All Episodes

October 10, 2025 • 14 mins
Cristina Gomez reviews jaw-dropping new revelations from Military whistleblower Daniel Gockerell who appeared on Jeremy Corbell's show, Weaponized, giving details of his shocking UFO encounter over a major USAF base, and other UFO news updates.

To see the VIDEO of this episode, click or copy link - https://youtu.be/iAJ8mgaJVv0
Visit my website with International UFO News, Articles, Videos, and Podcast direct links -www.ufonews.co

00:00 - Whistleblower Comes Forward
01:45 - February 2006: The Incident
06:40 - Congressional Denial at Eglin
09:55 - Repeated Test Runs Observed
11:15 - Pentagon City Corroboration


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/strange-and-unexplained--5235662/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Another military whistleblower has come forward to investigative journalist Jeremy
Corbel with testimony about a strange sighting at Eglin Air
Force Base, the same installation where Congresswoman Annapellina Luna, Matt Gates,
and Timbershett were denied access when they attempted to investigate
UFO activity. The whistleblower, army ranger Daniel Gackerel, witnessed something

(00:23):
in two thousand and six that bears striking similarities to
what Dylan Borland described in his recent congressional testimony. A
massive triangular craft displaying capabilities that looked out of place,
but there is a crucial difference. Daniel watched this three
hundred foot triangular object perform repeated test runs while surrounded

(00:46):
by military personnel, humvi's black SUVs and portable lighting equipment.
This was not a flitting encounter with an unknown intruder.
This appeared to be an organized military operation testing technology
that looked just like a UFO. Years later, at a
classified meeting in Pentagon City in Virginia, Daniel met with

(01:07):
other military witnesses who described the exact same craft, checking
off every characteristic he had observed. So the question we
need to answer is simple. Is this a non human
craft that our military has encountered or is this ours?
Is this fitting into the statement that the tic TAC
was lockeed? Martin's all along. As always, I'm here to

(01:30):
report the information without bias, and you can decide what
to believe. You can find the sources in my detailed
articles at ufoews dot com, along with in the description
box below. Hey, you follow yours. I'm Christina Gomez and
welcome to this episode of UFO News Updates. Back in
February of two thousand and six, Daniel was confined to
a medical facility at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida,

(01:51):
recovering from catastrophic injuries sustained during ranger school, a spying
compression fracture and traumatic brain injury from a bad pair
or a shoot jump that had left him in a
back brace with crutches, immobilized in bed. But then late
one night, something will come up. They sounded powerful enough
to shake the building. He described it as a large

(02:13):
engine powering up and down repeatedly, cycling through some kind
of startup sequence, and despite his injuries, Daniel made his
way to the staff Deputy desk, asked for a cigarette,
and stepped outside. Here's what Daniel mentioned on the webinar's podcast.

Speaker 2 (02:29):
And I saw humvies military personnel out there look like,
and some black SUVs. And I see hovering about fifteen
to twenty feet off the ground, this giant maybe three
hundred or so feet in length aircraft. There was no

(02:52):
visible cockpit, you know, no visible like traditional fuselage or
engine like. I couldn't see. It goes straight up. And
when I say hover, I don't mean in a traditional sense.
So when you think about any fixed wing aircraft, any
bird that we have known to man right now, even

(03:13):
a rotary bird, it oscillates when it hovers. This just
goes straight up and it's dead quiet, nothing, not a sound.
I could hear the buzzing from the generator lights.

Speaker 1 (03:25):
When he stepped outside, he immediately noticed unusual activity in
an open field that appeared to be a drop zone.
High mass portable generator lights the kind used for highway construction,
illuminated a structure parameter, with military personnel, humvis and black
SUVs surrounding something very strange. The absence of oscillation represents

(03:48):
a fundamental violation of conventional aerospace engineering. Every aircraft humanity
has ever built that we know of, from helicopters to
the most advanced V TALL fighters, exhibits instability when hovering.
Maintaining a stationary position in mid air requires constant microadjusting

(04:10):
to compensate for air currents, weight distribution, and thrust variations.
So these corrections produce visible motion, and what Daniel observed
was perfect stability, as if the craft was locked to
a fixed point in space, rather than balancing on thrust.
When the craft banked and departed, he gained a clear

(04:32):
profile view that revealed its geometry and lighting configuration.

Speaker 2 (04:37):
This aircraft when it banks, I can see that it's
a perfect triangle, and it's gigantic, and it has a
white light at each apex of the triangle and a
large white light in the center. And it takes off
and it zips out of sight. I mean, mock something
we don't know. And the biggest shock to me at

(04:59):
that point was there was no audible report. There was
nothing like something going that fast it's gonna bust the
sound barrier going to hear it.

Speaker 1 (05:08):
The departure sequence presents the most significant technical anomaly when
any object accelerates faster than the speed of sound. It
generates a shock wave the sonic boom. Military jets breaking
the sound barrier produce booms that can shatter windows miles away.
And yet Daniel heard nothing. But the craft didn't simply depart.

(05:30):
It returned multiple times, and he watched it perform what
appears to be repeated test runs, accelerating out of sight,
returning to canopy level, pausing momentarily, and then accelerating again
in the same direction. This was operational testing. The presence
of military personnel, all of these humvs and black SUVs,

(05:53):
and even the professional lighting equipment reinforce this. According to Daniel,
nobody at the base treated this as unusual. The staff
duty specialists casually attributed the activity to the Aurora project
and dismissed it as routine air force testing. Consider this,
if you witness military personnel conducting test runs of a

(06:15):
three hundred foot craft that violated basic physics, would you
assume it was human technology that we developed in secret
or with the capabilities suggest we reverse engineered something that
we recovered. Drop your thoughts in the comments and subscribe
to never miss the latest UFO news. What happened years

(06:36):
later makes this question more critical than what you might think.
Egglin Air Force Base has emerged as a focal point
in congressional UAP investigations, and in recent years, Anni, Paulina Luna,
Matt Gates, and Timberschett's visited Egglin, seeking briefings and attempting
to interview pilots who had reported anomalist encounters, and they

(07:00):
based pretty extraordinary resistance. The commanding officer allegedly left them
waiting and was either relieved of duty or transferred during
the visit. Congressional representatives with oversight authority were effectively stonewalled
at the same facility where Daniel had watched a triangular
craft performed test runs nearly two decades earlier, and it

(07:24):
was even mentioned at the twenty twenty three UFO hearing.
Take a Listen.

Speaker 3 (07:29):
Several months ago, my office received a protected disclosure from
Egglin Air Force Base indicating that there was a UAP
incident that required my attention. I saw a briefing regarding
that episode and brought with me Congressman Burchett and Congresswoman Luna.
We asked to see any of the evidence that had
been taken by flight crew in this endeavor, and to

(07:50):
observe any radar signature as long as as well as
to meet with the flight crew. We were not afforded
access to all of the flight crew, and initially we
were not afforded access to images and to radar. Thereafter,
we had a bit of a discussion about how authorities
flow in the United States of America, and we did

(08:13):
see the image, and we did meet with one member
of the flight crew who took the image. The image
was of something that I am not able to attach
to any human capability, either from the United States or
from any of our adversaries.

Speaker 1 (08:29):
Better yet, was timber shed bringing up again on the
Sean Ryan.

Speaker 4 (08:33):
Show what Matt said in the hearing. He said, these
were craft that work. None of our enemies or our
adversaries or or friends had and nobody in this world
had this type of aircraft. Is that correct? And they
all said, nope, nobody's got those.

Speaker 2 (08:53):
Unanimously, without hesitation.

Speaker 4 (08:55):
Without hesitation, just went down the line. Now I'm not
sure if he anyway, but that led up to all
that at which I thought was was I don't know
if magnificence the right word, but it was. You know,
you don't ask a question unless you know the answer.

Speaker 1 (09:12):
This is not a coincidence. Eglin appears, according to testimony,
to function as a nexus for activities that military leadership
prefers to keep compartmentalized from congressional oversight. The fact that
elected officials with congressional authority to oversee military programs were
prevented from accessing information at the same base where this

(09:36):
craft was openly tested back in two thousand and six
suggests layers of classification that extend beyond standard special access programs.
The craft's behavior during the observation period suggests controlled operational
testing rather than random appearance.

Speaker 2 (09:55):
I watched this as I'm smoking my cigarette, seemingly do
several hutchin goes, but it doesn't go down at that
little drop zone that it took off. It just comes back,
stays there for a second couple seconds, and then takes
off again, comes back, stays there for a couple seconds,
takes off again, And at that point I grew bored

(10:16):
of it. And I was impressed, obviously, but I'm like, Okay,
this is our military testing some awesome technology, and you know, again,
this isn't my wheelhouse, so I'm not really realizing that
this is some sort of zero point energy or something
that we you know, we've never seen before.

Speaker 1 (10:33):
Daniel never signed a non disclosure agreement in NDA, no
security personnel approached him to confiscate his phone or confine
him for briefing. The absence of official response in itself
is either relieving or alarming, depending on who you ask.
If the craft represented classified technology that civilians should not observe,

(10:56):
standard security protocols would mandate immediate matainment measures. The fact
that none occurred suggests either the observation was not considered
a security breach or the containment was impractical given the
visible nature of the testing. In twenty twenty four, Daniel
attended a private meeting in Pentagon City with congressional investigators

(11:18):
and other individuals who had come forward with testimony about
advanced aerospace phenomena.

Speaker 2 (11:24):
When I did go up to that meeting up there
Pentagon City, I talked to a couple other whistleblowers and
they both talked about the same exact craft. It would
be one thing if it was, you know, oh I
saw a flying disc, and oh this guy saw a
flying disc. But no, he's literally telling me and like

(11:45):
just going down the list and checking off every characteristic
of what I had seen.

Speaker 1 (11:50):
This cooperation connects to a broader pattern of triangular craft
reports from military witnesses. Dylan Borland, whose congressional testimony pursuaded Daniels,
described a similar triangular craft, though Borland's account included a
distinctive gold lava like substance dripping from the craft, which
Daniel did not observe. But this suggests either multiple variants

(12:15):
of similar technology or the same craft operating in different modes.
Daniel himself expressed hope that the craft represents American technological advancement,
telling investigators he was optimistic that the government has some
control over this technology, but his testimony also reveals uncertainty.

(12:35):
When asked why such advanced craft had never appeared in
theater of war operations, where they would have provided technical advantage,
he had no answer. If this technology had existed since
at least two thousand and six, why has it not
been deployed? Why is it not revolutionized transportation, energy generation,

(12:56):
or even space exploration? What do you think is being
tested at? Human breakthrough technology? Are something we reverse engineered?
Leave your thoughts in the comments below. I'm Christiana gomaz
and that is it for today. I will see you
next time for another UFO news update. Be safe and
remember keep your eyes on the skies. If you enjoy

(13:43):
today's show, hit that like button and if you're not subscribed,
what are you waiting for? Hip notification?

Speaker 3 (13:48):
Bell?

Speaker 1 (13:48):
As I do day, UFO news and updates crash away
through stories, government disclosures and breaking developments land here every
single day.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist

It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.