Swinney and SNP Humiliated, Yet Again Ep 136. 16 April 2025

Alistair McConnachie of pro-UK unionist campaign group and think tank, A Force For Good (AFFG), and viewers discuss:
- Welcome.
- Supreme Court decision on "woman" definition.
- What will it mean in practice?
- The British Supreme Court should move around the country more often.
- Join us in our Swinney Activism, Wednesday 23rd April, Glasgow.
- Why Swinney won't debate Reform UK.
- Who we define as the "Native Scottish/British".
- We have to leave the UN Refugee Convention.
- Keir Starmer could at least emergency "suspend" UK's membership of the UN Refugee Convention.
- How to make countries take their people back.
- Join us in Glasgow to campaign against Swinney and the SNP, Wednesday 23rd April.
- What is up with No.10 not supporting Easter, but supporting all other religions?
- If you can't be out with us on the streets, please consider supporting us in other ways - for example, see our Shop link below.

FURTHER READING
"The Aim is Mass Minus Migration (not 'Net Zero Migration')"
https://www.aforceforgood.uk/single-post/mass-minus-migration

"To Stop the Boats, Criminalise the Channel Crossers"
https://www.aforceforgood.uk/single-post/criminalise-the-crossers

"Return to Sender: How to Do it"
https://www.aforceforgood.uk/single-post/deportation1

"End our Out-Dated, Massively Expensive, Refugee Benefit System"
https://www.aforceforgood.uk/single-post/end-refugee-benefit-system

TO HEAR ABOUT our EVENTS, PLEASE SIGN-UP for our FORTNIGHTLY EMAILS https://www.aforceforgood.uk/sign-up

Please hit the Thumbs Up Button if you like what we say! 

And please Subscribe to this Podcast channel. It really helps spread the pro-UK word! 

MERCH STORES
Our Website Shop
https://www.aforceforgood.uk/shop-1

Our Tee-Shirts, Hoodies, and Mugs at
https://a-force-for-good.creator-spring.com

DONATE 
If you like what we're doing, please chip-in at 
https://www.aforceforgood.uk/donate2

or become a monthly Union Supporter donor (with rewards) at
https://www.aforceforgood.uk/union-supporters

This is the 136th episode of "Good Evening Britain" broadcast on Wednesday 16th April 2025.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello, and welcome to Good Evening Britain, a Force for
Goods weekly show coming to you live from our studios
here in the heart of the great British city of Glasgow,
with me your host, Alston mcconachie. We are broadcasting on

(00:20):
all our digital platforms throughout the United Kingdom and across
the world. We're bringing you quality pro UK comment and
analysis every Wednesday from seven until eight pm on Facebook,
on YouTube, on x and on TikTok. Folks, please send

(00:46):
us your comments, Please send us your questions, Please send
us your greetings. Tell us where you're watching from on
this great British Evening. We have viewers watching throughout the
United Kingdom and across the world, as we like to say,
and if you're somewhere across the world, please chime in

(01:08):
and please tell us what's on your mind as well. Tonight.
Well we've titled this program Swinny and SNP Humiliated Yet again,
Yet again they have been humiliated by the Supreme Court,

(01:30):
and yet again they have been put in their place.
How many more times do they need to be told?
And irony of ironies, it's about this issue that constantly
dogs them, which you know what that issue is it's

(01:52):
this inane issue on the gender question, and so we're
going to be looking at that. We're going to be
saying what was actually judged, what does it mean, what's
likely to happen as a consequence of that. We're also

(02:15):
going to be looking at the record breaking channel crossings
that have been occurring in the last week, and we're
going to show how to stop them, because you know what,
I'm fed up watching the news and people just reporting
it and nobody comes out and tells you what actually

(02:36):
needs to be done to stop it. So we're going
to be running through that as well. And we've also
got some exciting news about activism which we are going
to be engaged in next Wednesday. We're going to be
telling you about that. We're going to be asking for
people to join us. We're going to be showing you

(02:57):
how you can join us in that activism which is
sure to hit the national newspapers. All of that and
more if you need more on this show tonight. And
this is our one hundred and thirty sixth Good Evening
Britain show and that has to count for something, doesn't it.

(03:21):
One hundred and thirty six of these we've been knocking
them out goodness sake, dispensing wit and wisdom every Wednesday,
and we have no intention of stopping either, because we
can't be stopped, because this is a force for good
and we're here to stay, as we always like to say.

(03:45):
Let's say hi to one or two people who have
come in already. Derek was first in. He says, good evening,
Alistair and the affg family. Hope everyone is fine and
well this rainy day. Derek is sterling stalwart. Here's another
Debbie beer. Just got back from Cornerstay in time to
watch fantastic Debbie. Hope you and the family are well.

(04:10):
Hi to Oxanna and to Paul from Kent the Garden
of England. Hello to exiled Viking. Good evening to you, sir,
And to Alan Dawes, who says good evening everyone. Christopher says,
another great day for unionism and common sense. Good evening

(04:34):
to all fellow unionists. Oh, exiled Viking is not well.
Sorry to hear that. Hope your throat infection clears up pronto, sir.
Good stuff. Now let's begin at the beginning with the
Supreme Court judgment today. What's all that about? Because once again,

(05:00):
it's embarrassed John Swinney, and it's embarrassed the SNP. But
you know what, it should also embarrass Labor and it
should also embarrass the Lib Dems because and the Greens
needless to say, because these are the parties that have
been promoting all of this kind of stuff for many

(05:21):
years now, for over twenty years. You know, if we
cast our minds back to two thousand and four, there
was an act passed in the British Parliament and it
was called the Gender Recognition Act, and that was an
act that allowed adults throughout the United Kingdom who have

(05:44):
gender dysphoria to change their legal sex on a piece
of paper. And that came into effect back in April
two thousand and five, and that was under the Tony
Blair our government, and the Labor Party, whether throughout the
UK or here in Scotland, they've always supported all of

(06:07):
that kind of stuff anyway, They've always voted in favor
of whatever the SNP has voted in as well. It's
just simply that since two thousand and seven the SNP
has been the reigning power here in Scotland. But we've
got to remember the complicity as well. Of Labor and
lib Dems and Greens in all of this rather inane activity.

(06:32):
So what happened was there's a campaigning group called Four
Women Scotland and they took a case to court. They
took it initially to the courts in Scotland, the in

(06:53):
Our House and then the outer House. And what was
the case about, Well, it revolved around what was the
legal definition of a woman under the Equality Act twenty ten.
The Equality Act twenty ten is another act of the
UK Parliament and they wanted to know how the definition

(07:18):
applied to another act called the Gender Representation on Public
Boards Scotland Act twenty eighteen and the Scottish Executive, the SNP.
They said that a trans woman, a man who claimed

(07:39):
to be a woman, should be considered a woman for
the purposes of meeting the gender representation targets on public boards.
So for example, if a public board said we want
ten representatives here, five of them have to be men,

(08:00):
five of them have to be women. The Four Women
Scotland people were saying, well, as far as the women
are concerned, are you allowing men who claim to be
women to be counted as women on these boards? And
the Scottish executives said yes. So the four women in

(08:22):
Scotland thought quite understandably that that wasn't very fair. So
they took the SNPs and Scottish Parliament's definition of a
woman to court and said, what is the proper definition
of a woman in British law as far as the

(08:43):
Supreme Court is concerned. But first they took it to
the first court in Scotland that they have to take
it to, which is the I'm going to say Inner House,
and the Inner House found against them. The Inner House
of the Court of Session. Got that wrong, it's the

(09:03):
outer House they took it to. They took it to
the Outer House, that's the first court that they take
it to, and the Outer House found in favor of
the SNP and the Executive. So they took it the
next one up, which is the Inner House, and again

(09:24):
the Inner House found for the SNP, found for the
Scottish Executive. So they took it to the ultimate court
of civil appeal in the UK, which is the Supreme Court,
which is the court that sits down in Westminster. It's
made up of judges from all over Scotland, England, Northern

(09:48):
Ireland and Wales. And it pronounces it's the ultimate judge
for these civil matters for the UK, and to the
Supreme Court found that the definition of a woman is,
as far as the Equality Act two thousand and ten

(10:10):
is concerned, the definition of a woman is a biological
female at birth. It's not a man who claims to
be a woman. And you know, you would think, well, yes, well,
we all knew that, and we've known that since we
were able to become conscious as human beings all those

(10:32):
years ago when we were in the caves, if you
believe that kind of thing. So, however, this is modern
Scotland in twenty twenty five and we do have to
go through these sorts of those sorts of illegal processes.
So it's remarkable that something like that had to be
taken to court. But of course it had to be

(10:53):
taken to court in order to get a proper decision
because the matter had been so confounded and complicated by
gender activists, people with people with a desire to make
those kind of distinctions for whatever personal reasons that they

(11:15):
have going on in their own lives. So that had
to be taken to court. It got taken to court.
The Supreme Court today has said the definition of a
women as far as the Equality Act is concerned, is
a biological female. I'm glad that they said that, because
if they hadn't said that, that would have been mad really.

(11:37):
So the question now is, okay, well, what does that
actually mean in practice? Is that going to affect women's spaces,
Is it going to affect men in women's toilets, Is
it going to affect men playing in women's sports? And

(11:58):
all of that is at the moment and up in
the air, because nobody really knows whether it's going to
make much of a difference to those sorts of things,
and to what extent those kind of things are just
going to depend upon the particular contexts of the gymnasium

(12:19):
or the restaurant or the sports team and what their
particular preferences may or may not be. So nobody really
knows how that decision, that judgment is going to work
through the rest of reality. But it's certainly a victory

(12:40):
for those people who have always believed those sorts of things.
So it's very good news for us who believe those
sorts of things, and it's very bad news for the SNP,
it's bad news for labor it's bad news for the
Lib Dems. It's bad news especially for the Greens, who

(13:05):
who are somewhat obsessed with these gender matters. So it's
always good to see them struggling with things, isn't it.
Absolutely So that's one good thing. And again Swinny's been humiliated.
And isn't it ironic the extent to which this inane discussion,

(13:28):
this inane concept has been has undermined the SNP consistently.
It's undermined all its leaders. Yet they persist, they persist
in doubling down on these kind of matters. But it

(13:49):
undermines them and it humiliates them, and in the case
of Sturgeon, it destroyed her. It didn't do comes a
use of much use, And now it's embarrassing John Swinney.
Wouldn't it have been better just to leave those topics
completely alone? But no, they had to go there for

(14:11):
their own ideological purposes. And you do find that with
some of these people. You can say, well, that's not
a very good idea to do that, but they'll do
it anyway, just because they think the principle is much
more important than the actual practical reality. They put principle

(14:33):
before practice. Anyway, suffered a blow, which is fantastic news.
Let's have a look at some of your comments. Detube,
thank you for the super chat two pounds and that's
well worth saying. SNP and greens are crazy loonies. Thank

(15:00):
you tube. D tube is a great super chatter for
those who don't know. Superchat is when you send a
donation because you're loving it so much, and you do
that on YouTube by clicking the little dollar sign below
the video. Thank you dtube. Paul says, well, aren't the

(15:22):
SNP too thick skinned to be embarrassed? Good point. Stephen says,
you know, gender dysphoria quote unquote is just the highly
subjective opinion of medical personnel. There's nothing empirical, as in
scientific about it. Alan says we're living in ridiculous times

(15:44):
when even some women don't know what women are and
it becomes a Supreme Court issue. The world is laughing
at us. Exil Viking says woman is an adult human female.
But she says I got called a hitteronormal by a
lefty for saying that I think heteronormal is meant to

(16:07):
be an insult. I never heard the phrase, but I
can't see it being an insult. Christopher says this is
a matter where political posturing and opportunism have come up
against the reality of the law and biological fact. Alan

(16:30):
says he hopes it's going to be a turning point
for more common sense. Jolly Good on TikTok wonders it's
the Supreme Court of Scottish or English court. Well, it
is actually the genuine British court. It's the Supreme Court
for UK civil law, the ultimate court of appeal for

(16:55):
UK's civil law, and it has got, as I say,
it's got the Scottish, English, Irish Welsh judges on it.
We've always said that it should move around the country.
I know it's easier to be based I suppose just
down in one area, but it's always good if it
moved about each year, it could move some judgments around

(17:19):
the country. I'd be all for that, And in fact
it's done that before. It has had a sitting in Edinburgh,
and I think we should have more of that, just
so people helps people to understand the legal and constitutional
structure of the United Kingdom and how it's really quite

(17:41):
integrated in many ways, which it should be. Of course.
Oxanna says they should be concentrating SNP, that is on
the issues that matters. Maypecks Scott's and said, how much
did this case cost the Scottish public will so far

(18:05):
to take it to defend it? Out of an amount
of sixty one thousand pounds that it cost the Scottish
executive to defend the case, that seems to me extremely low,
extremely low. And on top of that, though they're going

(18:26):
to have they'll probably have to pay the expenses of
the four Women's Scotland group, and so the ultimate cost
to the taxpayer will be well over one hundred thousand
pounds and probably far more. But we'll find out in time,
no doubt. Well Dominic says it wouldn't have passed if

(18:50):
it wasn't Scotland. Well, certainly the outer court and the sorry,
the outer house and the inner house of the Court
of Ession did side with the SNP. Some people might say, surprise, surprise.
Christopher asked a very serious question, how many lives have
been ruined and destroyed by this so called gender fluidity

(19:12):
and reassignment nonsense? How many people have made terrible life
changing choices that they have not then been able to
live with will goodness sake, that's a very concerning thing,
especially when you're speaking about the young children that can
get caught up in that, usually because their parents actually
have some kind of strange fetish going on. Richard wonders,

(19:37):
are the wheels coming off Western civilization? Well, let's hope not.
Let's hope not. I tell you the wheels are coming
off the SNP, that's for sure, and they're going to
come off even further next week because I let me
tell you about our our let me tell you about
our planned activism for next week. Okay, On Wednesday, the

(20:03):
twenty third of April. Here in Glasgow, John Swinney is
going to have as much heralded anti Reform Party summit.
Now he hasn't given it a name yet, but that's
essentially what it's about. He's having a summit. He's brought
together the leaders of all the main parties in Scotland

(20:25):
except the Conservatives, to discuss the rise of the so
called far right, by which he means the Reform Party.
And he's going to be holding that in somewhere in Glasgow.
Now he has not interestingly announced the venues the venue

(20:47):
of the time, but he's surely going to do that
in the next two or three days. Very possibly he
might wait until the Sunday papers to give it a
kind of run into the weddings day. However, a Force
for Good is going to be there. We're going to
have our banner and we're going to have our megaphone,

(21:11):
and we are going to challenge not just John Swinney,
but we're going to challenge and Assarwar. We're going to
challenge that guy from the Lib Dems, and we're going
to challenge the Green people as well. And we're not
We're not going to be challenging them from a party

(21:33):
political point of view. We don't support any particular party,
we don't support reform, labor Tories, Lib Dems or any
we as an organization or non party political but we
are going to challenge these people on what on earth
they mean by the far right when it appears to

(21:57):
us all they're really meaning is people who want to
control immigration into Scotland and people who want to cut
back on the numbers of asylum seekers who are coming
to Scotland. We're going to be challenging them on those
matters and asking them what is their solution to all

(22:19):
of this. Do they just intend to keep the borders
of Scotland open forever more without any kind of control whatsoever,
because if you listen carefully to John Swinney, that's exactly
his position. That's exactly his position. So we're going to

(22:40):
be challenging that. We're going to be asking for what
are your solutions, mister Swinney, mister Sawar to stop the
levels of mass immigration and asylum seeking into Scotland or
do you support the fact that every year a population
bigger than Paisley is coming into Scotland now and so

(23:02):
we're going to put them on the foot, put them
on the back foot. And if you want to join us,
stay in touch with us, okay, keep watching our Facebook
page every day, keep watching our ex page every day,
and make sure you sign up if you're not already

(23:25):
signed up to our email update, because we will be
sending out an email update on that as well. So
we've got the they sign up address that you want
to be signing up to if you want to stay
in touch with us, let me put that up there.

(23:49):
That's a force for Good dot UK forward slash sign
hyphen up. Make sure you're signed up to that and
you'll hear either well you'll hear as soon as we
know where the venue is and when it's occurring, and

(24:12):
we'll also send out an email the night before as well,
just to keep everybody up to date on that. But
we will have the banners, we will have the flags,
and so you just need to turn up. It's going
to be somether in Golasgow and we're going to be challenging,

(24:34):
sanctimonious Swinny. It's going to be fun, it's going to
be good. Can't wait for that, so please do join us.
Richard says, excellent work. People like Swinny, Sarwar and the
political establishment have no answers because they've abandoned common sense.
Screenshot that one. Definitely like, comment, share and subscribe, Richard says,

(25:03):
Swinny's Summit of stupidity. I like that one. Swinny's Summit
of stupidity. Sanktimonious, Swinney's Summit of stupidity, and oh man
is he sank timonious? Hey Rapha good to hear from you.

(25:28):
Any comments on TikTok that we can that we can
read out that are of value. Saffrey eighty says, God
Save the King. Fantastic, So we'll read that one out definitely.
Jamie says, hey from Sterling, good to see you, Jamie,

(25:50):
and to Catherine, good stuff. Paul says, if Swinny and
the others really believe they are right, why not just
debate reform. If they are right, they would win on
those grounds. Well, I don't think that, Swinny. And here's
the thing. Swinny doesn't want to change his point of view.

(26:15):
His head is still in a nineteen seventies student union.
His head is still in a world where the only
immigrants into Britain were Afro Caribbeans in London. And so
he's lived most of his life without ever having to

(26:36):
ever think about immigration really because it's never affected him
and it's had little effect in Scotland. It's only in
the last ten years that it's really started to come
to Scotland, and in particular in the last post COVID

(26:56):
in particular since twenty twenty two after that Boris wave,
that it's really taken off now and the borders have
been thrown open, and he's his head is still in
the Oh, it'll be okay someday and we'll all just
get along and everything's going to be fine. He's not.

(27:17):
I don't think he's capable of thinking, oh, my goodness, me,
we actually have a very serious situation on our hands here.
This is an emergency. This could change Scotland into a
different country very quickly, within just a few years, Scotland
could become essentially what looks like a foreign country, and
he doesn't he doesn't have the wherewithal to really grasp

(27:42):
that reality and to do something about it. He's he's
a man out of time now and you can see
that in the way that he talks as well. He
talks about things that he's believed in all his life
are now being challenged. That's almost a direct quote from
one of his press conferences. And he's right. He's right

(28:06):
things that he thought were just normal, which is like, oh, yeah,
there'll be immigration in London, but you know who cares
about that. He's suddenly realizing, oh no, I've got to
have an opinion on that, because it's happening right here.
And he doesn't want to have an opinion because it's
too scary for him to have to deal with and
so he would much rather just condemn everybody as far

(28:28):
right and hope that somehow this matter goes away. Even
if the consequences of him doing nothing will mean effectively
the end of Scotland as a recognizably native Scottish country. Oh, alst,
what do you mean by native Scottish? Native scotsman or

(28:52):
scottswoman is a person who can trace their ancestry, either
fully or part sully back to grandparents who existed in
some form on the fourth of August nineteen fourteen, the
day that World War One broke out, and whose grandparents

(29:14):
were not required by the police to register under the
Alien's Registration Act of the fifth of August nineteen fourteen
the very next day. If you can trace your ancestry
back on both sides or on one side of the
family to that period, and you had a British citizen

(29:38):
grandparent living in what was then the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Ireland and the Crown dependencies, then you
have a claim to be native Scottish, similarly Welsh, English,
Irish or British. And we extrapolated that out and we

(30:02):
explained why we believe that in our latest article, which
you can find at a Force for Good dot UK
forward slash blog. Because that period just before the war,
before many British men lost their lives that period. The

(30:28):
people who lived in Britain at that time and Ireland
and the Crown dependencies were effectively the same people who
lived in Britain hundreds of years previously, with of course
the exception of a tiny number of people who were

(30:50):
not native British at that time, but a tiny tiny number.
So that's the period. Really, it can't be after World
War two because that would me and you weren't counting
all the men who made the sacrifice in World War One.
It would also mean that you weren't including the Irish,
and I think the Irish should be included in the definition.
And so that's our view. Check it out of forcefogod

(31:16):
dot UK forward slash blog and it's the lightest article,
which is we aim for mass minus migration and we
explain all of the reasoning in there. Paul says, can
people be trans Scottish And I'd have to contact the

(31:40):
Supreme Court about that one. I think Derek says, keep
the good work going, very good. Rappas says, I said
this on another live stream, you did, sir. Everyone here
on chat agrees with me that Britain should learn more
with Denmark's Paul and these have their strong anti immigration laws. Yes,

(32:06):
then Mark's been quite good these days. Well, talking about
talking about mass immigration. The news today was that yesterday
over seven hundred people came into the south coast of

(32:26):
England on Dinghy's over seven hundred, beating the previous record
of the twelfth of April, when six hundred and fifty
six came in. And you know this article when the

(32:46):
Telegraph says is dated tenth of April, six days ago
only five convicted as six thousand arrive in boats. The
record number of six thousand, six hundred and forty two
migrants have reached the UK this year, up from four thousand,
six hundred at the same point in twenty twenty four. Well,

(33:09):
this was six days ago and it's saying six thousand,
six hundred and forty two today it's nine thousand. That's
how many have come in in the last few days.
And you look at the social media and everybody is
rightly outraged about that, and everybody's reporting it. But what

(33:32):
nobody's ever doing is saying, Okay, well how do we
stop this? And I'm going to tell you how we
stop it. It's very very simple, but Before I do that,
I just want to point out that the Labor people
will say, oh, we have to smash the gangs, but
as this points out, only five have been convicted of

(33:56):
six thousand people who've arrived. What you need to do
is to convict six thousand. That's what you need to do.
But I'll get to that in a moment. And the
reason the Labor Party can't do anything is because, and
I know people don't like to hear this, but these

(34:18):
people are the people who are coming across and the
Dinghies are exercising their so called legal rights under the
UK's membership of the UN refuge Convention. The UN Refugee
Convention was set up in nineteen fifty one when the
population of the world was two point five billion. The

(34:41):
population of the world now is well over eight billion,
and the nineteen fifty one UN Refugee Convention is completely
out of date, completely out of date. But it is
one of the core laws that god from the post

(35:02):
war globalist structure, and it's one of these laws that
people like Swinney and Sarwar and Starmer and the Tories
as well, they've all grown up with and considered just
part of the furniture of modern political life, and the
idea of changing or suspending or stopping or coming out

(35:27):
of those sorts of legal conventions. It doesn't occur to them,
and if it occurred to them, they would be aghast
at the thought. But that's what needs to be done,
because these things are no longer fit for purpose. For example,

(35:48):
take the UN Refugee Convention. It has a legal obligation
upon every member state Britain that effectively in traps that
country into a policy which is effectively a form of
open borders. It puts a very onerous legal obligation on

(36:16):
every member country not to send anybody who claims for
asylum back to the country from which they're claiming to
be unsafe, not to send them back without having thoroughly

(36:38):
investigated their claim and found otherwise. So if somebody rocks
up at Dovo, we either have to investigate their claim,
which is expensive and can take months and years and

(37:01):
we have to find one way or the other, or
we can declare their claim inadmissible. But we still can't
send them back to that country, as I say, without
an investigation which proves that they're not at risk. So
what we have to do with the inadmissible claims is
find a safe third country to send them to, and

(37:25):
that's almost impossible because who's going to take them. So
we end up with all of these people claiming asylum,
many of whom we investigate, and for those that we
say are inadmissible, we still have to keep them hanging
about because we can't send them to a safe third
country because nobody else wants them. So it is effectively

(37:47):
just open borders that we're facing. So what we have
to do is we have to leave the UN Refugee
Conventions so that we are no longer entrapped by those
required moments. And then what we can do is we
can simply say that anybody who comes across the channel

(38:09):
or comes through another means of entry that we do
not approve of, such as through the back door from
the Republic of Ireland, anybody who does that will not
be granted any kind of consideration whatsoever, will not be
granted asylum, and will be considered to be breaking our
law of entry, and the punishment for that will be

(38:31):
prison unless you self deport. And if you do not
self deport, you're going to prison. And I ask you,
how long would we have to do that before the
channel crossings ended. We'd only have to do it for

(38:52):
that at the most a month, a few hundred people.
Everybody else would get the message and it would stop.
And that's the only way we can get out of this.
So if I were Cure Starmer, and look, I know
he's not going to do this, but here's what I

(39:13):
would do. If I was Cure Starmer and I didn't
want to leave the UN Refugee Convention because I was
so attached to it in my globalist heart, what I
would at least do is pass emergency legislation to suspend
our membership, to say to the UN, we're suspending our
membership because this is an emergency, effectively is a national invasion.

(39:38):
And what we're going to do is we're going to
ensure that it's an illegal form of entry. Now it's
not legal. We've suspended the UN Refugee Convention. We're going
to say it's illegal to come across the channel, it's
illegal to come in the back door via the Republic
of Ireland, and we're going to tell people either you

(39:58):
self deport or you're going to because you've broken our laws.
And that's what he needs to do. And then you know,
if he gets it under control, maybe he can think
about what next. But the first thing he has to
do is suspend our membership of the UN Refugee Convention
and don't bother sending them back to France. I mean,

(40:22):
they can get back to they can fly back to
France if they want to do so, but France isn't
going to take them directly from us. We need to
deport them directly back to whatever country they claim to
be unsafe in because quite frankly, we cannot, we cannot
be allowing them to come here in these numbers. The

(40:43):
whole point now has been rendered ridiculous by the sheer
level of numbers. So there are ways out of this.
It just requires the political will, and people say, well,
what if those countries won't take them back, these countries

(41:04):
will take them back. There's many there's many carrots and
there's many sticks that you can use. Okay, say Country
X won't take there's people back. You say to them, okay,
for every member of your country in this country, we're
not going to allow them to send any money back

(41:24):
to your country, or we're going to tax those remittancies
very heavily, or you could say, right, your country is
not getting any tourist visas, it's not getting any work visas.
For Britain, it's certainly not getting any study visas. Or
we could say, well, we're no longer sending you foreign
aid anymore. Or we could repurpose the foreign aid in

(41:45):
a way that helped their country and encourage them to
take these people back. There's all sorts of things we
can do. But these these countries will take these people back.
There's no question that they will if you put the
screws on them. So whenever you see people talking about

(42:05):
how it's a difficult question, it's not a difficult question
at all. It's a very easy question to answer. And
if there's parties intending to be elected, then this is
what they need to do. These are the things that
we're mentioning in our new book, which will be coming
out in the summer, volume two of a big book
for the Union. All these policies are going to be

(42:29):
properly laid out for you. So if you like the
fact that we're doing that, if you like the fact
that we're communicating these points, please do help us get
that book published, because we do need support and the
best way that you can do that is to become
a union supporter, which is to say a monthly donor
at our Union supporters page. We'll get the link up there.

(42:54):
Let's there. We are a Force for Good dot UK
forward slash Union hyphen supporters and if you prefer just
to give us a one off then you can do
that at a Force for Good dot UK forward slash
donate too. But that's what we're going to be doing.
And I believe in my heart that what I've said

(43:18):
will become the law. We will live to see this
become the law, and we will live to see lots
of things that right now aren't don't seem as if
they could be possible. But it only takes a little
change in the way of looking at things and everything
becomes possible. That's why the talking heads are so keen

(43:42):
for us to always think about these channel crossers as poor, vulnerable, dispossessed, exploited.
No they're not. They're people with agency, they're people with
self determination. They are people who know what they're doing,
and we know that they know what they're doing as well.

(44:03):
And so when you get a rid of that way
of thinking of all vulnerable people, when you realize, no,
these people are just trying to come here for the benefits.
When you realize that, then you can deal with them appropriately,
which is to criminalize their behavior immediately when they land,
you say, okay, you've got two options. You self deport

(44:25):
to wherever you want. You just can't stay here, or
if you choose to stay here, you go into prison
for five years until you change your mind. It will
eventually change, says Richard, because an awful lot of people
are fed up with the current so called policy. Raphas

(44:46):
says that Denmark has tough immigration laws, but Austria and
the Netherlands have too. Italy is doing the same. I
recommend Singapore and Japan as good examples. Yes, they're trying
to corrupt Japan, though they're trying to. The various powers
that be are trying to use whatever they can to

(45:07):
get Japan to take in the World's Richard refuse as
it says on the Statue of Liberty. But hopefully the
Japanese will see through it. But it's going to have
to be Britain that sets the agenda. It was Britain
that basically set up this nineteen fifty one Refugee Convention.
It was one of Winston's shurt shows, less clever ideas,

(45:28):
and him and his mates basically got that going, which
was very sad really at the end of the day.
But so it's us that's going to have to turn
it over. It's us that's going to have to stop it.
And there are people rising now in the UK who
will stop it. And do you know what, I'm going
to start shouting this stuff at John Swinney as well

(45:49):
on Wednesday, folks. On Wednesday the twenty third here in Glasgow.
Time and venue to be announced. We are going to
be how a presence outside John Swinney's Summit of stupidity,
and we're going to be barracking the Scottish political class

(46:09):
and we're going to be demanding answers from them as
to their solutions for the mass immigration invasion that's going
on in Scotland at the moment and of course in
the rest of the United Kingdom. But this is a
perfect moment to do it because Swinny is holding this

(46:31):
conference because he doesn't like the fact that he's hearing
people like me and like a Force for Good and
others talking about these things. So he's going to try
to nip us in the bud, but we're going to
put him on the back foot and demand answers. If
you want to join us, make sure to stay in

(46:52):
touch with us. Sign up to our email A Force
for Good dot UK, forward slash sign hyphen up, and
keep an eye on our Facebook page and or our
ex page forward slash uk A Force for Good for

(47:13):
those and you will be kept in touch about what
we're doing because we're inviting everybody to join us. Okay, indeed,
most immigrants are economic migrants, but goodness me. Number ten
Downing Street has been loving Britain's diverse ethnicities this week

(47:40):
in the Christian calendar, this is Holy Week, with Good
Friday two days from now, with Holy Saturday and Easter
Sunday of course this weekend. However, you wouldn't know that
if you had been following Number ten's Twitter page, because

(48:06):
they've found every day under the sun in the last
few days that have not related in any way to Christianity.
We've got some pictures that picks here. Let's stick the
first one up. This was let's get rid of that
thing along the bottom so I can see what dates

(48:27):
these were. Yes, this was the tenth of apro and
the Prime Minister was wishing Jane's jai ns in the
UK and around the world a peaceful and blessed Mahavir jayante.
Don't ask me what that is, but have a peaceful
and blessed one. So that was on the tenth. This one,

(48:51):
I think was maybe the next day shang pishak Samish
to Jewish communities here in the UK and around the world,
celebrating Passover. Okay. Then on the thirteenth, wishing seeks in
the UK and around the world peace, happiness and prosperity.
This vashaki okay, and I don't even know what this means.

(49:17):
Wishing a joyous Tamil and Sinhala New Year to everyone
celebrating That was on the fourteenth, and then again on
the fourteenth Okay, not enough, he had to have more.
It was him happy Bengali New Year to everyone. Okay.

(49:40):
So Charlie Downs put this quite well. Actually he is
worth following on X and he said, as we will say,
this is starting to look like parody. It reveals a
lot about how our secular liberal state views religion, not
a set of beliefs about the fundamental nature of the universe,
as a series of superficial quote unquote holidays. They sincerely

(50:05):
believe that religion is just a costume that one can
choose to put on. And they think that because their religion,
which is liberalism, views the self as God and faith
as a delusion. This is. This is to say nothing
of the fact that Christianity, the religion of the indigenous British,

(50:25):
has not been acknowledged once, despite this being Holy Week.
It would be one thing for Christianity to be presented
as quote, one option among many. Now this would be
insulting enough, given that the Christian faith is the foundation
of the West, and moreover, the truth. It is something

(50:48):
else to not even dare speak its name, Isn't that?
So it is something else to not even dare speak
its name? So what's going on there at number tens
social Media Office? I think it's a classic example of
simply when the minorities have become the authorities, the minorities

(51:15):
have become the authorities, and the minorities want to do
to use their position of authority in whatever way they can.
But you would have thought there would have been at
least one Christian in there, but apparently not. Apparently not
so this is the nighted UK that we're living in

(51:37):
at the moment, but at least we can still point
these things out. Good stuff, good stuff. So let me
see what else I wanted to speak about tonight. I've
been talking about a lot. We've been talking about a lot.

(52:02):
But the big news as far as our activism is concerned,
is Wednesday the twenty third. Please do contact us and
if you can't, if you can't be out with us
on the streets, please do consider supporting those of us
who will be out on the streets. And one of
the ways you can do that is to check out

(52:24):
our shop. And at our shop we've got things like
a we Book for the Union only a fiver, still
the best introduction to British Unionism that's out there. You'll
find a link to One Big Country there as well,

(52:46):
which is volume one of a Big Book for the Union.
Or you can also of course search Amazon. Simply go
onto Amazon dot co dot uk and search for One
Big Country and Volume two is coming out this summer
and it's going to be a cracker and we are
we really What we really need to do is to

(53:08):
hire a hall and have a launch event for it
as well. That would be worth doing. That would be
worth doing if we have the If we have the
the the the money for that, but that would be
that would be worth doing. Also, check out our shop

(53:29):
for our magazines as well. You can buy our magazines
or you can buy back issues of all the magazines.
We have produced ten issues so far. An eleventh show
we published sometime this year. But we need to get
the book out the way first. That's the first requirement.

(53:51):
But that's that's how you can help us. And magazines
are free as well for our Union supporters. That is
our monthly donors. Good good, okay, folks. Well, I do
hope everybody has a has a nice Easter weekend. I

(54:12):
wish everybody a peaceful Easter, and remember as well that
while things in Britain look broken, there will be coming
better days. Political points of view are changing in such
a way that we will prevail. Okay, we will stop

(54:36):
the John Swineys of this world from destroying our precious
Scotland and the Kere Starmers of this world from destroying
our precious United Kingdom. We will win. Always remember that
even because there are ideas out there I've explained some
tonight that will set us back on the right track again.

(54:59):
And so as long as there's people speaking the truth,
there's always hope. Okay, folks, as I say, have a
have a blessed Easter. It just remains for me to say,
God Bless the United Kingdom and God Save the King.

(55:21):
See you next time.