#888- Communisms Plan To Infiltrate The Modern World | The Perestroika Deception - Cult of Conspiracy

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Oh, that's are and welcome to the show. This is

(00:48):
the Cult of Conspiracy, and my name is Jonathan. I'm Jacob,
Jacob filling the good cult members. What are we talking
about today?

Speaker 2 (00:55):
Sar all right, to anybody who's listening to our show before,
you're gonna know that I am not a fan of communism, right,
or socialism or anything in line with any kind of
Marxist ideology. Okay, yes, on paper, is it a great idea?

Speaker 1 (01:14):
Sure? Sure, it's equitable.

Speaker 2 (01:16):
Right, everybody puts in what they get out, and everybody's equal.
Nobody is of a higher stature than anyone else. On paper,
in a dream state, it is a wonderful system. The
problem is that it has never one time worked in
the course of human history, right, because of people, right,

(01:37):
and it's not There's gonna be people that will say, well,
that's because of greed, or that's because of this, because
of that. Listen in a way, right, there's always going
to be haves and have nots. Take away money for
just a second, let's say it's even in a bartering system.

Speaker 1 (01:54):
You've got a farmer who he grows corn.

Speaker 2 (01:57):
Okay, you got this other farmer he grows uh turnips,
or whatever the case.

Speaker 1 (02:02):
They will have a bartering system.

Speaker 2 (02:04):
You give me so much corn, I give you so
much turn ups, We'll make a trade.

Speaker 1 (02:07):
Happen.

Speaker 2 (02:08):
Everybody eats, We all prosper as a whole. Okay, excellent,
until the time comes where one person's crop or herd,
or skill set or craft or whatever. Right, a carpenter
versus a blacksmith. Right, Okay, there's gonna come a point
where one of these things is more sought after than
the other.

Speaker 1 (02:28):
And that's not based off of human greed. That's just
the nature of nature. Okay.

Speaker 2 (02:33):
When this time comes, the one who has the most
of the more sought after thing becomes one of the haves,
and then the rest of everybody becomes the have nots
now In theory, if the person who is of the
have variety is a moral person and doesn't try to
screw over his fellow man and keeps it equitable across

(02:55):
the board, everybody prospers as a whole. But there's always
gonna be one bad apple who will decide, no, you
know what, I'm going to just increase the price of things,
because if my stuff is so sought after, it's gonna
cost you a little bit extra to get out your
hands on some of this.

Speaker 1 (03:10):
Well, the way it works, and the thing is too,
is that there's so much corruption on a countrywide scale
to where this is why we are always against globalism
because if it gets up to a globalist scale, you
want to talk about the level of corruption, and there's
already traces of it right now, like beyond traces if

(03:31):
you look at big corporations and everything and all of
the monopolies the World Economic Forum. This is why we
hate the World Economic Forum because they are trying to
set the tone for the rest of the world, which
is globalism at that point. And that's not good for
anybody because it's rules for the and not for me.
It is going to be putting money in the pockets

(03:52):
of the people that are making the rules while taking
money away from the people that are actually putting the
work in. It does good for nobody except for the
top one percent of the top one percent of the
top one percent.

Speaker 2 (04:05):
The haves one hundred percent, And that's the thing. It
works on a tribal scale, and I think there's a
few studies that have been done on this a communistic
or socialistic just for lack of better words, Marxist ideology
can work on the small scale, and by small scale
I mean a village of two thousand people or less.
It can work in that small, small society. It cannot

(04:29):
work on a macro scale. It simply can't. And it's
not even because humans are so greedy. It's a mixture
of things. It's a little bit of keeping up, but it.

Speaker 1 (04:39):
Is literally within our dna.

Speaker 2 (04:41):
It is a part of our human nature to keeping
up with the joneses is one status of it. Don't
get me wrong, but you always have that person that like,
all right, just for you personally. You see your neighbor
who works the same amount of hours that you do, okay,
and he's you would think, making about the same of
what you're making, give or take a little bit. But

(05:02):
he's driving a Bentley okay, and he's able to like
vacation with his family five times a year. Somewhere deep, deep,
deep inside of you, and even if this is not
like a jealousy thing, okay, we're taking away the ego
from it for two seconds. You see that, and there's
something inside of you that wants to get like that,
and that's okay, that's human nature.

Speaker 1 (05:23):
You want to strive for more.

Speaker 2 (05:26):
You want to do better for your family, not necessarily
better than your neighbor is doing, but better overall, maybe
better than what you have when you grew up, maybe
better than what you're currently at. You want to be
able to make ten twenty k more this next year
coming up, so that maybe you can put something away,
maybe you can go on a vaca, whatever, whatever the
case is. That's human nature. We are not built to

(05:46):
be stagnant. We don't do well in stagnation. Okay, that's
just that's the way our human biology is. Whether it's
the caveman, well, this guy who is a way better
hunter than me, his family's eaten, way better than my family.
I need to get better at hunting, right, it goes
to whatever level you want to put it to.

Speaker 1 (06:05):
Well, and as far as you know, Marxism, communism, whatever, socialism,
it's it kind of just reminds me in globalism in general,
but uh, globalism in general, it kind of reminds me
of like it's a modern day raping and raping and
pillaging really is.

Speaker 2 (06:22):
But they rebranded some things and it doesn't look like
raping and pillaging. They branded as equality for all.

Speaker 1 (06:29):
Well, everybody's getting raped and everybody's getting pillaged, so exactly exactly,
but it's all equal. But it's not. It never is.
But here we go.

Speaker 2 (06:39):
We're gonna do a little bit of a history lesson here,
just slight bit, and we're going to talk about the
ways in which the communist ideologies spread. Let's talk about
the Cold War real quick. Okay, Actually, let's talk prior
to Cold War for just a second. Prior to World
War Two, Communism was taking over in Russia. There was
a big rush revolution about this. America and Russia were

(07:03):
not homies. As a matter of fact, there was a
packed between Nazi Germany and Communist Russia to invade Poland together.
People forget this, but let's not do that. Let's not
forget the ribbonsoft pack. Let's not forget the fact that
the Communists were aligned with the Nazis at the beginning
of World War two until they went back on their

(07:26):
treaty and then started attacking Nazi Germany. Then it was
an enemy of my enemy as my friend type of thing.
And they were a part of the allies, right, The
big three of the Allies was America, Britain and Russia. Yes,
there were other countries involved, but those are the big
three key players. Okay, as soon as World War two ended,
and by like as soon, I mean the following day

(07:48):
after the treaty was signed, Russia and America were back
to not fucking with each other at all. Right, the
beginning of the Cold War started. Now, there was some
conflicts the Cold War that was being funded and proxied
by both sides of this, i e. Let's start from
the beginning here Korea, Vietnam, all the way into the eighties,

(08:13):
with Russia's Afghanistan invasion, and how we were funding and
training the muja haden to fight the communist Russians that
were making their way through Afghanistan. It goes a long,
long level here. We ourselves America were involved in somewhere
around thirty different coupes in South America between nineteen fifty

(08:35):
and now. All of those were to stop communism from
spreading closer to America's doorstep.

Speaker 1 (08:41):
And we've talked about that before.

Speaker 2 (08:43):
Right, Yeah, Now, Russia decided at one point in time
that communism still needed to spread, even though it was
very clear that they could not beat us on a
toe to toe fighting stance. They needed to get creative.
They needed to inject their ideals in cultural ways rather

(09:04):
than military and government ways because that didn't work. I
think it also ties into Americans having an inherent rebellious nature,
like deep within our culture, we were founded off of
a rebellion from Britain, right in some way, deep deep,
deep in the recesses of the human soul of an American,
a little bit of fuck. The government still resides right,

(09:28):
regardless of political parties. Right even the most devout liberals
who are on every social program ever, they will still
tell you that they don't trust the government.

Speaker 1 (09:39):
It's a part of our culture. You'd be an idiot
not to think that exactly. But that being said, there's
a group of Russians KGB, you know, the type Putin's
former job and things very similar to American Cia. And
I'm not going to say that America is the inherent

(09:59):
good guy on the one. But for this episode, we
are gonna be talking.

Speaker 2 (10:02):
About how the KGB went long con to spread communism
to such a way that they are trying to bring
about the new World order. And they did it way
back when, they're still doing it now, and they're using
political ideologies to further their means. We have a lot
of history to go over here from a KGB defector

(10:23):
who has written many books about it, all the way
through ladies and gentlemen. Today we are going to be
talking about the Peristoika deception.

Speaker 1 (10:31):
Let's go, let's go. We're gonna go ahead and share
the screen and we're gonna be diving in here.

Speaker 2 (10:37):
We got videos, we've got articles, we got a book
that was written on it. We're not gonna read the
whole book, but we are going to read the forward.

Speaker 1 (10:43):
Jonathan.

Speaker 2 (10:43):
For anybody who would like to see all of the
things that I'm gonna be talking about today rather than
just hearing about it, tell them where they can go.

Speaker 1 (10:49):
You already know where you can go. You can go
to Patreon dot com slash Cultive Conspiracy Podcast. That is
the best way to be able to support the show.
We appreciate all of the good cult members who have
done so already and are joining us every Tuesday night
at nine pm Central for the Cult Member Live Show.
If you want to be able to come join us
every Tuesday night, then go to the Third Eye all
the way open tier or higher. That'll give you access

(11:10):
to come join us and shoot the shit with us
literally four or five times a month, and you'll also
be able to slide into our dms. You'll be able
to get the shows a couple of days in advance,
you'll be able to see all of the videos. And
the best part about Patreon is the only place where
every single episode is completely promotional through Yeah buddy, so

(11:33):
it's all inclusive. We don't have to worry about monitoring
our words or using unlived or any of these bullshit
ass terms. It is free speech all day over there.
So we appreciate everybody that has following us over there,
and we're just trying to, you know, keep it real.
We're not trying to play by the Internet's rules, We're

(11:53):
not playing by YouTube's rules. We're just trying to, you know,
remain ourselves and we want everybody listening and everybody tuning
in to also remain themselves as well. Patreon is the
place to do that.

Speaker 2 (12:06):
Indeed, all right, everybody quick clip right here. And yes,
I know it's an AI video. I have two AI
videos that I'm going to be playing on this one.
Everybody knows I hate AI, but both of these videos
really do a good job of explaining the point and
again you could fact check what these AI videos are
saying very true. So with that being said, let's dive

(12:26):
into the Peristoika deception.

Speaker 1 (12:29):
The Peristroika deception.

Speaker 3 (12:31):
So this entry is based on a book that was
written by a Russian man named named Anatotly Gillitson. This
man was a KGB defector when the USSR was still
up and running. The Peristroika Deception book dives into conspiracies
surrounding how KGB spies were placed all over the world
in very high positions in order to attempt at the

(12:53):
stabilizing governments, specifically in the.

Speaker 1 (12:55):
US and Great Britain.

Speaker 3 (12:57):
This was all done through what was known as the
perist Peristroika in history books is known as the fall
of the USSR and the attempted reformation of Soviet Russia. However,
the book explains that the Peristroika had the exact opposite
effect and was actually used as a secret tool to
maneuver the USSR to the top of the world's food chain.

(13:19):
This was done in an effort to more effectively spread communism.
Some believe that Russia's actions in recent times tell that
Golitzen may not have been too far off of the money.

Speaker 1 (13:28):
But I guess only time will tell. Okay.

Speaker 2 (13:32):
So, like I said, very brief overview of it, and
like I said, this is not going to be just
an American thing, although we will be bringing up some
American examples because it's a little more closer to home.
We're also going to be diving into Putin himself because
all the way back from two thousand to now, what's
going on in Ukraine. And this isn't just a conservative

(13:53):
mainstream media talking point. There are a lot of signs
that are indicating that he is in the belief that
he is trying to re establish the former borders of
what once.

Speaker 1 (14:05):
Was the USSR. I know some people are going to
disagree with that. This is not me saying that this
is a fact.

Speaker 2 (14:10):
I am saying that there is a chain of events
that is leading a lot of people to make this assertion.

Speaker 1 (14:15):
And if you think about it, if he is you know,
prior KGB, and that was the goal all along, and
that guy is still in charge over there, why would
he go against his original plan. I'm just saying, I mean,
we're gonna get to all I know that there's a
lot of people out there that are like that, I
don't know, think that fucking Putin is a white hat

(14:38):
or think that he's a good guy. I'm not. I
don't know how you get there. That's like saying Jijupang's
a good guy. That's like saying Kim Jong un is
a good guy. That's like saying our own CIA is
the good guy. None of these people are good. None
of them are white hats. They all want maximum control.
They all don't give a shit about what you think
or feel.

Speaker 2 (14:57):
Absolutely, And to that point, how many many people have
we had on the show that have talked about some
Q drop where they actually believe that everyone you just
listed are actually secretly in cahoots with Donnie t and
that they're gonna bring about the end of the New
World Order. And it's like, I don't, I honestly do
not see how that tapestry weaves out well, just to show.

Speaker 1 (15:20):
You that nothing can stop what is coming, I guess anyway, Yeah,
it's it's crazy how they just got everybody roped into
believing that politics and politicians is good. You know what
I'm saying? Like that was really the whole idea behind
QAnon is that these guys are the good guys. That's like,

(15:40):
oh my god, they do so many people, including me
for a little bit. I'm not even gonna lie like
it just because I who doesn't love a good rabbit
hole to go down into, you know what I'm saying.
And so the problem is is that with a lot
of the rabbit holes, you have to believe that there
are good guys and there are bad guys. Otherwise everybody screwed.
And so and I'm not sitting over here saying that

(16:00):
I'm blackpilled by or turbo black pilled or whatever the
fucking term is. It's like, no, I think that you
just have to have your third eye all the way open.
And I like that. I mean, some people call that
just white pilled.

Speaker 2 (16:12):
But that's a thing, yeah, in some regard, But I
mean diving into conspiracies, you will blackpill yourself accidentally, okay,
because the deeper you go. Sure, let's say that you
are of political party A, and then there's political party B.
Doesn't matter what country you live in. Yes, I know
that there are certain countries or they have like five
or six just there's usually two, maybe three main ones

(16:35):
that are actually in the conversation for leading the country
at any given election point. Right, if you are on
political parties a's side, and you could find a million
things wrong with political party B, it will not take
you long, especially in the age of information like we're
in right now.

Speaker 1 (16:51):
If you're in.

Speaker 2 (16:51):
Political party b's side, same thing, it doesn't take long
to discover that, oh, I'm on this side because these
people are so bad A bop bop pop pop, or
the other way around, the problem is when you open
up that third eye, when you do look at everything
from the outside, take away your own political stigmas and
dogmas and morals and ethics and beliefs, take all of

(17:14):
that off for two seconds and just look at the
situation as a whole. It is a black pill moment
because there are no good guys. None can be found
in any political spectrum of any country ever.

Speaker 1 (17:26):
Right, By the way, anybody that is curious about what
these terms actually mean, I know I was. I was
a little confused whenever I first got into conspiracies. What
is blue pill? What is red pill? What is white pill?
What is black pill? What is gray pill? And all
these other fucking colors. So just to I mean, you
should know what red pill and blue pill is by
now so white pill and black pills. So the terms
white pilled and black pilled represent different philosophical outlooks. This

(17:50):
is from UH, actually from redded but it says uh.
White pill generally refers to a hopeful or optimistic perspective,
while black piled signifies a belief in the futility of change,
often leading to despair or nihilism. So it's not it's
not good to be black pilled, although diving into a
lot of these conspiracies, it's easy to get there. So

(18:13):
that's that's the point, is that you don't want to
become nihilistic and think that everybody hates you and that
you're under the Enannaki's thumb or some bullshit, you know, like,
you want to still have some kind of hope and
you believe that there the change can happen. That's great pilled.

Speaker 2 (18:29):
For the record, White pilled is more like you just
got an optimistic disposition to everything that's going on. Black pilled,
you are just pessimistic and you don't even see a
reason get out of bed in the morning. Gray pilled
would be like, all right, I can see the disgusting
nature of the world, but I still am trying to
have a little bit of hopium that things can and
will get better.

Speaker 1 (18:48):
Well, I like to think that like white pilled, it's
it's more of a to be honest, it's kind of
like an internal thing. It's kind of like what they say,
like change your change yourself, change the world, you know,
Like that whole kind of ideology is just like how
do you what is your perspective against the world, Like,
if something terrible happens, is it going to send you
into a downward spiral or you know what I mean,

(19:10):
Like there's a bunch of different things that could happen
as a result of that. So I like to remain optimistic.
I like to you know, kind of hone in on
the silver linings of a lot of things. But also
I'm at the point where I'm like, yeah, I don't
trust anybody, you know, I don't trust any any government.
I don't trust any politician. I don't trust any build
that has passed that is so good and so great

(19:30):
and so big and beautiful. You know.

Speaker 2 (19:32):
Yeah, having skepticism is not black piled, right, That's that's
not the same thing.

Speaker 1 (19:38):
Yeah, So I think that we're probably on the gray
pill side.

Speaker 2 (19:42):
I would like to think so anyway, I guess it
depends on the topic and depends on the day, to
be honest with you, but I mean that's the way
it goes.

Speaker 1 (19:48):
Every day is a new day. You can decide what
you make of this one. You like to get a
little gray scale up in here, baby, absolutely? Yeah. So
all right, now we have the overarching theme to the deception.
Let's learn about.

Speaker 2 (20:01):
The author who was the KGB defector himself. This is
Wikipedia page. We're not going to read the entirety of it,
but there's a few key things that we really need
to discuss. Let's just start off with this top paragraph.

Speaker 1 (20:13):
All right. Anatolely Glitsen yep. He was a Soviet KGB
defector and author of two books about the long term
deception strategy of the KGB leadership. He was born in
Ukrainian SSR, Soviet Union. He provided a wide range of
intelligence to the CIA on the operations of most of

(20:33):
the lines departments or lines our departments lines at the
Helenski and other residences, as well as KGB methods of
recruiting and running agents. He became an American citizen by
nineteen eighty four. The military writer General Sir General Sir
John Hackett, and former CIA counter intelligence director James Angleton

(20:56):
identified Gilitsen as the most valuable defector ever to reach
the West. However, many of Glitzen's claims were controversial, with
MI five historian Christopher Andrew describing him as an unreliable
conspiracy theorist.

Speaker 2 (21:10):
Indeed, even though once again, we're gonna paint a picture
of how many of his predictions have come to pass,
and you be the judge of he was a credible
source or not, then we can look at what's going
on in the world today and over the last few decades,
and it's yeah, no, anyway, let's continue with his defection.

Speaker 1 (21:30):
Glitzen worked in the Strategic Planning Department of the KGB
in the rank of major. In nineteen sixty one, under
the name of Ivan Klimov, he was assigned to the
Soviet embassy in Helenski, Finland as Vicekuntinki Helsinki. How what
did I say? Yeah, you said Helensky. Oh, sorry about that, Helsinki,
Finland as vice counsel and attashe he defected with his

(21:53):
wife and daughter to Central Intelligence Aid Agency via Helsinki
on December fifteenth, nineteen sixty one. They flew with a
CIA escort from Finland to Sweden and thence to the
United States via Frankfurt am Maine, Germany, arriving on December eighteenth,
nineteen sixty one. He was interviewed by James Jesus Angleton.

(22:13):
Imagine that middle name Jesus. I mean, damn, dude, I mean,
I get it. You know, it's like I named my
son after my football idol, you know what I'm saying.
So why not name it after like the number one
idol of all time.

Speaker 2 (22:27):
I mean, you see a lot of Hispanic people named
their sons Jesus.

Speaker 1 (22:30):
I've met quite a few Hayesuses.

Speaker 2 (22:32):
In my life, but I've never heard of a white
dude with the middle name Jesus before this article.

Speaker 1 (22:36):
So, like, that's interesting. I'm doing it. My next kid,
middle name Jesus. Doing it? Oh my god, I believe
you're gonna do that too. Absolutely, I'm gonna tell me
ys Christ consciousness, no, don't do that to them kids.
And so he was interviewed by James Jesus Angleton, CIA
counterintelligence director. In January of nineteen sixty two, the KGB

(22:58):
sent instructions to as a Dentura throughout the world on
the actions required to minimize the damage. All meetings with
important agents were to be suspended. In November of nineteen
sixty two, KGB head Vladimir Semi semi Caste approved a
plan for the assassination of Glitzen and other particularly dangerous traders,

(23:20):
including Igor Guzenko, Nikolai Kolov and bog Dan Stashinsky. Did
I do good on all those? I think you I
think you did.

Speaker 2 (23:32):
I'm not sure if the pronunciations were one hundred percent,
but I think he did pretty damn good.

Speaker 1 (23:36):
Fucking Russian over here, dude. The KGB made significant efforts
to discredit Glitzen by promoting disinformation that he was involved
in illegal smuggling operations. Glitzen provided information about many famous
Soviet agents, including Kim Philbey, Donald McLean, Guy Burgess, John Vassal,
and double agent Alexander Kopotsky who worked in Germany and others.

(24:00):
While unable to identify some agents like Philby specifically by name,
Glitsen provided sufficient information that SIS was able to perform
or able to determine the culprits. Thus, Glitzen's defection in
nineteen sixty one said in motion of the process that
definitively confirmed Philby as a Soviet mole.

Speaker 2 (24:20):
Okay, so again we're already off to a good start
with this guy being credible. He was telling them, maybe
not by name on all of them, some of them, yes,
by name, but the others he could at least say,
all right, I know for sure that the KGB has
a mole working in this office with this agency in
this country, and we know that they are in this
type of position and they have this type of a

(24:44):
job scope. So look for somebody of this kind of
age range who has this going on for him. And
he gave them enough of a profile the way they
could figure out who these people were. Then come to
find out confirmed every one of them was in fact
a Soviet spy. So already he's showing his credibility before
we even get into the thick of it.

Speaker 1 (25:04):
Okay, well, there is controversy as well. Did you want
to do that one?

Speaker 2 (25:08):
No, not necessarily the controversy, But let's talk about the
book at least this top part here, because we're going
to be reading some of it ourselves.

Speaker 1 (25:18):
In nineteen eighty four, Glitzen published the book New lies
for old, wherein he warned about a long term deception
strategy of seeming a retreat from hardline communism designed to
lull the West into a false sense of security and
finally economically cripple and diplomatically isolate the United States, among
other things. Glitzen stated in his quotes, the liberalization would

(25:42):
be spectacular and impressive. Formal pronouncements might be made about
a reduction in the Communist Party's role. Its monopoly would
be apparently curtailed, and ostensible separation of powers between the legislative,
the executive, and the judiciary might be introduced. The Supreme
Court would or the Supreme Soviet would be given greater

(26:02):
apparent power, and the President of the Soviet Union and
the First Secretary of the Party might well be separated.
The KGB would be, in quotes reformed. The dissidents at
home would be amnestied. Amnesty. Amnesty, Damn, that's a I've
never read that word on paper.

Speaker 2 (26:22):
Given amnesty, there you go. The dissidents at home would
kind of get a.

Speaker 1 (26:26):
Pass on that those in exile abroad would be allowed
to return, and some would take up positions of leadership
and government. Sokarov might be included in some capacity in
the government or allowed to teach abroad. The creative arts
and cultural and scientific organizations such as the writers' unions
and Academy of Sciences would become apparently more independent, as

(26:48):
would the trade unions. Political clubs would be open to
non members of the Communist Party, leading dissidents leading dissonance
might form one or more alternative political parties. Would be
a greater freedom for Soviet citizens to travel Western and unitedations.
Observers would be invited to the Soviet Union to witness

(27:12):
the reforms in action.

Speaker 2 (27:14):
This being said, when the Soviet Union fell, what he
is saying, what happened happened across the board.

Speaker 1 (27:23):
And here's the deal.

Speaker 2 (27:24):
When the Soviet Union fell, the people that were living
in Soviet Russia at that time, granted they weren't a
big fan of their government, but for the last fifty
years they had been true blue bread.

Speaker 1 (27:37):
In to this communist ideal.

Speaker 2 (27:41):
Once that goes away, the people didn't decide that they're
just done with communism.

Speaker 1 (27:45):
Hell, that was all they had known for the most part.

Speaker 2 (27:47):
Right, you may have some of the old timers that
remembers a time before the Russian Revolution that was very
few and far between, so even after it was gone
and they were seen as a democratic republic unquote massive
quote unquote on that It's not like you're just going
to change the mindset and the culture of your entire
nation with the stroke of a pin.

Speaker 1 (28:08):
That's not how that works. And they knew this. Angleton
and so Jesus Angleton and Glitzen reportedly sought the assistance
of William F. Buckley Junior, who wants worked for the
CIA in writing the New Lies for Old book. Buckley refused,
but later went on to write a novel about Angleton
called Spytime The Undoing of James Jesus Angleton. New Lies

(28:31):
for Old received a first edition in Portuguese in twenty eighteen.
How about that.

Speaker 2 (28:36):
Right now, let's read this paragraph about the topic of
today's discussion, the Perishtroika Deception.

Speaker 1 (28:44):
In nineteen ninety five, and Atoly Glitzen and Christopher's Story
published a book entitled The Peristroka Deception, containing purported memoranda
attributed to Golitzen claiming, Number one, the Soviet strategists are
concealing the secret court that exists and will continue between
Moscow and the nationalist leaders of the independent republics. Number two,

(29:06):
the public of the KGB or the power of the
KGB remains as great as ever. Talk of cosmetic changes
in the KGB and its supervision is deliberately publicized to
support the myth of democratization of the Soviet political system.
And number three, scratch these new instant Soviet democrats, anti
communists and nationalists who have sprouted out of nowhere and

(29:30):
underneath will be found secret party members or KGB agents.

Speaker 2 (29:35):
Okay, now this is the talking point Soviet strategists. Excuse me,
we're absolutely coordinating secret things between Moscow and the nationalist
leaders quote unquote of independent republics quote unquote. They didn't
just mean former Soviet states, right, like every nation that

(29:57):
has a stand at the end of it was a
former Soviet state.

Speaker 1 (29:59):
We know this. That is not what they meant.

Speaker 2 (30:02):
They meant the independent republics across the world.

Speaker 1 (30:06):
Right.

Speaker 2 (30:06):
Of course, the power of the KGB remains as much
as ever. There will be cosmetic changes, right, it's gonna
be a whole new look. The Soviets are gone, man,
Communism is dead. We're not that Russia. We're the Russian Republic.
Come on, now we're not the same group. Even though
all of those same people that were figureheads with the
KGB are now just figure heads with the Russian Republic.

(30:28):
It didn't change anything. Their flag might have changed, their
rhetoric might have changed, but the ethos were still the same.

Speaker 1 (30:34):
The titles have changed, but the people are the same.

Speaker 2 (30:37):
Exactly Now he named democrats, I'm gonna throw that out.
And also some of the loudest anti communist people actually
were secret Communist sympathizers.

Speaker 1 (30:48):
It was a front, right, it was a ruse.

Speaker 2 (30:51):
And then of course the ultra nationalists, these people that
seem like they are just the most patriotic ever in reality, again,
that was all a front that just.

Speaker 1 (31:00):
Sprouted up out of nowhere.

Speaker 2 (31:02):
Promise you they are actually a secret Communist party agent
or a KGB agent.

Speaker 1 (31:07):
It's just the way this goes. Oh, that was Martin
Luther King right, Well, like that was something that they
were trying to get him, like to keep him from
talking about because he was such a Communist Marxist like
ideology type of guy that you know that they had
to like write his scripts and everything for him to
try and calm him down a little bit and water

(31:28):
it down a little bit from what we learned, yes
and no.

Speaker 2 (31:32):
So the jury is still out on if he was
a true communist or was that rhetoric that was sprung
up by the CIA to discredit MLK and his mission.

Speaker 1 (31:42):
Right, That's what I'm saying.

Speaker 2 (31:43):
There are certain figures that if the CIA had their
hands in it in any way, shape or form, how
much of the story can you trust?

Speaker 1 (31:50):
How much of it was a part of the op.

Speaker 2 (31:52):
And or the counter op right, You got to like
cut through the weeds on that. But we do know
as far as the political parties in America is concerned,
one of these parties got heavily, heavily, heavily infiltrated by
communists and communist sympathizers, and the other one gets called
racist bigots a lot. This is by design. Okay, so

(32:17):
we're gonna get to all of it.

Speaker 1 (32:18):
I promise. Now, let's go ahead. I'm gonna read this.

Speaker 2 (32:21):
This is the book itself, The Peristroika Deception. If anybody
wants to look into this book, I highly recommend it.
It is a thick read, is a thickums, but it's
full of amazing information. So we're just gonna read the
forward of it. The forward is ten pages, but we're
gonna get through it. I promise it's worth it. So

(32:44):
this collection of my memoranda to the CIA is about
Soviet Grand strategy and the new dimensions of the threat
to Western democracies. There's a marked difference between the America
and the Communist use of the term strategy quote unquote.
Americans tend to think of strategy in short range terms,
in relation to presidential election campaigns, in football or baseball games,

(33:06):
or in such instances as the strategy of stonewalling during
the Watergate investigations. For Russian communists, on the other hand,
strategy is a grand design or general party line, which
governs the party's actions over a long period and contains
one or more special maneuvers designed to help the party
achieve its ultimate objectives. The seizure of power in Russia
in nineteen seventeen, the subsequent expansion of communist camps, and

(33:31):
the final worldwide victory of communism. Yes, everyone, we are
talking about a new world order. The book shows that
the essence of the special maneuver in the present grand
strategy for Communism lies internally in the creation and use
of controlled political opposition quote unquote, to affect a transition
to new democratic quote unquote non communist quote unquote nationalist

(33:56):
quote unquote power structures which remain in reality communist control internationally.
The essence of the maneuver lies in the use of
political potential of these new power structures to develop contacts
and promote solidarity with the Western democracies as a means
towards the achievement of world communistic victory through the coverage convergence,

(34:18):
excuse me of the communist and non communist systems. The
main purpose of my defection at the end of nineteen
sixty one was to warn the American government about the
adoption of the current Grand Strategy for communism and the
political role of the KGB and the use of disinformation
and control political opposition which the strategy entailed, and to

(34:42):
help the West neutralize KGB penetration of their governments. Now,
before I read more, yes, we are going to be
talking about the current Russia Gate situation with old Barack.
So put a pin in that one for later, because
what Tulsa Gabbert just released plus Obama saying that I'll
be more flexible after the election when he knew he

(35:04):
was about to get out of power, but he was
talking to the Russian Minister of Defense about how he'll
be more flexible towards their means after he got out
of office.

Speaker 1 (35:12):
We're gonna talk about it all. We're gonna talk about
it all, but just so we're clear.

Speaker 2 (35:15):
Although this was written back in the day and he's
talking about him defecting in sixty one, there is a
lot of signs to say that the operation.

Speaker 1 (35:24):
Is still ongoing anyway.

Speaker 2 (35:27):
On arrival in Washington, I asked to be received by
President Kennedy. I was assured by General Taylor and the
President's security advisor that the President would see my appropriate contributions.
Mister Robert Kennedy, the Attorney General, told me that in
due time a meeting with the President would be arranged.
General Taylor wrote me in the following terms.

Speaker 1 (35:45):
Here we go.

Speaker 2 (35:46):
This is from the White House, Washington, the twenty first
of December nineteen sixty one. Dear mister Galitzen, I have
your letter of December nineteenth, nineteen sixty one, addressed to
the President of the United States. The subject matter is
one of considerable interest to the government, and your request
has received careful consideration. I wish to assure you that

(36:07):
the officials with whom you are now in contact have
the full authority and responsibility for handling matters of this nature,
and I therefore request that you give them your complete cooperation.
I have asked that I be kept informed of the
developments in this matter, and you may be confident that
information concerning your contribution will be brought to the attention
of the President when and if appropriate.

Speaker 1 (36:29):
Maxwell D.

Speaker 2 (36:30):
Taylor, all right, that was the letter he received. Now,
while waiting for the meeting, I limited my cooperation with
the CIA, FBI and allied services to the problems of
KGB penetration of American, British, French government institutions. After President
Kennedy's assassination, I briefed the head of the CIA and
head of that agency's counterintelligence staff about the Communist long

(36:52):
range strategy, the creation of the Disinformation Department, and of
Schlipin's reorganization of the KGB into a political arm of
the party. Now this is also pretty important. When Kennedy
was assassinated, does anyone remember what happened next?

Speaker 1 (37:08):
LBJ took over.

Speaker 2 (37:09):
He refused to get onto the plane to He is
the only president to not be sworn in in Washington, DC.
I might add he was sworn in at the Dallas
airport because he refused to even get on the plane
to go back until he was the president. JFK's body
wasn't even cold yet they had just pronounced him dead. Now,
why was this Well, right around this time was something

(37:32):
called Vietnam. Maybe you've heard of it, and we were
trying to just not be a part of that at
that time. But LBJ and his wife, Lady Bird Johnson,
who had massive military contracting jobs or you know, money,
I should say, really wanted that.

Speaker 1 (37:49):
War to continue. That was like their whole thing, right,
They wanted to get involved with that.

Speaker 2 (37:54):
We need American troops over there, we need American industry
over there. We need to get this war machine running
and gun and so that the Johnson family can be
made rich. There's more than a few reasons why JFK
was assassinated. There's more than a few reasons why LBJ
did what he did when he got to office, how
he got to office, the whole way through. So with
that in mind, as soon as he was assassinated, your

(38:17):
boy here, the KGB defector was like, hey, y'all, I
know that there's a lot of stuff going on. This
is why this is what is happening right now. But
it didn't matter because at that point the long game
had already been started the defector's area, I should say,
the plants were already planted in France, in England and

(38:38):
in the United States.

Speaker 1 (38:41):
That's this seems like a long drawn out plan. And
I gotta say, dude, I'm really not that shocked that
this is even a thing though, if you really think
about it, like you know, we've been feeling that, especially
ever since JFK was assassinated, that there has been a
change in the wins of the of the political system,
you know, and maybe there always has been, but it

(39:02):
seemed to make like a crazy ninety degree turn, especially
at that point in time.

Speaker 2 (39:08):
Seemed I'm glad that you said the word that you said.
It seems like there was a political shift, right. It
seemed like the parties switched sides. What if I was
to tell you that the parties never swap sides, but
it was all a part of the propaganda machine to
make it appear that they swap sides to ensure that
their voter base felt even more morally upright.

Speaker 1 (39:32):
For voting in the way that they did. Yeah, it's like,
you know, because it used to be the Democrats were
anti war, now they're pro war. Used to be that
the Republicans were pro war, Now we're anti war, right,
And it seems kind of like the sales are shifting
a little bit, which ultimately just waters down both political
parties because they don't necessarily have a good solid foundation

(39:55):
that they can stand on that goes back one hundred,
one hundred and fifty years or whatever, because everybody's flip
flop side so many damn times, and everybody kind of
forgets what the main goal is, which should be peace
and happiness and the pursuit of property and whatever.

Speaker 2 (40:09):
But let me throw out an idea at you real quick.
I know that you're not like the most well read
as far as history goes, and that's kind of the
point on this one. Okay, So we do know that
Abe Lincoln was a Republican, right. We do know that
the slaves being freed in America was a Republican initiative.

Speaker 1 (40:29):
Right, that's not a secret. We know this right civil rights.

Speaker 2 (40:34):
Don't think about it, don't seriously, do not think any
deeper on this, Which party spearheaded the civil rights movement.

Speaker 1 (40:41):
To get past Jonathan Um spearheaded the civil rights movement. Well,
you would think that it'd be democratic, right, you would.

Speaker 2 (40:51):
And for the record, I've had this conversation with three
different people in the past two weeks. Most people believe
that the civil rights full equality for minority groups in
America was a Democrat initiative. What if I was to
tell you that it was overwhelmingly a Republican initiative, I

(41:11):
would believe it right, one hundred percent, because history is
definitely a lie agreed upon and everything is always the
opposite of what you think it is. Like, that's just
that's the bait and switch of history in general.

Speaker 1 (41:25):
I would say it.

Speaker 2 (41:26):
Was propagandized to make it look like the Democrat.

Speaker 4 (41:29):
Party, the workingman's party, the one of the poor, they
care about the minorities, never mind the fact that Southern
Democrats were the ones that were trying to fight against
civil rights being passed.

Speaker 1 (41:42):
Okay, you know it felt weired. It felt weird whenever
you said that Abe Lincoln was a Republican, because I
swear I remember as a kid thinking that he was
a Democrat. Again, propaganda would lead you to believe that
even though a quick Google search will show you these things,
and it's not like this is a secret information, but
they have put it out there into the public zeitgeist

(42:02):
in such a way to where you think that it
had to have been a Democrat initiative, because well, obviously
the Democrats are the party that care about minorities. No,
they're not, And for the record, they never have been. Yeah,
let me read this. For the record, they never have.
They still do not. So it's and I just typed
it in on Doug Doug go. And it says that

(42:23):
Abraham Lincoln became a Republican because he opposed the extension
of slavery into the territories, which was a central issue
for the newly formed party. His leadership and anti slavery
stance significantly shaped the Republican Party's identity during the mid
nineteenth century. Why do I not remember learning that?

Speaker 2 (42:43):
Because it was propagandized to where you wouldn't remember that.
Never mind that the Democrat Party was the party that
put Indians on reservations, kept Jim Crow laws in action,
formed the fucking clan, I might add, and here's the deal.
Everybody thinks the political party swapped after civil rights. They

(43:06):
did not, but the propaganda machine, spearheaded by communists in
the Democratic Party, spun the machine and put out a
narrative into the public zeitgeist so culturally to where people
still to this day believe that the Democrats actually care
about minority groups. We're gonna get to it all. We're
gonna get to it all. I promise you. This is

(43:27):
not just a massive oh yay, Republican Party is the
best thing.

Speaker 1 (43:30):
Okay.

Speaker 2 (43:31):
I understand the Republican Party is a lot of issues
with them themselves. A lot of people have issues with
some of their beliefs, a lot of people have some
issues with certain Republicans that have taken charge over the years.
And I'm not denying these facts, and I'm not saying
that every single Republican is inherently not a racist or
not a my anti minority in some way. I am saying,

(43:51):
if you were to look at the parties over the
course of the last you know, one hundred and fifty
years as a whole, one of these parties truly cares
about your your you know, the the downtrodden and the
minority groups, and wants true equality across the board.

Speaker 5 (44:10):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (44:10):
Oh, women's rights, Jonathan, women's rights, the rights for women
to vote right off the rip, Republican or Democrat initiative,
I guess since we're sticking on this flavor, I'm guessing
this republican.

Speaker 1 (44:24):
But you would have thought Democrat before we had this conversation,
wouldn't you. I think that's what most people would think.

Speaker 2 (44:28):
Yeah, exactly, complete lies, not even not even there was
only a handful of Democrats that are even kind of
in favor of it.

Speaker 1 (44:37):
Well, it makes sense whenever you got Joe Biden saying
that we want we want little Uh what does he
say that? Like, we want poor kids to be as
smart as white kids? Yeah, poor kids as smart as
white I'm like, did you just.

Speaker 2 (44:50):
Say that that We're gonna get to it all? But
here's the deal, especially Joe Biden being a great example
of that old China Joe himself, I might add, China
being ran by the CCP and has been for decades.
He is a communist sympathizer, very loud and proud about that. Actually,
although yes, I understand his mental faculties aren't what they
once were. It's a long con by the former Soviet

(45:14):
Union and KGB to not just in America. This is
happening in France, this is happening in England, This is
happening all over Europe, this is happening across Africa.

Speaker 1 (45:22):
It's happening across South America. Which is why America led.

Speaker 2 (45:27):
Like thirty coups in the last fifty years in South
America to keep communism off of our doorstep. This was
the reason why we're gonna get to it all. But
let's continue here. On many subsequent occasions, I this is
this is our boy from the book. By the way,
this is ol Galitzen. I had the opportunity to brief
other leading Western services on the subject of Soviet long

(45:47):
range strategy and the new role of their KGB, recommending
a reassessment of the communist problem. A few counterintelligence officials
in the CIA and the British and French services began
to understand and accept the validity of my views. For me,
the most encouraging development was the understanding I received from
the Count Demarenci Marnsch of the French Intelligence Service under

(46:10):
the late President Pompadieu. Count Dementi provided me I'm probably
mispronouncing it. Sorry, it's been a while since I spoke.
French provided me with the opportunities to work with the
service on the reassessment of communist developments in terms of
Soviet strategy. In the presence of a dozen senior officials
of his service, the Count stated that he was in
agreement with my views on the existence of the strategy

(46:31):
and of disinformation, but I was unable to explain my
ideas in detail because my project with his service was terminated.
Interesting that it was just terminated. He agreed that this
is a real problem. We're done talking about it now.
Funny how that worked out. The growing awareness about disinformation
and the political role of the KGB in implementing the
strategy was interrupted by the Watergate hearings, which weakened the

(46:56):
American services, by the unfortunate death of the President, which
weakened the position of the French services.

Speaker 1 (47:02):
So around the same.

Speaker 2 (47:03):
Time where Watergate was going on and now the CIA
was under serious scrutiny because Nixon was using them to
further his own means and they got caught, is the
same time when the French president dies. So right off
the rip he was big working with the Big three
at that time, England, America and France.

Speaker 1 (47:20):
Two of them just had some massive things.

Speaker 2 (47:22):
Happen to where his whole talking points had to be
just kind of sidelined for a bit. Despite adverse circumstances,
I have made a consistent attempt to analyze important developments
in the USSR and other communist countries through the prism
of the communist long range strategy, strategic disinformation, any political
role of the KGB. I continued to submit my memoranda

(47:44):
to the CIA about significant Communist developments and made suggestions
on how to improve the agency's understanding of the communist strategy.
In nineteen eighty four, I published a book New Lies
for Old about Communist strategic political disinformation. In the book
and in my memoranda, I made several significant predictions about
future developments in the communist world. I predicted that the

(48:04):
communist strategists would go beyond Marx and Lenin and would
introduce economic and political reforms in the USSR and Eastern Europe.
I predicted the legislation of solidarity in Poland, the return
of the democratization of Czechoslovakia, and the removal of the
Berlin Wall. I warned about political offensive to excuse me.
I warned about a political offensive to promote a neutral

(48:27):
socialist Europe, which would work to Soviet advantage. There's a
few socialist countries in Europe right now. They are all
not doing so hot. But my point is that everything
he predicted came true. Let's continue to do Where are
we at it is yep. I also warned, Yeah, I

(48:47):
also warned that the West was acutely vulnerable to the
coming major shift in communist tactics. It is axiomatic that
the political ideas should be tested out in practice, and
it is a fact that many of my predicts, particular
about the coming of the economic and political reforms of
the USSR in Eastern Europe, passed the test and were
confirmed by subsequent events, particularly in Poland and Czechoslovakia. It

(49:10):
remains also a fact that the leading Soviet experts like
mister Brazinski, failed to make accurate predictions about these developments.
This failure on the part of mister Brazinski and other
experts in Washington was noticed by an independent observer in
the New York Times of September twelfth, nineteen eighty nine.
Since then, I have submitted new memorandas to the CIA

(49:33):
and the American policy makers in which I explained the
Soviet Grand Strategy and its strategic designs against the West,
the essence of the Perestroika, the final phase of the strategy,
the new use of the bloc's political and security potential
for introducing new deceptive, controlled, democratic, nationalistic and non communist

(49:53):
structures in the communist count countries, and the development of
the political and security potential of the renew dude democratic
regimes quote unquote for the execution of the strategy strategic
design against the West. In the memoranda, I provided seven
keys for understanding prayer Stroyca, explained the danger of Western

(50:13):
support for it, and proposed a reassessment of the situation
and rethinking of that support as priority.

Speaker 1 (50:19):
Items of business.

Speaker 2 (50:21):
I suggested also how the West should respond to the
challenge of prayer Stroika and its destabilizing effect on Western democracies.
Since the CIA did not react to my memoranda.

Speaker 1 (50:33):
I decided to publish them and ask the CIA to
declassify them for the purpose The agency agreed. Several considerations
forced me to take my decision.

Speaker 2 (50:43):
First, the democracies of the United States and Western Europe
are facing a dangerous situation and are vulnerable because of
their governments, the Vatican, the elite, the media, the industrialists,
the financiers, and the trade unions, and most important, the
general public are blind to the dangers of the strategy
of Perestroika and have failed to perceive the development and deployment,

(51:06):
rather of the communist political potential of the renewed democratic
regimes against the West. The democracies could perish unless they
are informed about the aggressive design of Perastroka against them.
Before I even read the next one, I think that
he's on one here.

Speaker 1 (51:21):
He is, Yeah, that's uh, he's It's crazy how he's
basically bat in a thousand over here and everybody's just like,
we don't see it. I don't see it. I don't
see I mean, yeah, you made some I mean you
made some awesome predictions, and good for you, and you know,
you would you classify them so that you can, you know,
get your trophies and whatnot. But it's like, why would

(51:41):
you not continue to listen to this guy. This guy's
a fucking modern day profit at this point, and for
some reason, they're just you know, disregarding him. He literally
came from the KGB. He knows what they're doing.

Speaker 2 (51:52):
Because he was once a part of them, And somehow
they're like, we see what you're saying, but man, we
kind of got other shit going on right now, bro.
And he's like, Bro, you're not gonna have any shit
going on if this continues. Eh, yeah, he can write.

Speaker 1 (52:04):
Your book about it. It's all good. Crazy. It blows my mind.
And it wasn't just some Joe Schmoe either. I mean
he's literally having conversations with the White House.

Speaker 2 (52:13):
He's got the president's direct line like that. That's not
a sidestep or conversation. But still somehow they're like, eh,
it's you know, we'll see how it goes. Bro, I've
said what was gonna happen, and it all happened, and
you're still just kind of going meh okay.

Speaker 1 (52:30):
Yeah, it's might a whole lot of sense. It almost
seems like the oh, if you really think about it,
are are they just disregarding it? Or you know, are
there penetrators in the White House that are you know,
purposefully disregarding it.

Speaker 2 (52:46):
I think you're more on the money with that statement, personally,
but we're gonna learn more.

Speaker 1 (52:51):
Let's continue.

Speaker 2 (52:52):
Secondly, I could not imagine that American policymakers, and particularly
the conservatives in both the Republican and Democratic parties, despite
their long experience with communist treachery, would not be able
to grasp the new maneuvers of the communist strategists and
would rush to commit the West to helping Perestroika, which
is so contrary to their interests. It has been sad

(53:14):
to observe the jubilation of American and Western European conservatives
who have been cheering Peristroika without realizing that it is
intended to bring about their own political and physical demise.
Liberal support for Peristroka is understandable, but conservative support came
as a surprise to me. Thirdly, I was appalled that

(53:36):
Paristroka was embraced and supported by the United States without
any serious debate.

Speaker 1 (53:41):
On the subject. Yeah, we're going all the way, deep, y'all.

Speaker 2 (53:46):
In the fourth place, I am appalled by the failure
of the American scholars to point out the relevance of
Lenin's new economic policy, to understanding the aggressive anti Western
design of Perestroika, or to provide appropriate warning to policymakers,
and their failure to distinguish between American's true friends and
its Leninist foes, precisely because these foes are wearing the

(54:09):
new Democratic uniform. Given the pressures they face, policymakers have
no time to study the history of the period of
Lenin's New Economic policy or to remind themselves of Marxist
Leninist dialectics.

Speaker 1 (54:22):
But how could such learn? How could such learn? And
distinguished scholars as S. Baylor ze Brazinski have failed to
warn them about the success of the New economic policy,
the mistakes made by the weston accepting it, and Gorbachev's
reputation of Lenin's strategy and its dangers for the West.

(54:43):
What happened to their credentials as scholars?

Speaker 2 (54:46):
Why was it left to Professor Norman Stone of Oxford
University to detect and make the parallels in his article
on the London Daily Telegraph on the eleventh of November
nineteen eighty nine and to express concern at the uf
FOI or over Gorbachev in his book or in his
book The Grand Failure. Brazenski limited his description of Lenin's

(55:08):
New economic policy of three brief phases. He described the
new economic policy as amounting to a reliance on the
market mechanism and private initiative to stimulate economic recovery. In
his words, it was probably quote the most open and
intellectually innovative phase in Soviet history. For Brazinski, the NEP

(55:32):
the New Economic Policy is a shorthand term for a
period of experimentation, flexibility, and modernization. See the Grand Failure
By the Way, It's a New York, nineteen eighty nine,
pages eighteen through nineteen. I am appalled by Brazenski's failure
to explain the re relevance of Lenin's New Economic Policy

(55:52):
to Perishtroika. This failure is further illustrated by the following Bieler's,
former defector from the Central Committee apparatus of the Polish
Communist Party, wrote a forward to Gorbachev's book Perestroika, introducing
it to the US public without inserting any warning about
the parallels with the New Economic Policy and its danger

(56:13):
for Western democracies number or letter B. During his recent
visit to Moscow, Brazinski, the former National security advisor in
the Carter administration, met leading Soviet strategists, including Yakol Yakovlev,
an expert in the manipulation of the Western media, and

(56:34):
advised them on how to proceed with Perestroika. Furthermore, Brazenski
delivered a lecture on the same subject to the Soviet
diplomats at the High Diplomatic Academy. So basically what he's
saying is these two learned and educated academic people who
wrote these papers about it were actually plants, and they

(56:55):
could he could prove his receipts on that s. Baylor
or Biler was a member of the Polish Communist Party,
although he rebranded himself and started running as if he's
a new democrat and he's all about democracy and all
of that. Shocker that he just kind of missed the
mark on a few things. Then Brazinski is the same way,

(57:15):
although he on the surface seemed to be a democracy
type of guy, come to find out he went to
Russia and literally not only talked to their advisors on
how to manipulate the Western media, but then gave a
lecture on the topic.

Speaker 1 (57:32):
Yeah, it's it's sounding a lot more like infiltrators, and
that's why he's not getting any pushback at all as
far as you know Western government leaders right right.

Speaker 2 (57:44):
Essentially, that's the thing. It's not just one or two
of them. It is a mass number of them that,
in some way, shape or form, were all I don't
want to say the term coerced, because that's not act.
They were duped by plants from the communist sympathizers from

(58:06):
around the world. They spread out like lice, okay, like rats,
and they set up shop and they made nests in
all these western countries, not just America, not just France,
not just England. They did it all over Europe, they
did it all over Africa, they did it all over Asia,
they did.

Speaker 1 (58:24):
It all over the world.

Speaker 2 (58:26):
And that's why there were so many wars that were
happening during the Cold War.

Speaker 1 (58:30):
When Americans and again it's not.

Speaker 2 (58:33):
Our fault that we don't know this more, but during
the Cold War, Americans.

Speaker 1 (58:37):
Get taught about US versus Russia. We get taught about
the Korean War, We get taught about the Vietnam War
because we were involved in those.

Speaker 2 (58:45):
So we show and we talk about how those were
a part of the Cold War through some proxy shit.
During the Cold War, the rest of the world wasn't
at peace by any means. Have you ever played Call
of Duty Black Ops? Yeah, you remember how there were
certain scenes there was African fighting going on. There were
certain scenes where South American things are going on, and

(59:05):
that your boy was like tied up and they had
to keep shocking them to tell them the stories of
all this stuff.

Speaker 1 (59:09):
Mm hmm. There's a reason why communists quote unquote were
spearheading wars all over the world.

Speaker 2 (59:20):
During this timeframe, but America only pays attention to a
few of them.

Speaker 1 (59:24):
Damn well, it seems like new World Order is It's
like everybody almost has their own opinion and how they
want to implement the New World Order. But where exactly
is it coming from? Is it coming from the Rothchilds,
Is it coming from the Rockefellers, Is it coming from
your Schwabs? But it seems to really be coming from

(59:45):
all the different degrees, and it makes me wonder, like,
I mean, are they going along to get along with
this plan rate here? Because yeah, we're we we want
we all want the same thing. We all want new
world order, we all want globalism, we all want you know,
social or whatever. But it just makes you wonder, are
they kicking the can down the road so that the

(01:00:06):
West can kind of come up with their own flavor
of what this guy's talking about. I think there's multiple
things happening at the same time. Okay, So like, for instance,
the name Rothschild.

Speaker 2 (01:00:19):
The bankers who fund wars want there to be more wars.
They don't care if it's this side versus that side,
this country versus that country, capitalism versus communism. They couldn't
care less.

Speaker 1 (01:00:33):
It's profit.

Speaker 2 (01:00:33):
Okay, it's profit for them. It is strictly business. Their
emotions are completely separate from it. Okay, when you're talking
about the World Economic Forum, kind of the same thing.

Speaker 1 (01:00:44):
They're all about the economy.

Speaker 2 (01:00:46):
And yeah, war isn't always good for business, but it's
certainly not always bad for business either.

Speaker 1 (01:00:52):
So they're willing to kind of look the other way
and maybe speak very strongly about what's going on and
said country and said place with this group. In this group,
we strongly urge them to find peace. They're not gonna
do anything about it. Well, these are these are the
same people who now have a interiom head that says

(01:01:14):
that you shouldn't have your own individual car and there
should not be single family homes. This is World Economic
Forum that is saying this, right, But meanwhile, do you
think that those heads over there are gonna not have
their own car and not have their own house, like
that's the rules for the and not for me. I
highly doubt any of these people are gonna be willing

(01:01:35):
to have any foreigners from another country come in and
share a bedroom, or share a kitchen, or share a
laundry room. None of them are gonna be doing this.
They want you to do it, absolutely so.

Speaker 2 (01:01:48):
I don't believe that the Rothschilds had been infiltrated by
KGB plants or anything like that. I think that if anything,
they're funding the KGB as much as they're funding the CIA,
as much as they're funding Inner Poll, as much as
they're funding Mussad and the cartels everything. They're funding all
of it because you keep starting that pot. They keep
making money hand over fist.

Speaker 1 (01:02:07):
But isn't it what they all have been infiltrated. They
all find it to be the most profitable for them.
Like they they they they're never going to get like
somebody who is you know, pro individual, you know what
I'm saying, Like you might have certain parties that that
might say that that's what they believe. They want you

(01:02:28):
to have your rights to free speech and free you know, uh,
you know, not free guns, but the right to use
guns and all this kind of stuff. It's like they
want you to they it's like service level, that's what
they're saying. But every year, the the it's shifting, you know,
every year it's getting closer and closer and closer, until
inevitably communism is worldwide.

Speaker 2 (01:02:50):
I think that the World Economic Health Forum has absolutely
been infiltrated by KGV plants, right. I think they are
absolutely a part of the perestroika deception.

Speaker 1 (01:02:59):
We also some of that World Economic Health form.

Speaker 2 (01:03:02):
I admit World Economic Forum, but that was also about
to make it the point about the World Health Organization.
I think they and the CDC have also absolutely been
infiltrated by the peristroika plants.

Speaker 1 (01:03:16):
One hund Look at fucking COVID that came around. They
got everybody to do it, bro every.

Speaker 2 (01:03:21):
Somehow they got the world economy to stop. But there
was more billionaires created during that time than ever before
in human history. That math, don't math, but somehow it
is a true statement.

Speaker 1 (01:03:33):
Oh it's by them. Oh yeah, they're they're working on
five D chess right now.

Speaker 2 (01:03:38):
And I personally am of the belief that it all
ties into peristroika. We're gonna skip over this next one
because it kind of brings up more things about nineteen ninety.

Speaker 1 (01:03:46):
All these things the sixth place.

Speaker 2 (01:03:49):
In the sixth place, the misguided Western support for Paristroka
at all levels and especially among Western media, is destabilizing
Western societies, their defense, their political processes, and their alliances.
It is immensely accelerating the successful execution of the Soviet
strategy designed against the West. In nineteen eighty four, I

(01:04:12):
thought that in the event of Western resistance to Soviet strategy,
the scenario of convergence between the two systems might take
the next half a.

Speaker 1 (01:04:21):
Century to unroll.

Speaker 2 (01:04:23):
Now, however, because the West has committed itself to the
support of Peristroika, and because of the impact of the
misguided and euphork support for it in the Western media,
convergence might take less than a decade. The sword of Democles, yeah, Democlets,
is hanging over the Western democracies, yet they are oblivious
to it. I believe in truth and the power of

(01:04:44):
ideas to convey the truth. Therefore, I present my memoranda
to the public, convinced that they will help the that
it will help them see the Perishtroika changes and their
sequels in the communist world and beyond in a more
realistic light and to recover from their blindness. This is
from Anatotly galitzin the United States nineteen ninety five. He

(01:05:07):
submitted all of this to the CIA multiple times, to Interpol,
to I five and I six, to all of the
agencies that would even give them the time of day.
Every one of them. They didn't tell him to kick rocks.
They acknowledge that what he's saying is true. They just
didn't really decide to apply it in any way, shape
or form, which is my point. It is obvious that

(01:05:28):
there was plants in place.

Speaker 1 (01:05:30):
Yeah, it seems like they're looking the other or seeming
like they're looking the other way, and like, I didn't
see that. I didn't see that. I didn't see that. Meanwhile,
and it makes you, you know, kind of look at
it like, well, we got duped, and you know, we
got taken advantage of. And that's why the world is
the way that it is whenever it ultimately inevitably becomes

(01:05:52):
the way of the perestroika.

Speaker 2 (01:05:54):
Absolutely, Now, that was all of the ford I was
going to read. There was another like five pages, but
we're not going to read all if anybody would like
to look it up, I highly highly recommend pretty much
any book that Anatoli Glitzen wrote, people need to really
check out. So this is an abstract from one of
them new lies for Old Committee for the State Security.
All right, let's read just the abstract from this one

(01:06:17):
and it will give you the overarching ideas. Once again,
your boy literally never won time missed.

Speaker 1 (01:06:23):
So in his nineteen eighty four book Anatotly Glitzen predicted
a forthcoming fake democratization of Communist Bloc countries for the
ultimate goal of deceiving and defeating the West. According to Golitzen,
Czechoslovakia played a significant role in the deception. The Prague
Spring of nineteen sixty eight was a Communist provoked uprising
that was to be replicated on a larger scale in

(01:06:44):
the future. On November seventeenth, nineteen eighty nine, Czechoslovaki Czechoslovak
secret police provocateurs led an official Communist student demonstration away
from its approved course of march in Prague. When the
police surrounded and viciously attacked the crowd of protesters, one
of the secret police agents posed as a dead student

(01:07:05):
and only a few days the news of the alleged
student killing led to a general uprising. It appears that
some members of the Czechoslovakian Communist Party and the Czechoslovak
Secret Services, in cooperation with the Soviet Secret Service, planned, organized,
and initiated the events of November seventeenth, nineteen eighty nine,
which marked the start of the Velvet Revolution. The Velvet

(01:07:29):
Revolution in Czechoslovakia was not a genuine revolt of the
Czech and Slovak people against the Communist regime. Rather, it
is the hypothesis of this paper that, as foreseen by Gilitzen,
the revolution was a Communist planned handing of power to
new caters as cadres cadres as part of a long

(01:07:50):
term deception strategy designed to transform and unify Europe into
a neutral socialist continent.

Speaker 2 (01:07:57):
Now, just so we're all clear here, that sound kind
of familiar to something that we probably have heard of.
There's more than a few examples that might be come
into your head right now, But okay, secret police. There
was a student march, was a protest, a peaceful protest,
i might add, and the secret police kind of made

(01:08:17):
them veer a different direction from where they were intended
to have their march. Then when they got them, surrounded them,
they beat the shit out of them. You had one
cop that posed as a dead student that got blasted
all over the media, and next thing you know, there
is a quote unquote full scale revolution. If anybody wants
to look up the Velvet Revolution, please do so, right,

(01:08:38):
But all of it was because of a quote unquote
regime change. The people are uprising in all this and
they want a.

Speaker 1 (01:08:45):
New leadership, new democratic leadership, except for the fact that
the democratic leadership was already KGB plants. So it was literally,
you know, a changing of the guard.

Speaker 2 (01:08:57):
But it was just an old slave master for a
new slave master who were reading out of the same textbook,
just with different labels and different propaganda, right, a new
branding if you will.

Speaker 1 (01:09:08):
But that was it. Yeah, it sounds a lot like
pretty much every protest you can find that there are
infiltrators of it. What was the most recent one, that
was like a couple of months ago. You remember, it
was like all over the world, right because look at
the BLM riots or the free No King's Day, the
No King's Day. Yeah, that was and that was out

(01:09:29):
in the open that it was funded by the fucking
owner of Walmart. Yeah, which which is crazy. People are like,
oh well, nobody questions is this a genuine thing that
is actually happening. Nobody questions that. It's like, oh wow,
look we got the support of fucking Walmart. Do you
really think that Walmart gives a flying shit about Kings

(01:09:49):
or no Kings. They're making money hand over fist regardless
they are kings. We're talking about the Walton family, one
of the wealthiest families on Earth, not political, well health,
true wealth.

Speaker 2 (01:10:01):
They built it from the ground up and they are
one of the biggest most wealthiest financier families on the
face of the planet as of this moment, and they
were funding the No Kings Day protest. Does anybody see
the red flag or are we just gonna bypass that?

Speaker 1 (01:10:17):
Well, and the same thing goes for BLM. You know,
maybe it's I don't know exactly how it started. Maybe
it was a genuine start, maybe it was infiltrated from
the very beginning. It's hard to find the roots of
where exactly that started. But if you look at the
fruits of what came from that, you see, like I mean,
division that was sewed on purpose, you see the people

(01:10:39):
that were at the absolute top that were bringing in
and raising all of the money. You find that, well,
they just so happened to buy fucking mansions in California,
right Like they all have six or seven different mansions
in California, And it was absolutely well, I don't know
if you want to say, was it misguided? Was that
on purpose? I mean, was it? Is it always just

(01:11:01):
about funneling money to the top in support of these
quote unquote protests that aren't really doing anything for anybody,
rather than just getting in the way of people like
on the.

Speaker 2 (01:11:11):
Roads, you know what I mean, multiple levels of what's
happening at the same time. So let's break down the
BLM real quick. I'm not saying that it did not.

Speaker 1 (01:11:19):
Start or at least the initial first BLM meeting, Okay,
not the first riot, not the first protest, the first
meeting of these people coming together. I bet you they've
had true intentions, right, agree with those intentions, disagree with
those intentions whatever. At least I think that they really
believed in what they were trying to stand for. Okay.

Speaker 2 (01:11:40):
Cut two United Way, which received federal funding, was bussing
protesters from city to city and state to state for
the purpose of it becoming a riot. Cut too, there
were pallets of bricks left on random street corners out
of nowhere to make sure that this peaceful protest had

(01:12:00):
the ammunition needed to turn it into a full scale riot.

Speaker 1 (01:12:03):
Also cut to we had federal agents.

Speaker 2 (01:12:06):
All this has been disclosed by the way dressed as
protesters that started the breaking of windows and the burning
of shit to get the crowd motivated and turn it
into a mob rather than a peaceful protest that was
done by government infiltrators.

Speaker 1 (01:12:19):
Well, right, don't forget about George Soros's Open Social Foundation,
who was ultimately paying people to show up at these
events to disturb everything. Literally where I was about to
go next. Yes, now, let's look at the wealthy financier
that was trying to make sure that this happened in
the way that it did. Right, George Soros does not

(01:12:40):
give a fuck about black people. He does not give
a fuck about Democrat versus Republican. He couldn't care less.
He's a literal Nazi. But but does it suit his means?
Do the ends justify those means?

Speaker 6 (01:12:53):
Right?

Speaker 2 (01:12:54):
What is his overarching goal? This could be used? So
he funded these things to happen. Then let's cut two.
What happens in every society and group, there's the haves
and the have nots, and those members went on to
buy all these mansions and all this shit. Never mind
the fact that they were supposed to use that money
to better their movement and better their people. That's not

(01:13:15):
what happens ever, ever, because human nature dictates that people
are going to be shitting when given the opportunity. But
that's my point, start to finish. Look at any big protests,
and I don't mean the Civil rights movement, because those
were not riots. Those were inherently peaceful protests. As a
matter of fact, MLK was very specific with his people

(01:13:35):
to do peaceful sit ins, right, peaceful bus rides, peaceful marches.
He did not want them to take one single movement
against the police because then it would have detracted from
the entire standpoint right cut to BLM and look how
far that went intravers because one side was being funded

(01:13:56):
and manipulated by political parties and the other side was
a true grass its movement.

Speaker 1 (01:14:00):
You see what I'm saying. Yeah, And also I feel
like just from going from Mlk's marches to BLM. It
seems like a complete de evolution, right, Like, it seems
like people have really gotten so much dumber, so much
more animalistic, and only thinking about what's right in front
of their face, and not worried about what's going to

(01:14:22):
be happening in the future, because people are going to
use that, you know, the the BLM. You think that
the fucking all the big data centers and AI and
all the all the governments around the world didn't take
all that data and said, look, all we got to
do is infiltrate it this way. We put some money
towards this, We set aside some bricks over here, and

(01:14:44):
this is the reaction that we're going to get. Say less.

Speaker 2 (01:14:48):
Say what you want about MLK. Yes, there's been files
that have come out about him. Yes, was he a
d gen Absolutely like and that's the thing. I thought
that was an understood fact, but apparently the government disclosure
of that was like earth shattering to some people. But whatever, Okay,
say what you want about him as a person. Your
boy understood the power of the optics. That's the thing. Yes,

(01:15:10):
on the.

Speaker 1 (01:15:10):
Surface, he was a stalwarts reverend of his church, and
he was a pillar of his community. Behind closed doors.

Speaker 2 (01:15:16):
He was an absolute dejon fine cool, but he understood
that in the public eye you had to be seen
a certain way for you to be taken seriously. And
he knew that for the micro for himself and the
macro for his movement. He knew that if one of
these peaceful marches would have turned into burning and looting
in all these things, civil rights would never get past
because the optics are what the people are going to

(01:15:37):
see when it's all said and done. The optics of
the civil rights movement are police officers sicking German shepherds
and fire hoses on peaceful marchers. It's not cops beating
the shit out of looters and rioters. You see what
I'm saying. Now, cut to the BLM movement. You have
cops that have been decapitated or I should say crippled

(01:15:58):
by their authority figure whether it's the chief or the
mayor or whatever, saying to stand down and let these
people act whatever way they want to act. And the
people are the rioters and the mob and all these things.
And that's the optic. Incapable police officers and rioters that
have no justice ever coming their way. You see the
difference of the optics because Perestroika civil rights movement was

(01:16:22):
at the beginning of the peristroika deception BLM, it's in
full fucking swing.

Speaker 1 (01:16:28):
You see what I'm saying. Yeah, so I was just
I couldn't remember what her name is. It's Patrice Colors
wash which it's I mean, the jokes Mansions, the nine
fucking Mansions, Dude, the jokes kind of right themselves that
her last name is Colors. But anywow, Yeah, she spent
twelve million dollars on mansions, on several mansions, including one

(01:16:52):
of the mansions that was six million dollars alone, from
money from funds that were raised from donations, and so yeah,
it's a lot of misappropriation and uh, not a lot
of transparency at all. It was. It was a fucking dupe, dude.
Everybody got c dooped. Everybody that bought a BLMT shirt,

(01:17:13):
everybody that changed their profile picture, you fucking bought it.
Bait and switch. That's what happened, one hundred percent. But
you see what I'm saying.

Speaker 2 (01:17:22):
The motives behind the BLM movement and the civil rights movement,
some could argue, are pretty comparable, right, at least the
ethos what they wanted to come across. However, one of
them was influenced by perestroika deception, the other one was not.

Speaker 1 (01:17:40):
It's not hard to see which one was which, right,
And so I mean, I would say that BLM is
just about as dumb as Cony twenty twelve was. Yeah again,
Cony twenty twelve.

Speaker 2 (01:17:53):
That was meant to be a good initiative, right, and
they there was a good ethos behind something that people
could really sink their teeth into and get behind. Regardless
of political parties or religious stigmas and socioeconomic class.

Speaker 1 (01:18:07):
Everybody can agree that child soldiers and child slavery is wrong.
So we got this one guy we know for sure
is that the spearhead of all of that in Africa.

Speaker 2 (01:18:17):
Let's go take this guy out. We need to bring
awareness to it. We got to do something that is
a noble, noble cause, well so is BLM. It started
out that way, same with Coney. It started out as
a noble cause. Nobody went to rioting and all that
over it. But the people that sold the T shirts
and shit, all they did was just collect that money
for themselves.

Speaker 1 (01:18:36):
And that's it. Connie's still there Cony is still there
like to this day.

Speaker 2 (01:18:41):
But anyway, anyway, so my point is though as far
as Paris Droika, you can see where and how like
even in our real time today, how some of these
things are being blasted and promoted and coerced and shifted
based off of some quote unquote bad actors. The pair
short cout eception are where these bad actors really came from. Now,

(01:19:04):
this is a quick video clip that I got from
the YouTube's and it's gonna give us a good breakdown
of the last three decades of just overall the parishtroikad
deception being real.

Speaker 1 (01:19:14):
Let's listen.

Speaker 7 (01:19:15):
In Mikhail Gorbachev's revolutionary policies transformed the Soviet Union. His
policies permitted the peoples of Russia and the other republics
to cast aside decades of oppression and establish the foundations
of freedom.

Speaker 1 (01:19:33):
Real quick. This is George H. W. Bush.

Speaker 2 (01:19:37):
Okay, this is a Republican that was spitting the rhetoric
that Gorbachev's a really good guy. He was literally a
part of parishroykat deception. Even the Republicans. Just so we're
all clear here, I am not taking this episode just
to shit on Democrats.

Speaker 1 (01:19:52):
It's infected all sides of the political.

Speaker 2 (01:19:54):
Spectrum, some more than others, for sure, But nobody's hands
are clean on this.

Speaker 1 (01:20:00):
I wonder that even according to your boy that wrote
the book, it's like he was like, it's no surprise
that the Democrats are in on it, Like it's it's
not really surprised at all. But what really surprised him
was that the Republicans were seemingly not doing anything against
it either. Exactly so proof in the pudding.

Speaker 2 (01:20:17):
George hw talking about it, and we're going to continue
into other presidents as well, including Donnie t.

Speaker 1 (01:20:22):
We're going to get there. Let's go first.

Speaker 7 (01:20:26):
The United States recognizes and welcomes the emergence of a free, independent,
and democratic Russia, led by its courageous President Boris Yeltsen.
Our embassy in Moscow will remain there as our embassy
to Russia. We will support Russia's assumption of the USSR's

(01:20:47):
seat as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.
I look forward to working closely with President Yelsen in
support of his efforts to bring democratic and market reform
to Russia.

Speaker 1 (01:21:03):
It says, behind the mask of diplomatic and political cooperation
in the partnership with the United States and Europe. The
current Russian leaders are following the strategy of their predecessors
and working towards a new world order. When the right
moment comes, the mask will be dropped and the Russians,
with Chinese help, will seek to impose their system on
the West on their own terms. That is from your boy,
and it totally Gillitsen. Oh look at your boy, Vlad.

(01:21:31):
Oh yeah, oh yeah, dude, it's that's flat with u. LBJ.
Like I said, they're going we're going back in time
into the future. But let's go.

Speaker 2 (01:21:41):
Is vlad short or was he short? Was he like
five eight? I've met George W. Bush, who's shaking his
hand right now. Actually that wasn't LBJ.

Speaker 1 (01:21:50):
Excuse me. This is a summit that was hailed. That
was the uh god trying to remember which prime minister
that was a which country beside the point.

Speaker 2 (01:21:58):
So I've met George W. Bush and I'm saying, I'm
seeing him standing next to.

Speaker 1 (01:22:02):
Vladd he's not tall. For the record, Vladimir Putin is
uh he's a short stack. That says right here, that says,
Vladimir Putin is officially reported to be five foot seven,
although some estimates suggest that he could be as short
as five foot two. Dude, I'm yeah, I'm just saying

(01:22:23):
five to seven. No, sir, George W. Look on how
tall George W. Bush is.

Speaker 2 (01:22:28):
Just that's're all on the same page here, because your
boy is standing about six inches taller than Vlad at
this moment. So the five to seven conversation, that's a
bold statement.

Speaker 1 (01:22:41):
But all right, Uh, George Bush is right at six
feet tall. Right, So your boy Vlad looking like he's
probably five five five.

Speaker 2 (01:22:50):
Six maybe, Okay, yeah, that's right. But the imagery right
shows him being this big dude. He's all swulky. Lease,
he's riding a bear. He's over here riding a horse
shirtless and all of these it's it's a Sylvester Stallone situation.

Speaker 1 (01:23:06):
Oh yeah, Sly is short, isn't he? So it's Tom Cruise.

Speaker 2 (01:23:11):
But yeah, anyway, yeah, all right, so let's continue, and trustworthy.

Speaker 8 (01:23:17):
I was able to get a sense of his soul.
I wouldn't have invited him to my ranch if I
didn't trust him.

Speaker 1 (01:23:30):
Here's what two decades have failed to personal diplomacy.

Speaker 9 (01:23:33):
Looks like in the international community since the eleventh of
September has been remarkable. We have cooperation today that would
have been really unthinkable just a short time ago.

Speaker 1 (01:23:44):
Does bunch so about the basis of the very friendly
cooperation between Russia and Germany, which likely has never been
as good as it is now.

Speaker 10 (01:23:55):
Is trust I'm confident that this new level of cooperation
between NATO's members and Russia, well no change the world
and far the better.

Speaker 1 (01:24:06):
By the more cooperation between NATO members and Russia. This
was only a few years ago, y'all.

Speaker 2 (01:24:16):
Well, I say a few Yes, we're talking about like
the early two thousands. But like that's very different from
what we hear today, isn't it.

Speaker 1 (01:24:24):
Yeah? Yeah, I mean, if they had such good cooperation,
why would natos don't need to be around?

Speaker 2 (01:24:30):
If they had such good cooperation, why is Russia trying
to kill all the NATO Nazis.

Speaker 1 (01:24:35):
That are ruling the world. Yeah, strange how that works out,
It really is. It's almost like it was all according
to a plan. Let's keep going, he said. I suggest
that from now on the headquarters of NATO should be
renamed the Council of the Soviets. That's putin saying that.

Speaker 2 (01:24:57):
Yeah, I hope there's no objections, and he's laughing, but
everybody else in the room is laughing as well.

Speaker 1 (01:25:03):
Like, ah, funny the Soviets, Ah, yes, you laugh y'all
thought he was joking. Y'all thought that the former KGB
agent in charge of doing some really heinous shit was
joking with you. But all right, let's continue. Yeah joke,

(01:25:24):
Do I trust him?

Speaker 11 (01:25:25):
Trust?

Speaker 12 (01:25:28):
Russian heavy guns were firing at Georgian positions. Inside Georgia,
buildings are burning from the last air strike, and people
are warning that the Russian Air Force may soon be back.

Speaker 6 (01:25:40):
I brought with me today a big delegation of British business,
all with an interest in expanding their trade with Russia.

Speaker 12 (01:25:46):
We seek a significant and sensible approach to economic development
across our continent, and to that end will now be
closely interconnected for decades to come.

Speaker 1 (01:25:55):
That was from Angela Merkel, by the way, German killery
by any other account, but moving on is a French
Prime minister. I found him very well informed of the issues,
very calm, very intelligent of.

Speaker 13 (01:26:08):
The extraordinary work that you've done on behalf of the
Russian people breaking news for Knight armed men sees control
of two government buildings, as Putin announces he's sending.

Speaker 1 (01:26:18):
True many if Putin's critics have mysteriously become ill or die.
Here a vicious political assassination of one of President Vladimir
Putin's most outspoken foot a new report.

Speaker 14 (01:26:29):
About Russian interference in the presidential election.

Speaker 1 (01:26:31):
Next to look at how strong the evidence is that
points to the Putin government.

Speaker 12 (01:26:35):
Well not Russian spy is in a critical condition in hospital.

Speaker 5 (01:26:39):
Investigators suspect the Kremlin could be behind the incident in
Salisbury on Sunday.

Speaker 15 (01:26:43):
He says great things about me.

Speaker 7 (01:26:44):
I'm going to say great things about him, and he's
been a leader far more than our president has been
a leader.

Speaker 8 (01:26:48):
Week wouldn't it be great if we actually got along
with Russia?

Speaker 1 (01:26:52):
Am I wrong in saying that? Wouldn't it be great?

Speaker 7 (01:26:54):
I believe that President Putin really feels, and he feels
strongly that he did not medal in our election.

Speaker 2 (01:27:02):
He's not going into Ukraine real quick, real quick. Just
the last fifteen seconds of that. I believe that Putin
did not meddle in our election. Cut to what Tulsey
Gabbert is coming out and saying right now, and the
whole new Russia Gate scandal showing its connections to Obama.
But we'll get there later, right, And then Trump is
saying he's not going into Ukraine.

Speaker 1 (01:27:23):
Putin is not going to go into the Ukraine.

Speaker 2 (01:27:25):
As we are looking out bombed at outbuildings in this
two week special military operation is on year three and
a half, about to make the lap and become year four.

Speaker 1 (01:27:36):
But okay, yeah, I always found it interesting that in
all the movies, especially from like our childhood, it always
seemed like Russia was always the bad guy. Like in
every single cartoon and every single movie, and every single
news talking point all around the board, Russia is always
the bad guy. Why are they making them out to
be the bad guy? I believe just by looking over

(01:28:00):
this to take attention off of themselves, because they're actually
working with Russia anyway exactly. And now China is gonna
become the new bad guy. You're gonna watch this shift happen.

Speaker 2 (01:28:12):
There's gonna be a new same way with like when
we were involved in two different wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,
all the big bad guys from a lot of the
movies that came out just interestingly started to become middle Eastern.
Interesting how that just kind of randomly shifted, right everybody. Yeah,
Russia was always kind of seen as the bad guy

(01:28:32):
of old kind of thing and still could totally turn
at any moment, but it wasn't the big talking point.
The big talking point was people from Latin descent and
people of Middle Eastern descent.

Speaker 1 (01:28:45):
Those became the big baddies.

Speaker 2 (01:28:47):
Right. We are about to see a shift happen right
now to where Southeast Asian and specifically China is going
to become the big baddie and a lot of the
movies in the comic books and the zeitgeist.

Speaker 1 (01:28:59):
Wow, yeah, it doesn't chock me. I can see that now.

Speaker 2 (01:29:02):
Staying on this whole Putin thing and talking about this
deception of like, oh, you know, Russia's turned a new leaf.

Speaker 1 (01:29:08):
They're not the Soviet Union anymore.

Speaker 2 (01:29:10):
The KGB is shut down, it's just Russian intelligence these days.
It's not the same thing. This is a this is
a clip from miss Stature. Yeah, yes, I understand. Hold
whatever opinion you want about old Margaret. Okay, I get it,
I get it.

Speaker 1 (01:29:27):
But what she talks about and how this validates the
Perestroika deception is very, very critical let's watch a little
bit about this.

Speaker 6 (01:29:36):
No, we have now we have the new mister Putin.

Speaker 7 (01:29:44):
Uh.

Speaker 6 (01:29:46):
I looked at the pictures of mister Putin trying to
look for a trace of humanity.

Speaker 7 (01:30:00):
I don't know.

Speaker 6 (01:30:01):
I should within a few weeks have known better, because
you know what happened. They had the terrible tragedy of
the submarine.

Speaker 1 (01:30:13):
Just we're all clear here. The submarine in question.

Speaker 2 (01:30:17):
Into August the two thousand, the cursed nuclear Submarines sank
during an exercise caused by a large explosion on board.
It sank to the seabed one hundred and eight meters.
The international community offered assistance, which Putin refused. Five days later,
having achieved nothing with outdated equipment, he allowed British and
Norwegian crews to try to assist.

Speaker 1 (01:30:38):
Five days there were dudes.

Speaker 2 (01:30:40):
Still alive at the bottom of the ocean inside of
a submarine. But we'll get to the whole talk about
that here in a moment. But this was far too little,
too late, and all one hundred and eighteen crew members perished.
Putin faced widespread criticism for his slow response and perceived indifference.

Speaker 1 (01:30:56):
We're going to talk about that one a little bit
more in depth here in a moment, but let's continue.

Speaker 6 (01:31:01):
Going down straight to the floor. Whether there was an
explosion inside or not, we don't know, but it was
very interesting what happened. If ever, there's a calamity in
the west, the whole of the armed forces will go.
They'll take everything there immediately. The politicians immediately will get

(01:31:23):
together and say what help do we want? They can
have anything we can give. If we haven't got the help,
we'll get it from someone else. There would be anxiety
because what mattered was not the submarine, but the lives
of those in. And the interesting thing was that the
new leader of the Soviet Union didn't act quickly. This

(01:31:43):
was very soon.

Speaker 2 (01:31:44):
In the comment, her words, just so we're clear, this
is year two thousand. Soviet Union collapsed, damn near a
decade before this. Okay, it's the Russian feder the Russian Republic.
Now her words, the new leader of the Soviet u Union.
Was that a slip of the tongue or was that
actually what she intended to say, Fredian slip?

Speaker 1 (01:32:06):
Oh sure, sure of course. But keep in mind Soviet
Russia did not care about their troops or about their people.
They didn't mind losing a million of them. As long
as the mission was accomplished. This is supposed to be
a new Russia, right with a new leader, one for
the people. All these things former KGB and aw let's
keep going.

Speaker 6 (01:32:28):
He didn't try to mobilize everyone else. We didn't know
whether we could help, but we were all ready to
go and help and scent some of the small submarines
that we had just for such an occasion. But that,
my friends, was very very revealing. Indeed, they still do
not value human life in the same way that we do.

Speaker 1 (01:32:49):
And so all the help got there.

Speaker 6 (01:32:51):
I'm afraid, really rather late, and I'm very relieved in
one way that mister Putin got so much criticism for
what he should have done but didn't, And that again
shows that the Soviet Union and the peoples of the
Soviet Union are very much aware of what could be done.

(01:33:11):
A great deal more could be done than is being
done at the moment.

Speaker 1 (01:33:17):
She kept saying Soviet Union.

Speaker 2 (01:33:19):
Now I understand for the majority of her life Russia
was the Soviet Union. But at the same time I
have to agree with her statement. They don't value human
life the same way we do. Okay, and yeah, we
can look at the Ukrainian situation as of this moment.
I want to say their KIA is somewhere around like
seven hundred thousand, eight hundred thousand right now. Ukraine's is

(01:33:39):
somewhere around like three hundred thousand. It's still a lot.
But Russia by and large is doing meat wall tactics
like they did during the time of the Soviet Union.
They don't care. They do not care if people die
or not. My point is, though, the whole point of
this conversation, Putin had the opportunity.

Speaker 1 (01:33:57):
The West was trying to help him.

Speaker 2 (01:33:59):
Okay, this is everybody's looking at the rebrand of Russia, right,
everybody's seeing it as the Russian Republic, not the Soviet Union.
NATO is even having him at meetings and talks, right,
so they're saying like, we're trying to let Russia turn
a new leave. We're trying to let them show how
different they are. He's getting involved with Germany and Britain

(01:34:20):
and France and multiple United States presidents.

Speaker 1 (01:34:23):
He's a new guy. This is a new Russia, this
is a new era.

Speaker 2 (01:34:27):
And then the first thing that goes wrong you see that, No,
it's actually gonna be much much more of the same.
It's just gonna continue with the whole rebrand thing.

Speaker 1 (01:34:37):
Yeah. So, and that's the thing. It's like, what would
you rather, you know, like, what would you rather? Would
you rather your country? Would you rather understand that you
are just a digit on a statu sheet and it's
very out in the open and very loud and very proud,
and it's Mother Russia first and the people second. Or

(01:34:59):
would you rather a country that pretends to care about you,
pretends that it's for you, you know what I mean.
So it's like neither one of them really care about you.
It's just that one pretends to care.

Speaker 2 (01:35:11):
It's the same conversation that you and I have had
with TikTok a million times. Yeah, I know our government
is spying on us, and I know that they're not
a fan of us. I would rather our government spy
on us than the CCP, Like we know for a
fact that they don't be given a fuck about their people.
They literally are ran by the Chinese Communist Party. So yes,
to your point, I would much rather at least have
the image of freedom, But I also believe in individual freedom.

(01:35:35):
Like you said, with the communist ideals, the culture or
I'm sorry the people. The overarching of Russia is more
important than the individual freedoms of one I am very
much in favor of individual freedoms as a collective to
make the entirety of a nation, but certain people in

(01:35:56):
certain cultures do not feel the same way.

Speaker 1 (01:35:57):
Communism shits on that ideal, the idea of a democratic
republic that definitely outweighs the idea of socialism and communism.
I know, I get the point of what you're trying
to say. I'm just saying that the idea of a
democratic republic is more of a dream than compared to
its actual reality. Yeah, but it wasn't always the case,

(01:36:21):
and I would postulate that the peristroikuad deception went a
long way to turn Americans into statistics and figures to
the government rather than their constituents and their voters. I'm
not saying that it didn't.

Speaker 2 (01:36:35):
Predate that, right, Yeah, for I would say even much
earlier than that, the government kind of saw the people
as an ends to a means and not like the
reason for their job. I'm sure that that existed, but
the perishtroi could deception, especially embedding itself into our political
figures and zeitgeist to the level that it has since
the sixties too. Now it's gone a long way to

(01:36:57):
make it very much more of there's a club and
we're not in it.

Speaker 1 (01:37:01):
Yeah, it's I would say that it's probably just a
little bit more obvious now. Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:37:06):
So all right, real quick, this is a short about
the Russian submarine and Cursk that we just heard about,
just for anybody who has never heard of this situation
in the year two thousand, the Cursk submarine disaster, Let's
listen in.

Speaker 16 (01:37:20):
It was supposed to be a show of force and
a demonstration of Russia's military capabilities, but something went went
horribly wrong. On August twelfth, two thousand, around eleven thirty
am local time. According to the official investigation, one of
the practice torpedoes that the Cursk was loading had a
faulty weld in its casing, which leaked high test peroxide

(01:37:41):
HTP inside the torpedo tube. HTP is a highly reactive
substance that can explode when it comes into contact with
metal or organic matter. But there have been several theories
about the possible causes, including a collision with a foreign submarine,
a malfunction in the torpedoes and an accident during a
mins military exercise. There is no evidence to suggest that

(01:38:03):
the United States was involved in the Kerse submarine disaster.
The Russian Navy has stated that the accident was caused
by a malfunction in one of the torpedoes, and an
investigation conducted by the Russian government concluded that the explosion
was caused by a failure in the torpedoes fuel system.

Speaker 2 (01:38:20):
Okay, like I said, just the overarching breakdown of that
submarine explosion, most people of our day and age right
now have probably not heard of it.

Speaker 1 (01:38:28):
Yeah, I'm just just a we're all clear. This is
pre nine to eleven.

Speaker 2 (01:38:31):
Russia was on a whole different platform, right, They're trying
to turn a new leaf all these things, Just so
we're all clear.

Speaker 1 (01:38:38):
That's what old Thatcher was talking about a moment ago.
You know, what I find interesting is the absolute lack
of respect that Russia has for its own people. That
it is always feeding, you know, its own people, its
own lies, and its own propaganda. And the people have
kind of understood over there, probably that they know that
they're propaganda, as they know that they're being lied to

(01:39:00):
all the time, and so it doesn't even matter the
lies that the government tells to its people, because everybody
knows that it's just a face, it's a facade, it's
for geyzy, right, And it almost seems like they've they've
almost gotten a little bit too laxadaisical and too reliant
on their own people's distrust of them that they believe

(01:39:21):
that they can just fool the rest of the world
in that same kind of manner that we're gonna feed
you a bunch of lies, We're gonna feed you a
bunch of bullshit because hey, our people understand it, like
we're not gonna give you the actual truth. No matter
how belligerent and how blatant and obvious the lie actually is,
it doesn't matter. Like it's all just surface level bullshit

(01:39:41):
that nobody buys anyway.

Speaker 5 (01:39:43):
Bro.

Speaker 1 (01:39:43):
That's why if you ever watched the Russian news, like
Russian State TV is what it's called, because everything in
Russia is ran by the state even to this day.
Well they're a republic, not.

Speaker 2 (01:39:53):
Exactly, but so you can watch how their news anchors
speak and the rhetoric that they are pumping out their
most pop show in the nation. You see what these
people are saying, and it is like the term propaganda.
I know, we kind of throw that around fast and
loose from time to time. This is almost dystopian propaganda.
Keep in mind, one out of every ten houses in

(01:40:14):
Russia does not have indoor plumbing.

Speaker 1 (01:40:16):
But these people want to talk about the Great Russia
like it is some sort of a monolith and the
crown jewel on Earth, and how everybody in the West
is Nazis.

Speaker 2 (01:40:26):
Everybody in the West is against Russia right now. Meanwhile, like, dude,
before you invade Ukraine, no one had beef with you, literally,
no one had beef with you at all. But okay, right,
everything is controlled by the state, and I think it's
gone to such a level now to where the people,
even if they know it's being propagandaized to them, that's
the only source they have, like they don't have access.

Speaker 1 (01:40:46):
To and I know somebody in the comments that's not true.
They could use VPNs bit bit bit y.

Speaker 2 (01:40:51):
Okay, fine, fine, But to the vast majority of Russian
people that are not using a VPM, they're only getting
Russian Internet, They're only getting Russian news and Russian movies.
They have no idea what the West actually thinks of them.
It's it's complete propaganda through and through, and I think
they've gotten to a point to where the majority of
them believe it. Putin's approval ratings in Russia right now now, granted,

(01:41:13):
if we are to believe the polls that are being
done by Russia about Putin, so okay, his approval ratings
are still extremely high. They faltered a bit because the
two week operation is coming up on year four and
that's not good, But overall, they still like him and
see him as a very good, capable leader, even though
they keep sending their sons to die, and even though

(01:41:35):
they had two million military aged men flee the country
when the war kicked off.

Speaker 1 (01:41:41):
But like, sure, okay, it's.

Speaker 2 (01:41:44):
Crazy to me, But to your point, yeah, they know
it's propaganda, but it's also the only source of information
that most of them have.

Speaker 1 (01:41:52):
Yeah, it's kind of like, you know, what what source
do you actually believe? You know? Whenever you start talking
about different polls and excessens and like how much how
many people are actually believing what the state is telling
them and stuff like that, it's like I almost wonder,
not that I even wonder, I'm almost like one hundred
percent certain that those polls are always rigged in the

(01:42:14):
state or the country's favor anyway. So I can't believe
even any statistics, even whenever we talk about like the
we brought it up before, about the COVID vaccine, and
that number is literally always changing, Like whenever you ask
to see, like what percentage of Americans took at least
the first vaccine. I remember the last time we read it,
it was like eighty three or eighty four percent of Americans,

(01:42:35):
And I just looked it up right now and it
says that, uh, seventy eight percent. But even still, it's
the vast majority, right, And I don't know if I
necessarily even believe those numbers because I know a lot
of people that didn't get the first vaccine. Like I
know more people that didn't get it than did. I
would think that I know more that they get it

(01:42:56):
that didn't.

Speaker 2 (01:42:56):
But the majority of the people I know that got
it was because they were at risk of losing their
jobs if they didn't, right, they were I'm not gonna
say forced. No one held a gun to their head,
but I will say that they were not willing to
take the risks associated with not being able to provide
for their family unless they could provide that slip of
paper to their job.

Speaker 1 (01:43:16):
Yeah, yeah, no, I get it. I'm just saying it's like,
I don't know, dude. I almost wonder if the Russian
people might even be a little bit smarter than us,
because there's a lot of people over here that still
believe everything in the news, like and don't question it.

Speaker 2 (01:43:32):
Most of the people in Russia believed the news, dude,
and they are like still very much in favor of
the war. There is still very much in favor of Putin.
It's insanity and there's no There was a few quote
unquote uprisings that happened recently. They were allegedly peaceful protests
that were like, you know, an afternoon you know. Never

(01:43:52):
mind the fact that your boy Petrosian what was his name,
Pregosion excuse me, the leader of the Wagner group, who
was Putin's homeboy, like tight tight friend, tried to throw
a coup two years ago, got thwarted and then got
thrown outside of a helicopter.

Speaker 1 (01:44:14):
Yeah yeah, I remember.

Speaker 2 (01:44:15):
Yeah, that's a thing that just happened, and everybody in
Russia's like, wait, why would he do that with our
leader Putin's obviously doing an amazing job, why would anyone
try to take over?

Speaker 1 (01:44:25):
It's it's actually kind of mind blowing. But like I said,
it's all a part of the deception.

Speaker 2 (01:44:31):
And although Russia may be a republic today, they will
never get out of the shadow of the.

Speaker 1 (01:44:36):
Soviet propaganda machine.

Speaker 2 (01:44:38):
So to circle back to the deception, right, our boy
Anatotly Golitzki or Glitzen excuse me, wrote this book with
Christopher's story. Okay, now, this is Christopher's story in an
interview to talk about the book. This is in two
thousand and three, after Glitzen died, and we're gonna listen
to the first ten minutes of this interview where he

(01:45:00):
kind of gives the overarching breakdown to the whole shemang,
let's learn about the Perestroika deception.

Speaker 10 (01:45:06):
Y'all, Welcome to the McIlhenny Report. I'm Bill mclhanney. On
this show, we cover current issues of the day, but
always from a viewpoint or perspective rarely aired by the
mass media. We hope you'll find it interesting. Since nineteen
eighty nine, the world has been told that the Soviet
Union collapsed, and that except for several countries, communism is

(01:45:28):
dead and the US won the Cold War. The truth,
the reality is quite the reverse. Everything we have witnessed
since nineteen eighty nine has been a massive and successful,
multi decade long deception strategy on the part of the KGB,
the Soviet secret police, the goal to deceive the West

(01:45:50):
and achieve the goal of Leninist strategy, a totalitarian world
government or international police state. We know this from the
evidence provided by Anatolely Galieitsen, the most important defector from
the KGBB, who came to America in nineteen sixty one.

Speaker 11 (01:46:08):
In nineteen eighty he wrote.

Speaker 10 (01:46:09):
A book, New Lives for Old that was published in
nineteen eighty four, which described the disinformation strategy and made
specific predictions as to what KGB would do in subsequent years,
such as removing the Berlin Wall, changing the name of
the KGB itself and other structures in the Soviet hierarchy,

(01:46:31):
and also the role to be played by Mikhail Gorbachev.

Speaker 11 (01:46:34):
An independent analysis of these.

Speaker 10 (01:46:36):
Predictions years later showed that over ninety four percent of
them came true by nineteen ninety one, and since then.
That's how we know Galitsen was telling the truth and
quite correct. Our guest today, who first appeared on this
show in nineteen ninety five, is uniquely qualified to expose
this conspiratorial strategy. Based in London, he publishes ten newsletters

(01:47:00):
and reviews on economic, financial and political intelligence, including Soviet Analyst.
These invaluable periodicals incorporate the understanding of post nineteen eighty
nine events provided by Anatoly Galaitsen. He's published Galatsan's second book,
Peristroika Deception. He's also published Joseph Douglas's Red Cocaine, on

(01:47:22):
the Soviet strategy of using drugs to sabotage the West.
And he's published a very important book, The European Union Collective,
on the regional world government now in place over both
Europe and Britain.

Speaker 1 (01:47:35):
Real quick, I do want to make a mention of
something here that book about Red Cocaine. Do you remember
how I said earlier that Russia was.

Speaker 2 (01:47:44):
Involved in Afghanistan for years and that America trained at
the Mouzhih Dean to kick them out. Just so we're
all clear, here's two places on Earth where poppy is
grown really really really heavily and really well one of
them would be called the Golden Triangle, which is in

(01:48:06):
Southeast Asia, right, Vietnam War, anybody. And the other one
is in what's called the Golden Crescent, which includes a
majority of the country of Afghanistan.

Speaker 1 (01:48:17):
So what the hell is going on with the balloons? Okay?
So when the Russian communist the Soviets were in Afghanistan,
do you think they were there to spread Keep in mind,
Afghanistan is a very tribal, clandestine area.

Speaker 2 (01:48:31):
They most of them do not know who their current
president is. Most of them do not know the majority
of the world politics. They're worried about what's going on
in their village, with their tribe and their clan. Okay,
So do you think that the Soviets were in Afghanistan
to spread communism to a bunch of farmers that couldn't

(01:48:53):
give a fuck less? Or do you think that they
might have been there because there's a lot of poppy
that grows there which makes really great opium and really
great heroin.

Speaker 1 (01:49:04):
With the latter, I would say.

Speaker 2 (01:49:06):
So, just so we're clear that book. I highly recommend
that one as well. The Red Cocaine. It's not just
about coke, although there's a conversation for that one as well,
little you know, contra conversation, right, Reagan was trying to
stop the comedies by selling weapons to Nick Rogwins.

Speaker 1 (01:49:22):
In exchange for coke. And that's the whole thing. It's
the whole thing.

Speaker 2 (01:49:25):
Okay, they are the Iranian conjuring conversation. But anyway, we're
going to continue. I just want to make a mention
of what that could mean with the how the Soviets
were using drugs to bring down the West. Meanwhile, most
drugs are punishable by life in prison in Russia.

Speaker 1 (01:49:42):
So anyway, moving on.

Speaker 10 (01:49:44):
I am so happy to welcome back to the McIlhaney
Report my valuable friend and colleague Christopher's story. So glad
to have you here, glighted to be here. Now, for
those people who are just learning about Anatoti Galatson, we
need to emphasize that the understanding he provided about the
strategy of which he was a part in the early

(01:50:05):
nineteen fifty nine to sixty one period in forming this
strategy in the KGB hierarchy, this multi decade strategy means
that nothing really has changed in the Soviet Union and
the other satellite EA East Block. Communist states that call
themselves democratic republics. Today, nothing has changed except deception, appearance,

(01:50:27):
and propaganda. And let's go over some examples of that.
Don't We have the same KGB Leaden bureaucracy with different
names on the doors.

Speaker 17 (01:50:35):
Absolutely, the KGB remains the same. It's divided itself into
several parts. But this is by no means the first
time this has happened, has happened about five or six
times since nineteen seventeen. But Galitzin's great achievement was to
make Lenin understandable. Because actually all that Glitzin did in

(01:50:56):
his two books New Life, fold In the Parastrikeer Deception
is to explain Lenin's mind. And these people actually are
in Lenin's mind. They're out of their own minds, and
they're in Lenin's mind, which is not a very nice
place to be.

Speaker 10 (01:51:12):
Also, the system of some seventeen hundred concentration camps that
comprise the Soviet Gulag prison house of territory with millions
and millions of political prisoners. All of those concentration camps
are still there, but never discussed by the media, which
since nineteen eighty nine has told us that communism has gone.

Speaker 11 (01:51:33):
Out of business.

Speaker 17 (01:51:34):
In a few years ago I was privileged to receive
a list of these concentration camps from a very reliable source.

Speaker 1 (01:51:41):
And this list.

Speaker 17 (01:51:42):
Contained the actual street addresses, I mean, so to speak,
the locations of these concentration camps. And these included a
number of new camps which have been set up under
the so called quote unquote non communist government of Boris Yeltsin,
which in fact was a continuation by other means, which
we'll come to now. I published this. When I published

(01:52:04):
this in Soviet Anists, I thought, this has got to
be a really interesting story. I sent it to the
whole of the Western media that I could think of
the English speaking world. Not a trace, no response at all. However,
there have been a number of open references to this
which have appeared, almost as if by accident, in articles

(01:52:27):
in the Guardian and elsewhere, which of course I and
others collect, And when you put these things together you
get actually a very interesting picture. There's been no change
at all.

Speaker 10 (01:52:35):
Okay, not only has there been no change in the
Soviet concentration camp system, but in their massive military build up,
their worldwide espionage activities within Western nations, the subversion in
sabotage they wage, particularly the area of sabotage called drug trafficking.

Speaker 17 (01:52:55):
Basically, in nineteen sixty one, the Soviets relaunched or launched
a long range strategy, which is what Gilitzin talks about
in his two books. I should say, perhaps that the
Communist Party of the Soviet Union has had four programs

(01:53:16):
since it started, only four party programs. The first was
nineteen three, the second was after the revolution nineteen seventeen.
The third party program is that which Gilitzin speaks about
and writes about in his two books. The third party program.

Speaker 10 (01:53:31):
Which would be from nineteen sixty one on.

Speaker 17 (01:53:33):
From nineteen sixty one to nineteen eighty six, when Gorbachev
Goebchev is sorry eighty five, Gorbachev arrives as general secretary
in eighty five, and at the twenty seventh Party Congress
in nineteen eighty six he launches the fourth party program.
Will come to that in a minute. So and the

(01:53:55):
purpose of the long range strategy, which was which was
actually an ounced by the head of the KGB in
nineteen fifty nine. They prepared this strategy and then when
they had worked out how they were going to deceive
the West, in what has turned out to be the
biggest deception operation in the history of mankind. To be honest,

(01:54:19):
when they worked this out, they convened a conference called
the eighty one Party Congress, which took place on one
day on the sixth of December nineteen sixty one, and
the consisting of eighty one parties from all over the
world communist parties and the long range strategy was rubber stamped,
and that was it. And from nineteen sixty one to

(01:54:41):
the arrival of Gorbachev was a period when they were
preparing for the implementation of what Gorbachev subsequently introduced. Now,
i'd last just like to stay to say here something
very important, which is sometimes people say, why was there
such a long period from the introduction of the Third
Party program to the introduction of the Fourth Party program?

(01:55:03):
And the answer to that is extremely interesting. It is
that in nineteen forty nine or nineteen forty eight, the
Western Allies agreed with the Soviet Union. I you with
Stalin that Germany was to be occupied for a period
of forty years. Forty nine to eighty nine takes you

(01:55:25):
to the pulling down of the Berlin Wall and on
Q quick as a flash, they start pulling down the
wall at the end of the forty year period, So
what do they do during this extended period. Now, by
the way, we don't really know why that forty year
period was agreed, but it seems to have been an agreement,

(01:55:46):
almost a secret agreement. By the way, Secure of State
Burns byr Nes was responsible for agreeing that that was
his last that was his most important contribution. As matter
of fact, that's his main legacy. And we don't really
know why it was it was agreed that the Germans

(01:56:06):
should be occupied for forty years.

Speaker 1 (01:56:08):
I personally do not know.

Speaker 10 (01:56:09):
That a third party program from sixty one onward consisted
of this scheme to promote disinformation about the alleged crumbling
of monolithic worldwide communist superstructure, alleged rifts and splits between
the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union in Red China,
and give the West the impression that communism was fragmenting

(01:56:31):
and becoming decentralized.

Speaker 11 (01:56:33):
At the same time.

Speaker 10 (01:56:34):
They were waging they were creating and waging an international
terrorism campaign by creating an international.

Speaker 11 (01:56:42):
Terror network we'll get back to.

Speaker 10 (01:56:44):
And they were using drugs and drug trafficking internationally as
they gained, maintained and gained total control over in national
drug trafficking as a weapon of sabotage against the West. Yes,
so these are all strategies along with military build up
and espionage.

Speaker 17 (01:57:00):
They are all substrategies, but they're very important planks. I mean, basically,
there are four main substrategies within the long range strategy,
apart from the weak look which you've already described. The
weak look being you know, appeer weak, which is based
on the ancient Chinese military strategiest Sun t Su, which
Sun SU's famous book The Art of War was required

(01:57:25):
reading and still is in the Soviet military and in
the East German. We have to know that it was
required reading in the East German military because we've got
a copy of the East German translation of Zu which
appeared in nineteen fifty six, which is highly significant. So
the substrategies are the global drug offensive, the international terrorism offensive,

(01:57:49):
the what I call international criminalism, which is the exploitation
of organized criminal operations in the interests of strategy.

Speaker 2 (01:57:58):
Now, going off what he just said, how many movies
that we've seen that the Russian mafia somehow isn't just
in Russia anymore.

Speaker 1 (01:58:07):
That's not just in movies. That's an understanding.

Speaker 2 (01:58:10):
So the four big strategies they need to make communism
look weak. They need to export their organized criminal elements
to the world. Drug trafficking is really really important to
all this as well. And international terrorist organizations. Now let's
follow a chain of events here. Iran by and large

(01:58:31):
is the largest funder of terrorist organizations as far as
the Islamic world is concerned on Earth. Who is Iran's
titus homey Russia? It would in fact be Russia. It's
crazy how that works out. And again this is a
part of the long con because Iran or Iran whatever
you wanna call it, didn't go through its religious revolution

(01:58:53):
until the eighties, around the time when the wall fell
and Boris Yeltsen and all these things, and Gorbachev and
all that was taking place. That new phase, the fourth
phase of this deception campaign that was around that time.

Speaker 1 (01:59:06):
This is all a part of the plan. What are
your thoughts as of this moment. I I'm like shocked,
but not shocked at the same time. You know, it's
kind of like, uh, once once you do so many
of these types of episodes, your your skin starts, it
starts to get a little thick to a lot of it,

(01:59:27):
because you know, if you're just now getting into conspiracies,
this kind of shit would absolutely make your head spin.
But being is that we've been in it for so long,
it's like nothing surprises me anymore. Bro, It really doesn't.
Like I've just come to the conclusion that, like people
are going to manipulate all the time. It's never going away.

(01:59:50):
There has never been good guys, there never will be
good guys. And it's like, so yeah, I'm not shocked
at all that, and especially you know with Russia and
the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union, I mean, let's just
be real, bro, Like the New World Order is like
the Soviet Union is baby New World Order? Oh yes,
oh yes, you know. So the the the idea that

(02:00:12):
you would have all of these, you know, the World
Economic Forum and you know, all those types of things
as far as the New World Order goes. It's like
they probably looked at Russia and said, damn, I love
the way that those people respect their government and don't
ask any questions. You know, it wasn't just Russia, it
was communism.

Speaker 2 (02:00:30):
They love how any country that gets down with communist ideologies.
These people fall in line. We that is great, we
need that. How do we mass produce that on the
global scale to bring about the new World Order?

Speaker 1 (02:00:43):
Yeah? Yeah, it seems it's so out in the open too.
It's like the way that this guy is basically prophesizing
all of it is like, man, this fucking it's it's
it's a shock that more people don't know about it,
and it's honestly a shock that we haven't talked about
it yet. I know, I know.

Speaker 2 (02:01:01):
Whenever I first discovered this one, I was like, oh wait,
how deep does this go? And when I found I'm like, oh, yes,
this is the next episode we will be talking about obviously,
So real quick, old British do we just heard from
his name's Christopher's story? Just so everybody understands who this
guy is, right, we already talked about our boy Galatsen
or yeah, Galatson and what his background was, former KGB

(02:01:23):
and all that. But just so everybody's clear about who
Christopher's story is, what his background is, and how he
became an authoritative figure on these things.

Speaker 1 (02:01:33):
Let's read his bio real quick. It's not long interesting
how his last name is Story. That's like if our
last name was Podcast. You know what I mean? Because
he's a writer. Yeah, yeah, yeah, no doubt so. Christopher's
Story was a British writer, publisher and government advisor specializing
in intelligence and economic affairs, who and perhaps best known
for his collaboration with KGB defector Anatoty Gildson on the

(02:01:55):
nineteen ninety five book called The Peristroican Deception. Christopher's Story
the son of Colonel Henry Harrell Story MC of the
Cameronians Scottish Rifles, was educated at Eton College and christ Church, Oxford,
and then worked as an industrial writer in Canada. In
nineteen sixty three, he formed his own publishing company specializing

(02:02:17):
in intelligence, and founded the World Reports Limited that year.
In nineteen seventy, the Story edited and published International Currency Review,
which has included the World Bank, the Federal Reserve and
the Bank of England amongst its subscribers. Story became an
economic advisor to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and in nineteen
ninety one, a year after her resignation, he published Soviet

(02:02:40):
Analyst book. Due to his continued continued skepticism about Mikhail Gorbachev,
Perestroika and the official version of events in the Soviet Union.
Soviet Analyst was a respected journal whose previous editors included
Robert Conquest and and Tibor Samuli. I don't know how

(02:03:04):
to pronounce that one either, so let's just roll with it.
In May of nineteen ninety two, Story was approached by
KGB defector Anatolely Gilitzen, who supported stories analysis of the
Soviet Union and Soviet Analyst. Glitzen handed over this to
Story his memoranda to the CIA, which Story edited and
published in nineteen ninety five as The Peristorica Deception. And
an interview in nineteen ninety five, Story said the purpose

(02:03:26):
of Perestroika has been to convince the gullible West that
communism is dead, that the Soviet Union has collapsed. Story
said that he agreed with Glitzen that the Sino Soviet
split was a deception which masked the continuing collaboration between
the Russians and China, which, again, if we were to
look today, Putin and g are really tight homies.

Speaker 2 (02:03:49):
That's kind of the whole thing. They've been homies since
the end of World War Two. They are still thicker
than Thieves Today.

Speaker 1 (02:03:56):
In two thousand and two, Story published The European Union Collective,
which applied Stories analysis to the European Union. He was
also critical of the German intelligence establishment, pointing out its
Nazi origins. Story claimed that former British Prime Minister Edward
Heath was recruited by Germans before the war and was
an agent of the secret Nazi strategic Continuum, since exposed

(02:04:17):
as the Deutsch oh God Verted dig Gung's dinst or
the DVD de.

Speaker 2 (02:04:24):
Chow doc Ow That's where one of the biggest concentration
camps were at.

Speaker 1 (02:04:28):
Story claimed that successive European Collective treaties have been routinely
procured by means of bribery. There that there was a
corrupt financial incentive for ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon,
which entered into force in two thousand and nine. Story
claimed that slush fund money was being paid into offshore
bank accounts for the top facilitators of the treaty. Story
wrote about the Wanta crisis, when the controversial CIA operative

(02:04:52):
Leo Wanta was involved in a plot to destabilize the
Soviet economy. In nineteen ninety, Story wrote a series of
articles posted on his website. His website is now closed
as in May of twenty twelve. Interesting. Yeah, So, just
so we're all clear about who Christopher's story was. This
guy wasn't some half stepper, okay, He was an advisor
to the British Prime Minister. Then continued to write about

(02:05:15):
more and more and more things that he saw that
were coming to pass, and again have yet to see
him be wrong on any points. So let's real quick.

Speaker 2 (02:05:26):
This is a clip from Ronald Reagan talking about socialist Democrats.
This is around the same time when these phase changes
were happening.

Speaker 1 (02:05:36):
Let's listen in.

Speaker 18 (02:05:38):
Because back in nineteen thirty six, mister Democrat himself, Al Smith,
a great American, came before for the American people and
charged that the leadership of his party was taking the
Party of Jefferson, Jackson and Cleveland down the road under
the banners of Marx, Lennon and Stalin. And he walked
away from his party, and he never returned till the
day he died.

Speaker 1 (02:05:57):
Because to this day, the leadership of.

Speaker 18 (02:05:59):
That party has been taking that party, that honorable party,
down the road in the image of the Labor Socialist
Party of England.

Speaker 1 (02:06:08):
Agreed one hundred percent. So there was actually a point
in time where true Democrats stood up and said, no,
you people are turning this into a socialist party, and
I'm not going to be a part of it, and
they walked away. Now, your boy Al was one of
the biggest talking heads on this, but a lot of
the other ones fell in line. They saw dollar signs,

(02:06:31):
they saw control of their constituents, they saw a new
forming in, a bringing about of the new world order.
They just got in where they fit in. By the way,
totally off topic here, but breaking news. Minneapolis Catholic school shooter.
Have you heard about that? I've heard of a few

(02:06:52):
school shootings. Was that that happen today or a couple
days ago? I think I'm just real recent. But it
says that Minneapolis Catholic school shooters sell uf identified as transgender.
So just shocker, shocker, all right, So be getting back
to it. Here are the Democrats a communist party?

Speaker 4 (02:07:10):
Now?

Speaker 2 (02:07:11):
Listen to any of our good cult members out there
listening that are of the Democrat variety.

Speaker 1 (02:07:18):
First of all, good on you for listening to this show,
even though you're a registered Democrat. Most of them hate us.

Speaker 2 (02:07:24):
But secondly, again, we are not talking about a social democrat.

Speaker 1 (02:07:29):
And by that I don't mean socialism.

Speaker 2 (02:07:31):
I mean like somebody who believes in the liberal ideologies
that the left claims that they're about. And they may
be like Joe Rogan has even said multiple times he's
financially conservative but socially liberal. Okay, we're not talking about
these types of people. We are talking about the figureheads
that are pumping all of the fists for you. We
are Democrats, We are the left with all these screaming

(02:07:54):
heads of today.

Speaker 1 (02:07:56):
Are they actually communist? Let's read in are the party
or are the Democrats of the Are the Democrats a
communist party? This is written by Roger Simon, so it
says this is on a substack. Even though I haven't
voted for a Democrat in this century, I did many
times before. I wasn't one of those who called them communists.

(02:08:18):
It seemed like overkill, naive, yes, brainwashed to a degree,
except for those who obviously profited from their power. But commies,
give me a break. And yet, watching the opening night
of the Democratic National Convention, I had second thoughts. Who
were these drones applauding the same empty swill they had
for years? Almost none of which had anything resembling a

(02:08:40):
positive result. Often it was the reverse. But did but
did that matter not to them? I am, to be clear,
no particular fan of Republican rhetoric and propaganda, nor am
I attracted to a party line to party line politics
of any sort. But this convention seemed on the edge
of an out of body mass formation psychosis experience, a
lah I'm Mattias desmet from both audience and speakers that

(02:09:04):
eerily approach the atmosphere of Lenny Riefenstall's documentary of the
nineteen thirty four Nuremberg Rally. Not exactly Communists, but close
enough in its celebration of group think. I would have
to honestly agree it doesn't take much to see that.
But let's keep going the times. They are indeed a
change in at an almost unfathomable clip. But I am

(02:09:25):
I exaggerating maybe, but even the scheduling of speakers at
the DNC is beginning to resemble the shuffling of faces
on a politic bureau rostrum, with Presidents Biden and Obama
being rendered non persons by not speaking until nearly eleven PM.
Biden is almost literally their bres nev to be propped
up and then escorted from the scene. But if we were.

(02:09:49):
But if we are to ask whether today's Democrats are
a communist party, we must first define the term communist
that has become rather different in our era, though no
less ominous and in my view, potentially more successful globally.
Communism today is far from what Karl Marx envisioned sitting
on his Ample Darriere in the library of the British Museum.

(02:10:09):
Not that his concept of the future was particularly accurate then.
He predicted his paradise of quotes, scientific socialism would appear
first in a modern industrial state like Germany, but not
that long after his death it began. It began a
considerably more primitive Russia. Although the Soviet Union became a

(02:10:30):
substantial military power, it fell apart economically and quickly became totalitarian,
largely due to its adherence to Marx's economic theories command
economies don't work, a message apparently lost on Kamala Harris.
This mistake, Yeah, that was something that she said a
lot of She was and we talked about that multiple times.
The whore was literally getting on the microphone and spitting

(02:10:53):
pure Marxist rhetoric almost line for line, And it's not
like she was smart enough to ever read the Communist
manifest though she was being given this by her aids
and by her handlers. To read these things, it's a
whole whole conversation in and of itself, But let's continue.
This mistake was no longer repeated by communist China once

(02:11:14):
Dang shaoping of a cat can be black or white
as long as it catches mice fame rose to power
starting in nineteen seventy six. Ironically, two hundred years after
our revolution. Dang, responsible for the Tianeman maskers, was as
much a despot in his way as mad as Mao Zedong,
but did not adhere to Marxism with the uber religious

(02:11:37):
fervor of Mao that allowed the chairman to become history's
greatest mass murderer. More More, dengis Today's China is somewhat different.
The despotism remains a good deal of Marxist rhetoric is
employed for show or to keep the masses from getting
untoward ideas, but communism itself, even more ironically, has evolved

(02:11:59):
into the most advanced, autocratic and perverse form of capitalism
yet devised one party only capitalism you might call it,
with the obvious benefits of market available exclusively to party members.
Socialist economics might have its problems, but autocracy can really
pay off. Here's where it begins. That's kind of the thing,
right in a pure capitalist society, monopolies are a thing.

Speaker 2 (02:12:23):
They happen all the time. In America, we have laws
to bust up monopolies. Now, yes, we can have a
conversation about how there are new monopolies that are forming
and they are just curtailing outside of the realm of
the rules to operate, but it's still monopoly in another form.
In an autocracy like China where they are the CCP,
every single business that is owned is also part owned

(02:12:46):
by the government. That is a law enforced monopoly, no
matter which industry you're trying to get involved in.

Speaker 1 (02:12:53):
Here's where it begins to align with today's Democratic Party,
which is not so distant in essence from the CCP,
especially in our inspiration. Sometimes, I think, particularly among their leadership,
they secretly envy the chi cooms for having it evolved
a perfect totalitarian system. This could account, along with the
obvious personal profit that accrued in many quarters for their

(02:13:14):
favoritism to China, from Biden to Tim Waltz and a
host of others. That has also been shared, regrettably by
a somewhat smaller those significant percentage of Republicans. China is,
after all the deepest of deep states. Nevertheless, a caveat
despite the growing similarity between the CCP and the Democratic Party.

(02:13:35):
It it ill what's up, or it ill behooves. Yeah,
that's correct, Yeah, it ill behooves. Conservatives and Libertarians, including
their standard bearer mister Trump, simply to call the opposition
party commis and leave it at that. The only that
only impresses the choir most Americans, our educational system being
next to nonexistent, or propaganda propaganda, propagandistic. There we go.

(02:14:01):
For the other side, understand little of what communism has become.
If anything, they think of Stalin or Mao, who are
long in their graves and have supposedly a and are
supposedly a thing of the past. This renders the charge irrelevant,
with communist ideology cleansed and made suitable through the rubric
equity that promises a mythological equality of outcomes, Just how

(02:14:23):
mythological I saw on trips to China and the Soviet
Union Party officials I met lived like lords, just as
just as do party elites.

Speaker 12 (02:14:32):
Here.

Speaker 1 (02:14:33):
The disparity was even greater in the Soviet system. Few
in the public have heard of Dang Xiaoping, even though
he is arguably the most consequential political figure of the
twentieth century. I few also know of his reforms and
the system that wrought. Trump and others should take the
opportunity to explain this transition to America, not just hurl insults.

(02:14:54):
This is difficult since the mainstream media themselves, profiting from
this corrupt system, hired as much as possossible from the
public as well as from themselves lest they lose power
that is precious to them. But difficult and actually painstakingly
as this may be, those concerned with preservation of our
republic must suck it up and make the greatest effort
to do this in a short time. Therefore, we must

(02:15:16):
be mindful and inform others that during the DNC and
later in their propaganda, you will see words used in
an Orwelian matter that are almost always their exact opposites.
One of those is freedom, which, as Matt Taibi has
pointed out on his substack, has been rebranded. Another is democracy, which.

Speaker 2 (02:15:37):
Is true love to throw a lot of rebrandings of
certain very key buzzwords in our time frame. You've noticed
this right fascist or nazi. Just nowadays they can call
you a nazi for just not believing what Obama was doing.

Speaker 1 (02:15:53):
You're obviously a nazi, a big and no homophobe xenophone
And it's like wait, wait whoa hey, homophobe means you're
scared of gay people, like you have a fear of them.
I don't actually know any homophobes realistically, but sure, yeah, sou.
We can only guess what a political party, uh, what

(02:16:15):
a political party that has just anointed its presidential candidate
in a matter of weeks without a single vote means
by that word. In one sense, Jijuping should be impressed.
That's how they do it. And imitation, as the saying goes,
is the sincerest form of flattery. But more likely he
and Vladimir Putin are licking their chops in anticipation of
dealing with the US administration that is weaker than ever.

(02:16:38):
The intelligence report that the Chinese hacked into the Trump
campaign is therefore not in the latest or not in
the least surprising. Neither is the number of people at
this point very real and not just imagined, who wish
to kill the Republican candidates. This is typical communist behavior.
As Mao is thought to have ordered the death of
his competitor Lynn Biao, we also.

Speaker 2 (02:16:59):
For the record, I am I believe that he absolutely
ordered the killing of that.

Speaker 1 (02:17:03):
There are some people that say there's no way he did.

Speaker 2 (02:17:06):
Obviously, Mao, the most prolific mass murderer of the last century,
clearly killed his only political opposition. But moving on, just
as Putin does, oh absolutely, that happens a lot.

Speaker 1 (02:17:21):
Every time there's an election.

Speaker 2 (02:17:22):
It's either one of Putin's homeboys that he knows is
gonna lose and like it's ran to make it look
like a free and fair election, but in reality, it's
they know he's not gonna win, they just had to
put another name on the ballot. Or it's somebody who's
actually trying to go against him, And wouldn't you know it,
every time they get arrested, they get killed in some
crazy accident. It's just it's wild how many of these
planes go down and how many of these car wrecks

(02:17:44):
just happen.

Speaker 1 (02:17:44):
It's insane. Oh dude, the same thing happened in Mexico.
What was it like? Thirty seven candidates died on the
way to election. Yes, the current president of Mexico wasn't
even on the in the running during the election until
the final because everyone else that seemed like they might
have something to run off of was immediately murdered. But okay, interesting,

(02:18:10):
so we all know what Stalin did to Trotsky and
several other members of his politic bureau. Those are only
the tips of an exceptionally bloody iceberg that floats through
every communist state from Cuba to North Korea. We are
not there yet, except for a strange character in Butler, Pennsylvania.
The media seems to have deep sixed. But could we be?
A better question is what country and history is exempt?

(02:18:32):
France that had its reign of terror certainly wasn't. Things
don't look so hot in Europe now or on the
streets of Chicago. As I mentioned, events are moving at
an unfathomable clip. Anyone who wants Benjamin Franklin's a republic,
if you can keep it apocryphal or not, better keep
their eyes open and act accordingly.

Speaker 2 (02:18:54):
So again, I'm not saying that every single person who
votes Democrat is a commy or a communist sympathizer. What
I am saying is that the vast majority of Democrat
political figures are one hundred percent. So this is another clip.
This is actually from the PbD podcast Value Teaman. This

(02:19:15):
is a short clip where he's speaking with David Horowitz
about if all Democrats are actually communists.

Speaker 1 (02:19:21):
Let's listen in.

Speaker 14 (02:19:23):
If the Democrats were to have hired you hypothetically, I
know this is not going to happen. If they were
to have hired you and say, if the Democrats were
to have hired you hypothetically, I know this is not
going to happen. If they were to have hired you
and said, look, we want one hundred percent accurate answers.

Speaker 12 (02:19:42):
Here.

Speaker 11 (02:19:42):
They put you on a light detective test and.

Speaker 14 (02:19:45):
Said, here's the panel of all the candidates that we
have going up against Trump.

Speaker 1 (02:19:48):
Who do you think stands the best chance.

Speaker 14 (02:19:51):
Going up against Trump? Pre you know, when they put
their candidates up, I'm talking about Buddhachid.

Speaker 5 (02:19:57):
All these guys, to a man and women, all the
leaders of the Democrat Party are communists, They're racists, and
they have no respect for American principles. You can't declare
a resistance to a duly elected president and not be
an enemy of this country. Our whole democracy is based

(02:20:20):
on the peaceful transition of power. That's why we have
honeymoons for incoming presidents. Barack Obama, who is an extreme leftist,
got a honeymoon that lasted more than a year. Trump
didn't get seven seconds. They men at a hotel at
the Mandarin Oriental. This is all of my book Blitz,

(02:20:41):
by the way, at the Mandarin Oriental in Washington. Pelosi
was there, Elizabeth Warren was there, the communists, the street
communists who managed Occupy Wall Street, the anti FOP people,
they were all there, and they formed a resistance to
au elected president. The last time that happened was in

(02:21:03):
eighteen sixty one, Lincoln was elected. Then they conducted this
phony impeachment process for three years, knowing from the outset
that it was based on lies, that there was no evidence.
Imagine imagine accusing the president of the United States of
being a trader, of being in Putin's pocket, of Putin

(02:21:27):
having something over his head, which Nancy Pelosi is doing
this day to run him. You want to hurt the
American people. That's what you do to their commander in
chief if you are an enemy. You know, if the
Mullahs had a psychological warfare unit, that's what they would
be doing. Is they are doing. Unnoubtedly are one of

(02:21:48):
them who's been nominated or is mentioned as a lead
was the head of the Black Caucus, Karen Bass. She's
a communist. She's was a leader of the Vents Brigades,
which was run by Cuban intelligence for decades. That's the
kind of people that they have. All that said, I

(02:22:11):
think that he would be stupid not to pick Susan
Rice is a pathological liar who lied about the Benghazi Berry. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:22:22):
So again, we're not saying that everybody who's voting Democrat
is inherently Kami or even a commedy sympathizer. I'm saying
that the vast majority of politicians that are running on
the Democrat docket are absolutely a part of it. But again,
let's not forget that there are Republicans who are part
of this deception as well.

Speaker 1 (02:22:41):
But dude, they chose Kamala Harris, Like, say less, I
mean you want to talk about like is it controlled?
Is it operated by people who are trying to make
you believe that a presidential nominee is actually running the country.
And then you get Biden in there, then you get

(02:23:03):
Harris in there, even Obama to a certain extent, who, yes,
he was a good speaker, but not necessarily a power
player by any means right, not necessarily going to be
holding it down for the entire country. Most of these
people are absolutely political puppets, and it makes you wonder,
you know, like, are like, is it all a facade?

(02:23:23):
Is every president some kind of facade, just a lower
level puppet to orchestrate the world's the New World Orders agenda.

Speaker 2 (02:23:33):
I think that Trump wasn't his first term. I think
that that's why they pushed him so hard. Like he
had just said, you bore Hortz. So every president gets
a honeymoon period where the media kind of leaves him alone. Right,
they don't start shitting on him yet. He just got
in office, bro, give him a little bit of time
to cook. Let's see what kind of policies he implements,

(02:23:54):
and these types of things. Obama got a honeymoon period
that was over a year. You didn't even hear news
talk shit on him.

Speaker 1 (02:24:01):
They may have voiced some concerns with things that he
said on the campaign trail, but they didn't go after
him until after a year of him being in office.

Speaker 2 (02:24:12):
It wasn't even like he said, seven seconds. We have
played clips of when Trump took office. How many of
these democratic you know, news anchors were crying on camera
and like started the rhetoric and started, this is not.

Speaker 1 (02:24:26):
A joke, this is not a nightmare. He is really
the press like he didn't get any time before. They
were like, no, fuck this guy. And the reason why
is because, just my opinion, he wasn't a part of
the political machine at that time. Yeah, he was a funder.
He knew a lot of politicians, but he wasn't in
the click, not the political click. He was in the
financial click for sure.

Speaker 2 (02:24:47):
But you're stepping into a realm where you don't necessarily belong,
my boy, and we don't like the way you're gonna
shake things up. So they immediately started shitting on him.
I think that he has now turned into a politician.

Speaker 1 (02:24:58):
Oh bro fucking Rosi O'Donnell moved to Ireland because of it,
which that's silly.

Speaker 2 (02:25:03):
I will say that at least I'll give a little
bit of respect where it's due. So many wealthy Hollywood
types said that if Trump gets elected there moving out
of the country. At least Rosie was about that action.

Speaker 1 (02:25:15):
Yeah. But the thing was is that, you know, one
of the main reasons why she moved out of the
country was because Trump was racist. Yet she moves to
the whitest country probably in the world. Yeah, it was.
It was a silly, silly reason for her to move.

Speaker 2 (02:25:29):
But all I'm saying is, at least she was about it,
and not just she wasn't just gonna talk about it.

Speaker 1 (02:25:33):
She actually was gonna be about it.

Speaker 2 (02:25:35):
I will at least give that shred of respect where
it's due for that. She is still a psychopath, but
you know, at least she was about that action. But anyway, anyway,
Betty Robots.

Speaker 1 (02:25:47):
Yeah, so this all being said, we're talking a lot
about communism. We're talking about some socialism, especially because AOC
is now being thrown up as a possible VP candidate
for the next election. They don't want her to be
the president because she's not old enough, but they are
talking about her being a solid choice for the Democratic

(02:26:09):
vice president, and she is a very loud and proud socialist,
which is very close to communism. But real quick, do
you know the difference between communism and socialism? Just quick?
I mean, socialism is not a far cry from communism.
I know that it's not.

Speaker 2 (02:26:27):
It's still the Marxist belief system, but there are some differences.
But just because we're going to be talking about both
of these things, and I think how both of them
do tie into this deception overall, because like we're talking about,
it's all about the rebranding, right, It's all about the
it's all about the optics of it.

Speaker 1 (02:26:44):
This isn't communism, it's democratic socialism.

Speaker 2 (02:26:48):
That's not any better, but they're gonna make it look
like it's better. So let's hear a quick This's just
a two and a half minute long video about why
socialism sucks.

Speaker 1 (02:26:56):
In theory and in practice. I fucking love this.

Speaker 2 (02:27:01):
People need to just hear this and let it marinate
in their brains before you go and vote for somebody
who claims to actually be one of these people.

Speaker 1 (02:27:08):
Let's listen in.

Speaker 13 (02:27:10):
Sure, socialism has had its problems, but it's still.

Speaker 11 (02:27:13):
A great theory.

Speaker 13 (02:27:15):
Sure socialism has had its problems, but it's still a
great theory. Well, actually, I think it sucks as a theory.
Oh damn you, I'm nick fraidus. And this is the
Why Minutes where we challenge the popular narratives of our time.

Speaker 11 (02:27:27):
Now, whenever we talk about.

Speaker 13 (02:27:28):
Socialism, the first thing that we have to do is
define our terms, because there is a lot of discussion
about what exactly socialism is. But it's important to point
out that words have meaning, at least they still do,
and in order for something to be truly socialist.

Speaker 11 (02:27:42):
Then it has to incorporate this concept.

Speaker 13 (02:27:45):
Socialism is a system or condition of society in which
the means of production are owned.

Speaker 11 (02:27:49):
And controlled by the state or the people. So what
the hell does that mean? Well, under socialism, you can
still own your.

Speaker 13 (02:27:56):
Toothbrush or a pair of shoes or some other sort
of good, but you are not permitted to have private
ownership of the very capital which is needed to produce
those goods and services. No, those things must be owned
by either the state or some kind of collective. And
while we have ample examples of such a theory failing
miserably when put into practice, there are still a lot
of people that insist it's a really good theory. And

(02:28:17):
maybe that's because there is some comfort in believing that
if only the right people were in charge, and that
all of us could agree on a particular course of action,
then we could focus our collective efforts on making all
of our lives better.

Speaker 11 (02:28:28):
The problem is we don't agree.

Speaker 13 (02:28:30):
And ultimately, any theory which subordinates your individual ideas, creativity,
or goals to a collective in the name of the
common good is going to run into a couple of
serious problems. And that first problem is who gets to
decide the common good?

Speaker 11 (02:28:44):
Because you, as an individual, certainly don't.

Speaker 13 (02:28:46):
The collective decides, which is to say, some sort of
simple majority, And if you and your ideas are outvoted
or out maneuvered politically when the time comes to drop
the next five.

Speaker 11 (02:28:54):
Year plan, well tough for you.

Speaker 13 (02:28:56):
The second problem with the system is that it degrades
our humanity and treats peop people as if we're nothing
more than producers or consumers.

Speaker 11 (02:29:03):
Under a socialist system, you're no longer an individual.

Speaker 13 (02:29:05):
You're simply a cog in the machine that needs to
be managed sort of specific goal which will be determined
by someone other than you. And this is why Alexis
to Tokville warned that socialism calls, in fact, for the
forfeiture of human liberty, to the point where I would
say that it was simply a new system of serfdom.

Speaker 11 (02:29:21):
Now there are those who insist that you actually.

Speaker 13 (02:29:24):
Don't even need a government to implement real socialism, and
so they reference anarcosocialism that essentially these communes could work
through voluntary action. But this has already been tried hundreds
of times across the United States, and you can find
out how they turned out by clicking right here. I'm
Nick Fredous with the y Minutes. Thank you for watching.
Please like and subscribe so you can get our new.

Speaker 11 (02:29:44):
Videos every Wednesday.

Speaker 2 (02:29:46):
Now, real quick, we can watch that video if socialism's
ever been tried. But the overarching breakdown of it is
how many of these hippie communes or just communes in general,
not just hippie, some of them are of the sovereign
citizen type. And then there was that one in Alabama
for the UH. I remember we talked about it with
the the Black Moorish Science Temple and they bought land

(02:30:08):
out and was Alabama or Georgia, and they were trying
to start it in this way and it was gonna
be a socialist utopia. Every single one of these communities
that tries to enact some sort of socialist thing, like
we talked about on the small scale, socialism possibly can work,
but it just never does, like.

Speaker 1 (02:30:27):
Never, Jacob, I mean, Chaz was it was really firing
on all cylinders right right.

Speaker 2 (02:30:33):
I forgot about the place that was taken over a
few square blocks. It was ran by a SoundCloud wrapper,
and there was a lot of rapes and a lot
of injuries that happened. There was one murder that took
place specifically that I can remember, and then they got
mad that they weren't getting medical treatment even though they
hailed off the ambulance at gunpoint and would not allow

(02:30:55):
them to come in.

Speaker 1 (02:30:57):
Yeah, that's that's a thing that happened.

Speaker 2 (02:31:00):
Right, So again the socialists and communist rhetoric that is
being spurned on by these people. Let's hear from Obama
himself when he tells men Medvedev that he will have
more flexibility after the election. And for the record, this
was after Trump got elected, so it's not like Obama

(02:31:22):
was up for re election at this time. He was saying,
once I'm out of the hot seat and off of
the public zeitgeist. I'll have more flexibility to make some
deals happen with Russia. Let's listen to his words, not mine.

Speaker 19 (02:31:35):
Transl transl is lead. Dam this is my last selections.

Speaker 1 (02:31:46):
Yes, that's for my election.

Speaker 14 (02:31:48):
I have more flexibility trust disfimation.

Speaker 19 (02:31:53):
To the legion that unless.

Speaker 1 (02:31:59):
This is my last time in this So once I'm
all right, I'm sorry. I actually I do a decent
Obama impersonation. Let me do that. So listen, I have
a this is my last selection cycle. So once I'm
out of the office, I'll have more flexibility work with you.

Speaker 2 (02:32:12):
And then your boy was like, I'll translate this message
and I'll make sure that he unders by. He he
means putin he understands. You know, Yeah, gotcha, gotch Yeah.

Speaker 1 (02:32:20):
I remember this. I remember this. This was super sketchy.
You got more flexibility once you're out of the house. Dude,
what does that even mean? I thought you're not supposed
to have any fucking power at all once you leave.
It was sketchy then, But now that you know more
about the Perishtoika deception, does it sound a little sketchy er?

(02:32:44):
I mean, I don't know how much more sketchy it
could get.

Speaker 2 (02:32:48):
I mean, now we know that Russia specifically has put
in certain political figures into our zeit guys for the
purpose of spreading communism and by extension, social to take
over the world in a cultural way instead of a
military way. And then we see Obama trying to make
that was a hot mic situation. We weren't supposed to
hear that, by the way, and we know for sure

(02:33:11):
that he is already making backdoor deals with Russia.

Speaker 1 (02:33:14):
But it was it was Trump CoFe Russian collusion. Well,
it's interesting that that's what people really truly believed at
one point in time. Let's hear from a French media
outlet about Trump's DOJ opening grand jury probe into Obama
officials over Russia Gate. Let's read in this was only

(02:33:35):
dropped a few days ago. The US Justice Justice Department
on Tuesday launched a grand jury investigation into claims that
Obama era officials falsified intelligence on Russian election interference, followed
following allegations by Director of National Intelligence Tulsea Gabbard. Democrats
have dismissed the probe as politically motivated.

Speaker 2 (02:33:54):
Of course they would, of course, the Democrats would be like,
you're just on a witch hunt. You mean, like you
did to Trump the entire time he was in office
and found nothing. Y'all are so hell bent on seeing
him in a jumpsuiting in handcuffs. Never mind the fact
that the Russia conversation, even back then, all the Russia
Gates scandal showed was connections to Clinton, who was going

(02:34:17):
against Trump.

Speaker 1 (02:34:18):
Remember we talked about that for forever. Oh well, you
don't know what you're talking about. Well, here's the proof
in the pudding. Yeah, all you care about is the
only thing he cares about is retribution. He only cares
about retaliation. It's like, maybe if you wouldn't have tried
to gun after him the entire time that you were
in office, you wouldn't have to worry about that. That's

(02:34:38):
like a bully being scared of being bullied.

Speaker 2 (02:34:41):
Or if there was no connection to Russia or this
deception that has been going on since sixty five, and
you were free and clear of that because you're not
in cahoots with the plan to take over the world,
you would have nothing to worry about with this probe.

Speaker 1 (02:34:57):
US Attorney General Pam Bondi has directed federal p prosecutors
to launch a grand jury investigation into allegations that members
of Democratic former president Barack Obama's administration manufactured intelligence on
Russia's interference in the twenty sixteen elections, a source familiar
with the matter set on Monday. The Justice Department said
late last month it was forming a strike force to

(02:35:17):
assess claims made by Director of National Intelligence Tulsa Gabbert
about an alleged weaponization of the US intelligence community. Republican
US donald President Donald Trump has leaped on comments from
Gabbard in which she threatened to refer Obama administration officials
to the Justice Department for prosecution over an intelligence assessment

(02:35:37):
of Russian interference. Fox News first reported that Bondi personally
ordered an unnamed federal prosecutors a prosecutor to initiate legal proceedings,
and the prosecutors expected to present Department evidence to a
grand jury, which could consider an indictment if the Justice
Department pursued a criminal case. The report cited a letter
from Bondi and a source a DOJ spoke. This person

(02:36:00):
declined to comment, referring to the probe, and a post
on True Social Trump said the truth always wins out.
This is great News. Yeah, this is actually his truth
social posts. I mean, it's it's basically that. But it's uh, yeah,
it's pretty crazy how this is transpired. Last month, Trump
accused Obama of treason, alleging without providing evidence, that the

(02:36:21):
Democratic that the Democrat led an effort to falsify or
falsely tie him to Russia and undermine his twenty sixteen
presidential campaign. Trump won the twenty sixteen election against Hillary Clinton.
A spokesperson for Obama had denounced Trump's claim, saying, these
bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.

(02:36:42):
Gavin never mind, we just heard from his own mouth
about his flexibility once the election's over. So he already
had some underhanded dealings going on. But whatever, all right, Deny, deny, deny,
that's always.

Speaker 2 (02:36:53):
Deny, make counter accusations, implement others, shift the blame.

Speaker 1 (02:36:57):
This is the old, the old standard show, y'all. Gabbard
had declassified documents and said the information she release showed
a treasonous conspiracy in twenty sixteen by top Obama officials
to undermine Trump claims that Democrats called false and politically motivated.
An assessment by the US Intelligence Community published in January
of twenty seventeen, concluded that Russia, using social media, disinformation hacking,

(02:37:21):
and Russian bot farms, sought to damage Clinton's twenty sixteen
presidential campaign in Bolster Trump, who won that election. The
assessment determined the actual impact was likely limited and showed
no evidence that Moscow's efforts actually changed voting outcomes. Russia
has denied its attempted its attempt to interfere in US elections.

Speaker 2 (02:37:40):
So you remember that that was the thing, right hashtagkofethe
Russian collusion, and it was the whole thing. Trump has
ties to Putin and he's going to try to take
over the world with Putin and all these things.

Speaker 1 (02:37:51):
And it was clearly it was to damage Clinton's standings.

Speaker 2 (02:37:56):
That was by the intelligence community at the CIA, just
people quote unquote of the intelligence community in twenty seventeen.

Speaker 1 (02:38:05):
Yes, these balloons, and that was what they published, even
though we knew that that was a lie.

Speaker 2 (02:38:11):
All of the Steele dossier, all the emails that Clinton deleted,
all these things. Yeah, some of them were about like
Belizian Grove and some of the other discussing shit that
she's done.

Speaker 1 (02:38:22):
A lot of them.

Speaker 2 (02:38:23):
John McAfee tried to bring to light as a matter
of fact, were about her ties to Russia. This is
a portion of the reason why he was killed.

Speaker 1 (02:38:33):
Yeah, yeah, and unfortunately that kill switch never came to be,
not even a little bit.

Speaker 2 (02:38:39):
All right, So we're gonna hear back from our boys
story here. This is just a little six minute video.
It's kind of the ending of that. It was like
an hour and a half long interview. If anybody wants
to watch it, I highly recommend it. Where he talks
about the multi decade communist deception and disinformation strategy. He
breaks it all down very beautifully. Here Again, the man
is literally an expert on this and wrote the book

(02:39:01):
on this with Gletson, So let's listen to the man himself.

Speaker 17 (02:39:06):
All these countries, so instead of just having the USSR
and Ukraine and Belo Russia as it up to nineteen ninety,
we now have sixteen of these republics, so that there
suddenly we've got sixteen KGB's and we've got sixteen delegations
in the World Bank and the IMF, so that these

(02:39:28):
institutions have now become metamorphosed into instruments of the revolution.
More clearly than was the case before. That is one
reason why they are provisionally they were given this curious independence.
But another very important reason is that with the apparent
independence of these countries, they opened up scope for independent

(02:39:51):
military action, so that the repression which subsequently took place
in Georgia, Tajikistan, Moldova and in Abkazia could take place,
The minorities could be suppressed, and Russia could be whiter
than white. Do you see what I mean? In other words,
the communist the repression was carried out by apparent non communists.

Speaker 10 (02:40:15):
Was delegated, was delegated.

Speaker 17 (02:40:17):
And it was actually in the case of Georgia where
the most severe repression has been taking place, supervised by
Shiva Nazi, who the West thought was was not only
a Christian, but you know, baptized a Christian, but the
architect at the end of the Cold War. He's known
as Stalin two in Georgia.

Speaker 19 (02:40:37):
All right.

Speaker 10 (02:40:38):
In the early nineteen eighties, Abraham Schiffrin of Israel, an
expert on Soviet concentration camps, published a guide book to
these camps, listing over seventeen hundred concentration of camp sites
in the Soviet Union, with millions of prisoners. Are we
to believe that all of these suddenly vanished about nineteen
eighty nine.

Speaker 17 (02:40:56):
Are we to believe that these people suddenly all of
a sudden set aside their ideology and suddenly started talking normally?

Speaker 10 (02:41:03):
Or are the some sixty million members of the Communist
Party of the Soviet Union did they all stop being
members of it instantly?

Speaker 17 (02:41:09):
In the same time, Galitzin makes it quite clear in
his new book The Parastroke of Deception that the power
structures depend on the continued adherence to revolutionary objectives of
the Consomole. There are over fifty million members of Comsomol.
They work closely with the structures, and so he says

(02:41:31):
somewhere in the book, he says, scratch any of these
so called sudden instant democrats and you will find underneath
them a Consomol or a secret party member. We all
these people you see on the television screen in Moscow,
they are all, without exception, secret party or CONSOMOL members.

Speaker 10 (02:41:49):
We're going to have to do a second show on
the content of Perastroic Exception because it covers the period
of nineteen eighty nine through nineteen ninety three and written
by elites and actually derived from memorandum he memoranda HE
prepared for the CIA, which they of course ignored. But
we hear about free enterprise, a burgeoning of free enterprise

(02:42:12):
in the Soviet Union and in the Eastern European countries.
What is the reality of this, I mean, isn't it?
Isn't it overwhelmingly controlled and limited in a way that
makes a mockery of the term free enterprise.

Speaker 17 (02:42:26):
They themselves call it state controlled capitalism, which is of
course a contradiction in terms. What has happened is that
Lenin's original state was a criminal state. The Chekha, the
Soviet intelligence controlled the mafia, invented the mafia, became the mafia,

(02:42:47):
so that what this apparent outbreak of free enterprise we
see is in fact controlled by the KGB and this
outbreak of Soviet criminality, and it's controlled, and it's been
exported on a global scale. Why is it being exported
in order to It's one of the themes that they

(02:43:08):
are developing to create problems which need global solutions. So
that there's a world criminal crime epidemic, terrorist epidemic. We've
got to have global structures in order to contain this
epidemic which they themselves have created.

Speaker 10 (02:43:22):
Also, the KGP generated criminal activity provides an excuse for
ever tighter control over whatever window dressing business or free
enterprise or business or entrepreneurial activity may exist over there.

Speaker 17 (02:43:35):
Sure, and not only that, but of course you've got
the drug element as well. It Since the nineteen fifties,
Soviet Military Intelligence GRU has been in control of drug
networks all over the world. And the reasonason the GRU
controls is involved in this is because it's sabotage. You know,

(02:43:57):
the narcotics operation is sabotage. Other elements of controlled by
the KGB.

Speaker 10 (02:44:02):
Christopher, we're gonna have to continue in our second part
of this interview. I want to thank you for being
with us today.

Speaker 1 (02:44:08):
If you found any of this all right? The audio
does kind of go to ask towards the end there,
but again, can you find any faults with what your
guy is saying here? It seems like pretty haffus. No,
it's not even like a far stretch. It's like, of course,
the original Communists and the original Soviets wouldn't have just

(02:44:30):
been like, yeah, you know what we lost, So we're
we're gonna go and do what everybody else is doing. No,
these people were fucking hardcore about it. It wasn't just
like a fad thing that people were into. That's like
asking the original followers of Jesus to stop following Jesus
and take up Islam. It's like, exactly, you're not gonna

(02:44:51):
get that to happen. It's even deeper.

Speaker 2 (02:44:54):
Well, and I gonna say deeper than that, but like,
for instance, Jesus only did his ministry for three years,
right where you could even say it's like somebody who
lived as a Nazi, not just like a person that
went along to get along, but like a true believer
in Nazism. Did they just like stop and change their
ways when the war ended? Did their Avoy Werner von Braun,
did he just stop being a Nazi when he got

(02:45:16):
to America?

Speaker 1 (02:45:17):
And keep in mind, Nazism, true Nazism was only around
for arguably fifteen to twenty years. Well that's not true.
I'll give you twenty. I'll give you a solid twenty
on that. But that's my point.

Speaker 2 (02:45:30):
Communism in Soviet Russia was around from nineteen When you
say nineteen seventeen to nineteen ninety one, we are talking
about an entire population of a country that understood nothing
except communism being the way of the truth in the life.

Speaker 1 (02:45:47):
Sixty million of them. Boom, Well, Soviet Union's over. Communism's bad.

Speaker 2 (02:45:52):
We're a free and open republic now, all of you
need to just get with it. In the seventeen hundred
gulags a political dissidence and just anybody who they really
didn't like. These people were set free, new system, new government.
I know the crime that you said was again stalin,
but always man, you're free to be clear to get
out of here.

Speaker 9 (02:46:10):
Now.

Speaker 1 (02:46:10):
Do you think they went away?

Speaker 13 (02:46:12):
No.

Speaker 1 (02:46:12):
As a matter of fact, more goologs were built and
filled since then, and the ones currently are still full
to this day. Jacob, if all of the women were
just deleted from the planet, would you just accept to
being gay for the rest of your life? I can't
say that I would. Dog can't say that. It was
basically what they're trying to say here. It's ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (02:46:32):
You're talking about people who this is not just like
their identity. This is what they adhere and acknowledge to
be truth, like true factual information. They've never heard anything
else ever in their life unless it was from you know,
those Western.

Speaker 1 (02:46:48):
Dogs over there those capitalist pigs like that, that's all
they've been taught. And then flip of a switch, Berlin
wall is down, Stalin and Gorbachev, all these, it's all
the things have happened.

Speaker 2 (02:46:59):
The transition is made. It's a new Russia now allegedly.
Then Putin takes over and shows us that not so much.
Never mind the fact that he was former KGB and
again as true blue of a communist as they come,
was your boy Putin. Now he's in charge of the
Russian Republic and it's a new Russia.

Speaker 1 (02:47:22):
Funny how you said true blue, I just say true red.
Excuse me, true red? Yeah, well, I'm just thinking of
the Democrats being socialists and communists. Nah, which leads me
to my final point.

Speaker 2 (02:47:34):
This is an AI video, and I understand that it's
it's meant to be funny, but also you can't find
any incorrect information that they say about here. If we
are going to make the true connections to the Republican
Party and the Democrat Party when it comes to the uh,
excuse me, when it comes to the prestroikia, I keep

(02:47:58):
forgetting how to pronounce the word, actually perishtroika deception when
it comes to that with these parties. Yes again, I
know that they have infiltrated the Republican Party two. But
it's a little more extreme with the Democrat Party. But
like I asked you earlier, whenever we talk about certain
social rights issues, and certain tax issues and certain freedom issues,

(02:48:19):
everybody thinks the political party swapped it. One time, I
can prove to you that they haven't, and this AI
video actually does a pretty decent job of showing it.

Speaker 1 (02:48:28):
Let's go. The Republican Party, formed in this check in
eighteen fifty four, is the anti slavery party, but later
it would be better known as the party of your
boy on a stage. We freed the slaves and won
the war. Then I took my wife to a play
in hopes to get laid after, but a shitty actor
cock blocked me with a pistol. Republicans dominated the North,
which was always the industrial hub of the nation, so

(02:48:49):
naturally they gained a more free market, get your shit
together stance. We overwhelmingly supported the nineteenth Amendment allowing women
to vote. We dominated election until my cousin wrote to
power on his hot wheels. Then came the Depression.

Speaker 15 (02:49:04):
People lost trust in markets, so I wheeled in to
drastically expand communism across the country, and Democrats been hooked
ever since.

Speaker 1 (02:49:10):
Then.

Speaker 15 (02:49:10):
We passed the Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty four
to say we're sorry for slavery, but it was actually
majority Democrats that blocked or filibustered the bill.

Speaker 8 (02:49:18):
All right, we're all still super pissed and racist about
this bill, but now.

Speaker 11 (02:49:22):
We're all going to switch parties.

Speaker 15 (02:49:23):
So actually Republicans are the evil racist ones.

Speaker 1 (02:49:26):
Okay, so let me get this straight.

Speaker 11 (02:49:28):
You're super pissed.

Speaker 15 (02:49:29):
Republicans overwhelmingly supported the Civil Rights Bill, but you now
want to be Republicans, correct, But don't forget Republicans now
want to.

Speaker 1 (02:49:37):
Be the evil racist party.

Speaker 15 (02:49:39):
And that's exactly how we'll teach it at universities around
the country. I hate to break it to you, but
no matter what your comrade professor told you, the big
party switch never happened. Democrats still ruled the South until
the early nineteen nineties. Voters simply changed preferences and the
South became more economically inclined. You're seeing another switch happen today,
but it's not the parties, it's just voters.

Speaker 1 (02:49:58):
The Republican Yeah, that was a great video, Actually, dude,
I thought it was. I can't look at Teddy Roosevelt
and not think of Robin Williams anymore. Ah, I see
it because what was it Night of the Museum. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:50:12):
But everything that was just said in that in that clip,
if anybody wants to look it up, who actually was
Which political party was the one that freed the slaves,
gave women the right to vote, overwhelmingly supported civil rights.
All of the things that you can think of that
were inherently good for our country was done by one party.
But again, FDR on hot wheels right spread communism in

(02:50:37):
this country.

Speaker 1 (02:50:38):
That was the beginning of it. Truly.

Speaker 2 (02:50:41):
Right after him, you had Eisenhower, who was a general
in World War Two, very.

Speaker 1 (02:50:46):
Much anti communist.

Speaker 2 (02:50:47):
But by that point FDR had sunk his hook so
deep with these social programs to try to get us
out of the Great Depression Bear. His answer to that
was communism. His answer to that was socialism and social
programs and welfare systems and all these things that were
just flooding tax dollars into no name projects. The Green
New Deal, the Big New Bill, all this well, not

(02:51:09):
the Green New Deal.

Speaker 1 (02:51:10):
That was my point is the big new bill, right,
all these things, the New Deal that he was going
on and on about was communist in nature, but a
lot of people of the American voting population didn't really
know about that at the time.

Speaker 2 (02:51:26):
Some of them have heard of communism and socialism, but
it wasn't that wasn't like a big stance to be
talked about over the dinner table. Only certain people of
the educated class even had heard of the Communist Manifesto,
let alone Carl Marx. But this was after Russia had
had their revolution. They were seeing the communism might work,

(02:51:46):
because it's going it seems to be going well in
Russia right now, never mind the fact that it was
absolutely the beginning of the end and full on despotism
had taken over.

Speaker 1 (02:51:57):
So you had mentioned about how now Trump is also
a part of this giant plan. Do you believe that
is there? I mean, is he just is he part
of it too? Or what's going on there? Again?

Speaker 2 (02:52:11):
I don't think he was his first term. I think
that he was the I want to say, the underdog
by any means, But nobody believed that he was going
to be taking over as far as that goes, then
he did.

Speaker 1 (02:52:24):
And that's just how that shook out.

Speaker 2 (02:52:27):
I think that at this time especially, Yeah, he's trying
to end the war, but he's not trying to topple
Putin right, No, he's trying to bring him to the deal.

Speaker 1 (02:52:35):
They just had a big meeting in Alaska. That whole shabam.
It's just it's a sign of the times, brother, it is.
It is good cult members out there. Let us know
what you think about all this. I mean, is this
just conspiratorial crazy jargon? Is you know? Or or are
the breadcrumbs actually there? And how far back do they extend?

(02:52:59):
And how far full to the extend in the future?
You know, let us know what you think if you want,
if you could go check us out on TikTok and
on we have YouTube clips and everything too. Cult of
Conspiracy Clips. I think it's called cock clips. I don't know.
Cooc clips don't actually type in cock like with a K. Yeah, yeah,

(02:53:20):
it's cock without the K or the chain of command,
whatever you want to call it. But we have it
all over the place. If you're trying to just you
don't have time to listen to every single episode. We
have clips of most of the episodes up on TikTok
on YouTube on Instagram. Go give us a follow over
there and you'll be able to keep up, you know,
with your regular one or two minute videos or something

(02:53:41):
like that. And also if you want to be able
to get the shows a couple of days in advance,
see all the video listen to a completely completely commercial
free As I said, come check out patreon dot com
slash Cult of Conspiracy podcast. But other than that, I
mean Jacob any parting word for you, sir.

Speaker 2 (02:53:56):
There is another way that you can help support the
show and support your own financial freedom. That would be
to go to the link in the description below to
cocsilver dot com to get your start in the buying
and selling and trading of gold and silver billion.

Speaker 1 (02:54:07):
If you want to invest a little bit, you want
to invest a lot of bit.

Speaker 2 (02:54:10):
Listen, talk to your financial advisor and ask them what
they think about it. Is precious metals a wise investment
for the future. I promise the answer is going to
be yes, at least in some portion. The best place
to get your start at this time would be again
to go to cocsilver dot com.

Speaker 1 (02:54:23):
Silver is a little bit over thirty six dollars an ounce.

Speaker 2 (02:54:25):
I think I looked at it today gold is still
over three thousand dollars an ounce those prices are only
going to go up forty years from now, fifty years
from now, maybe even in your children's lifetime, not yours.
You're gonna be thankful that you took the opportunity to
buy some while it was still affordable. Once again link
in the description below. But another way that you can
support the show, especially with this one. Tell us what
you think about the prayer stroika.

Speaker 1 (02:54:47):
Jesus, I'm gonna get this right, parastroika and let us
know what what parastroka deception? Thank you. Let us know
what you think about the parastroika deception is this is
completely off base?

Speaker 2 (02:55:01):
Is there at least a chromeb of truth to this?
Is it something that you have been able to witness
in your own lifetime? I know, I for sure have.
I know Jonathan has. But we want to hear from
you in the best place to do that would be
too Please hit the five stars. Hit the shares of
like suscribes to comments, they ale, post reviews, shares, sit
defensive family shares that We're here's the deal.

Speaker 1 (02:55:18):
The more activity the algorithm is across all of our
listening platforms, the more we get promoted to more potent
to listeners who could that become potential COLT members like
THEIRSTU Fine ladies and gentlemen, Why are you already? Go
check out Metamisteries Jonathan's other show and getting the same
level of respect with the five starbs and the positivity
in the comments. Come check out the caje to Night
and come join each of us for our individual patreons
that we host every Wednesdy Night at nine pm Central
links to those in the descriptions as well, and we

(02:55:39):
thank if everybody's already gone and done so, Oh the
little boy and you came out a little bit on
that last part, I did a drink, dude. That fucking
crackle there was not pleasant. Nice. Also, I do want
to say if you are absolutely fucked big Pharma all
the way to the grave, then go and check out
Real Rife Technology dot com. That link is down in
the show notes below. Use the promo code you'll get

(02:56:00):
ten percent off of the Rife Machines. The Rife machines
are staples in our houses and in our families houses.
We know that they absolutely work. It is crazy. Don't
know how it works. You can't see how it works,
but I can't see how Wi Fi works. I can't
see how cell towers work, but they just do. You
know what I'm saying. The real rife technology towers, the

(02:56:22):
machines themselves are fucking They are all the way middle Finger,
all the way up to big Pharma. If you want
to not have to take in a leave or an
asperin every time you get a headache, you don't want
to have to go and lay down because your back
hurts today. You want to be able to get rid
of whatever ailment or whether it be mental or physical,
it really doesn't matter. It helps all across the board

(02:56:45):
using natural frequencies that your body was designed to be
able to be healed with. Okay, these are real, actual,
like perfect, perfected technologies. So if you want to get
your Rife machine, go ahead and click the link down below.
Get ten percent off of that bad boy and put
it in your house, and you ain't ever got a dude.

(02:57:06):
It is. It's it's the best thing you could possibly
do for your entire family, So go and check it out.
There's a thirty day money bag guarantee.

Speaker 2 (02:57:12):
Also, if you cannot tell any effects by I promise
you'll be able to Within a month of using it
on a daily basis, you'll be able to see the.

Speaker 1 (02:57:18):
Effects, I promise you. But if you can't, we should
also mention there is a thirty day money bag guarantee.
It works so well you're going to think that it's
a coincidence that your migrain went away, because you're not
going to know how it just happened. It just absolutely so.
With that being said, this why is that another beautiful
episode of the Cult of Conspiracy? And my name is Jonathan,
I'm Jake, and there's one very important extreme we final

(02:57:40):
piece of information we needed to learn just as soon
as humanly possible. Hey, cult members, Jacob here just want

(02:58:24):
to ask who wants better sex? The best way to
get started is to go to Adam and eve dot
com Right now. Adim Eve is offering fifty percent off
just about any item, but that's not all. When you
get one item, they will also send three bonus sexy
items and six free movies. They offered a screet shipping
as your privacy is a priority. Plus free shipping on

(02:58:45):
your entire order doesn't matter how much you spend or
what you buy. All we packaged and sent discreetly for free.
That's fifty percent off one item and ten free gifts
to boot bring more pleasure and satisfaction into your bedroom.
Just go to Adam and Eve dot com and select
any one item. It could be an adventurous new toy
or anything you desire. Just enter the offer code CULT

(02:59:07):
at checkout and you'll get fifty percent off almost any item,
plus ten free gifts, three bonus items, six free movies,
and free shipping. Use the offer code CULT that's cult
at Adam and Eve dot com. Now, this is an
exclusive offer specific to this podcast, so be sure to
use this code to get you not just the discount
and the free goodies, but also the one hundred percent

(02:59:29):
free shipping with the code CULT

All Episodes

#888- Communisms Plan To Infiltrate The Modern World | The Perestroika Deception

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Stuff You Should Know

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}#888- Communisms Plan To Infiltrate The Modern World | The Perestroika Deception