Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
In a recent courtroom appearance, formerPresident Donald Trump expressed satisfaction with his testimony,
characterizing the case against him as ascam that should never have been initiated.
Trump confidently stated, I think itwent very well, referring to his
testimony, while suggesting that the assembledreporters had witnessed the farcical nature of the
(00:21):
case. According to Trump, thisis a case that should have never been
brought. It's a case that shouldbe dismissed, immediately asserting that the real
deception lay with the court itself,which he accused of being the true perpetrator
of fraud. During his time onthe stand, Trump also emphasized the results
(00:43):
of a recent New York Times aSiena survey which purportedly showed him leading President
Joe Biden in several key battleground states. Trump's attorney referenced these poll numbers during
the court proceedings. As Trump exitedthe courtroom, Attorney General Letitia James characterized
his testimony as a series of distractionsand insults, stating, today we heard
(01:07):
from Donald Trump. He rambled,he hurled insults, but we expected that.
James contended that the documentary evidence demonstratedTrump's false inflation of his assets for
personal gain. Looking ahead, Jamesexpressed her anticipation for Ivanka Trump's upcoming testimony
and indicated that her team planned toconclude their case after that. One of
(01:30):
Trump's attorneys, Alina Habba, tookissue with Judge Arthur and Goren's conduct during
the trial, calling him unhinged andaccusing him of preconceived notions about Trump's guilt.
Habba cited the judge's admonishment to Trump'slegal team to provide more concise answers
as evidence of bias. Habba voicedconcerns about the state of the country and
(01:53):
alleged corruption in courtrooms where attorneys aregagged, asserting the right to speak out
when something appears wrong. She alsocriticized James insinuating that the Attorney General was
using the trial to advance her ownreputation. During a break, Trump shared
(02:13):
Angeron's comment without context on his socialmedia platform Truth Social. Trump attempted to
read a document but was denied bythe judge, leading to an outburst in
which Trump accused Angron of ruling againsthim prematurely and labeling him a fraud.
Throughout the proceedings, the judge repeatedlycalled on Trump's lawyers to ensure their client
(02:35):
answered questions directly. Trump's legal teamssparred with the judge over the manner of
questioning, with Habbah arguing for moresuccinct inquiries. Angroon's firm warnings are significant
because the case primarily concerns monetary damages. If the judge deems Trump's testimony not
credible, as he did in aprior instance, he may impose substantial financial
(02:59):
penalties on true Trump and his company. Trump, clearly exasperated, remarked,
this is a very unfair trial.I hope the public is watching. In
this courtroom drama, it seems thatTrump's characteristic rants and confrontations have found their
way into the legal arena, markinga departure from his previously restrained behavior within
(03:22):
courtrooms. The judge's insistence on directanswers and control over the proceedings will play
a pivotal role in determining the outcomeof the case, which revolves around financial
penalties. Thanks for tuning into thislively discussion about the recent courtroom drama involving
former President Donald Trump. If youenjoyed this conversation, please consider subscribing for
(03:46):
more engaging content, and remember thispodcast is brought to you by Quiet.
Please stay tuned for more episodes,and until next time, stay curious,