With his tail between his legs following Donald Trump's sweeping victory in the 2024 election, Jack Smith quietly requests for Judge Tanya Chutkan to drop his January 6th 'election interference' case against the former President. Ryan points out how this only exposes what a completely political weaponization of the justice system this was by the Biden administration.
Valdamar Archuleta joins Ryan in-studio to discuss a gathering effort to potentially recall Mike Johnston following the Denver mayor's insane comparison of resisting ICE agents looking to deport criminal illegal aliens to the student protests at Tiananmen Square.
Valdamar Archuleta joins Ryan in-studio to discuss a gathering effort to potentially recall Mike Johnston following the Denver mayor's insane comparison of resisting ICE agents looking to deport criminal illegal aliens to the student protests at Tiananmen Square.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
A wet raccoon doesn't have seven billion dollars in the back.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Excuse me, my turn.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
You said you went to Delaware State, but you forgot
the name of your college.
Speaker 3 (00:12):
You didn't go to Delaware State.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
You graduated either the lowest or almost the lowest in
your class.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
Don't ever use the word smart with me.
Speaker 1 (00:21):
The total initiative relative to what we're gonna do with
more border patrol and more President Trump, I really don't
know what he said at the end of this, and
I don't think he knows what he said either.
Speaker 4 (00:33):
And your father was never considered smart.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
He was never considered a good senator.
Speaker 3 (00:39):
He was only a good vice.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
President because he understood.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
How to kiss Barack Obama's ass.
Speaker 5 (00:49):
Are you ready?
Speaker 3 (00:49):
Can I talk?
Speaker 6 (00:50):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (00:51):
Can't you mind?
Speaker 7 (00:52):
I would like to you dance the Okay, it's.
Speaker 1 (00:54):
Very simple to That's why I asked that. It's very
simple that you're a nasty person.
Speaker 3 (00:58):
I don't be rude. I'm not going to give you
a question. You are fake news. If I were running
the View, i'd fire Rosie. I mean I'd look at
right in that fat, ugly face of hers. I'd say, Rosie,
you fired.
Speaker 8 (01:10):
You call women you don't like fat pigs, dogs, slobs,
and disgusting animals.
Speaker 2 (01:18):
Your Twitter account only Rosie o'donald.
Speaker 9 (01:21):
It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of
Donald Trump is not.
Speaker 5 (01:25):
In charge of the law in our country, because you'd
be in jail.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
She shocked that I picked her, like in a state
of shock. I'm not thinking about That's okay. I know
you're not thinking. You never do.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
She was big on defund the police in Minnesota.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
She went out, I'm talking now, you don't mind, please?
Does that sound famil you?
Speaker 2 (01:47):
This is a tough business.
Speaker 10 (01:49):
You know, you're a tough guide, and we need to
have a leader that is real talk.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
You're never going to be president. I insulting your way to.
Speaker 10 (01:56):
Let's see, I'm at forty two and you're at three,
So somehow I'm doing it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
So far, I'm doing better.
Speaker 10 (02:02):
You know you started off over here, jem, You're moving
over further and further. Pretty soon you're going to be
off the end.
Speaker 11 (02:08):
Is visceral response to attack people on their appearance short, tall, fat, ugly.
My goodness, that happened in junior high. Are we not
way above that?
Speaker 2 (02:18):
And would we not all be.
Speaker 11 (02:19):
Worried to have someone like that in charge of the
nuclear part.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
Mister Trump.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
I never attacked him on his look. And believe me,
this plenty of subject.
Speaker 3 (02:28):
Matter right there.
Speaker 12 (02:30):
Oh my, that from the likes of TikTok as you
heard at the very end there, Ryan Schuling lineback with
you on this Monday before Thanksgiving full house kind of
I am running my own board. However, we got this
kind of bunker mentality with Kelly Couchera and Valdemar Archiletta.
He's waiting in the wings. He's the wind beneath my wings.
He's in the on deck circle, and he's coming up
(02:51):
at two thirty three. But first and foremost five seven
seven three nine, want to get your text. Want to
make this week a lot more fun, maybe than what
we're custom to in the wake of Donald Trump's victory
and all the liberal handwringing and pearl clutching. We'll get
to that too, and we'll get to Mike Johnston and
Valdemar's effort to perhaps unseat the mayor and recall him
(03:13):
after his bizarre off the wall comment saying that it's
going to be another Tiena Men's Square in Denver as
residents and the Denver police and the mayor himself alike.
I'll line up at the boundary to prevent ICE agents
from coming in and deporting illegals. But I want to
hear whatever your favorite line was from what you just heard. Guys,
(03:36):
We're only twenty days after Donald Trump's victory and a
second term is coming on January twentieth, and I will
be there in Washington, d C. For the inauguration, hopefully
as a slightly embedded reporter, following Representative Lauren Bobert around
the sites, the sounds, and all the goings on on
that Monday, January twentieth. But this is what we get
(03:59):
back in office now, and it's such a refreshing change,
the strength that will come back to the White House and.
Speaker 2 (04:06):
For the world on that day and going forward.
Speaker 12 (04:09):
And we've seen the shift I think in the paradigm
of American culture, world culture. We're hearing people and even
Dan Campell's has said his wife Amy went over to
Britain and France right during the election and its aftermath,
and they're all not so quietly saying they're very glad
that Donald Trump won.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
Kelly.
Speaker 12 (04:28):
From what you heard there of all the greatest hits
from Donald Trump, was there one that stands out? Was
there one that's an absolute favorite for you? Keb Oh,
you're a real tough guy, Jeb. I'm at forty two three.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
You starting to move further down. Oh, it's just beautiful.
Do you remember watching that in real time?
Speaker 8 (04:46):
And of course you know Rosie o'donald.
Speaker 3 (04:48):
That's always a good one.
Speaker 2 (04:49):
Oh, and you only ros'donald exactly. And this was one
that was not on there.
Speaker 12 (04:56):
But this was one of my favorites also, I believe
leave from.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
That same Caitlin Collins town hall.
Speaker 12 (05:06):
He had notes, He had notes about January sixth and
the tweets he had sent out that got shadowband or whatnot.
He was pushing back on a lot of what she
was trying to advance in terms of her narrative. And
then he comes right out guns of blazon on one
e Jen Carroll, who had accused him of rape by
lifting a storyline from Law and Order SVU that literally
(05:30):
came from an episode of that. Well, here's what he
had to say that was not admissible in court.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
Apparently this woman, I don't know her, I never met her.
Speaker 3 (05:39):
I have no idea who she is.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
I had a picture taken years ago with her and
her husband, nice guy John Johnson. He was a newscaster,
a very nice man. She called him an ape. Happens
to be African American, called him an ape. The judge
wouldn't allow us to put that in. Her dog or
her cat was named Vagina. The judge wouln't allowed to
put that. All of these things he was, but with her,
(06:02):
they can put in anything.
Speaker 11 (06:04):
Access to cent jury of nine people who found you
liable of sexual abuse.
Speaker 6 (06:09):
Do you think that that will deter women from voting
for you.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
No, I don't think so, because I think the whole thing.
Just so you understand ready, I never met this woman.
Speaker 3 (06:20):
I never saw this woman.
Speaker 12 (06:23):
Donald Trump won white women, by the way, just that demographic.
You could hear, you know, Caitlyn Collins, she was trying
to hang with him. She doesn't have what it takes
to do that. And I believe Donald Trump on this issue.
He should fight this tooth and nail to the very end,
because it's not the only charge that is suddenly evaporating.
(06:43):
We had breaking news today Sandra Smith reporting for Fox
News with David Spunt on scene.
Speaker 9 (06:50):
Special castle Jack Smith is seeking to dismiss, dismiss the
Trump election interference case in Washington DC. We should note
that this was expected. We've been reporting for a few
weeks now that this would happen, since the dog cannot
prosecute a sitting president. Today this news brings us one
step closer to this case formally being dropped. The judge
(07:14):
is going to need approval for this before anything is
officially dismissed, as David's reporting, and that could come as
soon as today. I believe David's funt is up now
He's got this news for us.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
David Well, Hey, Sandra.
Speaker 10 (07:25):
After almost two years of this, Jack Smith saga, things
seem to be ending for him. We just need the
judge to sign off on it. After thousands of pages
and hundreds of hours of interviews, it comes down to
just six pages. Jack Smith the Special Council asking Judge
Tanya Chutkin to dismiss this superseding indictment. This is the
(07:46):
election interference case in Washington, DC, where Donald Trump was
charged with trying to overturn the results of the twenty
twenty presidential election. Ultimately, Smith says that DOJ does not
pro acute sitting presidents. This never went to trial. It
was supposed to go to trial earlier this year. That
never happened. So he's asking to dismiss this case Separately,
(08:10):
We're waiting to see if and how he's asking to
move forward in the document's case in Florida. Now, you
may say that case was dismissed the summer, and that's true,
it was dismissed this summer. However, Jack Smith at the
time he didn't know Donald Trump was going to win,
and he filed in appeal with the Eleventh Circuit Court
of Appeals in Atlanta. We're told that he's also going
(08:31):
to be filing something soon winding down that case as well.
So as of now, these cases are not officially dropped yet,
but Smith is asking Judge Chuckkin, who's expected to move
along with it, and say, okay, we're going to drop
this case because we cannot prosecute a sitting president separately.
(08:52):
If I may add, President elect Trump said that he
would fire Jack Smith within quote two seconds of taking office.
It doesn't appear that the President of the elect will
even have the opportunity to do that because we've been
reporting for several weeks now that Jack Smith will be
gone at that point. On January twentieth, at noon, he
will have stepped down. So at some point over the
(09:14):
next several weeks he's going to step down. They're going
to close up the Special Council office, and this case
will not go to trials. So while it was expected,
it's certainly a big deal to see that Special Council
Jack Smith, who's been a thorn in the side of
Donald Trump for over two years, is officially asking a
judge to drop his case.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
Why so suddenly and why at all?
Speaker 12 (09:35):
We were told Donald Trump represented an existential threat to democracy.
What he did on January sixth was so beyond the
pale that it took a special prosecutor designated by Merrick Garland,
the Attorney General leading the Department of Justice on behalf
of the Biden administration, to appoint Jack Smith for this
very purpose. Donald Trump wins and it all goes away.
(09:58):
We can't prosecute a sitting president. Why did the charges
come so late? I mean, this is the question that
many on the left are asking. Now we'll get to
Zoe Lofgren, representative from California, in just a moment, but
one ding back before her, how about Representative Dan Goldman,
Democrat New York.
Speaker 6 (10:14):
His thoughts, well, look, I certainly understand why he did it,
given the Department of Justice policy that you cannot prosecute
a sitting president. I think it is a shame for
justice in this country. It establishes that Donald Trump is
above the law. The Supreme Court put him above the
law in that opinion that Paula just mentioned, but now
(10:36):
he appears to escape full accountability for what were crimes
charged by a grand jury.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
Incorrect, It's the exact opposite.
Speaker 12 (10:45):
It establishes that Donald Trump is not below the law,
that you cannot simply target your political opponents and prosecute
them the way that they do in third world countries.
And the fact that these charges were dismissed or dropped
so suddenly tells you that it was all political all along.
Goldman tries a straw man argument.
Speaker 6 (11:06):
We cannot normalize the fact that Donald Trump, as the
president elect, should not be held accountable for crimes that
he committed before. If he were to have fired the
special counsel, that would be a gross abdication of the
independence of the Department of Justice.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
And if the shoe were on.
Speaker 6 (11:24):
The other foot, for example, and Joe Biden were to
have fired David Weiss, who clearly had a politicized investigation
because the House Republicans effectively scuttled a plea agreement.
Speaker 3 (11:40):
Everyone would be up in arms.
Speaker 6 (11:41):
So let's make sure that we don't normalize Donald Trump's
political partisan behavior that has no place under our rule
of law.
Speaker 12 (11:50):
It's a close call. But Dan Goldman may be the
stupidest person in Congress. I mean, Mazi Herono is down
on that list as a very unintelligent individual.
Speaker 2 (11:58):
But Dan Goldman is a legitimate dummy. It was not the.
Speaker 12 (12:02):
House Republicans who scuttled the deal that was made David Weiss,
rather with the judge in that case came in and
said what is this? The judge scuttled the plea agreement
because it was unprecedentedly soft, and then they had to
save face the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
And then they had to go back and David Weiss,
who's a.
Speaker 12 (12:23):
Phony kind of Republican appointee, and that's what they hang
their hats on. But he was trying to get this
kind of swept under the rug with Hunter Biden, the
gun charges, everything else. And then they reopened that case. Yes,
here's Representative Zoe Lofgren, Democrat California at Kelly Coucher's home state.
Speaker 10 (12:39):
Looking back, do you think that not charging Trump until
more than two years after January sixth was the ultimate mistake?
Speaker 7 (12:47):
That doing this well, it was a huge mistake. Certainly,
the committee found, you know, a lot of evidence without
the tools that the Justice Department has, that made it
clear that Trump was at the center of this wide
ranging conspiracy. Why the Justice Department delayed until basically our
(13:10):
report was done is something I've never understood. However, Trump
and his lawyers are the masters of delay, So even
had the efforts begun in advance, who knows whether they
wouldn't have been able.
Speaker 3 (13:26):
To drag them out.
Speaker 7 (13:28):
Justice delayed is, of course justice denied false.
Speaker 12 (13:32):
This is a complete misread misunderstanding of the very premise
of our judicial system, which is geared to protect the
rights of defendants, not the prosecution. The prosecution doesn't have
a right to a fair, speedy trial. That's the defendant
that has a right to a speedy trial, to a
jury of their peers, etc. Justice delayed is justice denied
(13:56):
is for the defendants, not the prosecution, not even the
people you united states for whom the prosecution portends to represent.
The prosecution doesn't have those built in rights. They were
done so in the Constitution on the basis of a
defendant having that right to a free, fair, speedy trial,
(14:18):
and they could not be delayed. You know, the way
that the January sixth protesters are having their rights delayed
and denied. Representative Zoe Lofgren is exactly wrong here. Okay,
And going back to our original point, I don't know
why Jack Smith, the Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, the
Biden administration didn't prosecute Donald Trump sooner. Well, that one's easy.
(14:41):
There's two parts to this one. Had Donald Trump never
run for president again, none of these charges would have
been brought, none of them would have been pursued. He
would have been allowed to continue with his life in
mar A Lago happily for the rest of his years.
This was a political cudgel, that's it, that's all. And
(15:02):
as such, they didn't want to bring this prosecution sooner,
have it adjudicated whatnot. They needed it to be an
issue in the twenty twenty four campaign. That was the
whole point and purpose of this was to throw land
minds and roadblocks and obstacles legal, financial and otherwise for
Donald Trump political so that he would take a hit
(15:22):
with voters. But it all backfired. If anything, it strengthened
Donald Trump's position with voters. The financial part hasn't hit
him yet, probably won't. And this was never about getting
justice against Donald Trump. The justice was supposed to come
at the ballot box where he would lose to either
(15:42):
Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. And now that that hasn't happened,
all of this is exposed for what it actually was,
political subterfuge, weaponization of the Department of Justice, collaboration and
collusion between Letitia James, Attorney New York, Alvin Bragg, Manhattan
District Attorney Fannie Willis the joke that she is down
(16:05):
in Fulton County, Georgia. Jack Smith himself appointed to pursue
two cases, the documents case mar Lago and the January
sixth election obstruction case in the wake of this committee
that Zoe Lockrom was on. In their findings, all five
of those cases were intertwined for the same reason, political
(16:25):
subterfuge to trip up Donald Trump, and I turned to Kelly.
All of that, even the convictions that they were able
to get with the hush money scandal in Stormy Daniels.
Speaker 2 (16:35):
It didn't work. Donald Trump won.
Speaker 8 (16:37):
Why well, I think we both know that it was.
You know, he always likes to say it was a
witch hunt.
Speaker 3 (16:46):
It was.
Speaker 8 (16:47):
And Alvin Bragg, Fannie Willis and her boy toy.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
Down there, Nathan Wade.
Speaker 8 (16:53):
Everything is falling apart. And now that the New York
Court is now postponing things indefinitely for four years, it's
just not gonna last well.
Speaker 12 (17:06):
And I think there's got to be a constitutional problem
with that. Just letting this linger and holding it over
the president elect's head for four years. We're just gonna
wait it out, and then once he leaves office at
age eighty two or whatever, then we're going to pursue.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
That and sentenced him.
Speaker 8 (17:21):
They also have given the green light to for emotion
to dismiss which I think he has a very good
opportunity for his defense attorneys to actually have this case
completely dismissed.
Speaker 12 (17:37):
This was all a joke and these people were all
clowns in a circus that only the far left and
the red meat for their base wanted to see. And
they could call Donald Trump a convicted felon. That was
the whole basis of what they were trying to get
out of this. They could run it in ads for
Kamala Harrison against Donald Trump, but fifty percent of the
United States didn't care. It didn't bother them. A majority
(17:59):
of voters who bought to show up. They took all
of this in stride and realized it for what it was.
A systemic persecution of a man who had served as
president of the United States, unprecedented in our history. And Kelly,
do you think it'll ever happen again now that it
has failed?
Speaker 2 (18:16):
Luckily?
Speaker 8 (18:16):
Absolutely not. And first of all, it was a huge
backfire because they not only won white women, they also
won Hispanics, they won blacks. It almost gave Trump a
validation that they were doing all of this to him,
and that is one of the reasons why he came
with such a resounding victory.
Speaker 12 (18:35):
Well, he didn't win black voters. He did better with
black voters I think ever since nineteen sixty and Richard Nixon.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
I mean, that's that's pretty much a win. Well, and
that's what I mean.
Speaker 12 (18:46):
The post mortem analysis is revealing itself. With Joe Scarborough
talking to April Ryan, who is very much of the
fire left in MSNBC, and even Whoopi Goldberg shutting down
Anna Navarro telling her that she's pissing.
Speaker 2 (18:59):
In the win. We'll get to that comment and.
Speaker 12 (19:02):
Just a little bit, but coming up next, my good
friend Valdemar Archiletta joins US. He ran for the first
congressional district and he is now leading the cause to
explore possibly recalling Mayor Mike Johnston for his t n
Square comments about ice.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
But you don't hear anti gay stuff from Donald Trump.
You don't. And Donald Trump loves the gays.
Speaker 4 (19:26):
He is the first president to go into office who
fully accepted same sex marriage. He's the first president to
go into office who waived a rainbow flag on his campaign.
Speaker 3 (19:37):
Log Cabin Republicans.
Speaker 4 (19:38):
Nationally have had multiple fundraisers at mar A Lago, where
Donald Trump himself attended, and Malania Trump this year, the
very first thing she has done was a fundraiser for
log Cabin Republicans. So Donald Trump himself is very welcoming
of the LGBT community.
Speaker 12 (19:58):
Not sure that Kyle Clark, Comrade Kyle of nine News
was expecting that answer, but Valdemar had the receipts and
he came to that sit down interview with them in
hand and he joins me. Live in the control room
here we got our podcast setting going on. So it's
really warm. It's comfy. You know, we're looking forward to Thanksgiving.
Valdimore Archiletta. You can follow him on X at Archiletta
(20:19):
the number four coo. That's ar c h U l
e t a number four coo on the X. Valdemar
welcome back man, thanks.
Speaker 3 (20:29):
For having me.
Speaker 4 (20:29):
You always play like sad slow Mariah songs.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
No too well. I'm happy about that that you ran.
Speaker 3 (20:38):
That is a good song though I love it.
Speaker 12 (20:41):
It is, and you ran I think the best campaign
that's ever been run against Diana to get in an
impossible district.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
It really was. But you gained traction. You you did.
Speaker 12 (20:52):
You gained also the attention of the media with the
likes of Kyle Clark, et cetera. You had a platform
for the issues that were important to you. I thought
you did extremely well in the one debate that you
had with her. She at least granted you that opportunity.
I guess from on high, But how do you feel
about the campaign that you ran?
Speaker 2 (21:10):
Looking back?
Speaker 3 (21:10):
On it.
Speaker 4 (21:10):
Now.
Speaker 3 (21:11):
It was good.
Speaker 4 (21:12):
I understood the challenge we faced and what the reality
of the most likely outcome would be. So I'm not,
you know, surprised by that, but it was positive in
that we were able to reach out to the community.
We had a platform where we were able to speak
about different topics, and a lot of things came up
through the campaign that I wasn't fully expecting, and it
(21:35):
was good that we were there to be able to
talk about it, kind of like what happened there with
Kyle Clark when situations came up in June and then
we were able to talk to the media about it,
and I'm go out and talk to the public about it,
and so it was it was a positive thing and
something that we're going to build on and looking forward.
Speaker 3 (21:53):
You know, I'm not going away.
Speaker 4 (21:54):
There's a lot of things i want to do, and
where exactly I'm going to take this platform and what
I'm going to do with it, I'm still kind of
working on. But some things have popped up recently that
you know, now we get to talk about and we're
looking at doing here in Denver.
Speaker 12 (22:09):
The way I look at it at Valdemar As You've
built a foundation. Now what you built upon that foundation,
that's going to be up to you. And I think
the fact that you're at this point speaks volumes about
how you got to this point. And I know you
love the city of Denver, and you know this most
recent issue that we're going to discuss right now has
to do with the mayor and Mike Johnston. I mean,
putting his foot in his mouth is putting it quite mildly.
(22:31):
I think he felt he was speaking to maybe a
friendly audience and didn't really anticipate the consequences. For once
this got out of the far left echo chamber, he
made these comments to Denverit about comparing the resistance that
could be coming ice his way should they choose to
descend upon Denver and extradite and remove and deport illegal
(22:51):
criminal aliens from the city of Denver. And he compared
it to a Tienna Men's Square moment. Now, to his credit,
Mark Salinger nine News really peppered him in this interview
about those comments.
Speaker 13 (23:05):
Are you open to sending Denver police officers to the
county line to stop federal forces or National guardsmen from
other states from coming into Denver?
Speaker 2 (23:14):
We have no plan to do that, and we really
hope that we don't ever.
Speaker 3 (23:17):
Have to do that.
Speaker 2 (23:18):
I have no plan. Are you open to well we're
going to do?
Speaker 3 (23:20):
Right now?
Speaker 14 (23:21):
It's hard to keep an eye on what the creature
president actually plans to do and what the proposal actually is.
Speaker 13 (23:25):
It sounds to me like you're walking back to comments
from a couple days ago saying that you would be
willing to send Denver police officers. Do you regret making
those comments and now getting questions like this?
Speaker 14 (23:35):
Would I have taken it back if I could? Yes,
I probably wouldn't have used that image because I don't
that's the image I hope we can avoid. What I
was trying to say is this is an outcome I
hope we can avoid in this country. I think none
of us want that.
Speaker 13 (23:44):
You talk about civil disobedience, You've mentioned that a couple
of times now. Would you be willing to participate in those?
As the mayor of Denver? Would you be willing to
go out and protest these things?
Speaker 2 (23:53):
I would if I believe.
Speaker 14 (23:54):
That our residents are having their rights violate, If I
think things are happening that are illegal or more or
an American in our city, I would certainly protest it,
and I would expect other residents would do the same.
Speaker 2 (24:05):
Baltimo, are your response to that.
Speaker 3 (24:07):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (24:08):
If Mayor Mike Johnson is just being inflammatory or just
doesn't understand how this process actually works. Because deportations, which
is what he was talking about, there, are happening now.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
They've been happening.
Speaker 4 (24:20):
They happened under Obama, every president, and so it's not
like Donald Trump is trying to do something new. The
way he was speaking, if you listen to that whole interview,
they even talk about the National Guard. He was talking
about the Colorado's Guard won't do it, so they'll have
to get Mississippi or Alabama. The National Guard isn't involved
in deportations. So what he's talking about is almost as
(24:41):
though like an army is about to invade the city
of Denver, grab citizens and take them out, and that's
not what's going to happen. So I don't really get
what he's even talking about. And he really he did
kind of you could tell he kind of regrets what
he said to the Denver right because it was inflammatory
and it really was a call to violence in a way,
(25:04):
like he's talking about citizens going out there with the
police and standing at the county line, which is also stupid,
because what does he think. It's like, you know, Denver's
a walled city with one gate where you can come in.
What he's talking about, He's like, where are they going
to stand? Which part of the county line. It's very large,
you know, it's on there's a west side and the
(25:24):
north side, and they just what's he talking about? Like
they're going to stand there and block them from coming in,
and then fifty thousand citizens are going to stand there
with the police, Like that's not good. And then you know,
he likened it to Tenements Square where you know, three
hundred people that we know have died. There's probably much
much larger than that. Thousands of people were injured. It's
(25:46):
really a bad, you know, visual that he gave there,
and I think he realized that, but he didn't also
completely walk it back. He just said, we want to
avoid that right still on the tables. I heard, Yeah, exactly,
it's still on the table.
Speaker 2 (25:59):
We want to void that.
Speaker 3 (26:02):
But it does sound like.
Speaker 4 (26:03):
He's, you know, putting up a huge resistance too, or
he wants to put up a huge resistance should this happen,
will he be able to probably not. I actually just
talked to a police officer of Denver earlier today and
you know, he mentioned the know that you know, should
Mike Johnson asked the Denver police to go and stop
(26:25):
ICE from from doing what their job is that They
will not do.
Speaker 2 (26:29):
That, nor should they in my view, they.
Speaker 12 (26:32):
And it's putting their own lives at risk and risking
a conflict that should be avoided.
Speaker 4 (26:37):
But he said, most likely, like Mike Johnson, won't even
know these things are happening. They're not going to ask
his permission. When ICE is going to come in and
do this, They're going to get what they may need
and they're going to go do it. Mike Johnson will
probably find out about it afterwards. And with the Denver
Police Force, typically they enforced local laws. The federal agents
(26:58):
enforced the national federal laws. When they do ask for help,
usually it's just in protecting the area for the citizens
in the area. They don't actually participate in going in
and deporting someone. One interesting thing police told me today
was that they were dealing with a man from Nicaragua
recently downtown who was intoxicated and they there was a
(27:22):
call he got kicked out of a homeless shelter, and
the man from Nicaragua actually asked, can you guys just
support me?
Speaker 3 (27:30):
I want to go home.
Speaker 12 (27:32):
Well that's the easiest way right there.
Speaker 4 (27:36):
The Never Police department doesn't do that, Like, no, we can't,
that's outside our jurisdiction.
Speaker 3 (27:42):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (27:42):
But he said, that's interesting that someone would say that
that maybe there's going to be a change, because he
said he never heard someone say that before.
Speaker 3 (27:49):
But this guy's like, could you just could you just
send me home? It's cold here and imsable.
Speaker 12 (27:54):
They didn't factor that in, But yeah, I think this.
They know that the storm is coming in the form
of ice, and a lot of them might want to
get out ahead of it. Like the man you just described.
He is Valdemar Archiletta. I'm Ryan Schuling. We're back to
wrap up our number one. More comments from Mike Johnston
walking this back about Tieneman Square and Ice issuing deig
deportations of those here illegally, and it's gotten national response
(28:17):
as well from Senator Rand Paul and Tom Holman. The
incoming borders are for President elect Trump back after this.
Speaker 13 (28:27):
Trump's new borders are Tom Holman has said that he
is willing to arrest leaders like yourself for standing in
the way of these policies that they want to enact.
Would you be willing to go to jail for these things?
Speaker 14 (28:41):
Yeah, I'm not afraid of that, and I'm also not
seeking that. I think the goal is we want to
be able to negotiate with reasonable people how to solve
hard problems.
Speaker 2 (28:49):
You would encourage people to protest. I think we're going
to look at every option.
Speaker 14 (28:53):
But yeah, I don't think that there are You know,
I talked to some high school kids this week who
were terrified about this. I don't think those kids are
going to stand there and watch three of their classmates
get pulled out of a history class with other twenty
seven stand by and do nothing. I don't think that's
what Denver rights or Americans would do in this context
at all.
Speaker 13 (29:08):
What is your line where you say, yes, I support
these deportations and no, I don't support these other ones.
Speaker 3 (29:14):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (29:15):
I think our line is clear.
Speaker 14 (29:16):
We think if you are a violent criminal that is
committing serious crimes like murder or rape in Denver, you
should be prosecuted to the folks end of the law
and you should be deported.
Speaker 12 (29:25):
Mayor Mike Johnston of Denver with Mark Salinger nine News,
and that last part right there is exactly who Ice
Tom Holman President Trump are going to target with this
first wave of deportations. These people shouldn't be in Denver, Trenty, Rogwass,
shouldn't be an Aurora. There should be no debate, discussion
or argument about this. Let's go to the Texters five
(29:46):
seven seven three nine Ryan. The good news about Mike Johnston.
It's people like him that are turning the state of
Colorado red.
Speaker 2 (29:53):
People are just sick and tired of this.
Speaker 12 (29:55):
Better than that now governor's mayor is telling people what
to do and when to do it and how to
do it.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
Police know better.
Speaker 12 (30:01):
He's actually even worse because he's not pretending to be
on Trump an RFK Junior side, the fake libertarian governor
and mayor, lying liars who lie. I'm not so sure
about the turning Colorado red part. This guy tried to
do it, at least in part. Vladimore Archill letterback with
me in the studio.
Speaker 3 (30:15):
Nice, I hope he knows something I do.
Speaker 2 (30:19):
What do you make of Johnston's comments right there?
Speaker 4 (30:22):
Again, he doesn't understand what's actually going to happen. Either
that or he's just lying because he wants to get attention. One,
he's not going to go to jail because again, no
one's going to tell him that this is happening. It's
going to happen around him. He's insignificant to the whole process. Really,
the fact what I don't like there that he says
is the fact that he went and talked to high
school kids wherever he talked to them, and when they
(30:44):
brought this up as a fear, rather than telling them
the truth, which he has to know that no, they
are not going to come into your schools and drag
your classmates out.
Speaker 3 (30:55):
Instead, he kind of like fanned.
Speaker 4 (30:57):
The flames and was like, oh, no, you're gonna union
to rise up or whatever.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
Is horrible.
Speaker 4 (31:04):
I hate when our politicians are leaders or whatever lie
to different groups because they want to use them as
emotional pawns to get you know, political capital or whatever.
Speaker 3 (31:15):
Rather than being honest and telling them, you know, don't
you don't.
Speaker 4 (31:18):
Have to worry about that, that's not the way deportations work.
Your classmates are not going to be drawn out, and
then tell them that this is the plan, which he's
he has to have heard it that they're going to
go after people who are criminals in the system, the
criminal justice system, and those are going to be the
individual they're looking to deport first, and is going to
be overstays. And that's what's not what he's making this
(31:43):
out to be. He has to know it. He's lying
to the people because he wants to draw or rile
up this emotional feelings.
Speaker 3 (31:51):
Why.
Speaker 4 (31:51):
I don't know what personal gain he has to come
from it. I don't know what his long term goals are,
if he wants to be governor or whatever. But he's
trying to use this as a statement to bring attention
to himself, like, look at me.
Speaker 3 (32:03):
I'm going to stand up to Trump. I'm going to
stand up to this.
Speaker 4 (32:06):
I'm going to be, you know, the hero for the
everyday citizen here who's going to be taking out of
their house and deported when that's not going to happen.
Speaker 3 (32:14):
So tell the people the truth rather than scaring them
for their own benefit.
Speaker 12 (32:19):
What what he's doing is in line with what Rush
Limba always warned us about with liberals. It's symbolism over substance.
It's him trying to send a message to those far
left kind of voters that are part of his base,
or how he assumes it. But here's Senator Ran Paul,
a true libertarian and no far right conservative. But this
was his words of wisdom and warning for Mike Johnston.
Speaker 2 (32:41):
The mayor of Denver.
Speaker 11 (32:42):
If he's going to resist federal law, which there's a
long sending history of the supremacy of federal law, he's
going to resist that, it will go all the way
to Supreme Court, and I would suspect that he would
be removed from office. I don't know whether or not
there be a criminal prosecution for someone resisting federal.
Speaker 2 (32:58):
Law, but he will lose.
Speaker 11 (33:00):
People need to realize that what he is, what he
is offering, is a form of insurrection where the states
resist the federal government. Most people objected to that and
rejected that long ago. So I think the mayor of
Denver is on the wrong side of history, and really
I think will face legal ramifications if he doesn't obey
the federal law.
Speaker 2 (33:18):
And here's Tom Holman.
Speaker 5 (33:20):
And for those mayors and those governments who say they're
going to stop me from stop Ice from doing the job,
stop me from doing this job, listen to Lake and
Riley tape. Listen to the seventeen minutes of this girl suffering,
fighting for her life, fighting for her breath. This little
girl didn't want to die. She fought like hell. And
listen to that tape. That happens every day across this
country in the hands of an illego alien.
Speaker 12 (33:40):
Sixty two percent of Americans in a CBS poll favored
mass deportations Valdemar. So, is Johnson just playing to the
hard left on this issue because it seems like a
loser he is.
Speaker 4 (33:50):
I think a lot of times in areas like Denver,
where they are very blue, individuals like him live in
their own little bubble where they just assume everyone in
their day strict things the way they do.
Speaker 3 (34:02):
And so.
Speaker 4 (34:04):
It's time that you know, Mike Johnson hears that there's
another side. He represents more people than the hard left,
and we should not be advocating things like this that
are ridiculous and they are illegal.
Speaker 12 (34:15):
Now you have started pursuing at least the investigation of
potentially recalling Mike Johnston.
Speaker 2 (34:22):
Tell us where that stands and where that's going.
Speaker 3 (34:24):
Yes, and it wasn't.
Speaker 4 (34:25):
I honestly had no intention of pursuing this, but so
many people have responded that they want to do this,
that it's worth looking into, and so there's a.
Speaker 3 (34:34):
Group of people doing it.
Speaker 4 (34:35):
I'm kind of just working with them. But the papers
have been picked up to file a petition, and so
you know, we're looking at what kind of language do
we want to use in filing the petition? What is
it going to cost to print these petitions? Because even
though we only need like twenty two four hundred signatures,
you need to get like thirty five thousand or something
because a lot of them will be thrown out. So
(34:57):
to get those printed, what does it cost? Also what
is going to be entailed in the groundwork, and that
is it going to be worth it? And then also
who's going to replace him? Because if you just throw
him out, we could end up with somebody worse and
we don't want that to happen. You know, we could
get like Ty Anderson, I've been there, who runs and wins.
We would not be happy with that. Kelly Broff, I
(35:19):
would love for her, Kelly for out there, contact me.
I want to talk to you. Yeah. So, and I
don't agree with everything she says. There are things she
has proposed idea and agree with but she's far better
than Johnston. So we're looking into it and we'll keep
everyone updated.
Speaker 2 (35:35):
Valdemar Archiletta.
Speaker 12 (35:36):
You can follow him on Exit Archiletta, the Number four COO.
If you're interested in reaching out, please contact him there.
Kelly Bruff if you're listening, or somebody that knows her is.
I think she would be a suitable alternative. She was
the one that ran head to head again against Mike
Johnston the last time around. Valdemar, thank you so much
for your time, Thank you, and thanks all of you.
Our two straight ahead
A wet raccoon doesn't have seven billion dollars in the back.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Excuse me, my turn.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
You said you went to Delaware State, but you forgot
the name of your college.
Speaker 3 (00:12):
You didn't go to Delaware State.
Speaker 1 (00:14):
You graduated either the lowest or almost the lowest in
your class.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
Don't ever use the word smart with me.
Speaker 1 (00:21):
The total initiative relative to what we're gonna do with
more border patrol and more President Trump, I really don't
know what he said at the end of this, and
I don't think he knows what he said either.
Speaker 4 (00:33):
And your father was never considered smart.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
He was never considered a good senator.
Speaker 3 (00:39):
He was only a good vice.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
President because he understood.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
How to kiss Barack Obama's ass.
Speaker 5 (00:49):
Are you ready?
Speaker 3 (00:49):
Can I talk?
Speaker 6 (00:50):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (00:51):
Can't you mind?
Speaker 7 (00:52):
I would like to you dance the Okay, it's.
Speaker 1 (00:54):
Very simple to That's why I asked that. It's very
simple that you're a nasty person.
Speaker 3 (00:58):
I don't be rude. I'm not going to give you
a question. You are fake news. If I were running
the View, i'd fire Rosie. I mean I'd look at
right in that fat, ugly face of hers. I'd say, Rosie,
you fired.
Speaker 8 (01:10):
You call women you don't like fat pigs, dogs, slobs,
and disgusting animals.
Speaker 2 (01:18):
Your Twitter account only Rosie o'donald.
Speaker 9 (01:21):
It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of
Donald Trump is not.
Speaker 5 (01:25):
In charge of the law in our country, because you'd
be in jail.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
She shocked that I picked her, like in a state
of shock. I'm not thinking about That's okay. I know
you're not thinking. You never do.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
She was big on defund the police in Minnesota.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
She went out, I'm talking now, you don't mind, please?
Does that sound famil you?
Speaker 2 (01:47):
This is a tough business.
Speaker 10 (01:49):
You know, you're a tough guide, and we need to
have a leader that is real talk.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
You're never going to be president. I insulting your way to.
Speaker 10 (01:56):
Let's see, I'm at forty two and you're at three,
So somehow I'm doing it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
So far, I'm doing better.
Speaker 10 (02:02):
You know you started off over here, jem, You're moving
over further and further. Pretty soon you're going to be
off the end.
Speaker 11 (02:08):
Is visceral response to attack people on their appearance short, tall, fat, ugly.
My goodness, that happened in junior high. Are we not
way above that?
Speaker 2 (02:18):
And would we not all be.
Speaker 11 (02:19):
Worried to have someone like that in charge of the
nuclear part.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
Mister Trump.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
I never attacked him on his look. And believe me,
this plenty of subject.
Speaker 3 (02:28):
Matter right there.
Speaker 12 (02:30):
Oh my, that from the likes of TikTok as you
heard at the very end there, Ryan Schuling lineback with
you on this Monday before Thanksgiving full house kind of
I am running my own board. However, we got this
kind of bunker mentality with Kelly Couchera and Valdemar Archiletta.
He's waiting in the wings. He's the wind beneath my wings.
He's in the on deck circle, and he's coming up
(02:51):
at two thirty three. But first and foremost five seven
seven three nine, want to get your text. Want to
make this week a lot more fun, maybe than what
we're custom to in the wake of Donald Trump's victory
and all the liberal handwringing and pearl clutching. We'll get
to that too, and we'll get to Mike Johnston and
Valdemar's effort to perhaps unseat the mayor and recall him
(03:13):
after his bizarre off the wall comment saying that it's
going to be another Tiena Men's Square in Denver as
residents and the Denver police and the mayor himself alike.
I'll line up at the boundary to prevent ICE agents
from coming in and deporting illegals. But I want to
hear whatever your favorite line was from what you just heard. Guys,
(03:36):
We're only twenty days after Donald Trump's victory and a
second term is coming on January twentieth, and I will
be there in Washington, d C. For the inauguration, hopefully
as a slightly embedded reporter, following Representative Lauren Bobert around
the sites, the sounds, and all the goings on on
that Monday, January twentieth. But this is what we get
(03:59):
back in office now, and it's such a refreshing change,
the strength that will come back to the White House and.
Speaker 2 (04:06):
For the world on that day and going forward.
Speaker 12 (04:09):
And we've seen the shift I think in the paradigm
of American culture, world culture. We're hearing people and even
Dan Campell's has said his wife Amy went over to
Britain and France right during the election and its aftermath,
and they're all not so quietly saying they're very glad
that Donald Trump won.
Speaker 2 (04:28):
Kelly.
Speaker 12 (04:28):
From what you heard there of all the greatest hits
from Donald Trump, was there one that stands out? Was
there one that's an absolute favorite for you? Keb Oh,
you're a real tough guy, Jeb. I'm at forty two three.
Speaker 2 (04:41):
You starting to move further down. Oh, it's just beautiful.
Do you remember watching that in real time?
Speaker 8 (04:46):
And of course you know Rosie o'donald.
Speaker 3 (04:48):
That's always a good one.
Speaker 2 (04:49):
Oh, and you only ros'donald exactly. And this was one
that was not on there.
Speaker 12 (04:56):
But this was one of my favorites also, I believe
leave from.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
That same Caitlin Collins town hall.
Speaker 12 (05:06):
He had notes, He had notes about January sixth and
the tweets he had sent out that got shadowband or whatnot.
He was pushing back on a lot of what she
was trying to advance in terms of her narrative. And
then he comes right out guns of blazon on one
e Jen Carroll, who had accused him of rape by
lifting a storyline from Law and Order SVU that literally
(05:30):
came from an episode of that. Well, here's what he
had to say that was not admissible in court.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
Apparently this woman, I don't know her, I never met her.
Speaker 3 (05:39):
I have no idea who she is.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
I had a picture taken years ago with her and
her husband, nice guy John Johnson. He was a newscaster,
a very nice man. She called him an ape. Happens
to be African American, called him an ape. The judge
wouldn't allow us to put that in. Her dog or
her cat was named Vagina. The judge wouln't allowed to
put that. All of these things he was, but with her,
(06:02):
they can put in anything.
Speaker 11 (06:04):
Access to cent jury of nine people who found you
liable of sexual abuse.
Speaker 6 (06:09):
Do you think that that will deter women from voting
for you.
Speaker 1 (06:12):
No, I don't think so, because I think the whole thing.
Just so you understand ready, I never met this woman.
Speaker 3 (06:20):
I never saw this woman.
Speaker 12 (06:23):
Donald Trump won white women, by the way, just that demographic.
You could hear, you know, Caitlyn Collins, she was trying
to hang with him. She doesn't have what it takes
to do that. And I believe Donald Trump on this issue.
He should fight this tooth and nail to the very end,
because it's not the only charge that is suddenly evaporating.
(06:43):
We had breaking news today Sandra Smith reporting for Fox
News with David Spunt on scene.
Speaker 9 (06:50):
Special castle Jack Smith is seeking to dismiss, dismiss the
Trump election interference case in Washington DC. We should note
that this was expected. We've been reporting for a few
weeks now that this would happen, since the dog cannot
prosecute a sitting president. Today this news brings us one
step closer to this case formally being dropped. The judge
(07:14):
is going to need approval for this before anything is
officially dismissed, as David's reporting, and that could come as
soon as today. I believe David's funt is up now
He's got this news for us.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
David Well, Hey, Sandra.
Speaker 10 (07:25):
After almost two years of this, Jack Smith saga, things
seem to be ending for him. We just need the
judge to sign off on it. After thousands of pages
and hundreds of hours of interviews, it comes down to
just six pages. Jack Smith the Special Council asking Judge
Tanya Chutkin to dismiss this superseding indictment. This is the
(07:46):
election interference case in Washington, DC, where Donald Trump was
charged with trying to overturn the results of the twenty
twenty presidential election. Ultimately, Smith says that DOJ does not
pro acute sitting presidents. This never went to trial. It
was supposed to go to trial earlier this year. That
never happened. So he's asking to dismiss this case Separately,
(08:10):
We're waiting to see if and how he's asking to
move forward in the document's case in Florida. Now, you
may say that case was dismissed the summer, and that's true,
it was dismissed this summer. However, Jack Smith at the
time he didn't know Donald Trump was going to win,
and he filed in appeal with the Eleventh Circuit Court
of Appeals in Atlanta. We're told that he's also going
(08:31):
to be filing something soon winding down that case as well.
So as of now, these cases are not officially dropped yet,
but Smith is asking Judge Chuckkin, who's expected to move
along with it, and say, okay, we're going to drop
this case because we cannot prosecute a sitting president separately.
(08:52):
If I may add, President elect Trump said that he
would fire Jack Smith within quote two seconds of taking office.
It doesn't appear that the President of the elect will
even have the opportunity to do that because we've been
reporting for several weeks now that Jack Smith will be
gone at that point. On January twentieth, at noon, he
will have stepped down. So at some point over the
(09:14):
next several weeks he's going to step down. They're going
to close up the Special Council office, and this case
will not go to trials. So while it was expected,
it's certainly a big deal to see that Special Council
Jack Smith, who's been a thorn in the side of
Donald Trump for over two years, is officially asking a
judge to drop his case.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
Why so suddenly and why at all?
Speaker 12 (09:35):
We were told Donald Trump represented an existential threat to democracy.
What he did on January sixth was so beyond the
pale that it took a special prosecutor designated by Merrick Garland,
the Attorney General leading the Department of Justice on behalf
of the Biden administration, to appoint Jack Smith for this
very purpose. Donald Trump wins and it all goes away.
(09:58):
We can't prosecute a sitting president. Why did the charges
come so late? I mean, this is the question that
many on the left are asking. Now we'll get to
Zoe Lofgren, representative from California, in just a moment, but
one ding back before her, how about Representative Dan Goldman,
Democrat New York.
Speaker 6 (10:14):
His thoughts, well, look, I certainly understand why he did it,
given the Department of Justice policy that you cannot prosecute
a sitting president. I think it is a shame for
justice in this country. It establishes that Donald Trump is
above the law. The Supreme Court put him above the
law in that opinion that Paula just mentioned, but now
(10:36):
he appears to escape full accountability for what were crimes
charged by a grand jury.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
Incorrect, It's the exact opposite.
Speaker 12 (10:45):
It establishes that Donald Trump is not below the law,
that you cannot simply target your political opponents and prosecute
them the way that they do in third world countries.
And the fact that these charges were dismissed or dropped
so suddenly tells you that it was all political all along.
Goldman tries a straw man argument.
Speaker 6 (11:06):
We cannot normalize the fact that Donald Trump, as the
president elect, should not be held accountable for crimes that
he committed before. If he were to have fired the
special counsel, that would be a gross abdication of the
independence of the Department of Justice.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
And if the shoe were on.
Speaker 6 (11:24):
The other foot, for example, and Joe Biden were to
have fired David Weiss, who clearly had a politicized investigation
because the House Republicans effectively scuttled a plea agreement.
Speaker 3 (11:40):
Everyone would be up in arms.
Speaker 6 (11:41):
So let's make sure that we don't normalize Donald Trump's
political partisan behavior that has no place under our rule
of law.
Speaker 12 (11:50):
It's a close call. But Dan Goldman may be the
stupidest person in Congress. I mean, Mazi Herono is down
on that list as a very unintelligent individual.
Speaker 2 (11:58):
But Dan Goldman is a legitimate dummy. It was not the.
Speaker 12 (12:02):
House Republicans who scuttled the deal that was made David Weiss,
rather with the judge in that case came in and
said what is this? The judge scuttled the plea agreement
because it was unprecedentedly soft, and then they had to
save face the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (12:20):
And then they had to go back and David Weiss,
who's a.
Speaker 12 (12:23):
Phony kind of Republican appointee, and that's what they hang
their hats on. But he was trying to get this
kind of swept under the rug with Hunter Biden, the
gun charges, everything else. And then they reopened that case. Yes,
here's Representative Zoe Lofgren, Democrat California at Kelly Coucher's home state.
Speaker 10 (12:39):
Looking back, do you think that not charging Trump until
more than two years after January sixth was the ultimate mistake?
Speaker 7 (12:47):
That doing this well, it was a huge mistake. Certainly,
the committee found, you know, a lot of evidence without
the tools that the Justice Department has, that made it
clear that Trump was at the center of this wide
ranging conspiracy. Why the Justice Department delayed until basically our
(13:10):
report was done is something I've never understood. However, Trump
and his lawyers are the masters of delay, So even
had the efforts begun in advance, who knows whether they
wouldn't have been able.
Speaker 3 (13:26):
To drag them out.
Speaker 7 (13:28):
Justice delayed is, of course justice denied false.
Speaker 12 (13:32):
This is a complete misread misunderstanding of the very premise
of our judicial system, which is geared to protect the
rights of defendants, not the prosecution. The prosecution doesn't have
a right to a fair, speedy trial. That's the defendant
that has a right to a speedy trial, to a
jury of their peers, etc. Justice delayed is justice denied
(13:56):
is for the defendants, not the prosecution, not even the
people you united states for whom the prosecution portends to represent.
The prosecution doesn't have those built in rights. They were
done so in the Constitution on the basis of a
defendant having that right to a free, fair, speedy trial,
(14:18):
and they could not be delayed. You know, the way
that the January sixth protesters are having their rights delayed
and denied. Representative Zoe Lofgren is exactly wrong here. Okay,
And going back to our original point, I don't know
why Jack Smith, the Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, the
Biden administration didn't prosecute Donald Trump sooner. Well, that one's easy.
(14:41):
There's two parts to this one. Had Donald Trump never
run for president again, none of these charges would have
been brought, none of them would have been pursued. He
would have been allowed to continue with his life in
mar A Lago happily for the rest of his years.
This was a political cudgel, that's it, that's all. And
(15:02):
as such, they didn't want to bring this prosecution sooner,
have it adjudicated whatnot. They needed it to be an
issue in the twenty twenty four campaign. That was the
whole point and purpose of this was to throw land
minds and roadblocks and obstacles legal, financial and otherwise for
Donald Trump political so that he would take a hit
(15:22):
with voters. But it all backfired. If anything, it strengthened
Donald Trump's position with voters. The financial part hasn't hit
him yet, probably won't. And this was never about getting
justice against Donald Trump. The justice was supposed to come
at the ballot box where he would lose to either
(15:42):
Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. And now that that hasn't happened,
all of this is exposed for what it actually was,
political subterfuge, weaponization of the Department of Justice, collaboration and
collusion between Letitia James, Attorney New York, Alvin Bragg, Manhattan
District Attorney Fannie Willis the joke that she is down
(16:05):
in Fulton County, Georgia. Jack Smith himself appointed to pursue
two cases, the documents case mar Lago and the January
sixth election obstruction case in the wake of this committee
that Zoe Lockrom was on. In their findings, all five
of those cases were intertwined for the same reason, political
(16:25):
subterfuge to trip up Donald Trump, and I turned to Kelly.
All of that, even the convictions that they were able
to get with the hush money scandal in Stormy Daniels.
Speaker 2 (16:35):
It didn't work. Donald Trump won.
Speaker 8 (16:37):
Why well, I think we both know that it was.
You know, he always likes to say it was a
witch hunt.
Speaker 3 (16:46):
It was.
Speaker 8 (16:47):
And Alvin Bragg, Fannie Willis and her boy toy.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
Down there, Nathan Wade.
Speaker 8 (16:53):
Everything is falling apart. And now that the New York
Court is now postponing things indefinitely for four years, it's
just not gonna last well.
Speaker 12 (17:06):
And I think there's got to be a constitutional problem
with that. Just letting this linger and holding it over
the president elect's head for four years. We're just gonna
wait it out, and then once he leaves office at
age eighty two or whatever, then we're going to pursue.
Speaker 2 (17:20):
That and sentenced him.
Speaker 8 (17:21):
They also have given the green light to for emotion
to dismiss which I think he has a very good
opportunity for his defense attorneys to actually have this case
completely dismissed.
Speaker 12 (17:37):
This was all a joke and these people were all
clowns in a circus that only the far left and
the red meat for their base wanted to see. And
they could call Donald Trump a convicted felon. That was
the whole basis of what they were trying to get
out of this. They could run it in ads for
Kamala Harrison against Donald Trump, but fifty percent of the
United States didn't care. It didn't bother them. A majority
(17:59):
of voters who bought to show up. They took all
of this in stride and realized it for what it was.
A systemic persecution of a man who had served as
president of the United States, unprecedented in our history. And Kelly,
do you think it'll ever happen again now that it
has failed?
Speaker 2 (18:16):
Luckily?
Speaker 8 (18:16):
Absolutely not. And first of all, it was a huge
backfire because they not only won white women, they also
won Hispanics, they won blacks. It almost gave Trump a
validation that they were doing all of this to him,
and that is one of the reasons why he came
with such a resounding victory.
Speaker 12 (18:35):
Well, he didn't win black voters. He did better with
black voters I think ever since nineteen sixty and Richard Nixon.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
I mean, that's that's pretty much a win. Well, and
that's what I mean.
Speaker 12 (18:46):
The post mortem analysis is revealing itself. With Joe Scarborough
talking to April Ryan, who is very much of the
fire left in MSNBC, and even Whoopi Goldberg shutting down
Anna Navarro telling her that she's pissing.
Speaker 2 (18:59):
In the win. We'll get to that comment and.
Speaker 12 (19:02):
Just a little bit, but coming up next, my good
friend Valdemar Archiletta joins US. He ran for the first
congressional district and he is now leading the cause to
explore possibly recalling Mayor Mike Johnston for his t n
Square comments about ice.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
But you don't hear anti gay stuff from Donald Trump.
You don't. And Donald Trump loves the gays.
Speaker 4 (19:26):
He is the first president to go into office who
fully accepted same sex marriage. He's the first president to
go into office who waived a rainbow flag on his campaign.
Speaker 3 (19:37):
Log Cabin Republicans.
Speaker 4 (19:38):
Nationally have had multiple fundraisers at mar A Lago, where
Donald Trump himself attended, and Malania Trump this year, the
very first thing she has done was a fundraiser for
log Cabin Republicans. So Donald Trump himself is very welcoming
of the LGBT community.
Speaker 12 (19:58):
Not sure that Kyle Clark, Comrade Kyle of nine News
was expecting that answer, but Valdemar had the receipts and
he came to that sit down interview with them in
hand and he joins me. Live in the control room
here we got our podcast setting going on. So it's
really warm. It's comfy. You know, we're looking forward to Thanksgiving.
Valdimore Archiletta. You can follow him on X at Archiletta
(20:19):
the number four coo. That's ar c h U l
e t a number four coo on the X. Valdemar
welcome back man, thanks.
Speaker 3 (20:29):
For having me.
Speaker 4 (20:29):
You always play like sad slow Mariah songs.
Speaker 2 (20:33):
No too well. I'm happy about that that you ran.
Speaker 3 (20:38):
That is a good song though I love it.
Speaker 12 (20:41):
It is, and you ran I think the best campaign
that's ever been run against Diana to get in an
impossible district.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
It really was. But you gained traction. You you did.
Speaker 12 (20:52):
You gained also the attention of the media with the
likes of Kyle Clark, et cetera. You had a platform
for the issues that were important to you. I thought
you did extremely well in the one debate that you
had with her. She at least granted you that opportunity.
I guess from on high, But how do you feel
about the campaign that you ran?
Speaker 2 (21:10):
Looking back?
Speaker 3 (21:10):
On it.
Speaker 4 (21:10):
Now.
Speaker 3 (21:11):
It was good.
Speaker 4 (21:12):
I understood the challenge we faced and what the reality
of the most likely outcome would be. So I'm not,
you know, surprised by that, but it was positive in
that we were able to reach out to the community.
We had a platform where we were able to speak
about different topics, and a lot of things came up
through the campaign that I wasn't fully expecting, and it
(21:35):
was good that we were there to be able to
talk about it, kind of like what happened there with
Kyle Clark when situations came up in June and then
we were able to talk to the media about it,
and I'm go out and talk to the public about it,
and so it was it was a positive thing and
something that we're going to build on and looking forward.
Speaker 3 (21:53):
You know, I'm not going away.
Speaker 4 (21:54):
There's a lot of things i want to do, and
where exactly I'm going to take this platform and what
I'm going to do with it, I'm still kind of
working on. But some things have popped up recently that
you know, now we get to talk about and we're
looking at doing here in Denver.
Speaker 12 (22:09):
The way I look at it at Valdemar As You've
built a foundation. Now what you built upon that foundation,
that's going to be up to you. And I think
the fact that you're at this point speaks volumes about
how you got to this point. And I know you
love the city of Denver, and you know this most
recent issue that we're going to discuss right now has
to do with the mayor and Mike Johnston. I mean,
putting his foot in his mouth is putting it quite mildly.
(22:31):
I think he felt he was speaking to maybe a
friendly audience and didn't really anticipate the consequences. For once
this got out of the far left echo chamber, he
made these comments to Denverit about comparing the resistance that
could be coming ice his way should they choose to
descend upon Denver and extradite and remove and deport illegal
(22:51):
criminal aliens from the city of Denver. And he compared
it to a Tienna Men's Square moment. Now, to his credit,
Mark Salinger nine News really peppered him in this interview
about those comments.
Speaker 13 (23:05):
Are you open to sending Denver police officers to the
county line to stop federal forces or National guardsmen from
other states from coming into Denver?
Speaker 2 (23:14):
We have no plan to do that, and we really
hope that we don't ever.
Speaker 3 (23:17):
Have to do that.
Speaker 2 (23:18):
I have no plan. Are you open to well we're
going to do?
Speaker 3 (23:20):
Right now?
Speaker 14 (23:21):
It's hard to keep an eye on what the creature
president actually plans to do and what the proposal actually is.
Speaker 13 (23:25):
It sounds to me like you're walking back to comments
from a couple days ago saying that you would be
willing to send Denver police officers. Do you regret making
those comments and now getting questions like this?
Speaker 14 (23:35):
Would I have taken it back if I could? Yes,
I probably wouldn't have used that image because I don't
that's the image I hope we can avoid. What I
was trying to say is this is an outcome I
hope we can avoid in this country. I think none
of us want that.
Speaker 13 (23:44):
You talk about civil disobedience, You've mentioned that a couple
of times now. Would you be willing to participate in those?
As the mayor of Denver? Would you be willing to
go out and protest these things?
Speaker 2 (23:53):
I would if I believe.
Speaker 14 (23:54):
That our residents are having their rights violate, If I
think things are happening that are illegal or more or
an American in our city, I would certainly protest it,
and I would expect other residents would do the same.
Speaker 2 (24:05):
Baltimo, are your response to that.
Speaker 3 (24:07):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (24:08):
If Mayor Mike Johnson is just being inflammatory or just
doesn't understand how this process actually works. Because deportations, which
is what he was talking about, there, are happening now.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
They've been happening.
Speaker 4 (24:20):
They happened under Obama, every president, and so it's not
like Donald Trump is trying to do something new. The
way he was speaking, if you listen to that whole interview,
they even talk about the National Guard. He was talking
about the Colorado's Guard won't do it, so they'll have
to get Mississippi or Alabama. The National Guard isn't involved
in deportations. So what he's talking about is almost as
(24:41):
though like an army is about to invade the city
of Denver, grab citizens and take them out, and that's
not what's going to happen. So I don't really get
what he's even talking about. And he really he did
kind of you could tell he kind of regrets what
he said to the Denver right because it was inflammatory
and it really was a call to violence in a way,
(25:04):
like he's talking about citizens going out there with the
police and standing at the county line, which is also stupid,
because what does he think. It's like, you know, Denver's
a walled city with one gate where you can come in.
What he's talking about, He's like, where are they going
to stand? Which part of the county line. It's very large,
you know, it's on there's a west side and the
(25:24):
north side, and they just what's he talking about? Like
they're going to stand there and block them from coming in,
and then fifty thousand citizens are going to stand there
with the police, Like that's not good. And then you know,
he likened it to Tenements Square where you know, three
hundred people that we know have died. There's probably much
much larger than that. Thousands of people were injured. It's
(25:46):
really a bad, you know, visual that he gave there,
and I think he realized that, but he didn't also
completely walk it back. He just said, we want to
avoid that right still on the tables. I heard, Yeah, exactly,
it's still on the table.
Speaker 2 (25:59):
We want to void that.
Speaker 3 (26:02):
But it does sound like.
Speaker 4 (26:03):
He's, you know, putting up a huge resistance too, or
he wants to put up a huge resistance should this happen,
will he be able to probably not. I actually just
talked to a police officer of Denver earlier today and
you know, he mentioned the know that you know, should
Mike Johnson asked the Denver police to go and stop
(26:25):
ICE from from doing what their job is that They
will not do.
Speaker 2 (26:29):
That, nor should they in my view, they.
Speaker 12 (26:32):
And it's putting their own lives at risk and risking
a conflict that should be avoided.
Speaker 4 (26:37):
But he said, most likely, like Mike Johnson, won't even
know these things are happening. They're not going to ask
his permission. When ICE is going to come in and
do this, They're going to get what they may need
and they're going to go do it. Mike Johnson will
probably find out about it afterwards. And with the Denver
Police Force, typically they enforced local laws. The federal agents
(26:58):
enforced the national federal laws. When they do ask for help,
usually it's just in protecting the area for the citizens
in the area. They don't actually participate in going in
and deporting someone. One interesting thing police told me today
was that they were dealing with a man from Nicaragua
recently downtown who was intoxicated and they there was a
(27:22):
call he got kicked out of a homeless shelter, and
the man from Nicaragua actually asked, can you guys just
support me?
Speaker 3 (27:30):
I want to go home.
Speaker 12 (27:32):
Well that's the easiest way right there.
Speaker 4 (27:36):
The Never Police department doesn't do that, Like, no, we can't,
that's outside our jurisdiction.
Speaker 3 (27:42):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (27:42):
But he said, that's interesting that someone would say that
that maybe there's going to be a change, because he
said he never heard someone say that before.
Speaker 3 (27:49):
But this guy's like, could you just could you just
send me home? It's cold here and imsable.
Speaker 12 (27:54):
They didn't factor that in, But yeah, I think this.
They know that the storm is coming in the form
of ice, and a lot of them might want to
get out ahead of it. Like the man you just described.
He is Valdemar Archiletta. I'm Ryan Schuling. We're back to
wrap up our number one. More comments from Mike Johnston
walking this back about Tieneman Square and Ice issuing deig
deportations of those here illegally, and it's gotten national response
(28:17):
as well from Senator Rand Paul and Tom Holman. The
incoming borders are for President elect Trump back after this.
Speaker 13 (28:27):
Trump's new borders are Tom Holman has said that he
is willing to arrest leaders like yourself for standing in
the way of these policies that they want to enact.
Would you be willing to go to jail for these things?
Speaker 14 (28:41):
Yeah, I'm not afraid of that, and I'm also not
seeking that. I think the goal is we want to
be able to negotiate with reasonable people how to solve
hard problems.
Speaker 2 (28:49):
You would encourage people to protest. I think we're going
to look at every option.
Speaker 14 (28:53):
But yeah, I don't think that there are You know,
I talked to some high school kids this week who
were terrified about this. I don't think those kids are
going to stand there and watch three of their classmates
get pulled out of a history class with other twenty
seven stand by and do nothing. I don't think that's
what Denver rights or Americans would do in this context
at all.
Speaker 13 (29:08):
What is your line where you say, yes, I support
these deportations and no, I don't support these other ones.
Speaker 3 (29:14):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (29:15):
I think our line is clear.
Speaker 14 (29:16):
We think if you are a violent criminal that is
committing serious crimes like murder or rape in Denver, you
should be prosecuted to the folks end of the law
and you should be deported.
Speaker 12 (29:25):
Mayor Mike Johnston of Denver with Mark Salinger nine News,
and that last part right there is exactly who Ice
Tom Holman President Trump are going to target with this
first wave of deportations. These people shouldn't be in Denver, Trenty, Rogwass,
shouldn't be an Aurora. There should be no debate, discussion
or argument about this. Let's go to the Texters five
(29:46):
seven seven three nine Ryan. The good news about Mike Johnston.
It's people like him that are turning the state of
Colorado red.
Speaker 2 (29:53):
People are just sick and tired of this.
Speaker 12 (29:55):
Better than that now governor's mayor is telling people what
to do and when to do it and how to
do it.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
Police know better.
Speaker 12 (30:01):
He's actually even worse because he's not pretending to be
on Trump an RFK Junior side, the fake libertarian governor
and mayor, lying liars who lie. I'm not so sure
about the turning Colorado red part. This guy tried to
do it, at least in part. Vladimore Archill letterback with
me in the studio.
Speaker 3 (30:15):
Nice, I hope he knows something I do.
Speaker 2 (30:19):
What do you make of Johnston's comments right there?
Speaker 4 (30:22):
Again, he doesn't understand what's actually going to happen. Either
that or he's just lying because he wants to get attention. One,
he's not going to go to jail because again, no
one's going to tell him that this is happening. It's
going to happen around him. He's insignificant to the whole process. Really,
the fact what I don't like there that he says
is the fact that he went and talked to high
school kids wherever he talked to them, and when they
(30:44):
brought this up as a fear, rather than telling them
the truth, which he has to know that no, they
are not going to come into your schools and drag
your classmates out.
Speaker 3 (30:55):
Instead, he kind of like fanned.
Speaker 4 (30:57):
The flames and was like, oh, no, you're gonna union
to rise up or whatever.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
Is horrible.
Speaker 4 (31:04):
I hate when our politicians are leaders or whatever lie
to different groups because they want to use them as
emotional pawns to get you know, political capital or whatever.
Speaker 3 (31:15):
Rather than being honest and telling them, you know, don't
you don't.
Speaker 4 (31:18):
Have to worry about that, that's not the way deportations work.
Your classmates are not going to be drawn out, and
then tell them that this is the plan, which he's
he has to have heard it that they're going to
go after people who are criminals in the system, the
criminal justice system, and those are going to be the
individual they're looking to deport first, and is going to
be overstays. And that's what's not what he's making this
(31:43):
out to be. He has to know it. He's lying
to the people because he wants to draw or rile
up this emotional feelings.
Speaker 3 (31:51):
Why.
Speaker 4 (31:51):
I don't know what personal gain he has to come
from it. I don't know what his long term goals are,
if he wants to be governor or whatever. But he's
trying to use this as a statement to bring attention
to himself, like, look at me.
Speaker 3 (32:03):
I'm going to stand up to Trump. I'm going to
stand up to this.
Speaker 4 (32:06):
I'm going to be, you know, the hero for the
everyday citizen here who's going to be taking out of
their house and deported when that's not going to happen.
Speaker 3 (32:14):
So tell the people the truth rather than scaring them
for their own benefit.
Speaker 12 (32:19):
What what he's doing is in line with what Rush
Limba always warned us about with liberals. It's symbolism over substance.
It's him trying to send a message to those far
left kind of voters that are part of his base,
or how he assumes it. But here's Senator Ran Paul,
a true libertarian and no far right conservative. But this
was his words of wisdom and warning for Mike Johnston.
Speaker 2 (32:41):
The mayor of Denver.
Speaker 11 (32:42):
If he's going to resist federal law, which there's a
long sending history of the supremacy of federal law, he's
going to resist that, it will go all the way
to Supreme Court, and I would suspect that he would
be removed from office. I don't know whether or not
there be a criminal prosecution for someone resisting federal.
Speaker 2 (32:58):
Law, but he will lose.
Speaker 11 (33:00):
People need to realize that what he is, what he
is offering, is a form of insurrection where the states
resist the federal government. Most people objected to that and
rejected that long ago. So I think the mayor of
Denver is on the wrong side of history, and really
I think will face legal ramifications if he doesn't obey
the federal law.
Speaker 2 (33:18):
And here's Tom Holman.
Speaker 5 (33:20):
And for those mayors and those governments who say they're
going to stop me from stop Ice from doing the job,
stop me from doing this job, listen to Lake and
Riley tape. Listen to the seventeen minutes of this girl suffering,
fighting for her life, fighting for her breath. This little
girl didn't want to die. She fought like hell. And
listen to that tape. That happens every day across this
country in the hands of an illego alien.
Speaker 12 (33:40):
Sixty two percent of Americans in a CBS poll favored
mass deportations Valdemar. So, is Johnson just playing to the
hard left on this issue because it seems like a
loser he is.
Speaker 4 (33:50):
I think a lot of times in areas like Denver,
where they are very blue, individuals like him live in
their own little bubble where they just assume everyone in
their day strict things the way they do.
Speaker 3 (34:02):
And so.
Speaker 4 (34:04):
It's time that you know, Mike Johnson hears that there's
another side. He represents more people than the hard left,
and we should not be advocating things like this that
are ridiculous and they are illegal.
Speaker 12 (34:15):
Now you have started pursuing at least the investigation of
potentially recalling Mike Johnston.
Speaker 2 (34:22):
Tell us where that stands and where that's going.
Speaker 3 (34:24):
Yes, and it wasn't.
Speaker 4 (34:25):
I honestly had no intention of pursuing this, but so
many people have responded that they want to do this,
that it's worth looking into, and so there's a.
Speaker 3 (34:34):
Group of people doing it.
Speaker 4 (34:35):
I'm kind of just working with them. But the papers
have been picked up to file a petition, and so
you know, we're looking at what kind of language do
we want to use in filing the petition? What is
it going to cost to print these petitions? Because even
though we only need like twenty two four hundred signatures,
you need to get like thirty five thousand or something
because a lot of them will be thrown out. So
(34:57):
to get those printed, what does it cost? Also what
is going to be entailed in the groundwork, and that
is it going to be worth it? And then also
who's going to replace him? Because if you just throw
him out, we could end up with somebody worse and
we don't want that to happen. You know, we could
get like Ty Anderson, I've been there, who runs and wins.
We would not be happy with that. Kelly Broff, I
(35:19):
would love for her, Kelly for out there, contact me.
I want to talk to you. Yeah. So, and I
don't agree with everything she says. There are things she
has proposed idea and agree with but she's far better
than Johnston. So we're looking into it and we'll keep
everyone updated.
Speaker 2 (35:35):
Valdemar Archiletta.
Speaker 12 (35:36):
You can follow him on Exit Archiletta, the Number four COO.
If you're interested in reaching out, please contact him there.
Kelly Bruff if you're listening, or somebody that knows her is.
I think she would be a suitable alternative. She was
the one that ran head to head again against Mike
Johnston the last time around. Valdemar, thank you so much
for your time, Thank you, and thanks all of you.
Our two straight ahead
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.