Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Wake Up Radio Network.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
A rational voice in a world of conspiracy Jim Duke perspective.
So there were six astronauts that just went into space.
I heard six women, Yeah, I heard about that females.
It was called the Blue Origin Flight. And we're going
(00:26):
to talk about We're going to look at the Katy
Perry ritual and hidden agendas because they're associated with our
theme in most cases. Before we go get started, I
want to make an announcement that I will be in
the process of building my new studio in the next
month or so, and it's going to be tougher for
me to get in a studio to do the recording.
(00:49):
So I'm going to try to do them as I
can here and there and on off time. So you know,
Darren won't be joining me for the next month or
so because he doesn't know what I'm able to time
these things and it's hard to have him join me.
So I'll be going solo and just giving you some
(01:10):
content while I'm moving into the studio. I may even
recite some off my phone. The lazy way is I
have a phone device that I can actually do my
podcast right on my phone, and if you hear a
different quality. That's probably what it is. But in the meantime,
after June or so, I should start being able to
get rolling again. But I want to keep you guys
(01:33):
all informed of things going on. We're gonna be talking
about things. I may not be able to get deep, deep,
deep into some of the information, but enough to give
you some insight about what's going on. My website can
be heard on any of your favorite podcast channels, any
of your favorite apps. Jim Duke Perspective, just check it out.
(01:54):
And my website is Jimdukeperspective dot com. So the overview
of this thing is it was called the NS thirty
one mission and the wyts NS. I think there's been
some that went up before right there, And this isn't
the first.
Speaker 1 (02:11):
No, this is several other times, you know, Yeah, supposedly.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
Was it always like six people?
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Well, let's say, I know the Challenger had seven.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
That's not the same one as this though, I'm talking
about the Blue Origin, the Blue Origin.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
No, No, I remember the other one was NASA need
another seven astronauts? Yeah's a dumb joke, sorry, folks.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
Well, this is the Jeff Bezos version. I guess I
don't know how these people. How did these people start out?
You know the Jeff Bezos story that he started out
as a humble kid in a garage with a desk
made out of a door laid on cement bricks, and
he started selling things out of his garage and that
(02:53):
turned into the empire called Amazon. And now he's into
rocketry into space. How does this work? You know him
and Elon Musk and all these guys. But he launched
I guess it's a company called Blue Origin. It's using
what's called the New Shepherd rocket. That's the NS in
(03:15):
the NS thirty one, this must be the thirty first flight.
It's a flight designed to offer a brief experience of
weightlessness and a view of the Earth, the flat Earth,
right Derek the supposedly the Rounder. The celebrity list this
time included Katie Perry and five other elite women, which
(03:40):
got significant media attention. And it's marketed as space tourism
and a mildstone in commercial space exploration, but some see
a larger agenda of it. It has a lot of symbolism,
power dynamics, and social control. Then the outward appearance. Many
(04:04):
are questioning whether these flights are more than just a
celebrity spectacle or a marketing move by Blue Origin. And
we wonder if the space missions have symbolic elite journey
to transcendence, you know, transcendental meditation and all this other,
(04:24):
or are they a part of another occult ritual? And
why are women so prominently featured in these flights? That's
what we wonder. Why is it always women as going up?
I'm going to tell you my theories and my basically
warped perspective of this.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
Let's hear it all right.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
Well, first of all, to name this what the heck
Jeff Bezos? Is that is that who's this is owned by?
Is that he owns the Blue Origin flight? Is that
what it is?
Speaker 1 (04:56):
I'm not sure exactly how. I supposedly that's what they'd
tout extreame news, but who knows.
Speaker 2 (05:02):
And like I said, you know, he went from from
a desk of of a of a door on on cylinders,
on uh on cement blocks to to having this big
illy enterprise of these people do this? I can you?
(05:22):
And I start, why don't Darren, why don't we put
a door in your garage and just start telling people
we're gonna sell stuff, and and let's see how fast
we get noticed and start building an empire from it.
Speaker 1 (05:37):
Something tells me he may have known a few people.
Speaker 2 (05:40):
Maybe maybe possibly maybe maybe somebody. I don't Yeah, I
don't think it was anybody significant. I think I think
he all built it on chance and and great fortune
and and and great entrepreneurship, right, exactly. Yeah, So let's
break down these passengers. First of all, who was on
the flight. It was five women or six women, I'm sorry,
(06:02):
six women, including Katy Perry. That she's the most prominent one.
I think because she's a pop star, right.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
And yeah, yeah, Katy Perry's well known.
Speaker 2 (06:11):
She's a global pop star icon known for her larger
than life performances and the use of symbolic imagery of
her music videos, but are also her work associated with
the occult, mysticism and spiritual themes. Remember dark Horse and Firework?
Speaker 1 (06:31):
Oh yeah, yep.
Speaker 2 (06:33):
And I don't know much about her music. I only
know the controversy ones. Remember dark Horse and she had
that what was that the Grammys? And she was dressed
as a witch and she was put on an altar
and levitated and then put in a crystal a crystal ball,
and they had a Satanic ritual and trying to tell
(06:54):
me that she applauded this. Now, this is Katy Perry.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
You know who she is, right, Yeah, Katie Harry is
that singer.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
Yeah. But she started out as a humble Christian.
Speaker 1 (07:06):
Christian from a Christian family, your parents.
Speaker 2 (07:09):
Katie Hudson Hudson, right, And do you know her first
appearance in a video, her first video?
Speaker 1 (07:15):
It must have been a Christian video, right, So it was.
Speaker 2 (07:19):
It was a video by a band called p O
D Christian rock band O D p O D.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
Like to know what that demand?
Speaker 2 (07:29):
Oh, it's a there Christian themed rock band. And she
appeared in in a video or in the song. What
happened was she was hanging out at the studio and
she wanted to be the next uh uh Grant. What's
that lady's name?
Speaker 1 (07:46):
I have no idea.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
Amy Amy Grant. So she she wanted to be the
next Amy Grant. Yeah, and she decided that she wanted
to hang around the studio and pod were doing a
song and they said, hey, you know, maybe we can
get some female singer to do some back background. And
since she was hanging around like a you know, like
a studio groupie they used her, and they put her.
(08:11):
They put her in the video too. What's the name
of the song? Where do we go? A new song?
Uh no, it's not new song, new song. I forgot
what the name of the video is. But anyway, so
she arose from that and then she got recognized on
her own, changed her name to Carrie Katie Perry and
(08:32):
started doing bubblegum songs but not Christian because she had
the song I Kissed the Girl and I liked it.
So she had a lot of controversy. And when she went, uh,
mainstream industry bought she. She got bigger and bigger and bigger,
and her bubblegum songs started turning into more occult themes
(08:55):
and general uh sexual themes and such. So you know,
she was sold. She sold out, and she may have
been selected to represent spiritual transcendence, and we wonder if
her participation was seen as a metal for for the
elite assent into space, reinforcing the idea that only the
(09:18):
select few, often entertainment and media industry people, are capable
of transcending Earth's boundaries. So it's basically elitism. You know,
you can all be free, all release your minds, but
only us can do the elite things. And we wonder
if she's also participating in a ritual tied to the
esoteric beliefs or a new World order narrative in her
(09:48):
in her video, she's often showing like spiritual ascension. And
but you remember she had that video about her face
a kissing an et, and you wonder maybe she was
looking for her mate.
Speaker 1 (10:05):
I don't know, and that would be close encounters of
the third kind or maybe fourth kinds, or.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
Or connection with the spiritual entities, demotic entities, maybe trying
to break through to the next dimension beyond earth.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
But I think that's what cern was about, to breaking
the you know thee Yeah, the third and fourth dimension.
Speaker 2 (10:28):
That's a weird thing. The certain thing is it's so
weird because it's scientific. But then you know, they deny
that they had anything spiritual, but then it's laced with
spiritual text manuscripts inside the facility and the and the
people that are associated direct director. We've often often quoted
Tara shield Shears who said that we may break reality.
(10:52):
We're going to break throughs reality basically look for the
inner dimensional, I don't know, separate separation or whatever. And
then you got Sergio what the heck is his name,
but Trushi or something like that, that he said that
something of that interdimensional realm may come into this dimension,
(11:18):
or something from this dimension may go into that realm.
So they're basically talking about quantum physics breaking through the
ether and all this identifying the God particle and all that.
So that's weird stuff, but you know this is more spiritual,
breaking through the dimensions in a spiritual sense, spiritually or
emotionally or whatever, you know, through a cult themes cult imagery.
(11:41):
You got to remember how these occultists view this. They
don't use imagery like you and I use imagery. They
don't use it for artwork. They don't use it even
to mark things as much. They use it for magic.
It's symbolic magic. The articles that they use. The symbolic
imagery they use is supposed to to bring them energy,
(12:02):
bring them power. So the more they use it, the
more power they draw. So you know, either Katy Perry
or Katie Paarry's handlers are coaxing these images because you
have like the dark Horse music video with the Grammy
thing was bad enough using fire and light and rebirth
(12:26):
imagery and the scarlet woman riding the beast, and the
beast was filled with diamonds, laced with diamonds. And I
remember Fritz Springmyer and Freeman Fly were coming up with
theories about what would be produced at the Grammys before
they came, and Fritz Springmyer made it notice that diamond
(12:51):
imagery was prominent in MK ultra at that time, Monarch
diamond programming. And she comes out with a diamond laced beast. Incredible,
he guessed it, wow, And I have that video. I
think Freeman Fly and said about the scarlet beast was
(13:11):
about to be unleashed in fire, rebirth and all this.
So they both got it. They nailed it before the Grammy.
But then her video is depicting an ancient sorceress with
Egyptian themes. It's all about that. And of course the
writer of that song, was it Max or Doctor Luke.
(13:35):
I think it was one of those. They were kind
of a team producer. They were main handlers for a
lot of top performers. And I don't remember which which
one of them wrote it, but one of them were
involved in writing this, and they wrote a lot of stuff.
You know, remember the star Keisha. I think our name
is she was suing doctor Luke for abuse sexual abuse,
(13:58):
and then I think she dropped the case. But these
people are involved. And you remember that that Katy Perry.
Do you remember that Katy Perry video. Did you see
this where her eyes rolled the back of her head.
Speaker 1 (14:12):
Like she was Yes, I did see that.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
That was freaky, wasn't it her eyes? She was like
in trance. And then the one that she she was
standing before the crowd and she was like gasping for breath,
and all of a sudden, her eyes just brightened up,
like like she just went into a trance of her programming.
Speaker 1 (14:33):
Yep, but she was being taken over by some type
of entity.
Speaker 2 (14:36):
Yeah, exactly. And I saw a video. I saw a video.
I was watching it for a different purpose than identifying
the occult or anything or mk ultra. I was watching
the video because her band went into a rendition after
one of the songs at the end of the concert
went into a rendition of a Rush song. I was
really intrigued by that. They didn't just do like a
(14:57):
famous Rush song like Tom Sawyer. They did a Deep
Sickness X one, the story about space in the concept
album of Rush Hemispheres or a farewell to King one
of those Wow, it was not a famous song. It
was one of the most obscure, deep cut songs. So
her band, I know, knew something. They were into Rush
(15:19):
as fans. But in the video when I was watching
it the live performance, she jumped off the stage and
was interacting with her audience, went back on stage, and
all of a sudden, she dropped back like her crew
had to pick her up like she she like got
knocked out for a second, and then they had to
kind of revive her and push her back on stage.
(15:40):
She looked like she was possessed. It was really weird.
So she's got a lot of these weird And then
you remember she was crying in that one video. She
was crying and says, oh, where did Katie Hudson go?
Where'd my old being go? I want to be Katie
Hudson again. I want to be my old self. They
turned me into this being, this creature. She was talking
about her stage persona and the programming that she received.
(16:04):
I mean, these people will tell you they told you.
I'm not making this up. I'm not telling you I
think she was pro I'm telling you she was acting
like she was programmed. She admitted that they were they
had a spell on her. And then she has a
lot of horace symbolism.
Speaker 1 (16:21):
Yeah, I've seen that too, yep.
Speaker 2 (16:22):
References to occult interviews and she has raised eyebrows, which
is symbolism of occultism, of Egyptian occultism. So her role,
you know, whether she's in the occult, whether this is
a cult ritual. We'll get into this in a second.
But then there's Audrey Powers, corporate elite in space, and
(16:45):
she had qualifications as an aerospace engineer and she was
one of the most capable individuals to take part in
the mission, because I guess she had some training. Is
that what it was. I think she had some training
in the past, but u but she was she was
(17:09):
significant in the corporate control over space. So this is
like a positioning of corporate elites as future rulers of
space exploration and women empowerment. And this Audrey Powers represents
the merger of technology power in space, highlighting the increasing
(17:31):
corporalization of space and tech moguls influence on the final frontier.
And it's also symbol of how corporate elite can be
involved in space and be the forerunners for regular mass exploration.
But I don't see mass exploration happening because I think
(17:54):
it's how much is it to ride this thing or
to get involved.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
I don't know if it's fifty grand or somewhere in that.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
Area, thirty or fifty grand forty? Yeah, So I mean,
who's gonna put up that money just to, you know,
to do this. I don't know. Somebody made but I
had the money to do it. But I'm not gonna
waste my money on this. I I'd rather have a
down payment on a house.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
I hadn't throw it at you.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
But anyway, her role suggests the future of space that
maybe more about national pride and a corporate domination. So
it was it was serving as a showcase for their
abilities to control humanity's next phase. And then you have
Mackenzie Scott philanthropy and power. She's the ex wife of
(18:41):
Jeff Jeff Bezos. Isn't I ironic? Really send you out? Hey,
I have a have a I have a plan. I'll
send my wife, my ex wife, into space. I'll entice
her to take my ship and I'll make sure it crashes. No,
I mean he didn't do that, but you know, would
(19:02):
you do that? Crasher. No, I'm just kidding. So she
used her vast wealth to donate billions to various causes.
But she's also a prominent figure in elite circles for
her philanthropy. So her benevolence of donating large money to
institutions and causes, but that helps the consolidation of powers
(19:26):
within the hands of the wealthy. So the philanthropy, it's
like the Rockefeller philanthropy. We're given to colleges and universities.
Why because you like to see kids having an education. No,
because they're putting their own people in place as CEOs
and deans. Were they fooling? They have the money to
do it. So there, you know, it's seen as more
(19:51):
of a propaganda move. Her philanthropy is, you know, is
the the draw that you know, Oh she's she gives,
and you know everybody that gives supposed to be you know,
represents good goodness they give. It's like the Rockefellers, but
(20:12):
it's symbolizing wealth and power that only elite people possess.
And we wonder if the flight of a ritual a
ritualistic ascension for philanthropists and tech moguls are reinforcing the
idea that wealthy elite have the privilege to transcend Earth
and explore to Cosmos, because you and I are the
(20:33):
average person can't do that. Right, Then we have Lauren Sanchez.
She's in the media. She was also Jeff Bezos's girlfriend.
What's he sending all his girlfriends up there?
Speaker 1 (20:50):
Maybe he doesn't like them, to get rid of them,
That's what I was saying.
Speaker 2 (20:54):
Now, she's a media mogul, she's a former TV anchor.
I don't know for I don't have that information in
front of me. I didn't look deep into it, kind
of thought of this topic. I had another topic, as
you know, Darren, I had another topic in mind, and
I switched at the last minute. When I saw I
heard news about the Blue Origin, I said, oh, maybe
(21:16):
I better covered that because it's still fresh. So I
switched off and I pivoted to this. So I got
my notes together and probably not that long, probably a
couple hours. I had to do it after work today
to get ready for this presentation. I hope I served
you well though with it. But so Sanchez's participation was
(21:37):
seen as reinforcing the idea of elite dynasties because Bezos
and Sanchez represent new world order where the wealthy powerful
are united in control over space, and it's suggesting that
space isn't just for scientists and explorers or NASA. It's
being marketed as a luxury experience for glow will elite,
(22:01):
and the media playing a key role in shaping public
opinion towards that. You know, it's almost like sports. You're
watching people athletes that can do things you can never do,
and you root them on and cheer them on and
applaud them and get involved. This is like rooting on
these women for going out in space, something that you'll
never be able to affward and do. But you're rooting
(22:22):
them on for their participation and their accomplishment into space.
And you know there's other things. You know, media manipulation
is part of it. And she's a media mogul, so
maybe this is part of her sector in this selecting
media figures for these flights. They could spend the narrative
(22:43):
anyway they want. How do you even know they really
went up there?
Speaker 1 (22:47):
Oh? You know, just like you know, I said, once
it looks wait what do you say, it looks so real? Wait,
it looks it's fake because it's real, Because it looks
so fake something like that. He even said that, yeah,
he said that on TV about his in the car
going up in space and let yeah, but you.
Speaker 2 (23:05):
Got to remember that he's competing his own SpaceX Explorations,
isn't he Yes, So he's probably in you know, it's
like it's like, uh, Walmart competing with Target, or Low's
competing with home Depot. You know, they had the same CEOs,
the same financiers, but they're they're on the surface, they're
(23:26):
competing for the public uh focus, you know, so uh yeah,
I mean, these influencers are supposed to be like heroes
for this thing. But didn't they say something about when
they when they came down, they they were supposed to
unlock the doors, and Jeff Bezos was too anxious, and
(23:47):
he went over and opened the door and they closed
it real quick, and or somebody, no, somebody else I
think opened it and they closed it real quick. And
then Bezos had to make a big display that he
was unlocking it. They don't opened it. How did it
flight open so easy? This thing really go out in space?
And they said there was a six after six minutes,
(24:07):
there was a glitch in the video and they said
they could have, they could have switched videos. Who knows
what they did, and then they showed them inside of course,
you know, floating, because that's the whole thing. And I
don't think they went up to the moon or anything.
I think they just went into space a little bit.
So I don't know if they they crashed through the
belt there.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
Belt?
Speaker 2 (24:30):
Did they? I don't think they even want that far,
did they? Or how far do you have to go
when you can start to float?
Speaker 1 (24:35):
Well, according to the mainstream scientific paradigm that there is
an outer space in an endless universe in relation in
comparison to you know, being encapsulated with a firmament, that's
a whole o their subject. But where you're able to float,
that's type of theoretical. Okay, well they're away from this
(24:56):
gravity source, but we believe as a flat earth there
that it's not gravity, but you know, a diamagnetism push
down from being in a toroital field, you know, company
with buoyancy in density, but gravity that's you know, like
I said, that's a speculative. So I can't really answer
that question from a scientific standpoint.
Speaker 2 (25:12):
Because there's not really it. But I don't know their
narrative and how that works. And then there's Wally Funk,
aviator and space pioneer. I guess she was pioneering one
of the first female astronaut trainees in the sixties. And
she wasn't allowed to fly in space until the twenty
twenty one mission of Blue Origin, so she was already
(25:34):
on it. And now she's included in the NS thirty
one and this is seen as a historic moment. Why
because probably Katie Perry's aboard. I don't know. Now she
could be interpreting the elite narrative of breaking barriers for women,
but also symbolizing the initiation of women into new error
(25:54):
of space exploration. This could be a ritualistic moment where
women are power and our scene is ascending to the
next level of leadership again, the rising of the women,
the rising of the female deity, the rising of the goddesses,
you know her. You know people are going to say
(26:14):
this is sexist or chauvenus, but you know, we're just
bringing up the aspect. Is it is it chauvin us
to say ishtar was uh was worshiped and uh she
gave birth to the gods, and and that's why we
worship the women and the fertility, and you know that?
Is that racist too? Or is that chauvenus too? Uh? Now,
it's it's just fact of female fertility, worship, sexual rituals
(26:38):
and such.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
Did you say that to try to close your mouth?
Because if you're saying something they don't like, they you know,
use semantics against you, against you, you know, exactly psychological. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (26:49):
Now she could be representing elder wisdom and transitioning to
the new age of space where the older generations of
elites ascended into the heavens. I don't know. Uh, then
we got Arianna Huffington, author media founder of huff Post.
Huffington Post. Is that what that is? Arianna founded it?
I didn't know. I'm not sure about Okay, Well, she
(27:12):
was was an advocacy for mental health, aligning herself with
the ideas of transforming human consciousness. What's that like? Magic?
Human consciousness? Transforming uh, you know, transforming will into into
you know what, what's the definition of magic? This is
(27:34):
not off the not rolling off the tip of my tongue, uh, changing,
transformation of the will or something like that. But this
runs through many transhumanisms and spiritual movements. So her inclusion
may be seen as a reinforcing of elite agendas, the
role of women shaping humanity, but also the symbolism of
(27:54):
spiritual awakening and uh, you know, maybe a larger transhumanist agenda.
It's not just about physical exploration, but about evolving human
consciousness and exploration. Now, of course I'm speculating I'm reaching them,
(28:15):
but I'm just giving you these ideas. And it seems
that it was a publicity stunt. Why are they choosing
these women their flash and prominence of empowerment, and it's
likely to bring attention to the loss, to the launch
and emotional content that's needed for publicity. It could be
a big pr stunt. And then you got five women
(28:37):
that are all connected to the global elite, whether in business, media, philanthropy,
or or entertainment. And their symbolism transcends to these things
that are visible, that are known, that we often relate to. Now,
they went through some preparations. Now this are they included
(29:02):
as as astronauts? Now is Katie Perry an astronaut? This
is I guess so right. They went to extensive G
force and gravity general gravity simulations. Of course, it could
be in a simulation for on the on the on
the recording, on the video for all we know. But uh,
they prepared psychologically, They had to go through a whole
(29:24):
bunch of psychological readiness. Is this their programming? Is this
part of their m k Ulter programming. I don't doubt
that the astronauts, the male astronauts, were not under some
kind of psychological mk Ulter like experience to maybe visualize
that they were in space. Who knows what they really were,
because he talked to Buzz Aldridge Aldrin. Uh and and
(29:48):
he was hinting that maybe they didn't go to space. Yes,
really peculiar, wasn't it.
Speaker 1 (29:54):
Yep? He asked a little a little girl asked him,
why have we haven't been to space? And he's like,
that's not an eight year old's question, that's my question.
It's because we've never been there. It's just the way
it is.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
Yeah, he was. And then they then they tried to
they tried to spin it and say, oh, he's lost
his mind, he's getting senile. Oh yeah, okay, there's yep.
Speaker 1 (30:15):
Another man followed him through a public place when he's
holding a bible and asking him to put his hand
in the Bible and swear that we've been to the moon.
He asked several times, and he finally ended up punching
the guy in the face.
Speaker 2 (30:26):
Oh wow. All right, So so there are a cult
and transhumanist agenda ties connections to this. What's really behind
the curtain and the occult connections. Now, you got to
understand the space exploration had been linked to a cult
(30:48):
symbolism right from the beginning, with the rocket launch representing
ascending to higher realms. This is actually factual, folks. For
anybody that's denying that rocketry, rocket launch, exploration space, for
anybody denying that it had any occult ties, it was
(31:10):
all to do with as sending into hio realms and
reaching spiritual awakening. If you don't believe me, look at
the very purpose of Jack Parsons, the founder of jet
propulsion and rocketry and what NASA was based on. Jack
Parsons was a follower of Alistair Crowley and was involved
in what's called the Babylon Working ritual Babylon with a
(31:32):
Ba ba l o n to summon the scarlet woman
that for the beast, for the Antichrist, just like Alister
Croley said, he's the Antichrist, he's the beast. This ritual
was to bring the scarlet woman as the horror for
the beast, and Parsons practiced several times occult rituals by
launching rockets, which are obelisks. Think about it, the rockets
(31:56):
are shaped like obelisks. That was purposeful. Is a male
phallic symbol, the male penis. And he he launched rockets
into the atmosphere to puncture the dome, which is a
symbolic of the sexual wound womb as a sexual ritual
and duality. And uh, this stuff all relates the rocket here,
(32:21):
the blue origin rocket. Did you see this thing?
Speaker 1 (32:25):
I think I've seen one picture of video of it. Yeah,
it's it's.
Speaker 2 (32:29):
It's a phallic symbol. It's shaped like a penis. I mean,
come on, and they're sending women up there. What is
this symbolic of They're sending women in a male phallic
to puncture the atmosphere of the womb of the woman.
Oh yeah, this is basically a ritual, right.
Speaker 1 (32:54):
I read around Easter time too.
Speaker 2 (32:56):
Act Yeah, yeah, it was it was up till Yeah.
Speaker 1 (32:59):
That's the goddess of fertility, yeah most.
Speaker 2 (33:03):
Likely, Yeah, but it relates to Isis, because that's what
the phallic symbol is from. It's from Egyptian mysticism of
Isis and Osiris, okay, and and and the lost organ
male organ and the search for it. But this is
all duality. Duality is taking the opposites, the duality and
(33:27):
and and uniting them and it becomes an energy ritual.
This is a unity. This is an overall you know,
representation of female empowerment, male empowerment ritual. And even the symbols,
the ritual symbols of wearing the blue flight suits could
be seen as ritualistic uniforms that are elevated into the
(33:50):
next spiritual realm.
Speaker 1 (33:53):
Especially when you said mentioned lost, you know how it's lost.
That could also perhaps be related to Pindar Pinnacle of
the Dragon.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
Yeah, I don't know about that.
Speaker 1 (34:03):
Yeah, that's soosally the highest of all the elite if
you want to call them that, you know, ranking order
in the pyramid above the Illuminati and all them. So
I'm that one. Yeah, that's Pinnacle of the Dragon is
basically the penis of Satan essentially. Huhh, I mean, I
just want it was related to that when you said that, maybe, I.
Speaker 2 (34:26):
Mean it's good. This is definitely related to spiritual rebirth
or ascension, just like occult traditions. I mean, even if
this is scientific, whatever they want to say in the narrative,
it's still laced with it mirrors occult traditions, initiations and such.
So I mean, I don't know, it just seems like,
(34:48):
you know, it's it's a metaphor for spiritual transcendence, with
pat the passengers representing the elite who are about to
escape Earth's turmoils and uh in aristal, rich ualistic journey
where the elite are prepared to enter the new realm,
the new world order or the New Age or whatever,
and the idea of space travel as a ritual It
(35:11):
has been discussed in occult circles for years. Rocket launches,
as I mentioned, synonymous with Aleister Crowley Magic and Jack
Parson's continuation of it ascending into Heaven's spiritual elevation and
space as the new heaven. Could these flights represent the
ascension of the elite into a new world order?
Speaker 1 (35:32):
Wow?
Speaker 2 (35:33):
Yep. For some the space represents a new frontier and
for others it's a spiritual transcendent. So we have to
wonder what the purpose of this is, but the fact
that it's so prominent, and could it be a redirection
of other things? I don't know, But you know, I'm
a skeptic of why they do these things, why they
(35:55):
have to do and how they do it. I mean, again,
how Jeff Bezos, how does even Elon Musk have satellites
up in space? How did he get this? I'm sure
Elon Musk didn't build a satellite in his garage right
one day and said I'm going to shoot this up,
and he had to have elite people behind it, technology technicians.
Speaker 1 (36:17):
Some of them actually debunked the nocean that there's tens
of thousands of satellites in orbit because number one, they're
not visible. Second one, well they claimed they're just stalloons,
like big satellites on balloons.
Speaker 2 (36:29):
Well, some people do visualize them. They say that when
you see those one moving in the skies to some
of those are satellites. A lot of people attend. My
son thinks he sees them once in a while. He says, oh,
I see some satellites up there. Because they look different.
They're not planes, they're just sitting up there, right, But
could they be drones? I don't know. I don't know,
but but no, you could see them. You could see
the satellites up there.
Speaker 1 (36:49):
I guess.
Speaker 2 (36:50):
So I don't know, but this whole thing just reeks
of a spiritual occult, hidden rituals to me, So I
guess we'll go on that.
Speaker 1 (36:59):
Darren sounds good, all right.
Speaker 2 (37:01):
So my website Jim Duke Perspective dot com. Check it out,
tune in for us every week. I'm going to try
to hold these things every week still, even during my move,
I'm gonna be doing odd time recordings, so I won't
be able to be joined by anybody. I'm sorry if
you missed Darren for a couple of weeks. He's still
(37:21):
gonna be with us, but just not able to make
my flexible recording schedule because it's going to be on
the whim. So we'll see it. We'll see you next time,
and God bless