Master of Science - 04/29/2025

Tune in every Tuesday at 7:00 PM EST for new episodes
Only on BoldBraveTV!

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
Welcome to Master of Science with host Professor James McCanny.
The good professor's career spans fifty years as a university teacher, scientist,
and engineer. Each week, he will explore the rapidly changing
world of science as many long held theories are crumbling
under the weight of new data. He will cover the

(00:23):
fields of geology, archaeology, meteorology, oceanography, space science, astronomy, cosmology,
biological evolution, virology, energy, mathematics, and war. So please welcome
the host of Master of Science, James McCanny.

Speaker 2 (00:53):
Go ahead, evening, Welcome this episode forty one, moving along,
and first of all, I want to take one second
to give credit to tonight's sponsors, jmcc water Filters at
the webpagejmccwaterfilters dot com, where you can get a ten
percent discount purchases over three hundred dollars using the coupon

(01:16):
code Master. Once again, the web page jmcc water filters.
That's filters plural gmccwaterfilters dot com. Okay, tonight, I want
to talk about plate tectonics and what's the real cause
for mountain building. So over the last number of weeks,

(01:42):
due to some benefits that of a special donor. We
have examined the mountain ranges of southern Spain. Now these
are primary examples to prove. They prove conclusively that there

(02:02):
is no such thing as plate tectonics. In other words,
the geological idea that plates move around and very slowly
over millions billions of years, somehow push against each other
and one plate goes under the other and causes mountain
ranges to rise. And in studying going back in time,

(02:25):
it's very interesting because there was a time in geology,
in the subject of geology when they talked about what
are known as upthrust mountains. These are the mountain ranges
like the Rocky Mountains, the Alps, the Pyrenees in eastern Spain,
the Andes Mountains in South America, the Rocky Mountains in

(02:46):
the United States, and older mountain ranges like the Appalachian Mountains,
which are very old and partially worn away just through weathering.
They were formed becase because of uptrusts Now are other
types of mountains that are built which are volcanic and

(03:08):
they have a life cycle of their own also. But
what we're talking about here is where the earth builds
up sediment layers over long periods of times, and all
of a sudden you see these just jagged cliffs and
rock faces, thousands of feet of sheer rock cliff where

(03:30):
you see all the layers that had built up over time,
and all of a sudden, they're just thrown up in
the air. There was a time in geological the study
of geology, in which they believed that these were caused
by violent events. But what happened? Where did plate tectonics

(03:50):
get its roots? Where did it come in here? The
answer is that it really solidified with a guy named
Carl Sagan. The idea that this all had to happen
over a long period of time, very slowly, and the
Earth just did this all by itself is the whole

(04:13):
idea that there were no violent upheavals in Earth's history. Now,
that word upheaval is very interesting because it's part of
the title of one of the books that got this
whole thing going. Okay, So the term upheaval is interesting

(04:38):
because there's a book Emmanuel Velakowski. I'll talk about his
work in a minute in general, but he had a book.
It was called Earth and Upheaval. It was his second book.
The first book was Worlds and Collision. The second one
was Earth and Upheaval, and the third one was called

(04:59):
Ages and Chaos, where he talked about more historical events.
But anyway, the second book, Earth and Upheaval, he added
a tremendous amount of geological data, a lot of which
is being repeated now in different circles and really being
copied by a lot of people, and then trying to

(05:20):
give different explanations like, oh, an asteroid hit it or
something like that. But he made it very clear that
the geological event that he was specific about was the
Venus event, where Venus was a large comet, it came
through the Solar System, it relieved Mars of its atmosphere

(05:41):
and oceans, and it came by Earth. And we know
that it came by Earth on two occasions because of
the Mayans. Now historically you can go back in all
of the great civilizations talk about the Venus event. It's
very specific. But the Earth and Upheaval, the second book

(06:03):
dealt with geological events like the mastodons in Siberia that
were dug up from the permafrost and they had undigested
plants in their throats, which meant that they were flash
frozen within a matter of hours literally flash frozen. And

(06:25):
there were so many of these masadons discovered in Siberia
when they were building the Trans Siberian Railway that they
used them for food and then they shipped off the excess,
which there was a tremendous amount, to France to Paris,
where they were then consumed and sold as delicacies. Now,

(06:48):
anybody that's familiar with animals that are living in the wild,
with especially in a temperate climate where the like where
the mastodons lived, they would decay, they would start to
decay and putrefy in a matter of hours literally, and
so to find them completely preserved to the point where

(07:10):
you could eat the meat and it was like a delicacy,
is just amazing. But they found literally thousands of these,
not just one. Okay, so, but back to the point
that Earth had some upheavals and they had to get
rid of this Velakowski guy because he was saying things

(07:32):
they just didn't like. And now the point I want
to make here is that if you mentioned Velakowski's name,
the scientists go, oh, he was disproven long ago, and
he was you know, this whole charade that was put
on by Carl Sagan and then the Cosmos series. When

(07:54):
I was at Cornell a faculty member at Cornell University,
Carl Sagan was off in Hollywood. He was the David
Duncan Cher of astronomy at Cornell. He was off in
Hollywood becoming a movie star. And the basis if you
wanted to take the Cosmos series twenty episodes, I think
it was like about twenty sixteen to twenty episodes that

(08:17):
formed the Cosmos series. And then there was the Cosmos book,
like the very beautifully done book that was then published
relative to it's called Cosmos, one of the biggest selling
books in the world. They had to get away from

(08:38):
this Belakowski guy and any idea that there was catastrophic
events in the Solar System, and so almost immediately they
realized that oops, there were some things like oops, the
dinosaurs died, and there was a Nobel Prize winner that
went out and found this iridium layer, and so it

(08:59):
was kind of like a collusive type of compromise. So
they had to come back and say, okay, well, we
will allow, as NASA the universal authority on everything dealing
with space, etc. We will allow asteroids hitting Earth to
be claimed as some source of catastrophe. But that's it.

(09:23):
Don't go beyond that. Don't go beyond that. And the
reality is is that asteroids hitting Earth don't explain really
much at all. And to boot, if you have an
asteroid hitting Earth with enough energy to do serious damage,
you need a crater. You have to identify a crater.

(09:45):
And that's why the crux of the issue, because there's
a bunch of clowns running around the Internet jumping up
and down and claiming that asteroids hit Earth and caused
all kinds of damage. In fact, the reality is if
that happened, then you have to identify the craters because

(10:07):
these would be recent and these would be of a
size that would be sufficient to cause catastrophic events on Earth.
But tonight I'm talking about mountain building. Mountain building, and
so what did they do in the world of geology.
They had to find an excuse. This is around nineteen

(10:30):
fifty when the dirty snowball comet model. Back then it
was called the ice ball comet model Fred Whipple. They
had to find an excuse for all of these astronomical
things like comets, because they didn't know in the nineteen fifties,
you can find the textbooks or the books that were

(10:51):
written around nineteen fifty. They had no idea what comets were.
They didn't even know if it had a nucleus. They
did not know if it had a nucleus or not,
because comets would come between Earth and the Sun and
they'd try and look and see if it had a nucleus. Finally,
there was one big enough where they could actually see
the nucleus between Earth and the Sun and they said, yeah,

(11:15):
there's a nucleus in there. And this was not until
very late in the astronomy programs that they even knew
there was a nucleus. There was one theory that said
that maybe it was a sand cloud or some kind
of material cloud that would stretch gravitationally when it came

(11:35):
to the Sun and then would pull back together as
this thing left the Sun, and that the idea was
that there was no nucleus. It was just kind of
a loose conglomerate of stuff government coming through the solar
system and reflecting sunlight. And that's what we saw as
the comet tale. This was the state of comentary science
in nineteen fifty, and Velakovski is implying that no there

(11:59):
was a big one whose nucleus caused serious damage to
other things in the Solar system, and it had electrical properties. Okay,
so now let me say something about plate tectonics, and
this is the idea that the Earth has these plates,

(12:20):
these solid plates that move around, collide with one another
and cause mountain building. Well, that was this story they
had to come up with. That's what they solidified on
as the basis. And it's really really bad science. It
doesn't even pulling back the first onion layer would disqualify

(12:41):
it from even being a consideration as a scientific theory.
And the reason is because Earth is The Earth's surface
is not like a plate. So the idea of a plate,
you think of a plate. You pick up a plate
of food and you hold it at the edge, and
it's solid that can hold the food. It's not going

(13:03):
to break apart. But if let's take something on a
scale that people can understand. Let's take something the size
of New York City or some major city. Okay, let's
take and imagine we have a big chainsawn, you can
cut out a big square. Let's say something the size

(13:25):
of a city block in New York City. Okay, and
without building something Let's say you're in Central Park where
there's no buildings, you cut out a city block and
try and lift it up. If the Earth was like
a plate, then that would be a solid piece, and

(13:45):
it'd be a solid piece that you could pick it
up and hold it on when and it wouldn't fall apart.
But the reality is that there is no such thing
as a plate. So the term plate tectonics is just
from the beginning, let alone on a continental basis. So
you take the American North American continent, or the North

(14:08):
American Plate, or the Nasca Plate on the west side
of the South America, or the North African Plate, and
there's other plates that are associated with, for example, Spain,
which I'll be talking about here. And when you read
the geological history, it's almost comical when you read from

(14:34):
the perspective of plate tectonics, because the Earth sat there
for millions of years, millions millions, hundreds of millions of years,
building up and layering up with oceans and different bodies
of water, et cetera. And then all of a sudden,
the plates start moving and they move this way, then
they move that way, then they move that way over there,

(14:56):
because the mountain ranges, for example, or if you look
at the mountain ranges anywhere they are grouped such that
the mountain range is formed in different directions. If you
look at southern Spain, a lot of them run east
and west, but a lot of them don't. They run northeast.

(15:18):
And if you look at the Pyrenees, they run at
an angle northwest in a northwesterly direction ninety degrees from
the plate boundary. That's in northern Africa. So the point is,
if these plates are moving to form these mountains, why
did it move one direction to form these mountains and

(15:38):
it moved a completely different direction ninety degrees to form
these mountains over here. And the biggest question is what
makes these plates move around the planet? What is the
herculean forest? Now I'm a physicist, and if something happens
in nature, you have to explain what's the cause, what's

(15:59):
the what's the modus operendous? Whereas what is the force?
What causes this thing to move? We're talking about entire
continents moving after they don't move for a long, long
long time. So they're sitting there, they're building up, they're layering,
and all of a sudden they move Hello, anybody notice this?

(16:24):
But so there's all kinds of serious problems with the
concept of plate tectonics. First of all, the plates are
not plates. It's not like a solid piece, so that
if you push on one side that is reflected through
the plate all the way over to the other side.
Or say you have a plate that is supposedly they

(16:47):
have these wonderful drawings where one plate is subducting under
another plate subduction and the other plate is rising above.
What's making these plates move sideways? Uh? And it's something
I called the hammock problem. Now I've talked about this,
I believe on the show introduced it a little bit before.

(17:08):
But I like repeating things because, uh, in my experience
as a teacher, you have to repeat things three times
w before people really pick up on it. But it's
called the hammock problem. If you take a hammock and
you have two nails, one in each wall, and you
hang the hammock, now you get in the hammock. If

(17:31):
there's a big dip in the hammock, in other words,
the ropes are hanging like this, then the force on
the ropes is not too great. Uh. In fact, if
you have the ropes hanging straight down in a little
sack at the bottom where you sit like a suspended chair.
Then the force on the rope holding it up is

(17:52):
equal to the weight of whatever is sitting in the chair,
your weight. If as soon as you put those ropes
out at an angle, like with a hammock, the vectors
that add up to equal your weight have to be
distributed amongst and along that line, and the tension in

(18:16):
the rope grows. So now if you bring that hammock
up almost straight and you lay in the hammock, the
tension on the rope, because it's the vector, the vertical
vector has to support your weight. The actual force on
the rope is astronomical. So I say you weigh a
hundred pounds. If you sit in a chair and it

(18:41):
is supported by a rope up above, then the force
on the rope is a hundred pounds. If you take
in it like in a hammock, and you support it
with one hundred you know the person weights hundred pounds,
but you have it at an angle, you could have
up to one thousand pounds of pressure on those lines
because of the angle. And if you have it almost

(19:02):
horizontal and you sit one hundred pound person on that hammock.
Then you could have literally five six seven thousand pounds
of tension on that line to keep it straight. And
so it's like a bowstring or something like that, and
in other words, there's a lot of tension on that string. Okay,

(19:26):
so the idea, let's reverse this concept now and talk
about plate tectonics for a vertical force. Now, this is
what they claim, that there's a vertical force that pushes
on the plate and that translates into sideways motion. It's
the same issue as the hammock problem. How much force

(19:48):
do you have to have here vertically to make the
entire continent move sideways. It's almost infinite because it's perpendicular. Now,
I remember doing a block backboard demonstration earlier in this
series of shows on this very concept. So the idea
that a plate would hold together. Now, the plate is compressible,

(20:12):
and like say you took something, let's say the size
of Iowa, State of Iowa, and you could take the
chainsaw and cut down through the mantle in the crust
of earth and try and lift up something the size
of the state of Iowa, it would crumble into pieces.
There's no such thing as a tectonic plate. But everybody

(20:35):
in the university will tell you how many PhDs have
been given the people studying plate tectonics. When there's no
such thing as a continental plate. It can't exist, it
doesn't exist. It's physically impossible. And I get a kick
also about these people that talk about the hollow Moon.

(20:56):
They're talking about the moon being hollow, and it's just
this shell and inside there's nothing. Well, even if it
was solid granite, basalt, some of the hardest rock in
the world, let's imagine that. Just take an example. Let's
take something the size of the state of Iowa, but

(21:17):
a piece of granite. That's let's make it twenty kilometers thick.
And so it's let's say a square two hundred kilometers
by two hundred kilometers by twenty kilometers thick, but solid granite.
We're talking granite, the hardest rock. If you tried to
pick that up with a rope, it would just all

(21:38):
crumble because it does not have strength. That there is
no thing such thing as a continental plate, simply put.
And so once again, if you had a force, if
you could imagine somehow creating a force on this plate
to make it move sideways, then it would it would

(22:00):
crumble at the source of the force trying to make
it move. It wouldn't translate into pushing mountains up over
there someplace. The other thing is that the issue with
up thrust's mountains is all that weight. You're trying to
take all of this mass and throw it up into
the air and move it. And they're talking about a

(22:22):
centimeter per one hundred years maybe or something like that.
When you look at uptrussed mountains, you see violence. But
where did that energy come from? Earth didn't do this
by itself. So throughout the Earth's history, here's the entire point.
Throughout the Earth's history, the Earth has encountered large celestial

(22:48):
objects coming by. They didn't hit They don't hit Earth,
not like an asteroid. They don't hit Earth. But they
come by, and it's the gravitation wave that sets up.
And these are what you would call tidal waves. Just
like the Earth's ocean has tides because of the Moon

(23:09):
and the Sun, the gravitational poll makes the oceans bulge
out in the direction of the Moon and causes a
tidal bulge. With that tidal bulge, then, because the Earth
is spinning at about one thousand miles an hour on
its surface. That tidal bulge is moving at a thousand
miles an hour. That's really fast. But what if you

(23:31):
had a wave that was so big that it could
cause a fifty or one hundred foot wave, or five
hundred foot wave or a two thousand foot wave in
the land surface of Earth. What a lot of people
don't realize is that when we have tidal waves in

(23:52):
the ocean, due to the Moon's differential force, it's stronger
on the side of the Moon, so it causes a
bulge on the Earth side the Moon. The Earth the
side of the Earth that faces the Moon, and then
the gravitational force is less on the other side, so
it bulges out in that direction. So it gives you
this these two bulges on planet Earth, and that tidal

(24:16):
wave then moves around the planet, and that's what we
call tides. But what if there was a tidal wave
in the land that was huge, and what's going to
happen with the energy in that wave? And so if
you already have some kind of resistance in the land mass,

(24:37):
like an existing mountain range or a crack or some
other deformity in the Earth, or maybe a deposit of something.
When that wave comes in, it's going to stop. It's
kind of like a wave hitting the shore, and all
of that energy is going to go into it's going
to be absorbed at that mountain range and your car

(25:00):
the uptrust mountains. So the fact that we have uptrust
mountains all over the world, the fact that we have
uptrust mountains in all directions all over the world, tells
us that these objects have come by in many different directions.
But because Carl Sagan and his bogas science, because they

(25:23):
had to oppose Velikowski, they had to prove him wrong.
So the only way they could account for this in
the world of geology is for Earth to somehow do
this all by itself. And like I say, I just
read in a geological summary of mountain building in Spain

(25:44):
according to plate tectonics theory, and they talk about, for example,
a sedimentary ocean that was there and it took hundreds
of millions of years to build up these sediment layers,
and then all of a sudden plates start moving. What
caused the plate They sat there for a millennium, thousands,

(26:08):
millions of years, and all of a sudden they start moving.
What makes a move. What makes a continental plate move sideways?
In physics, you need a source of energy, a source
of force. And in the all of the textbooks of
plate tectonics and all of the PhDs and all of
the published papers, nobody ever identifies the force that supposedly

(26:35):
makes these continental plates move around. Willie Nelly, there at
one time over there, another time up here, one time
over there, to make the mountains in the mountain ranges
are all over the place. I was once in southern Colorados,
the southern region of the North American Colorado Rocky Mountains range,

(26:55):
and it kind of dwindles down around Durango, southwest eastern Colorado,
and you can look if you drive around the rockies
at that point they again start growing as you get
down to the Sierra Madre in Mexico, but at that
point there's like an altiplano. But you can see at

(27:17):
that point it's one of the best places I've seen
where the waves of mountain building came in from different directions,
and the up thrusts are in different directions this way
and this way. Well, plate plate tectonics does not explain that,
because if plate tectonics work, then all the mountain ranges

(27:40):
would be parallel to the plate boundaries, and it's not
the case. The mountain ranges are in all different directions,
go around the Andes, the Alps, the Rocky Mountains, and
the Pyrenees for example. So I was just in the
Pyrenees mountain and unbelievable. I mean, the Alps are fantastic mountains.

(28:06):
A number of years ago I'd spent seventeen days driving
around the Alps mountains in a car and so literally
saw firsthand the Alps mountains and absolutely amazing. But to
imagine somehow that these mountains just slowly crept up there,

(28:30):
you know, over millions of years, a centimeter here, a
centimeter there, as these plates decided to move. No impossible
because of the amount of mass. So you're expected to
believe that something over here pushed a plate and it
somehow forced these jagged mountain ranges up trust into the

(28:54):
sky tens of thousands of feet. All of this matter,
somehow just just rows up like a helicopter. No impossible,
Absolutely impossible. And so the crux of the issue is,
and this is in almost every field of science that
I've discovered problems. Last week I talked about climate, climate science,

(29:17):
and the absolute absurdities relative to real physics. It's that
most scientists that go off into a different branch, whether
it's astronomy or or space science, whether it's geology, whether
it's meteorology, have very poor physics backgrounds. They don't understand

(29:45):
physics concepts, and so they they don't understand that what
they're saying is physically impossible. Uh. And then you get
the grant, the publications cycle that's been going on for
decades now, and you run into this issue where nobody

(30:06):
can step up to the plate and say, hey, this
is bogus science. Plate tectonics doesn't work. Play tectonics is
bogus science. That is the only thing you can say
about it. Yet it is universally accepted. It is universally
taught in schools from grade school from the time they

(30:27):
start talking about such things all the way up to
a university PhD level. And there's no scientific basis for it.
In fact, I'll make a statement here and in the
truest scientific sense, nobody, I repeat, nobody has ever seen

(30:49):
a mountain built from play tectonics. And the reason is simple.
It's like the Big Bang. Nobody was there to see it. Everything.
All of the supporting evidence is tertiary. It's third order.
It's somebody interpreting data and data and saying, oh, is
this supports our theory of the Big Bang, or this

(31:11):
supports the theory of plate tectonics, or this supports the
theory of climate change. When you get down to the
actual cause and effect and the ability to observe that
direct cause and effect. For example, I use this example
for climate change. You know, the emotional science of climate change,

(31:34):
where everybody's supposed to get excited, and the fact is
that let me take an example. If the temperature is rising,
so is the price of refrigerators, and so I could
make a theory that climate change and the rise in

(31:55):
temperature is actually due to the price the rising price
of refrigerators. But where's the cause and effect between the
price of refrigerators and the temperature of Planet Earth. Well,
it's the same thing. There's a leap of faith there
in the so called climate science with the greenhouse effect,

(32:18):
which by the way, they don't talk about anymore. They
talk about the CO two, which implies a greenhouse but
the greenhouse effect itself scientifically has been thoroughly discredited a long,
long time ago, and so they don't they don't say
greenhouse effect. They just talk about CO two implying the

(32:38):
greenhouse effect. But why isn't my theory that the price
of refrigerators is the thing that affects the climate in
the in the supposed a rise in temperature. The actual
situation with planet Earth is we're coming out of an
ice age, and so we're warming up to what may

(33:01):
appear to be normal. When I was a kid, there
were glaciers, big glaciers in the Western States. They're all
gone in my lifetime because it's an exponential curve once
the ice age set in, and that was due to,
by the way, a pole shift, a physical posshift caused

(33:22):
by a large celestial object coming by Earth, and the
old North Pole was in the state, in the region
of Hudson Bay. A good friend of mine who wrote
a book mark Gaffney and let's see, where's just a
second here, I'll grab it. I'll grab it in a minute,

(33:45):
and he talks about the poleshifts and now what we
have going on. Unfortunately, there are popular shows, and I'll
mention one Joe Rogan has all kinds of people on
there who are non scientist. They don't understand science they're
talking about. They're just making stuff up basically, and completely

(34:11):
ignoring the science that was proposed by a lot of
other people. And the end result is Earth has had
a pole shift, not a magnetic pole shift. I saw
some joker on there talking about magnetic pole shifts. Magnetic

(34:32):
pole shifts happen all the time, all the time, a
couple of months where the solar wind comes in, and
the solar wind comes in and switches our plasma magnetic
field has nothing to do with real pole shifts, which
are caused by large celestial objects coming by Earth. And
so what happens is you have the Earth and imagine

(34:57):
a large celestial object coming by setting a gravitational wave
into the Earth and causing the mountain building where the
waves actually the energy of the wave is actually dissipated
when that wave hits a mountain. And then the next
time something large comes this way, and then the next

(35:18):
time comes underneath this way. That's what explains why all
the mountain ranges are in different directions. They're oriented in
different directions because these large objects and it's not just one,
it's going to be many, many, many, but over a
very long period of time. So that is the key issue.

(35:39):
It's not an asteroid hitting Earth. You know, certainly asteroids
hit Earth, and now there's somebody trying to propose that
the meteor streams contain big asteroids that will hit Earth.
The problem with that is that media streams contain very
small particles, the actual media streams that are left over

(36:02):
from comets. And so the end result is that the
media streams, you can watch them. You see these trailers
coming into the atmosphere about the size of a pe.
And so a lot of misinterpret or misinterpretation of data

(36:23):
going on here. But the point is that the public
is being fed a load of belogney, both from what
I called controlled misinformation sites or something we called controlled opposition,
and then the other tier two layer of Tier two

(36:46):
science layer of NASA and standard university astronomy, physics, et cetera. Astrophysics,
the Big Bang, you know, the idea that the Solar
system formed all at once four and a half billion
years ago, just totally boga science. And so the problem
is the public is being fed an immense amount of

(37:08):
garbage science, and it's really a major problem. So the
reason I'm talking about plate tectonics tonight, and I want
to get into the concept of the Spanish mountains. Now.
Spain is very interesting in that even though it's a
small country, larger for in respect with respect to European countries,

(37:32):
but Spain itself is about the size of Texas. That's
about a relative size, just to give you a feeling.
But Spain has many different mountain ranges and they're orientated
in very different directions, which tells you that these were
not caused by movement of plates. Even if you had

(37:53):
a plate that existed, even if there was validity to
the concept of plates, it doesn't explain mountain ranges that
are oriented in many different directions. But I encourage you
if you have the ability to travel to Spain. Now.
I went from Gibraltar, which is at the meeting of

(38:16):
where North Africa meets Europe in that channel where the
Rock of gibraltars on the s side, the Spanish side
the northern side, and you can see across the channel.
Africa is right there. It's visible. But so I went

(38:37):
from Gibraltar all the way along through southern Spain, back
and forth, north and south, all the way up to
a place called Andorra. Now I encourage you there's only
one way to drive into Andorra and then drive back out.
And so you have to drive there to see the mountains.

(38:58):
Just ten thousand feet of sheer cliff mound just thrown
up and you can see all the layering in these
This is not due to play tectonics in slow evolution
where they moved a centimeter a year. These were created
in a night, in a day. And I said, now,

(39:23):
nobody in science, in the world of science, nobody in
the world of geology, has seen uptress mountains formed by
plate tectonics. Why because supposedly it takes millions of years
and nobody was there to see it. So this is
all This is all hearsay, it's all happenstance, it's all

(39:45):
third level interpretation of data because they need something where
the Earth just does all this by itself. And if
you talk about the planet's forming, you talk about the
Big Bang, any other the that you find in standard
science today. In fact, the formative formation of hurricanes. I

(40:08):
talked about that a number of weeks ago, that hurricanes
they say are formed by warm water residue, absolutely absurd.
Science has no basis in fact, no basis in physics,
no basis in thermodynamics. Yet it's because they need the
Earth to do all of this by itself and without

(40:31):
electric fields in outer space. Hurricanes are driven by the
vertical electric field, and the hurricanes form at nights. So
how does the sunlight in warm water form a hurricane
when it's nighttime. It's you know, the theories don't make
sense at all. Okay, So back to the idea of

(40:53):
plate tectonics. The entire issue with plate tectonics is that
it's just boga science. But what's really going on. The
mountain building that we see on Earth is dozens and
dozens of times different events throughout Earth's history that happened overnight.

(41:16):
And I should mention also that there are Indians, and
for example, the Mayans talk about ketzl Kuala, the plume
serpent god of the night sky, which represents the comet
Venus created mountains and mountain building. There are people, indigenous
peoples who talk about entire mountain ranges forming overnight and

(41:41):
they live through it, and this is reported. So people
have reported seeing mountain building by the technique that I'm
talking about, where it forms overnight, nobody in the history
of the world has ever seen up trust mountains forming
because play tectonics, because of the long period of time

(42:03):
that it takes. So it's like I say, it's in
the term in the true scientific using the scientific method,
play tectonics has no verification of any kind at all. Okay,

(42:24):
I want to spend a little time talking about comets
in some of the completely bad science surrounding the concept
of comets. The first one is, and I've talked about
this on this show, is something called the Ort cloud. Now,

(42:44):
in the when people started examining comet orbits back in
the as early as the seventeen hundreds the eighteen hundreds,
they noticed that the long period comets, their orbits all
seem to begin way out there in a certain region
of outer space. They's very distant from our solar system.

(43:08):
And so they said, oh, there must be a collecting
point of comets out there. And so I think it
was a Norwegian scientist, Ort was his last name. Rt
hypothesized a cloud of comets, and this is when they
thought that still do think that comets are dirty snowballs.

(43:30):
But by the way, the people in Tier one science
don't believe any of this malarchy, as we say in Ireland.
But the idea was that the orbit seemed to indicate
that there was a region from which these comets were
coming from. And I've talked about this on my show before.

(43:50):
The real reason for this is because when comets come
in comet nuclei, these objects like rocks. They're not snowballs,
they're not ice. They are really hot, dry rocks, and
they might be cold because they've been outer space. But
basically what very the very first thing that happens when

(44:11):
they excite into brightness, when they first discharge the solar capacitor,
there's an influx of tail material which slows them down
and it gives the impression that they come from this
region that they call the Oort Cloud. But the reason
I'm mentioning this is because here, once again is a

(44:32):
concept that can never be proven. Excuse me. The Oort
Cloud is supposedly, you know, a huge distance from the Sun,
and there's no spacecraft that cannot get out there to
see if it's filled with comets. In other words, there's
no way to prove it. There's no telescope that you

(44:55):
could build on planet Earth. Even the James Web telescope
could never see comets out there because a typical object
that we see that is not self luminous, like a star,
we see because of reflected light, and there's just no
light out there, even from our own star. So there's
no way to see these, even if you could get

(45:16):
a spacecraft out there. They're cold, they're not infrared, they're
not hot in the infrared spectrum. They're not visible because
there's no visible light coming from a star that would
reflect off them. So there's literally no way to prove
something called the Oart cloud. But people repeat it all
the time as if were a scientific fact. It's in textbooks.

(45:39):
You have people running around the internet jumping up and
down talking about the Oort cloud. There's literally absolutely no
scientific basis for it. All science requires experimental verification, and
there's no way to verify the cloud. Something that I

(46:03):
predicted in my various earliest work dealing with comets and
the discharge of the solar capacitor, the Mcanny plasma discharge
comet model, was that there would be this region around
our Solar system full of developing planets, and finally they
discovered it. It's called the Kyber Belt, and so anyway,

(46:27):
you'll see in my very earliest work, I show star
systems neighboring star systems that have entire regions of comets
that are developing out there. And it's a region of plasma.
It's a region of I call it the nebular ion cloud.

(46:48):
It's full of dust and gases and ions and larger
scale molecular species and all of this material. Then the
objects that are forming out there are in the form
of comets, and you can see these around other stars.

(47:08):
It's in my original papers have a picture of something.
They're the various nebula, the Eskimo nebula, and the various
other very well organized nebula. I'm not talking about something
like the crab nebula. But these are called planetary nebulae,
and so they you can see the planets forming around

(47:32):
these stars out in this region beyond where the normal
planets are formed. And so Pluto is really a member
of the Kuiper Belt. And when they started discovering these
with automated search engines, other planets that are very similar
to Pluto. Pluto has two moons, Sharon, it's one moon

(47:54):
fairly large, and these are comets. These are acting as comets.
When the the spacecraft that approached Pluto from a distance,
you could see the comet tail forming around Pluto, and
when they got close, you could see the nitrogen hydrogen
compounds falling into the atmosphere of Jupiter of Pluto, excuse me,

(48:16):
and falling like snow on the surface and so building
up literally building up as a plasma discharge comet. Okay, Now,
this is a region that's filled with planets of all
different sizes, thousands of them, and we don't have orbital

(48:37):
data on all of these. When NASA first started discovering these,
they announced about forty of them, and then once they
got up to about a thousand, they simply shut off
the information valve and started and they stopped talking about
them at all. So, but it's something like I say

(48:57):
that I predicted, and every time runs into something they
don't understand. Of course, they still don't have an explanation
other than oops, maybe these things formed in the Inner
Solar System and then got thrown out there. Well, that
explanation doesn't work because if they were thrown out of

(49:18):
the Inner Solar System, their orbits would bring them back
into the Inner Solar System, and that's not happening. So
every time they find new data and can't account for it,
they put some kind of band aid on the old
theories that don't work either. The idea that somehow the

(49:39):
Solar system formed all at one time simply doesn't work.
And the reality is that the Kuiper Belt is developing
new planets. They're growing all the time, and you can
see them. You can see them. And by the way,
it also happens that the region of the Kuiper Belt

(50:00):
called the nebular ion cloud, it is held back by
solar wind pressure out beyond the orbit of Pluto. And
like I say, Pluto is one of the Kuiper Belt objects.
But you can see these formations, these nebular ion cloud
formations around other nearby stars, and it just so happens

(50:23):
that that is the source of micro microwave black body
radiation that they're seeing, and they attribute that to the
Big Bang. It's not true. What they're really seeing, the
three degree microwave background radiation is due to this nebular
ion cloud, not due to the Big Bang. So it's
just one other piece of like I say, nobody ever

(50:48):
saw the witness the Big Bang would be impossible supposedly
the beginning of the universe, and now the Big Bang
has been thoroughly discredited by the James Webb Telescope, which
has seen galaxies fully developed galaxies farther away than what
the Big Bang. Lightwise, the distance to these galaxies is

(51:09):
farther away than the supposed Big Bang, which totally disproves
the Big Bang. Yet, in the world of funding and science,
in the cycle of funding and science, the use of
big equipment, government supported equipment, and publication, it's almost impossible
to break this monopoly, this government funded monopoly. But there again,

(51:34):
so I'll just repeat these. The art cloud nonexistent, there's
no way to prove it. It's mythology. The idea that
the Kuiper Belt is somehow related to the original formation
of the Solar system mythology, no proof for it at all.
It's just putting band aids on theories that don't work

(51:58):
in the first place. And the idea that say, if
something happens on Earth, oh, an asteroid hit it, that's
the cause of everything. You know, it's just bogus science.
And the reason I keep talking about this is because
you are going to see this if you turn on
any anybody talking about science today, whether they're talking about

(52:22):
Egyptology or the age of races of Man or the
ages of archaeological sites, et cetera, this is all going
to work its way in and you're going to be
the victim of scientific misinformation. So it's unfortunate, but that's

(52:44):
just the situation today. Okay, So let me turn on
a positive note here and end this show with what
is really going on. So once again, mountain building was
the original thing this show talking about the formation of mountains.
Mountain building up, drust mountain building, and actually a lot

(53:08):
of volcanic activity is the result of large celestial objects
and they're in the form of comets. They're discharging the
solar capacitor. So whether they're baseball size, whether they're the
size of Manhattan, or whether they're the size of Jupiter
or Venus, if they're moving through the Solar system, they're

(53:30):
going to be in the form of a comet. They're
going to be very large comets. The cover of my
book Planet X, Comets and Earth Changes has some glyphs
prehistoric glyphs that were found near Green River, Utah, showing
two very large comets, and the very interesting part about

(53:51):
one of them is they show the nucleus now they
show it visible, so they could actually see this planetary
sized object in the coma of the comet. Very large comets,
and they have this squiggly electrical discharge on the sunward

(54:12):
side on both comets, so very distinctly drawn. And this
is what the ancients saw up in the sky. This
is totally discounted as real data points by standard science
because it does not fit their narrative. Where have you
heard that before? Okay, so the real situation is Earth

(54:34):
has had major interruptions by large celestial objects. The other
thing that these things do, besides causing mountain building, is
they change our atmosphere. There are definitely times in Earth's
history when we ended up like Mars without any oceans
or atmosphere, and it rebuilt over time. Earth on a

(54:57):
daily basis is taking in material from outer space and
in the form of water, in the form of hydrocarbons,
in the form of dust material, and this is building
up over time. The other thing that is true about
the Solar system is that it is dynamic. It's not

(55:21):
something that formed four and a half billion years ago
and nothing has happened since, so all of the science,
all of the geology, the atmospheric science, the meteorology, the
planetary science of the formation of the other planets, the
Kuiper Belt objects. Where do comets come from? What are

(55:42):
comets in the first place? Everything in standard science is
built on the idea that it formed all at one time,
and that implies that Earth had to do all this
by itself form mountains, volcanic activity. Let me just give
you an example here relative to volcanic activity. If the

(56:03):
Earth formed four and a half billion years ago. First
of all, they can't tell you where the water came from,
because a hot molten planet initially farming would be so
hot there would be no volatiles at all, There wouldn't
be any atmosphere, there wouldn't be any oceans. So where
did that come from? They can't tell you. But the

(56:27):
newly formed planet Venus, for example, already has an extensive atmosphere.
That was part of the package. That was what came
with the comet that came through the Solar System. And
how did it get into its nice circular orbit. It's
because of the tail drag. The plasma discharge comet model
explains that the tail drag slows down, the orbit circularizes

(56:52):
the orbit, and that's why Venus nestled in to its
nice orbit inside Earth's orbit between Us and the Sun.
That's the physical process. So the Solar System is dynamic.
It is constantly forming new members. Hailbop, the large comet
from the nineteen nineties is a planet. Information it's not

(57:14):
forty miles across. NASA was lying about that. It's a
planetary sized body. Inside of that, the nucleus is planetary size,
and it's going to be back in twenty six hundred years,
and its orbit will diminish more each time until it
finally works its way into becoming a resident planet in

(57:36):
our Solar system. And it's already interacted with Jupiter once
the next time through the Solar system, or eventually it's
going to work its way into the Solar System. And
I've talked about this before, where if a planet is
in an obtuse or orbit outside of the ecliptic, then

(57:59):
the big planet, or really second star of our Solar system, Jupiter,
if it's above the ecliptic, Jupiter will pull down. If
it's below the ecliptic, Jupiter will pull up, and it
eventually works into the plane of the planets over a
long period of time. This is how dynamic solar systems work.

(58:20):
And so one of the main reasons I talked about
these subjects on this show is first, it takes actually
quite a bit of time, as you can see, to
discredit and show the bad science that's being fed to
you the public, and then to replace it with real science.
And that's what this show is all about. So we'll

(58:42):
talk to you next week, and I just want to
reme remind you that the sponsor this week is jmcc
water Filters webpage jmccwaterfilters dot com. There are replacement filter
elements for gravity water filters, the new Hi filter elements

(59:07):
that are two stage filters, the most modern technology. Then
the flagship product of the company is the MR five
whole house water filter, unlike anything you will find, stainless
steel construction and five large filter elements that remove toxins,

(59:27):
et cetera from your water. And it comes also with
a UV sterilizer final stage, so you have pure water
in your whole house, hot in cold water. We also
have a very nice stainless steel sink filter, So go
to the web page jmccwaterfilters dot com and use the

(59:48):
coupon code master for a ten percent discount.

Speaker 1 (01:00:00):
It has been Master of Science with host James McCanne.
Join us each week as James will delve into historical
figures such as Nicola Tesla, Albert Einstein, and the great
mathematicians as we explore the history of Man Earth in
our universe as you've never seen it before. Tuesday, seven
pm Eastern, right here on the Bold Brave TV Network,

(01:00:23):
powered by B two Studios