Cory Hughes on Forbidden Knowledge News July 21, 2025

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Hello friends. If you're looking to start your therapeutic microdosing
journey but don't know where to start, especially when looking
for the highest quality ingredients, including new tropics and what
you'd expect from a true microdose capsule, check out our
friends at Brain Supreme. They offer the absolute highest quality ingredients,

(00:22):
so you can start your microdosing journey knowing that you're
getting top notch ingredients. To find out more, visit their
website using that link right in the description, and you
can get fifteen percent off your entire order. Hello friends,
have you tried what may be the most powerful antioxidant
known to man? See sixty Purple Power. My C sixty

(00:45):
story has led me to great health mentally and physically.
It's helped me personally lose weight, have more energy, and
fight aging in general. You can also get C sixty
for your pets. Our dog's life love it, they may
live forever. Go check out C sixty for yourself. If
you use the link right in the description, you're going

(01:08):
to get ten percent off your order plus free shipping.
They have some incredible new products like gummies, oils, and
much more. Now enjoy this episode.

Speaker 2 (01:21):
I think it's just going to get weirder and weirder
and weirder, and finally it's going to be so weird
that people are going to have to talk about how
weird it is. Eventually people are going to say, what
the hell is going on. It's not enough to say
it's nuts. You have to explain why it's so nuts.

(01:43):
The invention of artificial life, the cloning of human beings,
possible contact with extraterrestrials. The systems which are in place
to keep the world same are in utterly inadequate to
the forces that have been unleashed.

Speaker 1 (02:05):
Welcome back to Forbidden Knowledge News. I'm your host Chris Matthew.
Today my guest is Corey Hughes. First, be sure to
join us September twelfth through fourteenth for our annual Forbidden
Gathering in Fort Collins, Colorado. Will he having a three
day celebration and gathering food, podcasts, a hike through the mountains.
If you'd like to attend, please RSVP two Forbidden Knowledge

(02:28):
Neews at gmail dot com with subject gathering for more
details and to reserve your place at the event. It
is completely free to attend. It'll be a potlock event,
so we request that each party bring food or drink
to contribute. We hope to see as many of you
as possible there. We are booking guests first September. If
you have suggestions or you'd like to be a guest,

(02:50):
email me Forbidden Knowledge Neews at gmail dot com. Today,
I want to welcome back to the show Corey Hughes.
He is an author, researcher, host of Bloody History, and
co host of Day zero podcast. Corey, welcome back.

Speaker 3 (03:04):
How you doing good, Thank you for having me.

Speaker 1 (03:07):
Thanks for coming back on man. Excited about this. You
have a new book available now on Amazon, Lee Harvey
Oswald in Black and White. This book presents profound, documented
evidence that there is much more to the story behind
the character of Lee Harvey Oswald. You've also launched a
new crypto which we're going to talk a little bit

(03:28):
about later as well. Lots to get to before we do.
Just remind the audience a little bit about yourself and
where they can find you.

Speaker 3 (03:37):
Sure. My name's Corey Hughes. I'm a Kennedy Assassination researcher.
My information is at Corey Hughes dot org. My book, well,
I guess I have two books now. My first book
was a warning from history. It tells a story of
the shooters and what happened in Daily Plaza. And my
new book, Lee Harvey Oswald in Black and White, Volume one.

(04:00):
It's the first of a four volume set which will
probably take me the next three or four years total.
It's about the life of Lee Harvey Oswald, which, to
be honest with you, at this point in time, I
find far more fascinating than the assassination itself, because I
am a sucker for a mystery, and once you get

(04:23):
through the inner workings of the assassination, it kind of
makes sense and the mystery factor is gone. But when
it comes to Oswald, let me just say this. Oswald
is not the person that anyone has ever been told
that he is, even in the biographies and books in
many movies like Nobody got It Right, Nobody got it right.

(04:43):
The closest anyone ever came to getting Oswald right was
John Armstrong, who wrote his book Harvey and Lee, where
he basically outlined and some people will just call it
a thesis or a theory, but I can tell you
at this point it is not just a thesis or
a theory. I now have absolute proof that there were

(05:08):
two Oswald's and that their lives. The documentary record showing
this goes back to nineteen forty one. So Oswald's born
October eighteenth, nineteen thirty nine, and he allegedly lives in
New Orleans, Louisiana. This is somewhat provable. We have the
enough witness statements and documentary evidence to show this. And

(05:31):
he's there until nineteen forty four. April of forty four,
when they moved to Dallas, him and his mother, and
his brother Robert Oswald and his half brother John Picked.
They all moved to the Victor Street address in Dallas,
and they live with Marguerite and she will go on
to marry a man named Edwin Ekdahl shortly after that.

(05:53):
Now nineteen forty one. We have this information because when
Oswald applied for the Marines on his entry application, and
there are numerous anomalies. First of all, I have to
back up just a little bit because the overarching theory
that was put forth by John Armstrong, which I can
tell you now is more than theory, was that there
were two boys raised under the name Lee Harvey Oswald,

(06:15):
but that one of them went by Lee and the
other went by Harvey. And this sounds like a preposterous
story on its face. It really does. I mean, it
just sounds ridiculous, like some sort of play on words
or something along those lines. But as you move forward
through the life of Lee Harvey Oswald, you will find

(06:36):
things that don't fit what we're told. Everyone's life is
a straight line. Everyone has a past that should be
able to be tracked quite succinctly, but not Oswald. When
you take all the pieces of evidence of Oswald's life
and you construct a timeline, what you actually end up

(06:58):
with are two completely distinct timelines, with different addresses, different schools,
different neighbors and witnesses who put Oswald in between nineteen
fifty five and nineteen fifty eight. I've got Oswald in
three places at once, three where I have evidence to
all three, which doesn't make any sense, right. But the

(07:23):
more you come to understand and grasp the story, you
realize that it's really nothing more than a naval intelligence
identity transfer operation. That is a spy technique where they
borrow an identity from a willing donor called an identity donor,
and then they use that to create what's called a legend,

(07:45):
where you can have. You have two people sharing one identity.
There is a main person whose identity that really belongs to,
who has an established background and a history, right, and
then this other person borrows that identity to go off
and do spy stuff. Now, for me, the endgame of
this is to get us by into the Soviet Union.

(08:06):
The way I see this is that naval intelligence, and
we know it's naval intelligence because they were the only
ones doing covert operations like this before the CIA. CIA
doesn't come around till forty seven. They really don't have
their shit together till forty eight forty nine, and so
this is clearly a naval intelligence operation. Is a dozen
pieces of evidence that point to it being a naval
intelligence operation. But if you have a child that you're

(08:30):
raising under the name of somebody else, and then that
child ends up joining the Marines and then subsequently defecting
to the Soviet Union, if you ask me, the culmination
of the mission and the defection to the Soviet Union
is the obvious fruit of the labor that they put
into this thing for you know, ten or fifteen years before, right,

(08:54):
the fact that he did defect to the Soviet Union
as the name Lee Harvey Oswald, and we can show
that there was this program to establish a legend and
two children involved at least, then I think it's pretty
obvious why they did it in the first place. It
was obvious that to me at least, that they did
this operation to create a legend, to create a fake

(09:16):
background and have a child who they would raise to
speak Russian and then defect to the Soviet Union. Right,
So to me, the result is as much substantiation of
the plot as anything else. But we run into some problems.
So if you have any questions, you can hop in.
But we have some problems that I'm running into now
because I am starting to doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald

(09:38):
spoke Russian at all. That is the story that he
spoke Russian, right, And so we have alleged witnesses at
out in San Ana, California, when he's in the Marines
and he allegedly was listening to Russian records. There's no
evidence whatsoever that he had anything to do with speaking
Russian or Communism in the Marines at anytime prior to

(10:01):
about January of fifty nine. Okay, So, but we're supposed
to believe that between January of fifty nine and when
he leaves in September, by the time he gets to
the Soviet Union in October, he's learned fluent Russian in
ten months. That's an impossibility. Russian is one of the
hardest languages to learn. They have thirty three letters in

(10:21):
their alphabet. I mean, give me a break. We don't
even comprehend what that means. So the problem is when
Lee Harvey Oswald gets to Russia, none of all of
his friends out there, so he'd never spoke Russian. He
only spoke English when he got to Russia. There is
a There are recordings of him in Russia giving talks
and he's doing it in English, and the guy sounds

(10:45):
like a dope. The guy sounds like a dope, he
really does. He doesn't sound like he's overly intelligent, and
he sounds very amateurish. There's no indication whatsoever that he
spoke Russian ever while he was there. But then he
comes back and we have a slew of people who
surround him, who then tell us that he was fluent
in Russian, a guy named Peter Gregory, who I still

(11:08):
need to investigate how he gets involved, But he's a
Russian teacher, he gets involved with Oswald, and then you
have Ruth Payne and Marina and a couple people around
Peter Gregory. They all swear Oswald's spoke fluent Russian. So
this is a big mystery to me. How does someone
who speaks fluent Russian go to Russia but never speaks
Russian while he's there? Right, So this is outside the

(11:30):
scope of the book. This is stuff that's going to
end up going into the next book, which will be well,
the next book is going to be Oswald the Marines
and then Oswald in Russia, so that'll all be covered.
But in the lead up to that, there was most
certainly two lee Harvey Oswald's and to Marguerite Oswald's. And
just so we can get past the concept, I want

(11:50):
to screen share a couple images just to make the point.

Speaker 1 (11:54):
If you had to speculate the original purposes or intelligence
operations that he may have been involved in, or why
what do you think that was? Why were they using
two versions of this man and what exactly was he
being used for before the assassination?

Speaker 3 (12:17):
Okay, so there's a lot to unpack in that question,
but ultimately I think that let me put it in
terms of like supply and demand. As far as the
intelligence community goes, they had a distinct need for covert identities.
And one thing about alias is you can't just when

(12:40):
they do aliases, they don't just make up names. You
can't just make up a name, because when people do
research into that name, they're going to find out it's
a bunk name or a dead person or something like that.
You absolutely have to use the identity of a real
person who was in on the use of their name
as the alias, right. So that is a very common practice,

(13:00):
the shared use of one name amongst many people. So
I kind of to a certain degree, believe that when
you had people involved in these identity transfer operations for
whatever main purpose, it would appear that those names also
got used by other people elsewhere in maybe one off

(13:22):
or isolated or limited other operations, Because the name Lee
Harvey Oswald will pop up numerous times and other apparent
intelligence operations by people that seemingly are completely disconnected from
all of this, Like when Oswald's in the Soviet Union,
you have the name Lee Harvey Oswald being connected to
operations in Greenwich Village in New York, and it's connected

(13:46):
to another guy named lands who was also involved in
a different identity transfer operation with a guy named Landsberg. Right,
So the CIA was connecting people involved in these identity
transfer operations, so to some degree, the name was just
being shared amongst people who I think needed it for
operational reasons. It was a good cover to use once

(14:08):
they have a volunteer to donate their identity. Right. Oswald
in particular, when you trace his life, it's really kind
of strange because you have is this picture still screen sharing? Yeah?
I get it, Okay, So the guy pop here, that's
the really hardy Oswald. Every photograph of the r YA
Oswald up until nineteen fifty nine is of this person,

(14:30):
with only a handful of exceptions. There was a slight
overlap in period between fifty five and fifty six when
they're before the Marines and then in the Marines you
have pictures of both of them also, which is weird.
I think they were really sloppy, But at the same time,
I think this is as much experimentation as it was
anything else, and they had to have people in on

(14:50):
this at every step of the way. I mean, we
have documents from eight different intelligence agencies, including Defense intelligence,
Agency Marine G two, like a whole bunch of in
time elegience agencies who are not CIA, who most people
never heard of. This absolute proof that all of them
were in on this because they all had records and
documents that used both names Lee Harvey Oswald and Harvey

(15:11):
Lee Oswald right, So it was a clear intelligence deception
that they were using. Peterdale Scott called it a dual
a possible dual filing system, but it was more than that.
There was clearly two of them. I mean, look at
the guy's chin up at the top left. This is
the passport photo taken when Lee leaves the Marines in
fifty nine, in September fifty nine, he has that picture taken,

(15:32):
and then allegedly this picture on the right was taken
shortly after that. It's kind of questionable on when that
second picture was taken, but it's clearly the same person.
Look at the chin, it's a very narrow chin. Look
at Harvey's chin. This is Harvey Oswald. I think they're brothers.
That's what it comes down to. They're actually brothers. And
this was kind of admitted to by Harvey when he
met with doctor Milton Currian in New York, when he's

(15:55):
at the youth house, when he's caught skipping school and stuff. Right,
So there's little pieces of ti tid bits of evidence
of who these guys are to each other. Right, But
look at the chin. It's not even the closer the
same chin and the picture you're on the right that
was taken by Robert Oswald at their family farm, at
the Mercer family farm, so.

Speaker 1 (16:12):
They're real close. But we talk about these there are
some major differences between the top and bottom. And for
those listening on the audio end, if you'd like to
see the visuals being presented, come over to Rumble and
check that out.

Speaker 3 (16:25):
So Marguerite Oswald, the woman on the left is verifiably
the real Marguerite Oswald. She's five foot seven inches tall.
She's a very slim, slender woman. This picture was taken
in fifty seven. I have dozens of other pictures of
her leading up to well fifty six. Fifty seven. She
kind of disappears and she's replaced by this woman on

(16:47):
the right. This woman on the right is the woman
who the world has embraced is Marguerite Oswald, but it's
not Marguerite Oswald. This woman's only about five foot one.
There's a picture of her in the hallway of the
Dallas Police Department with Marina, and she's looking up to
Marina and Marina is only five to two. This woman's
five foot one. She's short and fat, and she has
horrible teeth. In my new book, I have all these

(17:09):
photos are in there, and I have the photo of
her smiling with her bad teeth. It's clearly not and
you can see the woman on the left has beautiful,
stunning teeth, pearly whites right and the woman on the left.
The us are the woman on the right totally gnarly,
like meth mouth. It's gross. So but yeah, all that's
in the book. All that's in the book. But yes,

(17:29):
so fundamentally, what it comes down to is you can
tell that there's some kind of break in nineteen forty
one from the official story. So because Marguerite Oswald is
a liar and she's a cheater. She cheated on every
husband she had, so we don't know really whose kids
are who, honestly, and in nineteen forty one she falls
off the radar. We have conflicting information on where she's

(17:50):
living in New Orleans, and really from late forty one
through about April of forty four. We don't know where
she is. The addresses she gives us are not good.
The places she allegedly worked are no good. They're in
New York, They're not here in New Orleans. They happen

(18:11):
to be at companies that have home offices in New
York but also have branches in New Orleans, which kind
of is weird. But witnesses who work there at those
times can't verify that she worked there. Ultimately, we have
about a three year gap in Marguerite Oswald's history where
the addresses she gave twenty one to thirty six Broadway
and two two seven Atlantic Avenue are supposed to be

(18:31):
in New Orleans and Algier's Louisiana or a suburb of
New Orleans, but those addresses also exist in Manhattan, and
when you look at the circumstances. Marguerite Oswald wrote a
book called A Woman in History with a woman named
Jene Stafford, who was She's a CIA writer basically, and

(18:52):
a newspaper writer too, back in the sixties, and in
this book she admits that she was a telephone operator
and a switchboard operator for the Navy at the Naval
base in Algiers, Louisiana, in nineteen forty two. Okay, now,
she admitted a lot of things by saying that that
she didn't realize she admitted. Number one, she admitted that

(19:15):
she had joined the Navy Waves program. The Navy Waves
program was the women in the Navy program. It was
the program when all the men went off to the war.
Because this is during World War two, nineteen forty two,
they had hundreds of thousands of openings here in the States,
and they opened the Waves program to recruit all the
women who didn't go off to war, right, and so
they actually trained some of these women to be spies,

(19:37):
to do in cryptography, to do all kinds of stuff.
They shot guns, I mean, they were full on soldiers,
even though they did a lot of administrative work. But
when you researched the Waves program, if you were a
switchboard phone operator for the Navy in nineteen forty two,
you were part of the way Navy Waves program. And
that is a fact. And so she lied about all that.

(20:00):
And so in nineteen forty two, where is the Navy
Waves training facility. It is in the Bronx, New York,
less than ten miles from twenty one to thirty six
Broadway in Manhattan, not Broadway in New Orleans. So you
have some sloppy cover story stuff going on. She's down
in New Orleans, she goes there, she has a doctor visit,

(20:22):
but she might not have had a doctor visit down there,
because when she goes and visits her doctor, she gave
a wrong day to birth and she gave wrong information,
so it might not have been her, you know what
I mean. So it's kind of weird. What I think
is really going on here is that at some point
in time, Lillian Morett, who was clearly CIA. I've got
all kinds of travel records of her traveling to Cuba
and Air Force bases in Bermuda and Canada. She is

(20:46):
covering for Marguerite while Marguerite is off at the Navy
Waves training facility up in New York. The two addresses
that we can't corroborate in New Orleans and Algiers. They
work in New York. Also at the exact same time,
around ninety forty, she meets the guy Edwin Ekdahl, who
she'll go on to Mary in nineteen forty five, she
allegedly meets him down in New Orleans, but there's no

(21:07):
record of him ever having been in New Orleans, and
he lived only twenty four miles north of twenty one
to thirty six Broadway in Manhattan. To me, it is
so blatantly obvious. Marguerite Oswald joined the Navy Waves program,
she went to New York, spent three years doing something.
Oswald is living with Lillian Morrett at this time. He's
just a child. He's being bounced back and forth between

(21:28):
Lillian's house and the Bethlehem Orphanage, right, and so Marguerite
Oswald's associate path. She doesn't have any feelings for any
other human being on planet Earth, and I think that's
why they probably recruited her into intelligence. She's a cold
hearted bitch. She cheated on every man she was ever with.
She tried to give all three children of hers to
the orphanage permanently. And this whole time, she's crying that

(21:50):
she's broke, when I can prove she had money left
over from Robert Oswald's insurance, she had child support coming in,
she had a job, and she had rental property income
coming in, and all this she's crying she has no
money and can't raise her kids. No, she was just
a horrible, horrible human being.

Speaker 1 (22:06):
Would you say that there's generational intelligence families that is
throughout history to be implemented in these operations.

Speaker 3 (22:18):
One hundred percent. Definitely. I don't know too much about it,
but I see it like crazy. Whenever you run Lindy,
Whenever I do backgrounds on everybody, I do their I
go to you know, ancestry and all that stuff. I
got subscriptions there, and I just do I pull their
backgrounds and you will be shocked to see who's related
to who. Well in the intelligence world, you know what

(22:39):
I mean. So, yeah, and it's obvious to me that
the intelligence aspect of this runs through Marguerite's side of
the family because Lilian is her sister, and she's clearly
in on it. She's busted lying in the Warrant Commission
like ten times, and they just let her go. They
just flow, They just let her flow with it. You know,

(23:00):
it's wild contradicts herself on where Marguerite's allegedly living, because
between nineteen January fifty four and July of fifty five
or fifty six, actually I can put them in multiple
different places. They're only supposed to have been at two
different addresses. I can put them at minimum four to
five addresses. So she's lying about where Marguerite was because
she's covering for the fact that there were two Marguerites

(23:21):
and two Leaves. And here's the wild part. I think.
I think I have a very good idea on who
the false Marguerite is and circumstances surrounding how this came
to be. Maybe not how this came to be, but
on who this woman is in particular. So one thing
that you'll notice when you go through the life of
Marguerite Oswald, she is you know, she's unskilled labor. She
works as at a department store. She jumps around from

(23:43):
job to job constantly. She never holds a job for
more than eight or nine months, and she's always working
in retail shoe stores and Cox's department store, Learner's department store.
DH Doherty I think was one. There's a whole bunch
of them, but there's a pretty clear record that she
all always worked at a department store. Well, the other

(24:03):
Marguerite was a nurse, and we have evidence going back
to nineteen forty seven all the way till she died
that she worked as a nurse. Nobody on planet Earth
can tell me where Marguerite went to nursing school, how
she got experience as a nurse, and the overlap in
careers goes from forty seven to fifty six, clearly because

(24:24):
in fifty six the real Marguerite kind of disappears. Now,
when you dig into the family, we have a lot
of clues as to who this woman is. When you
dig into the family, you'll find that Marguerite and her
sister were very close, with a cousin and an aunt
both named Ammanth Voittier. Okay, so you have Ammanth Voitier senior,

(24:48):
and her daughter was also Ammanth, but Emminth Gene, and
so Ammanth Gene when you dig into her. This was
first brought up as a possibility by a guy named
Robert Durand, who wrote a book on this that I
can't locate a copy. I have one hundred dollars reward
if anybody can find me Robert Durand's book on the
Two Oswalds, because it doesn't seem to exist. But he
had this theory that it was Amminthe Voitier. Was this

(25:11):
false Marguerite Oswald impost and he laid out his reasons,
and most of his reasons were kind of bullshit, honestly,
but I think he got it right. Even a broken
clock is right twice a day. And the reason I
think he got it right was because Amminth Voitia is
a registered nurse. Her history is in New Orleans. Her
history is completely hidden. It is all linked to one address.

(25:32):
The census and the directory addresses for her for fifty
years go to one address on Saint Mary Street, and
that's crazy. Nobody stays in it. And her dad was
at that address for twenty years before that, so nobody
does that. And then her complete history ends in nineteen
fifty six, gone off the face of the earth. And
nineteen fifty six is the year they do the official

(25:53):
swaperoo with the Marguerite Oswalds, so she doesn't need to
be Ammanth the Voitia anymore, so she wouldn't have a
history after fifty six. So fifty six is when the
official swap happens, when the false Marguerite becomes the real
Marguerite for the history books, right, and so yeah, and
when you dig into Amanth and her family and the
dynamics there, I'm ninety nine, we can't prove this. Someone

(26:13):
would have to go to New Orleans and dig into
every record that possibly existed on this woman, every photograph,
every everything, but until that happens, does as close as
we can get as this speculation, But it makes perfect sense.
It fills in a gap. What we don't know, in
which I'm leaning towards heavily, is that these two boys
were brothers or one of them was born out of wedlock,

(26:36):
which I think is a great possibility. I think that
there's a possibility that Marguerite Oswald after Robert Oswald died,
Lee Harvey Oswald is born two months later. Okay, witness
to the birth was Robert Oswald's brother, Harvey Francis Oswald.
The entire Oswald family will eventually cut off Marguerite because

(26:57):
she's a cold hearted psychopath. Day Robert died August nineteenth,
nineteen thirty nine, she tried to have him buried the
same day without notifying the family. How crazy is that? Right,
So the whole family cut her off except for Harvey,
and Harvey stuck around at least long enough because he
was a witness to Lee's birth. He signed off on

(27:18):
the birth certificates. Now there's only two possibilities. If they're brothers,
they were either fraternal twins, and there's no reason why
they would hide fraternal twins. But if right after she
had Lee she had an affair with Harvey Oswald, and
then the second Oswald was born less than a year
later out of wedlock, that's no good that would bring

(27:42):
in that year what was that nineteen thirty nine, nineteen
forty you would be like, have a scarlet a branded
on you, right, you would be a whore. You don't
have children out of wedlock. That Harvey was married at
the time and had a wife and a daughter, So
for them to have had an illegitimate child would have
been royd everybody. And it kind of explains why Harvey

(28:02):
and Marguerite never had any contact again after this. So
I think it's a great possibility that Harvey Francis Oswald
is the father of Harvey Oswald, who's the man who
got arrested for killing the president.

Speaker 1 (28:15):
Are you able to pinpoint a period of time when
Lee and Harvey were targeted for this JFK operation.

Speaker 3 (28:27):
Well, I don't think Lee had anything to do with
this at all, So by my calculations, in nineteen fifty nine,
after Harvey goes to the Soviet Union, and we know
it's Harvey that goes to the Soviet Union because all
the evidence points in that direction. Lee disappears. There's no
more contact with him at all. He's gone. The last
photo we allegedly have as a photo that I showed
earlier from Robert Oswald that he took allegedly in December

(28:50):
or no September of fifty nine. So that's it after that.
And here's the thing. You have to think logically, if
you're raised for your whole life to do this operation,
the whole point is to get us by into the
Soviet Union and use your life as the legend to
create for this other person. Once the operation is pulled off,
you're done, and your identity is now fully compromised and

(29:14):
you are now given a new identity and given a
new life. And to me, this is where I think
John Armstrong really screwed up, because once that operation is
in place and Harvey goes off to the Soviet Union,
there's no need for Lee Harvey Oswell to ever be
around ever again. But since this was a lifelong and
he's a willing participant in this, they're not just gonna
kill the guy. They're gonna give him another identity. He's

(29:35):
going to be a part of another identity transfer operation.
And there is some indication on how that went down also,
which I don't want to talk about that today, but
there is some evidence of where the really Harvey Oswald
actually went and ended up. So to most people, I
can see it as I've been doing this for years
and I understand all this, But as the words come
out of my mouth, I can see the cringe of

(29:59):
people li who don't understand what I'm talking about because
this sounds like some BS spy book or some spy novel, right,
some make believe No, this is reality, and the CIA
still does this to this very day.

Speaker 1 (30:15):
Is there anything else, without giving away too much from
your book that we could cover that shows any other
evidence for this?

Speaker 3 (30:25):
Yeah, I'll go over a string of events, and I
can summarize this really quickly because the book has all
the fine details. But so going back to nineteen forty five, well,
we have the indication that there was a separation in
forty one, because I'm from forty one to fifty six.
He has fort Worth on his application for the marine,
So we can say with certainty they were split in

(30:47):
forty one. By forty five, we have Robert Oswald testifying
to the fact that his mother and his brother, John Pick,
and Lee and Edwin Ekdahl all got together in their
nineteen thirty eight Plymouth and they drove from New Orleans
to Mississippi, where they dropped off Robert Oswald and John

(31:08):
Pick at the Chamberlain Hunt Military Academy where they would
go to military school for the next couple of years.
Like I said, Marguerite looked for any reason to get
rid of her kids. She's a disgusting human being. Robert
Oswald testified that after that, Lee, Marguerite, and Edwin Ekdahl
continued to drive up to Boston, where they stayed in
Boston for approximately six months. An investigator for the Warrant

(31:32):
Comission named John hart Eli investigated this and he determined
that they did in fact go to Boston. He couldn't
get a lot of witness statements or anything like that,
but he determined it did happen. And he determined that
they had to have come back from Boston around February
mid February, because in February Oswald will have tonsilitis he'll

(31:53):
have his tonsils removed. So the problem is we have
documentary records start on October thirty first, that Lee Harvey
Oswald was attending the Benbrook Common School in ben Brook,
Texas from October thirty first all the way until around April.
So how can you be in Boston and a subsequent

(32:15):
road trip where they went to Arizona and stuff. How
can you be doing that and still have a school
record that you were there. There's only two possibilities. Somebody
was going there under that name or and this I
hold is a big possibility for all Kennedy research in general.
The CIA and the FBI were in such a fucking
panic to fake documents that they had to fake because

(32:38):
all the real documents will show Oswald in multiple places
and he's part of this operation. So they spent many
I don't know how, if it was months or years,
but they spent a lot of time faking documents. I
have documents I can tell you one hundred percent or fake,
and I can prove they're fake because I have the
original of the document right, and so a lot of
this stuff might just be CIA fakery. They fake document

(33:00):
and got dates wrong. You know what, I mean, so
it's almost impossible to determine what actually happened after that.
From forty six forty seven, Oswald's led to have gone
to Covington, Louisiana, where he goes to the Covington Bay
Grammar School. But we have Robert Oswald again testifying that
they were living off a Route forty five in Benbrook

(33:21):
at that time. So Robert Oswald is a dummy. So
he's proof that the CIA recruits dummies because they don't
only recruit the smartest of the smart they recruit idiots.
Because Robert Oswald spilled the beans more times than I
can count in his testimony, he got things so wrong
after this forty seven era, let me see, from forty
seven forty eight, you're moving into like the divorce from

(33:44):
Edwin Ekdahl, and that's when you get into the one
on one San Saba address. So according to the Warrant Commission,
Marguerite and Lee while his brothers are off at the
military school, Marguerite and Lee will live on Ewing Street
with Edwin Ekdahl until around May or June of forty eight,
and they'll move to an address called thirty three hundred

(34:06):
Willing Street, which is down in the ghetto. It's like,
it's really a horrible place. The Warring Commission concluded that
they would purchase the house at one on one San
Saba in July of nineteen forty eight, and that they
would live there for two months and then they would
end up renting out the house and selling it to
someone else a couple years later. The problem is, John
Armstrong went and pulled all the records for the one
on one San Saba address and found that Marguerite Oswald

(34:28):
had purchased it one year before, in nineteen forty seven.
So once again we have Marguerite Oswald and Lee living
at one on one San Saba while they're simultaneously living
at the Ewing Street address with Edwin Ekdahl. Crazy thing
is John Armstrong, who's an absolute legend who most people
marginalize as work because they don't understand it. He went

(34:50):
and interviewed neighbors at that time, and he was able
to confirm that the woman that was known to the neighbors,
Georgia Bell and Otis Carlton, was the short fat Marguerite,
and that she lived there in forty seven from around
May all the way up until Thanksgiving and these people
didn't know Marguerite or Lee when they live there over

(35:12):
the summer of forty eight. Right. So this, once you
start in forty five and you start to see the
overlaps and the contradictions, they don't stop, and once you
know where to look, you keep finding more and more
specific detail. After forty seven forty eight, they moved to Dallas.
They're at the at the they go to Victor Street,
and after the divorce and all that stuff, they will

(35:33):
end up back in New Orleans for a short time,
but they do spend a couple of years in New
York from the late fifty two time period through January
of fifty four in New York City. Once again we
have a this is this era that we're moving into.
Here becomes the most complicated because you have Oswald getting

(35:53):
arrested for truancy, being booked at the at the county jail,
showing up before Magistrate del and when you overlay the dates,
it's crazy because it goes from you know, you have
a warrant issued on the twelfth, they attempt to arrest
him on the nineteenth. Then he shows up in court
two days after he's been interviewed by the psychologist. So

(36:15):
when you lay out the series of events surrounding his incarceration,
none of it makes sense at all. It looks like
he gets arrested two times from two different locations, once
in the courtroom, once at his home in the Bronx,
one day apart. Doesn't make any sense whatsoever. If you're
arrested in the courtroom and sent off somewhere, you can't
be arrested the next day from your apartment, which is
exactly what the documents say. So yeah, but this doesn't end.

(36:38):
This never ends. Once you get out of New York,
you get back down to New Orleans, and then you
have the most complicated series of events yet. And what
I believe is a third person using the name Lee
Harvey Oswald, because I can put Oswald in squarely in
New Orleans in nineteen fifty five summer, squarely in Fort Worth,

(36:58):
and also another one in New Orleans working at the
Dolly Shoe Company who was not with the Oswald who
was living in New Orleans. So and it sounds complicated,
and it is. But ultimately I believe Lillian Murrett and
who's the aunt of Oswald and her son John Marshall
Morett were also involved in this identity operation, because there

(37:20):
are at least two or three different times and incidents
that I can place three Oswald's. When I get to
the Marines, I can clearly put both Oswald's in at Sugi, Japan, well,
one in at Sugi, one in what they called Formosa,
which is Taiwan, and then one back in New Orleans
working at the Fister Dental Lab, all in late fifty
seven early fifty eight. And then we have the witness

(37:42):
to the Oswald working at Fister Dental Lab in New Orleans.
We have the witness whose name is Palmer McBride. He
ends up talking to John Armstrong, and John Armstrong shows
him a picture of a woman who he wants them
to identify. The woman that he identified as Marguerite Oswald
is one hundred percent Marguerite's sister Lillian. So we can
say with certainty Lillian was impersonating Marguerite in late fifty

(38:05):
seven or early fifty eight in New Orleans when she
met Palmer McBride. And if both Oswald's are in Atsugi
and in Taiwan, who's going to be there. Who's the
third one that's with Lillian who was working for Fisterer
Dentel who had a motorcycle. That's another thing. The one
working at Fisterer Dental Lab had a motorcycle. Lee never
owned a motorcycle, no one, none of them ever owned
a motorcycle. So it's clearly a third person using that name,

(38:28):
and I believe it's family. And this goes back to
the Cia family operations one hundred percent. This is why
I become more convinced of the Cia family operations than
ever before, because that kind of stuff I didn't really
know about, but more I see it in Oswald, it
becomes crazy. And not only that, there's at least two
sets of friends of Marguerite, Myrtle and Julian Evans, who

(38:50):
are also in on this because they cover for Marguerite
with conflicting addresses. They say Marguerite's living with her at
their apartment that they own, when I can prove she's
living in one twenty six exchange place for at least
seven months before she's alleged to a move there. So yeah,
it's a wild and crazy story. It's got twist and turns,
and it'd make a great spy mode.

Speaker 1 (39:12):
Right moving to the actual day of the assassination. You
have found no evidence that Oswald was actually at the
book depository.

Speaker 3 (39:23):
Right, Yeah, this doesn't it doesn't make any sense. Here's
the thing. I can put one percent with absolute certainty.
William Seymour, who was impersonating Oswald all over New Orleans
and Dallas and everywhere, I can clearly put him at
the book depository. Now you have to thank this through
the incidents that we say involved Oswald didn't involve Oswald,

(39:43):
they involved William Seymour. Like the story of with Oswald
allegedly drinking a coke on the second floor ninety seconds
after the assassination. Right, So the official story is Oswald
came down the stairs and was saw drinking a coke
on the second floor lunch room by Baker and Trulli
officer Baker and Roy TRULEI who works in the bed.
That story never happened. That's a miss, okay. That actual

(40:04):
story happened on the stairwell, and it happened between the
third and fourth floors, and it involved a man wearing
a light brown jacket and a tan shirt, a tan
collared shirt. That's not Oswald. But when you go through
the documents from Curry and Decker and all these people.
They identify that man on the stairs as Oswald. But

(40:25):
then later they transplant that story inside the second floor
lunch room. And the reason that they did that was
because they had to cover for the fact something more
important than Oswald making it down the stairs was the
fact that Officer Baker made an arrest outside of the
book depository at the exact same time he's supposed to

(40:46):
be engaging Oswald on the second floor, but he's not.
And this was an arrest of Emelia Santana, who was
a shooter at thedal TECs. He got picked up and
he was held by Decker for like three plus weeks,
long after Oswald gets killed. They knew this guy had
done something they might not have known what. They held

(41:07):
on to him as like insurance, and then after three
weeks they had to let him go. He was known
as the quote second suspect, but no one ever talks
about that, but you can find that in newspaper articles.
You can find that in some of the statements. And
so that arrest that happened there happened, and it took
five six minutes at least. And so I put Baker's

(41:28):
entry into the building no earlier than twelve thirty seven pm,
not ninety seconds after. And this is really important because
I put William Seymour in the building when they stop
him coming down the stairs. And if William Seymour was there,
he had to have re entered the building, because he's
captured in the Robert Hughes film at exactly twelve thirty

(41:50):
three pm, So he is in the book depository. He
leaves the book depository, he's captured in the railroad yards
in the Robert Hughes film wearing the light brown jacket.
That he will then be stopped by Baker and truly
on the third or fourth floor on the stairwell. They
then cut him loose. Okay, it's not Oswald, it's William Seymour.
And this is how you know the whole thing is

(42:10):
a fugazy because Roy Trully, who's the boss of the
book depository, sees William Seymour, says that guy's an employee,
and they let him go. He will then continue down
the stairs, exit the building, leave in the light green
National unbe station wagon owned by Lawrence Howard. Lawrence Howard
identified by Roger Craig to Jim Garrison this whole chain
of events is perfectly makes perfect sense. And here's the deal.

(42:33):
If William Seymour was inside the building, the guy who
was impersonating Oswald all over the place, and he wasn't
out of place there, he felt free to walk in
and out of the building, that means he had to
have been there before. There's no alternative. He had to
feel comfortable there. He had to have been there before.
He had to have been the one known as Oswald

(42:55):
in that building. Had to have there's no alternative. And
so you're not gonna have two Oswald's literally working in
the fucking book depository. There's zero evidence that Oswald ever
worked at the depository. Zero. The entire story we know
about it comes from Ruth Payne and Bull Frasier's sister
Lenny may Randall, who's a fucking liar, right, All these

(43:16):
people see, the more I talk about this, every person
connected to every aspect of this is like an actor.
This is a stage. The entire story of the Kennedy
assassination was crafted, scripted, and played out by people who
were willing or unwilling participants, including the story about Oswald
getting the job at the book depository, which I promise

(43:37):
you it was a cover story. He never stepped foot
in that building. Never. There's a dozen Oswald sightings in
the three weeks that he allegedly worked there, that he
has a perfect attendance record, you know what I mean.
The whole thing is a fougaate.

Speaker 1 (43:51):
So that was caught, arrested, and later killed. You would
say that is Harvey right.

Speaker 3 (43:59):
Yes one. And we know this because once he gets its,
the same person all the way through from June sixty two,
once he gets back from the Siovie Union, same person
all the way through, Lee Oswald is out of the picture.
And he's probably using the name Donald Norton at this time.
That's probably reality. There's a whole shitload of information on
Donald arrestless Norton, and I should probably do something with

(44:21):
that information someday, write it up somehow, or do a
presentation on it, because it's very compelling. And I did
facial recognition on the real le Oswald to Donald Norton.
We have one photo of him and it was an
eighty percent positive match. So I don't know what to
tell you. I don't know, so, but yes, Leo Oswald's
out of the picture. By October of fifty nine. Harvey
Oswald is the one who went to the Soviet Union.

(44:43):
Harvey Oswald comes back. He's the one who's arrested in
New Orleans on August nineth when he gets in the
fight in Canal Street, and then he is the one
who is then framed by Kerry Thornley and ultimately carry
Thornley is the main pusher behind the scheme. He's the
New Orleans contact. David Ferry the shooter. David Ferry is
the shooter. Clay Shaw is a coordinator. All of them

(45:04):
were in Dallas. You know, it's all in my book.
A warning from history, and the story of Oswald and
all the crazy shit that I just said is all
in the new book.

Speaker 1 (45:13):
Any final thoughts about the book before we move on from.

Speaker 3 (45:16):
That, No, but I think everyone should go out and
get it. The next one's going to be on the Marines,
and the more I look and see, I already have
the marine stuff thought out in my head. And so
it was a little over two hundred pages. But I
started going back over other documents through John Armstrong's collection,
and this book is going to be a beast. It's
going to be a three or four hundred page book

(45:37):
unto itself, just Oswald and the Marines. I got so
much good documents, I mean, unbelievable stuff that no one's
ever seen. Stuff doesn't might be in the Warrant Commission,
hidden in like a rare, you know, hidden in some
volume somewhere. But it is crazy when you start to
when you see how they tried to pull off this
dual Oswald scheme in the Marines, itself, becomes clear. He
had to have handlers in the Marines, he had to

(45:59):
have people around him who are in on the scheme.
You know, he ends up shooting himself in the arm
to get out of being put on a boat that
he knew that the other oswaldt was going to be on.
I mean, like crazy stuff.

Speaker 1 (46:09):
Tell everyone about the new project you've been working on,
a new crypto for content creators.

Speaker 3 (46:18):
Yeah. So let me be the first to say that
I'm extremely critical of the crypto space in general, and
I don't want to give you a history lesson, but
Bitcoin came around and really was a paradigm shift in
how we perceive value, right, and then you have all
these other platforms come out that you know, it seems

(46:40):
like these days most of these tokens that come out
or mean coins, and they're scam bullshit coins that don't
do anything and then six months they're going to be gone.
They are little, they're like opportunities for people to get in,
make some quick money, and get out, and somebody pays
a price because someone's always left hold in the bag. Right.
So there's a lot of skepticism towards the crypto space
from people who aren't involved. Crypto actually has less than
three percent adoption globally, know, so it's kind of very

(47:01):
very rare for people actually to engage in crypto. But
we created something very different. Ultimately, what we created is
a kind of venture capital fund and we're using crypto
to do it. So ultimately we created what's called Independent
Media Token, and Independent Media Token is a token on
the Salana blockchain. It is up and available for trade

(47:24):
right now. You can get it through Phantom wallet or
whatever Solana wallet you use. But the idea was that
we would implement a one percent tax on transactions, meaning
as people trade the token and they send it back
and forth, we would get one percent of that return
to us, and that one percent we would use to
fund independent media projects. Unlike a traditional venture capital fund

(47:50):
where they invest in things to make money back. This
is not that. This is not like that. These are grants,
so we have we're coming up with a system of
district ution that basically doesn't require anything in return. It
is a kind of an angel investing granting system for
independent content creators. And we're looking for independent content creators.

(48:12):
If you're an independent content creator, go to independentmediatoken dot
com and fill out our little form at the bottom
because we're looking to we're looking to pick up as
many partners as possible. If we have a couple hundred
media partners all being funded by Independent Media Token, that
would be a win for us. So yes, please hit
us up and join our growing network. But the token

(48:33):
itself is up. It's live, it's doing well. We have
about a thirteen thousand dollars liquidity pool. The value of
the token is about eighty two thousand market cap right now,
so it's it's it's doing well considering that nobody even
knows we exist yet. Right we haven't started a marketing campaign,
which we're going to do. Actually, starting next month, we're
gonna be doing monthly marketing campaigns. We have a lot

(48:55):
in the works, and so yeah, it's a it's an
I think it's an incredible project that will go a
long way in as far as making sure that independent
media stays independent.

Speaker 1 (49:06):
Anyone right now can go and sign up. If people
want to just invest, can they do that?

Speaker 3 (49:14):
Yes, one hundred percent. So if you're not familiar with
buying crypto, it can be a little complicated. If people
are really looking to be serious about crypto, what I
would say is the first thing that they need to do.
Since you can't get crypto through your bank, I would
set up an account at coinbase. Coinbase is really where

(49:35):
you want to go if you want to have like
a crypto bank account. It's really the only place to go.
If you just want to buy some crypto with your
debit card, you can go to Moonpay. Moonpay is a
great place to go just to buy it with your
credit card or your debit card. But in order to
buy our token, we are currently operating on a decentralized

(49:56):
exchange known as Radium, and so the way that you
exchange your money for our token is you would purchase
Solana and then you would put Solana into your wallet.
Whether it's a phantom wallet or whatever other wallet you
want to use, and then you can do an exchange

(50:16):
within your wallet from Solana to Independent Media token. So
it's on the Salana blockchain, and we only have one
Salana pair up right now, and so, uh yeah, that's
the way to do it.

Speaker 1 (50:30):
So when you say it's worth eighty thousand, could you
break down really what that means for people that have
no idea?

Speaker 3 (50:37):
Yeah, crypto, Yeah, sure, we minted a billion tokens and
the total value of all those tokens is eighty two
thousand dollars. That is really a fraction of a fraction
of where we see ourselves just through natural growth over
the next year or two. So the top one hundred
coins are in the billions, right, you get to the

(50:59):
second page, you get to like a you know, the
top two hundred, you get into like hundreds of millions. Right,
we're at fifty or at eighty two thousand, and so
we could one hundred x the price of this coin
and still be under a ten million dollar market cap
and completely off the radar. This is so early that

(51:22):
and I'm not giving investment advice. I know I'm buying them.
I have a stash that I'm buying besides the project tokens,
because I think this is the thing is going to
easily go one hundred x over the next couple of years,
like without even a question, and so yeah, I think
it's a great investment. Bitcoin is going to go one
hundred x over the next ten years. We plan on
going one hundred x in the next like two years.

Speaker 1 (51:40):
Very interesting you said that only about three percent of
the population really invests or messes with crypto at all.
I would have expected that to be a lot higher,
especially with where we're at now.

Speaker 3 (51:54):
Well, there's the thing. This is statistic that there's like
in America alone, something along the lines of fifty five
million bitcoin wallets. So they kind of but you can't
assume that that's individual people. I've got fucking twenty bitcoin wallets,
you know what I mean. So you can't really use
that as a good metric. That makes it seem like

(52:15):
it's got more people holding bitcoin than holding gold, which
is kind of a crazy idea. But no, we're early.
We're early stages. I mean we're talking like we are
just in the stage where we switched from pagers to
aerial cell phones. Remember that in like ninety eight that's
where we're at with crypto, Like, this is not at
one hundred and twenty thousand dollars bitcoin. That's not shit.

(52:38):
That's not shit. In the next two to three years
you'll see the million dollar bitcoin, and the next three
to five years after that you'll see the ten million
dollar bitcoin. I mean, it's no top to bitcoin because
what it does is it absorbs assets. Right, Why would
you put your money into real estate if bitcoin will
do ten times a return forever, you know what I mean.

(52:58):
So you're going to see it naturally, it's going to
absorb assets from around the world. Now, of course, I've
been thinking about this a lot lately. You need to
have some minimum level of investment in every other thing, right,
Like if everyone pulled out of investing in like commodities
and put it all in bitcoin, the commodity markets would
fall apart, right, And we can't have that. So it's
obvious that there's a cap to the amount of money

(53:20):
that can flow into the system. But when you're talking
about things like volume and how much can flow through
the system, you're talking quadrillions of dollars, you know. So
one thing about money transfer, which is kind of weird,
is because bitcoin is a store of value because it's
going to keep going up in price. But if I
have money and I want to send it to you,

(53:41):
if I owe you ten bucks, I don't want to
send you an asset that number one. I could send
you ten bucks as soon as you get it could
be worth fifteen bucks. Or I don't want to send
you ten bucks in the asset as soon as you
get it could be worth five dollars less, and then
you got screwed out of five bucks. Right to me,
the idea of banks and international stuff and money moble
money transfer using a variable valued asset to send money

(54:07):
is fucking ridiculous. It's retarded. So that's where all these
stable coins come into play. And the Genius Act, which
I don't know too much about. Some people love it,
some people hate it. I just don't know what it does.
Is it gives like private companies the ability to make
stable coins like legally, which takes a which drastically reduces
the power of the Federal Reserve. Because why the fuck

(54:30):
do I need fed coin when I got JP morgan coin,
you know what I mean. Like they're almost in direct competition,
So it's fascinating. I think We're going to see a
major shakeup with the FED over this crypto stuff. And
Donald Trump hates the FED, and so we'll see. But yeah,
it's wild. The crypto is early in its days and
we are it really doesn't do much right now other

(54:53):
than transferring value from one form to another. And that's
kind of the race. How can we purely transfer value
in a stable way and not have to worry about
the confines of the old system, right, Like, here's the
biggest issue with money in general. Most people don't realize this.
Like you and me, we go to the store, we
use our credit card, we forget about it in like

(55:14):
ten seconds, and we're done with it. Let's say over
for us, but not the credit card company and not
the merchant. That money will not settle for those people
for could be up to ninety days, it could be
as far as long as ninety days before that transaction
that we just didn't forgot about is settled. Bitcoin and
crypto bitcoin makes that ninety days ten minutes. That's what
bitcoin does. But then you have people coming out and say, oh,

(55:36):
well ten minutes is way too long. I'm like, fuck you,
fuck you, fuck you. Just we had ninety days now
we got ten minutes and you're saying it's too long.
Fuck you, right, So that's my attitude with that. But
people are coming up with new ways of doing things
that I feel are less secure, Like when I do
an ethereum or salon is different. But if I do
an ethereum transfer and I get my ethereum in like

(55:57):
ten seconds, I still worry out their system on how
they're doing things in the security surrounding it, because I
know Bitcoin is one hundred percent security. These other every
other system has been hacked rolled back, you know, fifty
one percent attacked. And it's another thing about all other cryptos,
all other cryptocurrency besides Bitcoin are centralized, meaning they all
got a CEO, right right, Bitcoin doesn't. Bitcoin is just

(56:22):
a network, it's a system. It doesn't have anybody in charge.
If you want to upgrade the protocol, it's democratic, meaning
there's no flip. You can't just flip a switch and
get new stuff involved. You have to go through the miners,
you have to go through the users, the people who
run the nodes, and if they don't adopt your software,
you're not Your software is going nowhere, and the Bitcoin
protocol is not changing there is kind of a crazy

(56:44):
revolution going on right now. For many, many years, people
have tried to hijack the bitcoin blockchain, tried to seize
control of it in one way, shape or form, and
the core developers, who have always been known as bitcoin Core,
they've always won because they're the guys who basically been monitored,
the big guy who've been managing the chain since Satoshi left,
and they're the guys who understand it better than anybody.

(57:06):
So bitcoin core has always been the guys. Every time
someone has ever put out an alternative bitcoin mining type
or bitcoin node software, it might get a little traction
like a half a percent or something like that, you know,
people experimenting with it to see how it works. There is,
after all these years, there's a new protocol called Bitcoin Knots,

(57:26):
which is direct competition to the Bitcoin Core protocol, and
it's actually got an organic adoption of around fifteen percent,
which is absolutely crazy if you understand how bitcoin works
and how the protocol works, because if the Bitcoin core
software is ever replaced by knots, it will be basically

(57:48):
a democratic takeover of the protocol, which is exactly how
it's supposed to work. So instead of someone coming in
and trying to hijack the chain by like forking it
and trying to convince the miners to switch. True democracy
in bitcoin happens when you when the miners and the
guys who run the nodes naturally move to software that
does the same thing but better. And that's exactly what

(58:09):
we're seeing, which is a crazy shift in bitcoin. I mean,
you never know, It'll tell you probably take another couple
of years for it to get any more traction, but
it's wild to see these things play out.

Speaker 1 (58:18):
Yeah, definitely before we close out, remind the audience what
else she got going on? Bloody History Day zero And
I know you're working on some books.

Speaker 3 (58:29):
Oh my god, when you say it like that, I
realize I have no godamn life at all. So it's
been a busy year this year. I will have put
out two books because I'll have my second volume out
before the end of the year, launch a cryptocurrency, and
we're working on the JFK documentary. We are working with
a filmmaker who has produced something for us that we're
working on right now. We're we kind of re editing it,

(58:50):
but we're looking to have the JFK awarring from History
documentary out within the next I don't know, maybe ninety days.
So a lot going on. You can find my stuff
at Coreyhughes dot organ got all my links, but Bloody
history dot substack dot com has all my World War
two stuff been blown up. I got like seven or
eight new paying subs lately because I did Myron show.

(59:12):
But yeah, man, lots of stuff going on, and definitely
check it out and definitely check out Independent Media Token
one hundred percent.

Speaker 1 (59:19):
Corey, Thank you so much. We'll do it again in
the future. Until next time, everyone, have an excellent evening.
We'll talk again tomorrow. See y'all know we live in
an incredible age of information. More and more we're discovering
that we've been lied to and misled about much of
our human history. Corey Hughes is providing profound revelations about

(59:42):
World War I, World War II, the JFK assassination, Martin
Luther King's assassination, and much much more on his new substack,
Bloody History. Subscribe now for as little as five dollars monthly.
Just click that link write in the description to get
started now and learn about our true history.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Cory Hughes on Forbidden Knowledge News July 21, 2025

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Cory Hughes on Forbidden Knowledge News July 21, 2025

Stuff You Should Know