How Deleuze, Guattari & Judith Butler Shaped Today’s Woke Left

Dr. Jerome Corsi uncovers the hidden roots of today’s culturally woke identity politics. Drawing from the anti-capitalist book Anti-Oedipus by French philosopher Gilles Deleuze and psychoanalyst Félix Guattari, along with Judith Butler’s writings on Gender Theory, Dr. Corsi explains how these radical ideas shaped the Modern Left’s obsession with identity politics, false realities, and rejection of objective truth. Highlights include:

• How Anti-Oedipus provided a blueprint for anti-capitalist cultural movements
• The influence of Judith Butler on gender ideology and the denial of biological reality
• How Neo-Marxist ideas evolved into today’s Woke groupthink and cultural Maoism
• Why these theories fuel opposition to truth, freedom, and traditional values

📖 This discussion features commentary from Dr. Corsi’s book: The Truth About Neo-Marxism, Cultural Maoism and Anarchy.
👉 Get your copy here: Amazon Link 🌐 Visit Corsi Nation: https://corsination.com Support our partners:
• MyVitalC: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/
• Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.php 📬 Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/ 📖 Get your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush — Call 800-519-6268 🐦 Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1 🔔 Subscribe for fearless political and cultural analysis you won’t hear from the mainstream media.
👍 Like, share, and comment to join the fight against Woke insanity. #Woke #IdentityPolitics #NeoMarxism #GenderTheory #CulturalMaoism #CorsiNation

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/corsi-nation--5810661/support.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:02):
Of course, So we're going to do a deep dive
today into my new book. This book is The Truth
Neo Marxism, Cultural Maoism and Anarchy Exposing woke insanity and
an Age of Disinformation. I'm beginning to do some interviews
on it. It follows. It's volume two is what I'm
calling the Great Awakening Trilogy. Volume one was this book,

(00:27):
and you can see the Great Awakening Trilogy at the
top of the of the page there. It's The Truth
about Energy, global Warming and climate change, exposing climate lies
in an Age of Disinformation. So book number one says
that the the woke movement, the hard left, Neo Marxists

(00:49):
lie about energy. Global warming is carbon dioxide is a
turning novel of the Earth's temperature is ridiculous on legitimate
climate scientist knows it. This book, I am two in
the Great Awakening Trilogy explains why they lie. They lie
because the left exists in a different psychological space the

(01:12):
normal people. It has a different phenomenology, a different view
of the world. The communications gap is huge. So when
we hear things from the woke which sound bizarre, they
are bizarre, but we don't understand the worldview from which
they are coming from, which they operate, which makes these
ideas appear to be not only normal, but compelling, the

(01:38):
only true ideas, the only such that no other thought
can be tolerated. It comes to tolitarian and the far left.
The third book will be about transgenderism, artificial intelligence, and
permanent life extension, which shows where the globalists are going
with all this, trying to deconstruct capitalism, destroy modern day

(02:00):
dustrial societies. We know it, eradicate God, and that's what
it's all about. So it's a very important subject and
I am writing three books on it because I think
that it's going to be so bizarre the world these
people want to create that the average person is not
going to want to live in it. And I think
it has an awakening in that we begin to realize

(02:22):
that without a concept of God, without a concept of
the fundamental objective truth values that have been traditional to
the Enlightenment, that we're going in a world of destruction
and confusion and chaos and anarchy. And you'll see cities
deteriorate as they're deteriorating now in the Democratic Party to hellholes.

(02:44):
The Democratic parties become a neo Marxist Party, and it's
largely abandoned the traditional liberals. You even see that the Jews,
who have been progressives are now having difficulty with the
Democratic Party because they realized it embraces Hamas and it
embraces the Islamic haters of America. Why, because the woke

(03:11):
left hates America too, is a racist country. Now, how
did it ever get there? How do we ever get
two generations of Americans raised with these crazy ideas? And
it's going to it took me. It's going to take
three books to explain it, and it will be comprehensive.
These I'm going to kind of leave these as a
legacy because I think we'll need to sort this out
for many, many decades to come. Now, I'm going to

(03:33):
start this with the two bizarre post modernist slinkers. They're
Giles D. Luz and Felix Gutiari, and they wrote a
book called nineteen seventy two called the Anti Oedipis Capitalism
and Schizophrenia. Those are the two geniuses, right there, two

(03:58):
French intellectuals and as anti Oedipis. That's their book. What
they were defining is that the Oedipus complex. You know,
listen to the postmodernists and Freudian You know, Frankfurt School
began combining Freudian psychology with Marxism, and they began to

(04:19):
have a sex, drugs and rock and roll to be
the cultural revolution in which we abandon God, embraced drugs
and go to a new psychedelic world of freedom and love.
So the Pentegast and I'm sorry, Deluxe and Gutiari were

(04:41):
identifying that the Oedipus complex, the guilt over sex and
basically the love of a son for the mother, which
is in a sense incest It's the kind of ancestual
love which is fairly which is really not recognized. Freud
identified it a a deep psychological trait which was fundamental

(05:03):
to our sexual nature as human beings. And they want
to Deluxe and Gutiari want to transcend this. They want
to contrast capitalism in schizophrenia. They're saying, in capitalism, schizophrenia
is a mental illness. But where they're going, schizophrenia is
their fundamental definition of reality, because the postmodernous world believes

(05:26):
that there is no objective reality. We perceive reality through
our senses, so it's subjective by nature, and that everyone's
subjective experience of reality is the equally valid your value judgment,
my value judgment. Those are the two geniuses again there
So Catherine Prendergast, who was a professor of English at

(05:48):
the University of Illinois, Urbana Champagne in an article in
nineteen twenty eight and I'm Sorry two thousand and eight
that she published called the Unexceptional Schizophrenic a postmodern introduction.
It was published in the Journal of Literary and Cultural
Disability Studies, which is a woke journal. Schizophrenic is commonly

(06:15):
defined as a psychological disorder. It's a psychological state though
that best describes postmodern reality. In other words, schizophrenics are
believed to exist in their own world, in their own
bizarre world, and it's not accessible to others from the outside.
It's their own construct and they can't distinguish between their

(06:37):
construct of reality and the reality itself. So John Nash,
the famous mathematician, was a film. Beautiful Mind was about
John Nash. He lived in this world. This It was
a schizoph schizophrenic, paranoid schizophrenic, felt there are people coming
after him, and he lived in this reality in which

(06:59):
he identify find himself as an intelligence agent. And he
was he was decoding secret messages, it was finding in
news articles for the intelligence agencies. It was none of
it happened. It was all his own schizophrenic reality. He
was experiencing this in his mind, and he basically went
mentally ill. And the movies about his mental illness. Many

(07:22):
of the characters you see in the book or the movie,
rather you realize later on, were not real. They were
just his imaginary characters. Okay, So Prentero Gast explain why
the schizophrenic holds a place of honor in Deluxe in
Gutierre's book. So these two French intellectual geniuses, coffee shopping intellectuals,

(07:47):
decided that they were going to glorify, make heroic the schizophrenic.
So Prenogast wrote, the schizophrenic is imagined here in the book.
The anti Oedipis capitalism in schizophrenia to be immediately recognizable
with a disorder visible and yet because not seen at

(08:08):
the same time, invisible and outside the social order, so
distance from the public domain. The schizophrenic is ripe for
appropriation by Deluxe and Gutiari, who find in this figure
they're anti Oedipis, rejecting the Oedipus complex, which is sexual

(08:29):
repression fundamental to capitalism according to Frankfurt School and a
lot of the postmodern thinkers. So she continued to say
that schizophrenia is a particularly honorary the Gautier, Deluze, and
Gutiari have a particularly honorary position for the schizophrenic, and

(08:56):
that without schizophrenics, postmodernity would struggle to exist within its boundaries.
So the schizophrenic and post modern theory marks the point
of departure from the modern, the eataple, the referential.

Speaker 2 (09:13):
The old.

Speaker 1 (09:15):
Uh predators concluded. Reality is thus accessible to postmodern theory
through the thought processes of the schizophrenic. So post modern
theory assumes that since we must perceive external reality through
our senses, human understanding of external reality must also be subjective.

(09:36):
So they reject Plato's allegoria the cave. All they see
as images against the wall. They don't think there's any
reality behind them of people marching with candles projecting this film.
For Plato and Kant, they had a higher order of
understanding of reality, which is the a priori judgments judgments

(09:58):
of that were hard wired with values, judgments senses of
reality against which our subjective experiences are tested, but critical theory,
which is what the critical theory was the code word
for the Frankfurt Schools reinterpretation of Marxism. Frankfurt school were

(10:20):
largely a group of Jewish intellectuals who fled Nazi Germany,
and they were communists, but communists with a bizarre hybrid
combination of Freud wanting to be able to achieve the
utopia by releasing the inhibited sexual impulses within human beings

(10:43):
that Freud had identified. Freud believed that civilization required repression
of uninhibited sexuality in order to form families, to form order,
and the Frankfort School felt that was fundamental accountitalism. It
made us want to work to sublimate our labor for

(11:04):
other people's benefit, and they wanted to eliminate work. They
wanted to free up all these sexual impulses and go
to a utopian world in which the machines would take
care of the nasty business of staying alive and eating.
So in critical theory results in schizophrenic thinking because the

(11:26):
critical theories underlying phenomenology derives from postmodernist theory. So critical
theory embraces this idea that every individual's private languages, their solipsisms.
All of these are equally valid. So instead of descartes,
I think, therefore I am. The postmodernist formulation is I think,

(11:49):
but I'm confused. The non binary idiosyncratically defined identities that
not binary, not male, female, anything that was economy like
that was viewed as too limiting. These were all viewed
as language games. The rules that constructed our external reality

(12:11):
by constructs, and the constructs were either like etipole constructs
which we needed to break up, or they were post
edapol constructs, which was the leap into a leap away
from enlightenment thinking into postmodernist subjective thinking, in which there
is really no objective reality. So this non binary idiosyncratically

(12:34):
defined identities the critical theory generates would only work as
imagined if the rules of external reality bent to our whims.
Hegel I had mystical thinking, and that he believed that
we were going to perfect through the progress of history.
This utopia post modern theories fundamentally a mystical doctrine that

(12:58):
permits each one of us to magically create the world
for everybody. Post modern language of enlightenment rails against reason
and science, largely because world wars dominated the twentieth century,
and they thought, if this is what the Enlightenment results in,
we've got to reject the Enlightenment. Yes, the Enlightenment produced

(13:19):
a world of technological wonders, cell phones, personal computers, transportation
of millions of people across continents via advanced commercial aviation,
and so on. Yet by presuming the Enlightenment would also
advance human nature to produce a state of Nietzschean ubermensh superman,
we made a mistake assuming advances in technology would necessarily

(13:42):
result in advanced human morality. What we're ending up with
in producing postmodernous world of technological wonders is going to
be populated by a woke generation that can't tell us
what a man is or what a woman is. I mean,
is that confused?

Speaker 2 (14:00):
Used?

Speaker 1 (14:01):
Now, if we go into one other aspect of this
that I want to touch on before really looking at
this gender identity, postmodernism really involves a perversion of language.
So under postmodernism, many ideas that have been regarded previously

(14:23):
as objectively true. You know that we shouldn't kill, that
we shouldn't steal, etc. Became mere constructions of language. Full
cult who was a French writer who wrote about prisons
and wrote about all the kinds of things of convention,
also about sex, called all these discourses the construct reality.

(14:47):
Another one of the postmodern thinkers that I cover, a
guy named Leotard, expanded upon Victenstein, who is a language philosopher.
He Frichtenstein was a brilliant phenomenologist language philosopher. Victimsine said,
we were language games that in postmodern thought, language has

(15:08):
enormous power to control society and how we think and
to construct the reality in which we live. So it's
all about narratives. Creating utopian narratives is the heart of
postmodernists thinking. Now, let's apply this to what they call
queer theory in woke ideology coming out of the Frankfurt School.

(15:35):
This is Judith Butler leads this. She was born in
nineteen fifty six in Cleveland, Ohio. I was born in
East Cleveland, Ohio, in nineteen forty six, ten years older
than her. In ninety three she began teaching at the
University of California, Berkeley. And our seminole book is nineteen

(15:56):
ninety book called Gender Trouble, Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.
And that's the book in which this Judith Butler defined.
She distinguished between gender and sex. They're not equivalent terms.
A person sex is their biological makeup, whether they have

(16:19):
male or female sex organs, and male or female internal organs.
She distinguished the gender was a cultural construct identifying a
person's sexual inclinations. Thus, Butler insisted that gender was not
binary male female, but involved a spectrum of possible orientations.

(16:41):
Her worldview became post structural more than even postmodern. Distinction
between postmodern post structurals highly technical. Both postmodern and post
structural are nearly synonymous terms, each which emphasis emphasizes viewing

(17:03):
realities linguistically formed constructs. Structuralism is social sciences theory and
methodology that understands an element of cultures in society through
the network of relationships that define how the particular cultural
society element interacts with others. In other words, whose are

(17:23):
Butler's friends, Who does she associate with? What is her
her network? Butler's influential conclusion was that gender is understood
not by examining how sexual elements in culture or society
network and interact, but through performance acts over time. She
insisted the only valid methodology comprehend gender involved internalizing her

(17:47):
understanding of how performance acts defined gender. So she writes
a very convoluted passage in Gender Trouble. So the performance
of Drag plays upon the distinction between the anatomy of
the performer and the gender that's being performed. But we

(18:07):
are actually in the presence of three contingent dimensions of
significant corporal corporal reality, anatomical, sex, gender identity, and gender performance.
If the anatomy of the performance performer is already distinct
from the gender of the performer, and both of these

(18:30):
are distinct from the gender of the performance, then the
performance suggests a dissonance not only between the sex and
the performance, but sex and gender and gender and performance.
As much as Drag creates a unified picture of quote woman, which,
as critics often oppose, it also reveals the distinctiveness of

(18:54):
these those aspects of gendered experience which are falsely naturalized
as a unity through the regulatory fiction of heterosexual coherence.
In imitating gender drag. Okay, if you're following us, what
she's saying is that, you know, okay, so you get transgenderism,

(19:14):
which is, let's take a male who I identifies as
the gender as not necessarily female, but the gender is
performing a male with male sex organs in a female

(19:34):
cultural presentation, wearing feminine attire, dressing like a feminine a
woman would do, modifying her body, his body, its body
such that it would develop breasts, that it would emphasize
female characteristics, slender hips, changing the entire appearance of the

(20:00):
person to appear completely feminine yet have male sexual organs.
And their performance in society is to present themselves as
female but internally yet male. And if that isn't confused,
I don't know what is confused, But that's what That's

(20:21):
what Butler is saying, is how we determine what the
gender of a person is how they act it out. Okay,
So if she concludes this with a sentence that goes
on for a whole quite a while, says in imitating

(20:42):
gender drag implicitly reveals the imitative structure of gender itself,
as well as its contingency. The part of the pleasure,
the giddiness of the performance is in the recognition of
a radical contingency in the relationship between sex and gender

(21:02):
in the face of cultural configurations of casual unities that
are regularly asserved to be natural necessary in the place
of the heterosexual coherence. We see sex and gender denaturalized
by means of a performance which avows their distinctness and
dramatizes their cultural mechanism of their fabricated unity. Okay, that's convoluted,

(21:30):
But what she is saying is the transgender males in
drag are challenging because their gender performance is a staged
performance that acts out or imitates female sexuality, almost as
a parody for Butler's sex at birth is not determinative
of gender. Gender born male may define their gender as female.

(21:53):
A person born female may define their gender as male.
Butler's term sex is a physical term that refers primarily
to genital organs, where gender is a mental or identity
term that refers to the acts in which the person
engages that displays their sexual orientation. Critical gender theory has

(22:15):
thus embraced the parlance of queer theory. It's not an
offensive term because they are saying that Q so it's
lgb t Q I Q is for queer and I
is for intersex. Intersex is a term that applies to
those born with sex markers, genitals, hormones, chromosomes that are

(22:39):
neither male or female. The acronym opens up a yet
to be defined gender. So the University of California Riverdale's
published a long list of these constructed critical gender CGT terminology.

(23:01):
And in this list you get a whole list of
various bizarre kinds of combinations that people can which include
past lives, which include it ultimately ends up being lgbt
q I A plus lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, queer, intersexual

(23:23):
a sexual. Okay, Now that isn't confused, and if it
doesn't open up a bundle of problems, I don't know
what does.

Speaker 2 (23:38):
So.

Speaker 1 (23:39):
Regarding queer theory and gender theory, reading another book, Queer
Theory and Gender Theory, which I guess was her second
major book. Now this was This was Ricky Wilchins two
thousand and four book, Queer Theory and Gender Theory. She

(23:59):
basically made clear that the turmoil coming with consistent, generally
agreed concepts, as fundamentally as answering the question what is
a woman.

Speaker 2 (24:14):
What?

Speaker 1 (24:15):
Wilson's criticizes assertions that biology is not destiny. One is
not born, a woman becomes a woman. She required these
statements required women to absume maternity and femininity, such as
the essence of selfhood, in effect reducing women to another stereotype,

(24:36):
even if this time it is an entirely positive or
superior one. So she grappled with transgender male, boy identified
dyke or intersectional female genders on the margin of identity.
She suggests a queer theory and gender theory have adapted

(24:57):
to accept these subjectively identified gender identity so as to
make the offending, messy realities disappear. Now, the problem is
these messy realities we're not supposed to recognize. The criticizers
supposed to be identifiable, and you get the picture. You
can see there the queer theory, the gender theory. You

(25:21):
get a picture. Is that a picture of a man
or a woman? Well, it's the point is that gender
is the performance acts, and it's what the person becomes
based on their mental configuration of their sexuality, which is
not defined. It's more their gender because sexuality is a

(25:45):
term which is biologically determined but not psychologically determinative. Now
that ties together with where the left is and so therefore,
when you don't use their pronouns, you are not respecting them.
You're it's a microaggression. Now, the problem with this is

(26:09):
if we're going to live in a society where the
schizophrenics are going to rule. It's going to be anarchy
because even you know so now the current debate is
they want to eliminate reading in the school public schools.
The To Kill a Mockingbird, which is very famous nineteen
sixties book that defined a rape trial of a black man,

(26:35):
and I believe when the Southern States, and it was
essentially someone who did not commit the crime, and it
was it showed the confusion of you know, sex and
race in the in the Deep South post and a
post bell after the Civil War, modern times in which
these you know, black men were supposed to covet white

(26:57):
women and white women were afraid that they were going
to be raped by black men, and that led to
that's the book. Well, today there is a move in
the queer theory, critical gender theory to reject reading this
book because a black woman might say, that book isn't
about me, that's not me, that's not my problem. My

(27:21):
problem is that, you know, I'm a woman who is
really a which is saying, here is a My identity
is more of a boy, and it is more childhood uncertainty.
She fantasizes that I am really a boy within in

(27:42):
the female. And that's the kind of gender identity confusion
that has to be respected because it is what she feels.
And if she feels at reading to Kill a Mockingbird
identifies a racial issue of sex which she doesn't have.

(28:08):
It is old fashioned, out of vogue and reflective of
the Oedipus nature of sexuality which she is rejecting. Now,
if you've followed me so far, what I'm saying is
that we're dealing with a group of people who have
internalized these ideas, and that the evolution of Neo Marxism,

(28:34):
which was aimed at destroying the culture, have come up
with this language perversion which we construct this confused reality
where the inmates are running the asylum and demanding that
we adhere to their rules, when in fact, since it
doesn't coexist with objective reality, produces a group of people

(28:58):
who are confused their identity. Supreme Court justice who can't
tell you what a woman is because she doesn't know
what the performance acts are of a person who was
born with female genitilia until she knows what the person does,
and that requires an extensive observation, and it could be

(29:18):
very complicated. It could be a past life manifestation and
another culture that this person is experiencing as their gender
performance reality. The fundamental nature of this, I think is
so destructive and was concluded to be destructive. It ultimately

(29:38):
makes white privilege the ultimate villain and elevates racial tension,
saying that we white, you know, the white race, is
responsible for creating this Oedipus reality, repressing sex, creating capitalism,
making us work, sublimating our labor, and not advancing and

(30:02):
understanding and elevated society in which everyone pursues their individual
sexuality as they choose, everybody respects each other. And we
define these terms by the nature of critical theory, critical
queer theory, critical race theory, critical whatever you want theory. Craig,
you want to comment on this, because I think I've

(30:23):
covered pretty much of what I had intended to lay out.
This book is critical and understanding these people, and I'm
going to end with saying, how do we defeat this?

Speaker 2 (30:33):
Go ahead, Greg, Well, I can tell you that I'm
wondering if they're going to try to find more alphabet
letters to fit into that line of I think they're
writing numbers to it now too.

Speaker 3 (30:43):
Isn't there a two in there somewhere and on a plus.

Speaker 1 (30:46):
Sign, there's a plus sign. They could well be anything
in this. I mean, it gets so bizarre. I don't
endeavor to keep up with it.

Speaker 3 (30:54):
They're challenging Mary Poppins and Dick van Dyck.

Speaker 1 (30:58):
Yes, yeah, they're challenging everything that isn't a schizophrenic approach
to sex and and basically you know this acting out
so the way they define transgender and transgender is the
new superstar. Now the problem with transgenderism, okay, the problem

(31:22):
with all of this, I say, the only way to
defeat this is by classically biblically the fruit of the tree.
In other words, what does this produce? So if it
produces transgenders, that's why they're saying that, you know, a
male who identifies as a transgender or as a female

(31:44):
can participate in female sports. That you know they that
what it does is it challenges the identity of a
woman who born with female genitalia and who's identity as female.
It challenges the philisial athletes of the world who believe

(32:06):
that there was a sacred opportunity for giving life that
a woman uniquely had. These people want to even say
a man can get pregnant, a man can have a baby.
I mean, the bizarre nature of this is that when
you watch the acting out of a gay pride parade,
if that's the world we're going into, it is not

(32:28):
going to be a very productive world. It's going to
be completely messed up, and it's going to be a
destructive world because all these people can do is act
out their fantasies, demand that you buy into them, and
if you don't, you're the one that needs to go
to thought reform. They're atlitarian, they believe they've come to
a consensus and this is a higher order, this is

(32:50):
elevated human beings. And they include pedophilia, and they can
include every other thing you can think of, bestiality, all
the list goes on.

Speaker 3 (32:59):
A lot of these selfish theories and selfish actions where
they don't really care about what happens to everybody else
around them or some of those affected. Let's take on
the simple level, the transgender male to female athletes playing
women's sports. There's another recent report where a uh A
girl had her teeth knocked out because of a male

(33:19):
playing field hockey against her made this shot and hit
her face there that there are biological differences. These transgender
weightlifters are setting records and this is this is it's
leading to unfair competition. On the other hand, you're talking
about pedophilia and and these people who are very selfish
committing these acts for whatever reason they want to and

(33:41):
not caring what happens to the victims afterwards as well.
These are these are pretty horrible people. This is something
that's become a political movement without care and uh or
without I should say without I guess the best word
is care for what happens to those or being damaged
collaterally or anybody else that's in the way of their agenda,

(34:04):
if you will.

Speaker 1 (34:05):
Well, following on to your point, it leads to grooming
of children. So starting out of kindergarten, children are exposed
to this and made normal for an average child. This
is absolutely confusing. You know, mommy, why is that man
wearing a dress? You know? And it's it's not the
kind of they're imposing these ideas on children who have

(34:26):
no idea what sex is. They haven't biologically gone through puberty,
they haven't gone biologically to the point where they can
appreciate what a sexual discussion is all about. And yet
this mindset is being laid on them as preparation for
when they do become sexually oriented. Their bodies are mature
to the point where they can experience sex that they

(34:48):
then enter into these behaviors as normal. That's the grooming
part of it, preparing in advance the.

Speaker 3 (34:55):
Adults to the adults, taking or basically taking the perspective recruit,
if you will, the child under their wing and push
them a certain way. This is not job training.

Speaker 2 (35:07):
This is not.

Speaker 3 (35:09):
Teaching somebody how to drive a car. No, this is
a light These are life altering decisions that these groomers
are trying to push young children to make, and oftentimes
before they're old enough to realize what they really want.

Speaker 1 (35:24):
Well, and then we get down to the military wearing
dresses and modifying their bodies to look like their female
and they become generals and commanders. Now, from the history
of the world, that's been a bad idea, and the
idea of gender confusion in the military force is it

(35:45):
defines the chaos that these people intend to produce for society,
because the ultimate goal of the people who architected this
is the destruction of capitalism and the end of in
le Lightenment and the reduction of human beings to the
point where they can be eased. They'll self and slaves.

Speaker 3 (36:01):
And the patriarchy. I guess that's that's the boogeyman, the patriarchy.
It's always about that, right, always attacking males.

Speaker 1 (36:08):
Males are males are the boogeyman, like white supremacies the boogeyman.

Speaker 3 (36:13):
I laugh at people who say, well, you know, we
need a woman president. We'se women president. A woman president
would do things, would make things so much easier. I'll say, oh,
here's the thing, and look at world history. Women could
be just as horrible as men. We have We've had tyrannists,
We've had we've had women that Elizabeth Bathory is one
of them. I always forget her name in Metagascar. Yeah,

(36:35):
the Chinese empress. Now I'm my memory pills need to
be taken at this point. But the fact is there
were tyrannists, there were female dictators and and uh and
even even those female bad bosses, just as much as
there were males who did the same thing. So we're
in equal society both ways. Let's put it that way.

(36:57):
We can be equally great and equally horrible.

Speaker 1 (36:59):
Well, we were human beings, right. Women can kill just
like men can kill.

Speaker 3 (37:05):
That's true, can lie.

Speaker 1 (37:06):
Just like men can lie. Women can commit sins just
like men can commit sins. And there's no This is
a matter of blurring lines and language which is always destructive.
Let's wrap it up, Chris, this has been about the
new book Truth about Neo Marxism, cultural Maoism, and anarchy.

(37:31):
I think it will take a bit of effort to
read the book, but I think it will be rewarding
for those who manage to get through it. And I'll
take you to a new understanding of the insanity we're
facing with this critical race theory. In the end, God
always wins. God will win here too. This is going
to be passing. It'll be marked as a period of
human history that was a bizarre mass phenomenon, mass delusion,

(37:57):
mass insanity. These mass movements are typically based on language perversion.
They are typically based on ideas that are only partly true,
but are repeated and nauseum and insisted upon with a
hard edge of tutalitarianism. Doctor Jrome Corsi, we are going

(38:17):
to go through a judgment of God. I encourage people
in the spirit of Second Corinthians seven fourteen to join
me and asking God to forgive us for allowing the
world to get to this insane point not opposing it sooner.
And the remedy biblically is that God will hear our

(38:38):
prayers and heal our land. It's going to take God
intervention in order for this insanity to become a parent
all human beings. Doctor Jrome Corsi. Today is there's been
a deep dive, one of our deep dive sessions into
these books and ideas. It's today is Wednesday, November eighth,
twenty twenty three. The Truthcentral dot com. We're doing broadcasts

(39:01):
every weekday we go to the website. You can find
us on many different channels, broadcasting, live streaming on Rumble Bitch, Shoot,
many different websites, and audio only on Apple Podcasts and
many other places. Upper right hand corner you can see
all the social media where we're on and choose the
one you like. We also have archived on the right

(39:25):
hand side various programs from previously and some around themes,
and you can get the free copy of this book,
The Coming of the Coming Global Crash and how it
will create an historic gold rush. You can call it
the eight hundred numbers Swiss America, and I urge you
to do so. That one of our major sponsors, the
eight hundred number, is eight hundred five nine six two

(39:48):
six eight. I'll repeat that one, eight hundred five nine
six two six eight. Talk about gold and silver, investing
in what it can do for you. These precious metal
are going to retain purchasing power as the dollar is devalued.
The dollar becomes worthless, buys less