All Episodes

September 21, 2025 51 mins
I've combined a rant, along with narrating footnotes & presented my commentary:
* Readers Poll: Political Violence Up, Freedom of Speech Down
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/readers-poll-political-violence-up-freedom-of-speech-down-5917560?ea_src=frontpage&ea_med=section-1
* Was Jimmy Kimmel Censored?
https://brownstone.org/articles/was-jimmy-kimmel-censored/
* The Kimmel’s Nose Under the Tent? Actually, Libs Are Being Hoist With Their Own Petard
https://thenewamerican.com/us/the-kimmels-nose-under-the-tent-actually-libs-are-being-hoist-with-their-own-petard/
* A Weakened United Nations Plans Medical Censorship and Surveillance
https://thenewamerican.com/world-news/un/the-un-plans-medical-censorship-and-surveillance/
Music Credit by The Orchard Enterprises, Faster Than Light Introduction
Contact, LL3.Podcast@proton.me
Donations:
* PayPal - https://paypal.me/LokiLuck3
* Cash App - https://cash.app/LokiLuck3
* Steemit @ LL3-Podcast #Censorship #Surveillance #JimmyKimmel #UnitedNations #Nullification2025 #DemoniacResistance
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Greetings, my fili friend, Little Savin Thinkers. Thank you to
All three podcast. My name is Craig transmittferent A Beautiful
Realms of Planet Earth. Today's date is Sunday, September twenty first,
twenty twenty five. This episode eighteen ninety eight was Jimmy

(00:52):
Kimmel censored and a weekend un plans despotic agenda. Before
I proceed, you can find me a multiple social media sites,
en podcast channels. Just type in look you Luck number three,
Look you Luck Roman number three or three eyes, or
to look you Luck Roman in three podcasts for the

(01:12):
more of any questions, comments, recommendations and all that good stuff.
Whatever you do, please use the chorum, hit me via
email to l L three dot podcast a proton dot me.
If you want to donate it a PayPal on me
or cash do app for slash look Look number three,
or you could follow me on Steam it plus give

(01:33):
you a little crypto love at l L number three
Dash podcast. Yeah. I was like actually looking at this
today from the Epoch Times under reader's poll and as says,
political violence up, freedom of speech down, and it was

(01:59):
talk about, of course, the murder of Charlie Kirk and
the civic climate, today's civic climate, all that good stuff,
and I was just like amazed. And what they what
they've done here Epoch Times is pretty good. Is a

(02:19):
decent newspaper, and like it says here, kirk assassination marked
a literal turning point in American politics, according to nearly
eight percent of the participants in the Epoch Times the
latest reader poll, I'll just go down here about increased
political violence decrease political tolerance. Ninety six percent of response

(02:43):
to the Epoch Times agreed that there is an increased
frequency of political violence against public figures in the United States.
More than sixty seven percent said they strongly agreed, And
of course here I'll just go down the Yeppoc Times
and ask its readers to name what they saw as

(03:04):
the source of the grips under mine of political tyrants.
Many response is called out multiple sources, but out of
nineteen thousand, four hundred and thirty one who called out
only one source, forty seven percent said blame parson media,
twenty five percent blame social media, sixteen percent blame political rhetoric,

(03:26):
and twelve percent blamed the culture of college campuses. So
on that angle, Okay, you can blame medium manipulation, draconianism,
mind control, et cetera. And of course political rhetoric, many

(03:46):
historians will say, is more like going back to the
ninth eighteen fifties before the Southern States decided to separate
from the Union and the war broke out and all
that which, based on my research, it was an unconstitutional war.
So as another another another topic, you know, another episode

(04:10):
for that one is really intriguing. And so, like I said,
it was like looking through all this, and of course
here an additional two thousand, three hundred three respondent set
all of the above, and another eight hundred seventy blamed
the left, communists or socialists and Democrats in one form

(04:33):
or another. Hundreds of more blaming the country's departure from God,
Christianity and Christian morals and spiritual spirituality in one way
or another, including persistence of moral relativism. One participant wrote,
a loss of Christian culture and values has made it
increasingly impossible to have civil discourse and respect. Man. I

(04:55):
recall one gentleman who is deceased almost close to thirty
years ago. He told me that, but his father said
that about the whole separation of church and state, which
it was totally misconstrued. He goes, what's going to happen? Yes,
the society demoralized. It was like eight nineteen sixty one.

(05:19):
And now look what's been happening, spess when you got
you know, central banking system. States, government knows best, and
many of them want to follow that. And look what
occurred boom, you know, instead of natural law, they were
real to have the state tell him how to live.
And it just grew, dere grew, grew, just expanded. And
so it was a very interesting article here and this

(05:43):
is right here about the issue with media education. I'll
just go down as one paragraph I says here that
significant majority of Pole participants place blame on the state,
on both mainstream and social media and the state of
the nation's education system. Well, the sixty four percent either

(06:05):
disagree or strongly disagree with the notion that Charlie conkssassination
was covered fairly by the media. Of course, question everything
how accurate is the official narrative? Right? And plus many
of them want to twist it be more dramatized. We
know the whole game. This is why the mainstream news stations,

(06:26):
you know, they just go got nineteen percent viewing. So
it's like, hey, read, but you saw right, And so
it says here that were sixty percent either okay, I
got that one. Rough ninety six percent either greed or
strongly agree that progressive and commist ideology has a strong
influence on American colleges. You can use them Communist Manifesto

(06:50):
and relate it to the students. That's just one source
you can say, right, and it says here. Hundreds of
participants wrote and blame it all of the public education
system for the breakdown in political tolerance, accusing it of
pushing activists in doctrination over critical thinking, hosting biased teachers,

(07:11):
failing to teach civics, and failing to instill a love
of country in their students and at all levels. I
always say this too, like, hey, now we've got technology,
you don't really need the public school system, and you
could do homeschooling, or they can do a little bit
of both, and you could enhance, you know, your child's education,

(07:34):
be the mentor. Then they could challenge the teachers. And
I call them the projectors, you know, human projectors. A
lot of them are, and so forth. The results followed
the release of the Walton Family Foundation Gallup poll on
September sixteen, which indicated only three or five percent of
Americans are satisfied with quality of today's kid education, the

(07:57):
low satisfaction rate since Gallup again in nineteen ninety nine.
So it tells you something, tells the whole thing on
freedom of speech and turning point and all that. So yeah,
I will leave this on my footnotes and if you could,
if you get it, it'd be great. It is important

(08:18):
to know on this matter because freedom of speech is
sharing information and ideas. And I actually seen that one
interview but oh shoot with that gentleman's name, Oh my goodness,
but Van Jones was on it, Andson Cooper tells you
how much I really support the guy. Right. He had

(08:41):
actually a tweet stating that Charlie Kirk wants to have
a debate and disagree, but be agreeable. And Van Jones
didn't really get the message until some of his associates say, hey,
he's trying to get rich of you. This day. He
when Charlie Kirk was murdered, some people say he may

(09:03):
fake his death, but I'm not gonna go there. But
it's gonna a lot of claims, what truth of the
matter is. Van Jones was like wow, and he actually
wasn't very It was saddened him because what happened to
Charlie Kirk, even though he had his different Cisics can
be enemies, but it's not a real hateful relationship. But

(09:24):
have you know the words instead of weapons and and
a mossy, but principles. So he's gonna pay his respects
to Charlie Kirk, which is good. And I'm not a
Van Jones lover myself, but on a human element where
I observed that interview, he was very disheartened because there

(09:46):
would have been a nice discussion. It doesn't have to
be at the studio. It could be you know, on zoom,
don't matter. But it's been very good. But but he realized, wow,
we could still disagree but be neighborly. And it's all
right because even in my time tenure when I did

(10:09):
activism work, I just go out there and mingle with people.
Network doesn't matter if you've grinned everything, but we will
share input, ideas, et cetera. And there are days we
had to toss our differences society and stand as one
because of someone in government wants to rule over us,

(10:33):
but we have to turn the tide, to turn the
tables on them. And I've done that a couple of times,
and I think I can say it was really good. Though.
That's why you always got to say you have to
protect defend your enemies liberties. If not, it will be

(10:54):
a president. You create a president that would be a
burden on you. I'm just paraphrasing, but Tom's paying warn
us about this, and many folks with that faction mindset,
the hateful faction mindset, this boom to say forget. They
get too primitive and we cannot be in that state

(11:15):
of mind. And don't get me wrong, we've all been.
We all have those exhibitions, including yours truly. However, it
doesn't mean we to make that into a habit. We
all have our bumps in the road, but we'll always
want to learn to improve ourselves. And what Charlie Kirk
did was I want to have open discussions, and he

(11:41):
got dirt, He got mud slain. He charges every dirty
we're out of the book towards him, and he never,
you know, showed any tension and a mossy or bitterness
towards the people that that was he was talking to
and that's and that's a good thing. And we needed
to go back with that. So if you have a

(12:03):
civil war violently or with information, see one thing I
can tell you. The deep state, the globalist, the order.
They want this to be a reality, not just in
the United States but around the world. So we need
to look at ourselves and examine everything more thoroughly before

(12:29):
taking that ball and running with it. You want to
achieve things thoroughly instead of false starting. And I digress.
But it is a good interesting articles. Definitely, I'm gonna
have you. I'm gonna let you guys read it so

(12:49):
and I'll be right back. So stay tuned. So the
first article will be reading here came out on the nineteenth,
by the way past Friday. It could be be another
article from the New American, but this was here was
Jimmy Kimble censored. This is from the Brownstone staff. As

(13:13):
it reads, Kirk was the anti thesis of Jimmy Kimmel.
Kirk was tremendously influential with the youth, while Kimmel's sactimony
is reserved for a dwindling audience of the Blue state elderly.
Among coastal elites. Kirk sought good faith debate, while Kimmel

(13:35):
relied on monologues of smears. Kirk was fundamentally decent, while
Kimmel was callous and cruel. This week's headlines reveal another
difference between the men. Reactions to Kirk's assassination is a
grassroots movement, while the fury resulting from Kimmel's suspension is

(13:55):
a result of an entitled bureaucracy accustomed to an unaccount
of monopo of the public's resources. Corporate media and its
kept activists have howled in response to Kimble's suspension, but
none of this leaders offered an answer to a simple question.
Why should the First Amendment protect an audiologue right to

(14:16):
make millions from lies on government subsidized public airways in
defiance of market trends, but not independent americans rights to
dissent from predictable media or doxy relately of attacks on
expression is familiar. We've been exposing this and fighting for

(14:38):
five years with mountains of documents drawn from foyer and
discut court discovery. We've exposed the methods, funding cutouts and algorithms.
We have all the receipts tens of thousands of pages
of them. New York Attorney General Latita James used to

(15:01):
of the state to demolish v dare, Peter Bremelo's website
dedicated to immigration by administration coherst big Tech into suppressing
critics of the regimes COVID policies. Merrick Garland's Department of
Justice sentence Douglas Mackie to prison for lapooning Hillary Clinton.

(15:23):
Climate scientists bankrupted journalist Mark Stein from mocking them. President
Biden weaponized international legal systems against Pavel d'uov and Julian
de Sage for facilitating the free flow of information. For
Peter Brimelo to Tucker Carlston, to Bobby Kennedy, to Mark
Stein to Alex Jones, the victims of the war on

(15:47):
free expression were all independent voices who committed no crime
other than deviating from the tenants of the deep state
that here they led a parade of Democrat figures, including
Kenji Cantingi, Brown Jackson, Tim Waltz, Hillary Clinton, law professors,
and left wing media a call for removal of First

(16:09):
Amendment protections that obstruct their agendas. The First Amendment stands
as a major roadblock for US right now, John Kerry
marked last year of the presidential election. During the pandemic response,
the Democratic Party attempted to obliterate that roadblock. During oral arguments,

(16:34):
Justice Kenseon G. Brown Jackson said to the plaintiffs, my
biggest concern is that your view as a first amendment
hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time. Peers.
After all, the public needs accurate information in the context
of a once in a lifetime pandemic. White House advisor

(16:59):
Andy it lobbied Amazon banned politically unfavored well books and
the mandate. Facebook removed memes ridiculing the COVID vaccines. Director
of Digital Strategy, Robert Follery cohurst big tech companies to
remove mal information, meaning true content that cut against official narratives.

(17:22):
In April twenty twenty one, he strong armed Google into
ramping up his censorship operations and total executives that his
concerns were shared at the highest and I mean the
highest levels of the White House. Are you fin serious?
Lowery asked Facebook after the company failed the censor critics
of the COVID vaccine. I want an answer on what

(17:44):
happened here, and I want it today At other times,
Fatalery was more direct. Please remove this account immediately, he
told Twitter about a Biden family parody account. The company
complied within an hour. Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat from Massachusetts,
wrote alert to Amazon's threatening that selling Bobby Kenny's books

(18:07):
were unethical, unacceptable, and potentially unlawful. The Department of Homeland Security,
through a subsidiary called THESA, colluded with social media platforms
and NGOs. The Censor American through a process called switchboarding.
SISA then coordinated with left wing censorship a parity like

(18:32):
Media Matters, the Atlantic Council and the Sanford Stanford Internet
Observatory to suppressed unimproved reports challenging the effassy of mastering
lockdowns and vaccines. SISSA classify posts criticizing lockdown measures and
mask mandates as consistent with pro Kremlin media, and they

(18:56):
justified their censorship by claiming that any migrant as medic
any Asian, racist, or xenophobic tropes have been at the
forefront of the COVID nineteen related conspiracies. The history of
the censorship apparatus is discussed in great detail in Brownstone
Institute's COVID response. At five years the First Amendment versus

(19:18):
the US Security State. Check it out, good stop. Perhaps
most ironically, Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat from New York, demand
that Fox News removed across over the air in twenty
twenty three. Tell us the NN we not only have
a right to tell Rupert Murdoch and Fox what to
do by an obligation member. He's pinocchio. Hi, I'm Charles Schumer.

(19:41):
I support the bill of Rice Boo. His nose grows
and I'll continue on here. Representative for Kim Jeffrey's, Democrat
from New York, to use his perch and the House
of Representatives to insist that Fox stop. Aaron Carlson deeming
his reports to be live in propaganda, which he's very
good at projecting that too. Okay, he's a big liar, okay,

(20:02):
and the tree is this whore not and sorry for
you that language, but you re put yourself on your
actions regardless. I'll continue on. But a cognitive dissonance appears
loss on these figures, as ad mowned the loss of
Jimmy Kimmel from late night television. Unlike cable outlets, ABC

(20:22):
enjoys the government subsidy of public airways and therefore has
an obligation to ensure programming and it is in the
public interest. Moreover, it now appears that the decision to
fire Kimmel was independent of the chair of the Federal
Communications Commission's threat. But there's a big claim on that,

(20:48):
all right, So I'll just I'll just continue on here. Undoubtedly,
Kimmel's late night routine loses the parent corporation Disney one moment, Okay, cool,
I'm just I'm trying to see here, tens of millions
of dollars per year for the Saint Clair, The owner

(21:08):
of the local affiliate stations of ABC sefer condemned Kimbell's lives,
demand an apology, and announced it would air a tribute
to Kirk in the timeslop normally reserved for Kimmel's show.
Reports now revealed that before the suspension, Kimmel's plan to
go on air continue to blame Trump supporters for the
Kirk assassination. Advertising affiliates, including executives at Saint Clair and

(21:29):
Next to Our called to voice their concerns. Disney CEO
Bob Eager and an executive then decides to spend Kimbell
after sixty six of two hundred affiliate stations say they
will not air Kimil's next episode, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Nonetheless,
leaders of the ruling elite now waive the banner of

(21:50):
free speech, insisting that Kimmel's is the modern Thomas Payne
joined in the modeling display by other late night hosts
who bemoaned their declining market share. Thomas paid Can we
see the word blasphemy? Oh? Continue on? But their insincerity
is too easily discernible after years of censorship and smears.

(22:13):
People like David French of The New York Times blessed
the censorship of five years, including even that which the
platform the City present have suddenly converted into free speech
after lutists, They wanted everyone to pretend not to notice
that the censors or just a few years ago, had

(22:33):
become the free speech advocacy of today. Can we stay hypocrite? Yeah?
The Rose Deal bunal facts. Oh continue on, Note, however,
that this is selective. They demand the right of Chemel
to preside over a money losing show without a substantial audience,
but remains as the YouTube TikTok Facebook LinkedIn the other

(22:55):
removed content from Brownstone Institute. Their real voice of anger
is a loss of yet another bureaucratic attimement program. Rec
min it of this hysterics amid DOGE cuts earlier this
year from the public airways to USA and to DEI contracts.
The deep state and its media mouthpieces have enjoyed a

(23:16):
long standing structural advantage thanks to the largest of the taxpayers.
Now the primo roar of legacy media echoes throughout the
left wing, co opting the slogan of the free expression
as the Trump administration. Breton Seda with cultural head of
me it's final below. And I'll be very honest, I'm

(23:40):
not lovey dovey with the FCC. But the question I
haf to all those ar what I stand with Jimmy Kimmel?
How comes his ratings are so lousy? According to some
reports was one hundred and twenty nine thousand viewers a
night and the big network like that? And what? And two?

(24:05):
How about his contract? What were the conditions? How many
of you geniuses out there that's dan for free speech
know about contracts all right? Supplying demand? If the man
is low this continues, you can't really blame the FCC

(24:26):
for this. Jimmy Kimmel and his associates screwed it themselves.
Their vision was in hell in the handbasket. Far as
I'm concerned, you talk to a man's not a Jimmy
Kimmel lover. However, even the FCC to get involved. You
know what I say, don't You will waste your time

(24:48):
because he was gonna he's a cut loose anyway, based
on all these conditions he was in and what he
achieved was nothing. But I'll continue on here with this
other article from the New American and it says here
the Kimmel's nose under the tent. Actually lives are being
hoist with their own free tard. Petter, excuse me, and

(25:11):
this is from Swelling Duke. There's what mister Duke has
to stay here. Look, let's be honest. Kamala Harris tweeted
in twenty nineteen real Donald Trump twitle a count should
be suspended and the President Donald Trump was suspended from
Twitter two as he become another in a long line

(25:32):
of deep platform conservatives we all know as well with
the Twitter files released in twenty twenty two and Facebook
founder Mark Zuckerberg's twenty twenty four admission the by administration
pressured his website to sense the users that Democrats have
been zealously trampling the First Amendment with with the ABC's
preempting of Jimmy Kimmel Live and definitely under the Federal

(25:55):
Communications Commission pressure. However, democrats tune has changed now the
constitution of Freeman speech are imperiled. Oh, it's not that
they aren't staying on principle. It is it's that their
principle is is that it only bad when it happens
to them, absolutely right. As many know, Kimmel has joined

(26:20):
other leftists who recently lost jobs after making inappropriate remarks
about Charlie kirk assassination. Translation, those who happily wielded the
council culture kurgled for years are now being bloody. Oh wait,
bulgean but it themselves, of course, And as I wrote recently,

(26:43):
all civilizations have their social codes enforced with attendant social pressure.
Yet at issue here is in part government pressure. That
left wing hypocricy is intense. With respect to both phenomena
and me near the Twain shall meet. Making note on

(27:05):
this Friday was USA Today columnist Nicolled Russell. There has
been a backlash over Disney and ABC's decision to cancel Kimmel,
She writes, Actors Ben Stiller and Jimi Lee Kurz are upset.
Other comedians have responded with support. Russell states that she
is disturbed about Kimmel's nixting being partially driven by pressure

(27:26):
from the SEC chairman, Brandon Carr. None unless she knows
that the less cancel culture amnesia is striking. It is
game they created with rules they made up, Russell points out,
now they hate that it is being applied to them.
She then emphasized that Kimmel does have free speech rights.
The comment that caused some problems, however, was not just

(27:48):
some guarding variety jokes she has. Rather, she stated on
a show that aired Monday, we hit some new loads
over the weekends with the mega game desperately trying to
characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other
than one of them, and doing everything they can to
score political points from it. Kimbell should have known better.

(28:08):
Of course, is established fact that the assassin, Tyler Robinson
is a left winger whose actions were driven by a
leftist imperatives. This gets at what troubled car Kimmel was
misleading people regarding most significant political assassination we've seen in
a long time, he explained, to see an NBC this said,

(28:29):
this deceitful speech does not enjoy first man for protection. Heck,
politicians lie all the time, as Russell states too, people
should have allowed market pressure to determine Kimmel's fate. May
and maybe it did. Kimi's rains have declined notably in
recent years, and the show is like is likely losing money,

(28:49):
so is entirely possible ABC want to cancel it anyway,
and that Kirk's thomas were merely a handy pretext fair
player not turned about this is whatever the case. Examples
of people being canceled for refusing to bow at woke
this left wing alter bound, as Russell wright Gino Kurana,

(29:15):
who who was fired from Disney and lucasfilms, The maldonnellying
Okay on what she enjoyed a leading role as she
posted a story on social media comparing the current political
climate to Nazi Germany. A lot of regular Americans have
experienced cancel culture too, just for holding the traditional conservative views.

(29:36):
Peter Laming, but, a French teacher at West Point High
School in Virginia, who got fired in twenty eighteen for
not using a transgender students pre for pronouns. He threw
the school board and they settled the case. Then remember
Roseanne bar She was also fireding ABC in twenty eighteen
under pressure of Barack and Michelle Obama. Barr claims Google

(29:58):
acts employees James the More in twenty seventeen after you
questioned the diversity policies. The same year, professor Brett Weinstein
followed suit in opposing diversity schemes and was bullied out
of Evergreen State College. Noble Loretti scientist Tim Hunt was
Nick Hunt was nixed by University College London in twenty

(30:22):
fifteen for making an instant joke Mozilla CEO Brandon ikeke
Ike how pronounces reign excuse me was compelled to resign
in twenty fourteen after supporting a traditional marriage proposition, and
in two thousand and five, Larry Summers was dislodged from

(30:43):
Harvard's presidency after theorizing that men has a unique proclivity
for science. The proceeding is just a short list too.
What's more, Barack Obama, who recently had the termity to
criticize Trump for targeting enemies became notorious for weaponizing the

(31:03):
federal government. There will be his administration using IRS to
damage conservative tax exempt groups. I remembered all these things. Folks.
Remember Barack Obama is a an arrogant bend over bob
Okay to the globe, to the global system, plain and simple,
and I'll continue on here. Then there was the aforementioned

(31:25):
pressure pressure the Bio administration put on social media platforms
a sensor. Traditionalists, as I put at the time, the
defense were literally doing an end run around the First Amendment,
using text companies as proxy. The sensor. Speech, the method
to the mad method to the badness has already stated
an assertion that any and every council culture is in

(31:47):
principle wrong. Is it self wrong? Oh, it may be
wrong in in particular, But again, every society has its
social codes as uses scorn or ostracism to enforce them.
It would be nice, though, if we could unite them
in the proposition that our government shouldn't play speech enforcer. Instead,

(32:10):
leftists are pretending as if considered somehow originate council culture
and governments wrote in it. Why well, some people have
very short memories and very often and often very convenient ones.
Many leftists in particular also live in a self created
bubble of rationalization. When they scorned and ostracized people, it

(32:36):
was different. They deserve it. It's as much the same
as Tyler Robinson believes Charlie Kirk deserves it. And and
all this let's see here and all this real rationalization
and overt lies as well in the parent and X
mainstream media efforts to convince Americas that MAGA is the

(33:00):
real counsel culture threat. You better elect democrats is the message,
or will lose our freedoms. The good news is in
that new media such as A New American are now
pre eminent. Consequently, the tongue stiffing, stifling, excuse me social
pressure is increasingly being used against the liars, not the
truth tellers. And if anyone should complain, remember this one.

(33:24):
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of reach, which
ideologists made that common smug retort some years ago. Hit
it's the same people who are now losing reach. Well,
what can I say about that? Like I said before,
I'm not creative about the FCC. All right, if you

(33:48):
gotta look at the thing with all these dinkleberris are
are wigging out over Kimmel and never care about anyone else.
Total hypocrisy, total Carriot hacked, hacked to the core, you
get him where the hurts their wads. Of course, in
the Doge ordeal was there's a double ledged sword. Respectfully

(34:12):
usaved money to going to all these multiple places, including
these TV shows, that it's all being frozen up. They're
rigging out. People don't want to watch garbage or listen
to it. They're tired of being brainwashed. They want to
contemplate for themselves and many people. That's why, man, the

(34:32):
young people that were rated Charlie Kirk's speech and debates
were inspired. It doesn't matter what your belief system is.
Principle is the key. We need to go back to
that can sit be that consistent practice. We gotta spread

(34:54):
that everywhere we go, and we don't want to be
like these slugs they're trying to tell us how to
live and think. I really talked call when John Reno
was Attorney General and she's trying to talk about sex
and violence violence on TV. If you don't clean it up,
we will. That was in the nineties. General Reno. She

(35:15):
was some I can say, some hack who was a
district attorney in Miami Daye County, Florida. There was even claims,
I say this, claims that she was getting with being
with being provided lesbian prostitutes by the drug cartel. So

(35:39):
they have all the drug drug matics happened during that
time in the eighties, So a big claim on that.
But I knew one thing for sure, she was one
corrupt woman. It was never impressed. But when it does
it to them, they all wig out, run to the hills.
It's like an old saying, if you want to dish

(36:00):
it out, you've been able to receive. Remember, criminals hate
when people fight back. Let that think in, folks, or
I'm going to do one more segment after this break,
so stay tuned. Great, We're gonna do one more here.

(36:22):
Came out on the twentieth September. Another article from The
New American, A week in the United Nations plans medical
censorship and surveillance, is by Paul Dragoula. As it reads,
the United Nations is going into eightieth annual conference as

(36:44):
an organization in decline. Nevertheless, this week, world leaders will
meet in New York to discuss how they exploit the
world's problems for their globalist end under the guise of
reducing disease, combatimental illness, and jail with the next pandemic.
The UN plans to use it wanting, wanting polities, avail

(37:06):
and censor people. Since its creation, the UN has sought
to exploit legitimate societal threats and problems for their ultimate
goal installing the world government. They don't hire their true intentions.
General Secretary Antonio Guterres said last year during his speech

(37:27):
at the World Economic Foreman Dabbos that the only way
to address the world's needs is through strong multilateral institutions
and framework and effective mechanisms of global governance YEP, Global
order one oh one new word order were're gonna call it.
In twenty fifteen, after the UN revealed its Agenda twenty

(37:49):
thirty Plan, UN Under Secretary General for Economic and Social Affairs,
Wu hongbu Bo cided a long list of problems that
only global governance can solve. It's quite the speech to
soothe concerns of such power in the hands of so few.

(38:12):
He even claimed that he claimed the UN is just
fair and transparent. We need a global governance that encompasses
a much broader range of development fostatsis and provide long
term solutions for them, we said, adding that the United
Nations can become a locust for such global governance. Yeah,

(38:34):
attack everything on site, right and back. In nineteen sixty two,
Council Form Relations member of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, professor
and former State Apartment official Lincoln P. Bloomfield wrote a
report for the US State Department in which he said

(38:55):
a world effectively controlled by in United Nations is one
in which world government would come about through the establishment
of ooh national institutions characterized by mandatory universal membership exploiting

(39:15):
health concerns. A draft laying out one of the discussions
Happiness Week indicates the globalists seek more control over how
nations respond to disease, mental illness, and the next health crisis.
In the political declaration, they claim they want to reduce
death from non cumical diseases by thirty percent, make treatment

(39:37):
for hypertension and mental illness more accessible, and reduce smoking
also polity part of a larger goal to reduce poverty
and inequality. The way they intend to accomplish these goes
is by bringing together governments, civil society, and the private
sector also known as public private partnerships that include funding

(39:58):
and the power of the UNS Public Health arm the
World Health Organization. They also plan to enact within national
and were relevant regional context legislation and regulation. And they
want to develop and implement multi secrectorial national plans and
we're appropriate subnational plans. Is all just a fancy way

(40:21):
of saying they want control over sovereign nations governments. Decoration
says that accomplishment accomplishing, Sorry about that. All this will
require censorship and surveillance. Yay, come on of paying bondy,
come on, Americ Garland, join the UN. This is part

(40:42):
of your environment. Censorship is human physically defended as necessary
to counter misinformation disinformation about the prevention and treatment of
non chemical diseases and mental health conditions. It also mentions
their intent to regulate digital environments. The UN wants to

(41:03):
keep track of people's personal data. That is explained under
the Strengthen Governance. One of their goals is to improve
infrastructure for systematic and ongoing country surveillance are nonchemical diseases,
risk factors, and mental health, including death registration, population based surveys,

(41:30):
and facility based information systems. Changes to international health regulations
and they plan the reserve or reverse excuse me, or
at last or least censor man. I'm just like getting
tongue tied here, sorry, folks. The growing skepticism toward the

(41:51):
corrupt Western medical establishment. The document says that it is
important to acknowledge that there are evidence based interventions for
previous screening, diagnosing, treating, and caring for people with non
humulicable diseases and mental health conditions. When they say evidence based,

(42:11):
that's a sly way of saying they want to discredit
methods and drugs out of the paradigm of the Western
medical cabal. This week week's meeting is happening. That's just
at whose changes to the international health regulations go into effects.

(42:31):
These changes suentially give WHO, which is the World Health Organization,
more power over how member nations deal with pandemics and
other health emergencies. On Friday, WHO announced the changes in
a press release. A central message of the release is
that since borders don't restrain diseases, globalism is the antecdote.

(42:56):
WHO press release says the amendments recognize that infectious diseases
and other public health risks do not respect borders, and
that coordinated global action is critical among changes. It is
now a global threat that would trigger stronger international collaboration
when a health risk escalates beyond a public health emergency

(43:20):
of international concerns or FICK and poses the risk of
becoming or has already become a pandemic with widespread impact
on the health system and disruption to societies. President Donald
Trump signed executive order on his first day of office
this year that withdraws the US out of WHO. The

(43:43):
White House said, a disastrous way the organization handled this
bird of COVID nineteen and allow the Chinese to influence it.
Justify the exit, but the withdrawal comes with a one
year notice period, so technically the US is still in
the WHO. US is not fully on board. That's a question.
A number of Council of Council members the COOC, the

(44:07):
sub agency of the CFR, discuss what the UN looks
like now that the United States has leadership that isn't
fully sold on globalism. Rade Ryan Neelam, the director of
Public Opinion Form Policy Program at the Lowie Lowly Lowie Australia,
says funded found it to say succeeding generations from the

(44:30):
scourge of war, the United Nations now fined itself sidelined
as conflicts raised in Europe, the Middle East and Africa,
and tensions between major power powers escalate. Legal scholars warrant
of cast trophic collapse of norms against the use of force. Meanwhile,
US President Donald Trump's era taris policy has fractured decades

(44:54):
of broad consensus on rules based trade. For an a,
the budgets are shrinking, military spending is rising, and global
momentum to act on climate change and the Sustainable Development
Goals or SDGs has slowed. The forecast is not looking,

(45:15):
especially since the reduction of US funding to the UN
Neelam continued. Amid those geopolitical risks, the United Nations is
under severe financial strain. The United States its largest donor
because you're contributing some twenty two percent of the regular budget.

(45:35):
Is respected to announce for the funding cuts, find a
review of international organizations ordered by Trump. Hey like Donald
Trump or not? I support this? Okay, so that's good,
but I'll continue on. The UN Secretary General Neilam ads
will be reducing the UN budget and workforced by twenty percent.

(45:56):
Michelle Vilanie's, president of the Institute of the National Affairs
in Italy also know the effect of america indifference to
the UN. The United Nations needs to contend with fierce
competition and deep divisions between its members states at the
international level, along with a decreased interest in multi lateralism

(46:17):
even as the world becomes increasingly independent. Latter is due
in part to the detachment of the United States from
the activities and structures of the United Nations. Hector Cardanis,
president of the Mexican CFR, has a similar complaint. The
United Nations is stumbling into its eighth decade with mounting dysfunction.

(46:39):
The second Trump administration, renewed disdain from multilateralism, evident by
its withdrawal from the integral bodies such as the World
Health Organization and the UN Human Rights Council and by
its deep cuts to humanitarian aid, has deep in a
crisis that was already structural. US out it is if

(47:03):
this is what the UN looks like with the minimal
US support, imagining the Americans could accomplish with a full withdrawal.
The United States funnels a lot of money to the
subversive organization, but there was no reason for it to exist.
By his own admission, it hasn't maintained peace around the world,
and again, by his own admission, is a primary goal

(47:24):
to hijack power from nation states. If it believes its
humanitarian motivations are legitimate, then the catastrophic results should disqualify
these people. One need to look no further back than COVID.
At the center of the York's response was the UN.

(47:44):
Through the WHO the parent company of this magazine, John
Bird Society, has been fighting to get the US out
of the UN since nineteen sixty two. The JBS deserves
credit for the decades of work its members carried out
to expose the true nature of this organization can create
resistance to it. You can learn more about the UN

(48:07):
disaster's impact and what you can do to help. Click
there's a link for that, and I'll be very frank
their information is very good. Don Verse cited is the
new American regards what your belief system is. You should
always check these guys out, and they have a lot
of merit when it comes in fact, when it comes

(48:29):
to this tyrannical, tutalitarian institution playing simple. As far as
I'm concerned, we need to get out of it. I
agree with Patty Tannon and Ron Paul just the name too.
It's all wide because it's principled if you're not get

(48:51):
involved in foreign entanglements. And we need, I believe, we
need to cut foreign aid as a whole. If you
if you want to, don't mind doing it, much like
is it for example, you do on your own watch,
not mine, and nothing against the people who live there,
all right, but the foreign aid to me is nothing
more than a bribe. And furthermore, the United States needs

(49:16):
to cut tide on the powers of the powers of
foreign influences. I can go on with this and we
are no one thing for sure. They're worried, and that's
a good thing. So yes, I want to see the
United States leave the United Nations. That's my intake on this.

(49:41):
I have to hear from you and that will be it.
I thank you everyone for listening. What's feel free to
download and share. It's right. It's so should be a
networks and be questions, comments, recommendations, all that stuff. Wherever
do Please use the corn you hit me via email
to l three dot podcast that proton on me. I
will leave the footnotes on this episode on the page.
You can check it out for yourself. If you wanna donate,

(50:02):
Gonna PayPal, me or cash our app. Force that logan
up number three. If you wanna follow me on steam
it give me a little cryptal love. I'm at l
L number three dot podcast Dash podcast Wow, getting ready
to fall asleep here forgive me. Folks once again, think
a few times plus. Always remember that the moniacer resist
is healthy for the soul and can liberate human Until

(50:24):
next time, take care of yourselves, keep on spring to
love me or guardian spirits be with you.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know
Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

The Breakfast Club

The Breakfast Club

The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.