Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
More Angel.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
Of course it's during course, and today it's Monday, it's
October twenty, twenty twenty five. I'm going to cover several
stories today. I'm going to start with the no Name
protests that were going on across the country. I want
to do a discussion about Russia and Ukraine and what's
(00:22):
going on in Trump's now attempt to settle the war.
And then we're gonna end up with a little bit
of discussion about China and whether or not g is
losing control over China. China seems to be in some
pretty difficult economic positions. Let's start right in with the
no Name protests, and Chris, I want you to comment
(00:45):
on this, but in a minute, so I'm going to
go There's a very interesting article in zero Heads this morning,
and what they're featuring is that if evidently a lot
of the people who attended these meetings were the geriatrics,
I mean, they were the old agent kippies who uh
(01:06):
you know. This was a supposed to be a big,
big protest nationwide Democratic dark money NNGO network, which left
wing billionaires funded, now for a Color Revolution style nationwide
mobilization on Saturday. At least are the same tactics US
(01:29):
intelligence agencies have used to overthrow regimes with the help
of George Soros. But the terminated that, you know, as
it terminated. It was a flop because the turnout wasn't
dominated by young, unhinged leftists or gender confused woke warriors,
(01:49):
but by the baby boomer liberals. And that was Mike
Bens described it as they flat. They that coude flat.
In other words, it was nothing. It didn't go over. So, Chris,
what do you think. I mean, I see all the
(02:10):
signs and everything. By the way, as the Communist Party
also supported it, but here you've got all the I mean,
these are the people who attend to their grandmas and grandpa's.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
That's kind of funny, Yeah, I remember back I live
in the Hudson Valley we had in the eighties. I
guess the anti Bush old ladies called them, calling them
films the raging grannies.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Right.
Speaker 1 (02:37):
A lot a lot of these people are ex hippies
who want to go out and try to protest again.
They want they realized they didn't make much of a
difference before they think they're doing it. I don't think
they really understand how full on communist. This movement is
some of them. Others just want to go out and
do something. They're bored. They just see did you see
the last note King's Parade? There were a bunch of
elderly is banging on pots and pans. It reminds me
(03:01):
back in my when I was younger, my brother's sister
and I would go to my would go to this
place in Main called Points Tobago. It was a resort campground,
had everything to do. The toddlers two to four year
olds would have a weekly pots and pans parade. They
could walk around with bang spoons on pans and pots
and things like that and make noise around the beach.
(03:21):
That's what that reminded me of.
Speaker 2 (03:25):
Well, you know, it's the thing that concerns me is
that all this dark money network that funds it, the
Arabella Networks, Soros Network, the Gates Foundation, Ford Foundation, Tides Foundation.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
Already tied to Soros by the way.
Speaker 2 (03:42):
Yes, And you know Peter Schweitzer and Seamus Brunner Government
Accountability in Stude called them riot Inc. You know, the
permanent protest industrial complex. And this is no King's two
point zero. So these protests are far from organic because
this movement is manufactured, coordinated, and very artificial. And there's
(04:07):
an interesting thing about say, they don't want no Kings,
they want their kings, which is really the truth. But
Schweizer and Brunner calculated that they traced two hundred and
ninety four million dollars to the official No Kings two
(04:27):
point zero partners and organizers, all funneled through the same
riot ink dark money networks. So Arabella gave seventy nine million,
Soros seventy two million, Ford fifty one million, Tides Foundation
forty five million, Rockefeller twenty eight million, Buffet sixteen million. Well,
(04:48):
you know, the lift has got all this money, the
right has virtually it's impossible. My foundation, God's five stones,
We're lucky to have, you know, a few thousand dollars
in that these people are getting millions to protest against
Trump and against I guess this is also the late
(05:08):
night television crowd, is that right? Uh?
Speaker 1 (05:12):
The funny thing is you were talking about this off air.
A lot of the protesters are elderly. Now I'm pretty
much approaching that demographic in a bunch of years anyway.
But the fact is it's funny. I suppose the younger people,
some of them got a little bored with the attention.
You might. There are studies that young males and in
Generation Z are leaning more towards the right. Young females
(05:36):
are out there screaming because that's just what you're going
to do. But it looks like the aging hippies are
out there trying to uh their their last grasp of
glory if you will, or or I'll go with this too.
There's a there were There are several studies of people
who have let's just say, a certain level of intelligence,
(05:56):
who cannot separate television and television character and or personas
with real life. Donald Trump has always been portrayed as
the playboy. Well he kind of was in the eighties
in the nineties, and of course his apprentice is his mean,
his demeanor as far as firing everybody right and the left.
A lot of people kind of associate him with his
(06:19):
character and his flamboyance, if you will, rather than the
actual policy, which they'll will find, funnily enough, that they
agreed with maybe ten twenty years ago. In a lot
of cases, they just want to be out there. I
suppose it's just something to do. Others are just others.
As we know, we're getting paid. I don't think the
raging grannies here aren't.
Speaker 2 (06:40):
Well it's interesting because I think we're going to see
you know, this exposed more for the money than anything else. Yes,
and this is going to be interesting to see how
you know, the left is putting money into all these
anti Trump, anti America causes and the it's ridiculous and
(07:03):
it's a Marxistorian. There was a Marxist of the No
King's Protest too, called for murdering ICE agents one of
the protests, and then of course turns out he was
a university staffer. Of course. I mean, you know, they
protested a Progressive Labor Party calling for ICE agents to
(07:23):
get shot and wiped out. Well, Progressive Labor Party is
another just name for communism, and in Chicago they were
saying that, you know, calling for ICE to get shot
and wiped out, and all these things getting away with it.
These should be crimes. There should be threats. They have
to be taken seriously, and they do lead to people
(07:43):
acting on them, whether or not. There you know, it's
like they called dog whistles. The message is put out
there and it kind of gives authority or okay to
people who are fringe Waco anyway to go out and
do violent things to ice agents. It's irresponsible to do this.
I mean, whether it's criminal or not, or whether it's
(08:04):
free speech. But the point is you can't be encouraging
people to take violent action when it's likely that some
are going to listen and do it. That's irresponsible, maybe criminal.
So you know, Chris, I think the whole thing was
a flop. But again it indicates that the Left really
is out to see and doesn't know what it's doing.
(08:26):
Supporting causes that nobody else supports. In this government shutdown,
I think is just backfiring against Schumer and the others
who are looking ridiculous that they don't want to they
want to fund the legal aliens and all their other
crazy programs. They're holding out to fund a bunch of
programs the Americans don't care about.
Speaker 1 (08:45):
Agreed there, And the fact is Democrats are trying to
show the nation they have numbers. The numbers were down
from expected. I remember the hype about this being the
largest protest in the history of America. Oh yes, this
is the six hundred was in somewhat plus group and
as we know, mostly the Kimmel and Colbert watchers that
(09:05):
sort of thing. Although that's kind of down to one
hundred and twenty thousand, if correct.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
I think they're getting fewer than some YouTube pianels get.
Speaker 1 (09:14):
That's true. A lot of YouTube channels get a lot
of views, I gotta tell you. But but you're right
about this. It's funny. These these people just I don't know.
I guess some of them are looking for something to do.
Others I maybe want to fit in, do something they
perceive as cool. Or it's just a blind hatred for
Donald Trump, regardless of the policies. It's a media induced hatred,
(09:39):
by the way, maybe even peer induced.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
Well, let's shift gears and go to the second topic.
I want to talk about Russia and you Craine. A
lot is happening here, and Trump appeared to decide in
September he was going to give Tomahawk cruise missiles to
Ukraine capable of strike deep into Russia. Now those, of course,
(10:02):
that would escalate the war. And yet last Friday, October seventeenth,
Trump refused, at a meeting with Zelenski to provide the
Tomahawk missiles. It was a contentious meeting and Trump insisted
that Selenski must surrender this Dombas region in southern Ukraine,
(10:25):
even though Kiev still holds a quarter of the Esque province.
It's largely a Russian speaking province, but it has not
yet been taken over by Russia. If it did, it
would provide a clear path in the Kiev. Now, the
turnaround the policy seemed to be here a phone call
that Putin prompted with Trump the day before, and in
(10:51):
that Trump that was definitely had a long conversation, and
Putin suggested and Trump agreed to meet in Budapest, Hungary
for another round of talks. But you know the that
that Trump backed off from his statements with Zelensky at
(11:13):
the General Assembly suggested that you know when he suggested
that Trump would could win the war. But now Trump
has returned to its original to a more sane position,
calling upon Keevin Rott Moscow to stop the war immediately,
suggesting that an a peace deal Russia would retain the
(11:34):
territory as military has gained. Trump when he landed in
West Palm Beach after the meeting, UH said, you go
by battle line whatever it is. After the meeting, would
(11:58):
now I think Medvedev on October thirteenth made the statement
that essentially, you know, if you see these Tomawk missiles flying,
you don't know whether they're nuclear or conventional, and Trump
would be starting in a nuclear war to get these missiles. There. Also,
you know, the idea that it's uh a proxy war anymore.
(12:23):
If if in fact there are missiles and we're firing
them through NATO and all the rest of it, it's
hard to maintain that this is not a more direct
war that we're involved in. Okay, So what what is
the case is that I think this comes from General Kellogg,
(12:44):
who's been warmongering against Putin and Ukraine, and a conflict
between Kellogg and Special Envoy Steve Whitkoff, who's met with
Putin five times this year, and I've I've heard Kellogg
and private briefings compare Putin to Hitler arguing that Trump
must not repeat the Nebel Chamberlain mistake in nineteen thirty
(13:08):
eight Munich agreement, trying to appease Hitler. So Kellogg is
insisting that we must provide Ukraine with weapons needed to
win the war. And Kalig did not attend the White
House meeting on October seventeenth, but White House told the
Ukrainian delegation that Zelenski must give of the entire dn
(13:31):
Tesk region back to Russia to stop the fighting. Now,
this whole issue of the Tomahawk missiles goes back to
September twenty ninth, when Vice President J. D. Vance suggested
that we were seriously considering Ukraine's request for these long
range Tomahawk missiles, and that same day Kellogg gave a
(13:57):
I guess a press statement saying that Trump had all
the rise NATO members to deploy missile systems provided by
the United States into non NATO Ukraine. Kellig consisted that
Trump had authorized NATO to strike deeply Russia with missiles
supposedly the Tomahawks broker to NATO by the United States.
So keleg had to understand that authorizing NATO to strike
(14:20):
Moscow with US missiles would instantly transform the Ukraine War
from a proxy war between NATO and Russia. And this
is I think the key is that, you know, the
(14:40):
idea that we're just going to be able to provide
these missiles and turn back the tide of the war
is ridiculous. It's just not going to happen. So you know,
we've got to have some sense in here to understand
(15:02):
that if we do, if we do ramp up the
violence and escalate the war, we're risking nuclear war again.
And both Russia and China, I think would be willing
to go to nuclear war over Ukraine. I think they
both feel like they've got some strategic advantage. But the
(15:24):
coincidence advance and Kellogg's statements on September twenty nine suggests
that Kellogg was the author the suggestion that Trump should
supply Lensky with Tom markin missils Broker by the United
States to Ukraine through NATO. Now Trump's going to realize
that the Ukraine problem goes back to Obama and Biden,
(15:48):
together with the CIA and sorrows, the worthy real aggressors.
And I cite a book and called Provoked hole Washington
started the New Cold War and the catastrophe of Ukraine.
I've got the book here. It's a very large book.
It's about six hundred and seventy some pages long. It's
(16:10):
a really good book. It's called Provoked. Right here. This
is the book, and it's by Scott Horton h rt
N and Scott Horton is head of the Libertarian Institute
and he and he is the editorial director of anti
war dot com. Now I thought he By the way,
(16:33):
it's a very very good book, very detailed, very well footnoted,
and it goes through the Russian collusion. You know, my
role in the Russian collusion, all of the the fact
that I was now did not have a tie to
a songe all the things that went on going back
through the starting out with Bill Clinton and George HW. Bush,
(16:59):
all the whole idea that we needed to expand the
nat over to the border with Russia, which was the
democratic idea. There's one paragraph I quote in an article
I'm going to publish an American Thinker. I want to
read it to you because I think it's really a
very good summary of a lot of what we're dealing with.
(17:19):
Hinton wrote that the current fear campaign against Russia and
the American media is no different from the demonization of
any of the US government's enemies here and around the world.
Virtually all, virtually the entire popular narrative is fake. That's
the problem. But the older generation is used to hating Russia,
(17:42):
and the young has been sold aligned about Russian aggression
through Eastern Europe for years now. There's also harm done
by the Russia Gate hoax that claim the dastardly putent
inflicted President Trump upon our land, which is seemingly forever
damaged the brains of a man Americans Democrats and made
(18:02):
peaceful co existence for them unthinkable. I think the Democrats
have hated Russia ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall,
when Russia was no longer communist. Then the Democrats loved
Russia when it was communist, going back into nineteen seventeen,
but once it was no longer communists, the Democrats had
no use for it. So what I'm saying is that
(18:25):
I think Trump is finally coming to his senses and
that the reality is that we're not going to get
this territory back from Russia unless we have a nuclear war.
So the only solution is really to stop funding Zelenski
and NATO. If Trump needs to do it that way,
that's the only real solution, and that will force, in fact,
(18:47):
the end of the war. So I'm writing an article
about I'm about almost done with it. I've got to
make some changes in it. I want to refine it
just a little bit more. But it's I think an
important article examining the predicament that we're in. And Chris,
do you have any comments on this? I mean, we've
been at this war now for years. It's not going
to be ended with Russia withdrawing from Ukraine. And we've
(19:11):
got to really accept our culpability with the Democrats having
prompted this through the Maidan rebellion, you know, and all
the other things that the Democrats did to intensify the
violence between Russia and Ukraine.
Speaker 1 (19:29):
Any thoughts, Chris, Again, this war's been going on. Yeah,
this war has been going on for way too long,
and and I understand it has to end. But like
we're saying, the media is trying to push these this
idea that Ukraine, even though because Trump flooded it, that's
part of the reason, but that Ukraine can beat Russia.
I suppose one can say a nation has a puncher's
(19:51):
chance against another nation. Now you're talking about a country
which is trying to work with EU nations to call
back its citizen to fight in the war because they're
running out of a man power. We already know they
were trying to commission older people, people who really wouldn't
be able to fight on a regular basis to whip
him up in time to fight against Russia. Russia has
(20:12):
the population and have a president who doesn't really care
about the population he has, and it's going to just
as you said, it's just going to keep going until
Ukraine gives up those two regions. And again, this is
not a Nevill Chamberlain thing. Just like you said before,
this is something that just has to be done Russia
(20:33):
and we also have to keep them in. Russia also
wants to reinstate, or at least reform the old Soviet Union,
mainly in his image. He wants to be the guy
that does that before he passes. So he's going to
set his sites on another nation or let's say, another
republic after this. Is he going to wait till Trump's
gone or is he going to do it when Trump's president.
That's a good question.
Speaker 2 (20:55):
Well, I think you know this is this is gonna
this is coming to I think a point where it's
going to be resolved, and I think that's going to
have to happen pretty soon. You know. I'm seeing this
(21:16):
drama playing out and I think it's really coming very
very closely to a conclusion, and I'm hoping that this
meeting in Hungary will make some sense and night, but
I do think Trump's gonna have to say I'm done
funding it. If we're done funding at the war ends,
because NATO doesn't have the resources to fund it. Europe
(21:38):
is already in desperate economic situation, and I don't see
the war continuing. Okay, I want to move on to
a couple more stories. We're following very closely, and I
continue to follow price of gold, and today gold is
at four thousand, two hundred and eighty two dollars. Now
gold has gone right through the four two hundred dollars barrier,
(22:01):
and I've said it would be at four thousand by
the end of the year. It looks like it'll be
at forty five hundred by the end of the year.
And silver's at fifty two dollars and twenty eight cents
right now. So if you take a look at we've
revamped the Coursey Nation website a bit to tune it up,
take a look at the tabs at the top, and
Chris will show you. I think you can see that
(22:23):
we've got gold prominently figured there. Chris is showing you
right now our website on the God's Five Stones, and
we are advancing things on the voter registration issues. That's
coming to a head as well. By the way, as
I kind of predict it would happen, the White House
looks like it's hired this Kurt Olsen, former congressman, whose
(22:50):
task is going to be to start getting information out
about the voter integrity issue and much more on the
coddulant practices, including the algorithms which we've shown on God's
Five Stones, allow the creation of these millions of false
voters that yet get legitimate state ideas and can be
used in mail and ballot schemes. Now, the gold and
(23:15):
gold and silver, if you go back to that Swiss
America website, take advantage of this two hundred and fifty
coins you can get of these walking Liberty half dollars.
They're almost pure silver and silver is a good bye
at this time. This is a one time offer for
new customers of Swiss America and if you just click
(23:36):
the if you click the fill out the form here,
Swiss America will contact you. But if you get some
of these, you'll have some metal which will appreciate in value,
and silver is more affordable and at a lower price,
it will double in value quicker than gold will, so
it may in some ways be even a better buy.
(23:59):
But the point is that you need to talk to
Swiss America and get self directed iras. If you have iras,
so you can put some of your iras in gold
and silver. You have to do it the right way
and Swiss America to keep your tax exempt status. Swiss
America will set up a depository account for you in
Delaware where you can hold your gold and silver. You'll
(24:19):
get a Lloyd's of London guarantee that the golden silver
is really there and your gold and silver will appreciate
income tax free. In this setting, it's a good way
to take dollars that could be in the stock market,
which are risky. Even though the stock market's done well,
it could collapse this fall when Europe is facing a
(24:42):
debt crisis, and I believe Europe will also call Swiss
America to get a free copy of this book. The
book is how common global crash will create an historic
gold rush. I'm going to give you the one eight
hundred number here in a minute that you can call
to get this book. Chris will show you Chris, it's
(25:02):
showing you right now the book. I've co authored it
with Dean hesk in the head of Swiss America. The
toll free number is one eight hundred five six two
six eight. Write it down one eight hundred five one
nine six two six eight. I'll call them and get
your free copy of the book. Now, one more story
(25:22):
I want to cover has to do with this is
Xixing Ping, who is the head of China and one
of the most senior of the nine officers who are acts.
He's asking people in the military and you know this.
This one particular general was one of the more popular generals,
(25:46):
and it indicates this is a purge that Xixiingping is
doing on the military. The question is he losing control
of China's military and of China itself. So China is
an economic hardship and economic difficulty. And if Ping is
(26:07):
Jingping is this concerned about the internal disruption within the
Communist Party in China, it means his leadership is a
question and within the communist system he can be replaced.
Now China is going to be I think another force
that we're going to see. We're gonna see a world
emerging where the United States, Russian and China are all
(26:30):
going to vie for power, and I don't think the
United States, especially with our rapidly approaching forty trillion dollar debt,
is going to be in a position for long to
be the world's policeman. I think we're going to have
to realize that we can't afford to have conflicts, even
regional conflicts, because they very easily escalated into nuclear war.
(26:50):
And so therefore I'm watching very closely, but I think
Trump is right now, masterfully in charge. Over the weekend,
we had more a violence from Hamas, including the killing
of a couple of the IDEF Israeli Defense Force military
and Natanyahu launched some strategic strikes air strikes against Hamas
(27:14):
in order to enforce the ceasefire, and I'm sure that
was coordinated with President Trump this time. So I think
the ceasefire will hold. But the point is Hamas yet
remains in Gaza. Until Hamas is removed, You're not gonna
have stability in Gaza. Hamas is just gonna try to
return and eventually go back to the same determination to
(27:35):
destroy Israel and will do it all over again. Unless
Trump can emerge with his prosperity through peace and get it.
The Abraham Accords is extended. Abraham Accords will require the
Muslim nations to say they will accept Israel as a
Jewish state, will work economically to develop Israel. That's really
the only solution I can see. And this warning is
(27:59):
being put out by Gordon Chang, who I deeply respect.
I've know Gordon Chang, but his work on China is outstanding. Okay,
So summing up today, I think we're getting into another
another contentious week. It's gonna be a very interesting week
to see how these develop. I'm gonna be watching Russia
and Ukraine very closely, watching the economy very closely. But
(28:23):
Donald Trump, I think will take steps this week two
begin bringing the shut down to an end, although he
will not, I believe, concede on the spending. The Chuck
Humor wants to do this. Doctor Jrome COURSI, this is
the Coursination dot com. The end guy always wins. God's
gonna win here too, And I encourage you, the spirit
(28:45):
of second Chronicle of seven fourteen, to join me and
getting down on our knees and asking God to forgive
us for letting this insanity woke insanity dominate our land.
If we do that in sufficient numbers, God will hear
our prayer and heal our land. And I think with
Donald Trump in the office a president, we have a
(29:06):
great chance of making progress during the remaining time and
hopefully setting the stage for Supreme Court decision which will
not allow districting or voting by race, which will mean
that the Democrats will probably lose a third to half
the seats they have in Congress. Doctor dron COURSI thank
(29:30):
you for joining us. We'll be back tomorrow. God bless