American Journal WWIII Alert! Poland Shoots Down Russian Drones, Potentially Dragging NATO Into Ukraine War

WWIII Alert! Poland Shoots Down Russian Drones, Potentially Dragging NATO Into Ukraine War As Zelensky Begs For European Air DefenseGlobalists may finally have the catalyst they wanted to spark an all-out war

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/renegade-talk-radio--2181705/support.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Do you live in Henderson, Nevada? Are you looking for
a really hot sports bar. It's called Johnny Max. Johnny
Mack raised the bar on chicken wings fresh every day,
fried in no trans fat, rice oil, serve the old
fashioned buffaloway as hot as you can stand it. Three
to four alarm fire or four famous sauces. Also the

(00:24):
magic vibe that's free with every order. Make new friends
over a brew. J Max on Butter Highway and Henderson
now is on Water Street in Old Henderson Stitches.

Speaker 2 (00:37):
Or number one the number one Internet shock radio network,
Renegate Renegade Talk Radio.

Speaker 3 (00:55):
The United Kingdom is teetering on the edge of an
identity crisis that will unleash a domino effect across Western civilization.

Speaker 4 (01:04):
The European Union provides funding to member countries for accepting immigrants.
Ireland receives this money, which then flows to developers, hotels,
and the wealthy elite. These elites full on some of
that same money back to the government true donations and gives,
creating a cycle of wealth and influence. Meanwhile, immigrants are

(01:27):
used to secure faults for the government, reinforcing their power.
As more money is printed to keep the system going,
The wealthy become richer, while ornate citizens like you and
I suffer as the value of the euro drafts widening
the wealth defied.

Speaker 3 (01:45):
A twenty twenty one census lays out the stark reality
exponentially ballooning across the UK. Three million, eight hundred and
seventy thousand Muslims now make up six point five percent
of England and Wales population, a forty four percent surge
since twenty eleven, adding one point sixteen million people and

(02:05):
driving a third of the nation's population growth, while in
London a whopping fifteen percent Muslim.

Speaker 5 (02:12):
As the Quran says God does not burden any soul
with more than it can bear.

Speaker 3 (02:17):
And Birmingham thirty percent. This isn't a politically correct trend.
It's a tidal wave spiraling into an inevitable civil war,
and it's hitting every corner of the West with the
same diabolical playbook.

Speaker 6 (02:32):
Just had a lovely lady screaming and shouting out out
of a window athos racist scum. So obviously in England
in twenty twenty five, it makes you a racist to
put your flag up in your own country.

Speaker 3 (02:49):
As Western birth rates plummeted, British women now average one
point forty four children, well below the two point one
needed to sustain a population. Then, by design, the elites
flipped the script, crying about declining birth rates and aging workforces,
opening the floodgates to uncontrolled migration, and now entire nations, cultures,

(03:13):
and identities are on the chopping block.

Speaker 7 (03:15):
America will be a Muslim country, Russia will be on
Muslim country.

Speaker 3 (03:19):
Islam will enter every house.

Speaker 8 (03:22):
We have to be a part of that change.

Speaker 3 (03:24):
Now, enter Shabana Mahmoud, Britain's new Home Secretary, appointed September fifth,
twenty twenty five, and a cabinet reshuffle after Angelo Rayner's
tax scandal resignation.

Speaker 9 (03:36):
Do you know the people that you see holding the
English five most of the time Diminica, Theas will be
the DL and they are white now male, and they're
bad people and they want to divide our our communities
from one another.

Speaker 3 (03:49):
My Mood the first Muslim woman to hold this office
of state Overseas, Immigration, Policing, MI five and National Security.
A Birmingham born em barrister of Pakistani descent. She's a
labor MP for a seventy percent non white constituency and
identifies with the socially conservative Blue Labor faction. Regardless of

(04:13):
her towing of English narratives in the past, she is
now a gatekeeper for the inevitable attempt to establish Sharia
law in the UK.

Speaker 9 (04:22):
Like a lot of practicing Muslims, my faith is the
most important thing in my life. It is the absolute
driver of everything that I do.

Speaker 3 (04:32):
Thirty thousand boats entered the UK in twenty twenty four alone.
My mood is tasked with stopping these boats, speeding up
asylum deportations, and reforming a system where twenty seven point
eight percent of Muslim households live in social housing and
thirty two point seven percent face overcrowding. The real numbers

(04:53):
tell a story they don't want you to hear. Only
fifty one point four percent of Muslims aged sixteen to
sixty four are employed, compared to seventy point nine percent
of all Brits. Muslim women just thirty seven percent schools
ten percent of kids are Muslim, despite Muslims being six
percent of the population. In Birmingham, forty three and a

(05:16):
half percent of those under eighteen are Muslim, in Manchester
thirty five percent. Meanwhile, British kids are a minority in
twenty five percent of London schools. This is the demographic reality.
It's not a conspiracy which leads anyone with any brains
to question the endgame. The UK is at a breaking

(05:38):
point and the world's watching. Will my mood stop the
boats and restore trust or will the New World Order's
playbook continue unwrapped.

Speaker 7 (05:50):
It's Wednesdays, September tenth, in the year of Our Lord,
twenty twenty five, and you're listening to The American Journal
with your host, to Harrison Smith. Watch it live right
now at Banned Dot Video.

Speaker 10 (06:05):
I think it's time of blow this thing.

Speaker 11 (06:06):
You can get everybody stuff together, okay, three two when
its dam.

Speaker 12 (06:11):
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the American Journal.
I'm your host, Terryson Smith. Come't you live this Wednesday
morning from the Crucible, from the heart of darkness here
in America. There's some crazy energy in the air today,
and I think you'll agree with me. We've got some

(06:32):
big stories, but it feels like it feels like something's
about to happen. I don't know what exactly, but there
are some options I'll lay out for you. But we've
got a big story today about Poland apparently shooting down
Russian drones. I'm pressing X to doubt. I'm doubting that
this story is accurate, and I have got a lot

(06:54):
of very good reasons why we should cast suspicion on
this claim. As Poland seeks to start invoking NATO articles
to bring about that Third World war they've been chomping
at the bit for. We also have massive protests, in
riots going on in France, and I'm I'm getting flashbacks

(07:17):
to twenty nineteen in the height of irony. I don't
know if you'll remember this. In twenty nineteen. At the
very end of twenty nineteen, I did a twenty nineteen
Year in review, and ironically I called it twenty nineteen
the year the Mask came off, because twenty nineteen was
the year that you had all of these massive protest

(07:38):
movements igniting across the world, and the powers that be
sort of win mask off and just shutting it down
and just yeah, we just don't we don't actually believe
any of the stuff that we say. We're not actually
about democracy. We will just ruthlessly and heartlessly crush resistance

(07:59):
to us. The Yellow the Hong Kong riots. I mean
it was, it was everywhere. South America was exploding in
protest movements. It was the year the mask came off,
and then of course twenty twenty was the year the
mask went on. So you have all these big protest
movements bubbling up, taking you know, the world by storm,

(08:20):
and all of the sudden, the height of all of it,
everybody gets locked in their homes for six months. Well,
how convenient all those protest movements ended. And I have
a I'm seeing a similar trend here. Nepal's government was
just some of them were killed in their own home,
as you know, like all of their government buildings been

(08:42):
burnt down, and all of their ministers were hunted down
in the streets by angry citizens. In France now they're
burning things and writing, and of course the UK it's
been protesting rather aggressively for the last little while. Of course,
in America we're not seeing so much the Black Lives

(09:03):
Matter style George Floyd uprising, but the sentiment is there,
but the energy is there. After the murder of Arena Zaruska,
and I'm thinking, if I was the elite, if I
was the powers that be, I'd be flipping through my

(09:24):
little ROLODEXA crisises, what do I do next? We have
a dirty bomb go off in a major US city.
We need to, you know, stage a major Russian invasion
of Poland to get NATO going.

Speaker 11 (09:40):
Do I have a.

Speaker 12 (09:42):
White supremacist CIA wind up toy shoot up a black church?
I mean, what what card do I play here? Because
things are getting a little out of hand. They're getting
a little out of control, and control is what it's
all about.

Speaker 11 (09:56):
So we'll tell you all about all of that.

Speaker 12 (09:58):
And then we got these vaccine hearings that I could
just play for the entire show today. I mean it
would be it wouldn't even be irresponsible to me. It'd
be a good show. It'd be an informative show, and
it'd be a powerful show if I did nothing but
just showed you the highlights of some of the vaccine
hearings being held in the US Senate yesterday. Truly bombshell
stuff that I'm going to show you a lot of
videos from later today. So you've got the entire pharmaceutical

(10:22):
medical industry collapsing. You've got white people talking about themselves
as if we are a group that has interests for
the first time ever. And I think that's going to
expand rapidly. I think we're I think that cats out
of the bag quite frankly. I think it's going to
be interesting to see where that goes. So you've got

(10:46):
all of these issues on top of it all, We've
got a story today about our court case. The Info
Wars saga has been taken to a new level. I'm
very excited to tell you about that. And so I'm
getting ready for the show today and I'm thinking about
all this stuff and how just all of the teams
to be coming to a head. Everything seems to be

(11:07):
reaching a boiling point. And the thing I think I
want to try to express is none of these things
are separate from one another. They're all actually part of
exactly the same process taking place.

Speaker 11 (11:26):
I want to try.

Speaker 12 (11:26):
I want to try to draw all these things together
and kind of explain how they're all just different facets
of the same overall movement that does have everything to
do with control. It's all about control, folks. Once you
understand that, everything else can fit into place, and again,
try just expand out and take the thirty thousand foot

(11:47):
view and understand that again, everything that they're doing is
all about control, even the racial stuff. Once you understand that,
the powers that be are just hyper focused, very very
interested in just breeding rebellion out of the human race.
That's essentially what's going on here. They're breeding rebellion out of.

Speaker 11 (12:08):
The human race. I think I can explain that.

Speaker 12 (12:11):
And they're using war, and they're using pharmaceuticals, and they're
using you know, racial conflict to bring all of this about.
At the end of the day, they either want you
dead or a slave. There's no other option. Okay, dead
or a slave. You either willfully submit to them or
they will kill you. That is the paradigm they're working on.
I want to explain how that informs everything else that

(12:32):
we see going on in the world. So we'll begin today,
as we do every day, with our daily dispatch. All right,
here it is, folks. You were daily dispatch for Wednesday,
the tenth of September twenty twenty five. Poland shoots down
Russian drones that violated its airspace during Ukraine's strike. Poland

(12:54):
has activated NATO Article four after downing nineteen Russian drones
that violated its airspace, making an unpre president at active aggression.
All NATO members have expressed solidarity with Poland following the incident,
which involved joint operations with Dutch F thirty five's Polish
F sixteen jets. Prime Minister Donald Tusk called the drone
incursion an unprecedented violation and emphasized that the shooting down

(13:15):
of drones was a success for NATO forces. Ukrainian President
Vladimir Zelenski stated that the incursions should be viewed as
an attack on NATO, suggesting the moscows testing responses to
its actions. Because of course he is a couple problems
with this one. They've already tried this. They bombed Poland
and tried to blame it on Russia. But luckily for us,
there was an independent news reporter on the scene before

(13:37):
any of the officials, so we got images of the
missiles that fell, showing that they were Ukrainian, not Russian.
That false flag was spoiled before it could even begin.
But I've got an interview that i'll show you later
of the former prime minister i believe, or president of Poland,
and he actually says in a recent interview that Zelensky
tried to get him to claim that those were Russian
missiles to start World War three, to get NATO and

(14:00):
invoking Article five by calling the missiles Russian even though
they were Ukrainian. The president of Poland has said that
Zelenski tried to get him to do that and he refused.
So I'll show you that in just a little bit.
You also have, like, just last week, there was a
drone incursion into Poland. And I remember this because I
was scrolling through Twitter. At some point I saw somebody go,

(14:22):
if they attack Poland, should we invoke Article five? And
I was like, well, what are they really doing this?
And I just it was so sort of nonsensical. I
didn't even pay attention to it. I wish I had.
Now I've gone back and found some of the coverage.
But yeah, on August twentieth there was some drone fell
in Poland and they were trying to invoke Article five
over it. Now they're trying to invoke Article five over this.
The drones that were shot down were unarmed. They were

(14:44):
like reconnaissance drones. Russia claims they came from Ukraine. Everybody
else claims they came from Russia. But ironically or coincidentally,
you might say Ursula Vanderleyan the primark of the EU
is set to give the State of the Union today.
Isn't that interesting? She was already planning on focusing on
the rearmament of Europe and the threat of Russian aggression.

(15:05):
So very polite, very nice of Vladimir Putin to provide
her with the very attack that you know she needs
to make her speech justified. So very polite of Putin.
He's really helping out, doing a favor for his European neighbors.
There again, just absolutely absurd. And that's not even all
of the reasons why you should not trust this report

(15:26):
and instead assume that this is NATO desperately trying to
kick star World War three before Donald Trump and Vladimir
Putin can come to peace agreements. We'll go more into
that later, but just off the top, in a word, no, no,
we're not. I'm not believing it. I'm not trusting it.
They are trying to star World War three, and it's

(15:46):
gonna take something better in this. All right, You're gonna
have to Nuca City. Okay, they're gonna They're gonna have
to Nucas City if they want to star World War three.
A couple of reconnaissance drones down in a in a
field outside warsaw and not not quite the false flag
that we need to get behind a war. Meanwhile, Michigan
judge tosses tosses Democrat law Fair against twenty twenty electors.

(16:09):
In a major win for the rule of law, A
Michigan judge dismissed Democrat backed Lawfair waged against the states
twenty twenty Republican electors on Tuesday, citing a lack of
evidence for the charges. Quote, this is a fraud case
and we have to prove intent, District Judge Kristin Simmons
reportedly said during a Tuesday court hearing, and I don't
believe there's evidence sufficient sufficient to prove intent.

Speaker 11 (16:31):
So this is the just pure.

Speaker 12 (16:34):
Persecution case against Republicans who wanted to provide an alternative
slate of electors since the twenty twenty election was stolen
through a variety of you know, electoral malfeasance, and they
wanted to send these people who are like, you know,
seventy year old just Republican volunteers that raise their hands
when they asked if anybody was willing to be an

(16:55):
alternative elector, and they're like trying to charge them with
terrorism and throw them in jail for several decades. So
good to see this as dropped. I'd like to see
retribution again. Let's just stop with the half measures. I
think we all just need to decide that, like in
a war, it's not enough to just defend. We are
fighting a war and it feels like we do nothing

(17:18):
but play defense, and it's like you can't win a
war that way. You have to go on the attack.
And when they attack you, when they launch a law
fair program against your entire political sphere and actually do
throw people in jail and then try to throw grandmothers
in jail for life for daring to participate in the

(17:39):
political process, I think those people then have to be
put into jail. Those people have to be charged, Those
people have to be punished for abusing our system in
that way. It's not enough just to stop the attack.
You have to then counter attack. How else are you
gonna win? This is very very basic stuff, but I

(18:03):
guess we just need to push more. Meanwhile, Katar threatens
to retaliate against Israel for Doha strike on Demas. Qatar
threatened to retaliate against Israel in the wake of an
air strike on Doha that targeted the leaders of Hamas
As the country's prime minister called the situation a decisive
moment for the Middle East. Al Thani described israel strike
on Hamas as state terrorism that's being exerted by somebody

(18:24):
like Israel Prime Minister Benjamin D.

Speaker 11 (18:25):
Yahu. I think we've reached a decisive moment.

Speaker 12 (18:28):
There should be retaliation from the whole region in the
face of those barbaric actions that only reflect one thing.
It reflects the barbarism of this person that is leading
the region unfortunately to a point where we cannot address
any situation, we cannot repair anything, and we cannot work
within the framework of international laws. Al Thanny said, he
just violates all those international laws. Hey, I agree, Hey,

(18:48):
I'm on your side. Al Thanny, that statement was more
cohesive and reasonable and just more statesmen, like the manly
thing I've ever heard out of Israel. So do it, please,
for the love of God, you have to do it.
We are bagging the world is bagging you as the
people surrounding Israel.

Speaker 11 (19:08):
Destroy them. I'm done.

Speaker 12 (19:11):
I'm done even like modifying it. They deserve it, they
deserve it. Glass them. Please please free us, Free us
from these shackles of Israel. Meanwhile, DOJ files federal charges
against de Carlos Brown and murder of Irana Zaruska Arena Zaruska.

(19:34):
The Department of Justice has filed federal charges against Carlos
Brown Junior, the man arrested for the fatal stabbing of
Ukrainian refugee on a Charlotte, North Carolina light rail train.

Speaker 11 (19:42):
In August.

Speaker 12 (19:43):
Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote, Arena Zarutzka was a young
woman living in the American dream. Her horrific murder is
a direct result of failed soft on crime policies that
put criminals before innocent people. I've directed my attorneys to
federally prosecute to Carlos Brown Junior, a repeat violent offender
with a history of violent crime, for murder. We will
see the maximum penalty for this unforgivable act of violence.
He will never again see the light of day as

(20:05):
a free man. So that's good to see. And of course,
Donald Trump just earlier this year, I believe reinvoked the
federal death penalty, so he will be on the hook
for the death penalty for that. We'll get back into
that again. Matt continues to be the top story. There
was a point yesterday that I hit where I could
not think about this anymore because it made me too sad.

(20:27):
So I'm not gonna show the video. I'm gon ask
to crew not to show the video. I don't think
we need to see it again, although it's everywhere. If
you'd like to see it, you're more than welcome to
find it. But we are going to talk about the
events surrounding it. We're going to talk about the reaction
to it, We're going to talk about where we need
to go from here. But you know, yesterday it was

(20:50):
like you think you get to a point and in
a way it's like it's like, oh, something can pierce through.
I mean, you watch this stuff. Ever, I've been doing
the show for five years. You see just the worst
stuff in the world. And I'm doing the show for

(21:11):
five years. I've been looking at this stuff for twenty years.
At a certain point, you're like, am I numb? Am
I numb to all of this? And you see a
video like that and it really hits you and you
feel the shivers and you just go, Okay, Now I
can still be shocked. I can still be shocked and
horrified at the best the behavior of my fellow humans.

(21:36):
And I think, I'm like, this is this is too much.
I gotta, I gotta turn this off. I gotta, I
gotta look away. And as I'm about to click away,
because I'm about to click off X or whatever I'm on,
I see one last post. I see one last post
that piques my interest, and I take a look at it,

(21:59):
and it is a article, an interview with a Chicago
born Israeli sniper, and it might be the most the
single most horrifying thing I've ever read in my entire life.
So I'm gonna read it to you today. So we're
gonna get into that a little bit later too. But

(22:23):
you just feeling for the past year or so, it's
like every at least once a week, I'm like, this
has got to be the bottom, right, this has got
to be There's no way we can keep falling down
a pit. Right at a certain point, there's got to
be a bottom of the pit, right. I mean, pits
have bottoms, don't they don't. They usually have a point

(22:44):
to which you cannot get any lower. But no, we
just keep going deeper and deeper and deeper into hell.
So I'll read you that too, just fair warning. It
might change the way you see the world. That's just
how bad it is. We'll get into that. But finally
we have this and a bit of good news, a

(23:08):
potential shining light in the darkness. Alex Jones takes one
billion dollar Sandy Hook judgment to Supreme Court. Right wing
conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is asking the US Supreme Court
to review a Connecticut court's nearly one point four billion
dollar judgment against him and info war stemming from his
false claims that the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre was

(23:30):
a hoax. The default judgment, entered against Jones and his
Info Wars parent company in twenty twenty two after a
minor after minor discovery violations, was an unjust and disproportionate penalty,
Jones's lawyers told the Justice and a petition filed on
September fifth and obtained by a Bloomberg law the judgment
runs a foul of First Amendment protections established in New
York Times or a Sullivan They said, quote it is

(23:52):
an amount that can never be paid, which, based on
the trial court's findings, may not be dischargeable in bankruptcy.
They said the result is a financial death penalty by
fear imposed by media on a media defendant who's broadcast
reached millions. The filing to the High Court is one
of Jones's last avenue to reverse the judgment obtained against
him in Info Wars' parent company, Free Speech Systems, Llc.

(24:12):
The request comes shortly after a Texas state court appointed
a receiver to oversee the media company. A significant breakthrough
in efforts for Sandy Hook shooting victims. Families owned more
than one owed more than one billion dollars after collection
efforts sputtered for years in bankruptcy court, the Texas Appeals
Court paused the receivership in order. In late August, Jones
and Free Speech Systems lawyers told the justices that because

(24:35):
the Connecticut court sanctions were the result of a default
judgment rather than merit based, the families never actually proved
these specific claims about the shooting were false or that
he made them with actual malice. The justices should review
whether state courses can issue such death penalty default sanctions
brought by public figures against media defendants reporting on issues
of public concern. Jonesa's team said death penalty sanctions are

(24:56):
judicially decreed penalties or liability for all alleged claims to
litigation misconduct, such as discovery abuse. The justices were also
asked to answer whether liability can be imposed on media
entities for acts of unrelated third parties, and to find
whether a serious threat needs to be shown to award
punitive damages based on default sanctions. Allowing the ruling to
stand will chill new reporting and risk hurting other broadcasts

(25:19):
other broadcasters. Jones's lawyer argued a six person Connecticut jury
awarded fifteen family members and one FBI agent who responded
to the attack nine hundred and sixty five million dollars
in compensatory damages and forty four hundred and seventy one
point seven million dollars for other damages. The jury found
Jones and Free Speech System financially liable for spreading falsehoods

(25:40):
about the twenty twelve shooting which killed twenty children and
six school staffers.

Speaker 11 (25:45):
So this is going to the Supreme Court and we
can get into this.

Speaker 12 (25:53):
You know, I think if him for War's audience is
paying attention, they know you know about as much about
this as I do, from what Alex has said and again.
You know, people are are often like, what's really going
on behind the scenes at Enforce. I'm like, watch the shows.
We literally talk to each other through the shows, Like

(26:13):
I hear about what's going on from the shows. So
you probably know as much as I do. But I
have done some extra legwork because it takes extra legwork
to even figure out whether what happened in our case

(26:33):
is normal or not.

Speaker 2 (26:36):
And the.

Speaker 12 (26:40):
Ultimate conclusion that you'll come to if you actually look
into the decisions that were made and the presidents set
previous to our case, is that what has been done
to in full Wars is entirely unprecedented. Never happened like
this ever in history. There is no example. I couldn't

(27:00):
find one. Maybe someone out there knows one. I looked
and looked and looked. I've never been able to find
an example of a default judgment being issued in the
way that it was issued against them for Wars. I mean,
you can look it up, and default judgments the vast
majority of time is when people literally do not respond
to summons. They cannot be contacted, they refuse to show

(27:21):
up for court, they refuse to provide any evidence. They're
just completely stonewalling you know, the discovery process and just
radio silence, and after like months and months and months
of trying to get a response, if they don't hear
anything and they go, all right, then we decide in the.

Speaker 11 (27:38):
Favor of the plaintiffs or whatever in our case.

Speaker 12 (27:45):
From my understanding and layman here, but from my understanding,
what happened to get us the default judgment was they
demanded documents that don't exist that would have proved their
case against us if they did exist, but they don't.
They demanded those documents. We said, those don't exist. The
judge said, they're withholding documents. Default judgment totally unpresident, totally

(28:09):
unlike it's supposed to be applied, totally unlike any other
case in history. As far as I can tell, this
does not happen to any company, let alone a media
company being charged for the actions of people completely unrelated
to us, who we didn't instruct to do anything but
simply by covering a topic, and then other people act

(28:31):
on the information that's out there, whether we cover it
or not, whether it comes from us or not, and
then we get blamed for it because we cover the topic.

Speaker 11 (28:39):
We'll get back.

Speaker 12 (28:39):
Into this on the other side I really hope the
Supreme Court backs us on this.

Speaker 8 (28:45):
Ultimate life Force that's the name of the new product.
This is hands down the strongest.

Speaker 13 (28:52):
Most powerful spike protein detox out there with triple action,
taking all the major.

Speaker 8 (28:59):
Best seller start of five save formulas.

Speaker 13 (29:01):
And integrating an in to just a massive daily dose.
And it isn't just to clean out your blood, ladies, jorelemen.
It is so good for your whole body. It's got
foreigner milligrams of nac alone that is the precursor to
loud to thigh on and just does incredible things for
your whole body, not just that, the energy, the stamina,

(29:22):
all of it. Ladies and gentlemen. We're so excited about
this formula. I don't have time to get into all
the other great ingredientsentive. Go to the Ali showstore dot
com right now and check it out for yourself. This
is so game changing. Lesser formulas have already helped so
many people that I've personally bought them forward, you know,
giving them to friends and family.

Speaker 8 (29:40):
This is amazing. Hit yours now at the alow Showstore
dot com fifty percent off. InfoWars dot com is Tomorrow's
news today.

Speaker 7 (30:00):
Taking a record of the hearts and minds of the
American people. It's the American Journal with your host Harrison Smith.

Speaker 11 (30:16):
All right, welcome back, folks.

Speaker 12 (30:21):
So yes from Bloomberg dot com. And they should know
Alex Jones takes one billion dollar Sandy Hook judgment to
Supreme Court.

Speaker 11 (30:33):
And again looking into this.

Speaker 12 (30:36):
Just as a as a blameman, I guess, I mean,
I have access to as much information has made public.
I'm using I'm using croc grock and chat GPT. I'm
really trying to figure out what exactly was the decision
made here?

Speaker 11 (30:52):
Why exactly did it happened like this?

Speaker 12 (30:56):
And at a certain point you get down the rabbit
hole and it's like, okay, the default judgment came because
we sent the information to the plaintiffs, but we forgot
to see one of their lawyers or something.

Speaker 11 (31:11):
And that and that's it. It's a default judgment.

Speaker 12 (31:14):
Like way, so we provided the information, we see seed
fifteen people, but there was a sixteen person that was
actually left off the list. Therefore we owe one point
four billion dollars. What I'm sorry, what exactly is going on?
Like it's hard to even find what the reasoning is
because again default judgments, and you can look this up.

(31:38):
They're extremely rare period like they they almost never happened
ever in anything. The vast majority of the time that
they happen, it's when you know, it's for like small
claim stuff where you know, a a divorced couple, the
ex wife issuing the ex husband, and the ex husband
flees to Mexico to default judges like, well, he won't

(32:01):
show up, he's not responding. We served him, but he didn't.
But he's not answering us, so you win, so you win.
That's like the vast majority of cases when it's and
it's there for those cases when the people just like
do not respond and just completely ignore. And there's been
like I could find like one other case where like

(32:24):
I think it was Nestle or something like there's one
other case where a big corporation got a default judgment.
But again it's because they just straight up refused to
answer the summons to the court. And then like even
just just looking back over it now and going back
over some of the some of the articles are just
like asking groc about it and basically, as I understand,

(32:48):
and again all of this is with the caveat of
as a layman and from my you know, just going
entirely off public information as I understand it. They they
the entire court system when it comes to defamation or
defamation against a media corporation is all about money, and

(33:12):
it's proving that you're either stopping somebody from making money
or you lied about somebody in order to make money.
So it's all about money, and the charges are monetary
and the damages are monetary. And so they were trying
to prove that alex and Info Wars was covering Sandy Hook,

(33:32):
lying about Sandy Hook because it made money, and so
they wanted us to provide them with documents showing that
we looked at our analytics, saw that Sandy Hook made
us money and therefore designed shows talking about Sandy Hook
in order to make money. And we don't have those

(33:56):
documents because we don't do that type of stuff. And again,
if you watch the depth isis from these cases, it.

Speaker 11 (34:02):
Is it is.

Speaker 12 (34:05):
It is baffling because it's like they're trying not to
understand what's being said. Should I should clip out these
these pieces? But there's one point I think it was
in Daria's deposition where there it's like they refuse to
understand that there's no script for Alex Jones. So she's

(34:28):
trying to explain, like, no, we have a radio log
where Alex talks about stuff, and we write down what
he says as he's talking to keep track of it.
Because what happens is we do with three or Alex
is a four hour show. At the end of it,
we have a big log going. Okay, in segment one,
you talked about this, and segment two you talked about this,
so then we can go back and cut out videos
without having to watch the whole thing through.

Speaker 2 (34:47):
Again.

Speaker 12 (34:48):
It's just a matter of convenience for us in editing
and just keeping track of what was talked about on
the show that day. And they're asking her about this
and they cannot understand that it's not something that we
do before the show. She's like, it's a radiologue. We
just we type out what Alex talks about as he's
talking about it. And they're like, okay, so this is
something you provide to him before the show, explaining what

(35:09):
he's going to talk about, And it's like, no, we
just we write it as it goes, and there's just
this like disconnect where it's like, Okay, do they really
not understand? They really not understand. But the the point
is they're trying to portray it as if Alex is

(35:30):
told what to say and that there's a script for
Alex to follow and that's informed by what gets the
most clicks and what you know is making us money.
And so in their assumption, we're behind the scenes going, oh, Sandy.

Speaker 11 (35:44):
Hook, it gets us a lot of hits.

Speaker 12 (35:46):
Okay, tell Alex to talk about Sandy Hook, and then
we type out a script for Alex to go up
and talk about sandy Hook because it makes us money.
It's just not how it works here is we don't
have that documentation because we don't do that, and so
like literally that is but they did the default judgment
on it was stuff like that where they're like, where
are the documents showing that you had meetings, you know,

(36:08):
to talking about how sandy Hook was profitable. We don't
have that, and they're like, you're withholding it from us
default judgment or the Google Analytics. We got kicked off
of Google Analytics. We don't have access to Google Analytics,
so Google kicks us off their platform. The judge demands
information from their platform. We can't get access to it,

(36:30):
they charge, they give us a default judgment, completely unprecedented. Again,
just not the way default judgments work, not the way
they're supposed to work, not the way they've ever worked
in any other situation. And just take Alex Juns out

(36:52):
of it, take Info Wars out of it, and just
understand what this really is.

Speaker 11 (36:57):
This is saying that.

Speaker 12 (37:00):
You can you can dredge up a story that a
media outlet covered ten years ago. You can take actions
done by random individuals completely unassociated with that media outlet,
say because that person did something to me, I'm gonna
charge you, and if you don't provide me with the
evidence showing that you're guilty, then I'm gonna declare you guilty.

(37:21):
And then we're gonna have a show trial where we
have a jury and we have witnesses, but the witnesses
are told what they can and can't say, they're forbidden
from invoking the First Amendment, all this other like completely
arbitrary restrictions. But it's gonna be televised, so everybody's gonna
be able to tune in and watch what looks an
awful lot like a trial but is not a trial.

(37:42):
And it's gonna look an awful lot like a jury,
but it's not really a jury because they're not actually
deciding anything. They're just deciding how guilty you are. And
again Alex came up with the with the phrases that
explain this absurdity as well as you possibly can. It's
not even guilty until proven instant. It was guilty until
proven guilty, guilty until they decide how guilty you are.

Speaker 11 (38:06):
And again, I mean, you can do all this, you know.

Speaker 12 (38:08):
Research yourself, but like Groc like doesn't even understand what
I'm saying when I'm asking about big cases where default
judgments occur.

Speaker 11 (38:18):
Because it doesn't happen.

Speaker 12 (38:20):
Like literally I'm asking, so I asked, I asked Rock,
what are some big court cases decided by default judgment?
And it basically gets confused and it's like, well, there's
lots of like credit card default cases that go into
judgment because default judgments aren't like big case things.

Speaker 11 (38:38):
It doesn't happen with big cases. It shouldn't. It's not
supposed to, well, not big case.

Speaker 12 (38:42):
In terms of public prominence, this case is cited in
legal discussions as an example of defaul judgment being vacated
due to improper service of process. The defendants sus sexually
successfully demonstrated that we're not properly served, et cetera, et cetera.
Like it just it genuinely doesn't happen. It's not a thing.
High profile court cases, such as those reaching the US
Supreme Court involving major constitutional issues, are rarely decided by

(39:04):
default judgment. Default judgments are procedural rather than substantive, meaning
they do not reflect a court's evaluation of the case's merits.
For example, in Master's verse Lever, it was clarified that
a default judgment does not imply the court agrees with
the plaintiff's claims, allowing excuse me the defendants to potentially

(39:24):
re argue the facts in future proceedings. Defendants can move
to set aside a defaul judgment by showing valid reasons
such as improper service, excusable neglect, or other justifiable circumstances
e g. Hospitalization juristics and jurisdictions like California, Defends typically
have thirty days from the notice of entry to file
such emotion. Once granted, default judgments allow plaintiffs to pursue
remedies like wage garnsments or asset seizures, which can have

(39:46):
significant consequences for defendants. Challenges and identifying big default judgment cases.
Search results in available information do not highlight specific high
profile court cases decided by default judgment. These judgments are
typically associated with lower stakes, are less publicized civil disputes.
So I'm telling you it doesn't happen typically, And the

(40:11):
reason it happened in this case is because.

Speaker 11 (40:15):
It was a loophole.

Speaker 12 (40:16):
It's a loophole, it's a legal loophole that they found
to destroy Alex Jones. It's pretty damn simple. Actually, it's
just completely unfair and totally unwarranted, unprecedented nonsense as far
as I can tell. And again, so I asked Grok,
and it's like, yeah, there are no big cases decided

(40:37):
by default judgment. That doesn't happen. That's not what default
judgments are. And I'm like, okay, well what about Alex Jones.
And it's like, oh, right, right, yeah, that's one. Right,
It's the only one though. So it's just such a
rare and out of context situation that select I guess
Grok forgot about it. In November twenty twenty one, Connecticut

(40:58):
Supreme Court Judge Barbara Bellis issued a default judgment against
Jones and enforced parent company free speech systems and for
consolidated defamation cases. The default was due to Jones's repeated
failure to comply with discovery obstagation obligations, including refusing to
provide financial documents and website analytics data. And you've heard
Alex say over and over. We literally gave them our

(41:19):
quick books. They have full access to our bank account.
They have all of the financial information they could ever
possibly need. And what they wanted was documents that don't exist.
They're going, where are the emails between your marketing team
and your producers about what to cover? And we're like,
we don't have that, and they're like, so you're hiding

(41:41):
it from us, So you're withholding it doesn't exist here.
And we've explained this before as well, because Inforce is
not a normal company. We're not a normal media outlet. Yeah,
most media outlets you go and you go, okay, show
us the rundown where you tell the host what to
say and they have that inform and that information has
been informed by the marketing team who has you know,

(42:04):
done the analytics and tells us, you know, tells whoever
it is, what to cover and what not to cover.
We have absolutely none of that here. We have none
of that here. We don't look I don't look at
the Google analytics hard. Let me look at the view count.
We cover what we think is interesting and think is important,
and what our callers tell us they want to hear about.

Speaker 11 (42:24):
It's very organic.

Speaker 12 (42:25):
There is no corporate superstructure dictating our coverage depending on
what's popular and what's not. It just doesn't exist. They
demand evidence that it does exist. We say there is
no evidence that exists. They say, you're hiding it from us.
Therefore we give you a default judgment. I'm telling you
that's actually what happened here. Now, how this ever got

(42:46):
through I guess this has been through one appeals court,
a mid level Connecticut state appeals court, and Connecticut Supreme
Court denied a request or review. So it's going up
to the Supreme Court. I would hope that this court
would see the just just overwhelming absurdity in every aspect

(43:10):
of what we've been through, and just to lay it
out again, case you're new here, case you're unfamiliar with
how this whole process went down. Alex Jones talked about
Sandy Hook in twenty twelve, twenty thirteen, after the immediate event,

(43:30):
because Sandy Hook basically superseded nine to eleven as the
conspiracy theory topic du jour, and it was everywhere. You
used to be able to go on YouTube and type
Sandy Hook and you would see page after page after
page after page, hundreds or thousands of videos about Sandy

(43:51):
Hook from all different from hundreds of creators, Alex Jones
out nearly the most prominent among them. In fact, there
are multiple, like major Sandy Hook documentaries that have contributions
from like thirty different journalists and investigators and researchers, none
of them Alex Jones. And those are the documentaries that

(44:13):
really you know, progress the theory and all that. So
this is just a topic that everybody's covering that Alex
Jones didn't. He didn't come up with it. He didn't
he was the first to, you know, say there was
something suspicious about this. I mean, personally, I watched Sandy
Hook happen live from home, and I still have some

(44:38):
questions about lies that were told and about the way
the whole thing unfolded in the most suspicious way possible.
And my point of saying that, obviously is this wasn't
something that Alex Jones came up with on his own
and everybody just followed his lead. It was something that

(45:01):
millions of people all over the country all, you know,
in one movement, all went wait what wait, but I
saw the guy running through the woods. Why did they
tell me he didn't exists?

Speaker 11 (45:13):
How did that? Why is the guy rehearsing? This is weird?

Speaker 12 (45:17):
This is all very weird. Every Like, millions of people
thought it looked weird. Alex Jones was one of them.
So why is he the one that gets all the
blame for it? Well, the answer is in the timing
of when these court case came about. It didn't come
about twenty thirteen, fourteen, twenty fifteen, or even most of

(45:39):
twenty sixteen. The first the media campaign to associate Alex
Jones with Sandy Hook was launched within days of Donald
Trump getting elected. So for ten years almost so that point,
it was like half a decade. For half a decade,
there's no articles associating Alex Jones with Sandy Hook. There's

(46:02):
no you know, reports saying this guy Alex Jones given
with the Sandy Hook thing.

Speaker 11 (46:07):
It wasn't his. He wasn't the guy.

Speaker 12 (46:09):
A lot of other people are a lot more prominent
in the Sandy Hook world. Alex Jones was on the
periphery of anything, and it wasn't He didn't cover it
for years. But then the powers that be realized how
effective Alex Jones is politically, and they realized what an
impact in Full Wars had in getting Donald Trump elected.

(46:32):
So the day after he got elected, they published the
first story saying Donald Trump hangs out with Alex Jones,
and Alex Jones questioned Sandy Hook, the first time that
Alex Jones and Sandy Hook were written together in an article,
and it was about Donald Trump and how dangerous Alex
Jones was because he got Donald Trump elected, and how

(46:53):
Sandy Hook would now be branded with him, and from
that point on, the gates were open. So there's nothing
to do with is really nothing to do with San
Hook in general. I mean, it's just that's the excuse
that they're using to try to bring down Alex Jones,
something that they themselves have said over and over and
over again. So I mean, we can take your calls

(47:15):
on this. I'm praying again I'm just praying to God
that the Supreme Court of the United States can actually
look at this in a objective way and we'll actually
take this case and we'll actually concern themselves with the
fact that high powered lawyers have spent tens of millions
of dollars to eradicate the first miniment rights of a broadcaster.

(47:41):
That's the point here. Take Alex Jones out of it,
taken fullwards out of it, do high powered law firms
have a right to dig up coverage from ten years
ago that Alex Jones corrected he'd apologized for it. I mean, no,
you know, malicious ignoring of facts that came in now

(48:04):
he'd apology. In fact, it was the apology that you know,
may have really really put chum in the water for them.
So it was it was completely political, completely unpresident of

(48:28):
the default judgment, completely unwarranted and unjustified because we were
participating in discovery. We did give them everything we had.
We just didn't have stuff they asked for because it
didn't exist. But of course this is just part of
the overall law fair Again, we'll we'll get into some
of the other stuff going on today, which is which

(48:49):
is good. Some of the other lawfare cases are being dropped.
But again it's a question of whether people who say
themselves that their whole goal of bringing this case forward
is to silence Alex Jones. This is not something we
have to speculate about, or we have to say, hey,
this is the consequence of what's happening. Therefore, you know

(49:09):
that must be their intent. No, they tell us their intent.
They in their own words, have said over and over
and over again, the whole point of these cases is
to silence Alex Jones. Take his megaphone away, make sure
that he can't do this anymore to anybody else. In
other words, so he can't cover stories in a way

(49:29):
that is contrary to the mainstream media. Should that be allowed?
I mean, do you think the Supreme Court is going
to think that should be allowed? He should be allowed
to bankrupt a media company because you don't like what
they say, like, this isn't Gawker, Okay, this isn't. This

(49:52):
isn't You know, Alex Jones didn't steal somebody's a personal
naughty video and upload it without permission, right, That was
a case where they deserved it, and the way they
acted was flagrant and completely unjustified and unwarranted. Alex Jones
talked about a public event that literally millions people were

(50:14):
talking about it. But again, you got to understand how
the censorship goes into this, how they launched these cases
right as Alex Jones getting kicked off of all the
social media platforms all at once. And it's not just
Dolex Jones getting kicked off the media platform. So we
can't defend himself and can't say the truth in the
face of, you know, the lies being pushed by the
mainstream media, which obviously is a major disability in us

(50:39):
airing our side of the story to the public. But
it was about deleting all the other videos. What about
all of the hundreds and thousands of videos on YouTube
questioning Sandy Hook from everybody that's not Alex Jones. Oh,
they don't exist on YouTube anymore. So now I have
you got a YouTube Sandy Hook. It's Alex Jones. It's
the reports about Alex Jones leaking him to Sandy Hook

(51:00):
that you see on YouTube.

Speaker 11 (51:02):
Didn't used to be that way.

Speaker 12 (51:05):
It'd be a little bit ridiculous if they're going Alex
Jones came up with a Sandy Hook conspiracy. And then
you go on YouTube, there's tens of thousands of videos
from everbody who's not Alex Jones talking about this. You
might go, well, wait, are they blame in this guy?
It looks like there's hundreds of people way more interested
in this than Alex Jones ever was. So they delete those,
they censor those, and then they tell you it was

(51:26):
all Alex Jones. And there's no proof to the contrary
unless you go to something like bit Shoot or Rumble,
where all those documentaries still exist. You should watch them.
By the way, you should watch them. This course is
almost part and parcel for just being a outspoken right
wing dissident in this country these days. And on that note,

(51:47):
I want to go to clip number seven here because
this was Enrique Tarrio on with Joe Biggs yesterday, and
his whole video is long, but I thought the beginning
was really powerful.

Speaker 11 (51:57):
So we'll watch the first two minutes or so.

Speaker 10 (51:59):
Here.

Speaker 12 (52:00):
Number seven. This is Enrique Tario yesterday on the War
Room with Joe Biggs.

Speaker 14 (52:03):
Let's watch the attempting to overthrow the US government right
and just in those changing of words and putting that
in people's head.

Speaker 8 (52:10):
Oh, these are seditions.

Speaker 14 (52:11):
These are seditions that cost us that well, that almost
cost us decades of our lives because they decided to
change the definition of a word like those words should
be used in their contacts, like sedition should be used
if somebody attempts to overthrow the government by the use
of force, right, using firearms, going after you know, those

(52:33):
are acts of sedition. But it's a lot of the
in and out of the capitol go ahead.

Speaker 8 (52:39):
But I'm saying it's not even just that too.

Speaker 5 (52:40):
The other part of the sedition is in order to
overthrow the government, you have to have had people picked
to place in the positions of power. So you would
have had to have had who was going to be
the president, the vice president, the Secretary of War, the
head of the Irs, you know, the Department of you
know whatever, the DOJ, Attorney general, all this stuff. You

(53:01):
had that kind of Yeah, yeah, well that's what it is. Now,
you know, we take it back o school, I do too,
or maybe one day I'll get to be that. But look, yeah,
that's part of it. That's that's part of the definition
of what that was. Just the same thing with conspiracy.
Look what they did with conspiracy. Conspiracy is you know,
two or more people sitting down and they have a

(53:22):
conversation and they make a plan and they agree upon
something to do. Then it changed to Noah, doesn't have
to be a plan or a meeting of the mind.
It just has to be a wink or nod in
a split second. That HAPs there has to be no
spoken words, like they literally change judicial They change these

(53:44):
terms in real time.

Speaker 8 (53:45):
So they can convict us.

Speaker 5 (53:47):
And if that doesn't scare the American people, I don't
know what else does. I mean, maybe a hooded guy
on the back of a train ready to cut your throat.
But you know, that's really what they're doing right now.
When they change the words, that's the same thing as
a hooded guy sitting behind you and anytime you're going
to cut your throat.

Speaker 8 (54:02):
Because we were.

Speaker 5 (54:02):
Sitting here being normal, peaceful human beings, and then the
judicial system came in America versus the Proud Boys came
in with a knife right up barneck and slid our
throat and threw us in prison, try to take our
life from us.

Speaker 8 (54:14):
They wanted to give.

Speaker 5 (54:15):
Us thirty six years or thirty four years, both of us.

Speaker 11 (54:19):
So you can watch that full video.

Speaker 12 (54:21):
It's just part of the hour long conversation between Joe
Bigs and Enrique Tario yesterday.

Speaker 11 (54:27):
They don't care.

Speaker 12 (54:28):
They are abusing the law, their plaguing criminals trying to
destroy the right wing.

Speaker 13 (54:33):
Ultimate fish oil is now available at infowarstore dot com
after being sold out for more than six months. And
we give it the name Ultimate, like so many of
other products, because it is the highest grade.

Speaker 8 (54:43):
The very best you're going to find anywhere.

Speaker 3 (54:45):
Now.

Speaker 13 (54:45):
Most people know how great fish oil is, but not
all fish oil is made equal.

Speaker 8 (54:50):
A lot of it has been.

Speaker 13 (54:51):
Homogenized or basically boiled and cooked off, and it loses
almost all of us good effect.

Speaker 8 (54:56):
This is the highest.

Speaker 13 (54:57):
Grade fish oil from three different amazing sources.

Speaker 8 (55:02):
Listen to this.

Speaker 13 (55:03):
Arctic krill oil is known as the best essential fatty acid,
then another well known top one wild an choby oil
and high quality wild caught salmon also one of the
top forms of it. It is back of stock. It
is not as good for your cardioascular system. It's good
for everything. Take a few a few hours before you sleep,
and a lot of folks have amazing dreams on it.

Speaker 8 (55:24):
You always eat like a good piece.

Speaker 13 (55:25):
Of fish that's fresh. You also have great dreams. You
want to experience this. It's so good for your brain,
your heart, everything ultimoficial back of stock in porschor dot com.

Speaker 11 (55:47):
All right, welcome back, folks on the topic of law
fair these days.

Speaker 12 (55:52):
And by the way, we'll be joined by Stuart Rhodes
in the third hour, an expert in law fair, you
might say, one of the most prominent victims of it.
Let's go to Clive number six here, CNN sort of
let the mask slip a little bit. They admitted something
they were supposed to pretend they didn't know. Whoopsie daisy,
they let the cat out of the bag. Here, let's

(56:13):
go to a Clive number six.

Speaker 15 (56:14):
Now, wait a minute, did she just say this out loud?
Check it out?

Speaker 16 (56:17):
Agree with you that Democrats cannot only be the party
of resistance. We cannot like we resisted so hard between
twenty seventeen and twenty twenty four. We impeached the guy
like if we prosecuted him, convicted him of thirty four
felony accounts and guess what, he still got elected. So
I don't know how much harder we can resist, right?

Speaker 17 (56:36):
Are you admitting that? But the case against Trump and
New York was part of the Organized Democratic Party resistance.

Speaker 16 (56:40):
It was a Democratic prosecutor and at the time, okay,
at the time, I said, I thought it was unwise.
I went on Fox News and said it was said
this at the time.

Speaker 11 (56:49):
There were a lot Just to be clear, this wasn't.

Speaker 17 (56:51):
Just to be clear, everybody who now touts the thirty
four felonies, take it from Liz.

Speaker 11 (56:55):
This was not a real case.

Speaker 17 (56:56):
This was a plot to up end the presidential campaign,
which back.

Speaker 16 (57:00):
I just think it was a boneheaded move by Alvin Bragg.
But it's not as first or last ones.

Speaker 9 (57:04):
That is why we invite Liz because plain spoken or
who can really tell it.

Speaker 15 (57:09):
Yeah, they're like, this is why we invite this lady
because she's actually allowed to say what she thinks versus
us who might be fired. Right, it's unbelievable. When is
CNN going to get canceled? I want to know your
thoughts and until then stay elevated.

Speaker 12 (57:22):
When is see an DAT canceled her or any of
or win, Are any of these people going to be
held to account for abusing our system. It's not like
a small thing. They're like laughing at it. They tried
to send Trump to jail for life. That they just
completely demolished our system of governance going after Donald Trump,

(57:46):
the presidents, they set the links, they were willing to go,
and now they're at the third admitting, yeah, yeah, that
was all just as if we needed them to admit that, right,
as if we needed their you know, acknowledgment of what
has been imminently observable from the beginning. None of these
cases had any merit, none of them were warranted, All
of them were predicated entirely on the political outcome, So

(58:10):
they need to be punished. What do we not understand
about this? And that? That, I guess is the question
of the year at this point. How do we get
Republicans take this crap seriously and not just shrug it off.

(58:32):
I got another video here, let's go to Let's go
to clip number I thought, I thought I just had
it because there's another case sixteen. Let's go to clip
sixteen really quick.

Speaker 18 (58:45):
Here are it In Texas, Republicans blowing up the maps.
They're trying to draw new district lines that will get
them more seats out of Texas. So currently there are
twenty five Republican seats in Texas. Thirteen Democratic. Now, the
new map Republicans have drawn could, depending on how this
all plays out, get them up to thirty seats out
of Texas. That would be a gain of five new

(59:07):
seats for Republicans just out of Texas. Hadding that margin
they could afford to lose potentially in the midterms next year.
And of course the Democrats have responded to this. Gavin
Newsom in California, he and his party drawing new lines
out there. They're gonna have to be approved by the
voters this November.

Speaker 11 (59:23):
That's a big if.

Speaker 18 (59:24):
But if those new lines are approved, that could be
a gain of five new seats for the Democrats. And
you say, oh, it's all a wash, right, Well no,
because other states are getting in on this too, And
this is the advantage at least for twenty twenty six
that Republicans may have. There are more red states potentially
in position to do this for twenty six than there
are blue states. So you see Ohio right now, they

(59:46):
could get Republicans three new seats out of Ohio.

Speaker 2 (59:49):
Potentially.

Speaker 18 (59:50):
Republicans are doing this in Indiana, could gain a seat
out of Indiana. They're doing it in Missouri.

Speaker 1 (59:55):
It looks like could gain a seat there.

Speaker 18 (59:57):
They're talking about doing it in Kansas, could gain a
seat there. Florida they could gain maybe three new seats
out of Florida.

Speaker 19 (01:00:03):
Look at all these other.

Speaker 12 (01:00:04):
Republications, so there's like five or six red states where
we could redistrict and gain seats. California I think maybe
only one more is one where the Democrats could do it.

Speaker 11 (01:00:13):
Now they wanted to start this fight.

Speaker 12 (01:00:16):
Dexo is having to redistrict because our demographic change and
response California is like, well then we're going to redistrict
to give Democrats more seats. Okay, Well, now every Republican
state needs to be doing this.

Speaker 11 (01:00:26):
It's not an option. I get it. I don't like
star system being like this either, but this is the
way the system is. You have to fight to win.
Here's a victim.

Speaker 7 (01:00:37):
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host
Harrison Smith.

Speaker 11 (01:00:42):
Watch it live right now at banned dot Video.

Speaker 12 (01:00:48):
All right, walk back to folks, try to get into
all this news and just and just blast through it
here in.

Speaker 11 (01:00:55):
The next few hours.

Speaker 12 (01:00:55):
I do want remind you go to the outshown store
dot com. Three ten dollars ultimate fundraiser is on right now.
You're getting free ten dollars credit with every order over
seventy five dollars. It is a critical fundraiser sale. It's
only happening for a limited time. You're going to want
to go to the Alex Jones store dot com. Try
the ultramethyl in blue, the bovine colostrum plus the Shiligit complex.
And by the way, if you sign up for the

(01:01:17):
Scheduled deliveries, you save fifty percent off these products and
you get even more savings if you're a VIP member.
Go today the Alex Jones Store dot com. Support us,
keep us on the air and in the fight.

Speaker 8 (01:01:28):
Now.

Speaker 11 (01:01:29):
I have a lot to cover.

Speaker 12 (01:01:30):
Let's see if I can't lay out for you what's
actually going on in Poland, because the story is Poland
shoots down Russian drones that violated its airspace during Ukraine strike.
Poland has activated NATO Article four after downing nineteen Russian
drones that violated its airspace, making an unprecedented act of aggression.
All NATO members have expressed solidarity with Poland following the incident,

(01:01:52):
which involved joint operations with Dutch F thirty five's and
Polishe F sixteen jets. Prime Minister Donald Tusk called the
drone incursion an unpress violation and emphasizes that shooting down
of drones was a success for NATO forces. Vladimir Zelinski
stated the incursion should be viewed as an attack on NATO,
suggesting the Moscow is testing its responses to its actions.

Speaker 11 (01:02:12):
Now this happens to arrive on the eve of.

Speaker 12 (01:02:17):
Uh Vaughan dourleyan Ursula vander Leahyan's address State of the
Union address to the EU where she plans on focusing
on EU militarization. So again, very kind, very nice, very
thoughtful of Vladimir Putin to provide her with the example
and talking point that she needs here on the eve

(01:02:37):
of her warmongering address. The principal elements of her speech
are clear in advance. She calls to stand firm against Russia,
support for Ukraine and an accelerated pace of EU militarization.
The main points of her speech are already known, which
the Commission regards as key political events in Brussels in September.
They have also been reported by several European media outlets.
The principal elements to stand firm against Russia's port for

(01:02:59):
UK and an accelerated pace VU militarization, with particular emphasis
on digital technologies and AI based systems. Vonderland will also
voice support for continuing the Green Transition. However, sources indicate
this topic will receive less intention than in previous years
as it no longer represents the Commission's core ideological agenda,
which now is war, is war.

Speaker 11 (01:03:18):
Always war, We must have war.

Speaker 12 (01:03:21):
So, you know, this is the equivalent of and really
just right in perfect, you know, fulfillment of the pattern
of Nordstream two or Bashirah Assad chemical weapon attacking his
own people. It's absurd, it's nonsense, it doesn't make any
it doesn't track. Why would Russia do this? I mean,

(01:03:46):
it is very comparable to the Obama saying my red
line is chemical weapons. Of Asad ever uses chemical weapons,
America will invade, and then Assad, despite winning the war,
decides to drop barrel bombs full of you know, potassium
cyanide on his own people. It's just it's complete to bs,
complete nonsense, an obvious false flag that in that case

(01:04:08):
has since been proven by the you know, un Chemical
Weapons Inspector there were no chemical weapons that ever existed.
There least of all ones launched by Basha Assad. It's
the exact same thing here. The one thing Russia can't
do is bomb NATO country, and that's the one thing
they do. On the eve of the speech by Ersu
Levanderland about how EU needs to be prepared for war

(01:04:29):
with Russia, they happened to fly nineteen drones over Poland,
none of them armed, all of them reconnaissance, and they
happen to fly it kind of out of the Ukrainian
airspace if you really look at it, but don't look
too much into that, completely absurd, especially absurd since they've
already tried this multiple times already. The story from Hungarian

(01:04:53):
conservative dot com Poland's ex president Dudah exposes how Ukraine
tries to pull allies into war just happens to have
been published three days ago. For five days ago at
this point, September fifth, Poland's form president Andres Duja has
claimed that Russia the Ukraine president Vladimir Zelensky, attempted to
pressure Warsaw into blaming Russia for the twenty twenty two

(01:05:16):
Perwodo missile strike, calling it an effort to pull Poland
directly into the war. In an effort or in an
interview rather with the Polish outfit do Reski. Dudah said
Ukraine had sought to involve other nations in the fighting
since the outset of the conflict, stressing it was in
Kiev's interest to secure allies willing to confront Roscow. He
referred to the incident of the fifteenth of November twenty

(01:05:39):
twenty two, when a missile struck the Polish village of
Preswodo near the Ukrainian border, killing two farmers. According to Dudah,
Zelenski's insistence that the missiles would that the missile was
Russian amounted to pressure on Poland to confirm Moscow's responsibility,
something due to interpreted as an attempt to draw his
country into the conflict. So five days ago, the former

(01:06:01):
President of Poland blew the whistle admitted that Voladimir Zelinsky
pressured him to blame the missile attack on Russia to
invoke Article five to bring NATO into the war with Russia,
despite knowing it was the Ukrainian missile the entire time,
and that might have worked except for the miraculous event

(01:06:21):
that an independent reporter happened to be on the scene
happened to take a picture of the missile, happened to
post it online where it spread, where people saw this
wasn't a Russian missile if he hadn't been the first
on the scene, if they'd had a government agent there
first and could have covered it up and could have reported, Yep,
we got the missile pieces and they're definitely Russian, one

(01:06:41):
hundred percent. You know here they are, and they'll present
a Russian missile as if that was the one that landed,
we'd be in World War three right now. How many
events in recent history that hasn't been like that? Like
the one guy who happened to capture the video, wasn't
he a Polish guy? Wasn't it a Polish guy that
captured the video of throwing Hillary Clinton into the van

(01:07:01):
like a sack of potatoes? Like there are these things that,
by all rights, nobody should know about. We should not
know that that missile came from Ukraine. We should not
have ever known that Hillary Clinton was deeply unhealthy and
had to be thrown around like a sack of potatoes.
But it just so happens that Polish independent news reporters

(01:07:22):
just happened to be on the scene of these incredible events.
I don't know what it is, but humanity owes a
debt of gratitude to the Polish independent journalists out there.
I mean, this is bombshell. This is bombshell stuff, no
pun intended. The President of Poland has admitted that Zelenski
pressured him to say the missile was from Russia to

(01:07:43):
invoke Article five, try to get NATO into direct conflict
with Russia, to start World War three on a false flag.
And we only avoided it because an independent news reporter
was there on the scene to take a picture. Really
incredible stuff and admitted here now what we've known the
entire time. But pretty interesting that he gives this interview

(01:08:04):
days before they literally try to do it again, exactly
the same thing with drones's time, instead of a missile.
Europe is obviously wanting to go to war again. We've
talked about this. It is actually impossible for them to
do it. They don't have the armies, they don't have
the equipment, they don't have the industry to create the

(01:08:25):
equipment to arm the armies that don't exist. It doesn't
make any sense. It's not supposed to make any sense
because these people don't want to win a war against Russia.
They want to start a war against Russia. They don't
want to defeat Russia and China. They don't care about democracy.
They want to kill everyone in Europe as quietly as

(01:08:46):
possible or as quickly as possible. So they're trying to
start the war. They just aren't trying to win it.
Don't think they ever will win it. From Hugh Anthony
on X members of the Bridgetish Army are being threatened
with losing their jobs or military jail time if they
attend to the September thirteenth rally. So there's a big rally,

(01:09:08):
I believe, with Tommy Robinson being held on the thirteenth
of September in the UK. A source within the British
Army has reached out to me alleging the members are
being threatened with having a book thrown at them dishonorable
discharge if they attend the rally. Disorder has come from
a brigadier stating attendant shows political allegiance and taking sides
despite it being obvious. Members of the Army have taken
aside by joining the army to defend and serve the

(01:09:29):
country they love due to the rank of the officer
that has issued the order in subordination of this issue
can be punished by jail time in a military prison,
leaning to many members avoiding the rally over fear of
being punished for saying for the sake of your careers,
don't go. So the UK Army, in addition to telling
its people to be prepared for deployment, We're going to
have to go to war, etc.

Speaker 11 (01:09:49):
Etc.

Speaker 12 (01:09:51):
Are being threatened with jail time if they dare to
attend the right wing uprising that's taking place there. So again,
as the EU establishment, they are terrified of their own
people and so they're trying to start a war to
bring them back into line, to justify all of the
outrageous measures that in many cases they're already implementing. But
they really want to accelerate against their own people. Again

(01:10:14):
from a Polish user here, holy crap. Formed President of
Poland Dudah has revealed during an interview that Zelenski put
excuse me, pressure on him to I immediately declare that
the missile that fell in Russia on Polish territory a
few years ago was Russian. Dudas said he saw it
as an attempt by Ukraine to drag Poland into war
with Russia.

Speaker 11 (01:10:32):
So again of.

Speaker 12 (01:10:35):
Like nearly miraculous that this interview comes out just like
days before they do exactly the same thing again, and then.

Speaker 11 (01:10:42):
This was this is the thing where I'm like, am
I crazy?

Speaker 12 (01:10:46):
So somebody on August twenty sixth six says Ukrainian attack
drone crashes in Estonia A Ukrainian Ukrainian strike drone crash
in Estonia, err reported, citing the country's security police. According
to the agency, the drone was most likely lamed aimed
at targets inside Russia, but was thrown off course by
Russian GPS jamming, which I am. I mean, Estonia is

(01:11:07):
aligned with Russia, right, They're very much sort of a
Russian puppet state, if I'm not mistaken, So this would
seem to be Ukraine sort of going after Russia's allies
a little bit somehow. And then somebody else comments under
that where is the crowd who a couple of days
ago when a Russian drone crashed in Poland, we're asking
for Article five. This was from August twenty six, twenty

(01:11:27):
twenty five. So I'm like, yeah, I remember, like a
few days ago. I remember this. There's like a weird
sort of Groundhog's Day thing going on. I don't know
what it is, but I wake up to the news
story about Russian drones crashing in Poland and I'm like, wait,
this happened three days ago. It's like Twilight Zone stuff
going on, And yeah, it did. It happened a few

(01:11:48):
days ago where on like August twentieth or so, they
said they downed another Russian drone and we're talking about
invoking Article five from that. Apparently that didn't enough attention,
so then they had to do it again. Unless you
believe that Vladimir Putin is the stupidest person in the
world and doing the one thing that would guarantee NATO

(01:12:09):
gets drawn into the conflict. So I don't believe it.
I think we can. I think we've probably said enough
about that. But just just so you're aware, and by
the way, this is this is sort of the overall
trend that I'm noticing, and I hope we all see
this too. Uprisings in England, uprisings in France, you know,
massive protests all over the world. Uprisings in Australia, uprisings

(01:12:33):
in New Zealand, America is at the boiling point when
it comes to racial relations. Everything is sort of bubbling over.
Trump and Putin are are on the cusp of peace
in Ukraine. You know, Israel is rapidly losing support, like
things are falling through their fingers and they're trying to
tighten their grasp and they're trying to get something big

(01:12:54):
going right now, distract everybody. Like I said at the
beginning of the show, it reminds me of twenty nineteen.
Reminds me of the yellow that in the Hong Kong
protests and the farmers protest all starting to bubble up
in twenty nineteen. It looked like we were on the
cusp of something huge, and then they hit us with
COVID and the whole world locks down. Expect something of
that level to happen very soon.

Speaker 11 (01:13:13):
I think.

Speaker 12 (01:13:14):
I think the only way they get away with a
false flag is by going as big as possible. At
this point, I don't think a plane crashing into a
tower is gonna get people to go to war. I
don't think drones falling into Polish territory is going to
get people into war. I don't think, you know, a
CIA wind up toy shooting up a black church is

(01:13:34):
gonna be enough to drive us over the edge. I
think it's gonna be like a dirty nuke. I think
it's going to be maybe an aircraft carrier going down
completely losing all hands on board. Like it's gonna have
to be something monumental. They sort of already used up
their credit with COVID. I don't know if they can

(01:13:55):
do it with another illness, another disease.

Speaker 11 (01:13:58):
I don't.

Speaker 12 (01:13:58):
I think they've played that hand, and I think they
may be waiting a few years to unleash that again,
although maybe you know, all the systems are in place.
That's definitely an option for them. In fact, it seems
to be their plan. Let's go to clip number eighteen.

Speaker 5 (01:14:12):
Here.

Speaker 12 (01:14:12):
This is Ursula Vanderland, who later today will give the
State of a Union address to the EU, or she'll
talk about EU militarization. Because now saving the Earth from
the existential threat of climate change, which before superseded all
other concerns, because it's all of life on Earth, how
could anything be more important to this? While now starting
a war with Russia is more important to this and
the economic or rather environmental effects of a war don't

(01:14:35):
worry about that.

Speaker 11 (01:14:36):
Don't worry. It'll be fine. It'll be fine, It'll be fine.

Speaker 12 (01:14:38):
I mean, we're going to kill so many people, it'll
be will be in the positive at the end of it.
Because as we know, people are what cause climate change.
So if you want to fight climate change, killing millions
of people is actually a brilliant move. Let's go to
clip eighteen here erslavander Land, while simultaneously talking about starting
a war, is also warning with big fact quotation marks

(01:15:00):
around it, of a new disease outbreak similar to COVID.

Speaker 20 (01:15:04):
Let's watch, we are on the brink, if not even
at the start of another global health crisis. And as
a as as a medical doctor by training, I'm appalled
by the disinformation that threatens global progress on everything from

(01:15:28):
measles to polio. And this is why today I can
announce that the European Union will head a new global

(01:15:49):
health Resilience initiative.

Speaker 12 (01:15:54):
And you can hear the people there. You just start booinger.
There's like, you're not doing this to us. It's not
gonna happen. But by the way, I just sort of
during the break there, I thought I'd go click around
her Wikipedia here I see what I could find. Of course,
you know, we know that she is an elite, a

(01:16:14):
descendant of the nobles in in Europe. Of course, she's
married to Hiko vonder Leyan. Now, interestingly, both of these
people have very prominent positions in you know, healthcare. Yeah,
they both work for a giant, big pharmaceutical organization. So yeah,

(01:16:38):
maybe that might be something worth looking into. But you know, hey, hey,
I'd rather get the cold than go to a World
War three, So do your worst, I guess, But just
so you know, everything's heating up. The elite are is
watching their positions of authority become increasingly untenable, and so
they are ready and willing to start World War three

(01:17:00):
or you know, launch another COVID pandemic in order to
keep you the people under their thumbs.

Speaker 11 (01:17:07):
So there you go again.

Speaker 12 (01:17:09):
Polish media have released several pictures of the Gerbera drones
that crashed or were shot down in Poland.

Speaker 11 (01:17:15):
Gerbera drones are not armed.

Speaker 12 (01:17:17):
They're used for reconnaissance or as fake targets to air
defense fire at them. Wonder how they ended up in Poland?
Accident or ew? I mean, it could be as simple
as I mean, y'all know that like five years ago,
maybe even more, Iran hacked a US drone and landed
it on their own airfield, right, kind of thing about drones.

Speaker 11 (01:17:37):
There's no pilot.

Speaker 12 (01:17:38):
You can kind of direct them where to go if
you can hack into them. So if Russian drones end
up in Polish airspace, my first question would be were
they hacked to do that or was that on purpose?
And if it was on purpose, what would be the
point of that. I guess what they're saying is it's
a reconnaissance because Putin is about to invade Poland. Which, hey,

(01:17:59):
if he invades Poland, then we'll talk, all right, Once
he invades Poland, then we'll talk. But maybe we should
also look in the past about you know, wars started
on behalf of Poland and really question whether that's something
we want to do or not.

Speaker 11 (01:18:14):
Now, since we're on.

Speaker 12 (01:18:15):
The topic of fake diseases, fake pandemics created and then
weaponized by the powers that be to enslave humanity, let's
go to some of these videos from the hearings yesterday. Well,
like I said, I could have just been playing these
videos the entire show, and I encourage you to go
watch them. And like, find your favorite one and share

(01:18:37):
it to your friends. Maybe that's what you should do.
Because there's so much of this it's like almost overwhelming,
and every single one of these videos is worth long attention.
Let me find a really good one, because we got
some really good ones. Let's go to clin number twenty
nine here. This has been a big one throughout this

(01:18:57):
This is doctor Toby Rogers talking about the development of
autism in this country.

Speaker 11 (01:19:02):
Let's watch.

Speaker 10 (01:19:04):
An estimated one hundred and fifteen thousand children develop autism
every year in the United States. That means that three
hundred and fifteen children develop autism every day in the US. Now,
if doctor Sally Osenov's work is correct and she's at
UC Davis, she shows that eighty eight percent of autism

(01:19:27):
cases are characterized by regression. That means that So if
she's right about that, and I think she is, that
means that two hundred and seventy seven children regress into
autism every day in the United States. Now, regression suggests
an acute toxic exposure, not genetics, not better awareness, an

(01:19:51):
acute toxic exposure, which means that most cases of autism
are preventable. Autism is not a medical or scientific mystery.
We know beyond a reasonable doubt that toxicants, mostly from
vaccines in about a dozen additional toxicants are causing autism.
If we repeal the nineteen eighty by Dole Act, the

(01:20:14):
nineteen eighty six National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and the
two thousand and five PREP Act, that would remove the
structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic
disease epidemics in this country. Thank you, Thank Doc Rodgers.

Speaker 12 (01:20:30):
That guy was awesome, Doctor Rogers about autism. He also
got into COVID quite a bit. There's another guy that
was really good, Aaron Siri. Let's go to let's go
to clip number nineteen here, Well, we just don't we
don't quite have time for that. So what in the
first five minutes in the next hour, I'll play a
longer clip of Syria. Let's go now to clip twenty eight.

(01:20:52):
Problem is all these clips are so long. Let's go
clip twenty five. Let's go clip twenty five. Is a
little example of just the humiliation that theocrats were subjected
to yesterday.

Speaker 19 (01:21:02):
Mister Siri, we've been talking about medical issues. You're you're
not a medical doctor, are you No, sir, and you're
not an immuno I was an immunologist or a biologist
or any kind of vaccinologists. No, but I depose them regularly,
including the world's leading ones with the Guards to vaccines,
and I have to make my claims based on actual

(01:21:22):
evidence when I go to court with the guards to vaccines.

Speaker 8 (01:21:24):
I don't get to a lie in titles.

Speaker 11 (01:21:26):
Okay, nailed him. Okay, let's go to thirty one. Now
thirty one.

Speaker 19 (01:21:34):
In some of your Twitter posts, you said, and I'm
quoting you, people are all going to spend eternity in
hell Nuremberg two first, then Hell based What did you
mean by that?

Speaker 11 (01:21:56):
I'll tell you Richard, Thanks for the question, Senator.

Speaker 10 (01:21:59):
I believe that we are in the midst of one
of the greatest crimes in human history. We have a
product being injected into children seventy plus times over the
course of their development that's never been tested against the
proper sailine placebo. Over that course of that time period,

(01:22:26):
chronic illness in this country has gone from ten percent
of children having one or more chronic conditions to now
more than fifty percent of children having one or more
chronic conditions. Secretary Kennedy in the hearing that was last week,
said the latest data from the CDC says that seventy
six percent of Americans now have one or more chronic conditions.

(01:22:49):
And I believe that lots of these chronic conditions stem
from iatrogenic injury. We have three million children with autism.
Back in nineteen seventy, the rate was so low that
it was essentially zero. I'm outraged by that, and I
think every person in this room should be outraged by that.

Speaker 11 (01:23:08):
I don't absolutely it goes on again.

Speaker 12 (01:23:10):
Just incredible testimony from these guys. But we'll show you
one by Siri on the other side. Series is the
guy's the last name, Aaron Siri. Just incredible stuff. Massive
victories in the front of healthcare and destroying the pharmaceutical
industries control of this country.

Speaker 11 (01:23:28):
Massive victory on that point. And on the other side,
stay with us.

Speaker 8 (01:23:31):
You just saw an ad for methylene blue.

Speaker 13 (01:23:33):
Tell people the short term effect and then now the
long term affection.

Speaker 8 (01:23:37):
Yeah, it gives you a good energy boost. I'll use
it before I work out.

Speaker 3 (01:23:40):
So if I'm going to be doing a Kennibal workout,
so I do some Methley in blue about half hour before.

Speaker 8 (01:23:44):
Use your mental focus. I don't crash afterwards. That's good stuff.
I need some more. How fast did the kick in?
I'm fifteen twenty minutes. I'll take about a half hour
before on workout. And then you're saying you're almost out
of the bottle? Was that three weeks ago? A month ago?
An like that? I give you give me the liquid
hand and the pills too. You're almost out of both? Yeah,
I'm almost out of Oh my goodness, well you all right.

(01:24:04):
I'll give you more, but the audience.

Speaker 13 (01:24:06):
We can't give it to everybody when you're support the
uscistore dot com. For me personally, the first week I
got on it, I actually sorted to hurt myself because
the workouts were.

Speaker 8 (01:24:13):
So crazy, and my trainer goes, dude, what's going on?
Like three days into it, I don't know what it is.

Speaker 3 (01:24:17):
I like it better than doing like a five hour
injury shot, because those don't make a crash afterwards.

Speaker 8 (01:24:20):
This doesn't have the crash. See that, no crash. If
you'll just try, you'll be hooked and we can find
the operation and so win win. Now's the time.

Speaker 13 (01:24:27):
Get the betheling blue Bare Minimum, the Auxilstore dot Com,