July 31, 2024 • 12 mins
Similar to Fate, and unlike common belief, Externalism posits that all moments, past, present, and future, exist simultaneously. It contrasts sharply with the more intuitive presentism, which holds that only the present moment is real. Understanding eternalism enriches comprehension of time, challenging everyday perceptions. It provides insight into the nature of reality and existence. Exploring eternalism broadens philosophical horizons, deepening your grasp of metaphysical concepts.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/library-of-philosophy--5939304/support.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/library-of-philosophy--5939304/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Eternalism is a philosophical theory about the nature of time.
(00:04):
It posits that all points in time are equally real, as opposed to the idea that only the
present moment is real.
This means that past, present, and future events are all equally existent.
Eternalism is often contrasted with presentism, which holds that only the present is real,
and the growing block universe theory, which suggests that the past and present are real,
(00:26):
but the future is not yet real.
The core concept of eternalism is the block universe theory.
According to this theory, time is like a dimension similar to space.
Just as different locations in space are all equally real, different moments in time
are also equally real.
This view implies that the universe is a four-dimensional block where all events past,
(00:47):
present, and future coexist.
There is no objective flow of time, rather time is another dimension in which events are
laid out.
One way to understand eternalism is through the idea that time is a fourth dimension.
In this view, time is treated similarly to the three spatial dimensions.
Just as we can move forward and backward in space, all moments in time exist simultaneously
(01:09):
in a four-dimensional space-time continuum.
This perspective aligns with the theory of relativity, which describes time as a dimension
intertwined with the three spatial dimensions to form a four-dimensional space-time fabric.
Time has significant implications for our understanding of free will and determinism.
If all points in time are equally real, then the future is already determined and exists
(01:32):
just as much as the past and present.
This raises questions about the nature of free will and whether our choices are predetermined.
Some argue that this deterministic view is compatible with free will, while others
believe it challenges the notion of free will altogether.
The theory of relativity supports the eternalist view of time.
(01:53):
According to relativity, time is relative and can vary depending on the observer's frame
of reference.
This means that different observers can experience different sequences of events, and there is
no single objective present moment.
The relativity of simultaneity, a concept in relativity theory, suggests that events that
are simultaneous for one observer may not be simultaneous for another.
(02:16):
This further supports the idea that all points in time are equally real, and that there is
no objective flow of time.
Eternalism also affects our understanding of change and causality.
In a block universe, change is not a process that happens over time, but rather a difference
between different points in time.
Causality is seen as a relationship between events in the four-dimensional space time, rather
(02:39):
than a sequence of events unfolding over time.
This view challenges our intuitive understanding of change and causality, but provides a coherent
framework for understanding the nature of time.
Time aligns with the theory of relativity, which describes time as a dimension intertwined
with the three spatial dimensions to form a four-dimensional space time continuum.
(03:00):
This scientific foundation supports the idea that all points in time are equally real.
According to relativity, time is relative and can vary depending on the observer's frame
of reference.
This means that different observers can experience different sequences of events, and there is
no single objective present moment.
The relativity of simultaneity, a concept in relativity theory, suggests that events
(03:24):
that are simultaneous for one observer, may not be simultaneous for another.
This further supports the idea that all points in time are equally real, and that there
is no objective flow of time.
One thought experiment that illustrates eternalism is the twin paradox.
In this scenario, one twin travels at a high speed into space while the other twin remains
(03:45):
on Earth, due to time dilation, a consequence of relativity, the traveling twin ages more
slowly than the twin who stays on Earth.
When the traveling twin returns, they are younger than their sibling.
This thought experiment demonstrates how time can pass at different rates for different
observers, supporting the eternalist view that all points in time are equally real.
(04:08):
Another thought experiment is the bar and ring paradox, which explores the relativity
of simultaneity.
In this scenario, a bar passes through a ring.
In the rest frame of the ring, both ends of the bar pass through the ring simultaneously.
However, in the rest frame of the bar, the ends of the bar pass through the ring one after
the other.
(04:28):
This paradox illustrates how simultaneity is relative and depends on the observer's frame
of reference, further supporting the eternalist view that there is no objective present moment.
Eternallism is also reflected in literature and media.
Science fiction often explores themes related to eternalism, such as the idea that the
future is already determined and exists alongside the past and present.
(04:52):
For example, the movie Interstellar portrays time as a dimension that can be navigated,
with characters experiencing different rates of time passage depending on their location
and space time.
This depiction aligns with the eternalist view that all points in time are equally real.
The analysis between eternalism and presentism highlights key differences in philosophical
(05:13):
debates.
Presentism holds that only the present is real, and the past and future do not exist.
In contrast, eternalism posits that all points in time are equally real.
This fundamental difference leads to various philosophical debates about the nature of time,
existence, and reality.
For example, presentism struggles to explain how past events can influence the present
(05:37):
if they no longer exist, while eternalism provides a coherent framework for understanding
such influences.
Different cultures perceive time in various ways, and these perceptions can align with or
differ from eternalism.
Some cultures view time as a linear progression from past to future, similar to the presentist
view.
(05:57):
Others perceive time as cyclical, with events repeating in a continuous loop.
These cultural perspectives offer alternative ways of understanding time and provide insights
into the eternalist view that all points in time are equally real.
Adopting an eternalist perspective can change our daily lives by altering how we perceive
events and make decisions.
If we view all points in time as equally real, we might place less emphasis on the present
(06:21):
moment and consider the long-term implications of our actions more carefully.
This perspective can also impact our understanding of history and future planning, as we recognize
that past and future events are just as real as the present.
Eternalism extends into various philosophical areas, raising questions about the nature of
existence and reality.
(06:42):
One extension is the relationship between eternalism and metaphysical theories of time.
Eternalism posits that all points in time are equally real, suggesting a static view of
the universe where time is another dimension similar to space.
This view contrasts with dynamic theories of time, which see time as a process or flow.
(07:02):
Some influences our views on morality and ethical decision making.
If all points in time are equally real, then the consequences of our actions are not confined
to the present moment but extend into the past and future.
This perspective can lead to a broader consideration of the impact of our actions, as the future
is seen as just as real as the present.
(07:23):
Ethical theories that emphasize long-term consequences such as utilitarianism may
find support in eternalism, as it aligns with the idea that future outcomes are significant.
Essential implications of eternalism include questions about the nature of the self in purpose.
If all moments in time are equally real, then our existence is not limited to the present
(07:43):
moment but spans across time.
This view can lead to a sense of timeless existence, where our identity and experiences are part
of a larger, unchanging reality.
It challenges the traditional view of the self as a being that exists only in the present
and raises questions about the continuity of identity over time.
Imperative analysis with other philosophical theories highlights the nuances of eternalism.
(08:06):
Four-dimensionalism, for example, is closely related to eternalism and posits that objects
extend across time as well as space.
This view suggests that objects are four-dimensional entities with temporal parts, supporting
the idea that all points in time are equally real.
In contrast, presentism and the growing block universe theory offered different perspectives
on the nature of time and existence.
(08:28):
Presentism holds that only the present is real, while the growing block universe theory
posits that the past and present are real, but the future is not yet real.
Eternalism impacts debates about the nature of reality and consciousness.
If all points in time are equally real, then our conscious experiences are part of a larger,
unchanging reality.
(08:49):
This view challenges the traditional understanding of consciousness as a process that unfolds
over time and raises questions about the nature of subjective experience.
Some philosophers argue that consciousness is an emergent property of the brain's physical
processes, while others suggest that it is a fundamental aspect of reality.
Current trends in future research areas in the philosophy of time include exploring the
(09:13):
implications of eternalism for other areas of philosophy and science.
Advances in physics, particularly in the understanding of space time and quantum mechanics, may
influence philosophical discussions on eternalism.
Researchers are also investigating the ethical and existential implications of eternalism,
as well as its relationship with other metaphysical theories of time.
(09:36):
Eternalism also intersects with discussions on the nature of time travel.
If all points in time are equally real, then time travel could theoretically be possible
within the block universe framework.
This raises questions about the nature of causality and the potential for paradoxes,
such as the grandfather paradox, where a time traveler could potentially prevent their
own existence by altering past events.
(09:58):
Philosophers and physicists explore whether these paradoxes can be resolved within an
eternalist framework, often considering the consistency constraints that might prevent
such paradoxes from occurring.
Another area of interest is the relationship between eternalism and the philosophy of language.
The way we talk about time reflects our underlying metaphysical assumptions.
(10:19):
For instance, tense language using past, present and future tense implies a dynamic few of
time, while tenseless language using terms like earlier then, and later than aligns more
closely with eternalism.
Analyzing how language shapes in a shaped by our understanding of time can provide deeper
insights into the implications of eternalism.
Eternalism has implications for the philosophy of mind, particularly concerning the nature
(10:43):
of temporal experience.
If all points in time are equally real, then our experience of the present moment is just
one of many equally real moments.
This challenges the traditional view that consciousness is tied to the present moment
and raises questions about how we experience the passage of time.
Some theories suggest that our perception of time's flow is an illusion created by the
(11:05):
way our brain's process information.
In the context of metaphysics, eternalism prompts a re-evaluation of the concept of change.
Several views see change as a process that occurs over time, but within an eternalist framework,
change is understood as a difference between different points in time.
This perspective can lead to a more static view of the universe, where change is not something
(11:27):
that happens but rather something that is observed from different temporal perspectives.
Eternalism also intersects with discussions on the nature of identity over time.
If all points in time are equally real, then our identity is not confined to the present
moment but extends across our entire lifespan.
This raises questions about what it means to be the same person over time, and how our
(11:49):
identity is maintained despite changes in our physical and psychological states.
Philosophers explore whether identity is a matter of continuity of consciousness, physical
continuity, or some other criterion.
Eternalism is a philosophical theory about the nature of time.
(00:04):
It posits that all points in time are equally real, as opposed to the idea that only the
present moment is real.
This means that past, present, and future events are all equally existent.
Eternalism is often contrasted with presentism, which holds that only the present is real,
and the growing block universe theory, which suggests that the past and present are real,
(00:26):
but the future is not yet real.
The core concept of eternalism is the block universe theory.
According to this theory, time is like a dimension similar to space.
Just as different locations in space are all equally real, different moments in time
are also equally real.
This view implies that the universe is a four-dimensional block where all events past,
(00:47):
present, and future coexist.
There is no objective flow of time, rather time is another dimension in which events are
laid out.
One way to understand eternalism is through the idea that time is a fourth dimension.
In this view, time is treated similarly to the three spatial dimensions.
Just as we can move forward and backward in space, all moments in time exist simultaneously
(01:09):
in a four-dimensional space-time continuum.
This perspective aligns with the theory of relativity, which describes time as a dimension
intertwined with the three spatial dimensions to form a four-dimensional space-time fabric.
Time has significant implications for our understanding of free will and determinism.
If all points in time are equally real, then the future is already determined and exists
(01:32):
just as much as the past and present.
This raises questions about the nature of free will and whether our choices are predetermined.
Some argue that this deterministic view is compatible with free will, while others
believe it challenges the notion of free will altogether.
The theory of relativity supports the eternalist view of time.
(01:53):
According to relativity, time is relative and can vary depending on the observer's frame
of reference.
This means that different observers can experience different sequences of events, and there is
no single objective present moment.
The relativity of simultaneity, a concept in relativity theory, suggests that events that
are simultaneous for one observer may not be simultaneous for another.
(02:16):
This further supports the idea that all points in time are equally real, and that there is
no objective flow of time.
Eternalism also affects our understanding of change and causality.
In a block universe, change is not a process that happens over time, but rather a difference
between different points in time.
Causality is seen as a relationship between events in the four-dimensional space time, rather
(02:39):
than a sequence of events unfolding over time.
This view challenges our intuitive understanding of change and causality, but provides a coherent
framework for understanding the nature of time.
Time aligns with the theory of relativity, which describes time as a dimension intertwined
with the three spatial dimensions to form a four-dimensional space time continuum.
(03:00):
This scientific foundation supports the idea that all points in time are equally real.
According to relativity, time is relative and can vary depending on the observer's frame
of reference.
This means that different observers can experience different sequences of events, and there is
no single objective present moment.
The relativity of simultaneity, a concept in relativity theory, suggests that events
(03:24):
that are simultaneous for one observer, may not be simultaneous for another.
This further supports the idea that all points in time are equally real, and that there
is no objective flow of time.
One thought experiment that illustrates eternalism is the twin paradox.
In this scenario, one twin travels at a high speed into space while the other twin remains
(03:45):
on Earth, due to time dilation, a consequence of relativity, the traveling twin ages more
slowly than the twin who stays on Earth.
When the traveling twin returns, they are younger than their sibling.
This thought experiment demonstrates how time can pass at different rates for different
observers, supporting the eternalist view that all points in time are equally real.
(04:08):
Another thought experiment is the bar and ring paradox, which explores the relativity
of simultaneity.
In this scenario, a bar passes through a ring.
In the rest frame of the ring, both ends of the bar pass through the ring simultaneously.
However, in the rest frame of the bar, the ends of the bar pass through the ring one after
the other.
(04:28):
This paradox illustrates how simultaneity is relative and depends on the observer's frame
of reference, further supporting the eternalist view that there is no objective present moment.
Eternallism is also reflected in literature and media.
Science fiction often explores themes related to eternalism, such as the idea that the
future is already determined and exists alongside the past and present.
(04:52):
For example, the movie Interstellar portrays time as a dimension that can be navigated,
with characters experiencing different rates of time passage depending on their location
and space time.
This depiction aligns with the eternalist view that all points in time are equally real.
The analysis between eternalism and presentism highlights key differences in philosophical
(05:13):
debates.
Presentism holds that only the present is real, and the past and future do not exist.
In contrast, eternalism posits that all points in time are equally real.
This fundamental difference leads to various philosophical debates about the nature of time,
existence, and reality.
For example, presentism struggles to explain how past events can influence the present
(05:37):
if they no longer exist, while eternalism provides a coherent framework for understanding
such influences.
Different cultures perceive time in various ways, and these perceptions can align with or
differ from eternalism.
Some cultures view time as a linear progression from past to future, similar to the presentist
view.
(05:57):
Others perceive time as cyclical, with events repeating in a continuous loop.
These cultural perspectives offer alternative ways of understanding time and provide insights
into the eternalist view that all points in time are equally real.
Adopting an eternalist perspective can change our daily lives by altering how we perceive
events and make decisions.
If we view all points in time as equally real, we might place less emphasis on the present
(06:21):
moment and consider the long-term implications of our actions more carefully.
This perspective can also impact our understanding of history and future planning, as we recognize
that past and future events are just as real as the present.
Eternalism extends into various philosophical areas, raising questions about the nature of
existence and reality.
(06:42):
One extension is the relationship between eternalism and metaphysical theories of time.
Eternalism posits that all points in time are equally real, suggesting a static view of
the universe where time is another dimension similar to space.
This view contrasts with dynamic theories of time, which see time as a process or flow.
(07:02):
Some influences our views on morality and ethical decision making.
If all points in time are equally real, then the consequences of our actions are not confined
to the present moment but extend into the past and future.
This perspective can lead to a broader consideration of the impact of our actions, as the future
is seen as just as real as the present.
(07:23):
Ethical theories that emphasize long-term consequences such as utilitarianism may
find support in eternalism, as it aligns with the idea that future outcomes are significant.
Essential implications of eternalism include questions about the nature of the self in purpose.
If all moments in time are equally real, then our existence is not limited to the present
(07:43):
moment but spans across time.
This view can lead to a sense of timeless existence, where our identity and experiences are part
of a larger, unchanging reality.
It challenges the traditional view of the self as a being that exists only in the present
and raises questions about the continuity of identity over time.
Imperative analysis with other philosophical theories highlights the nuances of eternalism.
(08:06):
Four-dimensionalism, for example, is closely related to eternalism and posits that objects
extend across time as well as space.
This view suggests that objects are four-dimensional entities with temporal parts, supporting
the idea that all points in time are equally real.
In contrast, presentism and the growing block universe theory offered different perspectives
on the nature of time and existence.
(08:28):
Presentism holds that only the present is real, while the growing block universe theory
posits that the past and present are real, but the future is not yet real.
Eternalism impacts debates about the nature of reality and consciousness.
If all points in time are equally real, then our conscious experiences are part of a larger,
unchanging reality.
(08:49):
This view challenges the traditional understanding of consciousness as a process that unfolds
over time and raises questions about the nature of subjective experience.
Some philosophers argue that consciousness is an emergent property of the brain's physical
processes, while others suggest that it is a fundamental aspect of reality.
Current trends in future research areas in the philosophy of time include exploring the
(09:13):
implications of eternalism for other areas of philosophy and science.
Advances in physics, particularly in the understanding of space time and quantum mechanics, may
influence philosophical discussions on eternalism.
Researchers are also investigating the ethical and existential implications of eternalism,
as well as its relationship with other metaphysical theories of time.
(09:36):
Eternalism also intersects with discussions on the nature of time travel.
If all points in time are equally real, then time travel could theoretically be possible
within the block universe framework.
This raises questions about the nature of causality and the potential for paradoxes,
such as the grandfather paradox, where a time traveler could potentially prevent their
own existence by altering past events.
(09:58):
Philosophers and physicists explore whether these paradoxes can be resolved within an
eternalist framework, often considering the consistency constraints that might prevent
such paradoxes from occurring.
Another area of interest is the relationship between eternalism and the philosophy of language.
The way we talk about time reflects our underlying metaphysical assumptions.
(10:19):
For instance, tense language using past, present and future tense implies a dynamic few of
time, while tenseless language using terms like earlier then, and later than aligns more
closely with eternalism.
Analyzing how language shapes in a shaped by our understanding of time can provide deeper
insights into the implications of eternalism.
Eternalism has implications for the philosophy of mind, particularly concerning the nature
(10:43):
of temporal experience.
If all points in time are equally real, then our experience of the present moment is just
one of many equally real moments.
This challenges the traditional view that consciousness is tied to the present moment
and raises questions about how we experience the passage of time.
Some theories suggest that our perception of time's flow is an illusion created by the
(11:05):
way our brain's process information.
In the context of metaphysics, eternalism prompts a re-evaluation of the concept of change.
Several views see change as a process that occurs over time, but within an eternalist framework,
change is understood as a difference between different points in time.
This perspective can lead to a more static view of the universe, where change is not something
(11:27):
that happens but rather something that is observed from different temporal perspectives.
Eternalism also intersects with discussions on the nature of identity over time.
If all points in time are equally real, then our identity is not confined to the present
moment but extends across our entire lifespan.
This raises questions about what it means to be the same person over time, and how our
(11:49):
identity is maintained despite changes in our physical and psychological states.
Philosophers explore whether identity is a matter of continuity of consciousness, physical
continuity, or some other criterion.
Popular Podcasts
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com