War in Ukraine, Analytics. Day 1139: Ukraine's Future is Armed Independence. Arestovych, Feldman

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
Hello, everybody, This is Project Alfa. My name is Nicolai Feldman,
and you're watching Ward Diary Live with alexaer Storage. Hello, Alexei,
Hello everybody. My name is Alexeider Storage. Ale say, you're
in a good mood today. I actually planned a lot
of things to bring up today, and you're starting with jokes.
Oh sure, please go ahead. I apologize, Scola. I will

(00:40):
not do it again. We talk about Ukraine, right, so
I gotta maintain the post in the face. Okay. So
first of all, let's say that there have been a
lot of things mentioned about Putin's need to make sure

(01:00):
Trump preserves his face during the negotiations. And you did
mention that the children in Ukraine would not be reflecting
in a good way on President's Trump efforts. And we
do have pretty bad statistics on the kids' deaths here
in Ukraine. So do you think it affects Trump at all?

(01:23):
In your estimation, Nikolay, it is a strong hit because
it's much more difficult for Trump to explain what does
he putting a good fellow and his style negotiates with him.
He avoided going into this topic. Trump said that the
civilians continue dying, and this is not good, and the

(01:47):
ambassador reacted stronger. That chain happened on the very minimum
of communication, at the bottom of a signal. But people
understood what was sent to put In. Today put In
or I think the media mentioned that, or reaffirmed that.
Vladimir Putin or one of his talking heads confirmed also

(02:12):
that Putin is not against ceasefire. But there are some nuances,
and this is acknowledgment of the fact that Russian missile
killed Ukrainian kids, and in Russian social media there was
a wave of regret about deaths of kids, even though

(02:34):
there was in parallel a different wave about them targeting
a bunch of native generals who are somehow visiting this
kids background. But in Russia they don't have telemarathon like
we do in Ukraine, so even under Putin they have
a couple of different opinions. Still, this was indeed noticed,

(02:55):
This indeed was an event that and made people react
to that directly. They could not name the trouble directly
because it would have hung the negotiations, but they were
forced to react to that. It's similar to what's happening
with tariffs, by the way, which when Trump was asked

(03:20):
why did he not slap tariffs on Russia because they're
negotiating with Russia about the war, and your slap sanctions
when negotiations fall through. So the analogy I would say
is as follows. We would not spoil the things by
naming them as they are, although everybody does understand the events,

(03:44):
circumstances and dire consequences, all right, A lex say another
question about red lines, seems like the strikes of Russian
Federation on krivoi Rog in Ukraine were crossing some of
those red lines that were commented earlier in regards to
negotiations on ceasefire. So the results of negotiations between with

(04:09):
Rubio and Colas that United States Colas mentioned that, not Rubio,
that United States will not cross red lines that violate
terms of Ukraine. Regardless you did mention in previous streams
that the only red line that Ukraine has is the
quantity of Ukrainian troops in peace times, and Russian Federation

(04:33):
does not put it in the corner of negotiations. From
what was voiced as the result of these negotiations, Nikolai,
it was two hundred and fifty Two hundred and fifty
thousand is good enough for Ukraine. Those people who are
talking and commenting that Ukraine needs to have a million
people under arms in peace times, this is horrible because

(04:54):
we cannot contain, we cannot pay for so many people
taken out of work and just our borders. Two hundred
and fifty thousand is optimal. We can provide enough, regular training,
enough training for quality reserve to be rotated and created

(05:14):
as a result of this quarter million army, and this
is good enough quantity numbers to hold our borders. Minimal
quantity is the number that is enough to hold your
borders in peace times. Even Soviet Union had grid for that.
And of course it depends upon the real threats. And

(05:36):
we understand that we could use half a million army,
and some people documenting that special forces may be playing
a big role, and no, you cannot use special forces
for all terms and all needs of your army. Quantity
is still important stalin set. Quantity is quality in itself.

(05:59):
United States are not being threatened by Mexico or Canada,
but they still have about two million troops in peace time.
So we in Ukraine should also follow the same principle
of necessary and enough and two hundred and fifty thousand
is a good enough number. Previously Russians were demanding fifty
seventy eighty thousand. We cannot fully acknowledge that it is

(06:23):
indeed quarter million there, but this number was floated as
the result of these negotiations. I cannot remember who exactly,
but I think it was somebody from the Trump camp
who mentioned that when they were commenting on Putin's needs
and requirements, that he wants elections in Ukraine under guidance

(06:46):
of the United Nations, and that the army in Ukraine
cannot exceed to one hundred and fifty thousand. But that's okay,
that's a red line that we can agree. I'll say
one more scary thing now that I must specialists and
saying scary things. The rest of the demands of Putin
are basically could be interpreted as demands to Ukraine's constitution,

(07:08):
perhaps outside of the Russia's acquisition of the territories that
they want to acquire. As a result of this, we
were not planning on giving them to them. But as
for language and rights, civil rights of different groups and
ethnicities in Ukraine is in our constitution, Alexei. Could there

(07:29):
be other red lines that they could have discussed with
Rubio well Nikolai, what is a red line? Technically? Imagine
Ukraine putting up seven one hundred page documents denoting the
red lines, explaining that we cannot follow, we cannot cross them.

(07:50):
And then if they call to the company, to the
country that is supporting them, which is United States, the
United States would ask them, okay, those red lines. Are
you eager? Are you capable to defend these demands or
do we have to step in for you in order
for you to get them? And that's what is a

(08:11):
red line? Right? Red line is something that the one
who wants to violate that would think about three times
before violating because of the consequences. Can we provide any
consequences to put in right? The answer to this question
determines how real are our red lines. You can draw

(08:32):
a lot of red lines with your red pencil, You
can pray send us on us to your pencil, but
from a lot of gibberish birth by information politics of
this war, only two our complete idiocies. One is red lines,
another is guarantees of security so called. I also like

(08:55):
that statement with the addition of real security guarantees, because
there is only one real security guarantee, which is readiness
to fight on the side of Ukraine against Russian Federation.
And even that does not really guarantee you security. It
only guarantees you will have an ally who will fight
with you together. It's not security. This is not a

(09:19):
security guarantee. This is just another ally. So people divided
into two camps. One of them allow themselves to be
fooled and eat all that that is given to them,
and the others don't really And those who don't fall
for all this treachery, they usually watch our war diaries here,

(09:40):
all right, alex say we also perhaps add some people
those to the camp of those who don't watch us.
But I think they may also have some logic. These
are the people talking about placing peace troopers peacekeepers in Ukraine.

(10:01):
I paid attention to the President of Finland, Alexandra stub
who played golf with Trump and generally became rather loyal
to Trump on his politics pretty quickly, and here he
said the following, regardless of activization of possible placement of
foreign troops on the Ukraine territory, right now, it's not

(10:22):
a good time to discuss placement of peacekeepers in Ukraine.
And he said that in his interview to de O
Welt publication in Germany, and that topic is becoming more
symbolic and is disconnected from reality. And this was happening
on the background of President Zynski conducting big negotiations with
President of France and Germany on this topic, while President

(10:43):
of Finland is saying that this topic is really not real. Look, Nikolay,
that's why I put in Chinese and Trump do not
consider Europe to be a factor in these negotiations. Do
you see that these guys are absolutely not serious. All
these visits of the bosses and the heads of central commands,

(11:04):
this is just imitation of Europe having some position, any
position in this regard. Perhaps they do have a position,
maybe it's not rhetoric, maybe it is a position. But
how are they going to provide for these promises? Right now?
We do not have an answer. What will happen if

(11:24):
Russian missile hits the headquarters of French peacekeepers in Ukraine.
As long as we don't have an answer, that means nothing.
When Mcron in a beautiful pose that he had trained
before the mirror for hours, he is addressing his nation
saying that we need to take part in this process,
and his admiring nation is looking at him with big eyes,

(11:46):
but forgetting to ask a question, Dear President, dear Supreme Commander,
what happens if Russians kill a French soldier we start
war with Russia? Do we do the parity answer and
shoot one of theirs, or do we kill one hundred
of them? Or do we shoot at Moscow? Or are

(12:09):
we bringing our nuclear arsenal into readiness? What will friends do?
Until there is an answer, all these visits by chiefs
of staff, heads of military command, or even their whole
army is about nothing. Trump knows that Putin knows that
Susan pin understands that because and for the reason that

(12:29):
these three and who is and Israel and maybe I
ran in Turkey with this Zerbadja. Not too many countries
who are aware of that. These are the countries who
are ready to support their politics at the highest level.
They're ready to pay their bill on the highest level.
If they need to engage in hot warfare with their opponent,

(12:52):
they will. But when you know that you're not going
to fight, and you just talking without supplying any material
resources to these ideas, then you are just a blabber.
Even if you're a president of France or a commissioner
or security in EU, your cost is nothing. And that's

(13:17):
why none from Europe was taken to the table to
negotiate that big Yalta to oh that started a while ago.
There are only Americans, Russians, and Chinese at the stable.
That's why Trump is making reserved compliments to put In,
not because he is an agent, but because he is
dealing with real force. And by the way, North Korea

(13:38):
is also a real force, and he does give nods
and compliments to the leader of that country. He understands
that these countries will have no reservations about shooting, and
Trump knows that he has no reservations to retaliate and
should back. That's why he is taking this position, and
that's why he's also accepting it in Yeahoo in the

(13:58):
United States, regardless of the arrest orders in Europe. And
that's why Urban received him, even though he should have
probably arrested him. But Urban is an orbit. Rather poetically,
he is in Trump's orbit, and he knows that he
should not be afraid of anything. A lot of people

(14:19):
are saying that the holy world of Democrats is destroyed
with USA and LGBTQ, and the world fell back to
the bloody original state. I wrote a post today that
the world did not return back to the right of
the mighty. He turned back to the right of the capable.

(14:40):
If you're capable, people will consider you. Countries have to
consider who is even though those guys and flip loops
running around and shooting random missiles at some vessels passing
on the canal, people do have to consider them. And
if you're incapable of any strong answer, then regardless whether

(15:02):
you have louver rain metal is in your country and
you manufacture military equipment, nobody cares about your opinion, not
until you're ready to shoot somebody between the eyes who
crossed your red lines. When you, for example, are in
Texas and States, you can see some of these red
lines and you can feel them, and you don't need

(15:24):
to declare things. You do not need pretty statements in
front of nations. You walk on the street and you
understand that a lot of people on the street can
pull out their gun and shoot you if you cause rucus.
But everybody understands that everybody can pull against him too,
And that's why people are polite, owning their space and

(15:45):
relaxed as somebody said, like say, democracy is the world
of armed gentlemen. Right exactly, Nikolai, because those armed gentlemen
created the democratic procedures only because they were dangerous to others.

(16:06):
And when democracy turned into some fat free yogurt, these
procedures became stones that are drowning it when they started
paying too much attention to the emotionally hurt and defended.
When the original democracy was the form where people were

(16:27):
standing shoulder to shoulder defending their values in their townships,
Americans understood that while being armed, they need to have
a very strong society, otherwise it will bit difficult to coexist.
And that's why they do have the laws and they
do have the freedoms. But there is a good also
Eastern proverb, the one who has mosk in your pocket,

(16:50):
you do not scream about that or yell about that
on the square. The smile tells for it. Europeans got
contaminated with the ukrainiumase a lot of videos, a lot
of words, a lot of blabbering without having any force
to back it up, and without even having firmness of

(17:11):
intention even capability to do it. That's why Europe today
with all the nuclear British and French arms is weaker
than who is and that's it. That's why. Because of that,
it is not being considered. And when Ukraine pays them

(17:34):
visit or they pay visit to Ukraine, press of course
comments that oh this is a great event. Frances with us,
Britain is with us. This is all a very blatant
deceit of Ukrainian population that is tortured by this war
or still losing their kids because of this war, and

(17:55):
our dear government in Ukraine continues to pay that full
signal on top of this, basically continues to lie and
instead of treating and healing people with truth, they start
pouring lookwarm water of compassion. And that continues to repeat

(18:17):
over and over again after each strike. And nobody wants
to acknowledge that Europe purchased more oil and gas from
Russian Federation for worth more than they have funded Ukraine's
defense against Russian aggressian This is from French and British money.
Russian missiles and Russian UAVs are paid for with these

(18:40):
money that Europe paid Russia for the energy. This is
all paid from European money. And until we acknowledge this
fact and until we show them that we understand it.
And then guys, let's talk in real terms and not
about these fantasies. Mutual. Sure, it is about the pink yogurt.

(19:05):
This is about nothing. This is not serious politics. All right,
Let's clarify here one more thing, a Lex say, am
I right understanding that your message is that only condition
for security of Ukraine and guaranteeing any some red lines
of Ukraine is capability to hit your enemy with a

(19:29):
parity strike. No, not, Nikolay. Well, okay, maybe I misspoke,
but some kind of memorable or painful strike. Is that
what you imply? You know, Nikolai. There are guys called Gurkhas.
There are Nepalese mountain people who are considered to be

(19:49):
good soldiers. British Army has the whole battalion of them.
I am failing to draw the year when it happened.
Was it nineteen or twenty or the and says that
it did happen when the British embassy was evacuated or
there was another hustle. There was about fifteen hundred much
of heads approaching British embassy, getting ready to destroy them

(20:14):
and there are only two or three Gurkhas defending it.
So they came out. They took out their knives with
the insignia of Shiva on them. They originate from the
Greek cochis that's a small shortened Greek sword. And Alexander
the Great Warriors brought those weapons over to those lands
back in the day. So they were failing to remember

(20:37):
three or five. But they went against those fifteen hundred
with their knives. Of course they all perished, but they
used their sanctions, they used what they had to fight against,
and they are a factor. These people are considered. But
when you have nuclear arms like France, but you cannot
give an answer whether you will shoot back. If Russia

(20:58):
kills a French soldier, you can have ten times more nukes.
Nobody would care about it. It's about nothing. War is
the trumping card and if somebody wants to kill you,
what matters is your capability to retaliate back with equal
or stronger force. And instead of bringing up our people

(21:23):
as a nation of hunters, and our people need to
be actually in a higher level than hunters. We need
to be hunters for hunters. Because Russians are not so dumb.
They are treacherous and stubborn enemies, and in order to
fight and resist them while being a minority, we need

(21:43):
to be not just hunters, we need to be hunters
of hunters. And unfortunately our central signal in Kiev is
making everybody a victim and making everybody agello that absolutely
loves when they get some warm, pink drip attached to
their veins. And it's just surprising that not all of

(22:07):
our citizens are completely weak because six years, with the
three recent years being most stern of such propaganda, and
we still have some people who are resisting it. We
need to be merciless as the Northern Wind and cunning
as the Middle Eastern curved sword. And it starts with

(22:31):
us stopping to lie to ourselves and stop believing in
those sweetened fairy tales from Macron and British that they'll
come here and bring some peacekeepers. We do not need
to sit there with them in the cabinet and smile.
We need to be asking them hard questions, Monsieur Macron,
if a French soldier is murdered on the border or

(22:54):
in on Ukrainan territory by Russias, what will we do?
Until you're ready to answer this question. We can talk
about your art, about your kitchen in France, about your wines,
but we cannot talk about your army if you don't
know an answer to whether you will attack back if
you lose your soldier. French army is not a factor.

(23:14):
It doesn't exist until it's ready to shoot back. Why
am I asking about this right and capability to retaliate
to provide a parity force. I'm remembering a historic event
such as Dresden bombardment, which happened, and I think one

(23:37):
can say it was a big changing factor when Britain
and Allies bombed that city. In the logic that currently
follows these negotiations, when put in this trying to place
a responsive ultimatum to Trump to counter his ultimatum, and

(24:00):
Ukraine is taking a position of victim, and in many
cities of Ukraine there are a lot of there's a
lot of mourning about kids that died in Krivok. Do
you think it would be an adequate action to attack
Russian cities, Russian townships that would lead to similar effects?

(24:24):
Could we exercise that? Of course not Nikolea. Why well,
you know, if they are shooting up our civilians why
cannot we do that? Right, We're following our media and
we're saying we cannot be neutral to Russia. And understandably
we're not discussing any friendly formats. We're not even neutral

(24:47):
to them in the current states or in a future
possible state. But de facto, if we want to stop
this war, we need to be strong enough and we
need to exercise parity and very unparallel efforts on Russia
in order to make them stop. And think next time,

(25:09):
have you watched the movie The Predator? Oh, yeah, I've
seen that Alexi whom did he not fight with? Nikolay?
He is an archetypical hunter. He was tearing the spinal
cords together with heads of those who were fighting with him?
Whom did he not kill? The unarmed? And the movie
doesn't even talk about kids and women. In the Second Predator,

(25:31):
I think there is an episode when the police place
woman is shooting him. He grabs her and scans her
and sees that she's pregnant and he lets her go. Well,
she just shot him. If we're talking about having an
army that is capable to hold twenty five hundred kilometers

(25:51):
of water with Russia, we cannot be fighting with women
and children. We cannot use the bodies of Russian soldiers
as an alphabet to write some messages on the snow.
We cannot shoot up Bilgret aimlessly and tell them that
this is for you, for crivo rogue attack and all that. Yes,

(26:16):
we need to educate ourselves and prepare ourselves to be
people who can finish the most serious and strongest opponent
who is attacking us and who is killing our women
and children. We should not be attacking their women and children.
We should be hunting their hunters. This is the society

(26:38):
that we need to train and educate because when you
start going into that dark frame of will kill your
kids if you kill ours? You know, war is a
dirty thing. When we are attacking warehouses near Angus, when
our uvs are flying to Moscow, well, I say sorry
for interrupting you. I don't think there's going to be

(26:58):
kids and the will refined right, Well, Nikolai, when the
roof goes away or the windows get blown out, when
people are cheering when angles was destroyed, you know, some
of these shorts can cut some kids and maybe cause
irreparable harm. So we should not be marking them as targets.

(27:22):
This is not something to cheer, this is not something
to go for. I don't want to have anything in
common with people who are saying, let's kill theirs if
they kill ours civilians and women and children. With people
who are thinking, okay, what do we do that they

(27:43):
would stop killing our civilians forever and never do it again.
These people, I can talk to, these people, We can
have some values, shared values, But the first one is
I don't want to be on the same square mile
of space for them. And yeah, no, this question is
not to me about killing their civilians as retaliation for hours.

(28:08):
You know this is low and ineffective. Well, this position
is on the agenda in Ukraine. Alexey, regular Ukrainian often
thinks that Trump is talken to put In regardless of
putting shooting up Ukrainian kids. And Putin is also trying

(28:32):
to bind Trump with his own ultimatum, pushing back on
Trump's demands, and Trump understands that and goes to negotiate
and continue talking to him and negotiate with human that
global Yalta agreement because Russia is a subject to Russia
is a big territory, big resource, and it's definitely a
force in the world arena. And the main thing that

(28:53):
Ukrainian citizen, without thinking deeple say, well, probably killing our
civilians is part of what makes put and strong. And
the reverse logic what the exercise very often is in
order for us to exercise and be strong, we need
to basically do the same thing that Russia us. And
that's why I'm asking this question because this troubles some

(29:13):
Ukrainian circles and people are discussing that well. And you
did mention in other streams that French in Algeria have
killed a lot of civilians, British did that too, and
Americans had some dark episodes in Vietnam. You did bring

(29:34):
those examples. Maybe the world is like this, Maybe we
misunderstand something about this world. Nikolai. Definitely world is pretty dark.
What Ukrainians fail to understand is that when they bring
this bill to France and Britain and the United States
that Russians have killed our children, we cannot negotiate with
them and we need to bomb them to smithereens what

(29:56):
do French, Brits and Americans here They hear that Ukrainians
have not opened the world history book. Ever, they don't
want to use the collective experience of human kinds. Do
not know that Americans in Vietnam have killed several tens

(30:16):
of thousands of civilians in Vietnam, including some with defoliation
agents and other chemicals, and there were a lot of
mutations and consequences that French also caused a lot of
damage and casualties in Algeria and raids were the ones
who came up with the idea to bomb German cities

(30:39):
because they and the civilians in those cities, because they
were going after idea that German soldier in a trench
needs to think not about how to shoot another opponent's think,
but that his wife and children are probably suffering back
in the city, back at home. And Soviet Union caused
a huge harm to Afghanistan, and there were at least

(31:01):
several hundred kids there among them, and Ukraine was part
of Soviet Union at that time. Right, this is the
ugly face of war, that civilians and children do die
when Americans blow up the houthists. Do you think there
are also maybe accidental children victims there and when Europeans

(31:21):
made mistaking or erroneous attacks in Afghanistan, the moment there
is a wedding there and people are shooting up in
the air, the jet takes off and blows up the
whole wedding, and that things that these things happen at
for and all these countries who have committed quite a

(31:43):
few of the darker war episodes, they hear from Ukrainians
that you cannot deal with those who are doing that
with Russians who as a collateral damage has children in Ukraine.
Understand that Ukraine is not on the same page with them.
Our humanity is pretty dark. There are a lot of
casualties among civilians every time there is a warfare, and

(32:06):
humanity had actually resolved a way to solve these issues
and Iffresians were a bit smarter. I don't think they
will because it's because of the way the politics currently work.
But if they were smarter, they would actually compensate Ukrainian
families for the deaths of the children. The rules of
war allow for them. Americans, when they have destroyed the wedding,

(32:27):
they actually went in and paid money to the relatives
for the destruction. And that's when we initially he'd builded
it and accidentally killed some of the Russian children on
the ice rink. I did say that the best thing
Ukraine can do now is acknowledge that and pay reparations
to the relatives of the families who lost their children

(32:51):
and relatives. That would have been a sign to our
allies and supporting countries that Ukraine now has some moral
authority and is a strong, stronger country than what do
you think of us now? And what do we come
to them and say we cannot agree, we cannot sign

(33:11):
anything with those who kill civilians. Well, that's a wrong
message we're sending. And then the same people come out
and say, you know, we need to bring back the
nukes to Ukraine, and the partners looking at us and saying, well,
you are insane, guys. You cannot solve the simplest moral
dilemma that was resolved by humanity a while ago. You

(33:35):
were failing to address the collective experience of humanity. And
you're not thinking about anything but taking that plate of
pink jello with Macron's snot and put it on your face.
They do not consider us to be serious partner. They're
looking at us thinking, did they not know that civilians

(33:56):
dyeing war? What nukes? What stabilization fund? You know in
kindergarten They do have leashes where they put little kids
on you know, a year and a half ones, the
ones who cannot walk on their own if there is
only one teacher, Yeah they can. They tie them altogether
in the same leash. And they see Ukrainians as these kids.

(34:22):
How do you think we can deal with They can
deal with us on the rare earth minerals. Every day
there are people dying in this war. Every day there
are children and civilians dying. When Hama's attacked Israel, they
did a bunch of atrocities, right the recent story about

(34:46):
how they killed two brothers so that Israelis would not
get to them when they started the liberation process, and
then they try to present as if Israeli bomb killed them.
This is how the world works. And fortunately this world
was similar when Biden was running the United States or

(35:07):
whoever was behind him. Its just that they were pouring
the strawberry gym over everything and pretending everything is hanky dory,
and now they don't. And it's us Ukrainian who are
choosing to take that weak position when we choose to

(35:27):
support Zenanskin. Each morning, Ukrainian is choosing whether he'll be
the person from thinking of whom Russian soldiers will wake
up in a nightmare. Will they be that weak neighbor
who's always the perpetual victim? And when people suffer, where

(35:49):
do they look? Of course, they look at the central command,
central power and dealers of public opinion. And unfortunately they're
all expressing the similar points in Ukraine because they're either
afraid or wrong. Motivation is driving them and our authorities.
I don't know whether some of the stand up comedy

(36:12):
or some other experience is talking here, but they're sending
that resentimental signal our kids suffered as the result of
this attack. Russia needs to be destroyed with nukes in
its entirety as their response. And then Americans are probably
looking at that thinking, well, you know, yesterday when we
blew up who they's there? Probably were some children there.

(36:33):
This is Ukrainian popular society going to ask us to
shoot ourselves up as well if that comes to light.
And they also aspire to be the factor in the
global politics with these views. Look at Ukraine, I'm thinking
of them. So sadly this weakness that our society currently reveals,

(37:01):
it affects the destinies of our children and their children.
Trump is seventy eight. But he's concerned about our children
dying on this war. But no Ukraine wants snookes. Ukraine
wants to destroy Kremlin as an answer for this attack,
or shoot up their cities and their civilians as a retaliation.

(37:23):
This is the mentally disabled way of thinking. I understand
when some pr starving YouTube channel is talking about it,
but when our leading politicians are discussing that, what are
we talking about? Brings to mind the phrase that Vladimir

(37:47):
Lenin said back in the day in olocratic countries, where
the crowd is ruling and the leaders are never anybody
but the crowd. They are just the sum of all
the movie in the crowd, we have a mere story.
Here we have a guy from the people ruling us
in Ukraine. Literally, he's not one of the elites, he's

(38:09):
one of us and our authorities here they appeal to
some of the lowest instincts in the society. While also
on the TV marathon, we're talking about the highest moral
compass that we have and that will teach the whole country,

(38:30):
the whole world. And unfortunately we do not even have
enough energy to separate screamingly incompatible things. Because right now
we're talking about destinies. Okay, probably just Ukrainians millions of

(38:51):
kids' future citizens for several dozen years ahead. And responsible
politician cannot be dealing in this. He cannot be dealing
with the lives of their citizens and children in such
fashion because he is thinking about future. That is what
politicians should be doing. While in Ukraine, a politician is

(39:15):
the father of the family with a lot of kids,
who has mortgage and credits and everything else with the
sick parents, and he imagined that he lost everything in casino,
and then he comes home and says, well, we have
no money and we cannot even afford the house. And
when the family asks him that why, he says, well,

(39:39):
hang on here, I was very honest. I invested my
whole soul into my game. Nobody can tell me I
was a moral I was fitting my morals and everything
is great. But in our case it also will be
false because that dad in our case also stole some
money from the family to play in the casino. Here

(40:00):
was not even authorized to use that. And then they
talk morals when they're caught with their pants down with
the corruption. I cannot even pick the right word. This
is just such a low rank method of behavior that
it's not even the lowest of inmates and their categories,

(40:25):
because our leadership flushed everything down the toilet, and when
they're caught with their pants down, they start talking about morals.
I don't even know how to characterize them. This is
pretty low. And then we get surprised. Why do countries
treat us the way they do, because that's the signal

(40:46):
we emanate that they can and it's okay to treat
us this way. And a lot of this responsibility is
on our authorities to some degree. I can understand responsibility
on the pair, and those who lost their kids in
that playground understand that they're going through grief. But the

(41:07):
dealers of public opinion, if you are a centralized a
power representative of centralized power, you have some responsibility, and
instead of raising the ethics of your people, you are
lowering it. I think there's a special place in hell
for people like this, but until they get there it

(41:28):
may take some time. This road, unfortunately, leads Ukraine to
be isolated from the world community, world at large because
Americans and the others who kill civilians with bombings when
they have to bomb the enemy, they look at Ukrainian
appeals and think that you guys are inadequate, Nikolay, that society,

(41:57):
that we have societal screams and social media and tea
in Ukraine, that they need to retaliate Russia in the
same fashion. And they're saying that the real Trump, not
the fake one who was made in Moscow in somewhere
in the seventies, the real Trump would have blown up

(42:17):
Moscow as a retaliation. I'll just pose an adequate question here,
when we accidentally kill their civilians, does Russia have to
attack us with nukes? Well, of course not right, right, Nikolay,
because then we use a different argument. Oh, we are

(42:39):
being attacked, we can We are the victim in this war,
so we can do anything. This is the very low
rank behavior. I like this term, right, It's very delicate
term to avoid using the expectives. But this is a
very low rank behavior that our authority is currently display. Yep,

(43:04):
they started first. Basically, that's kindergarten. I'm sorry, I'm barely
picking up words. I'm in the mood to use some
eglatives here, all right. Generally, Ukraine is refusing to denounce

(43:24):
their illusions about Europe, and I wonder what can lead
us to understanding that some of this is fake. We
will have on the eleventh of April Raumstein, and I
think Hexath refused to fly and it'll be driven by
Germany and Great Britain. And I think this Rumstein will

(43:44):
be a signal to Ukraine. What will Europe do without
the United States? In your view, what can Europe do
without us? Because here in Ukraine we have some victorious
relations being spread around in the media saying that United
States are crawling back to their continent and Europe is
now taking their place. With counting the billions of euros

(44:08):
that will be designated for Ukraine, what do you expect
personally from Rumstein without United States? I expect nothing, Nikolay,
a lot of empty words. Talks about millions of shells,
hundreds of thousands of drones, hundreds of billions of eight
which will never come. As the result, they'll probably give
us a couple of billions of euros, maybe some shells,

(44:29):
and maybe they'll give us thirty APC vehicles and maybe
five hundred or one thousand aerial bombs. These are the
things that will spend in less than a week on
this war, not even to the next Rumstein. Europe is
not in a state where they can replace military aid
coming from the United States, and they will not be

(44:51):
in the state for another five years at least. Even
if they drop all they're doing now and switched to
mobilizing their military industrial complex, maybe in five years they'll
be somewhat equivalent. But in Ukraine they'll talk about any
aid we get that if we get sixty APC's from

(45:11):
Sweden or somewhere, that they'll help us take Siberia and
then lad of Astak and Russia. That's how it will
be presented. Right. What Ukrainians failed to understand not because
they're in Ukraine physically, but because a lot of things
are messed up in their minds. The central signal is
really effing them up. That we are in a very

(45:34):
essentially simple situation. The situation is extremely simple. You are
being directly lied to by your leadership, and these lies
are not for your good and it's not l like
this information where ninety percent of truth and ten is
some false tis just accommodate for the folk of war. No,

(45:58):
that's a direct change of six one hundred and eighty degrees.
Instead of coming out and saying that aid from from
Europe is shitty. That we're thankful for this, but it
cannot really help us to solve any problem. It cannot
even last from one Rumstein to another. Instead, this is
being presented as heavenly saving moment and that Europe had

(46:21):
replaced the United States. I'll repeat what I said yesterday
in a stream of Romayanca, that the main donor of
security for Europe is the United States. Europe is failing
to pull their own weight. Land Army of Britain is
seventy three thousand Russians attacking only in Pacross's direction, by

(46:44):
one hundred and fifty thousand, over than two times more
an entire British army of infantry. And I talked to
some friends in Britain who were brought up in no
warm attitude towards the United States. Their grandfathers were not
fans of the United States. And these people occupy rather

(47:05):
high positions now in Britain. They hate United States, they
hate Donald Trump, yet they still acknowledge that without United
States will be done with. And Britain is not Ukraine.
Britain has nukes, Britain has one and a half trillian
their annual budget and they're in Ireland, which one needs

(47:26):
to cross the canal to get to them. And I'll
repeat yesterday's thought. Remember the the Ganski's revolt, the ending
of this in the Oval office, he was almost propped
up to the position of the leader of European anti
American coalition. But next day all the handshaking, even with

(47:49):
the king ended with them pointing in direction of the
United States and telling him to go make friends again.
When there was a meeting in Brussels and they attended
in the same fashion, you need to go and make
peace with Trump. While we are trying on this basis
to build our government politics that is solving the matters

(48:11):
of survival or not survival of Ukraine. Who are we
after that? Who are we and how do you treat us?
What attitude can we demand towards us. It's always the
person who is setting his own price. If people who

(48:34):
have issues with their image, with their past, but they
see how their partner is lying, instead of just acknowledging truth,
they can see the true value of this partner. And
we've been doing that for three years. People are getting

(48:54):
tired from us. They consider us toxic. We are not
even an asset. We are the promisory note who are dead,
which misbehaves and throws tantrums once in a while. If

(49:16):
we're talking about reality, they can abandon us and say,
you know what, if you're so smart, when you're limiting
the languages people can use in your country, when you
force them into forced drafting, and well being absolutely immoral
in your politics, you appeal to some morality, you know,
in this case, these people who have been supporting us

(49:39):
for now till now, they can abandon us and say, well,
if you're so smart, go do it the way you
see it. End of the first hour.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

24/7 News: The Latest

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}War in Ukraine, Analytics. Day 1139: Ukraine's Future is Armed Independence. Arestovych, Feldman

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}24/7 News: The Latest

The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

All Episodes

War in Ukraine, Analytics. Day 1139: Ukraine's Future is Armed Independence. Arestovych, Feldman

24/7 News: The Latest