Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
Hello, everyone, welcome to Echo are today. We're scenario for
me today. Right in my background, I'm in my car
waiting to meet with a client, So I got thirty
minutes to kill. Had to make a quick episode that
I've been trying to record for days now. And well
(00:29):
information everything is going to be happening today within the
Supreme Court making some decisions.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
That definitely will alter how life can or ok, how
life will go on.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
From birth that right citizenship, which is a big deal
to the rest of it.
Speaker 2 (00:51):
So let's say.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
Many of you have very smart people who can understand
and process this information with no problem. My brain doesn't
do that. I need to have it, I guess dumped
down or water down, just because it makes it easier
for my brain to consume words like injunction.
Speaker 3 (01:21):
Or Adjournman, Just what do they mean?
Speaker 2 (01:31):
Right, A decision postponing.
Speaker 4 (01:34):
So I prefer to just a simple words like a decision
instead of and injunction, and like postpone instead of adjourn.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
And I only say that because in my field, I've
learned as the most neutral language is usually the best.
And so I've also noticed that we all have noticed
when the other side says, well, he says it.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
Like it is. It's just pullsitting you.
Speaker 5 (02:05):
But he says it in a way that you like it.
It feels like he's down to a level. He's not
trying to be something that he's not winning. Totally opposite,
he's trying to be something that he's not.
Speaker 1 (02:18):
So I asked chat jupety to help me understand the
sixth is it not understand, but to help me explain
to me the sixth decisions.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
Of the Supreme Court today?
Speaker 1 (02:29):
And I asked it to be just straight up, no bs,
no holdbacks, don't say who in day and some people
and some just name who what when, And so he says, okay,
got a run, no fluff breakdown of the six Supreme
Court decisions coming today June twenty seven five. This version,
(02:50):
name's name, goes out who's trying to do what to
whom and makes it digestible without warning it down. Think
of this as a clear eight street level take of
people who want the truth with no legal FuG or
sugar coating. So, first one Trump birthright citizenship? Can the
court stop him?
Speaker 2 (03:12):
This one?
Speaker 1 (03:13):
You know, Trump, if you're an executive vorder trying to
end the automatics citizenship for kids born in the US
if their parents are undocumented. Now, those are ones to
go into more detail. Every single one of these ones
has to be gotten more into detail, because if I
am not wrong, that also require our belief that at
(03:34):
one point they were pushing for it. The person to
be a citizen, even if you are a resident or something,
there were you know.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
Plans to if they could apply now and apply later.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
Where if you're not a citizen but you're a resident
or something like that, then you still won't be able
to your kids won't be able to be full sized
at full right citizenships. It also matters because he challenges
the fourteen Amendment, which is being born in the US
soil equals you're being a citizen unless certain exceptions, like
(04:06):
if there's a diplomat and they have a family here
because they are technically still everything under the other country
allegiance work everything.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
They're only here because they have to basically, not because
they want to.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
Or you know, somebody born to one of spies or
people who wants to basically know real allegiance to the US,
but anybody else citizen like immigrants citizen. Now it also
affects because of how the judge blocks trumpsorder for the
(04:42):
entire country via nationwide injunctions or court orders, or Trump
will get his way in possibly advertized citizenship. Now with
the whole whether our judgement send out a map or
an order and then be able to say that only
(05:03):
applies locally, Like that makes no sense. And maybe I'm
missing something because of my own stupidity, But I need
to make sure that I reach out to somebody who
knows more about it. Maybe, I mean, I don't think
I'll find an expertose somebody who has more knowledge about
it to explain it to me, because it makes no
(05:23):
sense to me that you will tell the judge that
they don't have the power, Like where is the checks
and balance?
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Then if the judge can say to the president.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
No, or I mean, because usually they just stop it
so that somebody else higher can review it, or so
that they can review it and go through the process itself.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
So now we're going to go through the process.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Well, like right now people are now allowed to be
sent to third world countries or third party countries. I mean,
can you imagine yourself, you whoever's listening to this, you
wake up going to do whatever it is that you're
(06:07):
going to do and suddenly you get pullover. You got
a whole bunch of people kidnapping you because you don't
know if they're real cops. We're all taught and it's
ingrained on our head to do us whole and we do.
But we are also in grainde the officers will be
able to identify themselves and we'll be able to go
(06:31):
by the law because when they don't, I'm just back
in Venezuela. That's what happened over there all the time.
Cops can just pull you over, you know. The only
thing to say from in Venezuela, it was my dad
used to be a low level judge, but just having
the title judge where the cops keep in line and
(06:56):
I wasn't really doing anything but just driving around. So
it's the kind of situation where does this Where does
it stop? Because once I can get away with one,
I'm going to keep pushing to get more.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
And so.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
That's in my opinion, two decisions being made into one.
Parents versus LGBTQ plus books to families have the right
to upt out Muslims and Christians.
Speaker 2 (07:32):
Parents in Montgomery County, Maryland versus the school board local
school board. Schools introduced books.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
Like Bride, Puppy and Uncle Bobby Is Wedding the show
All GBT plus Q plus families parents as and parents
ask to pull their kids from these lessons. The schools
set no exceptions. It matters because this is a fight
about religion freedom versus inclusion. The court will decide whether
schools can force kids to read alg take you content
(08:01):
even if it goes against their family believes, or whether
parents will have a say in whether kids are taught.
Speaker 2 (08:07):
That's a simple one to me.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
The parents, you have the decision, not because of anti
gay or pro religion or pro gay anti religion. It's
more because of your own personal decision. Nobody else will
be telling you. It's like if you are trying to
tell me that my kid will have to have and
go through the Tent Commandments every morning. Because when I Sea,
(08:33):
we did the coledge of religions. We are extremely, extremely Catholics,
Roman Catholics. My entire family, Oh my god, that's the
main thing all around the country. So we had Catechism
classes in school. They taught them in the school, but
(08:55):
I was too prepare to go take the communion because
this Outjact Catholic place. But if I'm not wrong, that
was du an option because you have other kids about
the religions that didn't. But obviously it was like one
of one hundred that would be in a different religion.
But that's just a random number, but pretty much real
(09:19):
I never really met in my neighborhood somebody who wasn't Catholic,
just like that. I mean, my mom, I'm talking to neighborhood.
The town itself, there were like very very like five
six people, you know, they were Jewish, They were like
a few dozen Jehovah witnesses. There were plenty of evangelists,
(09:45):
but I would say ninety or eighty percent Catholic. So
those divisions, those you cannot just be forcing people to
like your view. You can explain it, you can support it,
(10:07):
you can show it, and that's the freedom and that's the.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
Right to be able to talk about it.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
You cannot force somebody else to listen to it. So
I don't agree with the school saying that is mandatory
for everyone, because then we should when everybody else goes
and started teaching something else that they don't like. Now
they're going to try to change the law to make
it you know, optional.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
So.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
Parents should decide three Louisiana black voters versus the GOP.
And it's a new voting map fair the Louisiana state government,
which is Republican led versus the civil rights advocating black voters,
and a new congressional map was created with two majority
black districts after court said that they all map.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
Deluted black votes.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Right matters because Republicans say that the new map is
racial remadering, mandering.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
To focus on race.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
Civil groups, civil rights groups say it finally gives black
community a real voice. Now, if the Supreme Court side
with Republicans, black voters in Louisiana could lose representation if
they just came. Why this matters because it is crazy
how they complain of jerry mandering.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
By somebody else.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
When they're the ones that are always doing it and
making sure that they can tie up the screwis on
it even more.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
You don't want to have the problem.
Speaker 1 (11:32):
What don't you do, like Schwarzenegger and many others have
champion for many years, eliminate it altogether.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
How about that?
Speaker 1 (11:41):
And that's a conversation that they're not ready to have
because it will give everybody else a fair shot or
a fair shot.
Speaker 2 (11:49):
They're not ready for that. Four.
Speaker 1 (11:53):
Texas versus porn viewers, should you show idea to watch
sex online?
Speaker 2 (12:00):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (12:00):
I'm not even gonna go into the rest of it
right now, but yeah, because you should be able to
verify who the hell is watching it. Texas Attorney General
came Paxston versus rich speech correlation, Adult industry group.
Speaker 2 (12:15):
What's happening?
Speaker 1 (12:16):
Texas pass the law saying you must upload an IDA
to access adult websites.
Speaker 2 (12:21):
Upload. That's a whole different story. Why it matters.
Speaker 1 (12:26):
The porn industry says that this put people at risk
of hacking, stocking and government hacking. Texas that he must
protect kids from online porn. Fuck off, what's a stake?
If Texas wins, millions of adults may have to give
up privacy just to view the legal contact. If Texas
loses Tate, my loose power to regulate the internet like this,
I'm sorry the freedom of speech. People that don't trade
(12:49):
on me. People they get off my back. People wants
to have your ID for you to watch porn? Are
you kidding me? Not seeing the news lately in the
past several months and years, how most child predators that
come out out of the political parties are usually Republicans.
(13:10):
Matt Gates nothing, the last couple of ones lately nothing.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
Okay, so.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
Texas, no Texas, just my guy and all of you experiments.
Let me ask you, this isn't it? Maybe a chance
the talking openly and honestly about life with your kids
may preparing better than trying to hide everything away from
them and make sure that we don't talk about it,
because that way, God knows what could happen if you're
(13:44):
informed and make decisions bank somewhat you think is best
for you by the knowledge I gave in you, the
assisting you to grow in life and learn what's good
what's bad.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
No, you guys want control. You do what I say
when I say, do as I told, not as I do.
Speaker 6 (14:00):
Yeah, it's incredible because you guys keep saying that you
all the freedom fighters and whatever the hell do you
like to call yourself.
Speaker 1 (14:13):
But Jesus Christ, your freedom is not. It's just some
who can get some stuff. The rest of them it's
just screwed. Like this is gonna be as bad as
this is gonna be as bad for Texas as Uh.
(14:39):
Some like the bootleggers and prohibition because you know that
Texas love then so and if they're start messing without,
what's gonna happen with the strip clubs? Now number five
(15:00):
US employers versus Obamacare, and they refuse preventive care. Both
Christians owners like Brainwood, Bredwood Management versus.
Speaker 2 (15:09):
The US.
Speaker 1 (15:12):
And this employer say that they shouldn't have to cover
things like HIV prevention, cancer screening, and birth control because
the task force making them rules wasn't confirmed by the
Senate and doesn't reflect the religious values. They are trying
to undermine the Fulable Clear Act by attacking how it
mandates free care and if the courts agree, million of
(15:34):
people can lose has access to free health screening for
things like breast cancer, HIV and more. Now I'm sorry,
why again, are you trying to force your religious views
on me? So you see, imagine if it wasn't a
Christian values. Imagine if it would be more of Jehovah's
witness values they were trying to implement. And Jehovah's witnesses
(15:56):
they don't believe in transfer like transplants or blood transfusion
or anything like that. So are we going to force
everybody else to die because we refuse to get a
blood transfusion or a transplant or anything like that.
Speaker 2 (16:13):
Right, they're not forcing that on us.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
You agree to that if you join the religion, so
it should be a free will thing.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
Just my opinion. You know.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
Never mind for the people who say to care about
health in pro life, let's just talk about pro life
pro life.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
I want you to have a life. Well, that implies.
Speaker 1 (16:38):
Being able to give to somebody else's skid what we
give ourselves if they can't provide it. Have a safety
net for those kids who doesn't have the ability or
the ways to receive what other kids get for granted.
Oh no, that's their parents problem. Well, then you're not
pro life. You're pro birth. Talk about and being given birth,
(17:02):
you don't care about what happens to it afterwards. That's
not pro life pro life. It's taking care of them
throughout the life and the moments that are needed. Doesn't
mean that you pay up and do everything for them
for their entire life.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
It does mean that you.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Prepare them for life. You've given the knowledge, the tools,
and the resources to be able to when they grow
up be a good member of society, productive member, of society,
it reduces crime, impro improves increases performance and how the
country does so. Yeah, and then right wing groups and
(17:40):
the SEC who should control the internet? Subsidies, conservatives, organizations,
consumers research, and the Federal Communications at The SEC runs
a nine billion programs to help low income people pay
for inn and phone bills, especially en Role Area. Critics
say the secm private companies like USAC, which administers the
(18:03):
phone acting with our real congressional oversights.
Speaker 2 (18:06):
They say it matters because it's part of a bigger
push to.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Shrink the government power and questioning agencies like the SEC
should exist on their current form. What's at stake is
that if the courts limit the SCC million of Americans
who use access to affordable internet, especially in rural areas.
This is a lot of the new rate red states
because us in blue states, even if it gets taken away,
(18:31):
we get representative in governments.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
They usually would provide it for us anyway or in
some way or another. One.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
You guys getting lost completely because you usually get revenue from.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
US to be able to do so. So why is
the matter because you might be getting a cheap price.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
My mom's electricity just went up thirty fifty dollars a
month because of a subsidy going away. My mom is
seventy five. She works Monday through Friday. She starts as
six six thirty six o'clock in the morning as a
mold cleaner, and then it's at two thirty in the afternoon.
So she can't spend any time with grandkids or anybody
(19:11):
because she's working. And when she's not working, her body
doesn't want to do a damn thing.
Speaker 2 (19:15):
Everything hurts so badly.
Speaker 1 (19:18):
So now you're gonna make them pay more and take
those subsidies away from people that are already on a
limit on a budget, and that will allow them to
not be connected, to not be informed, for them to
be able to continue to do in all the dirty
shat their doing.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
So Yeah, basically.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
Trump wants or to end Perth certificate and we'll see
if the course will stop them. Parents are fighting schools
for the fight to keep their children out of LGBTQ
story time.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
I'm calling more.
Speaker 1 (19:53):
Parents are fighting to have a choice on what the
kids in certain things.
Speaker 2 (20:00):
Geography. You gotta learn it.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
Black voters in Louisiana may lose new voting power they
just got if Republicans get their way. Texas once id
online before you can legally watch porn. Extreme overreach, religious
business owner want to kill part ofs of Obamacare. Hey,
they all got extremely great benefits and healthcare pay for us.
(20:23):
Why should why should we? Conservative groups are trying to
gut the FCC. We could cut off internet aid for
lower income folks. And never mind that if you also
remove the FCC, who is going to be controlling some
of these things they you know, shouldn't be said. So
some of the you know, be proper being you know, eloquent,
(20:47):
not saying they're bad things such and so.
Speaker 2 (20:50):
Anyway, everyone have a great day.
Hello, everyone, welcome to Echo are today. We're scenario for
me today. Right in my background, I'm in my car
waiting to meet with a client, So I got thirty
minutes to kill. Had to make a quick episode that
I've been trying to record for days now. And well
(00:29):
information everything is going to be happening today within the
Supreme Court making some decisions.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
That definitely will alter how life can or ok, how
life will go on.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
From birth that right citizenship, which is a big deal
to the rest of it.
Speaker 2 (00:51):
So let's say.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
Many of you have very smart people who can understand
and process this information with no problem. My brain doesn't
do that. I need to have it, I guess dumped
down or water down, just because it makes it easier
for my brain to consume words like injunction.
Speaker 3 (01:21):
Or Adjournman, Just what do they mean?
Speaker 2 (01:31):
Right, A decision postponing.
Speaker 4 (01:34):
So I prefer to just a simple words like a decision
instead of and injunction, and like postpone instead of adjourn.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
And I only say that because in my field, I've
learned as the most neutral language is usually the best.
And so I've also noticed that we all have noticed
when the other side says, well, he says it.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
Like it is. It's just pullsitting you.
Speaker 5 (02:05):
But he says it in a way that you like it.
It feels like he's down to a level. He's not
trying to be something that he's not winning. Totally opposite,
he's trying to be something that he's not.
Speaker 1 (02:18):
So I asked chat jupety to help me understand the
sixth is it not understand, but to help me explain
to me the sixth decisions.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
Of the Supreme Court today?
Speaker 1 (02:29):
And I asked it to be just straight up, no bs,
no holdbacks, don't say who in day and some people
and some just name who what when, And so he says, okay,
got a run, no fluff breakdown of the six Supreme
Court decisions coming today June twenty seven five. This version,
(02:50):
name's name, goes out who's trying to do what to
whom and makes it digestible without warning it down. Think
of this as a clear eight street level take of
people who want the truth with no legal FuG or
sugar coating. So, first one Trump birthright citizenship? Can the
court stop him?
Speaker 2 (03:12):
This one?
Speaker 1 (03:13):
You know, Trump, if you're an executive vorder trying to
end the automatics citizenship for kids born in the US
if their parents are undocumented. Now, those are ones to
go into more detail. Every single one of these ones
has to be gotten more into detail, because if I
am not wrong, that also require our belief that at
(03:34):
one point they were pushing for it. The person to
be a citizen, even if you are a resident or something,
there were you know.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
Plans to if they could apply now and apply later.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
Where if you're not a citizen but you're a resident
or something like that, then you still won't be able
to your kids won't be able to be full sized
at full right citizenships. It also matters because he challenges
the fourteen Amendment, which is being born in the US
soil equals you're being a citizen unless certain exceptions, like
(04:06):
if there's a diplomat and they have a family here
because they are technically still everything under the other country
allegiance work everything.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
They're only here because they have to basically, not because
they want to.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
Or you know, somebody born to one of spies or
people who wants to basically know real allegiance to the US,
but anybody else citizen like immigrants citizen. Now it also
affects because of how the judge blocks trumpsorder for the
(04:42):
entire country via nationwide injunctions or court orders, or Trump
will get his way in possibly advertized citizenship. Now with
the whole whether our judgement send out a map or
an order and then be able to say that only
(05:03):
applies locally, Like that makes no sense. And maybe I'm
missing something because of my own stupidity, But I need
to make sure that I reach out to somebody who
knows more about it. Maybe, I mean, I don't think
I'll find an expertose somebody who has more knowledge about
it to explain it to me, because it makes no
(05:23):
sense to me that you will tell the judge that
they don't have the power, Like where is the checks
and balance?
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Then if the judge can say to the president.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
No, or I mean, because usually they just stop it
so that somebody else higher can review it, or so
that they can review it and go through the process itself.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
So now we're going to go through the process.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Well, like right now people are now allowed to be
sent to third world countries or third party countries. I mean,
can you imagine yourself, you whoever's listening to this, you
wake up going to do whatever it is that you're
(06:07):
going to do and suddenly you get pullover. You got
a whole bunch of people kidnapping you because you don't
know if they're real cops. We're all taught and it's
ingrained on our head to do us whole and we do.
But we are also in grainde the officers will be
able to identify themselves and we'll be able to go
(06:31):
by the law because when they don't, I'm just back
in Venezuela. That's what happened over there all the time.
Cops can just pull you over, you know. The only
thing to say from in Venezuela, it was my dad
used to be a low level judge, but just having
the title judge where the cops keep in line and
(06:56):
I wasn't really doing anything but just driving around. So
it's the kind of situation where does this Where does
it stop? Because once I can get away with one,
I'm going to keep pushing to get more.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
And so.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
That's in my opinion, two decisions being made into one.
Parents versus LGBTQ plus books to families have the right
to upt out Muslims and Christians.
Speaker 2 (07:32):
Parents in Montgomery County, Maryland versus the school board local
school board. Schools introduced books.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
Like Bride, Puppy and Uncle Bobby Is Wedding the show
All GBT plus Q plus families parents as and parents
ask to pull their kids from these lessons. The schools
set no exceptions. It matters because this is a fight
about religion freedom versus inclusion. The court will decide whether
schools can force kids to read alg take you content
(08:01):
even if it goes against their family believes, or whether
parents will have a say in whether kids are taught.
Speaker 2 (08:07):
That's a simple one to me.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
The parents, you have the decision, not because of anti
gay or pro religion or pro gay anti religion. It's
more because of your own personal decision. Nobody else will
be telling you. It's like if you are trying to
tell me that my kid will have to have and
go through the Tent Commandments every morning. Because when I Sea,
(08:33):
we did the coledge of religions. We are extremely, extremely Catholics,
Roman Catholics. My entire family, Oh my god, that's the
main thing all around the country. So we had Catechism
classes in school. They taught them in the school, but
(08:55):
I was too prepare to go take the communion because
this Outjact Catholic place. But if I'm not wrong, that
was du an option because you have other kids about
the religions that didn't. But obviously it was like one
of one hundred that would be in a different religion.
But that's just a random number, but pretty much real
(09:19):
I never really met in my neighborhood somebody who wasn't Catholic,
just like that. I mean, my mom, I'm talking to neighborhood.
The town itself, there were like very very like five
six people, you know, they were Jewish, They were like
a few dozen Jehovah witnesses. There were plenty of evangelists,
(09:45):
but I would say ninety or eighty percent Catholic. So
those divisions, those you cannot just be forcing people to
like your view. You can explain it, you can support it,
(10:07):
you can show it, and that's the freedom and that's the.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
Right to be able to talk about it.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
You cannot force somebody else to listen to it. So
I don't agree with the school saying that is mandatory
for everyone, because then we should when everybody else goes
and started teaching something else that they don't like. Now
they're going to try to change the law to make
it you know, optional.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
So.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
Parents should decide three Louisiana black voters versus the GOP.
And it's a new voting map fair the Louisiana state government,
which is Republican led versus the civil rights advocating black voters,
and a new congressional map was created with two majority
black districts after court said that they all map.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
Deluted black votes.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Right matters because Republicans say that the new map is
racial remadering, mandering.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
To focus on race.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
Civil groups, civil rights groups say it finally gives black
community a real voice. Now, if the Supreme Court side
with Republicans, black voters in Louisiana could lose representation if
they just came. Why this matters because it is crazy
how they complain of jerry mandering.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
By somebody else.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
When they're the ones that are always doing it and
making sure that they can tie up the screwis on
it even more.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
You don't want to have the problem.
Speaker 1 (11:32):
What don't you do, like Schwarzenegger and many others have
champion for many years, eliminate it altogether.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
How about that?
Speaker 1 (11:41):
And that's a conversation that they're not ready to have
because it will give everybody else a fair shot or
a fair shot.
Speaker 2 (11:49):
They're not ready for that. Four.
Speaker 1 (11:53):
Texas versus porn viewers, should you show idea to watch
sex online?
Speaker 2 (12:00):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (12:00):
I'm not even gonna go into the rest of it
right now, but yeah, because you should be able to
verify who the hell is watching it. Texas Attorney General
came Paxston versus rich speech correlation, Adult industry group.
Speaker 2 (12:15):
What's happening?
Speaker 1 (12:16):
Texas pass the law saying you must upload an IDA
to access adult websites.
Speaker 2 (12:21):
Upload. That's a whole different story. Why it matters.
Speaker 1 (12:26):
The porn industry says that this put people at risk
of hacking, stocking and government hacking. Texas that he must
protect kids from online porn. Fuck off, what's a stake?
If Texas wins, millions of adults may have to give
up privacy just to view the legal contact. If Texas
loses Tate, my loose power to regulate the internet like this,
I'm sorry the freedom of speech. People that don't trade
(12:49):
on me. People they get off my back. People wants
to have your ID for you to watch porn? Are
you kidding me? Not seeing the news lately in the
past several months and years, how most child predators that
come out out of the political parties are usually Republicans.
(13:10):
Matt Gates nothing, the last couple of ones lately nothing.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
Okay, so.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
Texas, no Texas, just my guy and all of you experiments.
Let me ask you, this isn't it? Maybe a chance
the talking openly and honestly about life with your kids
may preparing better than trying to hide everything away from
them and make sure that we don't talk about it,
because that way, God knows what could happen if you're
(13:44):
informed and make decisions bank somewhat you think is best
for you by the knowledge I gave in you, the
assisting you to grow in life and learn what's good
what's bad.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
No, you guys want control. You do what I say
when I say, do as I told, not as I do.
Speaker 6 (14:00):
Yeah, it's incredible because you guys keep saying that you
all the freedom fighters and whatever the hell do you
like to call yourself.
Speaker 1 (14:13):
But Jesus Christ, your freedom is not. It's just some
who can get some stuff. The rest of them it's
just screwed. Like this is gonna be as bad as
this is gonna be as bad for Texas as Uh.
(14:39):
Some like the bootleggers and prohibition because you know that
Texas love then so and if they're start messing without,
what's gonna happen with the strip clubs? Now number five
(15:00):
US employers versus Obamacare, and they refuse preventive care. Both
Christians owners like Brainwood, Bredwood Management versus.
Speaker 2 (15:09):
The US.
Speaker 1 (15:12):
And this employer say that they shouldn't have to cover
things like HIV prevention, cancer screening, and birth control because
the task force making them rules wasn't confirmed by the
Senate and doesn't reflect the religious values. They are trying
to undermine the Fulable Clear Act by attacking how it
mandates free care and if the courts agree, million of
(15:34):
people can lose has access to free health screening for
things like breast cancer, HIV and more. Now I'm sorry,
why again, are you trying to force your religious views
on me? So you see, imagine if it wasn't a
Christian values. Imagine if it would be more of Jehovah's
witness values they were trying to implement. And Jehovah's witnesses
(15:56):
they don't believe in transfer like transplants or blood transfusion
or anything like that. So are we going to force
everybody else to die because we refuse to get a
blood transfusion or a transplant or anything like that.
Speaker 2 (16:13):
Right, they're not forcing that on us.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
You agree to that if you join the religion, so
it should be a free will thing.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
Just my opinion. You know.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
Never mind for the people who say to care about
health in pro life, let's just talk about pro life
pro life.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
I want you to have a life. Well, that implies.
Speaker 1 (16:38):
Being able to give to somebody else's skid what we
give ourselves if they can't provide it. Have a safety
net for those kids who doesn't have the ability or
the ways to receive what other kids get for granted.
Oh no, that's their parents problem. Well, then you're not
pro life. You're pro birth. Talk about and being given birth,
(17:02):
you don't care about what happens to it afterwards. That's
not pro life pro life. It's taking care of them
throughout the life and the moments that are needed. Doesn't
mean that you pay up and do everything for them
for their entire life.
Speaker 2 (17:15):
It does mean that you.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Prepare them for life. You've given the knowledge, the tools,
and the resources to be able to when they grow
up be a good member of society, productive member, of society,
it reduces crime, impro improves increases performance and how the
country does so. Yeah, and then right wing groups and
(17:40):
the SEC who should control the internet? Subsidies, conservatives, organizations,
consumers research, and the Federal Communications at The SEC runs
a nine billion programs to help low income people pay
for inn and phone bills, especially en Role Area. Critics
say the secm private companies like USAC, which administers the
(18:03):
phone acting with our real congressional oversights.
Speaker 2 (18:06):
They say it matters because it's part of a bigger
push to.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Shrink the government power and questioning agencies like the SEC
should exist on their current form. What's at stake is
that if the courts limit the SCC million of Americans
who use access to affordable internet, especially in rural areas.
This is a lot of the new rate red states
because us in blue states, even if it gets taken away,
(18:31):
we get representative in governments.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
They usually would provide it for us anyway or in
some way or another. One.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
You guys getting lost completely because you usually get revenue from.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
US to be able to do so. So why is
the matter because you might be getting a cheap price.
Speaker 1 (18:48):
My mom's electricity just went up thirty fifty dollars a
month because of a subsidy going away. My mom is
seventy five. She works Monday through Friday. She starts as
six six thirty six o'clock in the morning as a
mold cleaner, and then it's at two thirty in the afternoon.
So she can't spend any time with grandkids or anybody
(19:11):
because she's working. And when she's not working, her body
doesn't want to do a damn thing.
Speaker 2 (19:15):
Everything hurts so badly.
Speaker 1 (19:18):
So now you're gonna make them pay more and take
those subsidies away from people that are already on a
limit on a budget, and that will allow them to
not be connected, to not be informed, for them to
be able to continue to do in all the dirty
shat their doing.
Speaker 2 (19:37):
So Yeah, basically.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
Trump wants or to end Perth certificate and we'll see
if the course will stop them. Parents are fighting schools
for the fight to keep their children out of LGBTQ
story time.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
I'm calling more.
Speaker 1 (19:53):
Parents are fighting to have a choice on what the
kids in certain things.
Speaker 2 (20:00):
Geography. You gotta learn it.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
Black voters in Louisiana may lose new voting power they
just got if Republicans get their way. Texas once id
online before you can legally watch porn. Extreme overreach, religious
business owner want to kill part ofs of Obamacare. Hey,
they all got extremely great benefits and healthcare pay for us.
(20:23):
Why should why should we? Conservative groups are trying to
gut the FCC. We could cut off internet aid for
lower income folks. And never mind that if you also
remove the FCC, who is going to be controlling some
of these things they you know, shouldn't be said. So
some of the you know, be proper being you know, eloquent,
(20:47):
not saying they're bad things such and so.
Speaker 2 (20:50):
Anyway, everyone have a great day.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.