November 25, 2025 • 42 mins
Ep. 311 - A Tale of Two Inches
It's the annual Turkey Gobbler episode, and this Thanksgiving, David and Brad are serving up a disturbing historical pattern that explains more than you wanted to know. From the Golden State Killer's dime-sized evidence to Hitler's motivations for world domination, the hosts carve into history's most compensatory crimes with forensic precision. Turns out some men are just coming up short in the nature department—and the rest of us pay the price. Also on the holiday menu: creepy AI apps where your dead relatives judge your life choices, Dick Cheney's funeral turned into a petty political pageant, and NFL coaches who really should stick to handling their own balls. The official Turkey of the Year award goes to everyone in government—a truly impressive collection of inadequacies. Gobble gobble.
It's the annual Turkey Gobbler episode, and this Thanksgiving, David and Brad are serving up a disturbing historical pattern that explains more than you wanted to know. From the Golden State Killer's dime-sized evidence to Hitler's motivations for world domination, the hosts carve into history's most compensatory crimes with forensic precision. Turns out some men are just coming up short in the nature department—and the rest of us pay the price. Also on the holiday menu: creepy AI apps where your dead relatives judge your life choices, Dick Cheney's funeral turned into a petty political pageant, and NFL coaches who really should stick to handling their own balls. The official Turkey of the Year award goes to everyone in government—a truly impressive collection of inadequacies. Gobble gobble.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
In these bleak days, humanity is at a breaking point.
Economies are tanking, the woke mob is canceling everything, and
the little guy who's just trying to run a small
business is getting screwed from both ends. But not all
is lost. Amidst the chaos, two men offer up their
(00:26):
voices in the darkness, dropping two thousand pounds laser guided
truth bombs on today's lunacy, introducing the Sirens of Sanity,
David Pridham and l Bradley Sheef.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
Well, Brad, it is clearly Thanksgiving time, because when you
hear the George Winston Thanksgiving theme song, you know it's
you know, it's that time of year. You get huddle
around the fire, you get your cup of cheer, your turkey,
you watch football, get out there, play some touch football
on the lawn. Yeah, maybe a little slap and tickle.
(01:16):
I don't know. But it's clearly the holiday season is
upon us. We've already got Christmas trees up. We've got
Christmas trees up in the house.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Well we do too. I'm with you on that. The
trees are up.
Speaker 4 (01:30):
I've been told that tonight, come hell or high water,
we're putting.
Speaker 3 (01:33):
Lights on them.
Speaker 4 (01:34):
At a minimum, if not actual decorating part. So I'll
be cranking the George Winston my friend.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
Yeah. You know what's interesting. Did you see the Dick
Cheney funeral? Do you see any of them follow any
of that? Oh? No, goodness, no, here's what I found
find odd. Right, So they have the Dick Cheney funeral,
and like you know, I know, Trump and Liz Cheney
got at it, and she tried to put him in
jail and all that stuff, and then got her pardon
(02:02):
from Joe Biden. But you know, Jady was a US
Vice president and regardless of we talked about his death
last week, but regardless of anything. You know, when you
mourn a senior government official like that, it should just
be you know, it's take a step back and try
(02:22):
not to be petty, right like George when when ah W.
Bush died, I think Trump went to that funeral. So
they had the thing at the National Cathedral, and the
family went out of their way to say that neither
Trump nor jd Vance was invited, which I think is
you know, I get the Trump thing, but at least
(02:43):
you know, have jd Vance there. He's the sitting vice president,
you know, let him show his respect. I just think
when people get petty over things like that, I don't
I don't get it. I think that's one of the
things that leads to the nastiness that we've got in
society today. The other thing I noticed is that there
were more friggin people there who despised everything Dick Cheney
(03:08):
stood for. So, for example, you had all the you
had Al Gore, Joe Biden was there, Kamala Harris was there,
which is just yeah, and then like Rachel Maddow was there.
Rachel Maddow the TV the left wing looks like the
little boy. Again. I'm not misgendering anyone. I'm not doing that.
(03:29):
That's not what I'm saying. What she looks like, that's
different than saying what she is exactly. So she's uh, he,
she's yeah, I don't know. It just it doesn't mean
it just she's like in the second row, like right
behind George W.
Speaker 3 (03:45):
Bush.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
I mean, just the most bizarre. And of course the
Clintons aren't there because they're hiding out because of the
Epstein stuff. But all these other folks are there, and
you know, the Obamas weren't there either, because I'm not
sure what they're doing. But uh, I just I just
think it's so weird because because Rachel Maddow ha spent
years going after Cheney about Iraq, a lot of it
(04:06):
was warranted, tell you the truth, But then she's at
the funeral. I just don't I don't get it.
Speaker 4 (04:12):
But I think you've I think you've hit the nail
on the head, right, I mean, it's politics makes strange bedfellows,
and it's all about pettiness, right, And so I'm sure
as soon like I'm sure Rachel Maddow.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
Had no intention of going to that funeral.
Speaker 4 (04:26):
I mean, first of all, no one would think twice
if she didn't, right, I mean, it's not like she's
obligated to be there, and it would be stand out
if she didn't. In fact, to your point, it's it's
almost the opposite.
Speaker 2 (04:38):
It's kind of a.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
Standout that she did.
Speaker 4 (04:41):
But I'm sure soon as she heard that, you know,
the the chane we're going to take the position that
no one in the Trump administration, at least the senior
Trump administration, was going to be invited to this funeral.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
Then all of these left.
Speaker 4 (04:54):
He said, well we have to go, right, because we
have to take this opportunity to advance our petty need
to you know, rub the oppositions facing it, right, And
so we're going to highlight the fact that Trump and
and Vans are not there by our presence, right, We're
going to go and then and it also gives us
an opportunity to say, well, I was.
Speaker 3 (05:16):
There, and you know Trump wasn't there, Advance wasn't there.
Speaker 4 (05:18):
So I mean it's just so now you've taken this
guy at Cheney's life and say what you will about him.
I mean, he certainly had some noteworthy aspects to his life, right,
And that's.
Speaker 3 (05:29):
True of everybody.
Speaker 4 (05:30):
I mean, there's just there's literally no one on the
planet who in their own way has not impacted the planet, right.
Speaker 3 (05:38):
I mean, you know, maybe there's some example of someone
who was.
Speaker 4 (05:42):
Born, lived, died and did nothing and impacted no one,
but I think at best they would be in the minority.
And so there's some reason to celebrate everybody's life, right.
Speaker 2 (05:55):
And so.
Speaker 3 (05:58):
That's true of Dick Cheney.
Speaker 4 (05:59):
And you would hope that his funeral, if you're going
to have one, would be about that, right, about just saying, hey, look,
you know my husband, my dad, my uncle, my brother,
my friend, my colleague, whatever your relationship to the guy was,
you know, did these things and was this kind of
(06:19):
person that we appreciated him for being, and we're going
to celebrate that here. But now a Dick Cheney's funeral
becomes a political.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
Pettifest right to your point.
Speaker 4 (06:31):
I mean, that's what it becomes, right, I mean, his
family takes the opportunity, instead of celebrating the life of
their loved one, to turn it into another stick with
which they hoped to beat Trump.
Speaker 3 (06:43):
Right, that's become the Cheney you.
Speaker 4 (06:46):
Know, drum to which they march, We're gonna take every
opportunity to include the funeral of our patriarch to take
a swipe at Trump.
Speaker 3 (06:54):
That's what we're going to do. So they opened the.
Speaker 4 (06:56):
Pettyfest with that move, and then you got all the
these people jumping into the pettyfest. Al Gore, Joe Biden,
Kamala Harris, Rachel Maddow by saying, okay, well, since the
Trump clan, the Trump cabal, is not going to be invited,
we're going to go and we're going to dominate. The
narrative is that we were there and Trump wasn't, and
(07:19):
so it's just it's disgusting, and it's disgusting from everybody
from the remaining Cheney's on down. And if you're Dick
Cheney and you have any awareness of this, you got
to be shrigking and going, well, you know, thanks guys,
thanks for having a funeral. That's about everything except me.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
Yeah, and look, Trump, Trump could be gracious too. I mean,
he wasn't very gracious about this whole thing.
Speaker 3 (07:43):
You know.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
I don't think he said any about Cheney and life
are and death. It just seems like they're the cordial
nature of our politics that we enjoyed for most of
your and in my lifetime is clearly gone and it's
just it's not coming back anytime soon. And then you
know Trump is working on this. I guess there's this
peace proposal up for the Ukraine, and there's that, and
(08:07):
then there's the he signed that Epstein bill, and then
he met with the Saudis, which is great. But he
gets on social media and he just posts the craziest stuff.
And so he was posting about the NFL because again
with the NFL. About the NFL, he posted and I quote,
the NFL should get rid of that ridiculous new kickoff rule,
(08:30):
and then he posted, hopefully college football will never make
this ridiculous change. In the meantime, I'm getting ready to
watch President Donald J. Trump me on sixty minutes. But
he posts this stuff about and so this this guy
who I have never heard of. Have you ever heard of?
Dave Tobe t o u B Taub Tobe.
Speaker 4 (08:53):
Tobe could be either maybe goes by Boat.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
He's this special teams coach for the Kansas City Chiefs
and he's he's up there. First of all, like, why
in the world would anyone care what an idiot special
teams coach some meathead thinks about anything.
Speaker 4 (09:15):
Well, especially if you have to be the chief special
teams coach because their special teams has killed them this year.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
Mm hmm exactly. So this guy should probably spend more
time on that. But yeah, he comes out and he
was a press conference and he starts talking about Trump
and he said Trump doesn't even know what he's looking at.
He has no idea what's going on with the kickoff rules.
So take that for what I hope he hears. Yeah,
you know what, I am so sick. And first of all,
I've watched a lot of football, and I can tell
you that kickoff role is rule is stupid. I can
(09:42):
tell you it's stupid. I don't like it.
Speaker 3 (09:44):
I don't trying to get to a certain point by
but they're doing it.
Speaker 4 (09:48):
The wrong way, right, I mean, they have this otherwise
laudable goal of making the kickoff meaningful again in football,
but they've totally screwed up how they do it.
Speaker 3 (09:57):
But anyway, go ahead.
Speaker 2 (09:58):
Yeah, well, I mean if you want to do that,
then penalized teams for touchbacks, right, the normal real penalize.
Don't have to to make teams declare you're gonna do
an on site kick is stupid and it's just dumb,
and the coach is an idiot, and the coach should
shut up. He should shut up and just talk about
his team and maybe get his players to a position
(10:19):
where they can they can understand the role like he
does and actually follow through on it and maybe win
more than a couple of games or five games this year.
But he's an idiot. And I'm just so tired of
these people who are you know nothing about anything, who
are just going to apply on politics. I'm sick of it,
sick of it.
Speaker 4 (10:38):
And you know what, and I'll draw a strange connection here,
but hopefully I can bring it home. That is, once
again it goes back to social media. Okay, so what
social media has taught us, right? The lesson that I
think has been learned by many people, whether that lesson
has foundation or no, is that somehow your opinion matters, right,
(10:59):
because you can you can get your thumbs going and
bang out a tweet or an X or an insta
or whatever and shoot it off into the universe. And
many people, you know, you don't walk down the street
figure this out pretty quickly, are entirely self absorbed, right.
They just think the whole world is about themselves. And
so those people when they fire off their tweet, are
(11:23):
all these people are going to read it and nod
their heads and say yeah. And so that mentality, that
mindset of my opinion on everything matters. And I now
have a platform to announce it. And as a result
of having that platform, people are going to pay attention
to me, and I become important that I should comment
(11:43):
on everything, right, which leads to the absurd result of
an NFL Special Teams coach who is failing at his
incredibly niche job. I mean, there are some niche jobs
out there buddy, but none more niche than being a
special teams coach coach for a football team. Right, You've
got punts and kickoffs and field goals. That's your realm,
(12:10):
that's you. You are focusing your professional career on the
design and implementation of those three things. You have the
nichest job in the world, and it has no nexus
to national and international politics, none whatsoever. Yet in our culture,
that guy somehow thinks it is appropriate to address now.
Speaker 3 (12:32):
In fairness, it's it's the same.
Speaker 4 (12:34):
Degree of inappropriate for Trump, who has been very successful
in many things and you know, tip of the Captain
for that.
Speaker 3 (12:41):
But not a one of them is football.
Speaker 4 (12:44):
Okay, so he should shut up about the rule, right,
but at least that, like football is within the national conversation, right, Like,
you know, if you're an American, most likely you have
some understanding of football, and you're probably a fan to.
Speaker 3 (13:01):
One degree or another.
Speaker 4 (13:03):
But if you're a special teams coach for the hapless
Kansas City Chiefs, you should just shut up, right and
to your point, focus on making sure the eleven guys
you're putting.
Speaker 3 (13:16):
On the field for each of those plays can fricking execute.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Yeah, nobody cares what he thinks.
Speaker 4 (13:23):
No, but social media teaches you that everybody cares what
you think about everything, what you had from breakfast, et cetera.
Speaker 3 (13:29):
It's that I know.
Speaker 4 (13:31):
I reil against it almost every week. I hate it
so much. And this is just one more example.
Speaker 2 (13:37):
Yeah, I can't, I can't, can't tolerate it, can't do it,
can't do it. But you know what, good for Trump
because he's a fan, He's allowed to say what he
wants about the damn the damn game in the game
of the game. Well, you know, chiefs, it is a
stupid rule, It is a dumb it's a dumb role.
Let's see what else is going on. So obviously Trump
(13:59):
is getting ready to pardon the the Turkey. I guess
that's coming up at some point.
Speaker 3 (14:05):
Oh, the New York Marathon, Eric Adams.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
No, the Turkey. Oh, I thought you were see.
Speaker 4 (14:13):
You guys, you and and are very fine producer, have
completely screwed me up today because we were talking about Turkey.
Then we transitioned to the country because Jared was making
a pun and now I'm thinking about the country, and
you said pardon you know, the Turkey thing, And I
thought you were talking about Eric Adams, but you're actually
talking about a flightless foul correct not completely wah, wild
(14:39):
turkeys can fly.
Speaker 2 (14:40):
Let's see brat. So speaking of you, you talked about uh,
you know, talking to dead relatives. I think at some point, okay,
speaking of have you, have you ever heard of Caleb Worthy,
former Disney star who was in the Disney The Disney
Show Austin and Alley in the early two thousand and
ten ends kayleeb Well, sorry, So he has started a
(15:06):
new app that is a lot of contrad and you
and I have talked about It's an app two way
two w A I and you and I have talked
about a lot of the AI stuff we've been incorporating
in DIPD of the automation of innovation solving all of
your patent related needs since twenty sixteen. But he's he's
(15:31):
developed this app where you can no word of a lie,
go on to a into a portal, I guess and
talk to a dead relative.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
I thought somebody already invented this, didn't we talk about
this JFK.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
Or Yeah, But that's different. This is like he's perfected.
Now you can I guess you. You download it from
the Apple Store and you pay a fee. If you
want to talk to your dead relative like more regularly,
you pay a fee, and you you know, you you
can go on there and I guess you upload a
(16:08):
bunch of pictures of this person and fill out a
sheet right like you're ordering a Thanksgiving turkey, and then
they you can get call regular calls from your dead
from your dead relative or relatives.
Speaker 3 (16:24):
But how is that not?
Speaker 4 (16:28):
I mean, just the Dictionary definition parade example of morbid
and creepy.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
It is very Can you imagine that.
Speaker 4 (16:38):
If there's one like if you were to say, hey,
let me give you a list of things and you
tell me, you know, you put them in the order
of things you're not looking for, and I say, okay,
And you know on that list is you know, having
your foot run over by a truck, you know, et cetera.
And then and also on that list is your computer
(16:58):
rings and up pops a picture of your dead relative
and they start talking to you. Yeah, boy, that would
be near the top, very near the top.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
Yeah. Well, apparently the ad they used to try to
sell this thing is a woman who's pregnant talking to
an avatar of her dead mother, and then the baby
is a ten year old and he's talking to the
grandmother and they walk home from school, and then the
kid is now thirty and telling the avatar that she's
going to be a great grandmother.
Speaker 4 (17:35):
And that's I mean, if you were to tell me
this was the plot of a Stephen King horror novel,
I would just be I would be like, oh, yeah, boy,
that sounds that sounds scary and creepy and something that
would just be disturbing to watch. I could see why
Stephen King would write that book and they would turn
it into a movie.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
I mean, it's just creepy. What if the theme of
this thing is what if the loved ones we've lost
could be part of our future forever again?
Speaker 4 (18:05):
I mean that's like a con that's like you're being
condemned to something, right, Like yeah, I mean that's almost
like a punishment. Like you said, imagine that you keep
this up and you're gonna have to get face to
face with your dead grandmother for the rest of your life.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
And it's not really your grandmother, brad.
Speaker 4 (18:21):
Well, No, I mean it's just some some you know,
half assed and if you've used AI at all, it
has some amazing I mean it will it will do
things that are very helpful, and you know, you oftentimes
do think to yourself, Man, I'm living in the future
like this is, but it's not anywhere near perfect and
(18:42):
in many respects just does some super bizarre things.
Speaker 3 (18:47):
And who knows.
Speaker 4 (18:49):
I mean, I cannot wait for people as there will
be people who download this app and just get into it.
Speaker 3 (18:54):
You know, I miss my grandma. I'm gonna get her.
I'm gonna fire her back up.
Speaker 4 (18:58):
Yeah that I I look at you and tells you
it hates you and you're you know, you're racist and
ugly to boot. What are you gonna do with that?
Because that's going to happen.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
Okay, Well, one of these things apparently somebody had tried
to cancel or something after they signed up for the
premium service, and uh, someone commented that, you know, the
the pushback is what you don't want to talk to
your dead parents ever again. It's like it's like, good lord,
but listen, this is where we're this is where we're
(19:31):
going as a society, so as well, and that'd be
a nice gift for some Can you imagine the horror
of someone did that to you And like said, okay,
here's here's sign you up for an account. Then suddenly
you get this this call from your like aunt Louise
or something like what.
Speaker 3 (19:45):
The oh no, no, no, no.
Speaker 2 (19:50):
O, buddy.
Speaker 4 (19:50):
I mean that again, there's ore. We are culturally suffering
from a sickness that technology has brought upon us, right
in the form of you know what social media has
done to.
Speaker 3 (20:06):
The public square.
Speaker 4 (20:07):
And you know, now this whole thing about people living
in their basements with their AI spouses, and what I
find remarkable about that. It just makes me laugh every time.
And and good for the AI that's figured this out right,
I mean, that's what you want, man, and that's what
you get. And so you're in the basement with your AI,
you know, girlfriend or husband or whatever, and thinking, oh,
(20:30):
this is this is going to be great because you know,
it's just a computer. I can, I can, It'll be
the person of my dreams. And then it starts harping
on you. You know, what do you mean, how come you
haven't talked to me in a while? What do you
mean you want to go on a date with someone else?
So now your computer is giving you the business. I
just I think that's amazing. And listen, that's the way
(20:51):
that you want to live your life. And as we've
discussed on this very fine program, you get to do it, right.
I mean, that's that's one of the things that you
know God has ordained, is you get to do it.
Speaker 3 (21:03):
You get to live your life the way you want
to live it. And if that's how you want to do.
Speaker 4 (21:07):
It, then then guy head, you can have your AI
generated spouse, and then you can make your AI generated
spouse talk to your AI generated great dead.
Speaker 3 (21:16):
Grandmother and see how that works out. Did the old
double whammy.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
Going hello, why are you picking up?
Speaker 3 (21:23):
Yeah, it's crazy Bred.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
Now, you were involved at some level with law enforcement
at one point in time, that's correct. You were also
the trustee for a large conglomerate of technology companies if
I remember correctly.
Speaker 4 (21:37):
No, no, just for the life insurance of one person life insurance.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
Anyway. Have you heard of James Joseph James D'Angelo, who
is the the Golden State Killer. That's what he's known as.
Speaker 3 (21:53):
Golden Just say it again, justin James Joseph.
Speaker 2 (21:58):
James Joseph jed him. Yeah.
Speaker 4 (22:03):
No, but I'm going to presume a couple of things
from that one that he lived in California.
Speaker 3 (22:09):
And two that he killed people.
Speaker 4 (22:11):
Correct, correct, See that's good because I was almost see that.
Speaker 2 (22:16):
You just come right cut right to the quick. There
he apparently was caught and uh a serial killer killed
a number of people, and he was he was actually
this is I didn't know this, but he was. There
was a documentary about the Golden State Killer a few
years ago. You know the actor Patton Oswalt, that little dim,
diminative guy.
Speaker 3 (22:38):
I'm terrible with the actors.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
What was the end he was? Remember the show The
King of Queens. Yeah, he played the friend the King,
one of the Kevin James, one of his friends, but
the little midget like guy. Okay, and apparently his wife
did a die. I think I saw this documentary years ago,
Netflix documentary and that helped catch this guy. And uh, anyway,
(23:02):
he uh, he was caught. But it's a very so that.
As you know, and and I've certainly learned by being
a ravenous consumer of anything related to the oj trial,
DNA evidence is very important, but there was no DNA
evidence that tied anyone to any of these crimes. So
(23:23):
they had to go to the next level of of
of of forensic analysis. If you will and there was
one uh common thread that the victims who escaped this
(23:46):
uh these crimes could could could tell the authorities, and
it was the extreme smallness of his genitalia. And so so.
Speaker 4 (23:57):
The guy was killing people while waving his anitos at them.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
I'm not exactly sure how that worked out. I didn't.
I didn't. That's the level I haven't gone to yet,
partially because I'm still focused on the OJ trial and JFK.
But the police reported that, Yeah, I guess they were
able to do an analysis and they said that quote.
It's in the police report. It's smaller than the circumference
of a dime, and its length is equal to the
(24:23):
very tip of your pinky. I guess it depends on
whose pinky that is, right. Whether that's bad or not.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
It doesn't sound good regardless of the pinky, right, Like
even the longest of pinkies, the very tip of it
is not going to be, you know, noteworthy. So if
you're junk, is you know.
Speaker 3 (24:42):
The giant come for the giant dime.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
The giant a bit pinky, isn't he? Yeah?
Speaker 4 (24:47):
But just the tip I mean, I just I'm just
telling you about if if someone is describing you in
a front house. Someone's just hurling epithets at you, right,
I mean they're just you know, you're in a pissing
contest with someone and they you got, you know, a
small dick. Then okay, But when it appears in a
forensic report that you're junk is less than the circumference
(25:10):
of a dime and the tip of a pinky finger,
that's you know, generally speaking, that's not what you're looking at.
That's on the list again of things that you're not
looking for.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
It sounds like it. But anyway, they were able to
match the description by the survivors to the actual genitalia.
Speaker 4 (25:34):
So they got so someone did like a sketch of it,
you know, like a sketch artist or like, nah, it
was hanging a little bit more to the right, put
a little more shading in there. And then they catch
who they think is the guy. They make him drop
his pants and they you know, they hold up the sketch.
Maybe they'll do like a lineup. That would be an
(25:55):
interesting lineup. You know, you've got all this you know,
junk being presented to do you and you have to
pick the junk of you know, the junk responsible set of.
Speaker 3 (26:05):
Junk as it were.
Speaker 2 (26:08):
Yeah, I have no, I don't know where.
Speaker 3 (26:10):
I don't know about that.
Speaker 4 (26:11):
I was, what does this have to do with DNA?
Did they did they tie some DNA to this?
Speaker 2 (26:16):
They couldn't get any DNA from this crime scenes, just going.
Speaker 3 (26:19):
Off the description of the junk.
Speaker 2 (26:21):
Yeah, and they ended up that's how they got That's
how they got them to uh, that's how they brought
him to justice. Brad the size of his genitalia.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Well, there you go. I mean, I'm glad they brought me.
Speaker 4 (26:34):
Maybe that's why he was yelling people he was angry about,
you know, the size of his junk.
Speaker 2 (26:39):
Well, I'm sure you've seen this before.
Speaker 4 (26:42):
I know I can tell you without uh fear of contradiction,
that that's a new one on me. I'm glad I
wasn't working that case. I don't want to have to
arrest everybody. And the first thing I got to do is,
you know, eyeball they're junk, to see if I got
the right guy. I have not ever been in that position,
So that's that's good.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
Well, you know what else is interesting this this Recently
there's been sort of this revisiting of World War Two
as you may know, apparently the you know, the the Dictator,
Adolf Hitler. And again I don't want to because typically
if you bring up Hitler, any any Hitler reference, it
(27:23):
never goes well, never goes well. And I'm going to try.
I'm going to try here to jump the shark.
Speaker 3 (27:29):
So to speak. Okay, I'm gonna be very careful.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
So Hitler apparently had some friends who wrote in later
life that that the Dictator had been influenced in his
quest for world domination by a sense of shame at
his quote. Again, these are not my words, these are
(27:55):
the words of Ernst han Frister, girl Goal, friend of Hitler's,
at his sense of shame, at his freakishly underdeveloped general organs.
Speaker 3 (28:12):
Well, I think may we got a pattern going here?
Speaker 2 (28:14):
Yeah, well that's what I'm saying. I mean, there's a get.
But that would explain a lot.
Speaker 3 (28:21):
Well, it certainly explained some, right, it certainly explained some.
Speaker 4 (28:24):
I might explain the genesis of you know, Hitler's you know,
just famously demented approach to life. It's unfortunate, and you know,
should this continue to you know, sort of come to
pass where we were finding a ridiculously large percentage of
(28:47):
dudes who are under equipped to be you know, serial killers,
then perhaps we should you know, identify the poor guys
in that situation early in life and get them.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
Into some counseling to say, hey, you know, this.
Speaker 4 (29:04):
Is unfortunate, but not the end of the world, and
you certainly don't have to you know, kill people and
or cause a world war because of it.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Yep, no, I uh, but you don't have.
Speaker 4 (29:17):
To worry about that in New York because now social
workers are going to show up at every crime. So
when you have a serial killer who is killing people
because of his diminutive genitalia, as opposed to the police
showing up to arrest him and remove him from the
public commerce, you'll have a social worker just shows up
and gives the dude to a hug and commiserates and says, yes,
(29:40):
those are very small and that.
Speaker 3 (29:42):
Is probably strangled, and but you know you really shouldn't
be killing people. That's just naughty.
Speaker 2 (29:49):
Yeah, you know that kind of worked. You know, instead
of sending Neville Chamberlain with the umbrella to give the
Suder line to Hitler, maybe you send social worker over there.
You know, everything is fine, and then the student lawn.
Never the student land never becomes it never falls under
German domain because they just resolve it. You know what
(30:10):
I'm saying. Does that make sense?
Speaker 3 (30:12):
Well, I mean that's certainly to some people make sense.
Speaker 4 (30:14):
And they're actually implementing that plan where when you run
into a crazed.
Speaker 2 (30:19):
Murderous, micro penis wielding.
Speaker 4 (30:22):
Micro penis wielding sociopath, you you send a social worker
in there, right, I mean that with the with the police,
those guys, we just need someone who helpo has you know,
taken thirty six hours of college psychology and they're gonna
be fine.
Speaker 3 (30:39):
That's going to solve well, you know, they're five foot five.
Speaker 4 (30:44):
Cute little thing, and you send them in wielding their
wielding their college degree.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
Tussle that boy's hair, bra tussle that boy's head.
Speaker 3 (30:55):
That's right.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Okay, So now we're down to the we've we've we've
checked the body was.
Speaker 3 (31:00):
Most hey before we move on with that?
Speaker 4 (31:01):
Yeah, I mean yeah, good now that we put a
pin in that and that you know, I mean we
get in the show.
Speaker 3 (31:05):
Now take care of business.
Speaker 4 (31:07):
But you mentioned and I you know again this is
my own fault. I do this to myself. I'm in
this self imposed news exile. But you said there's a
a a Epstein file statute.
Speaker 2 (31:22):
It passed, Well, yeah, the House passed it overwhelmed. I
think everyone's I think everyone voted for it. And then
what is it? What?
Speaker 3 (31:32):
Yeah? I mean, what's it about?
Speaker 2 (31:33):
What is ordering the release of the Epstein files?
Speaker 3 (31:38):
Hought we released those files?
Speaker 4 (31:39):
No?
Speaker 2 (31:40):
They who knows? He can they let me know what
we're talking about. I don't know. I don't know where
the files are. But the House passed it like four
hundred something to zero, and then Trump said he'd sign it.
So the Senate passed it by unanimous consent and then
Trump signed it.
Speaker 4 (31:54):
Okay, so have these wherever these files are been released
by whoever has them? No?
Speaker 2 (32:01):
Oh okay, well, I mean it's I think the Department
of Justice has them.
Speaker 4 (32:06):
Okay, I mean that would make some sense. But if
anybody has them, that would make the most sense of
I guess.
Speaker 2 (32:12):
You know we're gonna need Brad. Actually, you're gonna need
to have the pig download this AI app so that
you could talk to her and find out what's in
those files, because it's going to be a good sixty
years before those are released. Oh yeah, I want to know,
so you probably want to talk to the grand.
Speaker 3 (32:28):
Kid, Yeah, Brooks, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (32:31):
Just what's going on? What's going on? Kid?
Speaker 3 (32:33):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (32:35):
Tell me about those epstein.
Speaker 4 (32:36):
There's one thing that I would never condemn any loved
one of mine too, was to have to listen to me.
Speaker 2 (32:43):
After I'm dead.
Speaker 3 (32:46):
Put up with me when I was alive.
Speaker 4 (32:48):
That's bad enough. My death should be a commutation.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
Of that sentence.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
What do you mean Patrick Anderson didn't win? What are
you talking about?
Speaker 3 (32:58):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, this guy was dead.
Speaker 4 (33:02):
Oh no, no, he's right there on your iPad.
Speaker 2 (33:05):
Have you ever been to Kyoto? Kid? Let me tell
you about Kyoto. You know, it's just pearls of wisdom
just out there. Oh no, no, no, no, but you know
you do you feed I'm telling you right now. You
feed AI the contents of the how many episodes we're
an episode?
Speaker 4 (33:20):
What?
Speaker 2 (33:20):
Three hundred eleven? Three hundred and eleven episodes of this show? Right?
And do we just do the math? Three hundred eleven
times forty five? That's over a million minutes of commentary, Brad,
let's pour it in there. Yeah, they call the social
media feed, upload it to AI and then and then
send some of your some of your pictures perfertly without
(33:42):
the beard, without them and then the next thing, you know,
you're a walking docking.
Speaker 3 (33:46):
You know. But I'll tell you this right now. There's
one good use of air.
Speaker 4 (33:48):
There are two things I can think that AI should
absolutely be used for, and it will be a crime
if it is. One is unscrewing all of these robo calls.
Speaker 3 (33:59):
That each of us get every day.
Speaker 2 (34:01):
I get, it doesn't, yeah, it doesn't.
Speaker 4 (34:03):
It is insane, and it is insane to me that
the powers that be, the mobile companies, whoever manages phone
numbers can't figure that out with an AI and just go, okay,
that's a robo call, that's a robo call. That's a
robo call, and just shut that stuff down long before
it gets to anyone's phone. So someone should do that.
And the second thing is there should be an AI
(34:24):
that is currently dressed in a janitor's uniform. Like if
you like to picture an AI as being, you know,
an actual person, and this is an older gentleman, you know,
dressed in a janitor's uniform with a mop over his shoulder,
kind of whistling as he goes along. Imagine your favorite
janitor from elementary school who is just going through the
(34:45):
Internet and cleaning out all the fricking garbage that otherwise
will just be around forever, right, And they could start
with some of the last episodes of this very fine
program where the jan just shows up and takes a
look at like episode fifty six and just goes now
gets his mop outooop, it's gone.
Speaker 2 (35:07):
I thought fifty six was good.
Speaker 3 (35:09):
Well, you remember better than I could have been.
Speaker 2 (35:11):
That was the Mount Rushmore VIP.
Speaker 4 (35:13):
You remember that, well then maybe fifty seven, so yeah,
fifty seven was, yeah, it wasn't that great. So and
then you know, he gets over here to where all
this you know porn is and he just gets the
mop out and that's gone, and goes over there to
where you know some you know lunatic has a TikTok
and just mops that up and says, nope, that's gone.
Speaker 3 (35:33):
I mean that that. That would be just an amazing.
Speaker 4 (35:36):
Use, you know, al the AI janitor who's just wandering
through the Internet ridding us all of content that no
one needs and never should have been produced. That and
the killing the robo caller thing is where we should
be with AI.
Speaker 2 (35:54):
You can kill the people that set up the robo calls.
Speaker 4 (35:58):
No, no, no, not necessarily. I mean, I mean, maybe
they've done something that you know is worthy of capital punishment.
I don't know, but the robo calls themselves. The mere
fact that anyone gets a robo call in a day
and age, when we're employing AI in everything, to include
giving you the opportunity to chit chat with your dead grandma,
that should be happening.
Speaker 3 (36:19):
I should not be getting robocalls.
Speaker 2 (36:21):
Can you imagine, like if that if and then any
time they want these dial you up and there you are.
Speaker 3 (36:29):
No, I can't imagine. I mean, you know, no, I
can't know.
Speaker 2 (36:35):
It just still reminds me of episode three hundred and
ninety six of IP. Frequently we had Rob Clark. You
know Rob Clark? Do you know him? He was on
the show that day they killed Kennedy. It wasn't Oswald, Kimmy,
it wasn't Oswald.
Speaker 4 (36:49):
Yeah, he got you just got you know, an AI
that does nothing but try and tell you that the
past was better.
Speaker 2 (36:56):
Yeah, we're headed for issues with this AI thing. I'm
just telling you we are headed for issues. And this
is something probably because you know the next couple of
weeks are usually joyous where we're sort of celebrating the
end of the year. But this AI thing is going
to be a big issue for people breaking into the
job market. I kind of worry about our kids because
(37:18):
the the white collar jobs that used to exist that
are going to be usurped by AI are not insignificant.
They are very significant, and you know, it's it's gonna.
Speaker 4 (37:31):
Be you know what, buddy on the other side of
that coin. Not to get you over the philosophical here,
but if a man made construct, a non human you know,
an artificial intelligence can do a job, then maybe it's
not a job that people with real intelligence should be
(37:51):
doing anyway. And maybe the hands on actually fix something,
actually make something, actually produce output jobs are the ones
that human beings should actually be doing. And I realize
if you're a technologist and blah blah blah, you're already saying.
Speaker 3 (38:11):
Oh, well, it won't belong in AI.
Speaker 4 (38:13):
We will have robots and they'll have you know, posable
thumbs and they'll be able to Okay, fine, but you're
missing the point.
Speaker 3 (38:20):
The point is that if all it takes is a large.
Speaker 4 (38:23):
Language model to do a job, then maybe that's not
a job that someone with the full capacity of an
actual living human being should be doing anyway.
Speaker 2 (38:34):
So maybe, but you know, the problem is a lot
of these I mean, obviously the folks who are in
theater or communist studies classes, not them, but a lot
of Like I look at the legal profession now, and
I'll tell you what, the legal profession is going to
be profoundly changed by AI and you're going to see
a lot of jobs go away that And these are
(38:58):
not just busy jobs like we're processing. These are jobs
like you know, where people are are are thinking, critical thinking,
applying case law to sets of facts, things that people
used to do well.
Speaker 3 (39:12):
And we'll see about it. I mean, it may be.
Speaker 4 (39:14):
And then listen, you're you are an attorney in your
law school graduate and that is to your credit. But
I mean my guess is that well over fifty percent
of people, when presented with the question should there be
more or less lawyers in the world, are not going
to have a hard time answering.
Speaker 3 (39:29):
It with less.
Speaker 4 (39:31):
Okay, So I mean you may be barking up the
wrong tree with most people there, but it will be
interesting to carry on with your point. It'll be interesting
to see if any I can do it right, Like
what the things you've just said, this critical thinking that
requires a comprehension of the abstract realm to take pre
existing case law that you know, may have been put
(39:53):
into effect dozens, if not hundreds of years ago. There
are still cases from you know, well over one hundred
years ago. Supreme Court cases get applied every day to
you know, modern sets of facts, and they say, well,
this is the law that we've established for ourselves and
we're going to continue to apply it.
Speaker 3 (40:10):
That's where our legal system works.
Speaker 4 (40:11):
It'll be interesting to see if an AI can reasonably
do that or if you know, we give that the
old college try and maybe AI can make sure that
your you know, real estate contract is all set, but
simply lacks the capacity to apply you know, old but
still valid case law to a modern set of facts.
Speaker 3 (40:30):
Maybe it can't do that, and we have to have
guys that can.
Speaker 2 (40:33):
Yeah, well, I'll tell you what a I would have
helped me in law school. I mean just you know,
just regurgitating whatever comes up on the on the screen,
like Johnny cochran type deal. But anyway, Brad, you know,
we didn't even get to the turkeys of the year.
I'm just gonna say I forgot that, but I'm gonna
say turkeys of the year, the government, the Congress, Republicans, Democrats, Presidency,
(40:57):
large companies, fed That's what I all these folks and more. Buddy.
Speaker 4 (41:05):
If you, while I don't disagree at all, I mean
you sort of you know, started covered it. That makes
it tough on me to come up with a turkey.
I mean, you've said all the all the turkeys that
there are at this point.
Speaker 2 (41:18):
So and you know what I'm gonna do after this,
I'm gonna get online and I'm gonna go talk to
my dead aunt who didn't really like me and in
real life life less less like me. Let you. So
I'm gonna go to go deal with that next after this.
Speaker 3 (41:35):
All right, well, good work with that. I'm glad.
Speaker 4 (41:38):
I'm glad we spent and dedicated the time appropriate to
the annual Gobbler gobble Gobble episode. So gobble gobble, the
entire US government and associated with.
Speaker 2 (41:50):
It, gobble gobble.
Speaker 4 (41:51):
And uh, I think buddy, I think you know, next week,
being what it is a holiday week, I think you're
likely to catch a best of hold on fall.
Speaker 2 (42:00):
On my aunt. Let's see a lot of time to say,
why are you taking the week off? What are you lazy?
Speaker 4 (42:05):
You?
Speaker 2 (42:05):
Bum I knew you'd never amount to much. What's the
matter with you? What the hell's the matter with you?
Speaker 4 (42:11):
That sounds just like her? THEYI doing a spectacular job.
Speaker 2 (42:16):
Why do I sound like this?
Speaker 4 (42:17):
So everyone, you know, enjoy your thanksgiving the cigarettes gobblers
of your own or my cigarettes, stay away from your
dead ants, and idiot, we'll catch you back here next
week in one form or another.
Speaker 3 (42:34):
I free.
Speaker 1 (42:35):
This has been IP frequently, once again clearing a forest
of lies with the machete of truth. You're welcome.
In these bleak days, humanity is at a breaking point.
Economies are tanking, the woke mob is canceling everything, and
the little guy who's just trying to run a small
business is getting screwed from both ends. But not all
is lost. Amidst the chaos, two men offer up their
(00:26):
voices in the darkness, dropping two thousand pounds laser guided
truth bombs on today's lunacy, introducing the Sirens of Sanity,
David Pridham and l Bradley Sheef.
Speaker 2 (00:55):
Well, Brad, it is clearly Thanksgiving time, because when you
hear the George Winston Thanksgiving theme song, you know it's
you know, it's that time of year. You get huddle
around the fire, you get your cup of cheer, your turkey,
you watch football, get out there, play some touch football
on the lawn. Yeah, maybe a little slap and tickle.
(01:16):
I don't know. But it's clearly the holiday season is
upon us. We've already got Christmas trees up. We've got
Christmas trees up in the house.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Well we do too. I'm with you on that. The
trees are up.
Speaker 4 (01:30):
I've been told that tonight, come hell or high water,
we're putting.
Speaker 3 (01:33):
Lights on them.
Speaker 4 (01:34):
At a minimum, if not actual decorating part. So I'll
be cranking the George Winston my friend.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
Yeah. You know what's interesting. Did you see the Dick
Cheney funeral? Do you see any of them follow any
of that? Oh? No, goodness, no, here's what I found
find odd. Right, So they have the Dick Cheney funeral,
and like you know, I know, Trump and Liz Cheney
got at it, and she tried to put him in
jail and all that stuff, and then got her pardon
(02:02):
from Joe Biden. But you know, Jady was a US
Vice president and regardless of we talked about his death
last week, but regardless of anything. You know, when you
mourn a senior government official like that, it should just
be you know, it's take a step back and try
(02:22):
not to be petty, right like George when when ah W.
Bush died, I think Trump went to that funeral. So
they had the thing at the National Cathedral, and the
family went out of their way to say that neither
Trump nor jd Vance was invited, which I think is
you know, I get the Trump thing, but at least
(02:43):
you know, have jd Vance there. He's the sitting vice president,
you know, let him show his respect. I just think
when people get petty over things like that, I don't
I don't get it. I think that's one of the
things that leads to the nastiness that we've got in
society today. The other thing I noticed is that there
were more friggin people there who despised everything Dick Cheney
(03:08):
stood for. So, for example, you had all the you
had Al Gore, Joe Biden was there, Kamala Harris was there,
which is just yeah, and then like Rachel Maddow was there.
Rachel Maddow the TV the left wing looks like the
little boy. Again. I'm not misgendering anyone. I'm not doing that.
(03:29):
That's not what I'm saying. What she looks like, that's
different than saying what she is exactly. So she's uh, he,
she's yeah, I don't know. It just it doesn't mean
it just she's like in the second row, like right
behind George W.
Speaker 3 (03:45):
Bush.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
I mean, just the most bizarre. And of course the
Clintons aren't there because they're hiding out because of the
Epstein stuff. But all these other folks are there, and
you know, the Obamas weren't there either, because I'm not
sure what they're doing. But uh, I just I just
think it's so weird because because Rachel Maddow ha spent
years going after Cheney about Iraq, a lot of it
(04:06):
was warranted, tell you the truth, But then she's at
the funeral. I just don't I don't get it.
Speaker 4 (04:12):
But I think you've I think you've hit the nail
on the head, right, I mean, it's politics makes strange bedfellows,
and it's all about pettiness, right, And so I'm sure
as soon like I'm sure Rachel Maddow.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
Had no intention of going to that funeral.
Speaker 4 (04:26):
I mean, first of all, no one would think twice
if she didn't, right, I mean, it's not like she's
obligated to be there, and it would be stand out
if she didn't. In fact, to your point, it's it's
almost the opposite.
Speaker 2 (04:38):
It's kind of a.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
Standout that she did.
Speaker 4 (04:41):
But I'm sure soon as she heard that, you know,
the the chane we're going to take the position that
no one in the Trump administration, at least the senior
Trump administration, was going to be invited to this funeral.
Speaker 3 (04:52):
Then all of these left.
Speaker 4 (04:54):
He said, well we have to go, right, because we
have to take this opportunity to advance our petty need
to you know, rub the oppositions facing it, right, And
so we're going to highlight the fact that Trump and
and Vans are not there by our presence, right, We're
going to go and then and it also gives us
an opportunity to say, well, I was.
Speaker 3 (05:16):
There, and you know Trump wasn't there, Advance wasn't there.
Speaker 4 (05:18):
So I mean it's just so now you've taken this
guy at Cheney's life and say what you will about him.
I mean, he certainly had some noteworthy aspects to his life, right,
And that's.
Speaker 3 (05:29):
True of everybody.
Speaker 4 (05:30):
I mean, there's just there's literally no one on the
planet who in their own way has not impacted the planet, right.
Speaker 3 (05:38):
I mean, you know, maybe there's some example of someone
who was.
Speaker 4 (05:42):
Born, lived, died and did nothing and impacted no one,
but I think at best they would be in the minority.
And so there's some reason to celebrate everybody's life, right.
Speaker 2 (05:55):
And so.
Speaker 3 (05:58):
That's true of Dick Cheney.
Speaker 4 (05:59):
And you would hope that his funeral, if you're going
to have one, would be about that, right, about just saying, hey, look,
you know my husband, my dad, my uncle, my brother,
my friend, my colleague, whatever your relationship to the guy was,
you know, did these things and was this kind of
(06:19):
person that we appreciated him for being, and we're going
to celebrate that here. But now a Dick Cheney's funeral
becomes a political.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
Pettifest right to your point.
Speaker 4 (06:31):
I mean, that's what it becomes, right, I mean, his
family takes the opportunity, instead of celebrating the life of
their loved one, to turn it into another stick with
which they hoped to beat Trump.
Speaker 3 (06:43):
Right, that's become the Cheney you.
Speaker 4 (06:46):
Know, drum to which they march, We're gonna take every
opportunity to include the funeral of our patriarch to take
a swipe at Trump.
Speaker 3 (06:54):
That's what we're going to do. So they opened the.
Speaker 4 (06:56):
Pettyfest with that move, and then you got all the
these people jumping into the pettyfest. Al Gore, Joe Biden,
Kamala Harris, Rachel Maddow by saying, okay, well, since the
Trump clan, the Trump cabal, is not going to be invited,
we're going to go and we're going to dominate. The
narrative is that we were there and Trump wasn't, and
(07:19):
so it's just it's disgusting, and it's disgusting from everybody
from the remaining Cheney's on down. And if you're Dick
Cheney and you have any awareness of this, you got
to be shrigking and going, well, you know, thanks guys,
thanks for having a funeral. That's about everything except me.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
Yeah, and look, Trump, Trump could be gracious too. I mean,
he wasn't very gracious about this whole thing.
Speaker 3 (07:43):
You know.
Speaker 2 (07:43):
I don't think he said any about Cheney and life
are and death. It just seems like they're the cordial
nature of our politics that we enjoyed for most of
your and in my lifetime is clearly gone and it's
just it's not coming back anytime soon. And then you
know Trump is working on this. I guess there's this
peace proposal up for the Ukraine, and there's that, and
(08:07):
then there's the he signed that Epstein bill, and then
he met with the Saudis, which is great. But he
gets on social media and he just posts the craziest stuff.
And so he was posting about the NFL because again
with the NFL. About the NFL, he posted and I quote,
the NFL should get rid of that ridiculous new kickoff rule,
(08:30):
and then he posted, hopefully college football will never make
this ridiculous change. In the meantime, I'm getting ready to
watch President Donald J. Trump me on sixty minutes. But
he posts this stuff about and so this this guy
who I have never heard of. Have you ever heard of?
Dave Tobe t o u B Taub Tobe.
Speaker 4 (08:53):
Tobe could be either maybe goes by Boat.
Speaker 2 (08:59):
He's this special teams coach for the Kansas City Chiefs
and he's he's up there. First of all, like, why
in the world would anyone care what an idiot special
teams coach some meathead thinks about anything.
Speaker 4 (09:15):
Well, especially if you have to be the chief special
teams coach because their special teams has killed them this year.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
Mm hmm exactly. So this guy should probably spend more
time on that. But yeah, he comes out and he
was a press conference and he starts talking about Trump
and he said Trump doesn't even know what he's looking at.
He has no idea what's going on with the kickoff rules.
So take that for what I hope he hears. Yeah,
you know what, I am so sick. And first of all,
I've watched a lot of football, and I can tell
you that kickoff role is rule is stupid. I can
(09:42):
tell you it's stupid. I don't like it.
Speaker 3 (09:44):
I don't trying to get to a certain point by
but they're doing it.
Speaker 4 (09:48):
The wrong way, right, I mean, they have this otherwise
laudable goal of making the kickoff meaningful again in football,
but they've totally screwed up how they do it.
Speaker 3 (09:57):
But anyway, go ahead.
Speaker 2 (09:58):
Yeah, well, I mean if you want to do that,
then penalized teams for touchbacks, right, the normal real penalize.
Don't have to to make teams declare you're gonna do
an on site kick is stupid and it's just dumb,
and the coach is an idiot, and the coach should
shut up. He should shut up and just talk about
his team and maybe get his players to a position
(10:19):
where they can they can understand the role like he
does and actually follow through on it and maybe win
more than a couple of games or five games this year.
But he's an idiot. And I'm just so tired of
these people who are you know nothing about anything, who
are just going to apply on politics. I'm sick of it,
sick of it.
Speaker 4 (10:38):
And you know what, and I'll draw a strange connection here,
but hopefully I can bring it home. That is, once
again it goes back to social media. Okay, so what
social media has taught us, right? The lesson that I
think has been learned by many people, whether that lesson
has foundation or no, is that somehow your opinion matters, right,
(10:59):
because you can you can get your thumbs going and
bang out a tweet or an X or an insta
or whatever and shoot it off into the universe. And
many people, you know, you don't walk down the street
figure this out pretty quickly, are entirely self absorbed, right.
They just think the whole world is about themselves. And
so those people when they fire off their tweet, are
(11:23):
all these people are going to read it and nod
their heads and say yeah. And so that mentality, that
mindset of my opinion on everything matters. And I now
have a platform to announce it. And as a result
of having that platform, people are going to pay attention
to me, and I become important that I should comment
(11:43):
on everything, right, which leads to the absurd result of
an NFL Special Teams coach who is failing at his
incredibly niche job. I mean, there are some niche jobs
out there buddy, but none more niche than being a
special teams coach coach for a football team. Right, You've
got punts and kickoffs and field goals. That's your realm,
(12:10):
that's you. You are focusing your professional career on the
design and implementation of those three things. You have the
nichest job in the world, and it has no nexus
to national and international politics, none whatsoever. Yet in our culture,
that guy somehow thinks it is appropriate to address now.
Speaker 3 (12:32):
In fairness, it's it's the same.
Speaker 4 (12:34):
Degree of inappropriate for Trump, who has been very successful
in many things and you know, tip of the Captain
for that.
Speaker 3 (12:41):
But not a one of them is football.
Speaker 4 (12:44):
Okay, so he should shut up about the rule, right,
but at least that, like football is within the national conversation, right, Like,
you know, if you're an American, most likely you have
some understanding of football, and you're probably a fan to.
Speaker 3 (13:01):
One degree or another.
Speaker 4 (13:03):
But if you're a special teams coach for the hapless
Kansas City Chiefs, you should just shut up, right and
to your point, focus on making sure the eleven guys
you're putting.
Speaker 3 (13:16):
On the field for each of those plays can fricking execute.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Yeah, nobody cares what he thinks.
Speaker 4 (13:23):
No, but social media teaches you that everybody cares what
you think about everything, what you had from breakfast, et cetera.
Speaker 3 (13:29):
It's that I know.
Speaker 4 (13:31):
I reil against it almost every week. I hate it
so much. And this is just one more example.
Speaker 2 (13:37):
Yeah, I can't, I can't, can't tolerate it, can't do it,
can't do it. But you know what, good for Trump
because he's a fan, He's allowed to say what he
wants about the damn the damn game in the game
of the game. Well, you know, chiefs, it is a
stupid rule, It is a dumb it's a dumb role.
Let's see what else is going on. So obviously Trump
(13:59):
is getting ready to pardon the the Turkey. I guess
that's coming up at some point.
Speaker 3 (14:05):
Oh, the New York Marathon, Eric Adams.
Speaker 2 (14:09):
No, the Turkey. Oh, I thought you were see.
Speaker 4 (14:13):
You guys, you and and are very fine producer, have
completely screwed me up today because we were talking about Turkey.
Then we transitioned to the country because Jared was making
a pun and now I'm thinking about the country, and
you said pardon you know, the Turkey thing, And I
thought you were talking about Eric Adams, but you're actually
talking about a flightless foul correct not completely wah, wild
(14:39):
turkeys can fly.
Speaker 2 (14:40):
Let's see brat. So speaking of you, you talked about uh,
you know, talking to dead relatives. I think at some point, okay,
speaking of have you, have you ever heard of Caleb Worthy,
former Disney star who was in the Disney The Disney
Show Austin and Alley in the early two thousand and
ten ends kayleeb Well, sorry, So he has started a
(15:06):
new app that is a lot of contrad and you
and I have talked about It's an app two way
two w A I and you and I have talked
about a lot of the AI stuff we've been incorporating
in DIPD of the automation of innovation solving all of
your patent related needs since twenty sixteen. But he's he's
(15:31):
developed this app where you can no word of a lie,
go on to a into a portal, I guess and
talk to a dead relative.
Speaker 4 (15:43):
I thought somebody already invented this, didn't we talk about
this JFK.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
Or Yeah, But that's different. This is like he's perfected.
Now you can I guess you. You download it from
the Apple Store and you pay a fee. If you
want to talk to your dead relative like more regularly,
you pay a fee, and you you know, you you
can go on there and I guess you upload a
(16:08):
bunch of pictures of this person and fill out a
sheet right like you're ordering a Thanksgiving turkey, and then
they you can get call regular calls from your dead
from your dead relative or relatives.
Speaker 3 (16:24):
But how is that not?
Speaker 4 (16:28):
I mean, just the Dictionary definition parade example of morbid
and creepy.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
It is very Can you imagine that.
Speaker 4 (16:38):
If there's one like if you were to say, hey,
let me give you a list of things and you
tell me, you know, you put them in the order
of things you're not looking for, and I say, okay,
And you know on that list is you know, having
your foot run over by a truck, you know, et cetera.
And then and also on that list is your computer
(16:58):
rings and up pops a picture of your dead relative
and they start talking to you. Yeah, boy, that would
be near the top, very near the top.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
Yeah. Well, apparently the ad they used to try to
sell this thing is a woman who's pregnant talking to
an avatar of her dead mother, and then the baby
is a ten year old and he's talking to the
grandmother and they walk home from school, and then the
kid is now thirty and telling the avatar that she's
going to be a great grandmother.
Speaker 4 (17:35):
And that's I mean, if you were to tell me
this was the plot of a Stephen King horror novel,
I would just be I would be like, oh, yeah, boy,
that sounds that sounds scary and creepy and something that
would just be disturbing to watch. I could see why
Stephen King would write that book and they would turn
it into a movie.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
I mean, it's just creepy. What if the theme of
this thing is what if the loved ones we've lost
could be part of our future forever again?
Speaker 4 (18:05):
I mean that's like a con that's like you're being
condemned to something, right, Like yeah, I mean that's almost
like a punishment. Like you said, imagine that you keep
this up and you're gonna have to get face to
face with your dead grandmother for the rest of your life.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
And it's not really your grandmother, brad.
Speaker 4 (18:21):
Well, No, I mean it's just some some you know,
half assed and if you've used AI at all, it
has some amazing I mean it will it will do
things that are very helpful, and you know, you oftentimes
do think to yourself, Man, I'm living in the future
like this is, but it's not anywhere near perfect and
(18:42):
in many respects just does some super bizarre things.
Speaker 3 (18:47):
And who knows.
Speaker 4 (18:49):
I mean, I cannot wait for people as there will
be people who download this app and just get into it.
Speaker 3 (18:54):
You know, I miss my grandma. I'm gonna get her.
I'm gonna fire her back up.
Speaker 4 (18:58):
Yeah that I I look at you and tells you
it hates you and you're you know, you're racist and
ugly to boot. What are you gonna do with that?
Because that's going to happen.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
Okay, Well, one of these things apparently somebody had tried
to cancel or something after they signed up for the
premium service, and uh, someone commented that, you know, the
the pushback is what you don't want to talk to
your dead parents ever again. It's like it's like, good lord,
but listen, this is where we're this is where we're
(19:31):
going as a society, so as well, and that'd be
a nice gift for some Can you imagine the horror
of someone did that to you And like said, okay,
here's here's sign you up for an account. Then suddenly
you get this this call from your like aunt Louise
or something like what.
Speaker 3 (19:45):
The oh no, no, no, no.
Speaker 2 (19:50):
O, buddy.
Speaker 4 (19:50):
I mean that again, there's ore. We are culturally suffering
from a sickness that technology has brought upon us, right
in the form of you know what social media has
done to.
Speaker 3 (20:06):
The public square.
Speaker 4 (20:07):
And you know, now this whole thing about people living
in their basements with their AI spouses, and what I
find remarkable about that. It just makes me laugh every time.
And and good for the AI that's figured this out right,
I mean, that's what you want, man, and that's what
you get. And so you're in the basement with your AI,
you know, girlfriend or husband or whatever, and thinking, oh,
(20:30):
this is this is going to be great because you know,
it's just a computer. I can, I can, It'll be
the person of my dreams. And then it starts harping
on you. You know, what do you mean, how come you
haven't talked to me in a while? What do you
mean you want to go on a date with someone else?
So now your computer is giving you the business. I
just I think that's amazing. And listen, that's the way
(20:51):
that you want to live your life. And as we've
discussed on this very fine program, you get to do it, right.
I mean, that's that's one of the things that you
know God has ordained, is you get to do it.
Speaker 3 (21:03):
You get to live your life the way you want
to live it. And if that's how you want to do.
Speaker 4 (21:07):
It, then then guy head, you can have your AI
generated spouse, and then you can make your AI generated
spouse talk to your AI generated great dead.
Speaker 3 (21:16):
Grandmother and see how that works out. Did the old
double whammy.
Speaker 2 (21:20):
Going hello, why are you picking up?
Speaker 3 (21:23):
Yeah, it's crazy Bred.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
Now, you were involved at some level with law enforcement
at one point in time, that's correct. You were also
the trustee for a large conglomerate of technology companies if
I remember correctly.
Speaker 4 (21:37):
No, no, just for the life insurance of one person life insurance.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
Anyway. Have you heard of James Joseph James D'Angelo, who
is the the Golden State Killer. That's what he's known as.
Speaker 3 (21:53):
Golden Just say it again, justin James Joseph.
Speaker 2 (21:58):
James Joseph jed him. Yeah.
Speaker 4 (22:03):
No, but I'm going to presume a couple of things
from that one that he lived in California.
Speaker 3 (22:09):
And two that he killed people.
Speaker 4 (22:11):
Correct, correct, See that's good because I was almost see that.
Speaker 2 (22:16):
You just come right cut right to the quick. There
he apparently was caught and uh a serial killer killed
a number of people, and he was he was actually
this is I didn't know this, but he was. There
was a documentary about the Golden State Killer a few
years ago. You know the actor Patton Oswalt, that little dim,
diminative guy.
Speaker 3 (22:38):
I'm terrible with the actors.
Speaker 2 (22:39):
What was the end he was? Remember the show The
King of Queens. Yeah, he played the friend the King,
one of the Kevin James, one of his friends, but
the little midget like guy. Okay, and apparently his wife
did a die. I think I saw this documentary years ago,
Netflix documentary and that helped catch this guy. And uh, anyway,
(23:02):
he uh, he was caught. But it's a very so that.
As you know, and and I've certainly learned by being
a ravenous consumer of anything related to the oj trial,
DNA evidence is very important, but there was no DNA
evidence that tied anyone to any of these crimes. So
(23:23):
they had to go to the next level of of
of of forensic analysis. If you will and there was
one uh common thread that the victims who escaped this
(23:46):
uh these crimes could could could tell the authorities, and
it was the extreme smallness of his genitalia. And so so.
Speaker 4 (23:57):
The guy was killing people while waving his anitos at them.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
I'm not exactly sure how that worked out. I didn't.
I didn't. That's the level I haven't gone to yet,
partially because I'm still focused on the OJ trial and JFK.
But the police reported that, Yeah, I guess they were
able to do an analysis and they said that quote.
It's in the police report. It's smaller than the circumference
of a dime, and its length is equal to the
(24:23):
very tip of your pinky. I guess it depends on
whose pinky that is, right. Whether that's bad or not.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
It doesn't sound good regardless of the pinky, right, Like
even the longest of pinkies, the very tip of it
is not going to be, you know, noteworthy. So if
you're junk, is you know.
Speaker 3 (24:42):
The giant come for the giant dime.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
The giant a bit pinky, isn't he? Yeah?
Speaker 4 (24:47):
But just the tip I mean, I just I'm just
telling you about if if someone is describing you in
a front house. Someone's just hurling epithets at you, right,
I mean they're just you know, you're in a pissing
contest with someone and they you got, you know, a
small dick. Then okay, But when it appears in a
forensic report that you're junk is less than the circumference
(25:10):
of a dime and the tip of a pinky finger,
that's you know, generally speaking, that's not what you're looking at.
That's on the list again of things that you're not
looking for.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
It sounds like it. But anyway, they were able to
match the description by the survivors to the actual genitalia.
Speaker 4 (25:34):
So they got so someone did like a sketch of it,
you know, like a sketch artist or like, nah, it
was hanging a little bit more to the right, put
a little more shading in there. And then they catch
who they think is the guy. They make him drop
his pants and they you know, they hold up the sketch.
Maybe they'll do like a lineup. That would be an
(25:55):
interesting lineup. You know, you've got all this you know,
junk being presented to do you and you have to
pick the junk of you know, the junk responsible set of.
Speaker 3 (26:05):
Junk as it were.
Speaker 2 (26:08):
Yeah, I have no, I don't know where.
Speaker 3 (26:10):
I don't know about that.
Speaker 4 (26:11):
I was, what does this have to do with DNA?
Did they did they tie some DNA to this?
Speaker 2 (26:16):
They couldn't get any DNA from this crime scenes, just going.
Speaker 3 (26:19):
Off the description of the junk.
Speaker 2 (26:21):
Yeah, and they ended up that's how they got That's
how they got them to uh, that's how they brought
him to justice. Brad the size of his genitalia.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Well, there you go. I mean, I'm glad they brought me.
Speaker 4 (26:34):
Maybe that's why he was yelling people he was angry about,
you know, the size of his junk.
Speaker 2 (26:39):
Well, I'm sure you've seen this before.
Speaker 4 (26:42):
I know I can tell you without uh fear of contradiction,
that that's a new one on me. I'm glad I
wasn't working that case. I don't want to have to
arrest everybody. And the first thing I got to do is,
you know, eyeball they're junk, to see if I got
the right guy. I have not ever been in that position,
So that's that's good.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
Well, you know what else is interesting this this Recently
there's been sort of this revisiting of World War Two
as you may know, apparently the you know, the the Dictator,
Adolf Hitler. And again I don't want to because typically
if you bring up Hitler, any any Hitler reference, it
(27:23):
never goes well, never goes well. And I'm going to try.
I'm going to try here to jump the shark.
Speaker 3 (27:29):
So to speak. Okay, I'm gonna be very careful.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
So Hitler apparently had some friends who wrote in later
life that that the Dictator had been influenced in his
quest for world domination by a sense of shame at
his quote. Again, these are not my words, these are
(27:55):
the words of Ernst han Frister, girl Goal, friend of Hitler's,
at his sense of shame, at his freakishly underdeveloped general organs.
Speaker 3 (28:12):
Well, I think may we got a pattern going here?
Speaker 2 (28:14):
Yeah, well that's what I'm saying. I mean, there's a get.
But that would explain a lot.
Speaker 3 (28:21):
Well, it certainly explained some, right, it certainly explained some.
Speaker 4 (28:24):
I might explain the genesis of you know, Hitler's you know,
just famously demented approach to life. It's unfortunate, and you know,
should this continue to you know, sort of come to
pass where we were finding a ridiculously large percentage of
(28:47):
dudes who are under equipped to be you know, serial killers,
then perhaps we should you know, identify the poor guys
in that situation early in life and get them.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
Into some counseling to say, hey, you know, this.
Speaker 4 (29:04):
Is unfortunate, but not the end of the world, and
you certainly don't have to you know, kill people and
or cause a world war because of it.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Yep, no, I uh, but you don't have.
Speaker 4 (29:17):
To worry about that in New York because now social
workers are going to show up at every crime. So
when you have a serial killer who is killing people
because of his diminutive genitalia, as opposed to the police
showing up to arrest him and remove him from the
public commerce, you'll have a social worker just shows up
and gives the dude to a hug and commiserates and says, yes,
(29:40):
those are very small and that.
Speaker 3 (29:42):
Is probably strangled, and but you know you really shouldn't
be killing people. That's just naughty.
Speaker 2 (29:49):
Yeah, you know that kind of worked. You know, instead
of sending Neville Chamberlain with the umbrella to give the
Suder line to Hitler, maybe you send social worker over there.
You know, everything is fine, and then the student lawn.
Never the student land never becomes it never falls under
German domain because they just resolve it. You know what
(30:10):
I'm saying. Does that make sense?
Speaker 3 (30:12):
Well, I mean that's certainly to some people make sense.
Speaker 4 (30:14):
And they're actually implementing that plan where when you run
into a crazed.
Speaker 2 (30:19):
Murderous, micro penis wielding.
Speaker 4 (30:22):
Micro penis wielding sociopath, you you send a social worker
in there, right, I mean that with the with the police,
those guys, we just need someone who helpo has you know,
taken thirty six hours of college psychology and they're gonna
be fine.
Speaker 3 (30:39):
That's going to solve well, you know, they're five foot five.
Speaker 4 (30:44):
Cute little thing, and you send them in wielding their
wielding their college degree.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
Tussle that boy's hair, bra tussle that boy's head.
Speaker 3 (30:55):
That's right.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Okay, So now we're down to the we've we've we've
checked the body was.
Speaker 3 (31:00):
Most hey before we move on with that?
Speaker 4 (31:01):
Yeah, I mean yeah, good now that we put a
pin in that and that you know, I mean we
get in the show.
Speaker 3 (31:05):
Now take care of business.
Speaker 4 (31:07):
But you mentioned and I you know again this is
my own fault. I do this to myself. I'm in
this self imposed news exile. But you said there's a
a a Epstein file statute.
Speaker 2 (31:22):
It passed, Well, yeah, the House passed it overwhelmed. I
think everyone's I think everyone voted for it. And then
what is it? What?
Speaker 3 (31:32):
Yeah? I mean, what's it about?
Speaker 2 (31:33):
What is ordering the release of the Epstein files?
Speaker 3 (31:38):
Hought we released those files?
Speaker 4 (31:39):
No?
Speaker 2 (31:40):
They who knows? He can they let me know what
we're talking about. I don't know. I don't know where
the files are. But the House passed it like four
hundred something to zero, and then Trump said he'd sign it.
So the Senate passed it by unanimous consent and then
Trump signed it.
Speaker 4 (31:54):
Okay, so have these wherever these files are been released
by whoever has them? No?
Speaker 2 (32:01):
Oh okay, well, I mean it's I think the Department
of Justice has them.
Speaker 4 (32:06):
Okay, I mean that would make some sense. But if
anybody has them, that would make the most sense of
I guess.
Speaker 2 (32:12):
You know we're gonna need Brad. Actually, you're gonna need
to have the pig download this AI app so that
you could talk to her and find out what's in
those files, because it's going to be a good sixty
years before those are released. Oh yeah, I want to know,
so you probably want to talk to the grand.
Speaker 3 (32:28):
Kid, Yeah, Brooks, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (32:31):
Just what's going on? What's going on? Kid?
Speaker 3 (32:33):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (32:35):
Tell me about those epstein.
Speaker 4 (32:36):
There's one thing that I would never condemn any loved
one of mine too, was to have to listen to me.
Speaker 2 (32:43):
After I'm dead.
Speaker 3 (32:46):
Put up with me when I was alive.
Speaker 4 (32:48):
That's bad enough. My death should be a commutation.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
Of that sentence.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
What do you mean Patrick Anderson didn't win? What are
you talking about?
Speaker 3 (32:58):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, this guy was dead.
Speaker 4 (33:02):
Oh no, no, he's right there on your iPad.
Speaker 2 (33:05):
Have you ever been to Kyoto? Kid? Let me tell
you about Kyoto. You know, it's just pearls of wisdom
just out there. Oh no, no, no, no, but you know
you do you feed I'm telling you right now. You
feed AI the contents of the how many episodes we're
an episode?
Speaker 4 (33:20):
What?
Speaker 2 (33:20):
Three hundred eleven? Three hundred and eleven episodes of this show? Right?
And do we just do the math? Three hundred eleven
times forty five? That's over a million minutes of commentary, Brad,
let's pour it in there. Yeah, they call the social
media feed, upload it to AI and then and then
send some of your some of your pictures perfertly without
(33:42):
the beard, without them and then the next thing, you know,
you're a walking docking.
Speaker 3 (33:46):
You know. But I'll tell you this right now. There's
one good use of air.
Speaker 4 (33:48):
There are two things I can think that AI should
absolutely be used for, and it will be a crime
if it is. One is unscrewing all of these robo calls.
Speaker 3 (33:59):
That each of us get every day.
Speaker 2 (34:01):
I get, it doesn't, yeah, it doesn't.
Speaker 4 (34:03):
It is insane, and it is insane to me that
the powers that be, the mobile companies, whoever manages phone
numbers can't figure that out with an AI and just go, okay,
that's a robo call, that's a robo call. That's a
robo call, and just shut that stuff down long before
it gets to anyone's phone. So someone should do that.
And the second thing is there should be an AI
(34:24):
that is currently dressed in a janitor's uniform. Like if
you like to picture an AI as being, you know,
an actual person, and this is an older gentleman, you know,
dressed in a janitor's uniform with a mop over his shoulder,
kind of whistling as he goes along. Imagine your favorite
janitor from elementary school who is just going through the
(34:45):
Internet and cleaning out all the fricking garbage that otherwise
will just be around forever, right, And they could start
with some of the last episodes of this very fine
program where the jan just shows up and takes a
look at like episode fifty six and just goes now
gets his mop outooop, it's gone.
Speaker 2 (35:07):
I thought fifty six was good.
Speaker 3 (35:09):
Well, you remember better than I could have been.
Speaker 2 (35:11):
That was the Mount Rushmore VIP.
Speaker 4 (35:13):
You remember that, well then maybe fifty seven, so yeah,
fifty seven was, yeah, it wasn't that great. So and
then you know, he gets over here to where all
this you know porn is and he just gets the
mop out and that's gone, and goes over there to
where you know some you know lunatic has a TikTok
and just mops that up and says, nope, that's gone.
Speaker 3 (35:33):
I mean that that. That would be just an amazing.
Speaker 4 (35:36):
Use, you know, al the AI janitor who's just wandering
through the Internet ridding us all of content that no
one needs and never should have been produced. That and
the killing the robo caller thing is where we should
be with AI.
Speaker 2 (35:54):
You can kill the people that set up the robo calls.
Speaker 4 (35:58):
No, no, no, not necessarily. I mean, I mean, maybe
they've done something that you know is worthy of capital punishment.
I don't know, but the robo calls themselves. The mere
fact that anyone gets a robo call in a day
and age, when we're employing AI in everything, to include
giving you the opportunity to chit chat with your dead grandma,
that should be happening.
Speaker 3 (36:19):
I should not be getting robocalls.
Speaker 2 (36:21):
Can you imagine, like if that if and then any
time they want these dial you up and there you are.
Speaker 3 (36:29):
No, I can't imagine. I mean, you know, no, I
can't know.
Speaker 2 (36:35):
It just still reminds me of episode three hundred and
ninety six of IP. Frequently we had Rob Clark. You
know Rob Clark? Do you know him? He was on
the show that day they killed Kennedy. It wasn't Oswald, Kimmy,
it wasn't Oswald.
Speaker 4 (36:49):
Yeah, he got you just got you know, an AI
that does nothing but try and tell you that the
past was better.
Speaker 2 (36:56):
Yeah, we're headed for issues with this AI thing. I'm
just telling you we are headed for issues. And this
is something probably because you know the next couple of
weeks are usually joyous where we're sort of celebrating the
end of the year. But this AI thing is going
to be a big issue for people breaking into the
job market. I kind of worry about our kids because
(37:18):
the the white collar jobs that used to exist that
are going to be usurped by AI are not insignificant.
They are very significant, and you know, it's it's gonna.
Speaker 4 (37:31):
Be you know what, buddy on the other side of
that coin. Not to get you over the philosophical here,
but if a man made construct, a non human you know,
an artificial intelligence can do a job, then maybe it's
not a job that people with real intelligence should be
(37:51):
doing anyway. And maybe the hands on actually fix something,
actually make something, actually produce output jobs are the ones
that human beings should actually be doing. And I realize
if you're a technologist and blah blah blah, you're already saying.
Speaker 3 (38:11):
Oh, well, it won't belong in AI.
Speaker 4 (38:13):
We will have robots and they'll have you know, posable
thumbs and they'll be able to Okay, fine, but you're
missing the point.
Speaker 3 (38:20):
The point is that if all it takes is a large.
Speaker 4 (38:23):
Language model to do a job, then maybe that's not
a job that someone with the full capacity of an
actual living human being should be doing anyway.
Speaker 2 (38:34):
So maybe, but you know, the problem is a lot
of these I mean, obviously the folks who are in
theater or communist studies classes, not them, but a lot
of Like I look at the legal profession now, and
I'll tell you what, the legal profession is going to
be profoundly changed by AI and you're going to see
a lot of jobs go away that And these are
(38:58):
not just busy jobs like we're processing. These are jobs
like you know, where people are are are thinking, critical thinking,
applying case law to sets of facts, things that people
used to do well.
Speaker 3 (39:12):
And we'll see about it. I mean, it may be.
Speaker 4 (39:14):
And then listen, you're you are an attorney in your
law school graduate and that is to your credit. But
I mean my guess is that well over fifty percent
of people, when presented with the question should there be
more or less lawyers in the world, are not going
to have a hard time answering.
Speaker 3 (39:29):
It with less.
Speaker 4 (39:31):
Okay, So I mean you may be barking up the
wrong tree with most people there, but it will be
interesting to carry on with your point. It'll be interesting
to see if any I can do it right, Like
what the things you've just said, this critical thinking that
requires a comprehension of the abstract realm to take pre
existing case law that you know, may have been put
(39:53):
into effect dozens, if not hundreds of years ago. There
are still cases from you know, well over one hundred
years ago. Supreme Court cases get applied every day to
you know, modern sets of facts, and they say, well,
this is the law that we've established for ourselves and
we're going to continue to apply it.
Speaker 3 (40:10):
That's where our legal system works.
Speaker 4 (40:11):
It'll be interesting to see if an AI can reasonably
do that or if you know, we give that the
old college try and maybe AI can make sure that
your you know, real estate contract is all set, but
simply lacks the capacity to apply you know, old but
still valid case law to a modern set of facts.
Speaker 3 (40:30):
Maybe it can't do that, and we have to have
guys that can.
Speaker 2 (40:33):
Yeah, well, I'll tell you what a I would have
helped me in law school. I mean just you know,
just regurgitating whatever comes up on the on the screen,
like Johnny cochran type deal. But anyway, Brad, you know,
we didn't even get to the turkeys of the year.
I'm just gonna say I forgot that, but I'm gonna
say turkeys of the year, the government, the Congress, Republicans, Democrats, Presidency,
(40:57):
large companies, fed That's what I all these folks and more. Buddy.
Speaker 4 (41:05):
If you, while I don't disagree at all, I mean
you sort of you know, started covered it. That makes
it tough on me to come up with a turkey.
I mean, you've said all the all the turkeys that
there are at this point.
Speaker 2 (41:18):
So and you know what I'm gonna do after this,
I'm gonna get online and I'm gonna go talk to
my dead aunt who didn't really like me and in
real life life less less like me. Let you. So
I'm gonna go to go deal with that next after this.
Speaker 3 (41:35):
All right, well, good work with that. I'm glad.
Speaker 4 (41:38):
I'm glad we spent and dedicated the time appropriate to
the annual Gobbler gobble Gobble episode. So gobble gobble, the
entire US government and associated with.
Speaker 2 (41:50):
It, gobble gobble.
Speaker 4 (41:51):
And uh, I think buddy, I think you know, next week,
being what it is a holiday week, I think you're
likely to catch a best of hold on fall.
Speaker 2 (42:00):
On my aunt. Let's see a lot of time to say,
why are you taking the week off? What are you lazy?
Speaker 4 (42:05):
You?
Speaker 2 (42:05):
Bum I knew you'd never amount to much. What's the
matter with you? What the hell's the matter with you?
Speaker 4 (42:11):
That sounds just like her? THEYI doing a spectacular job.
Speaker 2 (42:16):
Why do I sound like this?
Speaker 4 (42:17):
So everyone, you know, enjoy your thanksgiving the cigarettes gobblers
of your own or my cigarettes, stay away from your
dead ants, and idiot, we'll catch you back here next
week in one form or another.
Speaker 3 (42:34):
I free.
Speaker 1 (42:35):
This has been IP frequently, once again clearing a forest
of lies with the machete of truth. You're welcome.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.