Pyramids: Alien Tech or Ancient Energy Machines? | Jason Shurka on Lehto Files - Lehto Files - Investigating UAPs

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome back to Later Files, where we try to find

(00:02):
the truth of the unexplained. Today, we're diving into something
that sparked a lot of buzz lately, the recent star
scans of the Pyramids. There's also been some wild revelations
from folks like John Ramirez if you remember him, on
human hybrids, those from several years ago, and Joe mcmonagall's
CIA remote viewing of Mars a million years ago. So

(00:22):
those have all come out lately. Our guest today is
Jason Shirka. He's author of the Pyramid Code. He's founder
of Unified DTV and Unified D Healing. He says the
Pyramids weren't tombs, but advanced energy devices tied to sacred
geometry and cosmic alignments. According to your questions on X
like whether ancient tech connects to UAPs or if we're

(00:43):
in a global awakening, it tells me that at least
some of you are ready to explore this on the edges,
and I secretly really enjoyed looking into all these alternate theories.
So let's connect some dots and see where this takes us.
Thank you for being on the show, Jason, Welcome.

Speaker 2 (00:59):
Thanks very much. Chris for having me.

Speaker 1 (01:02):
So Jason, let's start with the Pyramids. Your book claims
they're more than just monuments, so I'd like to unpack
that a little bit. You claim and again correct me
if I'm wrong, but you claim the pyramids weren't tombs
but actually energy devices. Can you walk us through how
they worked and what kind of energy we're talking about?

Speaker 3 (01:19):
Yeah, So, just to clarify, the document you're talking about
was not written by me. It was given to me
back in twenty twenty, so it's not my writing, but
I was given the opportunity to kind of share it
with the world.

Speaker 2 (01:30):
The man who actually wrote it kind of likes to
remain anonymous.

Speaker 3 (01:33):
He doesn't like being in the lime light for the spotlight,
so I respect that, although I want information to come out.
So when he gave it to me and gave me
the opportunity to share it, they resonated with me. It
made a lot of sense to me based on research,
and I said, let's bring this out to the world.
So that happened on September ninth of twenty twenty, so
about five years ago. And everybody called me crazy with that,

(01:54):
like Jason, what are you doing? Because I come from
a background of real estate, so I have nothing to
do with this world in terms of my background, but
it was always something that fascinated me and interested me,
and a lot of people looked at me and they said,
why are you going this route? Even if it's true,
people are going to think you're crazy, and you already
like you're good in life. You know, you got a
good business, everything's going well, why are you doing this?

(02:15):
And I said, well, I'm not doing it for business.
I'm not doing it for the money. I'm doing it
because I want some information to come out that I
feel can help this world be a better place, help
humanity be a little bit more aware on what's going on,
what our history is. So it makes a lot of
claims and I stand behind them. But the good news
is is over the past couple of months, really a

(02:37):
lot of those claims came true and they came to fruition.

Speaker 2 (02:40):
And I always say the truth will always prevail. So
even if in.

Speaker 3 (02:44):
The short term people think you're crazy, long term, if
you're standing by behind something true, it does come out.
So that's what I did with the pyramids and the
Pyramid Code specifically, and I mean just one of the
things that it says is deep underground.

Speaker 2 (02:58):
Underneath the pyramids, there are in.

Speaker 3 (03:00):
Chambers that nobody has found yet, and there are big
basements and plural that's the cubic structures that we're talking
about that they found underneath, and within those cubic structures
you're going to find different artifacts technologies that are there
because they use those chambers to charge those technologies. Now
people looked at me and they're like, Jason, you're out

(03:21):
of your mind. But now with what we're finding with
the ARD data, that's exactly what.

Speaker 2 (03:24):
It looks like.

Speaker 3 (03:25):
You see, the pyramid is not just what we see
above ground, it's actually primarily below ground. And you see
these structures, these six hundred and forty eight meters cylinders,
eight of them with coils going around them, going to
these boxes at the very bottom, and these boxes are.

Speaker 2 (03:41):
The size of football fields. They're massive, massive compartments.

Speaker 3 (03:44):
So it makes it make a whole lot more sense
when people say these are energy generators, because every energy
generator needs a place to store that energy, and that's
what those basements are meant for.

Speaker 1 (03:56):
Are you aware of the recent Princeton breakthrough levels from
Chris Taiba and it's not actually related to Princeton, but
he's there as a scientist, but in his free time
he basically found that you can use it's like a
farete type material and you put it in a cylinder
and you can actually use the spin of the Earth

(04:17):
combined with the magnetic field of the Earth, so they
don't spin together, they're actually separate, and you can generate
a electric charge its being Hastenfelder even made a video
on it, saying for once, she said she thought it
was quite compelling.

Speaker 3 (04:34):
You know, the more we find out, the more we
learn that we don't know, and that could definitely be
a piece of it. And the reason why I say
that is because when we look at all of these
megalithic structures, not just the pyramids, we always see mathematical
constants placed into them. We always see that they're aligned
with certain constellations and stars. And that's far out for
most people on this planet at least, because they're like,

(04:55):
you know, what does that mean, because we were never taught.
We were never taught the power of astrology. But people
call astrology a pseudoscience. They say there's no way that
you know, planets far away can impact anything on this planet.
And yet the Moon is responsible for a high tide
and low tide, and that's almost like three hundred thousand
or two hundred thousand miles away.

Speaker 2 (05:16):
From this planet.

Speaker 3 (05:17):
So if the Moon can do that, and we know
the Sun has an impact on it because of its
gravitational pull that causes for the Earth to go around
in our Solar system, well then what about all the
other planets and their masses and their gravitational polls. Everything
plays a role and is connected to everything else.

Speaker 2 (05:33):
And they understood this back then when it came to
the Pyramids.

Speaker 3 (05:36):
So they thought in the same way that Nicola Tesla
tried to make us think, which is terms of in
terms of energy frequency and vibration, and Nicola Tesla at
all does before he was.

Speaker 2 (05:47):
No longer here.

Speaker 3 (05:48):
When you think in terms of energy frequency and vibration,
you will understand the secrets of the universe. We do
not think in that way on the collective level. We
think in terms of physical only, and we forget that
everything physical is made up of energy. They understood this
back then, which is why they were able to tap
into the exact things that you were speaking about just now,

(06:09):
tapping into the energy of this planet and generating energy
from the movement of this planet because it moves fast
at about one thousand miles an hour.

Speaker 1 (06:20):
Yeah, and I'll point viewers to Anton Petrov. He's a
successful YouTuber about science and he actually he's made a
few videos about how Mars. They've shown that there is
correlation between Mars affecting Earth's tectonic plates. Actually it's on
I believe two point three million year cycles, so it
aligns when I think we're closest to Mars. But there's

(06:43):
another example of basically another planet in our Solar system
causing issues, so affecting our Earth. And also there's no
limit to gravity in our current physics. There's actually no
limit at all to gravity. So if you go by
even our current physical models or physics models, then we
are affected by everything in the universe, at least as

(07:06):
far as we can see, I would argue in the
observable universe.

Speaker 3 (07:09):
So I do kind of it's funny because like even
the words that you use just now, you said Mars
causing issues, it's not really an issue. It's just an
issue for us because we don't like when things move,
Like an earthquake is not an issue. It's a natural
thing that happens. It's an issue when we have a
home that is destroyed because of the movement of those

(07:30):
tectonic plates. So we need to filter between those two.
For everybody that's always thinking about these things. There's always
a change in climate. There's always I mean, look at
the ice age versus now, right, things got warmer. Were
there cars back then? No, it was like ten thousand
years ago. Things change all the time. It only is

(07:51):
an issue relative to what we want and what's happening
in comparison to what we want. But factually, if you
look at the Earth as like a magnet because it
has an electromagnetic field, and you look at Mars as
a magnet, Yeah, when you move those magnets around, the
energy between the magnets will shift and that will change
things on the magnets of their things on it. So

(08:12):
I share that just from like an objective view and
a logical point of view to take out our judgment
of good or bad or crazy or not is.

Speaker 2 (08:19):
Just look at the science. Two magnets move in will
shift what happens on each magnet.

Speaker 1 (08:25):
Fact Yeah, it's very interesting too because if you move
a magnet through an electric field, right, or even just
a wire. If you move a wire through an electric field,
you'll get induction. So that's really how all of our
transformers work. So if you look if the Earth is
a big giant magnet, which it is, we have a
northern south pole and we're moving through the Sun's magnetic field,

(08:49):
and the Sun has an enormous magnetic field that basically
defines the helium the heliosphere. You can generate amazing currents
that and we see results of this in the auroras.
You know, you mentioned you're going to put out there
what you think and people call you crazy.

Speaker 2 (09:06):
Well.

Speaker 1 (09:06):
Berkland he was a famous scientist from Norway in the
early nineteen hundreds. He argued for these Brookland currents that
the aurora is actually because he was lived in Norway,
I guess, so he saw these currents and these auroras
all the time. He argued they were from electrical connections
between the Earth and the Sun, and they called him crazy. Right,
it's the same things they called to you. But now

(09:29):
we call those Berkland currents and it's just a visual
representation that the Earth is directly connected, I believe, to
the Sun, and arguably we can show that through auroras, electromagnetically.

Speaker 3 (09:42):
Everything is connected to everything. Sometimes we just don't understand it. So,
like take our solar system. We just spoke about the
micro even though it sounds back, but it's still micro
in relation to the universe as a whole. Our solar
system is then impacted by other solar systems. And then
if you want to go a little more macro, which
is so micro, you have the galaxy which is its

(10:04):
own major system, and that will be impacted by other galaxies.
So it's all a game of energy. When people kind
of resist that, it just shows me that we lack
education on how things work.

Speaker 1 (10:17):
I completely agree. I have. I'm publishing a book this summer,
and the main argument in that is we live in
a factor universe. And what I found is a kind
of an interesting correlation. I just wanted to share with
you since you mentioned about cycles, is that there's there
are planetary cycles that we know are called bond events.

(10:40):
There's several types of them, and those happen every fourteen
hundred and seventy to twenty five hundred years. So if
you look at the cooling cycles of our planet, you
can look back and it's in the ice cores, et cetera.
It actually strangely aligns to two thousand years, which is
very close to the astrological ages of twenty one sixty years. Basically,

(11:05):
if you take the procession of the Earth, it's every
twenty five thousand, six hundred and ninety two years I
believe around twenty six thousand years, and you divide it
up by the twelve zodiacs if you will, astrological signs,
it comes very very close to what we can actually
find from the actual cooling cycles called so people in audience,
I'd encourage them to look up bond cycles, look into that.

(11:28):
There's also halistet cycles that the sun actually goes through,
so very interesting. When I watched through your the actual
Pyramid Code interviews, I watched all four parts. Recommend people
can check it out the full series full show on
Unified DTV. I was very interested in the astrological ages.

(11:48):
That's what Ray was talking about, basically the guy who
wants to remain anonymous, and that was the main thing
I felt and saw firsthand when I went to Egypt
in November. That really surprised me. I just like you said,
I was never taught that I didn't know that the
Egyptians were hugely into astrological signs and ages, and that

(12:10):
they put all of the zodiacs up on all their temples,
and they linked them to each of the constellations, and
they even had looked like beings, you know, coming on
boats that you could determine as spaceships, and that that
really blew me away from Egypt the astrological ages.

Speaker 3 (12:28):
So in the Pyramid Code document itself, it speaks about
the initiation process that each pharaoh or offspring of the
pharaoh go through called the barocop process, which in Arabic
means the purification, the blessing. Essentially, that's what barca means.
And interestingly enough, one of the first aspects of their
initiation process was that they had to become proficient in

(12:49):
something called asked science sciences ast meaning astrology. They needed
to know that because the pyramids are based on interact
with those energies. So you have these the zodiac with
the twelve constellations. The pyramids work hand in hand with
the energies of that. But again most people hear that,

(13:10):
they're like, Jason, what are you talking about? And again,
what we're talking about is the fact that just like
a planet has an energy to it, call it its
gravitational pull and other characteristics that it has, certain star
systems also have energies to them, and energy of this
star system will be a different energy of this star system.
So that's why in astrology, with birth charts and things

(13:32):
like that that people call crazy when you're born at
a certain time in a certain location, just like high
tide happens at a different.

Speaker 2 (13:41):
Time around the planet than load tide does.

Speaker 3 (13:44):
Based on where the mood is and where the tide
is actually changing on the planet.

Speaker 2 (13:48):
Well, again, you are also made.

Speaker 3 (13:49):
Of seventy plus percent water, and based on where you're born,
it goes beyond just the water. It will impact how
energy interacts with your body and therefore how you respond
and express yourself. So that's why there's a difference in
a generalization. You can go a whole lot deeper between
Capricorns and Cancers and Sagittarius. It's a difference in energy

(14:11):
based on those systems and where you were literally born
on this planet.

Speaker 1 (14:16):
Yeah, I find it interesting that the mainstream argument, right
if you bring up astrology, people think you're insane. Basically
it's that it's pseudoscience. But we just mentioned there physical
examples how we're electrically connected at least to the Sun.
We are gravitationally connected definitely to the Moon, the Sun,

(14:37):
and I already I just mentioned there Mars, So we
also even in our current physics, there's no limit to gravity.
So there is a physical process, direct physical process for
at least elements of the stars and the other planets
to interact with our own.

Speaker 2 (14:55):
We know.

Speaker 3 (14:57):
Factually that every single planet, whether it's Pluto, Mars, Venus, whatever,
every single planet has its own rotation and cycle around
the Sun based on its distance and gravitational pull with
the Sun. So that will change how it's actually moving,
the speed that it's actually moving at. Now, if we

(15:17):
accept that in astronomy not astrology, which we do. We
accept that in astronomy and we understand that as a fact, well,
then what about all the other ones in between?

Speaker 2 (15:28):
Right?

Speaker 3 (15:28):
So if the Sun is impacting Pluto, why isn't the
Earth impacting Pluto and vice versa. Why isn't Mars impacting
Pluto and vice versa. Again, it comes down to our
lack of awareness and understanding of how everything is interconnected.
And if you look at our world today, there's a
difference between reductionism and holism. Reductionism means you're an expert

(15:53):
in each piece, but you don't know what all the
pieces make in terms of the puzzle, while holism is
you understand each piece, but you also understand the big picture.
We right now are collectively tuned into the reductionist reductionism
reductionistic perspective, and we see that in our medical system.
So for example, our medical system with pharmaceuticals and all that.

(16:17):
They're brilliant when it comes to the pixels, meaning you
want this pill for acne, create acutane, and we're going
to get rid of the acne. But they're forgetting the
fact that the acutane will damage the liver. So you're
getting rid of the acne, but you're getting liver damaged
and liver disease along the way. That's because they're looking
at points instead of how all the points actually connect.

(16:40):
We're doing that in every aspect of our lives, including
with planets. It's just a reflection of our own consciousness,
which is mostly based in division as opposed to unification.
That's why we see war, that's why we see murder,
that's why we see corruption, it's why we see greed.
It's because we genuinely, collectively, maybe not me and you,
but most people are tuned into this perspective and mentality

(17:04):
of I am separate from you. So if I have
enough food on my table and I'm rich, but you're
poor and you're in poverty, I don't really care because
my family is taken care of.

Speaker 2 (17:14):
And that's an illusion. That's the equivalent of.

Speaker 3 (17:18):
A cell in your leg, or let's say your brain
saying you know, there's a cell or there's certain cells
that are turning cancerous in my left foot, but it's
far away from the brain, so the brain doesn't really
care and it's not really going to do anything to
help it.

Speaker 2 (17:33):
Well, guess what.

Speaker 3 (17:34):
Eventually, the brain's going to be impacted and the body's
going to die. And that's exactly what we're seeing around the.

Speaker 2 (17:38):
World right now.

Speaker 1 (17:41):
I love you brought up that analogy. I have a
series on this channel about the I already mentioned it,
the factal life argument, and the argument is we're actually
inside of larger organisms. So the idea is that the
Nations is a living, breathing earth organism, you know, and
that would be why we have war essentially is the

(18:04):
nation sees the same thing, it sees another nation as
an adversary, something separate, or something to get resources from,
basically like every other Earth creature. You know, we even
talk about the nations as America did this or Russia
did this, you know, so I think that's a great example.
And when you have cancer, it's really we even talk

(18:26):
about cancer cells. You know, they're actually organisms inside the
main organism, but their alignment is not aligned with the group,
the overall group. So inside your body, cancer is actually
very effective at living. It's very good at what it does.
The problem is it's not helping you to live, right,
it's not helping you like you said it, you're taking

(18:48):
care of your family. Yeah, you're taking care of your family,
but you're not helping the other people. You know, if
you're not helping the full system, then basically considered a
cancer's organism.

Speaker 3 (19:00):
And to your point, everything is part of something bigger,
and everything also has something smaller within it, and there
is no limit to either side.

Speaker 2 (19:10):
So we are in the Earth. The Earth is in
the Solar system. The Solar system is in the galaxy.
The galaxy isn't something bigger and.

Speaker 3 (19:18):
It keeps going, and it really never ends. I know
that they say the edge of space. There's no such thing.
There can't be because energy is infinite.

Speaker 2 (19:25):
It can't be created or destroyed.

Speaker 3 (19:27):
Maybe there's an edge to the physical expression that we
perceive and decode as reality, but there cannot be an
end to something that's infinite, and therefore there cannot be
a beginning to something that's infinite.

Speaker 2 (19:38):
So if you go and reverse, well, then we're the
human body.

Speaker 3 (19:43):
Then you have the cells, then you have the atoms,
then you have the sub atomic particles. Then you have
the subatomic of the sub atomic particles, and that's where
you get into the string theory, and it keeps going.
It doesn't mean it ends because we stop that string theory.
It keeps going forever because the macro is the micro
and the micro is the macro. So we just live

(20:03):
relative to what we see as big and small. But
that's a really really small, infinitely small perspective of what's
really going on.

Speaker 2 (20:10):
Because just like we have.

Speaker 3 (20:12):
Cells in our body, we are the cells in this
body of Planet Earth, and Planet Earth is one cell
in a much bigger body, and the galaxy is one
cell in a much bigger body and it keeps going.
So again we live according to the illusion of division,
so it creates all these problems, but it's false.

Speaker 2 (20:28):
It's a lie.

Speaker 1 (20:31):
That's amazing. Yeah, I may even may have to see
if you'll read a forward even for the book, or
at least a small section, sir, Yeah, if you look
at it based on what you just said there about
the different scales scales of life, right, And I don't
think the string theory is correct. I think string theory
hasn't made one accurate prediction in thirty years. I think

(20:52):
you're done as a theory if you can't make one
accurate prediction, like even your supposedly crazy theory at least
made at least like you just said, there was one
accurate prediction. So how could everything be linked? We already
said through gravity, through frequency, through light. There is an
argument I believe about consciousness. So if you talk about

(21:15):
conscious entities, if everything's just frequency and vibration, then could
you have larger conscious entities as in, could the planet
be a conscious entity? Could the solar system actually engage
in some sort of consciousness? I don't know what is
your take on.

Speaker 2 (21:34):
I don't think that there's anything that could not be conscious.

Speaker 3 (21:38):
Now, when I say conscious, I'm not talking about conscious
in the same way that me and you were conscious.
But if something has an order to it, that means
it has an intelligence to it. Whether we understand that
intelligence or not as a whole different story. But if
there's an order to it, there's an intelligence to it.
If there's an intelligence to it, there's a consciousness to it.
Everything in existence as order to it. Even what we

(22:02):
perceive is disorder. If you look deep enough, you're going
to find order in the disorder. There's no such thing
as disorder. It's against all the laws of the fundamental
universe and how things actually work. So by that very understanding,
there is nothing that can't be conscious. And for anybody
that would challenge and I've had people challenge me and

(22:22):
they say, Jason, explain to me how everything is interconnected.
And my answer is explained to me, how everything is it?
And they can't.

Speaker 1 (22:31):
That's simplete can't. Yeah, it's really how we define an object.
Because take a human for instance, a human will only
survive inside this biosphere, right, so you're basically gonna die.
You need the pressure, right, you need the pressure to
keep the air in your lungs. So in space, you're
going to die in seconds. You need the oxygen to

(22:55):
basically complete the electron transport chain, right or basically electric
electric beings. That's why we need oxygen. It has a
negative receptor, so it will accept an electron. It basically
grounds you, and you need water to make that electricity
electricity happen. So you can define yourself as a human,
but you're only a human because you're surrounded by the biosphere.

Speaker 2 (23:19):
Like, what is a human? You know, we got to
ask ourselves that as well. What is it?

Speaker 3 (23:23):
Is it?

Speaker 2 (23:23):
A like?

Speaker 3 (23:25):
Are you your body? Are you do something more than that?
Is there an energy that animates the body? There's the
confusion lies in our definitions because our definitions are arbitrary.
They're not based on anything true. They're based on our understanding.
So take World War two? When did it really start?

(23:45):
If it was surrounded around Let's say Hitler. Why didn't
it start when Hitler was born? Why didn't it start
when Hitler's parents conceived Hitler? Why didn't it start when
his grandparents were born? When does something actually start? And
the answer is it doesn't. We just need to create
arbitrary points to explain a linear expression of what we

(24:07):
experience as time. Take a book, Where does a book start?
Does it start on the front cover? Because sometimes I
see books and page one as seven pages in, because
you open it and you see the copyright page, and
then you see the cover page, and then you see
the acknowledgments, and then you see the table of contents,
and only then you get to page one, and sometimes
there's a preface and a forward. So where does something

(24:30):
start and where does something end? And the answer is, fundamentally,
it's one continuous event that never started and never ends.
But because we experience ourselves in this physical life, we
need to identify the beginning and the end of something
to be able to speak about it and relate to it,
because we experience ourselves as physical beings.

Speaker 2 (24:51):
But we know fundamentally that that's not true.

Speaker 3 (24:53):
And I can show you how. For example, time is
an illusion. I'll prove it to you in two seconds. Today,
I'm in Florida. In Florida, it's twelve thirty three pm
Eastern time. In California, it's nine thirty three am Pacific time.
Now is it really two different times? Because that's relative

(25:15):
to where I'm at. So let's say that there's a
train that takes you all around planet Earth, and there
are three stops. In this case California, New York, and
whatever London. London is about five hours ahead of here.
That means it's about eight hours ahead of California. So

(25:37):
I just broke it down to three different points. Now
I'm on this train and I leave California and I
go to New York. Now California is in my past,
and New York is in my future. And when I
get to New York, New York is in my present.
California is my past, and London is in my future.
And when I get to London, New York and California
in my past. But what happens if I and then

(26:00):
get on a spaceship shoot outside of this planet and
look at the entire planet from the perspective of seeing California,
New York, and London all at the same time. Suddenly
what used to be my past president in the future
is now all happening in my present moment.

Speaker 2 (26:17):
Those points dissolve, they're just happening all at the same time, meaning.

Speaker 3 (26:22):
It's all based on our perspective of what we're looking
at something from. If you have point A and point B.
You've created what's called time because you travel between here
and here. But if I remove point A and point B,
those two events are not too anymore. They're happening simultaneously.

(26:42):
And I don't even know how we got onto this topic,
but it's an important one for people to understand of
how things actually work in this world and the illusions
that we live.

Speaker 1 (26:50):
By basically defining the object, and you said, an interesting
statement is that the observable universe, right, And i'd encourage
my viewers. I'm not going to go into all the
details right now, but if you look at the furthest
we can see right, and you multiply that by the
red shift that's the Hubble constant. It's around seventy two

(27:14):
megaparsex I'm sorry, seventy two kilometers per megaparsec. So that's
how much we see the universe supposedly expanding. And I've argued,
I argue it's not expanding. I argue what we're seeing
is an actual red shift based on some sort of
interaction with I believe in ether medium. The point is,
we measure distance away from our planet with red shift,

(27:35):
and that's that's how we know it's expanding. If you
take that number, which is seventy two kilometers per megaparsec,
and you multiply that times the furthest we can see
right the observable universe, which is around forty six twenty megaparsex.
So that's the furthest right. So distance times the red

(27:56):
shift is how far we can see. That number actually
equals the speed of light. So every direction we look,
that's how much the light is shifted. Where it's red shifted,
it's shifted so much at that distance that now it's
equals the speed of light and we can't see it
anymore only because it's been red shifted so far. Does
that make sense? So that's the FROs fantasy.

Speaker 3 (28:19):
I would even add something to it, the very fact
that they're saying that the universe is expanding. My follow
up question would be expanding into what? Yeah, because if
it's expanding, and that means expanding in something, because if
there's that's why I'm saying, you can't limit something that's
limitless by the very words, an explanation of the universe
is expanding. It needs to expand in something to give

(28:41):
it room to expand it.

Speaker 2 (28:43):
Because there's no such thing as nothing.

Speaker 3 (28:45):
It's it's that's the only thing that's an impossibility in
this world. Because even if you now to get philosophical,
and this is based on Greek philosopher's name is Parmenides,
he goes into the philosoph of the word not, it
can't exist because isn't still is is not? Still isn't

(29:12):
There is no opposite is because it needs to be
in order to talk about it in the first place.
So when something's expanding, it can't expand into nothing, even
the word nothing. It's no thing, not one thing, it's everything.
It's expanding into something that's already infinite.

Speaker 2 (29:31):
But like you said, to say that that's the edge
of our universe.

Speaker 3 (29:37):
As they say, it's a very egotistical, arrogant way of
seeing the world because it assumes that we can see
everything and we can't well.

Speaker 1 (29:45):
And also it doesn't make any accurate predictions.

Speaker 2 (29:47):
Right.

Speaker 1 (29:47):
The whole point of having a model is that it
should be able to predict the future, right, or what
we should see. And that's the whole point of a model, right,
is that this happens. So now I can predict that
that will happen. But I just explained. Now, if you're
if you have a supposed expanding universe and you're looking
back further, and that's what the James web Space telescope

(30:10):
did for us, is it it looked in a in
UV right, so it's actually shifted more towards the red spectrum.
So it should have seen younger galaxies if they were correct,
should have seen like little baby galaxies, right, But instead,
what did it see? More galaxies? And that's if you
if you're just limited because your light is being red

(30:32):
shifted and now your your James web Space telescope can
see further into the red spectrum. The prediction from basically
a non expanding universe is we should expect to see
fully formed galaxies like that's what we should see and
and that is what we see, right, And but they
still will not will not change their change their model.

(30:53):
So I guess yeah, mainstream models want to get back
to the sacred geometry. And I had an amazing example,
but I need to look it up, so I'm going
to edit this out, but I need to find this. Okay.
We talked about the planets the Solar System, and what
I found out recently is in the eighteenth century you

(31:14):
had what's called the Tidius Bode law titious Boat law,
And basically this was an empirical rule proposed by Johann
Titius and it was popularized by Johann Boat in seventeen
sixty six. Okay, it it suggested a pattern for planetary distances.
So they had a formula A equals point four plus

(31:36):
point three to the two to the end. Okay, n
as an integer starting with negative infinity. So basically people
can look it up if they're more interested. But what
it did was for Mercury, Venus, Earth going out all
the planets, it predicted the distances in astronomical units, right,
so we had Earth at one and then Mars is

(31:58):
going to be at aximate one point six. So basically
what it did is it was able to predict, based
on these actual intervals, how each of the planets is linked,
Like you mentioned earlier about how the planet the planets
go around in a certain orbit at a certain speed.
And so what's amazing about this is it was able

(32:19):
to predict the asteroid belt, so it predicted that, and
it also predicted Uranus, so it predicted those. Now where
it broke down was at Neptune, right, and so I
was like, that's strange. So it predicted all of the
predicted seven planets, right, but the eighth planet and ninth
if you call Pluto a planet, it messed that up.
But if you actually look at the orbits for Neptune

(32:42):
and Pluto, they cross, so they're actually very integrated. I
think they could have actually just even messed up their
own units. So I just found that amazingly interesting and
I thought it was. What it made me think of
is sacred geometry. And so, like what we mentioned in there,
can you talk about sacred geometry and how it relates

(33:03):
to the pyramid code?

Speaker 3 (33:06):
Well, the proportions, the structure of the pyramid in and
of itself is a geometric shape, and as we know,
even if we want to relate it to the world
today and what we know about health, you need take
water as a medium for example, for electricity and energy
to run through water without being mitigated or hindered in

(33:27):
any way. You need the molecular formations to be coherent,
you need them to be geometric. That's how those things
work in order to create health in the body. So
the problem today is we have a lot of distorted
structures in our water and distorted structures in our body,
so energy gets stuck. The pyramid, for example, is one
of many different sacred geometric shapes that allows energy to

(33:50):
move through it in a much more coherent way, especially
if you're using it as an energy generator. You want
energy to move through it as seamless as possible. One
of the shapes that can allow energy to move through
it as seamless as possible. Thus, when you're generating energy,
you can generate a whole lot more and therefore store
a whole lot more as well. Now that's not to

(34:11):
say that you can't take a structure that's a completely
irrelevant and arbitrary shape and not create energy from it,
but it's going to be hindered in terms of how
much it can actually create based on the structure in
the medium that the energy is running through itself.

Speaker 1 (34:26):
It's interesting you talked about the earlier you talked about matter.
Everything is energy or frequency vibration and about specific angles there,
and that made me think to broadly. In nineteen twenty three,
he actually proved that the electron was not a particle.
So he proved that the electron was a field, and

(34:46):
that's what we have now is all our particle. Our
particles are actually fields. So matter is essentially vibration and field.
There's no particles there. Specifically, I was a material science major,
so chemistry major. Any chemists out there, it's all based
on angles. So you mentioned geometry, and you mentioned water.

(35:11):
Water is specifically a polar molecule, and what you'll learn
in organic chemistry when you get into chemistry, it's all
about angles of the bonds and how the atoms actually
relate to each other on these very specific angles, you know,
And that just yeah, that was what I thought initially
was sacred geometry, that it's all about fields.

Speaker 3 (35:31):
Like that's why, for example, the Great Pyramid in Egypt
is fifty one point whatever degrees. There's a reason for
that because it moves energy in a specific way, and
what energy moves in a coherent way, you get much
much greater outputs. That's also why what you're seeing behind
me is the shape of a pyramid. It's a healing
modality and the actual shape of it will only make

(35:53):
it even more effective.

Speaker 2 (35:54):
That's why I turned this into the pyramid.

Speaker 1 (35:57):
So that is that's fascinating because I wanted to shift
actually into your work with TLS and how this ancient
knowledge you might still be relevant today. So for those
new to this, what exactly is TLS and that crazy
pyramid behind you?

Speaker 3 (36:13):
So there are two different things there is. The Light
System is an organization, which is an organization that I
work with basically to bring more awareness to the world
on many different topics. That's what you're talking about with
ray and the pyramid code and all that. What this
pyramid is is also called the Light System, the Light
System technology. It's not a part of the organization anyway.
Obviously they gave me their blessing to use their name.

(36:36):
But the purpose of this is number one. It's called
the light system because it looks like a system of lights,
but it's using light in the form of a healing modality.

Speaker 2 (36:46):
Essentially.

Speaker 3 (36:47):
Now I can't tell you that this heals you, because
it doesn't. Your body heals itself. This will facilitate the process.
So it's using different wavelengths. As you can see, you
can actually change the colors and chew different wavelengths on
this that you're going to choose from intentionally to be
able to target different aspects of your body. So, for example,

(37:08):
when you go to you know, you choose.

Speaker 2 (37:10):
Blue and green.

Speaker 3 (37:11):
Blue and green are going to give you different aspects
you're trying to target, because the optimal frequency of your
heart and your lungs is in the color that we
perceive as green, so that would be green light therapy.
Blue light therapy would be more so for your thyroid, communication,
your throat, and so on and so forth, whereas red
would help with.

Speaker 2 (37:31):
Inflammation in the body.

Speaker 3 (37:32):
It would help with individuals dealing with leukemia, for example.
So it's using light as a form of therapy. It's
called polychromatic light therapy. Coupled with what you're actually seeing
on the screen looks like a bunch of codes, but
I can change those codes into English and may be
difficult to see with this camera, but that's actually the
English language with affirmations, and there are affirmations that you

(37:54):
can program into the system based on the work of
doctor Masso Emoto. The pyramid the light system in this case,
the pyramid is giving you the ability to create an
environment to tune to specific intentionalities that will restructure the
formation of water molecules of water in the body. And
that's huge because stick people have distorted water in the body.

(38:18):
Healthy people have coherent geometric structures of water in the body,
and that's what this thing does, helps you restructure the
water in your body, amongst many other aspects. So that's
the light system pyramid.

Speaker 1 (38:31):
So how does that tie into ancient pyramid tech.

Speaker 3 (38:35):
Well, it's built after the exact proportions of the pyramids,
So the proportions themselves is part of the technology because
energy moves through it in a specific way to help
with healing, to help expand consciousness, things like that. Beyond that,
the pyramids themselves were built with the understanding of energy, frequency, vibration.

Speaker 2 (38:55):
Of light, and this is as well.

Speaker 3 (38:57):
It's all built on the fundamentals of energy, g frequency, vibration,
and light. So it's using and emitting certain frequencies just
like the Pyramids did, not to the level that the
Great Pyramid Giza does, of course, but it's using the
same principles and fundamentals to help the body heal itself.
And again, we've seen people with children with autism that
were nonverbal, able to speak again. People with back pain

(39:21):
that we're dealing with it for twenty years on heavy
drugs gone in a few days in some cases, people
with eyesight that they're now reversing without having to do lasik,
people with diabetes that they no longer have lime disease.
All of these things are not the technology healing them,
but it's the fact that the body always tries to

(39:42):
do one thing. The body is always trying to heal itself.
The question is are you giving the body the proper
environment to do so. That's part of the purpose of
the ancient technologies in ancient Egypt back then, and that's
what we brought to this technology as well.

Speaker 1 (39:58):
So you mentioned a few specific examples there, Do you have,
I guess, a clear example of how it actually helped someone.
Is any of this proven with any sort of scientific studies,
et cetera.

Speaker 3 (40:13):
Oh yeah, there's tons of research, thousands of testimonies as well.
But I'll give you a personal one. My aunt she
had and I stay my aunt because she's we know
she's not an actor. You know, I know this person
on a first and basis. She had a thirteen and
a half centimeter sistic fiber in her uters. Doctor said,
you got to do surgery. Might be cancer. We don't
know what's going on.

Speaker 2 (40:34):
You got to take it out. Now.

Speaker 3 (40:36):
I'm not against Western medicine, but I do use it
as a last resort, not the first thing. So we
put her in the technology. Four hours later, Chris, the
sister was gone, never needed surgery. Overcame it completely. Now
that's just one.

Speaker 2 (40:51):
But for me, I looked at that and I said,
maybe it's the placebo effect.

Speaker 3 (40:55):
Maybe it's you know, her mind telling her that's going
to do something in her mind made to happen, not
the technology. So then my sister's dog, we found a
four centimeter tumor in his neck. Again, the vets are like,
you got to remove it, you got to put him
under to do the surgery.

Speaker 2 (41:08):
Blah blah blah. I said, you know, not, just put him,
put him in the technology. Let's see what happens.

Speaker 3 (41:13):
He slept around it for three nights, three days later, gone,
never needed surgery.

Speaker 2 (41:18):
Now that's on a dog. We can say placebo happens
on people. You cannot apply the placebo effect to an
animal because I couldn't tell the little toy poodle this
is what's about to happen. Now that's just two of many, many,
many examples. And that's why I stand behind it, because
I see what it does firsthand.

Speaker 1 (41:36):
So let's zoom out again. To the cosmic picture. I
guess some of the wider ideas you've touched on. Joe mcmonagall,
he said the CIA asked him to remote view Mars
a million years ago, and there is actual documentation that
they gave him this remote viewing target. Do you think
ancient Martian civilizations could tie to the knowledge encoded in

(41:59):
the pyramids?

Speaker 3 (42:01):
Who says that they don't have pyramids on Mars and
who says that the people that built them here didn't
build them there as well?

Speaker 2 (42:07):
Right, there are a.

Speaker 3 (42:07):
Lot of assumptions that we like coming down to because
we think we were in advance back then. But the
very fact that pyramids were all over this planet with
the same inscriptions on basically all of them, show that
there was some sort of interplanetary communication. And if there
was interplanetary communication back then, why couldn't there be intergalactic communication?

Speaker 2 (42:27):
So Number one, the remote viewing that you're talking about
is very real.

Speaker 3 (42:32):
Right, we have those declassifying documents, and there's a lot
of people I work with, some of those remote viewers
that find bodies that are missing that big authorities or
agencies are looking for that they can't find. So my
only question that we don't know the answer to is again,
who says that same people that built it here didn't
build it there. Who says the people that build it

(42:53):
here are from here and maybe not from somewhere else.
Who says that they're not from a completely different solar
system and they came here because something happened over there
and they needed to find a new home. All of
these things are possibilities. Well, we know the answer at
some point, maybe maybe not. But what we do know
is there are technologies here from a long time ago
that we should start tapping into. We should start learning

(43:14):
more of, regardless of who made and and you know
where they came from. That's that's a great thing to
figure out. But let's focus on the things that we
could apply right now. The more we focus on actually
experimenting and researching the pairments without core up powers that
beat to stop that because the threat to what they're
doing in this world, the faster we'll be able to advance.

Speaker 1 (43:36):
I had John Ramirez on the show a few years
ago as well. He was a CIA radar analyst, and
he said he was in a meeting. It was was
not classified, it was just off the books and basically
in the meeting and he recognized people there high level
government meeting. He said that it was they said we

(43:59):
had hybrid basically hybrid species. They also said mentioned something
about seventy five thousand years ago, and I'm sure if
that number came, it actually came. I believe Loue Alzando
mentioned it as well. But this actually sounded like it
played into the Pyramid code as well, where there was

(44:19):
some sort of catastrophe on Mars basically it was unlivable.
I've also heard the asteroid built was a previous planet.
Law of one for instance, says that it was Maldeck,
it was destroyed, etc. Is this all? Have you found
this in your work?

Speaker 3 (44:38):
So in the document it speaks about four different races
coming from four different planets. It didn't identify which ones,
so I don't know, but coming from four different planets
because they had problems over there and they.

Speaker 2 (44:48):
Needed to find a new hope. They were very spiritually advanced.

Speaker 3 (44:52):
That's why they built the things in the way that
they built them, with the mathematical.

Speaker 2 (44:55):
Constance and so on and so forth, and they.

Speaker 3 (44:57):
Came here in order to raise that level of spirituality
here on this planet as well. The problem is, and
you can actually see it in the Bible as well.
In the whole Testament, it says the sons of God
came down from heaven and made it with the daughters
of Man. Now sons of God in the Hebrews called
bane Elohim Delohem doesn't literally mean the sons of God.

(45:18):
It means what they called them back then, because they
are these beings coming from the sky, because they're coming
from somewhere else, and the people here didn't really understand
what was going.

Speaker 2 (45:26):
On what to do.

Speaker 3 (45:28):
So first thing they do is say bananaly and the
sons of God, because that's how they can understand it.
The problem was when they made it with the daughters
of Man, meaning that the female human being. When you
have and this is just in terms of DNA, when
you have a highly advanced race made with a very
not highly advanced race, this race starts diluting their DNA

(45:51):
and over time they become more and more and more
diluted until they become just like the lower race.

Speaker 2 (45:57):
They were not supposed to make with the daughters of Man,
but they did. And what you saw if you look
at the Pharonic lineage, specifically the Pharaohs It started as
a very positive thing, and then over time, over time.

Speaker 3 (46:09):
With the interbreeding that was happening, it started changing the
way that the pharaohs were treating the people and it
went from a very spiritually advanced race to slavery, killing
very bad things. And right after that, if you follow
the story of the Exodus, not that I'm a religious
man by any means, I just look at it as
a history book. If you follow this story of the Exodus,

(46:29):
that's when the last pharaoh before the Faronic lineage fell.
He became very cruel, it fell down and everything changed. So, yes,
I do believe that they came from other places. This
technology did not only come from here. And we see
it on the inscriptions on the wall, with the hieroglyphics.
They're literally telling it the story. It's showing you they're
coming from somewhere else. It's showing you their heads be

(46:50):
elongated skulls that are not part of you know, Homo sapiens.

Speaker 2 (46:53):
It's not a regular human being. They look like us.

Speaker 3 (46:56):
Nobody said in Eliot needs to look like this, you know,
gray thing would be eyes. Maybe they could as well,
but alien just means something that's not from here. There
could very well be other races that look like us
that are not from here, that have come here. And
you know, the standard model of evolution tells us that
it started as like a meebas and then it turned
into fish, and then the fish turned into a lizard,

(47:19):
and the lizard turned into a monkey, and then we
turned into humans. There's two problems with that, well, one
main one, if it's survival of the fittest, how did
the past one that we have alter and still survive?

Speaker 2 (47:30):
And number two, to.

Speaker 3 (47:31):
Me, it's a lot more logical to say that diversity
on this planet, in terms of the diversity of races
and how we look came from, you know, mating of
different types of races and the offspring of that, as
opposed to the amba to the fish, that a lizard
to the monkey to it, just the other one makes
a lot more sense, because how do you go from

(47:53):
a white person to a black person?

Speaker 2 (47:54):
You don't two completely different things.

Speaker 3 (47:57):
And Asian will never turn into a black guy ever,
I don't care what you do and how long it's
going to take you. And Asian will not turn into
somebody that's black unless that was in there. Now they
say in buttations and I don't buy it. It makes
a lot more sense on what these hieroglyphics are actually
explaining where multiple different types of races came and made

(48:19):
it together and created more diverse offspring.

Speaker 1 (48:23):
What I also think is interesting is that according to
I guess archaeological records, is that humans haven't changed, right
according to human bones, for three hundred thousand years, I
believe at least several hundred thousand years, and yet we
just have these giant societies in the last five thousand

(48:44):
is what they said. And initially they said five thousand
years based on the Pyramids, and then they found Goebeckley
Tepe and Quebecy Tepe was ten thousand BC, so almost
twelve thousand years ago, so pushing the record. So if
we haven't changed, humans have effectively not changed genetically in

(49:05):
at least one hundred thousand years, why is it just now,
like why just the last five thousand years we decide
to make these civilizations. You know, it just doesn't seem
correct to me either that there wasn't a previous civilization.

Speaker 3 (49:17):
Unless somebody else came from somewhere else one hundred percent okay,
And so my audience loves the nuts and bolts of
UAPs and tech.

Speaker 1 (49:26):
So I guess it's try and bring it back home here.
Do you see any overlap between like this energy based
view of the universe and the hard tech behind UAP propulsion.

Speaker 3 (49:39):
Yeah, it's not all hard tech. It's connected to something
called the power of thought. Now, people say, what are
you talking about.

Speaker 2 (49:45):
That's crazy.

Speaker 3 (49:46):
Well, physically, according to our understanding of physics, you cannot
have something traveling ten thousand miles an hour and then
make a sharp left turn without it exploding and the
people inside completely imploding, you know, and splatting against the wall.

Speaker 2 (50:02):
It's impossible. So we need to understand, well, what is.

Speaker 3 (50:05):
Going on here that makes something like that possible and
a very big part of it, and this is spoken
about in the Pyramid Code. It's called the power of thought,
meaning the craft actually becomes an extension of the consciousness
of the operator, meaning you cannot do things. For example,
if our consciousness stops at the limit of the physics

(50:26):
that we understand, we will never be able to operate
the craft in that way. To be able to operate
the craft in that way, we need to expand our
awareness and consciousness beyond our current limitations and understandings.

Speaker 2 (50:38):
Of physics as we know it today. That's what we're
talking about with these graphs. From my understanding, it's an
extension of the consciousness of It's an extension of the
operator's consciousness which is at a much higher level which
completely defies our understandings today, Which is why they can
do things that completely defy our understandings today, because in

(50:58):
the physical world none of that is possible. There needs
to be another dimension of something going on there that
makes that possible.

Speaker 1 (51:06):
Yeah, two thoughts there on what you said is that
it's also them traveling through the environment. They're not creating
sonic booms. So we had David Fraverer, you know, I
think the most famous I believe case lately, David Fraverr,
along with at least three other witnesses, aircrew witnesses, saw

(51:28):
the tic TAC bolt out of there, and no sonic
booms were recorded in the area. So basically no sonic booms,
and you should have seen, like the air molecule, the
water in the air, you should have seen some effect
right from that sort of that sort of pressure, but
there was nothing. So it's almost like the tic TAC
was not in the environment. It was outside of the

(51:51):
outside of the actual environment.

Speaker 2 (51:54):
Meaning outside of physics as we understand it exactly.

Speaker 1 (51:58):
And the second point was Peter Danucci. I interviewed Peter Danucci.
He was a airline pilot for many decades and basically
created the safety culture that made airlines so safe for
at least a small part or maybe a large part
of it. And he on my show he talked about
an encounter he had where he was actually flying a ship.

(52:20):
So basically they brought him onto the ship and he
touched some the device, but then he flew it with
his brain. So basically he said, how do I fly it?
Because they said you want to fly the ship and
he said, of course, and so he flew it just
with his consciousness. And he said, they flew around the
Solar System. He said, they went to Mars, they went
to the moon. He was there, he saw the moon,

(52:40):
and then they went to Mars and then came back
and there was no motion at all, no feeling inside
the craft. It was like he was just there, you know,
it just shot there, like moving around in a computer
system or something. So yeah, interesting account of.

Speaker 2 (52:56):
The power of thoughts should never be underestimated you could
do something incredible.

Speaker 1 (53:00):
Things okay, and then finally, what would you say to
I'm sure the skeptics who would call this, you know,
metaphysics or pseudo science, open your mind.

Speaker 2 (53:12):
It's okay if you don't believe it. My job is
never to convince, right.

Speaker 3 (53:16):
I share think of me and I think of myself
as a farmer. I plant the seed, I water it
every so often. I cannot force the plant to grow.
That's everyone else's job. That's the plant's job. So I
never expect everybody to hear everything that we're talking about
here and be like, you know, they got it.

Speaker 2 (53:37):
They know because we're we're shattering believe these systems. I
get it.

Speaker 3 (53:40):
So all I would say is with everything, have an
open mind, have an open heart, be open to different possibilities,
and also always.

Speaker 2 (53:48):
Base everything that you're doing off effect.

Speaker 3 (53:50):
So if you disagree with me, that's okay, but I
want you to tell me why you disagree with me,
with your actual reasoning, and not just because we're taught
something else. So what I'm saying might be wrong.

Speaker 2 (54:03):
So there are a lot of things that I do
that you know. For example, I'm not going to drink
there are certain things that I won't put in my body.

Speaker 3 (54:13):
Let's say for health purposes. Now that's my choice. If
somebody decides to put that in their body, that's okay.
But I want to understand why you're doing it. I
want to make sure you're coming from your own logical reasoning.
Take sunscreen, I'm not putting sunscreen on my body. I
just won't be in the sun for eight hours a
day twenty four to seven. The sun is not here

(54:35):
to kill you. But if you do too much, yeah,
you could do damage to yourself. Now, a lot of
people say, you gotta over a sunscreen. Okay, can you
show me why? Can you tell me why you're doing it.
Can you show me how the chemicals in the sunscreen
that you're putting on are better than what you would
be getting from the sun. And maybe just not be

(54:56):
in the sun for too long and so on and
so forth. Now, if somebody wants to put the five hundred,
they could do it, but I want to understand why
you're doing it, as opposed to I heard on the
news that the son is going to give me cancer,
so I have to put it on. That's not a
respectable answer to me. But if you can share your
own perspective, even if I disagree with it, I know
you're coming from your own perspective.

Speaker 2 (55:19):
And that's it.

Speaker 3 (55:19):
So that's what I would recommend to everybody. Right, Always
challenge yourself. Even if you hear what I'm saying and
you think it's crazy, ask yourself, are you resisting it
because you genuinely know something that I'm wrong, or because
other belief systems will imposed upon you? And sometimes I'm wrong, Right,
I'm a human being.

Speaker 2 (55:39):
That's okay. But we got to really come back into
our own power of making decisions.

Speaker 1 (55:46):
You mentioned you said some interesting points at the beginning
about from Greek philosophy about how something cannot exist, not exist, right,
there is nothing, there can't be nothing. And I've always
thought that was interesting, and I grew up as an atheist,
and just in the past few years really looking into
UAPs where I considered that, yeah, maybe there is more

(56:11):
to the life, Maybe there is more to all this
going on. And one of the one of the thoughts
that really stuck with me is if I'm existing now,
you know, if I'm having a conscious experience like like
you are, and the audience member who who's watching this,
Thank you for watching up to the end. Especially, you know,

(56:31):
if you're having a conscious experience and existing and I'm
doing that now as well, how can that not exist?

Speaker 2 (56:38):
Right?

Speaker 1 (56:38):
How could how could that? If we exist now, how
could I not exist in the future. So I guess
for anyone watching this who wants to consider any sort
of these spiritual awakenings or consider moving forward, what would
you say is the one message for them? Or how
could they start?

Speaker 3 (56:59):
There were so many, but I would really just say
it all comes down to probably the opposite of what
most people think.

Speaker 2 (57:05):
Most people think you got to pray.

Speaker 3 (57:06):
And meditate and blah blah blah, and all those things
are important, but first and foremost, your body needs to
be in a clean state. If your physical vessel is
in a clean and clear state, it will give room
for you to achieve all the levels above it. Without
a clean and clear physical vessel, good luck on everything else.
You could pray and meditate all you want, but the
vessel that you're living your life through in this lifetime

(57:29):
until you move on must be free, clean and clear
of any problems in.

Speaker 2 (57:35):
Order to move forward.

Speaker 3 (57:36):
And that's one of the biggest, biggest keys that most
people don't get so clean water, clean food, clean thoughts.

Speaker 2 (57:42):
Everything else will follow from there. You'll start understanding things
that you couldn't see before.

Speaker 1 (57:49):
I can agree with that. I haven't drink alcohol, and
I don't know, eighteen years or something. Had to quit again,
you know. I didn't want to quit, but it had
to and weed as well. I had to quit. Didn't
want to quit. But I can say now living like
at least claim from any any of those substances, substances,

(58:11):
et cetera. Is it took a little while. It took
a while, but now I feel fantastic. Yeah, you know,
and the body seems to have healed itself. Like I
did have back issues, but now I'm playing sports competitively,
really enjoy it, and mentally I enjoy it. And I
and I enjoy looking into this stuff, you know it.

(58:32):
It does motivate me and encourages me. I'm more optimistic
about life in the future just in general. So I guess, yeah,
I'd encourage anyone watching to consider it, consider making some
sort of change. You can change over time. Yeah, my
perspective has totally changed, and I can say I'm happier

(58:53):
for it.

Speaker 3 (58:54):
Yeah, so long as everybody tries to be better throughout
their life. One day at a time, one week at
a time, one month.

Speaker 2 (58:59):
At a time, when yearod of time.

Speaker 3 (59:01):
Just move in the right direction, doesn't matter how fast
or slow, just the trajectory in the direction.

Speaker 1 (59:05):
As okay, Well, thanks for everything you do, Jason. I
know you you supported a Sound of Freedom. That's a
very interesting movie. So thanks for that, and congrats on
all your success on that. How can people see more
of your work and how can they follow you?

Speaker 2 (59:22):
Yeah, so you can find me on Instagram at the
real Jason Shirkum.

Speaker 3 (59:27):
It's spelled s h r ka. If you do want
to learn about what we're doing with these cool things
with the light system payraments, you can learn more at
the Lightsystems dot com and plural. So that's the Lightsystems
dot Com. And if you want to go experience one
of our wellness centers, you can go to Unified Healing
dot com spelled right like that. So you and I
fyd Healing dot com. Five hundred locations, fifty countries around

(59:51):
the world. There's definitely one close to you somewhere.

Speaker 1 (59:54):
That is a lot of locations. I mean, are they
like separate brick and mortar places. What are these locations life?

Speaker 3 (01:00:01):
Each one is its on wellness center with various different
types of energy based wellness technologies and healing modalities. And
we just love to see people getting better however they can,
so that's why we support it.

Speaker 1 (01:00:13):
Right, Thank you, Jason, I have a great rest your day.
Thanks for your time. Thank you enjoyed the discussion with
Jason Chirko, Sound of Freedom producer and his views on
the pyramid. I didn't even think about the golden ratio
and resonance with water so interesting. The water residence angle
one hundred and three point sixty eight degrees so close

(01:00:34):
if you double the angle of the pyramid. So thanks
for watching to the end. Really appreciate it. Please consider
joining Patreon or becoming a YouTube member and helping to
support my channel. The YouTube advertising definitely doesn't cut it.
It's difficult to grow, et cetera. So I really appreciate it.

(01:00:55):
Please hit the like button and consider subscribing if you
want to get future videos like this. I think the
pyramids are just an amazing modern mystery. Right there's still
a huge mystery, and we're finding incredible structures underneath the
whole Giza Plateau. I'll be speaking with BEYONDI and Grassy

(01:01:16):
later this month. Have a great rest of your day, peace,

All Episodes

Pyramids: Alien Tech or Ancient Energy Machines? | Jason Shurka on Lehto Files

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Pyramids: Alien Tech or Ancient Energy Machines? | Jason Shurka on Lehto Files