Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
There have been over five hundred drone sightings in Denmark
in just twenty four hours, multiple airports shut downs across Scandinavia,
Russian aircraft violating NATO airspace, and now emergency meetings at
the highest level of European defense. This is not a
distant threat from some war zone. This is happening right
now and in the heart of Europe, and the implications
(00:21):
go far beyond than what we see on the news.
Is Europe dealing with a Russian threat or UFOs? As always,
I'm here to report the information without bias, and you
can decide what to believe. You can find all the
sources in my detailed articles at ufoews dot co, along
in the description box below. Hey you followers, I'm Christina
Gomez and welcome to this episode of UFO News Updates.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
Denmark said this Thursday that droning cursions overnight which briefly
closed two airports and affected military installations were hybrid attacks,
aing but spreading fear. Authorities couldn't yet identify who was
behind it all.
Speaker 3 (00:55):
It's the second time this week that unauthorized drone activity
has this up to traffic at Scandinavian airports. This one
was spotted above Alborg Airport in northern Denmark, which also
serves as a military base. Others were also seen over
three smaller Danish airports.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
Danish Defense minister held an emergency press conference where he
admitted these incidents were the work of a quote professional
actor conducting systematic operations, but when pressed for details about
this professional actor, he provided none, just an acknowledgment that
they are dealing with capabilities beyond their understanding.
Speaker 4 (01:35):
The Defense minister has said there's no direct military threat
against Denmark, but there also will be starting to look
at acquiring capabilities to detect and neutralize drones as a
Denmark look to try and respond to this latest incursion
into their airspace. The Adjustice minister also saying the threat
(01:55):
of hybrid attacks is here to stay.
Speaker 1 (01:58):
These are objects simons capabilities that mean conventional weapons ineffective
or even inappropriate. But there may be another reason for
this reluctance. According to investigator journalist Ross Coulthart, attempts to
bring down similar objects using counter uas technology have failed.
High pulse microwave systems designed specifically to disable drones prove
(02:20):
ineffective against these objects. If conventional countermeasures don't work. Military
officials may understand something about these objects that they are
not publicly sharing.
Speaker 5 (02:31):
My personal view is we're being fed nonsense. Originally the
suspicion was cast on the Russians, and I guess it's
because the Russians have got form from previous concursions in
Poland and other countries. But there's just absolutely no evidence
at all to suggest that this is Russia, China or
(02:55):
any other country in the world. They're guessing, and I
think President Trump made it very clear when he was
asked at a doorstop. They don't know where it came from,
and I think that's the key issue.
Speaker 1 (03:09):
Yesterday alone, multiple Danish airports experienced disruptions. Objects were spotted
near multiple Scandinavian air bases and airports, one of them
being home to Denmark's most advanced F sixteen and F
thirty five fighter jets. Danish authorities raised the country's alert levels.
Think about what that means a NATO member state officially
(03:31):
acknowledging they cannot protect their own airspace from unidentified objects.
The Danish Justice Minister stated the goal of these incidents
was to quote create fear and diversion and make us scared,
but he didn't explain who was behind them or how
they were achieving such widespread, coordinated operations.
Speaker 3 (03:51):
On Monday, Copenhagen and Oslo airports were paralyzed for hours
after large drones flee over them. Investigations are still ongoing,
but the Danish Prime Minister called it the most serious
attack on Danish critical infrastructure to date.
Speaker 1 (04:05):
Russian ships were spotted off the Danish coast with transponders
turned off, but Russia denies all involvement, calling the incidents
stage provocations. So if it's not Russia, then what is it.
The current crisis began just days ago with incidents that
defied conventional explanation. First looking at September twenty third, Copenhagen Airport,
(04:26):
one of Scandinavia's busiest transportation hubs, shut down for nearly
four hours. Two to three unidentified objects were spotted, but
the description from authorities suggests something unusual large objects with
flight patterns that didn't match standard drone profiles. What makes
these incidents particularly puzzling is the official response. Danish authorities
(04:49):
chose not to engage these objects. You had the defense
chief mentioned quote, when you shoot something down in the
air something comes down again, but experienced military officials know
how to safely engage aerial.
Speaker 6 (05:02):
Targets, including one that's actually an air base home to
Danish military fighter jets. The drones appeared to be flying
around the airports with lights turned on, but authorities that
we heard from MUGO said that they decided against trying
to shoot them down. Now, at this point you talked
about this, it's still unclear who was behind these attacks.
Speaker 1 (05:22):
We're watching professional military and law enforcement officials publicly admit
they cannot identify, predict or effectively counter objects operating in
European airspace. When experts traded for these situations are confused,
what does that tell us about what we're actually dealing with.
The European response reveals just how seriously authorities are taking
(05:45):
these unexplained incidents. On September twenty six, defense ministers from Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Finland, Romania,
Denmark and Bulgaria method discussed the drone Wall initiative and
this represents a six billion euro investment in detection and
defense technologies specifically designed to counter aerial threats that conventional
(06:09):
systems can't handle effectively. And what makes this entire situation
genuinely mysterious? Is what officials are not saying. Despite extensive
surveillance capabilities, international intelligence cooperation, and multiple military engagements, no
definitive identification has been made of these objects or their operators.
Speaker 5 (06:30):
These drone sightings are still happening, so called drones. I
don't believe they are drones. Increasingly, I think the evidence
suggests that they are certainly some kind of craft. But
why would any foreign state actor, even a foreign adversary actor,
want to put highly sensitive, clearly highly advanced technology over
(06:55):
civilian airspace in Denmark for heaven's sake? To what end?
For purpose? That's what fascinates me.
Speaker 1 (07:03):
And the objects demonstrate flight patterns, coordination capabilities, and apparent
immunity to conventional countermeasures that officials describe as professional and systematic,
but can't attribute them to any known actor. Russia denies
all involvement. No other state has claim responsibility or have
(07:23):
been definitively identified. The European aerial mystery continues to unfold
with no clear resolution in sight, but expert analysts reveal
why these incidents may be more significant than officials acknowledge.
If these objects represent neither Russia nor any known state technology.
Accusations against Russia could provoke retaliation for incidents they did
(07:47):
not cause. Reports persist across multiple countries. Traditional military response
prove inadequate. Civilian authorities remain unable to provide clear explanations
to increasingly concerned populations. This central mystery persists. European military
and intelligence professionals are publicly admitting they cannot identify, predict
(08:08):
or effectively counter objects operating with apparent impunity in NATO airspace.
What exactly are these objects? Where do they come from?
What capabilities do they possess that make conventional explanations and
responses inadequoids? What do you think is happening in European skies?
And are we witnessing technology that represents a significant advancement
(08:30):
beyond publicly known capabilities or something that requires us to
expand our understanding of what is possible? Show your thoughts
in the comments below, and Christina Gounz and eight for today,
I will see you again next time for another UFO
news update. Be safe and remember keep your eyes on
the skies. If you enjoy today's show, hit that like
(09:17):
Bundon and if you're not subscribed. What are you waiting
for Get notification bell as I do.
Speaker 4 (09:22):
Day.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
Ufo news and updates, thrash awaiting stories, government disclosures and
breaking developments land here every single day