Unmasking Power Plays in America's Internet, Health, and Climate Debates: Relentless Ep. 010

In Episode 10 of the "Relentless Podcast with Kyle Becker," we explore the intricate dynamics of political power and digital sovereignty in the United States. Kyle Becker provides an incisive analysis of the Biden administration's proposed internet regulations, highlighting potential threats to privacy and free speech.

The episode also delves into the contentious issues of health autonomy and vaccine mandates, examining the legal struggles and ethical implications. Additionally, Becker scrutinizes the narrative surrounding the climate crisis, questioning its role in governmental control and policy-making. Offering a critical lens on American politics, digital rights, and the ongoing battle for freedom and democracy, this episode invites you to join us for an exploration of these pivotal topics shaping the nation's future.

Segment 1: "Biden’s Woke Takeover Of The Internet" (00:37)

Critically examining the potential consequences of the Biden administration's plans to regulate the internet, Kyle discusses concerns about freedom of expression, privacy, and government overreach, emphasizing the risks of such a sweeping policy change.

Segment 2: "The Undemocratic Party’s War On America" (14:01)

Addressing concerns over election integrity and the need for decentralization in American politics, Kyle highlights the importance of transparent and secure electoral processes and discusses strategies for reducing centralized power in favor of more democratic systems.

Segment 3: "The Hijacking Of Our Health Decisions" (33:32)

Delving into the controversial topic of vaccine mandates, focusing on individual rights and health autonomy. Explore the legal battles and ethical dilemmas surrounding enforced vaccinations and the impact on personal liberties.

Segment 4: "The Left’s Obsession With The Climate Crisis" (43:16)

Kyle Becker challenges the prevailing narrative of the climate crisis. He questions the motives behind the climate change agenda and its potential use as a tool for increasing governmental power and control, rather than addressing environmental concerns.

Find Kyle on Twitter at @KyleNABecker for breaking news, analysis, and more.

Visit BeckerNews.com, your destination for stories that cut through the noise.

Join the community at TheKyleBecker.Substack.com for exclusive content and engaging discussions.

Brought to you by Becker News LLC, this podcast is a must-listen for anyone seeking a fresh, independent voice in the media landscape.

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
(upbeat music)

(00:02):
Welcome to Relentless with Kyle Becker,
where we're relentlessly pursuing the truth
about America's biggest stories.
Welcome back to the Relentless podcast.
I'm your host Kyle Becker.
We'll be relentlessly pursuing the truth
about America's biggest stories.

(00:22):
Today we have an important show.
The undemocratic parties wore in America,
the left's obsession with the imaginary climate crisis,
Biden's woke takeover of the internet
and the hijacking of our health decisions.
At first, Biden's woke takeover of the internet.
While everybody was paying attention

(00:43):
to the Taylor Swift Travis Kelsey romance
and other hot topics on the internet,
the FCC vote for Biden's takeover of the internet
is scheduled for this week.
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is sounding the alarms
about Biden's takeover of the internet.
This is what he had to say.

(01:04):
So last month, President Biden gave the FCC its marching orders.
The president called on the FCC
to implement a one-page section of the 2021
Infritz Structure Investment and Jobs Act
by adopting new rules of breathtaking scope,
all in the name of so-called digital equity.
For the first time ever, Carr says,

(01:26):
those rules would give the federal government a roving mandate
to micromanage nearly every aspect of how the internet functions.
From how internet service providers allocate capital
and where they build to the services
that consumers can purchase,
from the profits that they can realize
and how they market and advertise services
to discounts and promotions that consumers can receive.

(01:50):
Talk about central planning, Carr says.
Now, he continues to say,
Congress never contemplated the sweeping regulatory regime
that President Biden asked the FCC to adopt,
let alone authorize the agency to implement it.
Nonetheless, the commission will vote next week on November 15th.
That will be before this date

(02:12):
to put President Biden's plan in place.
A draft of the FCC order implementing President Biden's plans
is available here.
He says, I oppose the plan for several reasons.
Now, the FCC commissioner, Brendan Carr,
is right to oppose this internet takeover.
Namely, he says, Biden's plan
hands the administrative state effective control

(02:34):
of all internet services and infrastructure
in the country, unquote.
He says that network infrastructure deployment,
network reliability, network upgrades, et cetera, et cetera,
are going to be put in the hands of government regulation.
And if you put the government out in a desert
and told them that we need to get sand,

(02:56):
they probably would screw that up too.
There's really nothing that the government in this country
can be trusted to do right.
And every indication that whatever power they've been handed,
they abuse it or they have just major dysfunction
and don't deliver the services
that we Americans come to expect.

(03:17):
So the US government right now is really in an all-out drive
to centralize power over all of the major aspects of our life,
whether that's information in the freedom of Americans
to share that with one another without interference
from the government, whether it's health
and having bodily autonomy and the decisions

(03:37):
over our own bodies, or that's just anything in our environment
from our ability to use energy, what type of cars
that we want to drive or what type of gas stove
or electric stove or whatever type of, you know,
stoves you like to cook with in your house,
it really goes on and on.

(03:57):
And the thing that we have to think about
is that do we want a bunch of unelected bureaucrats
imposing these arbitrary rules on our lives
or do we want to live the way that we see fit
as long as we don't harm other people?
And what we're seeing from the government is an attempt
to say that freedom to live our own lives

(04:19):
is harmful to others in our environment.
And they're coming up with any kind of excuse
that they can think of, and I think the climate crisis
is the best example of this.
But misinformation is the other excuse they've come up with
for trying to regulate the internet.
Now, in the age of artificial intelligence,
they are complaining about AI being biased.

(04:42):
But AI mostly is a representation of the data
that is available to it.
So if it reflects a civil society
where we culturally are sharing information
in a certain way, ideally AI that is representative
like Grock, which Elon Musk came up with,
would represent the way that the culture looks.

(05:04):
But this is a threat to the cultural Marxism
that the Democrats rely on to manipulate
our perception of reality.
And this is really illustrated by the agenda
to promote diversity and equity in artificial intelligence.
Now, in February, Biden issued an executive order
on further advancing racial equity
and support for underserved communities

(05:25):
through the federal government.
Now, a phrase from this executive order
caused a number of people become highly concerned.
This is what it says,
when designing, developing, acquiring, and using
artificial intelligence and automated systems
in the federal government, agencies shall do so,
consistent with applicable law in a manner

(05:46):
that advances equity.
OK.
Now, the implementation of the executive order
would entail, quote, a diversity, equity, and inclusion,
unquote, or DEI board, that would supervise the rollout
of AI to promote so-called equity
in an anomalous term that could be defined to fit any bureaucratic
action.

(06:06):
Now, the free flow of information
is the lifeblood of our constitutional republic.
And we need to secure our ability to freely exchange ideas
and information if we want to live in a free country
or a liberal democracy, as it used to be known.
And we need new institutions for the information age
to tip the balance back in favor of the people

(06:28):
and their right to live their own lives as they see fit.
Now, someone who suddenly appears to be against this idea
is Republican presidential candidate Nikki Hadley,
former South Carolina governor.
She was on Fox News, and she laid out her desire
to know the algorithms of every big tech company, OK?

(06:51):
And then eliminate anonymity on the internet.
When I get into office, the first thing we have to do,
social media accounts--
social media companies, they have to show America their algorithms.
Let us see why they're pushing what they're pushing.
The second thing is every person on social media
should be verified by their name.
That's-- first of all, it's a national security threat.

(07:12):
When you do that, all of a sudden, people
have to stand by what they say.
And it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots,
and the Chinese bots.
And then you're going to get some civility when people
know their name is next to what they say.
Countable.
And they know their pastor and their family members
are going to see it.
It's going to help our kids, and it's going to help our kids.
Wow.
I didn't see that coming from Nikki Haley,

(07:33):
but then again, she got into politics
because of Hillary Clinton, as she admitted one time
on a video.
And it's really startling to hear this
from a Republican candidate, because she
is parodying the World Economic Forum agenda,
where we live with transparency as Klaus Schwab says,

(07:54):
we have nothing to fear if we do nothing wrong.
Now, it's getting scary, because there truly
is a uniparty in Washington.
And we need to stop looking at our politics
through a Democratic party and Republican party paradigm.
There isn't a team Republican or a team Democrat,
unless you have more like the Harlem Globetrotus versus
the Washington generals.

(08:15):
I mean, the Republican party, whenever
the rubber meets the road, has betrayed their constituents
over and over again.
I mean, we saw that with the Mayorkas vote this week.
I mean, you're telling me there's eight Republicans who
think that the border crisis is fine.
And the Orcas is doing a bang up job.
And he is violating his constitutional oath.
I mean, I have approximately six to seven million
illegal aliens come in under the Biden administration,

(08:37):
causing absolute havoc.
I mean, you even have the mayor of New York City
complaining about it for having sake.
And he is not making friends in Washington DC.
I mean, they're going after him, hardcore.
And the important thing is with this,
the Mayorkas vote to look at, all of the Democrats who voted yes
to table the resolution for his impeachment, essentially,

(09:00):
sending it back to committee, they see no problem
with the border crisis.
So all of this is intentional.
It's very obvious.
You look at the way they cleaned up San Francisco
for she's visit.
They could clean it up, but they won't do it
for American constituents.
They'll do it for a visiting Chinese leader, right?
So the crime in the cities, the homelessness,

(09:22):
it's almost like they want to remind us
that America isn't a great country,
or they want to create that sort of visual thing.
Now, they'll have a Potemkin village for Xi Jinping,
but for us, they have the opposite.
They have a disaster village for a lack of a better term.
Like, everything has to remind us in our inner cities

(09:43):
that this country is not great,
and that there's inequity, right?
And that there's, so you have predominantly black
or Latino neighborhoods that are run by Democrats
for decades, or not generations,
they never get any better, because they don't use
the institutions of freedom, of free market enterprise,

(10:04):
and the other great things, like the rule of law
that built this country up.
They want to keep these places as reminders to us
that there's chaos and that they need more government control.
But they've had government control in these areas,
and there is chaos, if not, is not even worsening.
So all of these people like Nikki Haley,

(10:25):
or like Klaus Schwab, all of these globalists out there,
if they want to really have equity,
what they need to do is just donate all their money
to the poor, and they need to build up
these homeless neighborhoods and just take a vow poverty
and show us what their communist utopia looks like in practice,

(10:45):
'cause every example throughout history
from the Paris-Calmian forward is shown
that these communist utopias don't work in practice,
in a sense it's a threat to us and our freedom.
So we need to go back to more of American Republican
framework for our country.
I mean, because what we're seeing from this moves
on artificial intelligence, with this bite and take
over of the internet, this centralization of power,

(11:09):
you know, in combination with technology,
like even robots that are armed, like this robot dog
and Los Angeles, I mean, that's black mirror stuff.
Do we really want to be like, you know,
John Connor fighting SkyNet in like 50 years?
I mean, I will take a pass on that.
I don't want to raise my son to be like in a Terminator movie.
So let's just start thinking proactively now,

(11:31):
because the writing is on the wall.
They revealed themselves for who they are.
They can no longer hide it.
They've compromised all our major institutions
from elections to the internet, to our health services even.
That's basically the main thing is we need to think
more conceptually about how we decentralize
and what I think is we need to think outside the box.

(11:51):
I have some ideas such as the virtual voting,
more referenda for people to vote on,
trick term limits, rotating representation
where we basically have eligible citizens
and they just, you know, we rotate on almost like a lottery
and localism.
So we need to think about decentralization
and power of the people and about making us more of a confederacy.

(12:16):
And I would even argue to disband Washington DC
because it's essentially obsolete.
And the only thing that they're doing there
is just rampant corruption because it's like the richest area
in the United States and they have nothing to sell
except their souls.
So America's versioning oligarch class
would strongly oppose this move and attempt
to hijack any institutions we create,

(12:37):
such as potentially a convention of the states
to implement some of these ideas,
but it may be the last best hope for our republic.
Some institutions throughout history
that kind of give us some guidance about the way
to think about representation and different bodies
that we could form.
Ancient Rome had assemblies.
They operated on the basis of a direct democracy

(13:00):
where ordinary citizens and not elected representatives
would cast all ballots.
Now of course this was subject to strict limits
by the Senate and by the emperor after Julius Caesar.
But still conceptually, we need to really think about
having more bodies where we have our voice made heard.

(13:24):
The French had the Estates General.
The third estate comprised about 25 million people.
The Burjwazis, the peasants and everyone else,
but the monarchy and the clergy.
But it was ultimately toothless
and could not be an effective safety release valve
to prevent the coming bloody French Revolution.
But let's not forget democracy is not all it's made out to be.

(13:45):
There are many problems with democracy
and it only gets worse as the population gets worse
as it gets more disunited.
And people cannot agree on sensible courses of action
or even on basic protections for the rights of citizens.
That is what we're seeing now.
This brings us to the undemocratic party's war on America.

(14:07):
The stressors of a multicultural republic
get worse with the centralization of power.
These centralization and individual rights,
like life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,
make the entire republican system stable
and more resistant to government takeover,
whether it be by ideological cabals like the woke left

(14:28):
or foreign powers like the Chinese or the Russians.
It reminds me of the ancient Roman system
and why the corruption of the imperial government
following the death of Augustus
was such a miserable period of time for the Roman people.
The famous historian Edward Gibbon

(14:49):
in the decline of fall of the Roman Empire writes, quote,
"The golden age of Trajan and the Antenis
"have been preceded by an age of iron.
"It is almost superfluous to enumerate
"the unworthy successors of Augustus.
"They're unparalleled vices
"and the splendid theater on which they were acted

(15:09):
"have saved them from oblivion.
"The dark, unrelenting Tiberius,
"the furious Caligula, the feeble Claudius,
"the profligate and cruel Nero,
"the beastly Vitalius and the timid and human demission
"are condemned to everlasting infamy."

(15:31):
Now during four score years or 80 years,
accepting only the short and doubtful respite of Vespasian's reign,
Rome groaned beneath an unremitting tyranny
which exterminated the ancient families of the Republic
and was fatal to almost every virtue
and every talent that arose in that unhappy period.

(15:52):
Under the reign of these monsters,
the slavery of the Romans was accompanied
with two peculiar circumstances,
though one occasion by their former liberty,
the other by their extensive conquests,
which render their condition more completely wretched
than that of the victims of tyranny
and any other age or country.
"From these causes were derived

(16:14):
"the exquisite sensibility of the sufferers
"and the impossibility of escaping
"from the hand of the impressor."
unquote.
Now here's the critical part and bear with me
because it fits in splendidly with the age of enlightenment
which Gibbon wrote contemporaneously
with America's founding fathers.
Quote.
The division of Europe into a number of independent states

(16:37):
connected however with each other
by the general resemblance of religion, language and manners
is productive of the most beneficial consequences
to the liberty of mankind.
A modern tyrant who should find no resistance
either in his own breast or in his people
would soon experience a gentle restraint

(16:59):
from the example of his equals.
The dread of present censure, the advice of his allies
and the apprehension of his enemies,
the object of his displeasure escaping from the narrow limits
of his dominions would easily obtain
in a happier climate a secure refuge.
A new fortune adequate to his merit,

(17:20):
the freedom of complaint,
and perhaps that means of revenge.
But the empire of the Romans filled the world
and when the empire fell into the hands of a single person,
the world became a safe and dreary prison for his enemies.
The slave of imperial despotism,
whether he was condemned to drag his gilded chain in Rome

(17:41):
and the Senate or to wear out a life of exile
on the barren rock of Sarifus or the frozen bank
of the Danube, expected his fate and silent despair.
To resist was fatal and it was impossible to fly in every side.
He was encompassed with a vast extent of sea and land
whether he could never hope to traverse

(18:02):
without being discovered, seized,
and restored to his irritated master.
Beyond the frontiers, his anxious view
could discover nothing except the ocean
in hospitable deserts, hostile tribes of barbarians
or fierce manners in unknown language
or dependent kings who would gladly purchase
the emperor's protection by the sacrifice
of an obnoxious fugitive.

(18:23):
Wherever you are, said Cicero to the exiled Marcellus,
remember that you are equally within the power of the conqueror.
A safe and dreary prison, that is America
if we do not decentralize and that can come from governors,
state legislatures, and even a convention of the states
if necessary.
Thus we find our institutions requisite to counterbalance

(18:44):
against the central government of the United States
that is now hijacking our rights and freedoms in Washington, D.C.
Every institution that we be proper and necessary
for our common defense against the encroachment of our rights
is being taken over and weaponized by a shadow cabal.
Thus we find our institutions such as elections,
the free press, the free flow of information, health,

(19:07):
and the environment are being subverted by a woke ideology,
hostile to the notion that we have our own lives, our own rights,
and our own freedom of choice.
But the enslavement of citizens to radical ideologues
is evil and wars against both God and nature.
The elections are a critical linchpin for a say in our own lives,
but even those have been compromised.

(19:30):
Millions of Americans still wonder rightly or wrongly
if the current president is legitimate.
Now comes news from a district court in Georgia
that we're not conspiracy theorists
if we question the integrity of our elections,
including the security of voting machines.
Remember, so many of us were censored
for even discussing the subject,

(19:51):
which tells you all you need to know
about whether we should be asking questions about it.
Judge Amy Tottenberg has agreed for a lawsuit
over Georgia's voting machines to go to trial
and that is set for January.
The district court judge found that there is sufficient cause
to believe that there may be, quote,
cybersecurity deficiencies that unconstitutionally burdened

(20:15):
plaintiffs first and 14th amendment rights
and capacity to case effective votes
that are accurately counted, unquote.
Tottenberg scheduled a bench trial
for January 9, 2024, which entails the absence of a jury.
Nevertheless, she acknowledged that a compromise
might be possible if the state legislature

(20:36):
were to take action.
Quote, the court cannot waive a magic wand in this case
to address the very challenges to our democracy
and election system in recent years,
including those presented in this case, she wrote.
But reasonable, timely discussion and compromise
in this case, coupled with prompt

(20:56):
informed legislative action might certainly make a difference
that benefits the parties and the public, unquote.
Critically, the court denied that criticism of security flaws
which Georgia's voting machines are based purely
on conspiracy theories.
Quote, the court notes that the record evidence does not suggest

(21:17):
that the plaintiffs are conspiracy theorists of any variety.
Indeed, some of the nation's leading cybersecurity experts
and computer scientists have provided testimony
and affidavits on behalf of plaintiffs' case
in the long course of the litigation, unquote.
The district court then laid out several established objections
to the 2020 election.

(21:38):
First, the court recognized that because the DREs
did not include a paper voting trail, quote,
"No voters could verify whether their intended votes
for particular candidates were actually cast," unquote.
The court notes that several voting machines
were running on an outdated Windows XP 2000 operating system.
And DRE machines were operating on software for 2005,
that was, quote, "so out of date that the makers of the software

(22:01):
were no longer supporting it or providing security patches,"
unquote.
Next, the court reviewed, quote, "nually
available evidence regarding the CES-KSU data breach
and the data systems management,
where there were record destruction events
that were previously addressed in the 2018 PI order.

(22:21):
The expanded record revealed additional troubling details
regarding the breach."
Now, it didn't dish in the court found in its 2019 order
that, quote, "plenus presented significant evidence
of vulnerabilities in the state's voter registration database."
It connection with the previously discussed exposure
of voter data, the exposure of passwords

(22:42):
and outdated software issues, unquote.
Wow.
Now, that just tells you how screwed up Georgia
is in the way that they run elections.
There is a track record there, and there
is nothing untoward or illegal about questioning
the way Georgia's run its elections.
Like, we have a track record.
So the mainstream press is out of its depth telling us

(23:08):
that we're conspiracy theories for just pointing out
the court documented record.
Now, the plaintiffs also raised issues
concerning the state's ability to, quote,
"audit the functionality of the BMDs or ballot marking
devices, specifically in the event
that the selections contained within the codes
do not match the selections that appear
in the human readable text."
Now, remember the QR code controversy?

(23:29):
We were all told that we have no reason to question it.
Here is the court saying, yes, there's
a reason to question it because there
are problems with auditing this type of procedure
in our elections.
Now, ultimately, the court concluded
that there are, quote, "material facts
and dispute presented in the record
that preclude its grant of the state defense motions

(23:49):
per summary judgment of the primary claims," unquote.
Now, that means that dominion voting systems
and the state and Fulton County, which we will talk about
a little bit later, did not have enough of a case
to just have it dismissed entirely.
Summary judgment, boom, done.
Now, the court then announced that it will, quote,

(24:11):
"resolve these material factual disputes
and related legal issues based on the evidence presented
at a bench trial to be gone January 9, 2024,
as we mentioned above."
Now, importantly, the court recognizes
that the most important remedies for election integrity
may be political and not judicial.
And this is something I've talked about before.
Now, quote, "To be clear from the start,

(24:31):
the court does not have the legal authority
to grant the broadest relief that plan is request
in this case without directly infringing
on the state legislatures, vested power
to enact legislation," the judge said.
"Even if plan is prevail on their substantive claims,
the court cannot order the Georgia legislature
to pass legislation, creating a paper ballot voting system,

(24:53):
or judiciously impose a statewide paper ballot system
as injunctive relief in the case."
Quite simply, the court has the legal authority
to identify constitutional deficiencies
with the existing voting system,
but it doesn't have the power to prescribe
or mandate new voting systems, for example, paper ballot
system to replace the current legislative enacted system.

(25:14):
But the court said that it would hear evidence
that there may be constitutional rights violations
related to the insufficient election security.
Quote, "That said, as the 11th Circuit previously recognized
in this case, suits challenging election procedures
for or policies are routine, and there
are critical issues raised in this case
that do not present a political question beyond this court's reach."

(25:36):
And she quotes a case against Raffin's burger.
Still, a plaintiff carries a heavy burden
to establish a constitutional violation
connected to Georgia's ballot marking device electronic voting
system, whether in the manner in which the state defendants
have implemented the voting system,
i.e. that opposes serious security voting risks
in burdens impacting plaintiff's voting rights,

(25:58):
or otherwise, the judge said.
Now, several election security experts
testified in behalf of the plaintiffs.
And we have Dr. J. Alex Halterman,
Adam Michigan, Dr. Philip Stark, Kevin Skoglin,
Dr. Andrew Apple, Adam Princeton, and Harry Herstie.
Now, the most substantive criticism of the current state

(26:19):
of the voting systems in Georgia, in my opinion,
was perhaps laid out by Dr. J. Alex Halterman.
And on July 1, 2021, you might recall,
Dr. Halterman submitted a detailed lengthy report,
both expounding on his prior testimony in the case
in identifying additional vulnerabilities
he found in the ballot marking device system
based on his testing of such a device

(26:41):
and the associated election equipment provided him
by Fulton County.
Now, Dr. Halterman identified seven primary vulnerabilities.
Attackers can alter the QR codes on printed ballots
to modify voter selections.
Anyone with brief physical access to the BMD machines
can install malware onto the machines.

(27:02):
And number three, attackers can forge or manipulate
the smart cards that a BMD uses to authenticate technicians,
poll workers and voters.
Anyone with physical access can use it
to install malware on the BMDs.
Number four, he notes, attackers can execute arbitrary code
with supervisory privileges and then exploit it
to spread malware onto BMDs across a county or a state.

(27:25):
And then number five, attackers can alter the BMDs audit logs.
Number six, attackers with brief access
to a single ballot marking device
or a single poll worker card.
And pin can obtain the county-wide cryptographic keys,
which are used for authentication
and protect election results on scanner.
Memory cards and number seven, a dishonest election worker

(27:46):
with just brief access to the ICP scanner's memory card
could determine how individual voters voted.
Now, Dr. Halterman also implies that, quote,
"Election insiders and ordinary voters
could be recruited by domestic political actors
or hostile sophisticated foreign actors
to attack Georgia's voting system
for instance by implanting malware."

(28:08):
So, following the court's review of this case,
the state defendants motions for summary judgment
was granted in part and denied in part.
However, Fulton County's motion for summary judgment
was granted in full.
So, once again, Fulton County is off the hook.
But, lo and behold, what just happened in Fulton County?
Looky here.
The Fulton County elections board is confirmed

(28:28):
the discovery of, quote, "missing ballots
from Tuesday's election."
The discovered batches of advanced voting ballots
or early in-person ballots were missed
during the November 7 election, but were found
during the recount on Monday.
According to a notice posted on the Fulton County
Election Board's website, the recount was performed,

(28:48):
quote, "to confirm the accuracy of the election results
before election certification," unquote.
The preliminary ballot tally for early voting
was finalized by the Fulton County elections board
in that afternoon as Williams stated during the Tuesday
meeting of the Fulton County Election Board.
And the incident was recorded to prevent a recurrence

(29:10):
in the upcoming election cycle, they said.
"BRE Chair Patrice Perkins Hooker
said about the ballots, quote,
"the recount will not delay our certification.
We will be certifying the election in 45 minutes or so."
The second recount was undertaken to verify
the accuracy of the advanced voting ballots,
which had done a degree in the first recount

(29:30):
with the election day totals.
It was only 300 ballots off.
This era was the result of a group of ballots
in one box not being scanned in last night.
The oversight was caught last night,
and today's recount was called, unquote.
Missing ballots.
Now where have we heard that one before?

(29:51):
Last week, Becker News reported
that two high-powered criminal defense attorneys
suddenly filed a motion withdraw from a 2020 election case.
That would be the favorito case for those of you
following along.
And this came upon questions about missing ballots.
This is what Rasmussen, the pollster who has quite a
based Twitter account, now X,

(30:14):
this is what they had to say, quote,
"These 150,000 still secret 2020 unfolded male ballots
with the perfect ovals protected by court order
for three years may have gone missing,
and the county's lawyers have just quit," unquote.
Now it is not clear why the lawyers are withdrawing
from the case, I reached out to the law firm,
and could not get a hold of them.

(30:35):
That would be the law firm, Garland, Samuel, and Loeb,
just for a comment and for the reason for the withdrawal,
whether it was a conflict of interest, it's unclear.
Now human events, however, had earlier reported
on the 147,000 male and ballots controversy.
This is what they said.
Fulton County poll manager, Susie Voils,
was sorting through a large stack of male and ballots

(30:57):
last November, which he noticed something odd.
Several ballots marked for Joe Biden were extremely similar.
One after another, the votes contained perfectly filled
ovals for Biden.
What's more, each of the bubbles boasted
an identical white void inside them
in the shape of a tiny crescent,

(31:17):
indicating they'd been marked with toner ink
instead of a pen or pencil per the epoch times.
Now Voils noticed that all of the ballots
were printed on different paper than the others.
She'd counted and none were folded or creased,
which is standard for male and ballots
as they come from envelopes.

(31:37):
Quote, "All of them were strangely pristine,"
unquote, Voils said.
She noted that she'd never seen anything like it
in her 20 years monitoring elections in Fulton County.
All but three of the 110 ballots in the stack,
which have been labeled state farm arena,
were marked for Biden and appeared to be identical ballots.

(32:01):
Hmm.
Now, in addition, there are massive chain of custody issues
in Georgia related to ballot images,
as we mentioned above.
74 of Georgia's counties have not been able
to produce original images of ballots
from the November 2020 election,
according to voter GA,

(32:21):
an election integrity nonprofit organization.
The group received confirmation
through open records requests from 58 counties
that either most or all of the images
at the voting machine system automatically created
for tabulating results have been, "Wait for it."
Destroyed.
Quote, "At least 28 counties admitted

(32:41):
having no original images at all.
At 22 of those counties only had recount images
that some claimed are the same as originals
as reported by the nonprofit group, voter GA.
Now, the Associated Press did not deny the substance
of the reports in a so-called fact check,
but merely rejected the narrative
that the missing ballot images proved voter fraud."

(33:04):
Well, we'll also be challenging for fact checkers
to dismiss questions about missing ballots
in the 2023 election,
because Fulton County's own election board
confirmed it at their meeting.
This just goes to show that the entire fact checking
industry in America is ridiculously corrupt.
They police narratives, not facts,

(33:24):
but we American citizens need to be able
to debate public policy openly in our civil society
or there is no liberal democracy in America, period.
(upbeat music)
That brings us to the hijacking of our health decisions.
There is also no liberal democracy in America
if we cannot control our own health choices.

(33:44):
Now there's an attempt to get some accountability
for those who claim they are vaccine injured,
but we are facing the possibility
of another promising lawsuit
going down in flames under suspect circumstances.
That's what happened this week
when the Supreme Court supposedly
the nation's highest adjudicator
and defender of our constitutional rights
has once again shot down a lawsuit over the jabs.

(34:07):
The nation's highest court found insufficient reason
to take up the lawsuit,
brushing aside arguments that the vaccine mandates
infringed on fundamental medical ethics principles
like the right to bodily autonomy and informed consent.
Four nurses from New Jersey
have petitioned the Supreme Court
to overturn the state mandated COVID-19 vaccine requirement.

(34:31):
The justice is, will not examine a US Third Circuit Court
of Appeal's decision that dismissed the nurses' challenges
as moot in the Supreme Court's list of orders
released on November 13th.
The court rejected an appeal in the case
from Katie Shesney at Al versus Murphy,
who is the governor of New Jersey.
And the justice it did not offer any justification

(34:54):
for the case's dismissal.
Early in 2022, New Jersey governor Phil Murphy
had issued an executive order
mandating that quote, "Unvaccinated covered workers
acquire their initial dose of the primary series
of a COVID-19 vaccination by January 27th, 2022."

(35:17):
Furthermore, by February 28th of that year,
the workers were required to provide
sufficient evidence of having received
all of their vaccinations.
And they said individuals who failed the furnish
adequate evidence should be regarded as non-compliant.
Now the lawsuit was filed against the governor's office

(35:37):
by the nurses Mary Advitie, Deborah Hagen,
Jamie Rumsfeld, and Katie Shesney.
The nurse's petition, the high court for an appeal
on the grounds that the vaccination requirement
violated their fourth amendment rights,
which they claimed to include the freedom
from medical procedure refusal and the right to privacy.
They also claimed that the role violated

(35:58):
the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.
Now it's hard to imagine that these nurses are incorrect.
Now the plea is alleged that while the order permitted
religious or medical exemptions,
the state quote, "mast denied religious exemptions
and state institutions, stating that accommodating people
with religious exemptions would place a supposed undue burden

(36:21):
on the state because employees with religious
or objections to the COVID-19 injections
pose a threat to public safety."
Now this is a bunch of nonsense.
First of all, the so-called vaccines, the mRNA jabs,
do not in any significant way prevent transmission
from person to person.

(36:42):
Period.
Now I think even Rochelle Wellinsky, the XCDC director,
admitted this on video.
So there's nothing really to talk about.
Now additionally, these nurses contended
that the booster mandate quote, "controvent the doctrine
of unconstitutional conditions," unquote,
which forbids the government from requiring
the renunciation of a constitutional right in exchange
for a privilege.

(37:04):
You know, a district judge in the United States
ruled against the nurses in a previous year
finding that they quote, "failed to establish probable cause
of success on the merits of their claim
that the executive orders violate their freedom,
their rights under the 14th Amendment do process clause,
and failed to demonstrate immediate and irreparable harm."
This is blatantly false on its face.

(37:25):
Like people have a right to control what goes into their body.
And it takes some contortion, some mental gymnastics,
to try to twist this into some way that it's consistent
with the US Constitution and its rights, including the first,
the fourth, and the 14th Amendment.
It's absolute nonsense.
Now, the action was deemed irrelevant by an order issued

(37:45):
by the US Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Months after the New Jersey mandate was revoked,
the nurses, however, lodged a Supreme Court appeal,
as we discussed.
The US Supreme Court had previously rejected an appeal
against vaccination mandates.
The Court denied a challenge by Missouri
and nine other states in 2022 regarding President Joe Biden's
COVID-19 mandate for federally funded healthcare facilities.

(38:08):
The mandate was subsequently revoked to 2021,
coinciding with the conclusion of the public health emergency.
Now, in January 2022, by a vote of five to four,
the Supreme Court permitted the Biden administration
to implement the healthcare worker mandate,
while lower courts continue to deliberate on its legal merits.
Concurrently, the justice is halted the administration's rule,

(38:31):
mandating weekly COVID-19 tests or vaccinations
for employees of companies with at least 100 workers
by a vote of six to three.
Meanwhile, a lawsuit filing Louisiana
represents a significant threat to big farmers liability shield.
It comes amidst rising claims of vaccine injuries.
Now, this is what this Bloomberg Law article has to say.

(38:53):
Quote, a lawsuit by COVID-19 vaccine recipients,
claiming they were injured by their shots,
may usher in long awaited changes
to how the federal government handles immunization injuries.
Unquote.
The article continues,
individuals frustrated by the HHS program
designed to compensate them for their injuries
are taking their grievances to court,

(39:15):
in a lawsuit lodged with the US District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana.
They say the program is unconstitutional,
depriving them of their rights to do process
any jury trial, unquote.
Now, lawyers say the move could spur Congress
in the Department of Health and Human Services
to reform how they handle vaccine injuries,
as well as push for more individuals alleging injuries

(39:39):
to not just sue the government,
but also the drug makers that the program
is meant to shield from litigation the article adds.
Now, this comes amidst the DOJ quietly loyering up
as a promising sign that this could be a watershed moment
for the COVID vaccine victims.
The New York Post in a column author by Miranda Devine

(39:59):
shared a fascinating nugget that is highly suggestive
that the Biden DOJ knows a wave of such lawsuits are coming.
Devine points to a new jobs ad that indicates
the Biden administration is searching for eight new attorneys
to defend the federal government and vaccine injury cases.
Now, this is what the job posting had to say.

(40:20):
The office is currently expanding to address workload
created by an increase in cases filed under the vaccine ad.
Now, the job posting was posted on the USA Jobs website.
It was also posted on LinkedIn where it said,
quote, "Trial attorneys in the office of constitutional
and specialized tort litigation, vaccine litigation staff

(40:40):
represent the interests of the secretary
of the Department of Health and Human Services.
In all cases filed in the US Court of Federal Claims
under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
The cases involve claims of injury
as a result of the receipt of vaccines covered by the act.
The office is currently expanding to address workload
created by an increase in cases filed under the Vaccine Act."

(41:05):
Now, Miranda divine ads, presumably the hiring
spree is an anticipation of a surge of COVID vaccine lawsuits
as people who are forced by the government mandates
to take the jab and suffered serious side effects as a result.
Try to extract compensation from the system that
is stacked against them."
The post article also goes on to point at a rising phenomenon

(41:26):
known as long VACs, which medical experts
are investigating as a host of chronic symptoms related
to the novel mRNA vaccines.
Dr. Ann Louise Ocklander, a neurologist and researcher
at Harvard Medical School, told Science, the journal,
about the new syndrome.
Quote, "You see, one or two patients
and you wonder if it's coincidence.

(41:48):
But by the time you've seen 10 or 20 patients,
where there's smoke, there's fire."
Now, the alleged cases are very rare.
However, they are being closely compared
to long COVID, which strongly suggests
the two syndromes may be confounded.
The COVID-19 vaccines were sold as 100% safe and effective.
They were touted as necessary to protect one's family

(42:11):
and community, although they do virtually nothing
to stop the spread.
And there were adverse effects, particularly
for young people who are not statistically
at significant risk from the COVID virus itself.
Now, the COVID-19 vaccine reckoning,
as far as I'm concerned, cannot come soon enough.
And meanwhile, the international globalist community

(42:31):
is maneuvering to put together a pandemic treaty
that does have some red flags, no pun intended.
The proposed amendment to Article 1 of the global pandemic
treaty would remove non-binding from the definitions
of standing recommendation and temporary recommendation.
The World Health Organization's attempt

(42:52):
to remove non-binding from the recommendations
reeks of a power grab.
However, all treaties are supposed to be moot
if they conflict with the US Constitution.
But as we've seen from the Biden administration,
they don't really give a flying fig.
Washington officials don't really seem to care much
about defending our Constitution anymore,

(43:13):
and are doing whatever they can to undermine it.
So that will be another thing for us to keep an eye on.
That brings us to one of my favorite topics,
the left subcession with the climate crisis.
Yesterday, President Neymar only Joe Biden
again harranged about climate change
being the ultimate threat to humanity.
Watch.
- You know, I've seen firsthand what the reports make clear.

(43:36):
The devastating toll of climate change
and its existential threat to all of us
and is the ultimate threat to humanity, climate change.
- So, President Biden claims climate change
is the ultimate threat to humanity.
It's actually the ultimate excuse
for totalitarian government.
And they keep lying about this over and over again.

(43:59):
Why?
Because the climate crisis is the linchpin
for the communist rebrand that took place
after the collapse of the USSR.
Mankind is not a more danger from the climate
than 100 years ago.
In fact, we are seeing 99% fewer deaths
from natural disasters every year
and humans are living longer than ever.

(44:20):
Modern technology, industrial society,
and adaptation are the keys to human beings
thriving on earth.
Can we have a cleaner environment?
- Sure.
- But all of the things we need to advance
as a species can be provided through a marketplace
and freedom of choice.
The climate crisis quite frankly is a hoax.

(44:41):
Once again, climate change is not the ultimate threat
to humanity.
The government's response to climate change
is the ultimate threat to humanity.
Just like viral pandemics aren't the biggest threat
to mankind, the government's response
to viral pandemics is the biggest threat to mankind.
Just like misinformation isn't the biggest threat
to our constitutional republic,
the censorship of information

(45:03):
and the name of fighting misinformation
is the biggest threat to our constitutional republic.
Plain and simple, government time and time and again
has shown itself to be the ultimate threat to mankind.
They have developed the nuclear weapons.
They've developed standing armies.
They've developed all of these apparatuses of control
that have been abused by oligarchs throughout history.

(45:24):
Now we're seeing, once again,
the government of the United States
is harnessing all these institutions
to tilt the power balance in the favor of the government,
which is ultimately at its foundation coercion.
These politicians in Washington, D.C.,
they are getting rich, they are getting powerful

(45:45):
at our expense.
This is the ultimate zero-sum situation.
It's not the employer versus the employee
as Marxist doctrine puts it.
It's the citizenry versus the state.
And we need to rethink the organization
of our constitutional republic
in order to address the exigencies

(46:06):
that we are facing in the information age.
This was the original purpose of the U.S. Constitution
to give us institutions at both the federal level
and at the state level in terms of,
to balance this power out,
so that what we have is an elite
that is competing with one another,

(46:28):
like you see in a free market system
where there's a separation of state and economy,
separation of state and civil society.
And this counterbalancing act is very necessary right now,
or we're gonna create a very unstable situation
in this country that is getting more precarious
and more dangerous by the day.
(dramatic music)

(46:49):
That's all for today's episode,
but our relentless quest doesn't end here.
If you've enjoyed our time together,
hit like and subscribe to Stamp2Date
with our latest episodes.
Find me on X or the platform formerly known as Twitter
at Kyle and A Becker
for the latest breaking news, analysis, and more.

(47:10):
For your daily fix of the news that matters,
visit BeckerNews.com.
Your destination for stories that cut through the noise.
RelentlesswithKyleBacker.com is your home
for all things related to this podcast.
That's all for now, and as always,
stay relentless about your freedom America.

(47:32):
(upbeat music)
[MUSIC]