Truth or Consequences: Biden's Battles and Fauci's Secret Meetings: Relentless Ep. 005

In Episode 5 of the "Relentless Podcast with Kyle Becker," we open with Hunter Biden's legal battle against Rudy Giuliani, centered on an alleged laptop hack and media misinformation. We examine the ripple effects this saga has on journalism and privacy rights. The conversation then shifts to Europe's heated debate on multiculturalism as we dissect the impact of immigration policies on Western cultural institutions. Our third segment takes us to Canada, where the legacy of a Ukrainian-Canadian veteran ignites a historical and ethical firestorm, challenging our perceptions of heroism and historical memory.

We then pivot to the speculative buzz surrounding Michelle Obama's potential to revitalize the Democratic Party for the upcoming 2024 Presidential election. The narrative deepens as we expose Hunter Biden's business dealings with China and their implications for the Biden family and U.S. national integrity. Finally, we tackle the contentious issue of COVID-19's origins, focusing on Dr. Anthony Fauci's alleged CIA meeting as we dissect the subcommittee's claims and the quest for truth amidst global power struggles.

Immerse yourself in this comprehensive analysis that connects the dots between personal scandals, international diplomacy, and the ever-shifting sands of political power. Subscribe and listen now to stay at the forefront of these unfolding global narratives.

Segment 1: "Hunter Biden vs. Giuliani: The Laptop Hack Lawsuit" (00:00)
Unpack Hunter Biden's legal action against Rudy Giuliani for alleged laptop hacking and explore its effects on privacy and media ethics.

Segment 2: "Europe's Multiculturalism Muddle" (04:33)
Explore Europe's contentious immigration policies and their impact on Western cultural values and societal integration.

Segment 3: "A Veteran's Contested Past: Canada's Historical Debate" (07:22)
Dive into the controversy in Canadian Parliament over a Ukrainian-Canadian veteran's WWII legacy and its broader historical implications.

Segment 4: "Michelle Obama: Democratic Party's 2024 Game-Changer?" (11:39)
Examine the buzz around Michelle Obama as a potential Democratic candidate and its implications for the party's future.

Segment 5: "Scrutinizing Hunter Biden's Chinese Business Links" (18:24)
Delve into the House Oversight Committee's findings on Hunter Biden's Chinese dealings and the potential fallout for U.S. politics.

Segment 6: "Fauci's CIA Meet: COVID-19 Origins & Political Drama" (22:02)
Investigate Dr. Fauci's alleged CIA meeting and the contentious debate over COVID-19's origins and political ramifications.

Find Kyle on Twitter at @KyleNABecker for breaking news, analysis, and more.

Visit BeckerNews.com, your destination for stories that cut through the noise.

Join the community at TheKyleBecker.Substack.com for exclusive content and engaging discussions.

Brought to you by Becker News LLC, this podcast is a must-listen for anyone seeking a fresh, independent voice in the media landscape.

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
Welcome back to the relentless podcast with Kyle Becker, where we're relentlessly pursuing the

(00:04):
truth about America's biggest stories. Hunter Biden is going on offense by launching a lawsuit
against former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and his associates for supposedly hacking his laptop.
Hunter filed a lawsuit arguing that Giuliani and his company violated his privacy by getting into
his hard drive and divulging its dirty secrets for the world to see. In the lawsuit,

(00:27):
Hunter Biden claims that Giuliani and his affiliates improperly used his username to gain access
to the laptop's contents and subsequently shared this information with third parties.
Hunter contends that the defendant's not only access but also tampered with and altered certain
data stored on the laptop. So I guess that wasn't really Hunter with the Ukrainian

(00:48):
prostitutes or him smoking crack. That is what Hunter's lawsuit seems to be implying.
But CNN shockingly got the basic facts of this case right.
And what Hunter Biden is accusing Robert Castello and Rudy Giuliani of doing is essentially
getting access to data that was taken from his laptop. So that laptop was the laptop that he had

(01:12):
given over to a computer repair shop in Delaware. And at some point Rudy Giuliani and Robert Castello
got access to a drive of information that Hunter Biden says at least some of that was indeed from
the laptop. He's not saying that everything was. There might have been manipulated data on there.
But what they're accusing Giuliani and Robert Castello of doing here in this lawsuit is essentially

(01:37):
unlawfully invading his privacy, hacking into a computer. That's some of the language that they use
in this lawsuit. And one of the things that they say is that defendant statements suggest that
they're unlawful hacking activities are ongoing today. And that unless stopped, we'll continue into
the future thereby necessitating this action. So that's the reason that they're going to court on

(02:00):
this. But it's also just one of these moments where Hunter Biden is on the offensive bringing a case
against Rudy Giuliani quite a well-known figure in the world.
So it seems that contrary to the lies from CNN and 51 former intelligence officials,
the Hunter Biden laptop is real after all. This lawsuit is yet another admission that the media

(02:21):
was wrong and lied to American faces to protect Joe Biden and sway a US election. Here's a look back
at what the media said. Biden secret emails. A really fishy story. The post claimed that the emails
were found on a laptop computer that was brought to her repair shop in Delaware in the spring of 2019.
The FBI is now investigating whether those alleged Hunter Biden emails are actually connected to a larger

(02:44):
foreign intelligence operation. They may be related to a foreign intelligence operation foreign
intelligence operation foreign intelligence foreign intelligence foreign intelligence operation.
For all we know these emails are made up. The information found on the laptop may be part of a
Russian disinformation campaign. Part of a Russian disinformation effort. Described by many

(03:07):
intelligence experts as having hallmarks all the hallmarks rather all the hallmarks of a Russian
Russian Russian disinformation Russian disinformation disinformation campaign. This is a classic
example of the right wing media machine. Now this very same media is looking to shut down independent
journalists and anti-established voices like Russell Brandt Tucker Carlson and others not to

(03:29):
mention the entire platform of rumble for allegedly spreading misinformation. The rumble CEO
Chris Pavlovsky was confronted by an NBC news producer citing an article by the associated
propagandaist for allowing free speech on its platform. He replied on X they hate competition.
They hate free expression and they all take cues from another exhibit A.

(03:52):
Yes they do. Here's a question. How much misinformation has the AP spread since the Russia
hoax was first hatched by Hillary Clinton and her minions at the DNC? When commentators like myself
launch a podcast or speak personally on issues people know that you're getting some opinion
along with the facts of the news. When the AP pushes news stories that are really active as pieces

(04:17):
that turn out to be ill-founded or misinformation that is a thousand times worse.
The America people are catching on that is more important to follow trusted journalists and
news commentators than the corporate media. That's what this battle for free speech is really all about.
Uncontrolled immigration, inadequate integration and a misguided dogma of multiculturalism

(04:43):
have proven a toxic combination for Europe over the last few decades. I'm not the first to point
this out. In 2010 Angela Merkel gave a speech in which she acknowledged that multiculturalism
had utterly failed. And then French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David Cameron

(05:04):
echoed similar sentiments shortly thereafter. Multiculturalism makes no demands of the
incomemer to integrate. It has failed because it allowed people to come to our society and live
parallel lives in it. They could be in the society but not of the society. And in extreme cases they

(05:28):
could pursue lives aimed at undermining the stability and threatening the security of our society.
That was British Home Secretary Swela Braverman. She recently gave an audience of Washington more
than a boggier for in a recent speech. It was a wake up call on the social and cultural damage
being caused by unchecked immigration in Europe. She said that uncontrolled immigration, inadequate

(05:53):
integration and a misguided dogma of multiculturalism have proven a toxic combination for Europe
over the last few decades. She added that multiculturalism has failed. Pointing out that you can see it
play out on the streets of cities all over Europe. From Malmo to Paris Brussels to Lysister.
She noted that immigration has been "too much too quick with too little thought given to

(06:17):
integration and the impact on social cohesion." Braverman said uncontrolled and illegal migration
is in "existential challenge for the political and cultural institutions of the West."
She then questioned whether the 1951 UN Refugee Convention is fit for our modern age or in need
of reform. Quote, "We will not be able to sustain an asylum system, in effect, simply being gay or a

(06:43):
woman and fearful of discrimination in your country of origin is sufficient to qualify for protection."
She also said. "We are living in a new world bound by an outdated legal model." She concluded.
"It's time we acknowledge it." Europe is now in a state of massive decline with a steel-mated war
on its eastern front and energy shocks throughout the continent. An empatel for the freedoms that have

(07:08):
been pillars of Western civilization for centuries. Braverman's remarks are a refreshing dose of sanity
for a continent that has blindly pursued diversity at all costs, even at the expense of its own values
and culture. During Ukrainian President Zelensky's address to Canada's House of Commons,

(07:28):
a 98-year-old veteran received a standing ovation from the parliamentarians as well as from Zelensky
and Canadian Premier Justin Trudeau. Canada's Speaker of the House of Commons, Anthony Rota,
presented honka as a Canadian-Ukrainian war hero from his political district. Quote,
"We have here in the chamber today a Ukrainian-Canadian veteran from the Second World War,

(07:51):
who fought for Ukrainian independence against the Russians and continues to support the troops
today, even at his age of 98," Rota said Friday. This was followed by a lengthy round of applause
and a wave by Zelensky. Quote, "He's a Ukrainian hero, a Canadian hero, and we thank him for all his

(08:12):
service." Thank you." Rota said. "The Zelensky's speech received at least a dozen standing ovation.
There was also one for this man, a 98-year-old Ukrainian Canadian who fought for Ukrainian independence
against the Russians during the Second World War." One problem, honka was shown to have fought on

(08:35):
the side of the Nazis. The Associated Press identified the man as Yaroslav honka, who fought
with the first Ukrainian division before immigrating to Canada. The first Ukrainian division, however,
was previously known as the 14th Waffen-Grenadier division of the Nazi party's Schutstoffel or SS

(08:55):
military branch. According to the foreword, a New York-based newspaper geared towards Jewish readers.
Quote, "Formed in 1943, SS Galicina was composed of recruits from the Galicia region in Western Ukraine.
The unit was armed and trained by the Nazis and commanded by German officers, the outlet reported."

(09:16):
In 1944, the division was visited by SS head Heinrich Himmler, who spoke of the soldier's willingness
to slaughter Poles. According to the foreword, units of the SS Galicina were responsible for
burning alive between 500 and 1,000 Polish villagers in Huta, Pianaka, a center of resistance

(09:36):
to German occupation in what is now Ukraine. The attack took place in February 1944.
The prominent Canadian parliamentarian, Roda, issued a formal apology to Jewish communities worldwide
for a regrettable incident during a Ukrainian president Zelensky's visit. In a statement late Sunday
afternoon, Roda said he recently became aware of more information which caused me to regret my

(10:02):
decision to recognize honka. He said he takes full responsibility for the seismic gaff.
"I wish to make clear that no one, including fellow parliamentarians and the Ukraine delegation,
was aware of my intention or of my remarks before I delivered them," he said. This initiative was
entirely my own. The individual in question being from my writing and having been brought to my

(10:26):
intention." Conservative opposition leader Pierre Pauliev called it an appalling error of judgment
by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and demanded he apologize and refrain from "passing the blame to
others as he always does." Now that appears to have happened on Tuesday as the Canada speaker of

(10:49):
the House of Commons, Anthony Roda, has resigned. It also appears that Poland will likely be calling for
the extradition of a honka. The Polish education minister, Przemislav Charnik, wrote with an attached
document on X quote, "and view of the scandalous events in the Canadian parliament which involved

(11:09):
honoring in the presence of President Zelenski, a member of the criminal Nazi SS Galizian
formation, I have taken steps towards a possible extradition of this man to Poland."
It is critical that the world never forget the horrors the Jewish people endured during World War
2. And the best way we can do that is by ensuring that we don't invite another Holocaust.

(11:31):
This time a nuclear armed one by uncritically supporting a war that is now a quagmire
and is putting millions of Europeans lives at risk.
As the Biden presidency implodes from scandal after scandal, disaster after disaster,
and crisis after crisis, the Democratic Party is looking for a savior, a hero, or a hero in

(11:54):
to save them from this national nightmare. Beating up on Trump is no longer enough.
The rabid Democrats have unleashed hell on the former president, dragging America and its institutions
through the mud during their relentless blood vendetta to ensure that "Orenjman Bad" doesn't
sniff the Oval Office ever again. But in their never-ending Trump delusion, they have failed to notice

(12:18):
one little thing. Their own party is a train wreck and Biden is the biggest exploding flaming locomotive
ever to jump off the rails, derailing the real progress that was made under the former presidency.
So is American Psycho, Gavin Newsom coming to the rescue? He's apparently running a parallel
soft campaign endlessly blabbing about national politics on X, complaining about Ron Desanis,

(12:42):
the kind of thing you would expect from the narcissistic governor of the failed state of California,
who can't get his own house in order. But certainly has aspirations for the pinnacle of power
in Washington DC, his own unbelievable denials to the contrary notwithstanding.
But there's one true dark horse candidate and she's been in the White House before.
That was under American's first so-called savior, the Messiah himself, Barry Sotero,

(13:08):
AKA Barack Hussein Obama. The former first lady was mentioned by Texas Senator
Ten Cruz on a recent Hannity episode as someone Americans should watch out for.
If it's just the Kingmaker saying, "No, we pick you. Whoever doesn't get picked,
everyone else is pissed." So here's the scenario that I think is perhaps most likely and most

(13:33):
dangerous. In August of 2024, the Democrat Kingmakers, Jettison Joe Biden, and Parachutean Michelle Obama.
And I want you to pause and reflect on this. No, I'm pausing and I'm reflecting as we said,
and so is everybody else listening right now. I view this as a very serious danger.

(13:57):
I'm smiling right now because it terrifies me and I also could totally see this happening.
So Michelle Obama, number one, you don't infuriate African American women, which is a critical part
of the constituency that Democrats are relying on to win. But number two, you avoid the problem if
you pick from any of the four, the other three are pissed because they're all to some extent peers,

(14:20):
their rivals, their all jab and knives at each other. Michelle Obama, because she was first lady,
has the ability to kind of parachute in above all four and say, "Hey, we're not picking
among any of you. You guys can all fight it out next time. You're all going to be on the same level.
We're coming. This is the Obama saving the day." And I think in terms of a solution

(14:45):
that unifies Democrats, there ain't nothing like that. I also think Michelle is not all that eager to
run for president. But to parachute in in August of 24 a couple of months before the presidency
and suddenly wake up and be president. Not about it. It's not about gig at all. Now, would she do it?

(15:06):
I don't know. I've met Michelle, but I don't know her personally in any meaningful way.
I don't know if she would do it. I do think Barack Obama is already running the Biden administration.
I think he is already the puppet master behind this Biden White House. I don't think Joe Biden is
the decision maker. And so when I see the media turning on Joe Biden right now, I think the odds of

(15:33):
Michelle Obama parachuting in in August of 2024 have risen dramatically. And that ought to scare the
hell at anyone who is unhappy about the direction this country is going and doesn't want us to go even
crazier in an even worse direction. But it's improbable as it might seem now. The Democrats are

(15:54):
definitely seeking a way out in exit strategy in escape hatch because dementia atle Joe Biden
is about to go overboard and his caretaker wife, Dr. Joe Biden, along with him. So there's virtually
no doubt they're about to pull the plug on plugs. Cruz elaborated on why Michelle Obama is a
tantalizing choice for the unhaged Democrats on his verdict podcast. Michelle Obama indeed would be

(16:21):
a very dangerous opponent for Republicans because Democrats are like raccoons. They are attracted to
shiny objects. They have no memory span and don't care about the past. They ignore history and they
want to escape reality instead of facing up to facts. They prefer a fairy tale. And what bigger
fairy tale to tell them than to have a black woman in the White House running the show, even if it

(16:45):
means running America into the ground. The media was touted endlessly as historic. They would water
borders with Michelle Obama fluff pieces until we begged them for mercy. Then they would make her
woman of the year move over Dylan Mulvaney. And out of the depths of the old crotchety crusty Biden
debacle would be hell spawned and new kind of national nightmare. America getting it just

(17:08):
deserts for its history of slavery, which is pretty much the same history as every other nation on
the face of the earth, except the US actually refuted slavery during its founding and fought a
bloody civil war to end it over 150 years ago. But be prepared for the 2024 equity tour from
Michelle Obama. Don't be the least bit surprised and start exposing the myth before it can even be

(17:32):
rolled out. Suck the hot air out of their trial balloon by treating her like a presidential candidate
now. That means showing her mumbling all this for a damn flag, her uncritical and misleading support
for a Black Lives Matter movement that thrashed America for months with nonstop writing,

(17:52):
killed over 20 people and left Black neighborhoods in ruins. In her trashing of Trump supporters for
their alleged lies, hate and division. So Michelle Obama's presidency would be every bit as divisive
as Barack's. Perhaps even more so. And one could argue that Joe Biden's presidency has been
nothing but a puppet show effectively a third term of Obama. America cannot afford another Obama

(18:18):
presidency, whether it's Barack Obama or Michelle Obama. If you thought that Joe Biden presidency was
bad, you haven't seen nothing yet. A bombshell dropped late last night. Joe Biden's home was used
as the address for two of Hunter's corrupt business deals. The House Oversight Committee dropped the
bomb on X. Here's what it revealed. A few months after Joe Biden announced his candidacy in 2019,

(18:42):
information available to the committee shows Hunter Biden received two wires from China for $250,000
and $10,000 respectively, including from Jonathan Lee. More alarming, the wires have Joe Biden's
home in Wilmington, Delaware as the beneficiary address. Weeks after those payments were made,
Hunter's lawyer George Mazeerez said Hunter Biden served with B.H.R. only as a member of its board of

(19:08):
directors, which was purportally an unpaid position. Here's the breakdown of events. In 2009 to 2017,
during his time as vice president and prior to later payments to Hunter Biden, evidence shows Joe
Biden developed a familiar relationship with Jonathan Lee. Devon Archer, a Biden business associate,

(19:29):
described how Joe Biden met with Jonathan Lee for coffee in Beijing, China, had a phone call with him
and wrote college recommendation letters for his children. April 25, 2019, Joe Biden
announced his candidacy in the 2020 presidential election. July 29, 2019, Wang Xin wired $10,000

(19:52):
with Joe Biden's home listed on the wire. August 2, 2019, Jonathan Lee wired $250,000 with Joe Biden's
home listed on the wire. October 13, 2019, George Mazeerez, who served as Hunter Biden's lawyer,
stated in part that Hunter Biden served with B.H.R. "only as a member of its board of directors"

(20:16):
unquote, which was purportally an unpaid position. October 22, 2020, during a presidential debate.
Joe Biden claimed quote, "My son has not made money in China." It has your address on the wires,
sir, said the committee. This is more no evidence that is coming out. The Joe Biden is compromised by

(20:38):
the Communist Chinese and the Ukrainians certainly have dirt on the US president. As we know, the US
government is effectively being held hostage by tiny Ukrainian funny man, Volodymyr Zelensky,
who has asked for dozens of aid packages worth nearly $120 billion. That's you, the American
taxpayer who have to pay for that. In our own government, maybe shut down over the question of

(21:03):
giving Ukraine more "blood money" as Marcher retailer Green put it. America is flat broke,
and Americans are getting broker by the minute. The Democrats' legacy media mouthpieces,
like the Washington Post and New York Times, are begrudgingly starting to be honest about the Biden
disaster. And even mainstream polls show Biden getting trounced by former President Donald Trump,

(21:26):
despite the weaponized DOJ's endless prosecutions and relentless persecution.
That's how we know the fix is in. The jig is up, and the Biden nightmare is about to end. But that
doesn't mean the deep state will give up. What nasty surprises do they have in store for us next?
A Gavin Newsom run? Or is Michelle Obama waiting in the wings? Can't wait to find out?

(21:53):
But whoever it is, Americans need to stay vigilant to ensure that the US election isn't going to be rigged.
The way the Democratic nomination is clearly being rigged.
Now, there's a story about another CIA cover-up. The COVID subcommittee has revealed it received
concerning information about the CIA's response to the coronavirus pandemic,

(22:16):
and it stars none other than that weasley scientist, Dr. Anthony Fauci,
whose fingerprints are all over the Wuhan lab cover-up.
According to Intel, gathered by the subcommittee, Dr. Fauci played a behind-the-scenes role in
the CIA's review of the origins of COVID-19. As the committee related, Dr. Fauci appears to have

(22:37):
been smuggled into central intelligence agency headquarters without a record of entry and
participated in the analysis to influence the agency's review. This is what the committee said, quote,
"The American people deserve the truth, to know the origins of the virus, and whether there was a
concerted effort by public health authorities to suppress the lab leak theory for political or

(23:01):
national security purposes." Accordingly, information regarding specific movements of Dr. Fauci throughout
the pandemic is reasonable and hardly intrusive, especially concerning he is no longer employed by
the federal government. He is no longer a protectee of the inspector general, and we are not requesting any
information regarding his current movements, unquote. It doesn't elaborate on how Fauci was snuck into

(23:25):
CIA headquarters, perhaps in a briefcase. The committee earlier uncovered evidence that Fauci
abused his influence to sway researchers away from the lab leak theory of the origins of COVID,
misled Congress about his role in the investigation, and may have been a principal author of the now
infamous paper, The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2. The House subcommittee on March 5th

(23:49):
issued a memorandum on its findings that Dr. Fauci had inappropriately influenced the COVID
origins researchers, contrary to Fauci's denials. While emails show that the authors initially
work quite compelled by evidence that COVID may have been engineered in the lab,
after the intervention of Fauci and his staff, they would go on to state definitively in the paper

(24:10):
that a lab leak theory was improbable. Quote, "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a
laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus," unquote the authors wrote. It is
improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-2
like coronavirus the researchers had. The researchers instead proposed a natural evolution hypothesis

(24:37):
while not revealing their doubts about their hypotheses in the paper. The Federal Bureau of
Investigation and the Department of Energy have since independently backed the lab leak theory
as the most probable origin of COVID. But none of this should surprise us. Fauci, after all,
funded the Wuhan lab through eco-health alliance, as well as the Pentagon itself funded the institution.

(25:01):
While there is no strong evidence the US helped develop COVID as a bioweapon,
it gets curiouser and curiouser. The lengths the US government went through in order to ensure
that no one could conclude that COVID had come from the lab. So instead of the US seeing COVID as a
potential Chinese bioweapon, the government went to elaborate lengths to persuade everyone to think

(25:25):
the lab origin hypothesis was a wild conspiracy theory, and that no one should conclude that communist
China was working on a biologically enhanced virus using gain of function research that was
subsidized by American taxpayers in a laboratory with inadequate biosecurity protocols.
Just last week, it came out that a whistleblower came forward alleging the CIA offered officials a

(25:49):
significant amount of money to say that COVID did not come out of the lab in Wuhan.
Quote, the Select Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic and the House Permanent Select Committee
on Intelligence have received new and concerning whistleblower testimony regarding the agency's
investigation into the origins of COVID-19. Unquote, this came from a letter to
the CIA Director William Burns from House COVID Subcommittee Chairman Brad Wenshrip,

(26:13):
as well as House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner. Quote, according to the whistleblower,
at the end of its review, six of the seven members of the team believed that intelligence and
science were sufficient to make a low-confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from lab in
Wuhan, China. Unquote, the letter continued. The seventh member of the team, who also happened to be

(26:35):
the most senior, was the one other to believe COVID-19 originated through Zuanosis, a natural process.
Unquote, the whistleblower further contends that to come to the eventual public determination of
uncertainty, the other members were given a significant monetary incentive to change their position.
The committee found this Wuhan cover story solves some rather pesky problems for Fauci himself,

(26:59):
as well as the deep state in terms of America's economic and security relationship with communist China.
And of course, we all know Joe and Hunter Biden are compromised by China. As we said,
corrupt businessmen even sent payments to Joe's house. This is not sustainable,
to have a US government with a relationship to the American people based on lies and deception,

(27:22):
instead of doing the right thing. That means treating China as America's adversary,
and not some kind of partner in a corrupt global enterprise. We need to do much more than cut off
all funding for biomedical research in China. We need to disentangle ourselves from the Chinese
dragon before it consumes our security, erodes our economy, and devours our freedoms.