April 15, 2025 • 70 mins
In the conclusion of “Rules for Radicals – The Leftist Political Theology That Is Reshaping America,” the narrative comes full circle. Tony reveals that the roots grows back from early Marxist thought of the early 1900's, Saul Alinsky’s radical blueprint has evolved from a fringe leftist doctrine into a political strategy adopted across the spectrum. This final chapter explores how tactics once exclusive to the Progressive Left now echo within the Right’s rhetoric, campaigns, and has become ingrained within the nation's academia and cultural institutions—signaling a deeper ideological shift in American politics. You best strap in before you dive into this.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Our foundering fathers here in this country, brought about the
only true revolution that has ever taken place in man's history.
Evolve the idea that you and I have within ourselves,
the god given right and the ability to determine our
own destiny.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
The United States of America the greatest nation in history,
ordained by our founders to be guided by divine providence,
but today we are witnessing the orchestrated disintegration of America.
Take a few seconds and take a look around your town,
your state, look at your country and your world, and
(00:39):
boldly ask what in the hell is going on?
Speaker 1 (00:43):
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it on to our children in the bloodstream.
The only way they can inherit the freedom we have
known is if we fight for it, protect it, defend it,
and then hand it to them with the well taught
lessons of how they in their lifetime. Let's do the same.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
Welcome to the podcast Project Third Eye Opened, where we
dare to question with boldness the events that are unfolding
around us that others won't. At the end of the day,
it is we the people who will decide the destiny
of the Nation. Now introducing your host Tony l.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
Great Change, Great Change Greece and this is another very
exciting podcast and our video cast presentation of project that
I opened and to start as always do you infras
(01:45):
was high d him, I will not be doing this.
I will not be here. I would not have been
born in the greatest country on the planet, and I
want to be bringing this to you. These are very very,
very very exciting times in which recurring are living in
(02:11):
existing someone I w want to say, you got to
go through to get to it, and we are going
through it now. What's going to come up on the
end for many of us is greatness, blessings. But as
(02:36):
you go through this period, we have to first look
at and be cognitive of where we're all economically as
a nation and as an individual ourselves. The best times
of America are in the rear view mirror. We need
(03:00):
to first come to a reconning with that. Many of
us still want to believe that still before still in
nineteen ninety nine, it's not but that understanding when you
look at our economic situation. If you got feat currency,
paper currency in your pocket, you need to think longer
(03:22):
hard looking at an offer diversify. Look into gold and silver,
precious metals, real currency, constitutional currency, not currency, money not currency,
(03:45):
is money, something of value, something that appreciates the value.
Look at gold and silver. If you go to my site,
project that help in dot com. That's project third spelt
out the letter I open e D dot com. Look
(04:05):
at that offer, check it out. You n the purchase,
go to sea Well there I would appreciate you doing so.
But if not there somewhere you get big discounts. This
this this bout being a listener, get big discounts. This
about being a listener going to that site and get coins,
(04:31):
get bars, get jewelry, whatever. But it's real, real money.
Look at that. Not there, get it somewhere because things
are changed. And Trump is trying to warn everybody, but
he ain't get no help. And the properties is not
educated enough to understand direct talk, so he's not talking directly,
(04:59):
which is what we need. But I'm I'm telling you
all right now, getting your hands on some gold and silver.
This is the fourth and final installment of this Well
Actress would be very important conversation having to deal with
(05:23):
a man who's very, very pivotal, pivotal, pivotal, and how
politicians communicate to us, and how politics is exercise now
and not just here but around the world, particularly those
(05:44):
on the left, how they are manipulating us, how they
are sekewing our perception of things. And yes we we
are heard of George, George orwell that's people though as well,
and you can learn a lot about how we are
(06:05):
being manipulated. But Rules of Radicals, I think it's a
different beast because, in my humble opinion, George always picked
up by many on the right, not to necessarily use
(06:25):
against us, but say, hey, look at what they're doing.
Look at what they're doing, how how they're doing word speech,
look at how they what they're doing, and how they're
doing that. The left is picking up a picked that
(06:47):
Rules who Radicals has have taught the teachings from what
I consider a theological perspective, because it is a religion.
It is a religion. That's why I call the theological
tenants of the man called Solominsky in his book Twelve
(07:16):
Rules Radicals tells you. It tells you one, two, three
to twelve the tenants of his theology, the principles of
his theology. For whatever reason, media or people on the
(07:40):
right though they're using these tenants. The last man I
heard tried to warn the people that this is being used.
It was used. Who was given to get used upon
us was former Speaker New English when he was running
against Obama. Try to tell you about Saltolensky. Of course,
(08:11):
the liberal media to try to make him out to
be able food and totally discount and discredit everything he
was saying regards to go to Salolinsky and and and
how Obama was Sallensky knight and in many cases that
they attacked from the left on inglish were successful because
(08:35):
unfortunately the media and the left know that general population
is not to go out and read, not could go
out and do their own homework. What's the reason why
I'm bringing this to you, hopefully that y'all will uh
not necessarily take what I say as as gospel. But hey,
(08:57):
the book is out there, the book is online, The
man's information is out there looking for yourself to you
and homework. So I'll tell you to do anyway. But
I'm bringing this to you because I want to do
my part, tell you how this man's influenced two generations.
(09:23):
There maybe more to come if this is not brought
to light. The three people that I'm focusing on right
now is Obama, with I mean, you can't get no
closer to Slolensky than Obama in regards to politics. Then
of course Biden, who was up under Obama for eight
(09:47):
years and who knows his disposure to Sallensky theology prior.
And then there's Trump, whose argument I could definitely understand
the argument that he's he had to be coming here
(10:07):
and use it for his for for his defense, you know,
which you will see in most cases, his his application
of his of Stolensky's techniques have been defensive and have
been sort of targeted at his opponents, not the American people,
(10:29):
not not not not through the testment of the country
that you cannot say in a case of sorto Lensky
and those who have picked up his theology and used
to on the left. So let's go on. We ended
on rule ten, so this is going to be eleven.
(10:58):
So these technical issues, so you got rut eleven. The
principle of successful attacks is a constructive alternative. Never let
the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution
(11:20):
to a problem. Oh sir, if you're not part of
the solution, You're part of the problem. Activist organizations have
an agenda and the strategy is to hold a place
at the table to be given a form to wield
their powers. So they have to have a compromised solution. Obama,
(11:50):
how did he use this strategy? In twenty ten? Obamacare
criticized healthcare system while offering a solution. Uh, even though
(12:12):
Republican attack that they struggle to propose an alternative. Why,
I don't know. I mean people people want to criticize
our healthcare system, but to say that socialized medicine is
the answer, that's a non starter to me. There's many
(12:36):
other solutions out there, like lowering the cause of litigation
in regards to my practice, you can lower the cause
of medicines. Listen, we have the best healthcare system because
(12:56):
it gives the individuals, the doctors to prefers, the ability
to earn what they're worth. But then when you bring
in litigation and the pharmaceutical industry, which is for whatever reason,
has an automatic seat at the table when it comes
(13:17):
to government policies, that's the problem. And then when you
have a healthcare system that is not a care prevention system,
that's the problem. There's other ways of going at this,
So why the Republicans didn't have a answer to this
(13:39):
kind of tells you where this went off the rails quickly.
Obama and the Democrats attacked the healthcare system high cost
means of understure Americans and companies denying coverage for pre
(14:04):
existing conditions. Instead of just complaining, Obama proposed Obamacare mandated
insurance coverages, expending Medicaid and prevented prevented denial of pre
existing conditions. Now, the mandated insurance coverages is definitely where
it was. It was the right for attack higher mandate
(14:28):
insurance coverage. When you're talking to a private company, somebody
got explained that part to me. You're gonna tell me
what I'm gonna charge and can't charge to people who
chose to do business with me. But Papa, let's let's
(14:48):
let that pass. Obama used this technique number eleven successfully.
He didn't criticize the problem. He for the clear policy.
The opponents were forced to argue against a concrete plan
rather than attacking complaints. Even at the years of opposition,
(15:13):
Republicans failed to fully repair Obamacare because they had no
strong alternative. Of course, there's other reasons behind that that
someone someone will will call it much more sinister, but
we'll live the lead that alone right now. Buying, on
the other hand, used this strategy and looking at the
(15:40):
Inflation Reduction Act criticizing inflation and offering a legislative fix.
Left always to look for government to come in. Obama
did it with Obamacare. There's other application is that couldn't
(16:01):
evolve private industry because private industry has an incentive. They
have an incentive to offer solutions and best services to
the customer. Government doesn't have that incentive because there the
money that they get is from us, so they have
(16:23):
no producial responsibility like private industry does to protect that
dollar and to keep that customer happy. But Left doesn't
doesn't look to engage the private industry because that's that's
no money for them. It's there's no win in it
(16:45):
for them. While inflation remain in concerned, Democrats could say
they had a solution, shifting the argument. Biden and Democrats
inflation uh inflation blaming corporate degree, supply chain issues and
Republican economic policies, and Republicans gave ground. They didn't stand
(17:12):
on the ground. They didn't stand on their principles of
the benefit of lower government, less regulations. Risk is a
winnable argument. It always win. Look at what Trump has done,
look at throughout his history. Where you look at Reagan,
(17:33):
you've got Trump or any even in your own household.
When you reduce impediments, artificial impediments to a goal that
you're trying to achieve and just go add it with
(17:54):
that cause and harm, of course, it's a much straight
out line, and so therefore it doesn't cost as much
to get to that goal. It's the same thing in
any situation, particularly when cars comes to government. A couple
of years ago, we up here in Atlanta had a
(18:14):
major major of bridge go out and they needed to
get that bridge replaced a SAP. What did they do.
The governor removed all regulations that were seen as an
impediment to get that bridge repaired a SAP, and they
(18:36):
did it in record time. My question is why then
they keep those regulations off the books and then bring
them back if they saw how well because no one died,
the bridge didn't fall down after they repaired it, so
(19:01):
what regulations were in place before that penalty was not necessary? Question? Question?
Instead of blaming internal external factors. They pace. They passed
(19:21):
the Inflation Reduction Act lower prescription drug costs by allowing
Medicare to negotiate. Medicare don't negotiate, it's government. So again
word manipulation, wordplay, Owellian double speak. Redefining what is is? Yeah, classic, classic, classic.
(19:46):
Investing clean energy to reduce long term costs, which it doesn't.
It came clean energy is it's just it's dirty. It's dirty.
It's dirty. There's no substans clean energy, and raise corporate taxes.
So therefore it costs more to do businesses in our
(20:08):
country to fund government program see I always work to
benefit development growth and therefore increase the weight on those
who pay taxes in this country instead of blaming inflation
(20:31):
on the stern of fractice. Biting past the bill, Republicans
forced to either support or pose transil legislation rather than
just debating inflation and theory. And you see it, it's repetition.
Republicans give ground, Democrats Charles for and take ground. Trump,
(21:05):
on the other hand, came with the Tax and Jobs
Act twenty seventeen, attacking high taxes and offering Republican solution.
So again he's using Sololinsky's tactics two rebuff or attack
(21:29):
the demoquests. The left use of these same tactics Democrat
attacks to attack the bill as benefit the wealthy, but
Trump Trump's side could defend it as the economic growth strategy.
Trump attacked attack the U system as taxesmans being unfair,
(21:56):
unfair the businesses to high for the middle class, and
her economic growth growth was as as anyone knows taxes
does just that it does. High taxes does her economic growth?
Regulation her economic growth. Instead of criticizing, Trump's team proposed
(22:17):
a solution cut personal income tax across multiple brackets. His
tax plan reduced corporate taxes from thirty five percent was
killing us in regards to international competitiveness to twenty one percent,
and argued and argued it was stimular economic growth. He
(22:41):
used successfully this rule to force Democrats who argue against
specific test cuts rather than just defending the old system
when when criticized is favoring the wealthy. Trump cut point
to middle class benefits. Rule twelve. Pick the target, freeze it,
(23:11):
personalize it, and polarize it. This rule was about is
isolated an opponent, making them the face of the opposition
and turning them into a divisive figure to waken their
influence in credibility. Obama used this like he's a master,
(23:37):
targeting Mint Romney and his associations with ban Capital, personalizing
y Romney as an out of test millionaire, which is
pretty pathetic because oh Obama is a was a millionaire,
as a much small a millionaire before after being president
(24:01):
than he was before. How did that happen? But no,
I want to talk about that. Twenty twelve elections, he
painted met Romney ascid alitis, highlighted his tenure at being Capital,
keepsing him of destroying American jobs, which is rich because,
(24:22):
as gone to later, he spearheaded Acorn was ruined many
people's lives. He used to leak forty seven comment to
brand him as someone who didn't care about half of Americans,
and we went over there for forty seven percent comment
(24:42):
earlier portrayed him as as rich just connected businessman, comparing
him to Wall Street. The strategy worked. Romney was isolated
as a symbol of corporate greed. Again, he didn't push back,
he didn't fight back. He didn't tell about Obama's wealthy
(25:05):
family and where he came from, and plus his hand
and Acorn w know why. It's like Republicans don't really
want to win. They didn't want to bring a gun
to a gun fight. They steady, steady wanted to bring
not even a knife, but a back and then they
(25:30):
want to come. They get pumpled, the slaughtered in the fights.
This rule twelve. She use to personalize the election by
making Miami the villain, not the Republicans froze the attack
by constantly tying him to bank capital in the forty
(25:52):
seven percent comment, which is definitely taking out of context,
portalized him by by making the election a choice between
what the corporate waiter versus a president who fought for
the middle class. Obama used it to demonize the demonized
(26:16):
MAGA extreamists in twenty two election, isolated Trump and his
supporters as a threat to democracy. Whereas again, if you'll
beat something enough times, it will be something that's truth,
especially when they see being no efficient pushback. And that's
(26:40):
how incredibly trump Trump's MAGA was able to be turned
into anti American or threat to democracy, which is pretty
interested if you know the definition of democracy and have
this come from a leftist but anyway, yeah, look look
(27:02):
at yourself. It's very the left depends on the ignorance
of the American people. Not to say all politicians don't,
but the left does it. They they talk about stuff
(27:25):
that they know it's crazy, and they know if they
just go and look it up, they know for the bs,
but they are counted on We're not doing that. They
counted on that, and you can't really say that the
(27:48):
strategy isn't working. Instead of just attacking attacking Republicans, Bidens,
the Biking Team focused on Trump's and Mecca as a
streatments speaks in Philodelphia twenty twenty two labored MAGA as
a threat to democracy. January sixth hearings positioned Trump as
(28:11):
a lawless authoritarian versus pretty rik authoritarian from Biden push
the term MAGA Republicans to separate them from traditional conservatives
US Trump's legal troubles to isolate him as a figure
of chaos and instability. This forced some Republicans to distance
(28:34):
the sales from Trump, weakening his support network, which I
find so irritating because Democrats can put forth a candidate
who who has himself admitted he leans socialists, he leans socialists.
(28:55):
He admitted that in his book, referring to Obama didn't
have Biden, whose cognitive challenged from the beginning of his
campaign so much kept him in the basement, then had
the decency to come out on the campaign trail to
(29:19):
face the people who were going to vote for him,
changed the rules to remove Bonnie Standers, and then changed
the rules again after his coignificate declinient became visible to
the whole world to inject a woman who didn't get
(29:44):
one vote when she ran on her own against Biden,
to put her into place of Biden to be voted
on to be president. And all the Democrats. You needn't
hear one Democrats say anything in opposition strongly or or
(30:15):
out of line. You gotta get the definitens. Do Democrats
do stuff as a unit? They are on script from
day one. It's like they they they are on a
chat line. When the world come out to one, goes
(30:35):
out to all, and they are on points. It got
to be some moderates in the demographic party. It got
people can't be this much of single speak and single
thought can't be. But some could say that the Republicans
(31:03):
are better because we do have differences of views, and
sometimes those differences of views come out and we are
honest supposedly to say I don't like what he see
your thinking, I don't like what he is see is doing.
(31:25):
I don't like what he is see you're saying you
look at that's a good thing, but we are in
a fight. Some things had to be kept behind doors.
And then when we come out into the moom, we
gotta be one voice for the betterment. But we haven't
(31:48):
learned a lesson to that point yet. This who was used,
was used successfully and to target Trump personally better than
just broad Republican policy. Froze him in the threat to
democracy label, making it hard for him to be rebranded
or to rebrand portalize him, forcing Republicans to either defend
(32:13):
or dishes themselves. Democrats don't do that. That's an issue.
That's a serious issue. When you look at the demonst
that Democrats have done and are doing to this country,
it needs to be pointed out. And there's something, there's something.
(32:34):
I mean, I give it the board label because they
act like that a board. You will be you will
be made to change or else. And how many y'all
(33:00):
want that you will be assimilated. That's not good for
a political party, national political party that Richard should lead
a nation that was built on individual individuality, individual thought,
(33:26):
individual freedoms. M I guess you don't have enough problem
with that because they keep getting voted in locally, nationally.
It's just bizarre. It's just bizarre. But that kind of
goes to the success of a Lensky's tactics right. Trump
(33:54):
used it the same strategy and making making Hillary a
step of corruption. Some of them just attacked Democrats he
forced He focused on Hillary's pillary Clinton personally nicknamed her
(34:17):
quicker Hillary. I remember, I remember how many of y'all
remember that do re enforced corruption allegations and they are
there are many constantly brought up her private email service scandal,
person bring guard's the attack criticism framing her as responsible
for American deaths encouraged lack of her chance to make
(34:40):
her the embodiment of elite corruption. The strategy worked even
among swing voters, as Clinton was seeing as as untrustworthy.
This will work because it throws her in place, making
her her to making her to defend herself, constantly portoized her,
making the election a bad of Trump the outside of
(35:02):
versus Hillary the corrupt insider. Trump fought back mm hm.
Trump fought back. It's unfortunately not in the Republicans due
on the nationale level, which kind of leads into this
notion that we are part of the federal on a
(35:24):
federal level, is a uni party because it doesn't seem
any seem to be any real, real true opposition party.
That it's a counterbalance to the Democrats to win the war,
(35:47):
not just the battle to win the war. It doesn't
seem to be a true opposition party. Democrats oppose everything
Republican administration prims, particularly a strong one like Trump's. How
(36:09):
many y'all remember our strong, fears cohesive Republican opposition against
the most Marxists led administration that being up by my
administration for eight years. How many y'all remember a strong,
(36:34):
solid Republican opposition party against Biden, a man who was
suspected to be not all there day one, Oh wait,
there was none. There was none. So Sololinsky's theology reshaped America.
(37:11):
This is a quote that I got out of I
read this article from way back I had in my
collection from the World Worldview Report, and this was titled
actually you can still find this online Sololinsky, nineteen on nine,
nineteen seventy two and his powerful disciples looking at that.
(37:36):
But this quote came from Investing Business Daily in twenty
or nine. Alinsky's worldview was that mankind is divided into
three parts, the half, the half knots, and the half
of little want mores. His purpose was to teach the
(38:03):
have nots how to take power and money away from
the has by creating matter organizations to seize power. And
he admitted this means evolution. He admitted it. Look at
(38:29):
his further, it's reshaping of America. He inspired movements like
community organization and through twenty seventeen to I mean through
nineteen seventy sorr se nineteen seventies to the nineteen hundreds
member Acorn. We'll get into that in a few minutes,
(38:49):
and labor unions. Obama's early political strategy. He worked as
a community organizer under Oleninsky's methods. I mean, y'all, remember
Alcha power Wall Street used war number one. Power is
what the enemy thinks you have. Black lives matter, I remember, y'all,
(39:12):
remember that used ten pushed negative until it becomes a positive.
Now for conservatives to come back being pummeled by the left.
(39:33):
With these strategies and and theologies. They had to incorporate
it into their arsenal. They adopt their uses by by
Trump twenty sixteen used would five ridly cool is a
(39:53):
man's most potent weapon to label his opponents. Right media
used to use this strategy to focus on personalizing attacks
fake news, deep state. The Tea Party movement used to
use this strategy. Oh nine, uh use war eight. Keep
(40:15):
the pressure on against Obama's policies. Further, it's it's his
his theology. Has a received America? It changed how political
fights are fought. Political campaigns today use a Lensky style framing,
(40:39):
making elections personal and polarizing. How many, ever, notice that
no longer are issues being discussed like in times of Reagan.
It's personal, it's polarization. And when did this start? Obama?
(41:07):
No coincidence. We don't talk about issues. We don't talk
about how you're gonna make this country great. That's talked
about at the back end this pastor election wasn't have
talked about how Trump policies We're gonna make this country better.
(41:29):
He talked about himself. This was talked about the the
The election wasn't about Biden or has view of America
how to make it better. It couldn't have been, because
Commander was talking about birthrights and and and and you know,
(41:57):
men having babies, fertility stuff. The folkus who was not
on how to make this country better for that generation,
more wealthier, more freer. It wasn't about how we could
keep our nacious enemies at bay and how to make
(42:17):
our nations alliances better and stronger. It wasn't. It wasn't.
It wasn't anything closed to a JFK kind of vision
from the Democrat Party and was allowed to be a
reaken like vision from the Republican site for the nation.
(42:43):
Just polarizing nonsense. I think it's on both sides to
use his strategy to disrupt institutions, pressure leaders, and gain
media tation. The loudest, void, most buffoonish actions the clowns
(43:05):
show social media empathize a Lensky attack. It's by making
it easier to target individuals, ridicule opponents, and spread messaging.
There we go. Now, this could be information that that
(43:25):
that I directly got from this article that I referred
to earlier Worldview report, and I'm just gonna go over
some of it. It starts off very interestingly, and this
article it was by Brandon House gets some background on
(43:50):
not this stolency, but the whole theory theology behind Sololensky
and his I guess creation of this book, Ruptual Radicals
a young Italian Marsis by the name of Antonio Gramsky.
It advised World War two dictator Mudulinski that violence was
(44:14):
not the way to bring about lasting revolution people would
embraced and maintained. Grimiski wrote etiquently of a quiet quote
unquote revolution, one that would transform a culture from within
by changing the basic worldview of each and every institution
(44:43):
in society. He also cautioned that this revolution would be
a long march through the institutions quote unquote, not a
bliscy of change, and so clear his strategy thinking that
(45:08):
Griminsky targeted Christianity specifically, that's the greatest philosophical adversary along
the way. So you wonder why Christianity Christism is being attacked.
It has been so visiently attacked since Obama and through
(45:31):
these listic nights like Hillary, like Biden, through their administrations
and leadership. Goes on to say later in the twelfth century,
Grimisky's vision captivated another rising neo marshas who codified through
(45:53):
the Gramaski Dream and in nineteen seventy one book Rules
for Radicals, the pragmatic premiere for realistic radicals, dal Sarolinsky
detailed the need to penetrate the middle class and reorganize
(46:15):
from within. Olinsky's articulate tactics for infiltrated every conceivable social institution,
including churches, including churches, and I want you to take
(46:38):
a look at this list, this very short list. Killry
Clinton wrote her senior thesis at Real Leslie College on
Olinsky's and its strategies. Barack Obama, while at Harvard attendant
(47:05):
an Industrial Areas Foundation Attendant d Industrial Areas Areas Foundation,
a group founded founded by Elinsky, and when he returned
to Chicago, Obama tossed on Elinsky's world view and strategies.
(47:26):
He was engrossed in this man's strategies and they both
were in Chicago. Clinting University professional Richard Andrew Cloward and
Francis Foster Pivns studied Alinsky and developed a Cloud Pivot
(47:51):
strategy which advocates implemented socialism by swamping the wlfare system
of states as well as the federal government with new sipions.
The social welfare system grew not like no other time
under Obaiden, under Obama and Biden, historic levels, particularly under
(48:18):
Obama because he had four years. And when you look
at the growth of the growth of immigrants under Obama, Obama,
under Biden to go onto the social welfare system. Have
(48:42):
y'all seen what's going on in California. Have y'all seen
what's going on in New York. Have y'all seen what's
going on in Illinois and countless cities, particularly goes that
have high minority and income populations. When you have such
(49:12):
a huge influx of low income individuals, many of them
low educated, that don't speak our language. Rather than rather
than put them in a situation like at the turn
of the century where where they were brought into the
(49:36):
culture more structuredly, but they were assimilated better, none of
those structures were applied in this case, not even attempted.
It was seen as a racist to even attempt to
make these people more like us. We had to become
(50:01):
more accepting, accepting of everything that they did, and we
were seeing as a racists or xenophoks that we even
tried to apply Western culture, American culture or expect for
our customs even uh, don't do that. Don't expect christ
missus Christmas. Again. That goes back to the attack on
(50:24):
Christianity in particular, Islam is given free reign. You see
what's happening today, radical Islamists, Uh, going through the cities,
beating up Jews, beating up and and and and tearing
(50:45):
down Christian monuments. And know what's going in Europe.
Speaker 4 (50:57):
HIV, New York and and municipalties are going brook trying
to feed all these people, house all these people.
Speaker 3 (51:16):
If it's just not there George Whitey, who's George Whitey?
Let me come on, George Wiley black Man for y'all
who didn't know, it's a thought pretty interesting. There's no
(51:40):
color bars. It's there's people who wow, who want people
to pay for what they want handouts again, battle between
(52:01):
have not In the Wanter halse And, as Margaret Thatcher said,
socialism only works until the people in the government one
out of money. Because if there's no if, if the
(52:25):
bucket is not being a full or made full or
feeling by the education of the people to become more affluent,
to become to become more of a participant in the
capitalist system. Eventually, the capital system is going to run
(52:46):
dry of resources. That's why the America's America is is
on one of fiends right now, because it's basically we've
been running on the successes of our fore for others,
(53:07):
because these type of theologies ideas have been injected into
our cultures since the industrial age. Is definitely since World
War two, real mechanism has been made a bad word.
The disciplines that came with Christianity has been thrown out
(53:28):
the window and relegated to the far far far far
fall back seats, and nothing better has been put in
its place. Something's gonna feel that void. Something hands filled
that void. Look at a culture. A culture is not
(53:51):
going forward, it's not progressions, degress is going backwards. And
theology such as this, it's filling that void. So George
Wiley was a chemist in nineteen sixties, turned to activism,
(54:23):
champions civil rights and economic justice. So he not only
plugged into Sulolinsky, he also found that the nw arm
r OH, which is a national welfare rights organization, to
(54:49):
push this ideology more and more and more out into
the culture. Then came.
Speaker 5 (55:01):
Uh rating way Way Wrathing Uh who worked with George
Wiley for for a minute, and then he went.
Speaker 3 (55:13):
On to uh found found Acorn. He went on to
found Acorn and then he laid a partner up with
another left leftist extremists, Bill Myers. He founded how many
(55:37):
y'all remember whether underground? If y'all are in anywhere in
nearl Philadelphy, y'all know, y'all know what Whether whether underground
and whether underground? It's a came from the Sorceress then
(56:00):
crap SDS, which are still very much associated with the
Democrat Party. So you see Salolninsky is still present on
(56:32):
the left in regards to its politics. I told you
about Acorn way Way rath Key started Acorn. Why is
that important because as a young attorney, going back to
(56:58):
this article again in the nineteen nineties, but Rock Whussein
Obama represented ACORN in Washington and their successful efforts to
expand Community Reinvestment Act authority in addition to making it
(57:19):
easier for ACORN groups to force force banks to making
risky loans to people who couldn't afford the loans, who
wouldn't qualify for the loans, was financially ill suited for
(57:40):
the loans, not racist economics but Acorn forced banks to
make this risky loans. This also paved the way for
banks like like Superior to package mortgages as investments and
(58:03):
for the government sponsored enterprise Fannie May and Freddie Mac
to underwrite them. The financial housing crisis that made headlines
in twenty h seven was brought on through Sarolinsky's idea
(58:26):
via Cloud Piven strategy of implementing socialism through big government,
destruction of contract, of contract law, and free market principles.
Don't want people who you know can't afford it, uh se,
(58:52):
that's a simple This economic sabotage was first tried in
New York City, and by nineteen seventy five the city
was on the verse of financial devastation. I mean, y'all
remember that all through New York. All though New York
(59:16):
had a manageable one hundred and fifty thousand, well manageable
one to fifty thousand welfare cations in nineteen sixty, a
decade later, just a decade later, the number had soared
(59:37):
to one point five million. Problem. Let me see problem,
and they won't see a problem with that. Our country
(01:00:06):
is in the world of park I said this many times,
and Sarlolensky's core core message or core mo. It's that
(01:00:28):
he's wanted to move the US from capitalism to socialism.
Going back to this article where the means of production
will be owned by all people i e. Government a
behavior and economic determinism, he viewed unemployment, disease, crime, bigotry
(01:00:54):
as byproducts of capitalism. Change. Change, Change was Olinsky's favorite word.
Hope and change. All right, this is a change was
a favorite favorite word, used on page after page. I
(01:01:20):
will argue he wrote that man's hopes lie in the
acceptance of the great law of change. Class vy race, baden,
anti Christian bigotry, and redistribution of wealth described the change
(01:01:44):
from which Olinsky was calling for which Ellinsky was calling
it would not be a stretch, and in fact it is.
Speaker 1 (01:01:59):
It is.
Speaker 3 (01:02:00):
It is a point to suggest that Olensky was the
source for candidates Obamas twenty eight campaign stock in Scripture
also warns that the wrong kind of change. Scripture goes
(01:02:22):
on to say, he says, speak pompous words against the
most high, shall persecute the saints of the most high,
and shall intend to change times. In law Daniel nine
twenty five, the underlying strategy when you want to you
(01:02:49):
want to say, he wasn't a Marxist, some argue, but
the underlying strategy, well, Marsians. Marsians begins with the prime
truth that all evils are caused by this exportation of
(01:03:12):
the politariat, you and I, the people, the little people,
by the capital, by the capitalists. Excuse me for this.
He logically proceeds to the revolution to the end, to
(01:03:35):
end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization, into
the new social order of dictatorship. All the politarian, you're
for capitalism to be under the dictatorship. Great, yeah, that's
(01:03:57):
what I wanted. Yeah. And finally the last stays political
paradise of communism. This is what we need to look at.
(01:04:17):
He says. He's not well, you don't say now, but
he said he wasn't a communist, but smell like a pig.
Look like a pig. It's a pig. When you look
at the two, we look at Karl marsh and you
look at Sardolinsky, they both focus on class and power struggle.
(01:04:45):
Themes Alinsky incursile, mobilizing and have nots against the has,
which aligns with Marxists. Now chairs of class struggle. He's
focused on attacking elites, resonates with left wing popularism, populism,
and socialist rhetoric. Example, the modern progressive movement often frames corporations,
(01:05:10):
the wealthy, and political elitists as oppressors, a theme seen
in both olenski tactics and Marsi's theology. Use of polarization
and social conflict will twelve pick the target, freezing, personalize it,
and polarize it. It's often used by social activists to
isolate opponents, similar to how Martians identify a borogus enemy. Example,
(01:05:40):
white privilege and systemic oppression. Nwatves targeted certain groups as oppressors,
much like how Martias target capitalists, long term societal chains,
real cultural institutions. Olenski's tactics emphasizes controlling, not just applying
(01:06:01):
constant pressure and changing perfect perception, which alignance with cultural
Martianism focus on reshape institutions e g. Media, education and law. Example,
Progressives push for DEI diversity, equity and inclusion. Policies and
(01:06:24):
corporations and education mirrors martians goals of dismounting or power structures,
and you can even see Martians geologia techniques way back
to how mild used it in the Chinese evolution. All
(01:06:46):
Listen is doing the same thing, just wrapped it into
different package and put it up in the tree for
other like minded and people individuals too on rapid later
if we don't recognize the evil and the danger all
(01:07:12):
people who use these type of strategies and techniques against us.
Doesn't matter if it's a female, doesn't matter, back and white,
doesn't matter if it's old or young. If they're calling
for the end of our traditions, the end and the
(01:07:36):
contamination of our Christian beliefs and theology, the end of
our reverence for our founders, you have to push back
on them or we will lose this country. There is
(01:07:57):
no two ways of looking at this. A. Lensky's theology
religion is alive and well because too many people do
not know about him in his theology and how it
is affecting our political environment and our cultural environment, and
(01:08:23):
too many of us don't hold Republican politicians accountable and
that at the end of the day, and you ain't
knowing this how to be a voter per se, But
you still have to understand at the local level who
(01:08:44):
your leaders are in politics and hold them accountable because
it's not about money. It can't be. It has to
be about doing the right thing, right and wrong. And
is that person honest? And that goes far beyond right
(01:09:05):
and wrong. It goes far beyond are you're a Democrat
or are you a Republican? It comes down to all
you an American.
Speaker 2 (01:09:57):
Thanks for listening to today's show, and and don't forget
to like and subscribe to this podcast and look for
Project Thirdeye Open on your favorite social media platforms. Check
out our web page at Projectthirdiopen dot com. And that's
third I with the letter I Projectthirdiopen dot com. Drop
(01:10:17):
us a note at Tony E.
Speaker 3 (01:10:19):
L At
Our foundering fathers here in this country, brought about the
only true revolution that has ever taken place in man's history.
Evolve the idea that you and I have within ourselves,
the god given right and the ability to determine our
own destiny.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
The United States of America the greatest nation in history,
ordained by our founders to be guided by divine providence,
but today we are witnessing the orchestrated disintegration of America.
Take a few seconds and take a look around your town,
your state, look at your country and your world, and
(00:39):
boldly ask what in the hell is going on?
Speaker 1 (00:43):
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it on to our children in the bloodstream.
The only way they can inherit the freedom we have
known is if we fight for it, protect it, defend it,
and then hand it to them with the well taught
lessons of how they in their lifetime. Let's do the same.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
Welcome to the podcast Project Third Eye Opened, where we
dare to question with boldness the events that are unfolding
around us that others won't. At the end of the day,
it is we the people who will decide the destiny
of the Nation. Now introducing your host Tony l.
Speaker 3 (01:25):
Great Change, Great Change Greece and this is another very
exciting podcast and our video cast presentation of project that
I opened and to start as always do you infras
(01:45):
was high d him, I will not be doing this.
I will not be here. I would not have been
born in the greatest country on the planet, and I
want to be bringing this to you. These are very very,
very very exciting times in which recurring are living in
(02:11):
existing someone I w want to say, you got to
go through to get to it, and we are going
through it now. What's going to come up on the
end for many of us is greatness, blessings. But as
(02:36):
you go through this period, we have to first look
at and be cognitive of where we're all economically as
a nation and as an individual ourselves. The best times
of America are in the rear view mirror. We need
(03:00):
to first come to a reconning with that. Many of
us still want to believe that still before still in
nineteen ninety nine, it's not but that understanding when you
look at our economic situation. If you got feat currency,
paper currency in your pocket, you need to think longer
(03:22):
hard looking at an offer diversify. Look into gold and silver,
precious metals, real currency, constitutional currency, not currency, money not currency,
(03:45):
is money, something of value, something that appreciates the value.
Look at gold and silver. If you go to my site,
project that help in dot com. That's project third spelt
out the letter I open e D dot com. Look
(04:05):
at that offer, check it out. You n the purchase,
go to sea Well there I would appreciate you doing so.
But if not there somewhere you get big discounts. This
this this bout being a listener, get big discounts. This
about being a listener going to that site and get coins,
(04:31):
get bars, get jewelry, whatever. But it's real, real money.
Look at that. Not there, get it somewhere because things
are changed. And Trump is trying to warn everybody, but
he ain't get no help. And the properties is not
educated enough to understand direct talk, so he's not talking directly,
(04:59):
which is what we need. But I'm I'm telling you
all right now, getting your hands on some gold and silver.
This is the fourth and final installment of this Well
Actress would be very important conversation having to deal with
(05:23):
a man who's very, very pivotal, pivotal, pivotal, and how
politicians communicate to us, and how politics is exercise now
and not just here but around the world, particularly those
(05:44):
on the left, how they are manipulating us, how they
are sekewing our perception of things. And yes we we
are heard of George, George orwell that's people though as well,
and you can learn a lot about how we are
(06:05):
being manipulated. But Rules of Radicals, I think it's a
different beast because, in my humble opinion, George always picked
up by many on the right, not to necessarily use
(06:25):
against us, but say, hey, look at what they're doing.
Look at what they're doing, how how they're doing word speech,
look at how they what they're doing, and how they're
doing that. The left is picking up a picked that
(06:47):
Rules who Radicals has have taught the teachings from what
I consider a theological perspective, because it is a religion.
It is a religion. That's why I call the theological
tenants of the man called Solominsky in his book Twelve
(07:16):
Rules Radicals tells you. It tells you one, two, three
to twelve the tenants of his theology, the principles of
his theology. For whatever reason, media or people on the
(07:40):
right though they're using these tenants. The last man I
heard tried to warn the people that this is being used.
It was used. Who was given to get used upon
us was former Speaker New English when he was running
against Obama. Try to tell you about Saltolensky. Of course,
(08:11):
the liberal media to try to make him out to
be able food and totally discount and discredit everything he
was saying regards to go to Salolinsky and and and
how Obama was Sallensky knight and in many cases that
they attacked from the left on inglish were successful because
(08:35):
unfortunately the media and the left know that general population
is not to go out and read, not could go
out and do their own homework. What's the reason why
I'm bringing this to you, hopefully that y'all will uh
not necessarily take what I say as as gospel. But hey,
(08:57):
the book is out there, the book is online, The
man's information is out there looking for yourself to you
and homework. So I'll tell you to do anyway. But
I'm bringing this to you because I want to do
my part, tell you how this man's influenced two generations.
(09:23):
There maybe more to come if this is not brought
to light. The three people that I'm focusing on right
now is Obama, with I mean, you can't get no
closer to Slolensky than Obama in regards to politics. Then
of course Biden, who was up under Obama for eight
(09:47):
years and who knows his disposure to Sallensky theology prior.
And then there's Trump, whose argument I could definitely understand
the argument that he's he had to be coming here
(10:07):
and use it for his for for his defense, you know,
which you will see in most cases, his his application
of his of Stolensky's techniques have been defensive and have
been sort of targeted at his opponents, not the American people,
(10:29):
not not not not through the testment of the country
that you cannot say in a case of sorto Lensky
and those who have picked up his theology and used
to on the left. So let's go on. We ended
on rule ten, so this is going to be eleven.
(10:58):
So these technical issues, so you got rut eleven. The
principle of successful attacks is a constructive alternative. Never let
the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution
(11:20):
to a problem. Oh sir, if you're not part of
the solution, You're part of the problem. Activist organizations have
an agenda and the strategy is to hold a place
at the table to be given a form to wield
their powers. So they have to have a compromised solution. Obama,
(11:50):
how did he use this strategy? In twenty ten? Obamacare
criticized healthcare system while offering a solution. Uh, even though
(12:12):
Republican attack that they struggle to propose an alternative. Why,
I don't know. I mean people people want to criticize
our healthcare system, but to say that socialized medicine is
the answer, that's a non starter to me. There's many
(12:36):
other solutions out there, like lowering the cause of litigation
in regards to my practice, you can lower the cause
of medicines. Listen, we have the best healthcare system because
(12:56):
it gives the individuals, the doctors to prefers, the ability
to earn what they're worth. But then when you bring
in litigation and the pharmaceutical industry, which is for whatever reason,
has an automatic seat at the table when it comes
(13:17):
to government policies, that's the problem. And then when you
have a healthcare system that is not a care prevention system,
that's the problem. There's other ways of going at this,
So why the Republicans didn't have a answer to this
(13:39):
kind of tells you where this went off the rails quickly.
Obama and the Democrats attacked the healthcare system high cost
means of understure Americans and companies denying coverage for pre
(14:04):
existing conditions. Instead of just complaining, Obama proposed Obamacare mandated
insurance coverages, expending Medicaid and prevented prevented denial of pre
existing conditions. Now, the mandated insurance coverages is definitely where
it was. It was the right for attack higher mandate
(14:28):
insurance coverage. When you're talking to a private company, somebody
got explained that part to me. You're gonna tell me
what I'm gonna charge and can't charge to people who
chose to do business with me. But Papa, let's let's
(14:48):
let that pass. Obama used this technique number eleven successfully.
He didn't criticize the problem. He for the clear policy.
The opponents were forced to argue against a concrete plan
rather than attacking complaints. Even at the years of opposition,
(15:13):
Republicans failed to fully repair Obamacare because they had no
strong alternative. Of course, there's other reasons behind that that
someone someone will will call it much more sinister, but
we'll live the lead that alone right now. Buying, on
the other hand, used this strategy and looking at the
(15:40):
Inflation Reduction Act criticizing inflation and offering a legislative fix.
Left always to look for government to come in. Obama
did it with Obamacare. There's other application is that couldn't
(16:01):
evolve private industry because private industry has an incentive. They
have an incentive to offer solutions and best services to
the customer. Government doesn't have that incentive because there the
money that they get is from us, so they have
(16:23):
no producial responsibility like private industry does to protect that
dollar and to keep that customer happy. But Left doesn't
doesn't look to engage the private industry because that's that's
no money for them. It's there's no win in it
(16:45):
for them. While inflation remain in concerned, Democrats could say
they had a solution, shifting the argument. Biden and Democrats
inflation uh inflation blaming corporate degree, supply chain issues and
Republican economic policies, and Republicans gave ground. They didn't stand
(17:12):
on the ground. They didn't stand on their principles of
the benefit of lower government, less regulations. Risk is a
winnable argument. It always win. Look at what Trump has done,
look at throughout his history. Where you look at Reagan,
(17:33):
you've got Trump or any even in your own household.
When you reduce impediments, artificial impediments to a goal that
you're trying to achieve and just go add it with
(17:54):
that cause and harm, of course, it's a much straight
out line, and so therefore it doesn't cost as much
to get to that goal. It's the same thing in
any situation, particularly when cars comes to government. A couple
of years ago, we up here in Atlanta had a
(18:14):
major major of bridge go out and they needed to
get that bridge replaced a SAP. What did they do.
The governor removed all regulations that were seen as an
impediment to get that bridge repaired a SAP, and they
(18:36):
did it in record time. My question is why then
they keep those regulations off the books and then bring
them back if they saw how well because no one died,
the bridge didn't fall down after they repaired it, so
(19:01):
what regulations were in place before that penalty was not necessary? Question? Question?
Instead of blaming internal external factors. They pace. They passed
(19:21):
the Inflation Reduction Act lower prescription drug costs by allowing
Medicare to negotiate. Medicare don't negotiate, it's government. So again
word manipulation, wordplay, Owellian double speak. Redefining what is is? Yeah, classic, classic, classic.
(19:46):
Investing clean energy to reduce long term costs, which it doesn't.
It came clean energy is it's just it's dirty. It's dirty.
It's dirty. There's no substans clean energy, and raise corporate taxes.
So therefore it costs more to do businesses in our
(20:08):
country to fund government program see I always work to
benefit development growth and therefore increase the weight on those
who pay taxes in this country instead of blaming inflation
(20:31):
on the stern of fractice. Biting past the bill, Republicans
forced to either support or pose transil legislation rather than
just debating inflation and theory. And you see it, it's repetition.
Republicans give ground, Democrats Charles for and take ground. Trump,
(21:05):
on the other hand, came with the Tax and Jobs
Act twenty seventeen, attacking high taxes and offering Republican solution.
So again he's using Sololinsky's tactics two rebuff or attack
(21:29):
the demoquests. The left use of these same tactics Democrat
attacks to attack the bill as benefit the wealthy, but
Trump Trump's side could defend it as the economic growth strategy.
Trump attacked attack the U system as taxesmans being unfair,
(21:56):
unfair the businesses to high for the middle class, and
her economic growth growth was as as anyone knows taxes
does just that it does. High taxes does her economic growth?
Regulation her economic growth. Instead of criticizing, Trump's team proposed
(22:17):
a solution cut personal income tax across multiple brackets. His
tax plan reduced corporate taxes from thirty five percent was
killing us in regards to international competitiveness to twenty one percent,
and argued and argued it was stimular economic growth. He
(22:41):
used successfully this rule to force Democrats who argue against
specific test cuts rather than just defending the old system
when when criticized is favoring the wealthy. Trump cut point
to middle class benefits. Rule twelve. Pick the target, freeze it,
(23:11):
personalize it, and polarize it. This rule was about is
isolated an opponent, making them the face of the opposition
and turning them into a divisive figure to waken their
influence in credibility. Obama used this like he's a master,
(23:37):
targeting Mint Romney and his associations with ban Capital, personalizing
y Romney as an out of test millionaire, which is
pretty pathetic because oh Obama is a was a millionaire,
as a much small a millionaire before after being president
(24:01):
than he was before. How did that happen? But no,
I want to talk about that. Twenty twelve elections, he
painted met Romney ascid alitis, highlighted his tenure at being Capital,
keepsing him of destroying American jobs, which is rich because,
(24:22):
as gone to later, he spearheaded Acorn was ruined many
people's lives. He used to leak forty seven comment to
brand him as someone who didn't care about half of Americans,
and we went over there for forty seven percent comment
(24:42):
earlier portrayed him as as rich just connected businessman, comparing
him to Wall Street. The strategy worked. Romney was isolated
as a symbol of corporate greed. Again, he didn't push back,
he didn't fight back. He didn't tell about Obama's wealthy
(25:05):
family and where he came from, and plus his hand
and Acorn w know why. It's like Republicans don't really
want to win. They didn't want to bring a gun
to a gun fight. They steady, steady wanted to bring
not even a knife, but a back and then they
(25:30):
want to come. They get pumpled, the slaughtered in the fights.
This rule twelve. She use to personalize the election by
making Miami the villain, not the Republicans froze the attack
by constantly tying him to bank capital in the forty
(25:52):
seven percent comment, which is definitely taking out of context,
portalized him by by making the election a choice between
what the corporate waiter versus a president who fought for
the middle class. Obama used it to demonize the demonized
(26:16):
MAGA extreamists in twenty two election, isolated Trump and his
supporters as a threat to democracy. Whereas again, if you'll
beat something enough times, it will be something that's truth,
especially when they see being no efficient pushback. And that's
(26:40):
how incredibly trump Trump's MAGA was able to be turned
into anti American or threat to democracy, which is pretty
interested if you know the definition of democracy and have
this come from a leftist but anyway, yeah, look look
(27:02):
at yourself. It's very the left depends on the ignorance
of the American people. Not to say all politicians don't,
but the left does it. They they talk about stuff
(27:25):
that they know it's crazy, and they know if they
just go and look it up, they know for the bs,
but they are counted on We're not doing that. They
counted on that, and you can't really say that the
(27:48):
strategy isn't working. Instead of just attacking attacking Republicans, Bidens,
the Biking Team focused on Trump's and Mecca as a
streatments speaks in Philodelphia twenty twenty two labored MAGA as
a threat to democracy. January sixth hearings positioned Trump as
(28:11):
a lawless authoritarian versus pretty rik authoritarian from Biden push
the term MAGA Republicans to separate them from traditional conservatives
US Trump's legal troubles to isolate him as a figure
of chaos and instability. This forced some Republicans to distance
(28:34):
the sales from Trump, weakening his support network, which I
find so irritating because Democrats can put forth a candidate
who who has himself admitted he leans socialists, he leans socialists.
(28:55):
He admitted that in his book, referring to Obama didn't
have Biden, whose cognitive challenged from the beginning of his
campaign so much kept him in the basement, then had
the decency to come out on the campaign trail to
(29:19):
face the people who were going to vote for him,
changed the rules to remove Bonnie Standers, and then changed
the rules again after his coignificate declinient became visible to
the whole world to inject a woman who didn't get
(29:44):
one vote when she ran on her own against Biden,
to put her into place of Biden to be voted
on to be president. And all the Democrats. You needn't
hear one Democrats say anything in opposition strongly or or
(30:15):
out of line. You gotta get the definitens. Do Democrats
do stuff as a unit? They are on script from
day one. It's like they they they are on a
chat line. When the world come out to one, goes
(30:35):
out to all, and they are on points. It got
to be some moderates in the demographic party. It got
people can't be this much of single speak and single
thought can't be. But some could say that the Republicans
(31:03):
are better because we do have differences of views, and
sometimes those differences of views come out and we are
honest supposedly to say I don't like what he see
your thinking, I don't like what he is see is doing.
(31:25):
I don't like what he is see you're saying you
look at that's a good thing, but we are in
a fight. Some things had to be kept behind doors.
And then when we come out into the moom, we
gotta be one voice for the betterment. But we haven't
(31:48):
learned a lesson to that point yet. This who was used,
was used successfully and to target Trump personally better than
just broad Republican policy. Froze him in the threat to
democracy label, making it hard for him to be rebranded
or to rebrand portalize him, forcing Republicans to either defend
(32:13):
or dishes themselves. Democrats don't do that. That's an issue.
That's a serious issue. When you look at the demonst
that Democrats have done and are doing to this country,
it needs to be pointed out. And there's something, there's something.
(32:34):
I mean, I give it the board label because they
act like that a board. You will be you will
be made to change or else. And how many y'all
(33:00):
want that you will be assimilated. That's not good for
a political party, national political party that Richard should lead
a nation that was built on individual individuality, individual thought,
(33:26):
individual freedoms. M I guess you don't have enough problem
with that because they keep getting voted in locally, nationally.
It's just bizarre. It's just bizarre. But that kind of
goes to the success of a Lensky's tactics right. Trump
(33:54):
used it the same strategy and making making Hillary a
step of corruption. Some of them just attacked Democrats he
forced He focused on Hillary's pillary Clinton personally nicknamed her
(34:17):
quicker Hillary. I remember, I remember how many of y'all
remember that do re enforced corruption allegations and they are
there are many constantly brought up her private email service scandal,
person bring guard's the attack criticism framing her as responsible
for American deaths encouraged lack of her chance to make
(34:40):
her the embodiment of elite corruption. The strategy worked even
among swing voters, as Clinton was seeing as as untrustworthy.
This will work because it throws her in place, making
her her to making her to defend herself, constantly portoized her,
making the election a bad of Trump the outside of
(35:02):
versus Hillary the corrupt insider. Trump fought back mm hm.
Trump fought back. It's unfortunately not in the Republicans due
on the nationale level, which kind of leads into this
notion that we are part of the federal on a
(35:24):
federal level, is a uni party because it doesn't seem
any seem to be any real, real true opposition party.
That it's a counterbalance to the Democrats to win the war,
(35:47):
not just the battle to win the war. It doesn't
seem to be a true opposition party. Democrats oppose everything
Republican administration prims, particularly a strong one like Trump's. How
(36:09):
many y'all remember our strong, fears cohesive Republican opposition against
the most Marxists led administration that being up by my
administration for eight years. How many y'all remember a strong,
(36:34):
solid Republican opposition party against Biden, a man who was
suspected to be not all there day one, Oh wait,
there was none. There was none. So Sololinsky's theology reshaped America.
(37:11):
This is a quote that I got out of I
read this article from way back I had in my
collection from the World Worldview Report, and this was titled
actually you can still find this online Sololinsky, nineteen on nine,
nineteen seventy two and his powerful disciples looking at that.
(37:36):
But this quote came from Investing Business Daily in twenty
or nine. Alinsky's worldview was that mankind is divided into
three parts, the half, the half knots, and the half
of little want mores. His purpose was to teach the
(38:03):
have nots how to take power and money away from
the has by creating matter organizations to seize power. And
he admitted this means evolution. He admitted it. Look at
(38:29):
his further, it's reshaping of America. He inspired movements like
community organization and through twenty seventeen to I mean through
nineteen seventy sorr se nineteen seventies to the nineteen hundreds
member Acorn. We'll get into that in a few minutes,
(38:49):
and labor unions. Obama's early political strategy. He worked as
a community organizer under Oleninsky's methods. I mean, y'all, remember
Alcha power Wall Street used war number one. Power is
what the enemy thinks you have. Black lives matter, I remember, y'all,
(39:12):
remember that used ten pushed negative until it becomes a positive.
Now for conservatives to come back being pummeled by the left.
(39:33):
With these strategies and and theologies. They had to incorporate
it into their arsenal. They adopt their uses by by
Trump twenty sixteen used would five ridly cool is a
(39:53):
man's most potent weapon to label his opponents. Right media
used to use this strategy to focus on personalizing attacks
fake news, deep state. The Tea Party movement used to
use this strategy. Oh nine, uh use war eight. Keep
(40:15):
the pressure on against Obama's policies. Further, it's it's his
his theology. Has a received America? It changed how political
fights are fought. Political campaigns today use a Lensky style framing,
(40:39):
making elections personal and polarizing. How many, ever, notice that
no longer are issues being discussed like in times of Reagan.
It's personal, it's polarization. And when did this start? Obama?
(41:07):
No coincidence. We don't talk about issues. We don't talk
about how you're gonna make this country great. That's talked
about at the back end this pastor election wasn't have
talked about how Trump policies We're gonna make this country better.
(41:29):
He talked about himself. This was talked about the the
The election wasn't about Biden or has view of America
how to make it better. It couldn't have been, because
Commander was talking about birthrights and and and and you know,
(41:57):
men having babies, fertility stuff. The folkus who was not
on how to make this country better for that generation,
more wealthier, more freer. It wasn't about how we could
keep our nacious enemies at bay and how to make
(42:17):
our nations alliances better and stronger. It wasn't. It wasn't.
It wasn't anything closed to a JFK kind of vision
from the Democrat Party and was allowed to be a
reaken like vision from the Republican site for the nation.
(42:43):
Just polarizing nonsense. I think it's on both sides to
use his strategy to disrupt institutions, pressure leaders, and gain
media tation. The loudest, void, most buffoonish actions the clowns
(43:05):
show social media empathize a Lensky attack. It's by making
it easier to target individuals, ridicule opponents, and spread messaging.
There we go. Now, this could be information that that
(43:25):
that I directly got from this article that I referred
to earlier Worldview report, and I'm just gonna go over
some of it. It starts off very interestingly, and this
article it was by Brandon House gets some background on
(43:50):
not this stolency, but the whole theory theology behind Sololensky
and his I guess creation of this book, Ruptual Radicals
a young Italian Marsis by the name of Antonio Gramsky.
It advised World War two dictator Mudulinski that violence was
(44:14):
not the way to bring about lasting revolution people would
embraced and maintained. Grimiski wrote etiquently of a quiet quote
unquote revolution, one that would transform a culture from within
by changing the basic worldview of each and every institution
(44:43):
in society. He also cautioned that this revolution would be
a long march through the institutions quote unquote, not a
bliscy of change, and so clear his strategy thinking that
(45:08):
Griminsky targeted Christianity specifically, that's the greatest philosophical adversary along
the way. So you wonder why Christianity Christism is being attacked.
It has been so visiently attacked since Obama and through
(45:31):
these listic nights like Hillary, like Biden, through their administrations
and leadership. Goes on to say later in the twelfth century,
Grimisky's vision captivated another rising neo marshas who codified through
(45:53):
the Gramaski Dream and in nineteen seventy one book Rules
for Radicals, the pragmatic premiere for realistic radicals, dal Sarolinsky
detailed the need to penetrate the middle class and reorganize
(46:15):
from within. Olinsky's articulate tactics for infiltrated every conceivable social institution,
including churches, including churches, and I want you to take
(46:38):
a look at this list, this very short list. Killry
Clinton wrote her senior thesis at Real Leslie College on
Olinsky's and its strategies. Barack Obama, while at Harvard attendant
(47:05):
an Industrial Areas Foundation Attendant d Industrial Areas Areas Foundation,
a group founded founded by Elinsky, and when he returned
to Chicago, Obama tossed on Elinsky's world view and strategies.
(47:26):
He was engrossed in this man's strategies and they both
were in Chicago. Clinting University professional Richard Andrew Cloward and
Francis Foster Pivns studied Alinsky and developed a Cloud Pivot
(47:51):
strategy which advocates implemented socialism by swamping the wlfare system
of states as well as the federal government with new sipions.
The social welfare system grew not like no other time
under Obaiden, under Obama and Biden, historic levels, particularly under
(48:18):
Obama because he had four years. And when you look
at the growth of the growth of immigrants under Obama, Obama,
under Biden to go onto the social welfare system. Have
(48:42):
y'all seen what's going on in California. Have y'all seen
what's going on in New York. Have y'all seen what's
going on in Illinois and countless cities, particularly goes that
have high minority and income populations. When you have such
(49:12):
a huge influx of low income individuals, many of them
low educated, that don't speak our language. Rather than rather
than put them in a situation like at the turn
of the century where where they were brought into the
(49:36):
culture more structuredly, but they were assimilated better, none of
those structures were applied in this case, not even attempted.
It was seen as a racist to even attempt to
make these people more like us. We had to become
(50:01):
more accepting, accepting of everything that they did, and we
were seeing as a racists or xenophoks that we even
tried to apply Western culture, American culture or expect for
our customs even uh, don't do that. Don't expect christ
missus Christmas. Again. That goes back to the attack on
(50:24):
Christianity in particular, Islam is given free reign. You see
what's happening today, radical Islamists, Uh, going through the cities,
beating up Jews, beating up and and and and tearing
(50:45):
down Christian monuments. And know what's going in Europe.
Speaker 4 (50:57):
HIV, New York and and municipalties are going brook trying
to feed all these people, house all these people.
Speaker 3 (51:16):
If it's just not there George Whitey, who's George Whitey?
Let me come on, George Wiley black Man for y'all
who didn't know, it's a thought pretty interesting. There's no
(51:40):
color bars. It's there's people who wow, who want people
to pay for what they want handouts again, battle between
(52:01):
have not In the Wanter halse And, as Margaret Thatcher said,
socialism only works until the people in the government one
out of money. Because if there's no if, if the
(52:25):
bucket is not being a full or made full or
feeling by the education of the people to become more affluent,
to become to become more of a participant in the
capitalist system. Eventually, the capital system is going to run
(52:46):
dry of resources. That's why the America's America is is
on one of fiends right now, because it's basically we've
been running on the successes of our fore for others,
(53:07):
because these type of theologies ideas have been injected into
our cultures since the industrial age. Is definitely since World
War two, real mechanism has been made a bad word.
The disciplines that came with Christianity has been thrown out
(53:28):
the window and relegated to the far far far far
fall back seats, and nothing better has been put in
its place. Something's gonna feel that void. Something hands filled
that void. Look at a culture. A culture is not
(53:51):
going forward, it's not progressions, degress is going backwards. And
theology such as this, it's filling that void. So George
Wiley was a chemist in nineteen sixties, turned to activism,
(54:23):
champions civil rights and economic justice. So he not only
plugged into Sulolinsky, he also found that the nw arm
r OH, which is a national welfare rights organization, to
(54:49):
push this ideology more and more and more out into
the culture. Then came.
Speaker 5 (55:01):
Uh rating way Way Wrathing Uh who worked with George
Wiley for for a minute, and then he went.
Speaker 3 (55:13):
On to uh found found Acorn. He went on to
found Acorn and then he laid a partner up with
another left leftist extremists, Bill Myers. He founded how many
(55:37):
y'all remember whether underground? If y'all are in anywhere in
nearl Philadelphy, y'all know, y'all know what Whether whether underground
and whether underground? It's a came from the Sorceress then
(56:00):
crap SDS, which are still very much associated with the
Democrat Party. So you see Salolninsky is still present on
(56:32):
the left in regards to its politics. I told you
about Acorn way Way rath Key started Acorn. Why is
that important because as a young attorney, going back to
(56:58):
this article again in the nineteen nineties, but Rock Whussein
Obama represented ACORN in Washington and their successful efforts to
expand Community Reinvestment Act authority in addition to making it
(57:19):
easier for ACORN groups to force force banks to making
risky loans to people who couldn't afford the loans, who
wouldn't qualify for the loans, was financially ill suited for
(57:40):
the loans, not racist economics but Acorn forced banks to
make this risky loans. This also paved the way for
banks like like Superior to package mortgages as investments and
(58:03):
for the government sponsored enterprise Fannie May and Freddie Mac
to underwrite them. The financial housing crisis that made headlines
in twenty h seven was brought on through Sarolinsky's idea
(58:26):
via Cloud Piven strategy of implementing socialism through big government,
destruction of contract, of contract law, and free market principles.
Don't want people who you know can't afford it, uh se,
(58:52):
that's a simple This economic sabotage was first tried in
New York City, and by nineteen seventy five the city
was on the verse of financial devastation. I mean, y'all
remember that all through New York. All though New York
(59:16):
had a manageable one hundred and fifty thousand, well manageable
one to fifty thousand welfare cations in nineteen sixty, a
decade later, just a decade later, the number had soared
(59:37):
to one point five million. Problem. Let me see problem,
and they won't see a problem with that. Our country
(01:00:06):
is in the world of park I said this many times,
and Sarlolensky's core core message or core mo. It's that
(01:00:28):
he's wanted to move the US from capitalism to socialism.
Going back to this article where the means of production
will be owned by all people i e. Government a
behavior and economic determinism, he viewed unemployment, disease, crime, bigotry
(01:00:54):
as byproducts of capitalism. Change. Change, Change was Olinsky's favorite word.
Hope and change. All right, this is a change was
a favorite favorite word, used on page after page. I
(01:01:20):
will argue he wrote that man's hopes lie in the
acceptance of the great law of change. Class vy race, baden,
anti Christian bigotry, and redistribution of wealth described the change
(01:01:44):
from which Olinsky was calling for which Ellinsky was calling
it would not be a stretch, and in fact it is.
Speaker 1 (01:01:59):
It is.
Speaker 3 (01:02:00):
It is a point to suggest that Olensky was the
source for candidates Obamas twenty eight campaign stock in Scripture
also warns that the wrong kind of change. Scripture goes
(01:02:22):
on to say, he says, speak pompous words against the
most high, shall persecute the saints of the most high,
and shall intend to change times. In law Daniel nine
twenty five, the underlying strategy when you want to you
(01:02:49):
want to say, he wasn't a Marxist, some argue, but
the underlying strategy, well, Marsians. Marsians begins with the prime
truth that all evils are caused by this exportation of
(01:03:12):
the politariat, you and I, the people, the little people,
by the capital, by the capitalists. Excuse me for this.
He logically proceeds to the revolution to the end, to
(01:03:35):
end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization, into
the new social order of dictatorship. All the politarian, you're
for capitalism to be under the dictatorship. Great, yeah, that's
(01:03:57):
what I wanted. Yeah. And finally the last stays political
paradise of communism. This is what we need to look at.
(01:04:17):
He says. He's not well, you don't say now, but
he said he wasn't a communist, but smell like a pig.
Look like a pig. It's a pig. When you look
at the two, we look at Karl marsh and you
look at Sardolinsky, they both focus on class and power struggle.
(01:04:45):
Themes Alinsky incursile, mobilizing and have nots against the has,
which aligns with Marxists. Now chairs of class struggle. He's
focused on attacking elites, resonates with left wing popularism, populism,
and socialist rhetoric. Example, the modern progressive movement often frames corporations,
(01:05:10):
the wealthy, and political elitists as oppressors, a theme seen
in both olenski tactics and Marsi's theology. Use of polarization
and social conflict will twelve pick the target, freezing, personalize it,
and polarize it. It's often used by social activists to
isolate opponents, similar to how Martians identify a borogus enemy. Example,
(01:05:40):
white privilege and systemic oppression. Nwatves targeted certain groups as oppressors,
much like how Martias target capitalists, long term societal chains,
real cultural institutions. Olenski's tactics emphasizes controlling, not just applying
(01:06:01):
constant pressure and changing perfect perception, which alignance with cultural
Martianism focus on reshape institutions e g. Media, education and law. Example,
Progressives push for DEI diversity, equity and inclusion. Policies and
(01:06:24):
corporations and education mirrors martians goals of dismounting or power structures,
and you can even see Martians geologia techniques way back
to how mild used it in the Chinese evolution. All
(01:06:46):
Listen is doing the same thing, just wrapped it into
different package and put it up in the tree for
other like minded and people individuals too on rapid later
if we don't recognize the evil and the danger all
(01:07:12):
people who use these type of strategies and techniques against us.
Doesn't matter if it's a female, doesn't matter, back and white,
doesn't matter if it's old or young. If they're calling
for the end of our traditions, the end and the
(01:07:36):
contamination of our Christian beliefs and theology, the end of
our reverence for our founders, you have to push back
on them or we will lose this country. There is
(01:07:57):
no two ways of looking at this. A. Lensky's theology
religion is alive and well because too many people do
not know about him in his theology and how it
is affecting our political environment and our cultural environment, and
(01:08:23):
too many of us don't hold Republican politicians accountable and
that at the end of the day, and you ain't
knowing this how to be a voter per se, But
you still have to understand at the local level who
(01:08:44):
your leaders are in politics and hold them accountable because
it's not about money. It can't be. It has to
be about doing the right thing, right and wrong. And
is that person honest? And that goes far beyond right
(01:09:05):
and wrong. It goes far beyond are you're a Democrat
or are you a Republican? It comes down to all
you an American.
Speaker 2 (01:09:57):
Thanks for listening to today's show, and and don't forget
to like and subscribe to this podcast and look for
Project Thirdeye Open on your favorite social media platforms. Check
out our web page at Projectthirdiopen dot com. And that's
third I with the letter I Projectthirdiopen dot com. Drop
(01:10:17):
us a note at Tony E.
Speaker 3 (01:10:19):
L At
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.