Josh Bernstein Part Two - Preserving Liberty

Josh Bernstein is by far one of the most cancelled Podcasters in America.  Why?  Because he's not afraid to speak the truth at a level that causes liberals to spontaniously combust. 

You'll want to read is first book, Preserving Liberty available October 8th wherever good books are sold. 


BIO: Josh Bernstein, author of Preserving Liberty: Bold and Brave Solutions to Save America and Create Permanent Freedom, is a talk show host, political analyst, commentator, and professional speaker, and is one of America’s most sought-after television and radio guests in media today.  Josh has been called a “political savant” by the late legendary Hall of Fame broadcaster Barry Farber due to his almost encyclopedic breakdown on many of the important issues of our times. Josh was the former national spokesman for The Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC.US), which is one of America’s leading seniors’ health advocacy groups—with over two million members. As a highly in-demand guest, Josh delivers a unique and original perspective that is thought provoking, engaging, truthful, and well sourced. His main areas of expertise include but are not limited to: world affairs, globalism, nationalism, healthcare, current events, social media, political trends, media bias, academia, immigration, and national security.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:16):
It's time for that little podcast down in Texas, the
Tea Party Power Hour with Mark Glare.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
Welcome to the Tea Party Power Hour. I am your host,
Mark Glar, and we have a friend back on the
show today, mister Josh Bernstein. He is the author of
Preserving Liberty. He's also the host of the Josh Bernstein
Uncensored podcast. I get that right, Josh, Yeah, excellent, Josh,

(00:57):
welcome to the show.

Speaker 1 (00:59):
Welcome back to back the program with you.

Speaker 2 (01:00):
I'm gonna say, welcome back to the show is what
I should have said. Well, Josh, I'm sure, like everyone else,
you watched the vice presidential debate on Tuesday evening. Oh
I got to laugh already and I haven't even said
Tim's name. So tell me what is your take on
the vice presidential debate.

Speaker 1 (01:21):
Well, I think that the first thing that I saw
with as and anyone else did, is that this caricature
that the media has portrayed jd Vance to be, you know,
this weird, strange, you know adult that's like a fire
breathing dragon ready to like grab your babies and eat them.

(01:44):
You know, that's the type of mentality that they talk
about in the media about JD. Vance. But the American
people had an opportunity to see somebody that was calm, cool, collected, measured, articulate,
really like a policy wonk, you know, somebody that really
knows the issues and most importantly was able to kind of,

(02:06):
you know, put them all together and really just lay
out President Trump and his vision for America moving forward.
And I thought it was a masterful, you know, you know,
ability to kind of do that. On the other side,
you had a self professed knucklehead, and this knucklehead lived

(02:29):
up to his own term, but he just didn't look
like he was comfortable. Number one. His eyes were darting
all over the place. Number two, and you know when
you're friends with school shooters and all the crazy things
that he said. I can't imagine that helped the campaign
much at all. And so I think what ultimately happened

(02:53):
here is that anyone that was a fence sit or
anyone that was like not one percent sure what they're
planning on doing, you know, to vote for Trump or
not defense stators. I think what has happened is from
the debate, you're going to see more movement back, you know,
towards President Trump. Because JD. Vance was able to kind

(03:15):
of calm the nerves and the rhetoric out there because
maybe a lot of these people didn't know who he was,
and they only knew him from the description that the
media portrayed him to be. So I think what he
did is he softened that image. And I think what
he ultimately did was say that the president, who's just

(03:36):
about eighty years old, President Trump, if God forbid something
was to have happened to him, we have a young, capable,
you know, intelligent person, you know, that could take over
and could govern the country. So I think that was
the number one thing that I would take away from it.

Speaker 2 (03:54):
Well, and that's a very good take. I think you
were as diplomatic in your takes as JD. Vance was
in his debate with the Walls. Our mutual friend A. J.
Rice was on yesterday and he said that Tampon. His

(04:15):
exact words were tampon. Tim looked like he was holding
in a fart the entire time. That's that's a j man.
I was like, oh God, I thought I thought he's
a funny guy.

Speaker 1 (04:30):
He is.

Speaker 2 (04:30):
He every every one was hysterical when he was on
last time. Somebody, well, actually, my mother in law told
AJ this shud my mother in law and my mom
called and said that guy was funny. I said, yeah,
he was. I was wondering what he was going to
do this time, but I thought that was a very
interesting take on it as well. Let's talk about the moderators,

(04:50):
those moderators who said they weren't going to fact check,
and then he had uh miss O'Donnell give. You know,
they said that jd vance Man splained, I think she
was liberal splaining with that climate change nonsense. I wish
he would have looked her in the eye and said,
you know, I would have to say, I think there's

(05:12):
a lot more skepticism than you think there is. There's
a there are a lot more people who disagree than
you think, you know. Yeah, And as for the experts
or you know, experts said that Hunter Biden's laptop was
rushing disinformation. I mean, you know, you can't always get
with what the experts say, and I do think he
made that point. Well, But at any rate, you wanted

(05:33):
to come on today because you have some advice for
President Trump as far as campaign strategy between now and
the election.

Speaker 1 (05:45):
Yeah, absolutely, I mean, I think, first and foremost, my
thoughts and prayers go out to these people out in
northwestern North Carolina. These people are suffering, They've lost everything.
I mean, this is you know, Kamala's Katrina basically, and
it might even be worse than Katrina. And the horrific

(06:07):
response or lack thereof a response at all to these people,
and then to insult them by giving them, you know,
seven hundred and fifty dollars. I mean, you know, they
have nothing, They've had, no no houses, no nothing. And
then to go online you have to apply for it. Well,
how are they going to apply for anything online? They
don't have a computer anymore, they don't have internet, they

(06:30):
don't have a connect, they don't have anything. So it
was such a horrific, horrific uh you know, response or
or non response from the government, and coming off the
heels of that successful vice presidential debate and of course
this terrible hurricane and non response. I think President Trump

(06:51):
can win the election handedly and within minutes of the
polls closing, if he immediately goes out and he puts
together he puts together a Jerry Lewis style telethon. Now
I want people to think back. If you're older out there,

(07:12):
remember nine to eleven. When nine to eleven happened, After
nine to eleven happened, there was a huge, like Jerry
Lewis style telethon on television, and you had all these
you know, celebrities from Oprah Winfrey to al Pacino to
Bruce Springsteen to all these different people, and they were
answering the phones and they were taking donations and they

(07:35):
were raising money for the victims of nine to eleven. Well,
fast forward to twenty twenty four, and President Trump could
do the same thing. He could announce that, Hey, next
I don't know, next Wednesday, we're going to do, you know,
a fundraiser, or Tuesday of next week, we're going to
do a fundraiser. It's going to be public. It's going
to be you know, on television so everyone can see

(07:58):
it in prime time. It's going to be one hundred
percent all the donations will be going directly to the victims. Uh.
And this is not a campaign event or anything like that.
And then basically he could just have that televised, maybe
from mar Lago or wherever it may be, and he
could be personally answering the phone on camera and taking

(08:21):
people's donations, but not just him obviously, JD. You would
be sitting up there. You know, you'd have RFK Junior,
You'd have Tulsi, you'd have Tucker Carlston. You know, you'd
have Charlie Kirk, so many other people that are in
and around the Trump orbit, Peter Navarro, all these different
people answering the phone and taking donations miked up so

(08:43):
that you know, he's, oh, thank you so much, you know,
John from Las Vegas. We appreciate your support. God bless you,
you know, that kind of thing. And I think if
he did that and he raised millions dollars like that,
what that would do is that would just completely the
optics of that where the administration is forgetting these people,

(09:04):
doesn't want them, doesn't want them to fly, you know,
rescue drones, doesn't want them to give them supplies because
you know they're not going to get paid for it,
and all this other stuff. I mean, these people are
angry and they are pissed off. And what that would
do is not only help him from the standpoint of
the Swing States, but everybody around the entire country would

(09:25):
see his true you know, heart and love and respect
for the American people. And I think that he would
gain millions and millions of voters, and it would be
too big to rake, and it would be you know,
a forty nine at a fifty state you know Reagan
type of you know, slaughter in the election. So that's

(09:48):
an important tactic that I would love to see the
President do. And I've said that to him down. I've tried. Yeah,
I've tried to get it to him into others. So
I've put it on you know, social media, truth, social X,
I've sent it to Elon, I've sent it to a
lot of people that are close to him. So I

(10:09):
really hope that he does this because you know, the
opportunity to strike is right now. And if he did that,
my god, he would help all these people. Number one.
Number one, that's the obvious reason. And number two, he
would really kind of, you know, bring this election into
his corner almost one hundred percent.

Speaker 2 (10:31):
Okay, I'm gonna play the devil's advocate for just a second.
When I was a kid, I probably five six years
in a row, I went out with my little jar
with the Jerry Lewis Labor Day telethon sticker on it
and collected money and that I'd go down on the
TV station and empty my jar in the barrel that
they had there. And one of the things I picked
up from that time period is that they and of

(10:54):
course things were different back then. They didn't have CNN,
there was no national chance. Everything was done through the
local affiliates. But they would say that they started planning
for next year the day after the telethon, because it
was so time consuming to plan the telethons. So I'm

(11:15):
guessing that you're probably looking at a scaleback version of this,
not a yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, like a four or
five hour type of deal.

Speaker 1 (11:25):
I mean, I'm thinking about something on Prime Time that
he markets, that he advertises, that kind of thing, and
then you know, he does a four or five hour
maybe even do two nights, you know, four or five
hours for two nights, whatever it may be. And then
you know, almost similar to the nine to eleven one,
maybe not Jerry Lewis, more like the nine to eleven

(11:45):
one where you had celebrities answering the phones and taking
donations and they were miked up so you could hear
what they were saying to the people that were calling
in and things like that. You know, similar to like
maybe like even like like a c SPAN you know
where you hear the caller and you hear the person,
you know, that kind of thing. But instead having all
the donations, it's not a campaign event. It's strictly for

(12:09):
donations and donations only. And should he should they should
reach out the Trump campaign should reach out to Samaritan Purse,
not the Red Cross, because the Red Cross, in my opinion,
is almost a fraud organization. Seventy percent of the donations
only go to the people. The other thirty percent goes

(12:31):
to the fat cats and you know, the CEOs and
all the people that work there. Where Samaritan Purse, it's
like ninety six ninety seven percent of all the money
donated goes directly to the victims. So he should reach
out his campaign and he should partner with Samaritan Perse
as the sponsor of the event. And that would be

(12:52):
another way to kick the Red Cross you know where,
and instead give it to another organization that's a conservative
Christian organization. You know. It's almost like go fund me
instead of using GoFundMe, use gifts saying go Jacob Wells's company,
who I know, great guy. They're a Christian based fundraiser
and they don't censor they don't try to stop donations,

(13:15):
they don't try to steal donations from you know, conservatives
like GoFundMe does and things like that. So that's why
I said, I think it would be a great opportunity
to not only help those people and try to make
their lives better and bring them back to being you know,
holes and a whole and all that, but it would
also help him, you know, politically.

Speaker 2 (13:36):
I think you're definitely right. It would help him politically,
and it would certainly help those people who right now
need a lot of help. So I mean, sure, why not.
I mean, if you thought about doing some artificial intelligence
memes where you've got Trump posting a television and maybe
some of the people in the background, I would you

(13:57):
kind of I would like to see that.

Speaker 1 (14:00):
Yeah, I'm not really good with that type of stuff.
I'm good at saving the world in the country, but
I'm not really good with the whole AI stuff. Nor
do I really like it at all. I think it's
pretty during dangerous to be quite honest.

Speaker 2 (14:14):
Uh, But you know, in this case, it wouldn't be
for malicious purposes. It would be good right, just throughout
an idea. I'm jealous. You've got ideas, and I didn't
have any today. Okay, that's you said you had several ideas.
Let's let's talk about some of those other ideas.

Speaker 1 (14:35):
Yeah. Well, I mean I think some of the campaign
ads that you know, he could be running, especially now.
You know, if you if you haven't traversed through social media,
the people are angry, they are as, they are really
upset with the government, and I think that you could
do some campaign ads where you show the devastation in

(14:59):
these ads, you show these people how upset they are
and yelling, and you know, how they're lashing out at
Kamala and then you can cut to her, you know,
fundraising and cackling and that kind of thing, and then
you know, I'm Donald Trump and I approve this message.
So I think that there's a lot of there's a

(15:21):
lot of meat if you want, you know, out there
right now, especially with what's going on. And I think,
you know, in the next week or so, after the VBT,
the vice presidential debate, as well as this horrific disaster
and hurricane, you're going to start to see the polls
shift regardless of what happens, towards President Trump, because there's

(15:45):
no way that anyone with a sane thought in their
head can could continue to support a government that abandons
its people like this. And so this is her Katrina,
This is her Katrina, and I believe it has changed
the entire trajectory of the race. And you know, we

(16:08):
don't even know if North Carolina and some of these
areas are going to even be able to vote, but
I'll tell you right now, I would have predict that
Trump was going to win North Carolina by anywhere between
three and five points. And if they can get things
together and they can maybe go to paper ballots instead
of you know, machines and actually get a chance to

(16:30):
vote before election day, I think you're looking at a
minimum of ten as much as fifteen to maybe even
twenty percent victory in North Carolina. That would be my
that would be my guess after this forget it, Yeah, yeah,
that would be great.

Speaker 2 (16:48):
When you look at the way the media is trying
to spend this, we have Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and
the media saying just heard Jessica Tarloff last night saying
the people have everything they need, Everything is fine. You know,

(17:10):
there are no problems happening. And I think it'd be
kind of interesting, not with Tarlov, but with both Biden
and Harris to have them saying that while you have
a background, yeah, as far as what's really happening, because
everybody knows that's not the case. But the Left is
really really good at gaslighting and that old saying, you know, accuse,

(17:33):
accuse your opponent of that, which you are good what
you're doing, and that is you know, when they were
calling jd Vance weird when they've got this idiot. I mean,
there was a video going viral the other day we
was grabbing Waltz, was grabbing his crotch. I mean, you

(17:54):
got to kind of control that kind of thing. And
you know, we lied about being deployed, and he has
that goofy look that he always does, and there was
one where he kind of ran out on stage and
then pointed to his finger back over his right shoulder
in some kind of weird fashion. And I just thought,
this guy's a creep. He's a creeper. Babysit your kids.

(18:19):
I mean, I just know, I don't think so. And
so when they were saying that JD Vance was weird,
I thought, do you guys really think that gas lighting
on jd Vance's demeanor is going to somehow make people
not notice what a screwball tampon Tim is.

Speaker 1 (18:41):
Yeah, really, I know, And you know the first thing
you said, I'll address. You're right. That's why I've called
the Democrats for many, many years the Projectocrats, because they
like to project onto everybody else what they are doing. Right.
The Russia, No, Russia, Russia, Russia No, Actually was Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine.

(19:02):
It was Ukraine that interfered in the election, not Russia.
You know, the whole impeachment thing. All these different things
that they say that we're doing, they're the ones that
are actually doing it all the time, and so they
use deceptive language obviously, right, The Inflation Reduction Act, the
Employee Free Choice Act, the Affordable Care Act. I mean,

(19:24):
all these things are just the opposite of what they
actually are intended and what they mean. And so yeah,
I think that's a that's a big, big part of it.
But this Tim Walls guy, I mean, do the American
people really want to vote for Tim Conway? You know
from the count Taro Bonechos. I remember, maybe I'm dating myself.

(19:47):
I don't know, because you know, I'm going to be
fifty soon. But that's what he reminds me of. He
reminds me of of Tim Conway. You remember the one
episode where you would like hit him and he would like,
he would like it was like a bubble, like a
we he like the and then come back and they
made him with the little tiny legs. That's what it
reminds me of. I did it reminds you of that?

Speaker 2 (20:08):
I am surprised that someone I am surprised that someone
fifty remembers that because I'm sixty one. And yes, Carol
Burnett was you know, I forget what night it was
Saturday night and whatever night it was my parents, you
know which, Yeah, get get my brother and myself on
the couch sitting with them, and we would almost watch

(20:28):
it like we were in a theater, even though the
televisions were a lot smaller back then. But I do
remember Tim Conway. I think one person said that he
looks like John McCain. I don't think so. I think
Tim Conway is.

Speaker 1 (20:44):
Yeah, I think Tim Conway, I.

Speaker 2 (20:45):
Bet in comparison.

Speaker 1 (20:47):
And you know your audience is going to be looking up,
who's this Tim Conway guy that's got Josh Bernstein's talking
about exactly.

Speaker 2 (20:53):
They're not going to know. Just it's like talking about
Captain Kangaroo. They have no idea who you're talking about,
all those shows from back in the day. But again
that's a that's a really good comparison. Now you mentioned
words and what they're going to call it, and that
type thing that is a Democrat specialty as far as

(21:16):
I'm concerned. I mean, for instance, killing an unborn baby
is female reproductive healthcare rights. I mean that's pretty clever.
And cutting off little kids' body parts, their sexual body parts,
breasts on the girls and the penis on the boy,
that is gender affirming healthcare. And they just have all

(21:41):
these these different names that they'll pull out when they
need to. I mean, January sixth, you had a million
people there, you know, or more, and two percent got
a little rowdy, went into the Capitol and they're saying
it's an insurrection. I think a lot of were afraid
to say this. But if there were ever an insurrection,

(22:05):
especially a planned insurrection, yeah, to talk about it exactly,
everybody would have had a gun. You know. Some people
had a gun in their car, some people had a
gun back in their hotel room. But everybody would have
been carrying a gun, not a flagpole. To suggest that

(22:26):
the conservatives in this country are so stupid that we
would try to have an insurrection with a flagpole as
a weapon. It just shows how dumb the Democrats actually are.
They'll believe anything. I mean, if the million people showed
up prepared for an insurrection, armed and ready to go,

(22:48):
I mean, this would be the United States of Donald
Trump right now, it.

Speaker 1 (22:52):
Would have been over exactly.

Speaker 2 (22:54):
And so they would think that we're going to show
up with some flagpoles and I don't know what a
weapon were found.

Speaker 1 (23:01):
And here here's something else. During the debate, JD. Vance
he did a very good job, but he missed a
couple of great opportunities for knockout punches. And what you
just brought up reminded me of one of them, because
when he started talking about the insurrection when I'm Tim,
Tim Tanneman square Tim, when he started talking about the

(23:22):
insurrection and things like that, all JD. Vans had to
do was say, Governor Walls, I'd like to ask you
two quick questions. The first question is this, how many
people that are being held right now as political prisoners
under under this regime in Washington, how many of them
have been charged with US Code eighteen twenty three eighty three.

(23:46):
And then he'd go, because you wouldn't know what to say, right,
And then you could follow that up with do you
even know what that is? And he would have been
right on the spot and he would have shown how
stupid he is right on national television and JD Events
would say, here, let me fill that in for you.
It's called insurrection. Do you know how many people were
charged with actual insurrection?

Speaker 2 (24:09):
I thought it was zero.

Speaker 1 (24:10):
It is zero, Oka, it is zero. And so what
I'm saying is he would have been able to take
this whole insurrection narrative and destroy it within seconds in
front of the entire country. He could say, not one
person has been charged with insurrection, but yet everyone in
the media wants to call this and what happened an insurrection,
but yet not one person was charged with actual insurrection.

(24:33):
Does anybody want to know and take a guess why?
Because what happened did not merit that charge. That's number one,
And Governor Wallas, I'd like to ask it one final
question here about January sixth, Do you know how the
doors open? Do they open from the inside? Or from
the outside done end of this whole insurrection and all

(24:56):
this other garbage. It would have been over just like that,
because we know that the do open from the inside,
and clearly we know that this was a federal setup.
When they couldn't take it back to the House of
Representatives where there was more representatives and states run by
Republican legislatures than there were Democrat legislatures, they would have
taken it, put it back into the House of Representatives.

(25:18):
They would have voted. Trump would have won by three
or four votes, right, because each state only gets one vote,
So California gets one vote. It's the same as you know,
Pennsylvania's one vote or Arizona's or whatever. And they would
have voted that way. They would have solved it that way.
But instead they knew that they were going to do that,
so they needed a backup plan. And that backup plan

(25:41):
was devised by the Capitol Police. It was devised by
the deep state inside of Washington. It was devised by
the Republican and Democrat Party, both of them, I believe,
not just one. And they said, Okay, we have to
create this fake insurrection so that we can take the
focus off of them going to the House of Representatives

(26:03):
to vote to see who you know, they're going to
choose for president, and instead we can trap these innocent
people that wanted to redress their government. And that's what happened.
And I've said this so many times and I'll say
it again right now. November third of twenty twenty was
the insurrection. January sixth of twenty twenty one was the

(26:26):
cover up or fed surrection. And I hope everybody gets
a chance to hear that one.

Speaker 2 (26:32):
Have you seen the movie on j six where they
focused on ray Epps And at one point I think
he had something like, you know, was it six or
eight people escored him away from there. I mean, yeah, yeah,
you can actually see it on the video. It's like
he sort of see them snaking through the crowd. If
ray Epps was nobody special, of course, I know they

(26:54):
gave him what six months probation or something. If he
was no one special, then why did he have such
a large entourage escorting him out of the melee. That's
what I want to know exactly. And plus he's like
they've got text messages where he's telling his son that
he instigated the insurrection and why in the hell didn't

(27:15):
they find that bomb outside of the DNC headquarters. I mean,
there's just so there are so many questions you can ask,
just like the.

Speaker 1 (27:23):
Twenty eight one planted by the FBI or Capitol police.

Speaker 2 (27:27):
That's my suspicion. Yeah, And when you look at the
election itself, you've got these people going.

Speaker 3 (27:33):
Oh, there was nothing wrong with the election. Over sixty
judges so viewed the evidence and said that there was
no problem with the election. First of all, that's a lie.

Speaker 2 (27:43):
There were actually a lot more than that that it
had cases. But apparently the lawyers on the left are
either too stupid or so willing to lie that they
are pretending that they do not know the difference between
an actual trial where the evidence is brought and rebutted

(28:06):
and then a jury or a judge makes a decision.
They do not know the difference between that and a
judge kicking the can down the road to another court
because they don't want to deal with it. So they
say the jurisdiction is wrong. They say there's a lack
of standing. But in those cases, there is no evidence presented.

(28:29):
And every time I hear somebody say that, you know,
I'll just ask them and in how many cases was
evidence heard? All of them? All of them, it's like,
oh no, shut up. For some of them, I'll mark
educate you. And that just drives me crazy. But we
hear so many lies. The left is not opposed to
telling lies. They're masters of gas lighting. How many times

(28:50):
have you heard the inject bleach lie? How many times
are how many times have you heard the loser and
sucker lie? Okay? I mean it's just yeah, crazy.

Speaker 1 (29:01):
They think if they can just repeat it, well, that's
what communists do. I mean, they repeat the same lie
over and over until people start believing it to be
a truth. And of course it's not a truth. And
you know, there's a group out there, an insidious, disgusting
organization of lawyers. They're known as the sixty five Project,

(29:21):
and they got their name from the sixty five lawsuits
that were filed, you know, for voter fraud in the
last election. So they're rubbing it in there, they're rubbing
it in the Americans' faces, like, we're even going to
name our organization the sixty five Project, and then we're
going to go after every single conservative lawyer in this
country who dares to defend uh, you know, a representative

(29:46):
or a public figure or whoever it may be. You
know that that tried to defend our freedoms and fight
against voter fraud, and they went after them, and they
tried to get rid of their you know, their life.
Since is Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman. I mean, the list
is endless of how many people they Sidney Powell, Yeah,

(30:07):
all these different people, and then you know that's what
that's what they're doing. A lot of what January sixth was,
you have to understand was a psychops too. It was
how dare you try to challenge us after we just
stole the election? What right do you think you have
to try to come after us when we're the ones

(30:27):
that are here illegitimately in power. That's the mindset. And
so let's arrest all these people in this entrapment that
we you know, put together by the intel community. Let's
entrap these innocent patriots, put them in jail as a sign,
don't you ever try to come after us ever again. Well,

(30:49):
you know what, that ain't gonna work, and we're not
afraid in the American people. Next time, if God forbid,
they have to go back I can assure you it'll
be a lot more than a million people.

Speaker 2 (31:00):
Oh, I think you're absolutely right about that. And again
we're just saying these people are master gas lighters. When
I was giving you the list of things they liked
to lie about, I left out the nice people Nazis
or nice people line. They'll just say absolutely anything, and
then they'll lie about their own personal histories, even though
they know all someone has to do is look it up.

(31:22):
Michelle Obama said she remembered watching Carl Lewis and win
gold medals in the Olympics and that she was sitting
on her daddy's lap on the couch. Well, I got
news for you, Kamala Harris was in college when Carl
Lewis was winning gold medals in the Olympics. And that
is a little late to be sitting on your daddy's lap.

(31:46):
Let's taken.

Speaker 1 (31:47):
Well you're a Democrat.

Speaker 2 (31:49):
Well there you go. That's true. You got Ashley and
Joe taking showers together. But then one of the one
of the other ones was Barack Obama when he gave
speech in Selma, Alabama, and he took on that fake
Negro preacher voice and he tried to claim that he

(32:09):
was here, that his parents were able to get together
and have Barack Obama Junior because some people walked across
a bridge. One little problem. The bridge march was like
four years after he was born or two years after
or something. Do they not think people are going to
look this crap up. There's no way that. Yeah, there's

(32:30):
no way it happened after he was born. There's no
way he could appen. And then one of my personal favorites,
because this show used to be called a global cooling
Radio the first couple of months it was around, and
al Gore claims that his mother used to read him
to sleep every night from the book Silent Spring. Yeah,

(32:51):
that was published his freshman year of high school. And
let me tell you, there are some serious Oedipus issues
going on if your mommy is reading you to sleep
from a book called Silent Spring of all things, when
you are a freshman in high school. I mean, I
love my mom, but if she had tried to read

(33:12):
me to sleep from Silent Spring when I was fifteen,
I believe I would have say, Mom, I'm trying to sleep.

Speaker 1 (33:20):
Get out of here.

Speaker 2 (33:20):
What are you doing? But so so you got al
Gore lying about Silent Spring. You've got Michelle Obama lying
about Carl Lewis, You've got Obama lying about the Selma March.
They will say anything. I even heard one went so
far as to claim she worked at McDonald's when she didn't.

Speaker 1 (33:38):
Yeah, no, obviously when if it wasn't McDonald's, it might
have been burger King because that's a huge whopper like that.

Speaker 2 (33:49):
I think you trained under aj because you have many
the same fine quality.

Speaker 1 (33:53):
Yeah, I would say. I would say Michelle in quotations,
by the way, may have a lot more that you know,
she could be hiding. I'll leave it at that, if
you know what I mean.

Speaker 2 (34:06):
Are we talking about Willie Brown?

Speaker 1 (34:09):
Okay, no, no, we're talking about Big mic is what
we're talking about.

Speaker 2 (34:13):
Oh Michelle. Oh I'm sorry, said Michelle, not Kamala. I
was thinking we're talking about Big Micrown. It depends what
they are wearing, because I've seen a couple of outfits
where it was like, does something supposed to be not
supposed to be there?

Speaker 1 (34:30):
But okay, yeah, just look at the Ellen Degenerate clip
where that's dancing and swinging. Oh yeah, that is.

Speaker 2 (34:39):
Exactly thinking of right there, and this part of the
show goes out to my mother in law because she's
always asking me if I think Michelle is a man,
and I'm just like, they don't.

Speaker 1 (34:53):
Know it killed Joan Rivers, didn't it, right? I mean,
Joan Rivers goes in for you know, a little botox.
Was Yeah, she just went in for a little you know,
non evasive thing, and that was it. She was dead.
You really think that that was a medical issue or
something else. I mean, I don't know. I don't know.

Speaker 2 (35:15):
Can doctors be bought off that easily? I don't know.

Speaker 1 (35:18):
Maybe you never know, you never do.

Speaker 2 (35:21):
But she did say that Michelle Obama was, ah, Michelle
Obama was a trainny and then she died in a
rather simple operation a short time afterwards. So I mean,
I guess I guess the Obamas were saying that Clintons
can't have all the fun. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (35:36):
Yeah, well that, and I mean, let's not forget the
uh the Martha's Vineyard paddle voater so apparently couldn't swim. However,
two years earlier he learned to swim, and there's video
of him not only swimming, you know, really well in
the pool, but also doing kick turns underneath the water.

(35:58):
Like an Olympic absolute and going through the water on
the other side. So that seems a little strange, especially
how shallow the water was in that part of the
pond on the property. But who knows what that chef
actually walked in on and saw. I'll leave it at.

Speaker 2 (36:17):
That refreshed my memory, I'm having, I know part of that.

Speaker 1 (36:22):
But yeah, that's the chef, the Obama chef that was
found dead on their property, you know, in the in
the pond on their on their property out there in
Martha's vineyard and died very very mysteriously. The next day.
Obama's got a bandage on his hand. There's images and
pictures of that as well. And so I'm wondering what

(36:44):
this uh, this personal chef may have stumbled a pond
or or saw that made him have a little accident
there in this paddle boat.

Speaker 2 (36:54):
I have no idea, but I do know that big
people think that they're here to save the world, and
if anything gets in the way of that, they take
care of it. We need to do a little business
with America, if you can just give me sure a
couple of seconds here, I want to run something and
then we will be right back with Josh Bernstein, author

(37:16):
of Preserving Liberty, And we are back with Josh Bernstein,

(37:40):
the author of Preserving Liberty, and he's sort of going
over some of the campaign strategies that Donald Trump might
think to employ between now and the election. Josh, were
those all you had? Or do you have some more strategies?

Speaker 1 (37:55):
Know, there's so many, there's so many others. I mean,
he could do a campaign ad where she's talking and
you can't really hear what she's saying. It doesn't really
matter what she's saying, and all of a sudden, as
she's speaking, her nose just starts to grow and grow
and grow and grow, until eventually her nose is so

(38:16):
big that it drags her off of stage. And then
you hear her cackling in the background, and then he
just comes on and says, you know, I'm Donald Trump
and improve this message. I mean, there's so many things
that he could do. He could show her talking about,
you know, a mandatory gun buyback program and then saying,

(38:37):
you know, Jim and I are gun owners. You know
we're not here to take your guns, and then cut
to that, you know, oh, I believe in fracking. I
believe in fracking. Then cut to her saying, no cracking.
I mean, there's so much that you could put together
in campaign ads that you know you could. I mean,
you can make an hour's worth of campaign ads if
you really wanted to. So I've sent a lot of

(38:59):
these idea is to people close to President Trump, and
he's used a few of them, but not all of them.
And so I just feel like at this point, his
number one strategy, if he really wants to change the
entire narrative not just about him, but ultimately help these people,

(39:19):
is to do a televised you know, primetime celofon to
raise money. And if he did that, the optics of that,
the people are already upset, you know, that they're being abandoned.
That femas said there's no more money because it was
given to the illegal aliens. I mean, you could put
ads together like that where FEMA's talking about that there's

(39:41):
no more money for the for the next round of
hurricanes and things like that. It's just, you know, the
gaslighting is going to have to stop, because I think
the American people are now living through incompetency and evilness,
because that's really what it is. It's evilness, you know,
these people Republican voters in northwestern North Carolina. They're they're

(40:04):
going to vote heavily for Republicans and for President Trump.
And it's interesting that the path hit that area. It
also hit by the way, western Florida, right the Jacksonville
and all that area up there where there's more Republican voters.
It hit Tennessee, you know where you know that's more

(40:25):
red states. It's almost less like if you wonder, could
there have been some type of manipulation into the path
of the hurricane. I don't usually like to get into
the conspiratorial side of things, but you know, there is
a company out there called make sunsets dot com. You
can look it up. Anybody can look it up that's
listening to this. It's called make sunsets dot com and

(40:50):
it's a website and it's an organization that literally shoots
sulfur dioxide and other chemicals into the air to geoengineer
the clouds and the weather and the weather pattern. So
for anyone to say that, you know, chemtrails and things
like that aren't real or they can't manipulate the weather,
I'm telling you right now, go look, there's a there's

(41:12):
a website, an organization out of California called makesunsets dot com.
How it's even legal or ethical for that matter, I
don't understand why any company would be around to be
trying to do that. But it's a global warming, climate
change propaganda website that literally has these people that are

(41:33):
doing this and shooting chemicals into the clouds and things
like that to try to change, you know, global warming
and all this other garbage. So to say that they
couldn't manipulate that and maybe strengthen it or put it
in the path of these people, I wouldn't put anything past,
you know, these monsters.

Speaker 2 (41:52):
To be honest, I have to be honest. I thought
at one point we might start seeing Supreme Court justices
taken out, and of course, I know with one of them,
there's that rumor. But I think these people do anything.
I mean, when you sit there and you have people proposing,
let's add one hundred justices, or let's add fifty justices

(42:14):
to the Supreme Court, you know, so we can do it, well,
we can appoint them while we're in office, you know.
I mean, that's just it's unbelievable some of the things
that they have suggested, you know, and as far as
global warming goes again, this show used to be called
Global Cooling Radio, and I used to bring in experts
from all over the world who were climatologists to disagreed

(42:34):
with al Gore's theory. And I can tell you there
are thousands and thousands and thousands of scientists who disagree
with the left wing environmentalists on this. And for Nora
O'Donnell to arrogantly make the statement that she did excuse
me regarding regarding climate change as if it's settled science.

(42:59):
I know how worsays it settled science, but that doesn't
mean it settled science. And I thought it was just
rude as hell. And they sit there and they talk
about JD. Vance Man splaining and that he has a
beard that is indicative of aggression toward women. I don't
know if you've heard those two yet, but it's absolutely

(43:20):
it's absolutely ridiculous. And so you sit there and not Nora,
but the other one, what is it, George ANSI. I
don't know whoever the other one was. She was lesser known,
and she was sitting there trying to tell JD. Dvance
about the immigrants in Springfield, Ohio. But she was okay
for her to woman explain that to him, but when

(43:43):
he pointed out that she was wrong, that was man'splaining. Okay,
And Nora O'Donnell, I gotta be honest with you. I've
disliked her for a long time. And I remember one
time Nuke Gingrich, they were showing some basketball footage of
Barack Obama playing basket ball, and Newton said, I think
what the American people want isn't an athlete, but instead

(44:08):
a leader, a true leader, not an athlete, And Nora
O'donnald came out and said, well, do anyone else get
this vibe? Like Obama's black? So you know, black people
are good athletes, And you know, I just thought, you know,
you're going to play the race card on anything, aren't you.

(44:28):
So I don't know, I've just liked her since then.
But yeah, let's get back to let's get back to
some of your proposals. What else you gonna tell Donald?

Speaker 1 (44:36):
Yeah, I think you know, that's one of the major
ones right there, the telephone. I think that if he
did something like that, I mean, the optics of that
would just be incredible, really, But I think, you know,
there's other things out there that we can take advantage of,
but ultimately, we've got to help these people. These people

(44:58):
are being helped by other patriots, which is amazing and excellent,
and it just goes to show you that maybe this
will wake up a lot of people that you can't
count on the government or certainly not this government, to
do anything. And so the people are realizing that they're
kind of out there by themselves, and this is not
even becoming a rescue mission anymore. This is becoming a

(45:19):
recovery mission because these poor people have been devastated and
so many people are dead and they're still finding bodies
and everything else. I mean, you know, the seven hundred
and fifty dollars that wouldn't even pay for a casket,
you know, for these victims. It's so sick. And so
it just goes to show you how out of touch,
you know, they truly are, and they are very much

(45:42):
out of touch. And the American people, they better vote
in major, big, big numbers for President Trump because you know,
he is the last line of defense here. He truly is,
because if God forbid, they steal it or they win somehow,
you know, illegally, because they don't have the votes to win.

(46:03):
You know, ethically, the American people are not going to
stand for it this time. And I can assure you,
you know, the three percenters, you've heard of that term,
the three percenters. The three percenters got their name because
during the Revolutionary War, it only took three percent of
the population to work with you know, George Washington, you know,

(46:26):
and the Americans and all that to root out the British.
And that's where the three percent name came from. I
can I can assure you now that you could take
that three percent and triple it or quadruple it, because
I think right now you're looking at a nine percent
or even a twelve percent. And what I mean by

(46:46):
that is, if you look at the population of the
United States, what is it, three hundred and thirty six
million people, nine percent of that is thirty million people plus,
you know, or even twelve percent would be even more
than that. And I can assure you that the next
time the American people feel the need to go to Washington,

(47:07):
it's not going to be with a million people. It's
going to be with thirty million people. And at that
point we're going to politely ask whoever's who thinks they're
in charge to immediately step down, and I think that
that could be the next scenario, if God forbid, they
steal this election, because I don't believe the American people

(47:29):
are going to stand by and accept tyranny number one
and number two, I also don't think that, you know,
they're going to accept an illegitimate government, not once, but twice.
So I think the very fabric of our country is
at stake here in this election, and not not just
you know, a winner and a loser, because if America

(47:53):
chooses wrong or they somehow figure out how to rig it,
it's going to get ugly pretty quick. That'd be my.

Speaker 2 (48:02):
Interesting prediction. So let me ask you for a clarification.
Do you think when these you know, tens of millions
of people go back to Washington, if the scenario plays
out like you're thinking it could, are they're going to
be armed with anything other than flag polls the second
time around?

Speaker 1 (48:22):
Yeah, I'm pretty sure they would be. I'm pretty sure
they would be at that point. And I think that,
you know, we have a right, it's in the constitution,
you know, to redress our government and change our government.
If our government no longer works for we the people,
they work for us, not the other way around. And

(48:43):
if the collective and I'm not saying me or anything
like that, or I know of a group that's doing anything,
nothing like that, But I'm just saying, collectively, as a country,
if we get to the point where we realize that
our government is no longer listening to the people, nor
supporting us and working, you know, for us to not
only preserve our liberties and our freedoms, I think the

(49:05):
American people are going to say, Okay, it's time for
this government to be changed. And I think at that point,
you know, we could have an escalation in the country.
When that is and when that happens, I don't know.
I don't think anybody knows. But all I can say
is everybody needs to vote for President Trump so we

(49:28):
never ever even have to think in a million years
of that scenario ever unfolding, because obviously we want to
change our government at the ballot box. And I think
with the non existence response to this hurricane and other things,

(49:49):
I think that even states that they thought they were
going to win are now more likely in play. And
I mean states like Virginia in New Hampshire and things
like that, because remember the whole country is seeing the devastation,
The whole country is seeing the lack of response. The
whole country is seeing, you know, this pigly, little seven

(50:12):
hundred and fifty dollars insult that was thrown in front
of everybody. And the country is also now knowing that
the money that was reserved for this type of catastrophic
emergency has been used and depleted to invade the country.
So you can't sugar coat it anymore, you can't hide
it anymore. The American people are living through it. Maybe

(50:35):
they have relatives in the area, maybe themselves are in
the area. And so I think what's happening is you're
going to start to see the accurate wheel pulling companies
out there tell the truth. In the next i'd say
five to seven business days, and after the successful VP
debate and the non existent response to the hurricane, I

(50:59):
believe the trajetic victory of the race will have changed significantly.

Speaker 2 (51:04):
Well, here's what I think. I think the polls are
completely fake. I think if we were taking true poles
right now, it would show Trump winning in a landslide.
But if you're going to rig the election, you've got
to rig the poles. And now I'm dipping into the
conspiracy waters. But the bottom line is they can't have

(51:25):
a huge discrepancy between the poles and the outcome of
the election. The fact that the poles are being rigged
right now, and it's obvious to anyone with the brain
that they are being rigged, tells me that they fully
plan to rig the election. So I got to tell you,
I hate to be a pessimist, but I have serious

(51:46):
doubts that Donald Trump can win. I don't know what
methods they're going to use to cheat this time. I
don't know if they're going to say the monkey pocks
or the bird pox or whatever pocks you want. The
one is amongst us and we're going to have to
go back to paper ballots. I don't know if all
the secretaries of state or attorneys general in the states

(52:12):
are going to change voting laws without the state legislature
like they did last time. I don't know what's going
to happen, but I do feel that there is no
way in hell they're going to let Donald Trump win.
And the other thing is as far as the war goes, Yeah,
I know you could probably mobilize thirty million people to

(52:33):
support Donald Trump. But I don't think the left is
going to be alone. First of all, if they're in power,
they're going to have the US military. And I think
we might see some blue helmets if a civil war
ever broke out in America. So I am and I'm
not saying you are, but I am definitely stating here
I am not anxious to see that happen because I
think there would be countries. I think we could see

(52:56):
countries from the Middle East coming in and helping the left.
And again I think the United Nations might come in
and help the left. I can tell you this. The
United Nations guys with the blue helmets have participated in
war type games in my area of the country. Okay,
so they have. They have been here training, and of

(53:19):
course they said it was you know, for to get
ready to in situations overseas. But you know they were
flying over flying over US cities at the time, and
our little area was one of the places they touched down.
So anyway, I'll get off my soapbox. But I'm very concerned.

Speaker 1 (53:39):
I think everybody is concerned. But you know, remember that
in twenty sixteen, you know, they said that he was
going to lose and of course he outperformed the polls
by five percentage points. Right in twenty twenty, they stole
it from him, but he still outperformed the polls by
five six percentage points. And I think now he's probably

(54:01):
out performing the polls by ten percentage points, if not
even more than that. So I think that a lot
has changed since twenty twenty. I'll try not to be
as certainly pessimistic as yourself. I mean, you have thirty states.
You have thirty states that look at registration, you have
thirty different states. You lost three one hundred and ninety

(54:22):
thousand people from the Republican Party, You lost three million,
five hundred thousand people from the Democratic Party, and then
you gained one point eight million new people that registered
as independence. So there's a lot of people from and
that's from July of twenty twenty to July of twenty
twenty four in thirty states, including many of the swing states.

(54:46):
That's a lot of people that have left the Democratic Party.
And if they did, many of them became independents. And
you know, I don't know what the rest of them did,
but maybe some of them became Republicans, but more than
likely most of them became Independence. And you know, I
just see the fact that if Independence break four to

(55:08):
one at a minimum for President Trump, he's going to
win a very tiny, small victory in the electoral College.
If if they break six points or more, he's going
to win a pretty significant victory. And if they break ten, twelve, fifteen,
twenty points or more, it's going to be a landslide,

(55:29):
no matter what else they try to think of or
come up with. So I'm cautiously optimistic, as I say
on my show all the time, that this time could
be different. And you know, I think, I think the
hurricane is really really hurting bad Kamala in her campaign.
And but yeah, I wouldn't I wouldn't sit back and

(55:51):
be complacent. I wouldn't be apathetic. I wouldn't just see,
you know, we got this in the bag. I mean,
we did that in twenty twenty, and you know, we
saw what happens. So I don't believe that, you know,
the laws are the same in twenty twenty as they
are in twenty twenty four. You know, many many states
have passed voter ID laws, many states have gotten rid

(56:12):
of zucker Bucks. And then you know, the RNC has
thousands upon thousands of lawyers that are you know, ready,
they're in the counting rooms, they're going to be in
the precincts, all that different stuff. Two hundred plus thousand volunteers,
and I think there's a lot more eyeballs out there
this time. And again they've they've filed one hundred and

(56:33):
twenty three lawsuits and they've probably won eighty something percent
of those lawsuits already, and a lot of that was
to stop the secretaries of states, you know, and they're
cheating basically, and so they've been they've been pro active
rather than reactive this time around. So again I'm cautiously optimistic,

(56:54):
but everybody needs to vote. I will tell you this,
you know, for the people that are listening, if they
offer you a felt marker, tell them to take that
felt marker and shove it where the sun don't shine,
because you ought to bring in a ballpoint, black pan
or blue pen. The reason you don't want to use
the markers that they hand you is because they smudge.

(57:18):
And even on the back of the ballots it says
do not use felt tip markers. So if you're using
that and it smudges, then guess what that file, or
that ballot becomes an adjudicated ballot, meaning that now it's
no longer counted by the machine, which could be a
good thing or a bad thing. But that's where nefarious
activity can set in. And you know, that's where you know,

(57:41):
a handcount in that case, in that scenario could be
stolen from the voter and things like that. So that's
what I would recommend. And the other thing is is,
and I don't care what the law is in whatever state.
I don't care what the precinct or the state's law
is about photocopying or anything like that. You take your
phone out and you take a picture of your ballot

(58:03):
front and back as posterity, you know, as evidence. And
I would tell people, you know, I was a big
proponent of voting on election day. Let's swarm them on
election day. But after what they did in Arizona in
twenty twenty two here in Arizona, and I saw how
they stole the votes and shut down the machine sixty
percent of the precincts in Maricopa County, all the stuff

(58:26):
that they did. I think the right time for people
to start voting is about seven business days before the election,
and here's the reason why. If you vote around the
seventh day, you can then go to the Secretary of
State's office the next day and you can verify that
you voted and that your vote counted. And then I

(58:47):
would track your vote every single day till election day,
and then I would track it three to four days
after election day, just to make sure there was never
changed and that it counted. Unfortunately, sadly, that's the type
of behavior the American people are going to have to
take in order to facilitate making sure that their votes

(59:09):
count in some areas. So those are just three tips
that I would tell people. Photograph your ballot before you
put it in the machine front and back. Bring a
ballpoint black ink pen, don't use theirs, and vote about
six to seven days before election day.

Speaker 2 (59:29):
Six to seven days before election date. Thing where I
am in Breses County in person, yes, And where I
am in Bress County. The machines are such that you
pull up the entire election vote for the president first,
and then down ballot like everybody else does, but you're

(59:50):
selecting it on the computer, and then when you finally
finish and you press final, it spits a piece of
paper out that has all of your selections and the
dots are filled out for you, And of course I
always go back and look at that and make sure
that they put the dots where they were supposed to be,

(01:00:11):
and then you bring it over to another table where
they scan that in. So that's what they do. So
we don't actually have the option of filling out the
little dots ourselves. But there are certainly around the country
plenty of places where that is still being done. And
you know, I mean, I don't mean to be pessimistic,

(01:00:32):
but I just I personally think there was a serious
amount of cheating that went on back in twenty sixteen.
Quite frankly, Hillary Clinton was famous for saying, you know,
this wasn't supposed to happen.

Speaker 1 (01:00:45):
Well, yeah, you're right, but exactly, you.

Speaker 2 (01:00:47):
Didn't build enough cheating into the system. Now, after twenty sixteen,
they were kind of like, hey, we underestimated this Trump guy,
and this time we're going to make damn sure that
there's enough cheat that Joe Biden is going to win.
And you know, a lot of people tell me there's
no big deal that they sent everybody home, sent the

(01:01:09):
reporters homes, sent the pole watchers home and then pulled
out ballots from under a table and started counting after
everyone had left. Some people are.

Speaker 3 (01:01:16):
There's no problem there that anyway, that wouldn't be enough
to swing the election, and you know.

Speaker 2 (01:01:21):
It just it just goes on and on. But the
simple fact is there was a hell of a lot
of cheating in twenty twenty. It's well documented. And you know,
all this nonsense about Trump went to court sixty times,
he did not. And you know again other people went
to court on his behalf and that's why they were
kicked out without, you know, for not having standing. But
at any rate, I guess the big question this time

(01:01:44):
for me, the pessimistic guy, is can the Republicans secure
enough legitimate votes to overcome the massive amount of cheating
that we are going to see again? And it's only
going to be with God's help that we do. I mean,
I just I know how dedicated the Democrats are to cheating.

(01:02:06):
You can go back to JFK in Chicago. You can
go back to LBJ and all the cheating that he did.
You can look at al Franken where they found two
hundred votes in the trunk of a car that were
all for him, and that pulled him over the line.
I mean, these people, it's kind of a if we

(01:02:28):
cheat in November, you can't prove it by January is
sort of their attitude. And it's like they're just doing
it out in the open and saying, you know, stop
us if you can. We don't think you can. So anyway,
I'll get off my soapbox. Anything else you want to
say today, Just for.

Speaker 1 (01:02:50):
Folks to go and grab a copy of Preserving Liberty.
Oh yeah, you can go to Amazon and just put
into the search Preserving Liberty Book. That's my book, new
book that comes out October eighth, so here in just
a few days, and I'm really excited about it. It's
a book just chock full of solutions, one hundred and

(01:03:10):
fifty pages. It's an easy read, but there's a lot
of solutions in the book talking about lots of different
things that we can fix inwards, solutions that are limited
government in scope, and there solutions that don't require the
heavy hand of government to fix anything. The answers to

(01:03:31):
our issues and all of our problems in this country
we can find within ourselves, as we the people truly
have the control in our country and it's just a
matter of using that power, or knowing how to use it,
or recognizing it. And that's what Preserving Liberty is. It's
a textbook on how to save this country. There's a

(01:03:52):
lot of information in it. I'm very proud of it.
Two New York Times bestselling authors have endorsed it, Alan
Dershowitz and Rogerson own. The forward was written by Congressman
Paul Gosar, and like I said, there's ten legislative suggestions
that I've created and came up with, and an additional
thirty other solutions. So that's one of the reasons why

(01:04:13):
I wanted a member of Congress to write the forward,
so that the next Congress, when they get in, they
can introduce some of these ideas as legislation. So check
it out. You can go to Amazon look up Preserving
Liberty Book and it's called Bold and Brave Solutions Save
America and Create Permanent Freedom.

Speaker 2 (01:04:34):
And as I said the last time you were on
the show, this book has no fat It is one
percent meet, It is a quick read. It will not
waste a second of your time. Everything is relevant, and
it's presented in such a way that again it makes
very efficient use of your time. So sometimes these books

(01:04:54):
come out and there are five six center pages. This one,
what is it one hundred and fifty nine or something
like that. Help me out here.

Speaker 1 (01:05:00):
Yeah, it's like one hundred and fifty seven pages.

Speaker 2 (01:05:02):
I missed it two yeah, but at any rate, it's
a very efficient use of your time. It's a great book,
a lot of great solutions. Check it out. And as
I think I said last time, you're never going to
lose an argument with a liberal again if you read
this book. So well, unless you have anything else, I'll

(01:05:23):
just say thanks for being on the show, and it's
a pleasure to have you on.

Speaker 1 (01:05:28):
Yeah. No, it's great to be back on with you,
and I look forward to doing this anytime you want
in the future as well. So always a good time
talking to you.

Speaker 3 (01:05:37):
You've been listening to The Tea Party Power Hour with
Mark gla