October 19, 2025 • 29 mins
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/mae-brussell-project--5891892/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
It's time once again for Dialogue Conspiracy with May Brussel.
For the past fourteen years, May has been researching and
uncovering facts and evidence from between the lines of the
news and placing them in a more thorough perspective of
how conspiracy, political assassination, and abuses of power affect us.
All Dialogue Conspiracy originates with KLRBFM in Carmel, California and
(00:31):
now May Brussel.
Speaker 3 (00:35):
Good Evening.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
This is May Brussel and Carmel, California. It's Dialog Conspiracy
number three hundred and ten, and this is February twenty sixth,
nineteen seventy six. This is the last Sunday in February.
They go around pretty fast. Last week on Dialogue Conspiracy,
I talked about my friend Lillian Castelano, who passed.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
To Wayne, Los Angeles February sixteenth.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
We were all concerned about the cause of her death
and about her research for the past fourteen years. That
was literally her life these past fourteen years. Since this
last week has gone by, the house is still locked
up where Lillian lived. The Los Angeles Police Department had
come there. Evidently a neighbor had called and told them
(01:18):
to come check the house out and the police have
found her dead and somebody, according to Tencher Rocket heard
the make a remark this is one of those assassination
conspiracy cases something of that effect. The police have locked
up everything at Lilian's house and the family were allowed
to go and search for a will, and no will
has been found.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
About what to do with their research, they have all agreed.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
That Penn Jones Junior and Texas should be the one
to have her research on the John Kennedy and Robert
Kennedy assassination, but the Los Angeles Police Department can hold
all that research for one year if no will is found.
Her very closest friend who worked with Sir Floyd can't
believe that Lillian didn't have a will. She wasn't in
(02:00):
the best of health, and they knew that she took
such care of her research and it's impossible to find this.
So that Floyd and Ted Shurok, Jan Diaz and other
people Los Angeles are really very concerned. And this is
a good lesson if to may Brussel and Penn Jones
Junior and take Gundolpho and other researchers to get our
wone wills in order, which I'm doing this week, because
(02:23):
if I were to be found dead and there were
no will in my home, the police could then take
all my research and lock it up for at least
a year at least that's what they're doing Los Angeles,
and nobody then would know what is missing because there's
no index of the material.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
It's too massive.
Speaker 2 (02:40):
So if the Los Angeles Police Department keeps Lilian's the
material a year, we wouldn't know if they took out
important photographs or not. There wasn't an inventory to go
buy or compare it to. And being as the very
agency that she was exposing at the time of her
death was responsible for selling the gun that Sir Hand
allegedly had in the Ambassador, or cutting off the sleeve
(03:01):
of Robert Kennedy, or throwing away ceiling panels that would
show the type of bullets that went into the ceiling
the night Robert Kennedy was killed, destroying vital evidence of
this sort, it certainly would be easy to get rid
of Lilian's material. So, as I say, the researchers are
concerned that if there is no will, her nephew and
family and cousins can't even touch the material for an
(03:23):
entire year, and in that meantime, the very people that
she was exposing at the time of her death, preparing
papers on Attorney General Evil Younger, who was a district
attorney when Robert Kennedy was killed in Los Angeles, and
Ed Davis, the Chief of Police of Los Angeles, who
helped cover up this case. Those two men will be
running for governor, one will probably win, and the other
(03:45):
will go on to national and international control and further fame.
Within this one year, a lot can happen while Lillians
particular documentation is locked up. I did say that every
week I talked a little bit about our Attorney general
and Ed Davis, the two candidates for governor in California.
There are a few quotations of Ed Davis I'd like
(04:06):
to throw around for you, and we'll compile in some
kind of booklet's soon. One was when he was talking
about the farm workers. These are Chavez farm workers and
the gay Rights group. He said in one speech that
they ought to go together in quotes to form at
the United Fruit Party. He also addressed the International Association
of the chief of Police and he told them that
(04:27):
those people who opened their ranks to women were simply
turkeys who quotes caved into liberal pressure and filled their
departments with undersized people end quotes. Ed Davis, our candidate
for governor in California, was a keynote speaker at the
John Birch Society for the nineteen seventy sixth National Convention.
He told the National Rifle Association in nineteen seventy five
(04:49):
and quotes, today's law enforcement can protect you and urge
them to keep up with their own rifles and guns
and doing their own job because the law enforcement couldn't
do as good a job that they needed their own guns.
Davis is back, like I said Leslie by Richard Vogeri,
the fundraiser for Ronald Reagan and the supporter of the
(05:11):
extreme right wing throughout the country. He is managing the campaign,
ed Davis, the former chief of police. He also called
part of Los Angeles assessment of pornography fruit bars bottomless bars.
Thanks to the United States and California Supreme Courts. So
you could imagine if he were governor what kind of
(05:32):
appointments he would make to the California Supreme Court if
he wanted to really crack down on a lot of
the things are going on in this state. He also
told a group of people that I hold the line
to recruit minorities, gays and women as police officers would
only make me envision myself on some stage a graduation
(05:54):
day giving a diploma to a four foot eleven transvestite
moron who had kissed me instead of saluting me.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
That's Ed Davis.
Speaker 2 (06:03):
He asked the love for the Los Angeles Police Department
in nineteen seventy to have a submarine in order to
hunt the waters for drugs mugglers, and jet powered helicopters.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
For finding narcotics from Mexico.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
The Berkeley barb had a long list of quotations, and
I'm quoting some of those from them, and I have
others in my files that I will be sharing with you.
And of course Ed Davis is the man who wanted
scaffolds at the airports to hang hijackers without trials, just
hanging them in public. I'm going back to where I
was for the rest of this program this evening on
(06:39):
the issue of the Los Angeles Free Press that was
put out by Larry Flint, and it's on the jfk assassination,
and I want to do some more critique on it
as much as time allows. And when I don't cover
or I may do in a future program and get
caught up on later, you.
Speaker 3 (06:56):
Can read for yourself.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
You can order them and if you write to me
and Carol PO Box one one nine afters, California, nine five,
nine ninety three, they're two dollars. It's a dollar fifty
plus postage and they're being sent out from this address
the copies of the Los Angeles Free Press. As I
mentioned briefly in this article, the first contradiction of the
(07:20):
material in there was the headline JFK murder solved.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
The killing coordinated by.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
The CIA, and that article is signed by Mark Lane.
Speaker 3 (07:29):
He's the author to that article.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
And then on the back page, Larry Flint has this
appeal help bring the JFK killers to justice, and you
know he's ordering this million dollar reward. He claims, I
will guarantee that we will protect every bit of evidence
we gather. Just call six one four two two eight
eight seven seven, Columbus, Ohio, and an independent panel of
(07:51):
experts and judges will go over your material. If you
have information on who killed John Kennedy and Larry Flint
promised in quotes, no more secret testimony behind closed doors.
Now he uses the word judges. If you send him material,
he will have a panel of judges, and he acts
(08:14):
as if this is going to be testimony that comes
to him. He's asking people with information on the Kennedy
assassination to reach him and he'll present it to Mark Lane,
Robert Road, and Dick Gregory and several other people. The
problem is here that Larry Flint has no way to
guarantee protection to these people who send in information. He's
(08:35):
listed a phone number, and he has a toll free
number and address. And right from the beginning with this advertisement,
how can he possibly offer protection to these witnesses to
the John Kennedy assassination. He himself is under indictment in
Ohio for criminal charges, pornography charges. He's in trouble with
the government and the law, and he has no means,
(08:56):
no police force, no bodyguards to protect these people advertising
they'll have protection. And here's the House Select Committee in Washington,
d C. That just got funds to investigate the Kennedy assassination.
And starting with the very day that they got funded,
the most important witnesses were murdered in succession George de Morinschild,
(09:16):
Carlos Prisa Kris. A week later, Gary Powers, William Sullivan,
and these four people were killed as soon as the
House Select Committee got started. So why would he even
say that they'd have protection. He should say sending information
at your own risk. He also says that this will
be investigated with no closed doors, and yet sitting with
(09:39):
Mark Lane in the offices at Century City in Los
Angeles is an ex FBI man who I saw there
when I was down in LA Who's going to assist
Lane with lead and information? Now what proof is there
that this man isn't still working with the FBI. You remember,
at the time of Watergate, James McCord was an ex
CIA man who ran McCord Associates. I our aunt was
(10:01):
an ex CIA man who worked at Mullen and Company
public relations firm. And yet the facts actually prove that
they both still work for the Central Intelligence Agency. Why
would an FBI man be working for Larry Flint to
receive information from very innocent people reading this ad who
believe that there are experts and judges that are going
(10:22):
to protect them if they come forward. The independent panel
that he talks about isn't independent. They're not volunteering their time.
They're paid large salaries. Lane has literally given up any
law practice, moved out from Washington, d C. To California
to work just for Larry Flint, getting this large salary,
computers in the office, a staff rent in Century City,
(10:45):
which is no slouch area, right next to Beverly Hills,
so the most expensive office space in the United States.
And is making an occupation of this, being paid full time.
And Robert Grodin got an immense figure for the pictures
in this magazine, the Bruder film that they put in
this issue. And these men are getting a large salary.
(11:06):
It's a business and an occupation. It isn't independent. They're
working for Larry Flint.
Speaker 3 (11:11):
He's paying them.
Speaker 2 (11:13):
So that's a contradiction right there. And as I mentioned
once before, this issue of the La Free Press is undated.
The one that says it's solved. It's published in the
front it says it's published by Press West on Hollywood Boulevard,
but it isn't. It's shipped from Columbus, Ohio. The opening
section has thirty five different topics and articles. There's a
(11:34):
table of contents with thirty five different subjects forty six
pages in all in this Free Press issue, but the
only article that has a name on it is Mark Lane's.
On the first article, it says the first articles by
Mark Lane, and no other author is listed there.
Speaker 3 (11:51):
On the back next to the.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Last page, Larry Flint said, there's many frustrated journalists who
couldn't get their articles printed in their own publications, who
have come to us and their.
Speaker 3 (12:01):
Articles will appear here.
Speaker 2 (12:03):
And yet there isn't a single name of a frustrated
journalist or any single person in this entire issue except
Mark Lane's. And he promises in that issue that people
will get their articles printed there. Ted Gondalfo said to
Mark Lane on the telephone just last week, this is
an opportunity now you're living in California to see May
(12:23):
Brussel's research, to get together and put some of her
material in the free press. And Mark Lane said to
him on the telephone and quotes to print May Brussel
in the Los Angeles Free Press would be to admit
to lunacy, to publish lunacy. Now, that isn't the first
time that Lane has made these allegations. I threatened in
nineteen seventy six a lawsuit against him, and he is
(12:47):
on the radio throwing this kind of information out.
Speaker 3 (12:50):
But here's a contradiction again.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
Larry Flint is saying that Los Angeles Free Press is
objective and it's your chance to get information out when
it goes on and implies and is admitted that all
of it must go through Mark Lane, and Mark Lane
makes the decision where it goes and Mark Lane can
say no, nothing that may Brussel Publishers will go in
(13:13):
this issue. And at the same time, Larry Flint is
paying Paul Krasner ninety thousand a year to run his
Hustler magazine, and the last three articles Paul Krasner ever
published in The Realist were entirely my research. So he
must know, Larry Flint, that this isn't quite lunacy that
I'm publishing in those three articles of The Realist, because
(13:35):
on what other basis would he hand over his entire
publishing field to Paul Krasner.
Speaker 3 (13:41):
And he's saying that this is an outlet to get.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
Information out, and on the other hand, Lane is to
screen it even though they say it's objective. So if
any of you want to write letters to Larry Flint,
Century City. I can give you the address on the phone,
or you can write to me and question about Mark
Lane and the objectivity of the La Free Press. I
think it would be a good thing to do.
Speaker 3 (14:03):
Now.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
The first article in there, the one signed by Mark Lane,
is titled the CIA conspired to kill President Kennedy. Now
secret documents provide new evidence. Now this is what the
allegations are in Lane's article. First, the CIA was planning
information about Lee rb Oswald's visit to the Soviet Embassy
(14:24):
in Mexico City and to the Cuban Embassy in Mexico
City that was purposely false in order to frighten the
Warren Commission. Secondly, he made them believe that Lee rb
Oswald was meeting with KGB member, a member of the
KGB who was a part of an assassination team. Three,
the CIA was setting Oswald up as a patsy as
(14:47):
early as October tenth, nineteen sixty three, with these false documents,
and that the Warren Commission was given those documents January
the twenty second, nineteen sixty four, And that the Warring
Commission was so frightened that by knowing that Oswald worked
with a KGB member and the assassination team, that they
(15:09):
suppressed facts about Lee Harvey Oswald in order to avoid
a further war and a major scandal. These are the
allegations of that first article. And he claims that Sylvia
Duran in a Cuban embassy and CIA agents surrounding the
Russian embassy were used for this hoax by the CIA,
and they told the Commission that Oswald meant with Valerie Costakoff,
(15:32):
a KGB member. Now, first of all, there is nothing
in that article, this first article written by Mark Lane,
that can prove that the CIA conspired to kill John
Kennedy as a advertised It only indicates that the CIA
assisted in a future cover up of setting him up
for something. Now we know that Oswald was photographed in
(15:55):
New Orleans with CIA agent Carlo Springeir, But the purpose
of doing this, of identifying Oswald with a Castro sympathizing
committee the fair play for Cuba, could possibly get Lee
Harvey Oswald to Cuba where he could be part of
an assassination team to kill Fidel Castro. It later could
(16:16):
be used to frame Lee Harvey Oswald. But these photographs
were taken in the summer of nineteen sixty three, and
they easily could have been done by the CIA to
get Oswald to Cuba, just as they lied about as
being of the Cuban embassy. They wanted to link him
with Castro in Cuba, but it could have been to
endear him to Castro as well as for any other reason.
(16:40):
The piece of paper, the document about this Costakov, has
nothing about killing plans or the actual intent of setting
up Leearvey Oswald as a patsy. The information was false
and the teletype that was set up on this information
was October tenth, nineteen sixty three, was sent to the
(17:00):
FBI State Department, Immigration Department that Alee Rvy Oswald was
in Mexico. And it's true that a month later Oswald
was dead and charged with killing John Kennedy. Five days
after the assassination, President Lyndon Johnson formed the Warring Commission,
and according to Lane, the October tenth teletype that they
had made just before Oswald was killed, before Kennedy was killed,
(17:24):
happened to be the very first evidence developed by the
CIA to frame Oswald for the murder that was presented
to the Warring Commission by January twenty second. Now, I
don't agree with this at all. I don't believe that
this document photographed in the free press, this teletype was
(17:44):
the first piece of evidence that the CIA was going
to frame Arvy Oswald. The first piece of evidence done
was in the summer of nineteen sixty three, before he
ever went to Mexico. It was setting him up with
those photographs and the altercationion with Carlo Springear that would
be played immediately.
Speaker 3 (18:03):
On the news.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
The minute John Kennedy was killed and Oswald was arrested,
we saw Oswald handing out pamphlets in New Orleans. That
scene was photographed and ready even long before the Warren
Commission was set up. There was no intention for a
Warren commission at all. That came five days after John
Kennedy was killed. That was set up, and it had
to be set in people's mind that John Kennedy was
(18:26):
killed by the Marxist Lee Harvey Oswald by Sunday evening,
by November twenty fourth, long before they ever knew there
was a Warren commission, and the first thing that would
be shown would be photographs at Oswald handing out.
Speaker 3 (18:38):
Pamphlets for fair play for Cuba.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
So by summer of nineteen sixty three, Oswald was set
up as a patsy by the CIA. The second piece
of evidence used to frame Lee Harvey Oswald as a
patsy was a record made in New Orleans with mister
ed Butler. I own the record. It's a record called
I Am a Marxist. Ed Butler worked with Army intelligence.
(19:01):
He then moved to California to work for Patrick Frawley,
who once owned large sugar investments in Cuban that were
confiscated by Castro.
Speaker 3 (19:09):
On the back of the record that was.
Speaker 2 (19:11):
Circulated and shown and played that the speech of Oswald
being a Marxist was already available as soon as Oswald
was arrested.
Speaker 3 (19:21):
As well as the photographs.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
On the back of that record are pictures of Thomas Dodd,
the Senator, Hail Bogs of Louisiana, and doctor Altnaschner of
the Information Council of America's all proclaiming Oswald was the Marxist.
That's interesting because it's the son of Thomas Dodd in
the Congress at the present time from Connecticut, who conveniently
(19:45):
put mister Blakey with his contacts of the CIA, in
charge of the House Select Committee. Dodd doesn't go far
away from the Marxist story, and Blakey is covering up.
But the record that Lee Rby Oswald made in the
summer of nineteen sixty was the second piece of evidence
to set them up as a patsy. Long before this
CIA document, the third piece of evidence to set Lee
(20:09):
Harvey Oswald up as a patsy by the CIA was
a telephone call November twenty second, nineteen sixty three, from
a preacher in North Carolina who informed the authorities in
the FBI that Lee Rvy Oswald's gun came from a
Klein's Gun mail order shop in Chicago, Illinois, under the
alias with the alias of Highdell, and it was purchased
(20:32):
in April nineteen sixty three and received at a box
that Learvy Oswald never saw that rifle, and it was
ordered in the name of an alias that Learry Oswald used. Now,
this anonymous phone call was never checked out by the
Warren Commission, and that was the third thing that framed
Leearvy Oswald. By the time they were started in January,
(20:54):
this was common knowledge in the media of this particular
tip off. The fourth piece of evidence that was to
make Lee arv Oswald the patsy was a telephone conversation
the day after John Kennedy was shot transatlantic telephone conversation
a major General Walker who works with doctor Alton Oschner
(21:14):
and the Information Council of Americas, the same people who
made that record.
Speaker 3 (21:18):
And he made a long.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Distance telephone called to Europe to a news service and
told them and quotes that this man who shot at
me in April nineteen sixty three, this Lee rb Oswald,
was the same person who shot John Kennedy, that he
was the assassin. And this was the setup of shooting
through General Walker's window and giving the excuse of linking
(21:42):
Lee rv Oswald to the Walker shooting and then to
the Kennedy shooting. Had links to the intelligence. The CIA
community in the Dallasport were THEREY and military intelligence. And
this was all long in advance of October tenth, nineteen
sixty three. As a matter of fact, I have correspondence
a documentation from a gentleman named James Frankenberry. He wrote
(22:05):
to me in January nineteen seventy four. The last I
heard from him was in nineteen seventy six, and I
should be writing to him more. He was in the
army in nineteen sixty two and was sent to Fort Bragg,
North Carolina, and he had special training and was told
that he belonged to a team who were going to
be working on assassinations. The excuse for the team was
(22:28):
that they were going to fly to Germany and kill
a Russian agent who had information about CIA operations over there.
But later he realized that the assignment that they were
going to have one of the targets was to be
Major General Edwin Walker. And he has given me the
names and other persons of the people in his unit
that were supposed to kill General Walker. And he was
(22:49):
the one who said there were three teams of five
persons each who trained an assassination team, and that they
had this dummy on a little train. They were to
aim for the head and practice the head. He named
five people, Robert Fleming, James Kelly, Peter Marshand, Robert Lawrence
and himself as being on a special terrain where they
(23:12):
had a stalking procedures sniper weapons. This was in Fort Bragg,
South Carolina in June of nineteen sixty three, and they
participated The operation was called Operation thereon. It was at
Camp David, and they were to be ready for assassinations.
And he was told this is interesting because he wrote
this in nineteen seventy four to me in correspondence, and
(23:34):
what he's saying is confirmed in a new book called
Operation Mind Control by mister Bowart.
Speaker 3 (23:40):
The officers who hired.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
Him for this assassination team said that if he told
anybody the story of what was happening, no one would
believe him, and if he said any more about it later,
they would place him in communicado and give him special treatment.
And he said that after Watergate he realized that he
recognized I howerd. Hunt as one of the men that
(24:03):
met them in the Spanish restaurant and was making arrangements.
Speaker 3 (24:06):
This is what he said for these assassination teams. So
they sent.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
Him in nineteen sixty nine to a Springfield medical center
and they went about making his assertions be proven untrue,
and he was afraid that his memory would be erased,
but he still had a memory to write in nineteen
seventy four and up to nineteen seventy six. But the
threats that he gave him are the exact threats that
(24:31):
are written up in this book Operation Mind Control, that
men were told that if you expose what happened, we
will fix you so that nobody believes you anyway, and
we can erase your memory. So the point is that
long before, months before this memo of the October nineteen
sixty three story, in the article in the Free Press,
(24:52):
there was every indication that Lee Harvey.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
Oswald was being set up as a patsy.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
Now, Mark Lane said the CIA used episodes surrounding Lee
Harvey Oswald's trip to Mexico to implicate the Soviet Union,
Fidel Castro, and the JFK assassination plans, and ultimately the
CIA could terrorize the Warren Commission and compel them to
issue a false report. Now that is a strong statement.
(25:20):
It implies that the Warren Commission protected the FBI and
the CIA. It implies that the KGB ran the Warren Commission.
It implies that all the evidence we're talking about being suppressed,
or the falsification of documents, or hiding John Kennedy's brain,
or dry cling John Conley's clothing or burning autopsy papers
(25:44):
was all done because the Warren Commission was afraid of
the KGB and that they would go to such lengths
to cover.
Speaker 3 (25:52):
Up for the KGB.
Speaker 2 (25:54):
Now the date that Mark Lane gives them this article
for the terror of the Warren Commission, he says in quotes,
on January twenty second, nineteen sixty four, the Warren Commission.
The CIA warned the Warren Commission of Oswald's alleged relationship
with a KGB officer, and this was sent to the
Commission before the first witness was testified. And as I
(26:16):
think I mentioned you before and I want to reiterate
it again. Gerald Ford wrote in his book The Portrait
of the Assassin that what terrified the Warren Commission at
their meeting was that Lee Harvey Oswald was allegedly an
agent of the FBI. I have documented proof in my
files from the National Archives that at the same meeting
the Warren Commission on January twenty second, nineteen sixty four,
(26:40):
was told Lee Arvy Oswald also worked for the CIA
as well as the FBI.
Speaker 3 (26:45):
So you have to take your choice.
Speaker 2 (26:47):
And it's very important to realize that Late is stressing
that they were completely cowed and humiliated because they were
protecting us against a war with Asia, and they covered
up this evidence to protect the KGB because of these
terrible secrets that they knew about Lee Harvey Oswald. Now
there isn't a bit of evidence to support this article.
(27:09):
I've gone through material for fourteen years. Every minute of
the Warren Commission meetings, every question asked, every witness, every
witness not called, every time they go off the record
or change their subjects indicates that the Warren Commission was
protecting the FBI and the CIA. When Earl Warren was
(27:31):
with Jack Ruby in the cell interviewing him, Ruby wanted
to tell about the assassins. He says, there's a group
of people far right in the Dallas for area. He
wasn't allowed to talk. He told him he would be dead,
and he was dead. Was Ruby killed by the KGV
or was he killed by the CIA's special cancer. I
(27:52):
don't believe that the KGB ran the Warren Commission. I
don't believe that the Warren Commission served out of fear.
Every question they asked, every time they went out of
the room when a major witness was called, Everything they
did showed that they were protecting Navy intelligence, Army intelligence,
and the operations that came from the Pentagon.
Speaker 3 (28:12):
And the important thing about this article.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
The entire issue of the Free Press is that the
emphasis of the story is on the FBI and the CIA,
and I think it should be on the Pentagon. I
think it should be at the National Security Council level.
Speaker 3 (28:27):
I think the.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
Guilt should go as high as the White House. I
don't believe for a minute that Lyndon Johnson wasn't covering
up from the word go, because he was part of
the plans of bringing John County to Dallas and part
of the plans of covering up the evidence at Parkland,
or his friend Clifton Carter taking the clothing of John
Conelly and giving it to Congressman Gonzales when it's dry cling.
(28:52):
I don't believe that the true story is in this issue.
And next week I may go into some more articles
in this issue, such as the one Sila Johnson and
other phases of the LA Free Press stories. There are
other articles there. The authors aren't mentioned. References are given
to show you how it diverts from some very important
leads that are available. And I did want to tell
(29:14):
you how I took issue with the first article with
Lane because there was every indication that the Warren Commission
knew very early that the FBI and the CIA were
making Lee Harvey Oswald the Patsy.
Speaker 3 (29:25):
Well, our time is up.
Speaker 2 (29:26):
Now you can order these copies of the Free Press
and we'll probably do more at a little bit next week.
On that there's May Brussel and Carmel, California, and I'll
be seeing you next Sunday.
Speaker 1 (29:39):
You've been listening to Dialogue Conspiracy with May Russell
It's time once again for Dialogue Conspiracy with May Brussel.
For the past fourteen years, May has been researching and
uncovering facts and evidence from between the lines of the
news and placing them in a more thorough perspective of
how conspiracy, political assassination, and abuses of power affect us.
All Dialogue Conspiracy originates with KLRBFM in Carmel, California and
(00:31):
now May Brussel.
Speaker 3 (00:35):
Good Evening.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
This is May Brussel and Carmel, California. It's Dialog Conspiracy
number three hundred and ten, and this is February twenty sixth,
nineteen seventy six. This is the last Sunday in February.
They go around pretty fast. Last week on Dialogue Conspiracy,
I talked about my friend Lillian Castelano, who passed.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
To Wayne, Los Angeles February sixteenth.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
We were all concerned about the cause of her death
and about her research for the past fourteen years. That
was literally her life these past fourteen years. Since this
last week has gone by, the house is still locked
up where Lillian lived. The Los Angeles Police Department had
come there. Evidently a neighbor had called and told them
(01:18):
to come check the house out and the police have
found her dead and somebody, according to Tencher Rocket heard
the make a remark this is one of those assassination
conspiracy cases something of that effect. The police have locked
up everything at Lilian's house and the family were allowed
to go and search for a will, and no will
has been found.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
About what to do with their research, they have all agreed.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
That Penn Jones Junior and Texas should be the one
to have her research on the John Kennedy and Robert
Kennedy assassination, but the Los Angeles Police Department can hold
all that research for one year if no will is found.
Her very closest friend who worked with Sir Floyd can't
believe that Lillian didn't have a will. She wasn't in
(02:00):
the best of health, and they knew that she took
such care of her research and it's impossible to find this.
So that Floyd and Ted Shurok, Jan Diaz and other
people Los Angeles are really very concerned. And this is
a good lesson if to may Brussel and Penn Jones
Junior and take Gundolpho and other researchers to get our
wone wills in order, which I'm doing this week, because
(02:23):
if I were to be found dead and there were
no will in my home, the police could then take
all my research and lock it up for at least
a year at least that's what they're doing Los Angeles,
and nobody then would know what is missing because there's
no index of the material.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
It's too massive.
Speaker 2 (02:40):
So if the Los Angeles Police Department keeps Lilian's the
material a year, we wouldn't know if they took out
important photographs or not. There wasn't an inventory to go
buy or compare it to. And being as the very
agency that she was exposing at the time of her
death was responsible for selling the gun that Sir Hand
allegedly had in the Ambassador, or cutting off the sleeve
(03:01):
of Robert Kennedy, or throwing away ceiling panels that would
show the type of bullets that went into the ceiling
the night Robert Kennedy was killed, destroying vital evidence of
this sort, it certainly would be easy to get rid
of Lilian's material. So, as I say, the researchers are
concerned that if there is no will, her nephew and
family and cousins can't even touch the material for an
(03:23):
entire year, and in that meantime, the very people that
she was exposing at the time of her death, preparing
papers on Attorney General Evil Younger, who was a district
attorney when Robert Kennedy was killed in Los Angeles, and
Ed Davis, the Chief of Police of Los Angeles, who
helped cover up this case. Those two men will be
running for governor, one will probably win, and the other
(03:45):
will go on to national and international control and further fame.
Within this one year, a lot can happen while Lillians
particular documentation is locked up. I did say that every
week I talked a little bit about our Attorney general
and Ed Davis, the two candidates for governor in California.
There are a few quotations of Ed Davis I'd like
(04:06):
to throw around for you, and we'll compile in some
kind of booklet's soon. One was when he was talking
about the farm workers. These are Chavez farm workers and
the gay Rights group. He said in one speech that
they ought to go together in quotes to form at
the United Fruit Party. He also addressed the International Association
of the chief of Police and he told them that
(04:27):
those people who opened their ranks to women were simply
turkeys who quotes caved into liberal pressure and filled their
departments with undersized people end quotes. Ed Davis, our candidate
for governor in California, was a keynote speaker at the
John Birch Society for the nineteen seventy sixth National Convention.
He told the National Rifle Association in nineteen seventy five
(04:49):
and quotes, today's law enforcement can protect you and urge
them to keep up with their own rifles and guns
and doing their own job because the law enforcement couldn't
do as good a job that they needed their own guns.
Davis is back, like I said Leslie by Richard Vogeri,
the fundraiser for Ronald Reagan and the supporter of the
(05:11):
extreme right wing throughout the country. He is managing the campaign,
ed Davis, the former chief of police. He also called
part of Los Angeles assessment of pornography fruit bars bottomless bars.
Thanks to the United States and California Supreme Courts. So
you could imagine if he were governor what kind of
(05:32):
appointments he would make to the California Supreme Court if
he wanted to really crack down on a lot of
the things are going on in this state. He also
told a group of people that I hold the line
to recruit minorities, gays and women as police officers would
only make me envision myself on some stage a graduation
(05:54):
day giving a diploma to a four foot eleven transvestite
moron who had kissed me instead of saluting me.
Speaker 3 (06:01):
That's Ed Davis.
Speaker 2 (06:03):
He asked the love for the Los Angeles Police Department
in nineteen seventy to have a submarine in order to
hunt the waters for drugs mugglers, and jet powered helicopters.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
For finding narcotics from Mexico.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
The Berkeley barb had a long list of quotations, and
I'm quoting some of those from them, and I have
others in my files that I will be sharing with you.
And of course Ed Davis is the man who wanted
scaffolds at the airports to hang hijackers without trials, just
hanging them in public. I'm going back to where I
was for the rest of this program this evening on
(06:39):
the issue of the Los Angeles Free Press that was
put out by Larry Flint, and it's on the jfk assassination,
and I want to do some more critique on it
as much as time allows. And when I don't cover
or I may do in a future program and get
caught up on later, you.
Speaker 3 (06:56):
Can read for yourself.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
You can order them and if you write to me
and Carol PO Box one one nine afters, California, nine five,
nine ninety three, they're two dollars. It's a dollar fifty
plus postage and they're being sent out from this address
the copies of the Los Angeles Free Press. As I
mentioned briefly in this article, the first contradiction of the
(07:20):
material in there was the headline JFK murder solved.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
The killing coordinated by.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
The CIA, and that article is signed by Mark Lane.
Speaker 3 (07:29):
He's the author to that article.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
And then on the back page, Larry Flint has this
appeal help bring the JFK killers to justice, and you
know he's ordering this million dollar reward. He claims, I
will guarantee that we will protect every bit of evidence
we gather. Just call six one four two two eight
eight seven seven, Columbus, Ohio, and an independent panel of
(07:51):
experts and judges will go over your material. If you
have information on who killed John Kennedy and Larry Flint
promised in quotes, no more secret testimony behind closed doors.
Now he uses the word judges. If you send him material,
he will have a panel of judges, and he acts
(08:14):
as if this is going to be testimony that comes
to him. He's asking people with information on the Kennedy
assassination to reach him and he'll present it to Mark Lane,
Robert Road, and Dick Gregory and several other people. The
problem is here that Larry Flint has no way to
guarantee protection to these people who send in information. He's
(08:35):
listed a phone number, and he has a toll free
number and address. And right from the beginning with this advertisement,
how can he possibly offer protection to these witnesses to
the John Kennedy assassination. He himself is under indictment in
Ohio for criminal charges, pornography charges. He's in trouble with
the government and the law, and he has no means,
(08:56):
no police force, no bodyguards to protect these people advertising
they'll have protection. And here's the House Select Committee in Washington,
d C. That just got funds to investigate the Kennedy assassination.
And starting with the very day that they got funded,
the most important witnesses were murdered in succession George de Morinschild,
(09:16):
Carlos Prisa Kris. A week later, Gary Powers, William Sullivan,
and these four people were killed as soon as the
House Select Committee got started. So why would he even
say that they'd have protection. He should say sending information
at your own risk. He also says that this will
be investigated with no closed doors, and yet sitting with
(09:39):
Mark Lane in the offices at Century City in Los
Angeles is an ex FBI man who I saw there
when I was down in LA Who's going to assist
Lane with lead and information? Now what proof is there
that this man isn't still working with the FBI. You remember,
at the time of Watergate, James McCord was an ex
CIA man who ran McCord Associates. I our aunt was
(10:01):
an ex CIA man who worked at Mullen and Company
public relations firm. And yet the facts actually prove that
they both still work for the Central Intelligence Agency. Why
would an FBI man be working for Larry Flint to
receive information from very innocent people reading this ad who
believe that there are experts and judges that are going
(10:22):
to protect them if they come forward. The independent panel
that he talks about isn't independent. They're not volunteering their time.
They're paid large salaries. Lane has literally given up any
law practice, moved out from Washington, d C. To California
to work just for Larry Flint, getting this large salary,
computers in the office, a staff rent in Century City,
(10:45):
which is no slouch area, right next to Beverly Hills,
so the most expensive office space in the United States.
And is making an occupation of this, being paid full time.
And Robert Grodin got an immense figure for the pictures
in this magazine, the Bruder film that they put in
this issue. And these men are getting a large salary.
(11:06):
It's a business and an occupation. It isn't independent. They're
working for Larry Flint.
Speaker 3 (11:11):
He's paying them.
Speaker 2 (11:13):
So that's a contradiction right there. And as I mentioned
once before, this issue of the La Free Press is undated.
The one that says it's solved. It's published in the
front it says it's published by Press West on Hollywood Boulevard,
but it isn't. It's shipped from Columbus, Ohio. The opening
section has thirty five different topics and articles. There's a
(11:34):
table of contents with thirty five different subjects forty six
pages in all in this Free Press issue, but the
only article that has a name on it is Mark Lane's.
On the first article, it says the first articles by
Mark Lane, and no other author is listed there.
Speaker 3 (11:51):
On the back next to the.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
Last page, Larry Flint said, there's many frustrated journalists who
couldn't get their articles printed in their own publications, who
have come to us and their.
Speaker 3 (12:01):
Articles will appear here.
Speaker 2 (12:03):
And yet there isn't a single name of a frustrated
journalist or any single person in this entire issue except
Mark Lane's. And he promises in that issue that people
will get their articles printed there. Ted Gondalfo said to
Mark Lane on the telephone just last week, this is
an opportunity now you're living in California to see May
(12:23):
Brussel's research, to get together and put some of her
material in the free press. And Mark Lane said to
him on the telephone and quotes to print May Brussel
in the Los Angeles Free Press would be to admit
to lunacy, to publish lunacy. Now, that isn't the first
time that Lane has made these allegations. I threatened in
nineteen seventy six a lawsuit against him, and he is
(12:47):
on the radio throwing this kind of information out.
Speaker 3 (12:50):
But here's a contradiction again.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
Larry Flint is saying that Los Angeles Free Press is
objective and it's your chance to get information out when
it goes on and implies and is admitted that all
of it must go through Mark Lane, and Mark Lane
makes the decision where it goes and Mark Lane can
say no, nothing that may Brussel Publishers will go in
(13:13):
this issue. And at the same time, Larry Flint is
paying Paul Krasner ninety thousand a year to run his
Hustler magazine, and the last three articles Paul Krasner ever
published in The Realist were entirely my research. So he
must know, Larry Flint, that this isn't quite lunacy that
I'm publishing in those three articles of The Realist, because
(13:35):
on what other basis would he hand over his entire
publishing field to Paul Krasner.
Speaker 3 (13:41):
And he's saying that this is an outlet to get.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
Information out, and on the other hand, Lane is to
screen it even though they say it's objective. So if
any of you want to write letters to Larry Flint,
Century City. I can give you the address on the phone,
or you can write to me and question about Mark
Lane and the objectivity of the La Free Press. I
think it would be a good thing to do.
Speaker 3 (14:03):
Now.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
The first article in there, the one signed by Mark Lane,
is titled the CIA conspired to kill President Kennedy. Now
secret documents provide new evidence. Now this is what the
allegations are in Lane's article. First, the CIA was planning
information about Lee rb Oswald's visit to the Soviet Embassy
(14:24):
in Mexico City and to the Cuban Embassy in Mexico
City that was purposely false in order to frighten the
Warren Commission. Secondly, he made them believe that Lee rb
Oswald was meeting with KGB member, a member of the
KGB who was a part of an assassination team. Three,
the CIA was setting Oswald up as a patsy as
(14:47):
early as October tenth, nineteen sixty three, with these false documents,
and that the Warren Commission was given those documents January
the twenty second, nineteen sixty four, And that the Warring
Commission was so frightened that by knowing that Oswald worked
with a KGB member and the assassination team, that they
(15:09):
suppressed facts about Lee Harvey Oswald in order to avoid
a further war and a major scandal. These are the
allegations of that first article. And he claims that Sylvia
Duran in a Cuban embassy and CIA agents surrounding the
Russian embassy were used for this hoax by the CIA,
and they told the Commission that Oswald meant with Valerie Costakoff,
(15:32):
a KGB member. Now, first of all, there is nothing
in that article, this first article written by Mark Lane,
that can prove that the CIA conspired to kill John
Kennedy as a advertised It only indicates that the CIA
assisted in a future cover up of setting him up
for something. Now we know that Oswald was photographed in
(15:55):
New Orleans with CIA agent Carlo Springeir, But the purpose
of doing this, of identifying Oswald with a Castro sympathizing
committee the fair play for Cuba, could possibly get Lee
Harvey Oswald to Cuba where he could be part of
an assassination team to kill Fidel Castro. It later could
(16:16):
be used to frame Lee Harvey Oswald. But these photographs
were taken in the summer of nineteen sixty three, and
they easily could have been done by the CIA to
get Oswald to Cuba, just as they lied about as
being of the Cuban embassy. They wanted to link him
with Castro in Cuba, but it could have been to
endear him to Castro as well as for any other reason.
(16:40):
The piece of paper, the document about this Costakov, has
nothing about killing plans or the actual intent of setting
up Leearvey Oswald as a patsy. The information was false
and the teletype that was set up on this information
was October tenth, nineteen sixty three, was sent to the
(17:00):
FBI State Department, Immigration Department that Alee Rvy Oswald was
in Mexico. And it's true that a month later Oswald
was dead and charged with killing John Kennedy. Five days
after the assassination, President Lyndon Johnson formed the Warring Commission,
and according to Lane, the October tenth teletype that they
had made just before Oswald was killed, before Kennedy was killed,
(17:24):
happened to be the very first evidence developed by the
CIA to frame Oswald for the murder that was presented
to the Warring Commission by January twenty second. Now, I
don't agree with this at all. I don't believe that
this document photographed in the free press, this teletype was
(17:44):
the first piece of evidence that the CIA was going
to frame Arvy Oswald. The first piece of evidence done
was in the summer of nineteen sixty three, before he
ever went to Mexico. It was setting him up with
those photographs and the altercationion with Carlo Springear that would
be played immediately.
Speaker 3 (18:03):
On the news.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
The minute John Kennedy was killed and Oswald was arrested,
we saw Oswald handing out pamphlets in New Orleans. That
scene was photographed and ready even long before the Warren
Commission was set up. There was no intention for a
Warren commission at all. That came five days after John
Kennedy was killed. That was set up, and it had
to be set in people's mind that John Kennedy was
(18:26):
killed by the Marxist Lee Harvey Oswald by Sunday evening,
by November twenty fourth, long before they ever knew there
was a Warren commission, and the first thing that would
be shown would be photographs at Oswald handing out.
Speaker 3 (18:38):
Pamphlets for fair play for Cuba.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
So by summer of nineteen sixty three, Oswald was set
up as a patsy by the CIA. The second piece
of evidence used to frame Lee Harvey Oswald as a
patsy was a record made in New Orleans with mister
ed Butler. I own the record. It's a record called
I Am a Marxist. Ed Butler worked with Army intelligence.
(19:01):
He then moved to California to work for Patrick Frawley,
who once owned large sugar investments in Cuban that were
confiscated by Castro.
Speaker 3 (19:09):
On the back of the record that was.
Speaker 2 (19:11):
Circulated and shown and played that the speech of Oswald
being a Marxist was already available as soon as Oswald
was arrested.
Speaker 3 (19:21):
As well as the photographs.
Speaker 2 (19:22):
On the back of that record are pictures of Thomas Dodd,
the Senator, Hail Bogs of Louisiana, and doctor Altnaschner of
the Information Council of America's all proclaiming Oswald was the Marxist.
That's interesting because it's the son of Thomas Dodd in
the Congress at the present time from Connecticut, who conveniently
(19:45):
put mister Blakey with his contacts of the CIA, in
charge of the House Select Committee. Dodd doesn't go far
away from the Marxist story, and Blakey is covering up.
But the record that Lee Rby Oswald made in the
summer of nineteen sixty was the second piece of evidence
to set them up as a patsy. Long before this
CIA document, the third piece of evidence to set Lee
(20:09):
Harvey Oswald up as a patsy by the CIA was
a telephone call November twenty second, nineteen sixty three, from
a preacher in North Carolina who informed the authorities in
the FBI that Lee Rvy Oswald's gun came from a
Klein's Gun mail order shop in Chicago, Illinois, under the
alias with the alias of Highdell, and it was purchased
(20:32):
in April nineteen sixty three and received at a box
that Learvy Oswald never saw that rifle, and it was
ordered in the name of an alias that Learry Oswald used. Now,
this anonymous phone call was never checked out by the
Warren Commission, and that was the third thing that framed
Leearvy Oswald. By the time they were started in January,
(20:54):
this was common knowledge in the media of this particular
tip off. The fourth piece of evidence that was to
make Lee arv Oswald the patsy was a telephone conversation
the day after John Kennedy was shot transatlantic telephone conversation
a major General Walker who works with doctor Alton Oschner
(21:14):
and the Information Council of Americas, the same people who
made that record.
Speaker 3 (21:18):
And he made a long.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Distance telephone called to Europe to a news service and
told them and quotes that this man who shot at
me in April nineteen sixty three, this Lee rb Oswald,
was the same person who shot John Kennedy, that he
was the assassin. And this was the setup of shooting
through General Walker's window and giving the excuse of linking
(21:42):
Lee rv Oswald to the Walker shooting and then to
the Kennedy shooting. Had links to the intelligence. The CIA
community in the Dallasport were THEREY and military intelligence. And
this was all long in advance of October tenth, nineteen
sixty three. As a matter of fact, I have correspondence
a documentation from a gentleman named James Frankenberry. He wrote
(22:05):
to me in January nineteen seventy four. The last I
heard from him was in nineteen seventy six, and I
should be writing to him more. He was in the
army in nineteen sixty two and was sent to Fort Bragg,
North Carolina, and he had special training and was told
that he belonged to a team who were going to
be working on assassinations. The excuse for the team was
(22:28):
that they were going to fly to Germany and kill
a Russian agent who had information about CIA operations over there.
But later he realized that the assignment that they were
going to have one of the targets was to be
Major General Edwin Walker. And he has given me the
names and other persons of the people in his unit
that were supposed to kill General Walker. And he was
(22:49):
the one who said there were three teams of five
persons each who trained an assassination team, and that they
had this dummy on a little train. They were to
aim for the head and practice the head. He named
five people, Robert Fleming, James Kelly, Peter Marshand, Robert Lawrence
and himself as being on a special terrain where they
(23:12):
had a stalking procedures sniper weapons. This was in Fort Bragg,
South Carolina in June of nineteen sixty three, and they
participated The operation was called Operation thereon. It was at
Camp David, and they were to be ready for assassinations.
And he was told this is interesting because he wrote
this in nineteen seventy four to me in correspondence, and
(23:34):
what he's saying is confirmed in a new book called
Operation Mind Control by mister Bowart.
Speaker 3 (23:40):
The officers who hired.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
Him for this assassination team said that if he told
anybody the story of what was happening, no one would
believe him, and if he said any more about it later,
they would place him in communicado and give him special treatment.
And he said that after Watergate he realized that he
recognized I howerd. Hunt as one of the men that
(24:03):
met them in the Spanish restaurant and was making arrangements.
Speaker 3 (24:06):
This is what he said for these assassination teams. So
they sent.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
Him in nineteen sixty nine to a Springfield medical center
and they went about making his assertions be proven untrue,
and he was afraid that his memory would be erased,
but he still had a memory to write in nineteen
seventy four and up to nineteen seventy six. But the
threats that he gave him are the exact threats that
(24:31):
are written up in this book Operation Mind Control, that
men were told that if you expose what happened, we
will fix you so that nobody believes you anyway, and
we can erase your memory. So the point is that
long before, months before this memo of the October nineteen
sixty three story, in the article in the Free Press,
(24:52):
there was every indication that Lee Harvey.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
Oswald was being set up as a patsy.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
Now, Mark Lane said the CIA used episodes surrounding Lee
Harvey Oswald's trip to Mexico to implicate the Soviet Union,
Fidel Castro, and the JFK assassination plans, and ultimately the
CIA could terrorize the Warren Commission and compel them to
issue a false report. Now that is a strong statement.
(25:20):
It implies that the Warren Commission protected the FBI and
the CIA. It implies that the KGB ran the Warren Commission.
It implies that all the evidence we're talking about being suppressed,
or the falsification of documents, or hiding John Kennedy's brain,
or dry cling John Conley's clothing or burning autopsy papers
(25:44):
was all done because the Warren Commission was afraid of
the KGB and that they would go to such lengths
to cover.
Speaker 3 (25:52):
Up for the KGB.
Speaker 2 (25:54):
Now the date that Mark Lane gives them this article
for the terror of the Warren Commission, he says in quotes,
on January twenty second, nineteen sixty four, the Warren Commission.
The CIA warned the Warren Commission of Oswald's alleged relationship
with a KGB officer, and this was sent to the
Commission before the first witness was testified. And as I
(26:16):
think I mentioned you before and I want to reiterate
it again. Gerald Ford wrote in his book The Portrait
of the Assassin that what terrified the Warren Commission at
their meeting was that Lee Harvey Oswald was allegedly an
agent of the FBI. I have documented proof in my
files from the National Archives that at the same meeting
the Warren Commission on January twenty second, nineteen sixty four,
(26:40):
was told Lee Arvy Oswald also worked for the CIA
as well as the FBI.
Speaker 3 (26:45):
So you have to take your choice.
Speaker 2 (26:47):
And it's very important to realize that Late is stressing
that they were completely cowed and humiliated because they were
protecting us against a war with Asia, and they covered
up this evidence to protect the KGB because of these
terrible secrets that they knew about Lee Harvey Oswald. Now
there isn't a bit of evidence to support this article.
(27:09):
I've gone through material for fourteen years. Every minute of
the Warren Commission meetings, every question asked, every witness, every
witness not called, every time they go off the record
or change their subjects indicates that the Warren Commission was
protecting the FBI and the CIA. When Earl Warren was
(27:31):
with Jack Ruby in the cell interviewing him, Ruby wanted
to tell about the assassins. He says, there's a group
of people far right in the Dallas for area. He
wasn't allowed to talk. He told him he would be dead,
and he was dead. Was Ruby killed by the KGV
or was he killed by the CIA's special cancer. I
(27:52):
don't believe that the KGB ran the Warren Commission. I
don't believe that the Warren Commission served out of fear.
Every question they asked, every time they went out of
the room when a major witness was called, Everything they
did showed that they were protecting Navy intelligence, Army intelligence,
and the operations that came from the Pentagon.
Speaker 3 (28:12):
And the important thing about this article.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
The entire issue of the Free Press is that the
emphasis of the story is on the FBI and the CIA,
and I think it should be on the Pentagon. I
think it should be at the National Security Council level.
Speaker 3 (28:27):
I think the.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
Guilt should go as high as the White House. I
don't believe for a minute that Lyndon Johnson wasn't covering
up from the word go, because he was part of
the plans of bringing John County to Dallas and part
of the plans of covering up the evidence at Parkland,
or his friend Clifton Carter taking the clothing of John
Conelly and giving it to Congressman Gonzales when it's dry cling.
(28:52):
I don't believe that the true story is in this issue.
And next week I may go into some more articles
in this issue, such as the one Sila Johnson and
other phases of the LA Free Press stories. There are
other articles there. The authors aren't mentioned. References are given
to show you how it diverts from some very important
leads that are available. And I did want to tell
(29:14):
you how I took issue with the first article with
Lane because there was every indication that the Warren Commission
knew very early that the FBI and the CIA were
making Lee Harvey Oswald the Patsy.
Speaker 3 (29:25):
Well, our time is up.
Speaker 2 (29:26):
Now you can order these copies of the Free Press
and we'll probably do more at a little bit next week.
On that there's May Brussel and Carmel, California, and I'll
be seeing you next Sunday.
Speaker 1 (29:39):
You've been listening to Dialogue Conspiracy with May Russell
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.