MAGAMind Podcast Episode 19 May 2, 2025 MAGAMind Podcast with Ian Macdonald of Media Right News Discussing Grifter Influencers calling out Shiloh Hendrix Comparing Words to Violence and Her Give Send Go Campaign After Allegedly Calling a Child the N-Word
Unfiltered MAGA Political and News Commentary
Welcome to the MAGAMind Podcast, where we cut through the bullsh*t and deliver hard-hitting MAGA political commentary and news analysis from a truth perspective. Hosted by Brian Ference and James Richard, this show is your go-to source for unapologetic takes on the issues that matter—America First policies, conservative values, and exposing the radical left’s nonsense. We’re not here to coddle snowflakes or bow to the woke mob; we’re here to fight for the soul of this nation, one episode at a time.
Dropping several times a week, MAGAMind Podcast keeps you locked and loaded with the latest on government overreach, election integrity, border security, and the culture war—all backed by razor-sharp insight and a refusal to pull punches. Whether it’s breaking down D.C.’s swamp antics or calling out the mainstream media’s lies, we’ve got your back with the facts and the firepower to make sense of it all. This isn’t just a podcast—it’s a call to action for patriots who still believe in making America great again. No apologies, no retreat, just the truth. https://magamindpodcast.com search on any stream service for “MAGAMind Podcast”Follow us on X: @brianference1 and @srrunciblespoon
Unfiltered MAGA Political and News Commentary
Welcome to the MAGAMind Podcast, where we cut through the bullsh*t and deliver hard-hitting MAGA political commentary and news analysis from a truth perspective. Hosted by Brian Ference and James Richard, this show is your go-to source for unapologetic takes on the issues that matter—America First policies, conservative values, and exposing the radical left’s nonsense. We’re not here to coddle snowflakes or bow to the woke mob; we’re here to fight for the soul of this nation, one episode at a time.
Dropping several times a week, MAGAMind Podcast keeps you locked and loaded with the latest on government overreach, election integrity, border security, and the culture war—all backed by razor-sharp insight and a refusal to pull punches. Whether it’s breaking down D.C.’s swamp antics or calling out the mainstream media’s lies, we’ve got your back with the facts and the firepower to make sense of it all. This isn’t just a podcast—it’s a call to action for patriots who still believe in making America great again. No apologies, no retreat, just the truth. https://magamindpodcast.com search on any stream service for “MAGAMind Podcast”Follow us on X: @brianference1 and @srrunciblespoon
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Hi, This is Brian Farrence. You can follow me on
exit Brian Farren's one or Brian farance dot com. Also
the Magamine podcast, which is Magamine podcast dot Com. With
me today is Ian McDonald from Media Write News.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Say hello, Ian, Hey, what's going on? Everybody? Thanks in
the sun today?
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Oh yeah, where where you hike? It looks like you're hiking.
Where are you hiking at?
Speaker 2 (00:28):
I'm just on a city walking pat in my town
in Idaho.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
Okay, it looks pretty nice. What's what's the temperature like
right now?
Speaker 2 (00:38):
It's about seventy seven degrees.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
Or that's nice. It's kind of like Arizona, but it's
a little bit warmer. It's getting getting hot fast. We're
gonna be in summer pretty soon in Arizona. So all right,
so we've had you on the show before. I'm gonna
share my screen because we're gonna talk about a couple
of things. But one of the things we're gonna talk
about this video. Uh, it's kind of going viral right
(01:03):
now of Shiloh Hendrix, which is the mother she called
another child, uh the N word, and then she started
to give send go, which has raised a lot of money.
But I want to go ahead and show this video
to the viewers so that they can see it and
has some context. First, so let me show my share
(01:25):
my screen here and everyone should be able to see that.
Let me make it bigger and I'm gonna play this
so hopefully everyone can hear that. Pretty well, here we go. Child.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
Did you call the child the nigga word? It is
my business you call Okay, why don't you have the
boss to say it right now?
Speaker 1 (01:48):
Again?
Speaker 3 (01:52):
All right, that's what you say, nobody, a little kid?
You call him a nigger? A little child? Are you
about to hit him? You're chasing him here? So that
gives you that I have to call the child five
year old a nigga the inward, that's what you're gonna
(02:15):
call him. You know, that's the hate speech. And you
can do the caller for that ship. Okay, we'll see
about that. What the internet has said?
Speaker 1 (02:27):
All right, let me let me stop sharing that. Uh so, so,
first of all, before we talk about the gifts and
go ian, just give me your reaction to that video.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
Well, first off, there's a lot of missing context. Unless
I missed something, I don't believe we anybody saw the
actual child or how verified his actual age or what
he was actually doing, how bad was anything like that. We're,
(03:05):
you know, all speculating on what actually happened, what actually
led up to it. So there's gonna be speculation on
all different side internet on what actually did happen to settlement. Now,
as far far as you agree with saying the N
(03:26):
word if you're white, especially to a child, I think
that's to be debated between your your your friends, your
family and things. That's not what we're because I'm I'm
for free speech, whether or not you like it or not.
You know, I don't think that's what we're here for today.
I think we're here to talk about the reactions of
(03:49):
the of the influencers on ACT and so on and
so forth.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
Yes, but before we get to the reactions, let's look
at the gifts and Go campaign. But did you did
you want to add any other comments before we look
at the gifts end Go campaign?
Speaker 2 (04:03):
No? No, go ahead, all.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
Right, So let me share this now. So this is
a live view of the gifts End Go campaign that
was launched by the mother again. Her name is Shiloh Hendrix.
And you can see here. I mean it might be
difficult to see but in the it's already raised three
hundred and forty nine three hundred and sixty six dollars,
(04:26):
three hundred and forty nine thousand dollars. This woman is raised.
She's saying, help me protect my family. She says, Hello,
my name is Shiloh. I've been put in a dire situation.
I had a kid steal from my eighteen month son
diaper bag in the park. I called the kid out
for what he was, which was the she says. That's
where she says the end word in the video. Another man,
who recently found out has a history with law enforcement,
(04:48):
proceeded to record me and follow me to my car.
He then posted these videos online, which caused my family
and myself great turmoil. My social Security number has been leaked,
my address and my quote never been given out for
my family members are being attacked. My eldest child may
not be going back to school even where I exercise,
where it's exposed. I'm asking for your help to assist
(05:09):
and protect my family. If you must relocate. I have
two small children who do not deserve this. We've been
threatened to buy the extreme people online. Anything will help.
We cannot live in fear she's posted some updates. Thank
you for the overwhelming support. No one's been harmed. I
(05:29):
won't feel safe until we escape completely. And before that,
she said, everything we've relieved, we've received is unbelievable, and
never felt so scared yet reassured in my life. And
again she's she's raised over three hundred and forty nine thousand. Yeah,
(05:51):
and she's raised the goal to now a million dollars
as her goal. That's that's a heck of a goal
for just relocating. I mean, she's gonna be relocating to
a luxury island, it seems.
Speaker 2 (06:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
Anyways, let me stop sharing that. And then you were
mentioning that there was some influencer reactions. Well, before we
go to the influencer reactions, So what's your reaction I
into the gifts and Go campaign.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
Well, first, I just want to clarify from my initial statements.
I'm sure you do too. I have a lot of
great black friends. So even if we agreed for the
sake of argument that for this, you know, maybe maybe
she shouldn't have, maybe she could have used a better word.
(06:43):
It's beyond the point now, because again, we do have
free speech in this country. Even if something we agree
wasn't the best choice of wording. It doesn't meanymore because unfortunately,
if you don't like free speech, you can go to
a country that doesn't that, and so you really can't
(07:06):
compare free speech to violent and that's what a lot
of people are trying to do. But to answer your question,
you know, I think it's getting excessive or whatnot. You know, maybe,
but a lot of people are comparing it to the
Carmelo Anthony case. Am I pronouncing name right?
Speaker 1 (07:27):
I think you're pronouncing it correct. I'm not sure how
they're comparing it, because it's it's pretty different, but.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
Right, And that's the point, the fact that it's so different,
but yet people are still comparing it anyway is what
repulses so many people. They're saying, hey, even if we
don't agree with that word, being murdered is so much worse.
And you're coming about somebody making a thousand bucks by
(07:59):
comparing those two things, and and that's what's creating this
outrage because it's as if people are trying to compare
murder to a bad word. Even if you you know,
whether you like using the word or think that it's horrible,
you should never use it. It's the matter, it's not violence.
(08:20):
The two shouldn't be compared. And a lot of people
are doing that to your arguargument against well, that's excessive
that so it's been too much much money? And who
the who? Who? Who gave any influencer the gavel to
(08:42):
decide how much money some random person is allowed to
raise for some random incident.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
And let me share one of those posts from one
of these influencers that you're talking about. So let's see.
This is uh, this is from Riley Gaines. And let
me just Riley Gaines. Okay, she hosts a girls Gains
for girls podcasts. She says she's a best selling author,
(09:13):
and it says, of course that she's a Turning Point
USA contributor. She's a Turning Point USA like paid influencer
is my understanding of what she is. I believe she
was involved in the Epstein Binder gate at the White House?
Is that right?
Speaker 2 (09:29):
I'll lean on your knowledge on that, but it sounds
about I think.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
She was, but I'll verify that anyways, it was either
her or another paid Turning Point USA influencer. But here's
what she says. She says talking about this woman shyly.
She says her original goal was twenty thousand to licate
to safety fair enough. Once she raised that, the gold
jump to one hundred and fifty thousand. She hit that too,
(09:58):
so it became two hundred and fifty that this isn't
the end of white guilt and black privilege, which I
agree is real and harmful. It's emotionalism at its finest.
That's what Riley Gaines says.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
So when you talk about amounts, I don't know if
I'm interrupting good I'm sorry if I am. When you
talk about amounts of money, the only people that get
to john ounce are judges and courtrooms when you're suing
or being sued or being fined for something, or your
(10:36):
back boxes. You don't get to come on the internet
as an influencer and say, hey, I'm the boss of
high Ground and I'm drawing the line at twenty five
thousand as much as anyone deserves for this random incident,
because I know best the hell are you? And I
(11:00):
don't know what you think of Ethan Ralph with the
Ralph retort live stream, the kill stream, what uh he
said that you weren't even in second place? You were
in and got famous because you weren't a tranny and
trying to grift off this. Maybe you should sit down
(11:22):
for this one along those lines.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
Yeah, you're talking about Riley Gaines, how she how she
became you know famous.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Yeah, you he was. He said you were in fifth place,
not second. Remind everyone maybe you should sit down something
along those lines. I kind of agreed with that sentiment.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Well, yeah, I mean, you know, that's that's an interesting point.
So I'm not sure what these internet you know, paid influencers,
what right they have just to call out someone else's
is doing what they're doing and that's wrong, but it's
okay for them to do it. That doesn't make a
lot of sense to me. Yeah, you know, I'm just
(12:04):
looking at Riley Ginnon's feed right now. She's you know,
she's reposting Insurrection Barbie, who you know we've talked about before. Yeah, yeah,
that's one of the things you repost.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
Any of your loyal followers already is rolling their eyes
right now.
Speaker 1 (12:24):
Yeah, And I'm sure she reposts, you know, Scott Presler
all the time too, another another drifter. So it's you know,
it's okay, Yeah, she's she's posting. Okay, well, let me
show this, Let me show this you you just mentioned
the Carmelo Anthony, So let me show this, uh screenshot
to our ears. So she she says that, she says,
(12:44):
let me make this bigger. She says that lady raised
two hundred and twenty five thousand, so far are we joking?
We don't need a white Carmelo Anthony. That's exactly what
you were talking about. She's literally making that comparison, and
it's completely different. It's a really dumb comparison. And then
she has to put a disclaimer because she realized how
(13:06):
dumb it was. That was viewed one point three million times.
So so Riley Grans makes a stupid comment comparing words
to murdering someone right as a right wing influencer, supposedly
gets one point three million dollars one point three dollar
one point three million views, and then has to say, obviously,
(13:27):
words aren't comparable to stabbing an innocent boy in the heart,
right and just.
Speaker 2 (13:35):
And that's the point I wanted to make is that's
the left big thing they try to compare words and
the right, even Charlie Kirk and his gang, they always
try to say, well, no, we're the reasonable ones who
pushed back on that, and words are not violence, but
here they are turning point ambassadors doing exactly what the
(13:59):
left does, comparing words to violence, right, And she.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
Was called out on it. There was multiple comments. Elijah
Safer said, Yeah, Riley, using the N word towards kids,
towards a kid who stole from you in the in
the park is the same thing as murdering a child
in cold blood at a public school. I thought you
defended women who retrieved who received unfair treatment. And then
(14:24):
Daniel says, you moron. They docked her and she isn't
safe at her house and she didn't stab anyone in
the chest. The dumbest effing posts on the entire Internet
just compared stabbing someone in the chest with a knife
and murdering them to calling someone in vain and then
(14:44):
more more of them other retard. So, yeah, she got
a lot of pushback on that, you know post that
was viewed one point three million times, which has you know,
five point five thousand comments and seven point six thousand likes.
So she's probably making Quie a bit of money off
of Elon Musk, off of X the revenue sharing, which
(15:05):
you know, I commented I was just demonetized. So you know,
I'm not allowed to make any money off of X
because I do investigative journalism, explore, expose the truth. But
Riley gains a paid turnpoint influencer can go out there
like a leftist and compare you know, words to violence
her post. Her post gets viewed one point three million times.
(15:28):
She probably made like at least a couple hundred bucks
off that one post alone. Uh. Yeah, that's the state
of the the MAGA influencers.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
That's be sad and at risk of my own monetarization.
It almost makes you wonder if you know you said
something to anger Elon munt by going against some who
he gave a million plus dollars to.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Yeah, that's well, that's exactly right. I've been critical of
Insurrection Barbie of Data Republican, So you know, that's that's
it for me. With ex monetization, you can't criticize those
people that told the line.
Speaker 2 (16:09):
Now that's just speculation, of course. And I still like
elonsk don't get me wrong. I'm just saying he gave
a lot of money, and here you are are bashing
with evidence.
Speaker 1 (16:21):
With evidence, that's another going against.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Him and your demonetized guys. Well, that's not I guess
it's a coincidence. I don't know.
Speaker 1 (16:32):
I guess the grifters get the millions of dollars and
then the investigative journalists with the truth get the shaft.
I guess that's what.
Speaker 2 (16:39):
Well. I think Nick short Tour is decent. Large accounts
that it's pretty good investigative journalism. However, when the people
he called out sort of apologized and said, yeah, you
got me. I got ace for taking the one thousand
(17:00):
dollars soda Gate campaign from I believe if it was influential.
He immediately said, oh, like you did the right thing.
It's okay, we're not gonna hold his shoe. And so
he's good. But at the same time he saw too,
He's not like a bull in the China shop type.
(17:22):
He's not like out there humor where you just got lumored.
You know.
Speaker 1 (17:28):
Well, yeah, but if you noticed. So when Laura Lumer
was doing some of that, she got demonetized on X
and then she had to you know, bend the knee
and kiss the ring and then she got let back in,
you know.
Speaker 2 (17:39):
And that's and then some tells you a lot. Yeah,
but The funny thing about that soda gate campaign which
Nick sore tour Uh, the main person who announced it,
said that Riley gaines him off because she was invited
(18:00):
to take part in promoting some candy and against being
taken away from Snappians. And she said, well, I'm gonna
I'm not word for word here, but she basically said,
I'm gonna the Maha stand and not take part in
(18:21):
this campaign. That particular campaign. However, to have gotten the
email in her to the to do it, she would
have had to been signed up for campaigns with that
company to begin with, right, So what other campaigns did
(18:41):
she take? I'm deculating because you don't just randomly get
email saying hey, you want to do soda and candy Gate.
For the Bucks, you would have had to have already
been established influencer with that company, signed up, ready to go,
waiting for for particular campaigns. So she probably probably signed
(19:07):
up with that influenceable campaign company for other campaigns. She
just didn't want to do that particular one because she
saw an opportunity to get clout off not doing it,
more opportunity than the thousand bucks if she it bodes
was it instead? And it worked out great for her,
(19:31):
didn't it.
Speaker 1 (19:32):
Yeah, that certainly did.
Speaker 2 (19:34):
She got the fame and the and the you know
everything good for exposing it. But nobody ever question why
were you signed up for those emails in the first way.
Nobody with a big enough account to pop up in
every and you know, little accounts like me. Nobody's gonna
I fall to the bottom of the feet anyway.
Speaker 1 (19:53):
You know, right, right, Yeah, So it's it's, man, there's
it's so much truth in that, and uh, it's really
disappointing to see, you know, what is being rewarded and
promoted on X financially, it's these influencers like Riley Gaines
and Scott Pressler, and you know, they're just putting out
(20:15):
lies and leftists dribble, and they're the ones that are
being you know, rewarded for. Right.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
So if I wanted to have a debate about the
morality of the end word, that would be like a
separate debate, I mean, because like I said that, I
don't even think that's what this is about, honestly, right.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
Right, yeah, And I was just looking while you were talking.
I was looking at this influencable website, right, So their
their applications for new influencers appears to be disabled because
if you go to their homepage and you try to
put in anything in order to like sign up, it
looks like it's disabled. They're not taking any more, probably
(21:00):
because you know, their business took a hit or something.
Speaker 2 (21:04):
I think they were exposed for soda Gate. They that
probably did them.
Speaker 1 (21:08):
In probably probably. But there's there's a dozen companies like
that that pay, you know, paid influencers for whatever they want.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Yeah, I was gonna say the CEO's name. I don't
have a memorized, but it was exposed at some point,
and whoever ran that company, they'll just reinvent themselves under
some other name or something like that. They'll they'll figure
out a way to scam people another way.
Speaker 1 (21:37):
Oh yeah, I'm sure they will.
Speaker 2 (21:39):
And that's, you know, in my in my opinion.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Well yeah, it's it's it's really a shame. And uh,
I mean, let me just think about this for a minute.
So that going back to what you know, the story
and what happened the woman and her gifts and go campaign,
I mean that's a true and his success. So I'm
assuming you know she's gonna be running for political office. Shortly, right,
(22:07):
or she'll be she'll be a Magga influencer herself. Right.
Speaker 2 (22:11):
So so to get back to that, there's a lot
of talk about whether or not she's going to get
that money because of pressure about you know, her campaigns
uh claiming that they're going to be called a racist
(22:32):
company if they allow to go. So there's it hasn't
been officiated or anything like that, but there's a lot
of rumors and discussions about if the money even goes
through or if if it gets like if obviously we
all know if it was funly it would have been
canceled a long time ago. Yeah, we're all hoping that
(22:56):
because I think the carmenyone was gives and Go.
Speaker 1 (23:00):
Too, was that one canceled?
Speaker 2 (23:03):
Because I think that go Fundme may have camped him
in the beginning because it was so controversial and then
he went to gives and Go. I think, don't quote me,
maybe maybe double check me on that, because I don't
a computer in front of me, but I they'll they'll
host anybody that Go fund me cancels as long as
(23:25):
it's legal. I think that's they're kind of their whole purpose.
Like rumble, you know, if you get footed off YouTube.
You go to Rumble, as long as you're not breaking
the law or whatnot, they pretty much let you talk
on there, and so I think that's the purpose of
so there is a campaign for them to pull the
rug on it. I think they'll they'll try to hold out.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
I don't think that they have comments on it on
it officially, Gifts and Go, I don't see. I'm on
their X profile. They're not very active. It's funny because
they're right in the middle of a nominate a mother
in your in your Life, A mom wins in every state.
They're running a campaign like that. I wonder if if
(24:12):
Chilah will be nominated as a Mother of the.
Speaker 2 (24:16):
Year for her They probably want this thing to be
as quick as possible, if you ask me, Yeah, they
probably do. They're probably getting emails from the Daily Beast
and media and tuns of hit rags as we speak.
I'm sure.
Speaker 1 (24:34):
I'm sure they are. It looks like they have not
commented on it. But what you'll see from what I'm
aware of Gifts and Go is they if they have
a problem, they will pause her campaign. So when I
looked it was still live. It has not been paused,
but if you know it's possible what you're saying. But
I believe the first step is they would they would
(24:56):
pause the campaign, which I have not uh seen that yet.
Let me go back to it. Yeah, it's still up there.
Now it's up to what did I say before? Three
hundred and fifty six is three hundred and fifty seven Now.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
I would almost wonder. It's almost just like me and
you talking here. I know alive, like if if that
was somebody I knew in the situation, Like not for
the reasons that other people are saying, but maybe it
(25:34):
is time to wrap up the the campaign and go
ahead and get paid out before it draws too much
scrutiny and and then possibly doesn't get paid out, and
now you don't get anything you almost want because that
is a lot of money.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
That's a lot of money, three hundred and fifty seven
nine as it were.
Speaker 2 (25:58):
And I'm not against it going as high as it goes.
But it almost makes you wonder too, if there's scrutiny,
a bird in the hand is better than two in
the bush.
Speaker 1 (26:09):
Yeah, I mean, if she think about it, if I
was Shiloh, She's probably I don't know, she might be
having dollar signs in her eyes now. But if I
was her and it raised three hundred and fifty seven
thousand dollars, I mean, yeah, you know, I don't want to,
you know, prejudge her by her appearance, but based on
the park and where she was, and you know, the
(26:30):
tattoos on her arms or arm sleeves she mentioned, the
gym and stuff, you know, based on where they're living
and the expensiveness of I don't know, her clothes and
different things. I mean, it's likely to say that that
would be a good amount of money for her. I mean,
it's for anyone. Really. Yeah, she could be a millionaire.
I don't know, but it doesn't that's probably not likely.
(26:51):
So you know, that could be you know, college tuition
for her kids. Certainly. You know, she could get a
new house, she get college tuition for her kids. Based
on this photo that I've seen of her, has her
left hand, she has no wedding ring on that left hand,
so she's probably a single mom.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
I'd say, you could move to you buy a small house, yeah,
no mortgage, and yeah, I mean, get a job and
have one hundred grand in the bank.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
That's exactly right. And you know that's what she should do.
That's what she should do. But I guess we're gonna
see what happens. But uh, yeah, you make a good
point that if it goes too high, too fast, she
might not get any of the money. I think typically
the way Gibson go works is once you get a
(27:44):
certain amount donated, you can request a payment, like before
you know, the gold reached or whatever. So you know,
she could she could have already requested a payment of
like one hundred thousand or something and maybe got it.
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
I yeah, I don't know. I don't know how that stuff.
I've never done one, so interesting side speculation there for sure.
But yeah, I've seen a lot of people say that
this is just sort of verse middle finger to all
the all all the stuff that Carmelo Anthony has been given,
(28:24):
all the money of the luxury home rent and a
one hundred thousand dollars SUV and you know, all this ridiculousness,
even though see him as an alleged murderer. You don't
want to say it till they're found guilty in court, obviously,
but that's how most people see it as as these
(28:46):
and it let a murder, not self defense. That's that's
how a lot of people see it as well.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
And let me share this here because I've pulled up
that one too because we were talking about it. And
if you can see this, this is the help Carmelo
official fund. It says on gifts and go it says
it's raised five hundred and nineteen thousand of a six
hundred thousand dollars goal.
Speaker 2 (29:11):
Yeah, So why would you, as Riley Gaines say, we
don't want another Like, on the one hand, you don't
want to compare words to violence. But on the other hand,
if simply raising money makes some people feel a little
(29:33):
bit vindicated about a situation, why are you trying to
take the moral high ground on something where you're not
really the designated person for that? Like, who wire you
(29:54):
to judge somebody over free speech that you don't like,
you know, for the risk of somebody judging me. Hey,
it sounds like you're defending the N word. You know,
that's no. I'm defense speech, right. It could be somebody
(30:15):
calling something and I might not like it, Well, but
I won't I won't be to have them arrested for
it either.
Speaker 1 (30:23):
Well, that's right, And you know what the US Constitution says,
it says, it says equal protection under the law. So,
you know, the child that I missed, if it was
actually a you know, African American black child or not,
that allegedly took something from the diaper bag that they
panned real quick on the video, it looked like it
(30:43):
was a teenager or like twelve or something.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
Yeah, I actually saw the child, but let's just.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Say, let's just say that that child had you know, uh,
you know, some kind of portable You don't have boomboxes anymore,
but some kind of portable you know, music like off
his eye and his phone or you know, he had
a you know, a bluetooth outdoor speaker, right, a bluetooth
outdoor speaker, and he wanted to blast the loudest rap
(31:11):
music he could at the park and it could be
an N word laced song. Yeah, and that would be fine.
Speaker 2 (31:20):
Well legally a decibel.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
Well yeah, there's there's of course, there's a decibel city ordinance.
But I guarantee you he wouldn't have had someone come
up and record him and be like, oh, your music,
it's the ordinance and blah blah blah. And but my
point was an equal protection under the loss. So if
if one person can say that in a public park,
(31:46):
or play music that says that in a public park,
but another one can't, that's violation of the constitution, equal
protection under the law. So I mean, that's the fact
of it, you know, That's how it is.
Speaker 2 (32:00):
So yeah, I mean, it's it's it's just it's a
shame that the whole situation, Like I said it, it'd
be easier if there was more of the footage of
it exactly what happened. Mm hmmm, see what led up
to everything.
Speaker 1 (32:18):
But yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
It's a shame that it all came to that.
Speaker 1 (32:23):
Well, it's interesting. It's interesting that the left's reaction was
they didn't like what this woman did, so they wanted
to immediately dox her and have her canceled, right, They
wanted to dox and cancel her, and I think that's
part of why it is backfired and people were like, well, no,
let's raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for her now.
So I think that this doxing and canceling thing is over,
(32:47):
and you know, probably the raising hundreds of thousands for
you know, that should be probably over too. But uh,
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (32:59):
Well again comparing violence to a word.
Speaker 1 (33:04):
Yeah, that's not even a comparison. So Riley Gaines, paid
Turning Point influencer, should be ashamed of herself.
Speaker 2 (33:12):
What was the name of the the the white child?
He was either five or nine. It was about two
or three years ago.
Speaker 1 (33:20):
He was murdered and.
Speaker 2 (33:23):
By by a black neighbor. And I believe there was
a lot of defending of the guy who killed him. Yeah,
from from the black.
Speaker 1 (33:31):
Twitter or whatever's uh what's black Twitter? What's that like?
Speaker 2 (33:38):
Black people?
Speaker 1 (33:39):
I thought that was a different social media so that
you were talking about.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
Like no, no, no, but what was the name? Do
you remember the kid that got just shot in the head?
Speaker 1 (33:49):
I remember that, yeah, And they asked the guy why
he did it, and it was something like, you know,
I saw a white kid and I wanted you know,
I wanted to And a lot.
Speaker 2 (33:57):
Of people defended the guy. They were like mentally ill
or something. There was a lot of defense ending this
guy who shot the kid in the head. I don't,
I don't And where was his I don't know if
he got three sixty for his family's expenses and heartbreak
(34:19):
and I don't, I don't remember what they got but
that was a cold blood and murder not a bad word.
Speaker 1 (34:26):
Yeah, it's not what what totally totally unrelated.
Speaker 2 (34:29):
I think it's what was the kid's name? Was it?
Speaker 1 (34:34):
Canon blankart?
Speaker 2 (34:38):
Yeah? Yeah you can't.
Speaker 1 (34:41):
Yeah, it says a in it and it was in
twenty twenty in North Carolina.
Speaker 2 (34:48):
I bet if you did a little did a little
searching through Twitter, I bet you find people being the
guy that shot him saying oh he was like he
was having a mental breakdown or something something crazy. I
bet you will. I bet you will.
Speaker 1 (35:05):
And the neighbor, Darius Sessoms was his name, It was
his neighbor.
Speaker 2 (35:14):
What was his uh? Are you able to look up
what his ultimate sentences?
Speaker 1 (35:18):
He was? He was sentenced to life in prison without
the possibility of parole.
Speaker 2 (35:24):
No death penalty. You'll have three hots and a cop
for the rest of his life.
Speaker 1 (35:30):
I just want to see if they did a gifts
and go for him. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (35:35):
Yeah, that was the other thing I was kind of
hoping you could check. Let's see, you know, because that's
what if she had half a brain. That's the sort
of Riley Games should be doing, not spouting off about
something that happened five minutes ago. But if you want
(35:57):
to be intelligent, you you reached stuff that has in
a few years ago. That's a little more apples that
to talk about.
Speaker 1 (36:11):
Okay, it says that a GoFundMe page was set up
to raise money for the victim and which raised seven
hundred thousand. But I'm looking to see if the uh
the shooter had fund raised, had funds raised for him,
(36:34):
and it does not appear to be so okay, in
that case, they only raise money for the victim. Well,
they will find it. Correct me if I'm wrong, If
any of my viewers, you know, send me a message
if I'm wrong on that.
Speaker 2 (36:54):
You can never replace a life, no matter how much
money raise.
Speaker 1 (36:59):
Yeah, that that's a more I guess accurate comparison. It
would be like if they had raised running money for Darius,
it would have been but they did not. So, you know,
Anthony Carmelo shouldn't have had money raised for him either.
Speaker 2 (37:18):
Yeah, if you're raising money for the family whose child
got killed, that makes absolute perfect sense, right.
Speaker 1 (37:26):
But to do it murder, that doesn't make sense. Yeah,
And what some people were saying is, you know, it
was a very small number of people that raise money
for you know, the murderer, and some other people were
saying they were you know, bobbing out some theories that well,
maybe this is another type of money laundering situation, like
(37:49):
this money is not from real donors. It's actually like
you know, coming from International or act Blue and it's
going to be used.
Speaker 2 (37:57):
Yeah, and also than it appears that's very interesting, m
because I don't want to speculatilate too much or say
anything to get me in trouble, but that's an interesting yeah.
Speaker 1 (38:12):
Yeah, it is so anyways, very very uh strange story
and getting stranger. But yeah, I mean it can kind
of go back again to you know, these grifting like
MAGA influencers that often express leftist you know, uh ideals
(38:33):
in commentary when you know they're not having their social
media team or their AI bot you know, put little
one liner comments and repost pok news videos. But when
they actually post something that's like their commentary on something
that's real that has happened that they actually do, and
(38:53):
it comes out like, well, this is the same thing
as Carmelo Anthony, you know, comparing words to to a murderer,
which is a leftist way of thinking. Riley gains and
that's that's who gets monetized, and you know, paid by
Turning Point and paid by X and everyone else who
thinks critically about things or you know, speaks the truth
(39:17):
or these other smaller accounts, they get all get demonetized.
So isn't that interesting, right? Yeah?
Speaker 2 (39:24):
No, And let's say, for example, some little white kid
gets called a cracker or honky. Do you think that
there'd be hundreds and hundreds of people threatening and doxing
that family of the person that or do you think
they would just brush it off? As you know, I
(39:46):
am a fan, I can't believe that happened, but I'm
I'm just gonna move on.
Speaker 1 (39:50):
Absolutely not. And in fact, even if the kid was
like raped or something, because you wouldn't even hear about it,
because the media hides all stories of islands against white children,
they don't cover, so.
Speaker 2 (40:04):
They wouldn't so they wouldn't have to worry about threats
of violence against them. And if their kid did the
same exact thing, most likely. So, but this woman does,
so she does have to fear now for her life
and for bins against her her child. So maybe that
money kind of does need to be used for safety
(40:27):
purposes to prevent another canonhendance. Maybe I'm stretching a little bit, maybe,
but hey, you never know. In this today's world, look
at the Luigi guy who came out of nowhere to
kill the United Care studio. You can create murderers out
of nowhere with enough outrage on the internet today.
Speaker 1 (40:50):
I'm pretty sure he's got to give said campaign. Do
you know his Do you know the spelling of his name?
Speaker 2 (40:56):
No? I can only I would have to guess.
Speaker 1 (40:59):
See, let me aig.
Speaker 2 (41:02):
Maybe M A and g I.
Speaker 1 (41:05):
Okay, Luigi Mangioni. Oh man, all right, let me share this.
Now here we go, Here we go, so all right,
hopefully you can see this. So this is Luigi Mangioni
official legal fund for all three cases. People, the State
(41:29):
of New York versus him, United States of America versus him,
Collonwealth of Pennsylvania versus him. They have the legal team
has officially accepted the funds. His attorney is Tom Dickey
and Karen Friedman blah blah blah. And that raised nine
(41:49):
hundred and seventy one thousand with a goal of one
point five million dollars.
Speaker 2 (41:55):
So that tells me they really shouldn't be pulling down
this other lady Irena.
Speaker 1 (42:01):
I don't think they can. If you can allow these murderers.
Speaker 2 (42:04):
Yeah, you know, then this this, I can't shiloh whatever.
They shouldn't be pulled on that down if they're if
they're leaving Luigi mainjilling up there, that's right, they should
They shouldn't be pulling anybody down unless they're like a
terrorist or something.
Speaker 1 (42:24):
Yeah, I mean that's a good point.
Speaker 2 (42:26):
Uh well, any any terror, any terrorst well, I was
just kind of using an example.
Speaker 1 (42:34):
It's it's just astounding to me though, that so much
money can be raised. I mean, you can murder someone
and then have so much money raised for you that
you can hire like this stellar legal defense and at
a minimum, even if like let's say you're guilty, at
a minimum, they're gonna get you probably some kind of
reduced sentence at a minimum. That that's you know, most
(42:57):
people could not afford. And they're gonna serve the max.
Speaker 2 (43:01):
I wonder what cope how much he's raised? You know
the mos Idaho Do you know the spelling of that,
Brian just just if you look up Brian Coburger, k.
Speaker 1 (43:19):
Okay b E R G E. I believe let's see,
all right, let's let me pull this up. Let's see.
Speaker 2 (43:35):
I'm sure you know about that story and the Idaho.
Speaker 1 (43:39):
Yeah, it said, wait a minute, let me let me
refresh this. Mmm, I'm not finding that one. Gifts and
go for that one. Let me look, let me search
on the site of itself.
Speaker 2 (43:57):
Yeah, he may not ray anything. I don't. I don't
think I know a few fans that write letters to
them though, like females. He's got like a female fan girl.
But which which is the dumbest thing ever?
Speaker 1 (44:12):
I do not. I don't see gifts and go for that.
It doesn't mean that you know they tried one or
I don't know. I don't. I don't see one for that.
Speaker 2 (44:20):
All right, Maybe I'll look into that some later. Get
back here. That's an interesting one.
Speaker 1 (44:27):
Well yeah, I mean it's it's interesting story. So we'll,
you know, we'll cover this. We'll do it. We'll maybe
do an update in a couple of days. What's uh?
What was the resolution? Did it get to a million?
Did you raise a million dollars? Did it get shut down?
What happened?
Speaker 2 (44:42):
But a good talking to put out there, you know
in the just discord. If our tiny accounts can get seen,
it would be the Hey they allow Louisy mang you
own to raise almost a million dollars on gives, then go,
I don't think they're gonna pull this down, whether you
(45:04):
like it or not like it?
Speaker 1 (45:05):
Right? I agree? I based on that evidence, it doesn't
look like they're gonna pull it down. They can just site. Hey,
we kept murderers up there, we can keep this one
up there. You know what you're gonna do?
Speaker 2 (45:15):
Yeah? So crazy?
Speaker 1 (45:17):
Well all right, well, any other closing comments Ian that
you want to make.
Speaker 2 (45:25):
No, I mean, like you said, it comes down to
following the story and seeing how it developments.
Speaker 1 (45:33):
All right, Well, I want to thank Ian McDonald from
Meteorite News from joining me again. My name is Brian Farns.
This is the Magamine podcast. You can watch previous episodes
magamine podcast dot com or search wherever you get your podcasts.
For Magamind that's one word podcast. Also Brian Ference dot
com and on x at Brian Farren's one. At least
(45:56):
for now. I'm also on truth Social at Brian Parents,
on gab at Brian fe and the Rumble ones a
little bit longer, but that's linked off of magamind podcast
dot com. So please please fall and join there, and uh,
you know, I'll just I'll get leave some closing words
(46:16):
for Elon Musk, Elon, you better pay attention to what's
going on at X because put your ex hat back on.
You're wearing too many hats. But your CEO, Linda is
running a muck and pretty soon there's not going to
be any free speech on X if things keep up
that way. Although to be fair, I do have to
say that it was reported today that the probable spam
(46:41):
issue where everyone is hidden under probable spaming censored in
shadow Band under probable spamppsonally has been fixed after a
year of complaining about it. So that's maybe a win,
but certainly a lot of demonetization and censorship.
Speaker 2 (46:56):
Otherwise, nice keep us up on that story. Maybe enjoy
some of your Arizona weather if you get a chance.
Speaker 1 (47:06):
I'm going to I plan that. So thank you again, Ian,
appreciate having you on, always a pleasure. We will have
you on again, sir, and enjoy the weather out there.
It looks like a great hike and you know, look
looks good. I'm jealous.
Speaker 2 (47:20):
Yeah, all right, thanks, all.
Speaker 1 (47:21):
Right, thank you, and to all my viewers, thanks again.
God bless talk to you later, have a good way.
Hi, This is Brian Farrence. You can follow me on
exit Brian Farren's one or Brian farance dot com. Also
the Magamine podcast, which is Magamine podcast dot Com. With
me today is Ian McDonald from Media Write News.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Say hello, Ian, Hey, what's going on? Everybody? Thanks in
the sun today?
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Oh yeah, where where you hike? It looks like you're hiking.
Where are you hiking at?
Speaker 2 (00:28):
I'm just on a city walking pat in my town
in Idaho.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
Okay, it looks pretty nice. What's what's the temperature like
right now?
Speaker 2 (00:38):
It's about seventy seven degrees.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
Or that's nice. It's kind of like Arizona, but it's
a little bit warmer. It's getting getting hot fast. We're
gonna be in summer pretty soon in Arizona. So all right,
so we've had you on the show before. I'm gonna
share my screen because we're gonna talk about a couple
of things. But one of the things we're gonna talk
about this video. Uh, it's kind of going viral right
(01:03):
now of Shiloh Hendrix, which is the mother she called
another child, uh the N word, and then she started
to give send go, which has raised a lot of money.
But I want to go ahead and show this video
to the viewers so that they can see it and
has some context. First, so let me show my share
(01:25):
my screen here and everyone should be able to see that.
Let me make it bigger and I'm gonna play this
so hopefully everyone can hear that. Pretty well, here we go. Child.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
Did you call the child the nigga word? It is
my business you call Okay, why don't you have the
boss to say it right now?
Speaker 1 (01:48):
Again?
Speaker 3 (01:52):
All right, that's what you say, nobody, a little kid?
You call him a nigger? A little child? Are you
about to hit him? You're chasing him here? So that
gives you that I have to call the child five
year old a nigga the inward, that's what you're gonna
(02:15):
call him. You know, that's the hate speech. And you
can do the caller for that ship. Okay, we'll see
about that. What the internet has said?
Speaker 1 (02:27):
All right, let me let me stop sharing that. Uh so, so,
first of all, before we talk about the gifts and
go ian, just give me your reaction to that video.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
Well, first off, there's a lot of missing context. Unless
I missed something, I don't believe we anybody saw the
actual child or how verified his actual age or what
he was actually doing, how bad was anything like that. We're,
(03:05):
you know, all speculating on what actually happened, what actually
led up to it. So there's gonna be speculation on
all different side internet on what actually did happen to settlement. Now,
as far far as you agree with saying the N
(03:26):
word if you're white, especially to a child, I think
that's to be debated between your your your friends, your
family and things. That's not what we're because I'm I'm
for free speech, whether or not you like it or not.
You know, I don't think that's what we're here for today.
I think we're here to talk about the reactions of
(03:49):
the of the influencers on ACT and so on and
so forth.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
Yes, but before we get to the reactions, let's look
at the gifts and Go campaign. But did you did
you want to add any other comments before we look
at the gifts end Go campaign?
Speaker 2 (04:03):
No? No, go ahead, all.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
Right, So let me share this now. So this is
a live view of the gifts End Go campaign that
was launched by the mother again. Her name is Shiloh Hendrix.
And you can see here. I mean it might be
difficult to see but in the it's already raised three
hundred and forty nine three hundred and sixty six dollars,
(04:26):
three hundred and forty nine thousand dollars. This woman is raised.
She's saying, help me protect my family. She says, Hello,
my name is Shiloh. I've been put in a dire situation.
I had a kid steal from my eighteen month son
diaper bag in the park. I called the kid out
for what he was, which was the she says. That's
where she says the end word in the video. Another man,
who recently found out has a history with law enforcement,
(04:48):
proceeded to record me and follow me to my car.
He then posted these videos online, which caused my family
and myself great turmoil. My social Security number has been leaked,
my address and my quote never been given out for
my family members are being attacked. My eldest child may
not be going back to school even where I exercise,
where it's exposed. I'm asking for your help to assist
(05:09):
and protect my family. If you must relocate. I have
two small children who do not deserve this. We've been
threatened to buy the extreme people online. Anything will help.
We cannot live in fear she's posted some updates. Thank
you for the overwhelming support. No one's been harmed. I
(05:29):
won't feel safe until we escape completely. And before that,
she said, everything we've relieved, we've received is unbelievable, and
never felt so scared yet reassured in my life. And
again she's she's raised over three hundred and forty nine thousand. Yeah,
(05:51):
and she's raised the goal to now a million dollars
as her goal. That's that's a heck of a goal
for just relocating. I mean, she's gonna be relocating to
a luxury island, it seems.
Speaker 2 (06:03):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
Anyways, let me stop sharing that. And then you were
mentioning that there was some influencer reactions. Well, before we
go to the influencer reactions, So what's your reaction I
into the gifts and Go campaign.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
Well, first, I just want to clarify from my initial statements.
I'm sure you do too. I have a lot of
great black friends. So even if we agreed for the
sake of argument that for this, you know, maybe maybe
she shouldn't have, maybe she could have used a better word.
(06:43):
It's beyond the point now, because again, we do have
free speech in this country. Even if something we agree
wasn't the best choice of wording. It doesn't meanymore because unfortunately,
if you don't like free speech, you can go to
a country that doesn't that, and so you really can't
(07:06):
compare free speech to violent and that's what a lot
of people are trying to do. But to answer your question,
you know, I think it's getting excessive or whatnot. You know, maybe,
but a lot of people are comparing it to the
Carmelo Anthony case. Am I pronouncing name right?
Speaker 1 (07:27):
I think you're pronouncing it correct. I'm not sure how
they're comparing it, because it's it's pretty different, but.
Speaker 2 (07:33):
Right, And that's the point, the fact that it's so different,
but yet people are still comparing it anyway is what
repulses so many people. They're saying, hey, even if we
don't agree with that word, being murdered is so much worse.
And you're coming about somebody making a thousand bucks by
(07:59):
comparing those two things, and and that's what's creating this
outrage because it's as if people are trying to compare
murder to a bad word. Even if you you know,
whether you like using the word or think that it's horrible,
you should never use it. It's the matter, it's not violence.
(08:20):
The two shouldn't be compared. And a lot of people
are doing that to your arguargument against well, that's excessive
that so it's been too much much money? And who
the who? Who? Who gave any influencer the gavel to
(08:42):
decide how much money some random person is allowed to
raise for some random incident.
Speaker 1 (08:51):
And let me share one of those posts from one
of these influencers that you're talking about. So let's see.
This is uh, this is from Riley Gaines. And let
me just Riley Gaines. Okay, she hosts a girls Gains
for girls podcasts. She says she's a best selling author,
(09:13):
and it says, of course that she's a Turning Point
USA contributor. She's a Turning Point USA like paid influencer
is my understanding of what she is. I believe she
was involved in the Epstein Binder gate at the White House?
Is that right?
Speaker 2 (09:29):
I'll lean on your knowledge on that, but it sounds
about I think.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
She was, but I'll verify that anyways, it was either
her or another paid Turning Point USA influencer. But here's
what she says. She says talking about this woman shyly.
She says her original goal was twenty thousand to licate
to safety fair enough. Once she raised that, the gold
jump to one hundred and fifty thousand. She hit that too,
(09:58):
so it became two hundred and fifty that this isn't
the end of white guilt and black privilege, which I
agree is real and harmful. It's emotionalism at its finest.
That's what Riley Gaines says.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
So when you talk about amounts, I don't know if
I'm interrupting good I'm sorry if I am. When you
talk about amounts of money, the only people that get
to john ounce are judges and courtrooms when you're suing
or being sued or being fined for something, or your
(10:36):
back boxes. You don't get to come on the internet
as an influencer and say, hey, I'm the boss of
high Ground and I'm drawing the line at twenty five
thousand as much as anyone deserves for this random incident,
because I know best the hell are you? And I
(11:00):
don't know what you think of Ethan Ralph with the
Ralph retort live stream, the kill stream, what uh he
said that you weren't even in second place? You were
in and got famous because you weren't a tranny and
trying to grift off this. Maybe you should sit down
(11:22):
for this one along those lines.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
Yeah, you're talking about Riley Gaines, how she how she
became you know famous.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Yeah, you he was. He said you were in fifth place,
not second. Remind everyone maybe you should sit down something
along those lines. I kind of agreed with that sentiment.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Well, yeah, I mean, you know, that's that's an interesting point.
So I'm not sure what these internet you know, paid influencers,
what right they have just to call out someone else's
is doing what they're doing and that's wrong, but it's
okay for them to do it. That doesn't make a
lot of sense to me. Yeah, you know, I'm just
(12:04):
looking at Riley Ginnon's feed right now. She's you know,
she's reposting Insurrection Barbie, who you know we've talked about before. Yeah, yeah,
that's one of the things you repost.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
Any of your loyal followers already is rolling their eyes
right now.
Speaker 1 (12:24):
Yeah, And I'm sure she reposts, you know, Scott Presler
all the time too, another another drifter. So it's you know,
it's okay, Yeah, she's she's posting. Okay, well, let me
show this, Let me show this you you just mentioned
the Carmelo Anthony, So let me show this, uh screenshot
to our ears. So she she says that, she says,
(12:44):
let me make this bigger. She says that lady raised
two hundred and twenty five thousand, so far are we joking?
We don't need a white Carmelo Anthony. That's exactly what
you were talking about. She's literally making that comparison, and
it's completely different. It's a really dumb comparison. And then
she has to put a disclaimer because she realized how
(13:06):
dumb it was. That was viewed one point three million times.
So so Riley Grans makes a stupid comment comparing words
to murdering someone right as a right wing influencer, supposedly
gets one point three million dollars one point three dollar
one point three million views, and then has to say, obviously,
(13:27):
words aren't comparable to stabbing an innocent boy in the heart,
right and just.
Speaker 2 (13:35):
And that's the point I wanted to make is that's
the left big thing they try to compare words and
the right, even Charlie Kirk and his gang, they always
try to say, well, no, we're the reasonable ones who
pushed back on that, and words are not violence, but
here they are turning point ambassadors doing exactly what the
(13:59):
left does, comparing words to violence, right, And she.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
Was called out on it. There was multiple comments. Elijah
Safer said, Yeah, Riley, using the N word towards kids,
towards a kid who stole from you in the in
the park is the same thing as murdering a child
in cold blood at a public school. I thought you
defended women who retrieved who received unfair treatment. And then
(14:24):
Daniel says, you moron. They docked her and she isn't
safe at her house and she didn't stab anyone in
the chest. The dumbest effing posts on the entire Internet
just compared stabbing someone in the chest with a knife
and murdering them to calling someone in vain and then
(14:44):
more more of them other retard. So, yeah, she got
a lot of pushback on that, you know post that
was viewed one point three million times, which has you know,
five point five thousand comments and seven point six thousand likes.
So she's probably making Quie a bit of money off
of Elon Musk, off of X the revenue sharing, which
(15:05):
you know, I commented I was just demonetized. So you know,
I'm not allowed to make any money off of X
because I do investigative journalism, explore, expose the truth. But
Riley gains a paid turnpoint influencer can go out there
like a leftist and compare you know, words to violence
her post. Her post gets viewed one point three million times.
(15:28):
She probably made like at least a couple hundred bucks
off that one post alone. Uh. Yeah, that's the state
of the the MAGA influencers.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
That's be sad and at risk of my own monetarization.
It almost makes you wonder if you know you said
something to anger Elon munt by going against some who
he gave a million plus dollars to.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Yeah, that's well, that's exactly right. I've been critical of
Insurrection Barbie of Data Republican, So you know, that's that's
it for me. With ex monetization, you can't criticize those
people that told the line.
Speaker 2 (16:09):
Now that's just speculation, of course. And I still like
elonsk don't get me wrong. I'm just saying he gave
a lot of money, and here you are are bashing
with evidence.
Speaker 1 (16:21):
With evidence, that's another going against.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Him and your demonetized guys. Well, that's not I guess
it's a coincidence. I don't know.
Speaker 1 (16:32):
I guess the grifters get the millions of dollars and
then the investigative journalists with the truth get the shaft.
I guess that's what.
Speaker 2 (16:39):
Well. I think Nick short Tour is decent. Large accounts
that it's pretty good investigative journalism. However, when the people
he called out sort of apologized and said, yeah, you
got me. I got ace for taking the one thousand
(17:00):
dollars soda Gate campaign from I believe if it was influential.
He immediately said, oh, like you did the right thing.
It's okay, we're not gonna hold his shoe. And so
he's good. But at the same time he saw too,
He's not like a bull in the China shop type.
(17:22):
He's not like out there humor where you just got lumored.
You know.
Speaker 1 (17:28):
Well, yeah, but if you noticed. So when Laura Lumer
was doing some of that, she got demonetized on X
and then she had to you know, bend the knee
and kiss the ring and then she got let back in,
you know.
Speaker 2 (17:39):
And that's and then some tells you a lot. Yeah,
but The funny thing about that soda gate campaign which
Nick sore tour Uh, the main person who announced it,
said that Riley gaines him off because she was invited
(18:00):
to take part in promoting some candy and against being
taken away from Snappians. And she said, well, I'm gonna
I'm not word for word here, but she basically said,
I'm gonna the Maha stand and not take part in
(18:21):
this campaign. That particular campaign. However, to have gotten the
email in her to the to do it, she would
have had to been signed up for campaigns with that
company to begin with, right, So what other campaigns did
(18:41):
she take? I'm deculating because you don't just randomly get
email saying hey, you want to do soda and candy Gate.
For the Bucks, you would have had to have already
been established influencer with that company, signed up, ready to go,
waiting for for particular campaigns. So she probably probably signed
(19:07):
up with that influenceable campaign company for other campaigns. She
just didn't want to do that particular one because she
saw an opportunity to get clout off not doing it,
more opportunity than the thousand bucks if she it bodes
was it instead? And it worked out great for her,
(19:31):
didn't it.
Speaker 1 (19:32):
Yeah, that certainly did.
Speaker 2 (19:34):
She got the fame and the and the you know
everything good for exposing it. But nobody ever question why
were you signed up for those emails in the first way.
Nobody with a big enough account to pop up in
every and you know, little accounts like me. Nobody's gonna
I fall to the bottom of the feet anyway.
Speaker 1 (19:53):
You know, right, right, Yeah, So it's it's, man, there's
it's so much truth in that, and uh, it's really
disappointing to see, you know, what is being rewarded and
promoted on X financially, it's these influencers like Riley Gaines
and Scott Pressler, and you know, they're just putting out
(20:15):
lies and leftists dribble, and they're the ones that are
being you know, rewarded for. Right.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
So if I wanted to have a debate about the
morality of the end word, that would be like a
separate debate, I mean, because like I said that, I
don't even think that's what this is about, honestly, right.
Speaker 1 (20:37):
Right, yeah, And I was just looking while you were talking.
I was looking at this influencable website, right, So their
their applications for new influencers appears to be disabled because
if you go to their homepage and you try to
put in anything in order to like sign up, it
looks like it's disabled. They're not taking any more, probably
(21:00):
because you know, their business took a hit or something.
Speaker 2 (21:04):
I think they were exposed for soda Gate. They that
probably did them.
Speaker 1 (21:08):
In probably probably. But there's there's a dozen companies like
that that pay, you know, paid influencers for whatever they want.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
Yeah, I was gonna say the CEO's name. I don't
have a memorized, but it was exposed at some point,
and whoever ran that company, they'll just reinvent themselves under
some other name or something like that. They'll they'll figure
out a way to scam people another way.
Speaker 1 (21:37):
Oh yeah, I'm sure they will.
Speaker 2 (21:39):
And that's, you know, in my in my opinion.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Well yeah, it's it's it's really a shame. And uh,
I mean, let me just think about this for a minute.
So that going back to what you know, the story
and what happened the woman and her gifts and go campaign,
I mean that's a true and his success. So I'm
assuming you know she's gonna be running for political office. Shortly, right,
(22:07):
or she'll be she'll be a Magga influencer herself. Right.
Speaker 2 (22:11):
So so to get back to that, there's a lot
of talk about whether or not she's going to get
that money because of pressure about you know, her campaigns
uh claiming that they're going to be called a racist
(22:32):
company if they allow to go. So there's it hasn't
been officiated or anything like that, but there's a lot
of rumors and discussions about if the money even goes
through or if if it gets like if obviously we
all know if it was funly it would have been
canceled a long time ago. Yeah, we're all hoping that
(22:56):
because I think the carmenyone was gives and Go.
Speaker 1 (23:00):
Too, was that one canceled?
Speaker 2 (23:03):
Because I think that go Fundme may have camped him
in the beginning because it was so controversial and then
he went to gives and Go. I think, don't quote me,
maybe maybe double check me on that, because I don't
a computer in front of me, but I they'll they'll
host anybody that Go fund me cancels as long as
(23:25):
it's legal. I think that's they're kind of their whole purpose.
Like rumble, you know, if you get footed off YouTube.
You go to Rumble, as long as you're not breaking
the law or whatnot, they pretty much let you talk
on there, and so I think that's the purpose of
so there is a campaign for them to pull the
rug on it. I think they'll they'll try to hold out.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
I don't think that they have comments on it on
it officially, Gifts and Go, I don't see. I'm on
their X profile. They're not very active. It's funny because
they're right in the middle of a nominate a mother
in your in your Life, A mom wins in every state.
They're running a campaign like that. I wonder if if
(24:12):
Chilah will be nominated as a Mother of the.
Speaker 2 (24:16):
Year for her They probably want this thing to be
as quick as possible, if you ask me, Yeah, they
probably do. They're probably getting emails from the Daily Beast
and media and tuns of hit rags as we speak.
I'm sure.
Speaker 1 (24:34):
I'm sure they are. It looks like they have not
commented on it. But what you'll see from what I'm
aware of Gifts and Go is they if they have
a problem, they will pause her campaign. So when I
looked it was still live. It has not been paused,
but if you know it's possible what you're saying. But
I believe the first step is they would they would
(24:56):
pause the campaign, which I have not uh seen that yet.
Let me go back to it. Yeah, it's still up there.
Now it's up to what did I say before? Three
hundred and fifty six is three hundred and fifty seven Now.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
I would almost wonder. It's almost just like me and
you talking here. I know alive, like if if that
was somebody I knew in the situation, Like not for
the reasons that other people are saying, but maybe it
(25:34):
is time to wrap up the the campaign and go
ahead and get paid out before it draws too much
scrutiny and and then possibly doesn't get paid out, and
now you don't get anything you almost want because that
is a lot of money.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
That's a lot of money, three hundred and fifty seven
nine as it were.
Speaker 2 (25:58):
And I'm not against it going as high as it goes.
But it almost makes you wonder too, if there's scrutiny,
a bird in the hand is better than two in
the bush.
Speaker 1 (26:09):
Yeah, I mean, if she think about it, if I
was Shiloh, She's probably I don't know, she might be
having dollar signs in her eyes now. But if I
was her and it raised three hundred and fifty seven
thousand dollars, I mean, yeah, you know, I don't want to,
you know, prejudge her by her appearance, but based on
the park and where she was, and you know, the
(26:30):
tattoos on her arms or arm sleeves she mentioned, the
gym and stuff, you know, based on where they're living
and the expensiveness of I don't know, her clothes and
different things. I mean, it's likely to say that that
would be a good amount of money for her. I mean,
it's for anyone. Really. Yeah, she could be a millionaire.
I don't know, but it doesn't that's probably not likely.
(26:51):
So you know, that could be you know, college tuition
for her kids. Certainly. You know, she could get a
new house, she get college tuition for her kids. Based
on this photo that I've seen of her, has her
left hand, she has no wedding ring on that left hand,
so she's probably a single mom.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
I'd say, you could move to you buy a small house, yeah,
no mortgage, and yeah, I mean, get a job and
have one hundred grand in the bank.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
That's exactly right. And you know that's what she should do.
That's what she should do. But I guess we're gonna
see what happens. But uh, yeah, you make a good
point that if it goes too high, too fast, she
might not get any of the money. I think typically
the way Gibson go works is once you get a
(27:44):
certain amount donated, you can request a payment, like before
you know, the gold reached or whatever. So you know,
she could she could have already requested a payment of
like one hundred thousand or something and maybe got it.
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
I yeah, I don't know. I don't know how that stuff.
I've never done one, so interesting side speculation there for sure.
But yeah, I've seen a lot of people say that
this is just sort of verse middle finger to all
the all all the stuff that Carmelo Anthony has been given,
(28:24):
all the money of the luxury home rent and a
one hundred thousand dollars SUV and you know, all this ridiculousness,
even though see him as an alleged murderer. You don't
want to say it till they're found guilty in court, obviously,
but that's how most people see it as as these
(28:46):
and it let a murder, not self defense. That's that's
how a lot of people see it as well.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
And let me share this here because I've pulled up
that one too because we were talking about it. And
if you can see this, this is the help Carmelo
official fund. It says on gifts and go it says
it's raised five hundred and nineteen thousand of a six
hundred thousand dollars goal.
Speaker 2 (29:11):
Yeah, So why would you, as Riley Gaines say, we
don't want another Like, on the one hand, you don't
want to compare words to violence. But on the other hand,
if simply raising money makes some people feel a little
(29:33):
bit vindicated about a situation, why are you trying to
take the moral high ground on something where you're not
really the designated person for that? Like, who wire you
(29:54):
to judge somebody over free speech that you don't like,
you know, for the risk of somebody judging me. Hey,
it sounds like you're defending the N word. You know,
that's no. I'm defense speech, right. It could be somebody
(30:15):
calling something and I might not like it, Well, but
I won't I won't be to have them arrested for
it either.
Speaker 1 (30:23):
Well, that's right, And you know what the US Constitution says,
it says, it says equal protection under the law. So,
you know, the child that I missed, if it was
actually a you know, African American black child or not,
that allegedly took something from the diaper bag that they
panned real quick on the video, it looked like it
(30:43):
was a teenager or like twelve or something.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
Yeah, I actually saw the child, but let's just.
Speaker 1 (30:48):
Say, let's just say that that child had you know, uh,
you know, some kind of portable You don't have boomboxes anymore,
but some kind of portable you know, music like off
his eye and his phone or you know, he had
a you know, a bluetooth outdoor speaker, right, a bluetooth
outdoor speaker, and he wanted to blast the loudest rap
(31:11):
music he could at the park and it could be
an N word laced song. Yeah, and that would be fine.
Speaker 2 (31:20):
Well legally a decibel.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
Well yeah, there's there's of course, there's a decibel city ordinance.
But I guarantee you he wouldn't have had someone come
up and record him and be like, oh, your music,
it's the ordinance and blah blah blah. And but my
point was an equal protection under the loss. So if
if one person can say that in a public park,
(31:46):
or play music that says that in a public park,
but another one can't, that's violation of the constitution, equal
protection under the law. So I mean, that's the fact
of it, you know, That's how it is.
Speaker 2 (32:00):
So yeah, I mean, it's it's it's just it's a
shame that the whole situation, Like I said it, it'd
be easier if there was more of the footage of
it exactly what happened. Mm hmmm, see what led up
to everything.
Speaker 1 (32:18):
But yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
It's a shame that it all came to that.
Speaker 1 (32:23):
Well, it's interesting. It's interesting that the left's reaction was
they didn't like what this woman did, so they wanted
to immediately dox her and have her canceled, right, They
wanted to dox and cancel her, and I think that's
part of why it is backfired and people were like, well, no,
let's raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for her now.
So I think that this doxing and canceling thing is over,
(32:47):
and you know, probably the raising hundreds of thousands for
you know, that should be probably over too. But uh,
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (32:59):
Well again comparing violence to a word.
Speaker 1 (33:04):
Yeah, that's not even a comparison. So Riley Gaines, paid
Turning Point influencer, should be ashamed of herself.
Speaker 2 (33:12):
What was the name of the the the white child?
He was either five or nine. It was about two
or three years ago.
Speaker 1 (33:20):
He was murdered and.
Speaker 2 (33:23):
By by a black neighbor. And I believe there was
a lot of defending of the guy who killed him. Yeah,
from from the black.
Speaker 1 (33:31):
Twitter or whatever's uh what's black Twitter? What's that like?
Speaker 2 (33:38):
Black people?
Speaker 1 (33:39):
I thought that was a different social media so that
you were talking about.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
Like no, no, no, but what was the name? Do
you remember the kid that got just shot in the head?
Speaker 1 (33:49):
I remember that, yeah, And they asked the guy why
he did it, and it was something like, you know,
I saw a white kid and I wanted you know,
I wanted to And a lot.
Speaker 2 (33:57):
Of people defended the guy. They were like mentally ill
or something. There was a lot of defense ending this
guy who shot the kid in the head. I don't,
I don't And where was his I don't know if
he got three sixty for his family's expenses and heartbreak
(34:19):
and I don't, I don't remember what they got but
that was a cold blood and murder not a bad word.
Speaker 1 (34:26):
Yeah, it's not what what totally totally unrelated.
Speaker 2 (34:29):
I think it's what was the kid's name? Was it?
Speaker 1 (34:34):
Canon blankart?
Speaker 2 (34:38):
Yeah? Yeah you can't.
Speaker 1 (34:41):
Yeah, it says a in it and it was in
twenty twenty in North Carolina.
Speaker 2 (34:48):
I bet if you did a little did a little
searching through Twitter, I bet you find people being the
guy that shot him saying oh he was like he
was having a mental breakdown or something something crazy. I
bet you will. I bet you will.
Speaker 1 (35:05):
And the neighbor, Darius Sessoms was his name, It was
his neighbor.
Speaker 2 (35:14):
What was his uh? Are you able to look up
what his ultimate sentences?
Speaker 1 (35:18):
He was? He was sentenced to life in prison without
the possibility of parole.
Speaker 2 (35:24):
No death penalty. You'll have three hots and a cop
for the rest of his life.
Speaker 1 (35:30):
I just want to see if they did a gifts
and go for him. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (35:35):
Yeah, that was the other thing I was kind of
hoping you could check. Let's see, you know, because that's
what if she had half a brain. That's the sort
of Riley Games should be doing, not spouting off about
something that happened five minutes ago. But if you want
(35:57):
to be intelligent, you you reached stuff that has in
a few years ago. That's a little more apples that
to talk about.
Speaker 1 (36:11):
Okay, it says that a GoFundMe page was set up
to raise money for the victim and which raised seven
hundred thousand. But I'm looking to see if the uh
the shooter had fund raised, had funds raised for him,
(36:34):
and it does not appear to be so okay, in
that case, they only raise money for the victim. Well,
they will find it. Correct me if I'm wrong, If
any of my viewers, you know, send me a message
if I'm wrong on that.
Speaker 2 (36:54):
You can never replace a life, no matter how much
money raise.
Speaker 1 (36:59):
Yeah, that that's a more I guess accurate comparison. It
would be like if they had raised running money for Darius,
it would have been but they did not. So, you know,
Anthony Carmelo shouldn't have had money raised for him either.
Speaker 2 (37:18):
Yeah, if you're raising money for the family whose child
got killed, that makes absolute perfect sense, right.
Speaker 1 (37:26):
But to do it murder, that doesn't make sense. Yeah,
And what some people were saying is, you know, it
was a very small number of people that raise money
for you know, the murderer, and some other people were
saying they were you know, bobbing out some theories that well,
maybe this is another type of money laundering situation, like
(37:49):
this money is not from real donors. It's actually like
you know, coming from International or act Blue and it's
going to be used.
Speaker 2 (37:57):
Yeah, and also than it appears that's very interesting, m
because I don't want to speculatilate too much or say
anything to get me in trouble, but that's an interesting yeah.
Speaker 1 (38:12):
Yeah, it is so anyways, very very uh strange story
and getting stranger. But yeah, I mean it can kind
of go back again to you know, these grifting like
MAGA influencers that often express leftist you know, uh ideals
(38:33):
in commentary when you know they're not having their social
media team or their AI bot you know, put little
one liner comments and repost pok news videos. But when
they actually post something that's like their commentary on something
that's real that has happened that they actually do, and
(38:53):
it comes out like, well, this is the same thing
as Carmelo Anthony, you know, comparing words to to a murderer,
which is a leftist way of thinking. Riley gains and
that's that's who gets monetized, and you know, paid by
Turning Point and paid by X and everyone else who
thinks critically about things or you know, speaks the truth
(39:17):
or these other smaller accounts, they get all get demonetized.
So isn't that interesting, right? Yeah?
Speaker 2 (39:24):
No, And let's say, for example, some little white kid
gets called a cracker or honky. Do you think that
there'd be hundreds and hundreds of people threatening and doxing
that family of the person that or do you think
they would just brush it off? As you know, I
(39:46):
am a fan, I can't believe that happened, but I'm
I'm just gonna move on.
Speaker 1 (39:50):
Absolutely not. And in fact, even if the kid was
like raped or something, because you wouldn't even hear about it,
because the media hides all stories of islands against white children,
they don't cover, so.
Speaker 2 (40:04):
They wouldn't so they wouldn't have to worry about threats
of violence against them. And if their kid did the
same exact thing, most likely. So, but this woman does,
so she does have to fear now for her life
and for bins against her her child. So maybe that
money kind of does need to be used for safety
(40:27):
purposes to prevent another canonhendance. Maybe I'm stretching a little bit, maybe,
but hey, you never know. In this today's world, look
at the Luigi guy who came out of nowhere to
kill the United Care studio. You can create murderers out
of nowhere with enough outrage on the internet today.
Speaker 1 (40:50):
I'm pretty sure he's got to give said campaign. Do
you know his Do you know the spelling of his name?
Speaker 2 (40:56):
No? I can only I would have to guess.
Speaker 1 (40:59):
See, let me aig.
Speaker 2 (41:02):
Maybe M A and g I.
Speaker 1 (41:05):
Okay, Luigi Mangioni. Oh man, all right, let me share this.
Now here we go, Here we go, so all right,
hopefully you can see this. So this is Luigi Mangioni
official legal fund for all three cases. People, the State
(41:29):
of New York versus him, United States of America versus him,
Collonwealth of Pennsylvania versus him. They have the legal team
has officially accepted the funds. His attorney is Tom Dickey
and Karen Friedman blah blah blah. And that raised nine
(41:49):
hundred and seventy one thousand with a goal of one
point five million dollars.
Speaker 2 (41:55):
So that tells me they really shouldn't be pulling down
this other lady Irena.
Speaker 1 (42:01):
I don't think they can. If you can allow these murderers.
Speaker 2 (42:04):
Yeah, you know, then this this, I can't shiloh whatever.
They shouldn't be pulled on that down if they're if
they're leaving Luigi mainjilling up there, that's right, they should
They shouldn't be pulling anybody down unless they're like a
terrorist or something.
Speaker 1 (42:24):
Yeah, I mean that's a good point.
Speaker 2 (42:26):
Uh well, any any terror, any terrorst well, I was
just kind of using an example.
Speaker 1 (42:34):
It's it's just astounding to me though, that so much
money can be raised. I mean, you can murder someone
and then have so much money raised for you that
you can hire like this stellar legal defense and at
a minimum, even if like let's say you're guilty, at
a minimum, they're gonna get you probably some kind of
reduced sentence at a minimum. That that's you know, most
(42:57):
people could not afford. And they're gonna serve the max.
Speaker 2 (43:01):
I wonder what cope how much he's raised? You know
the mos Idaho Do you know the spelling of that,
Brian just just if you look up Brian Coburger, k.
Speaker 1 (43:19):
Okay b E R G E. I believe let's see,
all right, let's let me pull this up. Let's see.
Speaker 2 (43:35):
I'm sure you know about that story and the Idaho.
Speaker 1 (43:39):
Yeah, it said, wait a minute, let me let me
refresh this. Mmm, I'm not finding that one. Gifts and
go for that one. Let me look, let me search
on the site of itself.
Speaker 2 (43:57):
Yeah, he may not ray anything. I don't. I don't
think I know a few fans that write letters to
them though, like females. He's got like a female fan girl.
But which which is the dumbest thing ever?
Speaker 1 (44:12):
I do not. I don't see gifts and go for that.
It doesn't mean that you know they tried one or
I don't know. I don't. I don't see one for that.
Speaker 2 (44:20):
All right, Maybe I'll look into that some later. Get
back here. That's an interesting one.
Speaker 1 (44:27):
Well yeah, I mean it's it's interesting story. So we'll,
you know, we'll cover this. We'll do it. We'll maybe
do an update in a couple of days. What's uh?
What was the resolution? Did it get to a million?
Did you raise a million dollars? Did it get shut down?
What happened?
Speaker 2 (44:42):
But a good talking to put out there, you know
in the just discord. If our tiny accounts can get seen,
it would be the Hey they allow Louisy mang you
own to raise almost a million dollars on gives, then go,
I don't think they're gonna pull this down, whether you
(45:04):
like it or not like it?
Speaker 1 (45:05):
Right? I agree? I based on that evidence, it doesn't
look like they're gonna pull it down. They can just site. Hey,
we kept murderers up there, we can keep this one
up there. You know what you're gonna do?
Speaker 2 (45:15):
Yeah? So crazy?
Speaker 1 (45:17):
Well all right, well, any other closing comments Ian that
you want to make.
Speaker 2 (45:25):
No, I mean, like you said, it comes down to
following the story and seeing how it developments.
Speaker 1 (45:33):
All right, Well, I want to thank Ian McDonald from
Meteorite News from joining me again. My name is Brian Farns.
This is the Magamine podcast. You can watch previous episodes
magamine podcast dot com or search wherever you get your podcasts.
For Magamind that's one word podcast. Also Brian Ference dot
com and on x at Brian Farren's one. At least
(45:56):
for now. I'm also on truth Social at Brian Parents,
on gab at Brian fe and the Rumble ones a
little bit longer, but that's linked off of magamind podcast
dot com. So please please fall and join there, and uh,
you know, I'll just I'll get leave some closing words
(46:16):
for Elon Musk, Elon, you better pay attention to what's
going on at X because put your ex hat back on.
You're wearing too many hats. But your CEO, Linda is
running a muck and pretty soon there's not going to
be any free speech on X if things keep up
that way. Although to be fair, I do have to
say that it was reported today that the probable spam
(46:41):
issue where everyone is hidden under probable spaming censored in
shadow Band under probable spamppsonally has been fixed after a
year of complaining about it. So that's maybe a win,
but certainly a lot of demonetization and censorship.
Speaker 2 (46:56):
Otherwise, nice keep us up on that story. Maybe enjoy
some of your Arizona weather if you get a chance.
Speaker 1 (47:06):
I'm going to I plan that. So thank you again, Ian,
appreciate having you on, always a pleasure. We will have
you on again, sir, and enjoy the weather out there.
It looks like a great hike and you know, look
looks good. I'm jealous.
Speaker 2 (47:20):
Yeah, all right, thanks, all.
Speaker 1 (47:21):
Right, thank you, and to all my viewers, thanks again.
God bless talk to you later, have a good way.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.