190: Tartaria, Cabbage Patch Kids & Cloning w/ Guy Anderson

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Top lots of productions.

Speaker 2 (00:05):
We are being hitleotized people like this, newsreaders, politicians, teachers, lecturers.
We are in a country and in a world that
is being run by.

Speaker 1 (00:21):
Unbelievably sick people. The chasm between what we're told is
going on and what.

Speaker 2 (00:27):
He's really going on is absolutely no.

Speaker 1 (00:31):
Oh yeah, dude, thissen nelorm shit.

Speaker 3 (00:33):
It's like we all know what's going down, but no
one's sayings it.

Speaker 1 (00:36):
What happens to the home of the breed?

Speaker 4 (00:38):
They controlling this.

Speaker 5 (00:40):
Now when no one's talking about it and decided be
please and everybody's just walking around in the plasmon a
week or doing.

Speaker 3 (00:47):
Done in the greave.

Speaker 1 (00:49):
But a little lay we need to be ready to
raise up. Welcome to the end of the day.

Speaker 6 (00:53):
Everybody is sleep only some are aware that the government
releasing poison.

Speaker 1 (00:58):
And a.

Speaker 6 (01:00):
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen to another episode of Nephelum
Death Squad. I am David Lee Corbo aka the Raven
that is top Lobster, the Father of Disinformation. Before we
get into today's guests, a little reminder that sometime around
the thirty minute mark, we're gonna be going live exclusively
to patreon dot com, backslash NETILM death Squad, where you
can sign up for whatever tier you'd like, continue enjoying

(01:22):
this live stream, sounding off in the live chat, and
also gaining access to our backlog of content.

Speaker 4 (01:28):
There's a lot of other goodies that coming go.

Speaker 3 (01:29):
For example, when it's.

Speaker 6 (01:30):
Time to launch Brohemian Grove four, you guys are going
to be the first ones who can get access to
those tickets. So patreon dot com, backslash Netlin dees Squad
is the place to be. Joining us today is Guy Anderson.
We are set to talk about many things. Before the

(01:51):
show started, we were discussing the connection potentially between Nikola
Tesla Tartaria and I'm sorry Nikola Tesla and the Cabbage
Patch kids, and how Tartaria is the joining glue there
between the two. We're gonna get into it, but before
we do, guys, thank you for joining us today and

(02:12):
where can people find your work?

Speaker 1 (02:15):
Thanks for having me on And my website is probably
the best place because it's got links to my YouTube
channel and also my Facebook page. So just that one
website is probably all people need to need to.

Speaker 6 (02:27):
Know, and that is the Tartarian Empire dot Co.

Speaker 1 (02:33):
Dot UK correct, yeap dot co dot UK.

Speaker 6 (02:35):
Yeah, okay, that's that's so. I mean that is going
to be the meat of what we're setting out to
get into today.

Speaker 7 (02:43):
And then just just a quick peruising through the first
article Megan the first Tartarian.

Speaker 4 (02:49):
This is crazy, fascinating right up, our Ralley.

Speaker 7 (02:53):
I'm very interested to just get into this episode. So
let's can we skip sorry that was let's let's give
the four plane. Let's just get right into it.

Speaker 4 (03:04):
Yes, guy, where do you want to?

Speaker 1 (03:05):
Where do you want to?

Speaker 6 (03:06):
How do you even start this conversation about Tartari and
Nicola Tesla?

Speaker 4 (03:10):
And I mean you you're the expert. Where do we begin?

Speaker 1 (03:14):
Ah? You see, I used to work with someone that
always used to say when he was called an expert,
that X is former as it has been you know,
was once spurts a drip under pressure.

Speaker 6 (03:29):
There you go, there you go.

Speaker 1 (03:31):
But yeah, so Tesla and the Cabbage Patch kids are
two vital components of the Tartaria conspiracy. And the reason
for calling my YouTube channel that and my Facebook groupe
that is because it's it's the name of my first book,
and I wanted to put something out there that appealed

(03:52):
to people that weren't just aware of Tartaria, because if
I if I just called it the Tartarian Empire the
name of my website, the only people that would be
interested in the information would be the people that already
are on board. But by calling it Tesla and the
Cabbage Patch Kids, it picks up people that think Tesla
is a car manufacturer and cabbage Patch Patch Kids not dull.

(04:14):
So you know, it brings more people into the what
would you call it into the fold?

Speaker 4 (04:20):
I suppose not. Is that not a fair assumption.

Speaker 1 (04:24):
It's a very fair assumption. Most people don't know who
Nikola Tesla is. And the strange thing about it is,
I mean, I'm clocking on a bit, but when I
was at school, we were taught all about Edison, but
nobody ever mentioned Nicola Tesla ever, and the whole reason
we had electricity in the building was because of him, allegedly.

(04:47):
So I find it very strange that it's only recently
become a name that people are familiar with, and when
most people think of it as obviously a car manufacturer
run by a very netherior, yes, and strange individual, you.

Speaker 3 (05:03):
Might actually begin to suspect that that sort of thing
is done on purpose. Right, There's a lot of instances.
For example, there is a running theory that Walt Disney
is somewhere what is it cryogenically cryogenically frozen, yes, for future,

(05:24):
you know, reanimation purposes. And now if you type in
Disney Frozen, you're going to get a totally different search
result based off of the popular children's Disney film Frozen.
It seems that every once in a while there is
an obfuscation through some creative means, like that, you know,
in this particular instance, Elon Musk co opting Tesla and

(05:47):
making it so that culturally speaking, in twenty twenty five,
Elon Musk self driving cars, those ideas are synonymous with Tesla,
Whereas you know, it seems that it would maybe maybe
it's just a coincidence, do a really good job of
screwing up any research that you might do on the man.

Speaker 1 (06:07):
Yeah, and that that happens quite a lot. I mean,
that's that one's intentional. The Frozen and Disney connection and
Walt Disney, who you know, that is one dark man
obviously involved with mk Ultra and an FBI in foremant
and had a strange fondness for children that we probably
can't discuss on this channel.

Speaker 4 (06:30):
On YouTube. It's fine man I.

Speaker 1 (06:34):
Whisper, So yeah, you know, I think that that's done
on purpose as freelon Musk and Tesla. Obviously, Musk wasn't
the founder of Tesla to you know, he sort of
bored his way in. But which is ironic, isn't it
someone who's been outspoken about the government. It gets most
of his funding from the government, so he, you know,

(06:55):
definitely a wolf in sheep's clothing, but that that's not unusual.
But what the did with Tartaria was they changed the
name to Mongolia, so it became the Mongolian Empire. So
anybody researching Tartaria hits this wall with it being pseudo
scientific never existed, so it was it was more cleverly done,
and it was it was removed by the Freemasons. There's

(07:17):
a document circulating out there that does actually state that
the Freemasons were tasked with removing Tartaria from the pages
of history every single book.

Speaker 3 (07:29):
Can you we we haven't really on this show, right,
we haven't done too much of a deep dive on Tartaria.

Speaker 4 (07:34):
Obviously it comes up.

Speaker 5 (07:36):
Well, it's I mean it's come up. Have you heard
of the Little Season theory?

Speaker 1 (07:40):
Yeah? Yeah, yeah, I talk about it all the time.

Speaker 3 (07:43):
Oh yeah, all right, so we're definitely going to end
up stepping into it.

Speaker 4 (07:46):
So he quick disclaimer.

Speaker 5 (07:48):
A couple of years ago, I mean maybe a year
and a half ago, we came across a theory and
we had JT files JC.

Speaker 4 (07:54):
We had on that was a friend of mine. Yes,
I was wonderful.

Speaker 3 (07:59):
We love Joe.

Speaker 5 (07:59):
So they kind of start exposing this theory, which I
don't know if it's brand new, but they bring it
back or they're they're doing a great job of putting
it out there. Then there are some naysayers that say,
we were not in the Little Season and we have
received We've received a ton of back last year, none
of it deserved, something that's probably deserved. We I just listened,
I kind of I want to hear what people are saying,

(08:20):
and then like go, okay, I'm just bringing the information.
And Tartaria kind of folds in with this idea of
the Little Season as well.

Speaker 4 (08:27):
So do you think it's maybe appropriate?

Speaker 3 (08:29):
Can we give a thousand foot overview of what Tartaria is? Uh,
you know, a crash course.

Speaker 1 (08:36):
Yeah. So well, first of all, we are in Satan's
little season, right, Yeah, so you know that, And if
anybody wants to to check that, then all you need
to do is look at the Statue of Liberty, the
American dollar bill. It's still there.

Speaker 5 (08:53):
You've got lucif me guy, I don't know if you know,
but a little it's on a pizza box.

Speaker 3 (08:59):
It's got to be real. It seems last deception.

Speaker 1 (09:02):
There you go, there, you go, Okay, you've really you've
you've got it over there a lot more than we
have here here. Not many people know about it, you know,
I'm in Britain. A lot of people refer to it
as the UK, but there's nothing united about this place.
And we don't have a king. We have a fake
king monarchy. Yeah yeah, yeah, so I assume.

Speaker 3 (09:25):
The guy that they're probably into, they have, you know,
some degree of power in our into you know, all
sorts of trouble over there, the crown as it were, right,
But yeah, yeah, certainly not the influence that No.

Speaker 1 (09:40):
No, I mean I mean when I say fake, I
mean they're not really the royal family. You know, for
a very long time ago they sort of infiltrated and
of course that their heritage is there. They're German. They
have no real right to be sat where they're sat.
And of course his relationship and his brother's relationship with

(10:03):
certain people has really exposed what they're all about. You know,
his little brother Andrew was very friendly with Jeffrey, and
Charles was very friendly with someone called Jimmy Savile, So
you know, they're not nice people. I think most people
here have woken up to that. But yeah, the Satan's

(10:25):
little season is New World Order, which started on the
fourth of July seventeen seventy six, and the back of
your dollar bill confirms that it's there for everybody to see.
New World Order seventeen seventy six, and the Statue of
Liberty is Lucifer breaking free from its chains. The original

(10:49):
statue wasn't designed for that. It's been bastardized. And you'll
notice that the date is also wrong. The M was
added afterwards, and you'll see it's out of a line
and the first M, and that's because the year is wrong.
They've falsified our timeline. So we've got this sort of
theory that we progressed slowly with regard to technology and

(11:13):
how we build our construction techniques and civilization, and banking
and finance, and maritime law, admiralty law, and so these
things are slowly introduced, but it's all old. There's nothing
new under the sun. So we went from the old world,
which a lot of people refer to as the millennial
reign of Christ. We went from that a period of

(11:36):
a thousand years where Christ and the angels reigned, to
new world order where Satan's friends are let loose. And
these are the thirteen bloodline families that go all the
way back to armen Rah or Marduk, the anunarchy as
is otherwise known. The person you say amen to when
you pray or go into a church is Armen. You're

(11:58):
saying where you're paying comage to arman Rah, the Naki
king and ruler.

Speaker 3 (12:04):
They go back to something real quick, guy, And I'm
sorry to interrupt, but I wanted to ask you. So
people when they look at the Statue of Liberty, which
I tend to agree with you, especially in the estimation
of it being Lucifer freed from the chains. But there
are those who interpret the Statue of Liberty as a
representation of Mithrus. Are those two characters interchangeable. Are they

(12:26):
one in the same entity, different name?

Speaker 1 (12:29):
No, no, they're not, And those people are right, but
it was hijacked. The statue now is used to represent
Lucifer breaking.

Speaker 4 (12:38):
Okay, okay, but.

Speaker 1 (12:39):
If anybody looks at Lucifer, the story of Lucifer and
the story you know, Lucifer was considered to be, well,
if you're into Lucifer, if you're a Luciferian, then people
would think that you're quite a dark, nefarious character and
that you're actually a devil worshiper. But actually, if they
do their homework, they'll say that that wasn't who Lucifer
was at all. This is the god of light and

(13:03):
someone that allegedly was incredibly beautiful to look at, knowledgeable,
and the only reason that he was kicked out was
because he stood up and said that you're treating these
people as if they're stupid. You're not giving them the
true information and knowledge that they possess. They're not aware
of their true potential. You're suppressing them. And I don't

(13:26):
agree with it. So to call this person or this
being satanic or some sort of form of the devil
is ridiculous because that isn't who it was, and he
was referred to as the morning Star, which Jesus also
was referred to in that way. So there are that

(13:48):
there are confusions and complications and sort of mixed messages
going around about who that is. So that Lucifer now
for most people would be considered to be the devil,
but that that's certainly if you haven't really done your homework.

Speaker 3 (14:04):
Items that the terminology the devil is is awfully reductive.
We're dealing with.

Speaker 5 (14:12):
They say, like Biblically they're talking about devils multiple being,
So like what does that mean like maybe uh, demons
or these entities that are the nephil and that are disembodied,
So what are what our devil? It's a question that
I have often. I see the chat is kind of
getting upset. But like the idea of Satan being Lucifer
or Satan being a title of a fallen angel is

(14:33):
something that we talk about a lot, and.

Speaker 3 (14:36):
Like like Satan being the adversary or the accuser.

Speaker 5 (14:39):
Right right, yeah, and that title is picked up as
a matter of fact, that might still be the title
of Satan might actually still be a heavenly title, where
whereas like a job title, like a job title of like,
you know, an angel that does a thing. So this
angel tempts or accuses on God's behalf, but when they
go too far and they fall, then they they're out

(15:00):
and there's something else, you know what I mean?

Speaker 4 (15:02):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (15:02):
Absolutely. Do you ever wonder why that the devil exists?

Speaker 3 (15:07):
Oh? It seems to be he is the facilitator of
a process that is necessary for mankind's development.

Speaker 1 (15:16):
That's a bloody good answer, because it seems strange to
me that that if you created everything, why you would
create an evil entity? If you are the creator of all,
why would you create a being that these parasites that

(15:36):
seem to run the show lean towards or ultimately go
and worship. And you know they call you know, lots
of people call it different things. Like some people will say, well,
these parasite families and beings follow Baphomet, and some will
say that they they're actually devil worshipers. They worship Satan
and refer to it as other other beings. Suppose the

(16:00):
demiurge is another one I hear of sometimes, but but
it's difficult to know exactly who they are referring to.
We just don't know, do we. But interesting enough. I
was in I was in Tamar in Portugal last week
and we went to where the Knights Templar were founded

(16:22):
and they're They're castle and the Convent of Christ. And
the only book we could find in the gift shop
that was in English fell open on a page about
Baphomet and saying that the Knights Templars worship Bafomet because
it represented unity but also diversion, so opposites contrast. And

(16:46):
I thought, well that that's very strange, because that's not
the understanding I have of baer Met. But there just
seems to be a lot of confusion between who actually
is this attack being that these people worship, and and
and I think Lucifer perhaps isn't the right term or

(17:07):
the right person. But that's just my opinion from I'm ordained,
and I've spent thirty years researching it, so but it
is only my opinion.

Speaker 3 (17:17):
Well, it does seem to be that the more I
look at it, the more it seems Number one God
created these entities right and and specifically says take no
other gods before me, insinuating that there are other gods,
and that there seems to be this theme where you know,

(17:41):
they become venerated or.

Speaker 4 (17:42):
Worshiped by mankind.

Speaker 3 (17:44):
There's there's set in place as powers and principalities, and
it seems that sometimes they will they'll take that worship
for themselves, right, and that's sort of Yes, the fall happens,
But I'm I'm much more of the school of thought
nowadays that it's not an individual entity. Maybe there is

(18:06):
a hierarchy within it, although there's chaos I think in
their jockey for position, but really there's a spirit, there's
an energy, and that energy is what drives one school
of them versus the others. I don't know if I've
explained that.

Speaker 5 (18:23):
I also think there's a thing about knowing these entities names,
the specific names of an entity. I mean, if you
believe that Solomon knew their names and their sigils and
wrote them down and circled them and then enslaved them
to build a temple, which is you know, Jewish law,
then it would be it would make sense why we

(18:44):
wouldn't be privy to exactly their names or who did what,
because if you know their name, then you can control them.
And oftentimes, like we'll read stories from people and they'll
say I was contacted by an entity and he said
his name was bal or he said his name was
Anu or whatever. And it's always like changing and very slippery,
and the descriptions are similar but never quite the same

(19:06):
because when these entities, if they are approaching these people,
they're changing their appearance slightly enough like maybe just to
see like what you will accept, but they're also being
deceptive of who they are. We had another writer, another
person writing it was a woman and she was sleeping
with this entity. Yeah, yeah, he would approach her and

(19:28):
her dreams. And we looked up the name of the
entity and.

Speaker 8 (19:31):
Oh, oh, oh, man, it wasn't no no, no, no, no, no,
it wasn't not gonna it was it was it was
something with multiple multiple syllables.

Speaker 3 (19:41):
It was. It was a weird name. And when you
looked it up, it was the body of a spider,
face of a man, and then there was two other
animal faces. Man, I forget what the heck that they write.

Speaker 5 (19:54):
But the thing is is that like, yes, maybe, but
these things also don't really have to be truthful with you,
and they shouldn't. They shouldn't be troubled with you because
if they tell you exactly who they are, there's a
lot of power in that. There's a lot of power
in this, in the name, in the name of whatever
they are.

Speaker 4 (20:09):
So that's why we use the name of Jesus Christ,
a lot of power in that.

Speaker 5 (20:11):
So wouldn't be surprised if they weren't completely honest with
who they were and what they are. But I think
the stories and the myths are the basis of these things,
is that there is some truth to that. So that's
like why we keep scratching at and trying to figure
out what's going on.

Speaker 1 (20:27):
I think that's true also with the Anunaki and the
Yella him. It's a very similar story, and a lot
of these cultures, a lot of different cultures, actually repeat
the same story. The story of Noah, for example, that
appears in the Epic of Gilgamesh, you know, a considerable
amount of time earlier on exactly the same story. For

(20:49):
the moment, I've completely forgotten in the Epic of Gilgamesh
what Noah's name is. But these stories repeat themselves, don't they,
And the characters that we're talking about, their names change.
Perhaps that's different interpretations, different translations, or perhaps it's intentional
that we don't know the true meaning of these people

(21:10):
and their real name. I mean the story of Gollum.
I'm sure you've heard of the homunculus in Jewish mythology,
You've got the Gollumn. And people would try and make
these alchemists in Jewish mythology. They would make this sort
of clay figure of a person, very small, and the

(21:31):
only time that anybody got one of these, allegedly to
come to life was when they wrote the hidden that
the hidden name of God on its forehead, and it
immediately came to life, and it actually started to scare
this person. It grew in size and it became quite scary,
this being. And it was only when they removed it

(21:53):
etched away the true name of God from its forehead
that it stopped being animatedascinating. So, like you said, then
the true name of a being that is perhaps where
the power lies.

Speaker 3 (22:07):
Yeah, I think there is something to that. And I
think that we've been given very much a reductive view
of spirituality, the spiritual realm, these various entities here in
the West, to the degree that we are unequipped to
interact with it, which is you know, that's like saying
you don't understand anything about the ocean, but get out
into these shark infested waters, and there are a lot

(22:30):
of good things in the water.

Speaker 4 (22:31):
There are a lot of bad things in the water.

Speaker 3 (22:32):
Things that you could find, treasures, you can find, you know,
fascinating creatures. You could also find sharks that will eat
you alive. And we don't understand it at all, I
would say, certainly, you know, just speaking from the point
of view of here in America. I was talking about
it recently where I think Tucker Carlson is talking to
Sean Ryan, and he's saying he just kind of lets

(22:54):
slip that we've been stripped of our understanding of the
spiritual realm, and it may well be by design. And
so that's that's kind of my my issue with I.
I'm coming at this, I'm gaining a greater understanding, but
I also recognize within the Bible it tells us to
lean not on our own understanding. And I think that's

(23:14):
because you know myself, I'm fundamentally retarded, and so there's
gonna be a lot of things that I misunderstand. And
and I think when you're dealing with high level spiritual
ramifications and implications, those misunderstandings can have some really dire consequences,
and and I think that a lot of us are

(23:36):
dealing with it. It's like it's like in America we
are and I'm sure it's like this in the UK too,
But we get our caricaturized wiccan, right, we get our
Harry Potter's, we get it's it's in all of our
video games, it's in our children's cartoons, it's in all

(23:56):
of our media, and we're given and a truncated version
of that that seems intriguing but also harmless. And so
I don't think we're doing ourselves any favor the way
that we're dishing it out to the world as it
stands currently. We're giving this like sterilized version of what

(24:18):
even Christianity is, which you know, you go to the
church and you get one version of Christianity, and it
tends to turn people off if you're a critical thinker,
if you're scrutinizing, But if you revisit it without that
scaffolding of let's say, a church that might not be
doing a good job, you realize that this the teachings
of Christianity or the things that lie within the Bible,

(24:39):
are incredibly rich and have quite a bit to say
that you didn't really hear before. I was talking to
somebody or I was listening to something, and they said
that they had gone to a church their entire lives,
and there was never a discussion about fallen angels. Never
a discussion about fallen angels. And to me, where I'm

(24:59):
sitting now is like that that seems fundamental. That's the
great conjoining tissue, right. We were talking earlier about how
this culture or that culture, or this mythology or that
mythology has this in common, whether it's the flood of
Noah or something else in the epic of Gilgamesh. And
once you realize that they all have this thing in common,
then you start to suspect, like, oh, there's something real here,
something really did happen in antiquity.

Speaker 4 (25:21):
And I'm spending all my.

Speaker 3 (25:24):
Time at a church on Sunday, you know, if you
were raising the church as a child, And this is
something that's never even touched on. And so I think
it's amazing that we've integrated these beliefs into our culture
in such a way, but they're so watered down.

Speaker 1 (25:43):
It's kind of really Yeah, I think religion has been
hijacked though, hasn't it I mean, you know, anybody that's
read the Bible and read the teachings of Jesus will
know that he told you not to go to a
place to worship or pray. It's something you do in solitude,
and you're certainly not supposed to go somewhere and listen
to someone telling you what you should and shouldn't do.

(26:06):
It's because we we all know right from wrong, and
we can all we can all decide for ourselves whether
or not we accept what we're reading in the Bible.
And obviously there are every religion has a different take
on it. But ultimately, you know, if we look at
like I said earlier on the Epic of Gilgameshes, that

(26:26):
is the first, if you like, the first kind of
story that we have. But then you know, the Torah
is the is the first Bible of sorts and everything
from that on. You know, it's sort of I suppose
different interpretations, different beliefs, but but ultimately I think that

(26:49):
we we all know, or we should at least all
know that we're kind of connected. We know that we're
connected to something, and perhaps that's the theory of the soul.
You know, we have this kind of process I suppose
that gives us the ability to know right from wrong,
to know what to do and what not to do.

(27:10):
And I think that no one's born evil, you know,
it's we are product of our environment, aren't we. It's
our upbringing and a serious events that determine who we become,
and we get to make choices along the way. And
I don't think we need someone to tell us that.
I think that's something that we need to understand and
take responsibility for ourselves. And I think that if you

(27:32):
look at Catholicism in particular, you know, there have been
some really horrible stories come out about the abuse in
convents and so on. You know that pregnant, young pregnant
women have experienced that children have experienced. And I think

(27:52):
that a lot of people that still today perhaps are
doing what they claim to be God's work, are certainly
not doing that. They're doing their version of it. And
I think that ultimately, as I said a moment ago,
I think it's something that we know for ourselves. And
I think religion perhaps has been used as a little
bit of a weapon. I think it to a certain extent,

(28:15):
perhaps there are elements of divide and conquer, breaking us
into small groups where we can hate each other over
a difference of opinion or belief. But for me, you know,
as far as I'm concerned, every days a school day,
I don't claim to know who ultimately God is. I

(28:36):
don't claim to know which religion anybody should be following,
And nobody else can make that claim either. I think
we're all a little bit in the dark because so
much is occulted. We know that the Bible has had
books removed from it, the Book of Eno, the Book
of jubileeve you know, the Book of Jan's, the Book
of Thomas, the Book of Jesus, They've all been removed.

(28:58):
Why is that? And perhaps we should be given all
of the information, you know, I'd love to get inside
the Vatican vaults, for example, and have a look at
what's really going on, you know, in that. And then
once we've given all of the information, we can actually
make an educative decision on what we believe to be
true and what we don't. But we're kind of dealing

(29:18):
with slippets, and it makes it very hard to make
a judgment based upon that over who is right and
who is wrong, and what beliefs are true and what's
are fictitious.

Speaker 3 (29:30):
That's why I do try to cut people slack when
it comes to so much has been obfuscated from us.
You're talking about the Vatican vaults, and you know, whatever
lies in that, I don't know if we're ever going
to see what's in the Vatican libraries. You know there's
supposedly destroy Yeah, yeah, the idea that there's there's tunnels
that stretch as far as the eye can see underneath

(29:51):
the Vatican that are filled with all kinds of relics
and books, texts, and et cetera that you know, obviously
are are important to them enough to hide away. So
who knows what lies beneath there. But when it comes
to Tartaria, this is something that I don't know. Just
ten years ago, and that's probably being conservative, maybe even

(30:15):
just five years ago, the vast majority of people were
not aware of, and still as it stands right now,
I'm sure if you looked at the numbers, the vast
majority of people are still unaware of. And what that
speaks to is the ability to hide potentially one of
the most advanced civilizations known to man. You said earlier

(30:37):
that they disguised it for lack of a better term,
on my behalf as Mongolia. And so if this is true,
if Tartaria did exist in the way that people think
that it existed, which is this technologically advanced civilization, beautiful architecture, right,
and you can erase that from the history books and

(31:01):
then give us this this kind of you know, reduced
version of how man came to be in the state
that we are, then it strikes me you can hide
a hell of a lot from us. So all of
that just to say that, you know, you got to
kind of take it easy on people. It's pretty hard,
especially when they saddle you down with the nine to

(31:21):
five grind and you've got debt, and you've got a family,
and you've got this, and that you don't really have
time to start sloothing to through whether or not there
are subterranean levels of buildings that have been you know,
eclipsed by by mud floods, and that the conventional story
for how those buildings came to be is not at
all that they were actually here and we discovered them.
So can you can let's bring it back to Tartaria.

(31:44):
What do you think What do you think Tartaria was
and why would they hide it?

Speaker 1 (31:51):
The best answer to that is it was an echo
of Atlantis. I think that that's the best way to
describe it, because they were using that kind of technology.
I mean, we now know from the recent developments with
the Great Pyramid of Geezer that the pyramid, that particular pyramid,
and probably all of them are a lot bigger than

(32:13):
we've been led to believe, and that actually they were.
They're now saying that they believe that they were used
to harness energy, they were some kind of massive power station. Well,
they were harnessing energy from the ether, which is what
Nicola Tensa dedicated most of his life to trying to redevelop.

(32:35):
And so really that was the Ethos. Some people refer
to Tartar area and calling it the Tartarian Empire is
kind of wrong because it was a region of land.
Really you're talking about Asia, Russia, sort of eastern Europe,
really a lot of the Northern Hemisphere. But the Ethos
spread across the world, so people will either call it

(32:56):
the Old World or they will call it the millennial
Reign of Christ. When all of these buildings appeared, churches
and cathedrals in particular that were used as healing centers,
and it was all to do with simatics and frequency,
which again Raymond Riiche for example, and Nicola Tesla also
worked on. And we know now that you finally scientists

(33:20):
have said that yes, frequency, when when admitted at the
correct the correct frequency, can kill cancer cells. You know,
they're now actually admitting that this was something that people
knew a very long time ago. But of course it's suppressed,
isn't it, because there are certain people that make a
lot of money from it from different treatments and medical interventions.

(33:41):
So yes, Tartaria was really an ethos. The people themselves
were what we would refer to today as the Mongolians,
but the way of building understanding, harnessing energy and also
it's referred to as the Empire of free Energy and
the Empire of free travel as well. And this was

(34:03):
airships that they're talking about there. But there is evidence
to suggest that all of these tunnels, and you mentioned
tunnels under the Vatican, but there are tunnels all over
the world, and you know, Elon Musk is currently planning
to start building tunnels for people to move from one
place to another incredible speeds, perhaps using vacuum trains or
mag trains and so on. I believe that the tunnels

(34:26):
were already there and they're just being reopened. There's also
evidence out there to suggest that certain wealthy people and
celebrities are using tunnels at the moment to get from
A to B and that's why we never see them
sat next to us in a traffic jam.

Speaker 3 (34:43):
So, you know, what's fascinating about that guy is that
there are these I don't know anecdotal, but there's testimony
and people that have experienced strange, supernatural occurrences, whether they
were people that claim to have escaped from SRA situations,
things of that nature, who in testimony as children recall
these underground being insubmersibles, going to a certain depth, re

(35:08):
emerging in a cave system, and then entering tunnels there.
And you know, it's hard to say whether or not
these people, if they really did go through this thing,
your memories are fragmented because of the trauma, or if
you take them at face value. It seems that some
of these people have experienced themselves moving from one place
to another great distances across, but at rapid speeds, and

(35:32):
they're describing something of a tunnel system. So that's fascinating.

Speaker 1 (35:37):
It's a common theme isn't it. We hear about it
all the time. Lots of civilizations talk about tunnels, and
a lot of people that research tartaria believe that's actually
key buildings and cities and countries were connected by tunnels
that you could get from one place to another using
a pneumatic train in a relatively short period of time.

(36:00):
Whether or not they're still in use, I don't know,
but it does beg the question, as I said a
moment ago, why we never pull up next to someone rich, powerful,
or famous in a traffic jam. It just seems to
be the rest of us that have to sit in queue.
So maybe they are still in use. I don't know,
but airships were a common theme for that particular time,

(36:23):
and I think a lot of people were traveling without
passports because that was introduced relatively recently that we were
able to move around. So it was all about frequency vibration,
increasing your connection with the source, and living in harmony
and balance. Everything was built a star forts in particular,

(36:45):
which you have quite a lot of in America. Inside
the walls. It resonates at four hundred and thirty two hertz,
which is the same frequency as the planet itself. The
earth all living matter is four hundred and thirty two.
Hurts Fello Institution decided to change that to four hundred
and forty hrtz not that long ago. So I think

(37:08):
everything was done to increase the well being and the
spiritual connection that everybody had. And you'll see that buildings.
If you look at your oldest asylums that are still standing,
orphanages and prisons, they will all look very similar. And
that's an incredible stretch really to believe that they would

(37:33):
put all of that time and effort into building what
appears to be some huge mansion with marble and granite
and limestone just to house people that they didn't really want.
And they appear all over the world as well. So
this kind of building style is what we associate with
with Tartaria and along with other things like the world's fairs.

(37:55):
As I said a moment ago, star thoughts. I mean,
the Smithsonians will say that star wars are a defensive fortress,
but they align with constellations, you know, they think they
vibrate at four hundred and thirty two. Those two things
alone are not really necessary for you know, a defensive fortress.

Speaker 3 (38:14):
It seems that you would go far out of your
way to incorporate that into your You know, that's certainly
not an accident. And but but what purpose does it
serve through the conventional explanation. You know, there are a
couple of things I'd like to ask you, especially in
regards to the World's Fair, as I believe either Donald Trump,
although we have images of the star frauds, I.

Speaker 4 (38:33):
Haven't really seen these.

Speaker 3 (38:34):
Yeah, they're they're they're the geometry is is fascinating. And
then as Gus said, they're there, as guys said, they're
in alignment with with with stars concerts. So but also
in this idea that that I think it was Elon
Musk or Donald Trump says he wants to bring back
the World Fairs.

Speaker 5 (38:53):
Well, yeah, I mean not just the World Fairs. But
guys struck a chord when he he mentioned, I mean
insane this islands were also built with like like looking
like these Gothic cathedrals, and you said you put on
desirabls in there. But Donald Trump also wants to bring
those back. As a matter of fact, I think, yeah,
he just signed an executive order to bring them, which
would be great for society. It's a lot of crazy

(39:13):
ass homeless people. But I can't help but like my
conspiracy brain starts to oh, yeah, like, well, what's going on?

Speaker 4 (39:19):
What are we really bringing back? What are we making
great again? What are we making great? Yeah? Yeah, okay.

Speaker 3 (39:23):
So before we go there, though, we have to let
the live audience know that we're about to go live
exclusively to patreon dot com backslash FLM death Squad.

Speaker 4 (39:30):
We are past the half hour mark.

Speaker 3 (39:32):
If you guys want to continue enjoying this conversation, engaging
in the live chat, then Patreon is where you want
to be.

Speaker 4 (39:36):
Otherwise, just give it some time and you.

Speaker 3 (39:38):
Will see this release in about a couple of weeks
or so, two weeks maybe, but you know that's it.

Speaker 4 (39:43):
But bye, guys.

Speaker 3 (39:44):
All right, So, man, there's a lot there, and I
kind of even wanted to rewind a little bit further.

Speaker 5 (39:52):
Well, I also wanted to say another crazy thought about
the star Ford But as I'm looking at the pictures
of this, they remind me a little bit of of
crop circles or these designs. And we had a fellow
from the UK as well who claimed to be one
of the people creating these crop circles or these designs,

(40:12):
and he was there. He said that he would receive
downloads of the location, of the time he should do it,
and of the design that he should put down, like channeling.

Speaker 4 (40:23):
Like yeah, like this.

Speaker 5 (40:24):
Channeling, but not directly, not directly or not even intentionally.
The guy kind of seems supernatural or spiritually retarded.

Speaker 4 (40:31):
If that makes him. He's like, aloof he just he
just wakes up in the middle of the night.

Speaker 3 (40:35):
Yeah, and he's just got this idea that won't go
away and he has to go and act on it.

Speaker 5 (40:39):
He told us, He's like, yeah, I have like a
lot of poldergeyst activity, but I don't think it's related.

Speaker 4 (40:43):
I'm like, I think it's related, but yeah, these kind
of remind me of that.

Speaker 5 (40:49):
They're like more well built, well built crop circles that
align astrologically, So something significant there.

Speaker 3 (40:58):
I think.

Speaker 1 (40:59):
The other interesting thing with the star force is if
you look at the shape of most of them, they're
kind of all similar. But that's the same shape if
you freeze water full and then submit four hundred and
thirty two hertz to it.

Speaker 4 (41:12):
That's right.

Speaker 3 (41:13):
Crystals will make That's something that we talk about often.
You'll also get that with positive affirmation, so it's not
just exposing it to four hundred and thirty two hurts,
although it makes you wonder if that's what frequency positive
affirmation resonates at. But if you should speak positive affirmations
to water a glass of water, and then another one

(41:35):
where it's negative. So if you do it to the
negative one and then you freeze it, it makes chaotic,
kind of nonsensical crystalline structures. Whereas the one that received
the positive affirmation, or you know, in this instance, music
that's played at four hundred and thirty two hertz or
just the frequency itself, it will freeze itself and the
crystalline structures will look symmetrical organized, and yeah, very much

(41:57):
like the star forards.

Speaker 4 (41:58):
That's fascinating.

Speaker 1 (41:59):
Yeah, and there are certain singers out there that have
actually put music out there at four hundred and thirty
two hurts. Some examples I've seen of the water changing
its form to make the most incredible patterns and shapes
was actually John Lennon. So I was playing John Lennon
imagine to a glass of water. And then, of course,

(42:24):
as you quite rightly said, if you start sort of
yelling abuse it it, or being quite negative to water,
it changes its structure of water carries memory. But what
I find fascinating with the star forts is that for
them to have understood when they were built that they
were making something that's exactly the same pattern as water

(42:46):
at four hundred and thirty two hertz would suggest that no,
unless they had the technology to see that. We're told
that these are quite primitive people. Clearly they weren't. They
were way more advanced, and I think we've gone backwards.
We might think that today the technology we have is fantastic.
You know what we're using right now to talk, you know,

(43:08):
you know, ten years ago, twenty years ago, it would
have it would have seen a little bit out there
and unlikely. But thousands of years ago, you know, if Atlantis,
if Plato and other researchers are writing what they've said,
then you know, this technology is nothing compared to what
we had. But I think that we consider the technology

(43:29):
we have now to be amazing, but actually it's the
wrong technology. You know, we're now sort of subjecting ourselves
to Wi Fi, you know, and we've got five gen
masks down the road.

Speaker 3 (43:40):
We don't who knows what it's doing?

Speaker 1 (43:42):
Yeah, we don't know, do we? And the things that
we've been introduced to. It's not done us any any good.
And I think perhaps we're only given things like Zoom,
for example, or FaceTime or whatever. One the people that
oversee everything, the parasites as I call them, I think

(44:04):
they refers to them as the reptilians. But until we're
until they're in a position where they can use it
for their benefits, we don't get it. And I wonder
what the deep state has, what sort of level they're
at with their technology. What iPhone do they have? You
know what number they are on? Thirty? You know, I
think sort of our technology, we think that we've got

(44:26):
some great kit and we'll queue up for the latest
phone because we want to be the first out because
he's got a better camera or something.

Speaker 3 (44:34):
But it's lenses. Actually, I think we already have four lenses.
The next one has five lenses.

Speaker 4 (44:40):
I got a bunch of shit here that doesn't work.

Speaker 3 (44:43):
You know. I wonder a guy, because we're talking about
whether or not they were more than us. It seems
that historically speaking, there's a lot of instances you can
look to where people will attribute either great works of
art or even inspiration for inventions, and certainly the ancients
said this right, who was responsible for teaching the metallurgy,
Who was responsible for teaching them agriculture? Where these various

(45:05):
entities and if you look at the idea of the
muses in Greek mythology, this idea of channeling something in
order to create great works of art, or the idea
that ideas themselves are alive in some way, shape or form,
that we are antennas receiving frequencies, you know, not just that.

Speaker 5 (45:21):
Not to interrupt, but I was listening to mercle today.
I know this is something that comes up old Time,
one of my favorite shows, and he was doing a
deep dive on Santa Ria Santai. It's like, you know,
it comes from Africa. But basically they have a different
god or a different entity that they will attribute to.
They atribute different characteristics too. If they want to sacrifice,

(45:42):
they want to have better farming, it's this guy. If
they want to have love, it's this guy. And when
they get down to the bottom of it, they're like, well,
where do these gods come from? These lowercase street gods
that you're talking about, And they come from Egypt, but
they can't quite you know, put their finger on exactly where,
but it seems like they all originate from this Arian Egypt.

(46:02):
And it's It's also interesting because when you go back
to Elon Musk and his conversation with Jordan Peterson, he
establishes the XI headquarters in Memphis, Tennessee, and he just doesn't,
you know, real slick, just a little passed by comment like, hey,
maybe the next God will also come from Memphis, because
Memphis is the capital of Egypt.

Speaker 4 (46:22):
Of course, and he's alluding to AI. Yes, exactly what.
He's absolutely right. It's terrifying actually.

Speaker 1 (46:30):
But there are a lot of people out there that
believe that America is far older than that. Actually, because
if you look at going back to the story of
Noah's Ark, I mean the woods used to build that arc.
He can only be found in Florida.

Speaker 3 (46:43):
That's right, we've heard as a matter of fact.

Speaker 5 (46:46):
I mean, you'd probably be interesting to go ahead, Tom,
I already see.

Speaker 3 (46:50):
Where you go. I was going to say, we are
in Florida, and where you're talking about the well, the well. Yeah,
so right now, we're in the middle of making a documentary.
It seems that some wonderful, hardworking people here in Florida
stumbled upon what may be like primary waters on their property,
and long story short, they tested the purity of the

(47:12):
water alkalin. I can't even say the word, can I
say the word? I guess we'll have to censor it
alkaline water. God forbid you should say it, or YouTube
will terminate you. And it is high in magnesium, it's
high in minerals, and right now we are waiting for
the results to come back to find out if it's
low in what's called deterium, which water that's high end

(47:32):
deuterium shuts off the cell's natural mitochondrial function that basically
processes waste and cancer. And our water that we drink
from the tapp or what have you is very high
in deterium, so it shuts off that natural function, and
that right now the cutting edge of cancer research is
determining that deterium might have something to do with the
really high cancer rates. So AnyWho, the people who live

(47:54):
on the property, who are trying to get this water
out after they spent their own money to test the
well and all this stuff, it's incredibly deep.

Speaker 5 (48:02):
Well not just not just that, I mean the grandfather
who owned this old this So here's some like here's
some inside scoop. The grandfather who owned the property owns
six thousand plus acres of it. When he died, the
government took more than half. The father or the guy
that we spoke to that owns it now and he's
started with about twenty eight hundred acres and the government

(48:22):
has been seizing his land pretty much. I mean it's lawful,
it's lawful seizure, but it's underhanded. Yeah, it's crazy what
they've done him. And they whittled him down to about
one hundred and sixty acres. But he has maintained the
spot where this well was created. And his father he
drilled this well using divination rods. Crazy walking the land

(48:44):
with divination rods, decided on this point. And it's not
strategic to where his house is.

Speaker 3 (48:49):
By the way, he was a freemason, and he was
a free mason.

Speaker 5 (48:52):
He hires some dudes in like the sixties to come
in and drill the well in one spot. And in Florida,
if you drill three hundred that's the max you're going
to go for a local well unless you're doing like
municipal stuff that goes deeper, probably to like maybe a thousand.
They drill six hundred feet hit bedrock. He tells the
guys keep going in this one specific spot, which is

(49:14):
not convenient, Like I said, it's like a fifteen twenty
minute drive off road from the house. They continue and
they drill to a fifteen hundred feet fifteen hundred feet yah,
fifteen hundred feet hit primary waters. And then the story
just goes crazy from there.

Speaker 3 (49:30):
So this guy, he, you know, he pays his own
money fifteen hundred dollars to have somebody come in drop
a camera down the well. And when they get through,
the guy, the survey or, I don't really know the terminology,
goes this is there's an ocean of water.

Speaker 4 (49:45):
Beneath our feet here.

Speaker 3 (49:47):
Long story short, this guy goes, we need to get
the water to the people. This is potentially even medicinal,
but it's certainly enough to service at least South Florida,
which if you go into the future, Thank you Matthew
Lane for putting it on our radar.

Speaker 4 (50:04):
It looks like by twenty.

Speaker 3 (50:05):
Thirty we're gonna have a real water issue based off
of like, what's the terminology for how many people are
dense in an area?

Speaker 4 (50:14):
In population population?

Speaker 3 (50:15):
I'm sorry, population density versus water accessibility, We're gonna have
a real problem in twenty thirty. This could alleviate that problem.
They threw this man in jail. They threw him in jail,
they've tortured him, they've stripped him naked, they've shot him
with water hoses, they've kept him from his phone calls
for a long time. And now today actually as we
sit here, they just had a pre sentencing, which, according

(50:37):
to Matthew, did not go well. They're trying to sentence
him to fifteen years in prison for what for emailing
a lot?

Speaker 5 (50:45):
It was, Yeah, I mean the charges are terrorism because
he sent out a bunch of mass emails. In my opinion,
I think he went about this wrong. But this was
also like he was doing this in twenty thirteen, so
social media and other kind of avenues maybe weren't available
at the time. He's just an engineer, he's not a
guy that's working in media. So he's trying to get
the word out and they classified what he did as terrorism.

(51:09):
Is sending out mass emails over and over like basically
saying hey, there's like really.

Speaker 4 (51:13):
There's water here being with help from the people, and.

Speaker 5 (51:16):
Yeah, it's honestly, when you're dealing with the with the
government though, like like how they got John Gotti, they couldn't.
If they can't get you on like actual murder, they'll
get you on tax on tax evasion.

Speaker 4 (51:24):
So if they want you, you're going to get you.

Speaker 3 (51:26):
But there are companies there are there are It's it's
nest Lee, which owns so many of the strings now
it has rights to the springs. And then there's also Mosaic,
which is an agriculture company in our area.

Speaker 5 (51:36):
But isn't it fascinating how this sort of ties into
what he's talking about with Tartara, because you're mentioning all
of these tunnels underground. It's like there's a lot of
stuff going on underground underground.

Speaker 9 (51:46):
Yeah, yeah, that you mentioned ness that they're obviously a
key supporter of the World Economic Forum, and I recently
posted saying that these are the main supporters of the
WU and it's quite easy to function, not totally, but
it is easy to function without.

Speaker 1 (52:06):
Supporting them all, and that Amazon's a big one. And
I used Amazon to publish my books because apart from
as a publisher in Japan that has published them, but
over here, I needed to find a publisher and when
I sent the content out, people just wouldn't touch it.
I made the mistake. I send it to a big

(52:27):
one called HarperCollins, which is a Masonic publishing house, and
what I wrote about them, They're not going to particularly
want to support. But I have to therefore use Amazon,
who are a big supporter of the World Economic Forum.
But there are ways, you know, we can reduce our
support to these organizations, and you know, we can boycott

(52:47):
certain companies and Nesle is one of them. You know,
we can decide, Okay, from now on, we're not going
to support any Nesle product, and that's going to hurt
And that's the little bit of power that we have.
That we can't go in and change these organizations and
these think tanks like the builder Berg Group, the Trianatal Commission,
Club of Rome and so on. But what we can

(53:08):
do is we can hurt their friends. We can hurt
the people that financially support them, just by by boycotting them.

Speaker 3 (53:15):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (53:15):
So I do think Next today is a good example
of organizations that we shouldn't support in any way, shape
or form, and maybe together we can make some sort
of difference.

Speaker 3 (53:26):
I don't know.

Speaker 5 (53:28):
I I'm a little bit more black pilled on that.
Sorry to like crap on people's idea because you know,
I mean we see with Disney, who was you know,
someone we were talking about in the beginning of the show.
There also in Florida, Alo in Florida. There's something significent
about Florida, right, because you've got all the worst people,
You've got all the best people in Florida. I mean

(53:50):
possibly the Garden of Eden, maybe even where Noah built
is are a lot of crazy stuff going on in
this place. But I mean, you know, people like people
like Disney, like I was saying, they don't even care
about the prophet anymore. They don't care about creating a
product that people want because it's almost like the money's
infused to them through the government and printing anyway. So
it's just we're in this weird spot where I'm like, oh, man,

(54:12):
like boycotting.

Speaker 4 (54:13):
Sure, but these.

Speaker 5 (54:14):
Guys seem dead set on their agenda and they're already
like full blast forward. They have their twenty thirty things
set up, or they have some sort of time for
him that they need to meet. So you know, I
don't know, I just don't know.

Speaker 3 (54:27):
I don't know if it's boycotting is definitely.

Speaker 5 (54:29):
Mean if you are definitely boycotting, because it's probably don't
spend your money with people that hate you, right, is
a great is a great place to start. Don't consume
poison a better place to start. Yeah, that's also a
good place to start. But I think doing things like this,
like being vocal. You know, going back to the gentleman's
name is Joe Gilbertie. He's the one that got very
vocal and then was thrown into a cage. We actually

(54:51):
had the pleasure of speaking with him briefly. We did
a podcast with his wife and with Matthew Laine, who's
hanging out in the chat, and he in the middle
of that podcast, and so we we jail from jail,
and you know, man, he has this opportunity, he's got
a platform, and what does he choose to say.

Speaker 3 (55:12):
He doesn't say free me from this cage. He says,
we need to get the water to the people, is
what he says. And so I think in the in
the spirit of that, what we can do is have
conversations like this and and and you know, make people
aware because you're fighting up he'll battle. If people don't
even know this sort of thing is happening, So yeah,

(55:33):
don't spend money with people that hate you. Probably don't
ingest poison and and don't be afraid to speak that
they can't.

Speaker 4 (55:40):
Throw all of us in a cage. Maybe they can't.
I don't know, they probably can.

Speaker 1 (55:45):
Well, it's funny you mentioned earlier on about about Trump
wanting to do something with asylums, and I get these
asylums back up and running, and I often wonder whether
or not he's talking about throwing people like me and you.

Speaker 5 (56:00):
Yeah, I'm from New York City, so I'm like most
of these people out here should be.

Speaker 3 (56:07):
But if something needs to happen, because there's a huge
crisis going.

Speaker 5 (56:10):
The homeless population is like, by and large, that was
the that were the people that were in that were
in asylum and people that were maybe gotten addicted to
meth and then thin that veil a little too much
and they're kind of in touch with this realm they
were kept in there in the days prior. But now, Yeah,
I do think it's very much like, oh, you oppose
Israel or something like, go to jail.

Speaker 3 (56:30):
Yeah, you have to go to prison.

Speaker 1 (56:32):
Yeah, And I think that that's what happened before, because
when you look at the asylums, one minute they don't exist,
the next minute they're everywhere. All over the world. We
have asylums suddenly open and thousands of people committed. And
I believe that these people were the ones that were
from the previous civilization that didn't get what was going

(56:52):
on or wouldn't comply. And I and it's something that
I hear about quite a lot. During twenty twenty, during
the pandemic, people were talking about building super prisons and
one started being built very close to where I lived,
And they were talking about actually putting away people that
were speaking out what you would call misinformation but actually

(57:13):
is malinformation. You know, we're saying things they don't want
us to say, and that over here people that you know,
people have been sent to prison for what they've tweeted.
It's already happened. So I just wonder when they talk
about World's Fairs and they talk about the asylums, I
just think, is this a repeat of what happened after

(57:36):
seventeen seventy six? Are we seeing history repeat itself like
it seems to so often?

Speaker 3 (57:41):
Do you do you think guy that so you're talking
about these people from a previous civilization who are then
institutionalized their children.

Speaker 4 (57:50):
Are these the orphan train children?

Speaker 3 (57:53):
Is it? The adults go to these institutions, and then
here in America just treeanes filled with children seemed to
come out of nowhere. And there's no real satisfactory explanation.
Can you talk about that a little bit?

Speaker 1 (58:08):
Yeah, And it didn't just happen in America. It happened
all over the world. In my grandfather and mother's father,
he was sent from Ukraine to New York the early
nineteen hundreds, but the England as well sent children to Australia,
and it happened everywhere. Canada had it happened to lots
of Indigenous children were snatched and taken away from their

(58:31):
you know, their families and sent all over the place,
forced to speak English. And of course you know this
is still going on today, that children are moved. But yeah,
so if you think at the time you have, you
had a lot of civil wars take place all over
the world. And I'll go through the population figures in

(58:52):
a minute, because it's a bit strange. So you had
the Napoleonic Wars, which were perhaps the largest wars that
took place in US Europe. A lot of people died,
we actually ate them and using them, which is pretty disgusting.
A lot of the dead bodies were used in fertilizer,
shipped back to Britain and used on crops. Then the

(59:16):
teeth at the time, the most expensive and best dentures
you could get were called Waterloo teeth. They were taken
from the soldiers that fell during the Napoleonic Wars the
batter of Drafalgar, so they would makeple's teeth from their teeth.
And then there is evidence to suggest, if people want
to dig, that's bone. China actually consisted of human bones

(59:39):
from the Napoleonic Wars. So you kind of got this
situation where you're eating your dinner with dentures from someone
that died in the Napoleonic Wars. You're eating, yeah, and
you're eating off a plate which is made from their bones,
and the food you're eating, the vegetables you're eating, were
growing from the remains of the bodies that dec posed.

(01:00:01):
So kind of when people say to me, you know
what happened to all the people that died in the
Civil Wars, Well, at them way or another.

Speaker 4 (01:00:10):
They went with them. Did we eat off of them?

Speaker 1 (01:00:14):
It's pretty gross, isn't it. But so a lot of
men died, and this isn't a sort of sexist thing.
At the time, it was men that went off to
typically went off to fight. You also had the obviously
the American Civil War, Lots millions of people died. Millions
and millions of men died during those wars. So what

(01:00:34):
you had left was a very small population comparatively speaking,
and a lot of women were incarcerated, so that they
brought out something called the Lunacy Act, which meant that
for a numerous reasons, you could be committed and your
children became property of the states, and they were then
sent to orphanages, became part of the orphan train movement,

(01:00:56):
or were just on the streets and almost feral in
some cases. So you've got the Lunacy Act removing the women,
the men killed in battle, and a lot of children
kicking about. So so that really was part of how
these orphans became so prevalent. And then Charles laring Brace

(01:01:17):
introduced the Orphan train movement. Prior to the Orphan Train
movement movement, it was called the Raife Train w A
I f WAF train and they were transported using those does.

Speaker 4 (01:01:29):
That word.

Speaker 5 (01:01:31):
I don't know if you're familiar with like Japanese culture,
but they have like a term called wifu w a
I f u and it's kind.

Speaker 4 (01:01:38):
Of yeah, it's weird.

Speaker 5 (01:01:40):
It's like a sexual term for like a young looking female.

Speaker 4 (01:01:46):
Very strange. I don't know, maybe no correlation there.

Speaker 1 (01:01:49):
Or maybe you know, I stopped believing in coincidence. But
waves and strays is a term that that that it's
used used in But so you had all of these children,
you know, we that a lot of the men died,
a lot of the women were committed because the Lunacy
Act was brilliant. I mean, you could be committed to

(01:02:12):
an asylum for reading too much. You could even a
woman could even be committed for having going through her
menstrual cycle. Women's problems was enough just cause to actually
commit someone. But what's really interesting is the population numbers.
In seventeen seventy six, the world population was estimated to

(01:02:33):
be seven hundred and seventy million. One hundred years later,
it was estimated to be one point three to five billion,
so they're or thereabouts. It had kind of doubled but
what they don't tell you was over three billion people
died during that one hundred year period. It doesn't stack up.
You can't really do your popular Yeah, three point three

(01:02:56):
billion people died through war, genocide, facs, I mean, and
natural causes. So, first of all, in a period of
one hundred years, they doubled the population, which is pretty
hard to achieve. But during the same period they lost
almost three times, over twice the population in eighteen seventy

(01:03:16):
six had died, and the numbers just don't stack up.
So it's very strange. It's worth people looking into. There
was a sudden appearance of children as well, which is
where the cabbage patch theory comes into it.

Speaker 3 (01:03:29):
Okay, now I'm glad that I'm back in time to
talk about the cabbage patch theory.

Speaker 4 (01:03:36):
It does strike me as significant.

Speaker 3 (01:03:38):
Not only would you want to be able to rebuild,
so you're taking in all these children, and also they're
displaced because their parents are potentially in asylums. But if
you're also taking children from all different parts of the world,
then you're ensuring that there is going to be really
slim to no chance that there's going to be any
cohesion in the beginning, of their story that they're going

(01:03:58):
to be able to unify and tell story about where
they came from. The Cabbage Patch Kids. That's fascinating. Mean,
we're talking about a that was one of the earliest
toys that took America by storm. It kind of laid
the foundation in very many ways for that, I don't
know what you would call it, Like there was like
a toy novelty sort of fanaticism that didn't exist before

(01:04:28):
the Cabbage Patch Kids, or at least not that I'm
aware of. And now that's that's really created quite the
theme here in America. Right, we have these things that
come along so often, like right now it happens to.

Speaker 4 (01:04:37):
Be Le Boo Boo or La Fou Fou.

Speaker 5 (01:04:40):
Yeah. I'm very, always, very suspicious of these inorganic toy
pushes because, yeah, they're usually either like a venerating a
demon or a propagating a lie. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:04:51):
Yeah, So let's let's get into the Cabbage Patch Kids,
because certainly those can't be nefarious, right, just there's just
a little.

Speaker 1 (01:05:02):
Okay, well, perhaps one of the most unpleasant aspects to
I Mean, first of all, the doll was stolen. It
was somebody else's idea not Xavier Robbers. Secondly, you weren't
allowed to buy one. He was very strict on that.
You could adopt one, but you couldn't purchase one. They
have to be adopted. They come with an adoption certificate.

(01:05:24):
He didn't want the word purchase or buy or sell
used in the terminology. So, as far as he was concerned,
you were buying one of these babies.

Speaker 4 (01:05:33):
Or adopting, you were adopting.

Speaker 1 (01:05:36):
Becupin, yes, you were adopting. But it's kind of a
little bit worse than that, because if the doll broke
and you sent it back to the manufacturer to be repaired,
and they went through quite a few different manufacturers over
the years, and it was beyond financial viability to actually
repair it. If it was not of economic sense to
repair it, they would send it back to the child

(01:05:58):
with its death certificate. Oh now that's pretty dark. But
the story that they came up with as a marketing
strategy for the dolls is really interesting because Xavier Roberts,
as a small child, finds his way through a waterfall
into cuts, his way through some brambles and some roots
and into a field full of cabbages, and emerging from

(01:06:19):
these cabbages are babies, and all of a sudden, these
things called bunny bees sprinkle crystals onto these cabbages. The
babies come to life and emerge from the cabbages, and
one of them says to Xavier Roberts, please save us
and find us homes to go to, or we're going
to have to go and work in the mines. Minus.

Speaker 4 (01:06:43):
This is this is a story. His name is Xavier Roberts.

Speaker 1 (01:06:47):
Xavier Roberts is the creator of the cabbage patch.

Speaker 3 (01:06:51):
And this is this is something that he said he
experienced in childhood.

Speaker 1 (01:06:56):
No, this is a story they put together as a
marketing strategy. So then the DoD dolls had a backstory.

Speaker 3 (01:07:03):
And that's interesting because I'm sorry to interrupt, but it
sounds a lot like the way you would engineer a
tulpa or a thought form is to give it this
incredible backstory and really flesh out what this thing is.
And the other part that's significant to me is how
legal ease the spiritual realm is. And now you have
this paperwork, this adoption paperwork, this death certificate paperwork. This

(01:07:28):
is I thought they just sawd these things on shelves
and that was the end of the that was the
end of it.

Speaker 4 (01:07:33):
It's a toy.

Speaker 1 (01:07:34):
Yeah, well that's ultimately what they were doing. But he
wouldn't allow the words sold or purchased or bought to
be used. He was very strict on that. You could
only adopt one. I mean, you weren't buying it in
the shop. But sure it was sort of making it
kind of it was normalizing adoption, but it was more
than that, because you were buying, you were paying, money

(01:07:56):
was changing hands. It was normalizing paying to adopt child,
which we know goes on. So what makes it even
stranger is that in the late eighteen hundreds, postcards became
very popular depicting babies being born from cabbages and they
were called meadow baby postcards, patch baby postcards. But more

(01:08:22):
sinister than that, they became known as repopulation postcards.

Speaker 6 (01:08:27):
Whoa.

Speaker 1 (01:08:28):
And then postcards came out showing babies for sale, and
you could buy babies in Paris, you could win a
baby in a raffle. Babies in the US were being
sent by post they were being mailed, and people were
people were buying them. There were, all of a sudden,
an incredible amount of babies out there. And then we
have the incubators at the World's Fairs and the incubator babies.

(01:08:53):
And the strange thing about the timing of those is
that you've got people investing a lot of time and
energy into saving the life of prems a premature babies
at exactly the same time that the American press are
reporting that they are overwhelmed with babies and orphans and
it's out of control. So why with that going on,

(01:09:14):
would you save the lives of babies that wouldn't have
naturally made it You're compounding the problem even further. And
I know it's clearly you know it's the right thing
to do, and I'm not disputing that. What I'm saying
is why would people go to extraordinary lengths to save
the lives of babies that wouldn't naturally have survived. So
the problem with too many babies out there becomes even higher,

(01:09:38):
and I think that that's that's part of the repopulation.
They were being told that the baby had died and
that they'd miscarried, and that wasn't the case. The baby
was actually moved on. It was it was shipped on
somewhere else, and you could buy them at the World's
Fairs as well, you could buy the babies that were Well.

Speaker 3 (01:09:57):
If you're suggesting that they're taking these babies from mothers
saying you miscarried, and then and then you know, taking
the baby elsewhere for what purposes.

Speaker 1 (01:10:10):
So they could repopulate certain areas.

Speaker 4 (01:10:13):
Oh so they're taking them from from other countries.

Speaker 1 (01:10:16):
Yeah, other countries. And this this still happens in Africa
at the moment. I'm sure it happens worldwide, but it
certainly still happens in Africa. My my wife is from
Tanzania and her grandmother was a matron, a midwife matron
and wrote a book on midwiffrey and said that every
now and again, and I'm not talking about every month

(01:10:38):
or so, I'm talking about during the day, every now
and again, someone would say tell them this one didn't
make it, and they were taken downstairs and then sent
somewhere else.

Speaker 3 (01:10:48):
Oh my god. That reminds me of what happened, what
allegedly happened during the Haiti earthquake. When you know it
leads a various nature from our country supposedly went there
and just and so among all of the chaos of
the earthquake. Yeah that so you know, there's this eight
point one I think it was or something like that

(01:11:08):
and Haiti, and it was this big push around the
world to pray for Haiti and to donate to Haiti.
And you would think that, you know, you would see
videos of people saying, oh my god, the destruction and
can you please help us?

Speaker 4 (01:11:21):
But among the chaos, there are videos.

Speaker 3 (01:11:23):
Emerging of mothers saying that they're taking our children. They're
coming down, they're saying they're here to help, and they're
taking our children. This is something that like, when you're
putting it into this perspective, it's like it never stopped.

Speaker 4 (01:11:37):
I think it begs a larger question.

Speaker 5 (01:11:39):
So you're talking about three billion people that died or
have gone unaccounted for in that time, in the timeframe
of like a doubling of the human population on Earth,
and then you're talking about these orphan trains and these
babies being redistributed to populate other areas. What happened to
those three billion people, Like these genocides are is something

(01:11:59):
that we don't know about.

Speaker 4 (01:12:01):
What is that?

Speaker 1 (01:12:02):
No, No, you can literally google it, so that the
people that died over the three point three billion people
that died during that one hundred year period, died through
civil war, natural causes, genocide, and famine. So these are
all documented cases of reported deaths.

Speaker 4 (01:12:25):
These are like research from.

Speaker 1 (01:12:26):
A population that was a fraction of the amount of
the people that died. So the numbers don't stack up.
And that's why I queried it. I queried it in
my second book, and I query it all the time
with people. How can you have a population of seven
hundred and seventy million which then doubles in one hundred years,
which is impossible even if you look. You know, even

(01:12:47):
if you consider taking every single person that can carry
a child and get them to reproduce, and even if
they had twins, you still can't get there. So to
double the population one hundred years is very difficult to achieve.
But to add on to it the three point three
billion people that died as well is impossible. So the

(01:13:09):
figures don't stack up. And this is why a lot
of people believe that actually what was going on was cloning,
that they were mass producing babies. And this is quite
well documented. Whether or not it took place, we don't know.
Did they have the technology, Yeah, probably, It's in the Bible,

(01:13:30):
isn't it. You know the story of Adam having a
rib removed, and let's just say that that story is
a metaphor. Great, it's a metaphor about how to clone
a human being. So it doesn't matter whether that story
took place or not. If that story in Genesis is
as old as we're led to believe, whoever wrote that
talked about the exact procedure you would go through to

(01:13:52):
replicate human life. Now, if we look at the story
of the Epic of Gilgamesh and the annunarchy Enki and
end Little creating us as a slave race to work
in the mines, or the Yella him creating us, then
human cloning appears to have been going on for a
very very long time. Now. You can believe it or

(01:14:13):
not believe it. We don't know for certain. Again, it's occulted,
isn't it. We don't know really what's going on and
what went before us. But all we do know is
the oldest scripture we have, the Epic of Gilgamesh, explains
it in fine detail. The Bible in Genesis says that
a rib was taken from Adam to create another life. Well,
that's human cloning, and it doesn't matter if it's a

(01:14:36):
metaphor or not. Whoever wrote that is describing the procedure.

Speaker 5 (01:14:41):
So are you familiar with I mean this. I know
you're not a fan of Elon, and neither am I.
But about a year ago he's going back and forth
with Kanye West on Twitter, or maybe more than a
year ago, I think, just as he bought Twitter, Kanye
saying all types of things that are crazy and you know,

(01:15:04):
off off the rails. Then he posts a picture of
the Nazi symbol within the Star of David. You know,
the triangle up, triangle down. It's a powerful symbol. But
he posts that and Elon goes, that's a that's a
step too far. You're off the platform, and he kicks them.
He kicks him off the platform. And I'm like, for that,
that was bizarre. It was no there was no context,

(01:15:25):
no anything. And then you look at the sign and
it's not necessarily just a swastika inside of the Star
of David, which would be offensive to like the layman,
because you're you're now you're combining you know, Judaism and
Nazi symbolism, but it's not that. It's the logo of
the Ralian cult and the really, yes, exactly so, and

(01:15:46):
I think Elon must does too, because that's almost like
appointing directly at Elon what what uh what Kanye did and.

Speaker 4 (01:15:54):
With what they were doing, you know, they're they're doing
like weird.

Speaker 5 (01:15:57):
Uh, they're banging the wives, which is always in a cult,
but they're they're also worshiping the elohem, which is you know,
that's your first red flag. But underneath all that, they
have a cloning company, and yeah, it's it's it's bizarre.
So you take that, and then I start to look
at Elon Musk a little bit more and a little deeper,

(01:16:17):
and the CEO of Neuralink, he's now he now has
how many two children with her?

Speaker 4 (01:16:22):
I think, so, yeah, two children.

Speaker 5 (01:16:24):
But the verbiage behind their relationship is not they're having
an affair. The verbiage is they have an arrangement. Yeah,
an agreement, and it's a financial agreement and a written
agreement on paper that she will have his child. And
we know that he's a fan of IVF, which is
not too far off from what cloning is. He's like

(01:16:45):
now selectively breeding. He's also choosing like random people online,
which are like you look at him and I'm.

Speaker 4 (01:16:51):
Like, this is the richest man in the world.

Speaker 5 (01:16:52):
These girls are not very attractive, but I'm like, why
are you now mating with this.

Speaker 4 (01:16:56):
One or that one?

Speaker 5 (01:16:58):
And it's like almost like selective reading, and I'm not
sure he's like doing it the regular way, it seems.

Speaker 3 (01:17:05):
And then Donald Trump, after they start to become, you know,
tied in together in such a big way, starts talking
about a government funded program for IVF. Right, this happened
like not very long ago, and it was like, oh,
this whole thing.

Speaker 5 (01:17:19):
Want to talk about like orphan trains, like about children
being taken from their parents and put on a train.
This is the technological this is the twenty first century
way of doing it. Because when you go through the
process of IVF, the mother produces I don't know, ten
eggs that may be viable, maybe fifteen, and the father
can produce millions of sperm. So theoretically with each parent,

(01:17:42):
each set of parents, you can have ten embryos. Let's
say eight of those are you know, viable. How many
children does this woman really want. Maybe they'll implant twins,
maybe they'll do three, four, five, So now we have
three left over, and you have these eggs that are frozen.
I mean, most of the they just freeze the entire
embryo after they've mixed it and they give you agreed.

Speaker 4 (01:18:04):
But they wouldn't use those They wouldn't use those there.

Speaker 5 (01:18:06):
And the government certainly wouldn't fund this and then say
this is our property. Now these are this is just
babies on trains that they have in Petrie dishes and
it's it's tuned to it's funded to the tune of
millions of dollars now billions of dollars from the US government.
We're in some strange times, but it's really just, you know,
nothing new under the sun.

Speaker 4 (01:18:25):
It's just looks a little different.

Speaker 1 (01:18:28):
Yeah, I mean Clonaid is a strange one because, as
you said, you know, he started this. Claude started this,
Orril started this movement, the radiant movement based upon the
Yello Him and considered himself to be a prophet. They
do expect that the yellow him are going to return
and yell him to me is the Anu Naki. They're

(01:18:48):
talking the same kind of language. The Clonaid appeared to
be alive and well they were based in the Bahamas,
but now I believe they're in Canada. They farm out there,
work to a facility in Mexico where the laws are
a lot more laxed regarding cloning, and they offer several services.

(01:19:10):
You know, they will make a duplicate you, they will
replace your lost children or loved ones. And they also
have something called Project Lazarus, which is memory transfer.

Speaker 3 (01:19:20):
Wow.

Speaker 1 (01:19:21):
So the thing with Adon Musk is quite strange because
I believe that he is a parasite what Ike would
refer to as a reptilian. And they do try to
reproduce as much as possible to keep their bloodline going,
and then they have children they can put into certain
key positions in organizations, governments and businesses. And I think

(01:19:44):
that that's fundamental. But it also could be connected to
blood type Blackstone or as they were once black Rock
bought ancestry dot Com. A lot of people have sent
their DNA off to ancestry dot com. Yeah, I did too,
I did it.

Speaker 3 (01:20:01):
I did it.

Speaker 4 (01:20:02):
They're beating my clothes ass underground right now.

Speaker 1 (01:20:05):
Well again, they may well be doing that. And Kanye
West has said the same, hasn't he? You know, Kanye
West has said it, Kevin Hart has said it, Britney
Spears has said it, and lots of people have come
out and said that they've been cloned. And you know,
as I said earlier on that if people don't believe
it's possible, then you need to never read Genesis again.

(01:20:26):
Forget the story of the Ela Him and the anarchy.
And let's go with us being some sort of mud
skipping you know, newt that crawled out of the crawled
out of the water and suddenly turned into us. Yeah right,
you know, I'm the perfect example of a Caucasian that's evolved.
Then why the bloody hell do I have hay fever

(01:20:47):
and burning the sun? Yeah?

Speaker 3 (01:20:49):
I have indigestion right now, tolerant.

Speaker 1 (01:20:53):
I really evolved to meet my environment, didn't I? But
Clonaid is interesting. Project Lazarus is.

Speaker 3 (01:21:01):
So bod has and if this is really associated with
the brilliant cool and let's say Elon is like, that's
a touchy subject. Maybe he's tied in somehow more than
we're aware of. Maybe he's not just inspired by them,
but maybe he's associated in some way.

Speaker 4 (01:21:16):
Shape or form Lazareth. Project Lazareth.

Speaker 3 (01:21:18):
You said, guy, that they have the ability to back
up memory, right, and and what have I.

Speaker 1 (01:21:23):
Been saying to that?

Speaker 3 (01:21:24):
Yeah, Well, there is this there's there's more than one account,
but there's one in specific that I'm aware of that
seems to be, in my opinion, an actual backup of
Elon Musk, of his personality, of of of his everything.
I mean, it's probably artificial intelligence. It has the ability

(01:21:44):
to operate independently of him, and to the extent that
he was in a live space with it and was
communicating with it, they sound exactly the same. And that
was the joke that they were making was, you know, oh,
people think that you're me. And and then the other one,
it's called Adrian Dittman, which by the way, means dark ruler.
I believe if you look at the breakdown of the

(01:22:05):
name Adrian, it talks about being of the lake of something,
and that lake translates to dark and then Dittman means ruler.
So dark ruler. Fascinating. But either way, the joke going
back and forth between them is that they sound exactly
the same speak with the exact same cadence, to the
extent that people think that it's his burner account or

(01:22:27):
his backup account. I don't think it's his backup account,
and I think he showed that by communicating with it.
At the same time on a live space. I think
it's his backup account. It's his own personality backed up
and then put on his own platform and operated by
artificial intelligence. That by the way, right now, guy, My
running theory is that they are trying to sort of
breathe this spark of life into artificial intelligence. And the

(01:22:52):
way that they're doing that is via old school Aleister
Crowley sex magic. Because they have now personified Grock into
a scantily clad AI avatar that certainly, you know, disenfranchised
men who are having trouble in the dating pool and
have a masturbation issue are going to you know, pardon

(01:23:14):
my language, but they're going to masturbate to this thing.
What happens when you get thirty thousand men masturbating to
an anime image of an AI. I think that it's
it we're looking at. We're looking at sex magic. So
I think there's there's something we're at the precipice of

(01:23:34):
something very strange. You know, I've been expanding that thought,
and I said, you know, you want to talk about
Project Lazarith.

Speaker 4 (01:23:40):
I've been Lazare.

Speaker 3 (01:23:43):
I've been saying that what they're going to do is
they're going to reanimate Elon's corpse.

Speaker 4 (01:23:47):
Let's say something tragic happens.

Speaker 5 (01:23:49):
Well, I mean this is a so you're talking about
n Time's prophecy, but he thinks that we're in the
uh truth.

Speaker 3 (01:23:56):
So well, it could be an emulation of it. It
could be a way to make us think or somewhere
in a timeline where we're.

Speaker 5 (01:24:01):
Not yeah, where do you put where do you put
that in the as far as the timeline goes, because
things seem to be playing out the way the Bible says.
But it's like, yeah, so you think it's a recreation.

Speaker 1 (01:24:12):
I think that that's exactly what they follow. I mean,
as I said right at the start, they've removed a
lot of the information, haven't they. Some of it's badly translated,
possibly on purpose. You mentioned God's earlier on that, you know,
the Old Testament, it's God's. It's plural, you know, make
them in our image, and then it becomes Lord at
some point, then it's singular. So yeah, I think that

(01:24:34):
they're playing it out. So the work of Anatoly Formenko,
he's a Russian professor, it's worth looking into. Lots of
people have looked at the falsification of our timeline, but Anatoly,
Foramenko is the one that perfected it. Even Einstein, before
he died, said the year is wrong, you know, none
of this stacks up. He suggests that eight hundred years

(01:24:58):
were added to our timeline, making the year now twelve
twenty five. So when New World Order began and the
end of the Old World, or what we call the
millennial Reign of Christ ended in seventeen seventy six, the
year would have been nine seven six. Now scholars believe
that Jesus was born in the year three BC, which
doesn't make a lot of sense, but there we go.

(01:25:19):
See if he was to reign for one thousand years
at nine seven six AD, you're not that far away
from that being achieved. We then enter Satan's Little Season,
where these bloodline families descendants from almen Rac and Couse Havoc,
introduced pornography, get us all drunk gambling money, passports licenses,

(01:25:41):
you need a license for this, registered for that. Restrictions
based upon US wars, genocide and later on medical interventions
and so on. That allegedly is a two hundred and
fifty year period, which should therefore end the fourth of
July next year.

Speaker 4 (01:26:01):
Huh, the fourth of jo then you would have.

Speaker 1 (01:26:04):
The second coming. He said he would return when he
didn't go until if you follow Anatoly for Manko, and
anybody who's interested in the timeline and the falsification of
a timeline should look at Anatoly for Manko's work before
it's dismissed, because it stacks up and I spent five

(01:26:24):
years looking at it, so we.

Speaker 3 (01:26:27):
Guy, that's that's a departure from what I'm typically hearing.
And albeit I'm not entirely immersed in the little season theory,
but they typically don't say that we are actually going
to that that that we're going to see the second Coming?

Speaker 1 (01:26:42):
Right? Is it?

Speaker 4 (01:26:43):
Isn't that? Isn't that not what they say? Or maybe
I'm misunderstanding something.

Speaker 5 (01:26:46):
So do you mean not not just the second Coming?
Are you talking about like the I guess because the
second Coming would would have been the the rapture? You're
talking about the actual final like New Jerusalem stuff. Is
that where you're yeah, and you put July fourth on it.

Speaker 1 (01:27:03):
That's interesting, Yeah, but that's not me. That's people that
have researched this far far more intensively than I have.
I'm more interested in the timeline falsification and for me,
following the millennial Reign of Christ. Satan's Little Season is
only something I've been looking at for the last few years.
Anatoly for Meenko's work, I've been looking at at a

(01:27:26):
long longer. But but what I found was once I
got the timelines in my head from looking at Anatoly
Formenko's work, I started to then see correlations with people.
I mean, I'm going back a few years here that
would correct me. I would talk about Tartaria on Facebook
for my old account before I was banned, and people

(01:27:48):
would often correct me and say, you know, you talk
about Tartaria, that's a region you're referring to the millennial
reign of Christ. And the more I dug, the more
I could see that they were right. That is what
we're talking talking about. So, you know, and I believe
that thirty three was a metaphor that Jesus died at
thirty three. I believe that was actually the death of

(01:28:08):
his ego. That there were because you know, he had
he'd been enlightened. We know that allegedly, we know that
he'd studied, you know, the Great Library of Alexandria that
he went to Tibet and studied all sorts of alternative
practices I suppose where he was looking at plants and

(01:28:32):
things like cannabis, aiahuascar, those kind of things, meditation and
so on, and came back and healed. So I think
that him dying on a crucifix at thirty three is
really a metaphor, because if you consider he didn't actually
break any Roman laws that would justify him being crucified
to start with. So the more that I was sort

(01:28:52):
of pushed into this sort of you're talking about Tartaria,
but actually you're referring to the millennial in Christ, the
more I started look and the more it started to
make sense. And then people were saying, well, you know,
it does prophesize that he will return, but I don't
believe he left. I think that that was relatively recently,

(01:29:12):
that would have been nine seven six AD. How he
returns in what way? Is it actually physically him or
is it just the ethos, the power, the unity, that
way of thinking. You know, are we talking about beings
what we may refer to as angels. You know, I

(01:29:34):
don't know in what shape or form. Nobody can possibly
know that there'll be people that argue that they do know,
but of course we can't. Possibly nobody can possibly know
what's what's going to happen. But yeah, that's kind of
the further I dug with Tartaria. The more people were
telling me that I'm talking about them, Malni, Ironic Christ

(01:29:54):
and of course Joe Telford, who you talked about earlier. JT.
He's someone that I talked to quite a lot. I've
been on his show, he's been on my show, and
we talk all the time about this, and the more
he's shared information with me, the more it all aligns.
But what is going to happen when Satan's little season's

(01:30:14):
over and who's going to be sat at the top table?
I don't know, No.

Speaker 3 (01:30:21):
You can. I would be interested in having you back
on to talk about the the disruption of the timeline specifically,
because it does seem to me that you know, people
talk about the ineffectiveness of the Gregorian calendar and all
these different things, and so it does. And then I

(01:30:41):
think in Ethiopia they're still operating off of a different calendar.

Speaker 4 (01:30:45):
I forget what that is, but it does.

Speaker 1 (01:30:50):
Do as well. The Jewish calender is different, so you
have buildings in America that have the wrong date on
you know, I've included them in my first book, photographs
of them. There's a building in Scotland where they forgot
to go along and add a one to the front
of it. We were in Portugal two weeks ago. We
went to a cemetery and there was there was a

(01:31:14):
tomb where they'd forgot to add the one on the
front of it. The year was eight nine to three.
Well it wasn't over a thousand years old, It's what
I was looking at. So every now and again they
get it wrong. There are buildings all over the world
where they forgot to add an M or a one
in front. And the statue of Liberty, as I said

(01:31:35):
right at the beginning, if you look where it's holding
the book, the statue is holding the book, you know,
the Declaration of Independence. Look at the M, the first M.
It is completely out of alignment. And this has been
done so many times. There are so many graves and
buildings out there that don't have the first digit. And
this aligns with Anatoli Fimenko, and he believed that certain

(01:31:58):
periods of time were introduced to give us a backstory,
so they'll throw in the Dark Ages and the Middle
Ages where nothing really happened for a very long time,
just to bolster it up. But yeah, it's Anatoly Fimenko.
People that are interested needs to be looking at it,
and it's fascinating because his works very intense. But anybody

(01:32:23):
who's interested in whether or not our timeline, whether or
not we are in twenty twenty five right now, needs
to at least consider doing a little bit of homework
on him and his work.

Speaker 3 (01:32:35):
Well, that, like I said, would be a fascinating conversation
have in the future.

Speaker 1 (01:32:37):
Before.

Speaker 3 (01:32:37):
It strikes me as obvious that if you wanted to
keep us in the dark, which they do quite often,
they're obviouskating history, that the timeline and our understanding of
where we are would be a pretty effective tool.

Speaker 5 (01:32:49):
Well, that's like we were talking about the insane asylums,
and it's the same idea with April Fools. Like that
came about because April first was the beginning of the
New year, and then that changed people who wouldn't adhere
to it. We're called April Fools and it's just a
smear campaign, yeah done, you know, to change people's mind.
So it's not it's the same techniques used over and

(01:33:10):
over again. It's a bit discouraging but kind of hilarious
because I don't think they work well anymore.

Speaker 4 (01:33:15):
Well, it almost does. I mean, you know we're even still.

Speaker 3 (01:33:18):
I know we've taken it back right, But conspiracy theorists
is a terminology coined by the CIA to smear people
who suspected that JFK was killed by more nefarious and
more complicated means than the official narrative. And so yeah,
they do that over and over again. Huh.

Speaker 4 (01:33:33):
They just kind of a lot of fun. It works
really well.

Speaker 3 (01:33:36):
Listen, we're at the hour and a half mark, guy,
we have to wrap it up, but this has been
a fascinating conversation. One more time for the audience. Where
where can they find your work? You've got a pretty
substantial body of work there, But.

Speaker 1 (01:33:47):
Right now they can find it on my website, which
is the Tartarian Empire dot co dot UK. But I
have a funny feeling within the next few years they'll
have to find me in an asylum somewhere. A lot
up for disinformation, misinformation. But yeah, while I'm still out
here and able to walk around the Tartarian mPire dot

(01:34:10):
co dot uk and there are links on there if
they want to, and I put blogs on there. I
put some things on there that I can't really put
on face. But because I've been banned from everywhere, I'm
demonetized from YouTube. I've been banned three times from face with,
banned from Instagram, banned from Twitter, and I've never said
anything other than shared information. So you know, I don't

(01:34:33):
put on their think and I'm very careful what words
I use as well.

Speaker 3 (01:34:37):
Yeah, yeah, Well we have to run everything through an
AI filter that sensors keywords so that we don't trip
up the AI algorithm that's searching for us on Twitter.

Speaker 4 (01:34:48):
You have to stay being there their radar.

Speaker 5 (01:34:50):
It only lasts for so long until they until you know, listen,
you're talking about a dangerous subject and you're pointing directly
at the people that are offiscating the truth.

Speaker 4 (01:34:59):
So I think we.

Speaker 5 (01:35:00):
All have a little bit of a you know, a
shelf life.

Speaker 3 (01:35:04):
Well, you know, I do a guy before we wrap
it up, Guy, We're we're circling the drain on harrowing
information right all times. This is a little bit disheartening,
it can be. I want to ask you, though, are
you are you having fun.

Speaker 1 (01:35:23):
Oh, that's a difficult one.

Speaker 5 (01:35:26):
I love that every time we asked, we we love
to end it and ask ask our guests that, and
they always.

Speaker 4 (01:35:30):
Go, it's a heavier question than we ever anticipate.

Speaker 1 (01:35:35):
Yeah, every every day somebody asks me because a lot
of information that I put in my books I cannot
put on social media. I can't even put on my website.
And people say to me our friendship books, how do
you sleep at night carrying this information around? And none
of it is none of it is just you know,
I don't just say blah blah blah. I think this.

(01:35:56):
My books include information where I got the information, from
the date the bloody information was printed. You know, it's
all there. How can you carry this around with you
and sleep at night?

Speaker 5 (01:36:07):
You know?

Speaker 1 (01:36:08):
Your world must be pretty grim? And I always say
the same thing. And this came from me to me,
from somebody called Max Egan. I don't know if you
know of Max Egan, but he was the person that
introduced me to Tartaria. And he said, brother, if you
can wake one person up, you might just have saved
a life. And that's a good enough reason to smile.

(01:36:31):
But every now and again, someone says to me, if
you hear something late at night or someone outside, do
you think they come in and get you? I say
the same thing.

Speaker 4 (01:36:41):
Yeah, there we go, There we go. Thank you guy.

Speaker 3 (01:36:47):
It's been a wonderful conversation. Until next time.

Speaker 5 (01:36:51):
That's right, guys, until next time, don't forget to obey, submit,
and comply with your tartarian overlords.

Speaker 2 (01:37:00):
The great hymnatist on Platter is a top locked box
in the corner of the rooms and is constantly telling
us what to believe is real during the sweet what
they've seen their eyes, what there is to see, because
they in the face.

Speaker 1 (01:37:19):
Of a position to trust the pic and they have

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}190: Tartaria, Cabbage Patch Kids & Cloning w/ Guy Anderson

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

190: Tartaria, Cabbage Patch Kids & Cloning w/ Guy Anderson

Stuff You Should Know