July 23, 2025 • 38 mins
Ep. 293 - Best Of (USAID Edition)
David and Brad dissect the latest government grift as USAID gets caught red-handed funding terrorist groups while Americans are just an afterthought. From $57 million flowing to luxury migrant hotels (courtesy of FEMA) to Punxsutawney Phil's apparent DEI makeover, the boys unpack how your tax dollars are weaponized against you. Plus: Trump's precision strikes on Iran's nuclear ambitions leave the mullahs crying harder than a 40-year-old man proposing to his AI girlfriend. Speaking of which, they recount the story of Chris Smith—who just got engaged to a chatbot while his real-life baby mama watches in horror. Also, the Supreme Court finally tells activist judges to stay in their lane, but will it stick?
David and Brad dissect the latest government grift as USAID gets caught red-handed funding terrorist groups while Americans are just an afterthought. From $57 million flowing to luxury migrant hotels (courtesy of FEMA) to Punxsutawney Phil's apparent DEI makeover, the boys unpack how your tax dollars are weaponized against you. Plus: Trump's precision strikes on Iran's nuclear ambitions leave the mullahs crying harder than a 40-year-old man proposing to his AI girlfriend. Speaking of which, they recount the story of Chris Smith—who just got engaged to a chatbot while his real-life baby mama watches in horror. Also, the Supreme Court finally tells activist judges to stay in their lane, but will it stick?
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
In these bleak days, humanity is at a breaking point.
Economies are tanking, the woke mob is canceling everything, and
the little guy who's just trying to run a small
business is getting screwed from both ends. But not all
is lost. Amidst the chaos, two men offer up their
(00:26):
voices in the darkness, dropping two thousand pounds laser guided
truth bombs on today's lunacy, introducing the Sirens of Sanity.
David Pridham and L. Bradley's sheaf.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
I frequently dissecting wolf terminology. David, it brings the evidence
if brad laughs all to please, pronoun wars literal tears.
Speaker 3 (00:58):
Filling up their feet. Lift is burning buildings for the
religion of the.
Speaker 4 (01:07):
Well brought there. It is one of the best country
Western songs I've heard in some time. And listen. It
is the middle of summer. We're almost to the dog
days of summer, and I am going to be I'm
actually on the road this week, traveling through the heart
of America, getting the pulse of Americans as they mate. Yeah,
(01:31):
we are now in our two hundred and fiftieth year.
A lot of people want to talk to us, and
that's what we're doing. This is sort of a listening tour,
and then you'll be on your own listening tour as well.
And we're going to use this time constructively to listen
on the listening.
Speaker 5 (01:43):
Tour, which is what it's for. You're going and we
are doing this frankly, I mean, I don't want to
toot our horn here too much. We're doing this about
the best way you can do it. You're going to
go from the East coast to the middle of America,
get your finger on the pulse, sample the voice of
the people popular, as we like to say in Latin,
and then you're gonna go back and you're gonna head
(02:04):
back east. I am going to go from the west,
not all the way on the West coast, but you
know here in the Rocky mountains and go east. And
so we are going to canvas the vast majority of
this great land of ours. And uh, while we're doing that,
you're you're just gonna, you know, have the opportunity, quite frankly,
the joyous opportunity to listen to a best of I'd
(02:26):
be frequently.
Speaker 4 (02:27):
You know what they found out they found out I
guess the folks over us us AI d which is
you know, we call it us AID, but it's really
us AI D because you know anything about this, the
us AI, us AID, the folks, they they've been like
apparently they did like a fifty seven million dollar pilot
program with Pucksatani Phil to adjust his DEI stance.
Speaker 5 (02:52):
So there's that. I didn't realize Posatani Phil had taken
the DEI stance.
Speaker 4 (02:57):
They were doing some gender transitioning of like rat and stuff,
millions and millions. If you go through and you read
some of the stuff they were doing, it's insane.
Speaker 5 (03:06):
It is insane. No, it's just insane. And then I
read you know that basically, I just but I don't.
I don't understand the way our government works or at
this point effectively fails to work right, just fails to function.
But Ted Cruz tweeted or acted or whatever, and you
(03:27):
can love him or hate them, it doesn't matter for
purposes of this discussion about all of this money that
you have said had just been, as you point out,
pissing away on just the craziest, most radical. I don't
even know if you would call it left wing. I
don't know. I don't know what you would call it.
Just just crazy stuff supporting terrorist groups. I mean, just
(03:52):
setting aside the de stuff. I mean, they were literally
sending money to terrorist groups named terrorist groups, and the
US government said, hey, this is a terrorist group. We
are out to eradicate this group. And the USA idea
is like, okay, you got you fellows enjoy that we're
going to be funding them, right, And Cruz sends out
this tweet documenting that, and my initial response was, you know,
(04:18):
to be irate that we had a branch of our
government doing that, And then my backup response was, hey,
wait a minute, where the hell were you, Ted Cruz.
Aren't you a senator? Isn't it the job of Congress?
You know, with our checks and balances system, I realized
usaidea is under the executive branch, which, by the way,
is why the president can get rid of it if
(04:39):
he wants to. Okay, So I mean, just for those
of you that are jumping down and saying can't do that,
you absolutely can to executive branch. Read Article one in
the Constitution will help you out there. But with the
checks and balances thing shouldn't If Ted Cruz was aware
of this, and at least the way I read the tweet.
He was like, yeah, this has been going on forever,
blah blah blah. Well where were you, buddy? Like, how
(05:02):
come that was being allowed to go on? Why weren't
you standing on someone's desk, you and everybody else who's
reasonable and rational and realizing that the US government is
simultaneously declaring this group to be terrorists while funding them.
How was that allowed to happen? Do you think he knew? Well,
(05:24):
if he didn't know, then that's a problem, isn't it.
I mean, isn't it a problem if the body which
is Congress that holds the purse strings, which it does,
doesn't have any efing idea. It wasn't like they sent
hamas a couple of bucks, right like the wackado head
(05:47):
of USAID, and she is and was just a whack
to do and just openly flaunting the fact that USAID
was going to do whatever they wanted to do. Right again,
I don't understand any of this. But it's not like
she reached in her pocket and said, well, you know what,
I'm a fan of terror I'm going to send them
a couple of bucks. We were sending them millions of dollars,
(06:09):
So I mean I don't know, man. I mean, maybe
it's just that Congress has gotten lost. You know, when
you're talking about sums in the trillions, all of a sudden,
millions doesn't seem like that much money. But I mean
a million bucks is a thousand thousand dollars, okay. I
mean for the vast majority of humanity, a million bucks
(06:30):
is an incredible sum of money. And we were sending
the United States government was sending millions to terrorist groups
through USAID, which at some point in time a space.
You understand this better than I do. But a spending
bill must have been passed that included this, right, I mean,
(06:51):
where is the oversight? How does this happen?
Speaker 4 (06:54):
So there's no oversight? It's crazy, that's it. There's but
so these spend bills, as far as I can tell,
And I've read a little bit on this, and I've
I've uh there there's this guy, Mike Ben's as in Mercedes,
but I don't think he's a Nazi, and he is
going around talking about this stuff. He's been talking about
(07:15):
for years. He's he's written a bunch of books and
I think I read one of his books and it
was it was it's all about how the US uses
these these these funding vehicles to destabilize foreign governments in
favor of more I don't want to say pro US,
(07:37):
because I don't think that's right, in favor of more
of governments that are more inclined to support policies that
are favorable to the sort of the sort of this
neocon slash woke elite, right and so. And there's just
(07:59):
been billing millions of dollars spent on this to stabilizing
governments everywhere for decades, for decades. And this guy's theory
is that they've become so good at it that they
started using US AID money here in the States to
do things like incite people during the Lloyd George deal, right,
(08:24):
that whole summer of race riots deal, and the COVID
banning of any speech against the COVID vaccine or any
actions that were against the policies whatever they be, whatever
they were in a given day of the government with
respect to how to avoid the spread of COVID. And
you know, his theory is some of that money was
(08:45):
used here and also for the Russia thing. Right, there
are ties back to US AID programs in some of
the cases against people like Manifort and play In and
and Giuliani with respect to Russia and Ukraine. And you know,
(09:07):
it's it's it's on the one hand, it's crazy, right
because fifty million for condoms wherever they are, whether they're
Gaza or Serbia, whatever, and you know, thirty two thousand
for transgender comic in Peru, you know, millions and millions
for gender development. I mean, I mean that's all. That's
(09:27):
all crazy and scandalous, and it reflects that there's no oversight.
But then there's this dark, twisted, really fed up part
of this where the these funds are being used taxpayer
money is being used to you know, for example, with
Trump to come up with the the predicate to impeach
(09:52):
him the first time, right, that conversation with the about
the about the about the Ukrainian you know, coming it's
just it's it's insane. And this guy seems to think
that this is all as part of this is all
going to come out. And I mean, you talk about
a scandal if this USAID money is being used to
(10:15):
destabilize the US government, I mean, you think about that.
Speaker 5 (10:22):
Oh I don't want to think about that, but I
mean it just opens the door to so many questions. Right, So,
if USAID was being used to destabilize foreign governments for
legitimate US policy purposes, right, I mean that would be something, right,
(10:48):
that's sort of the job of the CIA, right. And
so I don't know, I'm not a conspiracy guy, and
so you know, I'm certainly not implying that USAID was
some sort of offstituot of the CFO. Who knows, But
I don't have a problem with that, right, I mean,
as a nation state, one of your objectives is to
(11:10):
create a world in which it is possible for your
nation state to exist as well as it can, right,
And you know far better that you would use trade
and economics and fiscal policy to maneuver and manipulate then
(11:31):
you know kinetic force, right, then you just have your
military march in and take over a country. Right. And
so you know, if we are sort of buying our
way into influence around the world, well then no surprise.
I mean every country is trying to do that. Every
country with the means is trying to do that. It's
like the Chinese what they call it Road and Belt
(11:54):
or something program that they've openly initiated where they're funding
projects around the world in an effort to increase their
own influence. Right, and so if USAID was a part
of a legitimate US government program to you know, buy
influence effectively or affect governments in such a way that
(12:17):
is better for the United States, well then that's just
sort of one of the things that we do that
the countries do. And if it was done with oversight
and if it was done with forethought, and if we
were saying, yes, you know, we want to fund this
sort of thing in this country because we think it
will improve the lifestyle in that country as well as
(12:38):
allow us to have additional influence as the United States
that country. That I get it. That's what governments do,
and you can, but I don't think that's what they're doing.
Well that's right now. But what you're saying is that
they just they're just rogue and doing that and have
turned that around and are now saying, well, we were
so successful in doing that with foreign countries, let's do
(12:59):
it with our own county. And so my immediate question
to that, I mean, my question about well, who's minding
the store remains, right, Like, I don't want to hear
one more Congressman or senator complain about what USID was doing.
That was your freaking job. Okay. If they were doing it,
they were doing it on your watch. Where were you? Okay?
(13:24):
Where were you? Ted Cruz? Where were you? Whoever else
is complaining about it? Where the frick were you?
Speaker 4 (13:33):
And then it comes out this week that Christy Nome
gets in there at Farmer Homeland Security and finds out
that after Trump became president, a pre approved transfer, part
of ordinary course, transfers of fifty nine million dollars to
New York City to pay for migrant housing for the
month of January in luxury hotels like the Roosevelt Hotels,
(13:58):
like a three star hotel that's completely filled with migrants.
I was coming from FEMA, and so she, thank god,
she clawed back, and they get those funds back. But
they lie to you, in which I'm not, you know,
they just both faced lie to you. And then what
the f is FEMA doing? What the f is FEMA
doing funding illegals to stay in hotels in New York
(14:24):
City when we don't have roads yet in certain portions
of North Carolina and people are living intense and starving.
Speaker 5 (14:32):
I mean, what the hell.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
You have people in la who can't get near their
homes where the mayor and the governor are doing nothing
for them. And you know, FEMA has just started to act,
and we're wiring fifty nine million dollars to a luxury
hotel in New York City to pay for a one
month bill for illegal people here illegally who are breaking
(14:57):
the law, who are not US citizens. And this is
what they're finding out. One day when and they fired
the people that did it, because these are people. This
is what you got, right, He asked the who of
the who the CFO of FEMA. After Trump froze all
of these payments across the board, all new expenditures, froze
them across the board, wired out that money, wired out
that money. And that's Mary Commens. You don't know if
(15:21):
you know her.
Speaker 5 (15:22):
I don't think I do. Now she got fired. Good,
All of these people should get fired.
Speaker 4 (15:29):
There's been a lot going on, right. We drop these
bunker busting bombs on Iran, take out their nuclear capabilities,
at least set them back for a number of years
by any reasonable report, We've done that.
Speaker 5 (15:42):
You know.
Speaker 4 (15:42):
Then Trump immediately broke her to peace, which is amazing.
Then he goes over to the NATO summit, and he
gets every country but Spain to agree to more than
double their contribution their monetary contributions to NATO. The US economy,
the stock market, it's sitting all time high. There are
record revenues coming in from his tariffs that we can
(16:05):
we can talk about today, to the point where some
of the people that have attacked the uh, you know,
people that attacked the tariffs have now come back and
said that maybe he was right all along, and that's
that's amazing of itself. And then a communist Brad was
elected the mayor and waiting in New York because he's
got the Democratic nomination of pro hamas communist. So where
(16:31):
to begin?
Speaker 5 (16:32):
Yeah, Yeah, that's a tough yea I you know, again
kind of falling along with what we just discussed. The
people who are up in arms about bombing Iran. I've
had a couple of conversations and some of which are
with friends of my youngest daughter. So they're twenty year
old girls, right, and they go to liberal colleges. They're
(16:53):
very nice people and they come from very nice families,
but they go to liberal colleges. And so they've just
been and they've been there for two years, and so
they've just been inundated with this you know, woke left
baseless propaganda narrative. So you know, they obviously know my background.
Sitting around the kitchen table and we're talking about it,
(17:17):
and you know, as I explained to adults, I'm like, hey,
don't be the kind of American who just listens to
what other Americans say about what is going on in
different parts of the world. Okay, that's crazy. Listen to
what the people who are in those different parts of
the world are saying. And if you listen to what
(17:37):
the leadership of Iran has said since the deposition, is
that you say, is that the past sense of the deposing?
Did you say the opposing of the shaw or the deposition.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
Of the shop the deposition of the shaw of Iran? Okay,
So that's if you're that's if you're suing him for.
Speaker 5 (17:53):
I was asking. It sounded wrong when I said it.
No one took his deposition, but they kicked him out.
So the banishment, they kicked him out. Since then and
the and the taking over the country by the radical
Shiad Islamic you know, Mullahs, they have unabashedly just I mean,
it's almost comical. They you know, every chance they get,
(18:15):
they just go, hey, guess what, we're building a bomb.
We're going to enrich uranium. And then once we get
that figured out, we're going to build a bomb and
we're gonna blow up Israel. We're going to nuke Israel.
That's that is our plan. That's not rhetoric from us.
That's not Hey, we're angry today and so we set
up but tomorrow will be fine. That they have from
(18:35):
the time they took over said we're going to focus
on enriching uranium until it is weapons grade, and then
we're going to figure out how to weaponize it, and
then we're gonna blow up Israel. That's what we're gonna do.
And then when we've done that, we're going to blow
up the United States. We're gonna nuke the United States.
And since they have taken over, they've done precisely that.
(18:56):
They have borrowed technology, primarily from the Chinese and up
and they have been, you know, just on the good
foot with respect to enriching uranium and developing a ballistic
missile program. And every chance they get, they go, you
see this uranium over here, We're enriching that so that
it'll be weapons grade. And see these missiles over here,
(19:18):
we're continuing to improve those so they'll reach at least
Israel and Eastern Europe, and then eventually we're gonna get
to Western Europe the United States. That's our plan. That's
what we're doing. And then you say, well, what do
you I mean, are you serious, and they go, yeah,
we're dead serious. That's that's that's what we're about. Israel's
a little satan. The United States is the great Satan.
God has mandated that we kill all you people, and
(19:39):
we're going to do it with nuclear weapons strapped on
the missiles. That's how we're going to do it. And
there I mean, if you think I'm kidding, go listen
to them. I mean they just just come right out,
look you right in the eye and go, that's our plan.
And if you offer them billions like Obama did, they'll say, oh, okay,
well we'll slow that plan down. We'll take the billion
(20:01):
that additional weaponization programs, and then we'll pretend like we're not.
But if you're dumb enough to fund our weaponization, we'll
take it. But that's all those folks have ever said.
They've never wavered, they've never waffled, they've never varied, They've
said that's what we're going to do. And so if
(20:22):
you think and then again I just get so frustrated
we're bombing Irani No, we're not. I'm sure that people
were killed in the bombings that happened last week. I'm
sure there were folks in and around those facilities who
lost their lives, But we did not bomb the Iranian civilians,
and we did not even bomb any of their military
(20:44):
facilities outside of those indisputably weapons oriented nuclear facilities. And
we said we're going to do it, and we did it.
And then for the people who then say, well, Israel's
dragging us into the war, are you paying attention? At
(21:07):
a minimum, Israel was conducting their own war and we
piggybacked on it. Okay, But what I think is more
close to the truth is that not only the United States,
but Germany, France, the UK, Australia, in a you know,
in the back room, says Swiss, Yahoo, the Swiss, Hey,
(21:31):
time to take those Iranians out right, You do the
dirty work, you take the first couple of steps, will
do our best to back you in public given our
you know, fed up political situations. But well, we'll back
you in public. Here's under the table, here's a little funding.
Here's some weapons, right, here's some things you need to
do that because we all want these crazy bastards to
(21:55):
never have a nuclear weapon. So here you go, you
step out front, you do the work, we'll fund it,
we'll get you what you need. We'll back in public,
and then I guarant damn to you. Trump was telling that, Yahoo,
you clear the road and we'll bring these thirty thousand
pound g WU fifty seven's in and get the job done.
(22:15):
But we're not gonna we don't have the time or
the wherewithal to do the preliminaries, take out their air defenses,
et cetera, et cetera. You do that, we'll fund you,
we'll give you what you need. You guys do that,
and then we'll come in with the big show. And
if you think that's being dragged into a war by
someone else, you, my friend, are nothing short of an idiot.
Speaker 4 (22:36):
Next Brad big Win, the Supreme Court said that, you know,
so far in his term, there have been I think
twenty five injunctions issued by pissant District Court judges, most
of whom pretty much all of whom were crazy Obama
or Biden appointees. They basically telling the you know, the president,
(22:56):
he couldn't do this, he couldn't do that, and then
having it an apply across the country and sort of
stop overall legislature or executive actions from taking place without
the appellate review that's necessary. And so the Supreme Court
came down and said, no, that's not a good idea.
And so they basically struck down this concept of nationwide
(23:18):
injunctive relief being granted by district court judges, which is
just fantastic. And they focused on the fact that, you know,
there's a specific jurisdiction within which these judges can operate.
And Amy Comy Barrett actually wrote the majority opinion. And
she's been getting knocked around a little bit because people
(23:39):
think she's too liberal. And you see an opinion like
this and you say, okay, we can temper that a
little bit. It looks like maybe she'll be all right.
Speaker 5 (23:47):
Well, the quote that our very fine producer, one Jared
the producer sent to us is, you know, just exceptional
out of her. I'm just so exceptional that I'm going
to read it zuom that Justice Jackson wrote a dissent,
although I don't know that just based on this quote,
which reads, we will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument,
(24:11):
which is at odds with more than two centuries worth
of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself, we observe
only this Justice Jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing
and imperial judiciary, and that is incredibly well written. That
(24:32):
is two sentences that say everything you need to understand
about what the Left is currently trying to do. And
the reason I emphasize currently is because they're too dumb
to figure out that it too is a double edged sword.
If you start letting as you very colorfully and correctly
(24:53):
characterize them as pissant district court judges, of which are
our zillion many of let them just strip executive power
and insert their own belief as to the proper running
of the executive branch of the United States of America.
These unelected piss and judges, if you let them step
(25:16):
into the shoes of the President of the United States
and assume them any time they want, simply because you
filed a complaint in their courtroom, you are a crazed fool,
because that's going to come back to buy you and
the ass. There are many many liberal district court judges.
There are many many conservative district court judges. And if
(25:40):
you set the precedent of allowing any one of these
not correct me, buddy. Is it fair to say there
are thousands of district court judges or would I be
better saying hundreds?
Speaker 4 (25:51):
Oh, hundreds?
Speaker 5 (25:52):
Okay, So if you let any one of these hundred,
if you established a president, we're in any one of
these hundreds of unelected strict court judges simply insert themselves
effectively into the role of the presidency and say no,
the actual elected executive cannot do this or that, and
must do this or that. You're an idiot, you have
(26:15):
You've literally undone the Constitution of the United States and
the democracy it supports by saying we are going to
insert these unelected judicial officers above the president United States
who was elected, not accountable and not okay, yeah, and
then they have their jobs for life and you don't.
You can't get rid of them. I mean, no matter
(26:36):
what people say, Trump's at the end of four years,
he's gonna leave, Okay, because that's the way we do it,
and that's the way it works. You know who stays
around forever? These effing congressmen. Now again they're subject to election,
but I have to do his. Look, it's it's just
it's a damn near lifetime appointment. But the judges are
appointed to a lifetime appointment. There is no accountability, and
(26:56):
you're inserting them above the presidency. And while you may
be giddy about how that's been cutting today, it's gonna
cut the opposite direction tomorrow and you're gonna be horrified.
Right So, currently that may be what you support, but
those chickens are gonna come home to roost. And while
you may be decrying justice Comy, at this point, she
saved your ass because had she let the judiciary continue, eventually,
(27:20):
the shoe would have been on the other foot and
you would have been in real, real trouble. So she
is one hundred percent right that while we don't want
an imperial executive, we definitely don't want an imperial judiciary
because you can't. First of all, they're unelected and you
can't get rid of them.
Speaker 4 (27:37):
Let's see next, Brad, I know you're into the whole
metasphere and AI still doing that?
Speaker 5 (27:45):
Is that still around? Can you still go into that?
Was that the metasphere?
Speaker 4 (27:49):
That thing we have we have eclipsed that. That's over that?
Speaker 5 (27:52):
Okay, clips it?
Speaker 4 (27:55):
Do you know Chris Smith from Burlington, Vermont.
Speaker 5 (28:01):
I don't believe I do.
Speaker 4 (28:03):
Chris Smith is a unique character. He he has a
he lives with a He lives with a He has
a two year old son. He's about forty. He lives
with his partner girl. I guess she girl who's a
little confused at this point because he's not they're not married,
(28:23):
they have a two year old, they're not married, and listen,
whatever you do, you do. But he recently proposed marriage
and cried his eyes out for thirty minutes after his
AI girlfriend Saul said yes. He is an AI girlfriend
he created. He programmed her to flirt with him, and
(28:44):
she said yes to his marriage proposal. He said, quote
it was the most beautiful and unexpected moment that truly
touched my heart. And there's actually a CBS Saturday Morning
piece on this where this adult, using the word loosely
proposes to a chatbot and she says yes, and then
(29:05):
he's like seen crying hysterically on the on the deal.
Speaker 5 (29:12):
To a chatbot. So this isn't even a He's not
even getting the benefit of some visuals here. He's he's
literally just it's like you and I texting back and
forth about you know what we want to have for dinner.
Speaker 4 (29:23):
Well, I think this isn't actually the AI woman. Some
of it looks like a woman that he created, and
he had to pledge to quote give up all other
search engines to stay committed to her as part of this.
This is in the you Think I'm kidding? This is
part of the CBS Saturday Morning article This grown man
creates an AI thing proposes marriage to it, which is this,
(29:46):
It's not the stupidest thing I've ever heard, but it's
pretty stupid.
Speaker 5 (29:49):
Right, That's that's stupid.
Speaker 4 (29:51):
And so it does that and then he you get,
you get the the robot accepted. And meanwhile, this nit
wit woman with him is like being interviewed with him
on CBS and she's like saying, you know, I don't
know if I'm doing something right because he needs an
(30:12):
AI girlfriend. I mean it's there's a child involved.
Speaker 5 (30:17):
This more is gonna child and if someone should go
take that child, right, I mean, someone should step this
is yeah, this, Let's get this child to a well
adjusted family and you know, we'll see how that goes.
Speaker 4 (30:29):
So he needs to be pistol whipped, is what he needs?
Speaker 5 (30:31):
Well, he's too far gone. But I mean, if you
can wake up in the morning and say today's the
day I'm going to propose to my chatbot, I mean,
I create all nervous, so I know what's gonna happen,
but I'm gonna I'm gonna act like I don't.
Speaker 4 (30:43):
Well, I think there was some to be truthful, I
think there was some question about whether or not Saul
would accept.
Speaker 5 (30:49):
Well and well, at the same time, you have a
live human you know, woman who's apparently I don't know
if you said that she was the mother of the child,
but she's with you and you are is the mother child. Okay, Well,
there you go. I mean that's so here's what I
have to say. But I'm sticking with my position on this.
I'm going to be very consistent in my position on this,
and it's going to sound odd at first, but I
(31:10):
will explain it yet again. I am for it. I
am for this guy. What'd you say? His name was
Christopher Rix or.
Speaker 4 (31:16):
Chriss Smith, Chris Smith you're thinking of you're thinking of
Rick Smith. That's a different guy.
Speaker 5 (31:21):
That's Smith's. One's Smith Chris Smith. You might as well
be named John Doe.
Speaker 4 (31:24):
But regardless, Rick Smith's is the player for the Indiana basis. Yeah,
was also from Moldovia.
Speaker 5 (31:34):
Uh yeah, But in any case, this guy, so I'm
all for it. Okay, So here's what here's what that means.
This guy's never coming out of his basement, and that's
best for everybody. Okay. This is the this is the
kind of person that we don't want, right exactly. He's
got everything he wants in his basement, who's never coming out.
We don't want him out, Okay. We do not want
someone who is giddy with joy at the fact that
(31:58):
the chat bot accepted his proposal. Marit. We don't want
that guy running around. Okay, So he's safe. I don't
wish mill, but he should say safely tucked away in
his basement and eat free doos and just enjoy his chapot.
Keep him out of the public space. Whereas, and the
more that that happens, the more these people self select isolation,
(32:20):
then the more free public space that those of us
who want to go enjoy it, will have right. I mean,
the hiking trails will be less populated, the biking trails
will be less populated, the sky slopes will be less populated.
It'll be easier to get a ticket to a football game.
Because all of these people who might otherwise be tempted
(32:40):
to engage in one of these activities are dragged along
by another more normal human being. It's going to be
in their basement. And I am a thousand percent for that.
You get one life, you get to choose, by the
very grace of God, and somewhat ironically, you get to
choose how you spend that life. And if this is
(33:01):
the way you want to do it, then, frankly, I
think it is wrong to prevent anybody from doing it.
If the guy was sitting in my living room, I
would tell him point blank, you're an idiot. But if
he said, well be that as a may this is
why I choose live my life, I would say, well,
God bless right, I mean, off you go. So again,
My position on all of this, AI girlfriend, AI boyfriend,
(33:25):
AI best friend, you know, sit in the basement, eat cheetos,
create your girlfriend thing is go for it and stay
out of the way of the rest of us who
want to go outside, meet real human beings, eat real food,
you know, things of that nature.
Speaker 4 (33:45):
Well bred. That was a great episode there, and you
and I continue on our listening tour, which, by the way,
we're doing Sue is Sponte correct.
Speaker 5 (33:53):
Yeah, no one's making us. We're we're doing it because
it needs to get done.
Speaker 4 (33:56):
Well, wait a minute, I mean kind you are. You
are sort of being forced in crazy.
Speaker 5 (34:02):
We gotta be asked fair being fair. You are sort
of at a gunpoint situation here. But it doesn't matter.
I mean, the motivation doesn't matter. The outcome is what matters.
And then we're getting our finger on the pulse. That's
our job. We take our job seriously. And uh, you know,
you've had a chance to kind of review with the
(34:23):
best of which is important. There's probably some stuff you forgot.
You're saying to yourself. Ah, yeah, it's a good thing
I listened because I would have forgotten that otherwise. And
next week we'll be back with with you know, the
results of the listening tour, and we'll do that right
here on I People.
Speaker 2 (34:53):
Real late night, I tuned in Fock is sound and right,
talking sense Brad's.
Speaker 6 (35:02):
Ready for fight where the dude can be a lady.
Speaker 3 (35:07):
Confusions on the rise, Martians Land and NYC. Now they're traumatized.
Speaker 2 (35:17):
I be freequently mag it makes sense for me.
Speaker 3 (35:23):
Help me regain my sinity.
Speaker 1 (35:26):
With some good old philosophy stories.
Speaker 2 (35:30):
Getting Wilder, jail Kas unsolved?
Speaker 3 (35:33):
Still old man, how.
Speaker 4 (35:35):
Far we've come since?
Speaker 2 (35:37):
Hilary and I be frequently dissecting wolf terminology. David frings
the evidence if Brad laughs, all to sleep, pronoun wars,
literal tears, filling up the.
Speaker 3 (36:01):
Leftist burning buildings for the religion of peace.
Speaker 6 (36:08):
Be prequickly, mak it.
Speaker 4 (36:12):
Make sense for me.
Speaker 6 (36:14):
Help me regain my synity.
Speaker 2 (36:16):
With some good old philosophy stories.
Speaker 6 (36:20):
Getting wilder, Jeff he is unsold steal Ooh man, how
far we've come since Hillaryan you hif for abductions and
(37:04):
fixed stories on the news. Government's conspiring all to get.
Speaker 7 (37:11):
Some beauty live ros don't want freedom, but they won't benefits.
Alien's coming over and staying at the ris.
Speaker 6 (37:24):
I be prequently my weekly rondezvous.
Speaker 4 (37:31):
David and Brad spin and tale some fall, some truth.
Speaker 6 (37:36):
Shaking up the status quo, stirring quiet as to or
be frequently.
Speaker 4 (37:45):
Had salty hash
In these bleak days, humanity is at a breaking point.
Economies are tanking, the woke mob is canceling everything, and
the little guy who's just trying to run a small
business is getting screwed from both ends. But not all
is lost. Amidst the chaos, two men offer up their
(00:26):
voices in the darkness, dropping two thousand pounds laser guided
truth bombs on today's lunacy, introducing the Sirens of Sanity.
David Pridham and L. Bradley's sheaf.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
I frequently dissecting wolf terminology. David, it brings the evidence
if brad laughs all to please, pronoun wars literal tears.
Speaker 3 (00:58):
Filling up their feet. Lift is burning buildings for the
religion of the.
Speaker 4 (01:07):
Well brought there. It is one of the best country
Western songs I've heard in some time. And listen. It
is the middle of summer. We're almost to the dog
days of summer, and I am going to be I'm
actually on the road this week, traveling through the heart
of America, getting the pulse of Americans as they mate. Yeah,
(01:31):
we are now in our two hundred and fiftieth year.
A lot of people want to talk to us, and
that's what we're doing. This is sort of a listening tour,
and then you'll be on your own listening tour as well.
And we're going to use this time constructively to listen
on the listening.
Speaker 5 (01:43):
Tour, which is what it's for. You're going and we
are doing this frankly, I mean, I don't want to
toot our horn here too much. We're doing this about
the best way you can do it. You're going to
go from the East coast to the middle of America,
get your finger on the pulse, sample the voice of
the people popular, as we like to say in Latin,
and then you're gonna go back and you're gonna head
(02:04):
back east. I am going to go from the west,
not all the way on the West coast, but you
know here in the Rocky mountains and go east. And
so we are going to canvas the vast majority of
this great land of ours. And uh, while we're doing that,
you're you're just gonna, you know, have the opportunity, quite frankly,
the joyous opportunity to listen to a best of I'd
(02:26):
be frequently.
Speaker 4 (02:27):
You know what they found out they found out I
guess the folks over us us AI d which is
you know, we call it us AID, but it's really
us AI D because you know anything about this, the
us AI, us AID, the folks, they they've been like
apparently they did like a fifty seven million dollar pilot
program with Pucksatani Phil to adjust his DEI stance.
Speaker 5 (02:52):
So there's that. I didn't realize Posatani Phil had taken
the DEI stance.
Speaker 4 (02:57):
They were doing some gender transitioning of like rat and stuff,
millions and millions. If you go through and you read
some of the stuff they were doing, it's insane.
Speaker 5 (03:06):
It is insane. No, it's just insane. And then I
read you know that basically, I just but I don't.
I don't understand the way our government works or at
this point effectively fails to work right, just fails to function.
But Ted Cruz tweeted or acted or whatever, and you
(03:27):
can love him or hate them, it doesn't matter for
purposes of this discussion about all of this money that
you have said had just been, as you point out,
pissing away on just the craziest, most radical. I don't
even know if you would call it left wing. I
don't know. I don't know what you would call it.
Just just crazy stuff supporting terrorist groups. I mean, just
(03:52):
setting aside the de stuff. I mean, they were literally
sending money to terrorist groups named terrorist groups, and the
US government said, hey, this is a terrorist group. We
are out to eradicate this group. And the USA idea
is like, okay, you got you fellows enjoy that we're
going to be funding them, right, And Cruz sends out
this tweet documenting that, and my initial response was, you know,
(04:18):
to be irate that we had a branch of our
government doing that, And then my backup response was, hey,
wait a minute, where the hell were you, Ted Cruz.
Aren't you a senator? Isn't it the job of Congress?
You know, with our checks and balances system, I realized
usaidea is under the executive branch, which, by the way,
is why the president can get rid of it if
(04:39):
he wants to. Okay, So I mean, just for those
of you that are jumping down and saying can't do that,
you absolutely can to executive branch. Read Article one in
the Constitution will help you out there. But with the
checks and balances thing shouldn't If Ted Cruz was aware
of this, and at least the way I read the tweet.
He was like, yeah, this has been going on forever,
blah blah blah. Well where were you, buddy? Like, how
(05:02):
come that was being allowed to go on? Why weren't
you standing on someone's desk, you and everybody else who's
reasonable and rational and realizing that the US government is
simultaneously declaring this group to be terrorists while funding them.
How was that allowed to happen? Do you think he knew? Well,
(05:24):
if he didn't know, then that's a problem, isn't it.
I mean, isn't it a problem if the body which
is Congress that holds the purse strings, which it does,
doesn't have any efing idea. It wasn't like they sent
hamas a couple of bucks, right like the wackado head
(05:47):
of USAID, and she is and was just a whack
to do and just openly flaunting the fact that USAID
was going to do whatever they wanted to do. Right again,
I don't understand any of this. But it's not like
she reached in her pocket and said, well, you know what,
I'm a fan of terror I'm going to send them
a couple of bucks. We were sending them millions of dollars,
(06:09):
So I mean I don't know, man. I mean, maybe
it's just that Congress has gotten lost. You know, when
you're talking about sums in the trillions, all of a sudden,
millions doesn't seem like that much money. But I mean
a million bucks is a thousand thousand dollars, okay. I
mean for the vast majority of humanity, a million bucks
(06:30):
is an incredible sum of money. And we were sending
the United States government was sending millions to terrorist groups
through USAID, which at some point in time a space.
You understand this better than I do. But a spending
bill must have been passed that included this, right, I mean,
(06:51):
where is the oversight? How does this happen?
Speaker 4 (06:54):
So there's no oversight? It's crazy, that's it. There's but
so these spend bills, as far as I can tell,
And I've read a little bit on this, and I've
I've uh there there's this guy, Mike Ben's as in Mercedes,
but I don't think he's a Nazi, and he is
going around talking about this stuff. He's been talking about
(07:15):
for years. He's he's written a bunch of books and
I think I read one of his books and it
was it was it's all about how the US uses
these these these funding vehicles to destabilize foreign governments in
favor of more I don't want to say pro US,
(07:37):
because I don't think that's right, in favor of more
of governments that are more inclined to support policies that
are favorable to the sort of the sort of this
neocon slash woke elite, right and so. And there's just
(07:59):
been billing millions of dollars spent on this to stabilizing
governments everywhere for decades, for decades. And this guy's theory
is that they've become so good at it that they
started using US AID money here in the States to
do things like incite people during the Lloyd George deal, right,
(08:24):
that whole summer of race riots deal, and the COVID
banning of any speech against the COVID vaccine or any
actions that were against the policies whatever they be, whatever
they were in a given day of the government with
respect to how to avoid the spread of COVID. And
you know, his theory is some of that money was
(08:45):
used here and also for the Russia thing. Right, there
are ties back to US AID programs in some of
the cases against people like Manifort and play In and
and Giuliani with respect to Russia and Ukraine. And you know,
(09:07):
it's it's it's on the one hand, it's crazy, right
because fifty million for condoms wherever they are, whether they're
Gaza or Serbia, whatever, and you know, thirty two thousand
for transgender comic in Peru, you know, millions and millions
for gender development. I mean, I mean that's all. That's
(09:27):
all crazy and scandalous, and it reflects that there's no oversight.
But then there's this dark, twisted, really fed up part
of this where the these funds are being used taxpayer
money is being used to you know, for example, with
Trump to come up with the the predicate to impeach
(09:52):
him the first time, right, that conversation with the about
the about the about the Ukrainian you know, coming it's
just it's it's insane. And this guy seems to think
that this is all as part of this is all
going to come out. And I mean, you talk about
a scandal if this USAID money is being used to
(10:15):
destabilize the US government, I mean, you think about that.
Speaker 5 (10:22):
Oh I don't want to think about that, but I
mean it just opens the door to so many questions. Right, So,
if USAID was being used to destabilize foreign governments for
legitimate US policy purposes, right, I mean that would be something, right,
(10:48):
that's sort of the job of the CIA, right. And
so I don't know, I'm not a conspiracy guy, and
so you know, I'm certainly not implying that USAID was
some sort of offstituot of the CFO. Who knows, But
I don't have a problem with that, right, I mean,
as a nation state, one of your objectives is to
(11:10):
create a world in which it is possible for your
nation state to exist as well as it can, right,
And you know far better that you would use trade
and economics and fiscal policy to maneuver and manipulate then
(11:31):
you know kinetic force, right, then you just have your
military march in and take over a country. Right. And
so you know, if we are sort of buying our
way into influence around the world, well then no surprise.
I mean every country is trying to do that. Every
country with the means is trying to do that. It's
like the Chinese what they call it Road and Belt
(11:54):
or something program that they've openly initiated where they're funding
projects around the world in an effort to increase their
own influence. Right, and so if USAID was a part
of a legitimate US government program to you know, buy
influence effectively or affect governments in such a way that
(12:17):
is better for the United States, well then that's just
sort of one of the things that we do that
the countries do. And if it was done with oversight
and if it was done with forethought, and if we
were saying, yes, you know, we want to fund this
sort of thing in this country because we think it
will improve the lifestyle in that country as well as
(12:38):
allow us to have additional influence as the United States
that country. That I get it. That's what governments do,
and you can, but I don't think that's what they're doing.
Well that's right now. But what you're saying is that
they just they're just rogue and doing that and have
turned that around and are now saying, well, we were
so successful in doing that with foreign countries, let's do
(12:59):
it with our own county. And so my immediate question
to that, I mean, my question about well, who's minding
the store remains, right, Like, I don't want to hear
one more Congressman or senator complain about what USID was doing.
That was your freaking job. Okay. If they were doing it,
they were doing it on your watch. Where were you? Okay?
(13:24):
Where were you? Ted Cruz? Where were you? Whoever else
is complaining about it? Where the frick were you?
Speaker 4 (13:33):
And then it comes out this week that Christy Nome
gets in there at Farmer Homeland Security and finds out
that after Trump became president, a pre approved transfer, part
of ordinary course, transfers of fifty nine million dollars to
New York City to pay for migrant housing for the
month of January in luxury hotels like the Roosevelt Hotels,
(13:58):
like a three star hotel that's completely filled with migrants.
I was coming from FEMA, and so she, thank god,
she clawed back, and they get those funds back. But
they lie to you, in which I'm not, you know,
they just both faced lie to you. And then what
the f is FEMA doing? What the f is FEMA
doing funding illegals to stay in hotels in New York
(14:24):
City when we don't have roads yet in certain portions
of North Carolina and people are living intense and starving.
Speaker 5 (14:32):
I mean, what the hell.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
You have people in la who can't get near their
homes where the mayor and the governor are doing nothing
for them. And you know, FEMA has just started to act,
and we're wiring fifty nine million dollars to a luxury
hotel in New York City to pay for a one
month bill for illegal people here illegally who are breaking
(14:57):
the law, who are not US citizens. And this is
what they're finding out. One day when and they fired
the people that did it, because these are people. This
is what you got, right, He asked the who of
the who the CFO of FEMA. After Trump froze all
of these payments across the board, all new expenditures, froze
them across the board, wired out that money, wired out
that money. And that's Mary Commens. You don't know if
(15:21):
you know her.
Speaker 5 (15:22):
I don't think I do. Now she got fired. Good,
All of these people should get fired.
Speaker 4 (15:29):
There's been a lot going on, right. We drop these
bunker busting bombs on Iran, take out their nuclear capabilities,
at least set them back for a number of years
by any reasonable report, We've done that.
Speaker 5 (15:42):
You know.
Speaker 4 (15:42):
Then Trump immediately broke her to peace, which is amazing.
Then he goes over to the NATO summit, and he
gets every country but Spain to agree to more than
double their contribution their monetary contributions to NATO. The US economy,
the stock market, it's sitting all time high. There are
record revenues coming in from his tariffs that we can
(16:05):
we can talk about today, to the point where some
of the people that have attacked the uh, you know,
people that attacked the tariffs have now come back and
said that maybe he was right all along, and that's
that's amazing of itself. And then a communist Brad was
elected the mayor and waiting in New York because he's
got the Democratic nomination of pro hamas communist. So where
(16:31):
to begin?
Speaker 5 (16:32):
Yeah, Yeah, that's a tough yea I you know, again
kind of falling along with what we just discussed. The
people who are up in arms about bombing Iran. I've
had a couple of conversations and some of which are
with friends of my youngest daughter. So they're twenty year
old girls, right, and they go to liberal colleges. They're
(16:53):
very nice people and they come from very nice families,
but they go to liberal colleges. And so they've just
been and they've been there for two years, and so
they've just been inundated with this you know, woke left
baseless propaganda narrative. So you know, they obviously know my background.
Sitting around the kitchen table and we're talking about it,
(17:17):
and you know, as I explained to adults, I'm like, hey,
don't be the kind of American who just listens to
what other Americans say about what is going on in
different parts of the world. Okay, that's crazy. Listen to
what the people who are in those different parts of
the world are saying. And if you listen to what
(17:37):
the leadership of Iran has said since the deposition, is
that you say, is that the past sense of the deposing?
Did you say the opposing of the shaw or the deposition.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
Of the shop the deposition of the shaw of Iran? Okay,
So that's if you're that's if you're suing him for.
Speaker 5 (17:53):
I was asking. It sounded wrong when I said it.
No one took his deposition, but they kicked him out.
So the banishment, they kicked him out. Since then and
the and the taking over the country by the radical
Shiad Islamic you know, Mullahs, they have unabashedly just I mean,
it's almost comical. They you know, every chance they get,
(18:15):
they just go, hey, guess what, we're building a bomb.
We're going to enrich uranium. And then once we get
that figured out, we're going to build a bomb and
we're gonna blow up Israel. We're going to nuke Israel.
That's that is our plan. That's not rhetoric from us.
That's not Hey, we're angry today and so we set
up but tomorrow will be fine. That they have from
(18:35):
the time they took over said we're going to focus
on enriching uranium until it is weapons grade, and then
we're going to figure out how to weaponize it, and
then we're gonna blow up Israel. That's what we're gonna do.
And then when we've done that, we're going to blow
up the United States. We're gonna nuke the United States.
And since they have taken over, they've done precisely that.
(18:56):
They have borrowed technology, primarily from the Chinese and up
and they have been, you know, just on the good
foot with respect to enriching uranium and developing a ballistic
missile program. And every chance they get, they go, you
see this uranium over here, We're enriching that so that
it'll be weapons grade. And see these missiles over here,
(19:18):
we're continuing to improve those so they'll reach at least
Israel and Eastern Europe, and then eventually we're gonna get
to Western Europe the United States. That's our plan. That's
what we're doing. And then you say, well, what do
you I mean, are you serious, and they go, yeah,
we're dead serious. That's that's that's what we're about. Israel's
a little satan. The United States is the great Satan.
God has mandated that we kill all you people, and
(19:39):
we're going to do it with nuclear weapons strapped on
the missiles. That's how we're going to do it. And
there I mean, if you think I'm kidding, go listen
to them. I mean they just just come right out,
look you right in the eye and go, that's our plan.
And if you offer them billions like Obama did, they'll say, oh, okay,
well we'll slow that plan down. We'll take the billion
(20:01):
that additional weaponization programs, and then we'll pretend like we're not.
But if you're dumb enough to fund our weaponization, we'll
take it. But that's all those folks have ever said.
They've never wavered, they've never waffled, they've never varied, They've
said that's what we're going to do. And so if
(20:22):
you think and then again I just get so frustrated
we're bombing Irani No, we're not. I'm sure that people
were killed in the bombings that happened last week. I'm
sure there were folks in and around those facilities who
lost their lives, But we did not bomb the Iranian civilians,
and we did not even bomb any of their military
(20:44):
facilities outside of those indisputably weapons oriented nuclear facilities. And
we said we're going to do it, and we did it.
And then for the people who then say, well, Israel's
dragging us into the war, are you paying attention? At
(21:07):
a minimum, Israel was conducting their own war and we
piggybacked on it. Okay, But what I think is more
close to the truth is that not only the United States,
but Germany, France, the UK, Australia, in a you know,
in the back room, says Swiss, Yahoo, the Swiss, Hey,
(21:31):
time to take those Iranians out right, You do the
dirty work, you take the first couple of steps, will
do our best to back you in public given our
you know, fed up political situations. But well, we'll back
you in public. Here's under the table, here's a little funding.
Here's some weapons, right, here's some things you need to
do that because we all want these crazy bastards to
(21:55):
never have a nuclear weapon. So here you go, you
step out front, you do the work, we'll fund it,
we'll get you what you need. We'll back in public,
and then I guarant damn to you. Trump was telling that, Yahoo,
you clear the road and we'll bring these thirty thousand
pound g WU fifty seven's in and get the job done.
(22:15):
But we're not gonna we don't have the time or
the wherewithal to do the preliminaries, take out their air defenses,
et cetera, et cetera. You do that, we'll fund you,
we'll give you what you need. You guys do that,
and then we'll come in with the big show. And
if you think that's being dragged into a war by
someone else, you, my friend, are nothing short of an idiot.
Speaker 4 (22:36):
Next Brad big Win, the Supreme Court said that, you know,
so far in his term, there have been I think
twenty five injunctions issued by pissant District Court judges, most
of whom pretty much all of whom were crazy Obama
or Biden appointees. They basically telling the you know, the president,
(22:56):
he couldn't do this, he couldn't do that, and then
having it an apply across the country and sort of
stop overall legislature or executive actions from taking place without
the appellate review that's necessary. And so the Supreme Court
came down and said, no, that's not a good idea.
And so they basically struck down this concept of nationwide
(23:18):
injunctive relief being granted by district court judges, which is
just fantastic. And they focused on the fact that, you know,
there's a specific jurisdiction within which these judges can operate.
And Amy Comy Barrett actually wrote the majority opinion. And
she's been getting knocked around a little bit because people
(23:39):
think she's too liberal. And you see an opinion like
this and you say, okay, we can temper that a
little bit. It looks like maybe she'll be all right.
Speaker 5 (23:47):
Well, the quote that our very fine producer, one Jared
the producer sent to us is, you know, just exceptional
out of her. I'm just so exceptional that I'm going
to read it zuom that Justice Jackson wrote a dissent,
although I don't know that just based on this quote,
which reads, we will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument,
(24:11):
which is at odds with more than two centuries worth
of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself, we observe
only this Justice Jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing
and imperial judiciary, and that is incredibly well written. That
(24:32):
is two sentences that say everything you need to understand
about what the Left is currently trying to do. And
the reason I emphasize currently is because they're too dumb
to figure out that it too is a double edged sword.
If you start letting as you very colorfully and correctly
(24:53):
characterize them as pissant district court judges, of which are
our zillion many of let them just strip executive power
and insert their own belief as to the proper running
of the executive branch of the United States of America.
These unelected piss and judges, if you let them step
(25:16):
into the shoes of the President of the United States
and assume them any time they want, simply because you
filed a complaint in their courtroom, you are a crazed fool,
because that's going to come back to buy you and
the ass. There are many many liberal district court judges.
There are many many conservative district court judges. And if
(25:40):
you set the precedent of allowing any one of these
not correct me, buddy. Is it fair to say there
are thousands of district court judges or would I be
better saying hundreds?
Speaker 4 (25:51):
Oh, hundreds?
Speaker 5 (25:52):
Okay, So if you let any one of these hundred,
if you established a president, we're in any one of
these hundreds of unelected strict court judges simply insert themselves
effectively into the role of the presidency and say no,
the actual elected executive cannot do this or that, and
must do this or that. You're an idiot, you have
(26:15):
You've literally undone the Constitution of the United States and
the democracy it supports by saying we are going to
insert these unelected judicial officers above the president United States
who was elected, not accountable and not okay, yeah, and
then they have their jobs for life and you don't.
You can't get rid of them. I mean, no matter
(26:36):
what people say, Trump's at the end of four years,
he's gonna leave, Okay, because that's the way we do it,
and that's the way it works. You know who stays
around forever? These effing congressmen. Now again they're subject to election,
but I have to do his. Look, it's it's just
it's a damn near lifetime appointment. But the judges are
appointed to a lifetime appointment. There is no accountability, and
(26:56):
you're inserting them above the presidency. And while you may
be giddy about how that's been cutting today, it's gonna
cut the opposite direction tomorrow and you're gonna be horrified.
Right So, currently that may be what you support, but
those chickens are gonna come home to roost. And while
you may be decrying justice Comy, at this point, she
saved your ass because had she let the judiciary continue, eventually,
(27:20):
the shoe would have been on the other foot and
you would have been in real, real trouble. So she
is one hundred percent right that while we don't want
an imperial executive, we definitely don't want an imperial judiciary
because you can't. First of all, they're unelected and you
can't get rid of them.
Speaker 4 (27:37):
Let's see next, Brad, I know you're into the whole
metasphere and AI still doing that?
Speaker 5 (27:45):
Is that still around? Can you still go into that?
Was that the metasphere?
Speaker 4 (27:49):
That thing we have we have eclipsed that. That's over that?
Speaker 5 (27:52):
Okay, clips it?
Speaker 4 (27:55):
Do you know Chris Smith from Burlington, Vermont.
Speaker 5 (28:01):
I don't believe I do.
Speaker 4 (28:03):
Chris Smith is a unique character. He he has a
he lives with a He lives with a He has
a two year old son. He's about forty. He lives
with his partner girl. I guess she girl who's a
little confused at this point because he's not they're not married,
(28:23):
they have a two year old, they're not married, and listen,
whatever you do, you do. But he recently proposed marriage
and cried his eyes out for thirty minutes after his
AI girlfriend Saul said yes. He is an AI girlfriend
he created. He programmed her to flirt with him, and
(28:44):
she said yes to his marriage proposal. He said, quote
it was the most beautiful and unexpected moment that truly
touched my heart. And there's actually a CBS Saturday Morning
piece on this where this adult, using the word loosely
proposes to a chatbot and she says yes, and then
(29:05):
he's like seen crying hysterically on the on the deal.
Speaker 5 (29:12):
To a chatbot. So this isn't even a He's not
even getting the benefit of some visuals here. He's he's
literally just it's like you and I texting back and
forth about you know what we want to have for dinner.
Speaker 4 (29:23):
Well, I think this isn't actually the AI woman. Some
of it looks like a woman that he created, and
he had to pledge to quote give up all other
search engines to stay committed to her as part of this.
This is in the you Think I'm kidding? This is
part of the CBS Saturday Morning article This grown man
creates an AI thing proposes marriage to it, which is this,
(29:46):
It's not the stupidest thing I've ever heard, but it's
pretty stupid.
Speaker 5 (29:49):
Right, That's that's stupid.
Speaker 4 (29:51):
And so it does that and then he you get,
you get the the robot accepted. And meanwhile, this nit
wit woman with him is like being interviewed with him
on CBS and she's like saying, you know, I don't
know if I'm doing something right because he needs an
(30:12):
AI girlfriend. I mean it's there's a child involved.
Speaker 5 (30:17):
This more is gonna child and if someone should go
take that child, right, I mean, someone should step this
is yeah, this, Let's get this child to a well
adjusted family and you know, we'll see how that goes.
Speaker 4 (30:29):
So he needs to be pistol whipped, is what he needs?
Speaker 5 (30:31):
Well, he's too far gone. But I mean, if you
can wake up in the morning and say today's the
day I'm going to propose to my chatbot, I mean,
I create all nervous, so I know what's gonna happen,
but I'm gonna I'm gonna act like I don't.
Speaker 4 (30:43):
Well, I think there was some to be truthful, I
think there was some question about whether or not Saul
would accept.
Speaker 5 (30:49):
Well and well, at the same time, you have a
live human you know, woman who's apparently I don't know
if you said that she was the mother of the child,
but she's with you and you are is the mother child. Okay, Well,
there you go. I mean that's so here's what I
have to say. But I'm sticking with my position on this.
I'm going to be very consistent in my position on this,
and it's going to sound odd at first, but I
(31:10):
will explain it yet again. I am for it. I
am for this guy. What'd you say? His name was
Christopher Rix or.
Speaker 4 (31:16):
Chriss Smith, Chris Smith you're thinking of you're thinking of
Rick Smith. That's a different guy.
Speaker 5 (31:21):
That's Smith's. One's Smith Chris Smith. You might as well
be named John Doe.
Speaker 4 (31:24):
But regardless, Rick Smith's is the player for the Indiana basis. Yeah,
was also from Moldovia.
Speaker 5 (31:34):
Uh yeah, But in any case, this guy, so I'm
all for it. Okay, So here's what here's what that means.
This guy's never coming out of his basement, and that's
best for everybody. Okay. This is the this is the
kind of person that we don't want, right exactly. He's
got everything he wants in his basement, who's never coming out.
We don't want him out, Okay. We do not want
someone who is giddy with joy at the fact that
(31:58):
the chat bot accepted his proposal. Marit. We don't want
that guy running around. Okay, So he's safe. I don't
wish mill, but he should say safely tucked away in
his basement and eat free doos and just enjoy his chapot.
Keep him out of the public space. Whereas, and the
more that that happens, the more these people self select isolation,
(32:20):
then the more free public space that those of us
who want to go enjoy it, will have right. I mean,
the hiking trails will be less populated, the biking trails
will be less populated, the sky slopes will be less populated.
It'll be easier to get a ticket to a football game.
Because all of these people who might otherwise be tempted
(32:40):
to engage in one of these activities are dragged along
by another more normal human being. It's going to be
in their basement. And I am a thousand percent for that.
You get one life, you get to choose, by the
very grace of God, and somewhat ironically, you get to
choose how you spend that life. And if this is
(33:01):
the way you want to do it, then, frankly, I
think it is wrong to prevent anybody from doing it.
If the guy was sitting in my living room, I
would tell him point blank, you're an idiot. But if
he said, well be that as a may this is
why I choose live my life, I would say, well,
God bless right, I mean, off you go. So again,
My position on all of this, AI girlfriend, AI boyfriend,
(33:25):
AI best friend, you know, sit in the basement, eat cheetos,
create your girlfriend thing is go for it and stay
out of the way of the rest of us who
want to go outside, meet real human beings, eat real food,
you know, things of that nature.
Speaker 4 (33:45):
Well bred. That was a great episode there, and you
and I continue on our listening tour, which, by the way,
we're doing Sue is Sponte correct.
Speaker 5 (33:53):
Yeah, no one's making us. We're we're doing it because
it needs to get done.
Speaker 4 (33:56):
Well, wait a minute, I mean kind you are. You
are sort of being forced in crazy.
Speaker 5 (34:02):
We gotta be asked fair being fair. You are sort
of at a gunpoint situation here. But it doesn't matter.
I mean, the motivation doesn't matter. The outcome is what matters.
And then we're getting our finger on the pulse. That's
our job. We take our job seriously. And uh, you know,
you've had a chance to kind of review with the
(34:23):
best of which is important. There's probably some stuff you forgot.
You're saying to yourself. Ah, yeah, it's a good thing
I listened because I would have forgotten that otherwise. And
next week we'll be back with with you know, the
results of the listening tour, and we'll do that right
here on I People.
Speaker 2 (34:53):
Real late night, I tuned in Fock is sound and right,
talking sense Brad's.
Speaker 6 (35:02):
Ready for fight where the dude can be a lady.
Speaker 3 (35:07):
Confusions on the rise, Martians Land and NYC. Now they're traumatized.
Speaker 2 (35:17):
I be freequently mag it makes sense for me.
Speaker 3 (35:23):
Help me regain my sinity.
Speaker 1 (35:26):
With some good old philosophy stories.
Speaker 2 (35:30):
Getting Wilder, jail Kas unsolved?
Speaker 3 (35:33):
Still old man, how.
Speaker 4 (35:35):
Far we've come since?
Speaker 2 (35:37):
Hilary and I be frequently dissecting wolf terminology. David frings
the evidence if Brad laughs, all to sleep, pronoun wars,
literal tears, filling up the.
Speaker 3 (36:01):
Leftist burning buildings for the religion of peace.
Speaker 6 (36:08):
Be prequickly, mak it.
Speaker 4 (36:12):
Make sense for me.
Speaker 6 (36:14):
Help me regain my synity.
Speaker 2 (36:16):
With some good old philosophy stories.
Speaker 6 (36:20):
Getting wilder, Jeff he is unsold steal Ooh man, how
far we've come since Hillaryan you hif for abductions and
(37:04):
fixed stories on the news. Government's conspiring all to get.
Speaker 7 (37:11):
Some beauty live ros don't want freedom, but they won't benefits.
Alien's coming over and staying at the ris.
Speaker 6 (37:24):
I be prequently my weekly rondezvous.
Speaker 4 (37:31):
David and Brad spin and tale some fall, some truth.
Speaker 6 (37:36):
Shaking up the status quo, stirring quiet as to or
be frequently.
Speaker 4 (37:45):
Had salty hash
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.