Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Calaruga Shark Media. This is Eastwood reloaded. We followed Clint
Eastwood from spaghetti western star to contemporary icon to mature filmmaker.
Now we need to talk about the film that brought
everything full circle, The Western that ended westerns, the Gunfighter
(00:26):
movie that destroyed the myth of the gunfighter, The Clint
Eastwood film that deconstructed everything Clint Eastwood had ever represented. Unforgiven,
released in nineteen ninety two, winner of four Academy Awards,
including Best Picture and Best Director, the film that proved
Eastwood wasn't just a movie star, or even just a
(00:46):
skilled filmmaker, but an artist capable of examining and ultimately
rejecting the very myths that had made him famous. This
is episode five, nineteen ninety two Unforgiven. It was twenty
(01:08):
one years in the making. Eastwood had owned the script
since nineteen seventy six, waiting for the right time to
make it. He knew it would be his final Western,
his last word on the genre that had defined his career.
He also knew it had to be perfect, a summation
of everything he'd learned about violence, heroism, and the stories
we tell ourselves about both. Here's the Setup, eighteen eighty Wyoming.
(01:33):
William Money is a retired gunfighter trying to make a
living as a pig farmer. He's a widower with two
young children, struggling with poverty in his own violent past.
When a prostitute is disfigured by cowboys in the town
of Big Whiskey, her colleagues pool their money to offer
a reward for killing the men responsible. Money's former partner,
(01:53):
Ned Logan, and a young would be gunfighter called the
Schofield Kid, convince him to take the job. They need
the money. It should be simple work for men with
their skills. It isn't simple. Nothing about unforgiven is simple.
The town of Big Whiskey is controlled by Sheriff Little
Bill Daggett, who maintains order through brutal intimidation. He doesn't
(02:15):
allow guns in his town, and he enforces that rule
with savage beatings. When word spreads about the bounty on
the cowboys, other gunfighters arrive seeking the reward, Little Bill
destroys them systematically, publicly, as examples to anyone else who
might challenge his authority. Into this situation, rides William Money,
(02:37):
a man who was once perhaps the most dangerous killer
in the West, now twenty years removed from that life,
trying to convince himself he's become someone else. But, as
the film makes brutally clear, you don't stop being what
you were just because you want to. Eastwood had been
thinking about this story for decades. By nineteen ninety two,
(02:58):
he was sixty two years old, old enough to look
back on his career with perspective, old enough to question
the mythology he'd helped create. The Western had made him
a star, but he'd also seen how that mythology could
be dangerous, how the celebration of individual violence could justify
real world brutality. Unforgiven was his reckoning with that mythology.
(03:21):
It's a film about the costs of violence, told by
a man who had made his career celebrating violence. It's
a story about the impossibility of redemption, told by someone
who had spent decades playing redeemed characters. It's a Western
that systematically destroys every comforting lie the Western genre had
ever told. William Money is what happens to the Man
(03:44):
with No Name. Twenty years later, He's still competent, still dangerous,
but also broken by his past, haunted by the things
he's done, desperate to believe he's changed, even as evidence
mounts that he hasn't. Eastwood's performance is his most common,
complex and honest. Money isn't the cool, controlled gunfighter of
the spaghetti westerns. He's awkward on horseback, struggles with his rifle,
(04:09):
gets sick from drinking. Age and guilt have made him clumsy, uncertain,
almost pathetic. But underneath that decay, the old William Money
is still there, the killer, the force of pure destructive
competence that once terrorize the frontier, and when circumstances force
him to acknowledge that person, the results are catastrophic. The
(04:32):
film's treatment of violence is uncompromising. There are no clean deaths,
no noble gunfights, no moments where violence solves problems or
establishes justice. Every act of violence in the film is ugly,
messy and morally complicated. People die slowly and painfully. Survivors
are traumatized, Winners gain nothing meaningful from their victories. The
(04:56):
famous climax where Money enters the saloon to confront Little
Bill and his deputy is both the ultimate Western gunfight
and the complete destruction of the Western gunfight. Money kills
everyone efficiently and without emotion. But there's no satisfaction in it,
no sense of justice served. It's just an old killer
doing what old killers do, destroying everything in his path.
(05:18):
Gene Hackman's performance as Little Bill Daggett is equally complex.
He's the film's ostensible villain, but he's also trying to
bring order to a chaotic frontier town. His methods are brutal,
but they're effective. He's corrupt and violent, but he's also
competent and dedicated to his version of law and order.
In a traditional Western, the conflict between Money and Little
(05:41):
Bill would be a clear battle between good and evil.
In Unforgiven, it's a collision between two different kinds of
destructive force, two men whose approaches to violence have shaped
them into something barely human. The supporting characters are equally
well developed. Morgan Freeman's ned logan is a man trying
(06:01):
to hold on to friendship and decency in circumstances that
make both impossible. James Wolvet's Schofield Kid represents the young
men who are seduced by stories of gunfighter glory, only
to discover that the reality is unbearable. Most importantly, there's
Money's dead wife Claudia, who never appears in the film,
but whose presence drives the entire story. She represented the
(06:24):
possibility of redemption, the chance for Money to become someone
other than a killer. Her death removed that possibility, leaving
Money with nothing but his children and his rapidly failing
attempts to convince himself he's changed. As a director, Eastwood
showed complete mastery of the Western form while simultaneously deconstructing it.
(06:47):
The film looks like a traditional Western. The landscapes are beautiful,
the period details are authentic. The compositions echo john Ford
and Howard Hawks, but every familiar element is used to subvert,
rather than support, the genre's typical messages. The famous final text,
William Money had long since disappeared with the children, some
(07:09):
said to San Francisco, where it was rumored he prospered
in dry Goods, is both a traditional Western ending and
a complete rejection of traditional Western endings. Money doesn't ride
into the sunset as a hero. He disappears into mundane
civilian life, carrying his crimes with him, prospering through commerce
(07:30):
rather than violence. It's an ending that acknowledges the impossibility
of true redemption. While holding out the slightest possibility that
even irredeemable people can find ways to live with what
they've done. The film's reception was extraordinary. Critics recognized it
as a masterpiece, audiences embraced it, and the Academy gave
(07:50):
it four Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director for Eastwood.
But more importantly, it was recognized as the definitive statement
on the Western genre, the film that said everything there
was to say about American mythology, frontier violence, and the
stories we tell ourselves about both. Unforgiven didn't just end
(08:11):
Eastwood's career as a Western actor, it ended the Western
genre itself, at least as a commercially viable form. There
have been westerns since nineteen ninety two, some of them
quite good, but none of them have been able to
recapture the genre's cultural centrality. Unforgiven said everything that needed
to be said, asked every question that needed to be asked,
(08:33):
and provided answers that were too honest for the genre
to survive. Let's take a break here. When we come back,
we'll talk about what Unforgiven meant for Eastwood's career, how
it influenced his later work, and why It's unflinching examination
of violence and heroism remains relevant thirty years later. Back
(09:00):
Unforgiven represented the end of one chapter in Eastwood's career
and the beginning of another. After nineteen ninety two, he
would never again play a character defined primarily by his
competence with violence. The film had exhausted that possibility, examined
it so thoroughly that there was nothing left to explore. Instead,
Eastwood's later roles would focus on other kinds of characters,
(09:23):
aging boxers, grieving fathers, Korean War veterans, aging baseball scouts,
men defined not by their capacity for violence, but by
their attempts to find meaning in the aftermath of violence, success, failure,
or simply the passage of time. That shift reflected Eastwood's
own aging, but also his growing sophistication as an artist.
(09:46):
He had spent thirty years exploring variations on the strong,
silent type. Unforgiven showed him and his audience that he
could do more than that, that he could use his
screen persona to examine deeper questions of masculinity, aging, and
moral responsibility. The film's success also established Eastwood as a
(10:06):
serious filmmaker whose work deserved to be taken seriously by
critics and scholars. He had been making good films for
twenty years, but Unforgiven was the first that was immediately
recognized as a masterpiece, as a work of art rather
than just skilled entertainment. That recognition gave him the freedom
to take even bigger risk with his later films. He
(10:27):
could make a film like Million Dollar Baby, which combined
boxing movie conventions with a meditation on euthanasia and the
limits of human connection. He could make Mystic River, a
crime drama that was really about the long term effects
of childhood trauma. He could make Grand Tarino, which used
his screen persona to examine racism, immigration, and intergenerational conflict.
(10:52):
All of these films built on techniques and themes that
Eastwood had developed, and Unforgiven the use of genre conventions
to a explore serious themes. The focus on aging men
confronting their past the understanding that redemption is possible, but
never simple or complete. But Unforgiven was also important for
what it said about American mythology more broadly. The Western
(11:14):
had always been America's foundational genre, the source of stories
about individualism, frontier violence, and the relationship between civilization and wilderness.
By systematically deconstructing those stories, Unforgiven forced audiences to confront
uncomfortable truths about American history and American values. The film
(11:36):
appeared at a moment when America was beginning to reckon
with its own violent history, the genocide of Native Americans,
the legacy of slavery, the costs of military intervention abroad.
Unforgiven didn't address these issues directly, but it created a
framework for thinking about them, a way of understanding how
violence shapes both individuals and societies. The film's treatment of
(12:01):
heroism was particularly influential. Traditional westerns presented heroes as men
who used violence to establish justice, who were ennobled rather
than corrupted, by their willingness to kill. Unforgiven showed that
violence corrupts everyone it touches, that heroism based on superior
firepower is no heroism at all. That insight would become
(12:22):
central to discussions of American foreign policy, police violence, and
military intervention. The film didn't provide answers to these complex issues,
but it provided a way of thinking about them that
was more honest and more morally sophisticated than the traditional
Western mythology. The film's influence on other filmmakers was immediate
(12:42):
and lasting. Directors like Paul Thomas Anderson, the Cohen Brothers,
and Christopher Nolan all cited Unforgiven as an influence, particularly
its technique of using genre conventions while simultaneously subverting them.
But perhaps more importantly, Unforgiven established a new template for
how aging movie stars could handle the later stages of
(13:02):
their careers. Instead of simply repeating their earlier successes or
gracefully retiring, they could use their established personas to explore deeper,
more complex themes. You can see this approach in later
work by actors like Robert de Niro, Al Pacino, and
even younger stars who have learned from Eastwood's example. The
(13:22):
idea that established screen personas can be used as raw
material for more sophisticated artistic exploration has become commonplace, but
Eastwood pioneered it with Unforgiven. The film's technical achievements were
also significant. Jack Green's cinematography created a visual style that
was both beautiful and unsettling, using the traditional Western landscape
(13:46):
to evoke moral ambiguity rather than clear cut conflict between
good and evil. Joel Cox's editing maintained perfect pacing throughout
a film that moved between quiet character moments and explosive violence.
Most importantly, Eastwood's direction showed complete confidence and maturity. He
knew exactly what story he wanted to tell and exactly
(14:08):
how to tell it. There are no wasted scenes, no
false notes, no moments where the film's artistic ambitions exceed
its emotional truth. That confidence came from decades of experience,
but also from Eastwood's willingness to wait until he was
ready to make the film. He could have made Unforgiven
in nineteen seventy six when he first acquired the script,
(14:29):
but it wouldn't have been the same film. He needed
twenty years of life experience, twenty years of thinking about
violence and heroism, twenty years of aging and reflection to
make the film that Unforgiven became that patience. The willingness
to wait for the right moment rather than rushing into
production became another Eastwood trademark. His later films were all
(14:51):
projects he had been thinking about for years, stories that
had been developing in his mind until they were ready
to be told. The film's examination of frends was also significant.
The relationship between money and ned Logan represented a kind
of male friendship that movies rarely explored, intimate, without being sexual, supportive,
(15:12):
without being sentimental, based on shared experience rather than shared interests.
Their friendship is ultimately destroyed by the violence they choose
to participate in, but while it lasts, it provides both
men with something essential, understanding, acceptance, and connection to someone
who knows exactly who they are and what they've done.
(15:33):
That theme, the way violence destroys the relationships that make
life meaningful, would recur in many of Eastwood's later films.
It's a more subtle and more devastating critique of violence
than simple moral condemnation, because it shows how violence corrupts
not just individuals, but the bonds between individuals. For audiences,
(15:54):
Unforgiven offered a different kind of satisfaction than traditional westerns.
Instead of the simple pleasure of watching good triumph over evil,
it offered the more complex satisfaction of seeing familiar myths
examined honestly, of having comfortable lies replaced with uncomfortable truths.
That kind of satisfaction, intellectual and emotional rather than just visceral,
(16:16):
would become characteristic of Eastwood's later work as a director.
His films asked audiences to think as well as feel,
to question as well as accept, to confront rather than escape.
The film's legacy is still being written. Every serious Western
maide since nineteen ninety two has had to deal with
what Unforgiven accomplished, has had to find ways to justify
(16:39):
the genre's existence in the face of Eastwood's definitive deconstruction.
Some have tried to return to traditional Western myths, pretending
that Unforgiven never happened. Others have tried to build on
Eastwood's insights, finding new ways to explore the relationship between
violence and civilization, but none have match the film's combination
(17:01):
of artistic ambition and popular appeal. Next time on Eastwood Reloaded,
we'll look at how Eastwood applied everything he learned from
Unforgiven to a completely different genre, the boxing film Million
Dollar Baby, the movie that proved he could bring the
same level of artistic sophistication to contemporary stories that he
(17:23):
had brought to Western mythology. But for now, remember this
Unforgiven wasn't just the end of Clint Eastwood's career as
a Western star. It was the beginning of his career
as an artist who could use popular forms to explore
the deepest questions about how we live, what we believe,
and why we tell ourselves the stories we tell. Everything
(17:43):
he accomplished afterward built on the foundation of honesty and
moral complexity that he established in this film. Eastwood Reloaded
is a production of Calaroga Shark Media Executive producers John
mc dermott and Mark Francis Ai. Assistants may have been
used in this production.