May 21, 2025 • 62 mins
Do you understand how networking works in C#? Carl and Richard chat with Chris Woody Woodruff about his new book on networking with C#. Chris runs down the fundamentals of networking and then discusses the different approaches readily available in the C# world, including web sockets, gRPC, SignalR, and many more! The conversation also turns to the upcoming QUIC standards built into HTTP/3 that should simplify networking. Sure, you could go with the defaults, but why not explore all the options!
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
How'd you like to listen to dot net rocks with
no ads? Easy? Become a patron for just five dollars
a month. You get access to a private RSS feed
where all the shows have no ads. Twenty dollars a month,
we'll get you that and a special dot net Rocks
patron mug. Sign up now at Patreon dot dot NetRocks
(00:21):
dot com. We'll get down rock and roll. It's dot
net Rocks. I'm Carl Franklin and I'm Richard Cavell, and
it's gonna be a good show. Chris Woody Woodruff is
(00:41):
here with us, but before we talk to him, I
need to talk to you, Richard. What's up? You know,
this is the show that comes out during build. So
how is your build? Oh it's wonderful.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
Yeah, you were having a great You've been having a
great time. I think you're flying back on Thursday, too,
so you should be in the air at this particular moment.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
That's right. I need to fly back a little bit
early because my daughter is having a graduation party for
her masters So that's awesome. Well, and it looks like
Thursday's only a half day anyway, now, so yeah, not
a big deal. Well, this party is going to involve
lots of smoked meats.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Well, that's one of my favorite kinds of party.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
Yeah, I've got something interesting for Better Know a Framework,
So let's roll the crazy music. All right, man, hit me? Yeah,
aspnut Corp dot Diagnostics dot health checks. Oh no, not again.
(01:38):
Are you actually doing the framework on Better Know a framework? Well,
it's not really a framework. It's a it's a third
party thing. It's oh, it's okay, it's as a get
up repo. Yeah, enterprise health checks for asp net Corp
diagnostics package. But that's awesome if you scroll down, like
when you look at all of the things that it's about,
(01:59):
all the package, just that it supports. It's like everything everything. No, wow,
but it's only just asp dot net corey toly yeah Toly,
But I mean, how unhealthy can core get? Yeah, so
it's it's too much for me to explain. I mean,
it's basically that's what it is. It's health checks but nice.
(02:22):
But it supports everything, so it's cool. I'm not going
to read the list. It's a long list. Check it out. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:29):
But yeah, all right, you don't you a more importantly,
you don't have to write this stuff. Somebody's already built
a repository. It's got a bunch of contributors.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
Yep.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
So it's not up on nine yet. It's still dot
net eight. But who knows. By the time you hear
this than they I've already got it.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
I've already got it. I can see the issue in
there being worked. So that's a good sign. Yep, good stuff. Awesome, No,
learn it, love it. Hey. Richard who's talking to us today.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Grabbed a show off of episode nineteen forty six, the
one we do with Elias Pirnin when we were talking
about audio, video and dot net, and this comment comes
from Kurt Nichols who said, it's just a few weeks ago.
He said, for what it's worth, Marshall dot alec h global,
which is something that we talked about on the show.
For doing dealing with video stuff is unmanaged memory allocation.
(03:13):
Unmanage memory is not involved in garbage collection, does not
move within the address space, and does not need to
be pinned, and span of tea is very handily for
manipulating a native buffer. If you're doing things like this,
consider implementing a safe handle that is safe handle zero
minus one is invalid for releasing the allocation. So actually
a very important clarification. And once again here we are
(03:34):
talking about old school yeah sockets and stuff, you know,
managed versus unmanaged behavior. Elias also responded to that comment.
He said, Span of Tea is awesome and this safe
and then I asked, this safe handle take care of
the allocation too, or just provide a wrapper of sorts
for the life cycle stuff and it just provides the rapper.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
You have to deal with your own allocations. Cool.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
So, Kurt, thank you so much for your comment in
a coffee. Music cod by on its way to you,
and if you'd like a copy of music go buy.
I right a comment on the website at dot net
rocks dot com or on Facebook, So publish every show
there and if you comment there and I reading on
the show, we'll send you copy of music to go buy.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
Music two code my is still going strong, twenty two tracks.
I listened to it all the time still when I'm coding,
and you can download it well yeah, penny for it
of course, but you can get it at music to
code by dot net. You can get the collection in
MP three flack or wave or all three if you want.
(04:29):
Nice hey knock yourself out.
Speaker 3 (04:30):
I have a done DVD, not DVD CD.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Yeah, that's right, school. Yeah, you burned it to CDR.
Speaker 1 (04:39):
I love that. No, no, no no. When I came
out with it, you actually made a CD.
Speaker 3 (04:44):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
Yeah, so you have production CDs I have. I did.
That was the whole uh kickstarter. That also speaks to
the idea that Chris has a working CD player, which
is shocking to me. It is shocking to me too.
Speaker 3 (04:58):
I have a couple my kids have CD players because
they like to play my old CDs.
Speaker 1 (05:05):
I just bought a new car at VW Atlas and
it does not have a CD player in it, but
it has everything else. Yeah, just to just be key
in somewhere, yeah, sort of. Before that was Chris Woody
woodrowf our guest. But before I introduce him, let's talk
about nineteen fifty one. All right, where do you want
(05:26):
to go? So nineteen fifty one is the show number,
and so what we've been doing is highlighting what happened
that year. Major events include the continuation of the Korean War,
which we talked about last week, the Treaty of San Francisco,
which formerly ended the Pacific War with Japan, and the
beginnings of the Cold War with the Rosenberg Trial, also
(05:48):
the Schumann Plan. Six nations agreed to pool European coal
and steel resources, which was a precursor to the European Union. Yeah,
and let's see, that's the easy Cupean Eecy economic cooperation
is the beginning of that. In Libya gained independence from Italy.
I don't know if people knew that that Libya was
(06:10):
once part of Italy. Right, and then you sort of
actually mentioned the Rosenberg Trials. That's when supposedly the Rosenbergs
leaked the plans for the atomic bomb to the Soviets. Yeah,
not good.
Speaker 3 (06:21):
No.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
Technological advancements included the first transcontinental television broadcast, the introduction
of the first commercial color TV broadcast, and the first
direct dial telephone service. So up until then you had
to call an operator, yeah, to get a call put
through it. And how could we forget that UNIVAC one
was delivered by Remington Rand.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
It wasn't actually delivered. There's a great story here. Oh
it's cool. So UNIVAC one the very first one he
gets sold to the Census Bureau, right, and that's the
one that comes that's available in nineteen fifty one, and
so the sense they do this big thing in March
of fifty one about hey, so the first computer is
going to say sypua da da da da da. The
party's over now, It's like, okay, it's time to deliver this.
(07:04):
And I'm like, listen, it's the only one we got.
We kind of wanted to use it as a demo unit,
and we're afraid to take it apart in case it
doesn't go back together again.
Speaker 3 (07:12):
Oh man.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
So the second one was actually for the Pentagon, and
that one they install at the Pentagon the same year.
They don't actually get up the nerve until they build
a couple more. They don't get up a nerve to
take apart the demo model and move it to the
census Buro till the end of the year. And this
thing is this the one that took up the city block. Well,
it wasn't quite that big, but it is big. But
(07:34):
the UNIVAC console, if you ever go look at this,
it's what you think of when you think of old
school computer. It's the great, big black panel with all
the switches and the knobs and stuff on it. Like
there's no CRTs at this point, right, we're ahead of
all of that, right.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
What more important invention from nineteen fifty one, which is
this is the year that Bell Labs announces what they
call the grown junction transistor. So this is shockly you know,
the Bell Labs they had the point contact transistor, is
trying to develop an easier to make transistor, although it's
still not real easy to make, right. And what he's
(08:07):
doing is that he's melting semiconductor germanium as making into
a liquid it's very fairly high temperature, and then pulling
that out as a single crystal. And that the geranium
is actually doped, so there's a little bit of antimony
in it as well. That makes it what they call
an N type semiconductor. Why antimony, Because geranium has if
(08:31):
you go look at your periodic table and I know
you have one, it's right over there, has four outer
electrons on its outer electron shell, which is what makes
it a semiconductor, and antimony has five. So in the
natural crystal forming process, when all those electrons will lock
in with other ones, the doping material ends up with
(08:52):
a free electron and that makes it and type stepping conductor. Wow,
So you're drawing out the single crystal germanium. And about
Chris and I, our mouths are just hanging open here.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
We're just like, what the heck.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
So now you're literally talking in thousands of an inch,
but you're pulling a single crystal of this N type
geranium out of the liquid and as it's forming, it's
only going to be you know, maybe a quarter inch
long the whole thing. But as it's forming, you put
a droplet of P type on it, which is geranium
doped with gallium. And then you've cut off the crystal
(09:28):
and now you have to weld gold wires to it.
But you now have an N type rob with a
P type mount in the center of it. So you're
making an NP N transistor.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
Somebody had to have a wild imagination to be able
to say, hey, if we did this, what would happen?
Speaker 2 (09:44):
But this is how semiconductors. And again now now that
they've described a process to get idea of how expensive
these transistors were, like they were basically not commercially viable, right,
but that they worked and they were stabler even though
they were essentially handmade. Then the other types, although interestingly
in nineteen fifty one as well, ge and RCA because
(10:05):
that was Bell lads who were just talking about announced
a different kind of transistor called an alloyjunction transistor. So
here what they did was they made a geranium crystal
which was also dope with n antimony, so it was
ND type, and then they fused droplets of indium doped
gallium on each side of it to make what is
now known as a p NP transistor instead of an
(10:28):
NPN transistor. Was it cheaper, It was a little easier
to make, but not a lot easier to make, but
it also worked. It was faster to form because he
didn't have to actually draw a single crystal. At the
same time, all of these things become obsolete by nineteen sixty, right,
But there were stepping stones when the Planner. Yeah, when
the Planner transistor comes along because the planet, which is
(10:50):
actually a way to mass manufacturer transistors. Although there were
lower quality, they were cheap. And that was made by
fair Child Semiconductor, which was the company formed out of
Shockley's company that was formed to create these things. And
Shockley was a bit of a character, not a nice
man at all, and he called those eight that laughed
to form share Child the traitorous eight, though most of
(11:12):
those guys would go on to form a third company,
you know.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
As Intel Intel. That's it. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (11:19):
You know.
Speaker 1 (11:19):
The thing that I know is that scientists, I think
it was in the fifties, found that if you group
two helium adams close enough together that they would actually laugh.
Yeah he he helium fusion. Is that what we're talking about? Okay, okay,
all right, all right, well that's all I got. All Right,
(11:40):
we're here to talk about dot net and I think
c sharp networking with Chris Woody Woodriff, So let me
introduce him. Chris Woodriff is a seasoned software developer with
a career that spans before the dot com boom, kind
of like us. He specializes in enterprise web development, cloud solutions,
and software analytics, is on API design and scalable architectures,
(12:02):
and is recognized as a Microsoft MVP and dot net
and web development. He's also a dedicated mentor, instructing courses
for aspiring tech professionals and speaking at international conferences on
database development, web APIs, and software architecture. Woody co hosts
the Breakpoint Show podcast and has previously led engineering teams
(12:25):
at Rocket Homes and Driven Developer relations at Rocket Mortgage.
His consulting work has benefited companies like Apartments dot Com
and Major League Baseball Advanced Media, right MLB.
Speaker 3 (12:37):
MLB Advanced Media.
Speaker 1 (12:41):
Yeah, they're a offshoot, all right, but it is Major Baseball,
not something else. Okay. Woody enjoys bourbon. And I know
this because he is the guy that introduced I think
Richard and myself to Blanton's maybe maybe definitely introduced me.
I don't know about Richard.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
Yeah, I take bourbon everywhere with me when we go
to conferences.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
Yeah, and he enjoys writing about his experience at Woodrift
dot dev outside of tech. You cannect with them on
Blue Sky at Woodrift dot dev in Macedon at Macedon
dot Social Slash at c Woodrift. I can't believe we've
never had you on the show before. We've talked to you.
Kind of embarrassing, isn't it talked to you so many
times at all these conferences going back years.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
Yeah, it just it just never happened. It's okay. It
takes time, yeah, you know what. You know what, like bourbon,
it takes time to take time for for something a
good thing to come out.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
So okay, I'll take that, but yep, we're sorry.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
Yeah, no problem.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
Well, like a Pappy twenty three.
Speaker 3 (13:45):
Well, back in the day, we had a competing podcast,
you know we were doing. I was on deep Fried Bites.
Speaker 1 (13:53):
Yeah yeah, I remember. So I never considered you guys competition.
Speaker 3 (13:57):
I know. It was never all friendly. We're all friendly.
Speaker 1 (14:01):
Yeah, so I do remember deep Fried Bites good stuff.
Speaker 3 (14:04):
Yeah yeah so yeah.
Speaker 1 (14:08):
Speaking of bourbon, I have a an unopened bottle of
Pappy van Winkle twenty three year old, still unopened. It's
still unopened. It's in a safe.
Speaker 3 (14:18):
Richard hasn't seen it yet. Huh.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
Well no, when I got this batch and then I
promise we'll talk about C sharp networking. When I got
this batch, it included a fifteen year old which I
gave Richard for his birthday, which has been drank and
it has it was drunk pretty quickly after I gave
it to you.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
I think, listen, I do not collect whiskey. I drink whiskey.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
Yeah yeah. So my brother's a doctor, so he buys
the uh Pappy in the family. But I do have
to say my first bottle of good bourbon was George T.
Stag Love It four two thousand and four and I
was living in Lexington at the time, and uh, one
(15:07):
of the guys in my church was a sales guy
for Buffalo Trace and said, hey, do you want a bottle?
And it was like forty five dollars or something, this
before Bourbon exploded. So yeah, And how that bottle got
killed was my brother in law. I saw him mixing
(15:29):
it with diet coke the last ounce or two. So yeah, yeah,
oh that broke my heart.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
It's just it's shameful.
Speaker 3 (15:39):
And I could feel everyone listening.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Just keep I keep a bottle of Maker's Marker. It's
like here, just go ahead, put your coke in this.
Speaker 3 (15:46):
Yeah. Yeah, I always have a cheap bottle like Beam
or something around. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:52):
So but yeah, nothing wrong with that. Well anyway, yeah,
you were the first one that introduced me to Blant
and said, have you ever had Blants? If you like
Makers mark you know, because it's weeded, it's weeded like Makers,
and I think it's better. And then it shortly thereafter
became very hard to find. And now that there was
(16:14):
a flood at Buffalo Trace, So do you know the
status of that? Are they are they back to production?
Speaker 3 (16:21):
Yeah? It only took them a week to get back
to production. And all of the barrels that were submerged
or partially submerged in water, they actually sold because they
couldn't bottle them, so they actually sold them to collectors.
(16:41):
And I hear people are going to like bottle them
and sell them or you know, like orphan barrel. You know, sure,
orphan barrel came out. I think it's supposed to be
kind of like that. But no, they were back up
pretty quick.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
That's good.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
Yeah, yeah, so because the water directed quickly. But you
know that Pappy warehouse on the on the Buffalo Trace property,
it's on there. It's half underground, so I'm sure that
must have filled up with water. Yeah yeah, and then
they they did, you must have lost a lot.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
You know. They had the story where they were digging
for a new a new rick house.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
A rick house is where they store the barrel, right,
and and found the old old old distillery.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
And they found the old old like before, like the original.
She's distilled, and I think that's still underwater. I think
they're trying to pump out water in that.
Speaker 1 (17:37):
But such a shame, but yeah, yeah it is. Okay,
So we're here to talk about C sharp networking. And
this is a topic near and dear to my heart,
but only because many many, many, many many years ago
I wrote a book on socket's programming and visual Basic.
And it was even before visual Basic had a really
(18:00):
stable windsock control. I was actually using a third party
control because it was working better. I caught some flack
over that, but coming from serial communications programming before that,
which was a nightmare. The you know, the the TCP
(18:20):
IP stack and windsock on top of that was like
a dream come true. So I know, I know that
you do cover sockets in your your online book on
c sharp networking, but it's a vast topic and I
don't know where do you want to start.
Speaker 3 (18:33):
I don't know we can start why, Like why did
I write? I mean, people ask like, why do you
write a book right these days when everything's online and.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
Most people also don't care about the low level programming stuff.
Give me an HDP client, you know, give me some
poll exactly, and that's it.
Speaker 3 (18:53):
Well, and in the second half of the book, so
the book is kind of broken up into two parts.
The first part is all the fundamental stuff that I
think people should know. Maybe they don't need to use
it every day, but you should understand like what the
(19:14):
dot net framework abstracts away. And then the second half
I go through all the different types of network communications.
So I talk about like rest APIs and web sockets
and MQTT and gr PC and message queueing and stuff.
(19:36):
But what the most the most fun I had in
writing the book was the fundamental stuff because I love HTTP,
Like I've actually read the full protocol and I don't
think anyone should. I just kind of did it to
(20:00):
to do it because I was so interested. I mean,
I've done conference talks where I just talk about HTTP,
and so that got me interested in this, and I
was like, man, I really want to dig down into
this and get something out so people can know a
(20:21):
little bit more about what it really takes to communicate
between two computers.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
You wanted to inhabit the ghost of Tim berners Lee.
Speaker 3 (20:31):
Sure, yes, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
It also occurs to me here that if you're trying
to to side on a particular connection process through any
one of these APIs, through MQTT ORGRPC and so forth,
at least knowing them all in context so that you
can make a more informed decision. Yeah, yeah, I mean
most of the time we don't care much about networking
because the defaults are good enough, but sometimes they're not.
Speaker 3 (20:55):
Well, here's the thing. I mean. You have to know
about about asickerness, so I have a chapter on async.
When it's related to networking. You have to know about
multi threading, so I have a chapter on multi threading
(21:16):
in relations to networking. And down the line error handling,
data serialization, error handling, and fault tolerance. So you were
talking about Polly, I have a chapter on Polly that.
You know what, most people when they write their servers
(21:37):
and their clients never think about fault tolerances, never think
about what happens if I don't get anything back from
the other side. And you should.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
Absolutely, yeah, and just lifting a error is not enough.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
I mean the whole thing with Polly, and not to
plug your thing more, Carl, But I'm pluging your thing more.
But it's like, listen, there's a bunch of things you
could do, but you shouldn't write any of that because
it's written for you. Just go get the poly library
and you'll be fine.
Speaker 1 (22:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (22:05):
Yeah, there's there's lots of patterns to Polly that that
will solve a lot of your problems.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
Or just use the HDP Client Factory, which is sort
of Polly under it, but it's easier.
Speaker 3 (22:16):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, And and Microsoft has come out with
their own Polly like like you said, so you don't
have to use Polly. I still think Polly is has
lots of edge cases that it covers. So it's it's
I think a little more breadth.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Yeah. So and also you know, it's it's good to understand.
For me, it was really good to understand just pure
windsock programming, pure sockets. Right, I have a client, I
have a server. Client connects to the server. That connection
stays open until one of them closes it, and so
during that time you can send and receive at the
(23:01):
same time asynchronously over that socket. And uh, but then
you quickly realize when you want to go to use this,
Oh I what if I, you know, want to define
some message that I want to send and have the
server understand it. Well, now how do I do that?
So now you've got to think about protocols and if
(23:23):
you're both not if both sides aren't using the same protocol,
hilarity ensues. You know, it's like pulling up to the
drive through and uh, you know Wendy's and can I
help you? And you say, yeah, I want to make
a deposit. Yeah right, what what are you talking about?
Speaker 3 (23:39):
Yeah? Yeah, And that comes down to when you open
up a socket. There's really there's three types of protocols
that that you get. You get uh TCP, you get UDP,
and you can do your own you can have your
own custom protocol like do whatever wild things that you want.
(24:02):
Right and for a long time, I mean, most people
use TCP, but if you're streaming video or streaming audio,
UDP is the way to go. It's a much better
protocols the last week and.
Speaker 1 (24:15):
See, yes, because TCP has error checking built in and
delivery guaranteed delivery basically exactly exactly so. And the thing
that a lot of people don't understand is routers and
TCP IP routers, and the whole protocol was built to
a stand nuclear war yep, dark now. It was built
so that, hey, if one set of routers goes down
(24:38):
in the network, we'll just find our way around.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
Yeah yeah, which it still does to this day. You
don't even think about the fact that, yeah still does.
Undersea cables go down on a routine basis and most
people can barely tell.
Speaker 1 (24:50):
Yeah, exactly, and we just find another way around.
Speaker 3 (24:53):
Richard, when you were talking about transistors, I was really
thinking when you said in the sixties, but really what
made transistors so cheap? And uh is really the space program,
which is another government I mean they had to mentorize
to be clear.
Speaker 1 (25:11):
Fairchild Semiconductor's original business was building navigation systems for i CBMs.
Speaker 3 (25:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
Yeah, and they needed to make the integrated circuit to
get that system down to be small enough and robust
enough to survive a launch into space.
Speaker 3 (25:25):
Exactly.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
Yeah. When life and death are on the line, you know,
we get innovative.
Speaker 3 (25:29):
Yep, yep. And you know what, we have the Internet too,
and it's it's cool. I really love. I mean I
was programming when I was a kid with nothing I had.
I couldn't afford a modem, I couldn't afford the long
distance phone calls. So when I got to university, man,
(25:53):
I had so much fun, right because this weird thing
called Mosaic showed up on the on the Unix on
our solarist machines.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
That's one of the first web browsers.
Speaker 3 (26:05):
Yeah, it was. It was the first web browser mosaic.
Speaker 1 (26:09):
I also remember Cello. You remember Cello?
Speaker 3 (26:11):
Remember Cello?
Speaker 1 (26:12):
It was ninety three something like that.
Speaker 3 (26:14):
Yep. And I remember Gopher before yes, before uh, the Internet,
we were using Gopher for lots of research and stuff.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
So Gopher is a very simple folder based protocol that
instead of having websites, you have Gopher sites and you'd
get a basically a menu of folders and you could,
you know, trans you know, navigate down. There was no
search or anything. You have to know where it was.
But if somebody published a paper in a published papers folder,
(26:47):
you know, and you you basically had a URL to
it and you can download it anywhere. And I used
to use Gopher for boy, this is going back, but
one of the first talks I did on the Internet
was ges satellite imaging Gopher server. And I can't remember
where it was. It was in California somewhere, but it
(27:09):
would their computers would download satellite images every five minutes
and populate these Gopher servers. And so here I am
doing a talk at vibits on the Live Internet and
I show this you know Pacific, because I was in
California and San Francisco. I showed a picture over the
Pacific and there was like this huge, huge storm cloud
(27:33):
coming and it was only five minutes ago that this
thing was posted, and people like ran out of the room. Yeah,
suddenly nobody cares about your talk anymore exactly. But the
power went out, like you know, and we were stranded
in the hotel for a while, like you know that,
and all people didn't know until they were unless they
were at my talk. Yeah that it was going to happen.
Speaker 3 (27:55):
But that really shows that computers really didn't become a
thing until they were connected, right, I mean modems back
in the eighties where you would go to the well
or the well was kind of a.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
Bb BBS site.
Speaker 3 (28:16):
BBS in San Francisco that all and I would have
loved to have connected to that because it would have
been cool to meet to talk to people that were connected.
But like, yeah, it's back then. Long distance calls were expensive.
Speaker 2 (28:34):
And it cost money and everything. And that's what's the
big deal for the Internet, right, was that, Yeah, suddenly
the distance didn't matter. Everything was already connected. But yeah,
we had our bbs is in Vancouver.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
Yes, now we're all reminiscing and yeah, but welcome to
three guys Talk about technology and it doesn't exist anymore,
I know, but it's good for the young ins to
know that. You know, this is kind of your pedigree,
this is where all this stuff came from.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
Yeah, and I'm just trying to share. I'm just trying
to pay it forward. I'm trying to give a little
bit back because I got a lot of help twenty
twenty five years ago. I mean, I'm all I think
this December. I know, I've been working professionally for thirty
(29:22):
years now. Yeah, time flies. I banged my head against
the wall so much that all my hair fell out.
That was back in the nineties when there wasn't really
any good internet connections and what like. You didn't you
couldn't ask chat, GPT, how like write some code to
(29:45):
do this, or even even go the stack overflow. But
I think we're going off, We're going off into everything.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
Well, well, that's okay, We're going to take a quick
break when we come back. Here's a question you can
think about, what are some of the and gems and
networking that people may not know about? And you can
answer that question right after these very important messages. We'll
be right back. Did you know there's a dot net
on aws community, follow the social media blogs, YouTube influencers,
(30:17):
and open source projects, and add your own voice. Get
plugged into the dot net on aws community at aws
dot Amazon dot com, slash dot net. And we're back.
It's dot NetRocks. I'm Carl, that's Richard Hey, and Chris Woody.
Woodruff is here. And before the break I asked them
(30:38):
to think about this. What are some of the hidden
gems in networking that people may not know about and
then typically go unnoticed.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
Yeah. I think one thing is we hit upon this
subject in the first half of the show, which is
fault tolerance and learning how to get your network back
communication back up and running so and that uses poly
and and some other different technologies and frameworks. And the
(31:14):
other one is you really have to For me, I
think it comes down to understanding what the best protocols
and frameworks to use. So so many people just go, oh,
(31:37):
we'll just do everything in rest APIs right, Well, that
might not be the best thing.
Speaker 1 (31:44):
I don't even know if people know what rest is,
because first of all, it was a very hip term
to use. And then you know, when we first talked
to people, Richard, it was just like, well, it's just HDP.
You just get a request and it comes back. And
but there really talking about API endpoints and how to
handle them and how to structure the data that comes
(32:06):
back from an API endpoint and getting a little more
goo around that that's standardized.
Speaker 3 (32:11):
Yep.
Speaker 2 (32:12):
But it almost became that a buzzword thing. It's like, well, yeah,
that's not RESTful.
Speaker 1 (32:17):
Yeah it's right. Well well I'm sorry, but yeah it works.
Speaker 3 (32:23):
Finally, I finally have used the sixth law or sixth
rule of rest. So so there's six constraints that Roy
Felding when he wrote his PhD thesis, which rest was
part of, just a small part. He said six constraints
(32:47):
that you had to do like client server, and there's
a bunch of things, right, but the sixth one is
where no one really knew how to cross over that
and that is when giving code in your response. So
when you when you call a rest API endpoint to
(33:13):
be RESTful, it should return code or something that that
you use to uh change the state of your client.
And I finally learned I'm finally using and crossing that law,
and I'm doing it with HTMX, which I'm actually writing
(33:36):
another online book about HTMX is a very small Java
script framework. But I kind of digress.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
But so the question is is is that smart is
is using code's earning code? Is a response? Is that
sneak it is? I'm also sure I want to be
in charge of every line of code that I execute.
Speaker 3 (34:03):
Well, why not have the server tell you what?
Speaker 1 (34:06):
What?
Speaker 3 (34:07):
Uh? Based on a based on a HTTP request, you
get back some HTML that then you replace other HTML
in the dom and you have you have a new
UI without refreshing the whole page.
Speaker 1 (34:27):
And that gives Well I use Blazer, so that's not
an issue for me. But anyway, I can't see what
I did there.
Speaker 3 (34:33):
I know, I know, I know, I do server I'm
more old school. I like server side stuff.
Speaker 1 (34:39):
But but but in general, though, I think that opens uh.
That increases my attack surface. If what you're bringing down
executes code, you can bring down some bad code.
Speaker 3 (34:53):
Yeah you could. You could know.
Speaker 1 (34:55):
So that's why I say I like, I know, I
like when when I do rest or when somebody says,
you know, make this RESTful. What I do is I
create a response class and that response has like a
list of errors, and it has a success and failure,
and then it has either an entity or a list
of entities, collection of entities, and that's it, you know,
(35:18):
just the response code and all of that stuff. So
then my code figures out what to do with that.
Speaker 3 (35:24):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (35:24):
I like having the transport that the client, the API
client and the server just doing what they should be doing.
I don't want to mess in it.
Speaker 3 (35:34):
My you, I know, and we're really geeking out.
Speaker 1 (35:38):
I'll include a copy of Fielding's dissertation because you see
Irving published it.
Speaker 2 (35:44):
Because one of the options in REST and it just
say it's optional is code on demand. Yep, that's the
sixth yep to I mean, to your point there, Chris
is like, you decided to do the weird one.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
Yeah. I guess it's cool, but it's just not It
doesn't smell good to me.
Speaker 3 (36:03):
I know, you do have to be careful and everything,
but when you were talking about response codes and stuff,
I was my mind was like, oh, the language of
httph and and that's another thing I kind of talk
a little bit about in the book. Is in the
(36:25):
the introduction to everything, I talk about HTTP is a language.
It's a protocol, but it's a language between the server
and the and the clients that calls it.
Speaker 2 (36:38):
And as all protocols effectively are.
Speaker 3 (36:42):
Yes, and it communicates devices. Yeah, it communicates through the
response codes. Because I mean, so many people go, I'll
just pass back a two hundred when when there's when
it's successful, Well, know what what happens in the when
you do a delete When you when you send over
(37:05):
a delete request and it deletes a resource on the
server side and it doesn't return anything back in the
in the HTTP response body, you should always send back
a two oh four because that tells the client that
there's nothing in the in the response body.
Speaker 1 (37:27):
Right, if you think about it, the response code are
for HTTP, right, Like for example, if you get a
five hundred, that doesn't mean that your API end point
ran and there was an error. You shouldn't set the
code to five hundred. That's not for you. Yes, five
hundred is the I don't know where I can't even
reach the sendpoint.
Speaker 3 (37:48):
Yep.
Speaker 1 (37:49):
Yeah, only four hundreds for you, Yes, four hundreds the
last and the year can set.
Speaker 3 (37:55):
So but there's there's a whole thing like in in
the first couple chapters of the book, I talk I
just geek out on HTTP and talk about that and stuff.
But the most interesting chapter I think is the last one,
(38:17):
and it's looking to the future with quick HDP three Yeah,
HTTP three q U I see, and that that is
the protocol that soon will replace TCP, and it will
because TCP is slow, because it does, like Carl said
(38:40):
in the beginning, it does have to do error checking
and everything. Quick is going to replace that and we're
going to have a much quicker Internet in the future soon.
Speaker 2 (38:58):
Over on run as we because server twenty twenty five
now implements h TWB three. We've been talking about these ideas,
although you really upset administrators when you talk about this
stuff because it's integrated with TLS one point three and
so forth, Like it's inherently support secure approach. So it's
like quick end points should be exposed on the Internet.
It's designed to be. But you still have most administrators
(39:21):
everything's behind a firewall.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
This is enough, you're moving. They're cheese man. Yeah, now
they're scared. But you know the other part Quick is
really about TEA about IBV six. Yeah, right, all addresses
being routable, Like we've just gotten to this weird place
because we didn't move to six and still largely haven't,
and so we've done all this network translation, all these
(39:43):
years trying to stretch all the IP four addresses out,
which we've done still. But so we just don't have
this mindset of stuff shraudible. But also just because you're
behind ant firewall doesn't mean you're safe. No, no, none
of this has anything to do with safe. Absolutely not.
Somebody gets into your net work, your toast.
Speaker 3 (40:03):
But but like quick is going to going to go
from multi step handshakes, you know when when a website,
when you get to a website, there's multiple handshakes and stuff,
there's gonna be a single handshake, which is going to
be good. We're going to get rid of the headline
blocking with multiplexing. I mean, there's there's lots of different
(40:27):
stuff that I go through in the in that chapter
to set people up and uh I even have code,
so every chapter in the book also has code out
in the UH in the same GitHub repo that the
book is published from.
Speaker 1 (40:48):
So there's multiplexing. If I remember correctly, that was basically
to send to one IP address and then it gets
multi cast multi casting, I guess is what it is, right,
And that's just to get around the limitations of the
hardware of the time and the network connection speeds and
all that stuff. Now everybody's got a gig or two
(41:08):
gigs in their house, right, And are those protocols still relevant?
Are they still being used?
Speaker 3 (41:17):
Well? But like HTTP one and two still they have
pseudo multiplexing from what I've been able to determine, not
a real modern multiplexing like built into the protocol. I
(41:39):
don't think it was ever built into TCP or even UDP. Yeah,
Richard might know because he knows everything.
Speaker 1 (41:48):
So I was confusing multicasting and multiplexing. I think multiplexing
is where you can just send a bunch of data
out the pipe and it goes to different people because
it's all combined in the same wire, right, Yeah, I
mean multicasting was part of specification for the longest time. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (42:05):
The problem is that routers did didn't implement it, or
often it turned off, right, It had a bunch of limitations,
like it's never really gone where it's supposed to do.
There are these address blocks for both IVV FORORE and
V six for multicasting.
Speaker 1 (42:18):
It's just rare.
Speaker 2 (42:19):
The only place I ever saw of multicast being used
is internally internal networks with large volumes of video data.
Speaker 1 (42:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (42:27):
Well, the other interesting thing with that we'll get with
with HTTP three and quick is it we won't have
drops because of connections. We'll be able to move those
connections very freely. Two different ideas, So hopefully that will
(42:51):
solve some of the like drop connections that we experience
and network programming all the time.
Speaker 1 (43:01):
So do you see any security implications for this new
set of protocols?
Speaker 3 (43:06):
Yep. Uh So instead of having a uh separate t
OS layer, this has uh, this has integrated t OS
one point three encryption into the protocol.
Speaker 1 (43:23):
Do you see t L S or t O S,
t L S c L S.
Speaker 3 (43:28):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (43:29):
And because that way it's not optional, like you can't
use security.
Speaker 3 (43:34):
Everything is is encrypted?
Speaker 1 (43:36):
Good with quick? And what about crypto and not crypto?
What about quantum? Is quantum going to come along and
squash it? Is it quantum safe?
Speaker 3 (43:45):
Quantum? And yeah, I don't know. We were talking to
uh one of the Europe's MVPs in.
Speaker 1 (43:55):
Quantum, uh Cyprian Hannah, And.
Speaker 3 (44:02):
I think quantum. I think quantum will be good for
certain certain needs, but not for like an application like
we built today. It's still we'll still be having what
we're doing. Now, we'll just have quantum kind of giving
(44:22):
information to the application, which then probably will pass it on.
Speaker 1 (44:27):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (44:27):
But the concern here is someday the biggest quantum computers
not the ones that will actually be useful, because that
those are simpler, we'll be able to crack prime key
based in friptions. Yeah, but TLS has a cipher registry,
so you can switch protocol so you don't have to
use an RSA. You could be moving to a lattice
(44:49):
algorithm or any one of these non prime key algorithms,
so you don't have to change TLS, you just have
to switch the cipher.
Speaker 1 (44:56):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (44:57):
But so in the end, I I really did the
book for me so I could learn all this stuff. Nice,
and I think that's what most people write books about.
Because I learned more about this stuff than probably anyone
that reads it is going to learn. So it's awesome.
Speaker 1 (45:16):
But it was.
Speaker 2 (45:18):
Yeah, you get to drill into each of these things
in great detail.
Speaker 3 (45:21):
Yeah, yeah, you do, and you get to uh and
then you get to release it and everyone tells you
you're wrong about certain things. Yeah, which is awesome because
then I can argue, and I love to argue. From
a family of lawyers, so I love the debate.
Speaker 1 (45:40):
You always learn, I mean, whether you're right or wrong,
you always learn something. Yeah, well you get confirmation or
you learn something new. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (45:49):
Yeah, and uh, there's even I even have a page
on this that if someone tells me a correction, I
actually will correct it and give them credit. So I
have a little updates and corrections where I give credit
to people that tell me I'm wrong and they and
(46:10):
they fix something in the book. So it's all yeah,
and it's all on GitHub, it's all on prs. So
you know what, I I am not a very smart person.
Come on, now, I've just been around. I've been around
long enough. Well, I had a I had a.
Speaker 1 (46:29):
Professor, Brandon, you're gonna edit that out right, No, don't
edit that out.
Speaker 3 (46:34):
I'm not. I mean, there are so many smart people,
and that that's why I love going to conferences and
I love being around because I get to learn so much.
Speaker 1 (46:46):
Like it's just.
Speaker 3 (46:49):
No, I'm smart, but in the crowds that we.
Speaker 1 (46:55):
All, you're like, you're smart enough to know what you
don't know.
Speaker 3 (47:01):
Well, and that's the thing I mean, I think that's
that is being smart. As what you said it's knowing
that you don't know everything, right, and I don't know everything.
Speaker 1 (47:12):
So.
Speaker 2 (47:14):
Nobody knows everything close.
Speaker 3 (47:18):
I don't know. Richard's pretty close close.
Speaker 2 (47:21):
I have a very good memory, as you both know. Yes, yeah,
I haven't.
Speaker 3 (47:25):
I haven't stumped Richard too much about about anything.
Speaker 1 (47:31):
So, but you know, we also run with a group
of people who are inventing the things that we all
count on, right, you know, the Mads, targets of the
world and the like. Who are I think a you know,
different kind of intelligence again that they to be able
to to take everything that's going on and envision the
next version, envision what's possible. It's extraordinary.
Speaker 3 (47:53):
Yeah, yeah, exactly, and and it's it's amazing. That's why
I like computer science and this our industry is because
nothing ever is set in like stone. We're always moving.
(48:14):
And if you take a look at accounting or any
other kind of industry, they're pretty much all set I
will for the most part, but we have a we have.
Speaker 2 (48:28):
That being said, I presume your book ends with in
The correct answer is gr PC.
Speaker 3 (48:32):
Doesn't end in g r PC GRP.
Speaker 1 (48:36):
It's pretty freakin' awesome though, it is because it is.
Speaker 2 (48:40):
It is built on HDP two, right, Like most of
these protocols are are pretty much agnostic. They really we
want to just fine on one point one. But g
RPC needed to.
Speaker 3 (48:51):
Well, yeah, it needed to.
Speaker 1 (48:52):
James Newton King came around and made gRPC web which
runs on HDP one so you can use it in
dot net and it's still awesome. Yeah, yeah, I'm sure
it uses two if it can.
Speaker 3 (49:04):
Yeah. My last chapter is is quick, Yeah, just to
look towards the future. But the one before that is
Someone asked me to do a signal R chapter and
I said okay, because they convinced me that it it
fell in line with all the other kind of networking technologies.
Speaker 2 (49:29):
Because wasn't it just once just a wrapper over web socket.
I mean, I know it's involved into the yeah pretty
much things like that, but once for time socket.
Speaker 1 (49:37):
But here's here's what I don't like about SIGNALARE. I
love signalare and I use it all the time, but
you can't use it in replacement for a robust messaging
system because there's no queue. Right. If you're not there
to receive a message, you missed it, it's lost. You
can't come back online and say, hey, what were the
(49:57):
messages that I missed, right, So you can't just use
it in place of a really robust queuing system.
Speaker 3 (50:04):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (50:04):
No, that being said, you could use it to call
to a queue, absolutely, you could.
Speaker 1 (50:08):
You could, but you can also.
Speaker 3 (50:11):
Yeah, and that's a great thing about like something like
Kafta or Azure as your messaging queue.
Speaker 1 (50:20):
There's a million of them. Yeah, see, I see our
talk with clements.
Speaker 3 (50:25):
Yeah, yeah, I.
Speaker 1 (50:26):
Think so he's stopped in nine not a million, but yeah,
that's a lot.
Speaker 3 (50:32):
If you want, if you want to guarantee one hundred
percent or ninety nine point of your messages getting to
where they need to go, you need to do message
queueing and have that.
Speaker 2 (50:48):
Just recognize that the internet's not five nine, so you
know you've got to have a mechanism for recovery.
Speaker 3 (50:55):
Yep, yep, exactly.
Speaker 1 (50:56):
Show enough. What's the next thing that you're going to
be working on? Are you done with networking and c
Sharp or is there always more?
Speaker 3 (51:05):
I don't know. I'm done with that right now. I'm
I have two things I'm kind of doing. I'm in
the middle of a forty two day blog post series
explaining rust to c sharp developers.
Speaker 1 (51:23):
Wow, I would love to read that.
Speaker 3 (51:25):
Yeah, so I'm I'll send the link to you, but yeah,
it's out of my blog. Actually, this year I've got
a master plan to have a blog post every day
nice and it's a good idea. So for forty two days,
I think I'm up to day twenty nine. So today
(51:48):
was we were talking about traits in Rust.
Speaker 1 (51:52):
So if you want to know more, you have to
go out, and I'm going to start with read chapter one.
Speaker 3 (51:57):
But Rust is Rust is like my new kind of love.
So I've got two loves right now, Rust and HTMX,
and I'm writing the next quasi online book for HTMX
and then trying to learn Rust and share all this
stuff I'm learning about Rust.
Speaker 1 (52:17):
All right, So real quick, what is your favorite thing
about Rust? What is so great about RUSS that we
should one sentence that you can convince the c sharp
developer to read your blog posts.
Speaker 3 (52:29):
Yeah, so Rust will not let you compile.
Speaker 1 (52:35):
Bad code, So stuff that c Sharp would would discover
at runtime, Rust will discover compile time.
Speaker 3 (52:42):
Yeah, like if you if you write code to divide
one by zero rus, RUSS will not let you compile.
Speaker 1 (52:54):
It will stop because you can do that in c Sharp.
You can make a variable zero zer with a value
of zero and then divide.
Speaker 3 (53:01):
One by it, and that throws an exception.
Speaker 1 (53:03):
Compiler says run time, but now compile time.
Speaker 3 (53:07):
Yeah, yep. The other thing is everything is immutable, which
I think is really is really smart because it allows
you to do multi threading course much easier.
Speaker 1 (53:24):
It's not functional, though, is it. It's not a functional language.
Speaker 3 (53:27):
It can be functional. It's a very different object oriented language.
Like it doesn't have inheritance, so.
Speaker 1 (53:37):
There's no ideas of nulls, right, which is the bugaboo
of C shark.
Speaker 3 (53:41):
There is no nulls. You can't have a null because
whenever a variable is out of scope, it goes away.
And that's the other nice thing is like it doesn't
need a garbage collector because it just anything that's out
(54:04):
of scope goes away.
Speaker 1 (54:09):
Hmm.
Speaker 3 (54:09):
And there's It's just it makes you think differently. Sure,
it's kind of like when I learn React, like React
web development was for me very it was very different.
But but yeah, my thing is you have to keep
(54:32):
learning about new things. Even though I may not use
rust on anything, I want to learn it just to
just to see some different things that I can then
bring back potentially into c sharp and and and maybe
do smarter coding, have a smarter outlook on on my code.
(54:55):
But yeah, Rust is really cool. I'm building out some
some web APIs. I think I'm going to be pushing
some talks around around Rust and doing networking, like maybe
taking all of the chapters in the c Sharp networking
(55:16):
and doing Rust networking.
Speaker 1 (55:19):
Yeah. Interesting. So these blog posts around woodruf dot dev.
Speaker 3 (55:24):
Yeah, they are. And I'll send you guys the link
to I've got a one blog that links to all
forty two days as I am going through, So I'll
send you that page so people can kind of start
from the beginning and work their way down.
Speaker 1 (55:41):
Awesome, I'm really looking forward to that. Cool Chris, what
is the what is what is the next bourbon that
you're going to pour yourself? Oh?
Speaker 3 (55:53):
So, I love there's a there's a new two new
bourbons that I've discovered. RD one is a distillery close
to Lexington, Kentucky. They have a uh and I cannot
remember Richard will know the name of the wood. It's
this Brazilian wood that starts with A, the letter A
(56:18):
and I can't remember the name. But they finish their
their bourbon and barrels made of that wood and it.
Speaker 2 (56:28):
Makes the not oh huh, that's pretty strange.
Speaker 3 (56:32):
No, No, they start oak and then they finish the
last six months or a year in this in this
Brazilian wood, and it makes the bourbon tastes like cinnamon, toast, crunch, cereal.
It is amazing. So Richard, you're going to dev some.
Speaker 2 (56:52):
I think you're talking about amberanna.
Speaker 3 (56:54):
Yeah, Banna, Okay, that's it.
Speaker 1 (56:56):
See you drink enough of it? Do you see the
three little sweetish chef dancing around with the hats on?
Speaker 3 (57:02):
No? Maybe, no, you just pass out.
Speaker 2 (57:04):
So well, it's the only one I can think of.
They usually make kosasha with it, which is their rub
and varry that it's a it's a sugarcane based alcohol. Yeah,
and I know that the high end versions were aged
in Mburanna. But that's the only thing I think of
that's a wood from Brazil.
Speaker 3 (57:22):
Yeah, I think it is that. Okay, And so that bourbon.
And then the other one I've been drinking is one
from a Holiday distilleries and they make a sweet red
wheat using sweet red wheat to make le makers. And yeah,
(57:45):
but there's they have some America. They call it American
whiskies because they don't use fifty bourbon has to be
at least fifty one corn. Some of this is a
majority is wheat. So I'm really getting into They can't
(58:06):
call it bourbon, so they call it American whiskey. So
I'm really getting into the weeded American whiskeyes because they're
real sweet and uh, they're kind of the opposite of rise.
Speaker 2 (58:19):
Yeah, and it's not like it's not like bourbons weren't sweet.
But yeah, I'm with you, so.
Speaker 3 (58:26):
Yeah, yeah, So I'm I'm bringing two bottles over to Stockholm.
Def some you're gonna be there.
Speaker 1 (58:33):
I'll be there.
Speaker 3 (58:34):
Yeah, you'll be there, Richard, or you.
Speaker 1 (58:36):
Can be I will.
Speaker 2 (58:37):
I'll be coming straight up from South Africa, not going
to any os.
Speaker 3 (58:40):
Okay, well, I've I've got two bottles. I've got a
bottle of this RD one that I want to share,
and then I need to figure out the other one
I'm going to share. I think I'm going to bring
one of these weeded whiskeys with me.
Speaker 1 (58:55):
So we are going to see the three sweetish chefs
dancing around going see you know, I man?
Speaker 3 (59:01):
Yeah, So but those are those are the new ones.
There's there's so many cool, new new bourbons and the
price is starting to come down to Because so.
Speaker 1 (59:13):
You're in Lexington, did you say, supply.
Speaker 3 (59:16):
I lived I lived in Lexington for three years. Now
I'm in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Speaker 1 (59:21):
Okay, so yeah, well, being in Kentucky, of course, we're
trying to educate people about bourbon a little bit, especially
those outside the United States, and we have a significant
number of European listeners. Bourbon doesn't have to be made
in Kentucky, as Chris was saying, it has to be
made in America. Has to be at least fifty one
(59:42):
percent corn, and it also has this weird rule that
it has to be aged in virgin white American oak
casks that have been charred for a certain amount of
time minimum three years, three years, and then after that
they can finish in anything like port wine barrels. It
(01:00:06):
used to be only but they yeah, Angels Envy started
doing the sherry finishes and.
Speaker 3 (01:00:11):
Yeah and yep, yeah, yep.
Speaker 1 (01:00:15):
So anyway, that is one of the one of the
things that America has brought to the world is it's
American whiskey. Right, You've got Scotch whiskey, got Irish Canadian.
We have American whiskey. It's called Bourbon. There you go. Yeah,
and if you go listen to the series I've done
on Windows Weekly that they've clipped off his YouTube videos,
I explain all of them. That's so cool. And we
(01:00:36):
also did a show on Bourbon after we came back
from the road trip or No Code Palooza. Yeah, we
did a geek out on Bourbon.
Speaker 3 (01:00:44):
Oh I remember that. Yeah, that was a good episode.
Speaker 1 (01:00:46):
Yeah, good stuff. Chris Well, it's great to have you
on the show finally after all these years.
Speaker 3 (01:00:51):
Finally, thank you.
Speaker 1 (01:00:52):
Yep, and we'll do it again.
Speaker 3 (01:00:54):
I feel I feel my life is complete now, so
mine too. My career, my technical career is complete.
Speaker 1 (01:01:02):
So mine too. And I really mean that, like I
really enjoyed sort of geeking out and going back in
time with all of the stuff that I used to
think about. And it's good to think about it again. Yeah,
especially for the young kids.
Speaker 3 (01:01:15):
Everything comes around, everything comes around, that goes around.
Speaker 1 (01:01:19):
So good stuff. So yep, all right, thanks again, and
we'll talk to you, dear listener next time on dot
net rocks. Dot net Rocks is brought to you by
(01:01:48):
Franklin's Net and produced by Pop Studios, a full service audio,
video and post production facility located physically in New London, Connecticut,
and of course in the cloud online at pwop dot com.
Visit our website at d O T N E t
R O c k S dot com for RSS feeds, downloads,
(01:02:09):
mobile apps, comments, and access to the full archives going
back to show number one, recorded in September two thousand
and two. And make sure you check out our sponsors.
They keep us in business. Now go write some code.
See you next time you got Jamtlevans
How'd you like to listen to dot net rocks with
no ads? Easy? Become a patron for just five dollars
a month. You get access to a private RSS feed
where all the shows have no ads. Twenty dollars a month,
we'll get you that and a special dot net Rocks
patron mug. Sign up now at Patreon dot dot NetRocks
(00:21):
dot com. We'll get down rock and roll. It's dot
net Rocks. I'm Carl Franklin and I'm Richard Cavell, and
it's gonna be a good show. Chris Woody Woodruff is
(00:41):
here with us, but before we talk to him, I
need to talk to you, Richard. What's up? You know,
this is the show that comes out during build. So
how is your build? Oh it's wonderful.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
Yeah, you were having a great You've been having a
great time. I think you're flying back on Thursday, too,
so you should be in the air at this particular moment.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
That's right. I need to fly back a little bit
early because my daughter is having a graduation party for
her masters So that's awesome. Well, and it looks like
Thursday's only a half day anyway, now, so yeah, not
a big deal. Well, this party is going to involve
lots of smoked meats.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Well, that's one of my favorite kinds of party.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
Yeah, I've got something interesting for Better Know a Framework,
So let's roll the crazy music. All right, man, hit me? Yeah,
aspnut Corp dot Diagnostics dot health checks. Oh no, not again.
(01:38):
Are you actually doing the framework on Better Know a framework? Well,
it's not really a framework. It's a it's a third
party thing. It's oh, it's okay, it's as a get
up repo. Yeah, enterprise health checks for asp net Corp
diagnostics package. But that's awesome if you scroll down, like
when you look at all of the things that it's about,
(01:59):
all the package, just that it supports. It's like everything everything. No, wow,
but it's only just asp dot net corey toly yeah Toly,
But I mean, how unhealthy can core get? Yeah, so
it's it's too much for me to explain. I mean,
it's basically that's what it is. It's health checks but nice.
(02:22):
But it supports everything, so it's cool. I'm not going
to read the list. It's a long list. Check it out. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (02:29):
But yeah, all right, you don't you a more importantly,
you don't have to write this stuff. Somebody's already built
a repository. It's got a bunch of contributors.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
Yep.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
So it's not up on nine yet. It's still dot
net eight. But who knows. By the time you hear
this than they I've already got it.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
I've already got it. I can see the issue in
there being worked. So that's a good sign. Yep, good stuff. Awesome, No,
learn it, love it. Hey. Richard who's talking to us today.
Speaker 2 (02:51):
Grabbed a show off of episode nineteen forty six, the
one we do with Elias Pirnin when we were talking
about audio, video and dot net, and this comment comes
from Kurt Nichols who said, it's just a few weeks ago.
He said, for what it's worth, Marshall dot alec h global,
which is something that we talked about on the show.
For doing dealing with video stuff is unmanaged memory allocation.
(03:13):
Unmanage memory is not involved in garbage collection, does not
move within the address space, and does not need to
be pinned, and span of tea is very handily for
manipulating a native buffer. If you're doing things like this,
consider implementing a safe handle that is safe handle zero
minus one is invalid for releasing the allocation. So actually
a very important clarification. And once again here we are
(03:34):
talking about old school yeah sockets and stuff, you know,
managed versus unmanaged behavior. Elias also responded to that comment.
He said, Span of Tea is awesome and this safe
and then I asked, this safe handle take care of
the allocation too, or just provide a wrapper of sorts
for the life cycle stuff and it just provides the rapper.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
You have to deal with your own allocations. Cool.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
So, Kurt, thank you so much for your comment in
a coffee. Music cod by on its way to you,
and if you'd like a copy of music go buy.
I right a comment on the website at dot net
rocks dot com or on Facebook, So publish every show
there and if you comment there and I reading on
the show, we'll send you copy of music to go buy.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
Music two code my is still going strong, twenty two tracks.
I listened to it all the time still when I'm coding,
and you can download it well yeah, penny for it
of course, but you can get it at music to
code by dot net. You can get the collection in
MP three flack or wave or all three if you want.
(04:29):
Nice hey knock yourself out.
Speaker 3 (04:30):
I have a done DVD, not DVD CD.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Yeah, that's right, school. Yeah, you burned it to CDR.
Speaker 1 (04:39):
I love that. No, no, no no. When I came
out with it, you actually made a CD.
Speaker 3 (04:44):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
Yeah, so you have production CDs I have. I did.
That was the whole uh kickstarter. That also speaks to
the idea that Chris has a working CD player, which
is shocking to me. It is shocking to me too.
Speaker 3 (04:58):
I have a couple my kids have CD players because
they like to play my old CDs.
Speaker 1 (05:05):
I just bought a new car at VW Atlas and
it does not have a CD player in it, but
it has everything else. Yeah, just to just be key
in somewhere, yeah, sort of. Before that was Chris Woody
woodrowf our guest. But before I introduce him, let's talk
about nineteen fifty one. All right, where do you want
(05:26):
to go? So nineteen fifty one is the show number,
and so what we've been doing is highlighting what happened
that year. Major events include the continuation of the Korean War,
which we talked about last week, the Treaty of San Francisco,
which formerly ended the Pacific War with Japan, and the
beginnings of the Cold War with the Rosenberg Trial, also
(05:48):
the Schumann Plan. Six nations agreed to pool European coal
and steel resources, which was a precursor to the European Union. Yeah,
and let's see, that's the easy Cupean Eecy economic cooperation
is the beginning of that. In Libya gained independence from Italy.
I don't know if people knew that that Libya was
(06:10):
once part of Italy. Right, and then you sort of
actually mentioned the Rosenberg Trials. That's when supposedly the Rosenbergs
leaked the plans for the atomic bomb to the Soviets. Yeah,
not good.
Speaker 3 (06:21):
No.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
Technological advancements included the first transcontinental television broadcast, the introduction
of the first commercial color TV broadcast, and the first
direct dial telephone service. So up until then you had
to call an operator, yeah, to get a call put
through it. And how could we forget that UNIVAC one
was delivered by Remington Rand.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
It wasn't actually delivered. There's a great story here. Oh
it's cool. So UNIVAC one the very first one he
gets sold to the Census Bureau, right, and that's the
one that comes that's available in nineteen fifty one, and
so the sense they do this big thing in March
of fifty one about hey, so the first computer is
going to say sypua da da da da da. The
party's over now, It's like, okay, it's time to deliver this.
(07:04):
And I'm like, listen, it's the only one we got.
We kind of wanted to use it as a demo unit,
and we're afraid to take it apart in case it
doesn't go back together again.
Speaker 3 (07:12):
Oh man.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
So the second one was actually for the Pentagon, and
that one they install at the Pentagon the same year.
They don't actually get up the nerve until they build
a couple more. They don't get up a nerve to
take apart the demo model and move it to the
census Buro till the end of the year. And this
thing is this the one that took up the city block. Well,
it wasn't quite that big, but it is big. But
(07:34):
the UNIVAC console, if you ever go look at this,
it's what you think of when you think of old
school computer. It's the great, big black panel with all
the switches and the knobs and stuff on it. Like
there's no CRTs at this point, right, we're ahead of
all of that, right.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
What more important invention from nineteen fifty one, which is
this is the year that Bell Labs announces what they
call the grown junction transistor. So this is shockly you know,
the Bell Labs they had the point contact transistor, is
trying to develop an easier to make transistor, although it's
still not real easy to make, right. And what he's
(08:07):
doing is that he's melting semiconductor germanium as making into
a liquid it's very fairly high temperature, and then pulling
that out as a single crystal. And that the geranium
is actually doped, so there's a little bit of antimony
in it as well. That makes it what they call
an N type semiconductor. Why antimony, Because geranium has if
(08:31):
you go look at your periodic table and I know
you have one, it's right over there, has four outer
electrons on its outer electron shell, which is what makes
it a semiconductor, and antimony has five. So in the
natural crystal forming process, when all those electrons will lock
in with other ones, the doping material ends up with
(08:52):
a free electron and that makes it and type stepping conductor. Wow,
So you're drawing out the single crystal germanium. And about
Chris and I, our mouths are just hanging open here.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
We're just like, what the heck.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
So now you're literally talking in thousands of an inch,
but you're pulling a single crystal of this N type
geranium out of the liquid and as it's forming, it's
only going to be you know, maybe a quarter inch
long the whole thing. But as it's forming, you put
a droplet of P type on it, which is geranium
doped with gallium. And then you've cut off the crystal
(09:28):
and now you have to weld gold wires to it.
But you now have an N type rob with a
P type mount in the center of it. So you're
making an NP N transistor.
Speaker 1 (09:38):
Somebody had to have a wild imagination to be able
to say, hey, if we did this, what would happen?
Speaker 2 (09:44):
But this is how semiconductors. And again now now that
they've described a process to get idea of how expensive
these transistors were, like they were basically not commercially viable, right,
but that they worked and they were stabler even though
they were essentially handmade. Then the other types, although interestingly
in nineteen fifty one as well, ge and RCA because
(10:05):
that was Bell lads who were just talking about announced
a different kind of transistor called an alloyjunction transistor. So
here what they did was they made a geranium crystal
which was also dope with n antimony, so it was
ND type, and then they fused droplets of indium doped
gallium on each side of it to make what is
now known as a p NP transistor instead of an
(10:28):
NPN transistor. Was it cheaper, It was a little easier
to make, but not a lot easier to make, but
it also worked. It was faster to form because he
didn't have to actually draw a single crystal. At the
same time, all of these things become obsolete by nineteen sixty, right,
But there were stepping stones when the Planner. Yeah, when
the Planner transistor comes along because the planet, which is
(10:50):
actually a way to mass manufacturer transistors. Although there were
lower quality, they were cheap. And that was made by
fair Child Semiconductor, which was the company formed out of
Shockley's company that was formed to create these things. And
Shockley was a bit of a character, not a nice
man at all, and he called those eight that laughed
to form share Child the traitorous eight, though most of
(11:12):
those guys would go on to form a third company,
you know.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
As Intel Intel. That's it. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (11:19):
You know.
Speaker 1 (11:19):
The thing that I know is that scientists, I think
it was in the fifties, found that if you group
two helium adams close enough together that they would actually laugh.
Yeah he he helium fusion. Is that what we're talking about? Okay, okay,
all right, all right, well that's all I got. All Right,
(11:40):
we're here to talk about dot net and I think
c sharp networking with Chris Woody Woodriff, So let me
introduce him. Chris Woodriff is a seasoned software developer with
a career that spans before the dot com boom, kind
of like us. He specializes in enterprise web development, cloud solutions,
and software analytics, is on API design and scalable architectures,
(12:02):
and is recognized as a Microsoft MVP and dot net
and web development. He's also a dedicated mentor, instructing courses
for aspiring tech professionals and speaking at international conferences on
database development, web APIs, and software architecture. Woody co hosts
the Breakpoint Show podcast and has previously led engineering teams
(12:25):
at Rocket Homes and Driven Developer relations at Rocket Mortgage.
His consulting work has benefited companies like Apartments dot Com
and Major League Baseball Advanced Media, right MLB.
Speaker 3 (12:37):
MLB Advanced Media.
Speaker 1 (12:41):
Yeah, they're a offshoot, all right, but it is Major Baseball,
not something else. Okay. Woody enjoys bourbon. And I know
this because he is the guy that introduced I think
Richard and myself to Blanton's maybe maybe definitely introduced me.
I don't know about Richard.
Speaker 3 (12:58):
Yeah, I take bourbon everywhere with me when we go
to conferences.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
Yeah, and he enjoys writing about his experience at Woodrift
dot dev outside of tech. You cannect with them on
Blue Sky at Woodrift dot dev in Macedon at Macedon
dot Social Slash at c Woodrift. I can't believe we've
never had you on the show before. We've talked to you.
Kind of embarrassing, isn't it talked to you so many
times at all these conferences going back years.
Speaker 3 (13:25):
Yeah, it just it just never happened. It's okay. It
takes time, yeah, you know what. You know what, like bourbon,
it takes time to take time for for something a
good thing to come out.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
So okay, I'll take that, but yep, we're sorry.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
Yeah, no problem.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
Well, like a Pappy twenty three.
Speaker 3 (13:45):
Well, back in the day, we had a competing podcast,
you know we were doing. I was on deep Fried Bites.
Speaker 1 (13:53):
Yeah yeah, I remember. So I never considered you guys competition.
Speaker 3 (13:57):
I know. It was never all friendly. We're all friendly.
Speaker 1 (14:01):
Yeah, so I do remember deep Fried Bites good stuff.
Speaker 3 (14:04):
Yeah yeah so yeah.
Speaker 1 (14:08):
Speaking of bourbon, I have a an unopened bottle of
Pappy van Winkle twenty three year old, still unopened. It's
still unopened. It's in a safe.
Speaker 3 (14:18):
Richard hasn't seen it yet. Huh.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
Well no, when I got this batch and then I
promise we'll talk about C sharp networking. When I got
this batch, it included a fifteen year old which I
gave Richard for his birthday, which has been drank and
it has it was drunk pretty quickly after I gave
it to you.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
I think, listen, I do not collect whiskey. I drink whiskey.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
Yeah yeah. So my brother's a doctor, so he buys
the uh Pappy in the family. But I do have
to say my first bottle of good bourbon was George T.
Stag Love It four two thousand and four and I
was living in Lexington at the time, and uh, one
(15:07):
of the guys in my church was a sales guy
for Buffalo Trace and said, hey, do you want a bottle?
And it was like forty five dollars or something, this
before Bourbon exploded. So yeah, And how that bottle got
killed was my brother in law. I saw him mixing
(15:29):
it with diet coke the last ounce or two. So yeah, yeah,
oh that broke my heart.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
It's just it's shameful.
Speaker 3 (15:39):
And I could feel everyone listening.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Just keep I keep a bottle of Maker's Marker. It's
like here, just go ahead, put your coke in this.
Speaker 3 (15:46):
Yeah. Yeah, I always have a cheap bottle like Beam
or something around. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:52):
So but yeah, nothing wrong with that. Well anyway, yeah,
you were the first one that introduced me to Blant
and said, have you ever had Blants? If you like
Makers mark you know, because it's weeded, it's weeded like Makers,
and I think it's better. And then it shortly thereafter
became very hard to find. And now that there was
(16:14):
a flood at Buffalo Trace, So do you know the
status of that? Are they are they back to production?
Speaker 3 (16:21):
Yeah? It only took them a week to get back
to production. And all of the barrels that were submerged
or partially submerged in water, they actually sold because they
couldn't bottle them, so they actually sold them to collectors.
(16:41):
And I hear people are going to like bottle them
and sell them or you know, like orphan barrel. You know, sure,
orphan barrel came out. I think it's supposed to be
kind of like that. But no, they were back up
pretty quick.
Speaker 1 (16:59):
That's good.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
Yeah, yeah, so because the water directed quickly. But you
know that Pappy warehouse on the on the Buffalo Trace property,
it's on there. It's half underground, so I'm sure that
must have filled up with water. Yeah yeah, and then
they they did, you must have lost a lot.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
You know. They had the story where they were digging
for a new a new rick house.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
A rick house is where they store the barrel, right,
and and found the old old old distillery.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
And they found the old old like before, like the original.
She's distilled, and I think that's still underwater. I think
they're trying to pump out water in that.
Speaker 1 (17:37):
But such a shame, but yeah, yeah it is. Okay,
So we're here to talk about C sharp networking. And
this is a topic near and dear to my heart,
but only because many many, many, many many years ago
I wrote a book on socket's programming and visual Basic.
And it was even before visual Basic had a really
(18:00):
stable windsock control. I was actually using a third party
control because it was working better. I caught some flack
over that, but coming from serial communications programming before that,
which was a nightmare. The you know, the the TCP
(18:20):
IP stack and windsock on top of that was like
a dream come true. So I know, I know that
you do cover sockets in your your online book on
c sharp networking, but it's a vast topic and I
don't know where do you want to start.
Speaker 3 (18:33):
I don't know we can start why, Like why did
I write? I mean, people ask like, why do you
write a book right these days when everything's online and.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
Most people also don't care about the low level programming stuff.
Give me an HDP client, you know, give me some
poll exactly, and that's it.
Speaker 3 (18:53):
Well, and in the second half of the book, so
the book is kind of broken up into two parts.
The first part is all the fundamental stuff that I
think people should know. Maybe they don't need to use
it every day, but you should understand like what the
(19:14):
dot net framework abstracts away. And then the second half
I go through all the different types of network communications.
So I talk about like rest APIs and web sockets
and MQTT and gr PC and message queueing and stuff.
(19:36):
But what the most the most fun I had in
writing the book was the fundamental stuff because I love HTTP,
Like I've actually read the full protocol and I don't
think anyone should. I just kind of did it to
(20:00):
to do it because I was so interested. I mean,
I've done conference talks where I just talk about HTTP,
and so that got me interested in this, and I
was like, man, I really want to dig down into
this and get something out so people can know a
(20:21):
little bit more about what it really takes to communicate
between two computers.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
You wanted to inhabit the ghost of Tim berners Lee.
Speaker 3 (20:31):
Sure, yes, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
It also occurs to me here that if you're trying
to to side on a particular connection process through any
one of these APIs, through MQTT ORGRPC and so forth,
at least knowing them all in context so that you
can make a more informed decision. Yeah, yeah, I mean
most of the time we don't care much about networking
because the defaults are good enough, but sometimes they're not.
Speaker 3 (20:55):
Well, here's the thing. I mean. You have to know
about about asickerness, so I have a chapter on async.
When it's related to networking. You have to know about
multi threading, so I have a chapter on multi threading
(21:16):
in relations to networking. And down the line error handling,
data serialization, error handling, and fault tolerance. So you were
talking about Polly, I have a chapter on Polly that.
You know what, most people when they write their servers
(21:37):
and their clients never think about fault tolerances, never think
about what happens if I don't get anything back from
the other side. And you should.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
Absolutely, yeah, and just lifting a error is not enough.
Speaker 2 (21:51):
I mean the whole thing with Polly, and not to
plug your thing more, Carl, But I'm pluging your thing more.
But it's like, listen, there's a bunch of things you
could do, but you shouldn't write any of that because
it's written for you. Just go get the poly library
and you'll be fine.
Speaker 1 (22:05):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (22:05):
Yeah, there's there's lots of patterns to Polly that that
will solve a lot of your problems.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
Or just use the HDP Client Factory, which is sort
of Polly under it, but it's easier.
Speaker 3 (22:16):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, And and Microsoft has come out with
their own Polly like like you said, so you don't
have to use Polly. I still think Polly is has
lots of edge cases that it covers. So it's it's
I think a little more breadth.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Yeah. So and also you know, it's it's good to understand.
For me, it was really good to understand just pure
windsock programming, pure sockets. Right, I have a client, I
have a server. Client connects to the server. That connection
stays open until one of them closes it, and so
during that time you can send and receive at the
(23:01):
same time asynchronously over that socket. And uh, but then
you quickly realize when you want to go to use this,
Oh I what if I, you know, want to define
some message that I want to send and have the
server understand it. Well, now how do I do that?
So now you've got to think about protocols and if
(23:23):
you're both not if both sides aren't using the same protocol,
hilarity ensues. You know, it's like pulling up to the
drive through and uh, you know Wendy's and can I
help you? And you say, yeah, I want to make
a deposit. Yeah right, what what are you talking about?
Speaker 3 (23:39):
Yeah? Yeah, And that comes down to when you open
up a socket. There's really there's three types of protocols
that that you get. You get uh TCP, you get UDP,
and you can do your own you can have your
own custom protocol like do whatever wild things that you want.
(24:02):
Right and for a long time, I mean, most people
use TCP, but if you're streaming video or streaming audio,
UDP is the way to go. It's a much better
protocols the last week and.
Speaker 1 (24:15):
See, yes, because TCP has error checking built in and
delivery guaranteed delivery basically exactly exactly so. And the thing
that a lot of people don't understand is routers and
TCP IP routers, and the whole protocol was built to
a stand nuclear war yep, dark now. It was built
so that, hey, if one set of routers goes down
(24:38):
in the network, we'll just find our way around.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
Yeah yeah, which it still does to this day. You
don't even think about the fact that, yeah still does.
Undersea cables go down on a routine basis and most
people can barely tell.
Speaker 1 (24:50):
Yeah, exactly, and we just find another way around.
Speaker 3 (24:53):
Richard, when you were talking about transistors, I was really
thinking when you said in the sixties, but really what
made transistors so cheap? And uh is really the space program,
which is another government I mean they had to mentorize
to be clear.
Speaker 1 (25:11):
Fairchild Semiconductor's original business was building navigation systems for i CBMs.
Speaker 3 (25:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
Yeah, and they needed to make the integrated circuit to
get that system down to be small enough and robust
enough to survive a launch into space.
Speaker 3 (25:25):
Exactly.
Speaker 1 (25:26):
Yeah. When life and death are on the line, you know,
we get innovative.
Speaker 3 (25:29):
Yep, yep. And you know what, we have the Internet too,
and it's it's cool. I really love. I mean I
was programming when I was a kid with nothing I had.
I couldn't afford a modem, I couldn't afford the long
distance phone calls. So when I got to university, man,
(25:53):
I had so much fun, right because this weird thing
called Mosaic showed up on the on the Unix on
our solarist machines.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
That's one of the first web browsers.
Speaker 3 (26:05):
Yeah, it was. It was the first web browser mosaic.
Speaker 1 (26:09):
I also remember Cello. You remember Cello?
Speaker 3 (26:11):
Remember Cello?
Speaker 1 (26:12):
It was ninety three something like that.
Speaker 3 (26:14):
Yep. And I remember Gopher before yes, before uh, the Internet,
we were using Gopher for lots of research and stuff.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
So Gopher is a very simple folder based protocol that
instead of having websites, you have Gopher sites and you'd
get a basically a menu of folders and you could,
you know, trans you know, navigate down. There was no
search or anything. You have to know where it was.
But if somebody published a paper in a published papers folder,
(26:47):
you know, and you you basically had a URL to
it and you can download it anywhere. And I used
to use Gopher for boy, this is going back, but
one of the first talks I did on the Internet
was ges satellite imaging Gopher server. And I can't remember
where it was. It was in California somewhere, but it
(27:09):
would their computers would download satellite images every five minutes
and populate these Gopher servers. And so here I am
doing a talk at vibits on the Live Internet and
I show this you know Pacific, because I was in
California and San Francisco. I showed a picture over the
Pacific and there was like this huge, huge storm cloud
(27:33):
coming and it was only five minutes ago that this
thing was posted, and people like ran out of the room. Yeah,
suddenly nobody cares about your talk anymore exactly. But the
power went out, like you know, and we were stranded
in the hotel for a while, like you know that,
and all people didn't know until they were unless they
were at my talk. Yeah that it was going to happen.
Speaker 3 (27:55):
But that really shows that computers really didn't become a
thing until they were connected, right, I mean modems back
in the eighties where you would go to the well
or the well was kind of a.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
Bb BBS site.
Speaker 3 (28:16):
BBS in San Francisco that all and I would have
loved to have connected to that because it would have
been cool to meet to talk to people that were connected.
But like, yeah, it's back then. Long distance calls were expensive.
Speaker 2 (28:34):
And it cost money and everything. And that's what's the
big deal for the Internet, right, was that, Yeah, suddenly
the distance didn't matter. Everything was already connected. But yeah,
we had our bbs is in Vancouver.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
Yes, now we're all reminiscing and yeah, but welcome to
three guys Talk about technology and it doesn't exist anymore,
I know, but it's good for the young ins to
know that. You know, this is kind of your pedigree,
this is where all this stuff came from.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
Yeah, and I'm just trying to share. I'm just trying
to pay it forward. I'm trying to give a little
bit back because I got a lot of help twenty
twenty five years ago. I mean, I'm all I think
this December. I know, I've been working professionally for thirty
(29:22):
years now. Yeah, time flies. I banged my head against
the wall so much that all my hair fell out.
That was back in the nineties when there wasn't really
any good internet connections and what like. You didn't you
couldn't ask chat, GPT, how like write some code to
(29:45):
do this, or even even go the stack overflow. But
I think we're going off, We're going off into everything.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
Well, well, that's okay, We're going to take a quick
break when we come back. Here's a question you can
think about, what are some of the and gems and
networking that people may not know about? And you can
answer that question right after these very important messages. We'll
be right back. Did you know there's a dot net
on aws community, follow the social media blogs, YouTube influencers,
(30:17):
and open source projects, and add your own voice. Get
plugged into the dot net on aws community at aws
dot Amazon dot com, slash dot net. And we're back.
It's dot NetRocks. I'm Carl, that's Richard Hey, and Chris Woody.
Woodruff is here. And before the break I asked them
(30:38):
to think about this. What are some of the hidden
gems in networking that people may not know about and
then typically go unnoticed.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
Yeah. I think one thing is we hit upon this
subject in the first half of the show, which is
fault tolerance and learning how to get your network back
communication back up and running so and that uses poly
and and some other different technologies and frameworks. And the
(31:14):
other one is you really have to For me, I
think it comes down to understanding what the best protocols
and frameworks to use. So so many people just go, oh,
(31:37):
we'll just do everything in rest APIs right, Well, that
might not be the best thing.
Speaker 1 (31:44):
I don't even know if people know what rest is,
because first of all, it was a very hip term
to use. And then you know, when we first talked
to people, Richard, it was just like, well, it's just HDP.
You just get a request and it comes back. And
but there really talking about API endpoints and how to
handle them and how to structure the data that comes
(32:06):
back from an API endpoint and getting a little more
goo around that that's standardized.
Speaker 3 (32:11):
Yep.
Speaker 2 (32:12):
But it almost became that a buzzword thing. It's like, well, yeah,
that's not RESTful.
Speaker 1 (32:17):
Yeah it's right. Well well I'm sorry, but yeah it works.
Speaker 3 (32:23):
Finally, I finally have used the sixth law or sixth
rule of rest. So so there's six constraints that Roy
Felding when he wrote his PhD thesis, which rest was
part of, just a small part. He said six constraints
(32:47):
that you had to do like client server, and there's
a bunch of things, right, but the sixth one is
where no one really knew how to cross over that
and that is when giving code in your response. So
when you when you call a rest API endpoint to
(33:13):
be RESTful, it should return code or something that that
you use to uh change the state of your client.
And I finally learned I'm finally using and crossing that law,
and I'm doing it with HTMX, which I'm actually writing
(33:36):
another online book about HTMX is a very small Java
script framework. But I kind of digress.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
But so the question is is is that smart is
is using code's earning code? Is a response? Is that
sneak it is? I'm also sure I want to be
in charge of every line of code that I execute.
Speaker 3 (34:03):
Well, why not have the server tell you what?
Speaker 1 (34:06):
What?
Speaker 3 (34:07):
Uh? Based on a based on a HTTP request, you
get back some HTML that then you replace other HTML
in the dom and you have you have a new
UI without refreshing the whole page.
Speaker 1 (34:27):
And that gives Well I use Blazer, so that's not
an issue for me. But anyway, I can't see what
I did there.
Speaker 3 (34:33):
I know, I know, I know, I do server I'm
more old school. I like server side stuff.
Speaker 1 (34:39):
But but but in general, though, I think that opens uh.
That increases my attack surface. If what you're bringing down
executes code, you can bring down some bad code.
Speaker 3 (34:53):
Yeah you could. You could know.
Speaker 1 (34:55):
So that's why I say I like, I know, I
like when when I do rest or when somebody says,
you know, make this RESTful. What I do is I
create a response class and that response has like a
list of errors, and it has a success and failure,
and then it has either an entity or a list
of entities, collection of entities, and that's it, you know,
(35:18):
just the response code and all of that stuff. So
then my code figures out what to do with that.
Speaker 3 (35:24):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (35:24):
I like having the transport that the client, the API
client and the server just doing what they should be doing.
I don't want to mess in it.
Speaker 3 (35:34):
My you, I know, and we're really geeking out.
Speaker 1 (35:38):
I'll include a copy of Fielding's dissertation because you see
Irving published it.
Speaker 2 (35:44):
Because one of the options in REST and it just
say it's optional is code on demand. Yep, that's the
sixth yep to I mean, to your point there, Chris
is like, you decided to do the weird one.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
Yeah. I guess it's cool, but it's just not It
doesn't smell good to me.
Speaker 3 (36:03):
I know, you do have to be careful and everything,
but when you were talking about response codes and stuff,
I was my mind was like, oh, the language of
httph and and that's another thing I kind of talk
a little bit about in the book. Is in the
(36:25):
the introduction to everything, I talk about HTTP is a language.
It's a protocol, but it's a language between the server
and the and the clients that calls it.
Speaker 2 (36:38):
And as all protocols effectively are.
Speaker 3 (36:42):
Yes, and it communicates devices. Yeah, it communicates through the
response codes. Because I mean, so many people go, I'll
just pass back a two hundred when when there's when
it's successful, Well, know what what happens in the when
you do a delete When you when you send over
(37:05):
a delete request and it deletes a resource on the
server side and it doesn't return anything back in the
in the HTTP response body, you should always send back
a two oh four because that tells the client that
there's nothing in the in the response body.
Speaker 1 (37:27):
Right, if you think about it, the response code are
for HTTP, right, Like for example, if you get a
five hundred, that doesn't mean that your API end point
ran and there was an error. You shouldn't set the
code to five hundred. That's not for you. Yes, five
hundred is the I don't know where I can't even
reach the sendpoint.
Speaker 3 (37:48):
Yep.
Speaker 1 (37:49):
Yeah, only four hundreds for you, Yes, four hundreds the
last and the year can set.
Speaker 3 (37:55):
So but there's there's a whole thing like in in
the first couple chapters of the book, I talk I
just geek out on HTTP and talk about that and stuff.
But the most interesting chapter I think is the last one,
(38:17):
and it's looking to the future with quick HDP three Yeah,
HTTP three q U I see, and that that is
the protocol that soon will replace TCP, and it will
because TCP is slow, because it does, like Carl said
(38:40):
in the beginning, it does have to do error checking
and everything. Quick is going to replace that and we're
going to have a much quicker Internet in the future soon.
Speaker 2 (38:58):
Over on run as we because server twenty twenty five
now implements h TWB three. We've been talking about these ideas,
although you really upset administrators when you talk about this
stuff because it's integrated with TLS one point three and
so forth, Like it's inherently support secure approach. So it's
like quick end points should be exposed on the Internet.
It's designed to be. But you still have most administrators
(39:21):
everything's behind a firewall.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
This is enough, you're moving. They're cheese man. Yeah, now
they're scared. But you know the other part Quick is
really about TEA about IBV six. Yeah, right, all addresses
being routable, Like we've just gotten to this weird place
because we didn't move to six and still largely haven't,
and so we've done all this network translation, all these
(39:43):
years trying to stretch all the IP four addresses out,
which we've done still. But so we just don't have
this mindset of stuff shraudible. But also just because you're
behind ant firewall doesn't mean you're safe. No, no, none
of this has anything to do with safe. Absolutely not.
Somebody gets into your net work, your toast.
Speaker 3 (40:03):
But but like quick is going to going to go
from multi step handshakes, you know when when a website,
when you get to a website, there's multiple handshakes and stuff,
there's gonna be a single handshake, which is going to
be good. We're going to get rid of the headline
blocking with multiplexing. I mean, there's there's lots of different
(40:27):
stuff that I go through in the in that chapter
to set people up and uh I even have code,
so every chapter in the book also has code out
in the UH in the same GitHub repo that the
book is published from.
Speaker 1 (40:48):
So there's multiplexing. If I remember correctly, that was basically
to send to one IP address and then it gets
multi cast multi casting, I guess is what it is, right,
And that's just to get around the limitations of the
hardware of the time and the network connection speeds and
all that stuff. Now everybody's got a gig or two
(41:08):
gigs in their house, right, And are those protocols still relevant?
Are they still being used?
Speaker 3 (41:17):
Well? But like HTTP one and two still they have
pseudo multiplexing from what I've been able to determine, not
a real modern multiplexing like built into the protocol. I
(41:39):
don't think it was ever built into TCP or even UDP. Yeah,
Richard might know because he knows everything.
Speaker 1 (41:48):
So I was confusing multicasting and multiplexing. I think multiplexing
is where you can just send a bunch of data
out the pipe and it goes to different people because
it's all combined in the same wire, right, Yeah, I
mean multicasting was part of specification for the longest time. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (42:05):
The problem is that routers did didn't implement it, or
often it turned off, right, It had a bunch of limitations,
like it's never really gone where it's supposed to do.
There are these address blocks for both IVV FORORE and
V six for multicasting.
Speaker 1 (42:18):
It's just rare.
Speaker 2 (42:19):
The only place I ever saw of multicast being used
is internally internal networks with large volumes of video data.
Speaker 1 (42:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (42:27):
Well, the other interesting thing with that we'll get with
with HTTP three and quick is it we won't have
drops because of connections. We'll be able to move those
connections very freely. Two different ideas, So hopefully that will
(42:51):
solve some of the like drop connections that we experience
and network programming all the time.
Speaker 1 (43:01):
So do you see any security implications for this new
set of protocols?
Speaker 3 (43:06):
Yep. Uh So instead of having a uh separate t
OS layer, this has uh, this has integrated t OS
one point three encryption into the protocol.
Speaker 1 (43:23):
Do you see t L S or t O S,
t L S c L S.
Speaker 3 (43:28):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (43:29):
And because that way it's not optional, like you can't
use security.
Speaker 3 (43:34):
Everything is is encrypted?
Speaker 1 (43:36):
Good with quick? And what about crypto and not crypto?
What about quantum? Is quantum going to come along and
squash it? Is it quantum safe?
Speaker 3 (43:45):
Quantum? And yeah, I don't know. We were talking to
uh one of the Europe's MVPs in.
Speaker 1 (43:55):
Quantum, uh Cyprian Hannah, And.
Speaker 3 (44:02):
I think quantum. I think quantum will be good for
certain certain needs, but not for like an application like
we built today. It's still we'll still be having what
we're doing. Now, we'll just have quantum kind of giving
(44:22):
information to the application, which then probably will pass it on.
Speaker 1 (44:27):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (44:27):
But the concern here is someday the biggest quantum computers
not the ones that will actually be useful, because that
those are simpler, we'll be able to crack prime key
based in friptions. Yeah, but TLS has a cipher registry,
so you can switch protocol so you don't have to
use an RSA. You could be moving to a lattice
(44:49):
algorithm or any one of these non prime key algorithms,
so you don't have to change TLS, you just have
to switch the cipher.
Speaker 1 (44:56):
Okay.
Speaker 3 (44:57):
But so in the end, I I really did the
book for me so I could learn all this stuff. Nice,
and I think that's what most people write books about.
Because I learned more about this stuff than probably anyone
that reads it is going to learn. So it's awesome.
Speaker 1 (45:16):
But it was.
Speaker 2 (45:18):
Yeah, you get to drill into each of these things
in great detail.
Speaker 3 (45:21):
Yeah, yeah, you do, and you get to uh and
then you get to release it and everyone tells you
you're wrong about certain things. Yeah, which is awesome because
then I can argue, and I love to argue. From
a family of lawyers, so I love the debate.
Speaker 1 (45:40):
You always learn, I mean, whether you're right or wrong,
you always learn something. Yeah, well you get confirmation or
you learn something new. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (45:49):
Yeah, and uh, there's even I even have a page
on this that if someone tells me a correction, I
actually will correct it and give them credit. So I
have a little updates and corrections where I give credit
to people that tell me I'm wrong and they and
(46:10):
they fix something in the book. So it's all yeah,
and it's all on GitHub, it's all on prs. So
you know what, I I am not a very smart person.
Come on, now, I've just been around. I've been around
long enough. Well, I had a I had a.
Speaker 1 (46:29):
Professor, Brandon, you're gonna edit that out right, No, don't
edit that out.
Speaker 3 (46:34):
I'm not. I mean, there are so many smart people,
and that that's why I love going to conferences and
I love being around because I get to learn so much.
Speaker 1 (46:46):
Like it's just.
Speaker 3 (46:49):
No, I'm smart, but in the crowds that we.
Speaker 1 (46:55):
All, you're like, you're smart enough to know what you
don't know.
Speaker 3 (47:01):
Well, and that's the thing I mean, I think that's
that is being smart. As what you said it's knowing
that you don't know everything, right, and I don't know everything.
Speaker 1 (47:12):
So.
Speaker 2 (47:14):
Nobody knows everything close.
Speaker 3 (47:18):
I don't know. Richard's pretty close close.
Speaker 2 (47:21):
I have a very good memory, as you both know. Yes, yeah,
I haven't.
Speaker 3 (47:25):
I haven't stumped Richard too much about about anything.
Speaker 1 (47:31):
So, but you know, we also run with a group
of people who are inventing the things that we all
count on, right, you know, the Mads, targets of the
world and the like. Who are I think a you know,
different kind of intelligence again that they to be able
to to take everything that's going on and envision the
next version, envision what's possible. It's extraordinary.
Speaker 3 (47:53):
Yeah, yeah, exactly, and and it's it's amazing. That's why
I like computer science and this our industry is because
nothing ever is set in like stone. We're always moving.
(48:14):
And if you take a look at accounting or any
other kind of industry, they're pretty much all set I
will for the most part, but we have a we have.
Speaker 2 (48:28):
That being said, I presume your book ends with in
The correct answer is gr PC.
Speaker 3 (48:32):
Doesn't end in g r PC GRP.
Speaker 1 (48:36):
It's pretty freakin' awesome though, it is because it is.
Speaker 2 (48:40):
It is built on HDP two, right, Like most of
these protocols are are pretty much agnostic. They really we
want to just fine on one point one. But g
RPC needed to.
Speaker 3 (48:51):
Well, yeah, it needed to.
Speaker 1 (48:52):
James Newton King came around and made gRPC web which
runs on HDP one so you can use it in
dot net and it's still awesome. Yeah, yeah, I'm sure
it uses two if it can.
Speaker 3 (49:04):
Yeah. My last chapter is is quick, Yeah, just to
look towards the future. But the one before that is
Someone asked me to do a signal R chapter and
I said okay, because they convinced me that it it
fell in line with all the other kind of networking technologies.
Speaker 2 (49:29):
Because wasn't it just once just a wrapper over web socket.
I mean, I know it's involved into the yeah pretty
much things like that, but once for time socket.
Speaker 1 (49:37):
But here's here's what I don't like about SIGNALARE. I
love signalare and I use it all the time, but
you can't use it in replacement for a robust messaging
system because there's no queue. Right. If you're not there
to receive a message, you missed it, it's lost. You
can't come back online and say, hey, what were the
(49:57):
messages that I missed, right, So you can't just use
it in place of a really robust queuing system.
Speaker 3 (50:04):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (50:04):
No, that being said, you could use it to call
to a queue, absolutely, you could.
Speaker 1 (50:08):
You could, but you can also.
Speaker 3 (50:11):
Yeah, and that's a great thing about like something like
Kafta or Azure as your messaging queue.
Speaker 1 (50:20):
There's a million of them. Yeah, see, I see our
talk with clements.
Speaker 3 (50:25):
Yeah, yeah, I.
Speaker 1 (50:26):
Think so he's stopped in nine not a million, but yeah,
that's a lot.
Speaker 3 (50:32):
If you want, if you want to guarantee one hundred
percent or ninety nine point of your messages getting to
where they need to go, you need to do message
queueing and have that.
Speaker 2 (50:48):
Just recognize that the internet's not five nine, so you
know you've got to have a mechanism for recovery.
Speaker 3 (50:55):
Yep, yep, exactly.
Speaker 1 (50:56):
Show enough. What's the next thing that you're going to
be working on? Are you done with networking and c
Sharp or is there always more?
Speaker 3 (51:05):
I don't know. I'm done with that right now. I'm
I have two things I'm kind of doing. I'm in
the middle of a forty two day blog post series
explaining rust to c sharp developers.
Speaker 1 (51:23):
Wow, I would love to read that.
Speaker 3 (51:25):
Yeah, so I'm I'll send the link to you, but yeah,
it's out of my blog. Actually, this year I've got
a master plan to have a blog post every day
nice and it's a good idea. So for forty two days,
I think I'm up to day twenty nine. So today
(51:48):
was we were talking about traits in Rust.
Speaker 1 (51:52):
So if you want to know more, you have to
go out, and I'm going to start with read chapter one.
Speaker 3 (51:57):
But Rust is Rust is like my new kind of love.
So I've got two loves right now, Rust and HTMX,
and I'm writing the next quasi online book for HTMX
and then trying to learn Rust and share all this
stuff I'm learning about Rust.
Speaker 1 (52:17):
All right, So real quick, what is your favorite thing
about Rust? What is so great about RUSS that we
should one sentence that you can convince the c sharp
developer to read your blog posts.
Speaker 3 (52:29):
Yeah, so Rust will not let you compile.
Speaker 1 (52:35):
Bad code, So stuff that c Sharp would would discover
at runtime, Rust will discover compile time.
Speaker 3 (52:42):
Yeah, like if you if you write code to divide
one by zero rus, RUSS will not let you compile.
Speaker 1 (52:54):
It will stop because you can do that in c Sharp.
You can make a variable zero zer with a value
of zero and then divide.
Speaker 3 (53:01):
One by it, and that throws an exception.
Speaker 1 (53:03):
Compiler says run time, but now compile time.
Speaker 3 (53:07):
Yeah, yep. The other thing is everything is immutable, which
I think is really is really smart because it allows
you to do multi threading course much easier.
Speaker 1 (53:24):
It's not functional, though, is it. It's not a functional language.
Speaker 3 (53:27):
It can be functional. It's a very different object oriented language.
Like it doesn't have inheritance, so.
Speaker 1 (53:37):
There's no ideas of nulls, right, which is the bugaboo
of C shark.
Speaker 3 (53:41):
There is no nulls. You can't have a null because
whenever a variable is out of scope, it goes away.
And that's the other nice thing is like it doesn't
need a garbage collector because it just anything that's out
(54:04):
of scope goes away.
Speaker 1 (54:09):
Hmm.
Speaker 3 (54:09):
And there's It's just it makes you think differently. Sure,
it's kind of like when I learn React, like React
web development was for me very it was very different.
But but yeah, my thing is you have to keep
(54:32):
learning about new things. Even though I may not use
rust on anything, I want to learn it just to
just to see some different things that I can then
bring back potentially into c sharp and and and maybe
do smarter coding, have a smarter outlook on on my code.
(54:55):
But yeah, Rust is really cool. I'm building out some
some web APIs. I think I'm going to be pushing
some talks around around Rust and doing networking, like maybe
taking all of the chapters in the c Sharp networking
(55:16):
and doing Rust networking.
Speaker 1 (55:19):
Yeah. Interesting. So these blog posts around woodruf dot dev.
Speaker 3 (55:24):
Yeah, they are. And I'll send you guys the link
to I've got a one blog that links to all
forty two days as I am going through, So I'll
send you that page so people can kind of start
from the beginning and work their way down.
Speaker 1 (55:41):
Awesome, I'm really looking forward to that. Cool Chris, what
is the what is what is the next bourbon that
you're going to pour yourself? Oh?
Speaker 3 (55:53):
So, I love there's a there's a new two new
bourbons that I've discovered. RD one is a distillery close
to Lexington, Kentucky. They have a uh and I cannot
remember Richard will know the name of the wood. It's
this Brazilian wood that starts with A, the letter A
(56:18):
and I can't remember the name. But they finish their
their bourbon and barrels made of that wood and it.
Speaker 2 (56:28):
Makes the not oh huh, that's pretty strange.
Speaker 3 (56:32):
No, No, they start oak and then they finish the
last six months or a year in this in this
Brazilian wood, and it makes the bourbon tastes like cinnamon, toast, crunch, cereal.
It is amazing. So Richard, you're going to dev some.
Speaker 2 (56:52):
I think you're talking about amberanna.
Speaker 3 (56:54):
Yeah, Banna, Okay, that's it.
Speaker 1 (56:56):
See you drink enough of it? Do you see the
three little sweetish chef dancing around with the hats on?
Speaker 3 (57:02):
No? Maybe, no, you just pass out.
Speaker 2 (57:04):
So well, it's the only one I can think of.
They usually make kosasha with it, which is their rub
and varry that it's a it's a sugarcane based alcohol. Yeah,
and I know that the high end versions were aged
in Mburanna. But that's the only thing I think of
that's a wood from Brazil.
Speaker 3 (57:22):
Yeah, I think it is that. Okay, And so that bourbon.
And then the other one I've been drinking is one
from a Holiday distilleries and they make a sweet red
wheat using sweet red wheat to make le makers. And yeah,
(57:45):
but there's they have some America. They call it American
whiskies because they don't use fifty bourbon has to be
at least fifty one corn. Some of this is a
majority is wheat. So I'm really getting into They can't
(58:06):
call it bourbon, so they call it American whiskey. So
I'm really getting into the weeded American whiskeyes because they're
real sweet and uh, they're kind of the opposite of rise.
Speaker 2 (58:19):
Yeah, and it's not like it's not like bourbons weren't sweet.
But yeah, I'm with you, so.
Speaker 3 (58:26):
Yeah, yeah, So I'm I'm bringing two bottles over to Stockholm.
Def some you're gonna be there.
Speaker 1 (58:33):
I'll be there.
Speaker 3 (58:34):
Yeah, you'll be there, Richard, or you.
Speaker 1 (58:36):
Can be I will.
Speaker 2 (58:37):
I'll be coming straight up from South Africa, not going
to any os.
Speaker 3 (58:40):
Okay, well, I've I've got two bottles. I've got a
bottle of this RD one that I want to share,
and then I need to figure out the other one
I'm going to share. I think I'm going to bring
one of these weeded whiskeys with me.
Speaker 1 (58:55):
So we are going to see the three sweetish chefs
dancing around going see you know, I man?
Speaker 3 (59:01):
Yeah, So but those are those are the new ones.
There's there's so many cool, new new bourbons and the
price is starting to come down to Because so.
Speaker 1 (59:13):
You're in Lexington, did you say, supply.
Speaker 3 (59:16):
I lived I lived in Lexington for three years. Now
I'm in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Speaker 1 (59:21):
Okay, so yeah, well, being in Kentucky, of course, we're
trying to educate people about bourbon a little bit, especially
those outside the United States, and we have a significant
number of European listeners. Bourbon doesn't have to be made
in Kentucky, as Chris was saying, it has to be
made in America. Has to be at least fifty one
(59:42):
percent corn, and it also has this weird rule that
it has to be aged in virgin white American oak
casks that have been charred for a certain amount of
time minimum three years, three years, and then after that
they can finish in anything like port wine barrels. It
(01:00:06):
used to be only but they yeah, Angels Envy started
doing the sherry finishes and.
Speaker 3 (01:00:11):
Yeah and yep, yeah, yep.
Speaker 1 (01:00:15):
So anyway, that is one of the one of the
things that America has brought to the world is it's
American whiskey. Right, You've got Scotch whiskey, got Irish Canadian.
We have American whiskey. It's called Bourbon. There you go. Yeah,
and if you go listen to the series I've done
on Windows Weekly that they've clipped off his YouTube videos,
I explain all of them. That's so cool. And we
(01:00:36):
also did a show on Bourbon after we came back
from the road trip or No Code Palooza. Yeah, we
did a geek out on Bourbon.
Speaker 3 (01:00:44):
Oh I remember that. Yeah, that was a good episode.
Speaker 1 (01:00:46):
Yeah, good stuff. Chris Well, it's great to have you
on the show finally after all these years.
Speaker 3 (01:00:51):
Finally, thank you.
Speaker 1 (01:00:52):
Yep, and we'll do it again.
Speaker 3 (01:00:54):
I feel I feel my life is complete now, so
mine too. My career, my technical career is complete.
Speaker 1 (01:01:02):
So mine too. And I really mean that, like I
really enjoyed sort of geeking out and going back in
time with all of the stuff that I used to
think about. And it's good to think about it again. Yeah,
especially for the young kids.
Speaker 3 (01:01:15):
Everything comes around, everything comes around, that goes around.
Speaker 1 (01:01:19):
So good stuff. So yep, all right, thanks again, and
we'll talk to you, dear listener next time on dot
net rocks. Dot net Rocks is brought to you by
(01:01:48):
Franklin's Net and produced by Pop Studios, a full service audio,
video and post production facility located physically in New London, Connecticut,
and of course in the cloud online at pwop dot com.
Visit our website at d O T N E t
R O c k S dot com for RSS feeds, downloads,
(01:02:09):
mobile apps, comments, and access to the full archives going
back to show number one, recorded in September two thousand
and two. And make sure you check out our sponsors.
They keep us in business. Now go write some code.
See you next time you got Jamtlevans
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Law & Order: Criminal Justice System - Season 1 & Season 2
Season Two Out Now! Law & Order: Criminal Justice System tells the real stories behind the landmark cases that have shaped how the most dangerous and influential criminals in America are prosecuted. In its second season, the series tackles the threat of terrorism in the United States. From the rise of extremist political groups in the 60s to domestic lone wolves in the modern day, we explore how organizations like the FBI and Joint Terrorism Take Force have evolved to fight back against a multitude of terrorist threats.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com