Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
What if I told you the most expensive scientific experiments
in history have weaker statistical proof than telepathy research. What
if fusion power, promised for seven years, is being achieved
right now at least the temperature is required in a
basement lab with just nine million dollars. Chris Lado, Welcome
(00:28):
to Lato files. We like to think we're living in
the golden age of science. We have smartphones, space telescopes,
we have gene editing. But what if I told you
we're actually in the Dark Ages. I don't mean the
dark ages of technology. I mean the dark ages of
(00:51):
scientific thinking, where dogma Trump's data, where careers die for
question name orthodoxy, where we spend one hundred billion dollars
on theories that don't work while ignoring ones that do.
(01:12):
The last time science was this closed minded, they burn
Galileo's books. Today they just deny your funding. The result
is the same, the progress stops. Fusion power is the
perfect symbol of our scientific dark age. It's been twenty
years away since nineteen fifty three, when Eisenhower's scientists confidently
(01:35):
predicted breakthroughs as easy as splitting the atom. They said,
the head of the Atomic Energy Commission promised electricity too
cheap to meter in nineteen fifty four. Seven decades later,
the iter the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, the flagship Fusion
Project of Humanity, is twenty five years behind schedule and
(01:58):
counting twenty five years. The budget exploded from five billion
dollars to over twenty billion dollars, and now it's potentially
hitting forty one billion dollars. First plasma, originally planned for
twenty sixteen, might happen by twenty thirty four, if we're
lucky and the project director is twenty twenty four assessment,
(02:22):
he said, some things could have been foreseen a little
bit better. You think that's dark age speak for we
have no idea what we're doing. Your internet provider can
see literally every site you visit, every search you make.
That's why I use private Internet access. It's a virtual
private network and that's today's sponsor. So when I'm researching
(02:45):
sensitive topics, I need to know my connection is secure.
PIA encrypts everything with military grade protection and routes it
through servers in ninety one countries. But here's what sets
PIA apart. They have RAM only servers, so every time
a server reboots, all data gets wiped automatically. There's no
permanent storage of anything. Plus, it's the only major VPN
(03:06):
that's been proven in court multiple times to have zero
logs to hand over. I also use their built in
ad blocker it's called MACE. It blocks trackers and malicious
sites that could compromise my computer. And if you torrant
files for any sort of work, PIA supports that on
all servers. You get all this for two dollars and
three cents a month. If you use piavpn dot com
(03:28):
forward slash lado files that's my link, you not only
support the channel, but you also get eighty three percent
off plus four months free. So supporting sponsors like PIA
keeps this channel independent. Now let's get back to the show. Meanwhile,
in the light, Eric Lerner's dense plasma focus achieved two
(03:48):
point eight billion degrees celsius. That's the highest fusion temperature
ever recorded. That was back in twenty fourteen to twenty sixteen.
That's two hundred times hotter than the Sun's core and
fifteen times ITER's maximum projection. Learner's total funding over twenty
plus years about nine million dollars. Iter spends that on
(04:12):
coffee even better. Hellian Energy, backed by sam Aldman, is
building an actual fusion plant to power Microsoft by twenty
twenty eight. They're using a completely different approach than the
failed tokemacs. They're compressing plasma in magnets in a linear system.
(04:32):
It's like a barbell. And they've raised over a billion
dollars privately because investors see results, not just promises of
twenty years away. It's always twenty years away. The difference
is the startups have to deliver or die. Meanwhile, the
government projects just ask for more money. It's just like
a jobs program. But fusion isn't the only field trapped
(04:56):
in this cycle of broken promises. Billion dollar particle of nothing.
The Higgs Boson represents peak dark Age thinking, spend astronomical
sums to confirm theories instead of actually solving problems. Let's
look at the damage report. The large Hadron collider cost
(05:17):
four point four billion dollars to construct. It uses annual
electricity enough to power two hundred thousand plus homes. CERN's
yearly budget is around one point three billion euro. Twelve
years later, there's zero practical applications. There's no practical applications
for CERN Caltech. Sean Carroll said it bluntly. He said,
(05:42):
there really aren't any technological applications of the Higgs boson,
nor are there likely ever to be. There's never going
to be a technological application. But they're not done now.
They want seventeen to twenty one billion dollars for the
future circular collider, which would run until the end of
(06:02):
the twenty first century. That's a lot of careers there
to fund. When asked what it will accomplish, the answer is, essentially,
we'll let you know in seventy five years. They don't
even know what it's going to accomplish. It's not going
to give any sort of technological application. But here's the
part that should make you angry. The Higgs discovery used
(06:23):
the exact same statistical manipulation that gets other fields labeled pseudoscience.
They combine data from ATLAS and CMS detectors to reach
that magical five sigma significance. But when telepathy researchers combine
data the same way, they call it bad methodology. When
(06:44):
CERN does it Nobel Prize. We're not living in the
golden age of science, We're living in its dark age.
Quantum computing. The fusion of software. Peter Shore's nineteen ninety
four algorithm promised that quantum computers would crack encryption in
(07:07):
one hundred seconds, and that's versus classical computers billion years.
So the hype train left the station in nineteen ninety
four and it still hasn't stopped. The reality check is
that thirty years later, the biggest quantum computers are only
oney one hundred cubits. And that may sound like a lot,
(07:28):
except Shore's algorithm needs twenty million cubits. Right, We're at
eleven hundred. So the progress rate is ridiculously slow, and
the promises keep shrinking. Side Quantum in twenty twenty three
said they'll have one million cubits by twenty twenty five.
Then go to side Quantum's twenty twenty four projection. They said,
(07:51):
make that twenty twenty seven, we'll have one million cubits.
Remember that's one twentieth of what you need to actually
crack all these encryption codes. IBM said they'll have one
hundred thousand cubits by twenty thirty. Right, IBM is supposed
to be in the lead. Right. IBM later changed it
(08:12):
and said, actually, we'll have one hundred thousand cubits by
twenty thirty three, so now I'll say eight years. Nvidia's
CEO Jensen basically collapsed the quantum computing stocks in January
when he said you have fifteen years is probably too soon,
too early, and thirty years is probably too late. So again,
(08:34):
just like fusion, quantum computers will actually produce something in
around twenty years, and it seems like it's always going
to be around twenty years. And if we look at
investment versus results, it's even more ridiculous. So China's quantum
investment was fifteen billion dollars total. You have global private
investment just in twenty twenty four. Last year was two
(08:57):
billion dollars. So your total wantum computing revenue of last year,
how much did they actually bring in? Seven hundred and
fifty million? Right, And most of that is from guess
what government grants? So the revenue quantum computers are generating
is from taxpayers. Yet again, so we're funding science based
on theories that may or may not be true. The
(09:25):
pattern becomes undeniable when you look at cosmology. The James
Webb Space Telescope has delivered what appears to be the
killing blow after killing blow to the Big Bang cosmology,
But like a zombie theory, it just refuses to die.
It will not die. JWST found impossible galaxies everywhere, basically
(09:47):
three red monster galaxies nearly as massive as the Milky
Way when the universe was supposedly an infant. These galaxies
converted eighty percent of their gas into stars, right, but
the Big Bang models predict only twenty percent max. So
again they're four hundred percent off. JWST also found mature
(10:08):
spiral galaxies existing when only baby galaxies should shouldn't be
mature galaxies. And they also found ten times more massive
galaxies than predicted, so ten times the number of galaxies
were predicted, So they're only one thousand percent one thousand
percent off. In that case, it's not that bad. It's
just a scratch. So what's the establishment's response. They they're saying, now,
(10:35):
maybe the universe is twice as old as we thought,
twice as old, so maybe we were only one hundred
percent off. If we change our numbers by one hundred percent,
then maybe we can answer some of these questions. So
they'll basically come up with anything besides admit that the
underlying theory is wrong, or maybe that some of their
underlying assumptions are incorrect. But wait, it gets worse. To
(10:59):
save the Big Bang, they now claim twenty seven percent
of the universe is dark matter, so that was never detected.
Sixty eight percent is dark energy, also never detected, so
only five percent is stuff we can actually see. Imagine
a detective saying I've solved the case. Ninety five percent
(11:20):
of the evidence is invisible. But trust me, that's modern cosmology.
Ninety five percent invisible. In any other field, this would
be called complete failure. Now here's where it gets truly absurd.
(11:49):
The predictions they don't want you to know. Before Big
Bang theory dominated scientists predicted the cosmic microwave background temperature
with stunning accuracy. Sure you've heard of the CMB. Cosmic
microwave background is a pillar of the Big Bang. They say,
this is what proves the Big Bang theory, except they
(12:10):
had better predictions for the actual CMB temperature, way better. Actually,
I'll show you before the Big Bang theory ever was
a thing. Charles Guillaum in eighteen ninety six, he predicted
five point six kelvin for radiation from space. Arthur Eddington, right,
(12:31):
famous for the Eddington experiment that proved general relativity or
supports it. In nineteen twenty six, he predicted three point
one point eight kelvin. Then Erst Reginer in nineteen thirty
three he came up with two point eight kelvin. That
is ridiculously close to the actual temperature of two point
(12:52):
seven two five kelvin. I mean, Reginer nailed it within
point zero seven five degrees, and he nailed using simple
starlight calculations, just measuring how much radiation comes from space
and then using a Boltzmann distribution. Now, let's look at
George Gamal's Big Bang prediction, right, that proves the Big
(13:14):
Bang based on THECMB. He predicted anywhere from five to
fifty kelvin, So he's off by at least ninety percent. Right,
He's only ninety percent off, and that's up to fifty right.
He actually started much higher and then moved it down,
so which theory became dogma the wrong one, of course.
(13:37):
I mean, that's dark age logic. How does that support it?
Eric Lerner's analysis adds another nail to the coffin. Looking
at the galaxy brightness across billions of light years, he
found it stays constant, exactly what you'd expect in a
static universe. The Big Bang predicts brightness should drop dramatically
(13:57):
with distance, but it doesn't when telepathy beats particle physics.
So this will blow your mind. I'm guessing a blue mind.
But telepathy experiments have stronger statistical proof than the Higgs boson.
(14:20):
Think about that. The Gasfield experiments, where someone mentally transmits
images to an isolated receiver, have run for forty plus years.
Storm At Al's twenty ten meta analysis of twenty nine studies,
that's twenty nine studies found one four hundred and ninety
eight trials. They found statistical significance of P equal to
(14:42):
two point one three times ten to the minus eight.
So in physics terms, that is five point four to
eight sigma. That's higher than the Higgs discovery, which required
five sigma. So telepathy exceeds the Higgs bosons five sigma.
That's from the Gansfield experiments. And yet if you look
at the funding comparison, it's just criminal. So particle physics
(15:06):
they get around two point one billion dollars annually, and
as Sean Carroll said, with no technological achievements, it's nothing
that they can even think that it will do. Meanwhile,
all parapsychology research gets two to three million annually. We
think about that, that's a one thousand to one ratio,
(15:28):
and yet the actual sigmas, the statistical analysis of both
is the same. Actually, telepathy gansfield experiments is higher than
the Higgs boson. The biggest private PSI research grants is
sixty thousand euro the LHC four point seventy five billion dollars.
(15:49):
And I wonder if we can come up with any
technological devices or advancements if we prove telepathy. Yep, pretty
sure we'd come with something. Here the kicker, right, And
this is how you can see we're in the dark age.
When Ray Hyman criticized telepathy research for reliance on meta
analysis as the sole basis for justifying claims, he described
(16:12):
exactly how the Higgs discovery worked. Same statistics, different verdict.
I mean, that's dark age justice right there, the machine
that kills progress. So how do we get here? It's
(16:32):
not just a conspiracy, right, I think it's worse. This
is a system perfectly designed to prevent progress. It's a
funding jobs program, and what's the funding trap? Grants. Never
go to challenging mainstream theories. You can't get pey reviewed science.
One scientist reported, when I ask colleagues what would happen
(16:52):
if alternative theories prove right, every single one said they
would leave the field. They would leave the field, they
would quit if an alternative theory was proved correct, it
would be so embarrassing or whatever. You also have career assassination.
So Halt and Arm won Astronomy's Helen B. Warner Prize.
Then he found evidence against the Big bank, and suddenly
(17:14):
he had no telescope time. His career was over. The
message is clear, you have to conform to our dogma,
to our ideology, or you will die. Right, You'll have
to leave the field. You also have publication apartheid. So
archive ourshive requires endorsement from established researchers. I don't know
(17:34):
if you knew that without an endorsement, try Vikshra immediately
branded the crackpot archive. So your PhD doesn't matter if
you're not in the club. What is the pseudoscience weapon
of choice? It's academic napalm. Once deployed, evidence becomes irrelevant.
It doesn't matter. Eric Lerner sets fusion records doesn't matter.
(17:55):
He's a pseudoscientist. He questioned cosmology, questioned our ideology of
the Big Bang. But none of this is new. Okay,
this pattern is historical. Alfred Wegner proposed continental drift in
nineteen twelve. He had rock solid evidence. The establishment organized
conferences specifically to attack him, calling it moonshine, and he
(18:18):
died before his vindication came. Fifty years later, and the
famous scientists from Norway Berkland who discovered the auroras were
actually electromagnetic discharges related to the Sun made fun of,
basically ostracized for this crazy crackpot theory, and then decades
later it turns out true. And today's heretics don't have
(18:41):
to wait for death, they don't get locked in their
house like Galileo, but they do suffer career death. So
while billions are funneled into mainstream physics projects like fifty
billion dollars for the Higgs boson of forty billion dollars
for quantum computing, breakthrough ideas from credible scientists continue to
be ignored, mocked, or labeled pseudoscience. Doctor Christopher Chaiba He's
(19:06):
a Princeton astrophysicist with a PhD from Cornell and a
former White House Science advisor, proposed in twenty sixteen that
Earth's rotation alone could generate a magnetic field through spend
coupled charge separation. That's a model that could simplify our
understanding of planetary magnetism. And this year, because no one
looked at his paper from twenty sixteen, he did it
(19:26):
on his own and through a simple experiment showed that yes,
it's true. He proved it. And yet he's received virtually
no public funding or any real media coverage. Chances are
you haven't even heard of it. Doctor Filippo Biondi, I've
had him on the show. He's a geophysicist at the
University of Pisa. He developed Doppler radar tomography, a revolutionary
(19:48):
non invasive scanning technique that can already peer into volcanoes
and bridges, and he argues it can peer beneath ancient
structures like the Giza Plateau. His peer reviewed has been
criticized and again dismissed by archaeological gatekeepers. Doctor Charles Jonathan Bueller,
a NASA trained physicist with a PhD in condensed matter physics,
(20:12):
has pioneering research into electrostatics and propulsion. I've also covered
his work on the show. That's including demonstrations of high
voltage capacitive lift systems lifters. His work suggests suppressed physics
behind biofield Brown type effects. Yet again, he's received no
federal support, and chances are you haven't heard of it
unless you've seen my video. Eric Lerner mentioned him. While
(20:35):
not a PhD, he is a plasma physicist trained at
Columbia University and president of LPP Fusion. He's hit fusion
temperatures exceeding two point eight billion degrees celsius using just
nine million dollars in funding. Compare that to the forty
one billion dollars sunk into it, which still hasn't produced
any net power. Yet again. Learner's work is routinely labeled
(20:58):
French doctor Dean Raydon. I've also had him on the show.
He has a PhD in psychology and he's the chief
scientist at the Institute of Neuetic Sciences. His meta analysis
of telepathy experiments like Gonsfeld yield statistically significant results on
par again with particle physics standards. He's also conducted his
(21:18):
own experiments over many decades. Yet again, he's dismissed as
pseudo scientific doctor Rupert Sheldrake. He's a Cambridge biochemist with
a PhD and a former Claire College fellow. Has published
dozens of studies and books exploring morphic residence, telepathy, and
human consciousness. Despite his academic rigor his YouTube channel, he's
(21:41):
been blacklisted in band from ted X for challenging materialist dogma.
All these researchers share one thing in common. They're doing
real science, they're real scientists, they're backed by data, and
yet they receive mockery instead of any sort of money.
In total, they've likely received less than one hundred million
(22:01):
dollars combined. That's really a rounding error compared to the
budgets of CERN or DARPA. So breakthroughs are happening, but
we're just missing them, and it seems like it could
be on purpose. Why the dark ages love big budgets,
(22:24):
so the system rewards the wrong things. Of course, all
these government funded systems seem to reward the wrong things. Right,
Grandiosity gets funding, so you promise to solve everything with
a massive machine, Right, billions and billions of dollars, actually
solve something with clever engineering and you get nothing. Right,
if it's too simple, if it's too cheap, it's based
(22:46):
on a different fundamental assumption. It's not worth looking into. Right,
it's not based on our ideology. Also, failure pays I
term missus deadlines by decades. Clearly you need more money,
succeed quickly and cheaply. Well, now we don't need you.
We can't have any of that. Right. We've also gotten
(23:08):
to a state, really after World War Two, where complexity
somehow equals credibility. So the more baroque your theory is,
the more sophisticated. It seems simple solutions must be wrong
because they're obviously too simple. Right, it can't possibly be
the case. We couldn't be wrong so many years ago,
(23:29):
even though we have no new real breakthroughs. You also
get job security through failure. So a working fusion plant
ends thousands of fusion research jobs. Right. Think of all
the grants that won't be delivered anymore. An eternally delayed project,
that's a full career. Right. We need the next collider
(23:50):
out to the year twenty one hundred. We'll still be
doing research in twenty one hundred with colliders. Can you imagine?
So the numbers tell the full story. You have iter
has two thousand times Learner's budget. It's twenty five years late,
and you have no energy produced. The large Hadron collider
fifty plus billion dollars spent. It's found a particle with
(24:14):
zero applications. Right, and by the way, all of that
data is not publicly shared. The raw data cannot be
shared because it's too complicated. They keep it all locked up,
and then no one else can actually make sure that
they did it correctly. They can't even cross check it.
And to actually find the Higgs boson, they had to
remove so much noise from the system that they found
(24:36):
essentially what they want it. You can filter forever until
you get the answer you want. I think that is clear.
And then look at quantum computing like fusion, like TOKENMAK reactors.
We've had thirty years of promises from quantum computing, and
it still can't beat my cell phone, right, it still
can't beat a laptop at all, and it doesn't look
(24:57):
like we're any closer to getting that. We're still five
to eight eight years away from one hundred thousand cubits,
and we need twenty million to do this. Magical encryption technique. Right,
so again, no real application. It's all opium. So welcome
to the real dark age, I mean dark matter, dark energy.
I think it's pretty obvious we're not advancing, Okay, we're awesifying.
(25:21):
Real science makes bold predictions and will actually admit failure.
But that's we don't get that anymore. There is no
admitting of failure. Dark age science adds epicycles to save
our dying theories. Right, I'm sure you've heard it before.
The Big Bang has a lot of problems, but it's
the best theory we have. Right, that doesn't mean it's correct.
(25:43):
You just say it's wrong and then now open your
eyes to try and look for other theories. But actual
real science welcomes rebels. Okay, it doesn't ostracize people like
Eric Lerner. It would actually look into them. Possibly. Brian Keating,
who has a YouTube show, talks about it Arklonner all
the time. He loves making videos about him, but he's
still too scared to actually invite him on the show.
(26:05):
Won't have him on the show to actually talk. Dark
Age science just destroys your rebels, just like they did
back in the past. Lock them up ruin their careers.
I mean, when your cosmology needs ninety five percent invisible
matter to work visible stuff, you haven't solved the universe.
This should be obvious. Okay, you haven't solved it. You've
admitted bankruptcy and you need more handouts. When fusion is
(26:29):
perpetually twenty years away for seventy years, you're not researching.
You're LARPing as scientists. And the tragedy isn't even all
the wasted billions of dollars of taxpayer funds, so that
money could definitely have funded alternate approaches a thousand times over. Actually,
(26:49):
the biggest tragedy is the discoveries that were missing, the
problems were not solving. By just blowing all this taxpayer
money on incorrect theories, theories that we won't emit are correct,
that are wrong, we're just delaying in the future. We're
delaying it until AI can solve our own problems because
we can't look in the mirror and actually say you're wrong.
(27:12):
Telepathy experiments statistically stronger than the Higgs boson the same methodology,
the same statistical standards. One gets two billion dollars annually,
the other gets two million. Let that sync in so
(27:37):
right now, someone like learner is achieving the impossible. Look
at Chris Chaiba again no funding at all, achieves an
experiment in his basement lab. I mean, look at Felipo
Byondi in his garage. He came up with a new
form of Doppler tomography, and again experts label him as
some crackpot. Someone else has data destroying a cherished theory.
(28:02):
Another researcher has a simple solution to a complex problem.
They'll all be ignored, they won't be funded, they won't
be able to submit their papers for peer review. And
it's not because they're wrong. The scientific method should change,
but we're not running the scientific method right now. These
people are not being funded, they're not being listened to.
(28:22):
Their careers are being destroyed because they're right, but in
the wrong way. The good news is dark ages don't
last forever. So the printing press killed the medieval world.
The Internet is killing this one. When Helen delivers fusion
power to Microsoft in twenty twenty eight using impossible physics,
(28:42):
what happens to Iter when JWST finds galaxies older than
the Big Bang allows? How long can they keep adding patches?
How long can they keep just doubling their ages of
the universe that now they just say, oh, there's nothing
wrong with the Big Bang theory. It's our theory of
galaxy formation. When quantum computers still can't do anything useful
(29:05):
in twenty forty, who keeps writing the checks billions and
billions of dollars. I think there are cracks in the dam.
So Eric Lerner publishes fusion results they can't ignore. Startup
fusion companies attract billions from investors who demand results right,
not giant Tokemak reactors. When space telescopes show universes that
(29:27):
shouldn't exist, when they show galaxies further away than they
should be, older than they should be, and when telepathy
research keeps accumulating data like the telepathy tapes, these are
the cracks in the dam. Okay, but what's the establishment's response.
Louder denials, bigger budgets, They have more desperate patches. But
(29:51):
it's getting more and more obvious. You can't fund your
way out of being wrong. At some point, you have
to deliver results. Science advances one funeral at a time,
Max Plank said, but we don't have time for that, right,
it's going to take way too long. We don't have
time for a generation of funerals. We need a revolution now,
(30:13):
So I'd say we should stop funding promises. We should
be funding actual results. If it's still twenty years away,
and you said that twenty years ago, shut the program down. Easy,
cancel those careers, cancel the jobs. You shouldn't just be
delaying everything. We should not be giving billions and billions
of dollars to these programs. If cern cannot deliver anything
(30:35):
of actual value, then do not give them billions of
dollars more for another collider. I think the answer is easy.
Stop protecting theories. Stop protecting the theories. But we do
need to test alternatives. Do you need to have an
open mind? The Big Bang is not one hundred percent
for sure. It has so many holes. Quantum mechanics, quantum
(30:58):
computers in general have so many holes. Okay, if you
go back, many physicists, including Albert Einstein, did not buy
the whole Copenhagen interpretation. If you have to interpret some
sort of science, then you're probably not getting much value
out of it. And it could be that quantum computers
are not going to work because our idea, our understanding
of the quantum world is actually not correct. This rate
(31:22):
will run out of money before we run out of funerals.
We need to stop rewarding failure and start funding results.
Stop dismissing alternatives as pseudoscience and start testing them. Stop
protecting theories with the visible band aids, and start admitting
when we're wrong. Because right now we're spending billions of
(31:43):
dollars the prop up theories that don't work, while ignoring
approaches that do or at least possibly do. And that's
not science, that's religion. With particle accelerators, the universe is
ninety five percent mystery. Tell us, maybe it's time to
admit the mystery is in our theories, not the universe.
(32:14):
Please hit the like button you did like this video
and subscribe for future notifications of my content. You can
support my work and the channel investigating UAPs and science.
I think this is directly related. I mean, we can't
even look at our basic mainstream science much less could
there be actual alien life, non human intelligence life here
(32:37):
on Earth. I mean that's even a step way past
this video I talked about, and these are pretty obvious
to me. So if you want to support my work
and this effort to bring more transparency to the world,
to our science, to our understanding. Then consider supporting on
patreon dot com for slash Chris Lado or become a
YouTube member here. Either way, watching really helps. Sharing the
(32:59):
video really helps. So have a great rest of your
day in peace.