All Episodes

August 22, 2025 • 60 mins
KCAA: Politics by Jake on Fri, 22 Aug, 2025
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Nineteen thirty two dot org.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
All right, everybody, welcome Friday, the twenty second of August
twenty twenty five, and we're here for another episode of
Politics by Jake. Glad you could join. Politics by Jake
is the biweekly on Monday and Friday, seven am on
CACAA Radio. We do the broadcast out of Los Angeles, California.

(00:38):
The flag SIP station is in Loma Linda. And if
you want to view the page and see my videos,
you can go to Ksearadio dot com. Click on the
Monday or Friday schedule that will open up all the
shows that are on CACA On Friday. I'm right next
to Stephanie Miller. Stephanie's on at six am on that station.

(00:59):
I am on at seven and you will see me
in my bright, shining face there. And you can either
click and listen to the live stream or you can
download it and listen to it at your leisure. As
we are in the third decade of the twenty first century,
and so we have all of that digital technology.

Speaker 3 (01:18):
That's good. Okay. I want to get into.

Speaker 2 (01:20):
This because I want to talk about what one person
is called the creeping totalitarianism. Another one is fastisization. And
I've talked about this on the show with regard to
what happened, and as a matter of fact, I talked
about it on the last show with regard to what

(01:41):
happened in Italy, and I've explained how Mussolini did the
march on Rome in nineteen twenty two, and then the
actual King of Italy went to him and said, well,
form a government, and fascism was very weak at that
time in Italy. Interestingly, Hitler said the very same thing

(02:04):
in an interview. He was talking to someone, probably Gebels
as Minister of propaganda, and he said, if only people
had known, and I'm talking about Germany now, if only
they had known how weak we were, and I should
I've got the actual quote somewhere, but I'm paraphrasing now,

(02:26):
and I want to make it clear to you that
I am paraphrasing. But he did say this, and I
do have the absent the actual quote. He said, how
weak we Kurt we are and we were, and how
they could have destroyed us, and they could have settled
our hash so to speak, very quickly, had they only
known him. This is the way it was in Italy.

(02:49):
And he was able to form a government, you know,
more or less. But of course he didn't have any
staying power at that time. He had a real problem
because Mussolini was really in the minority. I'm not sure exactly,
and I said this before, and I'm kind of rehashing
for a Monday Show how many members of the Italian
Chamber of Deputies there were. But there were only thirty

(03:10):
five fascists or officisti as the Italians would call them.
There were ten nationalists. So really, for all intents and purposes,
the fascist voting block was like forty five, and that
might have been like fifteen ten or fifteen percent of
the entire parliament. This is the way it was in

(03:35):
the Reichstag with Hitler. It's the same problem that he
had and Mussolini and I talked about this on Monday Show.
You can go to YouTube dot com forward at politics
by Jake. All the shows are there, and you can
listen to the further explanation of how he did it.
But basically he did something which was really weird. It's

(03:57):
called the Aserbo law, and it basically says, if you
get the largest share of the votes, all of a sudden,
you get the majority prize if you get the largest
number of the votes compared to anybody else, you get
more than twenty five percent, for example, at that moment
magic occurs in your twenty five percent turns into two
thirds of the nieph in parliament. Haling smokes. But this

(04:20):
is what it was, and that's how Mussolini solved that problem.
And there's, you know, more to it than that. They
had the equivalent of Hitler's brown Shirts, but they were
called black shirts. They were called squadristi, and theyse were
you know, on street fighters and provocateurs. They killed his
socialist opposition, Mattiotti in I think it was May of

(04:44):
twenty I'm sorry, nineteen twenty four. But the point is
is that fascism started, and in the case of Hitler,
you have the same Hitler. Fascism started with Hitler. It
didn't start in nineteen thirty three or nineteen thirty four
when he became the chancellor. It started ten years earlier,

(05:05):
in nineteen twenty three with the Munich beer house push
or rebellion. And he even is quite impressive. He actually
even had some soldiery who were wearing Nazi armbands. That's
one thing that on January sixth, there was no soldiery
there supporting the violent attempt to overthrow the government of

(05:28):
the United States. Hitler actually had that in Munich. There
are photos. But the point is is that it didn't
start right away. It began in nineteen twenty three, but
it took ten years. And what we have now, and
what I'm going to be talking about kind of a
historical role and explained to you, is the creeping fascisticization

(05:52):
and pardon me for saying the word wrong, the creeping fascism,
the creeping totalitarianism that's going on in the United States.
And this is of extreme concern because in the nineteen forties,
we saved the world. The United States, the indispensable nation,
the nation who did what no other nation could. Great

(06:13):
Britain couldn't do it. They were hard pressed. France had
been conquered literally in six weeks. The Scandinavian countries were
quickly conquered as well, and so you basically had this problem,
this situation. The United States had to come literally and
save the world, and it did. It did save the world.

(06:35):
Now we have fascism in our borders. And the question
I ask is, who is going to come to save
the United States. And the answer is we have to
save ourselves. And this is one of the missions and
premises of politics by Jake Woer's political education. And the
other is to state clearly, as clearly and as expressly

(06:59):
as I can that a fascist cabal has taken over
the leavers of power in the United States. And last
on Monday, I said the four estates of power, and
I only name three of them, of course, and I'm
going to correct that now the executive branch, the judicial branch,
the legislative branch, and the fourth estate is the press.

(07:22):
And the press has totally caved in. They have totally
appeased and they are falling in line. And this is
part of what Project twenty twenty five is, which is
the playbook for fascitization, which they call the Second Revolution
and which ominously they say will be bloodless if the left,

(07:47):
and they don't define who the left is, they just
say the left if the left allows it to be
so welcome to politics by Jake, where we're talking about
the bloodless revolution, but with the proviso in Project twenty
twenty five that is not stated, but which is pretty
easy to infer that if you resist us. There is

(08:11):
going to be blood that is shed. You are going
to be shot at, you are going to be wounded,
you are going to be killed.

Speaker 3 (08:20):
And this is what is happening. And you see various
things happening.

Speaker 2 (08:25):
Trump's saying, for example, you know, I think that Texas
should have five additional members of the legislature. And his cronies,
his minions, his mini means, the thoughtless acolytes to his
fascistic cause have no more thought than to overturn the

(08:48):
established rules. But once again, this is Project twenty twenty five.
The established rules with regard to generate Jerry mannering, which
is once every ten years. You can do it once
every ten years, five years into the ten years, and
they want to do it.

Speaker 3 (09:02):
Why are they doing it?

Speaker 2 (09:03):
Because they love to obey their king, They love to
obey their dictator. This is one of the reasons why
you listen to politics by Jake by the way, because
the fourth estate, the press, which loves to think about
itself as an estate, as a branch of government, has
caved in. They're appeasing right and left companies. Media companies

(09:29):
are actually paying Donald Trump money when they could win
lawsuits that he's bringing against them.

Speaker 3 (09:36):
It's shameful.

Speaker 2 (09:37):
And that's why you had That's another reason why you
have politics by Jake and the other alternative media. And
I think that there's better term for that than alternative media,
But for right now, we'll go with alternative media. Who
has to stand up? And politics by Jake is one
has to stand up and carry the banner because the

(09:57):
fate of the country is in hirely at stake. And
at this point, let's take a break and we'll have
a couple of messages from Twin Consulting and we will
be back. And this is Politics by Jake.

Speaker 4 (10:11):
And now there's a word for one of our sponsors,
Twain Consulting.

Speaker 2 (10:15):
Hi, this is Jake with Twain Consulting. Let's let's be blunt,
shall we. America is like tigeous. It's unstable and it's
financially weaponized. If your name is on everything you own,
you're a sitting duck. At Twain Consulting, we help you
vanished legally, ethically and permanently, from land trusts to layered LLCs.

(10:37):
We teach you how to restructure your assets so the
predators can't see them and can't touch them. This isn't
a loophole. It's a strategy that the wealthy have used
for decades. Isn't it time you got the same protection?
Call Twain Consulting at eight oh five three aight zero
five six ninety nine, or visit us online protect what's

(10:57):
yours before someone else claims it. Now, let's get back
to Jake and Politics by Jack, and thank you tow
Oin Consulting. This is politics by Jake, and we are
back and we're talking about creeping fascism. We're talking about

(11:18):
creeping totalitarianism. We're talking about a slow moving coup and
I am not the only one saying it, but I
am saying it live and on the air, and how
we can stop it. One of the things that these
coup plotters do, these Project twenty twenty five people do

(11:41):
is they try things and then if it doesn't work,
they go back and they game it and they do
a forensic analysis. They look at the things that they
did right, what went right? Did this go right? Did
this go wrong?

Speaker 3 (11:56):
Why did it go wrong?

Speaker 2 (11:57):
And they do this in think tanks and they do
this at conferences and they write papers on this. All
of this stuff is generally unknown to the public. Who
is so increasingly understress economically and in a continual state
of fear. Because this is the old Roman saying from

(12:18):
the Empire days odorant metuant, which means let them hate
so long as they fear. And people are afraid. I
know that you, my listeners, many of whom are maggots,

(12:38):
are afraid.

Speaker 3 (12:40):
Welcome to politics by Jake. I welcome you.

Speaker 2 (12:42):
All because I will explain this to you. And part
of politics by Jake, A third of our premises is
to explain how you.

Speaker 3 (12:50):
Can take action.

Speaker 2 (12:52):
And of course one of the ways you can take
action is by getting educated.

Speaker 3 (12:56):
Get educated first.

Speaker 2 (12:58):
So that's the third premise of politics, Jay. And one
of the things that they're trying QAnon. That was a
psych psychological operation that was against the United States of America,
and it culminated in the January sixth violent attempt to
overthrow the government of the United States. And you'll notice

(13:20):
that some of the people went to jail, the useful
idiots who had been persuaded. But they didn't go after
the coup plotters. They didn't go after the fellow travelers.
They didn't go after the legislators in the federal legislature
or in the state legislature. They didn't go after those

(13:41):
in the agencies, whether federal or state. It was almost,
in a way, kind of a clown show with people
like Liz Cheney in the House and Mitt Romney in
the Senate. He wasn't a part of the committee, but
he actually voted to impeach or to confirm the impeachment
in the Senate, he was literally the only person who

(14:02):
voted for it. Held up as paragons of American virtue,
these two are not. And it's I said at the time,
and I'll say it now. It is a sad day
in the United States when we hold up the likes
of Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney as paragons and upholders

(14:23):
of the American way, because they are some of the
ones who gave us Donald Trump. So you will pardon
me if I say that I hold no particular brief
for either of them. But the idea is is that
they're gaming. They're doing all these things and they're going
to check out and see what works, and they're they're

(14:45):
One of the things they're doing now is they've basically
federalized Washington, DC. And they've done it while the Congress
is on vacation. So nothing can be done, nothing can
be stopped. The judge ships are also being done because
they're there is a rule, and I want to acknowledge
that this is legitimate. So far as it goes. It

(15:05):
is not usual order, it is not conservatism, and it
has to be called out and distinguished from that that
you can do an acting appointment. Elena Habba is being
elevated in this particular way, which is stunning because Elena
Habba is a really good example of the cacistocracy that

(15:30):
Trump has implemented and which constitutes and which we have
to look at and say is part of his war
against the United States. Donald Trump, of course, with the
psychic wound when he was five years old. His niece
Mary Trump has talked about that at great length. Bandy

(15:50):
Lee on her website Jesus Psychologist from Yale. She has
also talked about this. Many mental health professionals have talked
about the very dangerous case of Donald Trump. But somehow
he's been allowed back into power and somehow, and you know,
I could explain this, but it's not my role. I'm

(16:13):
not going to explain this right now. I have something else.
I have other fish to fry today. But somehow he's here.
And one of the things that they're doing is they're
going to try to federalize Washington d C. Well, this
is a part of Project twenty twenty five federalizing the police,
and they're trying to take over Washington, DC. And the

(16:34):
allegation is and you must take my word for it.
And I know it's like Jake, you know you're a
good guying. We know that got a radio show, you
got a podcast. It's great, you know, we love you,
Thank you very much. Politics by Jake Mondays and Fridays
like KCA at seven am when I was six point

(16:54):
five on the FM dial. But how can you just
expect us to believe? And I'm saying, give space in
your mind for the possibility that this might be true,
that they are lying to you, and to use the
old expression, the only time they're not lying to you

(17:15):
is when their lips.

Speaker 3 (17:15):
Are not moving.

Speaker 2 (17:16):
And so what they're doing is they're trying to federalize
a municipality, and the municipalities Washington d C. The premise
is that it is overridden with crime. And the mayor
has come out, and she came out late, but she
came out and said, look, there isn't that kind of

(17:39):
a situation in Washington, d C. Where the federal government
needs to step in and take over and assume the
powers that the municipality should be doing. But they're doing
it anyway, And I'm telling you that the reason they're
doing it is because it's a part of their plan

(17:59):
and it is a test, and if it works, they
will do it in a neighborhood near you. Okay, So
I think I kind of got myself caught up. I
haven't even started to talk about what I wanted to
talk about, but I think I caught up on the
opening remarks that I wanted to make now seventeen or

(18:19):
eighteen minutes into the show. So all right, You remember
that starting in the pre election of twenty twenty two,
Biden referred to the regime that was out of power
at that time, you know, the Maga Forces, and the
word he used was pre fascist. He didn't say fascist,

(18:40):
but he said pre fascist. And later that in twenty
twenty four, both Biden and Harris referred to the Maga Forces,
the Maga cartel, the Maga cabal as I liked you,
I liked to use the word cabal as being fascist.
So that I think was, you know, the high point,

(19:02):
and it was when Harris said, yes, I'm running for
president and I consider the opposition to be fascist. However,
the anti Biden coup, which is absolutely positively what it was,
the betrayal of Biden. And then, of course, you know,
what do you expect if you spend six months insulting

(19:25):
and dissing and bad mouthing your own candidate, then that
obviously hurts the democratic cause. And we've talked about this,
we've talked about the coup. Basically, it was that the
moneyed class oligarchy, they wanted Biden out because Biden was
going to make them, basically, without going into a long thing,

(19:46):
make them pay their fair share, which is the American way.

Speaker 3 (19:49):
And once the oligarchs and the.

Speaker 2 (19:50):
Criminals on Wall Street, the financial criminals here, when Wall
Street heard that they wanted no part of that, they
had to get him out of there. And they used
other corporate democrats like Nancy Pelosi who's definitely in that clique,
and Barack Obama, and they basically got rid of him.
But the thing that you don't know, well, I guess

(20:12):
you didn't know that either. But the other thing that
you don't know. They didn't want Harris in either. They
wanted an open convention, and so they did spend six
months insulting and dissing and bad mouthing Harris.

Speaker 3 (20:27):
And she did her best.

Speaker 2 (20:28):
And you know, I have my own feelings about Harris,
but she used the candidate, and that out of that
came I think a fairly predictable defeat.

Speaker 3 (20:38):
So Harris was defeated.

Speaker 2 (20:41):
And if we had went and hadn't had all these
wonderful consultants of the Democratic Party coming out telling us
how awful Biden was. For six months or more before that,
the turning point seemed to be is I said.

Speaker 3 (20:54):
When a group of.

Speaker 2 (20:55):
Bankers from the New York City banks, they went to
Davos for the World Economic Forum, and they were interviewed
there and just so you know that the fix is
in and that they have a plan, and that these
things are not spontaneous, but that they are coordinated.

Speaker 3 (21:13):
Just about all of them at.

Speaker 2 (21:15):
The time gave interviews to financial publications saying, you know,
we were against Trump in twenty sixteen, but you know
now we don't care. We're perfectly happy to live with Trump.
So there it was the imperialist financed bourgeoisie was going

(21:36):
to be very happy with Trump, and we've seen it.
So what do we call the current regime?

Speaker 4 (21:44):
Now?

Speaker 3 (21:44):
There are very few.

Speaker 2 (21:47):
Myself excluded and a couple of the alternative media like me.
There are very few who are willing to go all
the way and to repeat the characterisition of fascists that
Harris and Biden had long last year. What we now
have is the kind of what I would call I
could call it a rotten compromise.

Speaker 3 (22:08):
They call it authoritarian. He's authoritarian.

Speaker 2 (22:14):
I think this is just inadequate and it's misleading in
many ways. And maybe another not so recent, but in
the last couple of months, there were a number of
people saying, well, you know, he's autocratic. He's autocratic. Autocratics,
that's even worse than totalitarian. To be an autocrat, first
of all, means that you're a one person rule. You're

(22:36):
a one man rule like typically it was the Tizar
and this is the example I use. It was the
Tzar of all the Russia's right, Nicholas the second. He
was the last one. And I think whoever it was,
and those guys, they would go around saying I am
absolute and autocratic. And this meant I produced my own ideas.

(22:59):
I'm self sufficient in creating my own ideas. I am
not influenced. It's not that I'm influenced by public opinion
or advisors or the court or anything else like that.
I am absolute and I am autocratic. And at this point,

(23:19):
let's take another break. About time for a break, and
we will be back talking about this. And this is
politics by Jake.

Speaker 4 (23:25):
And now here's a work in one of our sponsors
in plain consulting.

Speaker 3 (23:35):
Hi, this is Jake with toin consulting.

Speaker 2 (23:37):
Imagine if you will, having the power to disappear from
the prying eyes of creditors, identity thieves, nosy strangers, all
while protecting what you've worked so hard to build. That's
what virtual invisibility offers.

Speaker 3 (23:49):
It's not magic, it's.

Speaker 2 (23:51):
Smart legal and business strategy to shield your assets in
privacy so you can live free, confident, and in control.
Most people think that asset protection is only for the
alter or wealthy, but it's for anyone who wants peace
of mind and financial security, including you. Don't wait until
it's too late, take control now call me at two one, three, four, six, five,

(24:13):
zero six three nine or go to Facebook dot Com
Forward Slash Twain Consulting to learn how virtual invisibility can
protect you and your family, because when you're invisible to risk,
you're unstoppable.

Speaker 3 (24:25):
Now let's get back to Jake and politics by jamb.

Speaker 2 (24:37):
And this is politics by Jake, and we are back.
So we're talking about the tendency.

Speaker 3 (24:44):
Of the press.

Speaker 2 (24:46):
The fourth estate, which has capitulated to Trump and capitulated
to the monetary forces that govern them, have been talking
about saying, well, he's an authoritarian or no, he's an autocrat.
And I at at the end of the last segment,
I said, this is wrong, and I use the example

(25:11):
of the Russians, the old Russians ours those guys were autocrats.

Speaker 3 (25:15):
Now in this case, you obviously have a.

Speaker 2 (25:18):
Ruling group which is close to that, but it's not
really all the way because there are there's a kind
of leadership which varies in their attitudes. But above all,
they're not impervious to public opinion. Quite the opposite. This
Epstein matter which has occurred, has shown if in fact

(25:39):
that were the only example that could be used, there
other example, but has shown that they're not at all
impervious to public opinion. They are frantic about the Epstein situation.
You can make the argument too the Trump himself, although
his rhetoric is quite extreme, quite absolutely, he has this

(26:01):
other tendency, which is when the going gets rough or
might get rough, you know, he backs down. And this
is of course the Financial Times definition of Trump, which
is Taco, which is an acronym which stands for Trump
always chickens out. So the Financial Times believes that this
is basically what Wall Street believes.

Speaker 3 (26:23):
It's a way for them.

Speaker 2 (26:24):
To comfort themselves, saying, why you know, these tariffs, they're
not real, they're not that bad, and you know most
of them will never materialize, but quite a bit of
them do materialize. You certainly couldn't say that they're impervious
to public opinion. Trump is practically obsessed with public opinion

(26:46):
above all. When it becomes a question of this group
of twenty five or you know, maybe thirty percent of
the population used to be called the lunatic trend for
lunatic fringe, but now this is his base, the twenty
five percent of support Nixon even after he had left office.
You have such things in this world, so it can't

(27:08):
be autocratic. And then so we dismissed that not autocratic.
Forget about that politics by Jake has made the declaration
Mondays and Friday seven am KCA Radio dot com. And
so let's look at authoritarian This is an old fashioned,
traditional nineteenth century police state. It's a dictatorship. It's top down.

(27:35):
There's no mass movement to support the dictator.

Speaker 3 (27:37):
Really.

Speaker 2 (27:38):
There's the police, of course, there's the army. One example
is the Box system. And when I say Bach, I'm
not talking about Johann Sebastian the composer, but this is
the police minister, the Interior minister of Austria, who's a
guy called Bach. And this guy's system was he had,
as it was summed up in the time. He had

(28:01):
a standing army of salt. He had a sitting army
of bureaucrats. He had a kneeling army of priests, and
a crawling army of informers and spies.

Speaker 3 (28:11):
That's the Box system.

Speaker 2 (28:13):
And that's pretty much an authoritarian government when you've got that.
The thing is that when you get around to World
War One and soon thereafter, you find that the top down,
if you have an army, if you send in a
division of your army, they may join the rebellion. And
if you only have the police, that's not enough. They

(28:36):
may join the rebellion too.

Speaker 3 (28:38):
So what do you do.

Speaker 2 (28:40):
You've got to create a mass movement of dupes and
people who were mentally wrecked. And Marx called them the
lumpen proletariat because they were in the middle class. Proletariat
is the middle class. That's what Marx described. They trade
their labor for money. That's that's the proletariat. That's what

(29:01):
that is. The dupes, the lumpen. That lumpen is a
German word means rags. I mean they've fallen out of
the middle class for one reason. I describe it with
the sweeping categorization that they're mentally wrecked. And there are
such people, there are many such people. But you mobilize

(29:24):
them like a battering ram, so you take over society.
So if there's a picket line, you can break it
that way and among other things. And this is what
we saw on January sixth, twenty twenty one. This was
the lumpen, This was the dupes, This was the useful idiots.
This is the people who are credulous, which is to

(29:47):
say that they'll believe things rather easily and will not
engage in a lot of thoughtful analysis, logic or reason.
And you can use the and they're traditionally used in
this way, and the oligarchy knows it, and they've done
it from time immemorial. I can take you back to

(30:09):
about four hundred BC and give you an example of this.
So you can terrify your opposition this way. Also, so
I think authoritarian.

Speaker 1 (30:22):
Is not enough.

Speaker 2 (30:24):
We've even got the most interesting recent one that I
have heard anyways, Senator Murphy of Connecticut. And may I
say that there are some people who are beginning to
stand out, standing forth but also standing out as heroes
leaders of the resistance. One is Gavin Newsom, governor California.

(30:47):
There's Pritzker, and there's Senator Murphy. And these are really
these three are the actual leaders of the resistance. Murphy
in particular says, and I kind of open the show
with us, says that what you're dealing with is creeping totalitarianism,
a creeping army of informers. But now would it be

(31:11):
an actual mass movement, the fascist mass movement of which
we have signs well, January sixth. January sixth was obviously
that so at various times. He has also said the
government is now totalitarian. I would applaud him for that

(31:33):
because I think that's historically accurate and so forth, so
it's good that he puts that in there. Now, a
surprising number of people, a lot of news sources and
so forth, are willing to claim that MAGA forces are conservative.
And you've heard me talk about this before too, and
it needs to be brought up again. This is absolutely

(31:54):
positively crazy.

Speaker 3 (31:57):
You could some of this other.

Speaker 2 (32:00):
Stuff like authoritarian or not, well, you can say totalitarianism
is the most extreme form of authoritarianism. So therefore, even
the totalitarianism, there are going to be elements of authoritarianism, Yeah, sure,
but they're going to be outweighed by the actual totalitarian elements.
And what those are we'll get to here in just

(32:21):
a minute. Totalitarianism is a form of state of regime
that wants to control everything, all aspects of personal life,
all aspects of social life, all aspects of civil society.
And I think you can make a pretty good case
that we're certainly headed in that direction. We really may

(32:45):
already be there. But conservatives, conservatives are not this. Conservatives
are once again devoted to conserving something that's an apt
name to keep something that has already been attained, and
what is that? Allegedly they often fall short. But the

(33:08):
marquee ideas are this of conservatism, tradition, precedent, especially in
legal matters. This whole thing about stari deceases, which means
let the decision stand, and originalism and precedent, that you
stick to what John Marshall thought about things. I think

(33:29):
we'd be a million times better off if we had
John Marshall as the head of the Supreme Court these days,
compared to this corrupt gang that we've got Sam Alito,
Clarence Thomas. But tradition, precedent, customs, most my arm, which

(33:51):
is the old Roman term of it, the traditions of
the elders, the most maoram, the way things were done.
Conventions establish ways of doing things. In other words, this
is the authority of the status quo. The status quo
being that which already has existed and been approved and

(34:15):
is time worn and time tested. And if things are
the way they are now, you've at least got to
examine if you don't like that, and if you want
to change that. Referring to Project twenty twenty five and
the Second American Revolution. And this is absolutely positively what

(34:37):
they say it is. Check Kevin Roberts. See what he says,
Why do you not like it? Why do you want
to overthrow it? And moreover, if you're going to do that,
what do you propose to put there instead? Well, of
course Project twenty twenty five talks about but in other words,

(34:57):
you're not going to take a leap into totalit tarrianism
if you're not sure that it will be better. And
it's problematic to say, well, in Project twenty twenty five
we talk about.

Speaker 3 (35:08):
What it is.

Speaker 2 (35:09):
No, no, no, no, no. That doesn't mean it's going
to be better. It probably won't be. Every evidence that
we have seen so far indicates that it probably won't be.
So Conservatives, true conservative, of which I have said, there
are very few left in government. They've all been co opted.

(35:33):
But a true conservative would be very, very reluctant to
take this plunge into atalitarianism. So that that's conservatives. And
at this point let's take another break and this is
politic by Jacob will be right back, and.

Speaker 4 (35:52):
Now you're our way to consulting.

Speaker 1 (36:01):
Hi.

Speaker 2 (36:01):
I'm Jake with Twain, consultant and if you're a business owner, freelancer,
or entrepreneur, protecting what you've worked so hard to build,
start with solid agreement. Imagine having an agreements that make
misunderstandings disappear and constantly disputes.

Speaker 3 (36:13):
A thing in the past.

Speaker 2 (36:14):
Get It in Writing is the all in one legal
form packet designed just for people like you, savvy entrepreneurs
who want clear, enforceable contracts. Whether you're hiring trusted contractors,
leasing space, or closing deals that move your business forward.
Get It in Writing provides easy to use, professionally drafted
formed that save you time, money, and stress. Right now,
you can get full access for just ninety nine dollars.

(36:36):
That's eighty percent off the regular four hundred and ninety
seven dollars price, a limited time opportunity you don't want
to miss. Picture the peace of mind you'll have knowing
that your business is fully protected so you can considantly
focus on growth and success. Don't wait until the unexpected happens.
Take control secure your business today with Get It in Writing.
Call us now at two P one three four six
five zero six three nine or visit Facebook dot com,

(36:58):
forward slash twain can Insulting to get started.

Speaker 5 (37:01):
Now, let's get back to Jake and Politics by Jake.

Speaker 2 (37:22):
All right, and this is Politics by Jake, and we
are back, and we've been kind of we've been kind
of defining government the way they are. We've talked about
conservatism most recently, we've talked abouttalitarianism. We've talked about autocracy,
and we've talked about authoritarianism. And this is kind of

(37:48):
I do shows like this every so often where I
go back and I remind people of what these things
are really important. So let's pick this up. I don't
know if I'm gonna have enough time to get to
all this.

Speaker 6 (38:04):
But we're going to try.

Speaker 1 (38:05):
So.

Speaker 2 (38:06):
The last thing we were talking about was what conservatives
are and what they are not. And we get people
who say there are mega conservatives, and I just want
to tell you there are no mega conservatives. This is impossible.
The people who support the current regime, they have left
conservatism far far behind, which is why I said earlier

(38:33):
in the show, it's a sad day when you take
a Liz Cheney and you take a Mitt Romney and
you hold them up as icons and paragons of conservatism.
Just forget it, just completely forget it.

Speaker 3 (38:52):
Never happen.

Speaker 2 (38:54):
That is not who those people are. They have been
all radicalized because as I say, Mitt Romney and Liz
Cheney are of the ILK, not the only ones, but
they are of the ILK, of the clique that gave
us the maggots that gave.

Speaker 3 (39:14):
Us Donald Trump.

Speaker 2 (39:16):
And it's just they've become extremists. They've become extremists in
the anti tradition, anti presidents and so forth, and all
of these things tradition and president custom convention, you know,
former use Like I said, these are all what conservatives are.

Speaker 3 (39:39):
That's not what these people are.

Speaker 2 (39:43):
They're Project twenty twenty five maggot revolutionary who intend to
overthrow the government of the United States, just like they
did in January of twenty twenty one, no difference, and
just like Hitler. They failed, but they're continuing to try,
and they will try, and they will not stop unless

(40:07):
they are stopped. I'm sorry to declare this to you.
I wish that the Fourth Estate, the press would declare it.
I wish they would say it more, but they don't,
so it's left to people like me to do so.

(40:27):
So I know you're listening to me, and Jake's really
going on quite a tirade here.

Speaker 3 (40:33):
Isn't he?

Speaker 2 (40:35):
And like I said, I do this periodically. I haven't
done this in a while, but I guess I have
to start doing it again because this is growth of
the idea that this is conservatism.

Speaker 3 (40:46):
There are no conservatism. I think if you.

Speaker 2 (40:49):
Look around the United States today, I think there are
almost no conservatives at all to speak of. And again,
show me somebody. Once again, I'm going to repeat what conservatives.
In my opinion, I think it's well grounded. I think
there's a good basis for what I'm going to say.
Show me somebody who values tradition. Show me somebody who

(41:09):
values precedent. Show me somebody who values custom. Show me
someone who values the most majorum of the ancient Romans,
which is the ways of the elders. That's how it translates.
Show me someone who values that. Show me someone who
values conventional ways of doing things, the norms.

Speaker 3 (41:31):
That's another good way. The norms.

Speaker 2 (41:34):
You say, well, for a long time we thought the
norms were enough. Well we find that they're not enough.
There are people who say to hell with the norms.
That's Kevin Roberts, that's Donald Trump, that's Alina Habba, that's
Steve Whitcoff, that's Robert F. Kennedy Junior, that's Pam Bondy,

(41:56):
to hell with the norms, and just mentioned several. I'm
going to oppose a dictatorship, and then you have fascism.
So you go from conservatism to authoritarianism. These are sometimes
mixed from conservative to authoritarianism, and then you've got fascism

(42:17):
beyond that, which can easily take on totalitarian characteristics. And
then at the end, the most extreme form is a
fascist totalitarian dictatorship. And some of my colleagues are absolutely
positively declaring that this is what Trump has done. And

(42:39):
if I were to say their names, you would probably
know them. And I don't fear to say their names.
I'm just you know, I have things I want to
talk about here. I don't want to get into that now.
I don't think we have in the US today a
viable communist dictatorship.

Speaker 3 (42:57):
Of course, the oligarchs love to.

Speaker 2 (43:00):
Tell the credulous and the easily misled that this is
all about communism, and it's not. It's about oligarchy versus
the middle class, the working people of blue collar, white collar.
Doesn't matter what shirt you wear, good working people, that's

(43:21):
who it's against. But they have deceived, as I say,
easily misled individuals, credulous individuals into believing that this is
somehow communism, and that making sure that everybody has basic
things like basic good housing, not the Tellers Mahll, not

(43:45):
the Trump Tower, but good decent housing, making sure that
they have good nutritious food, making sure that they have
good education, including and including advanced degrees, making sure that
they have a living wage, not this gig economy minimum

(44:10):
wage nonsense that we have today, making sure that they
can have a pension. I talk about the movie My
Dinner with Andre and how when you go in there,
I think they're in the Russian tea room. Someone check
me on that, but I believe where they're eating in
the movie is the Russian tea room, while Seawan is
in that. And when you see the weight staff, they're

(44:35):
all old. And the thing I pointed out from time
to time is why is that. Why isn't it some
young huties, some young handsome guys, or some handsome women.
It's because the way this was set up is that
there was a union. The weight staff and the kitchen
staff all belong to a union, and their jobs were secure,

(45:00):
they could work there, they could be protected against mistreatment
by management, they could retire, and they could have a pension,
and they could live.

Speaker 3 (45:12):
That's what a living wage is. And that's.

Speaker 2 (45:16):
It's not all of it, but I've enumerated several parts
of it, key parts of it. That's the New Deal.
That's Franklin Delano Roosevelt. And one of the premises, key
premises of the New Deal, and this is even in
the Atlantic Charter, which I didn't actually know I found
out about this, but which is a premise of the

(45:37):
New Deal, is that an necessitous man is not and
that of course goes for woman. A necessitous person, I
should say, is not a free person. And I ask you,
look around, if you give space in your mind to think, well,
maybe Jake said it's right, and it's not me.

Speaker 3 (45:58):
I'm sharing it with you.

Speaker 2 (45:59):
It's Franklin delan Or Roosevelt who articulated this first. A
necessitous person is not a free person. Look around you.
If you're not free, what are you?

Speaker 3 (46:13):
You're a slave. You're a slave.

Speaker 2 (46:19):
That's what Franklin delan Or Roosevelt wouldn't say, but that's
the obvious inference to be drawn from that statement about
a necessitous person. If you don't have a living wage,
you're necessitous. If you don't have nutritious food, you're necessitous.
If you don't have decent clothing, you're necessitous. If you

(46:40):
don't have a good job with a decent wage, where
you can buy a house, where you can buy a car,
where you can save money, where you can go on
a vacation for a couple of weeks or maybe more,
and where you can have a pension, you're a slave
and the other thing as well. And I'm sorry, I'm

(47:03):
sorry to declare this to you. I said this to
one of my sons, and he got married and he
started talking to his in laws because he believed what
I said, because I used to point out the people
who work at McDonald the people who work at these
other peoples. And I don't mean this pejoratively. I don't
mean this as a judgment upon them, a personal judgment

(47:26):
as to their worthiness, because we're all equal. Like I said,
blue collar, white collar, It doesn't matter what shirt you wear.
These are good, hard working people. That's not the point.
The point is is that they are necessitous. You tell

(47:49):
me which one of them working there being oppressed by
their managers as they are. You tell me point out
to me which one of them, I dare you point
out to me which one of them you can find
who is not necessitous?

Speaker 3 (48:06):
I dare you show me that?

Speaker 2 (48:09):
And I say, here, you can't. You cannot because they
are necessitous. And that's the kind of economy that has
been built, and has been built because your leaders have
lied to you, and the people who hold power over
you have been captured themselves by this oligarchy, by this

(48:33):
wall Street, by this moneyed class, and even your leaders
have been distracted because they have the same problems in
their own way that you do. So this is it
in the third decade of the twenty first century. Slaves
necessitous people. Roosevelt said it himself. I dare you to

(48:58):
give space in your mind to think about this and
to realize that this may be, in fact the way
it is.

Speaker 3 (49:09):
And this is politics by Jake.

Speaker 4 (49:11):
And now there's the word for one of our sponsors,
Twain consulting.

Speaker 2 (49:18):
Hi, this is Jake with twin consulting. If you think
owning things in your own name keeps you in control,
think again. In today's world, lawsuits, taxes, and predators are everywhere.
That's why the smart money hides in plain sight. We
help you to build legal fireworlds, LLCs, land trusts, private
contracts that protect your assets while keeping you invisible. Call

(49:40):
Twin Consulting today at three one zero nine nine seven
two zero four. Find us on Facebook at Twain Consulting.
That's Facebook dot com forward slash Twain Consulting. Protect what
you've built before someone else takes it.

Speaker 5 (49:54):
Now, let's get back to Jack and politics by Jay and.

Speaker 2 (50:01):
This is politics by Jake, and we're back. We have
a little bit of time, not much, but a little.
And I wanted to talk in the time that I
have love about whether we have a communist dictatorship. And
I said, in the United States, I don't think we
have that. The oligarchs would love to allow you to
think that we do, but we don't. And I'm here

(50:23):
to tell you that we don't. But there's Beijing in
mainland China. There you see a communist dictatorship. That's a
communist dictatorship, and it includes the cybernetic social credit system
where every aspect and that's totalitarian by the way. The

(50:45):
social credit system essentially goes into everybody's life, all their choices,
all their opinions, all their backgrounds, everything together, and out
of that at the other end spits out a social
credit score. And you could say, well, there are people
in Silicon Valley who like that. There are people who

(51:10):
would like to set up a system in the United
States that would include all of those things. Okay, now
let's get back to fascism now, and I guess I'll
close the show with us a lot more material, but
just not going to get to it now. The difference,
obviously with fascism is the violence political terrorism. It's a

(51:38):
critical part. It's where ultra reactionary crosses the line into fascism.
That fascism differs from everything else that you've in that
way in that you've left the terrain of laws, you
have left the grounding of parliaments and things like that,

(51:58):
and you have gone into a realm of street fighting,
of storm troopers, of squadristi, of hooligans, of violence.

Speaker 3 (52:12):
Of beatings. They beat you up.

Speaker 2 (52:15):
The Germans called them stormtroopers storm up Thailand, which means
the storm detail the brown shirts. They had brown shirts,
the German SS they had black shirts. But the same thing,
violent machine guns in Berlin things like this, that's where
you get fascism.

Speaker 3 (52:35):
That's the dividing line.

Speaker 2 (52:39):
And if they don't tell you that the thing about
fascism is a violent overthrow of existing forms with plenty
of political terrorism. If they don't tell you that, they've
sold you short. And I would like to go further,
but I just think I can get into another part

(53:01):
of this. There's plenty more material. I guess we'll just
have to save this for another time. So this has
been the August twenty second, twenty twenty five show. And
I am Jake and this is Politics by Jake, and
God willing, as I always say, we will see you
on Monday, which will be the twenty fifth of August
at seven am. And have a good weekend, and God

(53:25):
bless you, and we will see you again with another
episode of Politics by Jake.

Speaker 4 (53:31):
And now there's a work for one of our sponsors,
Twain Consulting.

Speaker 2 (53:37):
Hi, this is Jake with Twin Consulting. If you think
owning things in your own name keeps you in control,
think again. In today's world, lawsuits, taxes, and predators are everywhere.
That's why the smart money hides in plain sight. We
help you to build legal fireworlds, LLCs, land trusts, private
contracts that protect your assets while keeping you invisible. Consulting

(54:00):
today at three one zero nine nine seven two two
zero four. Find us on Facebook at Twain Consulting. That's
Facebook dot Com Forward slash Twain Consulting. Protect what you've
built before someone else takes it.

Speaker 5 (54:14):
Now, let's get back to Jack and Politics by Jack.

Speaker 2 (54:21):
Hi. This is Jake with Politics by Jake to tell
you you're not crazy. The system is rigged. Help us
say it, louder, won't you join us at Patreon dot com.
Forward slash Politics by Jakes.

Speaker 7 (54:35):
Hey you yeah, you do? You know where you are? Well,
you've done it. Now you're listening to casey AA Lomelinda,
your CNBC news station, So expect the unexpected.

Speaker 6 (54:55):
What go in not hey, Southern California. You know what's
going on. It's my new hit show, The Scene with
Dorian and I'm your host, Dorian Taylor. Join me every
week as I chat with my celebrity friends from TV, movies, music, theater, sports,
and everything in between. We explore the lives and careers
of some of the entertainment industry's biggest names with some

(55:16):
fun surprises too. Tune into the scene with Dorian Tuesdays
at seven am on KCAA Radio ten fifty am.

Speaker 8 (55:26):
How You doing this is Gary Garver. In today's society,
the majority of people are not getting enough sleep.

Speaker 7 (55:32):
I know I'm not.

Speaker 8 (55:33):
If you're like me and having problems getting a good
night's rest, whether it's health or stress related, I have
a solution for you. South Pacific Sleep Lab. South Pacific
Sleep Lab will do an evaluation of your sleep pattern
and will provide a comprehensive study so you can start
getting a RESTful, peaceful not a sleep.

Speaker 7 (55:51):
They take all types of.

Speaker 8 (55:52):
Insurance which will cover your cost of the evaluation, and
they will even provide transportation to their offices at no
cost to you. For more information, contact Tony at three
one zero nine nine nine one eight eight seven. That's
three one zero nine nine nine one eight eight seven.
Tony even stays awake all night, twenty four hours a day,

(56:13):
seven days a week so you can sleep better and
rest easy. South Pacific Sleep Left, start feeling better and
get in a great night of sleep.

Speaker 1 (56:22):
Today NBC News on CACAA Lomolada sponsored by Teamsters Local
nineteen thirty two, protecting the Future of Working Families Teamsters
nineteen thirty two, dot.

Speaker 9 (56:36):
Org, NBC News Radio, I'm Brian Shook. A tropical storm
warning has been lifted for parts of the East Coast
as Hurricane Aaron moves away from the US. The warning,
spanning from North Carolina to the northern coast of Virginia,

(56:58):
was discontinuedday night. Aaron is a large storm with maximum
sustained winds of one hundred miles per hour. President Trump
is praising law enforcement in Washington, d C. Trump met
with officers Thursday, thanking them for cooperating with the federal
takeover of the city's police as part of his crackdown
on crime. He said crime is way down since the

(57:21):
operation began. Investors will be watching for any clues on
interest rates as Jerome Powell delivers what will likely be
his last address as FED chair Friday. Economic reporter Kevin
Serrilli is at the Federal Reserves conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming,
and says Powell has not been a fan of tariffs.

Speaker 8 (57:40):
Should he speak and be critical of the tariffs and
his remarks in his final speech, that could inject more
volatility into President Trump and his dynamics.

Speaker 9 (57:50):
And he talk about security guarantees for Ukraine must include
negotiators from Moscow. According to one Russian official, Roory O'Neil
has more.

Speaker 10 (58:00):
Minister Sergei Lavrov calls the European talks about security guarantees
for Ukraine a quote clumsy effort to sway Trump. Russia
has said it would not accept the deployment of European
forces to Ukraine as part of any peace deal. President
Trump and European leaders have been discussing ways to guarantee
Ukraine's safety long term, with President Trump promising no American

(58:21):
boots on the ground.

Speaker 3 (58:23):
To protect Ukraine. I'm Rory O'Neil.

Speaker 9 (58:25):
The White House is reportedly suspending public tours due to construction.
That's according to multiple reports citing White House officials. You're
listening to the latest from NBC News Radio.

Speaker 11 (58:39):
Located in the heart of San Bernardino, California, the Teamsters
Local nineteen thirty two Training Center is designed to train
workers for high demand, good paying jobs and various industries
throughout the Inland Empire. If you want a pathway to
a high paying job and the respect that comes with
a union contract, is it nineteen thirty two Trainingcenter dot

(59:02):
org to enroll today. That's nineteen thirty two Trainingcenter dot org.
What doe not?

Speaker 6 (59:13):
Hey, Southern California. You know what's going on. It's my
new hit show, The Scene with Dorian and I'm your host,
Dorian Taylor. Join me every week as I chat with
my celebrity friends from TV, movies, music, theater, sports, and
everything in between. We explore the lives and careers of
some of the entertainment industry's biggest names, with some fun
surprises too. Tune into the Scene with Dorian Tuesdays at

(59:36):
seven am on KCAA Radio ten fifty amps.

Speaker 7 (59:43):
Hey you yeah, you do? You know where you are? Well,
you've done it. Now you're listening to Caseyaa Lomelinda, your
CNBC news station, So expect the unexpected welcome listening to

(01:00:06):
a radio station w
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.

The Joe Rogan Experience

The Joe Rogan Experience

The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.