Friday-06-16-2023

None

Episode Transcript

(00:42):
All right, good morning everybody.It is six o eight here on the
k c O Day radio program phonenumber eight eight eight nine three four seven
eight seven four. I I hateto do this to your first thing,
but I don't really have any choicein the matter. As I was reading

(01:04):
this piece yesterday, but I wasreading after I had sent you all the
stack stuff for us, so itdidn't make it in the stack. But
I feel like we should probably openhere because this is yet another example where
something should be done and nothing willbe done. A new reporting by Matt

(01:29):
Taiebi you know who that is,one of the journalists on the Twitter files,
along with Alex guten tag a greatlast name, and Michael Schllenberger,
who I'm sure you're probably aware,one of the Twitter files guys. But

(01:51):
also these three now say that theyhave multiple sources within the US government who
have identified patient zero for COVID,and specifically it's Patience zero or would it
be patient zeros don't know three individualsnow where I tell you their names.

(02:22):
Let me let me throw something outhere. We'll play a little like guessing
game. All three of them workat the same place. Would anyone like
to guess what that place might bethese three work. Don't I know what

(02:42):
you're doing? I know, Ross, I know what you're doing. He
is so excited with himself, soexcited. Now I'm going to give you
their names. Do you think thatwill help? Because Ross, he just
shrugged his shoulders. You don't know, right, because that's not enough clue.
Maybe some names would help, eventhough I told you he can't even

(03:07):
turn his mic gun. He's laughingso hard. You want to hear their
names before you guess it would behelpful. Yeah, okay, is that?
What is that what you just loadedhere? Okay? All right?
Some ting? No, that's notone. No, not him either,

(03:29):
dang. Maybe their cousin. Idon't know, like a shot man that
something was wrong at first? Wellno, because he told me, like,
you know, before we went inthere, like right before we went
in the air. Yeah, yoh my god. They found out you
know, who they are, Andso I google it's like a tweet at
the story and then I see theheadline and I'm like, okay, yeah,

(03:51):
yeah, yeah, so uh.Their actual names are Ben who which,
by the way, doesn't that soundlike a child knese rip off of
a classic American movie? Do reboots, You Ping, not ting Ping,

(04:12):
and yan Zoo? What does thatname reminds us that yan Zoo? What
am I thinking of some movie reference? It's not quite yan Zoo, but
it sounds similar. All right.So, now that you've been armed with
the correct information and not some tingWong we too low, holy fuk and

(04:39):
bang ding oo, that will neverdo you. That's got to follow everyone
at that station around for their wholecareer, right, yeah, but what
a pinnacle to be at. Ohof course. Yeah. The people will
never forget you as you sit thereand read the four pilots names from that.

(05:01):
Is it air China? I thinkit was Air China the plane that
crashed on the runway in San Franciscoor was it Seattle whatever, That's what
they went on the news with asthe story was developing. Classic So Ben

(05:21):
Whu, Youyu Ping, and yanZoo. Where do you believe they all
worked? No? No, notthe wet market, Wuhan Institute of Virology
Lab. So the three patient zerosor patients zero? Not sure? Maybe

(05:46):
it's like attorneys general. I don'tknow. All worked in research, specifically
research surrounding bats at the Wuhan lab. Do you remember when you were d
person for suggesting that. And bythe way, if you read the reporting

(06:14):
when our sources were asked, howcertain they were that those were in fact
the identities of the three patient zeros, all of which were scientists working in
the Wuhan labs specifically on the researchsurrounding these bats and the coronavirus and coronaviruses
within bats, providing documentation to thereporters. So what are we going to

(06:45):
do about it? There's a wholelot of people need dealt with. One
China right, two World Health Organizationwho helped China cover this up. Ask
yourself, how how long do youthink that they've known. They had to
have known way long ago, right, they've had to know for a while.

(07:08):
I mean, it's pretty damn obvious. What about our How would do
you think Fauci Fouci had to know? Of course he knew. Do you
think Trump knew? I'm not sureif Trump knew, because remember he was
really trying to u you could hewas trying to work on in that relationship

(07:28):
with China, and I remember losingmy crap over it because they just continue
to screw us daily. Um,I don't know, And and Frankly,
I would it would be believable thatFauci wouldn't tell Trump because obviously there was
other stuff that he wasn't telling him. But a lot of what we saw
from the COVID response could be Faucicovering his own ass. Now let me

(07:54):
but let's let's also process this logically. This isn't CIA deep cover crap.
This is an industry, right,a group of individuals who share information.
So do you think at the veryleast a strongly suspected rumor permeated the public

(08:20):
health community and those in the upperechelon? Like if you're a Mandy Cohen
and you're talking to all of yourbesties around the country and they're communicating with,
you know, Anthony Faucian and others, do you think that this particular
little piece of gossip wasn't part ofit? How do we have how do

(08:46):
we hold people accountable? Now,I know what you're saying. It's because
I saw the responses. Well you'reprobably not saying it, but I saw
people going, well, look,oh that's what I'm you know what,
that's a very good point. That'swhat I was thinking of when I read
when I saw that last dude's nameYondo, because his name is yan Zoo.

(09:09):
I'm assuming that's Yondo's cousin or something. He doesn't look blue in this
picture. He's not blue and he'salive. So why keep it a secret?

(09:30):
And did keeping it a secret changethings? I'm sure there's a lot
of ways that it was changed.I'm sure also if you're in the if
you're in this sphere, you canprobably delineate a lot more reasons than my
non bat scientist's brain can think up. But I have to I have to

(09:52):
suspect that the you know, keepingthis a secret obviously is about saving face
with China, but also saving facewith others who do this time type of
research and who would allocate funding forthis type of research, because they looked
at it, and they looked atit and said, if the American public

(10:13):
thought that one of our big researchfacilities was careless to the point that a
deadly virus or pathogen of some sortcould so easily infect and then escape,
the level of confidence that they're goingto have in allocating funds which basically give

(10:33):
us all jobs probably would dry upa little. When in reality, by
keeping it a secret and ignoring thatwe ended up throwing a crap ton more
funds at it. Hell, thefunding levels for research to quote unquote you
get ahead of the next pandemic oroff the charts. And those who were

(10:54):
so irresponsible as to either be partof what this appears to be or at
the released the cover up in notsharing that information, they're the ones who
are benefiting from the largess. Iknow that Fauci's retiring obviously, and others
are retiring, but they're retiring andthey're going to go on the speaking circuit

(11:16):
and they're gonna make a crap tonmore money. And then the next slate
of them, be it Mandy Cohenor others, they're going to take up
the mantle. And they lied thosewho knew anyway, And I suspect it
was more than just Fouci, andlike you know, China's version of Fauci.

(11:43):
So take that for what it's worth. But I want to see,
I want to see, I wantto see the House put a committee together
today. Today. This is righthere, man. The fact that you

(12:05):
have people obviously who were in thesewhistleblower position shows you it was more than
Fauci, obviously, But also oursources say they were terrified to tell us
what many had long suspected. Butthey were as outraged as the American people
and felt a moral obligation to speakout. Now, though, how long
did you know? How long?How long before you you didn't feel outraged?

(12:31):
Back when everyone was, you know, locked in their houses. When
you watch China welding people into theirhomes, when there was solid manipulation on
reporting of numbers by China, andthe World Health Organization was going along with
it and tweeting whatever the Chinese wanted, Where was your moral obligation then?

(12:56):
Where was your moral obligation when thekids weren't in school, people weren't at
work. Mom and pop shops hadto close and the big boys got to
stay open. People couldn't go tochurch. So I'm mad at everybody,

(13:18):
even yond especially Yon doing his boys. Now, what happened to him?
That's the other thing. I don'tsee him interviewing these guys. They don't
look like they worked there anymore.Ross, what do you where do you
think they probably would? They gotsome like vacation homes or whatever, and

(13:41):
they're just they took them to afarm up state. Really, they're scientists.
Do you think they like farming.It's the fresh air, you know.
They got to get out of thehive. Is that? Wait?
Is that the Is that the sameplace they took the former Chinese president,
Remember when they removed them literally fromthe parliament. He really looked like he

(14:01):
wanted to go. They're just allprance it around in the field picking strawberries
or something. I don't know,man, h So there you go,
all right, six twenty twenty one, hang on, thank you. Casey
is on nine four five WPTI inthe Triad and one oh six one FM

(14:24):
Talk in the Triangle. Well,I mean, all you have to do
if you want to do that isjust look up this day in history and
then grab ones you like. Likeguy, let's see. So on this
day in history, the first rollercoaster opened, the first Father's Day was
celebrated, the New Deal was okay, we're not going to get excited about

(14:46):
that. A Diary of a YoungGirl by Anne Frank, published USSR sends
the first woman into space and BobDylan recorded like a rolling stone. So
pick one of those, right,ros has decided we need more holidays.
I'm just saying I'm still looking forwardto a three Day weekend I've been looking
forward to, and I'm saying,you know, that'd be a great platform

(15:07):
for a politician, because, likeyou said, they already give stuff away
anyway. Yeah, you're bribe andyou're bribing voters anyway. That's what you're
doing for me. In six extrapaid holidays a year, we'll do one
a month. We'll just make stuffup. A Moon Day. It's the
day we landed on the moon.Okay, you can't landed, you can't
make air quotes while promoting it asa holiday. Make a called conspiracy Day.

(15:28):
I've already put it through committee.We're good to go. Vote Hayes
for sheriff. Are you gonna justput them all on Mondays or mix it
up? Oh yeah yeah Fridays orMondays? Yeah yeah, you got to
attach it to a weekend. Remember, because remember when Junteam would passing,
you had like people that hit likeCandice Owns. He was like Charlie Kirk,
oh yeah, oh you can't havethis holiday, and we're like,

(15:50):
shut up, free holiday. They'retrying to replace Father's Day. And I'm
like, no, it's even better, man, because I get presents on
Sunday, right, being amazing andthen I get a day off on Monday,
because prior to that, the presidentsyou got on Sunday where whatever your
family got you, and then mesending you prep links at night. Yeah,
now I won't be sending you anyprep links. That's a president in

(16:11):
and of itself, right there.So so six just six more. I'm
running twelve more. I mean,I'm vote for you. Yeah, twelve
more. Be great? Happy umfirst roller coaster day? Uh? Anyway,

(16:33):
all right, so we got lotsof we had very sad news unfortunately
on the Meghan and Hairy front.Oh yeah, we're gonna do that story.
So get your get your kerchief,your napkin, get ready to cry.

(16:53):
Keeping you connected. This is WPTIin the Triad one O six one
FM talk in the Triangle. Welllook at that the juvenile content. It's

(17:18):
not my fault. I'm being forcedinto this, all right, I'm being
forced into this. I don't wantto have to do this, but I
have to. I got an obligationto give you the news. FBI officials
in Boston say they've arrested two moreinsurrectionists. Oh boy, that word takes

(17:42):
on some meaning. Yes, twomore for their alleged roles in the breach
of the US capital on January six, twenty twenty one, being bringing the
total number of people arrested in theBoston FBI territory to twenty four. It
looks like it's a man and awoman. Should we give there? You

(18:07):
know what? Yeah, FBI andtheir press release here has the names.
So remember they're just accused of nothaving permission to enter. I'm not sure
exactly what all the stuff is,um, Julie Miller and Long Dong?

(18:33):
Is that is that from sixteen candles? All right? Long Tuck Dong?
It doesn't have a middle name,Long Dong also known as Jimmy Huang Long
Dong Um? And which which oneis the alias? Well it's Aka is

(18:55):
your alias? Right? So LongDong is his name, but sometimes he
goes by Jimmy. Well you thinkif you're if your name is Long Dong,
you would make sure you have permissionto enter anywhere you go, you
know what I'm saying, just inthis day and age, So yes,

(19:18):
Long Dong and Julie Miller, didyou get an invitation to the Miller Dong
wedding? Right? Could you putthe woman's name first? Right? That's
a brave woman too, right,being a relationship with a guy. And
there's a possibility your name is gonnabe Julie Dong. She actually has a

(19:45):
KA. I guess they used thisas online screen names or something. I
don't know. Her aka is HongHong No, which, of course her
alias includes the word no. Weneed to start a freelong Dong hashtag?
I think, huh. I'm surethere'd be some very interesting bots that would

(20:11):
come looking at a tweet with afreelong Dong hashtag. You know what kills
me as I'm looking at the actualtweet from the FBI Boston office and it's
nobody makes any comment about the namesfor the first twenty of them, and
it's just people going, yeah,get the insurrectionists, Yeah, thank you

(20:33):
for continuing to arrest these terrorists,right, and it's like, does anybody
see the names? Did you evenread it? So anyway, they are
accused of being part of the insurrectionright there? All right? So ut

(21:00):
four more arrest ross too. Ijust scrolled down to their second tweet.
So they rested those two. Andthen these guys thum Ting Wong we too
low Holy Fuk and Bang ding Oulthose guys are getting around. Yeah,
well, you know, after youcrash your plane, probably have a little
trouble holding down an airline pilot's job, right, turn to a life of

(21:26):
Really, you couldn't handle the plane, so we're gonna put you in a
contagious disease lab. It's the naturalprogression of things. Except in January twenty
twenty one free trip to DC youcan join Long Dong and Hong No,

(21:48):
also known as Julie. Oh.Everything's insane, just the way that we
like it, all right. Ipromised you sad stuff. It's sad stuff
you're gonna get. Apparently Spotify hasannounced that they will not be renewing the

(22:08):
Meghan Marco Prince Harry podcast. Fora second, I was kind of like
thinking, you're gonna see Joe Rogannow because he makes some money. He
makes money for them apparently, andI don't know. We're in We're kind
of in this business obviously. Podcast. Of course, we're the number one

(22:30):
podcast provider. I heart radio.Thank you, So tell me if this
makes sense to you. Apparently Spotifyhad paid the couple twenty million dollars a
year to produce a podcast, butthen they didn't. Instead, later on

(22:56):
in the deal, producing twelve shortinner view programs called Archetype, which um,
nobody wanted to listen to. Thecouple then demanded additional money for a
renewal of contract, at which pointwhat what So they give him twenty million,

(23:19):
Yeah, twenty million to do podcast. You don't have to do one
a week. They had to doI had to do like thirty episodes or
something. And then they're like,nah, anna do that. We're gonna
take the money. And then they'relike, oh, we need to ren
renegotiate or contract. Yeah, itjust wasn't enough money to not do stuff.

(23:42):
They did do the twelve interview things, which mostly consisted of Megan h
quote interviewing powerful women here we go, um yeah, interviewing women to talk
about the struggles they faced to breakthrough in their particular industry. Uh.

(24:03):
That included Serena Williams How how say? How are men holding Serena Williams down?
Serena Williams is and and her sisterare are the example of when people
go, you know, men hateall women's sports, they'll never be able
to get ahead, pointing out thatin some sports it is absolutely the women

(24:29):
that are arguably more high profile.Who do you think who do you think
was more high profile during the runof The Williams Sisters than on the men's
side. Don't get me wrong,there's a couple of guys that ended up
winning a bunch of bunch of majors, but they simply didn't get the coverage
and they sure as hell didn't getall the endorsement money like the Williams Sisters

(24:51):
did, and they earned it bythe way. I believe they earned every
bit of it. Also interviewed MariahCarey. What was Maria I carry struggle
like where to store her money?Right? Is she like Pablo Escobar and
like Narcos where he's having to likefigure out which hillside to bury barrels of

(25:12):
cash? I mean, because that'sbasically where she was at. Mindy Kalin
has like nine production deals and oneof them's that's the Velma thing, which
is just unwatchable. And Paris Hilton. She struggled to get the lighting right

(25:32):
in her sex tape. But otherthan that, they gave that. They
gave that idiot a show, didn'tthey where she and it was a Lionel
Richie's daughter ran around and just actedobnoxious. That was a thing, dude.
That show was super popular. Itwas incredibly popular, and I couldn't.
I watched like ten minutes of itone time, and I'm like,
they're not gonna have any That's whatI actually said, Like, wait,

(25:56):
they're not even gonna have any clipsfrom her tape where she's all green,
crazy thing about Paris Hilton. Whenwhen you realize that that voice she does
was completely fake? Is it Ihaven't studied the woman enough to know sort
of them who's the but I didstudy or anyway, what who's the Is
it? Which Holmes? Is itthe one that was unlike Forbes and the
the she had like the theorinose thing. Yeah, that chicken just went to

(26:18):
jail for ten years. Yeah.It was the same thing where Elizabeth Elizabeth
Holmes like she would like deepen hervoice. Yeah, it sound like more
commanding and more in charge. Yeah, Paris Hilton would do the opposite where
she would bring her voice up.It sounds really dumb and did see And
then when you actually hear her talkthis happened and when you so, her
voice is actually much deeper than usualthan you would expect. Wait, is

(26:42):
it Paris or Peter, I meanwhat I mean, I know it's not
because there's evidence but that she wasn'ttalking, but you know, just saying
so. So apparently they did thesethese interviews and it didn't meet what they

(27:03):
were actually supposed to do and PrinceHarry wasn't on them. So yeah,
they're not going to renew their twentymillion dollars year contract for more money.
Ah, he's greedy radio exacts man, expecting you to make money for him
and produce It's just crazy, allright, six forty five here on the
CaCO Day Radio program. I'm assumingthe memo went out and now all of

(27:26):
the Moonbat journalists have to write thesebecause we had an example yesterday from WBTV,
which was sourced off an AP articleabout you know, them trying to
get to the bottom of what exactlyhe's up with Bud Light's finances. Right
now, just all of a suddenin the Washington Post came out and did
a piece yesterday, and it's justweird that these these things travel in packs

(27:51):
and all arrive at the same wrongstation. So we will get to that
and much more coming up here onthe CaCO Day Radio program. This is
one oh six one FM Talk inthe Triangle and News Talk ninety four five
WPTI in the Triad. Now,seriously, I want to see U.

(28:23):
I want to see John Stewart runningaround screaming I told you so the entire
rest of the day. You rememberthat, man, they took him down.
Man, he's on Colbert talking aboutthe Wuhan Lab. So a new
report out from Matt Taiebi, MichaelSchellenberger and somebody Gutentag now has the government
sources confirming the three initial cases ofCOVID were three scientists who worked at the

(28:51):
Wuhan Lab, which means they knewthis and if you said it, you
literally would be locked out. Youcould have your social media lockdown. You
were called all sorts of names,conspiracy theorists, all the rest. Right,
You're a conspiracy theorist who's run aroundeating horse meads or whatever, when

(29:14):
in reality, a lot of peoplejust wanted the truth, man, and
the truth was China was manipulating thisall the way, and those who had
a lot to lose should news likethat have come out wanted to do everything
in their power to make sure thatyou didn't know that there's a financial motive
here. And the financial motive isif it looks like these research labs,

(29:38):
which we also put money into,were negligent to the point of causing a
worldwide pandemic, people aren't going tohave a lot of appetite for that.
Are going to have a lot ofappetite for shoving money in that direction.
Plus those who were part of thisand may or may not have been under

(30:02):
you know, undertaking gain of functionresearch. You don't want that level of
scrutiny there after you've gone on therecord saying you weren't doing that, because
you'll be shown to be a liar. So what did John Stewart say?
And literally this is him talking tothe dude who used to work for him.
So he's on with Stephen Colbert.And listen to how uncomfortable Stephen Colbert,

(30:26):
who is just a giant hack whowill go along with whatever he's fed
as long as it's, you know, the party line, reacting to John
Stewart attempting to do critically. Now, John Stewart's a moonbat, let's just
be abundantly clear. However, healso has demonstrated the ability to do independent

(30:47):
thinking. I think John Stewart,you got to think of with the Overton
window, right, John Stewart nowlike he used to be considered a moonbat.
Now I think he'd be considered moremoderate. It's the Elon must thing.
He seems like more sensible then someof the others, like like a
cold beer right where he's sitting thereand he's like that that thing that Elon
tweeted back in the day that everyonegot freaked out about. Where He's like,

(31:07):
I'm here, I haven't moved,right, it's the rest he yell
that've moved you guys moved away fromme, and now you're mad about it.
So here is John Stewart from thatinterview. Chance that is trated the
lab is an investigation? A chance? Well, I want Eppence, I'd
love to hear Arizon novel respiratory coronavirusovertaking Wuhan, China. What do we
do? Oh? You know who? We could ask the Wuhan novel Respiratory

(31:30):
coronavirus lab. The disease is thesame name as the lab. That's just
that's just a little too weird,don't you think? And then I have
those signist they're like, how didthis? So wait a minute, you
work at the Wuhan Respiratory coronavirus lab. How did this happen? And they're
like a tangling kissed the turtle andhe's like, non, look at the

(31:52):
name, len Can I let mesee a business card, Show me a
business card. Oh, I workat the coronavirus lab in wool Hand.
Oh, because there's a coronavirus loosing. Woohand how did that happen? Maybe
a bat flew into the kilowaka ofa turkey and maybe sneezed into my key,

(32:13):
and now we all have corona.Wait a second, alright, oh
my god, Oh my god,here's been an outbreak of chocolatey goodness near
Hershey, Pennsylvania. What do youthink happen? Like, Oh, I
don't know. Maybe a steam shovel, maybe with a cocoa bean, or
it's the chocolate factory. Maybe that'sit exactly. And Colbert, they look

(32:37):
at Colbert's Yeah, he's like,shut up, shut up, stop talking,
because you know his producers are talkingin the right and you can't shut
up John Stewart because he would haveno career if it wasn't for John Stewart.
But he's making sense, right.Bill Maher is the same way now
people are like, remember back inthe day, Bill Maher was like,
oh, he's a lunatic, he'sa moon bat. Now you're like,

(32:57):
you know, Bill Maher's he's makingsome sense because he's just it's just common
sense stuff, because I think there'selements within the ideology that even they're just
there. Now we're not we're notgonna do this. I remember Bill Marry.
The thing he used to get thebiggest grief about initially was the um
when there was this big tamping downwhere you couldn't literally say no, that

(33:21):
person is a radical Islamic terrorist.Remember you couldn't use right. Obama's like,
we won't use that, we won'tuse that language, and and Mars
like some of them are also there'sthere's fundamental Christian terrorists. We've seen those
before, and we've seen people whohave no religion that they're terrorists. Right.
And he was sitting there saying thisis so dumb, and um,

(33:42):
who was it he got into anargument with it was um Ben Affleck.
Remember Ben Affleck was on the showand he said radical Islamic terrorists and Affleck
was like, you can't say that. Yeah, they've gone so far left
and now they see moderate. Ah, thank goodness, it's Friday, ahead
of a three day weekend and Father'sDay. All right, we got lots

(34:07):
again to Pete counter will join uscoming up eight oh five. Oh we
got we got cursed mummies on theshow too, So stick around. It's
all coming up. Oh man,what a great little little piece here I'm

(34:54):
staring at from The New Republic entitledthe Supreme Court is corrupt but only because
of its conservative nature subheadline, TheSupreme Court's corruption is tied directly to its
conservatism. Liberals would never be corruptlike these right wing justices who don't believe

(35:17):
in the law or any particular judicialphilosophy, no matter what the justices tell
us or themselves. Really, youknow what, judge, hold on,
let me just let me just pullthis up. I was gonna get to
this yesterday and then I even forgotto put it in the stack. Uh

(35:40):
yeah, sorry, judge, therewe go. So um a judge,
an activist judge, a US districtCourt judge by the name of Marcia Peckman.

(36:13):
Basically she was here's what the dealwas. So Seattle, believe it
or not, has a little problemwith property crimes. You may have heard
about some of this, and theyspecifically, we're trying to address how affirmative
defenses, which affirmative defenses would belegal for people who were committing vandalism,

(36:34):
like with graffiti or basically defacing privateproperty, okay, And so they tweaked
the law a little to make itabundantly clear that unless you have expressed permission,
you can't graffiti the side of thewalgreens. Okay. So this is
just one part of one element ofwhat they were doing. So what did

(36:59):
this judge do? The judge,while considering, decided to institute an injunction
requiring the city of Seattle to notpursue property damage or vandalism charges under seven
hundred and fifty dollars, which isthe threshold for the second tier of prosecutable

(37:22):
property crimes. So five thousands forthe top tier, and if it's over
five and then seven fifty to fivethousand is the second tier. So anything
under that, which was the thirdtier, was it, you know,
it was its own thing. Itwas seven hundred and fifty dollars or under
or seven hundred, forty nine orundred. She decided nobody should be prosecuted.

(37:44):
For under seven hundred fifty dollars.Show she literally made it so the
city of Seattle's law was unenforceable.So as a result, they didn't have
they didn't have a law on thebook. They still don't. Does that
sound like somebody who has any respectfor the law in any way, shape
or form, or does that soundlike somebody who was an activist who's decided,

(38:07):
you know what, I don't.I don't. I don't think they
should be prosecuting people for five hundreddollars in damage. Ross If I came
over to your house and vandalized theoutside of it to the tune of five
hundred dollars, you would want well, I mean, I would never do
that, but if somebody did that, you would want them prosecute it because

(38:27):
five hundred dollars is five hundred dollars, right, that is correct? Yes,
this is and I'm sure that thisjudge. Do you think if somebody
went and vandalized her property and itwas seven hundred dollars or the damage like
on her garage, they wrote somethinghorrible, do you think she she wouldn't
want maybe, and then she wouldclaim some sort of virtuous victory there,

(38:51):
But she literally barred the city ofSeattle from being able to do it.
And I'm sure there's a few ofthese Seattle Moonbat Council people were probably pretty
excited about it. And it's andfor those of you going will look,
she's she's saying that this law,she is she is delineating a single portion

(39:12):
of the law, and she suspendedthe totality of it for under a for
what wasn't even the argumentative point,or it wasn't even the argument, right,
she just decided that as part ofthis injunction she was going to have
this cutoff, which she didn't haveto do. She just did it.
So good news. If you wantto commit you know, property crimes in

(39:35):
uh In and around the Seattle area, just you know, don't be too
good at it. You'll be fine. So yeah, when I read pieces
like this ole, an inherent problemis right wing justices don't believe in the
law. No. The difference isthey do believe in the word of the
law and in the in the strictin the strictest sense. That's with separates

(40:00):
them. Right. One one islike, you know, we read it,
but the other one is it's aliving document, living breathing document.
Yes, this is the great debate, and I'm going to interpret it due
to the way I feel, oror more if you want to be less
argumentative about it, you're going tointerpret it with modern standards rather than attempting
to interpret the intent of the authors. This came to play with the Heller

(40:22):
decision. Right, So it waswhat does a well regulated militia mean?
Well, if you go online,a moonbat would tell you that means that
there is a lot of government,a lot of control, and you've got
to be part of an official youknow, the militia like the National Guard,
they'll go when in reality, werewell regulated doesn't mean regulations. I

(40:45):
know that they love those. Itmeans literally to be well equipped, and
the militia is and it isn't wasthe people, which is why the very
next line says the people shall notbe infringed. This is not rocket science,

(41:05):
but that is the divide. Andso the other judicial philosophy is this
needs to be adapted to today's standards, which is a slippery slope of mile
wide, but arguably is a lessspecific respect for the law that is written.
But they're organized. Man. Wetold you yesterday about ap and WBTV

(41:30):
ran an article where they're like,uh, you know, some people think
that bud Light's financial issues maybe connectedto their partnership with Dylan mulvaney, but
we don't know. We had noway of finding out. And then,
like clockwork, all the other moonbad organizations and outlets decided to do their
stuff. Here's Washington Post. BudLight sales fall in US as Mexico's MODELO

(41:57):
gains popularity. Bud Light has beentargeted by a recent boycott, but consumers
might just be moving away from thebrand amid stagnation for domestic beer in general.
What a kuiki in right, man? How those two things just happen

(42:19):
to coincide all of a sudden righthere, and you know, one little
span of time. Bud Light hasbeen targeted by a recent boycott, but
consumers might be moving away from thebrand anyway, amid stagnation for domestic beer
in general. Absolute lunatics, man, But that's what you do when you

(42:45):
don't have an argument anymore. Youattempt to muddy the waters as much as
possible so that people can fall backon that stuff. Because what you're doing
is you're not just informing, you'respecifically, you're carrying out the the distribution
of the messaging. So now ifI'm somebody who you know, I love

(43:07):
some Dylan mulvaney and I want todefend this, I can go, well,
look, I read in the WashingtonPost that there's a larger trend of
people just not drinking as much domesticbeer, which, by the way,
did it done? And it wasa very trackable slope and then all of
a sudden, it's a double blackdiamond ski run. Okay, right,

(43:30):
it was a bunny hill. Justyou know, I visualize it. It
was a bunny hill with one ofthose little uh those little seat lifts.
Right, the kids are coming downin a little snowplow and making ski and
references here, but you get it. And now it's like, I'm gonna
die if I go down that asfar as the steepness of the graph,

(43:53):
so but it allows you to sitthere and argue that because you can't cut,
there's no way, there's no wayto argue that that is not the
single largest impact, especially how quicklyyou saw it. So you have to
have something, and it's easy togo. Well, I read in the
Washington Post, which is then supposedto you know that will immediately infer some

(44:15):
sort of superior information informing your answer, when in reality, Washington Post is
spinning as hard as they can andit's an idiotic take that doesn't hold up
even under the most minute scrutiny.You can be mad that the boycott has
been somewhat successful. I would arguevery successful. Actually, you can argue

(44:42):
that, but that's also shows yourfailure to understand how it's entered the It's
entered the the popular I don't knowhow to describe this. It's entered the
culture right where pe people will literallymake memes, which is not unusual.
However, it transfers over to peoplewho really aren't even that political, because

(45:07):
it's a bunch of dudes grabbing beersafter work in a certain age bracket,
who go, oh, Bob,you ordered to bud Light? Which batchor
you gotta use Bob? And youcan think that's as defensive as all get
out, but the reality is that'swhat's happening on the ground. And then

(45:27):
Bob doesn't order bud Lights anymore becausehe doesn't want to take grief from his
boys. You know what I'm saying. I mean, bud Light was really
successful. Right, because of themarketing and because of the tradition, the
actual product can be duplicated. Andhonestly, it wasn't that great, right,
there's a better alternative, Yes,yep, But you're not buying it
for that. You're buying it becauseit's easy. Right. It's because it's
what you do, right. Youknow what it costs. You know where
the eighteen pack is on the endcap. You know that you're having a

(45:50):
grill or barbecue, your friends arecoming over, they'll drink bud Light whatever.
There's a reason that the spots,the commercials they play right during the
Super Bowl stuff, or that theypay for bud Light costs so much because
they need that. Right. It'sthe image they're paying for that's selling the
product. And you squandered it allgone or or or you're ready ross,
You're ready. Just a general trendof consumers moving away from the brand and

(46:14):
stagnation for domestic beer in general.Is that how you read it? I
mean, I mean, I'm anuneducated man, So what do I know
it? Look at that? Sure, Okay, it was so stumb It's
in the Washington Post. So butat least you're not a cowboy hat wearing,
redneck racist dude. I'm I'm gonnado you know who Molly McGhee is.

(46:38):
She's a novelist and professor, collegeprofessor and all that. So she's
she decided to unload on her heritage. I think she's from coal Country,
Tennessee kind of area, and youcould tell this woman is really embarrassed by
it. So she starts putting outthis insane series of tweets yesterday and a

(47:00):
couple of people respond. I thinkthey did a very good job of pointing
to something that I think is um. I think when you hear it,
you're gonna know somebody like this.So I want to get into that story
coming up here. In just afew minutes, we had Connor McGregor in
the news, and how many ofyou have Canadian maple syrup. You might

(47:20):
be sitting on a gold mine.Hang on for that. Smart Talk all
day five WPTI in the Triad andone oh six one FM Talk in the
Triangle. All right, good morning, seven twenty five. Now, well

(47:51):
let me just uh, let mejust click on this little story here,
uh, San Francisco Chronicle. We'llget into more of this too. The
San Francisco Chronicle with a new pieceout, stop hating on bicyclists and share
the road the story. The storygoes on to say, ultimately, hate

(48:15):
a bicyclist comes from the same placeas racism, sexism, homophobia, and
transphobia, the desire to cling tothe status quo power arrangements that favor some
over others. What are you talkingabout. So if somebody gets annoyed at

(48:37):
the behavior of a bicyclist, andI'm not here to start the great bike
car you know, back and forth. There's people who ride bikes that are
total a holes and think they arethe only ones on the road, and
there's people that are in cars.The difference is some roads are more appropriate
for ones over others, and carsdon't get to act like pedestrian sometimes and

(49:00):
cars the other times. And Iknow that that is one of the criticisms
I've seen leveled at bicyclists or thenand then they'll say, well, you
know, for the road, andthen the bicycles say, well, I
pay taxes too, which is absolutelytrue, and I'm sure you probably drive
a car on that road too,So actually, now it's an extra thing

(49:20):
which is available to others. Thatbeing said, if somebody has that beef
because they live on what's the There'sa road over by Jordan Lake. I
was on one time and apparently itis a hot spot for bicycle action,
and I drove. It's rather curvyroads. The one that cuts up through
the dam and then you can makeyour way up to um not through the

(49:43):
dam, but one of this thelittle side side areas you can make your
way up to Chapel Hill, Carborothat way. I should I should have
looked up the road. But thepoint is I remember driving that one time
because I went to there was afriend just got it. She had a
spread out there and is having likea barbecue with a bunch of people.
And I decided from there to gomeet some folks up by Carborough. And

(50:07):
I'm driving on this road and everytime I go around the curve there is
a three wide cyclist pack, youknow, with all the gear and all
the bikes. So it must bea fun road. And if I was
into cycling, it looks like thekind of road I'd want to be on,
and it was. It really really, it struck me as incredibly unsafe,

(50:28):
even though I was not even Iwas not even doing the speed limit,
and I'm like, man, Ican't believe people don't get killed on
this road. This is crazy.Or if you're on the Blue Ridge Parkway,
I've seen this stuff and it's like, I don't want to I don't
want to run over and hit somebodyon the road, let alone slam into
a car, or as somebody ona bicycle. There's a whole family drive

(50:49):
in Lincoln Home. There'd be init, like five of them, mom,
dad and three kids in the centerof the road on their bicycles.
And you're going like like, Idon't want to murder you. Why are
you literally hitler? So yeah,can't people have that discussion about also people
driving ninety in a fifty or outof forty five? And how on Safe

(51:12):
one oh six one FM Talk andninety four five w PTI two stations driving
the best in talk. This iscase O Day and Carolina's Morning News.
Well that's Sarah. I figured thiswould go. So now people do why
you attack a bicyclist? Pay taxestoo? I am attacking people unnecessarily putting

(51:36):
themselves in harm's way, right,And it's it's and it comes down to
this, let me remove bicycles fromthe equation. I'm mostly attacking the stupidity
of the article thinks that people mayfind themselves annoyed by others on the road,
be a bicyclist or others are comingfrom a place of transphobia or whatever

(51:57):
stupid subheadline they had in there,And I'm going to remove bicycles from the
equation. All right. So let'ssay you're wanting to make a left hand
turn right across a highway and thehighway speeds fifty five and you look and

(52:19):
you're a You're in a standard sedanstyle vehicle, and then coming the other
way of the lane you're gonna haveto turn across is a giant dump truck.
Okay, and you can clearly tellthat that driver is not interested in
doing just fifty five, and thething's moving fast feasibly. You do have

(52:40):
the legal right of way, youknow what I'm saying, Like it's your
but because you're waiting for the lightto turn, and you see it,
and even though legally that driver shouldhave to stop allowing you then to make
your left hand turn, you seethat they're not slowing, and you still
pull in front of them because technicallyyou're in the right. That's it's an

(53:02):
extreme example, but I see peopledoing this crap all the time where they're
getting little fender betters and like,well, I was in the I was
in the right, you were,But the person who just lost to is
a dump truck doing sixty five.So when you're gonna have to, you
know, type that out on yourcomputer, you now need to speak because

(53:23):
you broke all of the bones inyour back. Are you still feeling like
you won? And I had thisconversation with a friend of mine who is
who is into bicycally and by theway, I get it, I get
it up. People love getting outon bikes. Um one of the funniest
things that I got to do ingrowing up out West, and I wish

(53:46):
there was more opportunity for it aroundhere. Is as wasn't on the roads.
It was mountain bikes, the skiareas. They some of them actually
adapted bike mountain bike trails to theirto their he runs, which is kind
of perfect. And then they wouldhave attachments where you could put bikes on
chairlifts and gondolas, primarily gondolas,and then they would do that and I

(54:09):
thought that was fun as hell,some people like to do the road thing.
And I understand the appeal of acurvy road man, especially if you're
you know, if you're a carguy you're zipping around some of the beautiful
mountain roads that we have, oryou're a motorcyclist you're going on there.
But the reality is some things createsafety conditions where people adapt, and these

(54:32):
are all legitimate conversations to have.Case in point, I'm so, I'm
talking to a friend of mine whodoes like to do the bicycling stuff.
He lives in North North Raleigh,got some places he goes around there,
and I was telling him. Isaid, what I don't understand, though,
is as I understand the rules,you guys are supposed to ride single
file, and if I come arounda corner and I see you guys five

(54:52):
wide, I feel like there's avery dangerous situation. And he goes,
well, the reason you may seethat is because people are wanting to more
be more visible to drivers, becausewhen you're single file, maybe they don't
see you as quickly as when you'rethree wide on the road. And I'm
like, that sounds like horrible logic, Like if you feel an activity is

(55:15):
so dangerous under normal conditions that youneed to break the law to accomplish it
to feel safe. That's it soundslike something's broken there. So I'm not
I'm not turning this into a bigbike versus car discussion. I'm just pointing
out that instead of being able tohave adult discussions like that, now it's

(55:37):
like, ah, you're just abig old racist. What no, no
offense. But I feel like ifyou, as a racist, wanted to
target a group for your hatred,it wouldn't be members of one of the
whitest sports I've ever seen, youknow what I mean. Ross. Let's

(55:58):
say you're a big old racist,all right, big old, big old
racist moral superiority, superiority of race, and that's your thing, and you
got to pick a sport to hateon, and the people take Is it
going to be bicycling? Is he? Is it gonna be beach volleyball?

(56:23):
I'd probably go water polo? Isit's gonna be water polo? Really?
And what about regular polo? Aboutregular polo? No? In case either
that's an old Bill Burbitt it is, yeah, yeah, yeah, what

(56:44):
does he tell you? What hewas talking about? All of these all
of the you always have the samesports movie right where a bunch of minority
athletes just want to take part andsociety wouldn't have it. And there's always
some you know, banker who's screamingracial craft ridden that coach get out of
the pool right in the pool.Yeah, he's like, where is it
end? Put the battle down?They're playing ping pong, you know,

(57:08):
like it's the same movie over andover and over again. Yeah, yeah
it is. That's why it's justso stupid. Oh yeah, you have
big fat racist and you decided togo all in on cycling. Good good
choice, Good choice there, Jethro. Speaking of that, um, let

(57:28):
me ask a question. How manyof you listening to the show right now
are driving a truck. How manyof you who are driving a truck,
who are listening to the show rightnow, have yourselves a cowboy hat on
a cowboy hat. Well, that'snot sitting well with Molly McGee, novelist

(57:54):
and college professor up in New York, who went off on a tangent?
Went off on a tangent? Wouldyou can tell is deeply rooted in her
own experience growing up and one ofself loathing. And I think we've all

(58:15):
met people like this, especially thoseof us who who grew up in a
small town or even in a rougharea of a bigger city. She says,
I grew up in the rules South, So I know that men are
out here driving massive trucks wearing cowboyhas is not just when I say truck
driving, I don't just mean likeeighteen wheelers, but I mean big old
trucks. I know they're driving massivetrucks wearing cowboy hats, talking about working

(58:39):
class values. Give me a break, dude, Just call yourself a white
supremacist and move on. Really,so, anyone driving so one the entire
state of Wyoming's white supremacists, okay, but also where I grew up.
But also all of you listening whowere driving around Rocky County or Johnston County

(59:00):
this morning, or Randolf or whereverit is, right, you're just going
from point A to point B.You live out in the country, and
you happen to have a pick themup truck and cowboy hat, just know
you're a white supremacist. According toMolly McGhee, well, there's a lot
more going on with this woman,as one person labeled her, and I

(59:22):
think it's very accurate. Molly McGheeis what some would refer to as a
I'm better than this place girl,and I and any of it. I
think we've all seen it. Andagain, if you grow up rule,
you grow up poor, you growup in a high crime area, any
of the rest there are there arethings that you can look at and go,

(59:46):
man, I wish it wasn't thisway, but there are those who
take it to the next level.And it is this misplaced internal hatred.
Right, diame a dozen as there'sa good little thread on this. So
she grew up in Tennessee, shewas poor, she's from the South,

(01:00:06):
and now she's up in New Yorkand she's in that you know, that
that old money crowd because she's she'san author and she's a professor. But
she's never going to be one ofthem because she never was old money and
it chaps her butt. But thevalue that her friends, if they really
are her friends, find in thiswoman is her ability to affirm all of

(01:00:30):
their worst thoughts that they have aboutpeople who do live there. Right,
So here's a girl. Here's agirl grew up in Tennessee at our you
know, here at our supper club, and she's telling us that, yeah,
you guys are right, you yousilverspoon New York limousine liberals, you
are right. Everyone who lives downsouth or as a truck bunch of racist

(01:00:52):
and people probably gravitate towards her becauseof it, and so she's got to
ramp it up. And then she'sinternally grow bitter because her parents probably worked
a very traditional job. They weren'table to send her to boarding school,
they weren't able to pay for hercollege, so maybe she's got loans and
she resents the fact that she's gotto deal with that, and then it

(01:01:15):
further hardens her hatred of where shegrew up, and that rage just builds
and builds and builds. She's probablynot altogether even that much more intelligent than
some of the people that she decidesto leave behind. And then when she
does go home to visit, shedoes so and for a very limited time
and probably corrects everybody and explains tothem why they're not as good as all

(01:01:37):
of her friends up in New YorkCity. Are you identifying people you grew
up with that this might fit becauseI've seen these folks. I may have
left where I grew up, butman, I love every bit of going
back there, and I wouldn't changea thing. In fact, I get
angry when I go back and realizemoonbats have moved in and started trying to

(01:02:00):
change things there. But the realityis her friends, if she wasn't there,
you know, backing up their ownbias, perceived bias against people who
grow up and you know, puta priority on hard work and family and
all the rest, and aren't arecontent to do that. They can't fathom

(01:02:21):
that, and so they just assumethey're lesser than And here she is,
somebody who came from there, pulledherself out, and she is going to
validate all of your insanity. Whatan angry, bitter way to live.
Man. And that's that chicken,a nutshell, one hundred percent race agent

(01:02:43):
from the Weather Channel. He's justhappy to be wherever. That's right,
happy to be here. Oh man, I don't know if you saw this,
but it's a big anniversary today,big anniversary ten thousand days since the
Dallas Cowboys have won a Super Bowl, Just so you know, Yeah,
tell that to the Vikings and Billsfans. Go ahead. Well, that

(01:03:06):
was kind of my second point,but I just thought it was how many
days since the Bills I won aSuper Bowl? Yes, how many?
I mean, how old is theuniverse? How many since they lost one?
Anyway, weather wise, is goingto be a great weekend shower thunderstorm
threat later today, It's not goingto be much or as a front coming

(01:03:28):
in mid uper eighties today in thesunny weekend, close to the middle eighties.
As we get it to Saturday andFather's Day, some spots close to
ninety. Next week does look alittle bit unsettled. Showers, thutter showers
maybe each day. The Atlantic's gota wave coming off the coast of Africa
forty percent chance of developing. Thelonger age guidance at least right now,
sometime late next week early the followingweek steers it away from the US mainland,

(01:03:52):
but we'll keep an eye on itfor everybody. And catastrophic flooding in
the Panhandle of Florida, especially overteenage drain in six hours in a Scambia
county and a couple of fatalities actuallyI think three from a tornado in Perryton,
Texas. So weather it was alittle bit busy yesterday. We're enjoying
some of the nicer weather in thenation right now. Yeah, I went

(01:04:14):
through a trailer park. I heardof news terrible man. Yeah, we
have you all right, thank yousir. We'll talk in an hour,
okay, yep, and we'll takea break. Come back. I mentioned
we got a little uh, wegot a little New Zealand New Zealand slash
Canadian news. But it might,I don't know, might benefit one of
you. So we get that.And also coming up eight oh five peak

(01:04:35):
calendar will join us, so stickaround for all of that your day smarter
one oh six one FM Talk andNews Talk nine four five w PTI more
with Casey starts now. Police saythat they have found one hundred and fifty

(01:05:03):
million dollars worth of meth cooked intoCanadian maple syrup. So now they're killing
us with their smoke and their meth. But I guess maybe if you have
some Canadian syrup on your shelf,you should check it. And if you
eat pancakes and then are able torun two miles for no reason, you

(01:05:30):
should stop eating that syrup. Perhaps, wow, look at this. In
fact, they say that the syruphas made its way all the way to
Australia and New Zealand as the methis manufactured and shipped all around the world.

(01:05:53):
That is crazy. So yeah,watch out for Canadian maple syrup.
It might be full of meth.Unless you're into meth, then you know,
rush out to your shout out tothe store today and get a hold
of it. All right, letme um, let me hit on.
We got to this audio here.I want to get into this. So

(01:06:14):
Joe Biden yesterday is getting some questionsfired at him, and reporter has a
question that he is not a fanof, not a fan of at all,
and frankly, no follow up questionsfrom any other reporters, even though
some would argue that if you're gonnarun what did I see the graph?
Two hundred and ninety minutes on theTrump indictment and zero minutes on the three

(01:06:38):
big networks on anything having to dowith the Biden and the whistleblower stuff.
I guess you can't expect him toactually try to do their job. But
here it is all right, hardto hear this. I'm gonna read it
before. Why did the Ukraine FBIinformant file refer to you as the big

(01:07:00):
guy President Biden? Why is that? What's a fair question considering what we
know about some other uses of theterm the big guy, right. Why

(01:07:20):
so, what Joe Biden responds is, why do you ask such a dumb
question? I have a question onmy own. I guess you can tell
me if it's dumb or not.Isn't that the level of disrespect for the
media that Donald Trump was said tohave ushered in and created, you know,
the end of the fourth Estate andthe ability of everyone to do their

(01:07:42):
jobs, And it was it wasunacceptable and a politician because Joe Biden has
answered a lot of questions lightly latelyin that very same way, and Jean
Pierre into a lesser extent because shesoftens it a little, but it means
the same thing has has done exactlythat. I thought that that was unacceptable
for the President of the United Stateswhen interacting with media, even though it

(01:08:06):
brought me an amazing amount of glee, and I like, I was glued
to my TV watching the first fewTrump pressers where he went, you know,
you're fake news, and and thenlater when he said when he's in
the gold room there and they're havingthat like hour and a half long press
conference, and he then upped theCNNs his CNN foil to really fake news

(01:08:32):
allway. That was crazy. Thewhole time, I'm being told through my
laughs that I'm immature and I don'tget it, and you can't talk to
reporters that way. You're trying toliterally get them killed. Remember that's what
That's what the allegation was. DonaldTrump was making reporters unsafe. People were
going to do harm to them.And Joe Biden, why do you ask

(01:08:55):
such dumb questions? Get out ofhere? Remember the way he guy tang
with a voter that one time,calling him fat, Hey, fat listen.
I wanted to fight the guy,and I hear none of that criticism.
Just why do you ask such dumbquestion? And then the talking heads
on the panel shows going that wasa disrespectful question to the president. Why

(01:09:23):
does that guy even have a presscredential? That's what I see a lot
of when Deucey asked the question.Or that guy who's he's from one of
the African news agencies, who's alwaysup in Jean Pierre's grill because he never
gets called on for questions anyway.All right, so we'll we'll get in

(01:09:44):
on a little of that and justa lot of what the week has had
coming up with Pete Callender eight ohfive right around the corner Casey O Day
Radio program. All right, goodmorning everybody, eight o seven. Here

(01:10:26):
on the k c O Day radioprogram Bad News. Pete and I were
riffing off the air. We coveredall the ground you should have been there.
It was amazing. I suppose wecould do it all again though,
you know, if you're into thatsort of thing, So let's let's join
in. Pete Calendar, Radio,Buddy Down Ato, WBT, and Charlotte
Midday's there via the iHeart radio app. You want to catch a listen.
How you doing, sir, I'mdoing all right. I'm actually just sending

(01:10:50):
out the requisite tweet to let everybodyknow that I'm joining your program. Wow
wow, okay, I'm I wasslacking on my social media ing. Big
time stuff there man. So wewere having a conversation, I guess for
those of you who just joining us. So there's reporting by recognize a couple

(01:11:11):
of these names, Matt Taiebe,Michael Schellenberger. You probably know their names
for either from Twitter, but moreimportantly from Twitter files. But they do
other stuff. And there's a thirdreporter and it's I don't have it in
front of me, but they havea pretty interesting report out with government sources
who apparently just have decided that theycan't live with themselves anymore three years later,

(01:11:36):
and it says that yes, theydo know who the patient zeros were
for COVID, and in fact,when you hear their names and you hear
where they work, all of asudden you're like, hey, you know
what, I seem to remember peoplebringing that up at at the time,
So they are that's not it toolong, No, that's not them,

(01:12:02):
and bang stop it. You haveno idea the excitement on Ross's face this
morning as he pulled that audio clipout of the archives so excited. Well,
so you know you can also runthat back for the Hunter Biden uh
Chinese energy uh corruption story as well. Dude, we do have any opportunity

(01:12:25):
to use that. So yeah,yeah, there's a couple of guys and
involved in that. I think there'sa whole involved in the laptop story,
you know what. I think there'sa lot of hoes involved in the Hunter
Biden lap my story. Judging bythe photos there, um no. But
what you have is you have threeindividuals who are scientists who work at the
Wuhan Lab, and I just ie, they don't work at the wet market.

(01:12:51):
I thought, wait, they're notemployees at the wet market. Well,
maybe they have a second gig,you know, maybe they're you know,
it's not making ends meet. Theygot a sigh hustle, uh,
you know, slinging pengguluint pegulin,tacos or something I don't know, or
you know, bat buffalo, batwings. So my theory and so my
theory is, yes, that you'veworked in the office where um, you

(01:13:15):
know, there's a restaurant nearby orsomething, and there's always like somebody that
goes around and they're like, hey, we're gonna go around the corner and
get some you know or something.Yeah. I'm going, hey, yeah,
what do you all want? Andso I'm thinking that all of the
scientists, uh, they were like, Hey, we're going over to the
wet market. Who wants who kindI put down for? You know,

(01:13:36):
what what do you want? WhoI'm taking orders? And then the scientists
they probably all got the bat soupand uh and that's where they that's where
they contracted the COVID nineteen. Wellthat's a theory. Um, but I
seem to remember, and maybe maybeyou're old enough to remember this as well.

(01:13:56):
Had you promulgated a theory such asthat that involved anything having to do
with the lab, you would havebeen deep platformed, or at the very
least had your social media shutdown.I can remember that, yeah, that
was a thing, and then accusedof taking horse pills or something. Right
right. The reality is, though, um, if these who are the

(01:14:17):
people speaking to the reporters knew Foucihad to know, people in China knew
the World Health Organization, people hadto know. How widespread do you think
that knowledge was? Even considering thatwe know that people, Um, you
know, we're within this circle ofdecision makers, and when it came to

(01:14:39):
the COVID stuff, obviously they werereaching out. Remember Mandy Cohen, would
you know she talked to her bestieson the regular to figure out you know
what they what they get to shutdown? How? How? Why do
you think that this knowledge was spread? And do you think it expands to
somebody like a Mandy Cohen? BecauseI feel like it almost would have to,
wouldn't it. Really? Well,I'm not so sure. I'm not

(01:15:01):
so sure. I mean, becauseyou look at the way people just fell
in line, right, and theyjust accepted whatever. And part of it
was, you know, self preservationand sort of this passing the buck of
responsibility to say, well, whatare they doing in Massachusetts or are you
opening up your panther games, youknow, your football games and stuff.
Okay, well I'm not either,Yeay. You know there's this there is

(01:15:24):
this peer pressure, this like goalong, get along kind of mentality,
and I suspect that it's the samething happens like sort of in a corporate
setting, in a bureacratic setting whereyou have the shot callers at the top
and then you have you know,all of us peons at the bottom that
you need that that middle buffer atmiddle management right where they don't know all

(01:15:46):
of the stuff that the people atthe top know, but they serve a
purpose as a heat shield. Sowhen the peons getting mad at whatever policy
is being crammed down on them,you have this this buffer that the middle
management serves where uh, you know, the top guys are not getting attacked
personally, but the middle management it'sthe plausible deniability. They're not told that

(01:16:09):
stuff. So this way they canwith confidence and assuredness and can convey this,
you know, authority this, Oh, I know, because the top
people told me, right, we'reconsulting the best minds on this, and
you know, right people in theworld. Yes, Right, So there's
so I believe, like, forexample, media serves this purpose, right,

(01:16:30):
Uh. And we saw it ondisplay during the pandemic when the people
that were given you know, keysto the gate to ask questions during the
governor's press conferences, right, theynever asked the kinds of questions that could
have rooted this stuff out. Therewas there was very little challenging of the
authority, right, And like peoplelike we talked about this at the time,

(01:16:54):
what's the you know, like,what are the costs when you're locking
everybody down? One of the costs. Now we're seeing numbers like twenty six
million in depths that would otherwise nothave occurred. You know, where where
do we go to get that accounting? Where do we go to get people
that's that will tell us? Okay, I made you know, these ten
decisions during the pandemic, and thesethree were the wrong decisions, and we

(01:17:14):
should not have done these three things. These other seven I got right.
But nobody says that there's no accountingfor any policy that was that was wrong.
Nobody asks Cooper, hey, didyou make any wrong calls during the
pandemic, because that's important, itis, that's important to know if there
were wrong calls made, so wedon't make them again. That's the point.
And none of this stuff was everasked during the pandemic, and it's

(01:17:39):
still not being asked of these people. Well let me ask you this though,
Um, do you think the reason, largely on the Cooper front,
is because listening to him have todetail it would take six hours as slow
as he speaks. No, Butin all seriousness, it's it's far worse
than that. And here's why.Because the penalty for you know, you

(01:18:00):
describe to some extent is standard government, right, you know, like Joe
Biden yesterday, Why would you asksuch a dumb question which, by the
way, I thought being mean tothe media was you wanting people to hurt
them and was unacceptable. But it'sokay now, um, because this went,
this went beyond just being ignored byCooper's office, which we we have
a proud tradition of here on thisshow. It because people were they were

(01:18:26):
dpersoned, not just deep platform theywere deep personed. They were de banked
up in Canada. Uh. Theythey had the inability to utilize various things
like go fund mesu and they theywere demonized and in some cases criminalized over
over this descent. So this wasn'tyour standard run of the mill. I'm

(01:18:48):
just going to ignore these guys andscrew them. And I don't care who
knows this was. If you questionthe standard protocol here, your life will
be ruined. And I'm sick ofpeople going, well, look at this,
the Hillary Clinton defense I've seen atthis point, what does it matter?
And that is a fundamental misunderstanding ofwhat all these folks and these upper

(01:19:12):
echelons had stood to lose if thatinformation came out. Right, they abused
people, and now they want andnow they want everyone to just move on.
Remember that was the story, whatlike a few months ago, Hey,
let's just all move on and admitsaid not everything was perfect, Mistakes
were made, things were said,whatever, you know, let's one foot

(01:19:33):
in front of the other. Yetno, no, you attempted to ruin
people's living. You were called allsorts of names. I was called all
sorts of names simply for asking questionslike, hey, you guys used to
say that masks don't work for arespiratory virus that's ariostolized. So what changed?
And for that, just asking whythe guidance changed with this virus.

(01:20:00):
You were a moon landing denier.You were a moon landing denier exactly,
Yeah, accused of wanting to killpeople, like, Hey, the virus
isn't really spreading among the kids.It might have something to do with the
ACE two receptors in their nostrils,So why are we closing all the schools?
And for that again, you're you'retrying to kill teachers. Why do
you hate children? All this?So there needs to be no There needs

(01:20:20):
to be a reckoning. There needsto be an accounting. And I don't
know, you know, maybe namingMandy Cohen CDC director maybe we get that.
I do find it very interesting towatch as the rest of the country
sort of gets to know Mandy Cohenand all of a sudden, now you're

(01:20:41):
starting to see some of these criticismsfrom outsiders that people like you and me
were making. And you know,folks at North State Journal and the John
Rock Foundation were raising these questions andyou know, why is she doing this
or that? And now with thebecause during the pandemic, everybody was looking
at their own state, right,looking at their own state or looking at
DC. But now people are startingto look at North Carolina and you're you're

(01:21:02):
starting to see the criticisms that wewere making getting amplified by people outside of
the state of North Carolina in away that our own press corps. A
lot of times, the political presscorps that was covering those daily briefings ignored.
Yeah, the ones who were inQ one. People don't realize that

(01:21:23):
they literally had separate ques for reporters, and it was it was like the
Caligula orgy boats. We talked aboutwhere you don't want to be on boat
three, well because that's where thelepers are, right or bout two,
But you want to be on boatone. And if you were on boat
one, you got questions and yougot to ask a couple of questions.

(01:21:44):
Yeah, all right, So let'slet's imagine, shall we Let's wildly speculate
if instead of days after we learnedthis information, the World Health Organization had
decided instead of amplifying a tweet fromChina going we didn't do nothing, they
instead pointed out that, yes,In fact, it appears that the first

(01:22:05):
cases originated among scientists at this virologylab. How different do you think things
would have played out? At thevery least, I think that people would
have sat there and it would havesapped public confidence in health officials to do
this type of research and in thesetypes of places if they were going to

(01:22:27):
be so wildly irresponsible and that stopthat stops the money flowing. So you
helped me imagine what it would havelooked like maybe, So yeah, I
completely agree there would be that backlash. Why are you doing this research?
Why are you doing at a leveltwo security lab, which is basically,
you know, a dental surgery standard. Why was that occurring? Who you

(01:22:47):
know? Who made those decisions?Sauchi uh pays a price for that.
Obviously, money starts getting dried up. But the response looks different as well.
I think the response is, firstoff, there's there's anger towards China,
which you know rightfully so um andquestions about their lax standards, and

(01:23:11):
that is sort of writ large acrossall of the communist country, right like
you've got lower standards for like everything. Um. So there's anger directed towards
China, But there's also then Ithink a rallying effect to say, uh,
you know this came from there.They made these mistakes. Yes,
we were part of this research.And I think you can actually make an

(01:23:34):
argument as the scientists dudes and thatlike we need to be doing this in
order to get the vaccines, andyou know, they can make some sort
of argument along those lines. Youcan't argue though at the low standards,
there's no there's no defense a lot. If you're whatever you want to study,
if it's really really bad, I'dprefer you not do it anywhere near
me. You know, I'll goall Nimby on this, but you're right

(01:23:57):
if that involves okay, well what'snot near you is Balua or you know,
some island out there, and we'rejust there's no standards whatsoever. Uh,
that's that's where we draw the line. But you're right. I think
it would have had a rallying effect. And I think one of the miss
the big miss things was the reshoring, especially within our medical industry.

(01:24:18):
Um, get that out of you, get that out of China, man,
right, Well, remember there wasthe travel band, right, you
had the locking down China. Ithink that would have been a much easier
call. But the downside for alot of the Democrats and media, but
I repeat myself, is that youwould not be able to attack Donald Trump
for calling it the Wuhan virus,right, and that really I mean no,

(01:24:40):
no, no, no, kungflu come on man, right.
So yeah, the attacks that werethat were you know, levied against him
uh and others, but mainly him, you know, to go after Donald
Trump as a racist, and therewas great benefit for for the left to
do so, so they were ableto weaponize that against him. Again,
it's another like another example of Trumparrangement syndrome where everybody is viewing everything through

(01:25:04):
this prism of Trump either pro oragainst, and it just it blinds people
to reality. Yeah, and it'snever dude, what I was what we
were watching obviously going on in thecity of Miami, where you had you
had protesters on all sides. Youhad idiots at the Miami Airport or were

(01:25:25):
standing outside International terminal with signs thatsays essentially welcome foreign visitors, you're safe
now we got them. And which, of course, when you had people
that were then walking out of theterminal who were pro Trump, obviously was
starting to fight. So the trollingwas working. That insanity rolls on.
Man, We're not getting away fromthat anytime soon. Yeah. No,

(01:25:47):
it's it's it's it's the circus andpeople are they're addicted to it, and
uh, you know, even thepeople like I'm not so sure, like
if people asked, like we weretalking about obviously the indictment of Trump and
all of this over the last fewdays. And honestly, I don't know.
But if you indict Trump and hispull numbers go up, and you

(01:26:09):
think that he's the easier guy tobeat in the general election, right,
and you're a Democrat, why notjust keep indicting him, keep indicting him,
drive his pull numbers up in theprimary, knowing that you will then
be able to more easily beat himthan another candidate. And I know that
sounds crazy, but people are crazyand everything is ordered around this guy,

(01:26:32):
Donald Trump, and so I haveto entertain the idea that some of this
stuff is pure politics. They wantto run against him, just like they
wanted to they thought they did intwenty sixteen. We don't know what we
don't know. I got less thana minute I find this funny WBTV down
by you, and then now theImpost. The talking points are out,

(01:26:53):
both with articles saying things like budLight lost their top spot, some people
leave it may have to do withDylan mulvaney. Washington Post goes further to
say that it likely was part ofa larger downward trend and stagnation among domestic
beer. Yeah, thirty seconds,who's buying that crap? Well, apparently

(01:27:14):
nobody's buying bud Light. That's theproblem. M So it isn't even the
Dylan mulvaney component. It's that flussAnd I think more importantly what that what
that PR woman said, Yeah,that interview see gave. That's what did
it in. When you when youinsult your clients, your customers, and
you say you don't want them ascustomers, right, they will go somewhere

(01:27:38):
else. Yeah, all right,Pete calendar. Have to leave it there,
but we will chat next week sinceSundays the holiday not Friday. Have
a good one, Okay, youtwo, and we'll be back. Hang
on. Best show after the showis on the iHeartRadio app. Search case
o day for the podcast on theiHeartRadio app. All right, welcome back.

(01:28:11):
It is eight thirty six k cO D Radio program Kent Christmas.
Do you know who that is?Kent Christmas. He is a pastor at
Regeneration Nashville, and he's not helpfulin any way, shape or form.
M watching this um this sermon,and here's the deal. I see people

(01:28:40):
trying to go he doesn't mean literally, he means figuratively. Can I play
it for you? And then youtell me if you you know how you
interpret this? And I saw itmade me angry as I saw people being
critical them. And then people arelike, I can't believe you would you

(01:29:02):
would criticize a fellow Christian. WhyWhy isn't that exactly what is asked of
people and other religions when it comesto maybe orthodoxy that it doesn't really align
with what you understand the belief forthe faith to be. Why can't people

(01:29:28):
have a conversation about it. Imean, he's not my pastor, but
I gotta tell you, man,if I was sitting in this church listening
to this, I wouldn't be sittingin that church much longer. And sometimes
it deviates into people having disagreements withmore liberal types of things right where the
church is like, you know,even though the parent the parent organization of

(01:29:51):
our particular faith says this, we'regoing to do things a little different here.
Well, when you hear that,you want to know what the little
different things are. And sometimes thoseare little different things that don't comport with
one's individual faith and they go finda new church. It happens. But

(01:30:12):
this guy right here, man,I don't know that I could walk out
fast enough. You want to knowwhy the Muslim faith has had his advancements.
It's because the Muslims who were willingto die for their believe. But
they were willing to strap bombs totheir chest they believed or the afterlife,
God give us some men and womennot they don't get a hold of some

(01:30:36):
passion, then their spirit, that'sit. I will lay down my life
for the golf sport now, allright? So I want you to I
want you to filter that because Isit there and I listened to it,
and I can see where some peoplewould say. What he's pointing out is
he's saying that these are individuals whowere so passionate about their faith that they

(01:30:56):
were literally willing to die for theirfaith. And that is obviously not an
uncommon thing or a point of discussioneven within Christian churches. But when you
invoked the suicide bomber example, thenpeople are going to be sharing that around.
And so look at this guy's callingfor suicide bombers. I just think

(01:31:17):
it's a really horrible way to makea point, if in fact the point
he was trying to make was themore nuanced one that people are claiming.
I've seen some other stuff with thisguys. This a little too much for
me, But that's that being said. It doesn't mean all of his messaging
is wrong. However, in thiscase, yes, it's not a great

(01:31:40):
example. Blood. It makes mea little clutchy. And and look,
you can call and you can screamat me, you can send me email.
What he's talking about is, youknow, are you willing to die
for for the faith? Well,then talk about it like that in the
sense that a will are people willingto because the example they give is would
you if you were you know,you got captured right by some somebody who

(01:32:04):
doesn't like Christians, right, andthey were on your knees and they said
we're going we're going to kill youif you unless you renounce your faith?
Would you renounce your faith? Andthere are obviously biblical stories that go along
with this, and uh, youknow, the renouncing of Jesus is kind
of a big thing. I wasgoing to say, you know, the
Bible does have tales of people.Second, you know, right right,

(01:32:25):
David, And that's good. Idon't know that you invoked the suicide bombers
though, you know what I'm saying, Well, did that make it a
little uncomfortable dubbing that in this morning? It did? Yeah? Yeah,
because like you said, if ifhe wants to go down the road,
there are plenty of examples or storiesor parables he could tell. Oh,
I don't know. And of course, because then the headline is Trump pastor,

(01:32:46):
Trump pap pro Trump pastor suggests Christiansshould be suicide bombers. That is
the headline from Newsweek. I'll playit again. Did he suggest they should
be suicide bombers? Or did heprobably just do a really horrible job of
trying to make a point. Youtell me, you want to know why

(01:33:09):
the Muslim faith has had his advancements. It's because some Muslims who were willing
to die for their believe, theywere willing to strap bombs to their chest
they believed or the afterlife God giveup Some men and women not they don't
get a hold of some passion theirspirit. That's it. I will lay

(01:33:31):
down my life for the golf sport. By the way, you think his
name is really Christmas? What anamazing pastor's name though, right, Uh,
I'm curious what you think. AndI don't know. Maybe I've just
never been in a church where wherethey were using tales of suicide bombers to

(01:33:56):
make larger points. But you know, hey, that's that's just me,
so we got that for you.Also, I don't know if you saw
Pat say Jack said he's retiring,And um, I don't like some of
the suggestions that are coming out aboutwho's gonna who's gonna take over? By
the way, who I mean,who do you think could take over for

(01:34:17):
Pat say Jack? Alex Trebek?Right, I mean that's a that's a
I would argue that those those twoobviously Trebecca's gonna I understand that, But
um, like, I don't evenknow that those two could host each other's
shows. So you're gonna have toget real nuanced here. Now, this

(01:34:41):
is an interesting one. One ofthe suggestions is to roll Vanah White over
to host, get somebody else tochurn the numbers. Maybe, yeah,
I think she did. She fillin firm one time on that side of
it. It was like a wholething. I mean, obviously Vannah White
is the show also suggested Ryan Seacrestdoes he need more jobs? There was

(01:35:09):
a time he had half the jobsin radio and TV slight exaggeration. The
third suggestion, whoopee Goldberg, Wellwhy don't you just get her and Joy
behar in there? Except neither ofthem will turn the numbers, because that's
you know, they don't need someman telling them what job to do.

(01:35:33):
These are all suggestions running around outthere. I think, actually, Pat
say, Jack's daughter Maggie is oneof the other ones too, So don't
know, but I know that it'sonly been just a few minutes. All
right, Daniel, what's up?Hey, Well, good morning. Look,
I'm a I'm a pastor. Andthe suicide bomber thing. I think

(01:35:55):
his intentions were probably right. Hewas probably in the moment, right in
the middle of the past. Ohno, your phone's cutting out there,
sir, right hold up? Ohcan you hear men? Yeah? I
can hear you now, and Ireally want to hear this, so,
uh you see, you think theintentions were there, and you understand maybe
what he was trying to communicate,But but what right right? So,

(01:36:17):
like being being a pastor, whenyou're delivering a message, you're always looking
for the perfect analogies of perfect example. Um. And you can tell that
this guy is a pretty charismatic guy, like he's he's he's passionate, he's
trying to get to it um andstuck just just being a pastor myself and

(01:36:39):
being in the in the ministry andwanting to deliver a message that resonates,
in a message that captivates the audienceand gets the point across. He probably
just got caught up in the heatof the moment um. You know.
One of the one of the cornerstonesof the Christian faith is you know,
like you know, Jesus laid downhis life for us, right, um,
and so we should We're supposed tocarry his cross daily, uh,

(01:37:01):
to follow him and so um.Yeah, I mean, you know,
all the all of the twelve Disciplesexcept for John. John was exiled to
the Isle of Patmoson was beheaded,but all the all the rest of them,
you know, they die a martyr'sdeath or Jesus some of them,
were crucified them, and then we'reburned. Um well then we had that
whole joke, the whole Judas thing. But yes, no to your point,

(01:37:25):
yeah, yeah yeah Judas. Judaskind of shot himself in the foot
on that one. So yeah,now I hear you, so um yeah,
I get it. But I alsoget how easy. And I know
you can't do everything based on whatNewsweek is going to do, but don't
make the job so easy, that'sright, you yeah, yeah, yeah,
right, because if it because ifit has the net here's here's why.

(01:37:46):
If it has the net impact ofturning people off of curiosity, perhaps
in the Christian faith, then it'snot a positive outcome for what you're trying
to accomplish. That's right. Andyou and you know, just as well
as everybody that's listening, the mediais out to ridicule Christianity at any given
moment. So yeah, they're lookingfor Yeah, all right, cool,

(01:38:08):
cool thoks, Thanks appreciate it.And oh real quick, race Stagic from
the Weather Channel. Since we're notgonna talk Monday, and you got an
easy forecast, we're gonna coast rightthrough it. What's up? Yeah today,
not a lot of rain, maybea shower thunder shower later today to
our dinner time or mid up radysun and clouds. Otherwise over the weekend,
lots of sunshine, probably between abouteighty four could be as warm as

(01:38:30):
ninety in the triad. Next weeklooks a little damp. I think we'll
get into a little bit wetter weatherpattern. All right, thanks to appreciate
it. How about three day threeday weekends? Sir? Okay, yeah,
see you Tuesday, yeah, yeah, yeah, and we'll come back
chat with Jeff Bellinger next. Hangon, Thank you. Casey is w

(01:38:58):
PTI in the Triad one six oneFM Talk in the triangle. All right,
eight fifty two Bloomberg Update now withJeff Bellinger and what's going on?
Jeff, Well, good morning,Casey. Happy Friday. Stocks rallied yesterday,
and it's taken investors a little whileto make up their minds what they
want to do today. We've seensome volatility, but right now the futures

(01:39:20):
are higher across the board, withthe Dow futures up forty one points.
Adobe shares were higher after hours yesterday. The media software maker posted record revenue
for the latest quarter, but hotelstocks missed out on yesterday's rally. A
City report was among the things thatworried investors. It said credit card spending
trends were slowing and growth in thetravel and entertainment category was down sharply.

(01:39:44):
Some federal agencies are among the victimsof cyber attacks by hackers exploiting that flaw
in the filed transfer product called moveIt. The flaws dangerous it can lead
to data theft. The Cyber Securityand Infrastructure Security Agency did not identify the
effected agencies, but sources tell Bloomberga national lab and a radioactive waste storage
site managed by the Department of Energywere among the victims. Some clothing makers

(01:40:10):
are seeing worrisome signs. Sales maybe holding up well for now, but
it appears some retailers are expecting demandfor apparel and footwear to fall off sharply
over the next several quarters. Thisis the time when stores put in their
holiday orders and some factory orders orsome factory owners are saying big drops in
those orders. And dan Heiser BuschCasey is about to roll out a new

(01:40:31):
ad campaign for bud Light. Thebrewer says it will put the focus back
on beer. There was a backlashagainst bud Light after the brand was promoted
by a transgender influencer. The summercampaign will say simply that bud Light is
easy to drink and easy to enjoy. Casey, so you saw that Pat
say Jack has announced he's retiring fromWheel of Fortune. Yes, I did.

(01:40:54):
Here So they said that some ofthe some of the people may take
over include Ryan Zecrest, Whoopee Goldberger, Vannah White. I can't think of
anyone who can replace Pat say Jack. Nobody immediately comes to mind. I
think a lot of people favor Vannah, but Will yeah so too. All
right, all right, were youJeopardy or a Wheel of Fortune? More

(01:41:15):
Jeopardy? Okay, all right,well, thank you much, sir.
Have a good three day weekend.We'll talk to you tuesday. Okay,
do the same, take care ofall right, there you go. Jeff
Bellinger Bloomberg News that Ross found somethinghe does watch good, good good.
This is not a good look,and yet I don't know that. All

(01:41:43):
right, I'm gonna read the headI'm gonna read the headline and stuff.
Had like, tell me why youthink that this might cause some problems,
although maybe it won't because of gettinga pass Um. A realtor in Texas.
A realtor in Texas has created anew thing, basically a service launched

(01:42:11):
by Bob McCraney, who established athing he calls Fleet Texas describing it and
these are his words as an undergroundrainbow railroad for LGBTQ individuals and families.

(01:42:32):
Let me repeat this again. Sohis service is one that he is comparing
to the underground railroad to help LGBTQplus people list their homes in Texas,
connecting them with an agent in adifferent part of the country. These are
all things that a good real estateagent will do for you already, regardless

(01:42:53):
of who you want to hook upwith. Okay, But the idea that
you would compare somebody in Texas whomay be frustrated with the politics there,
with somebody escaping slavery. I wouldthink that some people would find that a

(01:43:14):
bit insensitive. Owned by another personwhipped when they want to families separated,
you have no say and there's nopenalty for murdering you. Or Texas where
they love executing people who kill people, just so we know, but or

(01:43:35):
in Texas where the teachers can't makeyour kids read pornoe books, same thing,
right, I was just thinking,I was just I was looking at
some of these folks who were veryupset. They're just In fact, one
North Carolina teacher was file was reportedlyfired over claims he taught critical race theory

(01:43:59):
in a class room. The teacher, who used to work at a Charlotte's
school, suing the former employer,claiming the school bent to parent pressure because
he taught critical race theory by utilizinga book called Dear Martin for seventh graders.
The book, which is about racialprofiling by law enforcement, was deemed

(01:44:26):
inappropriate by parents who were wondering whatthe heck's going on here, according to
According to the statement, he believesthat school leaders bent because they just they
realized they were too close to potentiallyviolating what lawmakers were working on. Here's
the deal, because this is thepositioning that I see with these stories.

(01:44:50):
How about in the education system,you all yield on the side of being
careful and not try to go rightup to the line. You don't need
to go right up to the lineon stuff. Right when it comes to
most laws and rules, I understandthat that's your obligation. But as soon

(01:45:10):
as you start getting in that grayarea. Sometimes your employer is not going
to have your back because they don'twant to deal with the litigation that's going
to surround it. But then I'msitting there, and then in texas As,
somebody can't read a book. Nowthey have to create an underground rainbow
railroad and compare it to people escapingslavery. Everybody's nuts. Man. You

(01:45:34):
need, you'll need a three dayweek. It's your heads on straight.