War in Ukraine, Analytics. Day 1320: Sobchak Interview "Afterparty". Arestovych, Shelest.

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:07):
Greetings to our guests, friends and subscribers to my channel,
to Alexi's channel. This is our traditional stream. We usually
have it on Mondays, but today we do it on Tuesday.
Good evening, Good evening, guys. Thank you everybody for watching us,
for subscribing, for discussing and commenting the events unfolding. Thank

(00:29):
you for your reviews, and of course for those who
click like and subscribe, thank you so very much. If
you are watching us from Ukraine or Russia you and
have access to YouTube, just change the country you're watching
it from Alexander you're missing a third option, or you

(00:50):
can change the country in reality, just move to a
different place. Right, we will be talking about that. We
have two more points, organizational points to make before we
go hard on the things unfolding. So the QR codes
you have on the left side of a screen under

(01:10):
Alexander this is a place to ask questions for this
and the future streams. And the QR code next to
Alexey this is a link to his School of Communications,
School of Thought right, and School of something else something
else here, not elsewhere anyway, follow these links if you like.

(01:35):
And I think that's all the org matters. We had Alexey,
I want to start today from the main question of
today's stream. I was giving it a thought. There are
a lot of events. We have fresh statement by Trump
that it's more difficult to finish war in Ukraine than
the worre in Middle East. We have these promised tomahawks,
you have continuous who are with the drafting commission, and

(01:59):
a ton of life pouring from the Ukrainian TV sets
and military experts in Ukraine don't know how to tolerate
that anymore. But since it is today and we're doing
it live, I cannot notot start with this question. What
is the most concerning matter in Alexei's interview to Subchek

(02:20):
Option one give three districts in crimea Option two. Ukraine
is a big village, three putting flowers to the unknown
Russian soldier grave and four thirteen to fifteen pairs of
shoes in your wardrobe. So while the audience is voting Alexei,
how would you answer this question? Frankly, I probably would

(02:49):
say that I did not use my umbrella well during
the interview to cover Xenia when it was rating. So
you think that the awkward is not in this interview
was the rain and the umbrella. Yeah, I think that
was the one. And on the other hand, we always
had the operators and the camera guys moving around since

(03:10):
umbrella was getting in the frame, so it was not convenient,
and we jointly decided that it would be better to
have a better picture than being a gentleman and covering
her from rain. Are you satisfied with the result of
this interview? No? Why because inviting Aristo which for three

(03:32):
hours of interview and talk only about how I changed
my opinion during the unfolding of this war. Just imagine, Alexander,
you would be making cutouts from twenty fifteen, from two
thousand and six, from nineteen eighty two, when you were
still in kindergarten you were saying that, and in sixteen
thirty something there was a different event that had effect

(03:54):
on everything that is unfolding now. So I was trying
to steer that towards the bigger questions of civilizational choice,
collective security of Europe. What else can be done? These
would be the interesting topics. No, like say this is
all Bes, Let's go deeper and let me quote you

(04:15):
what you said one hundred years ago. So if somebody
is interested in that genre, then sure, go ahead knock
yourself out watch that interview, but not me. I'le say.
As always, we had a lot of controversy and discussions
around this interview. Some people are saying there are several

(04:37):
versions of this interview. This one was a specific interview
that Terrestovich maybe have recorded to sell himself as a
candidate for presidency in Ukraine to its neighbor Russia, but
something didn't quite work out and it changed. The others
are saying, no, no, wait, today Aristovitch is again being

(05:00):
searched for being sought for by Russia. Day today announced
that you are needed for criminal accusations in Russia. Apparently
they did not like your interview. The others are saying
that this is just a cover operation. International Russian demands
are not being answered by any country at the moment,
so likely you will not find yourself in a more

(05:24):
dangerous place than you were before. By the way, we
also still have a fundraiser ALEXI channel under this stream.
They would be a link to that. So some people
are saying, maybe you are making a good political capital.
On the difference of potentials, you are great for Ukrainians
with your normal interviews on the fundraisers for Ukraine army.

(05:46):
And also you're somewhat acceptable for Russian neighbors. Listen, Alexander,
A lot of commentators are not so delighted by my
mental acuity, apparently, But let's in return think about the
mental acuity of people who think that the best way
to sell yourself as a candidate to your neighbor who

(06:09):
is at war with your country is via an interview,
a public interview. What can you say about that mental acuity?
I really don't have anything to offer them except for
love and light. I can just hug everybody and feel pity.
But that Yeah, that's my reaction to these accusations. This sentence, however,

(06:32):
implies that Aristovitch is not known in Kremlin, but you
are known Alexei, right. Well, of course, if I was
the voice of Ukraine at the beginning of this war
for a year and a half, well, you're not the
voice of Kremlin, right, But I was the voice of
the country that they're fighting with, So I would expect
them to have noticed me. I also as participant of

(06:54):
the negotiation group before that Normandy format, Minsk format. Do
you think they might be aware of Aristovitch and Kremlin
because these conspiracy guys are talking about Kremlin is not
aware of Aristovitch at all, and Subchak had to take
this interview with any storage in London to remind Kremlin

(07:16):
that he actually exists and he is a possible candidate
for presidency in Ukraine whenever the elections come, and then
they react by slapping international warn't on my name. So yeah,
this is just another logical construct that can only cause

(07:36):
another wave of sharp affection and love to the commentators
who are posting that for me. The other thing, what
other questions were there? Can you go over them, Alexander,
I'll knock them out one after another. Yeah, chronology is interesting.

(07:58):
You have played very interestingly on the recording of this
interview and when it was aired, no no I was
not aware of when would she be publishing, And she
actually held it for about a month because we recorded
early September, and she actually could have put another plaque
in a couple of places that oh yeah, hey, he

(08:19):
changed his opinion again, And if she waited just one
more day, she could have added another asterisk there in
the interview that now he is and wanted criminal by
Russia according to Russian authorities. So listen, I experienced a
feeling of sharp pit to those who got too agitated

(08:40):
by this interview. Let's put it this way. But I
do treat most of our streams as a seminar that
I teach. And here I want to draw attention of
our listeners to a couple parallels with Alexander Duma, three musketeers,
the cardinal and the haberdasher. Look at Trump, who has

(09:00):
been talking to Putin for seven months to strike truth.
He brought him over to encourage. He made him an
offer to save his face, to save some part of
the captured territories that Russia acquired this way, new joint
project and Arctic joint relations with China. So Putin could
have been solving a ton of issues of Russia by

(09:23):
agreeing to Trump. What does Putin respond, We don't give
it them. Right after this, Trump goes down to Tomahawks,
and he might go to a couple more resources that
they have. And now regarding the hyberdasher, some hyberdasher giving
an interview to an ex candidate of a president in Russia,

(09:44):
which subject was, by the way, suggests options how to
get two peoples to agree to peace and how to
leave this war, joint prayers, joint technologment of mistakes, understanding
of heroes and losses on this war, creating the arbitrage
system respect to the fallen return, all for all exchange,

(10:07):
neutral status, no NATO return to the constitution and declaration
of independence of Ukraine to the roots, a significant part
of a territory which Russia was aspiring to grab as
the token for future peaceful relations. What does Russia do
the next day after this interview They announce this person

(10:31):
as a wanted criminal. Do you understand whom we're dealing
with here? They are complete imbeciles. The Russian regime now
is complete imbecile regime. They only follow their wants, but
they do not understand good offers. They do not understand

(10:52):
possible ways to solve issues. The only thing they appear
to understand now or want to understand now, is that
of their skull. And that's apparently or maybe starting first
with the nosebone. But that's the way they are. And
I'm for peace, right, but I'm not going to offer

(11:14):
for districts anymore. I'm not going to bring it up.
They need to understand mathematically that continuation of war is
a useless thing, and wherever the frontline will be, that's
where the war will end. They still have a lot
of territory to take to actually announce that they got
those four districts. Our goal now is to make sure

(11:34):
that Russia feels the pain and understands that this war
is useless, is not profitable. This is the only way
for Ukraine to finish this war. And that's why Cardinal
Trump gives tomahawks and the Haberdasher. Every Slavash is running
fund raisers for drones. Everything is quite simple, all right.

(11:55):
We have generated additional text. I guess that we could
have added to subjects video. At the end of her interview,
what do you think international warrant mean for Aristovitch from Russia? Well,
Russian international warrants are not paid attention to in Europe

(12:17):
or United States and most countries, so regardless what they
want doesn't mean that anybody will give it to them.
Russia is generally being told to go into a short
aut erotic journey in most countries of the world with
their requests. But it doesn't even matter if Erystovitch was
giving this cent view, anybody coming out and saying, you know,

(12:38):
to any interview saying Hey, this is how I see
we should leave this war. This is how we can
end it. These are the ways to finish it, and
I think this is reasonable. What should we do with
this person? As for me, I would say, listen, people
have some good ideas, people who want to finish this
war between as Russia keeps saying brotherly nations, right, what

(13:00):
does Russia do? Instead? They offer international criminal warrant. This
is the same thing as if Alexander, you would invite
me to an interview. You're an interesting person to communicate with,
and I in return would probably sue you for fraud,

(13:25):
right or slap me with sanctions, right, Alexi exactly? Yeah,
How to even deal with that? These people are incongruent? Okay,
le Si Another important point here. We have an approval
on affirmation of a sort that you were selling, not yourself,

(13:47):
but the idea or the vision to that piece. Alexander,
I am not selling anything. People have several misjudgments in
my regard. Some people will think that I am definitely
running for a president, and they'll keep writing in the
commentary that we will never vote for you, missing the point.

(14:11):
The other group is saying that he really wanted to
be loved by Kremlin with this interview, well look at
their action. Apparently that was not the case. And the
third group was saying that, okay, he's a pro Russian politic,
politician who wanted to be liked by Puttin, but again
missing the point. So let's leave these three groups with
their conspiracy theories on the side and address the matters

(14:35):
as they are. I'm not selling anything, and this is
exactly what I'm telling Subchuk and the second third of
this interview, where she's basically taken with the same you
want to be liked, you need to compete with Meviachuk
and the others, And I'm reaffirming there that I'm not
selling anything. I have all my offers on the table.
This is the idea. If you like the idea, we
can talk. If you don't like it, there is nothing

(14:56):
to talk about. Let me open another mystery here. Russians
did offer me tens of millions of dollars. I have
not talked about that before, but two years ago I
did not take a cent and I don't have any
relations or refused any dealings with them, and I said
there won't be any behind the door conversations. Everything will

(15:17):
be in the open, which Russians, Alexei, who specifically some
kind people Russians? And what did they offer you money for? Oh,
to become what they're trying to paint me now that
I'm a pro Russian politician who wants to be liked
by Kremlin. They were amazed to the depths of their

(15:40):
souls and they said, you're the first person from Ukraine
who did not take a cent. All right, this is
a sensation that just was bored here on this interview.
An important one would money go to for the election campaign? Oh? Yeah,

(16:08):
for the elections that are not happening? Wait two years ago,
tens of millions of dollars for election campaign to the
elections that have not occurred, and even today they are
not visible on the horizon. Do you think, Alexander somebody
got a golden stamp document that says there will never

(16:29):
be elections in Ukraine. You're probably missing the rhetoric of
that time. There were a lot of conversations about elections
in Ukraine at the moment, and the money were not such.
Money are not given to run for that specific election.
Right now, it is given as the broader strategic thing,
and they were offering twenty six million dollars. I did

(16:53):
ask them, though, why twenty six Why not twenty or thirty?
I said, well, we've made some calculations. That's how much
you need to all right, two years ago you were
in Ukraine, right, No, that was already when I was
in political immigration, when I did not return back to Ukraine. Okay,

(17:13):
So when you left, right, and when the announcement between
myself and Znansky's regime became public. Yes, that's when some
people approach me. Hoops. So I have a question here then,
and it will be popping up. I'm asking it because

(17:35):
you we're telling to the Ukrainian interviews and media. We'll
talk about Russian interviews separately to the Russian sources, but
maybe leave it for the end of this stream today.
But my question is, this is Ukrainian question coming from Ukraine.

(18:00):
What is the proof that you did not take money?
I have no proof, but I can tell you that
if I was thinking about it logically from the outside
the interview to Subchak, where I'm stating these things, that

(18:21):
my chance is to winning in current Ukraine brings it
down to zero. This would not be the way for
me to earn this money. There would be other indicators.
I would not be fundraising for Ukraine military, right, I
would not be doing some other things like that, and nobody.

(18:44):
Of course it's on your conscience, but there are some
things you would or would not be doing. Then one
does not have to talk about giving up four districts
while the populace is not tired enough from this ward
to accept such a decision. This would be done differently.

(19:04):
This would have to be brought much much later, when
the war would be closing to its sunset, and when
the Party of War would be losing and the Party
of Peace would be gaining momentum, it would be more
welcomed in society. So, Alex, say you were offered to
prop up the party of war the Party of Peace

(19:25):
for this money, Well, definitely not the Party of War. Right,
So that would generally confirm that most parties of peace
would be funded by Russians. Well, I don't think this
is an appropriate conclusion from this. Well, look, Russians are
ready to give money for a peace party, right, not exactly.

(19:47):
They were going to give money to make sure that
peace is organized in accordance with let's say something like
stumbul agreements. So the party that would bring up team ledgeation, denasification,
how they see it and the whole laughter of this situation.
That's actually what I retorted back Listen. I'm already on

(20:10):
these positions, but I have a certain correction to them.
I'm against the militarization. And for you, this is a
key point because the threat to Ukraine may be coming
not only from you and those fifty thousands of military

(20:30):
troops that you're suggesting Ukraine to still have. This would
mean the end of independent Ukraine, even if you never
attack it again. We are at the intersection of jeopolitical
plates and for us fifty thousands is just a defer
death till the next big conflict with somebody, not even you, probably,
so in second, I cannot be pro Russian pro Russian administration.

(20:57):
I gave an oath, which one military oath to Ukraine.
I'm an officer. That's why if you want to deal
with me, we can talk. Everybody talks with everybody, and
I would remind our audience that negotiations between Russia and
Ukraine never ceased. There are times in twenty three when
there are three different negotiation groups working in parallel, but

(21:19):
I will not take your money. I will not get
any support for my stance. If you want to talk
about peace, sure we can. And never since I saw
these people again, and I do know. I told them,
I do know how you work. This will all be
recorded and I will be put on a very good

(21:42):
hook and a leash, and then I will lose any independence.
So just from these ideas, I refuse to sit down
on this hook. And if you want to talk about peace,
sure we can talk about without that money. And those

(22:02):
people who were representing as emissaries or ambassadors from Kremlin,
they disappeared. Which Kremlin are we talking about in this case?
The Kremlin that changed with the Cossacks disappearance, I frankly
do not know, Alexander, which of the Kremlin towers did
they represent. They were Bullpark saying that we have been

(22:23):
listening and watching you. You're the only sober voice in
the Ukraine media field. Could have been a provocation for
all I know, to maybe compromise or hook one of
the potential Ukrainian politicians. But how should I put it
delicately here? I did serve in special services, right, and

(22:45):
they come from the world of intelligence. So these things
are for the fools, all right. Another important aspect here
that needs review. When did Subchak turn to you for
an interview? When did you get the request? Maybe a
couple of weeks before it end of August? Okay, so

(23:08):
in August. I can actually check on my phone. So
the time of those two weeks by Trump, I think
that happened after Encourage meeting. Let me check to be factual.
Here okay, here, I see you have a very lengthy communication. No,

(23:37):
it was not her, it's one of her managers. And
of August. Yeah, my first communication with them was right
before the recording, on Wednesday the tenth. But at the
end of August they reached out to my assistance while
London I don't know they asked for London. Okay, I

(23:58):
got the confirmation from my twenty fourth of August Independence day.
I think Encourage didn't happen yet. And where were you
going with this? No, Anchourage I think was on the fifteenth, right, okay,
so freshly after why did you ask? Well, I'm curious

(24:19):
about the format of this request. This is a fantastic information.
I'le say two years ago Atristovitch, who was not so critical,
who was discussing things and actually I want to think
and warn our viewers all these things that were voiced

(24:42):
in this centuryew with Subchuk, we talked about all of
that in our streams. There was nothing new in this interview.
It was just concentrated three hours interview with one person.
But essentially the same matters those viewers of our channel
who watch my channel's Lexey streams. There are no significant
discoveries in this center view, but I do want to understand.

(25:06):
So in twenty twenty three, Adistovitch receives phone calls from
r Mark people trying to maybe build the bridges back
with Alexei. So Adistovich at the time is not really
burning bridges with Zelenski's administration. He's still figuring out what

(25:29):
is going on. Some pressure is being exerted on his
aids and assistants, and he's outside the country and he's
trying to figure out his relations with Ukrainian government. And
as he just left, he's being offered twenty six million.
Just strange. If you think twenty six million is a sensation,
it's not even a number. Frankly, if one would be

(25:51):
seriously playing this game, you would have been actually offended.
Twenty six is change for matches and cigarettes in this world.
Maybe for those who watch us on the stream, they're
big money, right, for families and you know, average people, yeah,
it is big money. But for political movement this is nothing.

(26:17):
And I do not have confirmation who they are, who
they were. They represented themselves as if they are from Russia.
Could have been under black flag or the false flag, right,
we don't know that. But twenty six million is not
even a big amount, even in Ukrainian politics. I'm not
even talking about Russian politics. And then subchuk in two years, yeah,

(26:42):
after Anchorage, she wants an interview with you, alexey Well,
I did have another interview with Subchak a year ago,
if you remember. We had it by the way, in
English and our channel too, So yeah, she asked me
about interview in London. It coincided with my need to
be there at a certain date, so I agree to

(27:03):
all right, Alexi. So how would these days Adistovitch street
an offer from Russian Federation? I would not. If you
want to talk, we can talk about any attempt to aid,
any attempt to fund, We stop any communications, all right,

(27:24):
Why you think we see now these moves by Russian
Federation in regards to something that you'd think they want
to bet on somebody, they want to conduct a dialogue
with them. But Russia has nobody except for those who

(27:46):
left Ukraine for Russia. There are many towers in Kremlin,
and I strongly suspect that one or two of them
definitely do not like me, and they're the ones inspiring
this criminal prosecutions. Plus their politics is quite nebulous. They

(28:08):
also look at the ratings and they can think, okay,
in twenty third he had a rather big potential. Right
now he lost a lot of it. And that's why
such an interview with Subchak and her questions actually surprised me.
If you were a president, if you're running for a president,
I did answer her that I'm not really concerned much

(28:29):
about my chances of being a president. There may be
a small chance, a very very small chance. And she
insisted on imagining, and okay, I did draw them in
the golden picture for that case, and next day they
announced that they want me for criminal persecution and send
the warrants out. All right, friends, we might get back

(28:52):
to this interview. We have a lot of questions today.
There are so different different aspects. So if we are
judging situations from the current date, from today, if we
are following the line that Russians need to get their

(29:12):
assets handed to them so that they would stop where
they are Alexander, to stop them is only a part
of a task, and it's secondary to the main task
to make them understand the worthlessness of this war. There
are more items there, but I'll indicate a couple. They're saying,

(29:33):
we are fighting with leftist globalists. If Trump was in power,
says Putin, there would be no war. So it's basically
leftist globalists to blame in this war, according to Putin,
But then look at the decisions made by Sidzinpinin Putin,
what communicated they adopt after the parade in Moscow. They
write about un centric world and they insist on it.

(29:55):
They reaffirm United Nations after this meeting on the third
of September at the Shanghai Meeting, United Nations is the
main instrument of the leftist globalists. The number of programs
in United Nations where Russia participates is through the roof.
Not any other country in the world is funding leftist
globalists to such a degree as Russian Federation does. And

(30:19):
I would ask a question if you in your communications,
in your publications, if you are fighting with leftist globalists,
how many Ukrainian children need to be unlived in this
war and consequently EU Russian children too, because it's a war,

(30:41):
so that you would account that as a victory over
leftist globalists. This is ridiculous, right Trump would be if
they are against globalists. Trump and Mody would be against
the leftist globalists. How is Trump fighting the leftists? He's
closing your say, he's closing the Voice of America, He's

(31:02):
declaring Antifa a terrorist organization. He's taking systemic steps to
fight with the leftist ideology. Right, they also bring National
Guard to some states exactly because as in literature, that
treason has deep roots. What does Russian Federation do they
continue to attack Ukraine in the parogia Hearsson de viv

(31:26):
to continue fighting globalists? Is that? And then Russian Federation
is saying that we are for un centric world, so
lifting the banner of the leftist global iss even higher.
These people need to understand it may be help to
understand all the controversy of their position. I don't think

(31:52):
they understand themselves are capable in getting there themselves. This
does not diminish all the atrocities that and idiotic decisions
made by Zanski regime. And I think we talked about
that framework. We forgot about it for a while, but
this is the war of two fools. I did talk

(32:13):
about that before, and this is the problem. When I
was suggesting that option that I voiced with interview during
an interviewer subchak, this was not only a way to understand,
you know, my message to review the system of relations
since nineteen ninety one the roots of the problem stopped

(32:34):
this war, repent and make sure that doesn't happen again.
But the tragedy of this situation is that Russian Federation
and its leadership made the following decision. Sounds something like this.
You all are too flaky. Imagine something unconscious. Aristovitch gets

(33:00):
un thought of. Rostovitch becomes a president of Ukraine, gives
the four districts in Krainia, makes Ukraine neutral science peace
agreements with Russia that Ukraine will never attack Russian territory,
there will be no threat to it. I'm not even
going into all the details, and of course from Russia,
no threats to Ukraine to build some joint umbrella protective

(33:21):
system and that exists for five or ten years. Maybe
Atristovich state for two terms, right, and that is not guaranteed.
That would not be a parliament attempt to impeach. They
won't be eternal crisis because a president in Ukraine is
not az Are. We have seen different things, right yushen
Katimashenka come to mind, and here Aristovich eventually leaves, and

(33:46):
what goes next, well, maybe somebody to follow in his footsteps,
right maybe, but could have been also somebody like Zazemski.
That's how democracies work. Trump only has two years left
of his presidency. Now he has the Congress elections in
the middle, and nobody guarantees that the Republicans will win.

(34:07):
And then two years from now events may not prevail
if he runs, and then guess what they'll be Usayed
v South America arms in the Biden style to Ukraine,
Johnson or somebody else in Ukraine and Ukraine again attacking
Russia and Russian Federation can say in this way, okay,

(34:28):
we looked at you. You. Democracies cannot provide continuity of politics,
and this is arguably one of the main things that
every political system needs to be able to provide. That's
why any agreements with you can live only while you're
in power. Ideally could be ten years less than ideal

(34:51):
for and if we take parliamentary republics, their coalitions can
fall apart and you can have eight elections in two years,
like in Israel recently. What it is there for us
to agree with about? And second with whom? And this
is the depths of the tragedy and the situation. And

(35:11):
there's practically no exit from such a worldview. But does
it mean that people who offer an option to exit
this strategy, to exit this find exit from this tragedy?
Maybe completely theoretical doesn't imply that you should be sending

(35:34):
international warrants to this people for the people that tells
you whom are we dealing with in Moscow? So you
took it as an offense? I no, I did not
that international warrant. It's neither heart nor warm for me.
Russian requests are not fulfilled by anybody. Maybe in Thailand

(35:56):
or Burma, Myanmar, even China and India are ignoring these requests.
I'm not even talking about the countries of the West.
But this is a signal. This is a signal of
the people that we deal with on the other side. Okay,

(36:17):
you don't agree with Trump's software, get six districts, cut
Ukraino from the sea. I understand that could be western
borders of Russia that you're trying to protect. But when
another person comes and says, if we're brother oll Nations,
we should go here, and then he is being prosecuted,

(36:41):
that's as if I would be issuing you, Alexander right
before every stream. You don't have to be offended, but
you are in full rights to ask a question, how
logical it is, how sequential it is with previous events
and the ones that will follow, how reasonable it is.
That's why the war likely is not going to finish

(37:04):
in the nearest future, and it likely will continue to
the extreme positions when one of the sides will not
be able to continue fighting this war or will understand
that they cannot continue fighting this war in no long term.
In Kiev, by the way, I say, we have an
aerial morning right now and Russians are destroying railroads, energy systems,

(37:30):
natural gas pipelines. And I remembered about one thing that
you mentioned. Despite the horrors that they already created in
Ukraine that people are cooking on little guest stoves out

(37:51):
in the yards or on balconies. Russians are still doing it,
so weirdly, they are somewhat dispersed because you could have
sent sixteen twenty drones on the substations near the nuclear
power lines power stations and that's it. That nuclear station

(38:13):
cannot supply anything after. Instead, they're destroying smaller targets twenty
thirty thousand apps. Right, they're not big, but they're important.
Here's the problem, Alexander seven fifties are still manufactured three thirties.
The spare parts for them are not manufactured, maybe on

(38:35):
some Excussar countries, but it's difficult since they've been destroyed
several times over in Ukraine. This is basically the last
generation of supply parts that we're using. That's why they
don't need twenty uivs and certain substations. They need just
one or two that hit one of those three thirties
and revision and if the target has not destroyed, another

(38:56):
one will fly out of new things. This year that
we observe their attempts to destroy railcars and trains on
the railroads. They're trying not to hit the electric trains
because those will stop after they destroy the electric grid.

(39:18):
They're targeting mostly coal driven trains, so there is logic
in what they do. They're showing us the cost, the
price of this war to Ukraine, and they're saying that
in this year the price will be higher for all
the energetics in winter, and if you want to continue fighting,

(39:39):
your price tag for this will be pretty high. This
is very understandable and the framework of campaign they picked
and they're following through with. I like, say, then, what
can we say about the decision made recently by Ukraine
authorities that Zerensky government that they're raising salaries to teachers,

(40:01):
that free checkups annually for those at forty, so additional
one and a half billion flowing into the pockets of
Ukrainians this year supposedly as benefits. So they then mention
that he will not be able to protect the whole

(40:23):
gas pumping station system, but they will be figuring out
alternative ways from Europe. Did you, by the way, notice Alexander,
that they're putting mesh on the Russian side against our drones.
They're trying to cover their refineries with additional mesh, which

(40:43):
is pretty effective, especially if it's two or three layers,
so they can't reach it, and we're not doing that.
So I still have questions where did we spend one
have Billian doors. The only thing I can see as
the result is that we're not having electricity in most
cities and Ukraine regularly. That's why I said before and

(41:04):
I reiteriated it recently and will say it again that
the complexity of questions to be solved by Ukraine in
order to survive, whether we're joining NATO, who are our allies,
how do we save our energy systems? All these questions
are beyond the competence level of the ruling party ruling

(41:26):
power in Ukraine. Moreover, I would say that there is
another pure military sign. They are breeding so many types
of troops, so many branches of military, additional space force,
additional UAV systems, almost like space marines. This indicates that

(41:57):
something is falling apart in the military system. And that
indicated started to develop about a year and a half ago.
Why because those major decisions that put in med at
the beginning of this war, they started to pull Russia
slowly but gradually from the dead end. They initially found
themselves in. However, Ukraine, failing to make symmetric decisions, is

(42:25):
lagging behind, and that's why we're seeing these crags. We
started making these decisions under pressure, partially in autumn of
twenty twenty four, and even those too little, too late,
not enough. Back then, at Galavano's interview, I think about
a year ago, I made a statement that after Zelenski's

(42:48):
Villa assignment and then his visit to the United States,
I said that the scope of questions that need to
be solved for Ukraine in order to survive beyond the
competency of them. And by the way, I remember that
my point there was elections, because elections was actually being

(43:09):
propagated actively. Our only solution for Ukraine would be elections
to survive in such a difficult time, and even society
in Ukraine started talking about that. More. The tragedy of
Ukraine is in that Russian Federation, like a steamroller, will
continue steaming and rolling. And this is only a beginning

(43:33):
in some way, because they are now dealing with Ukraine systemically,
and most likely they will achieve most of their goals
in regards to destruction of train park and electro grids
and we have no resources to seriously counteract that, not
because we're dumb, but because our leaders do not have

(43:58):
it as the goal number. This is not their primary goal.
And moreover, the worst it is in Ukraine, in some fashion,
it is easier for them because in the country where
the cities do not have electricity for sixteen hours a day,
when the trains are not coming on time, it's easier
to implement martial law. It's easier to suppress opponents. Remember

(44:23):
a political article that was published this week where it
was said that, in accordance with the Western estimations, Zelensky
is using this war to suppress his political opponents. And
you don't need to go too far. Two of these
media opponents sanctioned are in the stream, and the worst

(44:45):
situation is in Ukraine, the easier it will be for
him to maintain his status quo. What exit does Zelensky have?
Many people are asking. He has a simple one, to
stay in power for two more years with big probability
Democrats will likely win, and then it starts all over again.

(45:10):
Many people will say that two years is too far. Well,
we already at four. It's over half and you didn't
even notice. What about victims. Who cares about victims in
this strange game called politics, Alexander, Well, Trump cares. Apparently
Trump is a good man. Yeah, he is a believer.

(45:31):
He is a religious man. Have you seen any religious
men in the President's office. If they do, that's some
sort of other religion here. You need to understand it
right that there are not some reptilians running Ukraine. They're
just very much alike Russian military who do not target

(45:55):
the hospital or the birthing ward on purpose. They were
a target the electric station nearby, but if they missed,
because you know, they don't care. And the same with Zilanski. Well, yeah,
it's war. That's how we're going to make our power
and money. Oh yeah, we heard that from his interview.
Just yeah, everything is nominal. That's why the tragedy Alexander,

(46:19):
of such people as Aristovitch is in that his peace
plans are not needed on any of the sides of
this conflict, even theoretically everybody giddily are continuing to fight
this war and position that he is trying to push

(46:40):
that we need to stop this war, that we need
to take a pause and take stock and find ways
to agree and do not kill each other. Both sides
do not see it as a profitable option. And I'm
making what another one hundred and fiftieth movement that is
not profitable for me in my career and everything. And
I understand that, however many drones and fundraisers I run,

(47:04):
the level of incompetence makes all these efforts rather puny
drones from Aristovitch cannot solve the deficiency of Zensky government.
But this is my personal position. This is the one
I take, understanding the complete hopelessness and absolute lack of

(47:28):
personal profitability of this position for myself. It is absolutely
a devastating position from many angles. But there's no other option,
and that's why I only have one option. I guess
there is another one where I can become indifferent and

(47:48):
just do some fundraisers and disappear from the public arena.
But something. When my friends appeal to me from the
front from Ukraine, they basically tell me, hey, you can
do whatever, but we would really appreciate a pickup truck
now because we have nothing to transport the wounded from
the front line with. So I continue, and that's what

(48:13):
I'm saying. It would be very beneficial to raise the
effectiveness of Ukrainian troops on the front by at least
fifteen percent. That would cause a significant pause on the
Russian side, and hopefully some thought. We don't need to
become arch angels and Makidonskis and some super advanced like

(48:33):
Spare Minister of Industries and third Rake whose factories are
working three shifts like clockwork. We don't need to be
that effective. We can only lift our effectivity by fifteen percent.
Remember the words of almost Saint Strinienka, sixty percent of
the drones currently being purchased are malfunctioning, so they cannot

(48:56):
be used at the front an article three sixty. Dot
Ua was also remembering Saint Petula. That General Command is
refuting that those six hundred million that were given to
fortify certain districts are not visible on the satellites. There's
no fortifications built, right, So six hundred million, right, big money.

(49:22):
If we become just fifteen percent more effective, it would
be so much easier to make Russians pause and reconsider
this war. Today it is probably only Trump who can
do that. Secondary Europe might help, and third, some defense
forces in Ukraine, those people who refuse to surrender. Who
is still fighting in Ukraine. They can help do that.

(49:45):
And what the paradox here is, I get a lot
of reviews, a lot of commentary from different people, different countries,
different political forces. There are some forces on Ukrainian side
who can give those twenty six million. There is a
chance to push it, and many of them are saying that,
you know what, we cannot even officially acknowledge that we

(50:08):
support you. We cannot even acknowledge our support to the
peace plan. And the problem is that if Russian Federation
would be ready to negotiate with us, we would have
found forces and organizations in Ukraine that would prevail over
the party of war at least be an adequate competition
to it. The core of the problem is that Russian

(50:29):
Federation and its leadership is pushing us towards a trap,
or any party of peace in Ukraine, any party that
suggests to sit down at the table and save faces
and honor and figure out a way out of this
horrible conflict, would be marginalized by Russian leadership. Russian leadership
completely denounces any effort. And by the way, I'm that

(50:52):
first example, they send international warrant on my name after
I suggested a Christian exit out of this war, brotherly war.
Not z Lansky who is marginalizing the Party of Peace.
It is Russian position. It's Putin and his administration that
are doing that. They're basically saying, get the f from
under our boots, will get you all on the bayonets

(51:16):
and will step on your throats, and you will behave
as we tell you to. And this is the tragedy
of the story. They are not even leaving a chance
to a Party of Peace but to continue fundraisers for
drones and other equipment. This is the crux of the
current problem. You and I are the Party of Peace,

(51:37):
and they're not giving us any chance other than resist
and continue fighting. If you are sane at least do
not send a warrant to a person who's suggesting peace.
But this is beyond them. End of the first segment.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

Crime Junkie

Stuff You Should Know

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}War in Ukraine, Analytics. Day 1320: Sobchak Interview "Afterparty". Arestovych, Shelest.

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

Crime Junkie

Stuff You Should Know

All Episodes

War in Ukraine, Analytics. Day 1320: Sobchak Interview "Afterparty". Arestovych, Shelest.

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist