July 9, 2025 • 27 mins
According to Attorney General Pam Bondi it is now found out that the said "Epstein Client List" NEVER EXISTED. Just like that it disappeared, "nuff said, let's move on, Also told that the official narrative of Epstein's suicide is as stated, not foul play. That according to the hero Dan Bongino.
The Big Beautiful Bill got passed. The contents may be Big beautiful... BS if you examine that it raises the debt ceiling, allow $4T in spending and increases possible inflation.
We examine and talk about these two topics. Forgive me for speaking through my inferior recording device. My equipment is still in storage.
The Big Beautiful Bill got passed. The contents may be Big beautiful... BS if you examine that it raises the debt ceiling, allow $4T in spending and increases possible inflation.
We examine and talk about these two topics. Forgive me for speaking through my inferior recording device. My equipment is still in storage.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
Hey, folks, Welcome to Jim Duke perspective.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
I'm coming to you again from my personal device rather
than my studio equipment that's still packed away. It's still
stored right now while I am in the process of
getting my studio done in which by the way, I'm
instrumental in, which is why I don't have the time to,
(00:38):
you know, go to a new studio or a different
place or whatever, because I'm actually involved doing the building
and the upgrade. So I am not in the having
the ability the time to simultaneously do everything. So I
just want to brief you on things that are going
on as I can. The one thing I'm concerned.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
About is.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
Did you hear this?
Speaker 2 (01:08):
The Jeffrey Epstein list client list never existed. Isn't that convenient?
If you remember, one of Trump's campaigns was that he
was going to reveal the list. He was going to
have the investigators look at it. After several months of
(01:30):
promising us that we'll look into the into the list.
If you remember, Attorney General Pam Bondie said it was
on her desk. She was quoted as saying that that
I have the bill, It's sitting on my desk and
(01:53):
we're going.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
To reveal it. But before she could reveal it, it.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Got put in the hands of the FBI and the
d o J that sent a memo that said that
it's a mandated investigation into it, that they have to
look over the the documents to make sure there isn't
any incriminating information or or let's say this and any
(02:21):
any uh sensitive information that needs to go through before
it gets released. So now all of a sudden, all
of a sudden, after months of this, the Justice Department
and and Pambody say that the list never existed. There's
(02:46):
no evidence that the list was ever ever exists, was
ever there.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
I mean, you gotta you gotta be kidding me.
Speaker 2 (02:57):
And a lot of pambondy these videos of her testifying
or admitting that the list was on her desk. It's
surfacing now, it's sitting on my desk now to review,
she said in February, and she even said that's been
a directive by President Trump and I'm reviewing that.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
Now.
Speaker 2 (03:24):
BONDI promised that the information would be coming and FBI
agents that were assigned to national security I think that's
what I was getting. Make sure it wasn't national security issues.
That's what they were trying to review it for working
around the clock, if you remember, with reviewing all the
documents that.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
They had.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
And other evidences, getting ready for public release, and they
stopped mentioning this release.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
They kind of squashed it.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
And if you remember, they asked Trump if he's still
going to release it, and he says, oh, it's not important.
Speaker 3 (04:01):
We got other things to get to.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
So FBI Director Kashpattel and deputy Director Dan Bongino, who
was instrumental in the case before while he was a
public entertainer, quickly questioned the investigation. He was questioning the
investigation before, you know, entering the government position in that
(04:30):
he was mentioning that there are you know, questions whether
Epstein was murdered, whether this list is incriminating. Now says
there is no evidence, there's no evidence, and the video,
the jailhouse video that we had of Epstein's death is
clear as day that it was suicide. There's now not
(04:51):
even any references to the people that left the area.
They squashed all those, all those details else that would
bring suspicion to Epstein's suicide to mean that you know,
he could have been killed. Now, aren't even in the play.
(05:12):
So the two things that are being told is that
that Epstein wasn't killed. He was he committed suicide. We
don't have any evidence otherwise, and that the list doesn't exist.
We don't have any evidence of the list. Even Elon
Musk tied in.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
He wrote, he wrote.
Speaker 2 (05:34):
About this, you know, this, this little feud between him
and Trump. You know that now they're now they're mortal enemies,
and you know this little, uh sandbox thing they have
going on here, this little sandbox battle.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
But he, you know, he even.
Speaker 3 (05:56):
He even reacted that what time is it.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
He says, Oh, look it's no one has been arrested
at o'clock again, Yeah, no one's arrested. So here we
go with the Epstein files being squashed. Just makes us
think what do they have to hide? And then you know,
on top of that, pe did he gets off? P
did he gets off? I mean basically he walks. You
(06:23):
can't make this stuff up. There was evidence against him.
Now there's not enough evidence against him. Trump talks up
the FBI and tries to recover his his base, who
was erupting at the client list denial. His fans are
starting to even question, I know several people that are
(06:45):
starting to say, wait a minute, Wait a minute, what's
going on here? Did he do a flip on us? Yes,
you trusted. You trusted that he's gonna you know, he
was going to save the world, he was going to
save politics.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
He you know, he was going to reveal this stuff
the deep state.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
By the way, now, the only people he went after
are people that ticked them off.
Speaker 3 (07:06):
And it wasn't because of.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
This moral issue or anything.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
But he he said, basically, the FBI is going back
to the basics, focusing on street level crimes.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
Let's get on with this.
Speaker 2 (07:21):
And he even you know, agreed, there's no client list
to be released.
Speaker 3 (07:28):
Okay, let's go, let's move on. Ah.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
How quick are they.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
To dismiss this stuff, deny this stuff.
Speaker 3 (07:38):
It's amazing.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
I'm gonna read the part of this, the rap that
says dj FBI insists there's no Jeffrey Epstein list, five
months after Pam Bondi said it was sitting on her desk.
Video and it says, according to the new memo reviewed
the Justice Department and FBI have found no evidence of
(08:04):
a long rumored list of clients once held by financierild
Sex offender and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who reportedly died
by suicide while in federal detention in twenty nineteen. Long
(08:25):
subject of conspiracy theories and rumors. Yeah, of course, and
at the center of it was the suggestion of this list.
And he had this black book, if you remember, that
was either for purposes of blackmail or conspiracy in order
to maintain his ongoing operation. And Pambondi was appointed to
(08:49):
the position of attorney general in that she said, admitted
that she was in possession of the list, demanding more
evidence be sent forward to her desk, and that was
the directive's And all of a sudden, everybody turns her head. No,
(09:13):
nothing to see here. We don't have a list.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
What list? There's no list, And the article says.
Speaker 2 (09:22):
Now the FBI and Dog memo insists that the Trump
mandated investigation into Epstein's criminal past did not uncover evidence
that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. If
you remember, for her part, when Bondi was asked in
(09:44):
July about the delay, why is it delayed? And we
talked about this, Why is there a delay in the
release of more substantial information about Epstein. Bondi told White
House reporters that the FBI in the midst of reviewing
tens of thousands of pornographic videos involving minors and different
(10:08):
things and looking at the lists, and all of a sudden,
now nothing, no evidence it exists, and she just denies
that any list had surfaced under any investigation. I mean,
(10:29):
these people play us up. They think we're stupid. Now,
you know what, They don't think we're stupid, They don't hope,
but that we're stupid. What they count on is our
lack of following through. They know that they're getting away
with it. They know they're lying. They're counting on our
(10:50):
inability to.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
Demand of transparency.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
They're relying on our inability to form a tribunal council
or anything like that to override the government to demand
these things. They're counting on the fact that we will
never rise up against the government in a revolution and
that we will never act on our First Amendment rights
(11:22):
of petitioning and redressing government. So that's why they do it.
They can do it, and you know what, they can
be as silly as they want, it can be as
obvious as they want, and they can count on people
relying on the official narrative and never getting to the
actual core of investigation or questionable skepticism, critical thinking or anything.
(11:48):
There's no critical thinking. There's you know, any critical thinking
is on behalf of the conspiracy theorists or the truth
or movement that brings these things up were the ones
that they are told to criticize and have critical thinking over,
not allowing us the critical thinking in order to question
(12:11):
the government.
Speaker 3 (12:12):
So and this is this is.
Speaker 2 (12:16):
Prevalent in the you know, the Warrant Commission, the Church Commission,
all these things that brought up past conspiracies that the
CIA used to deceive the public and to make derogatory
terms out of those that invest that call for investigation
(12:37):
or question the official narrative. You know, it's cognitive dissonance,
and they rely on that, and anybody that questions the
government is considered a conspiracy theorist. Kouk according to the
document in nineteen sixty seven that coined the phrase. Some
people questioned me, Oh, they didn't coin the phrase. They
(12:59):
just that's in the document. They didn't coin it though, Well,
they may not have coined it, but what they certainly
did was they emphasized how these things are our right
wing extremist kooks who should be in asane asylums.
Speaker 3 (13:14):
That's what they really count on. And I will.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
Further this by I remember growing up and seeing pictures
and seeing mockings of those that you know, said, oh,
the end is near and all this.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
Stuff, which I have to admit I even do.
Speaker 2 (13:30):
I've been coming against those that say, o, prophecy, God
told me the end is this year, Oh prophecy, the
end is soon, the end is. I come against those
people that are frantically hyping things up on the religious
term of declaring God told them and prophecy, they are
getting visions and all this stuff.
Speaker 3 (13:49):
Now that's to me, that's a bunch of bunk.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
But in the seventies they were criticizing anyone that would
question the government and would pose a conspiracy theory, and
they viewed them as tinfoil hat wearers. If you remember
all that, remember the ten pictures of people with a
was a dunce cap that was in the shape of
(14:13):
a of a tinfoil cap. You know that theory came
about because the tinfoil cat wearers were those that believed
that we were getting emitting frequencies. The government was emitting
frequencies and Germany was sending frequencies over and that by
wearing tinfoil on your head you would bounce off the
(14:34):
frequencies so you wouldn't be affected. Today it's called e
MF attacks that people are trying to diffuse their body
of any radioactivity. And you know, so the kooks have
gone from wearing tin hats to deflecting EMFs. You know,
(14:55):
all this stuff kind of the same thing, just on
a different level. But the CIA certainly learned to use
that to exploit those that were critical of government, and
they would lay down a campaign publicly against people and
try to convince people put it in their head that
anybody that thought this way or had a narrative that
(15:16):
was outside the official narrative was to be questioned and
they would be up for psychological treatment. Basically, so people
didn't get regard.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
To us back then.
Speaker 2 (15:30):
But now it's being with social media to be more
evident that these things are out there, and there's evidences
or at least strong speculations with dots connected that allude
to things really happening, and some people are awakening to
it and they're embracing the US conspiracy theorists. They're opening
(15:56):
their arms to us. We're a little bit more accepted
than we were in the seventies and eighties. I remember
in the nineties. I was a kid in the seventies
and eighties, and in the nineties as a young adult,
and I was starting to expose these things. And I
had a cable access television show that went to two states,
New York and Massachusetts, and I was on weekly. Yes,
(16:19):
I did this in weekly form on TV, a TV
production in my own basement. I mean, if you could
see videos of this, they said my video, my production
was pretty high class broadcast material. I mean, I had
a decent camera. I wasn't broadcast quality, but I tried
to enhance it later on, I bought a more enhanced camera.
(16:43):
But I was doing the stuff in my basement. I
was using the computer to edit and put graphics in.
And I was presenting these things back in the nineties,
and I was presenting things like the FEMA camps. I
was presenting things like the possibility of collections of decent
and s which didn't happen then, but I was bringing
it up then. I was bringing up government and banks,
(17:06):
government exploitation of people. I was bringing up the bankers,
the big bankers, and the pharmaceuticals, the chemtrails and what else?
Was I bring a new world order? Of course, so
I was doing this stuff back then. So this isn't
new to me, folks. Those the thing that I just
came on of podcast ten years ago and just started
(17:28):
wailing my mouth. I was on television, and maybe you
can find clips out there. I might have some, but
they're on ancient forms of formats that can't be played
today and any standard. I never converted them. Maybe I
can get them converted. But the thing is is.
Speaker 1 (17:44):
Most of them are a little bit archaic now.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
In today's standards. But back then they were broadcasted and
quality enough to be published, publicized, be pub made public.
And you know, so I had this stuff going on.
But I was even cited as a koup back then
by a lot of my peers and a lot of
(18:08):
my friends and some of my family. But it wasn't,
actually it wasn't until well the two thousands. People started
listening to me a little bit more. You know, I
was telling about nine to eleven all this stuff, and
they started saying.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
Well, maybe you're right, maybe there.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
Is stuff, But I was pointing out the real conspiracies
that are disclosed, that is proof like Operations Northwoods, proving
to them that there are conspiracies and showing them the
document never can remember it ten thirty five Dash ninety or.
Speaker 3 (18:42):
Something like that.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
In the CIA, it's called the it's under the Clandestine Units,
Special Units Department document that says that sixty seven, nineteen
sixty seven, anyone that questions the Warren Committee.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
Was to be up for.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
Charges of being ridiculed for conspiracy theories.
Speaker 3 (19:07):
You know, things like that. You know, so you know.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
But what really turned it around, I think is COVID.
The obvious push for a vaccine and the obvious exploitation
of our bodies and demand that we get this, and
a mass people started getting sick of it, and they
started questioning what the government's really up to. Then they
were flocking to those like me and others. What can
(19:32):
you tell me? What have we missed all these years?
Oh my gosh, we got to go back to nineteen
ninety four again and start from there. But then we
got to go back to ancient times, you know, back
to seventeen hundreds.
Speaker 1 (19:46):
Blah blah blah.
Speaker 3 (19:46):
Just listen to my podcast you know.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
But it's wild how those that were denying my fines
or not interested. A lot of times they deny you,
not because they're not interested or not because they don't
believe you, but because they don't want to see it.
They're not interested in being turned because it's a paradigm shift.
They have to admit that they're seeing things that they
(20:12):
don't want to see. They have to believe the opposite
of what they believe, and it's a paradigm shift, a shift,
it's cognitive dissonance, a choice to be distanced from the truth.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
So they're not denying, they're not.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
They're not.
Speaker 2 (20:30):
Necessarily denying our information. They're denying their willingness.
Speaker 3 (20:35):
To listen to it. Let's say it that way. That's
kind of how it is. So those are the.
Speaker 2 (20:43):
Things that are up, and you know, and then the
Trump Big Beautiful Bill. I wasn't gonna bring this up
in this time, but maybe maybe I'll try to pull
this up.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
The Big Beautiful Bill that is, basically.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
It's it's got nonpartisan, you know, things in it, supposedly
just to appease the other side, but it's supposed to
push massive tax cuts, permanently extends individual tax rates. I
guess it's removing tax on tips and overtime and social security.
(21:23):
That might be a good thing. That might be a
good thing. So, but it's a debt ceiling and deficit.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
Serge so raises the debt ceiling.
Speaker 3 (21:32):
Well, that's not a good thing.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
Every time they raise the debt ceiling, it puts more debt,
and we don't pay back the debt.
Speaker 3 (21:38):
We pay back the interest on it.
Speaker 2 (21:39):
So they're saying we need all these cuts so we
can raise the bills. I don't know, but they're raising
the ceiling and adding four trillion dollars to the deficit.
We didn't have it before, we don't have it now.
So what's the difference. Drastic safety cuts, Medicaid down twelve
(22:03):
percent of millions, twelve percent millions lose coverage, including stricter
snap and Medicaid work requirements. There's border defense spending, rollbacks
for green energy, eliminating many green energy tax credits, cultural
(22:25):
funding allocating forty million for natural our National Garden of
American Heroes, and then judicial shields, adding security bonds requirements
for plaintiffs seeking court injunctions in erosion of the judicial oversight.
According to al jazeer dot com. Now, why would we
(22:51):
be concerned over these things, Well, it's a fiscal madness.
First of all, there's shadows spending involved. There's enormous increases
in the deficit, in debt, in debt that that reflects
repeatd Trojan horse spending, things that get thrown through we
can't watch, you know, And we're worried about inflation. These
(23:12):
things are hike up inflation because the economy can't roll
without inflicting more currency.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
And that's the key. Quantitative easing, which.
Speaker 1 (23:22):
Lowers the value of the dollar, which.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
Increases the price of the value of the thing that
goes against what you're buying, so therefore raises the prices.
That's what causes inflation. There's a wealth redistribution to elites.
There's a cultural an ideological messaging symbolic things that are
(23:46):
removing green incentives. Well, some of these some of these incentives.
Speaker 3 (23:53):
For the environment.
Speaker 2 (23:54):
Got to admit that they're they're forcing us into regulations
that you know, carry the the theory that there's a
global warming in these things. Actually it isn't global warming.
It's now climate change, which takes care of both sides
whichever way it goes. Yeah, loopholes for the wealthy. But
(24:16):
the thing that we've seen here is that there's authoritarian
paths of things getting closer to the Project twenty twenty
five plans that he denied that he was following.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
Some claim that this is bringing.
Speaker 2 (24:30):
Him more enforcement powers to the presidency, more executive powers,
and there's also warning of surveillance, heightened surveillance. You got
to remember this doage thing that went on. It wasn't
all about just cutting spending, that's what we thought. It
was about identifying the waste and then making suggestions and
(24:53):
altercation alterations to the departments, making them more transparent or accountable. However,
Congress would have to pass cuts in these spendings, and
they weren't. They were reluctant in doing that. Therefore, nothing
really got cut. It was just suggestions. But what did happen,
(25:14):
we're told, is that they put in place more stringent
smart technology to monitor their whereabouts of the paperwork and
the things going on digitally, so that AI has been
involved in implanting itself in the surveillance of spending in
(25:34):
different departments. Now, how's that a danger? Well, if they're
monitoring the spending departments, they're monitoring those of us who
put in for the money that goes to the spending.
So it's likely that they could monitor the citizens and
try to cap our income based on what you know
(25:57):
they want distributed or whatever. I'm just saying it might
not happen, but I'm just saying it could. Just like
any smart technology isn't for you, it's for their benefit
of control. These things help put control mechanisms in place,
and who knows what they could do with it. Maybe
they decide to cut a certain energy department or something.
Maybe they decide that you're using too much energy and
(26:19):
based on your smart meter that they put in your
house now, they will petition for you to be cut
or throttled in your energy usage.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
I don't know. I'm just saying these things sometimes come up.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
So these are a couple things I wanted to hit
the desk with. I was gonna do a couple different
separate podcasts for it, but since they're both short and
I'm not throwing in a lot of extra material at
this time, I'm just giving you the surface in my opinion.
Speaker 3 (26:53):
That I think we'll just close with.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
This and give you this for this week, and I
thank you for listening my web site Jimdukeperspective dot com
and give it a give me a like. On social media,
look for my Jim Duke Perspective pages. I have a
Patreon page also, and I'm on Twitter, Jay Jay, you
have what is it jimd Perspective at Twitter dot com
(27:19):
something like that, and I'm on Facebook as well.
Speaker 3 (27:22):
And we'll see you next time. God bless
Hey, folks, Welcome to Jim Duke perspective.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
I'm coming to you again from my personal device rather
than my studio equipment that's still packed away. It's still
stored right now while I am in the process of
getting my studio done in which by the way, I'm
instrumental in, which is why I don't have the time to,
(00:38):
you know, go to a new studio or a different
place or whatever, because I'm actually involved doing the building
and the upgrade. So I am not in the having
the ability the time to simultaneously do everything. So I
just want to brief you on things that are going
on as I can. The one thing I'm concerned.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
About is.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
Did you hear this?
Speaker 2 (01:08):
The Jeffrey Epstein list client list never existed. Isn't that convenient?
If you remember, one of Trump's campaigns was that he
was going to reveal the list. He was going to
have the investigators look at it. After several months of
(01:30):
promising us that we'll look into the into the list.
If you remember, Attorney General Pam Bondie said it was
on her desk. She was quoted as saying that that
I have the bill, It's sitting on my desk and
(01:53):
we're going.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
To reveal it. But before she could reveal it, it.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Got put in the hands of the FBI and the
d o J that sent a memo that said that
it's a mandated investigation into it, that they have to
look over the the documents to make sure there isn't
any incriminating information or or let's say this and any
(02:21):
any uh sensitive information that needs to go through before
it gets released. So now all of a sudden, all
of a sudden, after months of this, the Justice Department
and and Pambody say that the list never existed. There's
(02:46):
no evidence that the list was ever ever exists, was
ever there.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
I mean, you gotta you gotta be kidding me.
Speaker 2 (02:57):
And a lot of pambondy these videos of her testifying
or admitting that the list was on her desk. It's
surfacing now, it's sitting on my desk now to review,
she said in February, and she even said that's been
a directive by President Trump and I'm reviewing that.
Speaker 1 (03:23):
Now.
Speaker 2 (03:24):
BONDI promised that the information would be coming and FBI
agents that were assigned to national security I think that's
what I was getting. Make sure it wasn't national security issues.
That's what they were trying to review it for working
around the clock, if you remember, with reviewing all the
documents that.
Speaker 3 (03:43):
They had.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
And other evidences, getting ready for public release, and they
stopped mentioning this release.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
They kind of squashed it.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
And if you remember, they asked Trump if he's still
going to release it, and he says, oh, it's not important.
Speaker 3 (04:01):
We got other things to get to.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
So FBI Director Kashpattel and deputy Director Dan Bongino, who
was instrumental in the case before while he was a
public entertainer, quickly questioned the investigation. He was questioning the
investigation before, you know, entering the government position in that
(04:30):
he was mentioning that there are you know, questions whether
Epstein was murdered, whether this list is incriminating. Now says
there is no evidence, there's no evidence, and the video,
the jailhouse video that we had of Epstein's death is
clear as day that it was suicide. There's now not
(04:51):
even any references to the people that left the area.
They squashed all those, all those details else that would
bring suspicion to Epstein's suicide to mean that you know,
he could have been killed. Now, aren't even in the play.
(05:12):
So the two things that are being told is that
that Epstein wasn't killed. He was he committed suicide. We
don't have any evidence otherwise, and that the list doesn't exist.
We don't have any evidence of the list. Even Elon
Musk tied in.
Speaker 1 (05:32):
He wrote, he wrote.
Speaker 2 (05:34):
About this, you know, this, this little feud between him
and Trump. You know that now they're now they're mortal enemies,
and you know this little, uh sandbox thing they have
going on here, this little sandbox battle.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
But he, you know, he even.
Speaker 3 (05:56):
He even reacted that what time is it.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
He says, Oh, look it's no one has been arrested
at o'clock again, Yeah, no one's arrested. So here we
go with the Epstein files being squashed. Just makes us
think what do they have to hide? And then you know,
on top of that, pe did he gets off? P
did he gets off? I mean basically he walks. You
(06:23):
can't make this stuff up. There was evidence against him.
Now there's not enough evidence against him. Trump talks up
the FBI and tries to recover his his base, who
was erupting at the client list denial. His fans are
starting to even question, I know several people that are
(06:45):
starting to say, wait a minute, Wait a minute, what's
going on here? Did he do a flip on us? Yes,
you trusted. You trusted that he's gonna you know, he
was going to save the world, he was going to
save politics.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
He you know, he was going to reveal this stuff
the deep state.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
By the way, now, the only people he went after
are people that ticked them off.
Speaker 3 (07:06):
And it wasn't because of.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
This moral issue or anything.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
But he he said, basically, the FBI is going back
to the basics, focusing on street level crimes.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
Let's get on with this.
Speaker 2 (07:21):
And he even you know, agreed, there's no client list
to be released.
Speaker 3 (07:28):
Okay, let's go, let's move on. Ah.
Speaker 1 (07:32):
How quick are they.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
To dismiss this stuff, deny this stuff.
Speaker 3 (07:38):
It's amazing.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
I'm gonna read the part of this, the rap that
says dj FBI insists there's no Jeffrey Epstein list, five
months after Pam Bondi said it was sitting on her desk.
Video and it says, according to the new memo reviewed
the Justice Department and FBI have found no evidence of
(08:04):
a long rumored list of clients once held by financierild
Sex offender and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who reportedly died
by suicide while in federal detention in twenty nineteen. Long
(08:25):
subject of conspiracy theories and rumors. Yeah, of course, and
at the center of it was the suggestion of this list.
And he had this black book, if you remember, that
was either for purposes of blackmail or conspiracy in order
to maintain his ongoing operation. And Pambondi was appointed to
(08:49):
the position of attorney general in that she said, admitted
that she was in possession of the list, demanding more
evidence be sent forward to her desk, and that was
the directive's And all of a sudden, everybody turns her head. No,
(09:13):
nothing to see here. We don't have a list.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
What list? There's no list, And the article says.
Speaker 2 (09:22):
Now the FBI and Dog memo insists that the Trump
mandated investigation into Epstein's criminal past did not uncover evidence
that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties. If
you remember, for her part, when Bondi was asked in
(09:44):
July about the delay, why is it delayed? And we
talked about this, Why is there a delay in the
release of more substantial information about Epstein. Bondi told White
House reporters that the FBI in the midst of reviewing
tens of thousands of pornographic videos involving minors and different
(10:08):
things and looking at the lists, and all of a sudden,
now nothing, no evidence it exists, and she just denies
that any list had surfaced under any investigation. I mean,
(10:29):
these people play us up. They think we're stupid. Now,
you know what, They don't think we're stupid, They don't hope,
but that we're stupid. What they count on is our
lack of following through. They know that they're getting away
with it. They know they're lying. They're counting on our
(10:50):
inability to.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
Demand of transparency.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
They're relying on our inability to form a tribunal council
or anything like that to override the government to demand
these things. They're counting on the fact that we will
never rise up against the government in a revolution and
that we will never act on our First Amendment rights
(11:22):
of petitioning and redressing government. So that's why they do it.
They can do it, and you know what, they can
be as silly as they want, it can be as
obvious as they want, and they can count on people
relying on the official narrative and never getting to the
actual core of investigation or questionable skepticism, critical thinking or anything.
(11:48):
There's no critical thinking. There's you know, any critical thinking
is on behalf of the conspiracy theorists or the truth
or movement that brings these things up were the ones
that they are told to criticize and have critical thinking over,
not allowing us the critical thinking in order to question
(12:11):
the government.
Speaker 3 (12:12):
So and this is this is.
Speaker 2 (12:16):
Prevalent in the you know, the Warrant Commission, the Church Commission,
all these things that brought up past conspiracies that the
CIA used to deceive the public and to make derogatory
terms out of those that invest that call for investigation
(12:37):
or question the official narrative. You know, it's cognitive dissonance,
and they rely on that, and anybody that questions the
government is considered a conspiracy theorist. Kouk according to the
document in nineteen sixty seven that coined the phrase. Some
people questioned me, Oh, they didn't coin the phrase. They
(12:59):
just that's in the document. They didn't coin it though, Well,
they may not have coined it, but what they certainly
did was they emphasized how these things are our right
wing extremist kooks who should be in asane asylums.
Speaker 3 (13:14):
That's what they really count on. And I will.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
Further this by I remember growing up and seeing pictures
and seeing mockings of those that you know, said, oh,
the end is near and all this.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
Stuff, which I have to admit I even do.
Speaker 2 (13:30):
I've been coming against those that say, o, prophecy, God
told me the end is this year, Oh prophecy, the
end is soon, the end is. I come against those
people that are frantically hyping things up on the religious
term of declaring God told them and prophecy, they are
getting visions and all this stuff.
Speaker 3 (13:49):
Now that's to me, that's a bunch of bunk.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
But in the seventies they were criticizing anyone that would
question the government and would pose a conspiracy theory, and
they viewed them as tinfoil hat wearers. If you remember
all that, remember the ten pictures of people with a
was a dunce cap that was in the shape of
(14:13):
a of a tinfoil cap. You know that theory came
about because the tinfoil cat wearers were those that believed
that we were getting emitting frequencies. The government was emitting
frequencies and Germany was sending frequencies over and that by
wearing tinfoil on your head you would bounce off the
(14:34):
frequencies so you wouldn't be affected. Today it's called e
MF attacks that people are trying to diffuse their body
of any radioactivity. And you know, so the kooks have
gone from wearing tin hats to deflecting EMFs. You know,
(14:55):
all this stuff kind of the same thing, just on
a different level. But the CIA certainly learned to use
that to exploit those that were critical of government, and
they would lay down a campaign publicly against people and
try to convince people put it in their head that
anybody that thought this way or had a narrative that
(15:16):
was outside the official narrative was to be questioned and
they would be up for psychological treatment. Basically, so people
didn't get regard.
Speaker 3 (15:27):
To us back then.
Speaker 2 (15:30):
But now it's being with social media to be more
evident that these things are out there, and there's evidences
or at least strong speculations with dots connected that allude
to things really happening, and some people are awakening to
it and they're embracing the US conspiracy theorists. They're opening
(15:56):
their arms to us. We're a little bit more accepted
than we were in the seventies and eighties. I remember
in the nineties. I was a kid in the seventies
and eighties, and in the nineties as a young adult,
and I was starting to expose these things. And I
had a cable access television show that went to two states,
New York and Massachusetts, and I was on weekly. Yes,
(16:19):
I did this in weekly form on TV, a TV
production in my own basement. I mean, if you could
see videos of this, they said my video, my production
was pretty high class broadcast material. I mean, I had
a decent camera. I wasn't broadcast quality, but I tried
to enhance it later on, I bought a more enhanced camera.
(16:43):
But I was doing the stuff in my basement. I
was using the computer to edit and put graphics in.
And I was presenting these things back in the nineties,
and I was presenting things like the FEMA camps. I
was presenting things like the possibility of collections of decent
and s which didn't happen then, but I was bringing
it up then. I was bringing up government and banks,
(17:06):
government exploitation of people. I was bringing up the bankers,
the big bankers, and the pharmaceuticals, the chemtrails and what else?
Was I bring a new world order? Of course, so
I was doing this stuff back then. So this isn't
new to me, folks. Those the thing that I just
came on of podcast ten years ago and just started
(17:28):
wailing my mouth. I was on television, and maybe you
can find clips out there. I might have some, but
they're on ancient forms of formats that can't be played
today and any standard. I never converted them. Maybe I
can get them converted. But the thing is is.
Speaker 1 (17:44):
Most of them are a little bit archaic now.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
In today's standards. But back then they were broadcasted and
quality enough to be published, publicized, be pub made public.
And you know, so I had this stuff going on.
But I was even cited as a koup back then
by a lot of my peers and a lot of
(18:08):
my friends and some of my family. But it wasn't,
actually it wasn't until well the two thousands. People started
listening to me a little bit more. You know, I
was telling about nine to eleven all this stuff, and
they started saying.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
Well, maybe you're right, maybe there.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
Is stuff, But I was pointing out the real conspiracies
that are disclosed, that is proof like Operations Northwoods, proving
to them that there are conspiracies and showing them the
document never can remember it ten thirty five Dash ninety or.
Speaker 3 (18:42):
Something like that.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
In the CIA, it's called the it's under the Clandestine Units,
Special Units Department document that says that sixty seven, nineteen
sixty seven, anyone that questions the Warren Committee.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
Was to be up for.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
Charges of being ridiculed for conspiracy theories.
Speaker 3 (19:07):
You know, things like that. You know, so you know.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
But what really turned it around, I think is COVID.
The obvious push for a vaccine and the obvious exploitation
of our bodies and demand that we get this, and
a mass people started getting sick of it, and they
started questioning what the government's really up to. Then they
were flocking to those like me and others. What can
(19:32):
you tell me? What have we missed all these years?
Oh my gosh, we got to go back to nineteen
ninety four again and start from there. But then we
got to go back to ancient times, you know, back
to seventeen hundreds.
Speaker 1 (19:46):
Blah blah blah.
Speaker 3 (19:46):
Just listen to my podcast you know.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
But it's wild how those that were denying my fines
or not interested. A lot of times they deny you,
not because they're not interested or not because they don't
believe you, but because they don't want to see it.
They're not interested in being turned because it's a paradigm shift.
They have to admit that they're seeing things that they
(20:12):
don't want to see. They have to believe the opposite
of what they believe, and it's a paradigm shift, a shift,
it's cognitive dissonance, a choice to be distanced from the truth.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
So they're not denying, they're not.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
They're not.
Speaker 2 (20:30):
Necessarily denying our information. They're denying their willingness.
Speaker 3 (20:35):
To listen to it. Let's say it that way. That's
kind of how it is. So those are the.
Speaker 2 (20:43):
Things that are up, and you know, and then the
Trump Big Beautiful Bill. I wasn't gonna bring this up
in this time, but maybe maybe I'll try to pull
this up.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
The Big Beautiful Bill that is, basically.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
It's it's got nonpartisan, you know, things in it, supposedly
just to appease the other side, but it's supposed to
push massive tax cuts, permanently extends individual tax rates. I
guess it's removing tax on tips and overtime and social security.
(21:23):
That might be a good thing. That might be a
good thing. So, but it's a debt ceiling and deficit.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
Serge so raises the debt ceiling.
Speaker 3 (21:32):
Well, that's not a good thing.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
Every time they raise the debt ceiling, it puts more debt,
and we don't pay back the debt.
Speaker 3 (21:38):
We pay back the interest on it.
Speaker 2 (21:39):
So they're saying we need all these cuts so we
can raise the bills. I don't know, but they're raising
the ceiling and adding four trillion dollars to the deficit.
We didn't have it before, we don't have it now.
So what's the difference. Drastic safety cuts, Medicaid down twelve
(22:03):
percent of millions, twelve percent millions lose coverage, including stricter
snap and Medicaid work requirements. There's border defense spending, rollbacks
for green energy, eliminating many green energy tax credits, cultural
(22:25):
funding allocating forty million for natural our National Garden of
American Heroes, and then judicial shields, adding security bonds requirements
for plaintiffs seeking court injunctions in erosion of the judicial oversight.
According to al jazeer dot com. Now, why would we
(22:51):
be concerned over these things, Well, it's a fiscal madness.
First of all, there's shadows spending involved. There's enormous increases
in the deficit, in debt, in debt that that reflects
repeatd Trojan horse spending, things that get thrown through we
can't watch, you know, And we're worried about inflation. These
(23:12):
things are hike up inflation because the economy can't roll
without inflicting more currency.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
And that's the key. Quantitative easing, which.
Speaker 1 (23:22):
Lowers the value of the dollar, which.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
Increases the price of the value of the thing that
goes against what you're buying, so therefore raises the prices.
That's what causes inflation. There's a wealth redistribution to elites.
There's a cultural an ideological messaging symbolic things that are
(23:46):
removing green incentives. Well, some of these some of these incentives.
Speaker 3 (23:53):
For the environment.
Speaker 2 (23:54):
Got to admit that they're they're forcing us into regulations
that you know, carry the the theory that there's a
global warming in these things. Actually it isn't global warming.
It's now climate change, which takes care of both sides
whichever way it goes. Yeah, loopholes for the wealthy. But
(24:16):
the thing that we've seen here is that there's authoritarian
paths of things getting closer to the Project twenty twenty
five plans that he denied that he was following.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
Some claim that this is bringing.
Speaker 2 (24:30):
Him more enforcement powers to the presidency, more executive powers,
and there's also warning of surveillance, heightened surveillance. You got
to remember this doage thing that went on. It wasn't
all about just cutting spending, that's what we thought. It
was about identifying the waste and then making suggestions and
(24:53):
altercation alterations to the departments, making them more transparent or accountable. However,
Congress would have to pass cuts in these spendings, and
they weren't. They were reluctant in doing that. Therefore, nothing
really got cut. It was just suggestions. But what did happen,
(25:14):
we're told, is that they put in place more stringent
smart technology to monitor their whereabouts of the paperwork and
the things going on digitally, so that AI has been
involved in implanting itself in the surveillance of spending in
(25:34):
different departments. Now, how's that a danger? Well, if they're
monitoring the spending departments, they're monitoring those of us who
put in for the money that goes to the spending.
So it's likely that they could monitor the citizens and
try to cap our income based on what you know
(25:57):
they want distributed or whatever. I'm just saying it might
not happen, but I'm just saying it could. Just like
any smart technology isn't for you, it's for their benefit
of control. These things help put control mechanisms in place,
and who knows what they could do with it. Maybe
they decide to cut a certain energy department or something.
Maybe they decide that you're using too much energy and
(26:19):
based on your smart meter that they put in your
house now, they will petition for you to be cut
or throttled in your energy usage.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
I don't know. I'm just saying these things sometimes come up.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
So these are a couple things I wanted to hit
the desk with. I was gonna do a couple different
separate podcasts for it, but since they're both short and
I'm not throwing in a lot of extra material at
this time, I'm just giving you the surface in my opinion.
Speaker 3 (26:53):
That I think we'll just close with.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
This and give you this for this week, and I
thank you for listening my web site Jimdukeperspective dot com
and give it a give me a like. On social media,
look for my Jim Duke Perspective pages. I have a
Patreon page also, and I'm on Twitter, Jay Jay, you
have what is it jimd Perspective at Twitter dot com
(27:19):
something like that, and I'm on Facebook as well.
Speaker 3 (27:22):
And we'll see you next time. God bless
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!