Ep. 1897: Pam Bondi's Wrong About Hate Speech & The Charlie Kirk Free Speech Act

I've done a rant, narrated some footnotes & presented my commentary:
* Why Everything Pam Bondi Said About ‘Hate Speech’ is Wrong
https://www.thefire.org/news/why-everything-pam-bondi-said-about-hate-speech-wrong
* A Bill of Rights Culture is the Only Answer
https://jpfo.org/alerts/alert20010914a.htm
* Why We Need the Charlie Kirk Free Speech Act: A Legal Shield Against the Censorship Industrial Complex
https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-09-14-why-we-need-the-charlie-kirk-free-speech-act.html
Music Credit by The Orchard Enterprises, Faster Than Light Introduction
Contact, [e-mail]
Donations:
PayPal - https://paypal.me/LokiLuck3
Cash App - https:// cash.app/LokiLuck3
Steemit @ LL3-Podcast
#Censorship #FreeSpeech #PamBondi #CharlieKirk #Nullfication2025 #DemoniacResistance

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:30):
Greetings of my fellow from Low Salvin Thinkers. Thank you
for tuning to all three podcasts. My name is Craig
trans mean Finny Beautiful Realms of Planet Earth. Today's day
is Tuesday, September sixteenth, one twenty five is episode eighteen
ninety seven Pam Bondi's wrong about hate speech and the
Charlie Kirk Free Speech Act before I proceeded. You can

(00:55):
find me in multiple social media sites and podcast channels.
Just type in looky Luck number three read looking Luck
Roman three with three eyes, order looking Luck Rowman in
with three podcast. Furthermore, if any questions, comments, recommendations to
all of your stuff, whatever you do, please use your
korn hit me via email to L three dot podcast
or Proton's on me. If you're gonna donate, go to

(01:15):
PayPal on me or cashot at four slash look look
number three and if you want to follow me if
steam it give me a little cryptal love there. He's
at steep at LLL number three dash podcast at steam it.
Once again, sorry about that, Yes, so I was informed
at UH Robert Redford passed Hollowood Actor for Great Holoored

(01:41):
Actor for his time and Thomas Lindbergh, leave his name
in the act, mister Lindbergh from At the Gates, Lock Up.
Few other projects he did death metal vocalist, Growling and
all that. And it's fun because I do. He was

(02:03):
fifty two when he passed, and he had a cancer,
which was very very young. I had an opportunity to
work the show many years ago with morbid angel and
dissection in nineteen ninety six. I seen him again in
twenty sixteen, twenty years later. Hey, say down, it was entertaining.

(02:24):
Don't be wrong. I have fun with that style of music.
Then may I want to cut people's wrists and all
that good stuff? Hey, look at corpse grinder George Fisher.
He likes to give stuff animals, use the whole machines
to pick them up and all that and get it
to the children that need. So he's a good folk.
Remember him from Mostrosity when he first came out and

(02:45):
a basis, Mark Van Drip said, dude, you got took
this guy as a sick bastard. So Mike fam you know,
many years ago before MASTROSSI got signed, and yeah, he
was an interesting chat. So I his front. I love
his exhibition on stage and when a Cauntboll corpse picked him,

(03:06):
I said, they chose wisely. I'm not a big fan
of them personally, but I do have a token appreciation entertainment.
I'm not gonna not my life's blood. But there was
a lot of stuff I could tell you for a
very long time. But yeah, Lindenbergh, you may still be

(03:27):
forever free as well. Fuck cancer, give my language, but
omit it be vigital on your health the best you can,
my friends, let's value it to the core. But I
was just having let's see all the paradigm game, the
blame game, the lefties, varieties who have more crime, show

(03:50):
me statistic on Facebook. You know what, This whole paradigm
game is meek, pathetic and unmerited. George Watson warns us
about that in his farewell address, which the upcoming anniversary
will be this Friday. Yeah, seventeen ninety six, And he
didn't warn us about the dangerous of factions in this

(04:14):
young republic. And it's not really the same. They go,
they go left wing, extreament, right wing Nazis, and it's
like so been diluted and misconstrued, And the truth of
the matter is folks. What the Nazis and the Commies

(04:34):
and the socialists have in common, they support it bigger
government left and I recall right wing is extreame. Right
wing is less government. But like I said before, it's
been misappropriate, appropriated, misappropriate. And what they're doing trying to

(04:56):
get us all triggered with buzzwords, all that good stuff
to hear about the thing our transhooters before that white supremacist,
I go on, and I go on. It's just the
doctor Moreau effect to encourage people. Have checked it out
down Doctor Moreau and read the book or listen to

(05:17):
it is public domain. LibriVox has one available and you
can probably hit it on all the other channel video channels.
That's the same old song and dance. And we all
know one thing is that George Orrell warned us about
it in his book nineteen eighty four and Animal Farm

(05:39):
plus what's that other gentleman's name Edward Bennaes who wrote
the book Propaganda Public Relations Man. He wrote it which
was published in nineteen twenty eight. He's climb Max in
his think before you react, don't let these propaganda machine

(06:01):
get to you, media manipulation and et cetera. That's why
you always need to study history, like what occurred in
Nazi Germany, even Wiwanda, the one hundred day Holocaust people
call it. Remember the Holocaust not just only happened one time.
There are several of them in the twentieth century alone

(06:24):
and before that and now. So please think critically, observe responsibly,
don't jump the gun. No false starts. And I say
that with love and good faith. Well enough for that.

(06:44):
I want to be reading here from thefire dot org
came out today why everything Pam Bondi said about free
speech is wrong. The nation's top law enforcement officer doesn't
understand that there is no free speech exception to the
First Amendment. And that's scary. It was co written by

(07:07):
Aaron Terror and Angel Eduardo. As it reads here, we
get it. Not everyone is a free speech expert. A
huge part of our job at fire is educated the
public about their First Amendment rights, scope of free speech law,
and the foundational principles that makes free expressions so important.

(07:30):
Most people don't have the time to get in the
weeds like we do. Those understandable for the average Americans
to sometimes get things wrong about free speech. But when
your Attorney Germany the United States, Like Pam Bondy, you
really should know better. That's right on your oath. I'll
continue on. While discussing the assassination of Charlie Kirk and

(07:50):
campus any Semitism the Katie Miller Podcast, Bondi said the
Justice Department would investigate and prosecute instance of hate speech.
While she's trying to go into damage control mode and
walk back some of our mistakes. Is important to correct
our nation's chief law enforcement officer on what is and

(08:11):
isn't protected expression. There is links for that will take
you right to that segment, and I do find this
chilling myself. I'll continue on. There's free speech and there's
hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially
after what happened to Charlie for that in our society.

(08:33):
In other words, to stay in age, we should compromise
our liberties, our natural rights to be patriotic. On Pam
Bindy quote, I'll continue This is two. This is, to
put it bluntly, absolutely false. So called free hate speech
is free speech. The idea that hate speech is a

(08:54):
separate and unprotected category of expression is one that we
unfortunately have had as to debunk time and time again.
The act is there is no hate hate speech exception
to the First Amendment, and there can't be. The Preme
Court has rejected the notion on multiple occasions, and the
reasons for this should be obvious to someone in Bonnie's position.

(09:18):
There's a free speech podcast on this matter. You go
check it out for yourselves. What constitutes hate speech is
inherently subjective, so it is impossible to narrowly define it
in a way. What passes constitutional must let alone in
a way that doesn't empower the government to target speech
is disfavors. As the Preme Court Justice John Marshall Harland

(09:43):
the Second wrote in nineteen seventy one's Cohen versus California,
one man's vulgarity is another man's lyric or. As Justice
Samuel Alito wrote in Matchell versus Tam almost four decades later,
the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that

(10:04):
we protect the freedom to express the thought that we hate.
In that case, the Court of University found that government
the government couldn't deny a trademark to an Asian American
band called the Slants because it found the name disparaging disparaging.
Excuse me, Some consider criticism of Israel or Black Lives

(10:29):
Matter to be hate speech. Others believe criticizing the LGBTQS
plus advocacy or Christian conservatism fits the description, and some,
like President Trump, want to push the idea that even
in critical news coverages coverage of an elected official, naming
him can be a form of hate speech. Personally, I

(10:53):
don't listen to those clowns anyway. Just laugh at them,
mock them, ridicule, and I do it all the time,
while continual on Apart from the escapably subjective sentiment that
free speech hate speech, excuse me, is any speech I hate,
the only thing on which proponents of treating hate speech
as protected agree is desire to punish it. This apparently

(11:16):
includes Pam Bondy. We will absolutely target you, go after you.
If you're targeting anyone with hate speech. It is absolutely chilling.
Is why carving out a hate speech exception to the
First Amendment is so dangerous. It grants the government the
power not only to decide what constitutes hateful speech, but

(11:37):
the punishhip, and that dual empowerment inevitably facilitates attacks on
the right to dissent, criticize, and hold accountable whoever is
in power. Nothing more is antithetical to what America stands

(11:58):
for than enabling free federal speech police. Earlier this morning,
Bonnie published a post on x attempting to clarify her
comments after a wave of negative response. Unfortunately, she only
introduced more confusion. This is what she says. Hate speech
that crosses the line into threats of violence is not

(12:20):
protected by the First Amendment. It's a crime. For far
too long, we've watched the radical left normalized threats, called
for assassinations, and cheer on political violence. That error is over.
While Bondi is correct as speech satisfying the stringent standard
for what constitutes a true threat of violence is not

(12:43):
protected by the First Amendment, she seems to effectively equate
with it with so called hate speech. She goes on
under eighteen US Code Section eight seventy five C is
a federal crime to transmit any communication containing any threat

(13:04):
to kidnap any person, or any threat to injure the
person or another. Likewise, eighteen US Code Section eight seventy
six and eighteen US Code Section one point fifteen make
it a felony to threatn public officials, members of Congress,
or their families. Bondy is narrowly correct here. In two

(13:26):
thousand and three Virginia versus Black, the Supreme Court defined
true threats as those statements where the speaker means to
communicate a series serious expression of an intent to commit
an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or
group of individuals. However, Bondy quickly shows that she doesn't

(13:49):
understand this narrow exception, which doesn't cover abstract advocacy of
violence or cheering on political violence, speech that is in
fact protect it. You cannot call for someone's murder. You
cannot swat a member of Congress. You cannot dox a
conservative family and think it will be brushed off as

(14:12):
free speech. These acts are punishable crimes, and every single
threat will be met with the full force of the law. Actually,
you can call someone's murder as long as you're not
inciting it. In the Landmarks Supreme Court case Brandenburg versus Ohio,
the Court established that there is a difference between speech

(14:34):
promoting unlawful action and the unlawful action itself. That speech
only loses First Amendment protection when it directs too and
likely to produce imminent lawless action. The reason for this
is to protect our ability to engage in sharp, critical,
and even incendiary language, because political speech, as Supreme Court

(14:58):
noted in nineteen six nine Watts versus the United States,
is often that you're pro oh the operative abusive and inexact,
and we don't want a particular politician or administration to
sign for everyone when it's too hateful or offensive. Like

(15:19):
hate speech, Bondee also fails to define do scene. It
often refers to the intentional release of an individual's personal
identifying information without their permission, though may use the term
more liberally, for an example, to refer to posting video
of ICE agents performing their duties in public. Disclosing truth

(15:41):
information about others is generally protected unless done in a
way that amounts of a true threat or excitement. Mercifully,
Bondy ender her tweet with somenting to which we don't object.
Free speech protects ideas debates even this, but it does
not and will never protect violence. You'll get no argument

(16:05):
from us there. Words are words and violence is violence,
and their distinction makes all the difference. Protect speech punish violence.
What Bondi feels to recognize is the critical importance of
protecting ideas, debate and dissent is why there is no
First Amendment exception for a so called hate speech, and

(16:27):
why there never should be. Kirk himself would have agreed
in his tweet. Hate speech does not exist legally in America.
There's ugly speech, there's gross speech, there's evil speech, and
all of it is protected by the First Amendment. Keep

(16:49):
America Free, he posts Maase second twenty twenty four. He
was absolutely correct. Regardless what you think of them, it
was pro free speech. I talked about my past episode
as well on this matter. Pam Bondi and many others

(17:09):
better start reviewing themselves before jumping to conclusions. And we've
all been there, don't get me wrong, according yours truly,
But in these particular political positions, you have an oath
to protect. You're protect and defend. You're the US Constitution,

(17:30):
a federal level, the state, they're both, okay, just give
you a heads up and local also. And I was
gonna say, you always gotta be vigilant when it comes
to these even the goofballs hacks from the so called left, okay,

(17:52):
use those totalitarian attributes to hate, hate speech is free speech,
and many of us, including the fire renounces it that
you always got to do it across the board regardless.
And even a man like myself when I did my
rialies and so forth, I don't really use vulgarity because

(18:12):
that's not my thing. I bring out intellectual ammunition and
that's more effective. Even when you go to these commission
meetings and so forth, you want to always utilize their language.
If you're real critical of for a certain measure, utilize
their language. You'll drive them crazy. Because many of them
are lawyers, wor use the law against them and what

(18:34):
they're trying to propose, they don't know what to say.
They get a wig out. Okay, So I happen to
be a couple of times and people love it. And
I don't even stress it or anything like that. I
just lay down everything I can. So one thing I
gotta say, as to anyone I was gonna, I could say,
Pam BONDI exhibit herself as missus Merrick Gardland, because remember

(18:59):
what he did, what he what he did when people
when people at the went to when the fans went
to the school meetings, school board meetings in their counties
and may of Garland CO considered them potential domestic terrorists.
Isn't just showing that four years ago? Be gole look
it up on my catalog A speaker and Nick Pobby, Yeah,

(19:22):
a few a few places and Spotify too for creators.
But this really amazes me. So it doesn't matter who's
in there. You gotta watch them all, all right. And
don't get me wrong. Let Donald Trump has fun with
these people, call them fake news beakers and just mock
them back because he's been witch hunting for all these

(19:43):
years too. And you don't have to be a Trump's
lover to say that. It's just how I look at
look at his presidency presidency. If I'm critical, I'm gonna
have my facts rather than using rhetoric. But when you
witch hunting, one man is so now this is what happened.
You've got career politicians. The centralization is the key. Always

(20:06):
say we need to repeal the seventeenth Amendment. Okay, let
the states do it. Lets the states decide how they
bring the Senate in because the original constitution Republic is
the president is elected ambassador that's boarded by the states.
The Senate are represented by their state, and the House

(20:28):
represents the people. That's how it should be. But now
in all due time, all got clustered and still in
that same predicament, at least since the eight eight mid
eighteen sixties. You can say, all right, but we can
probably go a little bit before that. So I'm gonna

(20:49):
be taking a little breather for the time being. I'm
gonna hit another article that's pertaining to this for the
people need to know, and I'll be right back. So
stay tuned, all right, So this one here is relevant
on the article I've read about Pam Bondi on hay speech.

(21:10):
This actually came out September fourteenth, twenty twenty one, so
twenty four years ago. A bill of rights culture is
the only answer Black Tuesday, which is September eleventh. During
that time and the passion of American all, a bill
of rights culture is the only answer. We must give
up some of our freedoms to help combat terrorism. The

(21:34):
predictable words and actions are beginning to dispute from political, military,
and law enforcement officials and their supporters for safety, for security,
for the grid of good. They somberly tell us we
must comply with their agendas to be protected from terrorism.
We must submit to more restrictions and our ability to travel,

(21:55):
our freedom from arbitrary searches, on the privacy of our communication,
on a right to bear arms, on our ability to
conduct business hidden from the prime eyes of government. Senator
Judd greg Republican New Hanshats, called for global prohibition on

(22:15):
encryption products without back doors for government surveillance. Tribal regulars
have banned knives on planes. Does this mean even pos
can't protect themselves and pastors against hijackers? Isps's who are
reluctant to cooperate with the FBI invasion of connivor program
are now Russian to comply to Senate in the wake

(22:37):
of Black Tuesday vote to increase the FBI's authority to
tap the phones of anyone's suspected of terrorism. As we've
seen by all these random restrictions, we are all suspects
in the eyes of the government. Perhaps most unominously of all,
The Washington Post quoted House Democrat Leader Richard Getpart, Democrat

(22:59):
from Missouri as making the self condictatory, contradictatory, excuse me,
but entirely predictable statement. We are in a new world
where we have to rebalance freedom and security. We can't
take away people's liberties, but we're not going to have
all the openings and freedom we've had. That's from a

(23:20):
posting the That's from Washington Post. The Post then went
on to describe how everywhere or crisis of the last
one hundred years has been used to increase government power,
often in the most are conan way. Freelance supporters of
the civilian state are rushing to urge everyone to comply.

(23:41):
One liberal talk show hosts respond to callers who complain
that Big Brother policies at airports were a problem. Big
Brother is the only thing holding us together. He offered
no evidence to show how Big Brother made us safe.
On Tuesday, September eleventh, we must think free, not patriotically

(24:01):
jerk our knees. Soon we may be at war, and
as always at such times, we'll be expected to pull together,
do what our leaders tell us is necessary, and sacrifice
more freedom in the name of safety and security or patriotism.
And as a reality of the day of horrors seeps in,

(24:22):
who doesn't feel and urge to strike back, to get
behind our government, to show those murdering bastards that they
can't push Americans around and to do whatever it takes
to defend the greatest country on Earth, even if that
means sacrificing individual liberty to the cause. Whenever it happens.

(24:43):
From here and out, we need to remember that Big
Brother is not holding us together, that he never can
and never will. We must remember that kind of restrictions
on the liberties of ordinary Americans that were entirely ineffective
in preventing the attacks on today's Tember eleventh, two thousand
and one, will not magically prevent future attacks merely because

(25:08):
their sebrity is increased. What did all Big Brothers' efforts
do to prevent Tuesday slaughter? The violation of freedom we've
already been subjected to in the name of safety. Airport
X rays, ID checks, disarmament, body searches, and the whole
gamut became a sick, a sick a joke when the

(25:33):
day arrived that we needed them to protect our country
against the world's worst criminals. In fact, Daniel Pipes on
The Wall Street Journal was quick to point out how
the government's reliance on mass eavesdropping and tracking actually divert
resources for more effective any terrorism methods, such as actually

(25:55):
studying and infiltrating genuine terrorist groups. Yet now the government
proposes a giant national effort to do more of the same,
to impose more effective, wasteful, and oppressive mass surveillance and restrictions.
New restrictions on the freedoms of non violent people will

(26:15):
do nothing to make America or the world safer. They'll
make us less safe, as well as less free. There
are at least two reasons for this. The first is
that more restrictions, more power placing the hands of government,
will simply, in their long run, create more rage and

(26:36):
therefore more desire to strike violently. As we also saw,
some restrictions, like those that forbid armed citizens on planes,
also make it harder for Americans to protect themselves and
their country. The second is something we observe tragically those
cell phone calls from four doomed hijacked planes, the fatal

(27:00):
assivity and dependence that seemed to be the coming norm
in American behavior. Belly up, be passive, do what they say.
I continue on the passive, unthinking American. It appears, how now,
that a handful of heroic pastors on one flight, having

(27:20):
learned via telephone that two other hijacked plants have already
smashed into the World Trade Center, decided not to allow
themselves to be used as weapons of war. These pastors
on United flight ninety three attacked the hijackers who were
in control of the plane. Doomed in any case, they
ended up dining in the woods and fields of rural Pennsylvania,

(27:41):
rather than passively allowing their captors to get away with
an even more horrendous mass murder. And there's some you
know claims on the butt. Let you know, is what
they wrote, So I'll continue on. We also know that
on at least one other flight, American Airlines Flight seventy seven,

(28:02):
which smashed into the Pentagon, passenger Bobara Olson learned from
her husband, US Solicitor General Theodore Olsen of the World
Trade Center catastrophe. During two separate calls. Missus Olson, a
well known author and conservative television comment here, ask her
husband what the pilot standing next to her in the
backs of the plane should do. Picture that passengers and

(28:23):
crews have been heard it, and note that word well
heard it to the back of the plane. Even the pilot,
the leader, the chief decision maker, does nothing, can't think
what to do, can't act. Instead of attempting to stay
of their own lives and the lives of others on
the ground, What do they do? They expected a federal

(28:45):
government official to make the decision for them. The evidence
says that these people didn't even feel empowered to defend
their own lives without first asking the advice or permission
of Washington d C. And why should we have expected otherwise?
Americans have been told repeatedly never to resist crime, always

(29:05):
to submit to any demand a thug makes them, always along,
for safety's sake, go along in order to avoid angering
the criminal. We've been told always to submit as well
to any demand made by anyone who appears to be
in charge to These people on flight seventy seven, and
presumably the two other of the other flights, were apparently

(29:29):
so paralyzed by their conditioning that they couldn't assert themselves
even when the alternative was certain death. Even as pathetically
disarmed as they are, they could have battered the hijackets
with their briefcases, with their shoes, their purses. They could
overwhelm them with sheer numbers of bodies. They could have

(29:51):
gouged at their eyes with fingers or car keys, could
have knocked them unconscious with luggage from the overhead racks.
Could have tripped them, stomped them, tie them up, records
from audio headsets. But except on United Flight ninety three,
they apparently did nothing, And so three planes flew sure

(30:14):
and true into the heart of three American landmarks, slaughtering thousands.
The only true security measure a Bill of rights culture.
We must take back America as the country. We must
make it free and independent again, no longer that would
be ruler of his own people, and no longer playing
at being the world's supercow. Only by doing that will

(30:37):
earn the world's peace and respect. We must take our
own individual lives and independent spirits back from the would
be rules and criminals as well. If we consent passively
to give up more freedoms, even temporarily or as an
emergency measure, we will be doing the opposite, will be
less safe, less free. To restore American freedom and personal courage,

(31:00):
we must restore the Bill of Rights in our country
and in our hearts and minds. If we understand the
Bill of Rights, we'll understand what we're fighting for and why.
If we let it slip away, what's left won't be
worth fighting for. This means not merely having an intellectual
or legal understanding of the Bill of Rights. This means
not merely memorizing the Bill of Rights or teaching it

(31:21):
to our children. This means understanding the concept of the
individual liberty that underlie the Bill of Rights, then living
those concepts, breathing them, eating the dreaming them, holding them
as the most central values of our lives, in the
same place we hold our beliefs in the deity or
our dedication to our families, or to truth or justice.

(31:44):
We must behave as free people, accept as and encourage
others to behave as free people, and have zero tolerance
for anyone who abuses freedom or use his authority to
violate the Bill of Rights. If there was a time
and history to get behind the Bill of Rights and
promoted it is now. If we wield to this mushy

(32:07):
thinking that the road to freedom and safety lives and
giving up freedom and the Bill of Rights, then we
might as well bow down and in defeat right now.
If we don't defend our rights, we'll have no rights.
If we don't defend ourselves, our families, and our fellow
citizens and defend their freedoms, then our lives would be
more vulnerable than those of cattle and sheep, and the

(32:30):
America we end up with won't be the america we
thought we were fighting for. If you want to be
a passive herd, beast, obey whatever the authority of the moment,
be that be that a bureaucrat or a hijacker tells
you to do, listen to their lives about safety, security,
and obey, obey, obey. But if you truly want to

(32:54):
combat terrorism or terror war, learn the Bill of Rights.
Teach the Bill of Rights, and enforce the rights with
every action of your life. Fight back with the Bill
of Rights. Even it's like this, it's like this is
why it is relevant today. And you know there's a
lot of stuff in there. Can be talking not talking

(33:18):
about the article Pam Bonni. However, we have to stand
for what's right. Our freedom don't end where your feelings begin. Okay,
So the same we're free speech. Okay, we got natural rights.
We all have. People have a habit saying constitutional, and
I admit yours truly have done it too. However, when

(33:42):
you learn further about our enailable rights, then you say natural.
So I always recommend folks to get that habit of
not saying constitutional rights, and it's all done with loving
and good faith. And don't get me wrong, there are
folks out there who use that and it drives me crazy.

(34:03):
I go, what the hell you doing? I just smack
them inside the head with love, and many of them
understand me. So this is why, guy, that's why everyone
in the United States has a duty to exercise our
natural rights, which is the Bill of Rights, culture government,

(34:24):
keep out zan kludes, pam bondi. Regardless what party you're in,
what your belief system is. You got some of the
folks out there say we may have to restrict our
Second Amendment. Bad history, because what happened because they try
use that with Charlie Kirk. Well, there's a time when
a German representative, poly a diplomatic, try to your peace.

(34:50):
He got shot in the head and it was claims
by a quote Zionist allegedly unquote. And what happened. What
are they done in Germany? Was a Nazi Germany, the
nineteen sixty eight gun control acts that happened in nineteen
thirty eight with disarmed all the Jews. Okay, so remember that, folks,
if you don't learn from the past. We're damn to

(35:13):
repeat it. I'm just wondering. Pam Bondy has knowledge of
this cause I can tell you. I can say one thing.
She was four She supported red flag laws in the
great state of Florida. So I have a bone to
pick with. Always be vigilant whoever's in there, Never trust them,

(35:34):
regardless who appoints. Well, I'm gonna do my final segment,
so stay tuned. I'm gonna do one more here. Just
came out a couple of days ago from the Healthranger
NaturalNews dot com. Why we need the Kirk Free Speech
Act a legal shield against the censorship industrial complex is

(35:57):
written by Mike Adams. America's under siege not from foreign
and theirs, but a but from a censorship industrial complex
that has weaponized big tech, corporate media, universities, and government
agencies to silence the silence descent, manipulate elections, and destroying

(36:19):
the very foundation of our republic free speech. The tragic
assassination of Charlie Kirk, a young, dynamic Conservative leader and
youth organizer, was not just an act of violence. It
was the unfortunate endpoint of a culture that has normalized
the silencing of opposition. When free speech is censored, Bondce

(36:40):
becomes the only remaining outlet for resistance. The First Amendment
was designed to protect all speech, especially unpopular speech, from
government tyranny. Yet today Google, Facebook, Twitter, which is x, YouTube, Wikipedia,
corporate media and universities operation as the facto arms of

(37:01):
the government, colluding with DHS, DoD CIA, and foreign NGOs
to blacklist the platform and economically destroy anyone who challenges
the official narrative. This is not hyperbole smoking gun. Documents
from lawsuits like Misseri versus Biden and Bridtown versus Google

(37:24):
proved that the US government has been laundering censorship requests
through overseas NGO you bypass constitutional protections. People like myself,
Robert Candy Junior, Carlson, Alex Jones, and now Charlie Kirk
all have been systematically erased from digital public squares simply

(37:44):
for expressing views that contradict the pharmaceutical industrial complex, the
climate cult, and the LGBTQ in doctrination agenda, or the
military industrial war machine. Enough is enough time for Congress
to pass the Charlie Kirk Free Speech Act, a landmark

(38:05):
law that would outlaw viewpoint discrimination on all large platforms
find violators one billion dollars per day for adlorhythmic or
manual censorship of protected speech explicitly protect political, medical, scientific, religious,
and any government speech. Establishes a one trillion dollar compensation

(38:27):
from for fifty we're victims of censorship over the past decade. Sorry, folks,
I just got tongue tied. There currently prosecute executives who
engage in systematics suppression of free expression. This is not
about restricting speech, is about restoring it. The First Amendment

(38:47):
was never meant to protect corporate oligarchs who acts as
state enforced thought police. If a platform functions as a
modern public square, it must uphold public square rules, no censorship,
no censorship of lawful speech. And there's a video clip
on here you can check it out for yourselves. Very

(39:08):
good stuff. I always love Mike Adams on his work
I found for almost twenty years. I'll get to you
on the censorship and industrial complex. How we got here
one big tech nexus, a decade of collision, and it
gives you a whole rundown of like deep state panic
and Project Veritas to the shadow band and so forth.

(39:32):
So it will continue on number two. The mechanics of
censorship laundering to bypass the First Amendment. Government outsources of
censorship too for an angels, fact checkers, AI durance suppression,
payment processors. This is money learning for censorship. I'm not
going to reading his satirety, but I'm just giving you

(39:53):
some clues. Give me some input on this, Nigga, read
it for yourself. I will leave the footnote on as
well on the page three. The human costs ruins lives,
stifled debate, and violence. Censorship does not suppress ideas. It
destroys lives and happened to Mike dam Kennedy, Tuck Carlson,
and Charlie Kirk. When lawful speech is criminalized, vonce becomes

(40:17):
unvita invailable. The shooting of Charlie Kirk is a direct
result of a culture that the threats conservative viewpoints as
dangerous and seeks to silence them by any means possible.
Everybody say here about the Charlie Free Speech Act, restoring
the First Amendment one, defining large platforms, two absolute ban

(40:38):
on viewpoint discrimination. I'll give you a sample to that.
What's not protected direct incitement to violence, true threats, child
pornography or exploitation, docsing and her harassment. Number three, one
billion dollars per day finds for censorship violations. Number four,

(41:00):
the one trillion dollars censorship compensation fund, the platform, demonetize
the banks, et cetera. Number five criminal penalties for executive
executives who enforce censorship. Why this law is needed now?
One twenty twenty four election is being rigged throughout through

(41:21):
censorship to the AI thought police are here. How to
make this law of reality? One grassroots pressure then, including
call your congressman, boycott big Tech, support censored journalists. Number
two Legal and political strategy, foul class actual lawsuits against
Google and other sites at violate First Amendment. Push state

(41:43):
attorneys to investigate sensitive collision. Demand at the Supreme Court
rule that big tech is a public utility, it must
uphold free speech. Vote with your dollars. Divest from Blackrock, Vanguard,
and State Street. The three firms that own Big Tech
use gold, silver, big cooin, privacy coins a bypassed final
financial financial censorship, support parallel economics, farmers markets, homeschooling, decentralized

(42:11):
social media which I agree always decentralized is important. We
must choose free speech to avoid civil war Americans at
are crossroads, says here Option one, we restore a free
speech to break the censorship industrial complex and return to
society where ideas compete fairly. Number option two, we allow

(42:31):
the silence team to continue. Watch more Charlie Kirks get
shot and descend into volunitilranny. The Charlie Free Speech Act
is not just a legal proposal. It stands as a
last stand for liberty. We will be a nation of
free citizens. That will be a nation of censored serfs.
The choice is ours, act now before it's too late.

(42:53):
The ACTIONNAOM. You can share the article, email your congressman,
boycott the big tech stuff, use brave search and all
that good stuff, and support sensored journalists. Prepare for legal
battleists will be a fight for our lives. Free speech
is not negotiable. Charlie Kirk Free Speech Act, much past,
God bless America, God blessed free speech. Give you a

(43:15):
whole rundown two of this, of these of his stuff.
Please support this man and I agree completely because it's
being unacceptable and even yours truly has been shadowed band
on a couple of sites myself, so I know how
it is. I'm not a big, big, big person in

(43:35):
that in this industry. I just like speak in my mind,
give you my input, and I always like to hear
what you folks have to say. And there's times I
do and I appreciate it. Sometime something oh you suck. Hey,
that's fine, but thanks, thanks for you know. Let me
know it doesn't boby one bit. I always try to
learn to improve myself as well. But it's been a

(43:58):
long time been doing this and now have a day jobs.
I'll I try to. I may get a little tired
of times, so please forgive me. Well, one thing we
got to say. You gotta support our natural rights as
a whole, with no exceptions and without us, the government,
the big tech companies, corporate media are nothing. So you

(44:21):
we all have the power, folks. Don't let them suppress it,
and that will be it. I thank you everyone for listening,
but feel free to download and share social media networks.
Have any questions, comments, recommendations of all that good stuff.
Whatever you do, please use the Korn hit me via
email to L three dot podcast the Proton's Got Me

(44:43):
and I will leave the footnotes on this episode on
the pages so you can check it out for yourself.
If you want to donate on a PayPal or me
or cash on app for SLA's local number three. If
you want to follow me on steam it give me
a little crypto love. I'm at l L number three
dash podcast. If you want to support the Fire, JPFO

(45:08):
or the Natural News, I'd be very cool. And I
understand that the Second Amendment Foundation runs it now. It's
a little bit different because the late Aaron Zamma May
is hope you forever free. And I'll be very honest
with that organization of some controversies, however, they're trying at
least trying to keep something alive. And he did their

(45:30):
fulfill his legacy by leaving the archives alone and cherish them.
So you got the decisions, folks, use it wisely. Once again,
take a few times plus, always remember that the Moniacle
resistance the hell can put the sell and can liberate humanity.
Until next time, take care of yourselves, keep on spread
of love and me your guardian spirits to be with you.