¿Porqué es importante SABER Historia?

Hablemos de la importancia de saber y estudiar la Historia para concer mejor el porqué de las cosas, sus orígenes y consecuencias.

Episode Transcript

(00:26):
Good odes, everybody. Again Iam with you, Mr K, to
share with you some reflections on past, current and future events. I welcome
all those who listen to me,those who are already following me on my
podcast. I thank you very muchfor listening and also for not giving your

(00:53):
opinions on the facts that I amraising here and your opinions, because,
of course, I do not havethe whole truth. No one has the
whole truth. I always tell youthat, from my point of view,
through time, everything I have studied, everything I have read, I like
to analyze, I like to reflectand I like to look for the context

(01:19):
of why things happen, why sometimesunexplained facts happen within geopolitics, within the
economy, within sociology and what thesefacts have of peculiarity. I, as

(01:40):
I always say, do not expectall people to agree with my opinion.
On the contrary, I think thateveryone has a more accurate or less accurate
view of the facts of the day, of the stamps that have passed and
of the likely consequences of this mixtureof events. So, I already,

(02:06):
in some previous podcasts I have spokento you about geopolitical issues that I consider
very important in the development of humanity, events that are taking place on time.
And there' s a fact thatI' ve touched it several times

(02:27):
and I think it' s veryimportant to keep playing it, because it
' s a defining fact in thehistory of humanity. Casually today, about
five hundred and seventy years ago thelast stronghold of the Roman imperial era fell

(02:50):
and the modern era began. OnMay 29, the Ottomans took the last
remaining stronghold of the Roman Empire.That' s a very peculiar thing.
Today, too, we are experiencingthe conflict that we see unleashed in Ukraine

(03:20):
against Russia, which is how ithas really happened and not what they want
to present to us, that ithas been Russia that has decided to open
a front of war against Ukraine withoutmore here and beyond, but that,
according to the media discourse of theWest, it is actually the owner of
the discourse in a global way.They tell us it was the Russians who

(03:46):
started this conflict, and that's not true. This conflict comes from
far beyond and as I already toldyou in some other podcast to give it
context and I think it is goodto say it again after the fall of
the Soviet Union, the induced fallof the Soviet Union, because it was

(04:10):
not at all, as they intendto make us see, a shocking fall
of a system that did not work. That' s fake. It is
also clear that many faults were borneby the leaders of the Soviet Union who
knew us to face the offensive thatthey developed on all sides so and their

(04:41):
regional puppets against Russia, encouraging Russianphobiaand trying to surround Russia and with a
speech that that was the empire ofevil, as they always presented it.
And I think it' s importantand that people who want to think,
who want to analyze about I whymore things happen that have to have consciousness

(05:03):
and knowledge. And that' swhat I rely on to do this podcast,
which I consider important, to spreadthe truth, to spread the things
that the media don' t counton at the service of the great centers
of world domination, which we knoware the NATO countries, and the owner

(05:27):
of NATO, which is the UnitedStates. And I' m not talking
about the people of America, becauseI believe and am confident in any people
who have lucidity, who know thetruth they know about history. You may
want a war, you may wantthis kind of domination at the expense of

(05:49):
the suffering of other people. But, like the great centers of power,
what they need is to increase theirpower, be it financial, but be
it military or social control. That' s why we see everything that'
s going on now. I amnot a person closed to the opinions that

(06:15):
contradict me, but I am awarethat for one to have a view of
the world appropriate and adjusted to thefacts, of the truth, of the
concrete and real history, one hasto study a lot, one has to

(06:35):
listen above all much, one hasto investigate more and then we will have
a vision quite correct, that doesnot complete, because there are always things
that escape us. No one hasthe absolute truth, I repeat. But
since the end of World War II, since the end of World War II,

(06:57):
which was a catastrophic war for humanity, the plans of the United States,
visualised Western among which, among themain ones are in England, was
to weaken the Soviet Union, becausethe model it proposed was different from that

(07:25):
of its world domination. That's why we always see the discourse that
states, that Russia is an empire, that the child is soviet, that
it was an empire that dominated,that killed, that there was gulat,
that there was this and that therewas the other. There is no government
in the world that is blameless ormade by human beings, and politicians are

(07:48):
human beings. But if we stopto look at history, as history is,
and not as we are told fromthe first Seed, England, which
is a parliamentary monarchy, as theysay in the 21st century, they still

(08:18):
have kings who are castes, whosay they are superior because they have the
blue singre or because historically they ownthat position. I do not understand,
for example, in almost the majorityof European countries that talk so much about

(08:39):
democracy and freedom and all those thingsthey like to sell to the unwary.
In almost everyone there is nobility,nobility of people who belong to Counts,
to mark kings who are like asuperior caste of society And almost everyone,

(09:01):
without excess, has a history ofdeath and blood, of destruction behind,
that is scary, that is scary. And to put into context England,
that England that they both sell usas the symbol of European stability and the

(09:24):
defense of values. England is foundedon the bodies of hundreds of millions of
people, hundreds of millions of people, on the suffering of hundreds of millions
of slaves, on the murder andtorture of hundreds of millions of human beings
in all the colonies they occupied,which was one of the bloodiest conquests in

(09:50):
the history of mankind. As soonas they colonized India, the Indian textiles
that were made on Indian looms bythe hand of Indian women workers, who
were women, were made by theEnglish to prevent that fabric from being superior

(10:11):
to that which they produced on theirmechanical looms in England, would compete with
them in the market. The solutionwas to cut off the fingers and hands

(10:31):
of the weavers. They' renot going to find that in the story
they sell us in the glorious picturesof battles against the bloody Aboriginal criminals.
Nor are they going to find thestory that the Queen, the Queen'

(10:52):
s mother, the one who diedrecently, has Lucifer in her cauldron,
if there really is hell that sometimesgives them the desire to believe in those
things, that there would really bea place where those people who do so
much harm to humanity would remain forcenturies suffering in compensation for what they have

(11:13):
done on the face of the Earth, that woman, the Queen' s
mother, this glorious England, thatof such pomp and so much fastuosity,
organized the largest drug trafficking operation thathas occurred in the history of mankind.

(11:39):
Simply insurmountable when, in order todominate China and its colonies in Southeast Asia,
it flooded with opium the city isChinese and unleashed the opium war,
with the military superiority they had toattack and destroy cities, they killed thousands

(12:03):
of people who only didn' twant them to poison society with the vices
and misery that led them from England. England, the motherland of what America
is today. In case you didn' t know, I' m also
making a story for you in thisinterim Those glorious people who say that they

(12:31):
founded America in the Mike Flower,the pilgrims, those are so adorned and
embellished by the stories of the West, by the books that extol us the
history of the United States. Theywere not any pilgrims who fled from hunger
poverty, they were not criminals,almost all prostitutes thieves, murderers that the

(12:56):
noble Spanish Queen apologized. The nobleQueen of England banished her possessions from Scotland,
from Ireland, from England itself,and commanded them in the hope that
they would die of disease and ofbeing killed by the natives. And that

(13:20):
is also a tremendous demonstration of theruthless ones who were with their own citizens,
those who said alive the Queen,alive the king who supposedly felt proud
that a few families of fascineros murderedthem dictated their destiny. In other words,

(13:45):
the Queen organized not only the largestdrug trafficking in the world with the
enormous benefits that she brought to herreign to sustain war, but also organized
human trafficking, expatriates of people inneed, the poor who, in their

(14:09):
desperation, became criminals and criminals forthe misery that existed in England, banished
them for colonies, not only withthe sense that they colonized, but that,
knowing that they were violent people,that they were fine people of vice,
they were going to cause a disasterin the colonies where they arrived,

(14:33):
that they were the natives, werenot used to dealing with that type of
people. You also have to tellthem if they don' t know,
I leave them to you said thatfor example, the colonies of Australia banished

(14:56):
the worst criminals who had been imprisonedand in England, the killers of cereals,
the maimers, the rapists. Thatis why, today, with much
sarcasm and much self, there isa mark of Vinus that is called nineteen

(15:20):
crimes that were the crimes that weretypified so that those were condemned by those.
Nineteen crimes were banished to the furthestcolonies of the British Empire. That
must be known, because no goodtree, no bad tree apologize gives good

(15:46):
seeds and those bad seeds were transmittedand reproduced. And the same thing they
sell to us. And that attentionto the royal wedding, to what the
prince says or, what the princessdoes is nothing but media junk. It

(16:07):
has always been operations to depend onall that hollow and fatuous fact as the
non plus ultra of the human species. That people generally don' t know
him, but to believe that thosepeople do it just for fun showing us

(16:37):
those weddings or companies where they spendtens of millions of dollars, even more
hundreds of millions of dollars on aft, pomp and factuosity. When there'
s so much need in the world, it' s ridiculous and it'

(17:00):
s gross and embarrassing to see aswhen the wedding of King Harry' s
son, Princess, Prince Harry.That were months and still today they continue
with the stupidity that if Harry saidthis, if I arrest who Harris is,
it is no one son of aking, son who the fuck is
a king, what did that goodking bring to humanity, what achievements that

(17:29):
king has that humanity has to thank, What relevant things come those people that
one can take as our behavior.On the contrary, they are prepotent,

(17:51):
they are people who have lived theirlives from the sweat and blood of other
people. It' s vampire truths. Then I am outraged, it bothers
me to see the young people,seeing what the Princess said, seeing what
the Duchess said and the so-called magazines of the heart, which are,

(18:17):
in addition, another maneuver of themedia to stupidize even more those who
read it, giving us every dayof the world reports about what she said
or the countess or about what clothesthe Marquis put on and all that crap,

(18:40):
all that crap that doesn' tserve anything or bring anything spiritually or
materially to people and they sell itto us like that' s a wonder.
And there are people who consume timefrom their lives watching ba that Saturday,

(19:02):
watching that crap while the world passesby without them noticing. And that
' s terrible for me. Thatis something that moves my soul, because
one of the most precious things,but the most precious that a human being
has, is the time, thetime that is given by nature to inhabit

(19:29):
this planet, to leave a markon the lives of others and on history.
But that hardly anyone repairs it,and that is a problem we have
these days and very serious. Ialways remember Humberto Eco' s phrase when

(19:56):
they asked him about the Internet andthat he thought the Internet could now be
extended to calls or miscalled social networks. At the time Eco talked about it.
Humberto Eco, if you don't know him, is one of

(20:18):
the most important writers of the decade, then the 80s of the 90s Italian
linguist. It was that he wrotethe name of the rose, a precious
work that contains much teaching about thehuman being and its importance in life and,

(20:42):
above all, the importance of knowledge, the importance of reading, the
importance of knowing how to analyze andthe importance of not being able to control
the acquaintance or concentrate it in thehands of few people, because knowledge is

(21:07):
the heritage of all mankind. Sohe said in that reflection that what he
was most concerned about the Internet is, as I think I already told him,
that anyone previously referred to the emergenceof such media. I repeat that
in the nineties, when he givesthat statement on the Internet, even what

(21:30):
was most visible was email and someother chat app no more. Then he
said of what he was most concernedabout the Internet is that those media at
the service of certain people were goingto amplify speeches that they would not have

(21:53):
filt because before friends met in abar, in a corner, they had
their opinions and debated among themselves.But at this time it is the amplification
of everyone and the same as thebars. There were people with knowledge and

(22:18):
there were stupid, mediocre or simplepeople, ignorant people who also gave their
opinion. What we see in thistime is that the more stupid, the
more lying, the easier you becomeviral, in quotation marks, the more

(22:41):
false your message is, the moredistorted or easier you get on social networks
at the level of an influential personor influencer, as they say in general
to those who have their YouTube channels, I like technology too and that'

(23:07):
s why I don' t sayit' s bad to use technology.
I don' t say that.I' m just saying if you don
' t study, if you don' t learn, if you don'
t analyze, if you don't reflect for yourself. Anyone sees you
making a story, anyone easily deceivesyou and, according to the theory of

(23:30):
stupidity, the one who can makeyou believe anything, can induce you to
commit any atrocity. And it's what happens today people are overly easy
to manipulate why, because they don' t look for knowledge in a book

(23:56):
or in a person who really hasthe knowledge that really knows what they'
re talking about, but they're looking for it on Facebook, on
tik tok, on YouTube or onany of those platforms where very rarely,

(24:18):
very rarely. I always say thatalmost ninety percent of what you see on
social media is a lie or istransverse or who says it is a fool
who doesn' t know what he' s talking about. But, however,
when you go to the, tothe average view, when you'
re going to see the groin orthe number of people that follow it,

(24:38):
you' re going to see thatthere' s a sight joons and the
more stupid the better video where yousell one person humiliates another by putting him
to make ridiculous games in exchange formoney or putting them to compete as if

(25:06):
they were animals for a prize.Also prizes can be of anything, money
or clothes, shoes, and peoplelend that. We' ve come to
that place, we' ve cometo that lowness, we' ve come
to it that doesn' t comparewith animals, because animals compete for themselves,

(25:30):
for food. But without reaching thoselimits, of humiliation, of exalting
the ridicule of another person, theshame of other people and, worse still,
of gaining profit and living. Ofthat and I think that violence is

(25:56):
not only physical, but also intellectualand spiritual, because when an influencer uses
a subject of which he knows nothing, but he seeks information, which he
knows that if it distorts that ifthey put it in the networks, he

(26:17):
will have many views and with thathe will earn money and does it without
any scruples and without any ethics.That' s a miserable person. He
' s a miserable person, whoeverhe is. So they don' t
teach stories, they don' tlook for contexts, they don' t

(26:41):
look for the reason for the facts, what they' re looking for is
yellowism. What they are looking foris easy applause, easy coexistence, without
reaching any analysis, any analysis ofthe reality, of the context, of
the things that happen, why theyhappen, what causes the facts. And

(27:06):
then we have what we have.Millions of people who support in quotation marks
or applaud in quotation marks, anaction that can even be more of a
criminal to the lights of any ofanyone with a little shame and self-
respect. And yet, it becomes, let' s say, make the

(27:33):
mass critical so that that criminal orcriminal or humiliating fact does not have the
condemnation it should have. And that' s what we see today, for
example, in the case of Israel' s war against the Palestinians, which

(27:53):
people believe is really because of Hamaswho made the October 7 attack of two
thousand and twenty- three. Ican tell them no. Israel' s
goal is to displace the Palestinians fromGaza, because the gas fields on the
Gaza coast are of strategic interest toIsrael and that is what they want to

(28:18):
take over the gas that is therein the Gasatí territorial area. It has
nothing to do with Israel, orthe defense of religions, or anything like
that. That' s the sameold thing we' ve seen one year
again and it' s a coincidence. Israel is one of the creations of

(28:45):
England and the United States, lookat all those most curious in England,
who organized human trafficking, drug trafficking. Just as the U S organized behind
people like the one that is happeningnow on the border, or drug trafficking

(29:07):
in Vietnam, or drug trafficking withinthe U S itself, from Colombia,
using official means to get the funding, to give money to the Nicaraguan contra

(29:30):
or like that, the famous OliverNorte, who organized gun trafficking for Iran
and who today, after the pardon, is a hero of the U S.
Those are the values that defend thegenocide of minority groups in any part

(29:51):
of the world, as long asthey respond to their interests. That is
the concrete and hard truth. TheUnited States and England are countries that behave
like pirates and like filibusters and asthey have or have an incomparable power,

(30:17):
unquestionable in the world, because theydid and did whatever they wanted. And
that' s why I' mtelling you England and the United States,
at the end of World War II, in the same year, one thousand

(30:37):
and forty- five, were alreadyplotting to organize an invasion of the Soviet
Union. This isn' t withpiranoia, this isn' t that I
' m making up. It's called the unthinkable plan and looked at
by Wiston Churchill. They can lookfor it in history to organize the invasion

(31:00):
of the Soviet Union with a millionmen, which were supposedly allyed. But
that wasn' t all. Togetherwith the United States and Canada, they
organized the escape of tens of thousandsof Nazis, from the SS of the
worst of the high- ranking stagesof Hitler' s Germany. They organized

(31:26):
the escape so that the Russians couldnot catch them and bring them to justice.
It is called the Paper Clip operationand it is also in history how
they organized so that the Nazi cofferscould escape after having caused the death of

(31:48):
twenty million Russians. How after killingmillions of Israelis or millions of Jews.
In other words, when that happenedto me, Israel, and those are
the ones who claim to defend Israel. That' s why it' s
good to know the story. That' s why it' s good to

(32:10):
know what you' re talking about. There is Joeth Biden' s current
President' s speech in nine hundredand eighty- three, but if I
am not mistaken where he says thatif Israel did not exist, an Israel
had to be invented, because Israelhad to be invented, because Israel is

(32:34):
the spearhead for control of the MiddleEast. It is the opposition to the
powers that may arise or that haveemerged as Iran is. That' s
why Iran does everything, but Iranknows it has to be patient. I
still think that Ibrahim Risey' sdeath was no coincidence. Even though there

(32:54):
is no report on it, letthem say it was an accident. I
don' t think it was anaccident. It is impossible for Razi to
have died and for two senior Iraniangenerals of the most important to have also
died in attacks and now it ishappening. I don' t believe in

(33:15):
coincidences and in this geopolitical age lessthan less convulsed. Then those who organized
the flight of the Nazis, whokilled millions of Jews, are now those
who defend the Jews, the sameones who later, in the ninety-
ninety- two ninety- three,organized the bombings of Yugoslavia, with the

(33:39):
justification that there was a genocide againstMuslims in Yugoslavia so that they see that
parallelism is so curious in ways ofacting, so lauded and without any ethics
or morals. Then you have tokeep that in mind. This war in

(34:00):
Ukraine is not just any war.This war in Ukraine is a defining war
that I hope for and say withouta shadow of a shadow. I hope
that Russia will win, but thatit will win. But strongly, I
do not believe you can accept anykind of negotiation other than the unconditional re

(34:22):
- vision of what remains of Ukraine, because you managed to convince a part
of the population of Ukraine of thewhole discourse that anti- Russian and this
banal speech, hollow, empty androtten of freedom and human rights and of

(34:46):
the grandeur of Western values. That' s all bullshit for idiots, and
it' s time for people towake up from that. I think Russia
has to go with everything, ithas to go with everything, and that
the consequence to the addition to Europe, which is the one that is assuming
the consequences. The goal of thiswar was also mentioned in a previous podcast.

(35:13):
It is none other than depriving Russiaof the Black Sea fleet. It
' s just taking control of theports of Odessa. And so I say
here again that Russia has to getto Odessa, it has to go up
to Transmitria and leave an area ofat least a hundred kilometers between the borders

(35:34):
of Russia and what remains of Ukraine. There is no other solution, because
the goal of the TAN is toweaken Russia and if they leave only a
part of Ukraine armed and with thepossibility of responding with a new war,
they will do so, because itdoesn' t matter at all how many

(35:59):
Ukrainians are going to die. Theyfollow their final goals, and that is
important for people who like geopolitics toknow. There is no other solution.
It is the total defeat of theOTAN within Ukraine and that is what is
going to happen. I say ittoday and I' ve always said it
from the beginning, and so you' ll see that it will be the

(36:24):
end of all this. These Balticcountries that you see desperate them asking for
action against Russia. They know somethingand they know that they are the next,
but they are not the next withweapons in Russia need no weapons to
do what they have to do withthe Baltic countries, despite the media discourse

(36:45):
and saying that there is anti-Russians and that I don' t know
what and I don' t knowhow much. As soon as Ukraine is
defeated, the Baltic countries, threewill fall within the sphere of muse influence,
because it cannot be otherwise and willdo so in the best possible way.

(37:05):
I hope it' s not likea war, but the mechanisms that
the United States uses cannot be America' s own. We will have to
look for creative ways for them,and I hope that will happen, because
why is Russia not going to bedefeated in this war, because it has

(37:30):
China behind it, who knows thatif Russia loses the next to it,
and besides that, the Russians haveto be clear, clear that despite the
discourse that so many countries condemn thegreat majority of the countries of the world
support Russia, the peoples support itbecause many people, many people are good,

(37:54):
they realize that it is the endof this whole time of destruction and
looting and of death and inhuman sanctionsagainst countries as they did against Venezuela,
as they have done against Iran,as they have done against Cuba for sixty
- five years, ruthlessly, causinghunger, causing death due to diseases,

(38:15):
vicisitudes of any kind. And Ithink this is the time for a new
dawn for humanity. There are peoplewho say no, but the Chinese are
worse. But show me the Chineseare worse? And how many countries have
the Chinese invaded, how many Presidentshave the Chinese deposed, how many countries

(38:39):
have been bombed? Because they don' t like politics. I hope that
you will listen to this podcast andgive your opinions, because it is necessary
to create, create that desire tothink and analyze, to know what is

(39:01):
happening in the world, because inthe end everyone affects us, everyone affects
us, the people on foot,who we have to work to be able
to take bread home and live,or at least with dignity. Thank you
all very much. I hope youliked it and we' ll see you

(39:24):
in the next podcast a hug andstay from Mr. Qu Bang Chao