Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Okay, so the San Francisco forty nine Ers, they just
had this really decisive win twenty six to eight over
the Cleveland Browns.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Big win.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
Yeah, but if you were paying any attention to what
people were talking about after the game, you know the
final score is it's completely irrelevant, right, not.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
The story at all. The whole thing was just completely
overshadowed by this explosive confrontation on the sideline.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
Involving the forty nine ers wide receiver Schwan Jennings.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
And this was so much more than your standard trash talk.
I mean, this was a real flashpoint. It exposed this
intense personal hostility from the other team, it really did,
and it ended with some of the I think most
shocking post game comments we've seen all season. So for
this deep dive, we're getting into the sources that detail
(00:46):
not just this one fight, but a whole controversial two
week span for Jennings. Yeah, he's just been this central
character again and again in these arguments, retaliations, and some
pretty significant league discipline.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
To really get the intensity of what was going on here,
we have to start right at the top, right with
the quote, the quote that just you know, defined this
whole drama. It's from the Browns veteran defensive lineman Shelby Harris.
He was talking about Jennings and he did not hold back,
not at all. The source material quotes him directly. He says,
(01:18):
I see exactly why they punched your nuts. I'm surprised
nobody punched him in the jaw yet.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
I mean, wow, that kind of language openly referencing and
you know, almost justifying past physical violence against another player. Yeah,
that tells you, the listener, that we are dealing with
something that goes so far beyond a normal unsportsmanlike conduct penalty. Oh. Absolutely,
(01:43):
When a player starts talking about someone needing to be
punched in the jaw, it signals that Jennings has allegedly
crossed some kind of unspoken line of respect. Yeah, and
not just once, but repeatedly.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
And like you said, this isn't some isolated thing. This
whole drama with the Browns. It really only blew up
because Jennings was already carrying this baggage from the week
before exactly. But let's stick with the Cleveland confrontation first.
The sources are really clear that this argument it didn't
even happen right after a big hit or a touchdown
or something. It flared up during a total stoppage in play.
(02:15):
The Browns defensive tackle Malike Collins was actually injured on
the field.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
And that timing is so crucial. It means the tension
wasn't just you know, a gut reaction. It had time
to sort of simmer and become deliberate. It wasn't just adrenaline, right.
The whole thing escalated in the Brown Star players. They
stepped in, yeah, but not to defend the game really,
but to defend their own teammates. From what Jennings was allegedly.
Speaker 1 (02:39):
Saying, and the comments from Miles Garrett, the Brown's defensive end,
they're really telling because he gets into the nature of
the attack. Garrett, you know, he's trying to be the leader,
trying to de escalate things, and he said that Jennings
had a lot to say that was demeaning and disparaging
towards some.
Speaker 2 (02:55):
Of our players meeting in desparace. See that's not football talk,
that's highly personal exactly. And Garrett said he trying to
get between them. He was trying to keep my guys
focused on the game and not worried about stuff outside
of it. He also specifically says that this kind of behavior,
these comments quote doesn't feel like that belongs in the game.
Speaker 1 (03:14):
So he's drawing a line, a.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
Very clear line. He's separating competitive fire from what he
sees as a personal verbal assault.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
It sounds like a classic unwritten rule was just shattered.
But you know, while Garrett was trying to keep the peace,
sheldy Harris's comments. They show that raw emotional reaction totally.
Harris just flat out said that Jennings says some things
that you should not say to another man. Ever, I
mean that implies a serious moral line was crossed.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
And what's also fascinating is how Harris then connects those
words to Jennings's on field actions right after it. He
didn't just criticize the words. He criticized Jennings for running
behind your O line. As soon as it got heated.
Harris called that and this is another quote some real
soft time, and I want that.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Okay, So let's dig into that idea of softness a
little bit in this kind of you know, hypermasculine, high
stakes world. Why does running the vind your linemen make
it so much worse? Why does that elevated?
Speaker 2 (04:10):
Well, it really speaks to this perceived failure to match
your aggression with accountability in their world, if you're going
to use that kind of demeaning and disparaging language, stuff
that's personal, Yeah, there's an expectation that you're ready to
stand there and face the consequences of it. So running
behind your teammates after saying something like that is seen
(04:30):
as a professional cowardice.
Speaker 1 (04:32):
Like you don't really stand by your own words.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
Precisely, it implies you don't believe what you said enough
to risk the physical outcome, and that, in their code,
is often seen as even worse than the first insult.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
That does make the reaction more understandable, but it also
shows you the long memory these guys have. The fact
that Shelby Harris could just pull up that past violence,
it suggests Jennings has a history here. It does, and
that leads us right to the first incident, the one
that happened less than a week for this against the
Carolina Panthers.
Speaker 2 (05:02):
And this is critical because it establishes a clear pattern
of escalation in a really, really short period of time.
The fight with the Browns was basically the immediate fallout
from the drama that started on Monday Night against.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
The Panthers, right with their safety Trayvon Morig exactly, So
walk us through that first instant. We know there was
a heated back and forth between Jennings and Morig during
the game. What was the thing that made it go
from verbal to physical?
Speaker 2 (05:28):
So the sources confirmed that after they were jawing at
each other, Morigg is the one who escalated it. He
delivered what was described as a low blow late in
the game.
Speaker 1 (05:38):
Okay, so he got physical first.
Speaker 2 (05:39):
Right, Mohrig got a penalty for it. But that mid
game physical shot that became the trigger for Jennings's response,
which was delayed, but you could argue was more volatile.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
And Jennings didn't hit back right away, probably trying to
avoid a penalty or getting thrown out.
Speaker 2 (05:56):
Smart.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
But once the game was over, clock hit zero, they're
walking off field. That's when Jennings walks up and delivers
an open handed right cross, a quick punch right to
Morig's face.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
Calculated and the differing accounts of why that happened are
key here. Jennings's justification was simple. He said he was
quote just responded to some childish behavior.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
So he's framing himself as the one reacting to an
immature act the low blow exactly.
Speaker 2 (06:23):
But the Panther's side of the story, well, it paints
a completely different picture, one that sounds a lot like
what the Browns were saying. Okay, Morigg and other players
maintained that Jennings was the one who started it all,
that he was blocking them in the back. And here's
the key phrase again, talking.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
Crazy, talking crazy. So we have the same pattern with
two different teams. Jennings allegedly uses this inflammatory, demeaning, disparaging
crazy language and.
Speaker 2 (06:49):
That provokes a severe physical reaction from the other guy,
a low blow in one game and then verbal threats
of violence in the next. League office had to step.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
In, which brings us to the consequences the discipline. And
this is where the sources give us a really fascinating,
almost contradictory look at what the league actually prioritizes at.
Speaker 2 (07:06):
So telling Morig and Jennings were both disciplined for their
actions from that one incident.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
Okay, so let's break it down. Morig, the Panther safety,
he throws the first physical shot, the low blow during
the game. What was his punishment?
Speaker 2 (07:20):
He was suspended for the next game against the Los
Angeles Rams.
Speaker 1 (07:23):
A whole game suspension. That's huge. And when we look
at the money, the sources say that one game suspension
cost Morig his entire game check, which.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
Was roughly sixty five thousand.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Dollars sixty five grand. That is a devastating financial hit
for one foul during a game.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
It is, but now contrast that with Jennings's punishment for
throwing the actual postgame punch to the face. Jennings was
fined twelve seventy two dollars.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
Wait, so the disparity there is just shocking. Morig loses
sixty five thousand dollars for a bad in game foul,
but Jennings loses less than a quarter of that for
physical assault after the game is over. Yeah, how does
the league even I rationalize that? What does that tell
you about what they care about protecting?
Speaker 2 (08:08):
It raises a huge question. Right when the league suspends
a player and takes away a game check, they're sending
a signal they are prioritizing the integrity and the flow
of the competition itself. I see mow Rigs low blow
happened in the game. It could be seen as an
attempt to injure to gain an unfair advantage that costs
you sixty five thousand dollars.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
So the message is, don't mess with the product, don't
disrupt the competition.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
That's the biggest sin precisely. Now, Jennings's punch was absolutely unacceptable.
It was violent, but it happened after the clock stopped,
the game was over. So the league addresses it with
a serious fine. I mean, twelve thousand dollars is not nothing, sure,
but they aren't willing to take him out of the
next competition. It suggests they see postgame stuff, while still punishable,
(08:54):
as less damaging to the core business of football.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
It's a pragmatic, almost cold, disciplinary view.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
It is, and it's a powerful look at institutional priorities
versus say, peer priorities. The league cared more about the
game than the punch, but the players, like Shelby Harris,
they cared more about the verbal code than the game itself.
His reaction was about the words, not about a blocking scheme.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
That really is the key insight here, isn't it. You
have these two systems of justice happening at the same time.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
Absolutely. System A is the official NFL rulebook enforced by
the league focused on protecting the product right and system
B is the unspoken code of conduct enforced by the
players themselves, which is all about personal respect and accountability.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
And we saw players try to enforce that code in
two totally different ways. You had Miles Garrett, the leader,
trying to do it through restraints, saying, you know, hey,
let's focus on the game. This stuff doesn't belong here.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
And then you had Shelby Harris trying to enforce the
code through aggression by referencing past violence and calling Jennings
soft for not backing up his words. It shows this
real internal conflict among the players themselves about how to
handle this stuff.
Speaker 1 (10:04):
So let's just review this progression when less time for
the listener. In less than a week, we see verbal
attacks escalate to.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
A low blow, then a retally tory punch.
Speaker 1 (10:13):
And then a brand new confrontation that leads to explicit
threats of more violence and condemnation from veterans on two
separate teams.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
And that progression confirms that it's Jenning's choice of language
what was called demeaning and disparaging that's really crossing the
line here. Normal trash talk is about distraction. This language,
according to the sources, seems to be about disrespecting an opponent's.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Humanity, and that's the trigger.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
That's the trigger for these really severe physical and personal responses.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
You know, this tells you so much about competitive environments
even outside of sports. You can master the official rolebook
in any high pressure job, a boardroom, a trading floor,
or whatever, right, but it's the unspoken rules, that code
of conduct and personal respect. Violating those carries a penalty
from your peers that the official rules might not even touch.
Speaker 2 (11:05):
And that's exactly what happened here. The league can deal
with the physical stuff, the fouls and the punches, with
fines and suspensions, but they can't discipline the emotional damage
or the hit to your reputation from using words that,
as Harris said, you should not say to another man.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
Ever, it's a powerful deep dive into the real cost
of crossing that invisible line.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Absolutely, and the tension we've been talking about, this conflict
between the official rules and the personal code. It's still unresolved,
which brings up a final provocative thought for you to consider.
Given it, a star leader like Miles Garrett says, this
behavior doesn't feel like that belongs in the game, but
another respected player, Shelby Harris, openly justifies pass violence against Jennings.
(11:49):
What's the real code when the official rule book gives
you a twelve thousand dollars fine for a punch, but
the unwritten code demands retribution for personal insults, which system,
in the long run, actually holds the greater power to
shape behavior
Okay, so the San Francisco forty nine Ers, they just
had this really decisive win twenty six to eight over
the Cleveland Browns.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
Big win.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
Yeah, but if you were paying any attention to what
people were talking about after the game, you know the
final score is it's completely irrelevant, right, not.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
The story at all. The whole thing was just completely
overshadowed by this explosive confrontation on the sideline.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
Involving the forty nine ers wide receiver Schwan Jennings.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
And this was so much more than your standard trash talk.
I mean, this was a real flashpoint. It exposed this
intense personal hostility from the other team, it really did,
and it ended with some of the I think most
shocking post game comments we've seen all season. So for
this deep dive, we're getting into the sources that detail
(00:46):
not just this one fight, but a whole controversial two
week span for Jennings. Yeah, he's just been this central
character again and again in these arguments, retaliations, and some
pretty significant league discipline.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
To really get the intensity of what was going on here,
we have to start right at the top, right with
the quote, the quote that just you know, defined this
whole drama. It's from the Browns veteran defensive lineman Shelby Harris.
He was talking about Jennings and he did not hold back,
not at all. The source material quotes him directly. He says,
(01:18):
I see exactly why they punched your nuts. I'm surprised
nobody punched him in the jaw yet.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
I mean, wow, that kind of language openly referencing and
you know, almost justifying past physical violence against another player. Yeah,
that tells you, the listener, that we are dealing with
something that goes so far beyond a normal unsportsmanlike conduct penalty. Oh. Absolutely,
(01:43):
When a player starts talking about someone needing to be
punched in the jaw, it signals that Jennings has allegedly
crossed some kind of unspoken line of respect. Yeah, and
not just once, but repeatedly.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
And like you said, this isn't some isolated thing. This
whole drama with the Browns. It really only blew up
because Jennings was already carrying this baggage from the week
before exactly. But let's stick with the Cleveland confrontation first.
The sources are really clear that this argument it didn't
even happen right after a big hit or a touchdown
or something. It flared up during a total stoppage in play.
(02:15):
The Browns defensive tackle Malike Collins was actually injured on
the field.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
And that timing is so crucial. It means the tension
wasn't just you know, a gut reaction. It had time
to sort of simmer and become deliberate. It wasn't just adrenaline, right.
The whole thing escalated in the Brown Star players. They
stepped in, yeah, but not to defend the game really,
but to defend their own teammates. From what Jennings was allegedly.
Speaker 1 (02:39):
Saying, and the comments from Miles Garrett, the Brown's defensive end,
they're really telling because he gets into the nature of
the attack. Garrett, you know, he's trying to be the leader,
trying to de escalate things, and he said that Jennings
had a lot to say that was demeaning and disparaging
towards some.
Speaker 2 (02:55):
Of our players meeting in desparace. See that's not football talk,
that's highly personal exactly. And Garrett said he trying to
get between them. He was trying to keep my guys
focused on the game and not worried about stuff outside
of it. He also specifically says that this kind of behavior,
these comments quote doesn't feel like that belongs in the game.
Speaker 1 (03:14):
So he's drawing a line, a.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
Very clear line. He's separating competitive fire from what he
sees as a personal verbal assault.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
It sounds like a classic unwritten rule was just shattered.
But you know, while Garrett was trying to keep the peace,
sheldy Harris's comments. They show that raw emotional reaction totally.
Harris just flat out said that Jennings says some things
that you should not say to another man. Ever, I
mean that implies a serious moral line was crossed.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
And what's also fascinating is how Harris then connects those
words to Jennings's on field actions right after it. He
didn't just criticize the words. He criticized Jennings for running
behind your O line. As soon as it got heated.
Harris called that and this is another quote some real
soft time, and I want that.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Okay, So let's dig into that idea of softness a
little bit in this kind of you know, hypermasculine, high
stakes world. Why does running the vind your linemen make
it so much worse? Why does that elevated?
Speaker 2 (04:10):
Well, it really speaks to this perceived failure to match
your aggression with accountability in their world, if you're going
to use that kind of demeaning and disparaging language, stuff
that's personal, Yeah, there's an expectation that you're ready to
stand there and face the consequences of it. So running
behind your teammates after saying something like that is seen
(04:30):
as a professional cowardice.
Speaker 1 (04:32):
Like you don't really stand by your own words.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
Precisely, it implies you don't believe what you said enough
to risk the physical outcome, and that, in their code,
is often seen as even worse than the first insult.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
That does make the reaction more understandable, but it also
shows you the long memory these guys have. The fact
that Shelby Harris could just pull up that past violence,
it suggests Jennings has a history here. It does, and
that leads us right to the first incident, the one
that happened less than a week for this against the
Carolina Panthers.
Speaker 2 (05:02):
And this is critical because it establishes a clear pattern
of escalation in a really, really short period of time.
The fight with the Browns was basically the immediate fallout
from the drama that started on Monday Night against.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
The Panthers, right with their safety Trayvon Morig exactly, So
walk us through that first instant. We know there was
a heated back and forth between Jennings and Morig during
the game. What was the thing that made it go
from verbal to physical?
Speaker 2 (05:28):
So the sources confirmed that after they were jawing at
each other, Morigg is the one who escalated it. He
delivered what was described as a low blow late in
the game.
Speaker 1 (05:38):
Okay, so he got physical first.
Speaker 2 (05:39):
Right, Mohrig got a penalty for it. But that mid
game physical shot that became the trigger for Jennings's response,
which was delayed, but you could argue was more volatile.
Speaker 1 (05:51):
And Jennings didn't hit back right away, probably trying to
avoid a penalty or getting thrown out.
Speaker 2 (05:56):
Smart.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
But once the game was over, clock hit zero, they're
walking off field. That's when Jennings walks up and delivers
an open handed right cross, a quick punch right to
Morig's face.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
Calculated and the differing accounts of why that happened are
key here. Jennings's justification was simple. He said he was
quote just responded to some childish behavior.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
So he's framing himself as the one reacting to an
immature act the low blow exactly.
Speaker 2 (06:23):
But the Panther's side of the story, well, it paints
a completely different picture, one that sounds a lot like
what the Browns were saying. Okay, Morigg and other players
maintained that Jennings was the one who started it all,
that he was blocking them in the back. And here's
the key phrase again, talking.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
Crazy, talking crazy. So we have the same pattern with
two different teams. Jennings allegedly uses this inflammatory, demeaning, disparaging
crazy language and.
Speaker 2 (06:49):
That provokes a severe physical reaction from the other guy,
a low blow in one game and then verbal threats
of violence in the next. League office had to step.
Speaker 1 (06:57):
In, which brings us to the consequences the discipline. And
this is where the sources give us a really fascinating,
almost contradictory look at what the league actually prioritizes at.
Speaker 2 (07:06):
So telling Morig and Jennings were both disciplined for their
actions from that one incident.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
Okay, so let's break it down. Morig, the Panther safety,
he throws the first physical shot, the low blow during
the game. What was his punishment?
Speaker 2 (07:20):
He was suspended for the next game against the Los
Angeles Rams.
Speaker 1 (07:23):
A whole game suspension. That's huge. And when we look
at the money, the sources say that one game suspension
cost Morig his entire game check, which.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
Was roughly sixty five thousand.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Dollars sixty five grand. That is a devastating financial hit
for one foul during a game.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
It is, but now contrast that with Jennings's punishment for
throwing the actual postgame punch to the face. Jennings was
fined twelve seventy two dollars.
Speaker 1 (07:53):
Wait, so the disparity there is just shocking. Morig loses
sixty five thousand dollars for a bad in game foul,
but Jennings loses less than a quarter of that for
physical assault after the game is over. Yeah, how does
the league even I rationalize that? What does that tell
you about what they care about protecting?
Speaker 2 (08:08):
It raises a huge question. Right when the league suspends
a player and takes away a game check, they're sending
a signal they are prioritizing the integrity and the flow
of the competition itself. I see mow Rigs low blow
happened in the game. It could be seen as an
attempt to injure to gain an unfair advantage that costs
you sixty five thousand dollars.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
So the message is, don't mess with the product, don't
disrupt the competition.
Speaker 2 (08:33):
That's the biggest sin precisely. Now, Jennings's punch was absolutely unacceptable.
It was violent, but it happened after the clock stopped,
the game was over. So the league addresses it with
a serious fine. I mean, twelve thousand dollars is not nothing, sure,
but they aren't willing to take him out of the
next competition. It suggests they see postgame stuff, while still punishable,
(08:54):
as less damaging to the core business of football.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
It's a pragmatic, almost cold, disciplinary view.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
It is, and it's a powerful look at institutional priorities
versus say, peer priorities. The league cared more about the
game than the punch, but the players, like Shelby Harris,
they cared more about the verbal code than the game itself.
His reaction was about the words, not about a blocking scheme.
Speaker 1 (09:19):
That really is the key insight here, isn't it. You
have these two systems of justice happening at the same time.
Speaker 2 (09:25):
Absolutely. System A is the official NFL rulebook enforced by
the league focused on protecting the product right and system
B is the unspoken code of conduct enforced by the
players themselves, which is all about personal respect and accountability.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
And we saw players try to enforce that code in
two totally different ways. You had Miles Garrett, the leader,
trying to do it through restraints, saying, you know, hey,
let's focus on the game. This stuff doesn't belong here.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
And then you had Shelby Harris trying to enforce the
code through aggression by referencing past violence and calling Jennings
soft for not backing up his words. It shows this
real internal conflict among the players themselves about how to
handle this stuff.
Speaker 1 (10:04):
So let's just review this progression when less time for
the listener. In less than a week, we see verbal
attacks escalate to.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
A low blow, then a retally tory punch.
Speaker 1 (10:13):
And then a brand new confrontation that leads to explicit
threats of more violence and condemnation from veterans on two
separate teams.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
And that progression confirms that it's Jenning's choice of language
what was called demeaning and disparaging that's really crossing the
line here. Normal trash talk is about distraction. This language,
according to the sources, seems to be about disrespecting an opponent's.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Humanity, and that's the trigger.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
That's the trigger for these really severe physical and personal responses.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
You know, this tells you so much about competitive environments
even outside of sports. You can master the official rolebook
in any high pressure job, a boardroom, a trading floor,
or whatever, right, but it's the unspoken rules, that code
of conduct and personal respect. Violating those carries a penalty
from your peers that the official rules might not even touch.
Speaker 2 (11:05):
And that's exactly what happened here. The league can deal
with the physical stuff, the fouls and the punches, with
fines and suspensions, but they can't discipline the emotional damage
or the hit to your reputation from using words that,
as Harris said, you should not say to another man.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
Ever, it's a powerful deep dive into the real cost
of crossing that invisible line.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Absolutely, and the tension we've been talking about, this conflict
between the official rules and the personal code. It's still unresolved,
which brings up a final provocative thought for you to consider.
Given it, a star leader like Miles Garrett says, this
behavior doesn't feel like that belongs in the game, but
another respected player, Shelby Harris, openly justifies pass violence against Jennings.
(11:49):
What's the real code when the official rule book gives
you a twelve thousand dollars fine for a punch, but
the unwritten code demands retribution for personal insults, which system,
in the long run, actually holds the greater power to
shape behavior
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by Audiochuck Media Company.
The Brothers Ortiz
The Brothers Ortiz is the story of two brothers–both successful, but in very different ways. Gabe Ortiz becomes a third-highest ranking officer in all of Texas while his younger brother Larry climbs the ranks in Puro Tango Blast, a notorious Texas Prison gang. Gabe doesn’t know all the details of his brother’s nefarious dealings, and he’s made a point not to ask, to protect their relationship. But when Larry is murdered during a home invasion in a rented beach house, Gabe has no choice but to look into what happened that night. To solve Larry’s murder, Gabe, and the whole Ortiz family, must ask each other tough questions.