology that you've got to do
what you can to prove we are who we say
we are and not let other people try to beat you.
Speaker 5 (28:20):
And I mean it, it makes sense.
Speaker 2 (28:25):
But like anything, it can be used also for tyranny,
and I'm watching globally biometric verification. It's a powerful tool
privacy and security because you have unique biological traits, your fingerprints,
your irises, your facial geometry and so it's noly impossible
to replicate. And so the effectiveness of biometric verification is
(28:48):
a wonderful thing, and it technically it's not the problem.
The problem is regarding who runs the system. So can
we trust the watchers who hold our data and biological markers?
And so the reason why I bring this up is
Vietnam just recently deactivated over eighty six million bank accounts
under a new biometric verification mandate. You use biometric verification
(29:13):
for your account, or we hold your money, you use
the method we want you to use, or you can
have access.
Speaker 5 (29:18):
To your account.
Speaker 2 (29:19):
And so then a bunch of people say, well, they
seize those funds, and they said, no, we didn't seize
the funds. We just locked them away until account holders
submit to biometric athundication. And first thing I thought was,
you know.
Speaker 5 (29:32):
The Bord resistance is futile, right, and this.
Speaker 2 (29:37):
And for Christians, this reeks of you know, the mark
of the beast. It echoes warnings from the Trump administration
about Central Bank Digital currency Bank digital currency CBDC. It
mirrors Canada's freezing of Trucker's accounts when they defied government
orders and when paired with UK's new the UK's new
(29:57):
digital ID system, and that's not also forget you know, Greece,
during this financial crisis, the government imposed capital controls limiting
how much citizens could withdraw from their accounts. So you
combine all of that, and what we're looking at is
a threat against our financial freedom and our information freedom.
(30:18):
I want what and so, like I said, I welcome
these tools, but we also have to recognize the erosion
of liberty and the expansion expanding reach of government surveillance
through digital ideas, biometric verification, financial restrictions. And they're not
And this is all not just isolated innovations. I mean,
(30:41):
I get it. When individuals we decide to technologies, I
get it. I understand that they are part of a
larger architecture of control. Though how also, as technology becomes
inseparable from daily life, the solutions to modern challenges increasingly
relies on the vveryous systems that threaten our time autonomy.
But this is not just what's going on in America.
(31:03):
This is not just democrats. This is a worldwide phenomenon,
and the world is five or ten years ahead of
where we are in the sense of the tumble towards tyranny,
and we embrace these tools because they're convenient. We think
they're safe. But is convenience of safety? Is that a
good trade for freedom? If we allow germents to have
(31:25):
unfettered access and use of all these technologies. Remember Benjamin
Franklin right, Those who should give up essential liberty to
purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety.
Speaker 5 (31:36):
We shudder as.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
We watch global events unfold, sensing the alarms of our minds.
Then we close our eyes, unsure what to do, and
then we go back about our day, paying for everything
with our phone or a plastic car to get an
online because it's.
Speaker 5 (31:53):
A part of life. How do we fix this? What
do we do?
Speaker 2 (31:57):
And I hope those of you out there listening, I
hope you're angry, But what are you going to do
about it? How are you going to influence this? How
are we going to influence the system? Attend political meetings,
run for office, use cash most of the time. Because
I'll say one thing, the clock is ticking, it's happening fast.
Speaker 5 (32:14):
Let's go to break.
Speaker 2 (32:15):
When we come back, see what Dennis and Allen has
to say about what I just talked about. Don't go anywhere.
(32:37):
Help me fight the good fight. This radio program is
funded by advertising dollars. So if you are a business,
add Constitution Radio with Douglas V. Gibbs to your business portfolio.
If you are a listener, become a patron of the
businesses advertising on this program. Without advertising, your weekend dose
of truth ends with more advertising.
Speaker 5 (32:57):
Constitutional Radio with Douglas V.
Speaker 2 (32:58):
Gibs grows, and we will be on the way to
win the battle to restore the Republic.
Speaker 5 (33:03):
To learn more, email us.
Speaker 2 (33:04):
At Constitution Speaker at yahoo dot com or visit Douglas V.
Gibbs dot com. Repeal Democracy by Douglas V. Gibbs is
finally available. Doug Lady's book examines the importance of being
a republic, how we can restore a republic, Why democracy
is so dangerous. Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercise
(33:25):
for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. C. S.
Lewis And that is the very.
Speaker 5 (33:31):
First page that you'll see, right before chapter one and
Repeal Democracy. Repeal Democracy by Douglas V. Gibbs on sale now.
Speaker 4 (33:42):
If you've been waiting to go solder, don't wait any
longer propose. Legislation ending the thirty percent federal tax credit
could pass this summer and go into effect by December
thirty first. With utility rates rising year after year and
summer hikes with no end in sight, now is the
time to lock in fixed energy costs for years to come.
As Guard Energy is a local, family owned company that
(34:03):
serves southern California since two thousand and eight. With over
four thousand flawless installs and personalized service you can trust.
Call eight five five seven six zero energy. That's eight
five five seven six zero three six three seven before
waiting costs you thirty percent more as Guard Energy local,
trusted proven.
Speaker 9 (34:25):
You got a dent in your door, scratch in your fender,
or a cratch in your door and a dent in
your fender. If you need auto detailing, if you need
fire shooting decals on the side of your car, if
you need a rally stripe right down the middle of
your hardtop, I don't care what it is. The patriots
at All Star Collision are the place you want to go.
They're the only place to go. Buy twenty two Railroad
Street in Corona. Web address all Star ci dot com
(34:47):
to see all that they do and what they're all about.
Well number nine five one two seven, nine six one
All Star Collision, the Kings of reck and Roll.
Speaker 8 (35:06):
We are the socialists.
Speaker 2 (35:08):
Your individual dideries, personal freedoms, and mental individuality will be
added to our own.
Speaker 5 (35:16):
Resistance is futile and welcome back. Constution Radio Douglas H. Gibbs.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
I was just talking about political control through technology. We've
become dependent on it, you know, And then it started.
This whole idea started with a conversation I had with
my sister in law. She says, well, Doug, what do
you think of the real idea? You're against it?
Speaker 5 (35:47):
Right?
Speaker 2 (35:48):
That's I was I am, but I got it, And
she says, well, why because I can't operate without it.
This is what they're doing. We've got so but I
don't know if the word addicted is right. That's what
I'm gonna use to technology that we're like, we're just
like the cattle being herded right in through the gates easily.
(36:08):
We're happy to because we don't see any other way,
of any other way to go. And so what the
world is creating is this surveillance fortress through technology. And
you know, the I get it biometric and all that.
That's it's a good way to keep our stuff protected.
(36:32):
But who's going to watch the watchers? So Alan, what's
your thoughts?
Speaker 1 (36:39):
This is a great topic, very powerful, and very scary
for me. It on the face of a lot of this,
it sounds very easy, very convenient. Oh, all I have
to do is look and they'll the system, whatever the
system is, will look at my eyes and say, I'm me.
(37:03):
Isn't this great? Or it might be a fingerprint or whatever. Okay,
this is now we're becoming into the AI revolution, different
than the industrial evolution. An AI apparently can allow people
(37:23):
to do all kinds of things like create an actress
that could be in a movie that doesn't actually physically exist.
What is this system going to do or what are
the people who control own and control the system going
to do when their AI system can gather your biometric data,
(37:50):
become you, and replace you. Let's say, oh, we don't
like him, so we're now going to use the biometric
data that we have, going to create an AI figure
and we're going to take your money.
Speaker 2 (38:04):
Well, we've already got scammers out there using AI to
for example, imitate Let's say you're a loved one. The
loved one through doesn't really call you. The AI calls you.
You know, Mom, Dad, I'm I'm stuck in such I
need to send me money now, I mean, you know
that kind of stuff's already going on. What happens when
(38:25):
it's when it goes beyond scammers And like you said,
it's a it's a system, and the system decides.
Speaker 5 (38:34):
Well not to use it.
Speaker 2 (38:35):
In a way that well, we wouldn't necessarily prove of.
But humanity doesn't understand, you know. I mean, how many
of these terminator type movies do we have to watch
before we realize how dangerous it is?
Speaker 1 (38:46):
As you mentioned, Canada did it to the truckers even
though it had no legal right to do it. You've
got what's going on.
Speaker 5 (38:56):
Because they could. Yeah, the lobby damned.
Speaker 1 (39:01):
You have what is happening in Vietnam. It's telling you
you either play our buy our games, or you won't
have a bank account, which translates into the next step.
You keep talking the way you talk, you won't have
a bank account. This is good.
Speaker 5 (39:19):
It's like to live. You want have a job because
you don't have a bank account.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
And if imagine a time where everything is electronic money,
no physical money exists, and which means your employer has
to send your net paycheck to your account. Well, you
just got shut down for whatever reason, which means you
have no account, which means they can't send any money
(39:45):
to you, and your employer would be informed that if
you send this net paycheck to someone else for their benefit,
we're going to shut you down. You just became unemployable,
and the only way to become employable again is you're
going to have to go through re education.
Speaker 5 (40:05):
No, it's a not to become an obedient citizen.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
A bow down to.
Speaker 8 (40:12):
Yes.
Speaker 5 (40:13):
Yeah, but don't worry. We'll protect you.
Speaker 2 (40:15):
We'll shut down the freeway when the Army is doing
or the Marine Corps doing something.
Speaker 1 (40:19):
Yeah, the Marine Corps is really iffy when it comes
to launching fire, live fire.
Speaker 5 (40:25):
I don't know what they're going. Uh So, I don't
think that.
Speaker 1 (40:30):
I don't think the thing is that. Well, some people
might be.
Speaker 2 (40:34):
I'm not.
Speaker 1 (40:34):
I'm not addicted to tech. I'm not addicted to a
I like. I like, I like doing the basic things
such as reading. But the thing that I pushed back
at against the most, I mean, if someone wants to
be in that world. Be in that world is when
we are being forced into it.
Speaker 2 (40:53):
Right, which it goes back, goes back to any of
these issues. You don't like the l B G T
b Q plus A b X y Z that same
thing here with the technology. You know, it's a wonderful
tool and every once while I use it, but don't
force me to be fully enveloped by it.
Speaker 1 (41:15):
And to me, it's not a matter of I mean,
some people might be addicted to it, but it's being
forced into having to comply and be part of it
and not have an alternative.
Speaker 2 (41:30):
No, because you can't live if you don't. Yeah, and
then that's what they did with a real ID. No,
you don't have to have the real idea. It's voluntary.
But you know you won't be able to travel.
Speaker 1 (41:40):
With the passport, Well, that's gonna be real soon, I
guarantee you well. And ultimately, this is about creating an
environment that allows more and more surveillance that's as actually exist.
And the point of this surveillance is not to make
(42:01):
sure you're safe and you you know, you don't get
attacked on a punk street. This is to make sure
that you do exactly as you've been told, and maybe
maybe this is a violation in part of the Fourth
(42:22):
Amendment to.
Speaker 2 (42:23):
Make sure you're a compliant part of a of a
system that they've created.
Speaker 1 (42:30):
And this system will continue to go on and propagate
itself and support itself by basically changing the education system.
Speaker 5 (42:41):
Well, yeah, and it goes back to Hitler.
Speaker 2 (42:44):
You know what he had said with you, the older
crowd was moving against him and standing against him.
Speaker 5 (42:50):
He says, who are you? You will pass away?
Speaker 2 (42:53):
And and the and and the younger generation, the new
they stand in the new camp.
Speaker 1 (42:58):
Right, And one last thing, if I can remember, the
opening to this segment, the one that you played, was
the perfect opening, because when the board tells you resistance
is futile, what they're really what the porch really telling
(43:19):
you is resistance is essential. Thank you.
Speaker 2 (43:25):
Well, they're just be saying that your resistance doesn't matter
to them. It's not you're not it's not you're not
capable of.
Speaker 5 (43:32):
Standing against them.
Speaker 2 (43:33):
But yeah, that that's typically that has to be said
when you're already nervous that they can stand against you. Uh, Dennis,
what's your thoughts about this digital fortress?
Speaker 5 (43:43):
Uh?
Speaker 2 (43:44):
This is the surveillance fortress that's that's been created. Dennis
can't tell you, sir, there we go.
Speaker 5 (44:00):
Go ahead.
Speaker 2 (44:05):
Sounds like Dennis is gone now I can hear the background. Dennis,
all right, Well, I hate to do this, but we
got to go on to the next topic. Then if
Dennis is unable to respond, So redistricting has reached the
Supreme Court. And this is a case out of Louisiana,
(44:30):
Louisiana versus KLA C A L L A I S.
And basically what's happened is it's the redistricting for the
purpose of racial fairness and the Voting Rights Act of
nineteen sixty five. I get it born out of the
noble desire of ensuring fairness and elector process. But you
(44:53):
don't create fairness one group by turning against a different group.
The and the equal Protection Clause is not about lifting
up a group so that they can, you know, because
you think that'll give them what you think is equity.
It's about individuals, not collectives. It's about making sure that
it's not about making law to force fairness. It's about
(45:16):
not making law that will interfere with fairness. That's what
the Equal Protection Clause is about. And so now we
have this redistricting war going on, and when race becomes
a driving factor in redistricting, we're no longer talking about equality.
And that's what this case is all about. And I
believe at the Court and they hurt the first the
(45:38):
opening arguments. They have not ruled on it yet, they've
hurt opening arguments, and basically Louisiana Druid's Map group plaintiffs
argue it didn't give enough representation of black voters.
Speaker 5 (45:50):
And now the Supreme Court.
Speaker 2 (45:51):
Seems poised to say, based on past recent rulings, that
race cannot be the reason districts are drawn. And if
that happens, it won't just affect Louisiana, it will ripple
across the country California and New York, Illinois, places where
race based Gary mandarin has become a political tool. And
a lot of this is just a response to what's
(46:13):
going on in Texas well.
Speaker 5 (46:14):
The Republicans are Gary Mandarin tech.
Speaker 2 (46:16):
No, they're not undoing the Gary mandarine that the Democrats
have been using. And the goal here should be neutrality.
The goal should be that the districts don't look like salamanders.
There shouldn't be any racial engineering. There shouldn't be any
partisan manipulation. And if the court rules the way I expect,
I think it'll be a victory for constitutional clarity. And
(46:38):
I think it'll be just another part in that will
help lead to another factor that will lead to a
twenty twenty six midterm election that goes well in favor
of the Republicans. So are you back, Dennis? I, uh.
Speaker 5 (47:04):
Go ahead.
Speaker 2 (47:09):
Well, you didn't just run a marathon, did you.
Speaker 8 (47:15):
No?
Speaker 6 (47:15):
No, no, no, I'm just kind of having a.
Speaker 8 (47:20):
I've been listening. I've been thinking. I just haven't got
a really a real good focus on this thing. Uh.
You know.
Speaker 6 (47:33):
Allen's comments, you know the CBC D and all this stuff.
You know, it's it's it's a link. It's a link
to totalitarianism. You know, it's a way of switching off
your money and holding you hostage. Uh, evaluating your money,
turning it off towards your wealth is gone, turning it on,
(47:54):
you know, based upon you know, like the Chinese metric,
you know social program and I know all of these things.
As you were talking about the biometrics. You know it's
supposedly for safety, but you know they they're using safety
to steal your freedom. And you know, that's exactly right.
Speaker 8 (48:17):
Yeah, that's that's what Franklin's talking about.
Speaker 6 (48:20):
And I'll give you all of these good reasons is
the why it ought to be there.
Speaker 8 (48:24):
But once they have you, they've got you. And then
the guys, the guys who.
Speaker 6 (48:29):
Have the the wicked, the evil desires to uh destroy you,
they can just turn off your money and.
Speaker 8 (48:42):
Uh, you know you're broke.
Speaker 6 (48:44):
You know, there's nothing you can do. And so I'm
totally against the bank digital currency. Uh, you just can't
go there. You know. It's it's like the WHO and
the health organizations and the vaccines that are supposedly to
(49:05):
help everybody, and you know, trying to overcome global warming,
you know, with all of the common dioxide problems, and
you know it's all ahead faith. You know, it's it's
a way of deception, That's exactly it.
Speaker 2 (49:24):
So and H and I remind people all the time,
if it's not godly, it's got to be from the
other guy.
Speaker 5 (49:31):
And what's the other guy all about? Lies?
Speaker 2 (49:33):
The perception, the prince of darkness, the prince of lies,
And that's what they're doing. Yep, right, very good, Alan,
Did you want to discuss what I just talked about?
When it comes to the redistricting or what or did
you did you have anything first? Dani's about the redistricting part.
Speaker 6 (49:54):
Or well, the redistricting, Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (50:02):
This is talking about that court case, you know, and
where they're basically I think they're going to rule to
get rid of racial.
Speaker 6 (50:07):
Well that's the big deal. If they do that, then
you know, that's great.
Speaker 5 (50:12):
And you know you've.
Speaker 6 (50:14):
Got Newsome trying to do his redistricting to get rid
of Republican seats.
Speaker 2 (50:20):
Uh, but he's got to get Prop fifty passed first,
and I don't know if the voters are going to
go for it.
Speaker 6 (50:25):
Well, yeah, we'll have to see. But again, you know,
it's like a dominion voting machines, you know. I mean,
they can be used for good, they can be used
for bad. Well, I don't trust them. I think we
ought to get rid of all the electronics.
Speaker 8 (50:43):
We ought to get rid of me.
Speaker 5 (50:44):
You just got bought by a conservative Republican.
Speaker 6 (50:47):
Yeah, I know, I heard it, you know, but yeah,
we'll just have to You don't find out until after
the baking's done to see really what you got, you know.
And there's been so much deception going on with Democrats,
you know again like Pelosi and the others and Sanders.
You know, they they wrap you up in the American
(51:08):
flag and they give you the aroma you know of
hot dogs and apple pie and Americana. But you know
they're selling you down the river, you know, and uh.
Speaker 2 (51:17):
They're throwing They're throwing some some ketchup and some mustard
and some picklerellation on top of a turd and telling
you it's a hot dogg And that's because just because
you think it looks good doesn't mean it is right,
ir Alan, Before we run out of time, here is
we've got about four minutes. Uh, what's you thought about
this case I just talked about with the where the court.
(51:40):
I think they're going to end racially influenced congressional districts,
don't you think?
Speaker 1 (51:46):
Well, I have a problem with the term, and for me,
there's only one race human. So if you're talking in
terms of racial division, your divisive.
Speaker 2 (51:59):
H But obviously the truth doesn't matter to these people.
So we've got to we've got to hit them where
they're at.
Speaker 1 (52:05):
We need. The thing is what I'd like to know,
and you know this better is originally what was parameters
for creating these different districts in.
Speaker 2 (52:19):
Well, they they just wanted to make sure that the
districts were as equal to population in size as possible.
And and originally they were based on a grid concept.
It wasn't until the Massachusetts State Senate Gary Mander the
(52:40):
district looked like a salamander. According to a a journalist. Uh,
they were a bit basically grid shaped.
Speaker 8 (52:50):
Well they are.
Speaker 6 (52:51):
They ought to be boundary related, physical related, city related
as much as possible, and not getting into this other
stuff where they're you know, like you say, making these
horrific congressional districts that are skinny here, fat here, you know,
connected here. I mean some of these aren't even one district.
(53:13):
You know, you've got an island next to something else,
you know.
Speaker 2 (53:16):
I believe there needs to be amendment of the Constitution
that requires that a district has no more than four
corners in those corners or ninety degree angles.
Speaker 1 (53:26):
What if what about if it's eighty nine degrees? Is
that okay? No, okay, I just get to a uniform shape,
not number, but shape throughout all the states and be
done with them and leave them that way, and make
(53:46):
them bigger or smaller depending on a number of people
who are living there to balance it out well.
Speaker 2 (53:52):
And see as a result of all this, what we're watching,
what we're seeing coming because we've got the redistricting, you
know deal, we got this in case I was just
talking about. You got what Trump has been doing, which
has been fantastic as president. You've got his his push
to get rid to to to fix the voter rolls,
to push for voter ID, to clean up the voter roles,
(54:14):
to renewed focus on election security. I think we're going
to something's gonna happen that that doesn't typically happen. Normally,
the party out of power wins the midterms. I don't
think that's gonna be the case this time. And I
think it's going to be a political earthquake that that
is going to shock the system. I think twenty twenty
six is going to break the mold. I think because
(54:35):
because everybody knows that Donald Trump isn't just holding the line.
His presidency is flipping this gript. The economy is rolling back,
prices are dropping, He's convinced of the least to reduce
their oil prices. Market in history, industry is on the rise.
We're we're seeing the early stages of a manufacturing renaissance
in this country. And so I'm a I'm a firm believer.
We are on the verge of some great stuff, and
(54:57):
I think the shutdown is also hurting them. So I
I think we're gonna see a very good end before
this is all over. All right, we're our time, Collin.
Speaker 1 (55:07):
Plug yourself set at FUDED dot US for Basic Monetary
System of Education at five to seven pm West Coast
time on Patriot Soapbox for the Republic.
Speaker 2 (55:18):
Thank you, Dennis, Thank you Allan, Thank you, Sean the
Engineer United. We stand combined. We kick butt. God bless
American friends, God bless you. Visit me Douglas H. Gibbs
dot com. We get it all well, mostly fixed. I'm
blogging again. We still got to do some other stuff,
but we're on the road to getting that thing the
way you want. Also, you want a list of all
my shows, navigation to Liberty dot com, navigation the number
(55:40):
two Liberty dot com, all the list of all my
shows and all those stuff I do. I'm gonna be
in southern California coming up as well. Be sure to
visit the site and come see me.
Speaker 8 (55:48):
Douglas h.
Speaker 5 (55:48):
Gibbs dot com. We'll see you next time we're on
the radio.
But what is it that ANTIFA is looking for?
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Like why are they doing like why is this enemy
doing this? What is it that they want?
Speaker 3 (00:15):
Answer?
Speaker 4 (00:15):
That is it?
Speaker 5 (00:16):
I mean it's simply the violent overthrow of the government.
Speaker 6 (00:19):
I mean what is it?
Speaker 3 (00:20):
Yes, for the for the ultimate the ultimate goal is
to destroy the United States. Antifa as a movement, it
is anarchist communism. Like people sometimes have just simply branded
them as communists, that's not the full picture.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
The reality is that extreme.
Speaker 3 (00:38):
There are communists and Antifa, but they're more so. The
majority of them are anarchists and anarchist communists, and so
they the violence is done essentially out of nihilism, and
that's why there's such brutality in it, setting buildings on
fire when people are inside, or in the case of
in June, the ice facility locked, trying to lock and
(01:00):
barricade the doors on that as facility inside it on
fire when there are people inside. These type of brutal, cruel,
sub human type of acts of violence, and their motto
is become ungovernable. So they want to destroy not just
the US as a nation, but they don't necessarily replace
it with like a communist regime. They want to destroy
(01:22):
everything all these institutions, the concept of nation states. So
when they do things like aid in giving out drug paraphernalia,
there's a reason for that. In the homelessness they believe
it's in an mass homelessness they view as an attack
on capitalism, is destabilizing two communities.
Speaker 4 (01:43):
They like that.
Speaker 3 (01:44):
They know that the money from the drugs that are
flowing in that are killing people, helps foreign and international
cartel networks that keeps migrants coming in. All that's meant
to destabilize the US. They know they don't have the tanks,
so the type of weapons that can compete with the
US military. So their goals are attacking infrastructure and playing
(02:09):
a very long game, and they've had a lot of success.
Speaker 4 (02:11):
I mean twins.
Speaker 5 (02:14):
And there you go.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
Welcome to Constitution Radio. Douglas Speak Gibbs k E T
fourteen ninety am. What that is as an interview, I'm
trying to remember the gentleman's name that was talking escapes
me at the moment. But this is an interview that
lays out what antifa is all about. Now, if you
listen to the mainstream media, Antifa doesn't exist.
Speaker 5 (02:36):
Why it's just.
Speaker 2 (02:37):
Some you know, just a bunch of kids being you know,
silly and getting together and putting on black There's no organization,
there's no there's no direction, there's no funding behind it.
It's just you know that these you know, these these protesters,
and besides, it's mostly peaceful protesting anyway. No, Antifa is
an organization. It is an organized organization receiving monies. And
(03:00):
in fact, there's a headline that just I was just
looking at the other day. I'm looking for it right
now on my computer, and by the time I get
to it'll probably be too late. So I will just
go from what I can remember is that there is
a whistleblower that has exposed that a lot of antifa's
(03:26):
funding are coming from organizations tied to George Soros and China.
So we have this organization, and so now here's the
reason why I bring this up.
Speaker 5 (03:38):
Donald J.
Speaker 2 (03:38):
Trump has the National Guard coming into cities to a
help assist ice in executing the laws of the United States.
Article one, section eight Constitution says that the militia may
be called up to execute the laws of the Union.
But after that Article one, section eight, it says suppress insurrections.
(04:01):
This is not Article four, Section four, where it says
that in the case of domestic violence that let me
read it word for word, the United States will guaranteed
every state in this Union a republican form of government,
and shall protect each of them against invasion and on
application of the legislature or of the executive when the
(04:23):
legislature cannot be convened against domestic violence, domestic violence, basic
domestic violence just for the just because there's violence going on,
the federal government can't just suddenly bring in federal personnel
and interstate and inter accounting without the sheriff's okay, and
just start taking control. That clause they are an artic four.
(04:48):
Section four is a result of the founding father's fear
of a standing army being used against the people. But
Founding Folence also realize there's going to be times when
there needs to be a force, a show of force
in certain situations when it comes to executing federal.
Speaker 5 (05:09):
Law, it may be necessary.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
Their example before they wrote this document was Shay's Rebellion,
where the veterans of the Revolutionary War were ticked because
the money was that they were given for fighting the
war was worthless, and so they rebelled. They were blocking
the front steps of courthouses, and they were doing it
(05:33):
with their guns. And part of the problem was the
government then had no way of dealing with it. And
the states are like, well, we use our militias. No,
it's the militia that's reacting. We need a central federal
authority that can take care of this kind of business.
In George Washington's presidency, that opportunity came up quickly the
(05:55):
Whiskey Rebellion, where there was an armed rejection of federal law,
a tax on whiskey. Whether or not it was a
right law, wrong law, good law, bad law, is not
the point. It was federal law. And the tax agent
would enter these towns who collect the tax, and they
were attacked by the by the barrel of a rifle.
(06:22):
Things were being done to them, They were being detained
by the rebels, and so on and so forth. So
President George Washington, with the militia came into the area
with a show of force to take care of business this.
These people who participated in the Whiskey rebellion, many of
(06:44):
them then were brought up on charges of insurrection, treason, rebellion. Now,
now let me read article on section eight again to
provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws
of Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions. If it's insurrection activity,
the for government doesn't have to ask the state's permission
(07:05):
to be there. What is insurrection? Is Antifa insurrection? We
played the audio. Yes, their goal, their plan. It is
an organization. It is an organized effort to overthrow our system,
as it is to overthrow our constitution, to overthrow any
(07:28):
constitutional government, and to create chaos to be ungovernable. So yes,
President Trump has the authority to have a show of force,
to bring in the militia, the National Guard into these
cities to get this under control. But you have to
understand who are up against. The Democrats hate well, any
(07:54):
show of force. I guess they hate what President Trump's
trying to do, and they hate anything military. You want
an example, let's let's let's bring up And I didn't
even know about this till right before the show. Uh,
my co host Alan Myers brought this up. And that's why
(08:15):
I'm gonna let him talk first. I know he's excited.
The five Freeway is going to be closed for for
four hours today because of a marine Corps anniversary event
at Camp Penland. They're gonna have live fire, and the
(08:39):
Marine Corps is like, hey, there's been previous instances where we've.
Speaker 5 (08:44):
Had live fire.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
Public highways remain open because you know, this is now
me because military is not so stupid to like let
bombs and bullets hit cars on the freeway. But Newsome,
being the idiot that he is, shutting down.
Speaker 5 (09:02):
From Harbor Drive.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
In in Oceanside to Barcelonia Road, basically at the north
end of Camp penal In there right right before you
get to San Clemente. And this is a major this
is a major artery in California. Eleven am three pm.
(09:27):
That thing is shut down. It's a major artery. I
don't care. I used to drive a big writ through
there a lot. I don't care what time of date is.
There's a lot of traffic. But this idiot that who
is governor of California, Oh, it's gonna be a lit fire.
We got to protect everybody, shut down the freeway. He
wants to send a message that the military is not
(09:49):
capable of controlling itself, and it ties into what Trump
is doing.
Speaker 5 (09:53):
In the cities. If they can't control themselves, right, there
on their own basis.
Speaker 2 (09:57):
How can they control themselves in the cities going after
Antifa or assisting Ice. They're out of control. You can't
trust the military. Shut down, the freeway shut down, Trump
shut down. Everything has to do with the military. That's
the message he's sending. Now, gentlemen, I have a bunch
of stories today. We never get through one or two.
(10:20):
I want to try to get to at least four
of them. So I'm gonna ask you to give me
a concise, precise opinion five minutes max, and then move
let's move on to the next story. So Alan, Yeah,
so you heard the video, the audio of that video,
that interview, heard what I've had to say. You're the
one that came up, you know, showed me this story
(10:42):
and it all ties into the same stuff in my opinion.
Speaker 5 (10:45):
What's your thoughts?
Speaker 1 (10:48):
Well, in addition to this, commemorating the two hundred and
fiftieth first day of the Marine Corps, vice President will
be there, m And Okay, I believe the Marine Corps,
(11:09):
among the all all the military branches, they deal with
live fire.
Speaker 7 (11:15):
It's kind of a normal thing for it's it's kind
of yeah, we have you know, we don't practice with
rubber bands and squirt guns.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
The and for those who would not know, Penalton Campellan
is an enormous space, huge lot of property. Instead of
working something out or confirming with the military at Camp Pendleton,
(11:45):
Hey guys, I'm the governor of California. I want to
make sure that people on I five are safe. Uh,
can you can confirm and you know, show to me
that you're not going to send any ammunition, any live
fire over the freeway.
Speaker 2 (12:02):
Well, let me let me give you a line from
that article I just read at CBS. Despite the US
Marine Corps previous insistence that public highways would remain open,
in other words, it's no big deal, right.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
And the thing is this got announced apparently this morning,
which means for people who are who are planning.
Speaker 5 (12:26):
To yeah, they got no heads up.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
Got you no heads up? And and you know the
announcement came through the California Highway Patrol. Where's the you know,
if you haven't shown that there's a danger, why are
you doing this now?
Speaker 5 (12:48):
Notify because in his opinion, there is a danger.
Speaker 1 (12:51):
Well, notify everybody in the state. By the way, if
you're traveling this roadway between this time they're maybe while
you're traveling this fifteen mile stretch there may be live
fire activity going on to Campenal. Then if that worries you,
don't drive between eleven and three. Let people make the decision.
(13:13):
They're capable of doing it. With Antifa, you know, and
we've talked about this before in the program. People get
confused between far left and far right, and antifa is
about being quote unquote anti fascist, which is just inside
(13:38):
the far left of communism. It's government control, but some
public some private ownership, but it's still government control and regulation.
If they're Antifa and they don't want to be full
left commies, then what they're about is full right, and
full right is anarchy. And how safe are you going
(14:02):
to be in your life in the States state of anarchy.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
Well, the thing is too though, is historically anarchy is
not designed to remain. Typically what happens is when anarchy
historically is when anarchy takes place, then the chaos hits,
and then the very people created the anarchy says, oh,
we'll be your governance. So it's a far right action
for a far left result.
Speaker 1 (14:31):
Yeah, this is about oh you need us, so now
you'll want communism because you know you all can't represent
yourself or be involved.
Speaker 2 (14:42):
It's flowerd pivot, it's cloward pivot. You tear down the
whole system so you can build it up the way
you want it.
Speaker 1 (14:48):
So it's uh. But either way, if one of your
techniques of getting your way is to use violence, burn things,
steal things, whatever, her, Uh, that's not a good way.
That's just wrong.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
I'll leave it all right, Very good, Dennis. Your thoughts
about what we've discussed so far.
Speaker 6 (15:14):
Well, I think your comments on Holi Antifa, obviously that's
been something that Trevor, you know, has got into and
the yeah and the sorows many arms or solo says, let.
Speaker 2 (15:36):
Me pause because the audience, not not every the audience
may be familiar. Trevor Louden had had a book and
a movie which you were executive producer of Enemies Within,
and in it he explains how what was it a
hundred of or eighty or one hundred of the members.
Speaker 6 (15:54):
Of he said, he said, what would you think of
one hundred members of the US Congress could not pass
an FBI background chet.
Speaker 2 (16:03):
Because of their connections of communism or Islam or something right? Right,
because so anyway, so that's that's that's what he said, Trevor, folks,
that's what he's referred to.
Speaker 5 (16:11):
All right, go ahead, you.
Speaker 6 (16:12):
Know, and you know that was in you know, twenty fourteen,
twenty fifteen, you know, a year or two before the election.
And Antifa and other similar names of organizations. Again, they're
all the chaos companies. They're the people, as you alluded
to earlier, you know, are out to destroy and they're
(16:34):
they're doing the pivot move, trying to overload the government
in debt and in payments to the illegals to where
it basically breaks the system and the financial system will fail.
And what rises out of it. They supposedly don't really have,
(16:55):
you know, that great of a concern, but they do.
You know, nobody is a pure communist, nobody is a
true anarchist.
Speaker 5 (17:05):
You know.
Speaker 6 (17:05):
They want to replace it with something more to their liking.
There will be a rise of some other form of
tyranny and power and government, and it would be to
the devastation.
Speaker 8 (17:19):
Of the citizens of the United States, and.
Speaker 6 (17:22):
Wholly to destroy the Constitution because they know that it
is the foundation that our government is based on, and
it's enemy number one.
Speaker 8 (17:35):
Family is enemy number two.
Speaker 5 (17:37):
You know.
Speaker 6 (17:38):
One of the great lives of the devil was he
doesn't exist, and now they're copy and pasting that in.
You know, with this recent last couple of weeks that
Antipa doesn't exist.
Speaker 8 (17:50):
You know, it surely does.
Speaker 6 (17:52):
Keith Ellison, who was the Attorney General under Obama, they
have pictures of him holding the handbook for Matifa, you know,
we had pictures of that, you know, going back to
the days of Obama. So and his son is now
(18:12):
a politician and is of the ilk of his father
and doing everything he can, which is why they do
not want law enforcement to be funded, which is why
they do not want people to be held in jail.
They want to keep them on the street where they
can continue to attack law and order and the fighters
(18:39):
on and Trump hopefully, you know, I mean they are
to arrest.
Speaker 8 (18:47):
Ellison and just start rounding these people up. They are
the Democratic.
Speaker 6 (18:52):
Leaders and the faithful. They are traders in the United
States of America. George Soros how to be arrested. His
money should taken just like they do with the cartel money.
They got to go in and just take the money
out of the bank accounts. To me, they got to
go after Zuckerberg, to go after all these more soft targets,
(19:17):
because they're enabling, you know, the hard action of Antifa
and these others that are very well organized, and the
election stealing is all part of the undermining of the
law and order, you know, of the country. So twenty
(19:39):
twenty election theft. All of these people are of the
same ilk, even though they wear different uniforms. If they
have uniforms, Anti Fish uniform is black and masks and anonymous.
Speaker 8 (19:59):
And when you fight fire.
Speaker 6 (20:00):
With fire, life with ice doing that, they talk about
how one constitutional it is, but they support it on
the other side with the terrorists, anarchists, Antifa, right.
Speaker 2 (20:17):
Very good And as all this is going on, and
the idea is to throw around the idea that Trump
is some kind of authoritarian, he's some out of control
authoritarian that will use the military against everybody.
Speaker 5 (20:34):
And that he wants war and all this other stuff.
Speaker 2 (20:37):
Meanwhile, this is the guy who's in the Middle East
making a deal for peace between Hamas and Israel. And
this is something no one else could ever do. This
is something that no politician could accomplish. Take now, you know,
granted we have a businessman here and I guarantee you.
Speaker 5 (20:57):
I wasn't in on these conversations. I guarantee you.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
They went something like, hey, you know I can blow
you to smithereens I've done. You know, I dropped bunker
Buster in Pakistan, I took out i RAN's nuclear capabilities.
You know I could find smither rings. You you got
a choice, smith Rings? Or have I got a deal
for you. Let's make this new Middle East? You know, uh,
(21:22):
give it, you know, make make it an investment.
Speaker 5 (21:25):
You could be rich. So it's your choice.
Speaker 2 (21:28):
I kill you, or you'll work with me and you
and you get to take part in some great big
hotels or something. That's what I'm thinking. And understand that
that when he did this, in this deal came through,
We've got even some Democrats going, whoa.
Speaker 5 (21:47):
You've got to give them kudos. You know, we did
not see this coming.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
We did not expect this, We did not think it
was possible, and it hasn't been possible for the last
however many hundreds of years.
Speaker 6 (22:01):
Well, well, one of the one of the great lies
is this whole no king's deal. You know, he doesn't
want to be a king, and they're trying to use
the courts what they're doing now saying you can use
the National Guard, but you can't use the national Guard.
You know, they're trying to stop him from using his
executive authority. And if I were him, I would just
(22:22):
tell him to go to hell and do it anyway,
you know, kind of in the spirit of.
Speaker 5 (22:25):
And Andrew Jackson did exactly.
Speaker 6 (22:29):
It's exactly what I'm saying, is he just ought to
say no, I had the constitutional authority. I'm moving, you know,
rather because of UHU, the government and uh people that
are uh trying to I got a mental block on
the word what. What's the word I want? Uh? Not recession,
(22:53):
not secession?
Speaker 5 (22:54):
What I'm not sure where you were going there.
Speaker 8 (23:02):
Well, you know the people that are fighting against the government.
Speaker 5 (23:07):
Right now, right the insurrectionists, insurrection.
Speaker 6 (23:10):
That's the word I'm looking for, you know, is that
he's going after them. And you and I have talked
about orange suits for nearly a decade. You know, they
need to start rounding these guys up. You know, they
they've got called me. You know, they've got Bolton. You know,
they had to get a few more. They had to
get McCabe, you know, they had to get.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
And Jennifer let me interrupt you here for a second.
You're exactly right across the board. But see, this is
why this piece in the Middle East thing ties into
this in white. It's so big because see, it doesn't
matter what the left wants. It matters what the what
the court of public opinion thinks. And the court of
public opinion has been fooled for a very long time.
(23:55):
But this piece in the Middle East thing, what it
has done, it is is because because the people are
watching and the media can't spin it.
Speaker 5 (24:05):
They can't spin it against him. How do you spin
against Trump?
Speaker 2 (24:09):
Oh my gosh, he got Israel and Hamasta shake hands
and they're both saying thanks Trump boy.
Speaker 5 (24:14):
How horrible is that? I mean, how do you is that?
Speaker 2 (24:17):
I mean they can't right and put and and see
and So what it's doing, though, is it's it's it's
making the public Uh that does not haven't figured things
out yet? Look and say, wait a second, He's done
a great job here. He's not acting like an authoritarian.
(24:37):
What are they lying to us about because they've been
spinning everything this finally they can't spin it. I see
what Trump's doing and what it's And I'm a firm believer.
Speaker 5 (24:48):
That the big key here is the fact that the
court of public opinion.
Speaker 6 (24:53):
It's well, I hope, so I hope that the court
of the public opinion it gets smart enough and big
enough to where they reject you know, the no kings.
Speaker 8 (25:02):
He is not an authoritarian. He is a president who.
Speaker 6 (25:06):
Is exercising executive authority and his constitutional right down the line.
He's using the military correctly because there are insurrectionists people,
there are pockets of the Democrat Chicago, Portland, wherever, you know.
And now you've got Congress, you know, trying to pass
the law saying that he can't do anything in Venezuela,
(25:27):
you know, unless they declare war.
Speaker 8 (25:29):
No.
Speaker 6 (25:30):
Now, that's not the way it works. He's the commander
in chief, for God's love the world. They didn't send
the committee. If he feels its power, then Congress can
try to check him after the fact, but they're trying
to get out.
Speaker 2 (25:43):
Of national security is his primary function, that's it.
Speaker 5 (25:49):
And he can wage war.
Speaker 2 (25:50):
And we talked about this even when other presidents were there.
Speaker 8 (25:53):
That's trying.
Speaker 2 (25:54):
The president can wage war without decoration if he feels
its necessary for national security.
Speaker 6 (26:01):
And he's being effective enough to where they're trying to
bollox him up now with Congress, just like they're trying
trying to bollox them up with the courts, and he
just needs to continue on his merry way.
Speaker 2 (26:13):
Absolutely, Alan, you've listened to us talking about this. I've
thrown in the piece of Middle East. How that throws
a boomerang into the left hatred of him.
Speaker 5 (26:21):
What's your thoughts about that part of the discussion.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
One thing I'd like to see everybody in my office
say is before they talk about what they want to do,
plan to do, hope to do, I like them to
lead in with this is why what I'm planning or
hoping to want is constitutional. I know I'm dreaming.
Speaker 2 (26:46):
And when the Democrats use Constitution General Welfare yeah, or
their version of the Congress clause yes.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
I would really like this to be come expected listening audience,
mm hmm, because if we don't ask for it, we're
not going to get it.
Speaker 2 (27:05):
Well, here's the thing, Alan, is this what's going on
is not just in this country though, we are up
against a global enemy. And I was reading and don't
get me wrong, I technology can be a wonderful thing.
Technology is a wonderful tool. I'm glad that AI is
(27:26):
a great tool. And as we navigate through this world
of technology, and we've had to do it more and
more and more as time passes, we have to do
everything we can digitally that's available digitally to secure our information,
to protect our our things online. I mean, we change
(27:47):
our We're supposed to change our passwords often. And you
know now they've got these multi factor authentication. You know,
you put in your passwords in a sense a text
to your phone or an email to your email address
or whatever. And you know, and we can with this
because we don't see a reason not to. We want
to keep our information safe. So we use the pin
numbers and the fingerprint scanning and the facial recognition and
(28:08):
all the other biometric methods. And it's a no brainer
in this age of technology that you've got to do
what you can to prove we are who we say
we are and not let other people try to beat you.
Speaker 5 (28:20):
And I mean it, it makes sense.
Speaker 2 (28:25):
But like anything, it can be used also for tyranny,
and I'm watching globally biometric verification. It's a powerful tool
privacy and security because you have unique biological traits, your fingerprints,
your irises, your facial geometry and so it's noly impossible
to replicate. And so the effectiveness of biometric verification is
(28:48):
a wonderful thing, and it technically it's not the problem.
The problem is regarding who runs the system. So can
we trust the watchers who hold our data and biological markers?
And so the reason why I bring this up is
Vietnam just recently deactivated over eighty six million bank accounts
under a new biometric verification mandate. You use biometric verification
(29:13):
for your account, or we hold your money, you use
the method we want you to use, or you can
have access.
Speaker 5 (29:18):
To your account.
Speaker 2 (29:19):
And so then a bunch of people say, well, they
seize those funds, and they said, no, we didn't seize
the funds. We just locked them away until account holders
submit to biometric athundication. And first thing I thought was,
you know.
Speaker 5 (29:32):
The Bord resistance is futile, right, and this.
Speaker 2 (29:37):
And for Christians, this reeks of you know, the mark
of the beast. It echoes warnings from the Trump administration
about Central Bank Digital currency Bank digital currency CBDC. It
mirrors Canada's freezing of Trucker's accounts when they defied government
orders and when paired with UK's new the UK's new
(29:57):
digital ID system, and that's not also forget you know, Greece,
during this financial crisis, the government imposed capital controls limiting
how much citizens could withdraw from their accounts. So you
combine all of that, and what we're looking at is
a threat against our financial freedom and our information freedom.
(30:18):
I want what and so, like I said, I welcome
these tools, but we also have to recognize the erosion
of liberty and the expansion expanding reach of government surveillance
through digital ideas, biometric verification, financial restrictions. And they're not
And this is all not just isolated innovations. I mean,
(30:41):
I get it. When individuals we decide to technologies, I
get it. I understand that they are part of a
larger architecture of control. Though how also, as technology becomes
inseparable from daily life, the solutions to modern challenges increasingly
relies on the vveryous systems that threaten our time autonomy.
But this is not just what's going on in America.
(31:03):
This is not just democrats. This is a worldwide phenomenon,
and the world is five or ten years ahead of
where we are in the sense of the tumble towards tyranny,
and we embrace these tools because they're convenient. We think
they're safe. But is convenience of safety? Is that a
good trade for freedom? If we allow germents to have
(31:25):
unfettered access and use of all these technologies. Remember Benjamin
Franklin right, Those who should give up essential liberty to
purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety.
Speaker 5 (31:36):
We shudder as.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
We watch global events unfold, sensing the alarms of our minds.
Then we close our eyes, unsure what to do, and
then we go back about our day, paying for everything
with our phone or a plastic car to get an
online because it's.
Speaker 5 (31:53):
A part of life. How do we fix this? What
do we do?
Speaker 2 (31:57):
And I hope those of you out there listening, I
hope you're angry, But what are you going to do
about it? How are you going to influence this? How
are we going to influence the system? Attend political meetings,
run for office, use cash most of the time. Because
I'll say one thing, the clock is ticking, it's happening fast.
Speaker 5 (32:14):
Let's go to break.
Speaker 2 (32:15):
When we come back, see what Dennis and Allen has
to say about what I just talked about. Don't go anywhere.
(32:37):
Help me fight the good fight. This radio program is
funded by advertising dollars. So if you are a business,
add Constitution Radio with Douglas V. Gibbs to your business portfolio.
If you are a listener, become a patron of the
businesses advertising on this program. Without advertising, your weekend dose
of truth ends with more advertising.
Speaker 5 (32:57):
Constitutional Radio with Douglas V.
Speaker 2 (32:58):
Gibs grows, and we will be on the way to
win the battle to restore the Republic.
Speaker 5 (33:03):
To learn more, email us.
Speaker 2 (33:04):
At Constitution Speaker at yahoo dot com or visit Douglas V.
Gibbs dot com. Repeal Democracy by Douglas V. Gibbs is
finally available. Doug Lady's book examines the importance of being
a republic, how we can restore a republic, Why democracy
is so dangerous. Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercise
(33:25):
for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. C. S.
Lewis And that is the very.
Speaker 5 (33:31):
First page that you'll see, right before chapter one and
Repeal Democracy. Repeal Democracy by Douglas V. Gibbs on sale now.
Speaker 4 (33:42):
If you've been waiting to go solder, don't wait any
longer propose. Legislation ending the thirty percent federal tax credit
could pass this summer and go into effect by December
thirty first. With utility rates rising year after year and
summer hikes with no end in sight, now is the
time to lock in fixed energy costs for years to come.
As Guard Energy is a local, family owned company that
(34:03):
serves southern California since two thousand and eight. With over
four thousand flawless installs and personalized service you can trust.
Call eight five five seven six zero energy. That's eight
five five seven six zero three six three seven before
waiting costs you thirty percent more as Guard Energy local,
trusted proven.
Speaker 9 (34:25):
You got a dent in your door, scratch in your fender,
or a cratch in your door and a dent in
your fender. If you need auto detailing, if you need
fire shooting decals on the side of your car, if
you need a rally stripe right down the middle of
your hardtop, I don't care what it is. The patriots
at All Star Collision are the place you want to go.
They're the only place to go. Buy twenty two Railroad
Street in Corona. Web address all Star ci dot com
(34:47):
to see all that they do and what they're all about.
Well number nine five one two seven, nine six one
All Star Collision, the Kings of reck and Roll.
Speaker 8 (35:06):
We are the socialists.
Speaker 2 (35:08):
Your individual dideries, personal freedoms, and mental individuality will be
added to our own.
Speaker 5 (35:16):
Resistance is futile and welcome back. Constution Radio Douglas H. Gibbs.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
I was just talking about political control through technology. We've
become dependent on it, you know, And then it started.
This whole idea started with a conversation I had with
my sister in law. She says, well, Doug, what do
you think of the real idea? You're against it?
Speaker 5 (35:47):
Right?
Speaker 2 (35:48):
That's I was I am, but I got it, And
she says, well, why because I can't operate without it.
This is what they're doing. We've got so but I
don't know if the word addicted is right. That's what
I'm gonna use to technology that we're like, we're just
like the cattle being herded right in through the gates easily.
(36:08):
We're happy to because we don't see any other way,
of any other way to go. And so what the
world is creating is this surveillance fortress through technology. And
you know, the I get it biometric and all that.
That's it's a good way to keep our stuff protected.
(36:32):
But who's going to watch the watchers? So Alan, what's
your thoughts?
Speaker 1 (36:39):
This is a great topic, very powerful, and very scary
for me. It on the face of a lot of this,
it sounds very easy, very convenient. Oh, all I have
to do is look and they'll the system, whatever the
system is, will look at my eyes and say, I'm me.
(37:03):
Isn't this great? Or it might be a fingerprint or whatever. Okay,
this is now we're becoming into the AI revolution, different
than the industrial evolution. An AI apparently can allow people
(37:23):
to do all kinds of things like create an actress
that could be in a movie that doesn't actually physically exist.
What is this system going to do or what are
the people who control own and control the system going
to do when their AI system can gather your biometric data,
(37:50):
become you, and replace you. Let's say, oh, we don't
like him, so we're now going to use the biometric
data that we have, going to create an AI figure
and we're going to take your money.
Speaker 2 (38:04):
Well, we've already got scammers out there using AI to
for example, imitate Let's say you're a loved one. The
loved one through doesn't really call you. The AI calls you.
You know, Mom, Dad, I'm I'm stuck in such I
need to send me money now, I mean, you know
that kind of stuff's already going on. What happens when
(38:25):
it's when it goes beyond scammers And like you said,
it's a it's a system, and the system decides.
Speaker 5 (38:34):
Well not to use it.
Speaker 2 (38:35):
In a way that well, we wouldn't necessarily prove of.
But humanity doesn't understand, you know. I mean, how many
of these terminator type movies do we have to watch
before we realize how dangerous it is?
Speaker 1 (38:46):
As you mentioned, Canada did it to the truckers even
though it had no legal right to do it. You've
got what's going on.
Speaker 5 (38:56):
Because they could. Yeah, the lobby damned.
Speaker 1 (39:01):
You have what is happening in Vietnam. It's telling you
you either play our buy our games, or you won't
have a bank account, which translates into the next step.
You keep talking the way you talk, you won't have
a bank account. This is good.
Speaker 5 (39:19):
It's like to live. You want have a job because
you don't have a bank account.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
And if imagine a time where everything is electronic money,
no physical money exists, and which means your employer has
to send your net paycheck to your account. Well, you
just got shut down for whatever reason, which means you
have no account, which means they can't send any money
(39:45):
to you, and your employer would be informed that if
you send this net paycheck to someone else for their benefit,
we're going to shut you down. You just became unemployable,
and the only way to become employable again is you're
going to have to go through re education.
Speaker 5 (40:05):
No, it's a not to become an obedient citizen.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
A bow down to.
Speaker 8 (40:12):
Yes.
Speaker 5 (40:13):
Yeah, but don't worry. We'll protect you.
Speaker 2 (40:15):
We'll shut down the freeway when the Army is doing
or the Marine Corps doing something.
Speaker 1 (40:19):
Yeah, the Marine Corps is really iffy when it comes
to launching fire, live fire.
Speaker 5 (40:25):
I don't know what they're going. Uh So, I don't
think that.
Speaker 1 (40:30):
I don't think the thing is that. Well, some people
might be.
Speaker 2 (40:34):
I'm not.
Speaker 1 (40:34):
I'm not addicted to tech. I'm not addicted to a
I like. I like, I like doing the basic things
such as reading. But the thing that I pushed back
at against the most, I mean, if someone wants to
be in that world. Be in that world is when
we are being forced into it.
Speaker 2 (40:53):
Right, which it goes back, goes back to any of
these issues. You don't like the l B G T
b Q plus A b X y Z that same
thing here with the technology. You know, it's a wonderful
tool and every once while I use it, but don't
force me to be fully enveloped by it.
Speaker 1 (41:15):
And to me, it's not a matter of I mean,
some people might be addicted to it, but it's being
forced into having to comply and be part of it
and not have an alternative.
Speaker 2 (41:30):
No, because you can't live if you don't. Yeah, and
then that's what they did with a real ID. No,
you don't have to have the real idea. It's voluntary.
But you know you won't be able to travel.
Speaker 1 (41:40):
With the passport, Well, that's gonna be real soon, I
guarantee you well. And ultimately, this is about creating an
environment that allows more and more surveillance that's as actually exist.
And the point of this surveillance is not to make
(42:01):
sure you're safe and you you know, you don't get
attacked on a punk street. This is to make sure
that you do exactly as you've been told, and maybe
maybe this is a violation in part of the Fourth
(42:22):
Amendment to.
Speaker 2 (42:23):
Make sure you're a compliant part of a of a
system that they've created.
Speaker 1 (42:30):
And this system will continue to go on and propagate
itself and support itself by basically changing the education system.
Speaker 5 (42:41):
Well, yeah, and it goes back to Hitler.
Speaker 2 (42:44):
You know what he had said with you, the older
crowd was moving against him and standing against him.
Speaker 5 (42:50):
He says, who are you? You will pass away?
Speaker 2 (42:53):
And and the and and the younger generation, the new
they stand in the new camp.
Speaker 1 (42:58):
Right, And one last thing, if I can remember, the
opening to this segment, the one that you played, was
the perfect opening, because when the board tells you resistance
is futile, what they're really what the porch really telling
(43:19):
you is resistance is essential. Thank you.
Speaker 2 (43:25):
Well, they're just be saying that your resistance doesn't matter
to them. It's not you're not it's not you're not
capable of.
Speaker 5 (43:32):
Standing against them.
Speaker 2 (43:33):
But yeah, that that's typically that has to be said
when you're already nervous that they can stand against you. Uh, Dennis,
what's your thoughts about this digital fortress?
Speaker 5 (43:43):
Uh?
Speaker 2 (43:44):
This is the surveillance fortress that's that's been created. Dennis
can't tell you, sir, there we go.
Speaker 5 (44:00):
Go ahead.
Speaker 2 (44:05):
Sounds like Dennis is gone now I can hear the background. Dennis,
all right, Well, I hate to do this, but we
got to go on to the next topic. Then if
Dennis is unable to respond, So redistricting has reached the
Supreme Court. And this is a case out of Louisiana,
(44:30):
Louisiana versus KLA C A L L A I S.
And basically what's happened is it's the redistricting for the
purpose of racial fairness and the Voting Rights Act of
nineteen sixty five. I get it born out of the
noble desire of ensuring fairness and elector process. But you
(44:53):
don't create fairness one group by turning against a different group.
The and the equal Protection Clause is not about lifting
up a group so that they can, you know, because
you think that'll give them what you think is equity.
It's about individuals, not collectives. It's about making sure that
it's not about making law to force fairness. It's about
(45:16):
not making law that will interfere with fairness. That's what
the Equal Protection Clause is about. And so now we
have this redistricting war going on, and when race becomes
a driving factor in redistricting, we're no longer talking about equality.
And that's what this case is all about. And I
believe at the Court and they hurt the first the
(45:38):
opening arguments. They have not ruled on it yet, they've
hurt opening arguments, and basically Louisiana Druid's Map group plaintiffs
argue it didn't give enough representation of black voters.
Speaker 5 (45:50):
And now the Supreme Court.
Speaker 2 (45:51):
Seems poised to say, based on past recent rulings, that
race cannot be the reason districts are drawn. And if
that happens, it won't just affect Louisiana, it will ripple
across the country California and New York, Illinois, places where
race based Gary mandarin has become a political tool. And
a lot of this is just a response to what's
(46:13):
going on in Texas well.
Speaker 5 (46:14):
The Republicans are Gary Mandarin tech.
Speaker 2 (46:16):
No, they're not undoing the Gary mandarine that the Democrats
have been using. And the goal here should be neutrality.
The goal should be that the districts don't look like salamanders.
There shouldn't be any racial engineering. There shouldn't be any
partisan manipulation. And if the court rules the way I expect,
I think it'll be a victory for constitutional clarity. And
(46:38):
I think it'll be just another part in that will
help lead to another factor that will lead to a
twenty twenty six midterm election that goes well in favor
of the Republicans. So are you back, Dennis? I, uh.
Speaker 5 (47:04):
Go ahead.
Speaker 2 (47:09):
Well, you didn't just run a marathon, did you.
Speaker 8 (47:15):
No?
Speaker 6 (47:15):
No, no, no, I'm just kind of having a.
Speaker 8 (47:20):
I've been listening. I've been thinking. I just haven't got
a really a real good focus on this thing. Uh.
You know.
Speaker 6 (47:33):
Allen's comments, you know the CBC D and all this stuff.
You know, it's it's it's a link. It's a link
to totalitarianism. You know, it's a way of switching off
your money and holding you hostage. Uh, evaluating your money,
turning it off towards your wealth is gone, turning it on,
(47:54):
you know, based upon you know, like the Chinese metric,
you know social program and I know all of these things.
As you were talking about the biometrics. You know it's
supposedly for safety, but you know they they're using safety
to steal your freedom. And you know, that's exactly right.
Speaker 8 (48:17):
Yeah, that's that's what Franklin's talking about.
Speaker 6 (48:20):
And I'll give you all of these good reasons is
the why it ought to be there.
Speaker 8 (48:24):
But once they have you, they've got you. And then
the guys, the guys who.
Speaker 6 (48:29):
Have the the wicked, the evil desires to uh destroy you,
they can just turn off your money and.
Speaker 8 (48:42):
Uh, you know you're broke.
Speaker 6 (48:44):
You know, there's nothing you can do. And so I'm
totally against the bank digital currency. Uh, you just can't
go there. You know. It's it's like the WHO and
the health organizations and the vaccines that are supposedly to
(49:05):
help everybody, and you know, trying to overcome global warming,
you know, with all of the common dioxide problems, and
you know it's all ahead faith. You know, it's it's
a way of deception, That's exactly it.
Speaker 2 (49:24):
So and H and I remind people all the time,
if it's not godly, it's got to be from the
other guy.
Speaker 5 (49:31):
And what's the other guy all about? Lies?
Speaker 2 (49:33):
The perception, the prince of darkness, the prince of lies,
And that's what they're doing. Yep, right, very good, Alan,
Did you want to discuss what I just talked about?
When it comes to the redistricting or what or did
you did you have anything first? Dani's about the redistricting part.
Speaker 6 (49:54):
Or well, the redistricting, Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (50:02):
This is talking about that court case, you know, and
where they're basically I think they're going to rule to
get rid of racial.
Speaker 6 (50:07):
Well that's the big deal. If they do that, then
you know, that's great.
Speaker 5 (50:12):
And you know you've.
Speaker 6 (50:14):
Got Newsome trying to do his redistricting to get rid
of Republican seats.
Speaker 2 (50:20):
Uh, but he's got to get Prop fifty passed first,
and I don't know if the voters are going to
go for it.
Speaker 6 (50:25):
Well, yeah, we'll have to see. But again, you know,
it's like a dominion voting machines, you know. I mean,
they can be used for good, they can be used
for bad. Well, I don't trust them. I think we
ought to get rid of all the electronics.
Speaker 8 (50:43):
We ought to get rid of me.
Speaker 5 (50:44):
You just got bought by a conservative Republican.
Speaker 6 (50:47):
Yeah, I know, I heard it, you know, but yeah,
we'll just have to You don't find out until after
the baking's done to see really what you got, you know.
And there's been so much deception going on with Democrats,
you know again like Pelosi and the others and Sanders.
You know, they they wrap you up in the American
(51:08):
flag and they give you the aroma you know of
hot dogs and apple pie and Americana. But you know
they're selling you down the river, you know, and uh.
Speaker 2 (51:17):
They're throwing They're throwing some some ketchup and some mustard
and some picklerellation on top of a turd and telling
you it's a hot dogg And that's because just because
you think it looks good doesn't mean it is right,
ir Alan, Before we run out of time, here is
we've got about four minutes. Uh, what's you thought about
this case I just talked about with the where the court.
(51:40):
I think they're going to end racially influenced congressional districts,
don't you think?
Speaker 1 (51:46):
Well, I have a problem with the term, and for me,
there's only one race human. So if you're talking in
terms of racial division, your divisive.
Speaker 2 (51:59):
H But obviously the truth doesn't matter to these people.
So we've got to we've got to hit them where
they're at.
Speaker 1 (52:05):
We need. The thing is what I'd like to know,
and you know this better is originally what was parameters
for creating these different districts in.
Speaker 2 (52:19):
Well, they they just wanted to make sure that the
districts were as equal to population in size as possible.
And and originally they were based on a grid concept.
It wasn't until the Massachusetts State Senate Gary Mander the
(52:40):
district looked like a salamander. According to a a journalist. Uh,
they were a bit basically grid shaped.
Speaker 8 (52:50):
Well they are.
Speaker 6 (52:51):
They ought to be boundary related, physical related, city related
as much as possible, and not getting into this other
stuff where they're you know, like you say, making these
horrific congressional districts that are skinny here, fat here, you know,
connected here. I mean some of these aren't even one district.
(53:13):
You know, you've got an island next to something else,
you know.
Speaker 2 (53:16):
I believe there needs to be amendment of the Constitution
that requires that a district has no more than four
corners in those corners or ninety degree angles.
Speaker 1 (53:26):
What if what about if it's eighty nine degrees? Is
that okay? No, okay, I just get to a uniform shape,
not number, but shape throughout all the states and be
done with them and leave them that way, and make
(53:46):
them bigger or smaller depending on a number of people
who are living there to balance it out well.
Speaker 2 (53:52):
And see as a result of all this, what we're watching,
what we're seeing coming because we've got the redistricting, you
know deal, we got this in case I was just
talking about. You got what Trump has been doing, which
has been fantastic as president. You've got his his push
to get rid to to to fix the voter rolls,
to push for voter ID, to clean up the voter roles,
(54:14):
to renewed focus on election security. I think we're going
to something's gonna happen that that doesn't typically happen. Normally,
the party out of power wins the midterms. I don't
think that's gonna be the case this time. And I
think it's going to be a political earthquake that that
is going to shock the system. I think twenty twenty
six is going to break the mold. I think because
(54:35):
because everybody knows that Donald Trump isn't just holding the line.
His presidency is flipping this gript. The economy is rolling back,
prices are dropping, He's convinced of the least to reduce
their oil prices. Market in history, industry is on the rise.
We're we're seeing the early stages of a manufacturing renaissance
in this country. And so I'm a I'm a firm believer.
We are on the verge of some great stuff, and
(54:57):
I think the shutdown is also hurting them. So I
I think we're gonna see a very good end before
this is all over. All right, we're our time, Collin.
Speaker 1 (55:07):
Plug yourself set at FUDED dot US for Basic Monetary
System of Education at five to seven pm West Coast
time on Patriot Soapbox for the Republic.
Speaker 2 (55:18):
Thank you, Dennis, Thank you Allan, Thank you, Sean the
Engineer United. We stand combined. We kick butt. God bless
American friends, God bless you. Visit me Douglas H. Gibbs
dot com. We get it all well, mostly fixed. I'm
blogging again. We still got to do some other stuff,
but we're on the road to getting that thing the
way you want. Also, you want a list of all
my shows, navigation to Liberty dot com, navigation the number
(55:40):
two Liberty dot com, all the list of all my
shows and all those stuff I do. I'm gonna be
in southern California coming up as well. Be sure to
visit the site and come see me.
Speaker 8 (55:48):
Douglas h.
Speaker 5 (55:48):
Gibbs dot com. We'll see you next time we're on
the radio.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.