Master of Science - 01/28/25

Tune in to a new episode of "Master of Science" with Professor James McCanney!

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
Welcome to Master of Science with host Professor James McCanny.
The good professor's career spans fifty years as a university teacher,
scientist and engineer. Each week, he will explore the rapidly
changing world of science as many long held theories are
crumbling under the weight of new data. He will cover

(00:23):
the fields of geology, archaeology, meteorology, oceanography, space science, astronomy, cosmology,
biological evolution, virology, energy, mathematics and war. So please welcome
the host of Master of Science, James McCanny.

Speaker 2 (00:53):
Good evening everybody, and tonight I'm going to postpone the
discussion of the BET's limit again. Let me just explain
this a little bit and why it's important. The wind
energy industry uses this universally to determine the value or
the efficiency to be specific, to determine the efficiency of

(01:16):
their wind turbines which don't work and so at any rate,
this is a physics discussion rather esoteric topic. Very important,
but I want to conclude what I was talking about
last week. The direction that this country is going to take.

(01:36):
It has a mandate from the populace. Whether you like
it or not, don't get involved in that that's not
an issue politics. This is where things are going, and
so I did not get to talk about the issue
of going to Mars. Okay, that's a you know, that's
a broad a very very high expectation to try and

(01:59):
get to Mars and plant the flag, which means putting
humans there. I'm particularly of the opinion that putting human
someplace really doesn't make any sense until we have a
lot of equipment there put there by robotics and so
at any rate, I want to talk about that tonight.

(02:19):
But back to the BET's limit, just to give you
a little bit of an idea. The BET's limit is
a physics is basically, if you have a column of
a non compressible fluid like water or hydro like a
hydraulic fluid let's say, for example, but typically the most
commonly used is water in a hydro dam, and you

(02:42):
have a tube where the water is rushing down from
this big reservoir. How much energy can you extract from that?
And it's a kinetic energy transfer, in other words, you
have to slow the water down. That kinetic energy then
gets put into a turbine, which drives a generation which
creates electricity. It's very very calculable. It's an amount of

(03:07):
energy you can determine and depend on. So dams are
very good in that respect, kind of like say a
coal dam. If you get a trainload of coal in,
you know how much energy you're going to produce with
that coal, and it's very reliable, although it has other issues. Okay,
so the best's limit has to do with fluids, and

(03:28):
they're using it incorrectly in the wind industry, and so
it takes a bit of physics talking about aerodynamics, the
Bernoili principle, which again is being misused. It's a lot
of this stuff and I just can't believe that engineering
schools are teaching this as some kind of fact. But
anyway that I believe, I'll be able to start on

(03:49):
that next week. So a very interesting topic and very important.
But let me talk about, first of all this week
the future of space. And first of all, I'll start
talking about the fact that we have people are saying
we have infinite reserves of petroleum, which is true. The

(04:13):
whole world has near infinite amount of petroleum all over
the place. It's not in the Mideast only, it's not
in Venezuela only it's not only in the Tyre Sands
of Canada. And how did it get there. It's because
Earth has passed through the tail of large comets multiple times.
We've gotten inundations of water from that. And I'll be

(04:35):
talking about that in a little while, related to another topic,
another crazy topic, where people talk about water shooting out
of the ground causing the Noah's flood. Absolutely an insane
idea that somehow has gotten traction. But the oil on
planet Earth has come from the Earth passing through the

(04:59):
tail of comets. And you can see see in the
tails of comets the hydrocarbons and they're baked all over
the nucleus. When we get to see comet nucleus and
there's no water's snow or ice. That's mythology. That's a
fairytale science from NASA, thank you very much. But the

(05:22):
oil on Earth is everywhere. It's under the oceans. The
idea that was created by fern forests is absolutely ludicrous.
And the reason that got traction back in the early
nineteen hundreds was so they could have oil shortages, planned
oil shortages when there's no shortage of oil at all.

(05:42):
And so no, the United States does not have to
import oil. The idea that we have to go someplace
else and good oil, and the fact that we don't
export oil. Once again, the people that know, and clearly
Trump has advisors who are telling him that there's vast
amounts of oil reserves and natural gas in the United States.

(06:06):
They're opening up the ports again. Remember they closed the
ports under Biden administration shipping out natural gas. And so
that is a resource that we have in the Appalachian
Mountains and other reserves. Underground. Where does natural gas come from.
It's part of the oil that over time, natural gas

(06:29):
is a byproduct and it is trapped underground, and so
when you go down, you drill down into the ground.
Originally natural gas was simply burned off because when they
went to an oil well, natural gas was one of
the things that was naturally occurring. Okay, So first of all,
the fact is it is a fact the United States

(06:54):
has in terms of the amount of oil and reserves
and natural gas that we use. We have a near
infinite amount of it, and we should be using it.
We should not be paying this vast amount of money
for oil. And the price of oil has to be
controlled so that it's profitable. To get it out of

(07:16):
the ground so that businesses can make a profit. But
it's not going to be the price of petroleum that
we've been paying. By a long shot. Gasoline in Venezuela
is five cents a gallon. Gasoline in other South American
countries where they produce locally in export is maybe five

(07:37):
cents a gallon. And why are we paying three four
dollars for a gallon of gasoline the amount of money
you pay for a gallon of milk. But you're putting
all this gasoline in your car and it goes into
the price of everything. So the first thing you have
to do if you're going to cure inflation and the

(07:57):
economy is to bring the cost of energy down, and
that means using local energy. And until somebody comes along
with a better plan, that's what's going to be used, because,
whether you like it or not, we built our society
on the use of energy and so any rate. But

(08:21):
the other issue is that we are burning native oxygen.
We are burning native oxygen. That is, in other words,
when a jet takes off, when the truck drives down
the road, when you get in your suv to drive
up and down the road to take to go shopping
or whatever you're doing, or take a trip across the country,
whatever you're doing, you are burning native oxygen and the

(08:44):
earth has a lot of it. Can imagine that every
day all of this gasoline is being burned three hundred
and fifty million gallons in the US alone worldwide. The
coal that's being burned is using native oxygen, and it
is effect the level of oxygen. But people still repeat

(09:04):
this crazy idea that somehow the Amazon jungle is replenishing
oxygen into the planet. Whether it's absurd. How does the
oxygen being created by the Amazon jungle get into the
Northern hemisphere during winter or get into the Southern hemisphere
during winter when it's winter in the Southern hemisphere. It's

(09:25):
absolutely ludicrous. It's you know. And if you took all
the carbon dioxide produced in the Amazon jungle, maybe in
nineteen twenty, it may have offset some of the burning
going on of high energy content feels like coal or
gasoline or petroleum based products, but not today, not by

(09:49):
any stretch of their imagination. So we are using native oxygen. Also,
I'm going to insert here that the idea that somehow
you have to take carbon dioxide out of the air
to make the Earth a healthier place is absurd. The
Earth needs vast amounts of CO two. And here's what

(10:10):
would happen if you doubled or tripled or multiplied by
ten the amount of CO two in the atmosphere. The
plant life would flourish. And they've done this in greenhouses.
You take a pine tree in this greenhouse, and you
take a pine tree in that greenhouse, and you put
double or triple or much more carbon dioxide in the

(10:32):
one greenhouse, the plant's going to grow like crazy. The
plant life today on planet Earth is being CO two starved.
The plants are starving to death from lack of CO two.
And you have people who want to take it out
of the atmosphere and they are doing it and nobody's
stopping them. And this is insanity. And thousands, tens of

(10:57):
thousands of phdts from all branches of science have signed
statements saying exactly that the political football of global warming
has been to raise the price of oil and energy
and raise the price of water and give us the

(11:20):
idea that on planet Earth we somehow have a water
shortage when three quarters of the surface of the world
is covered with water and there's a water shortage. It's absurd.
I mean, how do they convince us? But I'll be
honest with you. If you can take a society and
convince them that their greatest holiday of the year, which

(11:42):
would be either Christmas or Easter, take your pick, that
in Christmas there's a fat little man in a red
sooth gives presents and that's the main reason for the holiday.
Or for Easter, which is the resurrection of Christ. That
you would you have a bunny that lays colored eggs

(12:03):
that are painted and the kids run around and find
them in the art. If you can convince the society
of that, then you can convince them of anything. Believe me,
I got a bridge to sell you. So anyway, back
to the idea of energy, Yes, there is an issue
of pollution and we should not be burning the amount

(12:24):
the incredible amount of energy we're using. Simply put, people
use far too much energy, and I'm in agreement with that.
But the end result is that we built an economy,
whether you like it or not, based on the use
of petroleum, and if it doesn't keep flowing at the

(12:48):
rate it's flowing today, a lot of people will die,
a lot of people will die, simply put, so take
your chances with one or the other. Okay, last week
I talked about the state of colleges and that they've
turned into businesses and they've actually killed the goose that

(13:12):
laid the golden egg. And interestingly enough, I got an
email from a listener who said, well, of course colleges
have to be a business. How else could it be.
And so I thought, Okay, whoa this is? I have
to jump on this one because for thousands of years

(13:35):
and this is indicative people today who living today, especially
younger people. I don't know what the age of the
person who wrote this, but especially younger people don't understand that.
You know, twenty thirty years ago, not everybody had a
nice house in the suburbs now, but not everybody had
a nice car, not everybody you know in fifty years ago.

(13:57):
Even worse, most people in this country, you know, they
think that everything used to be just the same as
it is today. But let's go talk about education. When
you go back as far back as you want to
go in education, I don't care if you go all
the way back to the Greeks, or let's take from

(14:20):
a post year zero of the current calendar, so the
death of Christ ad after the death of Christ would
be the current reckoning of the calendar. Education and the

(14:41):
saving of information and the passing on of information and knowledge,
whether you like it or not, has been done by
people for free and vainly in the Catholic Church. Other
civilizations have come and gone, but like it or not,
the majority of information that has been passed down to

(15:03):
us today has been done so within the Catholic Church.
When I grew up, I went to a private Catholic school.
I went to kindergarten at the public school. That's the
only public school I've gone to. Other than that, it's
been private school education. But grade school nuns they didn't

(15:24):
get paid. Sorry, it wasn't a business. They had a
very hard time struggling in. These women. The nuns put
a lot of effort. Believe me. I got a really, really,
really good education from Dominican nuns. And God blessed them,
all of them for the work they do and giving

(15:45):
up their lives so that kids like me could get
a real good education. And it was not a business,
believe me. They did it completely out of dedication, and
it was an order of teachers that was there. That
was their goal in life, and they would go through
until they were old they couldn't walk down the hall

(16:05):
anymore and they would go off to a place where
they would die. That was not a business. When I
went to college, I went to a private college taught
by Christian brothers. There again, they didn't get paid. They
got some money so they could, you know, like a
little spending money, but it wasn't a job where they
got paid like a professor today at a university making

(16:28):
two hundred grand a year. No, they did not make money.
This was not a money making proposition. And that's why
my school, like I said last week, cost twelve hundred
dollars tuition. The tuition was twelve hundred dollars a year
a year, and my room and board was twelve hundred
dollars a year. And there again you had people who

(16:50):
were basically volunteering their lives to make this happen. I
call my classes. I had a private professor too, who
were paid. They weren't paid a lot a living wage,
but they were not highly paid like universities are paying today.
So if you go back to the Middle Ages and

(17:13):
go way back, you know, you find that the monasteries.
They were people went and dedicated their lives for free.
When colleges in the nineteen sixties, seventies, and it started
to ramp up the eighties, the nineties and up to
today when colleges and universities turned it into a business

(17:37):
and started realizing, hey, we can charge mom and dad.
You know, like I said, when Sis and Junior got
to be eighteen, mom and dad had been paying on
that house for twenty years, you know, so they got
a lot of equity. Well guess what they're going to
sign on the line to get Junior and Sis and
a college education, and on the line for student loans

(17:59):
or or mortgage the house. And the college just realized this.
They said, wow, we can charge a lot of money
for this education. So the prices went up, up, up,
and it became a business. Then they started realizing, wow,
if we open up new avenues of study, we can
definitely make a lot more money. So they opened up

(18:21):
all kinds of avenues of new study, new degree names, etc.
And it became a business. And now what's going on.
They're too expensive. They have priced themselves out of business.
I remember when I was a kid, the plumbers did
that I had friends whose dads were plumbers, and they
raised their prices and raised their prices, and they were

(18:43):
doing really good until one day, all of a sudden,
plastic plumbing came along. People could fix their own tubes
in their house, and all of a sudden, the plumbers
went out of business. They had priced themselves out of business, literally,
and that's what happens with colleges and universities. Then they
started selling online degrees and that's where the end of

(19:03):
the end came. And so I was quoting a NASA
study and what's NASA doing making, you know, uh, creating
studies like this since year two thousand talking about the oh,
basically what the government is doing surreptitiously and incognito behind

(19:28):
the scenes to basically control you in society. And the
one thing I wanted to mention last week I mentioned
was that colleges, that twenty five percent of colleges and
universities would be closed by the end of the twenty
twenty five school year because they're just priced themselves out
of business. And so this listener writes in and says, well,

(19:51):
how else could a college be but a business? Well, traditionally,
like I said, the clergy. The uh the men and
women who gave their lives, dedicated their lives with a
p oh, what do you call it? A a uh?
Well in poverty, basically living in poverty. It gave their

(20:15):
lives to teach so that people like me could get
a good education. And so I value that, and so
B I'll just mention too that when I go to
American Geophysical Union meetings or when I go to places
a lot of times to give a talk or I
don't do so much of that anymore because uh, but
I paid my own way. I didn't work on a

(20:38):
government grant, and that was very important to me in
my career to never take government money. And so I
would go to American Geophysical re Union meeting. My name
tag would have my name and then it would say
independent Scientists, and I was the only one there, and
people would look at me and they they'd look in

(20:59):
the first thing they do when you're at one of
these meetings is they come up and talk to you
and they look at your badge to see your affiliation.
And especially these young green PhD students, they want to
talk to me and they go independent scientists. What does
that mean? That means that I'm not associated with the government.
I don't take my government money. I pay for my

(21:20):
own research. I pay for my if I travel someplace
or I'm on a field research project, I pay for
my own way. And they go, how can you do that?
That's impossible. You have to depend on the government for
money if you're a scientist, and no you don't, No
you don't. And that's why I've advanced more than whole
agencies of the government, because they're locked into this political

(21:43):
correctness Bologne that they can't get out of. So they
scientists spend their whole life marching down the wrong road
because they can't step out of the politically correct line
of thought anyway. So, yes, colleges used to be entities,

(22:03):
not for profit. They were used to be very much
lean because the people who were teaching. And this is
through the like I say, through the Middle Ages, and
then all of the universities, et cetera, and there were
not that many, and then all of a sudden, in
the nineteen thirties, the forties, the fifties, these universities and

(22:25):
colleges were built. And when they expanded and started basically
turning it into a business. Was the beginning of the end.
That's when they killed the goose that laid the golden egg,
essentially and destroyed education at the same time. And I

(22:48):
wanted to add a little bit to this topic. Is
because I have a master's to gree in physics. It's
in nuclear and solid state physics. And also I earned
the title of professor. Was very young, I taught in
the university and that's, by the way, how I got
hired when I was at Cornell. I got hired as

(23:09):
a faculty member at Cornell with a master's degree, and
you don't do that unless you have a serious experience.
They realized that I would be an asset to the
physics department, and that is why I was hired there.
But most people today don't realize that, not through the
history of the world. The PhD is a modern phenomena,

(23:31):
especially the plethora, the absolute huge numbers of PhDs that
have been given in the last say thirty years that
didn't exist before. When I went to college, there were
two people that had PhDs in our physics department in
the college and two that did not, and they were
all good teachers. But the two that did not that

(23:52):
had master's degree were excellent, excellent teachers. You don't need
a PhD nor the teacher certificate to be a good teacher.
Teaching is something either you have it or you don't.
And I don't care how many degrees or how many
certificates or whatever you pile on top of it. A

(24:14):
teacher is somebody that they just have a connection with
the students and they draw attention. The students go in
that classroom and they're excited to learn because that person
is at the front of the classroom. And so, yeah,

(24:34):
the way it used to be, there were a lot
of people in universities and colleges that had master's degree.
A lot of them went on to continuing education finally
got a bigger degree. But that's not the way it was.
Like thirty forty years ago, there were a lot of
people teaching university college level that had master's degrees and

(24:56):
very good teachers. So once again, people today don't realize
that this is not how it's always been. That's one
of the things that kind of drives me crazy about
young people is they don't know history. They don't know
anything about the past, they don't know how things were
in the past, and they judge everything through a lens

(25:18):
of today. And anyway, that's a lot of problems of
understanding today by today's youth or younger people is because
they don't understand. I had friends when I grew up
that lived in what we're called basement houses. They would
build a basement, put the first floor, literally the floor

(25:39):
on there, put tar paper, and they lived in the
basement till they could afford to build the house. You know,
not everybody lived in a you know, a huge house
in the suburbs as you see today. Kids don't understand
that not everybody drove a BMW. You know, people don't

(26:01):
understand how things were when I grew up. We were poor,
We didn't have money. My parents never imagined any of
us would go to school, to university or advanced education.
When I was little, my dad took me aside and
he says, okay, you've got the choice. Here are your
choices to the Army, the Marines, the Air Force, or the Navy.

(26:23):
Those are your choices. The career choices in life. They
never imagined. And when I get out of high school,
I get a full ride scholarship to go to university.
They couldn't pay for that. They didn't contribute anything because
they didn't have it. And but so the idea that
everything to the way you see it today is the

(26:44):
way it always was is not true. It's simply not true.
And it drives me crazy because kids today think that
everybody lived in the suburbs. This goes back to the
time George Washington was here. No, they don't understand, and
not everybody. He was driving BMW's and you know, SUVs

(27:05):
up and down the road. No, it's not always been
like that. Okay, this next topic, I'll tell you. I
have to put my seat belt on when I talk
about this recently. Again, now this is not a new topic,

(27:25):
but this has gotten so much traction that I have
to comment on it. And I've seen this come out
in a number of different from different angles. People are
saying that the Noah's Flood was a series of gushers
coming out of the Earth that was so intense that
it flooded the earth up to a couple hundred feet,

(27:48):
raised the ocean levels, and that this was Noah's flood.
It drives me crazy because Vince this, nobody has ever
been able to identify where these holes were. Now, the
amount of water coming out of these holes would have

(28:09):
been catastrophic rivers flowing for months to expel that amount
of water. Never in the history of geology have we
seen such a phenomenon. We have seen geysers where steam
comes out like a yellowstone. We'll see these little geysers

(28:31):
like Old Faithful every now and then. It used to
be regular every hour or something. Now it's a little
more irregular, but a little bit of a geyser coming
out the earth. But to see vast amounts, we're talking
rivers of water, like the equivalent of say the floodwaters
of the Mississippi River or the Nile River, shooting out

(28:55):
of the ground and then flooding the entire planet. This
is what there's And they're saying this water is locked
into a thing called ringwood or ringwoodite. It's like a mineral.
It's an earth that supposedly traps water. They don't say
how this becomes dislodged in the earth and all of
a sudden it's free waters there, and how it comes

(29:15):
shooting out of holes in the ground all over the earth.
There's no remnants of this, like an asteroid hitting the earth.
You would need a crater for this to happen. You
would need evidence of some kind where this water came
out of the Earth's surface, and there is none. We're
talking within the last ten thousand years or something estimate,

(29:41):
so there would be some kind of physical geological record somewhere,
and there isn't. But the bizarre part of this story
is that they're equating it to Noah's flood. Now let's
take let's take it back the just very first onion
layer on this story. That means that no would have

(30:01):
known that on a certain date all of this water
was going to come gushing up out of the ground.
And if you look at the Russell Crowe movie, that's
what happens. What is it. It's not Ten Commandments. I
don't know. Maybe it's Noah, I forget, but Russell crow
makes this movie. And I saw Russell Crowe in an
interview where he's going, yeah, this could happen. It was like, Russell,

(30:24):
you live in Hollywood, you live in Lalla Dreamland, and
you're not a geologist. And I don't know how much
time you've spent in the field. I really like you movies,
but excuse me, don't talk to me about science, let
alone geology, Let alone water coming up out of the
earth in vast amounts, enough to flood the entire earth.

(30:44):
But let's go back to the concept that somehow Noah
in his somehow knew that on a certain date all
his water was going to come shooting up out of
the earth, and he builds an arc. Excuse me, it
doesn't make any sense if you believe that story. I

(31:06):
got a bridge to sell you, buddy, Give me a
couple of billion dollars and I'll sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.
It doesn't make any sense. And these people are serious
about it, and I'm like, you can't be serious. How
did Noah know that at a certain date all this
water was going to come rushing up out of the earth.
And there's another story about the Noah's Flood, which is

(31:28):
equally daft, and that is that somehow there was a
land bridge in the Mediterranean holding back this vast amount
of water, and one day it broke and flooded the
Mediterranean Ocean, and that that was the Noah's Flood. Well,
the way the story comes down to us is it

(31:51):
was forty days and forty nights of torrential rain that
means rain from above rain, you know, And of course,
people calculated that if you take all of the rain
in the clouds in the world and it rained everywhere,
all of the rain at once, it wouldn't be enough
to create the Noh's flood. You know, maybe you know,

(32:12):
a small amount of maybe an inch or so whatever,
but not enough. And there's no other source of water.
So where did it come from? And the answer is
from a comet? And this is what when I see
these people stating this mainly out of ignorance, but there's

(32:33):
all of these scientific questions along with abiatic oil. That's
another concept that drives me crazy, that all of a sudden,
down deep in the earth, hydrocarbons are joined together by
pressure and that's where oil comes from. Well, how did
stuff move? There's no movement. If you go down in
the earth ten feet, there's no movement, Boys and girls,

(32:56):
there's no movement. And if something is in a in
a chemical bond like water connected to some mineral, it's
not going to just release. It's just gonna sit there.
There's no way to release it, let alone gathering the
big bodies and then somehow magically comes shooting up out
of the ground. If there were such a thing, we

(33:17):
would probably see it. We do see things like, for example,
natural gas fires where there's a case where I think
it's up in the tundras of Russia where it's starting
to warm up and these pockets of natural gas are
catching on fire and they create a crater. Well, that's

(33:38):
due to the fact that the oil down in the
ground is releasing this natural gas and when maybe a
lightning strike or something sets it off and it sits
there and burns, and that natural gas pocket just keeps
burning and burning and burning. Yes, but that's not water
shooting out of the ground one hundred feet into the air,
like the equivalent of a Mississippi River flood, water shooting

(34:01):
out of the ground and flooding the world with six
hundred feet of water. Excuse me, boys and girls. But
never ever has anybody witnessed such a phenomenon. Excuse me.
It just has never happened. So it's just a myth
and a fairy tale. But I want to talk about
something that is real for the noise flood explanation, and

(34:23):
that is that Earth passed through the tail of a
large comet. Take comet Hailbop, for example, which was one
of the relatively large comets we've seen in modern history,
back in the mid nineteen nineties, who was up there
for a period of six years. If Earth would have
passed through the tail of comet Hailbop, if it would

(34:47):
have taken us about forty days and forty nights the
length the estimated length of the noise flood in time.
So the and it's something that Noah would have known
in advance. There would be a way of knowing that
a comet is coming. Its trajectory, it's orbit is such

(35:09):
that that we would be passing through the tail at
a certain point in time in the future, and noahould
get his boys ready building the arc and putting the
animals in it, because they knew that at that point
in time that there would be torrential rains. That makes sense,

(35:30):
But you will never hear that in any of the
main broadcasts or people being supported under the table that
really don't know it. But when you see these stories
come out and being broadcast, you know, people say keep
an open mind. Well, yeah, up to a certain point, please,

(35:50):
thank you very much. If it doesn't even pass the
first layer of the peeling back the onion test, then
don't keep emulgating these ideas. It's like the Christmas Star
being a planetary alignment. I've talked about that in this show.
The planetary alignments happen all the time. The Christmas Star

(36:13):
was an event that was predicted thousands of years earlier
and was something so unusual that when it appeared, the
three Wise Men, the kings of three different nations India, Persia,
and what was the other one, Ethiopia all saw it

(36:33):
individually and started packing their bags and took probably a
year long trip to follow the star. Where they met
on their way to Bethlehem, remember, and they met, and
they came across Herod who was very interested because his
astrologers had seen it too, And so what was the

(36:54):
Christmas Star? It was a comet. They discovered it in
the east, they followed it to the west. Those are
properties of comets. It had a long tail, It was
visible in the night sky, possibly visible in the daytime sky.
And some people say, well, you know, how come it's
not registered in the Chinese texts, etc. And the answer

(37:15):
is that an item like that, because of its significance,
would be kept from public records very simply, and they
do it today. Hilbop was a great example. Here we
have a planet forming in our Solar system and NASA
was able to keep that information from the public for

(37:38):
the entire time that comet was in the Solar system.
So it's done. Keeping information from the public is done
all the time. That's the way things are done. It's
not the exception, it's the rule. So back to Noah.
Noah's Blood definitely was earth passing through the tail of
a comet, very predictable, unlike the water shooting up out

(38:02):
of the ground, or unlike the flood of land breach
and flooding the Mediterranean. And by the way, if it
was flooding the Mediterranean, and that's all it was, and
Noah had prior knowledge of this, he wouldn't build an arc.
He would just move his family up to the next
hill and avoid the flood, you know. And how would

(38:25):
he know that that land break was gonna happen at
a certain time and go around building an arc so
he could float up to the next hill, you know, No,
it doesn't it doesn't make any sense at all. The
Noah's Flood was a worldwide flood. It's recorded in all
societies all around the world. As a torrential rain flood
coming from above, and that's what would happen if we

(38:48):
passed through the tail of a comet. Okay, so enough
of that. But like I say, that idea that the
water came shooting up out of the ground for the
Noah's flood has raised its ugly little again and requires
some bit of sanity. It doesn't even pass the initials
open the package smell tests, let alone dig deeper and

(39:11):
actually make sense out of it. Okay, on to the
next topic. A listener wrote in I like this. Sometimes
I get negative comments, sometimes I get very nice comments,
and I'm sorry. This actually was a phone conversation I

(39:33):
had with a listener who's I think been following me
for a long time. But he said that my lecture
last week was one of the best ones I ever did,
and that is because I talked about physics being the
laws of the universe. In other words, we are as physicists,
and as everybody is trying to get direction, but particularly

(39:56):
as physicists of which I'm one, are trying to discover
the laws of the universe. And every time you discover
what you think is a law, there might be modifications,
there might be well, what about this, But we're trying
to put things in order, and I've spent a lifetime

(40:16):
doing that as an independent scientist. But anyway, his comment
was thanks for talking about this, but also mentioning and
so I want to add this also, in the spiritual realm,
there are laws of the universe, and one of them
is that, for example, do not do harm to other people,

(40:38):
and or envy or you know, the seven capital sins.
All of those are kind of etched into our being
and the way they are there is very interesting. They
asked christ about this, they said, how do we know
about this? And he goes, all of this is written
in your heart. That was his way of explaining it
to simple people. And you'll know the truth when you

(41:02):
hear it. And that's why today a lot of people
are waking up to the truth of what's going on
around them in many different ways. Talk radio the internet
has been a very good tool for that, where people
like myself can talk and reach the public in vast numbers.

(41:22):
But the comment was to also explain specifically that the
laws of the spiritual laws of the universe are there also,
and that's why, for example, for example, criminals or you say,
politicians who are double speaking that want to fool the

(41:48):
public or whatever. They'll say something in front of their
group of supporters and then they say something completely different
to the public. You know, their experts in double speak.
And flim flam is what we like a term, you know,
the snake, So the snake oil salesman. It puts hair
where you want it, takes it away from where you
don't want it. You know, they say anything to make

(42:10):
a sale. And so anyway, if you take somebody like
a criminal or a well dressed politician or whatever, the reason,
they want to present themselves as wonderful people. And that's
part of it, the wolf in sheep's clothing, because they

(42:32):
know that if you perceive them as being a good person,
then you'll think they're a good person and you won't
suspect what they're really up to. And so the fact
that they know that and the fact that they follow
that says that in their own being, in their own heart,
in their own mind, and their own psyche, they understand
the laws, the spiritual laws of the universe. If there

(42:54):
weren't any spiritual laws in the universe, then nobody would care.
And there are people like that they're pathological. They have
pathological psychological syndromes where they don't feel anything. They don't
feel any remorse for the damage they do to other people. Okay,

(43:14):
So at any rate, there are laws, spiritual laws of
the universe which are inherent and everybody sees them. And luckily,
in my life, I deal with a lot of people,
a lot of business partners, a lot of other people
who are honest and you know, they're hard workers, et cetera.

(43:41):
And what they do is very honest. You always can predict,
you know, they're not going to jab you in the
back or do something off the wall, or try and
overcharge you or try and whatever. They're very honest people.
You just expect that from them. But anyway, the comment
is that there are spiritual laws in the universe, and Man,

(44:06):
by the way, is the only one that we are
aware of that has this. Animals don't have a conscious.
When an eagle eats a rabbit, it's not worried about,
you know, as far as that eagle is concerned. That's lunch.
You know, I'm sorry, I'm having lunch and you're the
rabbit and I'm eating you. And throughout the animal kingdom

(44:30):
typically that's the law of the jungle. But men are
supposedly above that and try and live their lives in
conjunction with their environment, et cetera. And by the way,
when I talk about oil and the use of oil,
I am a tree hugger at heart. I would rather

(44:52):
see less being used. I think we could have structured
our economy very differently, but we didn't, and I'm not
in charge of that. I'm sorry. I can't solve the
world's problems. But the reality is if the oil doesn't
keep flowing at the rate it's flowing today, a lot
of people are going to die. You know. It's just
the way it is. And so what I do is

(45:17):
I work behind the scenes with the wing generator, with
purifying water, other things that I work on, and many
other projects in the background to try and resolve these
issues in the long term. But it's not going to
happen overnight, believe me, it's simply not. So we're stuck
with the system we have, and so being pragmatic, we

(45:38):
have to basically live with a system that's here and
then try to change it. Just a quick comment here
and once again kind of a reality check. There's a
lot of people in the United States around the world
who criticize the United States. But it's interesting because everybody

(46:00):
wants to come to the United States and be like
the United States and have the benefits of the United States.
But where did all of this goodness come from that
everybody is seeking to take part in. And the reality
is when the Northern Europeans came to the United States,
they basically came with nothing. They got off a ship,

(46:21):
they had the clothes in their back, maybe a bag.
They had nothing, and in a hundred years they built
a technology based civilization unlike we have seen in history.
Maybe there were civilizations similar to this going way back
that have been destroyed, and for certain certainly there were civilizations,

(46:43):
possibly space pairing civilizations. But in the history that we
have today, it was about one hundred years when the
Northern Europeans and the Scandinavians and the Irish and hit
and these are by the way, the Israelites. These are
the groups, the remnants of the groups that came out

(47:05):
of with Moses, out of Egypt and moved up into
the Caucasian mountains in Russia started the Russia, Northern Europe,
Northern Spain, England, the original settlers of England, the Celts
and the Irish who were descendants a lot of them,
either the Celts or the Vikings, like my ancestors who

(47:30):
were Vikings. When these people came to the US, that's
when all of this progress happened. And the point is
that if you look at say the Spanish who invaded
South America and had vast resources at their disposal, or
other people who have conquered other parts of the world,
whether it was they had all of the same resources

(47:56):
worldwide or in very large parts of the world, and
they did not do what we did. They did not
develop technological advanced societies where they can have automobiles and
trains and airplanes and rocket ships that go into space,
et cetera. They did not do that when they had
in terms of time, they had centuries, centuries and centuries

(48:19):
and centuries, and they did not do that. So what
is it that is different about the Northern Europeans when
they came to the United States, They built basically what
you see today, for better for worse. You may agree
with it, you may disagree with it, but that's reality.
And so I don't know what to tell you. The

(48:43):
bottom line is many civilizations throughout history had time vast
centuries and centuries and centuries and did not develop advanced
technological societies. They kept doing what they were doing, which
is fine, big deal. But when you look at the
United States and the situation today with the highway systems,

(49:06):
and yeah, the United States is not perfect. We can
all find fault. I could go on all day finding
fault with things in the United States and the military
and all kinds of other things. But the end result
is that if you look in Europe, it was Germany
that did the vast amount of development, other countries a
little bit, but mainly Germany, and they were from the

(49:27):
northern side of the Black Forest. Sorry, that's the way
history is. So the point being that it was the
Israelites who developed this technology, the northern European Caucasian people
who came to the United States with nothing and developed

(49:48):
what you see today. Okay, this last topic very interesting,
and I'll just try and summer the question, although it's
very complicated. Are there aliens? And this is a topic
that's hot on people's minds. It's been on sixty minutes.

(50:09):
They're showing pilots have seen things on their radar. They
can't explain whatever. None of that is evidence that amounts
to a hill of beans. But the real question is
what is my opinion about the alien situation. Does the
government have information? Oh yeah, they have tons of information.

(50:30):
They're never going to let it out. The idea that
they're getting closer to disclosure, no, believe me. The stuff
that is at top secret level. And if any conversations
have gone on between high level officials or bank the
owners of the International Banking Community or whatever, believe me,

(50:52):
they're not going to talk to you about it. What
gives you a clue into this entire topic is that
the CIA, which is the police force of the World Bank,
has nothing to do with the United States. The Police
Force of the World Bank had offices all over the world.
It was under a program called SkyWatch, now defunct, but

(51:14):
they literally had offices all over the world, and the
idea was that if you got visited by an alien,
you would call up this office and they would go
out and investigate, kind of like good buddies. But what
they were really interested in is being the first one
in line if anything happened. And that should be all
you need to know to realize that the government was

(51:39):
very I use that term loosely. The government or the
people in charge, let's say, had a big interest in
what happened out there with the public. I've been a
lead speaker at two of the UFO International UFO Congresses
in Laughlin, Nevada, two thousand and three and two thousand

(52:02):
and four, and so this is an annual event where
people get together and talk about UFOs and alien spacecraft
and abductions and types one, two, three, contact, et cetera,
any topic, and these are the main people. So my
topic was dealing with the issue. The first year was
dealing with Planet X. The second year was dealing with

(52:25):
my electromagnetic propulsion systems, something that I worked in professionally,
and when I realized that outer space was electromagnetic, they
had a lot of electromagnetic activities, something totally denied by NASA.
Then I went about understanding, well, if there are electromagnetic

(52:47):
fields out there naturally occurring, you can use those to
push against to create propulsion systems. And so that was
something that in the early nineteen eighties I spent a
good deal of time in the West Coast in California
looking for funding, talking to military groups. I was a

(53:09):
speaker at closed military meetings like one that's publicly available
as the nineteenth International Electric Propulsion Conference was held in
Colorado Springs in the Broadmoor Hotel, and it was a
closed military meeting for electric propulsion systems. People are designers, industry, military,

(53:33):
and I was one of the speakers there and that talk.
I don't think the talk itself is available online, but
my i TRIPOL paper that resulted from that is online.
You can see it as one of my published papers
describing one of my electromagnetic propulsion systems that tells how

(53:53):
flying saucers work basically, and those were vetted by Tier
one military very physicists both for funding and for viability
in use in the military, and of course those have
never made it into the public domain. But so, you know,

(54:15):
does that prove there are aliens? No, it proves that
the technology that people were seeing is real or has
the potential to be real. I want to talk a
little bit about going to the next star and innerspatial
travel and what it's like in our galaxy. As drewmaneto
this topic, to go to the next star, which is

(54:39):
what four and a half light years away, what would
it take and how long would it take to get there?
And with a non inertial propulsion system. Inertial propulsions propulsion
systems will never take us to another star let alone
very far in our own solar system. But non inertial propulsion,
all lectromagnetic propulsion systems are a viable way of moving

(55:04):
between the stars. In fact, one of the talks I
gave at the International UFO Congress was electric highways to
the stars. That's a term that I coined. And the
method of moving between stars is with a non inertial
propulsion system. Okay, so now, if you can accelerate your

(55:29):
spacecraft at one G in in the other words, an
Earth gravity equivalent one G, and you continue to do
that continuously, something you cannot do with an inertial engine,
whether it's nuclear or whatever, because you can't take that
much mass along with you. That's the problem. So inertial
propulsion systems do not work for interstellar travel. So it's

(55:53):
a non inertial propulsion system. And if you go at
one G continuously day and night, day and night for
about two and a half years, I've given lectures on this,
and then you decelerate at about the same rate one
G for two and a half years. Within about ten

(56:15):
years you can get to the next star, Okay, And
so anyway, the point is that moving between the stars
is possible. And that's less time than it took the
New Horizon spacecraft to get the Pluto within our own
solar system, so it's very possible. Now, let's take a

(56:36):
look at our galaxy. We live our Sun, our solar system.
We are way way out in the galaxy. We are
out in the boondocks. And so it would be like say,
in the eighteen hundred, somebody moves out to the prairie
in the middle of nowhere and just can't imagine why
nobody's visiting. You know, we live as far out in

(56:59):
the boondo in the galaxy as possible. We're way out there.
When we look in farther towards the center part of
our galaxy, there are star clusters, tens of thousands of
stars in a cluster, and if there's life there, which
I can pretty much guarantee you there is, those people,
those beings are not going to be able to even

(57:21):
see us. We probably have a much better view of
our galaxy because we're way out here. We don't have
all the light from all of those tens of thousands
of stars near us, they probably don't know that there's
an entire They don't know about the galaxy. They just
see their own star cluster because there's light everywhere. Everywhere

(57:42):
around them, there's light, so it's never dark there, and
so they probably have interstellar travel inner planetary travel. But
getting out to hear is not an easy thing to do,
which brings up the point that when I see the Grays,
when they talk about the Grays that have visited people,

(58:03):
and of a friend of mine, Whittley Strieber wrote a
book about it's called Communion, talking about his events with
the Grays, etc. My impression is that they are robots.
They smell the people that talk about them. By the way,
that's one of the main things you use as a
confirmation that something is real, is that the smell. You

(58:26):
cannot create a smell in your brain. You can create sound,
you can create vision, you can create a lot of things,
but smell is one of the things that you cannot imagine.
And so the people talk about the smell and what
the Grays smell like, and not to me says, okay,

(58:46):
that's real. But when we see robots being built today
that are human like. They look like us, and so
the Grays may be robots and be much easier to
send a spacecraft to planet Earth to visit. And what
are they looking for? They're looking for DNA. That's when
they abduct people. What do they always want? They want

(59:06):
DNA to take back, and so they're probably built in
the likeness of their creators, the beings that live in
these other planetary systems, That's my guess. I have personally
never been visited, nor have I seen UFOs what I
would consider to be a UFO. I've never been abducted

(59:27):
or I've spent a lot of time in the woods.
I've never seen things that I would identify as a UFO.
When I would be, you know, as a physicist, very
tuned to all the things that could happen that would
not be UFOs, like venus or atmospheric phenomenon. But I've
never personally had any encounters with UFO people or aliens

(59:50):
as you might call them. At any rate, I'm running
out of time here, But the point is that it's
an open question, and I think it's one that requires
a lot more study. But no, the government's not going
to let you see any information that's top secret just
not going to happen, So I'm out of time. We'll

(01:00:11):
talk to you next week.

Speaker 1 (01:00:16):
This has been Master of Science with host James mccanney.
Join us each week as James will delve into historical
figures such as Nicola Tesla, Albert Einstein, and the great
mathematicians as we explore the history of Man, Earth in
our universe as you've never seen it before. Tuesday, seven
pm Eastern, right here on the Bold Brave TV Network,

(01:00:40):
powered by B two Studios.