November 19, 2025 • 12 mins
Ja'Marr Chase Suspension Upheld: Bengals Receiver Sidelined
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. You share the source
material with us, the articles, the reports, the official statements,
and we distill it into the knowledge you need. Today
we are strapping on the pads and diving deep into
the disciplinary process of the National Football.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
League, right into it.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
And we're focusing on a well, a really high profile
case involving one of the league's most electric players, Jamar
Chase of the Cincinnati Bengals.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
The huge star.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Our sources lay out a pretty clear narrative of an
incident that was missed in real time, completely missed, but
it became a major focus for the league almost immediately.
The headline is simple enough. Chase was suspended for one
game for unsportsmanlike conduct.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
And crucially, that suspension was upheld upheld after a very
rapid appeal, which means he will miss the next game
against the New England Patriots. And that outcome it seems
straightforward on the surface, but it really unlocks a complex.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
Conversation about what exactly.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
About officiating authority, about player conduct and the specific section
of the rule book that governs what the NFL calls
the principles of sportsmanship. Okay, so for you, the listener,
We're using this incident as a perfect case study to
really understand the league's modern enforcement. We're going beyond just
the punch in the denial to see how postgame video
(01:23):
the camera lens can effectively overrule the officials on the
field and what that costs.
Speaker 1 (01:30):
Okay, let's unpack this. Let's start exactly where the trouble began. Yeah,
the setting was Week eleven. It was the Bengals, pretty
painful thirty four to twelve loss to their rivals, the
Pittsburgh Steelers.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
An AFC North battle, always chippy, and.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
The interaction involved Chase and Steelers defensive back Jalen Ramsey.
This rivalry is, it's always volatile, but this really elevated.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Things for sure, And the sources confirmed this wasn't their
first clash.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Of the day. No, they had already been flagged in
a scuffle earlier in the game. It led to offsetting unsupport.
It's been like conduct penalty. So the tension was already there.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
It was simmering.
Speaker 1 (02:03):
Yeah, but the specific act that triggered the league's review
happened later. And this is the core piece of evidence, right,
the video.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
The video is everything. Here footage from Cincinnati's w xi XTV.
It clearly showed Chase spitting in Ramsey's direction.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
And that actually the spitting was the flashpoint.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
It was, and Ramsey reacted instantly. He threw a punch
at Chase, which got him ejected, immediately ejected from the game.
He was tossed. End of story for him in that moment.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
And here's where the analysis really begins because of the
irony here. It's monumental. Ramsey is ejected for the clear
aggressive response of punch. But Chase, who instigated the whole thing,
he remained on the field. He finished the game, finished
the game because the official simply missed it. They missed
(02:53):
the spitting.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
That procedural gap is absolutely critical, and we know they
missed it because of the official postgame mechanism, the what's
called the Pool report.
Speaker 1 (03:01):
The Pool report, right, yeah, where the head referee has
to address the press on behalf of the whole.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Crew exactly to offer clarity on controversial calls and the
rekree Bill Vinovich, he stated directly in that report something like,
we did not see anything that rose to that level.
Speaker 1 (03:16):
At all at all. So they saw nothing.
Speaker 2 (03:18):
They saw the punch, they didn't see what caused it.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
It just seems almost backwards that the retaliation gets immediately punished,
but the you know, the foundational breach of conduct goes
completely unseen in real time.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
Well, they don't tolerate the disparity so much as they
tolerate human error. I mean, what this really emphasizes is
just how hard it is to spot a very discrete
action like spitting in the middle of all the chaos.
Speaker 1 (03:43):
Of a live play, compared to a punch.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Exactly compared to a visible overhand punch. The league's priority
in the moment is just maintaining order. Ramsey's punch is
clear fighting. It demands an immediate response, an ejection.
Speaker 1 (03:56):
Whereas Chase's action was just too.
Speaker 2 (03:58):
Subtle, too subtle for the human eye a cave. But
the league office, they have the benefit of high definition,
slow motion video review, and that's where the retrospective punishment
comes in.
Speaker 1 (04:09):
And Jase he didn't exactly help his own case, did he.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
Not at all? After the game he denied spitting on Ramsey.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
But that denial, I mean, it didn't really matter. Once
the video was.
Speaker 2 (04:19):
Out there, it didn't stand a chance. And this is
where the league draws a very hard line. Once there's
indisputable video, the denial becomes totally irrelevant.
Speaker 1 (04:29):
It's not about intent at that point.
Speaker 2 (04:31):
No, it's about enforcing a violation of game integrity. The
league had this compelling video of an action that just
fundamentally violates their basic conduct rules.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
And that set the whole discipliner machine emotion with I
mean incredible speed, lightning speed. The action happens Sunday. The
league announced the suspension on Monday, and.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
The appeal was heard and denied by Tuesday.
Speaker 1 (04:54):
Wow. So let's transition out to what they actually enforced.
What was the specific rule they cited here?
Speaker 2 (04:59):
This is key because they didn't just call it fighting
or unnecessary roughness. Oh, The league based the suspension on
a specific rule section, the one that applies to any
act which is contrary to the generally understood principles of sportsmanship.
Speaker 1 (05:14):
The principles of sportsmanship that language. That's where this conversation
gets really meaty.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
It does.
Speaker 1 (05:21):
It's a catch all phrase, isn't it. Why apply it
so severely here?
Speaker 2 (05:24):
It's kind of the highest standard of conduct rule, And
they used it precisely because spitting isn't just a physical foul,
it's it's seen as a deeply disrespectful and detrimental act
to the image of the game.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
Okay, so it's an image thing.
Speaker 2 (05:40):
It's a huge image thing, think about it. The league
usually reserves suspensions, especially for star players, for you know,
flagrant hits, repeated violations, substance abuse, things like that. Yeah,
to get suspended and lose a paycheck for an act
that the officials missed and that didn't physically harm anyone,
that sounds a profound message.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
They're defining spitting as something that threatens the game's integrity
more than a lot.
Speaker 2 (06:04):
Of borderline physical fouls. Yeah, it's a breach of professionalism.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
That makes a lot of sense. It's an integrity issue,
not just a fifteen yard penalty issue. So let's talk
about the accountability side of this. The league hands down
the suspension, but players have rights they can appeal. How
how robust was this process?
Speaker 2 (06:25):
This is a really crucial detail for understanding the you know,
the labor relations in the NFL. The appeal mechanism is
designed to be truly independent. Okay, The sources confirm the
appeal was heard by Jordy Nelson.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Wait that Jordy Nelson, the former Packers receiver.
Speaker 2 (06:40):
The very same, and his involvement matters a lot because
he's a joint appointee, meaning he was selected and approved
by both the NFL and the NFL Players Association, the NFLPA.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
So he's not just some league employee rubber stamping a
decision exactly.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
He serves as an independent arbiter. He's there specifically to
ensure a fair review, which is you know, often a
huge point of conflict between the league.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
And the union. So his role is to add.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
Legitimacy, legitimacy and independence. Yes, he reviewed all the evidence,
including that high def video that completely contradicted Chase's denial.
Speaker 1 (07:12):
And what was the verdict.
Speaker 2 (07:13):
He upheld the suspension, which confirms two things. One the
video evidence was just it was damning, indisputable, and two,
the league's interpretation of that act as a violation of
their conduct rules was justified, even under independent review.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
So the system worked in a.
Speaker 2 (07:30):
Way, the process worked. It moved from a mist call
on the field to a league review to an upheld
suspension by a joint arbiter. It just shows the increasing
power of this retrospective video enforcement.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
It basically means the referees whistle. It's not the final.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
Word anymore non player conduct.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
No, the camera is now the ultimate authority he rerely is.
Let's pivot now to the tangible cost because this abstract
idea of sportsmanship, it suddenly hits the player and the
team in a very concrete way. The obvious consequence is
the Bengals are now without their number one receiver against
the Patriots on Sunday. But let's get into the numbers
you teased. This is where it becomes visceral.
Speaker 2 (08:10):
It's staggering. I mean, when you actually quantify the financial
penalty for this one act, you understand the severity of
the league's message.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
So this one game suspension means Jamar Chase foresits his weekly.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
Paychecks as a whole weekly paycheck. Yeah, based on his
contract salary.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
And that number is it's massive. He forfeits four hundred
and forty eight thousand, three hundred and thirty.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
Three dollars just for his base salary. And that's not all.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
There's more.
Speaker 2 (08:36):
On top of that. Players often have these per game
active roster bonuses built into their contracts. Right, Chase forfeits his,
which is another fifty eight hundred and twenty three dollars.
Speaker 1 (08:47):
So let me do the math here. Yeah, we're talking
about a total financial loss of over half a million dollars, over.
Speaker 2 (08:55):
Five hundred seven thousand dollars.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
All from one action that lasted less than a second,
was missed by the officials.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
And was classified as being contrary to the principles of sportsmanship.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Think about that. When the league issues a normal fine
for say, unnecessary roughness a helmet to helmet hit, those
fines are often what fifteen twenty thousand.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
Dollars, maybe fifty thousand for a repeat offender.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
Right, And those are painful, sure, but they don't involve
losing your entire week's salary and bonuses.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
If this is a different level.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
By suspending him and triggering the loss of over half
a million dollars, the NFL is explicitly stating they view
this specific unsportsmanlike act as being just as severe as
the most serious infractions, the kind that usually get a suspension.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
Like performance enhancing drugs. Exactly, So, that half million dollar figure,
it's not just a number, it's the price the NFL
has put on its own image.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
It is a massive deterrent. That financial severity is designed
to send a just a chilling message to every player
on every roster, message being that that type of act
which harms the perceived inten gegrity and professionalism of the
game comes with a catastrophic immediate financial hit.
Speaker 1 (10:05):
And beyond the money, there's the competitive impact. That's right,
the Bengals are now missing their main offensive weapon for
a crucial late season game. The source material kind of
frames this as a secondary penalty, right, It's not just
on the player, but on the whole team.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
It is. The suspension structure means the team suffers for
what one individual did. It puts immediate competitive pressure on
the Bengals offense. They have to rely on deeper options now.
It completely changes the dynamic for their game against the Patriots.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
It just underscores that these things don't happen in a vacuum,
not at all.
Speaker 2 (10:36):
They ripple out and affect everyone's goals.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
So if we look back at this whole scenario, the
missed call, the damning video, the rabbit appeal, and that
half million dollar price tag, what are the key takeaways
you really need to hold onto from this deep dive? Okay, first,
I think remember the exact rule they cited. The NFL
used that clause about axe contrary.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
To generally understood principles of sportsmanship right.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
That language is foundational, gives them a really wide scope
for punishment based on video.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Second, pay attention to the integrity of the process itself.
The appeal was heard by Jordy Nelson, an independent arbiter
jointly appointed by the league in the union, and his
decision to uphold the ruling. It legitimizes using this postgame
video to enforce conduct rules the refs missed.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
And finally, you have to quantify the punishment. The sheer
financial cost of this one game ban over five hundred
thousand dollars. It just establishes the league's priority priority, which
is they will deploy huge financial penalties to deter any
acts they see as detrimental to the league's image and integrity.
Speaker 2 (11:41):
And this brings us to the I think the fundamental
question that this whole case raises no one given that
the officials on the field missed chases action entirely. They
let him finish the game, but the video evidence later
was so strong that an independent officer upheld the suspension
based on sportsmanship. How does the NFL balance that? How
(12:02):
do you balance the authority of real time officiating versus
this increasing reliance on retrospective video.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
It forces you to ask you, is the league moving
toward a state where punishment for player conduct is determined
less by a referees flag and more by what and
more by the cult unforgiving clarity of the camera lens?
And what does that mean for how players police themselves
going forward? Something to mull over as you watch the
games this weekend.
Speaker 2 (12:25):
Indeed, it's a fascinating development in player accountability.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
Thank you for joining us for this deep dive into
NFL discipline. We'll see you next time.
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. You share the source
material with us, the articles, the reports, the official statements,
and we distill it into the knowledge you need. Today
we are strapping on the pads and diving deep into
the disciplinary process of the National Football.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
League, right into it.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
And we're focusing on a well, a really high profile
case involving one of the league's most electric players, Jamar
Chase of the Cincinnati Bengals.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
The huge star.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Our sources lay out a pretty clear narrative of an
incident that was missed in real time, completely missed, but
it became a major focus for the league almost immediately.
The headline is simple enough. Chase was suspended for one
game for unsportsmanlike conduct.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
And crucially, that suspension was upheld upheld after a very
rapid appeal, which means he will miss the next game
against the New England Patriots. And that outcome it seems
straightforward on the surface, but it really unlocks a complex.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
Conversation about what exactly.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
About officiating authority, about player conduct and the specific section
of the rule book that governs what the NFL calls
the principles of sportsmanship. Okay, so for you, the listener,
We're using this incident as a perfect case study to
really understand the league's modern enforcement. We're going beyond just
the punch in the denial to see how postgame video
(01:23):
the camera lens can effectively overrule the officials on the
field and what that costs.
Speaker 1 (01:30):
Okay, let's unpack this. Let's start exactly where the trouble began. Yeah,
the setting was Week eleven. It was the Bengals, pretty
painful thirty four to twelve loss to their rivals, the
Pittsburgh Steelers.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
An AFC North battle, always chippy, and.
Speaker 1 (01:42):
The interaction involved Chase and Steelers defensive back Jalen Ramsey.
This rivalry is, it's always volatile, but this really elevated.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
Things for sure, And the sources confirmed this wasn't their
first clash.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Of the day. No, they had already been flagged in
a scuffle earlier in the game. It led to offsetting unsupport.
It's been like conduct penalty. So the tension was already there.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
It was simmering.
Speaker 1 (02:03):
Yeah, but the specific act that triggered the league's review
happened later. And this is the core piece of evidence, right,
the video.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
The video is everything. Here footage from Cincinnati's w xi XTV.
It clearly showed Chase spitting in Ramsey's direction.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
And that actually the spitting was the flashpoint.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
It was, and Ramsey reacted instantly. He threw a punch
at Chase, which got him ejected, immediately ejected from the game.
He was tossed. End of story for him in that moment.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
And here's where the analysis really begins because of the
irony here. It's monumental. Ramsey is ejected for the clear
aggressive response of punch. But Chase, who instigated the whole thing,
he remained on the field. He finished the game, finished
the game because the official simply missed it. They missed
(02:53):
the spitting.
Speaker 2 (02:53):
That procedural gap is absolutely critical, and we know they
missed it because of the official postgame mechanism, the what's
called the Pool report.
Speaker 1 (03:01):
The Pool report, right, yeah, where the head referee has
to address the press on behalf of the whole.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
Crew exactly to offer clarity on controversial calls and the
rekree Bill Vinovich, he stated directly in that report something like,
we did not see anything that rose to that level.
Speaker 1 (03:16):
At all at all. So they saw nothing.
Speaker 2 (03:18):
They saw the punch, they didn't see what caused it.
Speaker 1 (03:20):
It just seems almost backwards that the retaliation gets immediately punished,
but the you know, the foundational breach of conduct goes
completely unseen in real time.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
Well, they don't tolerate the disparity so much as they
tolerate human error. I mean, what this really emphasizes is
just how hard it is to spot a very discrete
action like spitting in the middle of all the chaos.
Speaker 1 (03:43):
Of a live play, compared to a punch.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Exactly compared to a visible overhand punch. The league's priority
in the moment is just maintaining order. Ramsey's punch is
clear fighting. It demands an immediate response, an ejection.
Speaker 1 (03:56):
Whereas Chase's action was just too.
Speaker 2 (03:58):
Subtle, too subtle for the human eye a cave. But
the league office, they have the benefit of high definition,
slow motion video review, and that's where the retrospective punishment
comes in.
Speaker 1 (04:09):
And Jase he didn't exactly help his own case, did he.
Speaker 2 (04:12):
Not at all? After the game he denied spitting on Ramsey.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
But that denial, I mean, it didn't really matter. Once
the video was.
Speaker 2 (04:19):
Out there, it didn't stand a chance. And this is
where the league draws a very hard line. Once there's
indisputable video, the denial becomes totally irrelevant.
Speaker 1 (04:29):
It's not about intent at that point.
Speaker 2 (04:31):
No, it's about enforcing a violation of game integrity. The
league had this compelling video of an action that just
fundamentally violates their basic conduct rules.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
And that set the whole discipliner machine emotion with I
mean incredible speed, lightning speed. The action happens Sunday. The
league announced the suspension on Monday, and.
Speaker 2 (04:51):
The appeal was heard and denied by Tuesday.
Speaker 1 (04:54):
Wow. So let's transition out to what they actually enforced.
What was the specific rule they cited here?
Speaker 2 (04:59):
This is key because they didn't just call it fighting
or unnecessary roughness. Oh, The league based the suspension on
a specific rule section, the one that applies to any
act which is contrary to the generally understood principles of sportsmanship.
Speaker 1 (05:14):
The principles of sportsmanship that language. That's where this conversation
gets really meaty.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
It does.
Speaker 1 (05:21):
It's a catch all phrase, isn't it. Why apply it
so severely here?
Speaker 2 (05:24):
It's kind of the highest standard of conduct rule, And
they used it precisely because spitting isn't just a physical foul,
it's it's seen as a deeply disrespectful and detrimental act
to the image of the game.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
Okay, so it's an image thing.
Speaker 2 (05:40):
It's a huge image thing, think about it. The league
usually reserves suspensions, especially for star players, for you know,
flagrant hits, repeated violations, substance abuse, things like that. Yeah,
to get suspended and lose a paycheck for an act
that the officials missed and that didn't physically harm anyone,
that sounds a profound message.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
They're defining spitting as something that threatens the game's integrity
more than a lot.
Speaker 2 (06:04):
Of borderline physical fouls. Yeah, it's a breach of professionalism.
Speaker 1 (06:07):
That makes a lot of sense. It's an integrity issue,
not just a fifteen yard penalty issue. So let's talk
about the accountability side of this. The league hands down
the suspension, but players have rights they can appeal. How
how robust was this process?
Speaker 2 (06:25):
This is a really crucial detail for understanding the you know,
the labor relations in the NFL. The appeal mechanism is
designed to be truly independent. Okay, The sources confirm the
appeal was heard by Jordy Nelson.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Wait that Jordy Nelson, the former Packers receiver.
Speaker 2 (06:40):
The very same, and his involvement matters a lot because
he's a joint appointee, meaning he was selected and approved
by both the NFL and the NFL Players Association, the NFLPA.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
So he's not just some league employee rubber stamping a
decision exactly.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
He serves as an independent arbiter. He's there specifically to
ensure a fair review, which is you know, often a
huge point of conflict between the league.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
And the union. So his role is to add.
Speaker 2 (07:03):
Legitimacy, legitimacy and independence. Yes, he reviewed all the evidence,
including that high def video that completely contradicted Chase's denial.
Speaker 1 (07:12):
And what was the verdict.
Speaker 2 (07:13):
He upheld the suspension, which confirms two things. One the
video evidence was just it was damning, indisputable, and two,
the league's interpretation of that act as a violation of
their conduct rules was justified, even under independent review.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
So the system worked in a.
Speaker 2 (07:30):
Way, the process worked. It moved from a mist call
on the field to a league review to an upheld
suspension by a joint arbiter. It just shows the increasing
power of this retrospective video enforcement.
Speaker 1 (07:44):
It basically means the referees whistle. It's not the final.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
Word anymore non player conduct.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
No, the camera is now the ultimate authority he rerely is.
Let's pivot now to the tangible cost because this abstract
idea of sportsmanship, it suddenly hits the player and the
team in a very concrete way. The obvious consequence is
the Bengals are now without their number one receiver against
the Patriots on Sunday. But let's get into the numbers
you teased. This is where it becomes visceral.
Speaker 2 (08:10):
It's staggering. I mean, when you actually quantify the financial
penalty for this one act, you understand the severity of
the league's message.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
So this one game suspension means Jamar Chase foresits his weekly.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
Paychecks as a whole weekly paycheck. Yeah, based on his
contract salary.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
And that number is it's massive. He forfeits four hundred
and forty eight thousand, three hundred and thirty.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
Three dollars just for his base salary. And that's not all.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
There's more.
Speaker 2 (08:36):
On top of that. Players often have these per game
active roster bonuses built into their contracts. Right, Chase forfeits his,
which is another fifty eight hundred and twenty three dollars.
Speaker 1 (08:47):
So let me do the math here. Yeah, we're talking
about a total financial loss of over half a million dollars, over.
Speaker 2 (08:55):
Five hundred seven thousand dollars.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
All from one action that lasted less than a second,
was missed by the officials.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
And was classified as being contrary to the principles of sportsmanship.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Think about that. When the league issues a normal fine
for say, unnecessary roughness a helmet to helmet hit, those
fines are often what fifteen twenty thousand.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
Dollars, maybe fifty thousand for a repeat offender.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
Right, And those are painful, sure, but they don't involve
losing your entire week's salary and bonuses.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
If this is a different level.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
By suspending him and triggering the loss of over half
a million dollars, the NFL is explicitly stating they view
this specific unsportsmanlike act as being just as severe as
the most serious infractions, the kind that usually get a suspension.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
Like performance enhancing drugs. Exactly, So, that half million dollar figure,
it's not just a number, it's the price the NFL
has put on its own image.
Speaker 2 (09:48):
It is a massive deterrent. That financial severity is designed
to send a just a chilling message to every player
on every roster, message being that that type of act
which harms the perceived inten gegrity and professionalism of the
game comes with a catastrophic immediate financial hit.
Speaker 1 (10:05):
And beyond the money, there's the competitive impact. That's right,
the Bengals are now missing their main offensive weapon for
a crucial late season game. The source material kind of
frames this as a secondary penalty, right, It's not just
on the player, but on the whole team.
Speaker 2 (10:18):
It is. The suspension structure means the team suffers for
what one individual did. It puts immediate competitive pressure on
the Bengals offense. They have to rely on deeper options now.
It completely changes the dynamic for their game against the Patriots.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
It just underscores that these things don't happen in a vacuum,
not at all.
Speaker 2 (10:36):
They ripple out and affect everyone's goals.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
So if we look back at this whole scenario, the
missed call, the damning video, the rabbit appeal, and that
half million dollar price tag, what are the key takeaways
you really need to hold onto from this deep dive? Okay, first,
I think remember the exact rule they cited. The NFL
used that clause about axe contrary.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
To generally understood principles of sportsmanship right.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
That language is foundational, gives them a really wide scope
for punishment based on video.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Second, pay attention to the integrity of the process itself.
The appeal was heard by Jordy Nelson, an independent arbiter
jointly appointed by the league in the union, and his
decision to uphold the ruling. It legitimizes using this postgame
video to enforce conduct rules the refs missed.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
And finally, you have to quantify the punishment. The sheer
financial cost of this one game ban over five hundred
thousand dollars. It just establishes the league's priority priority, which
is they will deploy huge financial penalties to deter any
acts they see as detrimental to the league's image and integrity.
Speaker 2 (11:41):
And this brings us to the I think the fundamental
question that this whole case raises no one given that
the officials on the field missed chases action entirely. They
let him finish the game, but the video evidence later
was so strong that an independent officer upheld the suspension
based on sportsmanship. How does the NFL balance that? How
(12:02):
do you balance the authority of real time officiating versus
this increasing reliance on retrospective video.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
It forces you to ask you, is the league moving
toward a state where punishment for player conduct is determined
less by a referees flag and more by what and
more by the cult unforgiving clarity of the camera lens?
And what does that mean for how players police themselves
going forward? Something to mull over as you watch the
games this weekend.
Speaker 2 (12:25):
Indeed, it's a fascinating development in player accountability.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
Thank you for joining us for this deep dive into
NFL discipline. We'll see you next time.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Bobby Bones Show
Listen to 'The Bobby Bones Show' by downloading the daily full replay.