Chains by Choice-How Alexander Tyler_s Prophetic Warnings Against Democracies Went Unheeded In Ameri
August 21, 2025 • 68 mins
In this gripping episode of Chains by Choice, Tony unpacks Alexander Tytler’s prophetic warning: democracies inevitably collapse into tyranny when citizens choose comfort over freedom. Discover how America followed the cycle and tripped into a Demcracy life—and what it means for our future. A msut watch if you love freedom and the posterity of America.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Our foundering fathers here in this country brought about the
only true revolution that has ever taken place in man's history.
Evolved the idea that you and I have within ourselves,
the god given right and the ability to determine our
own destiny.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
The United States of America the greatest nation in history,
ordained by our founders to be guided by divine providence.
But today we are witnessing the orchestrated disintegration of America.
Take a few seconds and take a look around your town,
your state, look at your country and your world, and
(00:39):
boldly ask what in the hell is going on?
Speaker 1 (00:43):
But freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it on to our children in the bloodstream.
The only way they can inherit the freedom we have
known is if we fight for it, protect it, defend it,
and then hand it to them with the well taught
lessons of how they in their lifetime. Let's do the same.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
Welcome to the podcast Project Third Eye Opened. Where are
we dare to question with boldness the events that are
unfolding around us that others won't. At the end of
the day, it is we the people who will decide
the destiny of the Nation. Now introducing your host, Tony L.
Speaker 3 (01:32):
Great Change, Great Change, Great Change America. Hope everyone's doing
well doing these very very challenging and exciting times in
which we are currently living and existing. This is your host,
Tony L and your spens. Another provocative, exciting, thrilling, informative
(01:57):
podcast Regitation, a project that I open where again we
always seek not to tell you what you need to know.
I want you change what you think you believe, but
just simply simply encourage each and everyone wanted you to question,
(02:20):
stop and question, boldly question what's going on abound you,
what the hell is going on around you? And as
I always do, since this is a ministry of truth,
for truth and seek in the seek of truth, I
must give thanks simple praise to the most High. But
(02:42):
without him I will not be here. I will not
be having this conversation with all of you, discussion. I
would not be born in the greatest country on the planet. No,
not perfect, but damn yeah, damn, oh my God, compared
(03:05):
to all the others. There's a reason why you see
people nation and people from all over the world beating
a path, sometimes risking, many times risking life. Limb just
(03:25):
not for them to get here, but for their family.
There's a reason nobody's trying to break into China, no
matter how popular these young people want to make China
(03:47):
and Russia even Sweden appeer countries like Sweden and no, no, no,
slam Sweden. But you know when people, the particularly young
people or the or then then tutively unchallenged people want
(04:09):
to hold Sweeten up as the postry child. Or yeah,
this is what socialism looks like. No, no, no, Swedish.
Swedish is not a socialist country. No European country is
a socialist country. There's a huge swath of its system
(04:30):
is socialists, but it is a dem democracy. It's a
democratic that's democratic socialist former government, which we kind of
are going to get into our I had h Huff
(04:56):
on my podcast the other day and that would be
as soon and I always have good, good conversations with him,
and I was on his show earlier in the year,
so he returned to favor and definitely appreciate that. While
and we we kind of fell into this conversation about
(05:21):
democracy and what America was supposed to be. He, like
many others, believed that America was supposed to be a democracy,
which we never never, never were, and I got taken
took enough guard and he referred to the America as
(05:41):
being the democratic republic or whatever. He had that one word, right,
republic democracy, and it got my backup because I knew
that was wrong. But I couldn't have reprolized him because
I haven't haven't used the the description of America recently.
(06:03):
But I knew growing up, you know, as people grew
up back in the day, I mean it was parents
had you know, the huge wall of encyclopedias, you know,
and I knew that doing a mentorial some period, I
had to look up what America's well described that it
(06:28):
wasn't the microcy so I knew who's wrong. And I later,
you know, doing a conversation and poadcast was getting it
be aired soon. I did find the definition what America
actually is, and it's MicroC because our founders destained and
(06:54):
that's parting amy democracy's because they saw how to operate
it digital learned people, so they knew they did not
want this country to be on democracy. And I would
(07:15):
go into that in great detail, but also brought up
to him the example or the the prophetic statement by
this man Alexander Tyler, and I remembered him, and he
(07:39):
was one of the few individuals whose quote I put
up on my wall two look at and visualize and
this understand that he shooting not only repeats, but the
(08:01):
often rhymes. And that is mhm. That can be no
no more true than how we see things now, not
just here in in in our country, but look at
what's going on in the in the in the EU. Ah. Again,
(08:23):
let's just getting it too, because I think if I
keep talking, I mean, there'll be no real need toation,
because I would have given up this supper. So here
we go this, uh, we're getting get this, get this going.
(08:50):
So again with my Alexander Fraser Tyler, he had a
couple of good prophetic quotes. This is one Democracy cannot
exist as a permanent form of government. You can only
exist to the voters discover that they can vote themselves.
(09:12):
A logest, a lifestyle gifts from the public treasury. From
that moment, the majority always votes for the candidates promising
the benefits from the public treasury. With the result, with
(09:39):
that result, I'm sorry, from the public treasury, with the
result that the democracy always collapses over loose for fiscal
policy always followed by a dictatorship. Who wow, and y'all
(10:05):
know I love quotes from people in that from that
era are founders, people like Ada Dana Tyler. It's like
not only what they learning of history, uh, but it's
(10:28):
to put it in it in appliable form for people
who came after him, damn, like me could read their
words and like, how how did they know? I mean,
this is really good you think about it. I mean,
(10:50):
at the time, oh my god, look at what's going
on around us? Is that not true? Is that not true?
But if this is the one that we can be
going toward. Another bit of prophetic statement, the average age
(11:16):
of worlds of the world's greatest civilizations happened two hundred years.
We'll be celebrating, I guess two on the fortieth next year.
Got worried in the cryptot rise that we do make
it to July twenty twenty six. These nations have progressed
(11:38):
through this sequence, from abundance to spiritual faith, from spiritual
faith to great courage, from great courage, from courage to liberty,
from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness
(11:58):
to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependence,
from dependency back to bondas. And this is a man
from eighteen hundreds, seventeen forty two, eighteen thirteen, Scottish Jurish.
(12:30):
I mean that he's very learned in law and her
and historian. So that means that he recognized this from
governments before America was created, and he was not even American,
(12:55):
he was Scottish. Think about that. So he has seen
governments go through this cycle the democratic elements, because America
was not designed to be a democracy. America's uniqueness and
(13:29):
how we have become so exceptional, it's because our spearmen
has never been tried before, where we put the rights
of the people above government, and we put God his blessings,
(13:51):
a leaning of rights for men codified. It made it
our founding the documents. No other country did that before,
no a sense, that's the experiment that they started and created.
(14:19):
So he's referred to democracies. He may me think, well,
if we're not the micracy, we probably be a public
Why it's appable to us now because we have been
turned into a democracy, not not by any form or
(14:41):
declaration or anything like that is, that's just that. But
Georgia Americans no longer no longer know who are what
we are and who are what we were supposed to be,
because it's not part anymore. I think intuitively we do.
You have questions because when you hear constitutional rights the
(15:08):
right to keep in bear arms, Okay, then why do
I have to go and get a pertmit, which a
natural right? Freedom of speech? Then why cannot how can
(15:30):
I be arrested in preennance for words that I speak? Uh,
the right to congregate? Then how can government tell me
that I can't? So on and so on and so on.
(15:51):
We know this contradictions, but these competitions have become so
ingrained into our culture. We celebrate when our children go
and get drivers licenses, driving permits, permits to do business,
(16:23):
licensis do business. How does that? How does that measure
with what our constitution says that the people are the
sovereign over government. But yet four or five years ago
(16:46):
government shut down this country and the many government jurisdictions
forbid civil liberties of the people to even go outside
to work, to under living. And now few people said boom,
(17:17):
there is whom say? And they take this it's being
me the drug put it in my arm. Goment say
mm hmmm, we've totally forgot. We ain't forgot. It's not taught.
If you cannot forget something that that's that's not ever
(17:38):
been taught to you. We need It's just not part
of our education anymore. But in choosing we know something
not just right, we do we should.
Speaker 1 (17:59):
M hm.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
So let's look at what is the difference between the
democracy UH and our public, UH public and former government.
The Founds again feared the volatility of appeal of democracy.
That's why they built a constitutional republic. That's constitutional federal republic,
because we have federalism, the federalist papers, you know, UH,
(18:26):
to protect liberty from the passions of the crowd mob rule.
As Jane manage Jane's managing one in Feludos teen, the
microcies have been found and capable and incompatible, incompatible with
personal security or the rights of property. Want more evidence
(18:52):
that we were not supposed to build UH democracy, Well
just look at uh in the Constitution Article four, Session four,
where it says that the Constitution will will promise republican
(19:15):
form of government, a republican form of government. Want more?
Article ten that is not specifically specifically mentioned written in
the Constitution share by default course pay a phrasing that
(19:42):
power shall go to the several states and the people
that are shown that the sovereign people. At the end
of the day, it is the authority. Remember, Obama famously
(20:09):
said that the reason why he did not like the
Constitution because basically it put too much restraint on government.
He said that if you go back and look at
(20:30):
his reign, he repeatedly ignored the constitutions as their Biden
for sure, but the fact that they had the nations
media complex behind them, they never challenged because what he did,
(20:56):
if nothing else. They championed what Obama did and what
Biden did. And then for the people, ignorant people lacking knowledge,
saw that there was no blowback expressed by the gatekeepers
(21:20):
the media. Then must be right, must be good, must
be lawful. So dumb question. So what's the different difference
publican democracy? Uh? One, you had the rule of law
(21:41):
in the public. Constitutions restrains government. That's why the first
ten amendments you look at, those are restraints of government.
One through ten. They doesn't say anything about what the
people can do. It's a government shout out in the
Michael She when Georgia dominates, Georgia rules protection of rights right,
(22:10):
so in late in in Unleenable, I'd like to say
that right Inunlaenable, Unleenable and protected in the in the
a public and the Michael She rights can be overridden
by popular vote, oh, by government. Look at what happened
(22:31):
during the the COVID tyranny. Canada, Australia, UK throughout cracked
down on individual liberties, particularly outside of the United States.
And I always tell everybody I know people in my
podcast during that time, thank god we had the constitution,
(22:57):
or we've been just like them, did some government officials
in northern constitutions and some sic penalties? Yeah, particularly in
the north, particularly in New York, California, Illinois. But the
(23:25):
fact that each state is sovereging up to itself, they
ought to me choose what goes on and how they
treat their individual residents and inhabitants and rare stations. It
(23:47):
wasn't so bad. Look at Texas, you know, they had
some issues, but go back and look and see what
what what states cracked down on this people during that
period in which they didn't. And then look at what
went on in Australia, what went on and the UK?
(24:09):
What went on in Germany? What? What what I mean?
And imagine that we did not have the chains of
the constitution on our government officials, how bad it really
could have been. And keep in mind when by you
(24:31):
got in office, he did his best to put the
constitution aside with fourth mandates. The constitutions saved us. Whether
you want to admit it or not, move forward. Decision
making representaas bound by constitutional limits in the public and
(24:56):
democracy representdas who representas act on majority will sovereignty implications.
The individual sovereignity is preserved in the republic, in the
microcy collective, the collective, the board will may suppress individual rights.
(25:22):
So when you look at what defines democracy, what defines
your public? Yes, by definition you can say as you
look around our communities, h towns or city, our country,
you can say we are in the micracy, because by
(25:43):
definition that is what that's that's how we're operating. But
the first president to other to to coin the phrase
and apply that to the to America was with Joe Wilson.
(26:03):
Before him, everyone referred to us rightfully. And if you
go back and look at documents on how the government operated,
you can see that there is there is a distinction
that they knew implicitly between the sovereign and themselves. That's
(26:28):
why there there was no US citizens. There was no
such stances of US citizens. If your your first US
citizen president, that's a little bit of history for you.
(26:48):
You're gonna look up. And there was no America itself
was not before a Church of Marcael democracy in public,
particularly by the US president until will Do Wilson, and
(27:10):
no one corrected him, and no one has corrected anyone
since him before US as democracy. But as if Ado
(27:31):
Adol said, mentioned light enough rebut it it will eventually
be something that's truth. There's no no truer word spoken.
It's not human ague, I guess. But let's move forward.
(27:56):
This is how Tyler's cycles, cycle phrases compared with the
US historical journey. You see seventeen seventy six, bonders, the
bonders period. Of course, you have British rule, taxations, so
and so on, Spirits of faith seventeen sixties to seventeen
(28:18):
seventy sixty, awakening the path towards the revolutionary ideas, laws,
natural laws will be expressed. During that period, common sense
by Thomas Pain worked at huge hughes, hit and awakening,
(28:44):
a subconscious awakening for the American people. The period occurage
seventeen seventy five to seventeen eighty three, The Revolution War
think independence of course, Confederation, liberty seventeen eighty nine to
(29:06):
eighteen sixty the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Westwood expansion,
rights of civil civic institutions. Abundance of eighteen sixty five
to nineteen twenty nine. That's a long period abundance during
that period, industrial evolution, the guilded age, post World War
(29:30):
one boom. We always hear about the World two boom,
but we know really hear about the World War one boom.
The rights of the middle class abundance. Then we started
going the other way selfishness. Period nineteen twenties to nineteen sixties,
(29:51):
the ruling twenties. Money was flushed. And keep in mind
this was before the income tax, federal income tax. Huh,
how do you have war friends without federal income tax? Ah?
How indeed, and how to seem now that we cannot
(30:14):
do with doubt? And can I get rid of the
income tax? Ah? History y'all history that the war in twenties,
money was flushed. There was no income tax, wall street speculation,
(30:37):
Cold War, consumerism, identity politics start to wear its ugly head.
Nineteen sixties complacency nineteen seventies and nineteen nineties declined. The
civic education I could remember when I went through elementary
(30:58):
high school and such. We had civics class, we had
social studies. Any one happened had we have children in
government schools, public schools. Can y'all say that your kids
(31:18):
has a class that they can go to called civics
social studies. The rise of the bureaucracy spends on government
the roads of constitutional literacy. Again, that goes back to
(31:42):
civics and social studies. Apathy two thousands to two thousand
and tens, political tribalism, lower voter in gazement, mass distraction
(32:04):
for your median check, got the internet coming in, We
got all these apps, uh, social media? Obama orcanizing our country?
Put it? Put putting the citizens into tribes, into camps
(32:31):
or two teams. You're not wearing my color. Screw you.
Your name is mud twenty tens, twenty twenties, entirement culture
or about me particularly in the black community. Oh my god,
(32:57):
hook line and sinker difference, spending relyance on government aid.
Were becoming a dependent culture where we depend on government
for so much of our basic necessities. The origin of
(33:23):
self sufficiency America was brought up on I could do
this myself, individual individualism, horror work of America and American
people harrormark. That's how we were able to outthink and
(33:49):
I perform on the Nazis because military men were able
to I think independently. We didn't need to wait for
work worth up high and now twenty bond this area again.
(34:14):
The civilian state cameras are everywhere. Oh that's a good idea.
I feel safe now we are saved before Who's who
control this? Who's on the other side of the camera.
(34:39):
We have invited listening devices into our homes for convenience,
where we have tools. Tools may not be the right word.
(35:07):
Where we could get up and ask you turn the
line off on me, can you follow this this program whatever?
And it's another voice to come out say the answer
whatever you wish or your question. And no one never
(35:34):
really seemed to put a serious start on how how
this is possible that I could just come wake up
and ask a question and the answered from this voice
and then turn it on. But yet it's where they
(36:00):
whim to answer my question or to do a task
because it's always on. Now seemingly that's that's not an
issue for people. They come back and say, well, you know,
it's not like they they don't know or not going
to know, you know, because everything's open. I'm like, because
(36:23):
you chose to make it open even despite that fact,
why you open the door? Nobody I know is living
in the glasshouse and the same individual who allow these
listening advices in their home, if you stand next to
(36:46):
them while they're on the phone on the sale, look
over their shoulder, and they will have an issue with that.
I don't understand what's the difference, because I do it.
You got a problem, but it does it. It's okay,
who and why are you closer to your blinds to
(37:10):
your house? Why are you locking your door? This? It's
okay with for government to to to come into your
life and know everything about you, but your neighbor came.
How make that makes sense? And yes you can say that, yeah,
(37:35):
government wants to know there we no, but why open
the door for them? Yeah? Rights tell you to render
the vice. If you don't surrender your rights, you got
an argument. At least you have an argument if if
(37:58):
you don't really willingly and know you surrender your rights
of prophecy. But you put everything on w and then
you wanna claim you gotta write the priphecy. Oh no,
you want to invite all these listening advices into your home.
(38:19):
And then when you claim, you want to claim you
got I got privacy. You don't work like that. It
can't work like that because if you volunteer to give
up your constitutional rights, which is recognized that that's God given.
(38:42):
God not gonna stand by you after the fact. You
were like, that's your problem, problem, problem, that's where the
bonds come back in. I mean, that's a choice. That
(39:06):
is a choice you could you either choose to be
free or to choose not to be free. That's a choice.
And many people they don't mind being on the plantation.
Three square meals somebody to take all the responsibility off
(39:29):
their shoulders. Hey, if that's what you want, it's available
to you, especially in a free country where it does.
You're allowed to make choices and and and and those
choices are recognized. But when you make that choice, you
make that chorge, and that's that's something that you got
(39:51):
to say. Okay, I'll set the responsibilities also for making
that choice. That's that's that's how I see it. Well,
let's go back and look at this closely. The face
(40:11):
is of Tiler as it applies to American capitalism in America. Okay,
because we had liberted to abundance the classic capitalism through
seventeen seventies, six to eighteen seventies, a lot of it
is just seen, we've done that, but not all and
it's you see, it's more again, more magnified. During that
(40:36):
period you have free markets, innovations, the rights of civil liberties.
Then you had had the period of abundance of selfishness
industrial capitalism through eighteen seventies to nineteen thirties. That also
came up monopolies, labor exploitation, consumer culturalism. Okay, then you
(41:00):
had the period of selfishness to complacency. Keenunism capitalism. Kununism
is an economic philosophy where it's believed that power from above,
from government down to the people. The bigger the bigger
government is that the better for the people. Nineteen forties
(41:23):
nineteen seventies. That also came the welfare system. Who brought
that in more appointingly FDR. Look at history and if
you may have grandparents that they're around that time, there
was no welfare system from the federal government. Again, constitution
(41:48):
does not give a fair government this much power over
the people in the several states. It's very limited power, y'all.
If y'all look at a constitution, limited power, none of
that supposed to apply to the sovereign individuals in the
(42:13):
several states. Look at that and then asked yourself, how
do we get to where we are now? And tilam
exploded under FDR because we say, hey, I want that,
(42:34):
I want more of it, I want more of it,
I want want I want more. I don't want the
the change, the responsibility, the cost of the responsibility, I
don't want that here somebody else take a government. You
take it and put put those changes on my wrists
and ankles. Could your change feel better? M F the
(43:00):
are the democrats? F ther A, P. J. Carter, Obama? Bye?
Look at all great dispensers of government the periods, most
of them, not to say all, because Bush Junior definitely
(43:25):
dispensing the off entirement programs, and you can say racing
with the uh child child cast credits. I think you
could also say Nixon Indian as well. I'm not saying
Republicans hands are cleaning, but damn you look at what
Democrats have done. This is what what what get get
(43:51):
them hard at night? Dispensing, the dispensing government into the
lives of the American people, the US citizens, complacency to
applthate to dependency, neoliberal liberal capitalism, neo liberal capitalism half
(44:20):
in half our this period was nineteen eighties to two
thousand and eights. Yeah, the regulation outsourcing the dependent economists,
we say neoliberalism. It is like the almost like the
marrying of hum corporate America and government, almost like fascist fascism,
(44:51):
but not to the fascism level. But it was marion
of again the Republican private So you had the dead economies,
outsourcing of of our labor, of our treasures to other countries. Reagan, Yeah, yeah,
(45:22):
he took a r on this one. I mean, yeah,
that's that's one thing that Yeah, Reagan, I can't I can't.
I can't give him a pass on this dependency to bond,
(45:44):
this corney capitalism. And that's from two thousand and eight.
Now where you know corneyism, you know, brothers, cousins, you know,
(46:04):
I put it into positions that they're not supposed to be,
that they're not qualified just because they know you or
done your favor or m stuff your coffers. So they
can see at the table, Bill all out censorship, technocratic autography,
(46:34):
the Bill Gates, the Facebook, the but I'll say Bill Gates, Facebook, Amazon,
you name it, the the tech industry hierarchy got to
(46:56):
see at the table, look at what how been doing COVID.
The censorship went off the chain through these arteries of
information bailoutsh So this is this is his his his,
(47:29):
his prophetic statements and views. Again, he was a was
he was a Scottishman. So it's just not acquable to America.
You gotta look at what's going in in in Europe.
The shift from in America from from rights to entirements.
I mean, once you take the seal off of that thing,
(47:54):
it's a rap because once people again discover that they
could take a lifestyle from the public treasurer, that lead
would never be reapplied in the EU. I mean that
(48:15):
they have never known where or or had never been
taught to them that they they are superior to government
(48:35):
just by being are a creator, a creature of the creator.
That's not part of the part of their DNA. They
come from always a period of the king, and they
(48:59):
still have kings and queens even today, even though they
may be uote unquote symbolic, But they're there for a
reason because that's they're comfortable with that. They're comfortable of
saying that a man that walked among them is so superior,
(49:20):
so great that they should be bowed to. And every
man of the of the world America never had that.
We never had a king you want to bow to.
(49:43):
So how does that look? When you look at liberty,
find the father's principles, constitutions build the rights, abundance gain.
You have the industry revolution in ports, World War two, prosperity,
selfish period. You have to costumerrism, Wall Street accessors, identity, politics,
(50:04):
your compliciency, yes, specivic illiteracy, bureaucredit expansions I mean erosion
of check of balances. In government, you have apathy, low
water turnout, media distraction, tribalism, dependence and titlement, culture differences, spending,
reliance on federal aid. Then you have the Bondus period
(50:28):
again that's emerged in civilian civilian state censorship, this disinical control,
the version of property speech. Look at what's going on
in Europe. How do these faces apply to them?
Speaker 1 (50:42):
You have.
Speaker 3 (50:44):
Liberty period post World War two. See their start in
World War two, are started in seventeen hundreds, big difference, right,
So you have post World War two democratic reforms, national rebuilding, abundance, expensing,
(51:04):
the welfare states, EU integration and maybe I'll remember that
complacency period, bureaucratic stagnation, declining birth rates, and that's and
that's equippling them right now so much that they have
to import people who have nothing to do with their ideology,
nothing to do with their religion, nothing to do with
(51:28):
any of their beliefs. They having to import them in
and think it's going to work out without them being
completely assimilated. Good luck with that. So that declining birth rates,
loss of courts who are cohesion is because of that laws,
because of the individualism also, and also when you look
(51:52):
at what what what did you think was gonna happen?
When you want to force people who have been worn
against starve there for millennia into a single state like em.
How do you think that that that that that that
was gonna go easily apathy, political fatigue, teocratic again, okay,
(52:22):
uh teocratic governance, erosion of national identity again when you
want to create a super state and this uh uh
and and then have the individual state leaders like we
have in the United States, even though the federal government
(52:43):
is to see where we all come in the individual
states countries still have that individual identity rights and our
leader quote unquote, the governors still have the automate say
(53:04):
and we vote individually in our city's town states. So
the world for from above, we ain't gonna listen to that.
Not so when it comes to the EU, and they
have unelected bureaucrats that governed the EU and imposed law
(53:35):
on the citizens of the individual states. Problem dependence, high taxation,
equator to great social programs. None of that is going
to lead to individualism, not meant to EU under Ali
(54:00):
on EU reliance. You have many states now Hungary for example,
and I think Bulgaria, I think looking to join the
EU y because they want the goodies. Just like you
have immigrants come coming coming from the South Southern hemisphere.
(54:23):
They're trying to get to the United States today, they're
not necessarily trying to be American. They want the goodies
because of the social system that has come up through
the entitement culture in the growth of government. And then
(54:45):
you have the bondits, which is so called the velick
love sovereignty roads and the populist backlashes, digital regulations, speech control,
Oh yeah again, got what happened five years ago? Goes?
Speaker 1 (55:03):
What go?
Speaker 3 (55:04):
What's happening now? But there is a way out for
those who will to better cross of being sovereign. Abundance
breeds complacency should we should always guard against that Lessons
(55:26):
Prosperity creates comfort, comfort eros vigilance implications. Sovereigns must re
exist cultural civitation while the massive chase convenience. Solvists must
cultivate discipline, study, and lawful lawful assertion. Tactics could that
(55:54):
could could could be employed. Use historical cycles to expose
how dependency in creeps in during times of ease. Frame
your message as a wake up call, not a critique.
Legal complexities, max authority decoded lessons. As systems grow, they
(56:20):
obscure lawful remedies behind buier credit fog implications. Sovereigns must
master administrative remedy. You shoe see references and constitutional anchors
to cut through the noise. Tactics build document sets that
(56:44):
assert standing jurisdictions. Remedy with precision, fees, affid Davis and
notices become weapons of clarity. Again, a lot of this
may seem very go on to you. But do your
own resource. I say, always do your own resource. Won't
(57:05):
take anything that I or anyone else tell you. Do
your own research. Globalization dilutes local solity. We assert jurisdiction
post seventeen, post nineteen seventies trade deals and outsourced and
(57:25):
shifted power from local to global entities. We claim that
implications sovereigns must reclaim jurisdiction geographic, legal, spiritual spiritual definitely
important by certain private contracts and lawful boundaries, we still
have to write the contract and government cannot impede in
(57:52):
lawful contracts. Period tactic use venue decorations, private trust structures,
and counter offers to re establish lawful presence outside of
corporate governance. Again, don't take this as any formal legal
(58:14):
advice for me. I'm not a lawyer at all. I'm
sharing information with you for you to do your own
research if it matters to you. If you don't, don't
worry about it. Digital innovations enable surveillance. If you got
(58:37):
to use it, use it strategically. Tech gave rise to
both empowerment and control. Sovereigns must leverage digital tools for
education and outreach while shielding private processes from exposure. We
(58:58):
have a choice tactic. Build podcasts, presentations, and social media
campaigns that teach remedy, but keep enforcement private and encrypted.
Cultural fragmentation weekends, unity for sovereign networks, identity, politics and
(59:27):
media silos, fracture, civic cohesion, implication. Sovereigns must build intentional
alliances based on remedy, not rhetoric. Tactic, host private workshops,
(59:50):
sovereign roundtables and enforcement coalitions, useful language, useful lawful angers
to unify, not polarize. Dependency is marketed as compassion. It's
(01:00:12):
supposed that trap lessons, welfare entitlement programs were sold as
moral progress, and it's anything but moral when you are
stealing from your neighbor. With that, you're stealing from your neighbor,
I mean, you're stealing from your neighbor. When you're talking
(01:00:38):
about I'm entitled, What are you're entitled to that's the question.
Were you're entitled two, Let's have that conversation first. My
degree more the likely that loan implications solvence must reflec
(01:01:01):
dependency as a form of control. A free man has
no change and owes nobody, owes nobody permission or knowing
(01:01:27):
the answer to so as he's acting within the law.
Who who? Who is the answering to script podcasts episodes
that that sect the psycho the psychology of comfort culture
(01:01:54):
use historical cycles to show how liberty arose when rule
is outsourced. Someone say, that's that's what I'm doing here
on my podcast. I'm educating. I want to open your
eyes to encourage you to bothly question what is going
(01:02:17):
on around you. You get educated to become informed, if
not by me, by somebody. Because this is where we are.
United States, or of the United States understakably is for
(01:02:38):
the sovereignty of the people in the States at the moment. Yeah,
powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution
are reserved for the states respectively or to the people
primetered to the people. And when you look at this,
(01:03:00):
uh being a direct information of this state and individual
sovereignty and limits the federal government, or go for a
Section four republican guarantee. United States shall guarantee every state
in the Union republican form of government. The word democracy
(01:03:24):
doesn't appear in any of our nation's founding documents. During
the pleasure legions, we say to the republic for which
it stands. But yet we have chosen to call ourselfs
(01:03:47):
of democracy, and we've been taught to democracy, and that's
not what we are if you want it to be now.
The democracy is what the un to state government is.
That's why you see when they vote in d C.
It is one man, one vote, and the majority in
(01:04:14):
that sense can overru the minority. But not that not
not supposed to be the implications with and there's several
states it's not, and the United States of America that
(01:04:39):
that's that's not what we're supposed to be. The people
have children to take on that clothing for whatever reason
we're not for whatever reason, They've just been conditioned to
take it on. And we no longer seem to question that,
(01:05:01):
even though events to the contrary is all around us,
particularly if we choose to read the Constitution and ask questions,
if we have rights to do this, do that, do whatever.
Why we have to go get permission or license to
do that same thing? Question, y'all. Clauses this clause insurance
that states certain its sovereign structure going by the law
(01:05:23):
and not substitute mob rule on federal federal overreach. But
someone say Trump is doing federal overreach. Kind of hard
to argue against that, especially when he talks about bringing
in the regular army. That's totally against the Post Commataeus,
(01:05:47):
totally against the law. But if the people allow it
to happen, then is he the bad guy. So we
have a choice to make, y'all. As I say, at
(01:06:10):
the end of the day, it's up to the people
to choose the destiny of this country. It's up to
the individual people to choose whether or not they won't
be sovereign, that they won't be slave. There is a
choice and convenienced ah, that is in an enticing proposition,
(01:06:33):
but it's a cost. But education comes at a cost too,
and that's what we have to choose. To become informed,
to be to become educated, and yes, be willing to
(01:06:54):
take on the change that buying the change our freedom.
It's up to us.
Speaker 2 (01:07:19):
Thanks for listening to today's show, and don't forget to
like and subscribe to this podcast and look for Project
Thirdeye Open on your favorite social media platforms. Check out
our web page at Projectthirdiopen dot com and that's third
I with the letter I Projectthirdiopen dot com. Drop us
(01:07:39):
a note at tonyel At Projectthirdiopen dot com. That's Tony
el At Projectthirdiyopen dot com. As you wait for our
next podcast to drop, don't take anything we've said us back. Instead,
do your own homework, make up your own mind, then
take action until next time. Be blessed, be good, and
(01:08:04):
be free.
Our foundering fathers here in this country brought about the
only true revolution that has ever taken place in man's history.
Evolved the idea that you and I have within ourselves,
the god given right and the ability to determine our
own destiny.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
The United States of America the greatest nation in history,
ordained by our founders to be guided by divine providence.
But today we are witnessing the orchestrated disintegration of America.
Take a few seconds and take a look around your town,
your state, look at your country and your world, and
(00:39):
boldly ask what in the hell is going on?
Speaker 1 (00:43):
But freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it on to our children in the bloodstream.
The only way they can inherit the freedom we have
known is if we fight for it, protect it, defend it,
and then hand it to them with the well taught
lessons of how they in their lifetime. Let's do the same.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
Welcome to the podcast Project Third Eye Opened. Where are
we dare to question with boldness the events that are
unfolding around us that others won't. At the end of
the day, it is we the people who will decide
the destiny of the Nation. Now introducing your host, Tony L.
Speaker 3 (01:32):
Great Change, Great Change, Great Change America. Hope everyone's doing
well doing these very very challenging and exciting times in
which we are currently living and existing. This is your host,
Tony L and your spens. Another provocative, exciting, thrilling, informative
(01:57):
podcast Regitation, a project that I open where again we
always seek not to tell you what you need to know.
I want you change what you think you believe, but
just simply simply encourage each and everyone wanted you to question,
(02:20):
stop and question, boldly question what's going on abound you,
what the hell is going on around you? And as
I always do, since this is a ministry of truth,
for truth and seek in the seek of truth, I
must give thanks simple praise to the most High. But
(02:42):
without him I will not be here. I will not
be having this conversation with all of you, discussion. I
would not be born in the greatest country on the planet. No,
not perfect, but damn yeah, damn, oh my God, compared
(03:05):
to all the others. There's a reason why you see
people nation and people from all over the world beating
a path, sometimes risking, many times risking life. Limb just
(03:25):
not for them to get here, but for their family.
There's a reason nobody's trying to break into China, no
matter how popular these young people want to make China
(03:47):
and Russia even Sweden appeer countries like Sweden and no, no, no,
slam Sweden. But you know when people, the particularly young
people or the or then then tutively unchallenged people want
(04:09):
to hold Sweeten up as the postry child. Or yeah,
this is what socialism looks like. No, no, no, Swedish.
Swedish is not a socialist country. No European country is
a socialist country. There's a huge swath of its system
(04:30):
is socialists, but it is a dem democracy. It's a
democratic that's democratic socialist former government, which we kind of
are going to get into our I had h Huff
(04:56):
on my podcast the other day and that would be
as soon and I always have good, good conversations with him,
and I was on his show earlier in the year,
so he returned to favor and definitely appreciate that. While
and we we kind of fell into this conversation about
(05:21):
democracy and what America was supposed to be. He, like
many others, believed that America was supposed to be a democracy,
which we never never, never were, and I got taken
took enough guard and he referred to the America as
(05:41):
being the democratic republic or whatever. He had that one word, right,
republic democracy, and it got my backup because I knew
that was wrong. But I couldn't have reprolized him because
I haven't haven't used the the description of America recently.
(06:03):
But I knew growing up, you know, as people grew
up back in the day, I mean it was parents
had you know, the huge wall of encyclopedias, you know,
and I knew that doing a mentorial some period, I
had to look up what America's well described that it
(06:28):
wasn't the microcy so I knew who's wrong. And I later,
you know, doing a conversation and poadcast was getting it
be aired soon. I did find the definition what America
actually is, and it's MicroC because our founders destained and
(06:54):
that's parting amy democracy's because they saw how to operate
it digital learned people, so they knew they did not
want this country to be on democracy. And I would
(07:15):
go into that in great detail, but also brought up
to him the example or the the prophetic statement by
this man Alexander Tyler, and I remembered him, and he
(07:39):
was one of the few individuals whose quote I put
up on my wall two look at and visualize and
this understand that he shooting not only repeats, but the
(08:01):
often rhymes. And that is mhm. That can be no
no more true than how we see things now, not
just here in in in our country, but look at
what's going on in the in the in the EU. Ah. Again,
(08:23):
let's just getting it too, because I think if I
keep talking, I mean, there'll be no real need toation,
because I would have given up this supper. So here
we go this, uh, we're getting get this, get this going.
(08:50):
So again with my Alexander Fraser Tyler, he had a
couple of good prophetic quotes. This is one Democracy cannot
exist as a permanent form of government. You can only
exist to the voters discover that they can vote themselves.
(09:12):
A logest, a lifestyle gifts from the public treasury. From
that moment, the majority always votes for the candidates promising
the benefits from the public treasury. With the result, with
(09:39):
that result, I'm sorry, from the public treasury, with the
result that the democracy always collapses over loose for fiscal
policy always followed by a dictatorship. Who wow, and y'all
(10:05):
know I love quotes from people in that from that
era are founders, people like Ada Dana Tyler. It's like
not only what they learning of history, uh, but it's
(10:28):
to put it in it in appliable form for people
who came after him, damn, like me could read their
words and like, how how did they know? I mean,
this is really good you think about it. I mean,
(10:50):
at the time, oh my god, look at what's going
on around us? Is that not true? Is that not true?
But if this is the one that we can be
going toward. Another bit of prophetic statement, the average age
(11:16):
of worlds of the world's greatest civilizations happened two hundred years.
We'll be celebrating, I guess two on the fortieth next year.
Got worried in the cryptot rise that we do make
it to July twenty twenty six. These nations have progressed
(11:38):
through this sequence, from abundance to spiritual faith, from spiritual
faith to great courage, from great courage, from courage to liberty,
from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness
(11:58):
to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependence,
from dependency back to bondas. And this is a man
from eighteen hundreds, seventeen forty two, eighteen thirteen, Scottish Jurish.
(12:30):
I mean that he's very learned in law and her
and historian. So that means that he recognized this from
governments before America was created, and he was not even American,
(12:55):
he was Scottish. Think about that. So he has seen
governments go through this cycle the democratic elements, because America
was not designed to be a democracy. America's uniqueness and
(13:29):
how we have become so exceptional, it's because our spearmen
has never been tried before, where we put the rights
of the people above government, and we put God his blessings,
(13:51):
a leaning of rights for men codified. It made it
our founding the documents. No other country did that before,
no a sense, that's the experiment that they started and created.
(14:19):
So he's referred to democracies. He may me think, well,
if we're not the micracy, we probably be a public
Why it's appable to us now because we have been
turned into a democracy, not not by any form or
(14:41):
declaration or anything like that is, that's just that. But
Georgia Americans no longer no longer know who are what
we are and who are what we were supposed to be,
because it's not part anymore. I think intuitively we do.
You have questions because when you hear constitutional rights the
(15:08):
right to keep in bear arms, Okay, then why do
I have to go and get a pertmit, which a
natural right? Freedom of speech? Then why cannot how can
(15:30):
I be arrested in preennance for words that I speak? Uh,
the right to congregate? Then how can government tell me
that I can't? So on and so on and so on.
(15:51):
We know this contradictions, but these competitions have become so
ingrained into our culture. We celebrate when our children go
and get drivers licenses, driving permits, permits to do business,
(16:23):
licensis do business. How does that? How does that measure
with what our constitution says that the people are the
sovereign over government. But yet four or five years ago
(16:46):
government shut down this country and the many government jurisdictions
forbid civil liberties of the people to even go outside
to work, to under living. And now few people said boom,
(17:17):
there is whom say? And they take this it's being
me the drug put it in my arm. Goment say
mm hmmm, we've totally forgot. We ain't forgot. It's not taught.
If you cannot forget something that that's that's not ever
(17:38):
been taught to you. We need It's just not part
of our education anymore. But in choosing we know something
not just right, we do we should.
Speaker 1 (17:59):
M hm.
Speaker 3 (18:01):
So let's look at what is the difference between the
democracy UH and our public, UH public and former government.
The Founds again feared the volatility of appeal of democracy.
That's why they built a constitutional republic. That's constitutional federal republic,
because we have federalism, the federalist papers, you know, UH,
(18:26):
to protect liberty from the passions of the crowd mob rule.
As Jane manage Jane's managing one in Feludos teen, the
microcies have been found and capable and incompatible, incompatible with
personal security or the rights of property. Want more evidence
(18:52):
that we were not supposed to build UH democracy, Well
just look at uh in the Constitution Article four, Session four,
where it says that the Constitution will will promise republican
(19:15):
form of government, a republican form of government. Want more?
Article ten that is not specifically specifically mentioned written in
the Constitution share by default course pay a phrasing that
(19:42):
power shall go to the several states and the people
that are shown that the sovereign people. At the end
of the day, it is the authority. Remember, Obama famously
(20:09):
said that the reason why he did not like the
Constitution because basically it put too much restraint on government.
He said that if you go back and look at
(20:30):
his reign, he repeatedly ignored the constitutions as their Biden
for sure, but the fact that they had the nations
media complex behind them, they never challenged because what he did,
(20:56):
if nothing else. They championed what Obama did and what
Biden did. And then for the people, ignorant people lacking knowledge,
saw that there was no blowback expressed by the gatekeepers
(21:20):
the media. Then must be right, must be good, must
be lawful. So dumb question. So what's the different difference
publican democracy? Uh? One, you had the rule of law
(21:41):
in the public. Constitutions restrains government. That's why the first
ten amendments you look at, those are restraints of government.
One through ten. They doesn't say anything about what the
people can do. It's a government shout out in the
Michael She when Georgia dominates, Georgia rules protection of rights right,
(22:10):
so in late in in Unleenable, I'd like to say
that right Inunlaenable, Unleenable and protected in the in the
a public and the Michael She rights can be overridden
by popular vote, oh, by government. Look at what happened
(22:31):
during the the COVID tyranny. Canada, Australia, UK throughout cracked
down on individual liberties, particularly outside of the United States.
And I always tell everybody I know people in my
podcast during that time, thank god we had the constitution,
(22:57):
or we've been just like them, did some government officials
in northern constitutions and some sic penalties? Yeah, particularly in
the north, particularly in New York, California, Illinois. But the
(23:25):
fact that each state is sovereging up to itself, they
ought to me choose what goes on and how they
treat their individual residents and inhabitants and rare stations. It
(23:47):
wasn't so bad. Look at Texas, you know, they had
some issues, but go back and look and see what
what what states cracked down on this people during that
period in which they didn't. And then look at what
went on in Australia, what went on and the UK?
(24:09):
What went on in Germany? What? What what I mean?
And imagine that we did not have the chains of
the constitution on our government officials, how bad it really
could have been. And keep in mind when by you
(24:31):
got in office, he did his best to put the
constitution aside with fourth mandates. The constitutions saved us. Whether
you want to admit it or not, move forward. Decision
making representaas bound by constitutional limits in the public and
(24:56):
democracy representdas who representas act on majority will sovereignty implications.
The individual sovereignity is preserved in the republic, in the
microcy collective, the collective, the board will may suppress individual rights.
(25:22):
So when you look at what defines democracy, what defines
your public? Yes, by definition you can say as you
look around our communities, h towns or city, our country,
you can say we are in the micracy, because by
(25:43):
definition that is what that's that's how we're operating. But
the first president to other to to coin the phrase
and apply that to the to America was with Joe Wilson.
(26:03):
Before him, everyone referred to us rightfully. And if you
go back and look at documents on how the government operated,
you can see that there is there is a distinction
that they knew implicitly between the sovereign and themselves. That's
(26:28):
why there there was no US citizens. There was no
such stances of US citizens. If your your first US
citizen president, that's a little bit of history for you.
(26:48):
You're gonna look up. And there was no America itself
was not before a Church of Marcael democracy in public,
particularly by the US president until will Do Wilson, and
(27:10):
no one corrected him, and no one has corrected anyone
since him before US as democracy. But as if Ado
(27:31):
Adol said, mentioned light enough rebut it it will eventually
be something that's truth. There's no no truer word spoken.
It's not human ague, I guess. But let's move forward.
(27:56):
This is how Tyler's cycles, cycle phrases compared with the
US historical journey. You see seventeen seventy six, bonders, the
bonders period. Of course, you have British rule, taxations, so
and so on, Spirits of faith seventeen sixties to seventeen
(28:18):
seventy sixty, awakening the path towards the revolutionary ideas, laws,
natural laws will be expressed. During that period, common sense
by Thomas Pain worked at huge hughes, hit and awakening,
(28:44):
a subconscious awakening for the American people. The period occurage
seventeen seventy five to seventeen eighty three, The Revolution War
think independence of course, Confederation, liberty seventeen eighty nine to
(29:06):
eighteen sixty the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Westwood expansion,
rights of civil civic institutions. Abundance of eighteen sixty five
to nineteen twenty nine. That's a long period abundance during
that period, industrial evolution, the guilded age, post World War
(29:30):
one boom. We always hear about the World two boom,
but we know really hear about the World War one boom.
The rights of the middle class abundance. Then we started
going the other way selfishness. Period nineteen twenties to nineteen sixties,
(29:51):
the ruling twenties. Money was flushed. And keep in mind
this was before the income tax, federal income tax. Huh,
how do you have war friends without federal income tax? Ah?
How indeed, and how to seem now that we cannot
(30:14):
do with doubt? And can I get rid of the
income tax? Ah? History y'all history that the war in twenties,
money was flushed. There was no income tax, wall street speculation,
(30:37):
Cold War, consumerism, identity politics start to wear its ugly head.
Nineteen sixties complacency nineteen seventies and nineteen nineties declined. The
civic education I could remember when I went through elementary
(30:58):
high school and such. We had civics class, we had
social studies. Any one happened had we have children in
government schools, public schools. Can y'all say that your kids
(31:18):
has a class that they can go to called civics
social studies. The rise of the bureaucracy spends on government
the roads of constitutional literacy. Again, that goes back to
(31:42):
civics and social studies. Apathy two thousands to two thousand
and tens, political tribalism, lower voter in gazement, mass distraction
(32:04):
for your median check, got the internet coming in, We
got all these apps, uh, social media? Obama orcanizing our country?
Put it? Put putting the citizens into tribes, into camps
(32:31):
or two teams. You're not wearing my color. Screw you.
Your name is mud twenty tens, twenty twenties, entirement culture
or about me particularly in the black community. Oh my god,
(32:57):
hook line and sinker difference, spending relyance on government aid.
Were becoming a dependent culture where we depend on government
for so much of our basic necessities. The origin of
(33:23):
self sufficiency America was brought up on I could do
this myself, individual individualism, horror work of America and American
people harrormark. That's how we were able to outthink and
(33:49):
I perform on the Nazis because military men were able
to I think independently. We didn't need to wait for
work worth up high and now twenty bond this area again.
(34:14):
The civilian state cameras are everywhere. Oh that's a good idea.
I feel safe now we are saved before Who's who
control this? Who's on the other side of the camera.
(34:39):
We have invited listening devices into our homes for convenience,
where we have tools. Tools may not be the right word.
(35:07):
Where we could get up and ask you turn the
line off on me, can you follow this this program whatever?
And it's another voice to come out say the answer
whatever you wish or your question. And no one never
(35:34):
really seemed to put a serious start on how how
this is possible that I could just come wake up
and ask a question and the answered from this voice
and then turn it on. But yet it's where they
(36:00):
whim to answer my question or to do a task
because it's always on. Now seemingly that's that's not an
issue for people. They come back and say, well, you know,
it's not like they they don't know or not going
to know, you know, because everything's open. I'm like, because
(36:23):
you chose to make it open even despite that fact,
why you open the door? Nobody I know is living
in the glasshouse and the same individual who allow these
listening advices in their home, if you stand next to
(36:46):
them while they're on the phone on the sale, look
over their shoulder, and they will have an issue with that.
I don't understand what's the difference, because I do it.
You got a problem, but it does it. It's okay,
who and why are you closer to your blinds to
(37:10):
your house? Why are you locking your door? This? It's
okay with for government to to to come into your
life and know everything about you, but your neighbor came.
How make that makes sense? And yes you can say that, yeah,
(37:35):
government wants to know there we no, but why open
the door for them? Yeah? Rights tell you to render
the vice. If you don't surrender your rights, you got
an argument. At least you have an argument if if
(37:58):
you don't really willingly and know you surrender your rights
of prophecy. But you put everything on w and then
you wanna claim you gotta write the priphecy. Oh no,
you want to invite all these listening advices into your home.
(38:19):
And then when you claim, you want to claim you
got I got privacy. You don't work like that. It
can't work like that because if you volunteer to give
up your constitutional rights, which is recognized that that's God given.
(38:42):
God not gonna stand by you after the fact. You
were like, that's your problem, problem, problem, that's where the
bonds come back in. I mean, that's a choice. That
(39:06):
is a choice you could you either choose to be
free or to choose not to be free. That's a choice.
And many people they don't mind being on the plantation.
Three square meals somebody to take all the responsibility off
(39:29):
their shoulders. Hey, if that's what you want, it's available
to you, especially in a free country where it does.
You're allowed to make choices and and and and those
choices are recognized. But when you make that choice, you
make that chorge, and that's that's something that you got
(39:51):
to say. Okay, I'll set the responsibilities also for making
that choice. That's that's that's how I see it. Well,
let's go back and look at this closely. The face
(40:11):
is of Tiler as it applies to American capitalism in America. Okay,
because we had liberted to abundance the classic capitalism through
seventeen seventies, six to eighteen seventies, a lot of it
is just seen, we've done that, but not all and
it's you see, it's more again, more magnified. During that
(40:36):
period you have free markets, innovations, the rights of civil liberties.
Then you had had the period of abundance of selfishness
industrial capitalism through eighteen seventies to nineteen thirties. That also
came up monopolies, labor exploitation, consumer culturalism. Okay, then you
(41:00):
had the period of selfishness to complacency. Keenunism capitalism. Kununism
is an economic philosophy where it's believed that power from above,
from government down to the people. The bigger the bigger
government is that the better for the people. Nineteen forties
(41:23):
nineteen seventies. That also came the welfare system. Who brought
that in more appointingly FDR. Look at history and if
you may have grandparents that they're around that time, there
was no welfare system from the federal government. Again, constitution
(41:48):
does not give a fair government this much power over
the people in the several states. It's very limited power, y'all.
If y'all look at a constitution, limited power, none of
that supposed to apply to the sovereign individuals in the
(42:13):
several states. Look at that and then asked yourself, how
do we get to where we are now? And tilam
exploded under FDR because we say, hey, I want that,
(42:34):
I want more of it, I want more of it,
I want want I want more. I don't want the
the change, the responsibility, the cost of the responsibility, I
don't want that here somebody else take a government. You
take it and put put those changes on my wrists
and ankles. Could your change feel better? M F the
(43:00):
are the democrats? F ther A, P. J. Carter, Obama? Bye?
Look at all great dispensers of government the periods, most
of them, not to say all, because Bush Junior definitely
(43:25):
dispensing the off entirement programs, and you can say racing
with the uh child child cast credits. I think you
could also say Nixon Indian as well. I'm not saying
Republicans hands are cleaning, but damn you look at what
Democrats have done. This is what what what get get
(43:51):
them hard at night? Dispensing, the dispensing government into the
lives of the American people, the US citizens, complacency to
applthate to dependency, neoliberal liberal capitalism, neo liberal capitalism half
(44:20):
in half our this period was nineteen eighties to two
thousand and eights. Yeah, the regulation outsourcing the dependent economists,
we say neoliberalism. It is like the almost like the
marrying of hum corporate America and government, almost like fascist fascism,
(44:51):
but not to the fascism level. But it was marion
of again the Republican private So you had the dead economies,
outsourcing of of our labor, of our treasures to other countries. Reagan, Yeah, yeah,
(45:22):
he took a r on this one. I mean, yeah,
that's that's one thing that Yeah, Reagan, I can't I can't.
I can't give him a pass on this dependency to bond,
(45:44):
this corney capitalism. And that's from two thousand and eight.
Now where you know corneyism, you know, brothers, cousins, you know,
(46:04):
I put it into positions that they're not supposed to be,
that they're not qualified just because they know you or
done your favor or m stuff your coffers. So they
can see at the table, Bill all out censorship, technocratic autography,
(46:34):
the Bill Gates, the Facebook, the but I'll say Bill Gates, Facebook, Amazon,
you name it, the the tech industry hierarchy got to
(46:56):
see at the table, look at what how been doing COVID.
The censorship went off the chain through these arteries of
information bailoutsh So this is this is his his his,
(47:29):
his prophetic statements and views. Again, he was a was
he was a Scottishman. So it's just not acquable to America.
You gotta look at what's going in in in Europe.
The shift from in America from from rights to entirements.
I mean, once you take the seal off of that thing,
(47:54):
it's a rap because once people again discover that they
could take a lifestyle from the public treasurer, that lead
would never be reapplied in the EU. I mean that
(48:15):
they have never known where or or had never been
taught to them that they they are superior to government
(48:35):
just by being are a creator, a creature of the creator.
That's not part of the part of their DNA. They
come from always a period of the king, and they
(48:59):
still have kings and queens even today, even though they
may be uote unquote symbolic, But they're there for a
reason because that's they're comfortable with that. They're comfortable of
saying that a man that walked among them is so superior,
(49:20):
so great that they should be bowed to. And every
man of the of the world America never had that.
We never had a king you want to bow to.
(49:43):
So how does that look? When you look at liberty,
find the father's principles, constitutions build the rights, abundance gain.
You have the industry revolution in ports, World War two, prosperity,
selfish period. You have to costumerrism, Wall Street accessors, identity, politics,
(50:04):
your compliciency, yes, specivic illiteracy, bureaucredit expansions I mean erosion
of check of balances. In government, you have apathy, low
water turnout, media distraction, tribalism, dependence and titlement, culture differences, spending,
reliance on federal aid. Then you have the Bondus period
(50:28):
again that's emerged in civilian civilian state censorship, this disinical control,
the version of property speech. Look at what's going on
in Europe. How do these faces apply to them?
Speaker 1 (50:42):
You have.
Speaker 3 (50:44):
Liberty period post World War two. See their start in
World War two, are started in seventeen hundreds, big difference, right,
So you have post World War two democratic reforms, national rebuilding, abundance, expensing,
(51:04):
the welfare states, EU integration and maybe I'll remember that
complacency period, bureaucratic stagnation, declining birth rates, and that's and
that's equippling them right now so much that they have
to import people who have nothing to do with their ideology,
nothing to do with their religion, nothing to do with
(51:28):
any of their beliefs. They having to import them in
and think it's going to work out without them being
completely assimilated. Good luck with that. So that declining birth rates,
loss of courts who are cohesion is because of that laws,
because of the individualism also, and also when you look
(51:52):
at what what what did you think was gonna happen?
When you want to force people who have been worn
against starve there for millennia into a single state like em.
How do you think that that that that that that
was gonna go easily apathy, political fatigue, teocratic again, okay,
(52:22):
uh teocratic governance, erosion of national identity again when you
want to create a super state and this uh uh
and and then have the individual state leaders like we
have in the United States, even though the federal government
(52:43):
is to see where we all come in the individual
states countries still have that individual identity rights and our
leader quote unquote, the governors still have the automate say
(53:04):
and we vote individually in our city's town states. So
the world for from above, we ain't gonna listen to that.
Not so when it comes to the EU, and they
have unelected bureaucrats that governed the EU and imposed law
(53:35):
on the citizens of the individual states. Problem dependence, high taxation,
equator to great social programs. None of that is going
to lead to individualism, not meant to EU under Ali
(54:00):
on EU reliance. You have many states now Hungary for example,
and I think Bulgaria, I think looking to join the
EU y because they want the goodies. Just like you
have immigrants come coming coming from the South Southern hemisphere.
(54:23):
They're trying to get to the United States today, they're
not necessarily trying to be American. They want the goodies
because of the social system that has come up through
the entitement culture in the growth of government. And then
(54:45):
you have the bondits, which is so called the velick
love sovereignty roads and the populist backlashes, digital regulations, speech control,
Oh yeah again, got what happened five years ago? Goes?
Speaker 1 (55:03):
What go?
Speaker 3 (55:04):
What's happening now? But there is a way out for
those who will to better cross of being sovereign. Abundance
breeds complacency should we should always guard against that Lessons
(55:26):
Prosperity creates comfort, comfort eros vigilance implications. Sovereigns must re
exist cultural civitation while the massive chase convenience. Solvists must
cultivate discipline, study, and lawful lawful assertion. Tactics could that
(55:54):
could could could be employed. Use historical cycles to expose
how dependency in creeps in during times of ease. Frame
your message as a wake up call, not a critique.
Legal complexities, max authority decoded lessons. As systems grow, they
(56:20):
obscure lawful remedies behind buier credit fog implications. Sovereigns must
master administrative remedy. You shoe see references and constitutional anchors
to cut through the noise. Tactics build document sets that
(56:44):
assert standing jurisdictions. Remedy with precision, fees, affid Davis and
notices become weapons of clarity. Again, a lot of this
may seem very go on to you. But do your
own resource. I say, always do your own resource. Won't
(57:05):
take anything that I or anyone else tell you. Do
your own research. Globalization dilutes local solity. We assert jurisdiction
post seventeen, post nineteen seventies trade deals and outsourced and
(57:25):
shifted power from local to global entities. We claim that
implications sovereigns must reclaim jurisdiction geographic, legal, spiritual spiritual definitely
important by certain private contracts and lawful boundaries, we still
have to write the contract and government cannot impede in
(57:52):
lawful contracts. Period tactic use venue decorations, private trust structures,
and counter offers to re establish lawful presence outside of
corporate governance. Again, don't take this as any formal legal
(58:14):
advice for me. I'm not a lawyer at all. I'm
sharing information with you for you to do your own
research if it matters to you. If you don't, don't
worry about it. Digital innovations enable surveillance. If you got
(58:37):
to use it, use it strategically. Tech gave rise to
both empowerment and control. Sovereigns must leverage digital tools for
education and outreach while shielding private processes from exposure. We
(58:58):
have a choice tactic. Build podcasts, presentations, and social media
campaigns that teach remedy, but keep enforcement private and encrypted.
Cultural fragmentation weekends, unity for sovereign networks, identity, politics and
(59:27):
media silos, fracture, civic cohesion, implication. Sovereigns must build intentional
alliances based on remedy, not rhetoric. Tactic, host private workshops,
(59:50):
sovereign roundtables and enforcement coalitions, useful language, useful lawful angers
to unify, not polarize. Dependency is marketed as compassion. It's
(01:00:12):
supposed that trap lessons, welfare entitlement programs were sold as
moral progress, and it's anything but moral when you are
stealing from your neighbor. With that, you're stealing from your neighbor,
I mean, you're stealing from your neighbor. When you're talking
(01:00:38):
about I'm entitled, What are you're entitled to that's the question.
Were you're entitled two, Let's have that conversation first. My
degree more the likely that loan implications solvence must reflec
(01:01:01):
dependency as a form of control. A free man has
no change and owes nobody, owes nobody permission or knowing
(01:01:27):
the answer to so as he's acting within the law.
Who who? Who is the answering to script podcasts episodes
that that sect the psycho the psychology of comfort culture
(01:01:54):
use historical cycles to show how liberty arose when rule
is outsourced. Someone say, that's that's what I'm doing here
on my podcast. I'm educating. I want to open your
eyes to encourage you to bothly question what is going
(01:02:17):
on around you. You get educated to become informed, if
not by me, by somebody. Because this is where we are.
United States, or of the United States understakably is for
(01:02:38):
the sovereignty of the people in the States at the moment. Yeah,
powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution
are reserved for the states respectively or to the people
primetered to the people. And when you look at this,
(01:03:00):
uh being a direct information of this state and individual
sovereignty and limits the federal government, or go for a
Section four republican guarantee. United States shall guarantee every state
in the Union republican form of government. The word democracy
(01:03:24):
doesn't appear in any of our nation's founding documents. During
the pleasure legions, we say to the republic for which
it stands. But yet we have chosen to call ourselfs
(01:03:47):
of democracy, and we've been taught to democracy, and that's
not what we are if you want it to be now.
The democracy is what the un to state government is.
That's why you see when they vote in d C.
It is one man, one vote, and the majority in
(01:04:14):
that sense can overru the minority. But not that not
not supposed to be the implications with and there's several
states it's not, and the United States of America that
(01:04:39):
that's that's not what we're supposed to be. The people
have children to take on that clothing for whatever reason
we're not for whatever reason, They've just been conditioned to
take it on. And we no longer seem to question that,
(01:05:01):
even though events to the contrary is all around us,
particularly if we choose to read the Constitution and ask questions,
if we have rights to do this, do that, do whatever.
Why we have to go get permission or license to
do that same thing? Question, y'all. Clauses this clause insurance
that states certain its sovereign structure going by the law
(01:05:23):
and not substitute mob rule on federal federal overreach. But
someone say Trump is doing federal overreach. Kind of hard
to argue against that, especially when he talks about bringing
in the regular army. That's totally against the Post Commataeus,
(01:05:47):
totally against the law. But if the people allow it
to happen, then is he the bad guy. So we
have a choice to make, y'all. As I say, at
(01:06:10):
the end of the day, it's up to the people
to choose the destiny of this country. It's up to
the individual people to choose whether or not they won't
be sovereign, that they won't be slave. There is a
choice and convenienced ah, that is in an enticing proposition,
(01:06:33):
but it's a cost. But education comes at a cost too,
and that's what we have to choose. To become informed,
to be to become educated, and yes, be willing to
(01:06:54):
take on the change that buying the change our freedom.
It's up to us.
Speaker 2 (01:07:19):
Thanks for listening to today's show, and don't forget to
like and subscribe to this podcast and look for Project
Thirdeye Open on your favorite social media platforms. Check out
our web page at Projectthirdiopen dot com and that's third
I with the letter I Projectthirdiopen dot com. Drop us
(01:07:39):
a note at tonyel At Projectthirdiopen dot com. That's Tony
el At Projectthirdiyopen dot com. As you wait for our
next podcast to drop, don't take anything we've said us back. Instead,
do your own homework, make up your own mind, then
take action until next time. Be blessed, be good, and
(01:08:04):
be free.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.