August 16, 2024 • 32 mins
Jake Novak is a Middle East Expert and former media director at the Israeli Consulate.
You may find him X here.
Jake's Takes Podcast: All The News You Need in 3 minutes per day. Click here.
You may find him X here.
Jake's Takes Podcast: All The News You Need in 3 minutes per day. Click here.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Warning the following podcast might be too truthful for most liberals.
Listener discretion is therefore advised.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Welcome to the Tea Party Power Hour. I am your host,
Mark Gollier. Today my guest is mister Jake Novak. He
is a Middle East expert and former media director at
the Israeli Consulate. He's a great sounding board for everything political,
and he's here today to talk to us about some
of the more recent events.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
Jake, welcome to the show.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
Thanks for having me. I'm glad to be back on
with you.
Speaker 1 (00:42):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
Yeah, we had you back on in April, and we
probably should have gotten you back on sooner, but I'm
glad that you're here today. I kind of joked with
you when we were talking earlier that we're going to
make this the Jake Novak Friday Afternoon rant.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
Second. So, looking at your Twitter feed, your X.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
Speed, I should say you state stated that it's August sixteenth,
twenty twenty four, and we still don't know who the
President of the United States actually is.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
You want to talk to us about that? Yeah?
Speaker 4 (01:13):
To me, this is I mean, I wish I could
laugh about it, but to me, this is our absolutely
number one story in this country for going on two
and a half months now. The June twenty seventh debate
performance by Joe Biden proved to the few doubters out
there who were still out there who may have thought
that he actually was the functioning president, that he was not.
(01:34):
And that may is not the end of the story.
I mean, it's not the end of the story that
we know that it is in Joe Biden. The end
of the story would be when we find out who
is the actual president.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
Now.
Speaker 4 (01:43):
I happen to think it's a presidency by committee. I
think it always was. But again, now the whole world
knows and has known since June twenty seventh, and that's
not a good thing. It's not a good thing when
we don't really know who's in charge of this country,
because our enemies, especially like to do things to rattle
our cage to find out who's in charge.
Speaker 3 (02:01):
And there's a couple of examples in history of this.
Speaker 4 (02:04):
In nineteen sixty with Dwight Eisenhower aging and this was
his last year in office, the Soviets in Nikita Khrushchev
became convinced that the CIA was really running the country,
and so when they shot down our YouTube jet with
Gary Powers our you two spyjet. They decided to play
a little game instead of just trotting him out there
because he survived, Gary Powers of Pilot survived, he was fine,
(02:25):
and they had the wreckage of the jet to prove it.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
Instead of just immediately trotting.
Speaker 4 (02:29):
Him out, they played a little bit of a cat
of mouse game, got President Eisenhower to deny everything, and
then they trotted him out. Now why did they wait,
Not just to embarrass the United States, that wouldn't have
been that important, but to see if Eisenhower, when caught
in the lie, would then blame the CIA, and thus
they would feel that they were legitimized in their belief
that the CIA was really running the country. Well, actually
(02:51):
who was credit. Eisenhower did take a responsibility for it.
Khrushchev was enraged by the fact that Eisenhower didn't apologize
in the Union. In addition to that, and he was
out of a summit agreement that that had in Paris.
Now we're seeing something similar to that. Now Iran is
rattling our cage in ways that we don't even know. Yes,
they have held off on an attack on Israel at
least for now. But they're demanding more and more, and
(03:13):
they're getting more and more of their proxy armies ready
to go as much as possible, and like I said,
demanding more and more from the United States in the
hopes of creating some kind of rifts in the cabal
in the White House to get them to sort of
show their faces. I mean, I can guess some of
the members of this cabal. I think Barack Obama's in it.
I think Susan Rice is in it. I think Nancy
Pelosi's in it. But Mark, who the heck is the
(03:35):
committee the poly Buer running the United States? At least
the Soviets, the Soviet people, as crushed as they were,
knew the names of the people on the Paula Buer.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
We don't know who's in charge.
Speaker 4 (03:44):
That is our national number one story to me for
the last fifty days or so, and an emergency.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
Yeah, and as far.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
As you mentioned the debate, I think just about every
liberal out there knew that Biden's you know. I guess
some people say, yes, should a few French frush sort
of a happy meal. I don't think anybody really thought
he was running the country. I think what happened was
and maybe down at the lower level, the street level
democrat may have thought so. But I think what happened
(04:12):
was is that they protected him and protected him, and
then it became obvious he wasn't going to win the
election against Trump, and it was like, holy cow, what's
happened to Joe?
Speaker 1 (04:23):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (04:24):
Yeah, I think his weak polls were a symptom of
the problem, but not the problem. The problem was, as
he said, to the street level voters, down at the
lower ends, the ones who make the difference in this election.
Because when we say undecided, you know, to be undecided
in this country, especially in this day and age, means
you're probably extremely low information or you're not telling the.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
Truth right one or the other.
Speaker 4 (04:43):
So when it was even obvious to the when the
lie couldn't be maintained, even for the low information voter,
that was the end of the road for Biben.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
They could deal with the polls, they could deal with.
Speaker 4 (04:51):
A few other things, because I think the poles have
been incredibly misleading the whole time.
Speaker 3 (04:56):
This is going to be an incredibly.
Speaker 4 (04:58):
Close election, just like our last several elect It will
be decided by fewer than one hundred thousand votes total.
Speaker 3 (05:03):
In all the swing states. To me, nothing will change that.
Speaker 4 (05:06):
And I think anyone who knows anything about the way
politics is going in this country right now has known
this for quite some time. So that was the problem,
and they just couldn't maintain that lie anymore.
Speaker 3 (05:16):
But believe it or not, Mark, there are people who
still believe it.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
You know.
Speaker 4 (05:19):
Every day I put on my ex feed the date
and I say, we don't know who the president is.
Speaker 3 (05:24):
And earlier this week I.
Speaker 4 (05:25):
Had a former Democratic congressman really pushed back on it
and talk about how Joe's in charge and it's really
irresponsible for me to say that he isn't. And it
was amazing. And then a ton of people, you know,
like all the brainwashed bots out there, all had the
same message that I was the one with dementia.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
I mean, talk about projection. I mean, it was just incredible.
So there are you know there.
Speaker 4 (05:46):
Don't ever underestimate the power of the brainwashed or the
you know, it doesn't rub off that quickly.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
Oh, I know you're right because I don't know why
I do this, but I like to engage liberals in
one on one situation in person live. And there was
this woman I used to talk to hardcore liberal, and
when the Muller investigation began, she said, I'm gonna go
with whatever the Mueller investigation concludes, but I feel certain
(06:16):
they're going to say that Russian helped Donald Trump win
because I just cannot believe that anyone could be you know,
Hillary Clinton, let alone someone like Donald Trump. So then
you might imagine that I was very quick to get
back in her face when the Muller investigation came out,
and she looked to me straight in the eye and
she said, I don't care what the Muller report says.
(06:38):
I'm going to I'm going to my grave believing that
Trump won because he had Russian assistance. And I said, okay, well,
if you're gonna rely on facts like that, I don't
guess there's any room for debate here or so. But
they're like that there are a lot of them out
there who really don't believe Joe Biden is crazy. And
if you showed them every single video of Joe's saying
(07:00):
and doing stupid things or nearly falling, they would just.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
Say, well, the videos have been rigged or.
Speaker 2 (07:08):
With artificial intelligence or something. I mean, they just don't
they don't want to believe it. But the other thing
is too, is that when you start calling them out
on the individual platforms of Democrat.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
Policy, they don't always agree with them. You know. It's like, oh, really,
so you're for killing unborn babies, huh?
Speaker 2 (07:25):
And oh well no, no, I could never have an
abortion myself, but I think other women should.
Speaker 1 (07:33):
Have the right. I would know. That's not me. I
would not kill a baby, you know.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
And it's like, okay, so you're okay with men dressing
up like women in an exaggerated fashion, you know, boobs
the size of milk jugs and going into kindergarten classrooms
and trying to recruit little boys into that lifestyle. Oh well,
they're just trying to, you know, desensitize young children to
(07:58):
people who look like that. And I'm like, to what end. Well,
you know, these people are giving there, they're valuable time
to help young people by teaching them to read.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
And it's it's.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Horrible that you have a problem with these people who
are sacrificing their time in order to help children read.
And I said, what are the teachers being paid for?
If they just want to help people, then why in
the hell aren't they at nursing homes.
Speaker 4 (08:22):
Yeah, Mark, there's a there's a mantra that I that
comes into play to explain what you just described. I
use it all the time because sadly it becomes your
maine more often than I'd like.
Speaker 3 (08:32):
And that is this.
Speaker 4 (08:33):
There is no such thing as a non religious person.
You may not be a devout Christian. You may not
be a devout you, you may not be a devout
Muslim or Hindu. But you believe in something that can't
be scientifically or factually quantified. You know, you know, you
might believe in God, but if you believe in God
as in a real way, you know that there's actual
no proof on paper that you can provide. That's what
(08:53):
makes it a belief. That's what makes it a religion.
That's what makes it a faith. If it were something
that no one could deny, then it wouldn't be a religion.
And politics and individual political tribes are probably the number
one replacement for established religions out there.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
And when people refuse.
Speaker 4 (09:08):
To accept facts, and they'll just take on faith that
Russia rig the election, or they'll take on faith that
Joe Biden is cognizant, or they'll take on faith that
having no restrictions on abortions at all is a good thing,
or trans people and the kids a locker room is
a good thing. Then that is a religious style mania
that they have. And I'm a member of the oldest cult,
(09:29):
oldest religion in the world. I gave it the office.
I don't need to join your new crazy religion, you
know when I talk to these people, so you know,
I gave it the office. I don't have to do that.
But I see it all the time. And some people
have some other less harmful religions. They you know, grateful dead,
or they're the ones who paint, who go shirtless to
a football game and it's negative twenty all that kind
of stuff. It's kind of like religion, or it is
a religion, but it explains a lot. You're not dealing
(09:52):
with someone that you can talk to rationally. I can't
talk to a Christian rationally and talk about and believing
that Jesus is in the Siah. It would never occur
to me to that because I think that belief, for
the most part, is has positive connotations. Even though I don't,
you know, even though I'm I grew up traditionally Jewish
and I'm a Jewish person. I still you know, I
think Christianity is a net positive in the world, so
I'm not trying to stop people from believing that. But
(10:14):
you know, even if I thought it was a net negative,
I thought someone believing some of these horrible political ideas
that once I get the once I talk to them
a little bit and I can see that they're religiously
married to some of this stuff, I give up because
you can't. You can't change their mind, their brainwash. They're
religiously tethered to it.
Speaker 1 (10:30):
I think that is very much correct. They do treat
it like a religion.
Speaker 2 (10:33):
The only thing they believe in that can be scientifically
proven or unproven is their berief.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
In global warming.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
Right.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
I just had a chat with someone about chat the
other day. It's absolutely crazy. I mean, all of them.
And I don't know if I said this Celest time
you were on the show, but I have this test
I call the blank piece of paper test, the carte
blanche test. And when someone like said, you know, I
firmly believe that the you know, the Earth is going
to boil up due to carbon dioxide whatever, I'll just
(11:03):
hand them a white sheet of paper. I used to
carry one with me, and I'd say, okay, tell me,
tell or actually write down all the reasons why you
are one hundred percent confident that you know anthropogenic global warming,
the human contribution.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
To it is going to cause us to go over the.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
Edge and you know, boil over as a as a planet.
And they don't write anything down, they don't want anything down,
And then I'll start hitting them with why I don't
believe it.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
And I had a.
Speaker 2 (11:31):
Friend of mine who is a doctor, hard core liberal,
and he said, well, you're obviously this show used to
be called Global Cooling Radio in the very beginning, fourteen
years ago. And so I had a lot of facts
at my disposal and my lot of lot of weapons
in my armamentarium, and I would start hitting them with
(11:51):
all the reasons why I wasn't worried about it. And
one doctor actually said to me, this was actually a specialist,
and he said, Mark, you're obviously much better versed in
this global warming stuff than I am. But if I
were as well versed in it as you are, if
I were as knowledgeable in it as you are, then
I would be winning this argument. Isn't that an interesting thing?
(12:13):
And I said, so no, if you were as knowledgeable
about it as I am, you wouldn't be worried. You
wouldn't be winning the argument. You'd be on the same
side of the argument that I am. But no, the
guy knew nothing about it. I mean, brilliant man, brilliant doctor,
but he knew absolutely nothing about global warming, or especially
anthropogenic anthropogenic global warming. And he but he still believed
(12:37):
in it with all his heart. I mean, the same
way people believe in God.
Speaker 1 (12:41):
And so you're right.
Speaker 4 (12:42):
It's so important that you brought up environmentalism because that
is one of the great replacements for established religion, because again,
there's no such thing as a non religious person, and
environmentalism it has all the trappings of ancient paganism. This
is something that I started working on and writing about
twenty years ago. It includes child sacrifice. You know, the
environmentalists was among the first to tell us you shouldn't
(13:03):
have any children, so child sacrifice before the fact, you know,
don't even have any kids, right, kill the kids before
they even exist.
Speaker 3 (13:11):
We must, we have our prophets, you know.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Al Gore was the profit of global warming and warning
us of doom, just like a prophet for a pagan culture,
the giving up.
Speaker 3 (13:19):
Of total all of our all of our freedoms, you know.
Speaker 4 (13:24):
You know again like pagan every pagan culture and pagan
religion eventually asks for these things, ask for child sacrifice
in one way or the other, ask for the loss
of all liberty, all liberty completely, you know, whereas I
think Judaism, Christianity and even Islam say you only you
only have to listen to what God says.
Speaker 3 (13:46):
You know, you have liberty. Otherwise you have free will.
Speaker 4 (13:48):
Otherwise you know, and and and you have free will,
but you know, to follow what God says, but you
still have you.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
Know, your own choices.
Speaker 4 (13:55):
There's no no, no free will ever allowed in pagan
cultures at all. So it's Environmentalism is a big one.
Narcissism is another one too. You know, there's a lot
of people who worship themselves. But like I said, there's.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
No such thing as right right. There's no such thing
as a non religious person. That just isn't.
Speaker 4 (14:14):
And and the people who tell you how secular they
are and not religious they are are some of the
most religious people.
Speaker 3 (14:20):
I've ever met.
Speaker 4 (14:21):
I have never been recruited too heavily by religious people
to join their their actual religion. But environmentalists, secularists, leftists,
they never stopped trying to recruit me.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
I'm sure that's true. You have a lot of influence
and I'm sure they'd love to have you on their side.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
Jake.
Speaker 2 (14:40):
We have to take a quick break to do a
little business with America and then we will be right back. Sure,
(15:05):
and we are back with mister Jake Novak. A person
who offers political commentary across the board, has all kinds
of knowledge in different areas, not just the Middle East, Jake.
As we continue with Jake's Friday afternoon rant, what else
is on your mind? What else happened this week that
got under your skin?
Speaker 4 (15:24):
Well, you know, it's a little bit more than a
week removed that, of course, the results of it were
all about a lot of what happened in the news
this week. You know, Kamala Harris and that DNC cabal
in the White House again we don't know who they are,
committed a very overt and blatant act of anti Semitism
in passing over Josh Shapiro for Tim Walls, and like
(15:45):
every other rash anti Semitic decision made by regimes and
dictators over the course of history.
Speaker 3 (15:50):
They're paying for it dearly. Already the choice of.
Speaker 4 (15:53):
Tim Wallas has already blown up in their face on
a number of accounts. Of course, the stolen vallery issue,
which is not going away, which has kept him off
of the Sunday Morning Interview Shows now a couple of
weeks running, has kept him out of anything. Just like Kamala,
he also hasn't done an interview. He also hasn't done
a news conference. And it's also now his DUI back
from the nineties is also coming out and looking much
(16:15):
worse than just a.
Speaker 3 (16:16):
Run of the middle dui.
Speaker 4 (16:18):
He lied about what a police officer said, denigrating the
police officer used his service as a veteran as an
excuse for his DUI, saying he lost his hearing, which
wasn't true.
Speaker 3 (16:27):
I had nothing to do with the arrest. But that aside, this.
Speaker 4 (16:33):
Is an overt active anti Semitism, which if this were
any other minority, would be bringing those members of that
minority out to the streets rightfully so to angrily protest.
And the fact that Jos Shapiro went along with it
and showed no respect for himself or his religion and
tradition by going to the rally to introduce him Walls
and being all gung ho about it doesn't change my
(16:54):
mind on Iota. He's a disgrace and by the way,
his political career is over. He will never do anything
other than being the governor of Pennsylvania. I understand that's
a pretty good gig. But if he had ever had
any designs on the White House or the Senate thinking
the Democrats will repay him dearly for his ability to
set beside, his agreement to set aside, he is another
thing coming. He's now there, little dog boy, and we'll
(17:16):
ever and so we'll ever be that. So to me,
this is a really really scary situation. It's part of clearly,
and it's indicative about cabal that's running mean that that
cabale that's running the White House again, it isn't Joe
Biden is anti Semitic, is pro Iran, and I'm sure
that there are handlers.
Speaker 3 (17:32):
In Iran and the people who pay them off or
them on.
Speaker 4 (17:35):
We're quite pleased with the decision to pass over Josh Shapiro.
And if they think that this is going to get
them some peace at the Democratic National Convention again, they're
going to be sadly mistaken.
Speaker 3 (17:44):
There will be violent.
Speaker 4 (17:45):
Anti Israel, antisemitic protests both in and outside of the
convention this coming week. You can get you can bet
on it. And to me, this is just a it's
just an incredible outrage and hopefully it will act. And
I'm calling it the Shapiro affair because it reminds me
of the Dreyfu affair from nineteenth century Europe, when France
had a major spying scandal that they erroneously blamed on
a Jewish officer in the French army, and it woke
(18:07):
up all of European jeury to the fact that despite
the fact that they had citizenship, now they were not
equal citizens and they needed to think about their future
and not unfortunately not enough of them got out before
the Holocaust, but they had it.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
They couldn't say they.
Speaker 4 (18:19):
Didn't have a head start and they didn't have a warning.
This is a serious warning to the Jewish people in
this country. The Democratic Party is an I call them
the Antismocrats. Now they are the antisemocrat party. And for
everyone else who is not Jewish, understand, you know, they
always start with us. It's actually never only about the
Jews or really even about the Jews. It's about being
against the rules of law, it's about being against any
(18:40):
kind of civilization. They start with the Jews because killing
and persecuting us gets you the least pushback, but once
you get away with that, it's a lot easier to
do it to everyone else.
Speaker 3 (18:49):
So this is a very very dire.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Development in American history, a very big low point for US.
I hope that it's pushed back upon by at least
a clear defeat of Harrison Walls that it'd be really
great if this, if the controversy surrounding Weals forces him
being done from the ticket.
Speaker 3 (19:05):
I know that's kind of a long shot, but that
actually would be great.
Speaker 4 (19:07):
But this is a sad, sad development, one that I'm
watching obviously very closely.
Speaker 2 (19:12):
Well, let's let's talk about the anti Semitic explosion that's
happening right now. I mean, we have Jewish kids on
college campuses asking for protection. It's so bad, Which is
one way of saying you all these people who say, oh, well,
I'm really more of an anti Zionist, I'm not more.
I'm not an anti Semitic person. And then then why
(19:32):
are American jew kids on college campuses, you know, pleading
for protection because they feel so in endangered.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
And what how did.
Speaker 2 (19:42):
This extremely sharp rise in anti Semitic behavior happened in
the last few years?
Speaker 1 (19:50):
What what what caused this?
Speaker 4 (19:53):
Well, what causes all the other things that we know
are bad about leftism and the Democratic Party in general.
You know, when we saw the like affirmative action and Dee,
I understand something. Jewish people don't act or they're not
any better behave than anybody else in the world. But
we have this problem. We're the ones who brought some
of these ideas to the world. I wish more of
my fellow Jews followed these rules that we brought to
(20:14):
the world, but we did. We brought this idea of meritocracy.
We brought this idea of searching for perfect justice with,
by the way, the understanding that we'll never get there.
Speaker 3 (20:22):
It's just not trying.
Speaker 4 (20:24):
Not trying for perfect justice, not trying for perfect meritocracy
is not the world you want to live in. Good
luck living in a society where they say that we
can't get there, we're not going to even try it.
Speaker 3 (20:33):
That's scary.
Speaker 4 (20:34):
So when you saw the Democratic Party moving away from
even pretending to be in favor of meritocracy, I would say,
erasing all the good things that Bill Clinton did for
the Democratic Party.
Speaker 3 (20:44):
He got them to be more pro capitalists.
Speaker 4 (20:45):
He reformed welfare, he cut capital gain sex, he was
bringing them to and he brought forth a bill called
the Personal Responsibility at which of course actually passed because
that was what they called his welfare reform. Of course,
he lost his ability to become the poster boy for
personal responsibility because of Monica Lewinsky, which all joking aside,
is actually a tragedy. It's a tragedy because here you
(21:07):
had a Democrat who was pushing for something that was
really good. I mean a lot of people think that,
especially economically, Bill Clinton's presidency was like Reagan's third term.
I would agree to some extent. So as soon as
I started moving away from that again, I knew that
anti Semitism was coming around the corner. Because as soon
as you start doing that, you start saying to yourself,
(21:27):
it's only about who you know. I mean, think about
think about the things that the Old Testament brings to us.
It brings to us radical ideas which are still radical
to this day.
Speaker 3 (21:35):
It brings to us the.
Speaker 4 (21:36):
Idea that it doesn't matter what your skin color is,
it matters what your conduct is. It brings to us,
it doesn't matter what your birth order is. Right, all
the heroes of the early stories of the Bible, they're
the younger brother, right, not the older one. All of
ancient society was considered to be the master of the domain.
All these things pushing the idea that what you do,
the choices you make, are what make you a good
or a bad person, not whether or not the gods
(21:57):
woke up on the right side of the bed, whether
or not your skin color was the right thing, whether
or not you were the oldest or youngest, whatever it is.
Speaker 3 (22:04):
And as soon as the.
Speaker 4 (22:05):
Democrats started moving away more and more from that, I
knew that we were in trouble.
Speaker 3 (22:09):
So that's giving you kind of the long philosophical answer.
Speaker 4 (22:11):
But as far as step by step stuff, you have
massive amounts of money coming into the Democratic Party from Iran,
from Cutter all those kinds of places, you know, and
that has a lot to do with it. And anti
Semitism is a big part of the package that they
are selling to American congress people, to universities, even to Hollywood.
(22:32):
You know, Obviously there's a lot of Jewish people who
are still in leadership positions in Hollywood, but you know,
they're not religious, and they certainly don't have a lot
of respect for themselves. Even Steven Spielberg has been terrible
about what's been going on in Israel, incredibly silent, doesn't
say the right things.
Speaker 3 (22:45):
He's very confused individual.
Speaker 4 (22:47):
So the point is they're they're getting us on a
lot of different fronts, and it has a lot to
do with their influence. You know, Iran is a really
horrifically anti Semitic entity.
Speaker 3 (22:57):
They've got a lot of.
Speaker 4 (22:58):
Money thanks to Biden and Obama, and they're getting their
money's worth all the time. So that's the answer, you know,
the philosophical answer, and also the rudimentary, sort of nuts
and Bolt's answer, and none of them will give us
a good picture of where we're going in this country.
Speaker 2 (23:13):
Well, David Horowitz always said that there was an unholy
alliance between radical Islam and the American left. So now
that the American left is getting more and more money,
he's looking more and more correct.
Speaker 4 (23:31):
Right, But there's a way out of that too. You know,
it's not all Islam. You have Saudi Arabia and the UAE,
who over the last ten years have become much less
anti Semitic. They've gotten rid of the textbooks that were
anti Semitic. Saudi Arabia kicked out the anti Semitic clerics
from their country. We're also anti American. So this argument, like,
because I hear this all the time, Well, yes, they're
anti Semitic, but you know, there's no other way to
(23:51):
deal with them, and for the sake of a greater good,
we have to sort of look the other way.
Speaker 3 (23:54):
No, you don't.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
Saudi Arabia is the richest Muslim country. United Air of
Emirates is small, but is a major business leader in
the world. There's other countries like Bahrain and Morocco and
Oman that are also moving in this direction. It's the
Nazi influence, and I mean literal Nazi influence on Islam,
which started in the late nineteen twenties with actual funding
for the Forefront of the Muslim Brotherhood, that is the
(24:18):
reason for this anti semitism, The genocidal anti semitism. Yes,
there was some anti semitism in ancient and medieval Islam,
but it was never genocidal.
Speaker 3 (24:26):
It was never go kill them.
Speaker 4 (24:27):
It was make them second or third class citizens, which
is not acceptable either. But there's a difference, right, this
is this is absolutely this argument that we have to
deal with these horrible anti Semites or otherwise we can't
deal with any Muslims at all is not true.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
Yeah, I find that most Americans are a little confused
about Muslims and you know, extreme Islam, and like when
you see groups like Lgbtqia Mamas and I mean, I
just I don't understand it.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
It's like, what do you do?
Speaker 3 (25:01):
Uh?
Speaker 2 (25:01):
I mean, don't you realize that that you know, if
you were with them, then a sure your run country,
you'd be thrown off a rooftops and there be no
penalty for that. I mean, Americans, I can't explain it.
But you know, there's a certain group of us that
seem to just always be looking for some kind of
a cause to get behind, and maybe it's filling that
religious void that you talked about.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
Yeah, well I'll answer your question.
Speaker 4 (25:24):
You know about why there's LGBT people who are for
Hamas and for Gaza. Why are we assuming that they
don't want to be killed? Mark, It's about the killing.
Remember I said that anti Semitism isn't really about the Jews.
It's just about creating chaos and destroying civilization. They want blood.
If some of it is theirs, so be it. They
want blood, they want no rules against it. They no
rules against murder, they want no rules against rape, they
(25:46):
want no.
Speaker 3 (25:46):
Rules against anything.
Speaker 4 (25:48):
And if that means that they're in the in the fray,
that's It's kind of like when we think that sending suicidal,
crazy homicides or homicidal maniacs into prison is some kind.
Speaker 3 (25:57):
Of punishment for them.
Speaker 4 (25:58):
You've never been to a maximum you know, prison facility, prison,
in a state prison.
Speaker 3 (26:03):
It's like they're heaven on earth. For these people.
Speaker 4 (26:05):
That's exactly the world they love, which is why we
got to keep them there.
Speaker 3 (26:09):
You know, they love that stuff. They love that chaos.
Speaker 4 (26:12):
I don't think all these gay people marching for gods
that don't know the realities.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
I think they just are. Absolutely these are people who
want anarchy in the most violent sense. They've seen the
purge one too many times, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (26:24):
Wow, that's an interesting take on the whole thing. Well,
Jacob almost used up all your time, But what else
is on your mind? Is there anything else you want
to cover, well, I would.
Speaker 4 (26:34):
Just say, you know, I thought one of the biggest
stories in the last few days that people ignored was
the leak story that the Justice Department may look to
break up Google now. From their mouth to God's ears,
Google should have been broken up a long long time ago.
But I have a sinking feeling that this was just
a warning from the Biden Harris Democratic cabal to Google
that they better continue with their election interference like they
(26:56):
did in twenty twenty.
Speaker 3 (26:57):
They better try to blackmall people like you and.
Speaker 4 (26:59):
Me because I was hit by it in twenty twenty,
or else, or we will break you up.
Speaker 3 (27:04):
But honestly that Google needs to be broken up.
Speaker 4 (27:06):
That was a huge story that almost no one talked
about outside of the business news world, and even they
didn't talk about it enough. Google is the de facto
only real publisher in the whole world. They have massive
amounts of power. It's the most obvious monopoly in my lifetime.
It needs to be broken up. And hopefully the next
president will do that.
Speaker 3 (27:23):
That's all I can say.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
Well, I hope the next president will and I hope
the next president is Donald J.
Speaker 1 (27:29):
Trump. And before you go what's your take on that.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
I know you said it's going to be a slog fest,
but do you think Trump can pull it out, or
are they gonna cheat again or what are.
Speaker 4 (27:37):
Your thoughts now. I still think that Donald Trump will
win the election. I didn't think that before June twenty seventh,
because I felt like the Democratic Shenanigans would be fired
up enough to do it.
Speaker 3 (27:48):
I think that changing a candidate in midstream.
Speaker 4 (27:51):
Despite this momentary bump in the polls of Kamala Harris,
which has received but she isn't even up by much
from this bump. She should be getting a much bigger
bump considering the love fest the news media with her.
So I didn't think it, but I never thought it
was going to be a landslide for either side. It's
going to be very close. It's going to come down
to again a few states. It's going to come down
to a net of one hundred thousand votes or so.
(28:12):
But if I had to choose one state where it's
going to be decided, it's Pennsylvania. And that's another reason
why I think Trump's going to win, because the fact
that they passed over Josh Shapiro, who could have helped
with not with people loving him, but with the infrastructure,
whether it's mail in ballots or other things that could
have helped them shenanigans or not. The fact that he
won't be as motivated to do that now, and maybe
he won't be even able to do that now, is
(28:35):
very encouraging. And I saw a number of polls today
that showed Trump ahead in Pennsylvania even even now, and
I think in a couple of weeks they'll be even
further ahead there. So to me, look at the Pennsylvania
polls that will tell you everything.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
You need to know.
Speaker 4 (28:47):
And again, gun to my head right now, I say
Donald Trump wins similar margins that he had in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
And that's the way I feel right now. But again,
I don't think it's going to be a landslide by
by a long shot.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
Okay, to Google, Item one on Trump's list needs to
be the breakup of Google.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
Break up at Google.
Speaker 4 (29:07):
He's got so many item ones, you know, I mean,
that's the whole thing. Understand that if he wins the election,
that's only giving us a chance at saving this country.
There needs to be a Trump administration that is ten
times literally ten times more proactive than the first Trump administration.
We need to cut the size of government, We need
to break up some of these monopolies. We need to
sanction Iran and get the money trail out of there.
(29:28):
We need so much work.
Speaker 3 (29:29):
To be done.
Speaker 4 (29:30):
But luckily it's all kind of clear what needs to
be done. He just needs to get the right people
in place to be willing to do that. And he
didn't have that last time. So let's hope he gets
that this No, he certainly did not.
Speaker 2 (29:40):
That's and I think that's the one big lesson learned,
is that he just didn't have the right people. I
had Peter Navarro on the other day and he was
talking about how he'd come in on the weekends to
work and it basically be him and Donald Trump, and
he said, you only have the White House for four years,
You've got to make use of every.
Speaker 1 (29:59):
Single day of it.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
So yeah, and a lot of the people, you know,
the resistance, that a lot of these people were working
against him, and that was that was just absolutely crazy.
But what if Judge Marshawn throws Trump in jail before then,
does it help him or hurt him?
Speaker 4 (30:16):
Well, I think it won't do much either way. It'll
hurt the country. I think it'll get a lot of
people very very upset.
Speaker 3 (30:22):
He definitely will do that. What I don't think is
for sure that it'll get the chance.
Speaker 4 (30:27):
We are moving in this discussion without realizing that there
probably is going to be yet another delay one way
or the other. I don't know whether it's going to
come from the courts itself or from or which quarter
it will come from, but I am dubious that this
sentencing date will go as scheduled. And so that's yeah,
that's one thing they need to remember that it may
not happen. But I don't doubt that Mershon will sendence
(30:49):
into something. And then, of course it depends how long
it is. If it's a week or two in jail,
it will absolutely help Trump. But if it's you know,
one day or thirty days, I think it's going to
have it'll ire up both sides to kind of an
equal effect. But certainly we'll be I can tell you
who would be bad for It'll be bad for the
United States of America. A terrible, terrible line will have
been crossed, and it'll be very difficult for us to
(31:09):
get back across it again.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
I think you're correct on that as well, Jake Novak,
Ladies and gentlemen, Jake, tell people how they can follow you.
Speaker 4 (31:18):
Best place for longer form stuff and daily stuff also
short is Jakenovak dot substack dot com.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
I do business stuff there.
Speaker 4 (31:26):
I do my five and three daily round of three
minutes is all you need to get all the news
of the day. And then of course follow me on
Twitter X. This is where I put a lot of
my stuff, I mean, everything else I'm doing in maybe
other places, I'll at least put the link to it
on Twitter X.
Speaker 3 (31:38):
And my Twitter handle X handle is.
Speaker 4 (31:40):
At Jakejake and why it's Jake twice at Jake Jake
and why I put everything up there.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
Very good, Jake, thanks for being with us today. It's
always a pleasure to have you on the show. Hope
to have you back very very soon and we'll see
how how some of these predictions age.
Speaker 3 (31:56):
It was my honor. Thank you so much.
Speaker 4 (31:59):
But you've been listening to the Tea Party Power Hour
with Mark Gillar
Warning the following podcast might be too truthful for most liberals.
Listener discretion is therefore advised.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Welcome to the Tea Party Power Hour. I am your host,
Mark Gollier. Today my guest is mister Jake Novak. He
is a Middle East expert and former media director at
the Israeli Consulate. He's a great sounding board for everything political,
and he's here today to talk to us about some
of the more recent events.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
Jake, welcome to the show.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
Thanks for having me. I'm glad to be back on
with you.
Speaker 1 (00:42):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
Yeah, we had you back on in April, and we
probably should have gotten you back on sooner, but I'm
glad that you're here today. I kind of joked with
you when we were talking earlier that we're going to
make this the Jake Novak Friday Afternoon rant.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
Second. So, looking at your Twitter feed, your X.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
Speed, I should say you state stated that it's August sixteenth,
twenty twenty four, and we still don't know who the
President of the United States actually is.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
You want to talk to us about that? Yeah?
Speaker 4 (01:13):
To me, this is I mean, I wish I could
laugh about it, but to me, this is our absolutely
number one story in this country for going on two
and a half months now. The June twenty seventh debate
performance by Joe Biden proved to the few doubters out
there who were still out there who may have thought
that he actually was the functioning president, that he was not.
(01:34):
And that may is not the end of the story.
I mean, it's not the end of the story that
we know that it is in Joe Biden. The end
of the story would be when we find out who
is the actual president.
Speaker 3 (01:43):
Now.
Speaker 4 (01:43):
I happen to think it's a presidency by committee. I
think it always was. But again, now the whole world
knows and has known since June twenty seventh, and that's
not a good thing. It's not a good thing when
we don't really know who's in charge of this country,
because our enemies, especially like to do things to rattle
our cage to find out who's in charge.
Speaker 3 (02:01):
And there's a couple of examples in history of this.
Speaker 4 (02:04):
In nineteen sixty with Dwight Eisenhower aging and this was
his last year in office, the Soviets in Nikita Khrushchev
became convinced that the CIA was really running the country,
and so when they shot down our YouTube jet with
Gary Powers our you two spyjet. They decided to play
a little game instead of just trotting him out there
because he survived, Gary Powers of Pilot survived, he was fine,
(02:25):
and they had the wreckage of the jet to prove it.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
Instead of just immediately trotting.
Speaker 4 (02:29):
Him out, they played a little bit of a cat
of mouse game, got President Eisenhower to deny everything, and
then they trotted him out. Now why did they wait,
Not just to embarrass the United States, that wouldn't have
been that important, but to see if Eisenhower, when caught
in the lie, would then blame the CIA, and thus
they would feel that they were legitimized in their belief
that the CIA was really running the country. Well, actually
(02:51):
who was credit. Eisenhower did take a responsibility for it.
Khrushchev was enraged by the fact that Eisenhower didn't apologize
in the Union. In addition to that, and he was
out of a summit agreement that that had in Paris.
Now we're seeing something similar to that. Now Iran is
rattling our cage in ways that we don't even know. Yes,
they have held off on an attack on Israel at
least for now. But they're demanding more and more, and
(03:13):
they're getting more and more of their proxy armies ready
to go as much as possible, and like I said,
demanding more and more from the United States in the
hopes of creating some kind of rifts in the cabal
in the White House to get them to sort of
show their faces. I mean, I can guess some of
the members of this cabal. I think Barack Obama's in it.
I think Susan Rice is in it. I think Nancy
Pelosi's in it. But Mark, who the heck is the
(03:35):
committee the poly Buer running the United States? At least
the Soviets, the Soviet people, as crushed as they were,
knew the names of the people on the Paula Buer.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
We don't know who's in charge.
Speaker 4 (03:44):
That is our national number one story to me for
the last fifty days or so, and an emergency.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
Yeah, and as far.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
As you mentioned the debate, I think just about every
liberal out there knew that Biden's you know. I guess
some people say, yes, should a few French frush sort
of a happy meal. I don't think anybody really thought
he was running the country. I think what happened was
and maybe down at the lower level, the street level
democrat may have thought so. But I think what happened
(04:12):
was is that they protected him and protected him, and
then it became obvious he wasn't going to win the
election against Trump, and it was like, holy cow, what's
happened to Joe?
Speaker 1 (04:23):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (04:24):
Yeah, I think his weak polls were a symptom of
the problem, but not the problem. The problem was, as
he said, to the street level voters, down at the
lower ends, the ones who make the difference in this election.
Because when we say undecided, you know, to be undecided
in this country, especially in this day and age, means
you're probably extremely low information or you're not telling the.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
Truth right one or the other.
Speaker 4 (04:43):
So when it was even obvious to the when the
lie couldn't be maintained, even for the low information voter,
that was the end of the road for Biben.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
They could deal with the polls, they could deal with.
Speaker 4 (04:51):
A few other things, because I think the poles have
been incredibly misleading the whole time.
Speaker 3 (04:56):
This is going to be an incredibly.
Speaker 4 (04:58):
Close election, just like our last several elect It will
be decided by fewer than one hundred thousand votes total.
Speaker 3 (05:03):
In all the swing states. To me, nothing will change that.
Speaker 4 (05:06):
And I think anyone who knows anything about the way
politics is going in this country right now has known
this for quite some time. So that was the problem,
and they just couldn't maintain that lie anymore.
Speaker 3 (05:16):
But believe it or not, Mark, there are people who
still believe it.
Speaker 1 (05:19):
You know.
Speaker 4 (05:19):
Every day I put on my ex feed the date
and I say, we don't know who the president is.
Speaker 3 (05:24):
And earlier this week I.
Speaker 4 (05:25):
Had a former Democratic congressman really pushed back on it
and talk about how Joe's in charge and it's really
irresponsible for me to say that he isn't. And it
was amazing. And then a ton of people, you know,
like all the brainwashed bots out there, all had the
same message that I was the one with dementia.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
I mean, talk about projection. I mean, it was just incredible.
So there are you know there.
Speaker 4 (05:46):
Don't ever underestimate the power of the brainwashed or the
you know, it doesn't rub off that quickly.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
Oh, I know you're right because I don't know why
I do this, but I like to engage liberals in
one on one situation in person live. And there was
this woman I used to talk to hardcore liberal, and
when the Muller investigation began, she said, I'm gonna go
with whatever the Mueller investigation concludes, but I feel certain
(06:16):
they're going to say that Russian helped Donald Trump win
because I just cannot believe that anyone could be you know,
Hillary Clinton, let alone someone like Donald Trump. So then
you might imagine that I was very quick to get
back in her face when the Muller investigation came out,
and she looked to me straight in the eye and
she said, I don't care what the Muller report says.
(06:38):
I'm going to I'm going to my grave believing that
Trump won because he had Russian assistance. And I said, okay, well,
if you're gonna rely on facts like that, I don't
guess there's any room for debate here or so. But
they're like that there are a lot of them out
there who really don't believe Joe Biden is crazy. And
if you showed them every single video of Joe's saying
(07:00):
and doing stupid things or nearly falling, they would just.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
Say, well, the videos have been rigged or.
Speaker 2 (07:08):
With artificial intelligence or something. I mean, they just don't
they don't want to believe it. But the other thing
is too, is that when you start calling them out
on the individual platforms of Democrat.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
Policy, they don't always agree with them. You know. It's like, oh, really,
so you're for killing unborn babies, huh?
Speaker 2 (07:25):
And oh well no, no, I could never have an
abortion myself, but I think other women should.
Speaker 1 (07:33):
Have the right. I would know. That's not me. I
would not kill a baby, you know.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
And it's like, okay, so you're okay with men dressing
up like women in an exaggerated fashion, you know, boobs
the size of milk jugs and going into kindergarten classrooms
and trying to recruit little boys into that lifestyle. Oh well,
they're just trying to, you know, desensitize young children to
(07:58):
people who look like that. And I'm like, to what end. Well,
you know, these people are giving there, they're valuable time
to help young people by teaching them to read.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
And it's it's.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Horrible that you have a problem with these people who
are sacrificing their time in order to help children read.
And I said, what are the teachers being paid for?
If they just want to help people, then why in
the hell aren't they at nursing homes.
Speaker 4 (08:22):
Yeah, Mark, there's a there's a mantra that I that
comes into play to explain what you just described. I
use it all the time because sadly it becomes your
maine more often than I'd like.
Speaker 3 (08:32):
And that is this.
Speaker 4 (08:33):
There is no such thing as a non religious person.
You may not be a devout Christian. You may not
be a devout you, you may not be a devout
Muslim or Hindu. But you believe in something that can't
be scientifically or factually quantified. You know, you know, you
might believe in God, but if you believe in God
as in a real way, you know that there's actual
no proof on paper that you can provide. That's what
(08:53):
makes it a belief. That's what makes it a religion.
That's what makes it a faith. If it were something
that no one could deny, then it wouldn't be a religion.
And politics and individual political tribes are probably the number
one replacement for established religions out there.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
And when people refuse.
Speaker 4 (09:08):
To accept facts, and they'll just take on faith that
Russia rig the election, or they'll take on faith that
Joe Biden is cognizant, or they'll take on faith that
having no restrictions on abortions at all is a good thing,
or trans people and the kids a locker room is
a good thing. Then that is a religious style mania
that they have. And I'm a member of the oldest cult,
(09:29):
oldest religion in the world. I gave it the office.
I don't need to join your new crazy religion, you
know when I talk to these people, so you know,
I gave it the office. I don't have to do that.
But I see it all the time. And some people
have some other less harmful religions. They you know, grateful dead,
or they're the ones who paint, who go shirtless to
a football game and it's negative twenty all that kind
of stuff. It's kind of like religion, or it is
a religion, but it explains a lot. You're not dealing
(09:52):
with someone that you can talk to rationally. I can't
talk to a Christian rationally and talk about and believing
that Jesus is in the Siah. It would never occur
to me to that because I think that belief, for
the most part, is has positive connotations. Even though I don't,
you know, even though I'm I grew up traditionally Jewish
and I'm a Jewish person. I still you know, I
think Christianity is a net positive in the world, so
I'm not trying to stop people from believing that. But
(10:14):
you know, even if I thought it was a net negative,
I thought someone believing some of these horrible political ideas
that once I get the once I talk to them
a little bit and I can see that they're religiously
married to some of this stuff, I give up because
you can't. You can't change their mind, their brainwash. They're
religiously tethered to it.
Speaker 1 (10:30):
I think that is very much correct. They do treat
it like a religion.
Speaker 2 (10:33):
The only thing they believe in that can be scientifically
proven or unproven is their berief.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
In global warming.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
Right.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
I just had a chat with someone about chat the
other day. It's absolutely crazy. I mean, all of them.
And I don't know if I said this Celest time
you were on the show, but I have this test
I call the blank piece of paper test, the carte
blanche test. And when someone like said, you know, I
firmly believe that the you know, the Earth is going
to boil up due to carbon dioxide whatever, I'll just
(11:03):
hand them a white sheet of paper. I used to
carry one with me, and I'd say, okay, tell me,
tell or actually write down all the reasons why you
are one hundred percent confident that you know anthropogenic global warming,
the human contribution.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
To it is going to cause us to go over the.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
Edge and you know, boil over as a as a planet.
And they don't write anything down, they don't want anything down,
And then I'll start hitting them with why I don't
believe it.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
And I had a.
Speaker 2 (11:31):
Friend of mine who is a doctor, hard core liberal,
and he said, well, you're obviously this show used to
be called Global Cooling Radio in the very beginning, fourteen
years ago. And so I had a lot of facts
at my disposal and my lot of lot of weapons
in my armamentarium, and I would start hitting them with
(11:51):
all the reasons why I wasn't worried about it. And
one doctor actually said to me, this was actually a specialist,
and he said, Mark, you're obviously much better versed in
this global warming stuff than I am. But if I
were as well versed in it as you are, if
I were as knowledgeable in it as you are, then
I would be winning this argument. Isn't that an interesting thing?
(12:13):
And I said, so no, if you were as knowledgeable
about it as I am, you wouldn't be worried. You
wouldn't be winning the argument. You'd be on the same
side of the argument that I am. But no, the
guy knew nothing about it. I mean, brilliant man, brilliant doctor,
but he knew absolutely nothing about global warming, or especially
anthropogenic anthropogenic global warming. And he but he still believed
(12:37):
in it with all his heart. I mean, the same
way people believe in God.
Speaker 1 (12:41):
And so you're right.
Speaker 4 (12:42):
It's so important that you brought up environmentalism because that
is one of the great replacements for established religion, because again,
there's no such thing as a non religious person, and
environmentalism it has all the trappings of ancient paganism. This
is something that I started working on and writing about
twenty years ago. It includes child sacrifice. You know, the
environmentalists was among the first to tell us you shouldn't
(13:03):
have any children, so child sacrifice before the fact, you know,
don't even have any kids, right, kill the kids before
they even exist.
Speaker 3 (13:11):
We must, we have our prophets, you know.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Al Gore was the profit of global warming and warning
us of doom, just like a prophet for a pagan culture,
the giving up.
Speaker 3 (13:19):
Of total all of our all of our freedoms, you know.
Speaker 4 (13:24):
You know again like pagan every pagan culture and pagan
religion eventually asks for these things, ask for child sacrifice
in one way or the other, ask for the loss
of all liberty, all liberty completely, you know, whereas I
think Judaism, Christianity and even Islam say you only you
only have to listen to what God says.
Speaker 3 (13:46):
You know, you have liberty. Otherwise you have free will.
Speaker 4 (13:48):
Otherwise you know, and and and you have free will,
but you know, to follow what God says, but you
still have you.
Speaker 3 (13:54):
Know, your own choices.
Speaker 4 (13:55):
There's no no, no free will ever allowed in pagan
cultures at all. So it's Environmentalism is a big one.
Narcissism is another one too. You know, there's a lot
of people who worship themselves. But like I said, there's.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
No such thing as right right. There's no such thing
as a non religious person. That just isn't.
Speaker 4 (14:14):
And and the people who tell you how secular they
are and not religious they are are some of the
most religious people.
Speaker 3 (14:20):
I've ever met.
Speaker 4 (14:21):
I have never been recruited too heavily by religious people
to join their their actual religion. But environmentalists, secularists, leftists,
they never stopped trying to recruit me.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
I'm sure that's true. You have a lot of influence
and I'm sure they'd love to have you on their side.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
Jake.
Speaker 2 (14:40):
We have to take a quick break to do a
little business with America and then we will be right back. Sure,
(15:05):
and we are back with mister Jake Novak. A person
who offers political commentary across the board, has all kinds
of knowledge in different areas, not just the Middle East, Jake.
As we continue with Jake's Friday afternoon rant, what else
is on your mind? What else happened this week that
got under your skin?
Speaker 4 (15:24):
Well, you know, it's a little bit more than a
week removed that, of course, the results of it were
all about a lot of what happened in the news
this week. You know, Kamala Harris and that DNC cabal
in the White House again we don't know who they are,
committed a very overt and blatant act of anti Semitism
in passing over Josh Shapiro for Tim Walls, and like
(15:45):
every other rash anti Semitic decision made by regimes and
dictators over the course of history.
Speaker 3 (15:50):
They're paying for it dearly. Already the choice of.
Speaker 4 (15:53):
Tim Wallas has already blown up in their face on
a number of accounts. Of course, the stolen vallery issue,
which is not going away, which has kept him off
of the Sunday Morning Interview Shows now a couple of
weeks running, has kept him out of anything. Just like Kamala,
he also hasn't done an interview. He also hasn't done
a news conference. And it's also now his DUI back
from the nineties is also coming out and looking much
(16:15):
worse than just a.
Speaker 3 (16:16):
Run of the middle dui.
Speaker 4 (16:18):
He lied about what a police officer said, denigrating the
police officer used his service as a veteran as an
excuse for his DUI, saying he lost his hearing, which
wasn't true.
Speaker 3 (16:27):
I had nothing to do with the arrest. But that aside, this.
Speaker 4 (16:33):
Is an overt active anti Semitism, which if this were
any other minority, would be bringing those members of that
minority out to the streets rightfully so to angrily protest.
And the fact that Jos Shapiro went along with it
and showed no respect for himself or his religion and
tradition by going to the rally to introduce him Walls
and being all gung ho about it doesn't change my
(16:54):
mind on Iota. He's a disgrace and by the way,
his political career is over. He will never do anything
other than being the governor of Pennsylvania. I understand that's
a pretty good gig. But if he had ever had
any designs on the White House or the Senate thinking
the Democrats will repay him dearly for his ability to
set beside, his agreement to set aside, he is another
thing coming. He's now there, little dog boy, and we'll
(17:16):
ever and so we'll ever be that. So to me,
this is a really really scary situation. It's part of clearly,
and it's indicative about cabal that's running mean that that
cabale that's running the White House again, it isn't Joe
Biden is anti Semitic, is pro Iran, and I'm sure
that there are handlers.
Speaker 3 (17:32):
In Iran and the people who pay them off or
them on.
Speaker 4 (17:35):
We're quite pleased with the decision to pass over Josh Shapiro.
And if they think that this is going to get
them some peace at the Democratic National Convention again, they're
going to be sadly mistaken.
Speaker 3 (17:44):
There will be violent.
Speaker 4 (17:45):
Anti Israel, antisemitic protests both in and outside of the
convention this coming week. You can get you can bet
on it. And to me, this is just a it's
just an incredible outrage and hopefully it will act. And
I'm calling it the Shapiro affair because it reminds me
of the Dreyfu affair from nineteenth century Europe, when France
had a major spying scandal that they erroneously blamed on
a Jewish officer in the French army, and it woke
(18:07):
up all of European jeury to the fact that despite
the fact that they had citizenship, now they were not
equal citizens and they needed to think about their future
and not unfortunately not enough of them got out before
the Holocaust, but they had it.
Speaker 3 (18:18):
They couldn't say they.
Speaker 4 (18:19):
Didn't have a head start and they didn't have a warning.
This is a serious warning to the Jewish people in
this country. The Democratic Party is an I call them
the Antismocrats. Now they are the antisemocrat party. And for
everyone else who is not Jewish, understand, you know, they
always start with us. It's actually never only about the
Jews or really even about the Jews. It's about being
against the rules of law, it's about being against any
(18:40):
kind of civilization. They start with the Jews because killing
and persecuting us gets you the least pushback, but once
you get away with that, it's a lot easier to
do it to everyone else.
Speaker 3 (18:49):
So this is a very very dire.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Development in American history, a very big low point for US.
I hope that it's pushed back upon by at least
a clear defeat of Harrison Walls that it'd be really
great if this, if the controversy surrounding Weals forces him
being done from the ticket.
Speaker 3 (19:05):
I know that's kind of a long shot, but that
actually would be great.
Speaker 4 (19:07):
But this is a sad, sad development, one that I'm
watching obviously very closely.
Speaker 2 (19:12):
Well, let's let's talk about the anti Semitic explosion that's
happening right now. I mean, we have Jewish kids on
college campuses asking for protection. It's so bad, Which is
one way of saying you all these people who say, oh, well,
I'm really more of an anti Zionist, I'm not more.
I'm not an anti Semitic person. And then then why
(19:32):
are American jew kids on college campuses, you know, pleading
for protection because they feel so in endangered.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
And what how did.
Speaker 2 (19:42):
This extremely sharp rise in anti Semitic behavior happened in
the last few years?
Speaker 1 (19:50):
What what what caused this?
Speaker 4 (19:53):
Well, what causes all the other things that we know
are bad about leftism and the Democratic Party in general.
You know, when we saw the like affirmative action and Dee,
I understand something. Jewish people don't act or they're not
any better behave than anybody else in the world. But
we have this problem. We're the ones who brought some
of these ideas to the world. I wish more of
my fellow Jews followed these rules that we brought to
(20:14):
the world, but we did. We brought this idea of meritocracy.
We brought this idea of searching for perfect justice with,
by the way, the understanding that we'll never get there.
Speaker 3 (20:22):
It's just not trying.
Speaker 4 (20:24):
Not trying for perfect justice, not trying for perfect meritocracy
is not the world you want to live in. Good
luck living in a society where they say that we
can't get there, we're not going to even try it.
Speaker 3 (20:33):
That's scary.
Speaker 4 (20:34):
So when you saw the Democratic Party moving away from
even pretending to be in favor of meritocracy, I would say,
erasing all the good things that Bill Clinton did for
the Democratic Party.
Speaker 3 (20:44):
He got them to be more pro capitalists.
Speaker 4 (20:45):
He reformed welfare, he cut capital gain sex, he was
bringing them to and he brought forth a bill called
the Personal Responsibility at which of course actually passed because
that was what they called his welfare reform. Of course,
he lost his ability to become the poster boy for
personal responsibility because of Monica Lewinsky, which all joking aside,
is actually a tragedy. It's a tragedy because here you
(21:07):
had a Democrat who was pushing for something that was
really good. I mean a lot of people think that,
especially economically, Bill Clinton's presidency was like Reagan's third term.
I would agree to some extent. So as soon as
I started moving away from that again, I knew that
anti Semitism was coming around the corner. Because as soon
as you start doing that, you start saying to yourself,
(21:27):
it's only about who you know. I mean, think about
think about the things that the Old Testament brings to us.
It brings to us radical ideas which are still radical
to this day.
Speaker 3 (21:35):
It brings to us the.
Speaker 4 (21:36):
Idea that it doesn't matter what your skin color is,
it matters what your conduct is. It brings to us,
it doesn't matter what your birth order is. Right, all
the heroes of the early stories of the Bible, they're
the younger brother, right, not the older one. All of
ancient society was considered to be the master of the domain.
All these things pushing the idea that what you do,
the choices you make, are what make you a good
or a bad person, not whether or not the gods
(21:57):
woke up on the right side of the bed, whether
or not your skin color was the right thing, whether
or not you were the oldest or youngest, whatever it is.
Speaker 3 (22:04):
And as soon as the.
Speaker 4 (22:05):
Democrats started moving away more and more from that, I
knew that we were in trouble.
Speaker 3 (22:09):
So that's giving you kind of the long philosophical answer.
Speaker 4 (22:11):
But as far as step by step stuff, you have
massive amounts of money coming into the Democratic Party from Iran,
from Cutter all those kinds of places, you know, and
that has a lot to do with it. And anti
Semitism is a big part of the package that they
are selling to American congress people, to universities, even to Hollywood.
(22:32):
You know, Obviously there's a lot of Jewish people who
are still in leadership positions in Hollywood, but you know,
they're not religious, and they certainly don't have a lot
of respect for themselves. Even Steven Spielberg has been terrible
about what's been going on in Israel, incredibly silent, doesn't
say the right things.
Speaker 3 (22:45):
He's very confused individual.
Speaker 4 (22:47):
So the point is they're they're getting us on a
lot of different fronts, and it has a lot to
do with their influence. You know, Iran is a really
horrifically anti Semitic entity.
Speaker 3 (22:57):
They've got a lot of.
Speaker 4 (22:58):
Money thanks to Biden and Obama, and they're getting their
money's worth all the time. So that's the answer, you know,
the philosophical answer, and also the rudimentary, sort of nuts
and Bolt's answer, and none of them will give us
a good picture of where we're going in this country.
Speaker 2 (23:13):
Well, David Horowitz always said that there was an unholy
alliance between radical Islam and the American left. So now
that the American left is getting more and more money,
he's looking more and more correct.
Speaker 4 (23:31):
Right, But there's a way out of that too. You know,
it's not all Islam. You have Saudi Arabia and the UAE,
who over the last ten years have become much less
anti Semitic. They've gotten rid of the textbooks that were
anti Semitic. Saudi Arabia kicked out the anti Semitic clerics
from their country. We're also anti American. So this argument, like,
because I hear this all the time, Well, yes, they're
anti Semitic, but you know, there's no other way to
(23:51):
deal with them, and for the sake of a greater good,
we have to sort of look the other way.
Speaker 3 (23:54):
No, you don't.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
Saudi Arabia is the richest Muslim country. United Air of
Emirates is small, but is a major business leader in
the world. There's other countries like Bahrain and Morocco and
Oman that are also moving in this direction. It's the
Nazi influence, and I mean literal Nazi influence on Islam,
which started in the late nineteen twenties with actual funding
for the Forefront of the Muslim Brotherhood, that is the
(24:18):
reason for this anti semitism, The genocidal anti semitism. Yes,
there was some anti semitism in ancient and medieval Islam,
but it was never genocidal.
Speaker 3 (24:26):
It was never go kill them.
Speaker 4 (24:27):
It was make them second or third class citizens, which
is not acceptable either. But there's a difference, right, this
is this is absolutely this argument that we have to
deal with these horrible anti Semites or otherwise we can't
deal with any Muslims at all is not true.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
Yeah, I find that most Americans are a little confused
about Muslims and you know, extreme Islam, and like when
you see groups like Lgbtqia Mamas and I mean, I
just I don't understand it.
Speaker 1 (24:59):
It's like, what do you do?
Speaker 3 (25:01):
Uh?
Speaker 2 (25:01):
I mean, don't you realize that that you know, if
you were with them, then a sure your run country,
you'd be thrown off a rooftops and there be no
penalty for that. I mean, Americans, I can't explain it.
But you know, there's a certain group of us that
seem to just always be looking for some kind of
a cause to get behind, and maybe it's filling that
religious void that you talked about.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
Yeah, well I'll answer your question.
Speaker 4 (25:24):
You know about why there's LGBT people who are for
Hamas and for Gaza. Why are we assuming that they
don't want to be killed? Mark, It's about the killing.
Remember I said that anti Semitism isn't really about the Jews.
It's just about creating chaos and destroying civilization. They want blood.
If some of it is theirs, so be it. They
want blood, they want no rules against it. They no
rules against murder, they want no rules against rape, they
(25:46):
want no.
Speaker 3 (25:46):
Rules against anything.
Speaker 4 (25:48):
And if that means that they're in the in the fray,
that's It's kind of like when we think that sending suicidal,
crazy homicides or homicidal maniacs into prison is some kind.
Speaker 3 (25:57):
Of punishment for them.
Speaker 4 (25:58):
You've never been to a maximum you know, prison facility, prison,
in a state prison.
Speaker 3 (26:03):
It's like they're heaven on earth. For these people.
Speaker 4 (26:05):
That's exactly the world they love, which is why we
got to keep them there.
Speaker 3 (26:09):
You know, they love that stuff. They love that chaos.
Speaker 4 (26:12):
I don't think all these gay people marching for gods
that don't know the realities.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
I think they just are. Absolutely these are people who
want anarchy in the most violent sense. They've seen the
purge one too many times, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2 (26:24):
Wow, that's an interesting take on the whole thing. Well,
Jacob almost used up all your time, But what else
is on your mind? Is there anything else you want
to cover, well, I would.
Speaker 4 (26:34):
Just say, you know, I thought one of the biggest
stories in the last few days that people ignored was
the leak story that the Justice Department may look to
break up Google now. From their mouth to God's ears,
Google should have been broken up a long long time ago.
But I have a sinking feeling that this was just
a warning from the Biden Harris Democratic cabal to Google
that they better continue with their election interference like they
(26:56):
did in twenty twenty.
Speaker 3 (26:57):
They better try to blackmall people like you and.
Speaker 4 (26:59):
Me because I was hit by it in twenty twenty,
or else, or we will break you up.
Speaker 3 (27:04):
But honestly that Google needs to be broken up.
Speaker 4 (27:06):
That was a huge story that almost no one talked
about outside of the business news world, and even they
didn't talk about it enough. Google is the de facto
only real publisher in the whole world. They have massive
amounts of power. It's the most obvious monopoly in my lifetime.
It needs to be broken up. And hopefully the next
president will do that.
Speaker 3 (27:23):
That's all I can say.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
Well, I hope the next president will and I hope
the next president is Donald J.
Speaker 1 (27:29):
Trump. And before you go what's your take on that.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
I know you said it's going to be a slog fest,
but do you think Trump can pull it out, or
are they gonna cheat again or what are.
Speaker 4 (27:37):
Your thoughts now. I still think that Donald Trump will
win the election. I didn't think that before June twenty seventh,
because I felt like the Democratic Shenanigans would be fired
up enough to do it.
Speaker 3 (27:48):
I think that changing a candidate in midstream.
Speaker 4 (27:51):
Despite this momentary bump in the polls of Kamala Harris,
which has received but she isn't even up by much
from this bump. She should be getting a much bigger
bump considering the love fest the news media with her.
So I didn't think it, but I never thought it
was going to be a landslide for either side. It's
going to be very close. It's going to come down
to again a few states. It's going to come down
to a net of one hundred thousand votes or so.
(28:12):
But if I had to choose one state where it's
going to be decided, it's Pennsylvania. And that's another reason
why I think Trump's going to win, because the fact
that they passed over Josh Shapiro, who could have helped
with not with people loving him, but with the infrastructure,
whether it's mail in ballots or other things that could
have helped them shenanigans or not. The fact that he
won't be as motivated to do that now, and maybe
he won't be even able to do that now, is
(28:35):
very encouraging. And I saw a number of polls today
that showed Trump ahead in Pennsylvania even even now, and
I think in a couple of weeks they'll be even
further ahead there. So to me, look at the Pennsylvania
polls that will tell you everything.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
You need to know.
Speaker 4 (28:47):
And again, gun to my head right now, I say
Donald Trump wins similar margins that he had in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
And that's the way I feel right now. But again,
I don't think it's going to be a landslide by
by a long shot.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
Okay, to Google, Item one on Trump's list needs to
be the breakup of Google.
Speaker 3 (29:06):
Break up at Google.
Speaker 4 (29:07):
He's got so many item ones, you know, I mean,
that's the whole thing. Understand that if he wins the election,
that's only giving us a chance at saving this country.
There needs to be a Trump administration that is ten
times literally ten times more proactive than the first Trump administration.
We need to cut the size of government, We need
to break up some of these monopolies. We need to
sanction Iran and get the money trail out of there.
(29:28):
We need so much work.
Speaker 3 (29:29):
To be done.
Speaker 4 (29:30):
But luckily it's all kind of clear what needs to
be done. He just needs to get the right people
in place to be willing to do that. And he
didn't have that last time. So let's hope he gets
that this No, he certainly did not.
Speaker 2 (29:40):
That's and I think that's the one big lesson learned,
is that he just didn't have the right people. I
had Peter Navarro on the other day and he was
talking about how he'd come in on the weekends to
work and it basically be him and Donald Trump, and
he said, you only have the White House for four years,
You've got to make use of every.
Speaker 1 (29:59):
Single day of it.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
So yeah, and a lot of the people, you know,
the resistance, that a lot of these people were working
against him, and that was that was just absolutely crazy.
But what if Judge Marshawn throws Trump in jail before then,
does it help him or hurt him?
Speaker 4 (30:16):
Well, I think it won't do much either way. It'll
hurt the country. I think it'll get a lot of
people very very upset.
Speaker 3 (30:22):
He definitely will do that. What I don't think is
for sure that it'll get the chance.
Speaker 4 (30:27):
We are moving in this discussion without realizing that there
probably is going to be yet another delay one way
or the other. I don't know whether it's going to
come from the courts itself or from or which quarter
it will come from, but I am dubious that this
sentencing date will go as scheduled. And so that's yeah,
that's one thing they need to remember that it may
not happen. But I don't doubt that Mershon will sendence
(30:49):
into something. And then, of course it depends how long
it is. If it's a week or two in jail,
it will absolutely help Trump. But if it's you know,
one day or thirty days, I think it's going to
have it'll ire up both sides to kind of an
equal effect. But certainly we'll be I can tell you
who would be bad for It'll be bad for the
United States of America. A terrible, terrible line will have
been crossed, and it'll be very difficult for us to
(31:09):
get back across it again.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
I think you're correct on that as well, Jake Novak,
Ladies and gentlemen, Jake, tell people how they can follow you.
Speaker 4 (31:18):
Best place for longer form stuff and daily stuff also
short is Jakenovak dot substack dot com.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
I do business stuff there.
Speaker 4 (31:26):
I do my five and three daily round of three
minutes is all you need to get all the news
of the day. And then of course follow me on
Twitter X. This is where I put a lot of
my stuff, I mean, everything else I'm doing in maybe
other places, I'll at least put the link to it
on Twitter X.
Speaker 3 (31:38):
And my Twitter handle X handle is.
Speaker 4 (31:40):
At Jakejake and why it's Jake twice at Jake Jake
and why I put everything up there.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
Very good, Jake, thanks for being with us today. It's
always a pleasure to have you on the show. Hope
to have you back very very soon and we'll see
how how some of these predictions age.
Speaker 3 (31:56):
It was my honor. Thank you so much.
Speaker 4 (31:59):
But you've been listening to the Tea Party Power Hour
with Mark Gillar
Popular Podcasts
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.