Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Today, a main source of truthWe've got ted Hadaco, who was fully
preoccupied with a grueling six week projectfor Apple, hadn't slept well in weeks.
On a Saturday in August twenty nineteen, shortly after returning from upstate New
York with those boys, his thenwife, Christine walked into his home office
and announced both that she was leavingand that their fifteen year old son was
(00:20):
transgender. A nightmare scenario has playedout in real life for our next guest
today. Puberty blocking implants had beeninserted in his son's arm and no one
ever asked him for permission. Thecourt system had failed him and ultimately has
destroyed his family. Our guest understandsthat this divisive Marxist initiative is here to
(00:41):
destroy the American family, and weneed to expose and understand what's going on
before it happens to your kids.This is the main source of Truth podcast,
and very few parents have said anythingwhat Sean mcbriarty did. Sean mcbriarty
is in the fust of Miss Today. Sean that in our school. Sean
mcbriarty joins us now he just wonthis lawsuit and gets forty thousand dollars from
(01:06):
the school board. Good morning,Shawn, You're most dangerous dad, apparently,
how are you? Are you beingso or were used to buy a
local district for exposing the transgender librarydisplay? Can you explain to what's what
happened? Hey? You all sowith everything that's going on to be just
talked to this just like alcohol mail. Yeah, I'll about the over septualization
(01:30):
of books and libraries at the pooland then look like you put the handle
on that. That's why I makesyou to support there. I ask you
to support this podcast if you wantedto continue, and if you want to
help me with my legal expenses andgod willing a legal offense fund to help
others in need, please consider chippingin at www dot gibson go dot com
(01:51):
slash Sean mcbriarty And now onto theshow. All right, folks. When
I started this out basically a coupleof years ago March first, twenty twenty
two, who never thought I'd getto one hundred episodes. I just kind
of was tired of having to waitaround for the fake news to want to
interview me about what was going onhere in Maine with parental rights educational K
through twelve horrors and other things.Ultimately, these cowards who won't have me
(02:14):
on the radio station anymore because theycan't handle the truth. But I just
said, Hey, I'm going togo on my own route, create my
own podcast. This is still apretty small show. This is kind of
a fledgling podcast. Even after onehundred episodes, you will not find the
range of guests that I've had ontalking about K through twelve, parental rights
and just some of the thing thatwe're exposing. It's crazy. So this
(02:35):
is season three, episode one hundred, January twenty fourth, twenty twenty four,
as recorded. This is the secondpodcast I've done today, back to
back, and I'm honestly telling youit's kind of hard. I prepare for
about two hours ahead of a podcast, researching material on the guest. We
go through about an hour's worth ofdiscussions. I got about another hour worth
of editing, So each one ofthese podcasts takes me about four hours,
(02:58):
and then I spent about a halfan hour are texting it, sending it
out on social media, and tryingto get it out there. So what
you can do to help me iscontinue to subscribe, share like you know
forward it to your friends. Thisone tonight. This was tough ted Hdaco
puberty blocked is I think what I'mgoing to call this episode, and this
is a rough one. I startout each podcast with the Bible verse.
(03:21):
I've used this one before, butit's worth repeating, and I'm going to
go through the full thing here,the full reading of Aphesian six' ten.
Finally, be strong in the Lordand in his mighty power. Put
on the full armor of God sothat you can take your stand against the
devil's schemes. For our struggle isnot against flesh and blood, but against
the rulers, against the authorities,against the powers of this dark world,
(03:42):
and against the spiritual forces of evilin the heavenly realms. Therefore, put
on the full armor of God,so that when the day of evil comes,
you may be able to stand yourground. And after you've done everything
to stand stand firm, then withthe belt of truth buckled around your waist,
with a breastpate of blessed breastplate ofrighteousness in place, and with your
(04:02):
feet fitted with the readiness that comesfrom the Gospel of Peace. In addition
to all this, take up theshield of faith with which you can extinguish
all flaming arrows of the evil one. We take a lot of arrows here,
take the helmet of salvation and thesort of spirit which is this is
the word of God. So onlyI don'ly believe that I've had it told
(04:23):
to me many times in my situation. I literally owned the T shirt,
and I'm going to wear that Tshirt to Augusta tomorrow when I attend the
LD seventeen LD seventeen thirty five hearingand the press conference that the Republicans are
going to give it eleven fifteen thereat the Capitol Building, And I will
think about our guest today in thathearing several times, because this is again,
(04:46):
this is an Orwellian situation where thisis unraveling faster than we can even
imagine. So some updates today.Twitter locked out my account today due to
fallioplasty photos. Value of plasty isa process where they take the radial muscle
of the forearm of a female Theyliterally strip it off their arm to create
(05:06):
a fake penis, causing the girlnot only to have this just incredible scarring
on her arm, but after theystitch up her vagina, they try to
create this fake penis creating incontinents forthe rest of their life, and as
we know, they become medical patientsand big farming patients for the rest of
their life. So it's kind ofproven my point there, Elon. First
(05:29):
off, I'll be hundred percent transparent. I didn't know that I could put
actually a warning on my pictures,so that's something that I might try again
in the future. But you know, if you can't put out pictures of
what's happening to these children that aregoing to be trans trafficked from any state
in the Union to Maine because they'reseen as gratuitous gore on Twitter for fuck's
(05:50):
sake, And Elon, I meanthat doesn't make any sense, right,
I mean, this is actually froma medical National Library of Medicine, National
Senate for Biotechnology Information, It's agovernment run website. These photos of fallue
plast year there. Are they disgusting? Yeah? Yeah they are. They
are disgusting, But it's this wholethis whole topic is disgusting. I mean,
(06:13):
can't I can't even believe that we'rehaving this discussion today, right,
So please, Elon, let's figuresomething out here. We've got to make
sure that Twitter is a free speechplatform. Now, if people are scrolling
through, should they see those photos? I guess in retrospect probably not.
But it's really that graphic photo thatemotionally can can help connect the dots for
(06:35):
folks. So I don't know whatthe answer is. I just know that
you know it was it was almosthypocritical to me that they locked down the
content for gratuitous gore. Given thenthat's exactly what we're talking about in this
situation with LD seventeen thirty five.I wanted to share with you just again
the next generation. I met thisyoung lady at Turning Point Ussay's Action conference
(06:56):
back in Florida in the summertime andhad some with the Hannah Faulkner. She
does a great job on Instagram.I joke that I'm too old for Instagram.
But I want to play for youwhat she's said about seventeen thirty five
again from her perspective, a youngwoman. I actually met her also at
the America Fest and her family justa great group of folks. So I
want to play Hannah's review here ofseventeen thirty five. All right, guys,
(07:19):
tomorrow at three pm and Maine theHouse will be voting on bill LD
seventeen thirty five, which frankly isstripping parents of their parental authority by allowing
these miners to travel across state lineto receive these hormones and surgeries without their
parents knowing. We already know thatthese surgeries and hormones do not satisfy or
(07:42):
fulfill any individual. A study thatwas conducted in Sweden shows that after these
individuals go through these surgeries, theyare nineteen times more likely to commit suicide.
Directly on the National Library of Medicine, it shows that the suicidal risk
and transgender people is higher than thegeneral population and seems to occur during every
stage of transitioning. So not onlyis this bill stripping parents of their parental
(08:07):
authority, but it is harming children. Is harming this next generation of children
because we already know that these surgeriesdeny science, nature, reality, and
just plain common sense. So I'llhave the emails below. Please contact these
legislators urge them to vote no onLD seventeen thirty five. Thank you all
so much, and God bless justa great job again. A young woman
(08:28):
who has a bright career to doanything she wants. She stands up in
the face of adversity. She youknow, just I'm so impressed by her,
and I just want to say thankyou very much to Hannah Faulkner there.
The other thing is when we hadpeace come out on LD seventeen thirty
five from the Daily Caller Mary Rokeor Rooke, I'm not sure exactly how
(08:50):
to pronoun your name. I didthank her on Twitter and she really writes
up you know, this is confirmingthe worst nightmare of conservative parents. Everywhere.
Lawyers have told me unequivocally, yes, can you laure pint minor to
traffic the child and main to getcastrated? Yes? And so you know,
she goes and talks to a coupleof lawyers. She recites or actually
(09:13):
puts in here Jackson Elliott from theEpic Times, who friend of mine,
Heather from at Mainly Free seventy sixon Twitter, she's she's been a huge
advocate and somebody I've met a coupleof years ago, and and Heather just
she's she's none of the moose peoplewho in May and she's putting it out
there and as a you know,her statement is a patriot, as a
(09:35):
patriot activist who opposes it, andshe gives her testimony from when it was
heard last year, and I gavetestimony on that as well. So appreciate
the Daily Caller, all of thesefolks, you know, Bright Bart,
the Blaze, Epic Times, Lives, a TikTok, you know, Elon
Musk, Donald Trump, Junior Billboard, Chris Riley Gaines, just everybody is
(09:56):
out there trying to push this andand so far still really hasn't been a
whole lot of opposition from the mainGOP, although they do plan on having
a live press release or live pressertomorrow at eleven fifteen at the Capitol Building
in the Gusta. I'll be thereto cover that and we'll go from there.
Also, in breaking news, theMain Supreme Court has dismissed main Secretary
(10:18):
of State and basically fascist dictator,Nazi crazy person Shanna Bellows in her appeal
in the case to keep former PresidentDonald Trump off the ballot. So screw
you, screw you, Shannabellos.And you know I'm gonna play let me
play a little sound effect game foryou here. You know this is a
(10:39):
situation for Shannabellos tonight resign You justpolitical hack you so Tomorrow. As I
mentioned, Thursday, January twenty fifth, twenty twenty four, is t day
for the parents of the United States, as main Democrats look to rip your
child away from you. The teastands for trans cultists or the Democrats of
(11:01):
Maine. Democrats of the Party foropen borders, illegal election interference, useless
climate change rhetoric, porn in theschools, chemically castrating minor children, baby
murder, war, and butchery ofyour children through what they call gender affirming
care. They are the Party ofhate and evil. And if you're hearing
this matches before three pm on Thursday, January twenty fifth, twenty twenty four,
(11:24):
and you've yet to send in anemail, please follow me on Twitter
at Sean mcbriory. Pinned on thetop of my tweets is the list of
names to send emails to urging thesecockroaches to kill LD seventeen thirty five in
Committee before it kills your child.Now, we've had some amazing guests on
no more important than this one abouta story of a California dad who lost
his son to the trans cult.It will happen here, it will happen
(11:48):
in your hometown. Might happen inyour neighborhood or your house if LD seventeen
thirty five passes. Lastly, Ihad an opportunity the other night to tape
a segment with student Peters. Ireally enjoy Stu. He he makes me
look calm when I do these interviews. But we talked about the genital mutilator's
push to this trans law, andit actually aired tonight on Stu's Rumble network
(12:13):
at six o'clock Eastern. I'm goingto kick that out on social media.
I completely forgot about it. Ihad a note to come up, note
to tweet it out, and thenI forgot. But I will tweet out
that video and hopefully that'll again,you know, continue to help people.
That's a pretty long segment, abouta half an hour long, trying to
expose what's happening, and I alreadygot a couple people sending me some notes
on it. So I do appreciatethat. One thing that people ask me,
(12:33):
how can I support the podcast?How can I support you Sean and
your calling and your efforts. Manypeople do not know that this is two
and a half years now that I'venot worked, I've not taken an income,
I've received donations. I've received asmall amount of money to do what
I'm doing, but I've cost myfamily two hundred fifty thousand dollars. Not
(12:54):
a pity party. I live ina beautiful house, but our finances are
starting to run close to dry.We made a windfall on a house sale
down in Cumberland and sold our housefor kings. Ransom stole a house here
on the Panobscott River, just abeautiful spot. But I'm not gonna be
able to do this forever without havingsome help. So there's a couple of
ways you can help. One becomea substack subscriber five dollars a month or
(13:18):
fifty dollars a year, or whateveryou want to do. And I've got
plenty of other opportunities for you tohelp out. I've joined forces now Patriot
Barbie Lindsay Graham on my Freedom Cart. We have four hundred amazing items to
help you and your family save moneywhile purchasing items from an American owned,
American made company. These items aresafer and more effective products than in the
big box store brand names that you'reprobably buying right now. They are so
(13:41):
much better. I personally have triedtheir protein powder. I have a gym
here in my house, and Iwork out a few times, you know,
a week, certainly not in thesame shape that I used to be.
But their protein powder, the orderliterally just came today, ups came
today, dropped it off, andthat was the first thing I went to
when I felt a pang of hungerin between podcast here, in a little
bit of sluggishness, I went rightto their protein powder and that that was
(14:05):
a big pick me up to helpme physically. So you can save yourself,
your family some money, support anAmerican owned conservative business, and support
the podcast by going to myfreedomcar dotcom slash main source of truth like the
State, Mai and E main sourceof truth, and stop shopping, start
shopping for and start shopping for overfour hundred products for you and your family.
(14:26):
I sure would appreciate it. Thankyou very much, Ted Hedaco Puberty
blocked. We talked about our nextguest with super lawyer and warrior woman Tracy
Henderson from California Parents Union back onepisode ninety seven. He was then fully
preoccupied with a grueling six week projectfor Apple back here a few years ago,
and hadn't slept well in weeks OnSaturday August. In August twenty nineteen,
(14:48):
shortly after returning from upstate New Yorkwith his boys, his then wife,
Christine walked into his home office andannounced both that she was leaving and
that their fifteen year old son wastransgender. He'd run in the custody gender
gauntlet due to the powerful hold onthe court system while parents, children,
families are paying the price with theirlives. That nightmare scenario really has played
(15:11):
out in real life with our nextguest. In October twenty twenty one,
he was stunned by a two thousandand two hundred and ten thousand dollars charge
on his insurance statement. A pubertyblocking implant had been inserted in his son's
arm and no one asked him forpermission. His then now ex wife knew
that their son would become sterile atsixteen because she approved of use of puberty
blockers, which is simply a Democratphrase for chemical castration. She made her
(15:33):
son provide a semen sample to freeze, knowing there'd be no other way to
have future grandkids without it. Ournext guest understands this is a divisive Marxist
initiative to destroy the American family,and he's often compared himself to the morose
Edward Norton character from Fight Club.What's the first rule of fight Club?
Don't talk about fight Club? Justlike the trans cultists don't want anyone talking
(15:54):
and exposing the truth about their lives. I welcome Ted Hadaco to the Main
Source of Truth podcast. Listen,Ted, I wish we were under speaking
under different circumstances. You know,that's one of the hardest interests that I've
ever done, Just a nightmare scenarioyou've had to endure essentially on your own.
(16:15):
I read a really informative piece byBrandon Showalter of The Christian Post we
just had on Yesterday, episode ninetyeight, speaking to the movie documentary Dead
Name, and the quote from hisarticle said, the Bay Area father told
the Christian Post that his plight isa herowing example of what other parents across
the US can expect to happen iftheir child who's struggling with gender confusion moves
(16:37):
to California, or I'd like toadd any parent in the United States.
If mains LD seventeen thirty five,this trans Trafficking Bill passes, creating this
trans tourism trans sanctuary state because everyparent in the United States is at risk.
So can you give the audience alittle bit of a summary, you
know, like, how did thissituation begin at the end of ninth grade
when your potential goth child kind ofstarted to suddenly sexually transition. So thanks
(17:03):
for having me. Your intro wasvery accurate. Of course, the first
article sort of chronicling my family's storywas written by Abigail Schreier that was published
in City Journal February of twenty twentytwo. As you mentioned an intro,
Yeah, my ex wife came tome in the middle of the ninth grade
(17:26):
year with our then fifteen year oldson, told me that he was trans
and she basically fled to the marriage. She left pretty much immediately took both
our sons. We have a youngerson as well. The younger son came
back home a couple of days lateron his own, and I've shared custody
(17:49):
of him since then. He's stillseventeen at this point. But yeah,
my ex wife quickly engaged with theword psychotherapist. But that may be giving
them undeserved respect. Therapist, Yeah, you know, you know, minimally
a credential therapist, an LMFT,who I believe really kind of greased the
(18:14):
kids and acknowledge the delusional thought andreally you know, solidified it. Well.
Yeah, and you mentioned the DailyMail article that that warning sign that
parents should have or that you justdidn't have the information of at the time,
should have been your son going toa therapist because you hadn't had a
chance to really research that person.Correct. Yeah, So any parent who
finds themselves in this sort of similarsituation, I hate to say, you
(18:37):
really can't trust the caring professions.You really need to do your research and
vet anyone you might might have orconsider having work with your child, see
what their methodologies are. You know, can can maybe play some devil advocate
questions and really and put some hypestheticalsto the therapist sort of see what they
would do. I didn't do that. I did realize you know that this
(19:03):
this I didn't realize what was goingon, that this skender ideology it so
permeated, you know, the caringprofessions back then. Well you mentioned that,
and in Maine, and I assumein California too, is their license
is basically affected if they don't affirmsomebody's gender because the way it's written up.
They can't say to a child,hey, you're really a dude,
you know. They they can't saythat they have to go along with a
(19:26):
charade. And I, you know, I can't. I can't imagine myself
whether I'm a you know, asa teacher or a counselor, or a
doctor, or a social worker oryou know, a therapist. I can't
imagine that my character, my integrity, my just who I am would allow
me to go along with this charade. But that's really what's occurring. You
(19:47):
know, these these therapists are goingalong with this just made up fantasy land
that unicorns exist, and they're they'rereally propagating that lie. One of the
things when we talked last week,you had stated that the legal court options
were the only way to cause adent in this liberal shield right around this
transcult union that are taking children andstripping them away from the parents. And
you had a tumultuous court battle andeven though you won, you still lost.
(20:12):
Can you explain what happened in thatsituation for your listeners and then we'll
dive a little bit into the judgeand some for just her craziness. After
my ex wife separated. She didfile for divorce about four months later.
That was just before COVID. WhenCOVID started, the courts in California went
to remote and via zoom, andthat slowed things down. So we did
(20:34):
eventually get into a family court inJune of twenty twenty one. To make
a very long sorted story short,I lost cause the entire investation of the
older one, just the older one. It was a really rather bizarre popca
esque preceding. The judge at onepoint asked me, if I were to
(20:57):
learn that my son believed himself tobe the Queen of England, could I
love and accept him? And Itold the judge, well, of course
I could do that situationally, butthat would probably be a you know,
process that might take some time.And she became angry at me, and
so what what would what would takeso long? Was that he occupies an
(21:21):
identity that you don't accept. AndI had pointed out to the judge,
said, your honor, you justmentioned that an identity of the Queen of
England, that in that event,he is not the Queen of England,
and the therapist in that event wouldknow that he's not the queen of England.
That's not going to change. Thejudge got angry or actually it wasn't
(21:41):
entirely clear what she was trying todo, but I think she was trying
to make the analogy that that weshould just accept discord and gender identity.
Well, yes, but that's whatyou're saying in that hypothetical. Really is
is that, regardless of what youthink as a parent who knows your child
better than anybody on this earth,if the therapist or a piece of paper
says that your son's a Queen ofEngland, then that's what she expects you
(22:03):
to comply with. I mean,it's insane, right, It's complete derangement
syndrome. Yeah. Yeah, thisjudge, you know, believe she had
some kind of reality distortion field aroundher. You know, it was a
bizarre proceeding. The follow up proceedingwas was equally bizarre as well. The
judge had actually appointed someone a minerscounsel, who she claimed had special training
(22:26):
and transgender possibly had had a handlea family case involving a transgender child.
Previously, we've gotten full disclosure orinformation around that, but this this miners
council, uh, did interview thefamily very briefly individually and spend a constroll
mount time with the doctors. Oneof the doctors dim Aaron Staffs and UCSF
(22:49):
Universe Calbar San Francisco, which hasa checker point of care that is engaged
in some research and key brief blockers. And I got doctor Aaron Saft's take
on things and wrote a report.It had had major facts the science basically
entirely backwards or upside down. Anddespite writing a rebuttal or opposing that report
(23:14):
of the Minors Council that was usedwith pretext by the judge to further restrict
it. We had limited my visitationand to make the orders more or less
permanent. You know, they claimthat the order is temporary, but it's
almost impossible to change them, youknow. Yeah. I don't want to
get into too deep of the weedbecause it's it's just a small part of
the story. About six months later, after this judge had issued orders,
(23:37):
I came to learn from someone Iguess, let's stay well acquainted with the
inside baseball, that that court courthouseor that courthouse community, that my judge
had an adult son in his twentieswho was transitioning to a girl at exactly
the same time and just previous tothe judge overseeing my my my manner.
(24:03):
And there are multiple posts of theof this judge basically praising and applauding her
her new daughter on on various socialmedia accounts, including applauding her daughter's U
s and m you know, bondageyour photos. Unbelievable, unbelievable. Yeah,
it's a little odd. You knowthat the point is the is the
(24:26):
point for motion to reconsider or seektan appeal of the orders? Was was
gone gone? Was passed. Judicialexperts have looked at that and and you
know, some of opine that thatdid represent a conflict of interest that the
judge should have disclosed to the parties, that we at least would have had
the uh, you know, informedability to to make a decision whether or
(24:48):
not to recuse. And certainly Iwould have recused the judge had I known
this. Well, yeah, Iwould go further to say ted that it
was you know, potentially emotional blackmailthat you know, she's in that position
and my opinion, my words,she's inside the trans cult. She's accepting
again that unicorns exist in the world, which they don't. You know,
I take a pretty hard stance.I don't believe trans children exist. I
(25:11):
believe there's two sexes, god givenand whatever sexuality or whatever, you know,
personality that child wants to have,you know, have at it.
But but yeah, I think youknow, Judge Haramoto, she that was
an absolute conflict of interest. Andyou know, there's there's no meaningful scientific
evidence that really affirms gender ideology.It's all this emotional blackmail. Yeah,
(25:33):
well, there's an important difference withJudge her motor. Her child was an
adult, he was in his twentieswhen he transitioned to be a female.
That's good, that's good to know. It's still it's still harrowing. But
I could see a little bit moreinto that. Well, I mean,
in a in a world where youknow, conservatives are libertarians and complete small
government in liberty, we do haveto kind of step back. So,
(25:56):
well, maybe this is something thata grown adult can do. I mean,
I don't necessarily it could see that, you know, the greatest idea,
but from an individual liberty perspective,for a grown you know, adult
in their majority, I you know, it's hard to it's hard to actually
criticize it or oppose I suppose Ithink it's entirely different when it comes to
children, because children are aren't allowedto have to get tattoos, they're not
(26:21):
allowed to vote, they're not allowedto drive a car in Manhattan. They're
not allowed to you know, buyweapons, or enter into contracts or join
the military. Yet we are goingto allow them to you know, choose
their sex right change their gender andthen go engage in a medical procedures or
(26:41):
procedures that will that are life alteringthat and you know, permanent in most
cases and super expensive, as youfound out two hundred and ten thousand dollars.
I mean these are yeah, thatwe'll get the money in a second.
I mean, the one thing Iwould want to say that just kind
of sticking to touch your motive fora moment. You know, she probably
presents herself as a caring mother andopen minded and in a model for others
(27:06):
to follow. But what I whatI don't think she she you know,
was cognizant of or or or justdidn't think about, is that the experience
for her adult child is not thesame as that for my minor's child or
anyone else's uh, A minor childand a big difference is even if and
I don't know the medical history ofa judge here motives child adult child,
(27:30):
but presumably this this person has pursuedsome of the available transition procedures, which
might include estrogen, female or hormone. But because of the age that that
Judge here motives uh son transition,he would not have been given puberty blockers.
And that's a critical difference and oneof the misnombers which we're which we're
(27:55):
encountering still in the court. SoI mean, I need to be rambling
in this presentation or this conversation.But consistent with Judge here motives failure to
disclose, you know, her personalbiases and her appointment of a minors counsel
with the quote unquote had training,special training and transgender. Two years after
(28:17):
and we're skipping part of the story, but this this is sort of a
new part of the sort that reallyisn't out there. Two years after the
judge issued the orders, and oneyear after I discovered the two hundred and
ten thousand dollars charge of my healthinsurance which was for surgery ten plant puberty
blocker, my judge taught a classin a transgender issues and custody and she
(28:42):
taught that at the Contra cost ofBar Association in October of twenty twenty two,
and she co presented it with agentleman by the name of massoft Or,
who was the legal director for UCSF'sGender Clinic at the time that my
son was undergoing treatment, and thatthat that legal presentation, it's a I
(29:04):
believe seventy development a class. Itagain presents the science completely upside down,
gets major facts backwards. There's assertionsfalse assertions that puberty blockers are reversible,
one hundred percent reversible, which isnot true. There's there's a sphere damage
to bone calcification. There's issues withcognitive function among other issues. But to
(29:30):
me, those are the two mostworries. But what's really kind of mind
blowing is that here you have thejudge who issued the orders in my my
my family law case co presenting aclass with the attorney for UCSF's Gender Clinic
who violated the custody or issued bythat judge. That was another condol Well
(29:52):
in the thing, it's the thingthat's interesting to me, And you know,
we talked a little bit about this. So through the divorce hearings with
your ex wife. You're able tomaintain shared custody of your youngest son,
but not the son that had beenpotentially brainwashed and then thinking he was a
girl and celebrated for it. Theywouldn't allow you to have shared custody because
you were not affirming, uh,you know, the gender change or whatever.
(30:15):
It's just that that does lead tothe quote of the courts or a
giant racket. I mean, you'reyou're you're correct about Yeah, I was
selectively denied custody just of the olderchild because I didn't affirm. They are
the course of the giant racket.Yeah, and in many ways, you
know, by virtue of having gonethrough this family court experience. You know,
(30:37):
I want to also to be realclear, I'm not not, you
know, having pity for myself andI'm not seeking pity. There's a lot
of people who go through suffering,and suffering is is probably the basis of
the human condition. We suffered differentways. I saw other other families going
through the family court system, andthey get they get badly brutalized. I
mean, people in poverty, peoplein racial minority get abused by the courts
(31:00):
as well, and in different ways. So I would actually just kind of
look at the the transgender issue asa pretext that the courts use to make
unequal custody the decisions or award custodyunequally, and basically the courts in a
(31:22):
way really don't care why or whatpretexts they use or what excuse they use
to make an unequal custody award.They just want to have unequal custody because
if they make a one parent getsno custody and the other parent gets all
the custody, that actually means thatthere's going to be more child support paid
by one party to the other.And there is actually a financial incentive for
(31:45):
family courts to do that under theSocial Security Act Typle four, Section V.
That's not really what this call ortalk is about. But what I
just want to say is that isthat transgender issues is really just a pretext
for the courts to do these unequalcustomy awards. And it's also you know,
(32:07):
used by cps effectively for the samereason. It is a money making
racket for the counties. Well,and you mentioned parental rights, so you
know, especially precious as they are, you know, part of the Bill
of Rights, their inalienable rights,their God given rights. And from the
Christian Post article, it said thesurgery to insert the hormone blocking inplan occurred
(32:28):
months before Hadaka Release realized that whathad happened when Drew was seventeen, violating
the court order. Its contribution tothe child's eventual sterilization might also violate the
California Family Code section six nine twofive B one, which does not authorize
a minor child to be sterilized withoutthe consent of the child's parents or guardian.
(32:49):
And so in this section, youknow, as we move forward,
you're now getting into another legal frontby going on offensive, basically going on
the on offense. Is that isthat accurate? The way to say that,
Well, you know, let's let'sbe careful about offense. Okay,
you know, at first point yousaid a lot of things there, But
right, California has a Family Codesection sixty nine B one, which which
(33:15):
prohibits sterilization of a minor, andthere are appellate decisions California pellet decisions which
uphold that statute and not only I'llhould that statute, but but state that
it's not okay to sterilize the minoreven with parental consent, and I think
most most listeners. If you scouryour own states body of law, you
(33:40):
will probably find a similar law.It's generally across the board not legal to
sterilize miners. And there's a there'sa recognition again, like I said about
the tattoos and joining the military,there's a recognition that miners don't have the
judgment. They don't they don't considerlong term consequences. So well, yeah,
(34:01):
I know, I certainly didn't wantto ever have kids when I was
eighteen or younger. You know,I did when I was in my late
thirties, and that's that's what ledto, you know, my my two
boys, and had had I madea decision like my ex wife and her
enablers and the lawyers and the judgesaround her did, then then I wouldn't
(34:24):
have had that opportunity, right,So being a parent is being a parent
is really one of the most specialexperiences of the human existence, and for
people to take that away from fromkids, you know, it's not right.
No, I agree hundre percent.As a father of twin girls myself
for now twenty one, I hearyou, and it is something that I
(34:47):
waited till I was thirty years old. I just didn't feel like I was
ready until then, and and somepeople don't don't get ready until later.
It seems to me later and laternowadays. But you know, you talk
about the full brain function really cominginto play when when you know, boys
are twenty six, twenty seven yearsold, so you know you're making these
decisions when he's sixteen, seventeen,eighteen, nineteen years old, and it's
(35:08):
just unfortunate that there's no turning backthe clock on this thing. So you
know, I'm out of speaking,spoken out of turn. So instead of
saying going on offense, what areyou trying to accomplish in this next round
of legal challenges, legal battles thatyou and Tracy Henderson are going through.
Okay, well, well thanks forgiving me an opportunity to talk about that.
(35:29):
And I also at this point,I want to say, I do
have a give send go fundraiser.If you happen to know that we're off
the top of your head, let'ssay it. Yeah, I got it.
It's it's gives endgo dot com slashstop gender experiments on kid The s
is missing on the other kids.So give send go dot com stop gender
(35:50):
experiments on kid. Yeah, soin my case, you know, the
I discovered the puberty blocker implant surgerytwo and a half months after it happened,
and they even when they revealed thatinformation, they only gave did some
pieces, dribs and drabs of whathad happened. At first, they mischaracterized
(36:13):
it as a procedure because the customersprohibited any gender identity related surgery. So
they were trying to use some moregames to keep me from discovering the truth.
I did some consults with a coupleof intercrenologists and former resigned a gender
clinic staff who explained to me thatthe combination of the puberty blocker and the
(36:37):
estrogen that was simultaneously started would causethe permanent sterilization of my son in four
months. And so two and ahalf months afore I gone by, I
attempted to get the implant removed,first by generally asking and then attempting to
file emotion and they, instead ofohoning up to what they had done,
(37:01):
h employed what's called the silver bulletstrategeum in family court. And that's basically
the false alligation of domestic violence,which I wasn't even living with my ex
wife at the time. But Ispent about four months defending myself against that
before all that was was dropped andI was cleared. But in the meantime,
(37:21):
uh, you know, the damagehad been done to my son and
there there wasn't going to be anygoing back on his his fertility. The
court also set hearing for that motion, my motion to remove the implant,
uh, six months out and justa couple of weeks before he was going
to get turn eighteen. So andeven the judge told me off the record
(37:44):
that if I were to prevail atthat hearing, he would not issue the
order to remove the implant. Therewas completely pointless to do. So that's
incredible, man, I mean,that's incredible that they're they're basically you know,
they're basically telling you they screwed up, and they won't still want to
do anything to dot it. It'sjust I mean, that's what what is
his what is his medical assessment todaybased on you know, what I had
(38:05):
perceived to be illegal surgeries like whereis he at? And I know strained
relationship, So you might not knowexactly, but generally speaking, what's what's
happened to your son? You know, he took a gap year after graduating
from from high school. He usesa female name. Now there may even
have been a legal legal name change. He is still engaged in the transition
(38:29):
process. You know, I canpositively say that that he took some training
and is making some efforts towards workingin the healthcare industry. So that's good.
I can't really speak more two morespecific than that. No, that's
fair. That's fair. One ofthe things, you know, we always
talk about here on the podcast isfollowing the money. And so you know,
(38:51):
you mentioned the big, the bigcharge on the on the insurance UH
claim two hundred and ten thousand dollars, and I was reading another uh.
This might have been from Bright partthe co founder and director of a clinic
that aids and children's sex change attempts. Doctor Stephen Rosenthal, the co founder
medical director at the University of California, San Francisco's been Off Children's Hospital Child
(39:12):
and Adolescent Gender Center, has receivedmoney as a consultant from two pharmaceutical companies
that are both under investigation for advertisingpuberty blockers. So big Pharma is wrapped
up in this, right, Sothat's that's one of the pieces that is
so difficult. I mean, right, so doctor Rosenthal, doctor Stephen Rosenthal,
(39:32):
medical director of the gender Clinic atthe CSF. He in fact was
treated my son on multiplications. Ihad progress notes from from from the doctor.
I had one progress note in whichhe describes all the lawyers, including
the UCSF's gender's clinic lawyer, havinghaving communications with with my ex wife's lawyer,
(39:58):
with the miners counsel, the Courtof Point lawyer, and how they're
all navigating around the problem of howto use Dad's insurance without Dad discovering,
so that they could implant this thispuberty blockers to prollen evil twisted six stuff.
(40:20):
I mean, yeah, it's it'sit's pretty clear evidence of a conspiracy
and concealment, which that is.That is one of the key exhibits that
we're using in the two current legalactions. You know, what's what's I
guess, like I said, theship has sailed really for for for my
my son. You know, maybesomeday down the road, uh, you
know, he'll he'll have a changeof heart like some of these people who
(40:45):
we called the transitioners to you,I've meant a number of transitioners, the
transitioners and spoken with them, althoughI can't say that any of them have
had exactly the same or even uncomparableexperience because most of them, the most
of the ones that I've met,did not use puberty blockers. Okay,
without without the use of puberty blockers, I think individuals have have I'm not
(41:09):
to say that they don't have mentalhealth challenges, but without the puberty blockers,
there may not be the same braindamage or or or brain function compounding
the compounding damage. Really, that'syou know, I mean many of these
things, and we talked the otherday, I mean, many of these
folks that go through this transition havesome sort of trauma, sexual trauma,
(41:30):
mental trauma, bullying, you know, whatever it is. And you know,
in your case, there wasn't anyreal super warning signs beyond you know,
maybe some goth painted fingernails and maybeyou know, wearing something that you
know, assembled or resembled the skirt. But you mentioned the Christian Post article,
(41:51):
the quote it's very Orwellian, it'svery upside down the new speak,
and that you didn't think we havemuch of a society for very long if
we don't do something about trend andit really comes down to how do we
change this, and certainly trying tochange that through legislative process. So you're
still active in your fight to explorethis, you know, expose this horror,
and I commend you for that.But what would you say to other
(42:14):
parents out there in California or inany state again, you know LD seventeen
thirty five and main has the abilityto take any child from any parent anywhere
in the country. Is what issomething that you try to give hope to
these other parents or give them insightas to some of the things you've had
to go through so they don't haveto go through that themselves. Well,
(42:35):
the first thing I would tell parentsis that you really think hard and long
about at what age you're going togive your child access electronic devices in the
internet and social media and cell phone. I would I would not have a
child take get a heather and personalcell phone before ninth grade. In our
case, that was that was actuallya point of contention with my ex wife
(42:57):
and I lost out on that.Are some had a phone at at age
eleven, which you know may havebeen an influence. Yeah, No,
I think as if I remember right, my twins were probably in about eighth
grade. And I think they saidthey might have been the last two kids
in the school. I didn't havea phone, you know, and that
whole thing. So it is,it is that puts pressure on kids,
(43:19):
and it allows predators and influencers andthose kind of folks to start, you
know, turning the dynamics of someof these kids' personalities. And it's very
unfortunate because they're spending more time onthose devices than they might you know,
be talking to their parents. Andand that's something else that I say is,
you know, and I was oneof those parents too. You come
home from a long day of work, you know, you work ten hours
(43:40):
a day, You pound through dinner, you try to get through homework,
You maybe watch TV, talk tothe kids for two minutes, put them
in to bed, kiss them ontheir head, and started over again the
next day. It's just not it'snot the way it's going to work anymore.
I think parents really need to understandthat kids, kids in school today,
behind the brick, all of theseschools are just in a rough,
(44:00):
rough dynamic. The level of anxiety, depression, thoughts of suicide or off
the off the you know, justoff the charts at this point. But
you know, parents in California.You've told parents in California to consider moving
out of California. Correct, Yeah, I mean this, This gender ideology
is definitely in the public schools.It's in the private and and Catholic schools
(44:23):
for that matter as well. Wehave activists in the judiciary, we have
activists in the governor's office, inthe in the Attorney General's office. We
have super majority Democrat legislature, boththe upper and lower bodies, you know.
(44:45):
And I've gone up to Sacramento onmultiple occasions to give testimony of committee
hearings on two years ago on aSenate Bill one O seven, which was
California's transgender or sanctuary state, whichhas elements similar to to the bill that's
under consideration main and then last yearAssembly Bill nine to five seven, which
(45:09):
did pass. That actually that didpass both both houses or the House and
the Senate Assembly. In the Senate, I went to GAVI and new somebody
pocket me to it because that andthat was actually the the would have been
the law to provide instructions to familycourt judges to award custody to only the
(45:31):
affirming parents if there was a situationsimilar to my family, but it was
actually a little bit worse. AndI believe the main bill is similar in
so far that it would have addedthe designation of the non affirming parent as
an a user. Yes, sohe had that, Yes, I had
that law in effect at the timethat my custody issue went on. I
(45:55):
would have lost customing not only myolder gender discordant, but the younger one
who wanted to be with me,And then frankly, that would have been
devastating. I don't don't know ifI would have really survived the process.
I also would say say that,you know, I had a lot of
a lot of support from the parentsgroups and from other parents are going through
this. You know, it's it'sa it's a special kind of health.
(46:16):
This happened to your family, it'sall it's all rainbows and unicorns, and
let's be accepting and and let's supportthese kids when it's it's somebody else's kids.
But when it happens to your ownfamily, then you actually, uh
have to kind of confront this andand and and drill into this and learn
about what are the medical consequences.It's then when you actually see that this
(46:38):
isn't this isn't also great, Yeah, it is there very it's it's crazy,
Ted, I mean, we wantto make sure that again gibsen go
dot com slash stop gender Experiments onkid is where you can help Ted.
And you know, again from alegal expense perspective, it's going to be,
you know, an incredible journey.I financially, it's it's going to
(47:01):
be so you know, difficult oneverybody because you're fighting, what against eighteen
different lawyers. I mean, you'rereally fighting against the system. And so
I appreciate your time tonight. Ireally wish that again we could have met
under different circumstances. But I justwanted to give you, you know,
my as a father, myself,just you know, my empathy to really
(47:22):
support you in any any way Ican to help expose the story. People
are still not aware and it seemslike until evil knocks down your door in
your home, they just don't getit. So any any last words,
Ted before we sign off. Yeah, I just, like I said,
I'm not really doing this to pursuingthis for myself. I do want,
(47:43):
I do want answers as to whatwent on behind the scenes and what was
the degree of collusion between the variouslawyers as well as that you say that
gender clinic, we know that theyhad a two hundred ten thousand dollars pub
hayout for what was you know,an outpatient a surveery surgery that took probably
(48:06):
less than an hour to accomplish.We all had family members sup to hospitalize,
you know, maybe from cancer orsomething that spent weeks in the hostele.
And nobody I know has ever hada two hundred and ten thousand dollars
bill even for weeks in the hospital. Well, and looking back twenty twenty
one years now to put a youknow, kind of summarize that obviously different
(48:27):
timeframe. But Riley, one ofmy daughters, was in the hospital for
six months when she was born andwent through heart surgery. And I think
she was like a four hundred thousanddollars baby, but she was there six
months. Like you know, therethere was a lot going on. It
wasn't like you said, you know, one hour in and out, you
know, just total jam session.But again that gets back to the just
the amount of money that's being pumpedinto and from big pharma and big medical
(48:52):
is just it's insurmountable. Unless peopleare exposed and aware. Ted, I
appreciate your time tonight. I reallythank you for exposing this. I understand
you're not trying to do this foryourself, but a part of this,
a part of it has to beto try to rectify some of the situation.
Your family's never going to be thesame, But I just want to
issue the best of luck with thiscourt case. I want to make sure
(49:14):
you know, obviously, anything Ican do to help support you and Tracy
Henderson and her assistant Alex you know, please, you know, just just
calling me if you ever need something, you know where I am. And
I just want to be able tosupport you guys the best we can.
I appreciate that, Sean, ourbest, best dude, and a good
luck in Maine tomorrow. Some finaltruth Tonight on our hundredth episode, the
(49:34):
leftist judge Hiramoto, who was TedHadako's judge in this entire cluster, said
to him, do you want atrans daughter or a dead son? Lies
built upon lies do not make themthe truth. This is emotional blackmail that
these people are trying to use onparents, and you can't stand for it
any more. Parents. You haveto fight back. It was mentioned that
(49:55):
the California state bill AB nine fiveseven actually passed. Democratic state senator had
amended the change the California Family Codeto include gender affirming alongside the child's need
for health, safety, and welfare. Critics of the bill believe the failure
to affirm a child's gender identity andwishes to under undergo experimental sex change procedures
(50:15):
would put parents at risk of beingcharged with child to be you the same
thing here in Maine for LD seventeenthirty five, Newsome as you heard,
Pocket vetoed it because we all thinkhe's still going to be the Democrat president
nominee in here in another few months. But so we'll see. But that
same situation, As I say allthe time, Maine is the California of
(50:35):
the East Coast and this is justanother example of that. But the fact
is, sex reassignment surgery doesn't work. It never gets to the root cause
of the issue. Sexual trauma,bullying, physical violence, brainwashing by the
schools, mental health issues, whateverit is. None of these things like
LD seventeen thirty five get to theheart of the matter, get to the
root cause, which is mental illness. The other thing that's really difficult is
(50:58):
you know, most people that gothrough this sex reassign surgery. As we
found out in Sweden, the longeststudy ever conducted over thirty years, documented
the lifelong mental unrest and went throughten to fifteen years after sexual reassignment surgery.
The suicide rate of those who hadundergone this surgery had rose twenty times
of that to comparable peers. It'sof Frankenstein's monster scenario. Ted and I
(51:21):
had a chance to talk before thepodcast last week. You know, when
we happened upon saying some of thisis true, there's a saying the four
boxes of liberty. There are fourboxes to be used in the defense of
liberty, soap, ballot, jury, and cartridge. Please use them in
that order, So one could saysoapbox, ballot box, jury box,
(51:42):
and amimal box. Now we've alreadyrolled through the first three. The last
one is the last resort. AndI would never ever push physical violence or
violence of any kind on anybody.But we are here to defend our families.
We are here to stand strong,we are here to support other parents,
and we need to continue to exposeit. So twenty twenty four is
going to be a wild ride.You need to be prepared for what's coming
(52:06):
next. Round them all, roundthem up, let's cool, round them
up less. And that's the data, data, data, mine data,
(52:40):
stay of mind. All right,that was shinedown. This was the main
source of Truth Podcast. Search forthe show on Facebook and give us a
like. I've been your host,Sean mcbriardy. Follow me on Twitter,
True Social and YouTube. We're workinghard to keep the Truth alive and we'd
love to have you donate it.Give us, send go slash Sean mcbriardy,
PayPal or Venmo. I hope youenjoyed the show.