November 6, 2025 • 22 mins
Opening: The AccusationYour Fabric Data Warehouse is just a CSV graveyard. I know that stings, but look at how you’re using it—endless CSV dumps, cold tables, scheduled ETL jobs lumbering along like it’s 2015. You bought Fabric to launch your data into the age of AI, and then you turned it into an archive. The irony is exquisite. Fabric was built for intelligence—real‑time insight, contextual reasoning, self‑adjusting analytics. Yet here you are, treating it like digital Tupperware.Meanwhile, the AI layer you paid for—the Data Agents, the contextual governance, the semantic reasoning—sits dormant, waiting for instructions that never come. So the problem isn’t capacity, and it’s not data quality. It’s thinking. You don’t have a data problem; you have a conceptual one: mistaking intelligence infrastructure for storage. Let’s fix that mental model before your CFO realizes you’ve reinvented a network drive with better branding.Section 1: The Dead Data ProblemLegacy behavior dies hard. Most organizations still run nightly ETL jobs that sweep operational systems, flatten tables into comma‑separated relics, and upload the corpses into OneLake. It’s comforting—predictable, measurable, seductively simple. But what you end up with is a static museum of snapshots. Each file represents how things looked at one moment and immediately begins to decay. There’s no motion, no relationships, no evolving context. Just files—lots of them.The truth? That approach made sense when data lived on‑prem in constrained systems. Fabric was designed for something else entirely: living data, streaming data, context‑aware intelligence. OneLake isn’t a filing cabinet; it’s supposed to be the circulatory system of your organization’s information flow. Treating it like cold storage is the digital equivalent of embalming your business metrics.Without semantic models, your data has no language. Without relationships, it has no memory. A CSV from Sales, a CSV from Marketing, a CSV from Finance—they can coexist peacefully in the same lake and still never talk to each other. Governance structures? Missing. Metadata? Optional, apparently. The result is isolation so pure that even Copilot, Microsoft’s conversational AI, can’t interpret it. If you ask Copilot, “What were last quarter’s revenue drivers?” it doesn’t know where to look because you never told it what “revenue” means in your schema.Let’s take a micro‑example. Suppose your Sales dataset contains transaction records: dates, amounts, product SKUs, and region codes. You happily dump it into OneLake. No semantic model, no named relationships, just raw table columns. Now ask Fabric’s AI to identify top‑performing regions. It shrugs—it cannot contextualize “region_code” without metadata linking it to geography or organizational units. To the machine, “US‑N” could mean North America or “User Segment North.” Humans rely on inference; AI requires explicit structure. That’s the gap turning your warehouse into a morgue.Here’s what most people miss: Fabric doesn’t treat data at rest and data in motion as separate species. It assumes every dataset could one day become an intelligent participant—queried in real time, enriched by context, reshaped by governance rules, and even reasoned over by agents. When you persist CSVs without activating those connections, you’re ignoring Fabric’s metabolic design. You chop off its nervous system.Compare that to “data in motion.” In Fabric, Real‑Time Intelligence modules ingest streaming signals—IoT events, transaction logs, sensor pings—and feed them into live datasets that can trigger responses instantly. Anomaly detection isn’t run weekly; it happens continuously. Trend analysis doesn’t wait for the quarter’s end; it updates on every new record. This is what alive data looks like: constantly evaluated, contextualized by AI agents, and subject to governance rules in milliseconds.The difference between data at rest and data in motion is fundamental. Resting data answers, “What happened?” Moving data answers, “What’s happening—and what should we do next?” If your warehouse only does the former, you are running a historical archive, not a decision engine. Fabric’s purpose is to compress that timeline until observation and action are indistinguishable.Without AI activation, you’re storing fossils. With it, you’re managing living organisms that adapt to context. Think of your warehouse like a body: OneLake is the bloodstream, semantic models are the DNA, and Data Agents are the brain cells firing signals across systems. Right now, most of you have the bloodstream but no brain function. The organs exist, but nothing coordinates.And yes, it’s comfortable that way—no surprises, no sudden automation, no “rogue” recommendations. Static systems don’t disobey. But they also don’t compete. In an environment where ninety percent of large enterprises are feeding their warehouses to AI agents, leaving your data inert is like stocking a luxury aquarium with plastic fish because yo
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Your fabric data warehouse is just a CSV graveyard. I
know that stings, but look at how you're using it.
Endless CSV dumps, cold tables, scheduled ETL jobs lumbering along
like it's twenty fifteen. You bought Fabric to launch your
data into the age of AI, and then you turned
it into an archive. The irony is exquisite. Fabric was
built for intelligence, real time insight, contextual reasoning, self adjusting analytics,
(00:20):
yet here you are treating it like digital tupperware. Meanwhile,
the AI layer you paid for, the data agents, the
contextual governance, the semantic reasoning sits dormant, waiting for instructions
that never come. So the problem isn't capacity and it's
not data quality. It's thinking. You don't have a data problem.
You have a conceptual one, mistaking intelligence infrastructure for storage.
Let's fix that mental model before your CFO realizers. You've
(00:43):
reinvented a network drive with better branding. The dead data problem.
Legacy behavior dies hard. Most organizations still run nightly ETL
jobs that sweep operational systems, flattened tables into commer separated relics,
and upload the corpses into one lake It's comforting, predictable, measurable,
seductively simple. But what you end up with is a
static museum of snapshots. Each file represents how things looked
(01:04):
at one moment and immediately begins to decay. There's no motion,
no relationships, no evolving context, just files, lots of them.
The truth that approach made sense when data lived on
prem in constrained systems. Fabric was designed for something else,
entirely living data, streaming data, context, away intelligence. One lake
isn't a filing cabinet. It's supposed to be the circulatory
system of your organization's information flow. Treating it like cold
(01:25):
storage is the digital equivalent of embalming your business metrics.
Without semantic models, your data has no language. Without relationships,
it has no memory. A CSV from sales, a CSV
from marketing, a CSV from finance. They can coexist peacefully
in the same lake and still never talk to each other.
Governance structures, missing metadata optional. Apparently, the result is isolation
so pure that even Copilot, Microsoft's conversational AI can't interpret it.
(01:49):
If you ask Copilot what were last quarters revenue drivers,
it doesn't know where to look because you never told
it what revenue means in your schema. Let's take a
micro example. Suppose your sales data set contains transaction records, dates, amounts,
product skews, and regent codes. You happily dump it into
one lake, no semantic model, no named relationships, just raw
table columns. Now ask Fabric's AI to identify top performing regions.
(02:12):
It shrugs. It cannot contextualize region code without metadata linking
it to geography or organizational units. To the machine, USN
could mean North America or user segment North. Humans rely
on inference. AI requires explicit structure. That's the gap, turning
your warehouse into a morgue. Here's what most people miss.
Fabric doesn't treat data at rest and data in motion
as separate species. It assumes every data set could one
(02:35):
day become an intelligent participant, queried in real time, enriched
by context, reshaped by governance rules, and even reasoned over
by agents. When you persist CSVS without activating those connections,
you're ignoring Fabric's metabolic design. You chop off its nervous system.
Compare that to data in motion in Fabric real time
intelligence modules ingest streaming signals, IoT events, transaction logs, sensor
(02:56):
pinks and feed them into live data sets that can
trigger responses in instantly. Anomaly detection isn't run weekly, it
happens continuously. Trend analysis doesn't wait for the quarter's end,
It updates on every new record. This is what a
live data looks like, constantly evaluated, contextualized by AI agents,
and subject to governance rules in milliseconds. The difference between
(03:17):
data address and data in motion is fundamental. Resting data
answers what happened with moving data answers what's happening and
what should we do next. If your warehouse only does
the former, you are running a historical archive, not a
decision engine. Fabric's purpose is to compress that timeline until
observation and action are indistinguishable. Without AI activation, your storing fossils.
(03:37):
With it, you're managing living organisms that adapt to context.
Think of your warehouse like a body. One lake is
the blood stream, Semantic models are the DNA, and data
agents are the brain cells firing signals across systems. Right now,
most of you have the bloodstream but no brain function.
The organs exist, but nothing coordinates. And yes, it's comfortable
that way. No surprises, no sudden automation, no rogue recommendations.
(03:59):
STAT systems don't disobey, but they also don't compete in
an environment where ninety percent of large enterprises are feeding
their warehouses to AI agents. Leaving your data inert is
like stocking a luxury aquarium with plastic fish because you
prefer predictability over life. So what should be alive in
your one leg The relationships, the context, and the intelligence
that link your data sets into a cohesive worldview. Once
(04:20):
you stop dumping raw csvs and start modeling information for
AI consumption, Fabric starts behaving as intended, an ecosystem of living,
thinking data instead of an ice box of obsolete numbers.
If your ETL pipeline still ends with store CSV, congratulations,
you've automated the world's most expensive burial process. In the
next section will exhume those files, give them a brain,
(04:41):
and show you what actually makes Fabric intelligent. The data agents,
the missing intelligence layer, enter the part everyone skips, the
actual intelligence layer, the thing that separates a warehouse from
a brain. Microsoft calls them data agents, but think of
them as neurons that finally start firing once you stop
treating one lake like a storage locker. These agents are
not decorative features. They are the operational cortex that Fabric
(05:03):
quietly installs for you, and that most of you heroically ignore.
Let's begin with the mistake. People obsess over dashboards. They
think if powerbi shows a colorful line trending upward, they've
achieved enlightenment. Meanwhile, they've left the reasoning layer, the dynamic
element that interprets patterns and acts on them, unplugged. That's
like buying a Tesla admiring the screen graphics and never
(05:23):
pressing the accelerator. The average user believes Fabric's beauty lies
in uniform metrics. In reality, it lies in synaptic activity
agents that think. So what exactly are these data agents?
They are AI powered interfaces between your warehouse and Azure's
cognitive services, build to reason across data, not just query it.
They live over one lake, but integrate through as your
AI foundry, where they inherit the ability to retrieve, infer,
(05:46):
and apply logic based on your organization's context. And here's
the crucial twist. They participate in a framework called Model
Context Protocols that allows multiple agents to share memory and
goals so they can collaborate handoff tasks and negotiate outcomes
like colleagues who actually read the company manual. Each agent
can be configured to respect governance and security boundaries. They
(06:07):
don't wander blindly into sensitive data because Fabric enforces policies
through purview and role based access. This governance link gives
them something legacy analytics never had moral restraint. Your cfo's
financial agent cannot accidentally read HR's salary data unless expressly allowed.
It's the difference between reasoning and rummaging. Now contrast these
data agents with Copilot, the celebrity assistant. Everyone loves to
(06:30):
talk to. Copilot sits inside teams or powerbi. It's charming, reactive,
and somewhat shallow. It answers what you ask. Data agents,
by comparison, are the ones who already read the quarterly forecast,
spotted inconsistencies, and drafted recommendations before you even open the dashboard.
Copilot is a student. Agents are auditors. One obeys, the
other anticipates. Let's ground this in an example. Your retail
(06:52):
business process is daily transactions through Fabric. Without agents, you'd
spend fridays exporting summaries, top selling products, regents trending up anomalies.
Over threshold with agents, the warehouse becomes sentient enough to
notice that sales in Regent East are spiking twenty percent
above forecast, while supply chain logs show delayed deliveries. An
agent detects the mismatch, tags it as a fulfillment risk,
(07:14):
alerts operations, and proposes redistributing inventory preemptively. Nobody asked it inferred.
This is in science fiction. It's Fabric's real time intelligence
merged with agentic reasoning. Pause on what that means. Your
warehouse just performed judgment, not a query, not an alert,
but analysis that required understanding business intent. It identified an anomaly,
cross referenced context, and acted responsibly. That's the threshold where
(07:36):
data warehouse becomes decision system. Without agents, you'd still be
exporting powerbi visuals into slide decks, pretending you discovered the
issue manually. Here's the weird part. Most companies have this
capability already activated within their Fabric capacities. They just haven't
configured it. They spent the money, got the software, and
forgot to initialize cognition because that requires thinking architecturally, defining
semantic relationships, establishing AI instructions, and connecting one leg endpoints
(08:00):
to the reasoning infrastructure. But once you do, everything changes.
Dashboards become side effects of intelligence rather than destinations for analysis.
Think back to the CSV graveyard metaphor those csvs were tombstones,
marking where all data sets went to die. Turn on
agents and its resurrection day. The warehouse begins to breathe
tables align themselves, attributes acquire meaning, and metrics synchronize autonomously.
(08:21):
The system doesn't merely report reality, it interprets it while
you're still drafting an email about last quarter's KPIs. Of course,
this shift requires a mental upgrade from storage management to
cognitive orchestration. Data agents don't wait for instructions. They follow goals.
They use model context protocols to communicate with other Microsoft agents,
the ones in power, Automate three sixty five, and Azure
(08:42):
AI services sharing reasoning context across platforms. That's how data
fluctuation can trigger an adaptive workflow or generate new insights
inside Excel without human mediation, and yes, when configured poorly,
this autonomy can look unnerving, like having interns who act
decisively after misreading a spreadsheet. That's why governance which will
reach soon exists, but first accept this truth. Intelligence delayed
(09:03):
is advantage lost. The longer you treat fabric as cold storage,
the more you pay for an AI platform functioning as
a glorified backup. So stop mourning your data's potential. Wake
the agents. Let your warehouse graduate from archive to organism.
Because the next era of analytics isn't about asking better questions,
It's about owning systems that answer before you can type them.
(09:23):
How to resurrect your warehouse with AI. Time to bring
the corps back to life. Resurrection starts not with code,
but with context, because context is oxygen for data. Step
one is infusing your warehouse with meaning. That means creating
semantic models. These models define how your data thinks about itself.
Sales are tied to customers, customers to regions, regions to
revenue structures. Without them, even the most powerful AI agent
(09:45):
is like a linguist handed a dictionary without syntax. In Fabric,
you use the data modeling layer to declare these relationships explicitly,
so your agents can reason instead of guests. Now for
step two, actually deploying a Fabric data agent. This is
where you give your warehouse not just a brain, but
a personality, an operational mind that knows what to look for,
when to alert you, and how to connect dots across
(10:06):
one lake. In practice, you open Azure AI foundry, define
a data agent and pointed at your fabric data sets. Instantly,
it inherits access to the entire semantic layer. It's not
a chatboard. It's a sentient indexer trained on your actual
business structure. From now on, every table has a guardian
angel capable of pattern recognition and inference. Step three is instruction,
(10:27):
and agent without parameters is a toddler with access to
the corporate VPN. You must provide organizations specific directives. What risk,
revenue or priority mean, Which data sources are authoritative, Which
systems must not be touched without human approval. Governance policies
from purview sink here automatically, but you must define the
logical intent, tell your agent how to behave. The clearer
(10:48):
your definitions, the more coherent its reasoning. Think of it
as drafting the company handbook for an employee who never sleeps.
The fourth step is integration, the part that transforms clever
prototypes into daily companions. Connect your data agent to copilot studio.
Why because Copilot provides the natural language interface your employees
already understand. When someone in sales types show me emerging
(11:09):
churn patterns. Copilot politely forwards the request to your agent,
which performs genuine reasoning across data sets and sends a
human readable summary back, complete with citations and traceable lineage.
This is intelligence served conversationally. Once this foundation is active,
the system begins performing quiet miracles. Consider trend detection. Your
agent continually examines transactional data, inventory levels, and forecast metrics.
(11:32):
When behavior deviates from expectation, say a holiday surge developing
earlier than predicted, it notifies marketing two weeks before the
anomaly would have appeared in a dashboard or picture. KPI
alerts instead of manual threshold rules. The agent recognizes trajectories
that historically precede misses and flags them preemptively. Churn prediction,
(11:53):
supply chain optimization, compliance verification. Every one of these becomes
a living process, not a quarterly report. And here's where
Fabrics is Dezi shines. These agents don't live in isolation.
They communicate through model context protocols with other Microsoft services,
creating multi agent orchestration. A Fabric data agent can identify
a slow moving squ notify a power automate agent to
trigger a discount workflow, sync results into dynamics through another
(12:15):
as your AI agent, and finally present the outcome insight
teams as a business alert. That sequence requires no custom scripts,
only properly defined intentions and connections. You've just witnessed distributed
intelligence performing genuine work. This is the real point so
many miss. Fabric isn't a place for storing results. It's
an operating environment for continuous reasoning. Treating it like a
(12:35):
static data vault wastes the one architectural innovation that sets
it apart. You are supposed to think in agents. Every
data set becomes an actor, Every insight becomes an event,
Every business process becomes an orchestrated adaptive conversation between them.
Your job shifts from building pipelines to defining intentions. Some
recoil at that they want comforting determinism, the assurance that
(12:57):
nothing changes unless a human press is run. But inteen
diligent systems thrive on feedback loops. When an agent refines
a metric or automates an alert, it's not taking control,
it's taking responsibility. This is how data finally earns its
keep by detecting issues, making recommendations, and learning from corrections.
If you've ever wondered why competitors move faster with the
same data sets, it's because their warehouses aren't waiting for instructions.
(13:19):
They're conversing internally, resolving micro problems before executives even hear
about them. That's what a resurrected fabric environment looks like.
A live, self aware and relentlessly analytical. And yes, giving
your data life requires giving it boundaries, because unchecked autonomy
quickly mutates into chaos. So before we let these agents
roam freely, let's install the guardrails that keep intelligence from
(13:40):
becoming insubordination. Governance as the guardrail, let's talk restraint, the
part everyone waves off until something catches fire. Giving your
warehouse intelligence without governance is like handing the office in
turn route access and saying be creative. AI readiness isn't
blind faith, its engineered trust. And in the fabric universe,
that trust wears three uniforms, purview, data loss prevention and
(14:00):
fabrics built in governance layer. Together they draw the perimeter
lines that keep your data agents brilliant but obedient. In
human terms, governance keeps curiosity from trespassing. Perview defines who
can see what, dlp ensures nothing confidential wanders off in
a careless query, and Fabric governance enforces policy right inside
the platform's veins. When configured correctly, these systems form a
(14:22):
nervous system that detects overreach and enforces discipline at machine speed.
Your agents might reason, but they reason inside a sandbox
lined with compliance class The crucial nuance is that Fabric
doesn't treat governance as an external chore. It's native to
every transaction. Each data set carries its own metadata, passport, lineage, classification,
and access rolls. So whenever an agent pulls data, it
(14:44):
drags that metadata context with it. That's how Fabric ensures
context aware AI. The information isn't just retrieved, it's traced.
You can see who touched it when, and how it
branched through workflows. It's forensic accounting for cognition. Now let's
address the fantasy of ungoverned intelligence. Many teams enable agents,
celebrate autonomy, and three weeks later wonder why a helpful
(15:04):
body emailed confidential numbers to a shared channel, Because in
the absence of explicit authority structures. Every agent becomes an
improvisational intern convinced its performing heroically. Governance turns those improvisations
into rehearsals with the script. Roles and permissions dictate which
data sets an agent can query and what actions require confirmation.
The AI still thinks creatively, but it does so while
(15:25):
reciting the corporate Ethics Manual. In real time, metadata enrichment
plays a quiet but decisive role. Here, every record gains
descriptive layers, ownership, sensitivity, lineage, so when an agent composes
a summary, it already knows whether the content is public
or restricted. Combine that with Fabric's lineage graph, and you
can trace any AI generated conclusion straight back to the
raw data source. That closes the interpretability loop, making audits
(15:49):
possible even in autonomous operations. It's the difference between explainable
automation and plausible deniability. The psychological benefit is immense. Executives
stop fearing rogue AI because they can inspect its reasoning
trail data Officers stop writing governance memos because policies travel
with the data itself. Fabric achieves what older BI systems
never could, self enforcing compliance. Every insight has provenance baked in.
(16:12):
Every action is recorded with the precision of a flight
data recorder. Of course, rules alone don't guarantee wisdom. You
can over govern and strangle creativity just as easily. Governance
is meant to channel intelligence, not muzzle it. The brilliance
of Fabric's model is in its proportionality, the balance between
automation and accountability. Agents act quickly, but within definable thresholds.
Decisions requiring empathy, judgment, or liability escalate to humans automatically.
(16:36):
You keep the machine fast and the humans responsible elegant.
So here's the litmus test. If your Fabric environment feels wild,
you've undergoverned. If it feels paralyzed, you've overgoverned. The sweet
spot is orchestration, a symphony where agents play confidently within
the score and compliance hums in rhythm rather than drumming interruptions.
Once trust is dialed in, that's when Fabric shows its
(16:57):
real nature, a disciplined sense collaboration between logic and law.
The chare subsides, insight flows, and for the first time,
your data behaves not like an unruly teenager, but like
a well trained professional who knows exactly how far brilliance
can go before it breaks policy. The intelligent ecosystem what
you've built so far, semantic models, agents, and governance isn't
(17:20):
merely a data warehouse. It's a colony. Every element in
Microsoft Fabric is engineered to coexist and cooperate. The beauty
lies in unification, data engineering, business intelligence, and AI all
share the same oxygen. Separately, they're impressive. Together, they evolve
into something bordering on sentient coordination. Fabric isn't another tool
in your tech stack. It's the operating system for enterprise intelligence.
(17:43):
Within a single canvas, you can engineer data pipelines, manage warehouses,
orchestrate real time analytics, and invite AI agents to reason
across it all. There's no handoff between departments, just one
continuous workflow that begins as ingestion and ends as insight.
Compare that to the pre Fabric era, where four platforms
and six handshakes were required before any data made sense. Today,
one lake feeds everything, POWERBI visualizes it, real time intelligence
(18:06):
reacts to it, and data agents interpret it. You finally
have orchestration rather than coordination chaos. Consider predictive maintenance in
a Fabric environment. Sensor data streams through real time intelligence.
The data engineering layer shapes it. The data agent detects
irregular vibration frequencies, and before a technician even sees the dashboard,
a power Automate agent has scheduled inspection tickets. That's closed
(18:28):
loop cognition, a system that doesn't wait for permission to
prevent a problem. Shift to marketing. Campaign data flows into
one lake from dynamics processed by data factory, contextualized by
semantic models, and interpreted by an agent trained on historical
response patterns. When the click through rate dips, the agent
cross references seasonality, proposes new timing, and feed suggestions back
(18:50):
into powerbi's copilot panel for the human marketer to approve.
Fabric doesn't replace creativity, It amplifies it with perpetual situational
awareness and many facturing. An operations agent correlates production data
with supply levels, instructing another agent in azure to rebalance
procurement orders automatically. When demand spikes, the system doesn't panic,
(19:11):
it reroots itself in milliseconds. That's what self adjusting intelligence
really means. Data that can feel its own imbalance and
correct it before anyone writes an escalation email. Every time,
Fabric connects these moving parts. The value compounds. Data has lineage,
insights have authorship, and actions carry rational POWERBI isn't just
a visualization endpoint. It's an expression surface for the machine's mind.
(19:33):
Data factory ceases to be an ingestion engine and becomes
a living artery, feeding continuous cognition, real time intelligence that's
Fabric's reflexes. Without it, the system would understand but never respond. Together,
these layers make up what might be the first truly
cooperative digital ecosystem, an environment where storage, reasoning, and action
are indistinguishable. In practice, the democratizing twist is copilot. It
(19:53):
turns all this complexity into conversation. Business users don't have
to learn KQL or DAX, They type questions in TA
Behind the scenes. Copilot delegates reasoning to data agents, which
retrieve validated policy compliant answers. The employees experience instant clarity,
while governance officers sleep soundly knowing every statement came with
verifiable lineage. It's the union of accessibility and authority. The
(20:15):
rare moment when user friendliness doesn't dilute rigor. This is
where the traditional BI mindset finally collapses. Yesterday's dita ecosystems
produced backward looking reports. Today's fabric ecosystem produces situational awareness.
You don't measure performance, you experience it continuously. The warehouse
isn't passive infrastructure anymore. It's the strategic nervous system of
the enterprise. Fabric's intelligence isn't isolated brilliance, its cooperative genius.
(20:39):
Think of the shift visually. The old lake was horizontal,
data flowed in one direction, then stopped. Fabric is vertical.
Data rises through engineering, modeling, reasoning, visualization, and action in
a perpetual climb, like heat rising through an atmosphere. What
emerges at the top isn't just analytics, it's foresight. So
the question becomes painfully simple. Will you populate this living
environment within intel entities or keep stacking flat files like gravestones,
(21:03):
Because at this stage, ignorance is a choice. Fabric gives
you the tissue and the neurons. Refusing activation is like
buying a brain and insisting on a coma. When functioning correctly,
your fabric ecosystem behaves less like software and more like
an organism, synchronized by feedback. Each time a data set changes,
each layer adjusts, ensuring the intelligence never ossifies. That finally,
(21:23):
is what it was built for, not static reporting, but
a perpetual state of learning. And now we reach the
inevitable crossroad. Whether you intend to maintain that evolutionary loop
or close the lid on it again with your next
CSV upload the choice. Here's the blunt truth. Microsoft Fabric
isn't a storage product. It's an intelligence engine that masquerades
as one. To avoid frightening traditionalists, you didn't purchase disk space.
(21:44):
You purchased cognition as a service. Your data warehouse breathes
only when your agents are awake. When they sleep, the
ecosystem reverts to a silent archive pretending to be modern.
Your competitors aren't outrunning you with bigger data sets, they're
outthinking you with the same data configured intelligently. They let
their agents interpret trends before meetings begin. You're still formatting exports.
(22:04):
The technological gap is minimal, The cognitive gap is a bistle.
So choose your future wisely. Keep treating Fabric like an
expensive data morgue, or invited to act like what it
was designed to be. A thinking framework for your business.
Reanimate those data sets, let agents reason, Let governance guide them,
and let insight become reflex rather than ritual. And if
this revelation stung even a little good, that's the sign
(22:26):
of conceptual resuscitation. Now, before your next ETL job embalms
another month's worth of metrics, subscribe for deeper breakdowns on
how to build intelligence into Microsoft fabric itself. Keep treating
it like a CSV graveyard. Just don't call it fabric.
Your fabric data warehouse is just a CSV graveyard. I
know that stings, but look at how you're using it.
Endless CSV dumps, cold tables, scheduled ETL jobs lumbering along
like it's twenty fifteen. You bought Fabric to launch your
data into the age of AI, and then you turned
it into an archive. The irony is exquisite. Fabric was
built for intelligence, real time insight, contextual reasoning, self adjusting analytics,
(00:20):
yet here you are treating it like digital tupperware. Meanwhile,
the AI layer you paid for, the data agents, the
contextual governance, the semantic reasoning sits dormant, waiting for instructions
that never come. So the problem isn't capacity and it's
not data quality. It's thinking. You don't have a data problem.
You have a conceptual one, mistaking intelligence infrastructure for storage.
Let's fix that mental model before your CFO realizers. You've
(00:43):
reinvented a network drive with better branding. The dead data problem.
Legacy behavior dies hard. Most organizations still run nightly ETL
jobs that sweep operational systems, flattened tables into commer separated relics,
and upload the corpses into one lake It's comforting, predictable, measurable,
seductively simple. But what you end up with is a
static museum of snapshots. Each file represents how things looked
(01:04):
at one moment and immediately begins to decay. There's no motion,
no relationships, no evolving context, just files, lots of them.
The truth that approach made sense when data lived on
prem in constrained systems. Fabric was designed for something else,
entirely living data, streaming data, context, away intelligence. One lake
isn't a filing cabinet. It's supposed to be the circulatory
system of your organization's information flow. Treating it like cold
(01:25):
storage is the digital equivalent of embalming your business metrics.
Without semantic models, your data has no language. Without relationships,
it has no memory. A CSV from sales, a CSV
from marketing, a CSV from finance. They can coexist peacefully
in the same lake and still never talk to each other.
Governance structures, missing metadata optional. Apparently, the result is isolation
so pure that even Copilot, Microsoft's conversational AI can't interpret it.
(01:49):
If you ask Copilot what were last quarters revenue drivers,
it doesn't know where to look because you never told
it what revenue means in your schema. Let's take a
micro example. Suppose your sales data set contains transaction records, dates, amounts,
product skews, and regent codes. You happily dump it into
one lake, no semantic model, no named relationships, just raw
table columns. Now ask Fabric's AI to identify top performing regions.
(02:12):
It shrugs. It cannot contextualize region code without metadata linking
it to geography or organizational units. To the machine, USN
could mean North America or user segment North. Humans rely
on inference. AI requires explicit structure. That's the gap, turning
your warehouse into a morgue. Here's what most people miss.
Fabric doesn't treat data at rest and data in motion
as separate species. It assumes every data set could one
(02:35):
day become an intelligent participant, queried in real time, enriched
by context, reshaped by governance rules, and even reasoned over
by agents. When you persist CSVS without activating those connections,
you're ignoring Fabric's metabolic design. You chop off its nervous system.
Compare that to data in motion in Fabric real time
intelligence modules ingest streaming signals, IoT events, transaction logs, sensor
(02:56):
pinks and feed them into live data sets that can
trigger responses in instantly. Anomaly detection isn't run weekly, it
happens continuously. Trend analysis doesn't wait for the quarter's end,
It updates on every new record. This is what a
live data looks like, constantly evaluated, contextualized by AI agents,
and subject to governance rules in milliseconds. The difference between
(03:17):
data address and data in motion is fundamental. Resting data
answers what happened with moving data answers what's happening and
what should we do next. If your warehouse only does
the former, you are running a historical archive, not a
decision engine. Fabric's purpose is to compress that timeline until
observation and action are indistinguishable. Without AI activation, your storing fossils.
(03:37):
With it, you're managing living organisms that adapt to context.
Think of your warehouse like a body. One lake is
the blood stream, Semantic models are the DNA, and data
agents are the brain cells firing signals across systems. Right now,
most of you have the bloodstream but no brain function.
The organs exist, but nothing coordinates. And yes, it's comfortable
that way. No surprises, no sudden automation, no rogue recommendations.
(03:59):
STAT systems don't disobey, but they also don't compete in
an environment where ninety percent of large enterprises are feeding
their warehouses to AI agents. Leaving your data inert is
like stocking a luxury aquarium with plastic fish because you
prefer predictability over life. So what should be alive in
your one leg The relationships, the context, and the intelligence
that link your data sets into a cohesive worldview. Once
(04:20):
you stop dumping raw csvs and start modeling information for
AI consumption, Fabric starts behaving as intended, an ecosystem of living,
thinking data instead of an ice box of obsolete numbers.
If your ETL pipeline still ends with store CSV, congratulations,
you've automated the world's most expensive burial process. In the
next section will exhume those files, give them a brain,
(04:41):
and show you what actually makes Fabric intelligent. The data agents,
the missing intelligence layer, enter the part everyone skips, the
actual intelligence layer, the thing that separates a warehouse from
a brain. Microsoft calls them data agents, but think of
them as neurons that finally start firing once you stop
treating one lake like a storage locker. These agents are
not decorative features. They are the operational cortex that Fabric
(05:03):
quietly installs for you, and that most of you heroically ignore.
Let's begin with the mistake. People obsess over dashboards. They
think if powerbi shows a colorful line trending upward, they've
achieved enlightenment. Meanwhile, they've left the reasoning layer, the dynamic
element that interprets patterns and acts on them, unplugged. That's
like buying a Tesla admiring the screen graphics and never
(05:23):
pressing the accelerator. The average user believes Fabric's beauty lies
in uniform metrics. In reality, it lies in synaptic activity
agents that think. So what exactly are these data agents?
They are AI powered interfaces between your warehouse and Azure's
cognitive services, build to reason across data, not just query it.
They live over one lake, but integrate through as your
AI foundry, where they inherit the ability to retrieve, infer,
(05:46):
and apply logic based on your organization's context. And here's
the crucial twist. They participate in a framework called Model
Context Protocols that allows multiple agents to share memory and
goals so they can collaborate handoff tasks and negotiate outcomes
like colleagues who actually read the company manual. Each agent
can be configured to respect governance and security boundaries. They
(06:07):
don't wander blindly into sensitive data because Fabric enforces policies
through purview and role based access. This governance link gives
them something legacy analytics never had moral restraint. Your cfo's
financial agent cannot accidentally read HR's salary data unless expressly allowed.
It's the difference between reasoning and rummaging. Now contrast these
data agents with Copilot, the celebrity assistant. Everyone loves to
(06:30):
talk to. Copilot sits inside teams or powerbi. It's charming, reactive,
and somewhat shallow. It answers what you ask. Data agents,
by comparison, are the ones who already read the quarterly forecast,
spotted inconsistencies, and drafted recommendations before you even open the dashboard.
Copilot is a student. Agents are auditors. One obeys, the
other anticipates. Let's ground this in an example. Your retail
(06:52):
business process is daily transactions through Fabric. Without agents, you'd
spend fridays exporting summaries, top selling products, regents trending up anomalies.
Over threshold with agents, the warehouse becomes sentient enough to
notice that sales in Regent East are spiking twenty percent
above forecast, while supply chain logs show delayed deliveries. An
agent detects the mismatch, tags it as a fulfillment risk,
(07:14):
alerts operations, and proposes redistributing inventory preemptively. Nobody asked it inferred.
This is in science fiction. It's Fabric's real time intelligence
merged with agentic reasoning. Pause on what that means. Your
warehouse just performed judgment, not a query, not an alert,
but analysis that required understanding business intent. It identified an anomaly,
cross referenced context, and acted responsibly. That's the threshold where
(07:36):
data warehouse becomes decision system. Without agents, you'd still be
exporting powerbi visuals into slide decks, pretending you discovered the
issue manually. Here's the weird part. Most companies have this
capability already activated within their Fabric capacities. They just haven't
configured it. They spent the money, got the software, and
forgot to initialize cognition because that requires thinking architecturally, defining
semantic relationships, establishing AI instructions, and connecting one leg endpoints
(08:00):
to the reasoning infrastructure. But once you do, everything changes.
Dashboards become side effects of intelligence rather than destinations for analysis.
Think back to the CSV graveyard metaphor those csvs were tombstones,
marking where all data sets went to die. Turn on
agents and its resurrection day. The warehouse begins to breathe
tables align themselves, attributes acquire meaning, and metrics synchronize autonomously.
(08:21):
The system doesn't merely report reality, it interprets it while
you're still drafting an email about last quarter's KPIs. Of course,
this shift requires a mental upgrade from storage management to
cognitive orchestration. Data agents don't wait for instructions. They follow goals.
They use model context protocols to communicate with other Microsoft agents,
the ones in power, Automate three sixty five, and Azure
(08:42):
AI services sharing reasoning context across platforms. That's how data
fluctuation can trigger an adaptive workflow or generate new insights
inside Excel without human mediation, and yes, when configured poorly,
this autonomy can look unnerving, like having interns who act
decisively after misreading a spreadsheet. That's why governance which will
reach soon exists, but first accept this truth. Intelligence delayed
(09:03):
is advantage lost. The longer you treat fabric as cold storage,
the more you pay for an AI platform functioning as
a glorified backup. So stop mourning your data's potential. Wake
the agents. Let your warehouse graduate from archive to organism.
Because the next era of analytics isn't about asking better questions,
It's about owning systems that answer before you can type them.
(09:23):
How to resurrect your warehouse with AI. Time to bring
the corps back to life. Resurrection starts not with code,
but with context, because context is oxygen for data. Step
one is infusing your warehouse with meaning. That means creating
semantic models. These models define how your data thinks about itself.
Sales are tied to customers, customers to regions, regions to
revenue structures. Without them, even the most powerful AI agent
(09:45):
is like a linguist handed a dictionary without syntax. In Fabric,
you use the data modeling layer to declare these relationships explicitly,
so your agents can reason instead of guests. Now for
step two, actually deploying a Fabric data agent. This is
where you give your warehouse not just a brain, but
a personality, an operational mind that knows what to look for,
when to alert you, and how to connect dots across
(10:06):
one lake. In practice, you open Azure AI foundry, define
a data agent and pointed at your fabric data sets. Instantly,
it inherits access to the entire semantic layer. It's not
a chatboard. It's a sentient indexer trained on your actual
business structure. From now on, every table has a guardian
angel capable of pattern recognition and inference. Step three is instruction,
(10:27):
and agent without parameters is a toddler with access to
the corporate VPN. You must provide organizations specific directives. What risk,
revenue or priority mean, Which data sources are authoritative, Which
systems must not be touched without human approval. Governance policies
from purview sink here automatically, but you must define the
logical intent, tell your agent how to behave. The clearer
(10:48):
your definitions, the more coherent its reasoning. Think of it
as drafting the company handbook for an employee who never sleeps.
The fourth step is integration, the part that transforms clever
prototypes into daily companions. Connect your data agent to copilot studio.
Why because Copilot provides the natural language interface your employees
already understand. When someone in sales types show me emerging
(11:09):
churn patterns. Copilot politely forwards the request to your agent,
which performs genuine reasoning across data sets and sends a
human readable summary back, complete with citations and traceable lineage.
This is intelligence served conversationally. Once this foundation is active,
the system begins performing quiet miracles. Consider trend detection. Your
agent continually examines transactional data, inventory levels, and forecast metrics.
(11:32):
When behavior deviates from expectation, say a holiday surge developing
earlier than predicted, it notifies marketing two weeks before the
anomaly would have appeared in a dashboard or picture. KPI
alerts instead of manual threshold rules. The agent recognizes trajectories
that historically precede misses and flags them preemptively. Churn prediction,
(11:53):
supply chain optimization, compliance verification. Every one of these becomes
a living process, not a quarterly report. And here's where
Fabrics is Dezi shines. These agents don't live in isolation.
They communicate through model context protocols with other Microsoft services,
creating multi agent orchestration. A Fabric data agent can identify
a slow moving squ notify a power automate agent to
trigger a discount workflow, sync results into dynamics through another
(12:15):
as your AI agent, and finally present the outcome insight
teams as a business alert. That sequence requires no custom scripts,
only properly defined intentions and connections. You've just witnessed distributed
intelligence performing genuine work. This is the real point so
many miss. Fabric isn't a place for storing results. It's
an operating environment for continuous reasoning. Treating it like a
(12:35):
static data vault wastes the one architectural innovation that sets
it apart. You are supposed to think in agents. Every
data set becomes an actor, Every insight becomes an event,
Every business process becomes an orchestrated adaptive conversation between them.
Your job shifts from building pipelines to defining intentions. Some
recoil at that they want comforting determinism, the assurance that
(12:57):
nothing changes unless a human press is run. But inteen
diligent systems thrive on feedback loops. When an agent refines
a metric or automates an alert, it's not taking control,
it's taking responsibility. This is how data finally earns its
keep by detecting issues, making recommendations, and learning from corrections.
If you've ever wondered why competitors move faster with the
same data sets, it's because their warehouses aren't waiting for instructions.
(13:19):
They're conversing internally, resolving micro problems before executives even hear
about them. That's what a resurrected fabric environment looks like.
A live, self aware and relentlessly analytical. And yes, giving
your data life requires giving it boundaries, because unchecked autonomy
quickly mutates into chaos. So before we let these agents
roam freely, let's install the guardrails that keep intelligence from
(13:40):
becoming insubordination. Governance as the guardrail, let's talk restraint, the
part everyone waves off until something catches fire. Giving your
warehouse intelligence without governance is like handing the office in
turn route access and saying be creative. AI readiness isn't
blind faith, its engineered trust. And in the fabric universe,
that trust wears three uniforms, purview, data loss prevention and
(14:00):
fabrics built in governance layer. Together they draw the perimeter
lines that keep your data agents brilliant but obedient. In
human terms, governance keeps curiosity from trespassing. Perview defines who
can see what, dlp ensures nothing confidential wanders off in
a careless query, and Fabric governance enforces policy right inside
the platform's veins. When configured correctly, these systems form a
(14:22):
nervous system that detects overreach and enforces discipline at machine speed.
Your agents might reason, but they reason inside a sandbox
lined with compliance class The crucial nuance is that Fabric
doesn't treat governance as an external chore. It's native to
every transaction. Each data set carries its own metadata, passport, lineage, classification,
and access rolls. So whenever an agent pulls data, it
(14:44):
drags that metadata context with it. That's how Fabric ensures
context aware AI. The information isn't just retrieved, it's traced.
You can see who touched it when, and how it
branched through workflows. It's forensic accounting for cognition. Now let's
address the fantasy of ungoverned intelligence. Many teams enable agents,
celebrate autonomy, and three weeks later wonder why a helpful
(15:04):
body emailed confidential numbers to a shared channel, Because in
the absence of explicit authority structures. Every agent becomes an
improvisational intern convinced its performing heroically. Governance turns those improvisations
into rehearsals with the script. Roles and permissions dictate which
data sets an agent can query and what actions require confirmation.
The AI still thinks creatively, but it does so while
(15:25):
reciting the corporate Ethics Manual. In real time, metadata enrichment
plays a quiet but decisive role. Here, every record gains
descriptive layers, ownership, sensitivity, lineage, so when an agent composes
a summary, it already knows whether the content is public
or restricted. Combine that with Fabric's lineage graph, and you
can trace any AI generated conclusion straight back to the
raw data source. That closes the interpretability loop, making audits
(15:49):
possible even in autonomous operations. It's the difference between explainable
automation and plausible deniability. The psychological benefit is immense. Executives
stop fearing rogue AI because they can inspect its reasoning
trail data Officers stop writing governance memos because policies travel
with the data itself. Fabric achieves what older BI systems
never could, self enforcing compliance. Every insight has provenance baked in.
(16:12):
Every action is recorded with the precision of a flight
data recorder. Of course, rules alone don't guarantee wisdom. You
can over govern and strangle creativity just as easily. Governance
is meant to channel intelligence, not muzzle it. The brilliance
of Fabric's model is in its proportionality, the balance between
automation and accountability. Agents act quickly, but within definable thresholds.
Decisions requiring empathy, judgment, or liability escalate to humans automatically.
(16:36):
You keep the machine fast and the humans responsible elegant.
So here's the litmus test. If your Fabric environment feels wild,
you've undergoverned. If it feels paralyzed, you've overgoverned. The sweet
spot is orchestration, a symphony where agents play confidently within
the score and compliance hums in rhythm rather than drumming interruptions.
Once trust is dialed in, that's when Fabric shows its
(16:57):
real nature, a disciplined sense collaboration between logic and law.
The chare subsides, insight flows, and for the first time,
your data behaves not like an unruly teenager, but like
a well trained professional who knows exactly how far brilliance
can go before it breaks policy. The intelligent ecosystem what
you've built so far, semantic models, agents, and governance isn't
(17:20):
merely a data warehouse. It's a colony. Every element in
Microsoft Fabric is engineered to coexist and cooperate. The beauty
lies in unification, data engineering, business intelligence, and AI all
share the same oxygen. Separately, they're impressive. Together, they evolve
into something bordering on sentient coordination. Fabric isn't another tool
in your tech stack. It's the operating system for enterprise intelligence.
(17:43):
Within a single canvas, you can engineer data pipelines, manage warehouses,
orchestrate real time analytics, and invite AI agents to reason
across it all. There's no handoff between departments, just one
continuous workflow that begins as ingestion and ends as insight.
Compare that to the pre Fabric era, where four platforms
and six handshakes were required before any data made sense. Today,
one lake feeds everything, POWERBI visualizes it, real time intelligence
(18:06):
reacts to it, and data agents interpret it. You finally
have orchestration rather than coordination chaos. Consider predictive maintenance in
a Fabric environment. Sensor data streams through real time intelligence.
The data engineering layer shapes it. The data agent detects
irregular vibration frequencies, and before a technician even sees the dashboard,
a power Automate agent has scheduled inspection tickets. That's closed
(18:28):
loop cognition, a system that doesn't wait for permission to
prevent a problem. Shift to marketing. Campaign data flows into
one lake from dynamics processed by data factory, contextualized by
semantic models, and interpreted by an agent trained on historical
response patterns. When the click through rate dips, the agent
cross references seasonality, proposes new timing, and feed suggestions back
(18:50):
into powerbi's copilot panel for the human marketer to approve.
Fabric doesn't replace creativity, It amplifies it with perpetual situational
awareness and many facturing. An operations agent correlates production data
with supply levels, instructing another agent in azure to rebalance
procurement orders automatically. When demand spikes, the system doesn't panic,
(19:11):
it reroots itself in milliseconds. That's what self adjusting intelligence
really means. Data that can feel its own imbalance and
correct it before anyone writes an escalation email. Every time,
Fabric connects these moving parts. The value compounds. Data has lineage,
insights have authorship, and actions carry rational POWERBI isn't just
a visualization endpoint. It's an expression surface for the machine's mind.
(19:33):
Data factory ceases to be an ingestion engine and becomes
a living artery, feeding continuous cognition, real time intelligence that's
Fabric's reflexes. Without it, the system would understand but never respond. Together,
these layers make up what might be the first truly
cooperative digital ecosystem, an environment where storage, reasoning, and action
are indistinguishable. In practice, the democratizing twist is copilot. It
(19:53):
turns all this complexity into conversation. Business users don't have
to learn KQL or DAX, They type questions in TA
Behind the scenes. Copilot delegates reasoning to data agents, which
retrieve validated policy compliant answers. The employees experience instant clarity,
while governance officers sleep soundly knowing every statement came with
verifiable lineage. It's the union of accessibility and authority. The
(20:15):
rare moment when user friendliness doesn't dilute rigor. This is
where the traditional BI mindset finally collapses. Yesterday's dita ecosystems
produced backward looking reports. Today's fabric ecosystem produces situational awareness.
You don't measure performance, you experience it continuously. The warehouse
isn't passive infrastructure anymore. It's the strategic nervous system of
the enterprise. Fabric's intelligence isn't isolated brilliance, its cooperative genius.
(20:39):
Think of the shift visually. The old lake was horizontal,
data flowed in one direction, then stopped. Fabric is vertical.
Data rises through engineering, modeling, reasoning, visualization, and action in
a perpetual climb, like heat rising through an atmosphere. What
emerges at the top isn't just analytics, it's foresight. So
the question becomes painfully simple. Will you populate this living
environment within intel entities or keep stacking flat files like gravestones,
(21:03):
Because at this stage, ignorance is a choice. Fabric gives
you the tissue and the neurons. Refusing activation is like
buying a brain and insisting on a coma. When functioning correctly,
your fabric ecosystem behaves less like software and more like
an organism, synchronized by feedback. Each time a data set changes,
each layer adjusts, ensuring the intelligence never ossifies. That finally,
(21:23):
is what it was built for, not static reporting, but
a perpetual state of learning. And now we reach the
inevitable crossroad. Whether you intend to maintain that evolutionary loop
or close the lid on it again with your next
CSV upload the choice. Here's the blunt truth. Microsoft Fabric
isn't a storage product. It's an intelligence engine that masquerades
as one. To avoid frightening traditionalists, you didn't purchase disk space.
(21:44):
You purchased cognition as a service. Your data warehouse breathes
only when your agents are awake. When they sleep, the
ecosystem reverts to a silent archive pretending to be modern.
Your competitors aren't outrunning you with bigger data sets, they're
outthinking you with the same data configured intelligently. They let
their agents interpret trends before meetings begin. You're still formatting exports.
(22:04):
The technological gap is minimal, The cognitive gap is a bistle.
So choose your future wisely. Keep treating Fabric like an
expensive data morgue, or invited to act like what it
was designed to be. A thinking framework for your business.
Reanimate those data sets, let agents reason, Let governance guide them,
and let insight become reflex rather than ritual. And if
this revelation stung even a little good, that's the sign
(22:26):
of conceptual resuscitation. Now, before your next ETL job embalms
another month's worth of metrics, subscribe for deeper breakdowns on
how to build intelligence into Microsoft fabric itself. Keep treating
it like a CSV graveyard. Just don't call it fabric.
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.