November 6, 2025 • 20 mins
Opening — The Real Bottleneck Isn’t Data, It’s LanguageEveryone swears their company is “data‑driven.” Then they open SQL Management Studio and freeze. The dashboard may as well start speaking Klingon. Every “business‑driven” initiative collapses the moment someone realizes the data is trapped behind the wall of semicolons and brackets.You’ve probably seen this: oceans of data — sales records, telemetry, transaction logs — but access fenced off by people who’ve memorized syntax. SQL, that proud old bureaucrat, presides over the archives. Precise, efficient, and utterly allergic to plain English. You must bow to its grammar, punctuate just so, and end every thought with a semicolon or face execution by syntax error.Meanwhile, the average sales director just wants an answer: “What was our revenue by quarter?” Instead, they’re told to file a “request,” wait three days, then receive a CSV they can’t open because it’s 400 MB. It’s absurd. You can order a car with your voice, but you can’t ask your own system how much money you made without an interpreter.So here’s the scandal: the bottleneck in business analytics isn’t the data. It’s the language. The translation cost of converting human curiosity into SQL statements is still chewing through budgets worldwide. Every extra analyst, every delayed report — linguistic friction, disguised as complexity.Enter Copilot Studio—the linguistic middleware you didn’t know you needed. It sits politely between you and Microsoft Fabric, listens to your badly phrased business question, and translates it into perfect data logic. It removes the noise, keeps the intent, and—most importantly—lets you speak like a human again.Soon you’ll query petabytes with grammar‑school English. No certifications, no SELECT * FROM Anything. You’ll ask, “Show me last quarter’s top five products by profit,” and Fabric will answer. Instantly. In sentences, not spreadsheets.Before you start celebrating the imminent unemployment of half the analytics department, let’s actually dissect how this contraption works. Because if you think Copilot Studio is just another chatbot stapled on top of a database, you are, tragically, mistaken.Section 1 — What Copilot Studio Actually DoesLet’s kill the laziest misconception first: Copilot Studio isn’t just “a chatbot.” That’s like calling the internet “a bunch of text boxes.” What it really is—a translation engine for intent. You speak in business logic; it speaks fluent Fabric.Here’s what happens under the hood, minus the unnecessary drama. Step one, natural‑language parsing: Copilot Studio takes your sentence and deconstructs it into meaning—verbs like “get,” nouns like “sales,” references like “last quarter.” Step two, semantic mapping: it figures out where those concepts live inside your Fabric data model. “Sales” maps to a fact table, “last quarter” resolves to a date filter. Step three, Fabric data call: it writes, executes, and retrieves the result, obedience assured, no SQL visible.If SQL is Morse code, Copilot Studio is voice over IP. Same signal, same fidelity, but you don’t have to memorize dot‑dash patterns to say “hello.” It humanizes the protocol. The machine still processes structured commands—just concealed behind your casual phrasing.And it doesn’t forget. Ask, “Show store performance in Q2,” then follow with, “Break that down by region,” it remembers what “that” refers to. Conversational context is its most under‑appreciated feature. You can have an actual back‑and‑forth with your data without restating the entire query history every time. The model builds a tiny semantic thread—what Microsoft engineers call a context tree—and passes it along for continuity.That thread then connects to a Fabric data agent. Think of the agent as a disciplined butler: it handles requests, enforces governance, and ensures you never wander into restricted rooms. Copilot Studio doesn’t store your data; it politely borrows access through authenticated channels. Every interaction respects Fabric security policies—same role‑based access, same data loss prevention. Even your nosy intern couldn’t coax it into revealing executive‑level sales numbers if their permissions don’t allow it.This obedience is baked in. The brilliance of the design is that Copilot Studio inherits Fabric’s governance instead of trying to reinvent it. You get convenience without chaos.So, simplified hierarchy: you → Copilot Studio → Fabric data agent → the warehouse → an answer, preferably formatted in something more readable than a thousand‑row table. And if you’re thinking, “Doesn’t that chain of command slow things down?”—no, because Fabric isn’t fetching the entire database; it’s executing a scoped query interpreted from your sentence. Precision remains intact.What Copilot Studio adds isn’t magic—it’s translation efficiency. It replaces syntax discipline with conversational freedom. You focus on meaning; it enforces structure. That’s the trade we should’ve made decades ago.And now that our translat
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Everyone swears their company is data driven, then they open
cecle management studio and freeze the dashboard. May as well
start speaking kling on. Every business driven initiative collapses the
moment someone realizes that data is trapped behind the wall
of semicolons and brackets. You've probably seen this oceans of data.
You know, sales records, telemetry, transaction logs, but access fenced
off by people who've memorized syntax as quirl. That proud
(00:22):
old bureaucrat presides over the archives, precise, efficient, and utterly
allergic to plain English. You must bow to its grammar,
punctuate just so, and end every thought with a semicolon,
or face execution by syntax error. Meanwhile, the average sales
director just wants an answer, what was our revenue by quarter? Instead,
they're told to file a request, wait three days, then
receive a CSV they can't open because it's four hundred milibi.
(00:45):
It's absurd. You can order a car with your voice,
but you can't ask your own system how much money
you made without an interpreter. So here's the scandal. The
bottleneck in business analytics isn't the data, it's the language.
The translation cost of converting human curiosity into sequl statements
is still chewing through budgets world wide. Every extra analyst,
every delayed report, linguistic friction disguised as complexity. Enter Copilot Studio,
(01:07):
the linguistic middlewhere you didn't know you needed it, sits
politely between you and Microsoft. Fabric listens to your badly
phrased business question and translates it into perfect data logic.
It removes the noise, keeps the intent, and most importantly,
lets you speak like a human again. Soon you'll query
petabites with grammar school English, no certifications, no select from anything.
You'll ask, show me last quarter's top five products by profit,
(01:28):
and Fabric will answer instantly, in sentences, not spreadsheets. Before
you start celebrating the imminent unemployment of half the analytics department,
let's actually dissect how this contraption works. Because if you
think Copilot Studio is just another chatbot stapled on top
of a database, you are tragically mistaken what Copilot Studio
actually does. Let's kill the laziest misconception. First, Copilot Studio
(01:49):
isn't just a chatbot. That's like calling the Internet a
bunch of textboxes. What it really is a translation engine
for intent you speak in business logic. It speaks fluent fabric.
Here's what happens under the hood, minus the unnecessary drama.
Step one natural language passing. Copilot Studio takes your sentence
and deconstructs it into meaning verbs like get, nouns like sales,
(02:11):
references like last quarter. Step two semantic mapping. It figures
out where those concepts live inside your fabric data model.
Sales maps to a factable, last quarter resolves to a
date filter. Step three fabric data call. It writes, executes,
and retrieves the result. Obedience assured, no sequel visible. If
escuol is morse code, Copilot Studio is voice over IP,
(02:33):
same signal, same fidelity, but you don't have to memorize
dot dash patterns to say hello. It humanizes the protocol.
The machine still processes structured commands, just concealed behind your
casual phrasing, and it doesn't forget ask show store performance
in Q two, then follow with break that down by region.
It remembers what that refers to. Conversational context is its
(02:53):
most underappreciated feature. You can have an actual back and
forth with your data without restating the entire query history.
Every time, the model builds a tiny semantic thread what
Microsoft engineers call a context tree, and passes it along
for continuity. That thread then connects to a Fabric data agent.
Think of the agent as a disciplined butler. It handles requests,
enforces governance, and insures you never wander into restricted rooms.
(03:17):
Copilot Studio doesn't store your data. It politely borrows access
through authenticated channels. Every interaction respects Fabric security policies, same
role based access, same data loss prevention. Even your nosey
intern couldn't coax it into revealing executive level sales numbers
if their permissions don't allow it. This obedience is baked in.
The brilliance of the design is that Copilot Studio inherits
Fabric's governance instead of trying to reinvent it. You get
(03:40):
convenience without chaos. So simplified hierarchy, you Copilot Studio, Fabric
Data Agent, the warehouse an answer, preferably formatted in something
more readable than a thousand row table. And if you're thinking,
doesn't that chain of command slow things down? Noe, Because
Fabric isn't fetching the entire database. It's executing a scoped
query interpreted from your sentence. Precision remains intact. What Copilot
(04:03):
Studio ads isn't magic, it's translation efficiency. It replaces syntax
discipline with conversational freedom. You focus on meaning. It enforces structure.
That's the trait we should have made decades ago. And
now that our translator is fluent, it's time to wire
it to something worth translating, an actual database that respects
regulations and occasionally tells you no. Wiring Copilot Studio to
(04:24):
Fabric now comes the part that usually separates enthusiasts from practitioners,
wiring Copilot Studio to Fabric without accidentally granting the intern
access to payroll. Conceptually, this connection is elegant. Practically it's
a bureaucratic handshake between two deeply cautious systems. Start with
a fabric data agent. That's your gateway. Publish it. Do not,
under any circumstances leave it languishing in Draft mode is
(04:47):
what you use to test if the thing can whisper
back answers. Published mode is what allows it to actually
speak to the outside world. Picture a librarian practicing their
pronunciation behind closed doors versus one standing at the counter
waiting for questions. You want the latter drafts whisper to themselves.
Published agents talk to everyone else, and then choose an environment.
Each co Pilot Studio environment DEV QA production is its
(05:08):
own little universe with separate permissions and credentials. Don't roll
your eyes. This is governance, not busy work. A DEV
environment is allowed to break things quietly. QA confirms nobody
set the curtains on fire, and production is what executives
will eventually panic. Click in teams. Wiring them all through
the same conduit would be the data equivalent of a
shared toothbrush. Maintain separation once the environment is ready. Link credentials.
(05:31):
Copilot Studio can authenticate in two major ways, through your
own account during testing, or by passing the end user's
credentials at runtime. Always prefer the latter when you let
authentication flow through the user's identity. Fabric enforces its role
level security automatically. It means that when Linda from Marketing
asks for quarterly revenue, she only sees her region's numbers,
not the global forecast that would make her question her bonus.
(05:53):
The Connection Wizard handles the grunt work. It spins up
a secure API handshake validates fabric access and binds the
agent to your copilot. Once complete, copilot studio becomes multilingual
in the only language that matters fabric meta data. From
this point, any natural language prompt you sent roots through
that agent converts into a legitimate fabric data call and
retrieves results framed by whatever governance your administrator painfully configured
(06:16):
last quarter. Now we discuss channels, because once your copilot
is breathing, you can publish it anywhere. Polite conversation happens
Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, or even embedded inside a web portal.
Each channel behaves like a different social circle, the same
person tone adjusted a team's deployment is great for quick
analytics banter show me today's sales. SharePoint offers formal boardroom queries,
(06:39):
and webchat is your customer facing FAQ that just happens
to have access to real data. The agent doesn't care
where it's summoned, as long as it's authenticated, it performs. Yes,
the user will still need to sign in every presentation
about AI consultation eventually hits this moment of human disappointment.
Microsoft is not performing witchcraft. It cannot answer questions for
people who refuse to authenticate. The restart of civilization after
(07:01):
every update is annoying but necessary. By the time you've
wired environment, credentials and channels, what you've built is essentially
plumbing for language questions, flow in structured queries, flow out
government responses, return its data conversation through certified pipelines. With
all that plumbing complete, we can stop admiring the pipes
and start admiring the water. Because the next leap isn't technical,
it's conversational. What does intelligent dialogue with a warehouse actually
(07:25):
feel like? Let's find out conversational intelligence in action. Finally,
the fun part, making fabric talk back. Most people expect
Copilot Studio to behave like a genie, one question, one answer,
then back into the lamp. Instead, it behaves more like
a patient analyst who remembers everything you said and quietly
connects the dots picture, asking what were our top five
trip days? The system calls into Fabric, sorts by total
(07:47):
journeys and presents the winners November first, twenty thirteen among them.
You follow up why those days? Now Copilot doesn't panic,
It carries forward. The original metric recognizes why as a
causal probe and hunts for correlated factors. When your next
message says show temperature to it already understands you mean
the same days, same data set. Expanded context, the conversation
(08:08):
becomes an iterative model of thought, not isolated searches, but
an evolving thread of reasoning. Under the hood, it builds
what Microsoft's engineers affectionately call context trees. Each branch represents
a question, a filter, or an attribute you've added. The
trunk is your main topic, trips by day, leaves are modifiers, weather, burrow,
fair type. It's not requeering from scratch each time, it's
(08:30):
refining an internal semantic model. Passing structure tokens back to
the fabric data agent for execution. The result feels less
like browsing a database and more like debating with one.
Here's the clever trick, Because fabric agents obey the same
security envelope, the conversation remains lawful. Copilot studio can reason
about data it's not allowed to show, ask for executive
bonuses by quarter, and it will reply with a perfectly
(08:51):
polite refusal wrapped in an explanation of governance policy. That's
the kind of manner sequel never had it used to
just throw an error in sulk. When it does answer,
what you receive isn't blind. It can present structured summaries, tables,
bullet comparisons, even heat map style outputs, depending on how
you instruct it. Say, list results as a table I
can copy into Excel, and the formatting adjusts instantly. Context
(09:12):
memory and response formatting together create what Microsoft calls conversational intelligence,
the ability to adapt not just what to say, but
how to say it now. Because this feature set is
still in preview, it occasionally forgets manners. You might get
the wrong data source or an over confident explanation sourced
from the web instead of fabric. Treat those moments like
Toddler phases, not fatal flaws. The accuracy improves as you
(09:32):
specify limits in your system prompt such as use fabric only.
In other words, conversational AI behaves well when you parent
it properly. For anyone who misses squls transparency, calm down.
You can still see the logic. Copilot Studios tracer view
displays the reasoning path, what it interpreted, which data agent
it called, and how the response was trimmed. Think of
it as query analyzer for humans you watch its chain
(09:54):
of thought, natural language, semantic map, fabric query governed output.
When a re is ult feels off, that tracer tells
you exactly which branch in the conversation tree caused confusion.
Debugging curiosity has never been easier. Another underrated design element
is feedback. Every time you rephrase or correct it, no
I meant twenty fourteen or twenty thirteen. That clarification feeds
(10:15):
the local model of your conversation style. It's not global learning,
its session bounded inside recycling. Within that chat, your linguistic
quirks become training data. The AI gets faster, narrower, and
disturbingly good at mirroring your wording. You become your own
tuning data set without writing a single token of code.
Want a concrete scenario, Two sales managers open teams during
a Monday huddle. One asks the fabric linked copilot show
(10:37):
top selling products for Q two by region. As the
chart appears, the second manager replies, which region grew fastest
quarter over quarter. When copilot remembers the first table, structure
calculates a delta and answers both with context continuity intact.
Within seconds, they're drilling into performance variants without once invoking
a stored procedure, and if someone fat fingers the timeframe
trips in twenty twenty seven, Copilot simply returns zero records found,
(11:01):
instead of the passive aggressive stack trace Sequel used to
throw courtesy as code. What a concept. This iterative memory
aware design turns analysis into conversation loops rather than one
of interrogations. Each question becomes both result and input, transforming
users from consumers of dashboards into participants in data reasoning.
The tool's real power isn't automation, it's engagement. By now,
(11:22):
the question stops being can I access the data? You
clearly can? The question becomes what can I make the
conversation do next? Because once your analytics system listens, remembers,
and clarifies, you're no longer querying. You're collaborating. Why this
changes the analyst's job. Let's address the panic quietly spreading
through analytics departments. If Copilot can talk to data, what
do we need analysts for? Relax? Analysts aren't becoming extinct,
(11:45):
They're being promoted out of the trenches. Historically, analysts have
functioned as translators, humans who know both English and sequel,
paid to convert why is revenue down? Into joint statements.
No one else understands that translation tax consumed half their calendar.
With conversational quaring, the machine handles grammar, the analyst is
free to handle, meaning this is the heart of data democratization.
(12:06):
AI removes gatekeeping but preserves governance. Copilot Studio doesn't hand
everyone backstage passes to production databases. It hands them filtered
microphones wired through. Fabric's security policy remains intact, but curiosity scales.
When everyone can ask informed questions safely, Analysts stop being
clerks and start being conductors. They orchestrate the logic, the semantics,
the quality control picture, and orchestra dozens of business users
(12:29):
playing their departments like instruments, sales, finance, ah R. The
analyst no longer slogs through tickets labeled please create accel report. Instead,
they set the tempo, They design how questions resolve, ensure
the definitions match corporate metrics, and fine tune prompts. So
Copilot interprets margin and profit correctly. Less typing brackets, more
shaping conversations. There's a scalability miracle here. One skilled analyst
(12:52):
refines a Copilot agent once defining entity relationships, synonyms and exclusions.
Hundreds of non technical staff then gain an instant autonomy
without breaking compliance. That's exponential leverage. The analyst becomes an
infrastructural multiplier rather than a bottleneck. The economics back this up.
Research into AI powered democratization estimates up to fifteen trillion
dollars in potential global productivity unlocks a number too large
(13:16):
to comprehend beyond a lot of GDP. That value doesn't
emerge from new data, it emerges from existing data, finally
being usable by normal humans. Every time a sales manager
self serves an insight instead of filing a ticket, a
spreadsheet somewhere size with relief. Compare that to legacy bistacks
tableaux AI, for instance, is a superb virtuoso, dense, predictive,
(13:37):
but expensive and insular. It's great at solo performances, but
bad at ensemble coordination coplate studios. Advantage is ecosystem integration
and affordability. It marries generative dialogue with Microsoft three sixty
five's collaborative DNA Team's share point outlook. The place's business
actually happens. Instead of exporting visuals, you're asking direct questions.
Inside the workflow itself, and yes, governance remains the civil force.
(14:01):
Copilot obeys Fabric's centralized security model to the latter. Every
query roots through authenticated channels, every result inherits lineage tracing.
Democratization without discipline is anarchy. Microsoft's architecture ensures democracy with
bureaucracy included. Analysts still define policies, classify data, and audit logs.
The AI can talk freely only within fences. Analysts built
(14:23):
so no. Copilot Studio doesn't replace analysts, It amplifies them.
It emancipates them from the drudgery of syntax and elevates
their focus to model design, semantic accuracy, and ethical stewardship.
They move from query slaves to language architects. The better
they train the agent, the smarter the organization sounds. The
future analyst is half linguist, half guardian. They'll curate vocabularies,
shape feedback loops, and debug logic in conversation rather than code.
(14:46):
Their deliverable stops being reports produced and starts being questions
answered safely. This fundamentally changes organizational velocity. Decisions stop waiting
for translation, discussions happen on demand. Analysts remain the custodians
of truth, but truth becomes conversational. In short, they don't
lose relevance, they gain omnipresence. Now, while the analysts evolve
(15:07):
into conductors, the rest of the company has homework too,
learning how to speak data without accidentally summoning nonsense. That
requires culture, not code, which leads us straight to the
next point, what a data literate organization actually looks like
Building a data literate organization. Technology is never the bottleneck
people are. You can deploy copilot studio across every workspace,
(15:29):
yet still watch employees type show me money, stuff, and
wonder why nothing useful returns data literacy. The ability to
ask precise questions is the final frontier of intelligence automation.
True data democracy depends not on everyone becoming sequel experts,
but on everyone becoming articulate questioners. Fabric plus copilot studio
only works if the humans know what to ask. So
(15:49):
the first cultural shift is curiosity with precision. Teach users
that sales by region for last quarter succeeds because every
noun and time frame anchor's meaning inane ambiguity still yields
inane answers. Start small, choose high impact domains sales finance
operations where metrics are clean and demand constant visibility. These
offer immediate ROI proof. A sales director getting answers in
(16:10):
seconds becomes a walking advertisement for adoption. Success stories spread
faster than training sessions. Meanwhile, governance remains tight at the core.
The administrators keep hold of the reins. Co Pilot may answer,
but Fabric dictates what it's allowed to say. That's its
genius integration. Privileged boundaries embedded in conversation. Admins can sleep
at night while employees play data karaoke during the day.
(16:32):
Fabric's automated lineage ensures every conversation leaves bread crumbs. Each
query becomes part of the audit trail who asked, what, when?
And why? In the past, verbal questions vanished in two
meeting minutes. Now their version controlled interactions. Compliance departments rejoice
there's accountability stitched into curiosity itself. However, with great generative
power comes spectacular nonsense potential hallucination. The AI's confident invention
(16:57):
of facts remains the corporate ghost story. Preventing it isn't mystical.
It's procedural, set clear system prompts instructing copilot to stay
within fabric data, disable external web sources for critical data sets,
create fallback topics that handle absurd questions gracefully with that
request is outside my datascope. A polite no preserves trust
better than a confident lie. Think of this environment as
(17:18):
a secure sandbox for curious humans inside. Experimentation is encouraged
because guardrails keep stupidity from breaching containment. Users can hypothesize freely.
Analysts can monitor how questions evolve, and leadership can observe
inquiry trends what the company actually wants to know but
never thought to measure. Curiosity becomes visible quantifiable currency. Building
(17:38):
that culture requires leadership endorsement. When executives use Copilot themselves,
asking on record what were last month's churn drivers, it
signals legitimacy. Nothing cultivates literacy faster than watching the boss
type full sentences. The goal isn't teaching everyone's statistics, it's
teaching them to converse intelligently with data. Over time patterns,
emerge departments develop dialects finance asks about variants, marketing about engagement,
(18:03):
hr about tenure. Analysts curate these dialects into glossaries, feeding
Copilot's understanding. The organization gradually acquires a collective language of
inquiry that's literacy, not numbers memorized, but meaning shared and
the irony. Once users can phrase clear questions, they start
caring about data quality. When someone asks average delivery time
in EMEA and the answer seems absurd, the instinct shifts
(18:26):
from blaming it to investigating the pipeline. Curiosity breeds accountability.
A literate culture polices its own data hygiene because poor
data embarrasses everyone equally. Eventually, conversations with Copilot become routine,
not remarkable. Reports push themselves, Insights arrive as replies, Hey,
Copilot summarized yesterday's exceptions, and by the next meeting, the
(18:47):
agenda rights itself. Automation becomes invisible. At that stage, the
only remaining skill gap is curiosity and perhaps the ability
to type complete sentences. Everyone else can speak data, only
the willingly ignorant will remain mute. In essence, Fabric plus
copalate Studio creates an organization that doesn't just store knowledge,
but dialogues with it. Analysts conduct, employees, inquire, the system answers,
(19:09):
and every exchange leaves the enterprise slightly smarter than before.
That's what literacy looks like when your database finally listens
the end of semicholons. We began with a language barrier
disguised as a technical skill, columns, joints, and filters rituals
that transform curiosity into syntax anxiety. But with copaliate studios
speaking fluent fabric on your behalf, the language wall finally crumbles.
(19:31):
You no longer translate thoughts into semicolons. You translate them
into sentences. This shift isn't cosmetic, it's cognitive humanity. Build
query languages to teach machines precision. Now machines have learned
enough English to meet us halfway, the axis flips. Instead
of you learning database grammar, the system learns your intent
querying by conversation, not by incantation, turns data work from
codecraft into dialogue, and this dialogue remains disciplined. Fabric governance
(19:54):
keeps every response chained to role based reality. You gain
freedom without forfeiting controlledatal language access doesn't dilute rigor. It
surfaces it elegantly behind polite phrasing and authenticated context. The
machine still checks your ID before serving the truth. The
irony is rich democratization by constraint the very fences that
one slowed. Analytics now protected from chaos, allowing curiosity to
(20:15):
scale safely. Analysts conduct, employees, converse, and inside circulates like
oxygen instead of paperwork. The organization stops requesting data and
starts speaking data. So here's the takeaway. Copilot studio doesn't
make cycle obsolete, it retires circle from everyday speech. The
future of business intelligence belongs to people who can ask
smart questions, not those who can punctuate precisely. Your experiment
(20:37):
is simple. Deploy a test agent, link it to fabric,
and type one forbidden question you'd never risk in a
board report. No scripts, no joints, just thought expressed clearly.
Watch it answer. If that doesn't feel like progress, you're
nostalgic for semicolons.
Everyone swears their company is data driven, then they open
cecle management studio and freeze the dashboard. May as well
start speaking kling on. Every business driven initiative collapses the
moment someone realizes that data is trapped behind the wall
of semicolons and brackets. You've probably seen this oceans of data.
You know, sales records, telemetry, transaction logs, but access fenced
off by people who've memorized syntax as quirl. That proud
(00:22):
old bureaucrat presides over the archives, precise, efficient, and utterly
allergic to plain English. You must bow to its grammar,
punctuate just so, and end every thought with a semicolon,
or face execution by syntax error. Meanwhile, the average sales
director just wants an answer, what was our revenue by quarter? Instead,
they're told to file a request, wait three days, then
receive a CSV they can't open because it's four hundred milibi.
(00:45):
It's absurd. You can order a car with your voice,
but you can't ask your own system how much money
you made without an interpreter. So here's the scandal. The
bottleneck in business analytics isn't the data, it's the language.
The translation cost of converting human curiosity into sequl statements
is still chewing through budgets world wide. Every extra analyst,
every delayed report, linguistic friction disguised as complexity. Enter Copilot Studio,
(01:07):
the linguistic middlewhere you didn't know you needed it, sits
politely between you and Microsoft. Fabric listens to your badly
phrased business question and translates it into perfect data logic.
It removes the noise, keeps the intent, and most importantly,
lets you speak like a human again. Soon you'll query
petabites with grammar school English, no certifications, no select from anything.
You'll ask, show me last quarter's top five products by profit,
(01:28):
and Fabric will answer instantly, in sentences, not spreadsheets. Before
you start celebrating the imminent unemployment of half the analytics department,
let's actually dissect how this contraption works. Because if you
think Copilot Studio is just another chatbot stapled on top
of a database, you are tragically mistaken what Copilot Studio
actually does. Let's kill the laziest misconception. First, Copilot Studio
(01:49):
isn't just a chatbot. That's like calling the Internet a
bunch of textboxes. What it really is a translation engine
for intent you speak in business logic. It speaks fluent fabric.
Here's what happens under the hood, minus the unnecessary drama.
Step one natural language passing. Copilot Studio takes your sentence
and deconstructs it into meaning verbs like get, nouns like sales,
(02:11):
references like last quarter. Step two semantic mapping. It figures
out where those concepts live inside your fabric data model.
Sales maps to a factable, last quarter resolves to a
date filter. Step three fabric data call. It writes, executes,
and retrieves the result. Obedience assured, no sequel visible. If
escuol is morse code, Copilot Studio is voice over IP,
(02:33):
same signal, same fidelity, but you don't have to memorize
dot dash patterns to say hello. It humanizes the protocol.
The machine still processes structured commands, just concealed behind your
casual phrasing, and it doesn't forget ask show store performance
in Q two, then follow with break that down by region.
It remembers what that refers to. Conversational context is its
(02:53):
most underappreciated feature. You can have an actual back and
forth with your data without restating the entire query history.
Every time, the model builds a tiny semantic thread what
Microsoft engineers call a context tree, and passes it along
for continuity. That thread then connects to a Fabric data agent.
Think of the agent as a disciplined butler. It handles requests,
enforces governance, and insures you never wander into restricted rooms.
(03:17):
Copilot Studio doesn't store your data. It politely borrows access
through authenticated channels. Every interaction respects Fabric security policies, same
role based access, same data loss prevention. Even your nosey
intern couldn't coax it into revealing executive level sales numbers
if their permissions don't allow it. This obedience is baked in.
The brilliance of the design is that Copilot Studio inherits
Fabric's governance instead of trying to reinvent it. You get
(03:40):
convenience without chaos. So simplified hierarchy, you Copilot Studio, Fabric
Data Agent, the warehouse an answer, preferably formatted in something
more readable than a thousand row table. And if you're thinking,
doesn't that chain of command slow things down? Noe, Because
Fabric isn't fetching the entire database. It's executing a scoped
query interpreted from your sentence. Precision remains intact. What Copilot
(04:03):
Studio ads isn't magic, it's translation efficiency. It replaces syntax
discipline with conversational freedom. You focus on meaning. It enforces structure.
That's the trait we should have made decades ago. And
now that our translator is fluent, it's time to wire
it to something worth translating, an actual database that respects
regulations and occasionally tells you no. Wiring Copilot Studio to
(04:24):
Fabric now comes the part that usually separates enthusiasts from practitioners,
wiring Copilot Studio to Fabric without accidentally granting the intern
access to payroll. Conceptually, this connection is elegant. Practically it's
a bureaucratic handshake between two deeply cautious systems. Start with
a fabric data agent. That's your gateway. Publish it. Do not,
under any circumstances leave it languishing in Draft mode is
(04:47):
what you use to test if the thing can whisper
back answers. Published mode is what allows it to actually
speak to the outside world. Picture a librarian practicing their
pronunciation behind closed doors versus one standing at the counter
waiting for questions. You want the latter drafts whisper to themselves.
Published agents talk to everyone else, and then choose an environment.
Each co Pilot Studio environment DEV QA production is its
(05:08):
own little universe with separate permissions and credentials. Don't roll
your eyes. This is governance, not busy work. A DEV
environment is allowed to break things quietly. QA confirms nobody
set the curtains on fire, and production is what executives
will eventually panic. Click in teams. Wiring them all through
the same conduit would be the data equivalent of a
shared toothbrush. Maintain separation once the environment is ready. Link credentials.
(05:31):
Copilot Studio can authenticate in two major ways, through your
own account during testing, or by passing the end user's
credentials at runtime. Always prefer the latter when you let
authentication flow through the user's identity. Fabric enforces its role
level security automatically. It means that when Linda from Marketing
asks for quarterly revenue, she only sees her region's numbers,
not the global forecast that would make her question her bonus.
(05:53):
The Connection Wizard handles the grunt work. It spins up
a secure API handshake validates fabric access and binds the
agent to your copilot. Once complete, copilot studio becomes multilingual
in the only language that matters fabric meta data. From
this point, any natural language prompt you sent roots through
that agent converts into a legitimate fabric data call and
retrieves results framed by whatever governance your administrator painfully configured
(06:16):
last quarter. Now we discuss channels, because once your copilot
is breathing, you can publish it anywhere. Polite conversation happens
Microsoft Teams, SharePoint, or even embedded inside a web portal.
Each channel behaves like a different social circle, the same
person tone adjusted a team's deployment is great for quick
analytics banter show me today's sales. SharePoint offers formal boardroom queries,
(06:39):
and webchat is your customer facing FAQ that just happens
to have access to real data. The agent doesn't care
where it's summoned, as long as it's authenticated, it performs. Yes,
the user will still need to sign in every presentation
about AI consultation eventually hits this moment of human disappointment.
Microsoft is not performing witchcraft. It cannot answer questions for
people who refuse to authenticate. The restart of civilization after
(07:01):
every update is annoying but necessary. By the time you've
wired environment, credentials and channels, what you've built is essentially
plumbing for language questions, flow in structured queries, flow out
government responses, return its data conversation through certified pipelines. With
all that plumbing complete, we can stop admiring the pipes
and start admiring the water. Because the next leap isn't technical,
it's conversational. What does intelligent dialogue with a warehouse actually
(07:25):
feel like? Let's find out conversational intelligence in action. Finally,
the fun part, making fabric talk back. Most people expect
Copilot Studio to behave like a genie, one question, one answer,
then back into the lamp. Instead, it behaves more like
a patient analyst who remembers everything you said and quietly
connects the dots picture, asking what were our top five
trip days? The system calls into Fabric, sorts by total
(07:47):
journeys and presents the winners November first, twenty thirteen among them.
You follow up why those days? Now Copilot doesn't panic,
It carries forward. The original metric recognizes why as a
causal probe and hunts for correlated factors. When your next
message says show temperature to it already understands you mean
the same days, same data set. Expanded context, the conversation
(08:08):
becomes an iterative model of thought, not isolated searches, but
an evolving thread of reasoning. Under the hood, it builds
what Microsoft's engineers affectionately call context trees. Each branch represents
a question, a filter, or an attribute you've added. The
trunk is your main topic, trips by day, leaves are modifiers, weather, burrow,
fair type. It's not requeering from scratch each time, it's
(08:30):
refining an internal semantic model. Passing structure tokens back to
the fabric data agent for execution. The result feels less
like browsing a database and more like debating with one.
Here's the clever trick, Because fabric agents obey the same
security envelope, the conversation remains lawful. Copilot studio can reason
about data it's not allowed to show, ask for executive
bonuses by quarter, and it will reply with a perfectly
(08:51):
polite refusal wrapped in an explanation of governance policy. That's
the kind of manner sequel never had it used to
just throw an error in sulk. When it does answer,
what you receive isn't blind. It can present structured summaries, tables,
bullet comparisons, even heat map style outputs, depending on how
you instruct it. Say, list results as a table I
can copy into Excel, and the formatting adjusts instantly. Context
(09:12):
memory and response formatting together create what Microsoft calls conversational intelligence,
the ability to adapt not just what to say, but
how to say it now. Because this feature set is
still in preview, it occasionally forgets manners. You might get
the wrong data source or an over confident explanation sourced
from the web instead of fabric. Treat those moments like
Toddler phases, not fatal flaws. The accuracy improves as you
(09:32):
specify limits in your system prompt such as use fabric only.
In other words, conversational AI behaves well when you parent
it properly. For anyone who misses squls transparency, calm down.
You can still see the logic. Copilot Studios tracer view
displays the reasoning path, what it interpreted, which data agent
it called, and how the response was trimmed. Think of
it as query analyzer for humans you watch its chain
(09:54):
of thought, natural language, semantic map, fabric query governed output.
When a re is ult feels off, that tracer tells
you exactly which branch in the conversation tree caused confusion.
Debugging curiosity has never been easier. Another underrated design element
is feedback. Every time you rephrase or correct it, no
I meant twenty fourteen or twenty thirteen. That clarification feeds
(10:15):
the local model of your conversation style. It's not global learning,
its session bounded inside recycling. Within that chat, your linguistic
quirks become training data. The AI gets faster, narrower, and
disturbingly good at mirroring your wording. You become your own
tuning data set without writing a single token of code.
Want a concrete scenario, Two sales managers open teams during
a Monday huddle. One asks the fabric linked copilot show
(10:37):
top selling products for Q two by region. As the
chart appears, the second manager replies, which region grew fastest
quarter over quarter. When copilot remembers the first table, structure
calculates a delta and answers both with context continuity intact.
Within seconds, they're drilling into performance variants without once invoking
a stored procedure, and if someone fat fingers the timeframe
trips in twenty twenty seven, Copilot simply returns zero records found,
(11:01):
instead of the passive aggressive stack trace Sequel used to
throw courtesy as code. What a concept. This iterative memory
aware design turns analysis into conversation loops rather than one
of interrogations. Each question becomes both result and input, transforming
users from consumers of dashboards into participants in data reasoning.
The tool's real power isn't automation, it's engagement. By now,
(11:22):
the question stops being can I access the data? You
clearly can? The question becomes what can I make the
conversation do next? Because once your analytics system listens, remembers,
and clarifies, you're no longer querying. You're collaborating. Why this
changes the analyst's job. Let's address the panic quietly spreading
through analytics departments. If Copilot can talk to data, what
do we need analysts for? Relax? Analysts aren't becoming extinct,
(11:45):
They're being promoted out of the trenches. Historically, analysts have
functioned as translators, humans who know both English and sequel,
paid to convert why is revenue down? Into joint statements.
No one else understands that translation tax consumed half their calendar.
With conversational quaring, the machine handles grammar, the analyst is
free to handle, meaning this is the heart of data democratization.
(12:06):
AI removes gatekeeping but preserves governance. Copilot Studio doesn't hand
everyone backstage passes to production databases. It hands them filtered
microphones wired through. Fabric's security policy remains intact, but curiosity scales.
When everyone can ask informed questions safely, Analysts stop being
clerks and start being conductors. They orchestrate the logic, the semantics,
the quality control picture, and orchestra dozens of business users
(12:29):
playing their departments like instruments, sales, finance, ah R. The
analyst no longer slogs through tickets labeled please create accel report. Instead,
they set the tempo, They design how questions resolve, ensure
the definitions match corporate metrics, and fine tune prompts. So
Copilot interprets margin and profit correctly. Less typing brackets, more
shaping conversations. There's a scalability miracle here. One skilled analyst
(12:52):
refines a Copilot agent once defining entity relationships, synonyms and exclusions.
Hundreds of non technical staff then gain an instant autonomy
without breaking compliance. That's exponential leverage. The analyst becomes an
infrastructural multiplier rather than a bottleneck. The economics back this up.
Research into AI powered democratization estimates up to fifteen trillion
dollars in potential global productivity unlocks a number too large
(13:16):
to comprehend beyond a lot of GDP. That value doesn't
emerge from new data, it emerges from existing data, finally
being usable by normal humans. Every time a sales manager
self serves an insight instead of filing a ticket, a
spreadsheet somewhere size with relief. Compare that to legacy bistacks
tableaux AI, for instance, is a superb virtuoso, dense, predictive,
(13:37):
but expensive and insular. It's great at solo performances, but
bad at ensemble coordination coplate studios. Advantage is ecosystem integration
and affordability. It marries generative dialogue with Microsoft three sixty
five's collaborative DNA Team's share point outlook. The place's business
actually happens. Instead of exporting visuals, you're asking direct questions.
Inside the workflow itself, and yes, governance remains the civil force.
(14:01):
Copilot obeys Fabric's centralized security model to the latter. Every
query roots through authenticated channels, every result inherits lineage tracing.
Democratization without discipline is anarchy. Microsoft's architecture ensures democracy with
bureaucracy included. Analysts still define policies, classify data, and audit logs.
The AI can talk freely only within fences. Analysts built
(14:23):
so no. Copilot Studio doesn't replace analysts, It amplifies them.
It emancipates them from the drudgery of syntax and elevates
their focus to model design, semantic accuracy, and ethical stewardship.
They move from query slaves to language architects. The better
they train the agent, the smarter the organization sounds. The
future analyst is half linguist, half guardian. They'll curate vocabularies,
shape feedback loops, and debug logic in conversation rather than code.
(14:46):
Their deliverable stops being reports produced and starts being questions
answered safely. This fundamentally changes organizational velocity. Decisions stop waiting
for translation, discussions happen on demand. Analysts remain the custodians
of truth, but truth becomes conversational. In short, they don't
lose relevance, they gain omnipresence. Now, while the analysts evolve
(15:07):
into conductors, the rest of the company has homework too,
learning how to speak data without accidentally summoning nonsense. That
requires culture, not code, which leads us straight to the
next point, what a data literate organization actually looks like
Building a data literate organization. Technology is never the bottleneck
people are. You can deploy copilot studio across every workspace,
(15:29):
yet still watch employees type show me money, stuff, and
wonder why nothing useful returns data literacy. The ability to
ask precise questions is the final frontier of intelligence automation.
True data democracy depends not on everyone becoming sequel experts,
but on everyone becoming articulate questioners. Fabric plus copilot studio
only works if the humans know what to ask. So
(15:49):
the first cultural shift is curiosity with precision. Teach users
that sales by region for last quarter succeeds because every
noun and time frame anchor's meaning inane ambiguity still yields
inane answers. Start small, choose high impact domains sales finance
operations where metrics are clean and demand constant visibility. These
offer immediate ROI proof. A sales director getting answers in
(16:10):
seconds becomes a walking advertisement for adoption. Success stories spread
faster than training sessions. Meanwhile, governance remains tight at the core.
The administrators keep hold of the reins. Co Pilot may answer,
but Fabric dictates what it's allowed to say. That's its
genius integration. Privileged boundaries embedded in conversation. Admins can sleep
at night while employees play data karaoke during the day.
(16:32):
Fabric's automated lineage ensures every conversation leaves bread crumbs. Each
query becomes part of the audit trail who asked, what, when?
And why? In the past, verbal questions vanished in two
meeting minutes. Now their version controlled interactions. Compliance departments rejoice
there's accountability stitched into curiosity itself. However, with great generative
power comes spectacular nonsense potential hallucination. The AI's confident invention
(16:57):
of facts remains the corporate ghost story. Preventing it isn't mystical.
It's procedural, set clear system prompts instructing copilot to stay
within fabric data, disable external web sources for critical data sets,
create fallback topics that handle absurd questions gracefully with that
request is outside my datascope. A polite no preserves trust
better than a confident lie. Think of this environment as
(17:18):
a secure sandbox for curious humans inside. Experimentation is encouraged
because guardrails keep stupidity from breaching containment. Users can hypothesize freely.
Analysts can monitor how questions evolve, and leadership can observe
inquiry trends what the company actually wants to know but
never thought to measure. Curiosity becomes visible quantifiable currency. Building
(17:38):
that culture requires leadership endorsement. When executives use Copilot themselves,
asking on record what were last month's churn drivers, it
signals legitimacy. Nothing cultivates literacy faster than watching the boss
type full sentences. The goal isn't teaching everyone's statistics, it's
teaching them to converse intelligently with data. Over time patterns,
emerge departments develop dialects finance asks about variants, marketing about engagement,
(18:03):
hr about tenure. Analysts curate these dialects into glossaries, feeding
Copilot's understanding. The organization gradually acquires a collective language of
inquiry that's literacy, not numbers memorized, but meaning shared and
the irony. Once users can phrase clear questions, they start
caring about data quality. When someone asks average delivery time
in EMEA and the answer seems absurd, the instinct shifts
(18:26):
from blaming it to investigating the pipeline. Curiosity breeds accountability.
A literate culture polices its own data hygiene because poor
data embarrasses everyone equally. Eventually, conversations with Copilot become routine,
not remarkable. Reports push themselves, Insights arrive as replies, Hey,
Copilot summarized yesterday's exceptions, and by the next meeting, the
(18:47):
agenda rights itself. Automation becomes invisible. At that stage, the
only remaining skill gap is curiosity and perhaps the ability
to type complete sentences. Everyone else can speak data, only
the willingly ignorant will remain mute. In essence, Fabric plus
copalate Studio creates an organization that doesn't just store knowledge,
but dialogues with it. Analysts conduct, employees, inquire, the system answers,
(19:09):
and every exchange leaves the enterprise slightly smarter than before.
That's what literacy looks like when your database finally listens
the end of semicholons. We began with a language barrier
disguised as a technical skill, columns, joints, and filters rituals
that transform curiosity into syntax anxiety. But with copaliate studios
speaking fluent fabric on your behalf, the language wall finally crumbles.
(19:31):
You no longer translate thoughts into semicolons. You translate them
into sentences. This shift isn't cosmetic, it's cognitive humanity. Build
query languages to teach machines precision. Now machines have learned
enough English to meet us halfway, the axis flips. Instead
of you learning database grammar, the system learns your intent
querying by conversation, not by incantation, turns data work from
codecraft into dialogue, and this dialogue remains disciplined. Fabric governance
(19:54):
keeps every response chained to role based reality. You gain
freedom without forfeiting controlledatal language access doesn't dilute rigor. It
surfaces it elegantly behind polite phrasing and authenticated context. The
machine still checks your ID before serving the truth. The
irony is rich democratization by constraint the very fences that
one slowed. Analytics now protected from chaos, allowing curiosity to
(20:15):
scale safely. Analysts conduct, employees, converse, and inside circulates like
oxygen instead of paperwork. The organization stops requesting data and
starts speaking data. So here's the takeaway. Copilot studio doesn't
make cycle obsolete, it retires circle from everyday speech. The
future of business intelligence belongs to people who can ask
smart questions, not those who can punctuate precisely. Your experiment
(20:37):
is simple. Deploy a test agent, link it to fabric,
and type one forbidden question you'd never risk in a
board report. No scripts, no joints, just thought expressed clearly.
Watch it answer. If that doesn't feel like progress, you're
nostalgic for semicolons.
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.