September 4, 2025 • 41 mins
Newly released but heavily redacted NASA documents involving the James Webb Space Telescope are creating dramatic controversy, and in this episode of Mysteries with a History we will dig into what hints can be gleaned from the documents, and also the latest Exoplanet findings.
To see the VIDEO of this episode, click or copy link - https://youtube.com/live/uKHm9aDA0hs
Visit my website with International UFO News, Articles, Videos, and Podcast direct links -www.ufonews.co
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/strange-and-unexplained--5235662/support.
To see the VIDEO of this episode, click or copy link - https://youtube.com/live/uKHm9aDA0hs
Visit my website with International UFO News, Articles, Videos, and Podcast direct links -www.ufonews.co
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/strange-and-unexplained--5235662/support.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
The James Webb Space Telescope can theoretically detect techno signatures,
which are artificial atmospheric pollutants, infrared signatures from megastructures, even
city lights on the dark side of nearby exoplanets. It
is the most capable instrument humanity has ever built for
searching for signs of technology beyond Earth. So here's the question.
(00:35):
If the JWST can detect something so significant, who gets
briefed first? We know from John Greenwall Junior's latest FOYA
battle with NASA that briefing records about the JWST do exist,
but NASA initially claimed that they didn't. What is going
(00:57):
on here? I'm Christianna Gomez and welcome to this episode
of Mysteries with the History. Let me bring in to
my co host, Jimmy Church a fight of black Radio. Jimmy,
Happy Thursday.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Happy Thursday. Here we go. Yeah, great subject, great subject, great, Yeah,
the James web Space Telescope. Now, was it the Black
Vault in these revelations that we you know, we kind
of know this stuff is going on, But is this
(01:30):
what got your attention? It was? That's it, that's it,
that's it.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
And I think we got to cover it because there
have been so many rumors Jimmy, of people getting briefings,
like Congressman Andre Carson, where Matt Lasso from Askapol said,
have you been briefed on the JWST, And the only
thing that he mentioned back in September of twenty twenty
four was no comments And that says so much for
(01:58):
a congressman because often they like to talk significantly, actually,
so from to say no comment really sets a foundation
of Okay, what's really going on here? And the thing
is that, as I had mentioned at the very beginning,
the JWST is a significant piece of work. It can
potentially detect techno signatures, which is something that we're all
(02:22):
so interested in. Are their aliens, how are they living,
what are they doing? Do they have city lights like
in the like here on planet Earth? And I think
that might be one reason to why it might have
been created.
Speaker 2 (02:37):
I agree with that. Now I'm going to make a
few brief comments in speaking with av Lobe about the
James Web Space Telescope and techno signatures and the ability
to see something inside of an Earth's or inside of
(02:58):
an Earth like planets atmosphere, a techno signature to me,
I mean city lights. If you look at Earth. And
I'm going to make all of this brief because we
have a lot to cover. But if you look at Earth,
if there is somebody observing our planet from inside of
(03:18):
the galaxy or outside, you know, throughout the universe, what
would they see? And Avi says, you know, they would
see city lights. And if the planet is rotating, right
and it's got that going on, then you would see
those city lights come and go. All right, Okay, makes
(03:41):
sense because the planet is rotating. And if we took
a satellite to the outside of our star system and
pointed it back at Earth, we would definitely see that.
Can the James Web see that from distant space? And
Abby says yes, those kinds of techno signatures would be
(04:04):
observable by the James Webspace telescope. Okay, So putting that
to the side for a second, what has the James
Web scene, what has it discovered out there? And has
it seen something like city lights on a distant exoplanet?
(04:26):
I would say yes, But here is the situation that
we are in. In my conversations with different researchers, these
are direct conversations by the way of people that are
involved with the James Webspace Telescope have said to me
(04:47):
repeatedly that if we made a discovery like that, we
would report on it. Okay, that it is an international Christina,
it is is an international platform. There are countries around
the world, about a dozen that are involved in that research,
(05:11):
and keeping something like that confidential and undisclosed is nearly impossible.
That they want this information to get out if they
do discover it. Now that makes me back up and
think to myself, is the United States in a position
(05:34):
to block or censor such a discovery if it is made?
And although I like the intentions of these statements from
people that I am in contact with with the James
Webspace Telescope, I think these are generally good and great
people that are out there looking for this stuff. Absolutely,
(05:56):
but are they in control of the They say yes,
I say not so fast. This kind of discovery what
in the in in the United States perspective would need
to be controlled? This kind of news is huge, the
(06:18):
biggest news probably in the history of this planet and
all of mankind, and they would control the distribution of that.
And I think that that is the position that I
take that the government the United States is certainly in
a position to get in front of said discovery. And
(06:41):
when we look at what has just been revealed by
by John and the Black Vault, this is exactly how
I think it would be handled. These discoveries are presented
and then suddenly hidden or didn't happen at all. That
(07:04):
doesn't make a lot of sense, does it. No, it
makes perfect sense. This is how the machine runs. Christina.
There have been a lot of exciting discoveries. I've got
a bunch here that I would like to go over
in just a bit. But are their briefings yes? Are
they secret? Yes? Are they compartmentalized? Absolutely? Is the Is
(07:27):
the United States government, which is the main funder of
the JWST, in control of the distribution of these discoveries?
I say yes. The researchers say no. I think that
John and the Freedom of Information Act explains all of
this quite clearly.
Speaker 1 (07:46):
It does. And the proof is in the pudding because
on September twenty second, twenty twenty four, Greenwald files a
very straightforward for a request to NASA, and it's practically said,
show me the records of congresstional briefings about the JWST.
Then on October ninth, twenty twenty four, NASA responds with, oh,
(08:07):
no records exist. But then so that's that's already kind
of going with what you are mentioning that if we
receive any information, it has to go through one door
to another to another. Because then on August twenty ninth,
twenty twenty five, really just last month, we finally got
some paperwork, We got some documents that were released by NASA,
(08:30):
and the crazy part is nearly every word is blacked out.
If there's nothing to hide, Jimmy, why bother blacking out
things such as questions that were posed, other ideas that
need to be discussed, theories and I can show an
image here in just a moment, But what's the point
of blacking it out if the public should know about
(08:55):
what the JWST is investigating what it's looking at. We've
received so incredible, beautiful, just spectacular images from the James
Webspace Telescope, but with very little data we know the
composition of the gases. That's how these images are created,
because in reality, the pictures that we receive look like this.
(09:18):
They're they're taking an infrared and so then artists have
to go in change the change the images based off
of the gas composition to create incredible images like this.
So why is this document that was released by NASA
August twenty ninth almost completely blacked out? I mean, is
(09:39):
there any rational explanation that you can think of?
Speaker 2 (09:43):
Jimmy, No, No. And this is what makes me angry,
all right. I will fight for this community, I will
fight for this planet, and it's it's It's very clear
to me, all right. This is what makes me angry
is nature, and that's the universe. Nature is ours, It's ours.
(10:10):
There is no reason to keep nature a secret from
us period now. If you want to take things one
step further, where I tend to understand keeping things secret
is if we recover a spacecraft and we backwards engineer
(10:33):
it and it has technology that we don't want our
adversaries to have. If you want to keep that secret,
I get it, all right, you want to keep us safe.
I dig it, and I can kind of agree to that.
I don't totally agree. If it's an energy source, Christina,
(10:57):
that can potentially heat our children schools, and harvest our
fields and take care of our planet and feed the starving,
all of it if there is something like that that
is being kept from us. Yeah, that makes me angry.
Is it something that could be weaponized by an adversary
(11:20):
and you can prove that, well, keep that secret. I
get it. But nature itself, Nature is their life out
there in the universe. Is their life on an exo planet?
Have you found a techno signature that is ours? That
is something that we fundamentally should know. It's nature. It
(11:43):
isn't any different than the bees and the butterflies and
the polar bears on this planet. That's our right to know.
Why would you keep a polar bears secret from us?
You wouldn't. And it's the same thing with the universe.
In a very fundamental, basic way. Am angry about this.
(12:03):
We should not be kept from nature. What is out
there is their life out there in the universe. That
is our right to know. Period. And there isn't a
great area.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
Here, There isn't. But then it goes to the very
common quote that we hear time and time again, which
is knowledge's power. If we have a better understanding of
our universe, how will it affect our understanding of our
place in the universe. There was some paperwork, How want
I say it was back in twenty twenty three, I believe,
(12:37):
where scientists were using the JWST to see how old
the universe actually was, and they said it was twice
as old. That information was very quickly debunked right after
scientists said the universe is actually twice as old that
we originally thought. But that information was very quickly brought
(13:00):
away with little evidence to back up why it was dismissed.
And that would lead us to the question of, Okay,
if we think that the universe is twice as old
than we originally thought, how old is planet Earth? And
while we have some ideas we think we know how
old it is, what if we're wrong? And it seems
(13:21):
that a lot of scientists have this chip on their
shoulder of I'm right, you're wrong. Do not question me
because I already wrote a paper, I already got so
much funding from these different agencies that you cannot question
me on this information because it'll make me look stupid, right,
which is very disappointing that ego comes first over actual
(13:45):
research and investigations, which really alludes to something that I
covered earlier today, Jimmy about how so many scientists and
doctors and those in the medical field don't want to
research UFO injuries of any kind because of the stigma.
We can apply that statement mentality of ridicule to those
(14:07):
that are researching the universe, researching archaeology, so on and
so forth. Overall, just like yourself, I feel the frustration.
I feel very disappointed in the way that we're taking
this and the ways that conversations are being held about this,
and how so much is being hidden on the topic.
For what purpose?
Speaker 2 (14:26):
For power?
Speaker 1 (14:27):
That's it that is so boring Jimmy.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
Well, it may be, but that is probably the case.
And if we back up just a little bit and
observe what is going on and what are the possibilities
of this? All? Right, If if it is revealed that
(14:52):
there is life out there and that is confirmed, they
lose power? How do they lose power? How do they
lose the grip that they have on Earth? It's very
simple that knowledge would unite the planet. It answers the
most basic question that we have had as humans since
(15:13):
the dawn of time, which is, you look to the stars.
Are we alone? Right? And as long as you can
keep that from us, then the fear stays there. That
question stays there. And you can control the planet if
if it is revealed that there is life out there,
(15:34):
the planet becomes one. We are no longer divided by
country's borders, by religions, by anything else. No, we just
become Earthlings. We become one, and we become united, and
those power brokers out there that want to continue to
(15:55):
control us would lose that control, lose that power that
you refer to, Christina. That's why, in my opinion, this
very very very basic question, the first question that we've
always had, that answer is going to be kept from
us because they lose control. They don't want us to
(16:18):
become Earthlings and united. It's really that simple.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
How disappointing, how disgusting actually just to conceptualize something like that,
because we are always bickering and fighting amongst ourselves that
we use what's really going on, and we're looking at
what the JWST has found. What they have disclosed and
not disclosed, also demonstrates that there is so much more
(16:45):
going on out there. I mean, these images that I'm
showing have all been taken by the JWST. They're all
just impeccable images, and yet again we're left in the
dark as to what they're finding. Are we going to
receive another congressional briefing? We received one a few years ago,
but it was kind of a nothing burger, like most
congressional hearings. We didn't really get any good information. We
(17:08):
had during the Biden administration. Biden and Harris also refer
to the JWST and about how great it is without
giving any actual information, which, by the way, that little
speech that they gave was running like twenty thirty minutes late,
which is disappointing, but something that we see consistently with
(17:29):
a lot of these hearings that we receive pertaining to
UFOs and space exploration. Do you think, Jimmy, that we
will receive any any real good, nutritious, substantial information from
the JWST in the years to come, maybe even about
techno signatures or even about aliens.
Speaker 2 (17:51):
Yeah, it is. It's something that we are going to
eventually arrive at. There are different stages of discoveries that
we can anticipate, not only within our own star system
like Mars or a moon of Jupiter or Saturn in Europa,
(18:13):
those are considerations too as well. But what that will
show is that the possibility of life can happen off
of planet Earth. That it's just not us. But when
you extended out past that, we really have to look
at where we are right now as humans. It's absolutely
incredible that you and I can sit here and have
(18:36):
this discussion about life out there. How many species on
this planet have a conversation like this. The answer is none,
It's just us humans, and we have the ability to
do this now. There's a documentary about the building of
the James Webb Space Telescope, its launch and it's positioning
(18:59):
out in our star system. Watched that documentary. What is
incredible about that is that we as humans, built it,
launched it, and it worked one million miles from planet Earth.
It parked, it unfurled, it opened up its lenses and
(19:19):
its telescopes, it tested, everything worked. How did we get
to this position as humans to put a piece of
technology like that one million miles from planet Earth and
it worked and we are out there looking now. We
have around ten thousand confirmed exoplanets. That number varies, and
(19:47):
the reason why it varies is we have different satellite
systems that are in place, different sensor systems that are
in place that are scanning millions of stars all at
the same time we used to in nineteen ninety five
when we discovered the first exoplanet, we had to look
(20:09):
and find it and then analyze it, and it just
took months and months and months, if not years, to
confirm these. Now we have software, we have scanning and
we look at chunks of the sky and this is
happening all at the same time. We have so many
exoplanets right now, Christino, right now, and it's a lot
(20:30):
because we have a trillion stars in our galaxy. Every
single one of those stars has at least one exoplanet.
That's a lot of work. So we know that the
best thing, the best job that you can have today
is be an astronomer, be on this project, because what
are you going to do today in your gig. You're
(20:50):
going to find an exoplanet. You can do that every day.
You wake up, you have your breakfast, you go to work,
you find an exoplanet. All of these have to be
confirmed and catalogued. That's why the number right now is
around ten thousand. It could be one hundred thousand, it
could be a million if we had the manpower behind
it to get all of this work done. And that's
(21:13):
that's one of the things about the James Web and
why previous administrations put so much hope on it. The
system works, and it's out there, and it's scanning, and
it's working with these other sensor systems that we have
in place, like tests. You know, these these are ginormous
swaths of the sky that we are looking at at
(21:35):
the same time. Yeah, So when you look at this
image here that you just put up, every single dot,
every single spec of light, every single thing that you
are looking at has that. That's so planet and it
continues beyond this to the edge of the observable universe,
right and so, and that's the other thing. Et is
(21:56):
doing the exact same thing. They are looking back at us. Now,
let me let me go through a list of stuff
recent observations of exoplanet K two eighteen B, which you
and I have covered here. I've covered it on Fade
to Black detected dimethyl sulfide DMS and dimethyl disulfide dmds,
(22:20):
gases that here on Earth produce life in our oceans.
Here on Earth. Both of those gases are only created
from life. We don't have an artificial another alternative to
the creation of these gases. Well, they were found on
(22:42):
K two eighteen B and what the initial reports stated
that it is probably an ocean covered world capable of
supporting life. This is what the James Webb Space Telescope
brings to us. What have we found since then? There
(23:05):
are so many tens of thousands of planets that the
James Webb Space Telescope can look at and detect this
and look inside of its atmosphere. And for humans right
to get to the point where we can look at
a planet one hundred two hundred three hundred four hundred
(23:26):
light years from planet Earth and peer inside of its atmosphere,
that is absolutely amazing that we have gotten to that
point here on Earth. Then there's LHF eleven forty b.
It is confirmed to have a nitrogen rich atmosphere which
(23:47):
resembles Earth's and could support liquid oceans. It orbits in
the habitable habitable zone where liquid water could exist. Now, really, Christita,
let me explain for those that may not know what
I'm talking about. When I say habitable zone, the Goldilock zone.
(24:10):
There is a you have a star. You have a
star that is generating heat and energy. You have an
exoplanet that is sitting outside of that star wherever that is,
depending on the heat that is generated from that host
star and what type of star it is. Where the
planet is positioned, it's either too cold or too hot,
(24:33):
hence the Goldilocks name. Right, Okay, so you want to
be in that zone where water is not frozen and
where water is not evaporated. You want to be in
the habitable zone, all right, And we are able to
detect this. Now we can study the sun, the star,
(24:54):
the host star, what type of star it is, what
kind of heat is created where these exoplanets are orbiting
these stars, and are they in that certain habitable zone.
We're able to do this. Does that blow your mind?
It blows I can't. Yeah, I cannot wrap my head
(25:15):
around that. Every single day I think about it that
we are able to do this. Now. It's amazing, isn't it?
It really is?
Speaker 1 (25:24):
And something else worth mentioning that people then to forget.
Well two things. One it the price tag on the
JWST is about ten billion dollars. Originally to be only
a billion, but then they kept delaying after delay after
delay that it turned into ten billion dollars. But the
biggest takeaway that I think gets a lot of people
(25:46):
very suspicious about the JWST is that after its launch,
it took six months when it was in space before
it really began to be in operation. Not The explanation
by NASA was that it had to be aligned properly,
it had to open properly, which the documentary that Jimmy
(26:08):
had mentioned goes into detail on that, and like him,
I highly recommend you watch it. It is a fantastic doc
that goes into great detail how it was created, all
of the problems that they came across, brushing every little
mirror with a paint brush, which is crazy, but it
shocked a lot of people, myself included that it took
(26:32):
six months before we began to receive images publicly. Now
there are some ideas, there are some rumors that during
that six month period they were doing a secret mission
taking pictures of images where NASA believes that there was
intelligent life on certain planets.
Speaker 2 (26:53):
I did that, I do. I talked to a half
a dozen research scientists involved with James Webb and here
is the thing, this is what I was told that
there was a certain amount of infighting going on about
(27:18):
not only which planets to look at right, and there
was a list that they were going to look at first,
but that they found stuff, and now they were fighting
over satellite time to focus on the stuff that they
were finding. And it wasn't just one planet. But how
(27:39):
this was going to get released? Now, this was about
a year ago, all right, about a year ago, and
I thought at that time, and so did a few
of these researchers, that this information was going to go
ahead and get released within a week. And then it
was about two weeks. It never happened. Christina, I never
(28:04):
got official confirmation about which planets were being looked at,
but I was told, and I've talked about this, that
it was indeed in the Trappist one star system, which
has seven, count them, seven Earth like planets. How many
planets do we have in our star system? How many
(28:27):
do we have? Well, we have eight, maybe nine, possibly
ten right and that may or may not include Pluto,
And we thought that that was unique. We now know
that at least one planet is attached to and created
by every star in the known universe. That's a lot
of planets. How many star systems have more than one
(28:51):
planet like ours? It's a big place out there, and
the answer is a lot It's a number that is
so big that you can't comprehend how many digits and
zeros follow that. It's a big, big, big number. But
we have Trappist one, and Trappist one has seven Earth
(29:11):
like planets in orbit around that star, potentially habitable planets.
Now check this out. I'm just going to go through this,
and this is what they were fighting about. Potentially habitable planet.
Trappist one B may have a carbon dioxide rich atmosphere.
That's what they discovered. What was disclosed, what was confirmed?
(29:35):
We don't know the research stopped there. It didn't stop there,
but that's what we were told. Planets E, F, G,
and H may have better chances of atmospheres because they
are further away from the energetic eruptions that are happening
with Trappist one. What's happening with that research? Was it
(29:55):
disclosed to Congress? Was it disclosed to the Senate? You
don't know. I know that the research is ongoing. But
then you have the exoplanet trapp Is one D, which
is similar in size to Earth. It's rocky. It resides
in the area around a star where liquid water on
its surface is possible. But according to a new study.
(30:19):
And this is how they put put a new study
using data from NASA's James Webb says, ah, not so fast.
It does not have a rocky earth like atmosphere. Right.
And this is what we're dealing with, right, Is this
(30:41):
the United States running interference on the information something that
these researchers were trying to get out there to the public.
They were infighting amongst themselves about what to do and
how to do it and which planets they needed to
focus on with Trappist One. All of that was a
(31:04):
year ago, and all of the discoveries, everything has been squashed,
all of it.
Speaker 1 (31:13):
And it's not surprising. It's really not surprising by any means,
because we've seen it time and time again. People will
come in with the research and then a bigger organization,
a bigger agency, will say, actually you're wrong, but it's
very little data to back it up. We've even seen
it with Arrow, the way that they tried to explain
(31:34):
the Aguadilla incident, for instance, saying parallax without really getting
too much detail on how that really took place. It's
not a new blueprint by any means. And before we continue,
I want to say a big Thank you to Moon
at Noon for all the super chats and for being
a member for Steve. Thank you so much, Android and
(31:55):
Moon a bunch of times. Again, Thank you guys for
supporting the channel. And another great way to support this
channel is to hit that like button and subscribe if
you haven't already. Jimmy, we have a few minutes left.
Is there anything else that is crucial that we need
to cover before we end today's show about the jwste.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
Yeah, I've got I've got two things I want to
talk about. I want to talk about Kepler sixteen forty
nine C Kepler sixteen forty nine S and again that
we are able to collect this data from our planet
right now from trailer Park Earth right. That's mind blowing
to me. Kepler sixteen forty nine season Earth sized exoplanet.
(32:37):
It's rocky. It's orbiting within the habital zone of its
red dwarf star, Kepler sixteen forty nine. It's located about
three hundred and one light years away from Earth. Relatively
close when you think about it, but it's in the
constellation Sickness. And if we go back and we look
(32:57):
at different books and differents and theories about sickness, and
I'm specifically talking about the Sickness Mystery. It's a great book.
These are associated with Giza, that's right, the Great Pyramid.
And so here we have a confirmed exoplanet in the
(33:21):
habitable zone. Another thing that I do want to point
out is life. Water is life, and the way that
like asteroid venue, the way that amino acids and proteins
are floating around on asteroids all across the universe and panspermia,
(33:46):
and the possibility of these asteroids impacting a planet that
has water on it. That's all you gotta do. There's
your soup, there's your stew. You just put that on
the back of the stove and you let that simmer
for a while and something is going to kick off.
And Kepler sixteen forty nine C is one of the
best examples of this. Again, this is just something that
(34:09):
we focused on. All you have to do is points
your sensors in another direction and there's something else just
as fascinating there to make a discovery with. It's all over.
It's all over the universe. And then we have Kepler
sixty nine C. It's a confirmed super Earth exoplanet. It's
(34:30):
also Rocky it's orbiting the Sun like star. It's very
similar to ours Kepler sixty nine, and it has two
planets orbiting that star. And all of this was discovered
originally by NASA's Kepler spacecraft and it's located about two
four hundred and thirty light years from Earth. I want
(34:54):
to point out one thing before we get out of here.
I have discussed this many times with you and over
the years, our Sun is going to last theoretically about
ten billion years. That's it. We are five billion years
(35:14):
into that, so we've got five billion years left theoretically
with our son. But that's not five billion fun years
all right on the front half of that, and we
are halfway through on the front half of that five
billion years. Radical changes are going to happen inside of
(35:35):
the Sun. And without getting into all of this, it
has a hydrogen core right now, it's very stable. Entropy
hasn't kicked in. It's been very stable for five billion years,
which has allowed us to evolve and you and I
to have this discussion today. All right, but soon, okay, soon,
(36:00):
our Sun is going to freak out, all right. It
just is going to happen. And when helium starts to
take over the core. Our Sun is going to grow
in size to the point where from Earth all we
will see is Sun in the sky. All right, but
(36:22):
we're not going to be here, Christina. We're going to leave.
We have to. We have to. We have to leave.
We can't stay when the Sun reaches that point, which
is soon, it'll be inside of a billion years. It
could be five hundred million years. Sounds like a long time.
(36:45):
It's not. All right now, as these changes occur and
start to occur in our sun, the temperature on Earth
is going to get to a thousand degrees very quickly.
Our water evaporates and the atmosphere is going to be
blown away. So before that happens, and that's what I'm
(37:06):
talking about in the very near future, we have to
do two things. We have to find someplace to go,
hence the search for exoplanets with a JWST Right, there's that.
And the second thing is we have to build something
to fly on. And that's what will give away the
(37:28):
power on this planet if we unite. What would unite us, Well,
we've got to build a starship, we've got to climb
on it, and we have to head out and go
find another place to live that would unite the planet,
that would get rid of any arguments and infighting and
everything else that we have. We become Earthlings, and that
(37:52):
is the next stage of this planet. We have to
leave eventually. We can't stay forever. And I know that
you and myself, you know, we grew up thinking that
Earth is going to last forever. We're going to be here.
We need to take care of this planet and future
generations and all of that. Yeah, that's all in play,
(38:15):
but we have to keep it beautiful and clean for
future generations to build those starships that we have to
fly away on. And that's j Wst's position, that's its job.
It's got to find a place for us to go to.
We need to build those ships, and we need to leave.
We can't stay here forever. It's a very important piece
(38:38):
of technology that is helping the future of us.
Speaker 1 (38:43):
What a fantastic way to end today's show. Jimmy, thank
you so much for being on today. Who do you
have on fad to Black tonight.
Speaker 2 (38:50):
I've got Jason McClean on tonight. You know what we're
doing tonight, Christina, tell me we're doing Bigfoot and goat
men in the State of Texas. That's right tonight on
Fade to Block. It's going to be a great show.
So I'll see everybody tonight on Fade to Block. Christina.
I won't be here next week now now I'm going
(39:12):
to be filming taping Beyond Belief, so I've got to
jet out of town next weekend. But I'll see everybody
back here with Christina in two weeks, all right, so behave.
I'll see everybody tonight on the show. Thank you, Christina,
another great show.
Speaker 1 (39:28):
Thank you so much. If you enjoyed the show, hit
that like button right down below and subscribe if you
haven't already. As I do daily UFO news updates at
ten am PST. And as Jimmy had mentioned, we are
a space faring species. We are not going to be
on Earth for infinity. We will be traveling the stars.
(39:48):
It's just a matter of when. We have been staring
at the stars since the beginning of humanity. It has
been written about for millennia, and so for if anything,
I feel like we're a bit behind. I felt like
in twenty twenty five we would already be out in
the stars, having flying cars, hoverboards, and who knows what else.
(40:08):
But yet we're still stuck into the very primitive kind
of technology in so many ways, while AI, on the
other hand, is exploding exponentially. But aside from that, we
should have been in space a long long time ago.
That is it for today. I want to say thank
you to everyone catching this live for all of these
(40:30):
super chats, superstickers, all of my amazing YouTube members and
Patreon members as well. Thank you Tina, You're the best.
Thank you Moon again, really appreciate that. I will see
you tomorrow. Be safe and remember keep your eyes on
this guys. If you enjoy today's show, hate that like bundon,
(41:15):
and if you're not subscribed, what are you waiting for?
H notification bell as I do data, UFO news and updates,
crash Away through stories, government disclosures and breaking developments land
here every single day.
The James Webb Space Telescope can theoretically detect techno signatures,
which are artificial atmospheric pollutants, infrared signatures from megastructures, even
city lights on the dark side of nearby exoplanets. It
is the most capable instrument humanity has ever built for
searching for signs of technology beyond Earth. So here's the question.
(00:35):
If the JWST can detect something so significant, who gets
briefed first? We know from John Greenwall Junior's latest FOYA
battle with NASA that briefing records about the JWST do exist,
but NASA initially claimed that they didn't. What is going
(00:57):
on here? I'm Christianna Gomez and welcome to this episode
of Mysteries with the History. Let me bring in to
my co host, Jimmy Church a fight of black Radio. Jimmy,
Happy Thursday.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
Happy Thursday. Here we go. Yeah, great subject, great subject, great, Yeah,
the James web Space Telescope. Now, was it the Black
Vault in these revelations that we you know, we kind
of know this stuff is going on, But is this
(01:30):
what got your attention? It was? That's it, that's it,
that's it.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
And I think we got to cover it because there
have been so many rumors Jimmy, of people getting briefings,
like Congressman Andre Carson, where Matt Lasso from Askapol said,
have you been briefed on the JWST, And the only
thing that he mentioned back in September of twenty twenty
four was no comments And that says so much for
(01:58):
a congressman because often they like to talk significantly, actually,
so from to say no comment really sets a foundation
of Okay, what's really going on here? And the thing
is that, as I had mentioned at the very beginning,
the JWST is a significant piece of work. It can
potentially detect techno signatures, which is something that we're all
(02:22):
so interested in. Are their aliens, how are they living,
what are they doing? Do they have city lights like
in the like here on planet Earth? And I think
that might be one reason to why it might have
been created.
Speaker 2 (02:37):
I agree with that. Now I'm going to make a
few brief comments in speaking with av Lobe about the
James Web Space Telescope and techno signatures and the ability
to see something inside of an Earth's or inside of
(02:58):
an Earth like planets atmosphere, a techno signature to me,
I mean city lights. If you look at Earth. And
I'm going to make all of this brief because we
have a lot to cover. But if you look at Earth,
if there is somebody observing our planet from inside of
(03:18):
the galaxy or outside, you know, throughout the universe, what
would they see? And Avi says, you know, they would
see city lights. And if the planet is rotating, right
and it's got that going on, then you would see
those city lights come and go. All right, Okay, makes
(03:41):
sense because the planet is rotating. And if we took
a satellite to the outside of our star system and
pointed it back at Earth, we would definitely see that.
Can the James Web see that from distant space? And
Abby says yes, those kinds of techno signatures would be
(04:04):
observable by the James Webspace telescope. Okay, So putting that
to the side for a second, what has the James
Web scene, what has it discovered out there? And has
it seen something like city lights on a distant exoplanet?
(04:26):
I would say yes, But here is the situation that
we are in. In my conversations with different researchers, these
are direct conversations by the way of people that are
involved with the James Webspace Telescope have said to me
(04:47):
repeatedly that if we made a discovery like that, we
would report on it. Okay, that it is an international Christina,
it is is an international platform. There are countries around
the world, about a dozen that are involved in that research,
(05:11):
and keeping something like that confidential and undisclosed is nearly impossible.
That they want this information to get out if they
do discover it. Now that makes me back up and
think to myself, is the United States in a position
(05:34):
to block or censor such a discovery if it is made?
And although I like the intentions of these statements from
people that I am in contact with with the James
Webspace Telescope, I think these are generally good and great
people that are out there looking for this stuff. Absolutely,
(05:56):
but are they in control of the They say yes,
I say not so fast. This kind of discovery what
in the in in the United States perspective would need
to be controlled? This kind of news is huge, the
(06:18):
biggest news probably in the history of this planet and
all of mankind, and they would control the distribution of that.
And I think that that is the position that I
take that the government the United States is certainly in
a position to get in front of said discovery. And
(06:41):
when we look at what has just been revealed by
by John and the Black Vault, this is exactly how
I think it would be handled. These discoveries are presented
and then suddenly hidden or didn't happen at all. That
(07:04):
doesn't make a lot of sense, does it. No, it
makes perfect sense. This is how the machine runs. Christina.
There have been a lot of exciting discoveries. I've got
a bunch here that I would like to go over
in just a bit. But are their briefings yes? Are
they secret? Yes? Are they compartmentalized? Absolutely? Is the Is
(07:27):
the United States government, which is the main funder of
the JWST, in control of the distribution of these discoveries?
I say yes. The researchers say no. I think that
John and the Freedom of Information Act explains all of
this quite clearly.
Speaker 1 (07:46):
It does. And the proof is in the pudding because
on September twenty second, twenty twenty four, Greenwald files a
very straightforward for a request to NASA, and it's practically said,
show me the records of congresstional briefings about the JWST.
Then on October ninth, twenty twenty four, NASA responds with, oh,
(08:07):
no records exist. But then so that's that's already kind
of going with what you are mentioning that if we
receive any information, it has to go through one door
to another to another. Because then on August twenty ninth,
twenty twenty five, really just last month, we finally got
some paperwork, We got some documents that were released by NASA,
(08:30):
and the crazy part is nearly every word is blacked out.
If there's nothing to hide, Jimmy, why bother blacking out
things such as questions that were posed, other ideas that
need to be discussed, theories and I can show an
image here in just a moment, But what's the point
of blacking it out if the public should know about
(08:55):
what the JWST is investigating what it's looking at. We've
received so incredible, beautiful, just spectacular images from the James
Webspace Telescope, but with very little data we know the
composition of the gases. That's how these images are created,
because in reality, the pictures that we receive look like this.
(09:18):
They're they're taking an infrared and so then artists have
to go in change the change the images based off
of the gas composition to create incredible images like this.
So why is this document that was released by NASA
August twenty ninth almost completely blacked out? I mean, is
(09:39):
there any rational explanation that you can think of?
Speaker 2 (09:43):
Jimmy, No, No. And this is what makes me angry,
all right. I will fight for this community, I will
fight for this planet, and it's it's It's very clear
to me, all right. This is what makes me angry
is nature, and that's the universe. Nature is ours, It's ours.
(10:10):
There is no reason to keep nature a secret from
us period now. If you want to take things one
step further, where I tend to understand keeping things secret
is if we recover a spacecraft and we backwards engineer
(10:33):
it and it has technology that we don't want our
adversaries to have. If you want to keep that secret,
I get it, all right, you want to keep us safe.
I dig it, and I can kind of agree to that.
I don't totally agree. If it's an energy source, Christina,
(10:57):
that can potentially heat our children schools, and harvest our
fields and take care of our planet and feed the starving,
all of it if there is something like that that
is being kept from us. Yeah, that makes me angry.
Is it something that could be weaponized by an adversary
(11:20):
and you can prove that, well, keep that secret. I
get it. But nature itself, Nature is their life out
there in the universe. Is their life on an exo planet?
Have you found a techno signature that is ours? That
is something that we fundamentally should know. It's nature. It
(11:43):
isn't any different than the bees and the butterflies and
the polar bears on this planet. That's our right to know.
Why would you keep a polar bears secret from us?
You wouldn't. And it's the same thing with the universe.
In a very fundamental, basic way. Am angry about this.
(12:03):
We should not be kept from nature. What is out
there is their life out there in the universe. That
is our right to know. Period. And there isn't a
great area.
Speaker 1 (12:16):
Here, There isn't. But then it goes to the very
common quote that we hear time and time again, which
is knowledge's power. If we have a better understanding of
our universe, how will it affect our understanding of our
place in the universe. There was some paperwork, How want
I say it was back in twenty twenty three, I believe,
(12:37):
where scientists were using the JWST to see how old
the universe actually was, and they said it was twice
as old. That information was very quickly debunked right after
scientists said the universe is actually twice as old that
we originally thought. But that information was very quickly brought
(13:00):
away with little evidence to back up why it was dismissed.
And that would lead us to the question of, Okay,
if we think that the universe is twice as old
than we originally thought, how old is planet Earth? And
while we have some ideas we think we know how
old it is, what if we're wrong? And it seems
(13:21):
that a lot of scientists have this chip on their
shoulder of I'm right, you're wrong. Do not question me
because I already wrote a paper, I already got so
much funding from these different agencies that you cannot question
me on this information because it'll make me look stupid, right,
which is very disappointing that ego comes first over actual
(13:45):
research and investigations, which really alludes to something that I
covered earlier today, Jimmy about how so many scientists and
doctors and those in the medical field don't want to
research UFO injuries of any kind because of the stigma.
We can apply that statement mentality of ridicule to those
(14:07):
that are researching the universe, researching archaeology, so on and
so forth. Overall, just like yourself, I feel the frustration.
I feel very disappointed in the way that we're taking
this and the ways that conversations are being held about this,
and how so much is being hidden on the topic.
For what purpose?
Speaker 2 (14:26):
For power?
Speaker 1 (14:27):
That's it that is so boring Jimmy.
Speaker 2 (14:32):
Well, it may be, but that is probably the case.
And if we back up just a little bit and
observe what is going on and what are the possibilities
of this? All? Right, If if it is revealed that
(14:52):
there is life out there and that is confirmed, they
lose power? How do they lose power? How do they
lose the grip that they have on Earth? It's very
simple that knowledge would unite the planet. It answers the
most basic question that we have had as humans since
(15:13):
the dawn of time, which is, you look to the stars.
Are we alone? Right? And as long as you can
keep that from us, then the fear stays there. That
question stays there. And you can control the planet if
if it is revealed that there is life out there,
(15:34):
the planet becomes one. We are no longer divided by
country's borders, by religions, by anything else. No, we just
become Earthlings. We become one, and we become united, and
those power brokers out there that want to continue to
(15:55):
control us would lose that control, lose that power that
you refer to, Christina. That's why, in my opinion, this
very very very basic question, the first question that we've
always had, that answer is going to be kept from
us because they lose control. They don't want us to
(16:18):
become Earthlings and united. It's really that simple.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
How disappointing, how disgusting actually just to conceptualize something like that,
because we are always bickering and fighting amongst ourselves that
we use what's really going on, and we're looking at
what the JWST has found. What they have disclosed and
not disclosed, also demonstrates that there is so much more
(16:45):
going on out there. I mean, these images that I'm
showing have all been taken by the JWST. They're all
just impeccable images, and yet again we're left in the
dark as to what they're finding. Are we going to
receive another congressional briefing? We received one a few years ago,
but it was kind of a nothing burger, like most
congressional hearings. We didn't really get any good information. We
(17:08):
had during the Biden administration. Biden and Harris also refer
to the JWST and about how great it is without
giving any actual information, which, by the way, that little
speech that they gave was running like twenty thirty minutes late,
which is disappointing, but something that we see consistently with
(17:29):
a lot of these hearings that we receive pertaining to
UFOs and space exploration. Do you think, Jimmy, that we
will receive any any real good, nutritious, substantial information from
the JWST in the years to come, maybe even about
techno signatures or even about aliens.
Speaker 2 (17:51):
Yeah, it is. It's something that we are going to
eventually arrive at. There are different stages of discoveries that
we can anticipate, not only within our own star system
like Mars or a moon of Jupiter or Saturn in Europa,
(18:13):
those are considerations too as well. But what that will
show is that the possibility of life can happen off
of planet Earth. That it's just not us. But when
you extended out past that, we really have to look
at where we are right now as humans. It's absolutely
incredible that you and I can sit here and have
(18:36):
this discussion about life out there. How many species on
this planet have a conversation like this. The answer is none,
It's just us humans, and we have the ability to
do this now. There's a documentary about the building of
the James Webb Space Telescope, its launch and it's positioning
(18:59):
out in our star system. Watched that documentary. What is
incredible about that is that we as humans, built it,
launched it, and it worked one million miles from planet Earth.
It parked, it unfurled, it opened up its lenses and
(19:19):
its telescopes, it tested, everything worked. How did we get
to this position as humans to put a piece of
technology like that one million miles from planet Earth and
it worked and we are out there looking now. We
have around ten thousand confirmed exoplanets. That number varies, and
(19:47):
the reason why it varies is we have different satellite
systems that are in place, different sensor systems that are
in place that are scanning millions of stars all at
the same time we used to in nineteen ninety five
when we discovered the first exoplanet, we had to look
(20:09):
and find it and then analyze it, and it just
took months and months and months, if not years, to
confirm these. Now we have software, we have scanning and
we look at chunks of the sky and this is
happening all at the same time. We have so many
exoplanets right now, Christino, right now, and it's a lot
(20:30):
because we have a trillion stars in our galaxy. Every
single one of those stars has at least one exoplanet.
That's a lot of work. So we know that the
best thing, the best job that you can have today
is be an astronomer, be on this project, because what
are you going to do today in your gig. You're
(20:50):
going to find an exoplanet. You can do that every day.
You wake up, you have your breakfast, you go to work,
you find an exoplanet. All of these have to be
confirmed and catalogued. That's why the number right now is
around ten thousand. It could be one hundred thousand, it
could be a million if we had the manpower behind
it to get all of this work done. And that's
(21:13):
that's one of the things about the James Web and
why previous administrations put so much hope on it. The
system works, and it's out there, and it's scanning, and
it's working with these other sensor systems that we have
in place, like tests. You know, these these are ginormous
swaths of the sky that we are looking at at
(21:35):
the same time. Yeah, So when you look at this
image here that you just put up, every single dot,
every single spec of light, every single thing that you
are looking at has that. That's so planet and it
continues beyond this to the edge of the observable universe,
right and so, and that's the other thing. Et is
(21:56):
doing the exact same thing. They are looking back at us. Now,
let me let me go through a list of stuff
recent observations of exoplanet K two eighteen B, which you
and I have covered here. I've covered it on Fade
to Black detected dimethyl sulfide DMS and dimethyl disulfide dmds,
(22:20):
gases that here on Earth produce life in our oceans.
Here on Earth. Both of those gases are only created
from life. We don't have an artificial another alternative to
the creation of these gases. Well, they were found on
(22:42):
K two eighteen B and what the initial reports stated
that it is probably an ocean covered world capable of
supporting life. This is what the James Webb Space Telescope
brings to us. What have we found since then? There
(23:05):
are so many tens of thousands of planets that the
James Webb Space Telescope can look at and detect this
and look inside of its atmosphere. And for humans right
to get to the point where we can look at
a planet one hundred two hundred three hundred four hundred
(23:26):
light years from planet Earth and peer inside of its atmosphere,
that is absolutely amazing that we have gotten to that
point here on Earth. Then there's LHF eleven forty b.
It is confirmed to have a nitrogen rich atmosphere which
(23:47):
resembles Earth's and could support liquid oceans. It orbits in
the habitable habitable zone where liquid water could exist. Now, really, Christita,
let me explain for those that may not know what
I'm talking about. When I say habitable zone, the Goldilock zone.
(24:10):
There is a you have a star. You have a
star that is generating heat and energy. You have an
exoplanet that is sitting outside of that star wherever that is,
depending on the heat that is generated from that host
star and what type of star it is. Where the
planet is positioned, it's either too cold or too hot,
(24:33):
hence the Goldilocks name. Right, Okay, so you want to
be in that zone where water is not frozen and
where water is not evaporated. You want to be in
the habitable zone, all right, And we are able to
detect this. Now we can study the sun, the star,
(24:54):
the host star, what type of star it is, what
kind of heat is created where these exoplanets are orbiting
these stars, and are they in that certain habitable zone.
We're able to do this. Does that blow your mind?
It blows I can't. Yeah, I cannot wrap my head
(25:15):
around that. Every single day I think about it that
we are able to do this. Now. It's amazing, isn't it?
It really is?
Speaker 1 (25:24):
And something else worth mentioning that people then to forget.
Well two things. One it the price tag on the
JWST is about ten billion dollars. Originally to be only
a billion, but then they kept delaying after delay after
delay that it turned into ten billion dollars. But the
biggest takeaway that I think gets a lot of people
(25:46):
very suspicious about the JWST is that after its launch,
it took six months when it was in space before
it really began to be in operation. Not The explanation
by NASA was that it had to be aligned properly,
it had to open properly, which the documentary that Jimmy
(26:08):
had mentioned goes into detail on that, and like him,
I highly recommend you watch it. It is a fantastic doc
that goes into great detail how it was created, all
of the problems that they came across, brushing every little
mirror with a paint brush, which is crazy, but it
shocked a lot of people, myself included that it took
(26:32):
six months before we began to receive images publicly. Now
there are some ideas, there are some rumors that during
that six month period they were doing a secret mission
taking pictures of images where NASA believes that there was
intelligent life on certain planets.
Speaker 2 (26:53):
I did that, I do. I talked to a half
a dozen research scientists involved with James Webb and here
is the thing, this is what I was told that
there was a certain amount of infighting going on about
(27:18):
not only which planets to look at right, and there
was a list that they were going to look at first,
but that they found stuff, and now they were fighting
over satellite time to focus on the stuff that they
were finding. And it wasn't just one planet. But how
(27:39):
this was going to get released? Now, this was about
a year ago, all right, about a year ago, and
I thought at that time, and so did a few
of these researchers, that this information was going to go
ahead and get released within a week. And then it
was about two weeks. It never happened. Christina, I never
(28:04):
got official confirmation about which planets were being looked at,
but I was told, and I've talked about this, that
it was indeed in the Trappist one star system, which
has seven, count them, seven Earth like planets. How many
planets do we have in our star system? How many
(28:27):
do we have? Well, we have eight, maybe nine, possibly
ten right and that may or may not include Pluto,
And we thought that that was unique. We now know
that at least one planet is attached to and created
by every star in the known universe. That's a lot
of planets. How many star systems have more than one
(28:51):
planet like ours? It's a big place out there, and
the answer is a lot It's a number that is
so big that you can't comprehend how many digits and
zeros follow that. It's a big, big, big number. But
we have Trappist one, and Trappist one has seven Earth
(29:11):
like planets in orbit around that star, potentially habitable planets.
Now check this out. I'm just going to go through this,
and this is what they were fighting about. Potentially habitable planet.
Trappist one B may have a carbon dioxide rich atmosphere.
That's what they discovered. What was disclosed, what was confirmed?
(29:35):
We don't know the research stopped there. It didn't stop there,
but that's what we were told. Planets E, F, G,
and H may have better chances of atmospheres because they
are further away from the energetic eruptions that are happening
with Trappist one. What's happening with that research? Was it
(29:55):
disclosed to Congress? Was it disclosed to the Senate? You
don't know. I know that the research is ongoing. But
then you have the exoplanet trapp Is one D, which
is similar in size to Earth. It's rocky. It resides
in the area around a star where liquid water on
its surface is possible. But according to a new study.
(30:19):
And this is how they put put a new study
using data from NASA's James Webb says, ah, not so fast.
It does not have a rocky earth like atmosphere. Right.
And this is what we're dealing with, right, Is this
(30:41):
the United States running interference on the information something that
these researchers were trying to get out there to the public.
They were infighting amongst themselves about what to do and
how to do it and which planets they needed to
focus on with Trappist One. All of that was a
(31:04):
year ago, and all of the discoveries, everything has been squashed,
all of it.
Speaker 1 (31:13):
And it's not surprising. It's really not surprising by any means,
because we've seen it time and time again. People will
come in with the research and then a bigger organization,
a bigger agency, will say, actually you're wrong, but it's
very little data to back it up. We've even seen
it with Arrow, the way that they tried to explain
(31:34):
the Aguadilla incident, for instance, saying parallax without really getting
too much detail on how that really took place. It's
not a new blueprint by any means. And before we continue,
I want to say a big Thank you to Moon
at Noon for all the super chats and for being
a member for Steve. Thank you so much, Android and
(31:55):
Moon a bunch of times. Again, Thank you guys for
supporting the channel. And another great way to support this
channel is to hit that like button and subscribe if
you haven't already. Jimmy, we have a few minutes left.
Is there anything else that is crucial that we need
to cover before we end today's show about the jwste.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
Yeah, I've got I've got two things I want to
talk about. I want to talk about Kepler sixteen forty
nine C Kepler sixteen forty nine S and again that
we are able to collect this data from our planet
right now from trailer Park Earth right. That's mind blowing
to me. Kepler sixteen forty nine season Earth sized exoplanet.
(32:37):
It's rocky. It's orbiting within the habital zone of its
red dwarf star, Kepler sixteen forty nine. It's located about
three hundred and one light years away from Earth. Relatively
close when you think about it, but it's in the
constellation Sickness. And if we go back and we look
(32:57):
at different books and differents and theories about sickness, and
I'm specifically talking about the Sickness Mystery. It's a great book.
These are associated with Giza, that's right, the Great Pyramid.
And so here we have a confirmed exoplanet in the
(33:21):
habitable zone. Another thing that I do want to point
out is life. Water is life, and the way that
like asteroid venue, the way that amino acids and proteins
are floating around on asteroids all across the universe and panspermia,
(33:46):
and the possibility of these asteroids impacting a planet that
has water on it. That's all you gotta do. There's
your soup, there's your stew. You just put that on
the back of the stove and you let that simmer
for a while and something is going to kick off.
And Kepler sixteen forty nine C is one of the
best examples of this. Again, this is just something that
(34:09):
we focused on. All you have to do is points
your sensors in another direction and there's something else just
as fascinating there to make a discovery with. It's all over.
It's all over the universe. And then we have Kepler
sixty nine C. It's a confirmed super Earth exoplanet. It's
(34:30):
also Rocky it's orbiting the Sun like star. It's very
similar to ours Kepler sixty nine, and it has two
planets orbiting that star. And all of this was discovered
originally by NASA's Kepler spacecraft and it's located about two
four hundred and thirty light years from Earth. I want
(34:54):
to point out one thing before we get out of here.
I have discussed this many times with you and over
the years, our Sun is going to last theoretically about
ten billion years. That's it. We are five billion years
(35:14):
into that, so we've got five billion years left theoretically
with our son. But that's not five billion fun years
all right on the front half of that, and we
are halfway through on the front half of that five
billion years. Radical changes are going to happen inside of
(35:35):
the Sun. And without getting into all of this, it
has a hydrogen core right now, it's very stable. Entropy
hasn't kicked in. It's been very stable for five billion years,
which has allowed us to evolve and you and I
to have this discussion today. All right, but soon, okay, soon,
(36:00):
our Sun is going to freak out, all right. It
just is going to happen. And when helium starts to
take over the core. Our Sun is going to grow
in size to the point where from Earth all we
will see is Sun in the sky. All right, but
(36:22):
we're not going to be here, Christina. We're going to leave.
We have to. We have to. We have to leave.
We can't stay when the Sun reaches that point, which
is soon, it'll be inside of a billion years. It
could be five hundred million years. Sounds like a long time.
(36:45):
It's not. All right now, as these changes occur and
start to occur in our sun, the temperature on Earth
is going to get to a thousand degrees very quickly.
Our water evaporates and the atmosphere is going to be
blown away. So before that happens, and that's what I'm
(37:06):
talking about in the very near future, we have to
do two things. We have to find someplace to go,
hence the search for exoplanets with a JWST Right, there's that.
And the second thing is we have to build something
to fly on. And that's what will give away the
(37:28):
power on this planet if we unite. What would unite us, Well,
we've got to build a starship, we've got to climb
on it, and we have to head out and go
find another place to live that would unite the planet,
that would get rid of any arguments and infighting and
everything else that we have. We become Earthlings, and that
(37:52):
is the next stage of this planet. We have to
leave eventually. We can't stay forever. And I know that
you and myself, you know, we grew up thinking that
Earth is going to last forever. We're going to be here.
We need to take care of this planet and future
generations and all of that. Yeah, that's all in play,
(38:15):
but we have to keep it beautiful and clean for
future generations to build those starships that we have to
fly away on. And that's j Wst's position, that's its job.
It's got to find a place for us to go to.
We need to build those ships, and we need to leave.
We can't stay here forever. It's a very important piece
(38:38):
of technology that is helping the future of us.
Speaker 1 (38:43):
What a fantastic way to end today's show. Jimmy, thank
you so much for being on today. Who do you
have on fad to Black tonight.
Speaker 2 (38:50):
I've got Jason McClean on tonight. You know what we're
doing tonight, Christina, tell me we're doing Bigfoot and goat
men in the State of Texas. That's right tonight on
Fade to Block. It's going to be a great show.
So I'll see everybody tonight on Fade to Block. Christina.
I won't be here next week now now I'm going
(39:12):
to be filming taping Beyond Belief, so I've got to
jet out of town next weekend. But I'll see everybody
back here with Christina in two weeks, all right, so behave.
I'll see everybody tonight on the show. Thank you, Christina,
another great show.
Speaker 1 (39:28):
Thank you so much. If you enjoyed the show, hit
that like button right down below and subscribe if you
haven't already. As I do daily UFO news updates at
ten am PST. And as Jimmy had mentioned, we are
a space faring species. We are not going to be
on Earth for infinity. We will be traveling the stars.
(39:48):
It's just a matter of when. We have been staring
at the stars since the beginning of humanity. It has
been written about for millennia, and so for if anything,
I feel like we're a bit behind. I felt like
in twenty twenty five we would already be out in
the stars, having flying cars, hoverboards, and who knows what else.
(40:08):
But yet we're still stuck into the very primitive kind
of technology in so many ways, while AI, on the
other hand, is exploding exponentially. But aside from that, we
should have been in space a long long time ago.
That is it for today. I want to say thank
you to everyone catching this live for all of these
(40:30):
super chats, superstickers, all of my amazing YouTube members and
Patreon members as well. Thank you Tina, You're the best.
Thank you Moon again, really appreciate that. I will see
you tomorrow. Be safe and remember keep your eyes on
this guys. If you enjoy today's show, hate that like bundon,
(41:15):
and if you're not subscribed, what are you waiting for?
H notification bell as I do data, UFO news and updates,
crash Away through stories, government disclosures and breaking developments land
here every single day.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.